WEBVTT - 2018 Open Championship Recap

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Frida Egg Podcast.

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Sean Martin and Brendan poor Eth are back to recap

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable Open Championship. We talk Tiger Surge on Sunday,

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Xander Schafley, Ricky Fowler, and much more. First, I'd like

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to thank our Open Championship sponsor, Greater Than. It's a

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>healthy and delicious alternative to your traditional sports drink, and

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it packs two times of electrolytes with half the sugars

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of its big brand competitors. Greater Than introduce a new

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>trial pack, which you can get on drinkgt dot com.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.319
<v Speaker 1>It gives you the chance to try each of their

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>three flavors and decide which one you like the best.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Give it a shot. It's my favorite non alcoholic refreshment

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>on the golf course. Now here's Brendan and Sean.

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>The fried Egg requires a different technique. What you need

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>to do is actually square the face so it'll dig

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 2>down underneath that bad lie and propell'm all right.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Out onto the green.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Here's the thing.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Playing out of a buried lion of bunker is completely

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>different than playing out of a night and clean lion

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of green side bunker.

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 3>You need to be aggressive on any show, whether it's

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 3>sitting cleanly for its Friday Egg. Well, we've all faked it.

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>The dreaded Frida egg not to be feared, though it's

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 3>actually a pretty easy shot to hit.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 5>I just the Xander thing is more true today than

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 5>it was when you asked it before the player.

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Is Xander overrated or underrated?

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 5>It's more true today than it was before the player.

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So you're doubling down on him being overrated out.

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 4>There was This was a nuanced take. It wasn't that stinks.

0:01:55.600 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't general. Yeah, the general ign name is public.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 3>He's vastly underrated. But to the in the know golf

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>audience who like he's they, I'm just tired of me,

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 3>like all woke because I know whose Andrew is. Like,

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>we all know whose Andrew is. If you follow golf

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>and don't know whose Andrew is, you're doing it wrong.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 5>Yes, it's more true today than it was the players.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 5>The question was or our point Our response was not

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 5>that he sucks at golf, or he wasn't gonna win

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 5>or this couldn't happen. It was that it was like

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 5>this hipster crowd saying, you know, what I think.

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Uh, I'm so woke.

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>I know whose Andrew is. No, you're not woke. He's

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 3>a good player. You should know who he is.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 4>John keeps interrupting me. Is sorry.

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 5>It was like people saying, you know what, I think

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 5>Brooks kept go like like last year, I think Brooks

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 5>kept goes get a golf. He's my dark horse pick. Like, no,

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 5>it's not dark horse. It's like, it's not it's not.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 5>That's the thing. Xander got to overrated with the hipster crowd.

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 5>It's just like it's a ubiquitous take. He's good at golf.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 5>We know he's good at golf. I hope he does well.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 5>I would have been great. I would have been happy.

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 5>If you want today, that's fine. But it's more true

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 5>that what what we were saying then. It's more true

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 5>today than it was that when than it was even

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 5>before the players good autumn for his runner up finish,

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 5>that was great, But I mean it only reaffirms like

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 5>now everybody's like Xander man, he's got like I know golf.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 5>There's this guy with like kind of a funny name, Man,

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 5>I know golf. And you hear about Xander Schoffley. You

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 5>hear what you hear that name before? That's my guy.

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 5>So that's the whole crew that it got that that's

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 5>the whole genesis of this overrated thing.

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>So the problem is that the pod is going to

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 3>start in the middle of this ran somewhere that idiots.

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Again, No, I'm gonna I'm gonna give you guys the

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>full runway here. Where where Doesander? Where does Xander ring?

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Among the young players in the game, let's just say

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five and younger.

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean you still got to put speth in JT

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 3>ahead of him?

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Rom, how young are we going?

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Like cole Hammer.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Had? I think have to be professional?

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 3>There was an over under better career in majors Ram

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 3>or Xanders somewhere in the Twitter replies, And I still

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 3>I lean rom, I mean a lean rom in that

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 3>sense question.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, come on, I think we're getting a little

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 4>carried away.

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, if Brendon and I don't realize that Xander

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Schoffley is good at golfer, both idiots should be immediately

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 3>fire from our jobs.

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 4>No, yeah, I just where do you do it? Andy?

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 5>You seem to have preconceived thoughts on this before you

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 5>asked it.

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think, like you know, two years ago you

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>would say there was like Speith, JT and Berger, right,

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's he's moved into I put him

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Burger for sure. I think I think with

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>with Americans, I mean, obviously you've got some young guys

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>like D'shambo and Aaron Wise that are just getting there

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of footing on the PGA Tour. But you know,

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 1>De'shambo and Xander essentially Ben Pro's you know, for the

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>same amount of time and uh you know, on the

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour for the same amount of time, both have

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>two wins. But I think the thing that sticks out

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>with Xander is like if you look at where he's

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>gained all his world ranking points, they're like the biggest

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>events of the PGA Tour schedule. I mean, he gets

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>them in the majors, he gets them in WGCs, like

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, he had a really good finish at Riviera,

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, It's what impresses me is it seems

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>like his game rises to another level when it's a

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>stage with the best players in the world, you know,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>three totally.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean his hisenis year are rivier the majors and players.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like t second at the Players, t second at

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the Open, you know, first of the Tour Championship, he's

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>got he's got three top sixes in majors and just

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>t second at the Players, and he's he's played in

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>six of them, you know, four you know, four top

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>six finishes and the five biggest events of the year.

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 4>You're cut off is twenty five years old? Is that

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 4>what the question was?

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know, I don't know where you cut

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it off. I don't know what you. I think in

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>today's day and age, twenty five is probably the young right.

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Clost twenty five, you're like already entering your prime, right,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that's kind.

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Of that's It's interesting. I think the I think the

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>prime of a golfer has changed from it used to be,

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirty to forty to now it's twenty five

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to thirty five, really totally.

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean Patrick Rodgers ten years ago, Pattick Rodgers career

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>would be very far ahead of the Kerk and now

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 3>it's like he doesn't need to get mentioned with his

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 3>with his boys because they've done so much. But I

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>mean he's like twenty five, had a tour card for

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years, like that ten years ago. That

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 3>was really really good.

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>It's I was as Uh. The thing with Shoffley is

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I think rom I'd still give the edge to Ram

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>over Shaffley, but I mean the way he hits the ball,

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>so he's so good tee to Green. It's the way

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>he drives it, like he drove it so well all week.

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>That's he's just got so much confidence. And I think

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>he's he's underrated because he played at San Diego State.

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Nobody really knew him, but I mean he went he

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>made it to the finals of the Western m I

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that's that's a pedigree event. I think I think

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>he's I think he's a stud. I mean obviously he's

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a stud, but I think he's uh, he's definitely gonna

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>win at least one major. I just I don't know,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll see who gets more majors. Rickor or Shaffley.

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 5>Wow, man, it's awfully just because of like the less

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 5>the the year year's advantage and this less scar tissue.

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 4>And I don't know, man, I.

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 5>So Ricky's hard hard to hard to back right now,

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 5>Like like it's he either gets one and then it's

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.679
<v Speaker 5>like this is great. You know, it's kind of I'm done,

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 5>I made my career, my career achievement, or maybe, like

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 5>the worst cliche in sports, the flood gates open. So

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, it's hard, hard to predict with Rick.

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean everyone goes back to the you know,

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Phil was what thirty four when he won his first major.

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I think Hogan was thirty four. Uh, you can have

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 3>a fruitful career. I don't know. I just there's so

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 3>many different Like the thing I love about baseball, all

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 3>that they do is like they'll take a guy's stats

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 3>and they find comparable players based on their like career

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 3>paths from that point of order, and they'll compare like,

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 3>all right, every guy who was hitting two fifty by

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 3>his age twenty five season with fifteen homers, like this

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 3>is the average of what his career looks like. And

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't feel like we do that well in golf.

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 3>We just like some guy has a great season, this

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 3>his aggression is gonna be linear, like you know, any

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 3>you and I see an amateur golf of like, somebody

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 3>dominates an amateer golfing, like, oh, he's obviously gonna be

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 3>a great pro. And it's like, no, I think some

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 3>guys actually had the best years of their career, like

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 3>an amateur golf unfortunately, uh and earn nothing for it.

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 3>And it's just, I don't know, career progression is so hard.

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 3>We get so spoiled by these guys, Like we think

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 3>everyone's gonna have a twenty year great career when like

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 3>it's so hard in this game to have even ten

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 3>years of just great play. There's just so many things

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 3>that happen. Like I always look at like Keegan. Now,

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 3>granted Keegan, I mean anchoring man obviously really hurt his career,

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 3>but like Kegan twenty eleven rookie year wins twice, including

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 3>a major. Like we all think, oh my gosh, where's

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 3>this guy gonna You know, he went to Saint John's,

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 3>a small school, and we all think of like he's

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna be unstoppable. But it didn't. It didn't pan out.

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not saying that Xander's gonna go to the

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 3>same thing. But it's just like there's so many variables

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 3>that you just never know what's gonna happen.

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, well, Molinari is a perfect example of

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that career progression. You know, this is his moment and

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it's all because like he was always an elite ball striker,

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know, he shored up his short game and putting,

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and I mean he didn't make a bogie the last

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>two two rounds, and you know five years ago that

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>would never have happened. But he keeps working better, and

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that is that's at all levels of golf.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I think one of the things about golf, like

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you you see it playing junior golf, Like you see

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>these kids that are unbelievable at age fifteen. But the

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>hardest thing golf is to get better once you're at

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:07.959
<v Speaker 1>zero plus two plus three handicap, Like getting better, it

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>becomes way more difficult the better you get.

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I would just say this is a good transition

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 3>to talk about the US. You here, I'm just kidding.

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 5>About you are like in here, got a good like

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 5>ten minutes on Shoplet. Tiger just had like the biggest

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 5>moment in golf, our biggest contention in five years. Got

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 5>to get ten minutes on Shopley. I mentioned of Keegan Bradley,

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 5>Patrick Rogers, Cole Hammer. We haven't talked about Tiger Molinario. Yeah,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 5>It's just this is like exactly how it to be so.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So so you're bringing us back to the to the

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>general here, Brendan, what what what? What? What was your

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>takeaway from you know, the open what you know? What

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>do you? What do you? What did you love today?

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Or what do you think?

0:11:58.160 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 5>My favorite moment I think was the absurdity of that

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 5>woman keeping her child in that stroller and shopping back.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that woman should be ejected from the country.

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 4>She should be thrown in prison, she should be like

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 4>she was steadfast refused to move. The guy was over

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 4>his ball and address, and the kids started chirping again,

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 4>and she just stood there. He backed off, and then

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 4>she just stood there, like wouldn't you skurry into the

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 4>crowd and shame and hide your face?

