WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Union of the Snake

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind a listener mail.

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Robert Lamb.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 3>And this is Joe McCormick. And it is Monday, the

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 3>day of each week that we read back messages from

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 3>the Stuff to Blow Your Mind mail bag. If you've

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 3>never gotten in touch with us before, why not give

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 3>it a try, give it a I was going to

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 3>say try and chance, at the same time, I think

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 3>I said give it a chie Uh yeah, well, why

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 3>not give it a try or a chance or a

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 3>chi at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Whatever you want to send us, fair game. We of

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>course always appreciate feedback on recent episodes, especially if you

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 3>have something interesting to add to a topic we have

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 3>talked about. I guess this is the first listener mail

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 3>we're doing since the New Year, and we've got it.

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 3>We've got a backlog. A lot of messages came in

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 3>before we were out for the holidays, so so a

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 3>lot of them have tags like happy Holidays and such.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 3>That is the reason.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Now, before we get into the mailbag proper, I'm

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna go ahead and throw a couple of things up

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 2>here at the top of the episode. First of all,

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, we haven't really been hammering this in a while,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 2>but if you like the show, rate and review the

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>show wherever you have the power to do so, that

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 2>helps us out a nice gesture that you can do.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Another thing, if you listen to the show on an

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Apple device through some sort of Apple app or what

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 2>have you, go in there and check out the settings

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 2>and all. Make sure that you are still subscribed to

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 2>the show, make sure you're still getting downloads and so forth.

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 2>Just another thing that our internal departments have told us

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 2>to flag for listeners.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 3>And to be totally clear if you're wondering why, the

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 3>reason is Apple sometimes stops auto downloads for people who

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>are intending to be subscribed to the show, So that

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 3>may have happened to you. Just make sure that you're

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 3>still getting the automatic downloads that you want.

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, just make sure, yeah, everything is the way

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 2>you want it to be. That's all we ask. All right, Joe,

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 2>what do we have? What do you want to kick

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>things off with? Here?

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's see, Well, maybe you should read the first one here, Rob,

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>this is about your monster.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Fact?

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Is this about DC's Dracula or some other kind of

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>vampire related Monster fact.

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, yes, yes, this one comes to us from Mike.

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It might be I think it might be your response

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 2>to Yeah. I think it's a response to something on

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the Monster Fact so, Mike says, in this week's Monster

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Fact episode, you mentioned the mythos around vampire's obsession with counting.

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 2>This also came up in last week's Doctor Who episode

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Wild Blue Yonder, the Doctor is able to delay two

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 2>evil aliens by convincing them that they had to follow

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.519
<v Speaker 2>the rules of monsters in our universe, which includes vampires

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 2>having to count the grains of salt. The Doctor poors

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 2>on the floor in front of them. I also gained

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 2>a new appreciation for Sesame Street from the episode of

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Monster Fact in last week's Doctor Who. I always thought

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the count you know one two was just a clever

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 2>play on the word count and the name Count Dracula,

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 2>but now I realize this character was actually based on

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>real vampire mythos. Thanks for reading, Mike. So yeah, I

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 2>think this was a talking about the magic of knots

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 2>in this episode and about how you know you have

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 2>this one. There are a lot of ideas regarding vampires

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>and the sort of folkloric and fictional worlds, but you

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 2>do encounter the idea that if you leave a complex

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 2>not out, they will have to untie it and maybe

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 2>they'll get caught up when the sun rises, and then

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, presto, they're burnt to a crisp or leaving

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 2>out grains of something for them to count as another

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 2>variation that they will be compelled to do so and

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it might delay their escape from the sun.

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>That in itself is interesting, but I don't know if

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 3>I've ever come across an explanation for like why vampires

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 3>would be thought to display this obsessive, compulsive type behavior,

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 3>the need to count or the need to untie.