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm glad, I'm glad you circled the wagons

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a child in the crowd.

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean that my favorite moment. It was just

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 5>added a sprinkled absurdity to a like to being in

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 5>all seriousness. I think, you know, since I've been doing this,

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 5>one of the maybe the top top day at a

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 5>major championship. I think twenty eleven Masters is up there.

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 5>Twenty thirteen Masters was bonkers, Like the whole weekend. You know,

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 5>Adam Scott and Hulkerbrera aren't the names that we got today.

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 5>And obviously twenty I don't know that whole twenty thirteen

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 5>year was great. I think this, this is certainly one

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 5>A or one B, and I think there's just too

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 5>much to choose from that. I guess that's where I

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 5>go is is this the best kind of the most

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 5>enjoyable and manic and eventful final round of a major

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 5>for you guys real quick?

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 3>I to go back to the kid in the stroller.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>I have a two year old, and I don't understand

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 3>how anyone brings a child under the age of thirteen

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 3>to accompliment. It blows my mind. As far as manic,

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 3>I think twe Masters is up there, but it's I mean,

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 3>it's definitely up there.

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, I mean leaderboard wise with like the Superstar,

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen that in a really long time, where

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>legitimately on Sunday you had, you know, three of probably

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the three biggest names in golf right now, Speath, Rory

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and Tiger all with like a legit shot to.

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 5>Win, you know, And then one of my favorite moments

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 5>was like, for whatever reason, I flipped out onto the

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 5>leaderboard online and like I just opened it real quick.

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 5>It was before they had showed Rory's eagle putt and

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 5>or maybe my DVR I at some point ended up

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 5>thirty seconds behind, and it showed Rory at the top

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 5>at six under. I was like, wait, what the hell

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 5>we were like because you hadn't seen him in so

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 5>long and he just he just wasn't like part of

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 5>the story.

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 4>I flipped up in the leader board was like, what

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 4>the hell Rory McRoy?

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 5>He was at the very top because he had just

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 5>made you know, join the lead most recent and then

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 5>all of a sudden it showed his eagle and it

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 5>just like took what already was a crazy day so

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 5>like a no other level. And I mean, anytime you

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 5>get Rory joining the lead in the last like what

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 5>I guess five holes of Major Championship, that's gonna be

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 5>the biggest story of the day. But this was like way,

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, in the middle of the pack three four five.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 4>That was amazing. I looked at the boards like that

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 4>can't be right.

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Rory's not first, And then as Ego plug came on

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 5>the TV, you know, thirty seconds later, and I couldn't

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 5>believe it.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it was just there's too much to choose from.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>To me, the Open Championship has supplanted the Masters as

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the best event of the year. Wow, three years in

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a row it's been the best and then and then

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look back, like Will Knights wrote

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>an article about like the last ten and you read

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and you read through them and it's just like, oh

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>my god, every year pretty much. I mean, you sink

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in Watson, you know they're every single year is seemingly

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a great championship. You know, when was the last time

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that you were disappointed with the Open Championship? Right?

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:02.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 4>But why do you think that is?

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean aside, but I think so much of it

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 3>is link golf because it allows so many different riise

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 3>of play to compete. I mean, Watson's not competing if

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 3>it's not a link course. Greg Norman is not challenging

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 3>in Birkdale and it's not a link I think so

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 3>much of it is that it is a links course.

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but even I think that.

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we keep getting the best names at the top

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 5>of the leaderboard out.

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Of all but I know we got Rory. I'm trying

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 3>to make my point. I think Andy will agree here

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 3>that when it's firm and fast and yeah, the greens

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 3>were soft, but the fairways were not. This week, when

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 3>it's firm and fast and windy, you got to control

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 3>your tras and so that brings out the best players.

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, It's one thing to hit an eight iron

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 3>one point fifty and stick it. It's another thing to

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 3>hit like a you know, a little punch seven iron

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 3>baby cut back into the wind.

0:16:58.440 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Pat. The Creed had a great quote earlier in the

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 3>week of like, the fairways were so firm that let's

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 3>say you were trying to hit a six iron and

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 3>you caught it a groove low, it was actually going

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 3>to go like twenty yards farther because the directory was

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 3>lower and the spin was last, and so like that

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 3>small little miship was going to be punished exponentially. So

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 3>I think you just have to control your trade, strike

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 3>your ball well when conditions are firm and fast and

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 3>when you're running it on the ground.

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. I think what it is is that

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>players all of a sudden have to think about where

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going to land the ball. And that's a lot

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>different than hey, it's one fifty two, you know, and

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's is it like the yardages at an Open. I mean,

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't mean anything. One fifty two could be a

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>wedge that you land one twenty or like you know,

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a chip eight iron that you land one twenty and

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>let roll in. It could be you know, it could

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be a number of shots. You could hit all these

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>different shots. The trajectory matters, This spin matters, like and

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that brings art to the game. It's not

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>as scientific, it's it's much more fuel oriented. And I

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think it also brings all the skills to the forefront.

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you know, great golf courses do, is

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it makes players have to hit all the great shots.

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Like when you go to a great golf course, you

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>generally hit every club in your bag, you know. And

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's the kind of the essence of

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of why the Open has has done this is that

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it allows everybody to play their own game. But it

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>also you know, to succeed, you have to hit all

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the shots.

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 5>So do you not need to think about where it's

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 5>going to land at Augusta or yourself?

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not you do, but I don't think

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>it's to the same degree you know, I think I think,

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean Augusta. You know, the tree planting has has

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>taken away a little bit from that golf course. That

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>golf course is, you know, just like it was built

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>after the old course, you know, So that's I mean,

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>but they've lost some of the you know, the essence

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of that over the years. But at the same time,

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is nothing against august I just think

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Open, in my mind, has become the best

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>event of the year.

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 5>I thought Will Gray from Golf Channel had a great

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 5>sweet about that. Is like USGA has every like technology

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 5>and piece of equipment at their disposal and still get

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 5>out of their own way. Well the harn I just

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 5>like puts a sign in the ground pointing you to

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 5>the first t and it's the best tournament ever.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 4>Like they just I don't know.

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>In the in the defense of the USGA, I think

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>that the media actually goes into the us Open and

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>like looking for things that the USJA is going to

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>screw up, you know, right like if if if the

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>USGA had the greens as soft as as what the

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>RNA had them this week, people would be throwing like

0:19:58.440 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a ship fit about it.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Good point, that's a good point, But would they it's

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 3>like eight under one, I think I think five to

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 3>ten under is a great winning score.

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree, But I think people would still do that.

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, like a perfect example is people would

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>complain about how thin the rough was, and like I

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>thought that was absolutely like that fescue was so perfect

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>because you could you saw shots, you saw unbelievable recovery

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>shots from that stuff. But then you also saw Tiger

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.959
<v Speaker 1>try and do too much from it, and that's what

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>killed him in the middle of the round. That's that's

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>what costs Tiger. That like thin fescue cost Tiger a

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>shot at the winning.

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, euphemism of tugging the shaft.

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that was always kind of parental advisory, kept kept

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 5>using that phrase. Uh yeah, that's that's literally what cost

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 5>him the championship in the middle of the That's a

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 5>that's a great point though, about the different universes the

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 5>organizations have to work in, especially with those green those

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 5>soft greens. First couple of days, I don't know, it's

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 5>just yeah, the bar the bar. I don't know if

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 5>the bar is higher for the USGA or they just

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 5>they you know, they've lost lost the luxury of having

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, margin for.

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Air or I don't know.

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more they've lost the trust. It's like,

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, if a kid like constantly abuses the trust

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>of a relationship, that the kids got a shorter release,

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, from whoever it is, you know, whether it's

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>their parents. But I think the USGA has, like, you know,

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>they've had so many problems over the years, and in

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the RNA on the opposite end of the spectrum, has

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>never really done anything that have you know, violated the trust.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 5>The biggest thing was what twenty fifteen Saint Andrew's and

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 5>the winds. They said that they let the greens get

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 5>too fast, so they had to wipe out the whole

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 5>day of play because of whatever. It's like the eleventh green,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 5>it's too exposed. So they were just I mean, that's

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 5>I think that's like the biggest screw, you know, the

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 5>most criticism they received in the last you know, eight

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 5>years or so.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>How about they put Spieth on the clock.

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 5>I didn't get that. I didn't know that until I

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 5>saw him talking about it. He said that was a

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 5>turning point in his championship. I mean, I don't know,

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't think I don't think he was trying to

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 5>blame someone else, but he's like that.

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 4>That threw me off.

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 5>That really like changed changed the way I played. What

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 5>would they come in at like three forty I.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Think it was like four fifteen today.

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Well they were that long.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was a little longer at two or something. Okay,

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but but you know they're actually enforcing the rules. If

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the USGA did that to leader, people would go nuts.

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, didn't they They put the final group on the

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 3>clock this year? No?

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah they did today I think No. I mean at

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the us Oh yes, they think they did, right.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 3>They did. Everyone's on the clock. They're all slow kidding.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that pace of play was was also

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the most refreshing things. Like here's the thing.

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I tweeted this at Colonial and all these Scotts, well

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 3>one Scott was coming at me, and I was like,

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 3>people underestimate how much the walk from Green to Tea

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 3>affects pace of play. Like Colonial is super walkable. I

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 3>mean Green's right off of Teas now, granted feels a

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 3>bit smaller. It's like one twenty I think, but like,

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 3>guys get around in four uh under four on the

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 3>weekend and so same with well, lace golf. I think

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 3>people underestimate the walk from tea to green. And then

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 3>also if you're not taking a ton of drops, there's

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of hazards obviously on lace golf, so you're

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 3>not getting a ton of rulings. I think those are

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 3>two things that people underestimate about. Paper Play was.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 5>Talking about how Xander kept getting bugs on his ball.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and what else. They had a couple of rulings,

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 4>but that was the only time.

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 5>It's like he said, it was the fastest round he

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 5>thought he really ever played, and he was surprised.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 1>He had that drop on what hole was it? On

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the front nine? It was eerily reminiscent of last year.

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Five right, yeah, yeah, six, Hogan Zally.

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>How great is that hole?

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 3>That hole?

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Those guys made double and and bogie on that holes.

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Tiger put it on the front edge of the green.

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>It's what did you guys think of CARNOUSTI.

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 3>I think Paul Casey put it the best. He said,

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 3>it's not sexy, but it's good. Yeah, Like you can't

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 3>see the water from the course, but so it's just

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 3>it is kind of you know, it's not a mistique

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 3>of Saint Andrews one the water views of some other courses.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 3>But it's just it is, it's it's good. It's so

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 3>well bunkered. And Tyler kind of called earlier in the

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 3>week of like some guys are talking about like, oh,

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to a driver and bomb over the bunkers

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 3>and tigers, like you can't really do that here. It's

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 3>too well bunkered. And it really it's it is, it's

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 3>very well bunkered. I think guys who tried to take

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 3>that approach because it was so firm and fast, got ejected.

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 3>And you know, it's some of the toughest pop bunkers.

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 3>They're so small here. Some of the faces are like

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 3>six feet deep that pop bunkers are almost a once

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 3>er penalty here. And so I don't know, I think

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 3>it was great the bunkering. I mean you had bunkers

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 3>coming into the middle of the fairways. You didn't just

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 3>have bunkers lining the size of the fairways. And so

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 3>really if you wanted to have the best angle and

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 3>you had to challenge the bunkers, which I mean that's

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 3>with an angles one oh one right there.

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's uh. I think like it reminds me kind

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of a Chicago golf in a way of like where

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's not a dramatic site, pretty flat, nothing

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>really special in the architecture. You look at it and

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you're like, why can't more golf courses be this simple

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>and this good? You know?

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I tweeted after you posted that drone

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 3>butt of school Chicago golf club, like this place is

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 3>dead flat, Like why can we do this more often?

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 3>This would be so cheap to build.

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Tiger was saying. Tiger was saying, it's he thought it

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 4>was much It's much more.

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Undulating then than Hoylake, because they were asking him about

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, if you would do the hoyl like strategy.

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 5>But it's like, well you got a lot more bumps

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 5>and humps and hills there.

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know, yeah, extremely flat.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Those bunkers are no joke there. I mean, how about

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that that shot Tiger hit on ten?

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 3>That was Tiger looked back there. That was like that

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 3>was old school Tiger. That was like, I don't know.

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think I heard multiple people say like, oh,

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 3>this is over. He's gonna win this thing after he

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 3>hit that shot.

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what I thought, like in my head I was like,

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, yeah, game over.

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 5>That was like he was he was getting He was

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 5>the spots where the first four or five spots where

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 5>like things would go backwards or come undone didn't happen

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 5>where he got used to that kind of in twenty thirteen,

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 5>just like a couple of early bogies. But here he

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 5>like saved par where there was eight I think it

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 5>was eighty, got up and down from a pop bunker

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 5>for par the one time, like as par saving putt,

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 5>just like hunt on the edge of the cup and

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 5>like fell in normally I would just kind of stay

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 5>not normally, but you know.

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 4>In recent years like it.

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 5>And then then that that recovery out of the bunker,

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 5>it just felt like he was the spots where like

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 5>he would drop a shot like it just felt like

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 5>those weren't happening. It combined with Saturday's t shot on

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 5>eighteen kind of dancing on the edge of the burn

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 5>there that when he yanked that iron to iron, it

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 5>just felt like it was kind of coming together and.

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 4>It was his week. And then the bogie's very much

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 4>happened a couple.

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Holes later, that double bogie on I mean it was

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it was amazing to watch, and I think I get

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>amazed by this every like Major where you're really watching

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>and you're really engaged in the tournament, is like you

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just realize how small the margin of error is. Of

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like Mulinari, like he just he just didn't make mistakes.

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>And then you look at Tiger like that one mistake,

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>like the flop shot, by just not playing a little

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>safer and giving himself a chance making that double bogie.

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, Molinari's web shot would have been a lot

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>more difficult with Tiger and their tight if he didn't

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>have that one shot lead or two shot leads. Yep,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, And uh, I think I think that's something

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that's uh and that you look at Rory. Rory missed

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a short putt on on Saturday on twelve, and then

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>he missed a short putt again today and those two

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>putt so that's like, you know, that's that's the difference

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.719
<v Speaker 1>between him being in a playoff and being in second.

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there were a couple with Rory that just what

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 5>do you have two bogies in first five holes today

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.719
<v Speaker 5>eighteen yesterday where he kind of just you couldn't get

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 5>up and down. There's so many like you said, like

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 5>so many very minuscule things that you know end up

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 5>being a big difference and put miles between the top

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 5>of the leaderboard and.

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Wherever you fall.

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I feel like Tiger would have made that Birdie

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>putt on eighteen had it been you know, a different situation.

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 5>I think why he saw whatever mulinary stuff it a

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 5>minute later and I was just like.

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh whatever.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So Andrew had a good question, Andrew K I think

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>based on this week one, which is the one player

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you're buying stock? In? Which one are you selling?

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Cool? I didn't own any Tiger stocks. I guess Tiger.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's Andrew, this.

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Is what you're buying.

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, selling Ricky.

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Buying I mean, I don't know buying Tiger.

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I guess right, long term, long term is a better

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 3>long term investment buying Xander if I didn't own already.

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm uh, I'm buying Tony Finow three straight top tens

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and majors, could could be four and Belle Reef probably

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is gonna fit him. Well, it's gonna be nice and

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>nice and dough boy soft out there, and then uh,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna sell I'm selling mm hmm, how am I selling.

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 5>Rom dj j T trying to messica. I meant a

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 5>lot of good guys obviously not not worth selling.

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying I think I'm probably probably selling right. Tough, Yeah,

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Rick only has like you talk about, like

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>these trajectories. Ricky doesn't have a lot of wins.

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and seventy three, I mean seventy three yesterday was

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 3>really disappointing. Started in the mix, could have made a move,

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 3>was playing easy. It was harder in the afternoon, but

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean still the seventy three yesterday was just wasn't good.

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 4>What what's his last win? Honda?

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Is it last last year's Honda?

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, last year last year's Honda.

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 5>It's just I don't know, it's it's it's like it's

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 5>not easy to be as like consistently good as he is.

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 4>But I mean it's easier than winning.

0:31:59.000 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 4>I he just doesn't. He doesn't win as much as

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 4>he's peer.

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 3>It is a tough one. It's like the Charles Howell argument.

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just don't understand why either he doesn't win

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>as much. He's kind of like Paul Casey in a way,

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think like he he.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 5>It whether we want, whether it's subconscious or not. Like,

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 5>the demands on him are greater because he's so exposed.

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 5>There's so much exposure, whether we think whether we're doing it.

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Conscious or not, because he's in you know, he pops.

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Up in every commercial break of every telecast, whether it's

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, Mercedes or mortgages or insurance or whatever it is.

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 5>And like his popularity with with just kind of the

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 5>clickbait world, you know, like he does something on Instagram,

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 5>it's immediately a post, whereas a lot of guys with

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 5>more wins don't you know, do something it's not it's

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 5>not the subject of some article. I think like the

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 5>demands on him are higher and the disappointments are more

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 5>conspicuous because because of because of that exposure, you know,

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 5>off the golf cars.

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 4>I know that's that's that's not exactly a new take,

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 4>but but I think it is.

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 5>Where we are when you're talking about you know, Paul.

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Casey or someone like that. It's just it just it

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 4>just is the disappointments are more conspicuous.

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like the Master's quote when he kind of said,

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, this was the first one I really felt

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 3>like I should have won. I feel ready to win.

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I thought maybe that would bring maybe a harder edge

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 3>to him. I think too, I mean the hard part too,

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 3>like Ricky's content, which I think is fine, Like we

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 3>want these guys to like always be mad, remember they

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 3>don't win, and we want them to be, you know,

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 3>just fiery, and you really you can't do that in

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 3>this game because you win so little. But then we

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 3>harp on them when they like seem content, which I

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 3>think Ricky does, like you want to just be more

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 3>fired up. I don't know, but he's really good by

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 3>most metrics, he just except for wins.

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It's this whole thing is like, is winning overrated? Because

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>if a consistency is you know, more important than winning,

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 1>he's like one of the ten best players of you know,

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world. But if it's strictly based off winning,

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>he isn't.

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I'm looking at his results, and so

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 3>he finished runner up with the Masters, and since then

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 3>he's missed one cut, and besides that miss cut, his

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 3>worst finishes twenty first, I mean literally like second T

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, mc T fourteen, twenty twelfth, and sixth, and

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 3>then I think he finished like twenty eighth this week. Like,

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 3>that's hard to do to me, but then I do.

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if there's like that, so like Ricky is

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of coast and play really good golf, and Ricky's

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 3>like Ricky's normal golf is really good, but you need

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 3>to have that like spike of where you're really like

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 3>so if you're like your strokes gain total, you know,

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.240
<v Speaker 3>some guys are pretty flat lined. Some guys have spikes,

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 3>peaks and valleys, and their piece get them wings, their

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 3>valis get them miss cuts. But we'd rather see that

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 3>in a sense, see the wings and the misscuts, and

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 3>see the guy's kind of flat line. Like Ricky just

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 3>plays well every event. He's kind of got his range,

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 3>whereas the environment favors those guys who will peak and

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 3>get the wings even if they miss the cuts afterwards. Yeah,

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 3>something you said for just playing a ton of good golf.

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It is. It is interesting because I think society values

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the you know, win twice in a year miss ten

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>cuts over yeah, you know, missing three cuts, having tons

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of top tens and not winning, you know.

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, totally.

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know what's better.

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, the market definitely, I don't know. Once whatever Ricky's

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 5>selling I guess whether.

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 3>He I don't know.

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 4>I think, like, but our little corner of the world golf.

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 5>Nerves and people who follow this, you know, I guess

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 5>we can have reasonable debates about it. But you know, Skip,

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 5>what did Skip Bayless say? Ricky's too short, like physically

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 5>too small to win. He's not tall enough the take artists?

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, so is is Justin Rose the best player

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>in the world?

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I uh, I was gonna say Dustin, But Dustin

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 3>missed the cut this week.

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 5>The thing that was, the thing that kind of struck

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 5>me was how really like unsurprising it was to see him, Yeah,

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 5>as soon as he made that putt on Friday to

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 5>make the cut on the numbers, like, oh, well, like

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 5>he's gonna finish in the top twenty, top ten maybe,

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 5>and then like it's just like it just felt natural

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 5>and expected for him to cheat that sixty four at

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 5>the round of the day on Saturday, and then you know,

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:27.280
<v Speaker 5>goes under under part again today, And I think that

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 5>what struck me was just how like how natural and

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 5>automatic it felt.

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think to the thing with bros. He

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 3>was an amazing ball striker for so long, right, but

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 3>he couldn't put yeah, and then his putting improvement has

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 3>been huge this year. And so basically you're taking a

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 3>guy who was a perfect player except for his the

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 3>one club in his bag, and now he's really good

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:53.439
<v Speaker 3>with that. So he's basically a perfect player right now.

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? It is because he'd stopped

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.720
<v Speaker 1>wearing the sunglasses. He can read the greens better.

0:37:58.800 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 4>I didn't even think.

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 3>I can't tell it. I can't. That feels like it

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 3>could be a real take, but I just can't tell.

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 1>No. He started to stop wearing the sunglasses last fall

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 1>in the FedEx Cup.