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not entirely sure either. But you see, you know

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 2>variations of this and other creatures and other lures, and

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I think, particularly with knots, it comes down to like

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the just the very old magical tradition surrounding knots. We

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 2>talked about this in some of our core episodes as

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 2>well recently. The idea that you know, on a very

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 2>basic level in these in magical thinking, you know, to

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>tie a knot is to transform something, it is to

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 2>bind something. And when you extrapolate that through the world

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>of magic. You know it can. It's something that can

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 2>take place across time, across space. It can bind wills,

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 2>it can bind souls, and it can command monsters.

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 3>All Right, we got a bunch of messages in response

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 3>to our series on Nott series. It was just one

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 3>episode on rattings, the idea of rats that have become

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.119
<v Speaker 3>tangled at the tail or have their their tails tied

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 3>in knots. I guess this actually connects to the same

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 3>thing the episode where you were talking talking about knot

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 3>and vampires having to untie knots.

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Would a vampire have to untie a rat king? Well,

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 2>it remains to be seen.

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Good question. And of course one thing that came up

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 3>in the rat kings episode is the question of whether

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 3>rat kings occur naturally or whether they are all of

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>a combination of false reports and hoaxes. And I think

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 3>we could not settle that question entirely, though I in

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the end was mostly persuaded by a couple of sources

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>we were reading that came down on the side of

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 3>rat kings probably do occur naturally. Probably it occurs when

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 3>rats of a specific species of Rattus ratus, the black

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 3>rat huddle together in a nest, they get their tails

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 3>entangled and stuck together somehow, maybe stuck together with a

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 3>sticky substance or frozen together somehow, and then they by

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 3>their natural movements kind of make the problem worse and

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 3>tie their tails in a knot, ultimately that they are

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 3>unable to escape. But there's still a question as to

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 3>whether this does happen in nature or whether it's people,

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, taking rats and doing some kind of weird

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 3>surgery to them to create these Jenny Hannover type sort

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 3>of taxidermy hoax objects. Jim has some commentary on that.

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.559
<v Speaker 3>Jim says, Hi, Robert and Joe, season's greetings to you both,

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 3>your families and your listeners. Love the show. Been a

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>long time listener from Canberra down Under. In regards to

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 3>the rat king episode, I can see how very young

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 3>rats may get their tails tangled in a nest, especially

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 3>if the nest is small and high populations of rats

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 3>are inside the nest. But as an environmental and domestic

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 3>pest controller, I've destroyed hundreds of nests and never seen

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 3>this in a nest. I've used an arrangement of traps

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 3>in order to control these populations. With this method, we

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 3>will sometimes trap the rats by their tails, and one

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent of the time the rats will warning here

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 3>gnaw off their tails. Why I'm a bit skeptical is

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 3>that the tales range from juvenile tales to large adult tales.

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Just thought I would add my experience to this one.

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Take care and keep up the great work. Cheers Jim. Well,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.239
<v Speaker 3>thanks Jim. That is interesting information, and I would wonder

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess, first of all, what species of rat your

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 3>experiences are with, because, as I was saying a minute ago,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>basically all of the credible reports of rat kings are

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Rattus ratus, aka the black rat, and not some other species.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 3>So if it's true that Ratus ratus will somehow gnaw

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 3>off or otherwise detach its tail when trapped by the tail,

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that would make me more skeptical of the

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 3>idea that rat kings do occur naturally and that the

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 3>reports of people finding them are naturally occurring objects, because

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 3>why wouldn't they just detach their tails like they do

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>in these other situations where they become trapped. But that, yeah,

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>that's interesting, Thank you, Jim.

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, it's always great to hear from folks who

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 2>have I mean sometimes grim obviously from folks who have

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 2>expertise in a given area, but it's always always great

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>to get that added level. I mean, this is one

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 2>of the big reasons we have a listener mail, so

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 2>we can hear from people out in the field or

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>even in the fields, if that's applicable to this situation.

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, this next one comes to us from ghost Rock.

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Ghost Rock, says Hi Joe and Rob longtime fan ghost Rock. Here,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to chime in on the rat King episode.