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Actually, you know what that's right? I remember it Tour Championship.

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I asked it, or someone asked him. I was in

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the interview, and he said that if he starts the

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 3>week with the sunglasses on, he would wear them throughout

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 3>the week. So, like I think one day it was

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 3>cloudy and he was wearing them, and someone was like,

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 3>why are you wearing sunglasses? Is cloudy out? He's like, well,

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 3>for consistency with my reads. If I start the week

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 3>with the sunglasses on, I finished the week. So now

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 3>there's just no sunglasses.

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 4>He's a right, is that right?

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 3>I think he does the claw. I don't know, my

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 3>hand point, I've seen him do that.

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, twenty three starts since last year's Northern Trust,

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 1>four winds and eighteen top ten.

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to be the guy who hits it really,

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.919
<v Speaker 3>really good and now punch for the really good.

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Less majors than Brooks Koepka.

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Less majors than Brooks Kepka. That's that's the This is

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>like the whole debate. Yeah, you know, less wins than

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>than Dustin probably, I think.

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 4>I would say I think maybe not.

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:18.800
<v Speaker 5>I'd say Jason Day has had like the most tiger

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 5>like run of the last five years. Maybe maybe DJ

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 5>when he won three starts a row.

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 1>But like, you know, Jason Day's the only guy that

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 1>sustained it for eighteen months. Yeah, you know, like over

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a year of sustained dominant. You know, like there was

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>like no question who the best player in golf was

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:39.439
<v Speaker 1>during Jason Day's run.

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, He's got one major PGA at Westland.

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Straight saying like about Roses, I feel like there's not

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 3>a lot it's going to be changing his life. Like

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 3>Jason's wife is pregnant, they have another kid. He wants

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 3>spend all the time in his family, which I think

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 3>is great, but like you're adding another kid and things

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:58.919
<v Speaker 3>like that, there's no there's no variables in Justin Rose's life, right,

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Like he's already he has his kids and now it's

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 3>it's all about his game. And I don't know, I

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 3>just don't see a lot changing with Justin Rose. I guess,

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 3>like I feel like he's just gonna keep this up.

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Late thirties. Well, he was what eighteen and the ninety

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.439
<v Speaker 3>eight Open when he finished fourth, So he's thirty eight

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven. Huh.

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 5>I'm just talking about like the Primes lasting, you know,

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 5>being shorter a Rose, although he's Rose has a game

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 5>that doesn't feel violent. Although he's got the uh the back,

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 5>the back back witch doctor.

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that was the thing is so last year

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 3>at Birkdale, I asked him, uh, because I've heard they'd

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 3>been making swing changes for the back, and I mean

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 3>that's one reason he's playing some much better is the

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 3>back is so much better. And they've changed a lot

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 3>in his swing. Not something's visible to like the naked eye,

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 3>but they've changed stuff in his swing to alleviate the

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 3>back pain. And that's when we playing so well, because

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 3>they've gotten the back in a good place.

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 5>In Surprise, Bully, one of Poley's students, says, that problem.

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, I I think with Uh, with Rose, I

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>think we talked about progression earlier in the UH in

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the pod. Yeah, he was like a short hitter and

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>now he's one of the longest. Yeah, nobody, nobody successfully

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>does that.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 5>I remember at the Masters when he and Sergio were

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 5>going back and forth. They were both heading at like

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:38.760
<v Speaker 5>three thirty with like with regularity on that on that Sunday,

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, not three thirty every time, but they were both.

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:47.279
<v Speaker 4>Plenty long enough. I just couldn't. Like everybody, it was

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 4>just crazy. Rose.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 5>You just think of as kind of like this lanky

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 5>ball striker. He's older and he's just like striping irons.

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, like I said, he's he's got, he's playing

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 5>long enough.

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>One way that Just and Rose could stay a little

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more healthy is to stay hydrated. It's good for

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 1>your back, it's good for your entire body. The best

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>way to stay hydrated on the golf course is greater

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 1>than check out Greater than on drinkgt dot com and

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.280
<v Speaker 1>use the promo code the fried Egg for twenty percent

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>off your order. If you want to give it a

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>shot before you dive into a full case, check out

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 1>their new trial pack where you can taste each of

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>their three flavors for a nice low price. That's drink

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 1>gt dot com. I might be selling Sergio.

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's good.

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 1>That that might be my my cell actually is.

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, talk about variaballs. I mean you got

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 3>married and had a child in not that long time span.

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 5>Well that that's kind of what I was talking about

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 5>with Ricky earlier. Is like I don't know, you spend

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:53.359
<v Speaker 5>your entire life trying to get this one thing and

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 5>you get it, and that like like that just has

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 5>to be a set of a comp Like, you know,

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 5>you build a company and you I mean some people,

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, build a company and sell it for enough

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 5>money to you know, retire one hundred times over, and

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 5>that's what they do and they just hang out and

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 5>have lived the life. And others want to build another

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 5>company and sell it, sell another one for a couple

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.800
<v Speaker 5>hundred you know times over, you know, money.

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:22.839
<v Speaker 4>More money than they will ever need.

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 5>I think like there's you can have that effect with

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 5>winning a major.

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Sergio spent twenty years.

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 5>In the spotlight and coming close to winning majors and

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:38.399
<v Speaker 5>they finally got it. And I guess, you know, I'm

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 5>not saying he like doesn't care anymore, but whether that's

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 5>whether it's deliberate or.

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 4>Not, I mean that could that could have an effect.

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 5>Where you're just like, Wow, I just achieved, you know,

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 5>everything that I've been building towards and that's eluded me

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 5>for so long and maybe some of you know, and

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 5>I wonder about that with Ricky, that's what that's kind

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:02.320
<v Speaker 5>of what I was getting out earlier.

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 5>I think Sergio is too talented to never contend at

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 5>a major again or not win a couple more. But

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 5>I think maybe that's what he's going through.

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I kind of think the same thing with Sergio.

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's uh, it's almost like you needed like

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:24.319
<v Speaker 1>he's on like a little bit of a golf break,

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's perfectly fine. You know, like when entrepreneurs sell

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>their companies, a lot of times they take a couple

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of year break.

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 3>You know, Yeah, I don't there, and it's understandable after

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 3>decades of pursuing a major and then also pursuing marriage

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:41.720
<v Speaker 3>and a family.

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the unique thing I think with golf more

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>so than like a lot of other sports, is like,

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think your body decays it, but

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>your these careers are so much longer. You know. Sergio

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 1>has been you know, in the spotlight since he was

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years old. Yeah, and now he's what thirty eight,

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine? Yeah, I mean that's like, you know, Kobe

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>retired at what thirty seven? Right, So like you know,

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like he's at a point where most athletes are retiring,

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, And and with golf, he's he's got ten

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>more years and it takes like such a special like

0:45:26.120 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>drive for somebody to keep going, and I think, yeah,

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I mean, it's, uh, it's a tricky thing

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>because I think after he won that major, I thought

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it was going to open the floodgates, and it's like, God,

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy's been so close so many times, and I

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 1>think it's one of those things where it could go

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>either way, and it went the other way at this point.

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:54.280
<v Speaker 5>It also coinciding with him getting married and having kids

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 5>was like like an unseen like a just kind of

0:45:57.160 --> 0:46:02.320
<v Speaker 5>an unexpected that's just just a lot I mean, achieving

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 5>the end of your life and then also achieving so

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 5>many personal so many things in your personal life happening

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 5>at the same time. I mean, can have that kind

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 5>of effect. I don't know, I was disappointed we make

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 5>these Can we just talk about like how it's so

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 5>dumb to make to think like a major eight ten

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 5>years ago would have any impact on this week. Like

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 5>the fact that he came close to Carnousti in you know,

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and seven.

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 3>It just it doesn't we put so we put way.

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 5>Too much weight in that kind of stuff. So I

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 5>think like, while it felt disappointed, disappointing, he didn't you

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 5>know whatever, He wasn't battling down the stretch like he

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 5>was ten years ago.

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 4>I just think like that storyline gets so.

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:55.320
<v Speaker 5>Overblown, Like every time we come to a new place,

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:57.839
<v Speaker 5>you know, in the three rotating majors, you come back

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 5>to a place, it's like, I don't know, people weren't

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 5>picking Paul Laurie this week. It's just it's just we

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 5>put way too much weight in that.

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 3>This week. Yeah, we just have ten top tens in

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the open.

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:13.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I understand that, but people were just citing that

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:15.399
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and seven one, like, oh, he played well

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 5>at Cournecy that that had no bearing on how he's

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 5>playing right now.

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And when I got fooled by that, you know, I'm

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm the idiot that picked Sergia.

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 4>What's that pick? I mean, it's not like a crazy pick.

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So when I when I play like really good golf courses,

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I find myself getting sad at the end of the round,

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>like on like the fifteenth hole, like on the green,

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll be just like kind of like in devastation knowing

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that the roundt ending. And today during the golf tournament,

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 1>like maybe like the back nine, the leaders got to

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the back nine, I all of a sudden got really

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>sad because I looked at the PGA Tour schedule and

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 1>saw Glenn ab Be, Firestone bell Ree Like it's really

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I want you guys to get me, Like, how can

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I get excited about the PGA, because like it might

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 1>be the all time lowest level of excitement for a

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>major championship I've ever had in my life.

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:20.840
<v Speaker 3>That's uh, I'm excited because my wife's brother is getting

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 3>married that week for running a beach house for the

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 3>week in Pensacola. I am sad to not see Brendan

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 3>and Kyle and Cad either. But I am excited for

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 3>the vacation.

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 4>I like when you talk about your feelings on this

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 4>podcast and.

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 5>Last time that day it's sin was the worst worst

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 5>day of your life? That was the US Open, like

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 5>post game, You're like, Saturday of the worst in my life?

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Well it was. It was such an upfront to win

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:53.720
<v Speaker 3>an angles.

0:48:55.360 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 5>I I completely agree with you and have a good

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 5>answer for why I should why I should get excited

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:08.839
<v Speaker 5>about this this PGA like and I almost think like if,

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 5>like even if like Ricky or Roy or some big

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 5>name wins it, it's like it should count as like

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 5>a WGC wing or something. I just I'm not I

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 5>don't have a good answer for you. I I completely agree.

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not too amp about it.

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that it's Belle Reeve is almost so

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 1>offensive that it's intriguing to me. And one way tonight

0:49:32.320 --> 0:49:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I found out that they when they did their most

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>recent renovations, they put brown dye in the cement mix

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 1>so that the cart paths were brown and they were

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>more aesthetically pleasing.

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 3>It's pragmatic.

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 4>That's how you want to spend your maintenance budget. Yeah,

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 4>car Pathesthetics.