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 2>My favorite pop culture reference to rat Kings is from

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the Terry Pratchett Discworld novel The Amazing Maurice and his

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Educated Rodents. I have not read this one. The book

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 2>combines stories of the rat King with the legend of

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the Pied Piper of Hamlin. I won't go into too

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 2>much detail, but the book could be almost a standalone

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 2>novel in that it doesn't involve recurring characters like the

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 2>night Watch or the Witches or any of the events

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>that occur in Discworld, and could be a generic low

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 2>man fantasy world. A cat, the titular Maurice and his boy,

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 2>along with some magically enhanced mice, are running a con

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>game throughout the country where they scan the local officials

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>into believing there is a horrible rat infestation, and then

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 2>the boy will play his flute and magically rid the

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 2>town of the pests. But actually the educated mice and

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the cat are the brains behind the scheme, and the

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>boy is more or less along for the ride. Trouble

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 2>comes when they hit on a town that has a

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 2>real rat infestation that is being controlled by a rat king. Hilarity, tension,

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 2>and danger ensue. Thanks again for the show and all

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 2>your hard work. I look forward to each episode. Gats Rock.

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I like that premise it I'm picturing it in

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>the same visual style. Is that is that illustration from that?

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I think seventeenth century book we looked at, you know,

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 3>with the guys with the batons. One of them seems

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 3>to be about to beat a rat king and the

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>other ones like hitting a bush.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, you know. I've never, like I said,

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I haven't read this particular book, but I have read

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 2>some Terry Pratchett books in the past, and I've really

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed the books of his that I've read. And I

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 2>also really enjoyed the two thousand and six mini series

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 2>or like a two part series TV adaptation of The Hogfather.

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>That one is a semi regular holiday viewing in my household.

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 2>It has a great cast. You have Michelle Dockery as

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 2>Death's daughter, susan Ian Richardson is the voice of Death,

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>David Jason is Albert, Mark Warren is Mister t Time,

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 2>and David Warner is Lord Downey, who's like the Lord

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 2>of the Guild of Assassins. So it's a lot of fun.

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, ghost Rock, thanks for writing in. And yeah,

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll have to move some Terry Pratchett up on the

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 2>reading list, all right. This next one comes to us

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 2>from Daniel Daniels. Has a very interesting email here regarding

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 2>the Nutcracker episodes. Says, Hi, I listened to your Nutcracker

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>episode and remembered an incident that I remember from my childhood.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 2>We went to visit my grandmother and I noticed she

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 2>had a nutcracker on the table I'd never seen before.

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 2>This would be the late seventies. It was a big

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 2>chunk of clear acrylic the size of an adult fist.

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 2>It was cube shaped with a hole through it big

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 2>enough to fit even a walnut. There was a thread

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 2>tapped into a half inchish hole bored through into the

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 2>center hole from one side of the cube. All right,

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm in trouble picturing this at this point, but let's

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>keep up. This threaded hole had an acrylic rod with

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>a thread and a wing nut style finger grip turner

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 2>on it. I was excited to see it work, so

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>we bought some nuts, and with great anticipation, my dad

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 2>began to screw the first nut. There was a sharp

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 2>crack and the cube split into I don't know how

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 2>strong the acrylic was, or if there was some sort

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 2>of an unseen flaw, but it never cracked a single

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 2>nut despite being a big, beefy chunk of plastic. Maybe

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 2>it was one of the decorative, non functional ones you

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 2>talked about. I've never before or since seen acrylic used

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 2>for a device like this. Love the show, Cheers, Daniel.

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 3>I wonder why it would be decorative and non functional

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 3>if it was like a big, clear acrylic cube, wouldn't

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 3>it be? I could see it being decorative and non

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 3>functional if it was like a wooden soldier nutcracker.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean maybe it was. I mean maybe it

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 2>was kind of like a prototype and it was never

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 2>meant to be used, and they're like, we should make

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 2>this out of steel, and instead just the acrylic version

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 2>gets passed down. I don't know, you know, speaking of

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 2>the Nutcracker, I have to mention over the holiday break

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 2>post Nutcracker episode, my family, my son and I particularly

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 2>only able to fit in just a couple of Christmas

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 2>stories before the actual Christmas Eve. But we pulled out

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the Christmas edition from the Enchanted World timeline book series,

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>which has some various Christmas things and of course lovely illustrations,

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 2>but it tells the classic version of the Nutcracker and

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 2>has some wonderful, just terrifying illustrations of of course the

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 2>rat King or the mouse King rather, and then has

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>these added elements that are believer pulled right out of

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>the original short story that inspired all of this, in

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 2>which the character of the Uncle takes on this added

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 2>sinister tone because at the end, the little girl and

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>her Nutcracker prints, you know, she asked that they be

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 2>together forever and he grants her wish, and she's essentially

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 2>trapped inside this toy castle that the uncle had constructed,

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 2>so it's very haunted. We had a nice, nice haunting

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 2>holiday story to share with each other there on Christmas Eve.

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Man, they don't make the mail order mythology books like

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 3>they used to. Those Time Life Enchanted World books are great.

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 2>They are, and I've said it said it before. These

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 2>are worth seeking out. They made millions of them, I think,

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 2>so you can pick them up for pretty cheap off

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the used book market and then these bookstores and so forth.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes the writing can make maybe get a little wordy,

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe a little long winded, but the illustrations are just

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 2>amazing and there's there's definitely some great content in there.

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I think we're gonna do some Weird House messages now,

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 3>And this one comes from Luisa. Subject line Santa Versus

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>the Devil slash First Memories. Hi, Robert and Joe, Your

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.239
<v Speaker 3>podcast is an endless source of knowledge, wonder and entertainment.

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 3>But the Weird House Cinema episodes are pure delight. I

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 3>have yet to see most of the movies you talk about,

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 3>and if I'm being honest, I probably won't no matter

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 3>how much I love listening do you talk about them.

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Imagine my surprise when you started talking about Santa Versus

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 3>the Devil. I had a vague memory of it and

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 3>wasn't entirely sure if it was the same movie it was.

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 3>I actually went to see this at a movie theater,

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 3>probably in the original sp Vanish. I don't remember much,

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 3>just the cherry red devil getting burned with a door handle.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 3>For me, this counts as an early memory, and what

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 3>I remember very clearly is how that movie made me

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 3>feel confused, uncomfortable, and a bit scared. I must have

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 3>been about five years old, so not particularly young, but

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 3>it made me go over what I think are my

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 3>earliest memories, and all of them are anchored to a

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>strong feeling I don't remember haha. If you came to

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 3>a similar conclusion in your early Memory episodes. Anyway, thank

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 3>you so much for your wonderful work. I always learned

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 3>something from you. Best regards and happy holidays, Luisa. Well,

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much, Luisa. I love when we hear

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 3>from people who saw these movies when they came out,

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 3>especially if they were little kids, like seeing them in

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 3>the Luisa's so great. It's been a while since we

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 3>did THEE Before You Could Remember series, but it does

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 3>seem right that a lot of early memories now. Apart

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 3>from us commenting on the accuracy of like the narrative

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 3>content of the memories, that a lot of early memories

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 3>do have some kind of strong emotional content to them,

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>that it might be something that made you feel good

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 3>and cozy, or made you feel afraid or something like that.

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 2>And I have to say confused, uncomfortable, and a bit

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>scared is probably the appropriate emotional response to this particular

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Santa Claus movie, especially if you're a child, but even

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>if you're an adult, I think it's appropriate.

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, those reindeer.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Ha ha ha. All right, here's another one concerning our

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 2>holiday films, because that wasn't the only holiday film we watched.