0:49:54.440 --> 0:50:00.360
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, I mean it, I don't know, it's wouldn't

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 1>be a major. It should not be a major championship

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this year.

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Like somebody, I think it was Will Bardwell, somebody was like,

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 5>can we talk about like the airball is not just

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 5>not just going there but PG having a hundred. They're

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:20.800
<v Speaker 5>like the other like you know what, you know, RNA

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:23.239
<v Speaker 5>like threw off the schedule a little bit, so the

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 5>one hundred fifty in twenty twenty one could specifically be

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 5>at Saint Andrew's.

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 4>What like they like bumped St. Andrew's back the year.

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:35.480
<v Speaker 5>What what it's a hundredth PGA, it's your one hundredth championship, Like.

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:38.319
<v Speaker 3>What happened? Who?

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:41.240
<v Speaker 5>Who didn't get the memo? Like that makes it extra

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, puzzling that you're supposed to like celebrate

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 5>your organization, organization and your championship, you know, even in

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 5>an extra way, and you're going to Bellery.

0:50:56.960 --> 0:51:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean it's the It's the closest major

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>championship to me and I I'm really having a tough

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>time getting myself to go. I don't know if I

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 1>can go down there.

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, the PGA, I feel like they're they're putting the

0:51:16.239 --> 0:51:19.799
<v Speaker 5>stake of the ground on some better places, just not

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:20.359
<v Speaker 5>this year.

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:22.920
<v Speaker 4>That is that wrong? And am I mistaken?

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. They're they're booked till like twenty thirty

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 1>venues and like, I don't know.

0:51:30.239 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 5>I think that they're always juggling the whole Ryder Cup thing.

0:51:33.600 --> 0:51:36.279
<v Speaker 4>All these clubs are here, you know.

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:39.880
<v Speaker 1>That's another thing I got this for my like like,

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:43.320
<v Speaker 1>don't like article I've been working on that really grinds

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>my gears. Is like the European Tour, the European Ryder

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Cup site.

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh god, yeah, Like We're.

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Watching this at Carnoustie and I'm like thinking, I'm being

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:57.239
<v Speaker 1>like I was like literally thinking, I'm like, how cool

0:51:57.239 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 1>would it be if a Ryder Cup was out at

0:51:59.280 --> 0:52:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a course like this or like Birkdale or Saint Andrew's,

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Like how amazing would a Ryder Cup be at St Andrews.

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:09.799
<v Speaker 1>But no, we're going to lay Golf National and we

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:13.800
<v Speaker 1>were at the Belfry and the k Club and Celtic

0:52:13.920 --> 0:52:18.799
<v Speaker 1>manor like these just these courses that don't embody at

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 1>all what the golf over there is, Like they play

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>them at the most americanized golf courses in Europe.

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:30.279
<v Speaker 5>Is there is there stated rationale for that, like because

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:33.879
<v Speaker 5>it seems so deliberate that that there's a reason for it,

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 5>Like it's not just like a anomaly.

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Like why can't it be at Royal County Down?

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:42.399
<v Speaker 4>Is it for infrastructure? Like why I don't like Glenn Hill.

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a big part of it.

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:47.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, but if they're the British, you can have

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:49.160
<v Speaker 5>the Open Championship at a place.

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 5>I know the Ryder Cup's a little different because you

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:55.200
<v Speaker 5>want everything's concentrated on like three and four holes at

0:52:55.239 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 5>a time.

0:52:56.760 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 4>But I I just yeah, Glenn Eagle was it's a gross.

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Ryder Cup venues in general just bother me.

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Like, but it's different.

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:12.240
<v Speaker 5>It's not about the venue, I mean, can it's a

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:16.360
<v Speaker 5>it's a competition that stands on its own venueless. I

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:20.279
<v Speaker 5>don't know as much as others your particular area of expertise.

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 5>It's just it's an adversarial competition. It's not the player

0:53:23.600 --> 0:53:24.240
<v Speaker 5>versus the course.

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of the Ryder Cup, though, the the teams are

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:32.319
<v Speaker 1>like absolutely stacked this year.

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 4>I've heard I've heard that.

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:39.719
<v Speaker 1>It's many are saying you guys want to want to

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:43.680
<v Speaker 1>do uh, overrated, underrated.

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Probably it's past midnight here in Scotland.

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll get Sean out of here, all right? Overrated,

0:53:50.880 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>underrated the coverage.

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I think I don't know if I'm qualified here because

0:53:57.640 --> 0:53:59.400
<v Speaker 3>I watched a lot of the world feed in the

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:04.120
<v Speaker 3>media center. I generally like, I have a lot of

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 3>friends work in Golf Channel, so I'm biased, but I

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:10.720
<v Speaker 3>generally like, and you seeing Golf Channel the ground tracer

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 3>thing was cool. I'm gonna say it's become cool to

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:19.920
<v Speaker 3>knock the coverage, so I'm gonna say underrated. And again

0:54:19.960 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 3>that's probably the same problem Randew before with other controversial

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 3>underrated overrated, is that I'm tailoring it for our small

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:29.720
<v Speaker 3>circle of friends and stuff. But I'm gonna say coverage

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:31.200
<v Speaker 3>is underrated because I feel like a lot of people

0:54:31.239 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 3>just knock it because that's the cool thing to do.

0:54:34.239 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 5>So I would say, talking about the coverage and this

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 5>question is extremely overrated. And I and get as guilty

0:54:46.000 --> 0:54:50.040
<v Speaker 5>of it as anyone, and I fall into it. I

0:54:50.160 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 5>just I don't know, I've typed, I've written it a

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 5>few times over the years. I just think like and

0:54:55.440 --> 0:54:57.759
<v Speaker 5>I tweeted, I guilt. I'm as guilty as anyone. I

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 5>tweet about too much. Just talking about the coverage is

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 5>jump the sharp, It's overrated, it's annoying, there's something really bad,

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 5>and go ahead, if you know somebody's being a particularly idiot,

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:15.319
<v Speaker 5>particularly big idiot, or said something really stupid, go for it.

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:19.360
<v Speaker 4>But I just think, like we talk like no one cares.

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:20.359
<v Speaker 3>No one, no one.

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 4>People are just just people.

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:24.200
<v Speaker 5>Just tune in to watch Tiger, Like I know, no

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:28.320
<v Speaker 5>one's trying to see like you know, the amateur from whatever.

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:33.279
<v Speaker 5>It's just Sam walk what Sam Locke. Well, yeah, I

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 5>mean I guess it gets to us a little bit

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 5>too much. But and we do want to see some

0:55:38.080 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 5>of the like lesser, you know, more random and I

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:46.239
<v Speaker 5>don't know off the radar stories, But just talking about

0:55:46.239 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 5>the coverage is exhausting. I've been done with it for

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:53.560
<v Speaker 5>a while, I've written it over the years. I just

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:55.439
<v Speaker 5>I think it's like even worse now.

0:55:56.600 --> 0:55:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I think golf is actually like probably the hardest thing

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to televise of any sport because it's happened. There's there's

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 1>all these players in different spots across like every other

0:56:07.880 --> 0:56:11.319
<v Speaker 1>sport is like there's one place that the game is

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:14.719
<v Speaker 1>being played and a focal point of the action, whereas golf, like,

0:56:15.120 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're all over the place all the time.

0:56:17.400 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think, also, yeah, go ahead.

0:56:20.239 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 3>I saw I saw some talk on Twitter about we

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 3>should have commercial free broadcasts of majors, and I was like, guys, like,

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 3>what fantasy world are we living in? Like, you got

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 3>to pay the bills. You paid billions for these broadcast

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 3>rights for millions. You got to recoup that somehow.

0:56:35.360 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the Masters is an anomaly.

0:56:37.920 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 3>I just yeah, it's just.

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:42.399
<v Speaker 5>Like people want all these articles for free, and then

0:56:42.520 --> 0:56:46.799
<v Speaker 5>you know, expect I don't know expect, you know, deep

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:48.800
<v Speaker 5>reported investigations just happened.

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:52.279
<v Speaker 5>It's yeah, Twitter is just a place to complain, So

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 5>it's not really surprising.

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey uh it was was Bryson's outfit on Saturday, the

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:00.080
<v Speaker 1>best outfit of the week.

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 4>It it made me feel.

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:08.799
<v Speaker 5>Good for getting up at an hour that I really

0:57:08.840 --> 0:57:12.680
<v Speaker 5>didn't need to. On Saturday, very little was happening. For

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:15.319
<v Speaker 5>some reason. I was down on my couch in front

0:57:15.320 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 5>of the TV at five am or whatever, it was

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:21.480
<v Speaker 5>four thirty and I look at the screen. I'm like

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 5>what the hell, what is going on? He looked like

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:31.720
<v Speaker 5>some like I don't know, Slavic, like gangster or I

0:57:31.720 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 5>don't know, or like an old Italian guy, you know,

0:57:34.720 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 5>the output of an old Italian. It just it was

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:40.880
<v Speaker 5>it paid off for me to you know, it was

0:57:41.000 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 5>worth getting up early to see that. And of course,

0:57:44.120 --> 0:57:47.880
<v Speaker 5>you know it's all this new fangled technology. It's just

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 5>the look from Afar with like the all white shoes

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:54.960
<v Speaker 5>and the white you know, Hogan cap with the shiny

0:57:55.000 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 5>gray jumpsuit was just absurd and wasn't sure. It wasn't

0:57:59.280 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 5>intended him to look slick, and you know, like he's

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 5>wearing pieces of technology, not some fashions, David.

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:09.560
<v Speaker 4>But it was fantastic.

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>It was straight out of the Sopranos, that outfit. I've

0:58:16.400 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 1>seen that look many times. You know, there's there's six

0:58:20.320 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 1>seasons of it.

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 3>I gotta be honest. Brendan had a great week of tweeting.

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:28.320
<v Speaker 3>It was. It was strong this week.

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame week.

0:58:31.440 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think over an underrated Brendan, I think right.

0:58:35.160 --> 0:58:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think his tweets are the are the the bar.

0:58:40.320 --> 0:58:43.560
<v Speaker 3>They're like they're funny without being just it's so easy

0:58:43.600 --> 0:58:45.560
<v Speaker 3>just to like rip on guys and try to get

0:58:45.600 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 3>engagements that way. But like they're funny without just being

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 3>controversial or like without being like just mean. Like it's

0:58:53.880 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 3>really easy to get people fired up on Twitter and

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 3>just you know, pick some player you don't like and

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:01.640
<v Speaker 3>just harp on them and ignite the masses against them

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:03.680
<v Speaker 3>and get it going that way. But like they're funny

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 3>while being intelligent, without just being like just mean for

0:59:07.200 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 3>the sake of being mean, Like they're clever. I don't know,

0:59:09.280 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 3>I think underrated, Brandon.

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you're like retweet, like per tweet percentage is

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 1>like better than anybody on the internet.

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, blushing over here, gosh, let's take what the course

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:24.840
<v Speaker 5>gives me.

0:59:25.160 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right.

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:30.640
<v Speaker 3>So that Bryson tweet was definitely, I mean, that was

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the example of the week, but there's there's definitely more

0:59:33.160 --> 0:59:33.920
<v Speaker 3>than that.

0:59:33.920 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 1>That came from overrated, underrated, out of bounds, overrated.

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 5>It's why, I don't know, I think I think it's hmm,

0:59:47.520 --> 0:59:51.560
<v Speaker 5>I think it's underrated as it's is that the most brutal.

0:59:53.040 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Penalty and golf, Yeah, it's.

0:59:54.880 --> 0:59:56.959
<v Speaker 3>So arbitrary, Like there's so many things that are marked

0:59:57.080 --> 1:00:00.200
<v Speaker 3>like okay, number one at Carnoustie, the Barry Burn us

1:00:00.280 --> 1:00:02.160
<v Speaker 3>on the left side kind of early off the tee.

1:00:02.160 --> 1:00:03.800
<v Speaker 3>You have to really you have to hit a snipe

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:06.520
<v Speaker 3>hooke to get it in there. But it's OB on

1:00:06.600 --> 1:00:09.880
<v Speaker 3>the first hole, but it's it's the Verry Burn. But

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:11.440
<v Speaker 3>like so on the first hole, if you hit it

1:00:11.920 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 3>left into the burn, it's OB. On a team, if

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:18.440
<v Speaker 3>you hit it left into the burn, it's a hazard. Like.

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 3>It's so arbitrary with OB sometimes, I don't know, I

1:00:21.120 --> 1:00:23.760
<v Speaker 3>just and the penalty is so much worse than any

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:28.840
<v Speaker 3>other penalty in golf. Really, I don't it's overrated. I mean,

1:00:29.000 --> 1:00:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I feel like also though we can't change it because

1:00:31.000 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 3>then I feel like all scoring records almost are rendered

1:00:34.280 --> 1:00:37.160
<v Speaker 3>obsolete because if you take away OB and make everything

1:00:37.200 --> 1:00:40.120
<v Speaker 3>at hazard like, it's a huge thing you've changed in

1:00:40.120 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 3>the game. And it's almost like raising the pitcher's mound

1:00:44.360 --> 1:00:47.880
<v Speaker 3>or lowering it, or like changing the height of basketball

1:00:47.920 --> 1:00:50.680
<v Speaker 3>rooms in basketball. Maybe not that drastic, but I don't know,

1:00:50.720 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 3>I just I don't understand OB. It's so arbitrary. When

1:00:54.320 --> 1:00:56.520
<v Speaker 3>something is OB versus martis hazard.

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 4>That was the end the end of rick.

1:01:01.680 --> 1:01:03.960
<v Speaker 3>OB should be off the property, like you hit on

1:01:04.000 --> 1:01:06.800
<v Speaker 3>the train tracks. That's ob If you hit it slightly

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:10.960
<v Speaker 3>left into like a backyard where you could maybe play it,

1:01:11.000 --> 1:01:11.800
<v Speaker 3>that should be a hazard.

1:01:12.600 --> 1:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Well isn't that off the property?

1:01:15.560 --> 1:01:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1:01:16.440 --> 1:01:17.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, true?

1:01:17.440 --> 1:01:18.959
<v Speaker 4>But was that the case this week?

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 5>It was like the property was literally constraint, like that's

1:01:21.800 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 5>where the property ended, don't know.

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:28.360
<v Speaker 3>But left of one into the very burn, like there's

1:01:28.360 --> 1:01:31.320
<v Speaker 3>play a property there. There's no reason that left of

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:33.960
<v Speaker 3>one in the very burn should have been anything beside

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the hazard. Like literally if you just hit it off

1:01:37.560 --> 1:01:39.840
<v Speaker 3>the grass into the burns, if your ball was sitting

1:01:39.840 --> 1:01:42.040
<v Speaker 3>in the water on one, you were out of bound,

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:46.800
<v Speaker 3>but you were in water, which is ninety nine in

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:47.640
<v Speaker 3>a time of hazard.

1:01:49.200 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think it's underrated. I hate it. I

1:01:52.960 --> 1:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>think it. I hate so many things about it. But like,

1:01:56.440 --> 1:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, that six hole wouldn't be as brilliant if

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a hazard down the left as it is

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>bounds like they were, people were terrified of hitting the

1:02:06.080 --> 1:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>ball left and they just kept sailing them right and

1:02:09.760 --> 1:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>making sixes without you know, going in any hazard on

1:02:13.960 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a part five, When do you ever see.

1:02:15.400 --> 1:02:20.360
<v Speaker 5>That it's as its as menacing as the hazard I

1:02:20.360 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 5>think right.

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 3>To be honest, Hogan's alley is wider than I thought

1:02:25.000 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 3>it was going to be. I was a little bit disappointed.

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's wider, but that that out of bounds makes

1:02:30.480 --> 1:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it like when you're when you're trying to hit that

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>t shot as like in a tournament, it's absolutely terrifying.

1:02:36.600 --> 1:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You like can't get yourself to hit it over there.

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Also, under the aspect of it, the ground slopes right

1:02:41.520 --> 1:02:45.760
<v Speaker 3>to left, so slopes towards the ob so you've got

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:47.360
<v Speaker 3>to like hit a cut in there. No, I totally

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:49.760
<v Speaker 3>it's that I wouldn't take that line. I mean that

1:02:50.480 --> 1:02:51.920
<v Speaker 3>it was wider than I thought it was going to be.

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:55.080
<v Speaker 5>Ended Ricky's championship, right, I mean he pumped on O

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:58.520
<v Speaker 5>B and then got spooked mentally and shot and ray

1:02:58.600 --> 1:03:00.920
<v Speaker 5>right went way right and then get.

1:03:02.440 --> 1:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, not to go back to Belle Reeve, but

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>just that hole, the six hole, the six hole at Krnousti,

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like I look at that and just Carnousti in general,

1:03:14.400 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Chicago golf, like what they do well is so simple.

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand how something like beller Reeve happened. Like

1:03:25.200 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>good golf architects so simple.

1:03:29.480 --> 1:03:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Hey, can you give us like the.

1:03:32.480 --> 1:03:37.320
<v Speaker 5>I don't know sixty second skinny on bell Reeveh. Give us,

1:03:37.360 --> 1:03:39.680
<v Speaker 5>give us a little paste of why it's so. It's

1:03:39.760 --> 1:03:43.080
<v Speaker 5>why I said, what's happened there? It's certain holes or

1:03:43.120 --> 1:03:44.520
<v Speaker 5>what's what's.

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's just narrow fair aways long and then

1:03:47.360 --> 1:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just bunkers on both sides. You know. It's like,

1:03:51.080 --> 1:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, hit it. It tells you where to hit everything.

1:03:56.600 --> 1:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, like six of Carnusty is great because you

1:03:59.040 --> 1:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>could hit it left and take that line, but they

1:04:01.760 --> 1:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>give you all this room to the right where it

1:04:04.640 --> 1:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is like a delayed penalty where if I hit it

1:04:07.480 --> 1:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>over here, I might not be dead right now, but

1:04:11.040 --> 1:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually dead unless I hit a perfect shot back.

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>It's this delayed penalty. Like everything at Belle Reeve is

1:04:21.360 --> 1:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is just you know, it's immediate, you know, ruling like

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you're either good or you're bad. And I think where

1:04:28.360 --> 1:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the brilliance in golf is is when there's this gray

1:04:32.320 --> 1:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and when recovery is allowed, and when you know you're

1:04:36.160 --> 1:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>forced to take on the aggressive line you know, and

1:04:39.920 --> 1:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you might not know what the aggressive line is. And

1:04:42.920 --> 1:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the thing why these opens are so

1:04:46.600 --> 1:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>captivating is because everybody can has their different strategy. Like

1:04:51.280 --> 1:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>at Belle Reeve, the strategy is going to be exactly

1:04:53.720 --> 1:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the same. But at Carnoussie we saw guys everybody was

1:04:58.200 --> 1:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>playing a different game plan. You know, Tiger was hitting

1:05:02.200 --> 1:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>irons off there. You know, like that it allows for people,

1:05:07.160 --> 1:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It forces people to think and execute, as opposed to

1:05:10.800 --> 1:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>bell Reeve tells you the answer on every and just

1:05:14.960 --> 1:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>asks you to execute that answer, hit it straight and far.

1:05:23.040 --> 1:05:26.960
<v Speaker 3>With an angles. Does that make sense totally? I mean

1:05:27.000 --> 1:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I think, I mean carnis Do is great in that

1:05:29.000 --> 1:05:31.080
<v Speaker 3>sense of like you had to take on the pop Bunkers.

1:05:31.160 --> 1:05:33.120
<v Speaker 3>You wanted the best angle.

1:05:33.440 --> 1:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And you could play safe, but like you're not gonna

1:05:35.640 --> 1:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>play safe all round long and be at the top

1:05:39.280 --> 1:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of the leader boar no.

1:05:41.080 --> 1:05:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Harrington said it great. Harrington was like, look, yeah, you

1:05:43.320 --> 1:05:46.240
<v Speaker 3>can lay back short of the pop punkers if you

1:05:46.320 --> 1:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>want here, but you're gonna have two hundred yard approaches

1:05:49.520 --> 1:05:52.400
<v Speaker 3>almost all day long and so you're not gonna score

1:05:53.240 --> 1:05:56.080
<v Speaker 3>which But the same time, if you're like a twenty

1:05:56.120 --> 1:05:59.000
<v Speaker 3>handicap and you're playing that course, like it's great, you

1:05:59.040 --> 1:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>can roll it. You know, all great holes should be

1:06:01.560 --> 1:06:03.640
<v Speaker 3>able to be played without a putter or with a putter,

1:06:03.960 --> 1:06:06.360
<v Speaker 3>except for the seventeenth Sawgrass a great hole, but you

1:06:06.360 --> 1:06:08.760
<v Speaker 3>can't play with a putter. Let's you get on the left.

1:06:10.240 --> 1:06:13.440
<v Speaker 3>But no, I think that's the reason Carnoustie is great.