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>We also watched I Come In Piece aka Dark Angel,

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>which is technically a holiday action film, and we heard

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 2>from Walter, Hey, guys, I just wanted to shoot you

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>a quick message. Maybe I misheard, But did Roberts say

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 2>John Savage's mom in The Princess Bride? And true enough,

0:16:55.280 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>I did misspeak and I said John Savage, which would

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 2>have been totally different, did totally different Princess Bride if

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 2>you had had then thirty eight years old John Savage

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 2>in the kid role. John Savage, of course, was in

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>The Deer Hunter in the Onion Fields and also in

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 2>a TV series titled Dark.

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Angel, not related to I Come in Peace.

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not related to I Come in Peace. And also

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 2>John Savage, not related to Fred Savage, who of course

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 2>was the actor I meant to reference.

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 3>What if you swapped them both is John Savage and

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 3>the Princess Bride and Fred Savage and The Deer Hunter.

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love these games. Swap them out, see how

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 2>it changes the finished product. Another fun one is to

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 2>think about actors Keith David and David Keith. They've never

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 2>appeared in a movie together, but go ahead and swap

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 2>him around and see what it does. You know, sometimes

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 2>may have no effect, Sometimes it may have a huge effect.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 2>These are the kind of things that I think about

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 2>as I scroll through IMDb from time to time. Anyway,

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Walter continues, it says, but Anyway, the real reason I

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 2>wrote in was because I listened to Crockett's theme after

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 2>you both talked it up. I wanted to share that

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 2>there is a whole genre of new artists putting out

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 2>tracks trying to sound almost exactly like that song synthwave.

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I've included a Spotify link to my favorite synthwave playlist.

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 2>If either of you are interested in taking a listen.

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I love the movie recommendations and I can't wait to

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 2>see what new Christmas themed movies you two will recommend

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 2>in the coming weeks. Walter, So yeah, thanks for sending

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 2>the synth wave playlist as well. I'm a fan of

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 2>several of the artists on this particular playlist, but there

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 2>are a number of them here that I am not

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 2>familiar with, so I'm always excited to check out new music,

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 2>particularly while working and driving, which is exactly what synthwave

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 2>is for in my life.

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I've got a thought on this that I think unfortunately

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 3>still only half formed, but it's basically like I also

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 3>find this type of music very appealing. The kind of

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 3>music that I don't know makes me think of like

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 3>the Terminator soundtrack or something, maybe not exactly that, but

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 3>music that is very synth heavy and conjures feelings that

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I associate with movies from the nineteen eighties, and it

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.479
<v Speaker 3>makes me feel like when I was watching those movies

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 3>from the eighties as a kid. I wonder how much

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 3>of the appeal of this genre, the synthwave type music

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 3>is specifically for people our age or older who remember

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 3>that kind of media landscape and it's a nostalgic appeal

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 3>for that thing, or whether this music might just be

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 3>equally appealing. I don't know if it just sounds good

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 3>and is equally appealing to people who don't have those

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 3>memories to sort of rejog.

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, that's a tough one to figure out. I mean,

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 2>I would guess it's probably both, right. I don't think

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:51.959
<v Speaker 2>you have to have a specialized media diet going into

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 2>appreciating something like say Boards of Canada or other maybe

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>like more overtly nostalgic acts. Yeah, but I.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Don't know if i'd group Boards of Canada and with

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the kind of music I'm thinking of the more I

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 3>don't know, Like you know, Crockett's theme evocative stuff.

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 2>Oh really, have you listened to Tomorrow's Harvest?

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.479
<v Speaker 2>I have? Yeah, I mean that directly in some cases

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 2>references a lot of the sort of like VHS era

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of music. So I think those those inspirations, those

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 2>notes are there. But Boards of Canada, I guess with

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 2>with Boards of Canada and with a lot of other acts,

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 2>it's like it is part of the tapestry, and the

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 2>tapestry of sound is so intricate that you don't need

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 2>to be able to identify all the colors, you know,

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 2>like there's the experience of identify of there's the experience

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 2>of the colors without knowing exactly what they all are. So,

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, I guess the nostalgia can add to the appreciation,

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 2>but of course, the nature of nostalgia is it can

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 2>also make something beautiful a little bit sad. I mean,

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 2>that's the whole power of nostalgia. So I don't know.