1:06:13.480 --> 1:06:15.920
<v Speaker 3>I think because someone had a great quote that some

1:06:16.000 --> 1:06:18.240
<v Speaker 3>of the other links courses like you can kind of

1:06:18.320 --> 1:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>lay back from the pop bunkers, but you'll still have

1:06:20.400 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 3>like if you lay back, you'll have you know, one

1:06:23.440 --> 1:06:25.840
<v Speaker 3>seventy in, but if you kind of go for it,

1:06:25.880 --> 1:06:28.280
<v Speaker 3>you'll have like one thirty in. But that's like an

1:06:28.320 --> 1:06:32.560
<v Speaker 3>eight iron versus a nine iron, eight iron versus wedge maybe,

1:06:32.640 --> 1:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>whereas that Carnoustie, you lay back and you have like

1:06:35.320 --> 1:06:38.040
<v Speaker 3>two hundred in. If you go for it and push it,

1:06:38.080 --> 1:06:40.200
<v Speaker 3>you have like one fifty in. And now you're talking

1:06:40.200 --> 1:06:42.640
<v Speaker 3>about like six iron versus like nine iron, and that's

1:06:42.640 --> 1:06:44.440
<v Speaker 3>a huge difference. So I think that was an interesting

1:06:44.480 --> 1:06:46.880
<v Speaker 3>point of like a Carnusie, you really have to push

1:06:46.880 --> 1:06:48.600
<v Speaker 3>it unless you just want to be hitting long irons

1:06:48.640 --> 1:06:49.240
<v Speaker 3>all day long.

1:06:52.600 --> 1:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, last, overrated underrated tiger.

1:07:01.320 --> 1:07:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Hmm, I'm gonna say underrated man, Like I think you know,

1:07:07.920 --> 1:07:09.760
<v Speaker 3>we it's kind of we've heard him say it a

1:07:09.760 --> 1:07:12.560
<v Speaker 3>lot every week of like, you know, this time last year,

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:15.920
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think I'd be playing golf again. But honestly,

1:07:16.000 --> 1:07:19.200
<v Speaker 3>like this time last year, he never thought he'd played

1:07:19.200 --> 1:07:22.040
<v Speaker 3>golf again. And the guy is contending in major championships.

1:07:22.280 --> 1:07:24.040
<v Speaker 3>That swing he took on ten out of that fairry

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:27.400
<v Speaker 3>bunker was like, I mean, there are very few people

1:07:27.520 --> 1:07:31.240
<v Speaker 3>on the on the on the planet who can make

1:07:31.280 --> 1:07:33.160
<v Speaker 3>that kind of a golf swing, let alone people on

1:07:33.200 --> 1:07:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the planet who've had four back surgeries and can make

1:07:35.320 --> 1:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>that golf swing. And it's easy to get jada with Tiger. Obviously,

1:07:38.960 --> 1:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>every time he gets in contention, the gifts are is

1:07:40.840 --> 1:07:44.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna start flying. Uh, There's nothing I hate more than

1:07:44.120 --> 1:07:47.000
<v Speaker 3>a tweet that has more exclamation points and gifts than

1:07:47.000 --> 1:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>it does words, and that always happens when Tiger gets

1:07:50.720 --> 1:07:52.920
<v Speaker 3>gets in contention. But at the same time, like the

1:07:52.960 --> 1:07:55.680
<v Speaker 3>guy literally, I mean you know what he was saying,

1:07:55.800 --> 1:07:58.480
<v Speaker 3>like he was bedridden and like how do he use

1:07:58.480 --> 1:08:00.360
<v Speaker 3>a golf club as a cane to walk out of

1:08:00.360 --> 1:08:03.400
<v Speaker 3>his bed and now is contending in major championships. You know,

1:08:04.600 --> 1:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Like I know, like it's not cool to gush about Tiger,

1:08:07.080 --> 1:08:08.760
<v Speaker 3>but I mean that's insane.

1:08:09.560 --> 1:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>That shot he hit on ten was like one of

1:08:12.640 --> 1:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the greatest golf shots I've ever seen.

1:08:15.080 --> 1:08:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it was ridiculous to get it that high. Then

1:08:17.840 --> 1:08:20.680
<v Speaker 3>also to move it that far forward.

1:08:20.560 --> 1:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>In that situation too, Like hey, I mean it's it's

1:08:24.200 --> 1:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a shame the green.

1:08:26.320 --> 1:08:27.839
<v Speaker 3>You can hit that in the burn easily.

1:08:28.040 --> 1:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>If he goes on to win that event, it's like

1:08:31.000 --> 1:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>into his top fifteen shots of all time. Oh yeah,

1:08:36.560 --> 1:08:39.639
<v Speaker 1>that shot was unbelievable. And I that's like, I think

1:08:39.680 --> 1:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing about Tiger is like he regularly does things

1:08:43.160 --> 1:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that you don't ever see anybody else do. He's He's

1:08:45.800 --> 1:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>way underrated. Is Brendan there?

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:51.639
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

1:08:52.000 --> 1:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gone.

1:08:54.960 --> 1:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh I see him.

1:09:00.960 --> 1:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>We might we might just have to call it. Brendan

1:09:05.200 --> 1:09:08.599
<v Speaker 1>just left the left. We'll get him in here real quick.

1:09:08.760 --> 1:09:10.600
<v Speaker 3>You know he's back.

1:09:11.200 --> 1:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, the last one. I don't know Whenny we

1:09:14.479 --> 1:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>lost you, but the last one is uh.

1:09:17.479 --> 1:09:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I heard.

1:09:17.880 --> 1:09:20.599
<v Speaker 4>I heard the whole thing. I heard it.

1:09:20.720 --> 1:09:25.120
<v Speaker 5>I think, Yeah, like you guys are talking about a

1:09:25.160 --> 1:09:28.160
<v Speaker 5>year ago. I wrote that Saturday, like a year ago.

1:09:28.200 --> 1:09:30.839
<v Speaker 5>He was sending weird ass tweets about his Open Raiders

1:09:30.840 --> 1:09:33.920
<v Speaker 5>pool table and then what's the.

1:09:33.840 --> 1:09:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Fact that the fact that you remember that stuff is

1:09:36.200 --> 1:09:38.320
<v Speaker 3>really like the key to your greatness? Like I don't

1:09:38.320 --> 1:09:41.679
<v Speaker 3>remember that at all, but that was a great tweet.

1:09:41.800 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 5>I mean that was up there with whatever Mac Daddy Santa.

1:09:44.560 --> 1:09:46.920
<v Speaker 5>For me, It's just like, Wow, he should not have

1:09:46.920 --> 1:09:48.760
<v Speaker 5>his account. What is the purpose of this, Like he

1:09:48.760 --> 1:09:50.519
<v Speaker 5>shouldn't have the keys, so why did he send I

1:09:50.600 --> 1:09:51.719
<v Speaker 5>just remember it in the moment.

1:09:54.240 --> 1:09:56.360
<v Speaker 4>I agree with all that. I agree with all that.

1:09:57.360 --> 1:10:00.880
<v Speaker 5>I think, like this is like he says, it's a gift.

1:10:00.960 --> 1:10:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Hashtag blessed. I'm weighing on Tiger, I'm buying them all that.

1:10:07.600 --> 1:10:09.280
<v Speaker 5>I think we're kind of overrating.

1:10:13.560 --> 1:10:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

1:10:14.000 --> 1:10:15.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that.

1:10:15.320 --> 1:10:18.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think based on the last five years of

1:10:18.200 --> 1:10:21.639
<v Speaker 5>injuries and personal scandals and all that stuff and barely

1:10:21.680 --> 1:10:24.559
<v Speaker 5>being able to walk kind of makes us a little

1:10:24.560 --> 1:10:29.599
<v Speaker 5>more lenient. But he was having trouble closing before all

1:10:29.600 --> 1:10:32.360
<v Speaker 5>that happened. He was having that trouble in twenty thirteen.

1:10:32.840 --> 1:10:37.640
<v Speaker 5>He had that trouble at Mirrorfield, at Oak Hill. He

1:10:38.080 --> 1:10:41.920
<v Speaker 5>was having that trouble, and he did again today. I

1:10:42.479 --> 1:10:45.760
<v Speaker 5>know he led a major championship on the back nine

1:10:45.760 --> 1:10:49.759
<v Speaker 5>on a Sunday, And I'm not like denegrating that that's amazing.

1:10:49.800 --> 1:10:53.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying. And I thought golf Brandle and Frank

1:10:53.360 --> 1:10:54.000
<v Speaker 4>went into this.

1:10:54.479 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 5>Better than anyone after a round as we were all

1:10:57.160 --> 1:11:00.439
<v Speaker 5>kind of it was a hit us some and we're

1:11:00.479 --> 1:11:02.479
<v Speaker 5>on this high and they kind of like brought it

1:11:02.520 --> 1:11:05.720
<v Speaker 5>back down to earth. For me, was like, well, you know,

1:11:05.880 --> 1:11:10.080
<v Speaker 5>he hit five and six fairways on every nine all week.

1:11:10.720 --> 1:11:12.200
<v Speaker 4>On his back nine on Sunday.

1:11:11.880 --> 1:11:17.120
<v Speaker 5>He hit one fairway and they put up like a

1:11:17.240 --> 1:11:20.120
<v Speaker 5>graphic about how many bogies he has on Sunday back

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:23.200
<v Speaker 5>nine this this year, whether it's you know, pumping it

1:11:23.240 --> 1:11:24.240
<v Speaker 5>out of bounds.

1:11:23.880 --> 1:11:25.680
<v Speaker 4>At bay Hill or.

1:11:28.760 --> 1:11:31.720
<v Speaker 5>Quick Loans Wells Fargo, the players, you know he put

1:11:31.720 --> 1:11:35.800
<v Speaker 5>in the water at seventeen, like they're like the bogies

1:11:35.960 --> 1:11:37.559
<v Speaker 5>or doubles, bogies are worse.

1:11:37.640 --> 1:11:40.439
<v Speaker 4>Stats for his final round back nine aren't great.

1:11:41.120 --> 1:11:43.040
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I mean, I thought Rory had a great

1:11:43.160 --> 1:11:45.759
<v Speaker 3>quote and Rory said it. They said that this tiger

1:11:45.800 --> 1:11:48.240
<v Speaker 3>does things a tiger of fifteen years ago did not do,

1:11:48.920 --> 1:11:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Like this tiger is not infallible.

1:11:52.880 --> 1:11:54.439
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what the tiger was here, And have

1:11:54.520 --> 1:11:56.439
<v Speaker 5>my words twisted like we did with Xander.

1:11:57.840 --> 1:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>How many times you said that this podcast.

1:12:02.800 --> 1:12:03.639
<v Speaker 3>But I'm not.

1:12:03.560 --> 1:12:04.840
<v Speaker 4>Trying to pour cold water on it.

1:12:04.880 --> 1:12:09.240
<v Speaker 5>I just think, like, wow, I know what this is going,

1:12:09.320 --> 1:12:11.320
<v Speaker 5>everything that's going to go last five years. We tend

1:12:11.320 --> 1:12:13.719
<v Speaker 5>to kind of tend to just focus on the positive.