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe there are cases where you're better off not having

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 2>them nostalgia because you don't get the you don't get

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 2>as sweet of a taste, but you're also not getting

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>that sour or the bittersweet as well.

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna keep thinking on this one. But anyway, thank

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 3>you for the message, Walter. Okay, rob do you mind

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 3>if I wrap things up today by going to this

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 3>message from Daniel about RoboCop. Let's have it, Okay, Daniel says,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 3>greetings Joe and Robert. Longtime listener, but first time writing

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 3>in since I thought I had something insightful to share.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 3>For once, after listening through the Weird House Cinema episode

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 3>on RoboCop and being a sound designer, myself, I was

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 3>a bit bummed out over the fantastic sound design by

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Stephen Flick and John pospisil never being brought up, which

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 3>deserves mention, as in my mind it sits right behind

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Star Wars as the most iconic and instantly recognizable in cinema. Fortunately,

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 3>the sound design is pretty extensively documented, as they meaning

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 3>Stephen Flick and John Pospicial wrote a letter required for

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 3>the Oscar nomination process, which has since been preserved online

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 3>for all to read and folks at home. I did

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 3>go and read this letter in full. It's worth looking

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 3>up and reading because it describes in detail where a

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of the sound effects in RoboCop came from. It

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 3>like describes the process they went through to try to

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 3>create the sounds, and like things that didn't work, that

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 3>didn't sound right, and what they would what they ended

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 3>up using, and in a lot of cases it's very

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 3>funny and surprising. And Daniel goes on to describe some

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 3>of these in his email. Daniel says, some of my

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 3>favorite highlights include, after many iterations, they settled on a

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 3>footstep fully made from a prop of truck timing chains

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 3>embellished with a low frequency synthesizer thud and a distinct

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 3>clink afterwards, meant to evoke the spurs of Cowboy Boots,

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 3>pulling from some of the Western themes present in the film.

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.199
<v Speaker 3>It's great, how like you can watch the movie so

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 3>many times and never think about the fact that you're

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 3>hearing it and making these subconscious associations still like other

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 3>media and stuff. As soon as I read that, I'm like, God,

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 3>that's right. It does kind of sound like spurs on

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Cowboy Boots. There's like a clink there. But I never

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 3>consciously put that together, even though I'm sure at some

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 3>level I did make that association.

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, this is one of the things. And this

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of gets back to the other point about us,

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 2>like not mentioning it in the episode, is that great

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Foley work, like other great effects in a film, can

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 2>be kind of invisible. You don't necessarily think about them

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 2>unless you know you have you know, maybe you know

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:48.479
<v Speaker 2>you have a little more insight into the world of it,

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 2>or when it's bad, I stand out or there's something

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 2>unnatural about it, But when it's so perfectly executed, you're like, no,

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 2>that's that's the sound AD two nine makes exactly not

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 2>going to second guess it for a second, or think

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 2>about how the magic happens.

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 3>This is why I think in order to learn how

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 3>to make good movies, you should watch a lot of

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 3>bad movies to like see see see how things don't work,

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 3>and then you can go back and watch the good

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 3>ones and appreciate the difference and understand when they do work.

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Because a lot of times when things do work, you

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 3>can't You don't even notice them, you don't think about them,

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 3>they're just invisible.

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you got to be able to see the zipper

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 2>on the monster suit to fully appreciate it when it's

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 2>not there.

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But come back to Daniel's message here. Robocops dramatic

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 3>movements like his punches or entering through the door of

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the convenience store being robbed, are accentuated with these abstract,

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 3>synthetic woshes that were directly inspired by the much more

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 3>stylized and overstated audio of Asian martial arts cinema, and

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 3>a style that remains prominent to this day in anime.

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I think that's true too. That's great. Like the kinetic

0:24:54.880 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 3>sound effects, there are things that are in reality generally silent,

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 3>but you hear them in the movie, there's a kind

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 3>of like whooshing or a movement sound effect, a kind

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 3>of advancing noise when when something is approaching or moving,

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 3>even though you if you were actually standing there and

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 3>literally seeing an object moving in that way, you probably

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't hear anything. It's kind of like in visual animation,

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 3>like the movement lines drawn around something. Yeah, Daniel goes on.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 3>While not explicitly brought up in the letter, the application

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 3>of the chorus slash flanger effect on his voice to

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 3>make it sound more mechanical is also cleverly woven into

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 3>the storytelling. As the effect is removed from his voice,

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 3>wants his behavior shifts to becoming more human. If I recall,

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 3>the specific point is once he confronts Emil Antanowski at

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 3>the gas station. Okay, yeah, I think I can hear

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 3>this too, that the vocal processing is sort of turned

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 3>down on his voice as he as he becomes more

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 3>and more human throughout the film, JJ, could you put

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 3>some chorus on my voice to make me sound more

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 3>like a robot? What does chorus on a voice sound like?

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I am issuing commands? Now engage Finally, Daniel says, also

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 3>after listening to the ratking episode. With both rats and

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 3>RoboCop fresh in my mind, I thought an excellent candidate

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 3>for a future weird House cinema would be the nineteen

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 3>eighty three movie of unknown origin, starring Peter Weller as

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 3>a yuppie losing his mind fighting an unusually resilient and

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 3>destructive rat hiding in his fancy New York home. I

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 3>had a hard time deducing what this movie was trying

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 3>to be tonally, as the premise suggests something more psychological

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 3>or perhaps comedic in nature, but while watching the trailer,

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 3>it was clearly riding on the mood and imagery of Poltergeist,

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 3>which had come out the year before Happy Holidays. Daniel, Wow,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:56.959
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I haven't seen that. That sounds weird.

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if has that come up in another Weird

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 3>House episode, Robert, The premise sounds kind of familiar, but

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 3>I know I haven't seen it.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.479
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen it either, but it has come up

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 2>because the director was George P. Cosmotos Oh, the father

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 2>of Panos cosmotos So so we have mentioned it in

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 2>passing as being kind of a notable weird film in

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Peter Weller's filmography.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well Yeah, anyway, thank you so much for this email, Daniel. Excellent,

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 3>excellent message, and thank you for bringing to our attention

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 3>all this great sound design by Steven Flick and John Pospisil.

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely worthy of a mention. And I'm sorry, you know,

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.239
<v Speaker 3>we we do often end up focusing mostly on the

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 3>cast when we talk about people associated with the film,

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 3>and obviously there are tons of there's tons of talent

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 3>that goes into making any great movie, and a lot

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 3>of that is behind the camera, not in front of it,

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 3>or is you know, the people who create the you know,

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 3>create the things we see on screen or that we

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 3>hear on the soundtrack, but we we oftentimes don't even

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 3>know their names. It really emphasizes how much film is

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 3>a team effort and it takes a lot of talented

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 3>people to make a great one.

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Yeah, we'll have to think about this in the future.

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we can. So sometimes we like to select something

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 2>based in part on the knowledge of certain individuals behind

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 2>the scenes, be at the musical side of things or

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 2>special effects. Maybe we should try and come up with

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 2>a sound effects first selection at some point and see

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 2>what rises to the top.

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 3>I endorsed this idea, all.

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, well, we're going to go and close the mail

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 2>bag there, but we'll be back with more next week,

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I believe. In the meantime, we'll just remind you hey,

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 2>core episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind Science episodes

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 2>on Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Fridays, we set all that aside.

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 2>We do a little weird house cinema talk about a

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 2>weird movie. You get your listener mail on Monday, and

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesday we have a short form episode of one

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 2>sort or another that comes out.

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Huge, thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:58.719
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.