1:12:13.720 --> 1:12:15.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure that's necessarily the wrong thing to do,

1:12:15.800 --> 1:12:18.880
<v Speaker 5>but there is says Tiger is over.

1:12:19.000 --> 1:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>It might be the headline of the of the title

1:12:23.520 --> 1:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast.

1:12:25.280 --> 1:12:27.880
<v Speaker 5>There is some there is some you know, we need

1:12:27.880 --> 1:12:30.720
<v Speaker 5>to approach this with an equitability that you know, the

1:12:30.760 --> 1:12:32.040
<v Speaker 5>fanboys may not have.

1:12:32.720 --> 1:12:35.679
<v Speaker 3>Come for the architecture takes, stay for Brendan calling Tiger

1:12:35.680 --> 1:12:36.679
<v Speaker 3>Woods over it.

1:12:37.479 --> 1:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You won't believe it. You will't not believe what Brandan

1:12:41.240 --> 1:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Poorath from Espanation said about Tiger Woods.

1:12:44.520 --> 1:12:50.080
<v Speaker 5>Fortunately small deal, but you know, people don't aggregate my podcast.

1:12:50.800 --> 1:12:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Brendan Poora said, what click here to find out?

1:12:54.720 --> 1:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's also at minute seventy five of the podcast

1:12:59.240 --> 1:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>You'll never leave.

1:13:00.320 --> 1:13:02.120
<v Speaker 3>But Brendan pora I said about Tiger.

1:13:01.880 --> 1:13:05.840
<v Speaker 5>Woods, we didn't get into blistering Tiger Takes until the

1:13:05.960 --> 1:13:07.120
<v Speaker 5>last two minutes.

1:13:08.439 --> 1:13:10.479
<v Speaker 1>All Right, what do you guys, what do you guys

1:13:10.760 --> 1:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>coming out? Uh, this about the Open, Brendan, are you

1:13:15.360 --> 1:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>published anything yet?

1:13:17.479 --> 1:13:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Sean? I, I just did a quick jam on on

1:13:22.439 --> 1:13:26.040
<v Speaker 5>Frankie Am this afternoon and then started gathering things for

1:13:26.080 --> 1:13:28.639
<v Speaker 5>the morning. Gonna have gonna have a thing on Tiger,

1:13:28.720 --> 1:13:30.960
<v Speaker 5>probably gonna have a thing on, just a separate thing

1:13:31.000 --> 1:13:33.320
<v Speaker 5>on like the holistic the entire Sunday.

1:13:33.600 --> 1:13:39.000
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I wrote a Tiger piece. I thought's pretty cool.

1:13:39.000 --> 1:13:41.680
<v Speaker 3>I asked Xander. I got to ask him Saturday, but

1:13:41.760 --> 1:13:44.200
<v Speaker 3>being a San Diego guy, if he was at the

1:13:44.240 --> 1:13:46.479
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and eight US Open, and it was kind

1:13:46.479 --> 1:13:48.840
<v Speaker 3>of cool. I thought he was at He was there,

1:13:48.880 --> 1:13:50.680
<v Speaker 3>he was at the seventy second hole watching as like

1:13:50.680 --> 1:13:53.360
<v Speaker 3>a fourteen year old when Tiger made that putt and

1:13:53.520 --> 1:13:55.280
<v Speaker 3>the last major he won, and then all of a sudden,

1:13:55.280 --> 1:13:59.519
<v Speaker 3>now you know, Xander is being chased by Tiger. So

1:13:59.560 --> 1:14:01.519
<v Speaker 3>that was cool and so sort of Tiger piece on that.

1:14:02.120 --> 1:14:06.439
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know, like his kids were there, which

1:14:06.439 --> 1:14:10.439
<v Speaker 3>I thought was a cool moment. You can tell it

1:14:10.439 --> 1:14:12.080
<v Speaker 3>really means a lot to him. I know it's kind

1:14:12.080 --> 1:14:14.639
<v Speaker 3>of sentimental and easy to make fun of, but sero

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Tiger today, I don't know what I have coming in.

1:14:16.960 --> 1:14:22.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm very intrigued by Francesco, wrote stats post after after

1:14:22.320 --> 1:14:26.040
<v Speaker 3>we want to Quicken that he could have finished third

1:14:26.080 --> 1:14:27.519
<v Speaker 3>to last in the field and he still would have

1:14:27.520 --> 1:14:29.800
<v Speaker 3>won because he hit the ball so well according to

1:14:29.800 --> 1:14:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Troe's gain. So I don't know. I'm very intrigued by Francisco.

1:14:32.439 --> 1:14:34.439
<v Speaker 3>I feel like no one hits the ball like straighter

1:14:35.120 --> 1:14:37.600
<v Speaker 3>like than he does, Like he's the Italian Hogan. So

1:14:38.160 --> 1:14:39.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying something with that.

1:14:39.640 --> 1:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't hit any foul balls like any no, no.

1:14:44.880 --> 1:14:47.360
<v Speaker 3>And also it's crazy too, people no one mentioned ed

1:14:47.360 --> 1:14:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Wardo like at all today, but like Wardo won the

1:14:50.040 --> 1:14:52.600
<v Speaker 3>US NAM and Marian so the Molinaris now have a

1:14:52.720 --> 1:14:55.200
<v Speaker 3>US Amateur and a Clarig jug which is insane, and

1:14:55.640 --> 1:14:58.759
<v Speaker 3>like it's crazy too because they don't look anything like brothers.

1:14:59.320 --> 1:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>And Wardo's really skinny, and he like doesn't hit it

1:15:03.080 --> 1:15:05.960
<v Speaker 3>very straight and he's a scrambler and has an amazing

1:15:05.960 --> 1:15:09.840
<v Speaker 3>short game. And Francesco fors forever couldn't putt, but just

1:15:09.880 --> 1:15:12.400
<v Speaker 3>hit it dead straight like every time, like he's the

1:15:12.439 --> 1:15:16.240
<v Speaker 3>iron Italian, the iron Iron. Uh. And it's so like

1:15:16.280 --> 1:15:18.240
<v Speaker 3>if you saw them play golf and saw each other,

1:15:18.280 --> 1:15:21.519
<v Speaker 3>you never know they were related, but they're both very

1:15:21.520 --> 1:15:23.840
<v Speaker 3>good golfers.

1:15:23.880 --> 1:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>The Molinari Slam might be the greatest record in golf.

1:15:27.760 --> 1:15:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know, I'm writing an exhaustive piece about

1:15:34.000 --> 1:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the I'm back moment of this weekend, which is Hunter

1:15:37.160 --> 1:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Mayhon tied first at the barbers.

1:15:39.200 --> 1:15:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I'm so excited for that to tee off tomorrow.

1:15:44.120 --> 1:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they're right now, it's seven.

1:15:49.240 --> 1:15:51.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, well they know. The leader work said

1:15:51.360 --> 1:15:52.960
<v Speaker 3>they had an eight pm T time, which I assumed

1:15:52.960 --> 1:15:54.240
<v Speaker 3>wasn't happening, and I assume.

1:15:53.960 --> 1:15:58.559
<v Speaker 1>They're just zb texted during this during this pod that said,

1:15:58.600 --> 1:16:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm walking the first t.

1:16:06.120 --> 1:16:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm very exorited that that's a big story. I

1:16:08.280 --> 1:16:14.799
<v Speaker 3>feel like, yeah, I got nothing to Ironomy. Yeah, BMW Championship.

1:16:14.800 --> 1:16:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Are you gonna be there? I know it's not in

1:16:16.200 --> 1:16:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the tribal area, but it's pretty woke.

1:16:18.600 --> 1:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm I'm thinking about, uh, you know, investing

1:16:22.200 --> 1:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>some resources and uh getting the low down, doing doing

1:16:25.800 --> 1:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>some stuff on for Marion or for Aronomic and uh

1:16:29.760 --> 1:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and Ridgewood.

1:16:31.640 --> 1:16:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh, and I'm playing Hickory golf tomorrow. I'm woke.

1:16:34.680 --> 1:16:37.679
<v Speaker 1>So other than that, hick Fever. You're gonna be Yeah,

1:16:37.720 --> 1:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna be you and Brandon Stone. That was one

1:16:40.200 --> 1:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of the coolest moments of the of the week. That'll go.

1:16:43.120 --> 1:16:46.439
<v Speaker 3>I love Ryan. I love when you see professional golfers

1:16:46.479 --> 1:16:47.240
<v Speaker 3>who love golf.

1:16:47.439 --> 1:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's so underrated.

1:16:50.080 --> 1:16:53.759
<v Speaker 3>Actually, yeah, it's like ZB why we love.

1:16:53.640 --> 1:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Them too many guys, Like I don't know. I think

1:16:57.000 --> 1:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the problems though, is like you know,

1:17:00.280 --> 1:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>is when it's your job, you lose what made you

1:17:04.360 --> 1:17:08.559
<v Speaker 1>so great, you know, Like, I don't know, It's it's tricky,

1:17:08.840 --> 1:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I agree. The guys that just can't get

1:17:11.560 --> 1:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>enough of golf are the best.

1:17:14.040 --> 1:17:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, shout out ZV in mid ninety seven of this podcast.

1:17:17.400 --> 1:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah all right, guys, I'm calling it. Unless you got

1:17:21.680 --> 1:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>anything else to say about the open.

1:17:24.080 --> 1:17:26.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh see a Firestone and Bellery.

1:17:27.240 --> 1:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I might. I might go to Firestone, you know, just

1:17:30.640 --> 1:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>so I can I can put the put the final

1:17:33.040 --> 1:17:37.719
<v Speaker 1>uh final, you know, dirt on top of its grave.

1:17:37.800 --> 1:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>As a PGA Tour site.

1:17:40.160 --> 1:17:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I gotta be honest. As a from a journalist standpoint,

1:17:43.800 --> 1:17:47.360
<v Speaker 3>I love Firestone. It's like summer camp because you have

1:17:47.400 --> 1:17:50.920
<v Speaker 3>the two other courses there. It's light till like ten pm,

1:17:51.040 --> 1:17:53.559
<v Speaker 3>and so we would just go like take carts around

1:17:53.600 --> 1:17:57.880
<v Speaker 3>and play golf to like tens So selfishly, I love

1:17:57.880 --> 1:17:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Firestones events to go to.

1:18:00.040 --> 1:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm recording this from Northeast Ohio, so I'm on published

1:18:04.120 --> 1:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and get out of town.

1:18:06.360 --> 1:18:07.000
<v Speaker 4>A great question.

1:18:08.320 --> 1:18:13.479
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, guys, later, alright, alright later. You've been listening

1:18:13.520 --> 1:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to the fried Egg Podcast. We do the digging before

1:18:17.040 --> 1:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you