WEBVTT - The Thing Before the Beginning, Part 1

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Hey A you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick. And in today's episode of

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind, I wanted to talk about

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 3>creation myths, in particular an aspect of creation myths that

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 3>has always really interested me but which often felt kind

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 3>of overlooked, especially in my early religious education, and that

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>element is what people imagine the world was like before

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 3>the time of creation.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>M Yeah, this is a this is a tough one, right,

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, because on one level, it's hard enough for

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 2>us to imagine the world before we were born, much

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>less some state of existence before the advent of humanity

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>or the event everything that came before that. But it's

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's a it's an important, you know, core contemplation.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, what existed before the observable universe, And it's

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 2>such an enormous question. It's only only possible through human

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 2>reason and self awareness building, allowing us to build out mythological, philosophical,

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 2>and ultimately scientific models of phases of existence completely beyond

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>our time or beyond our observation, beyond our just you know,

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 2>basic fathomability, and in a literal sense. The interesting thing

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 2>is it does us absolutely no good as a species

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 2>to form an understanding, incorrect or even partially correct, of

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>of what such a period might have been like, or

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 2>to even call it a period. It may not even

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>be accurate, But to even contemplate such a thing it does.

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't really give us a survival advantage or anything,

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.279
<v Speaker 2>But it is, I guess, to a large extent, urged

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>onward by our deeply seated survival instinct to understand the

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 2>past in order to better navigate present in future threats.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely right, it pays to understand the past, But does

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>it pay to understand what came before the past? Are

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 3>there lessons to learn from that? But it is actually

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 3>a question worth examining when you're looking at religious or

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 3>mythological creation narratives, because one thing you will notice if

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 3>you start reading a bunch of these stories is that

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of them are actually not very well captured

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 3>by the English word creation, because, at least in English,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 3>at least today in English, the word creation, I think,

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 3>tends to make people imagine the manufacturing of new materials

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 3>or substances that did not previously exist.

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 2>So if you think.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 3>About the act of cosmic creation in that way, bringing

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>new substances into existence, bringing the world into existence out

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 3>of nothing, then it doesn't make a lot of sense

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>to talk about what the world was like before creation,

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>because there's nothing to talk about or to describe. But

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 3>the instantiation of new existence from nothing is actually not

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 3>what most creation narratives describe. In most cases, I would argue,

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 3>there is some kind of pre existing world or state

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>before creation, and the act of creation is not actually

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 3>what spits out the raw space and matter and energy

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 3>of the cosmos, but rather it is some kind of

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 3>sorting and ordering process which, whether by the intentional will

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 3>of a God or God's or by some kind of

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 3>happy accident, takes a static or maybe unorganized, or a

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 3>highly entropic or chaotic state of affairs, and imposes on

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 3>it some kind of order or struck sure which allows

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 3>stories to take place within that space. And I want

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 3>to illustrate this by looking at just one example, which

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 3>will probably be surprising to a lot of people who

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 3>grew up like I did reading the creation story in

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the Book of Genesis, at least in its classic translated

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 3>form in English. So as we've just been talking about this,

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I bet a lot of listeners were probably thinking, Okay, yeah,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 3>some stories may have this ordering quality rather than a

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 3>creating quality. Maybe you're thinking of these creation by combat

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 3>type stories. We'll talk about some of these in our

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 3>episode today, but you might be thinking, well, the biblical

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 3>creation account in Genesis, that's got to be one of

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 3>the exceptions. That is a story that actually does feature

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 3>the creation ex nihilo, where God by his will instantiates

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 3>the universe out of non existence. And that's what I

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 3>used to think, because if you read the very first

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 3>sentence of Genesis one in the classic King James translation,

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 3>it says, reading from the King James, in the beginning,

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 3>God created the heaven and the earth, and the earth

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 3>was without form and void, and darkness was upon the

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 3>face of the deep, and the Spirit of God moved

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 3>upon the face of the waters. Now, a couple of

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 3>things about that passage actually, well, one of the reasons

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested in talking about this subject today is my

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 3>memory from childhood of how overwhelmingly dark and mysterious this

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 3>passage sounded like, I guess, as with a lot of

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 3>things in the Bible, if you grow up reading it

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 3>or hearing about it. You can kind of just gloss

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 3>over it, like go past it pretty quick and not

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 3>really think about it. But if you stop and think

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 3>about this image, I think it is very frightening and

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 3>exciting and weird. So it is a world that did

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 3>not yet have light, because it doesn't. It says that

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 3>God didn't bring light into existence until the next verse.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>But it has some quality of formlessness and emptiness, but

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 3>it's not completely empty because there are waters. It says

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 3>there are deep waters in this dark world, and the

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 3>deep waters have a surface. And then it says the

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 3>spirit of God or sometimes otherwise translated as the wind

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 3>of God moved upon the face of the waters. Again,

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe you can just kind of go past you if

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 3>you don't think about it too hard. But when I

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 3>try to picture this world and like give it a

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 3>feeling of physical reality, it is literally hair raising to me,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 3>kind of like if I really force myself today to

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 3>think about the physical reality of a black hole or

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.799
<v Speaker 3>imagining myself on the surface of Titan or something.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, something like knowing that it's supposed to not

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 2>just be the surface of the ocean perhaps, but like

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 2>something that is like the surface of the water with

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 2>some sort of force moving across the top of it.

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>But there's nothing else yet. There's no fish. Yeah, no light,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Well there's no light. There's just kind of this, this

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of semblance of darkness and depth and.

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Presence, cosmically deep water wrapped enveloped in darkness, with a

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of ghostly wind of the breath of God moving

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 3>across the top of it. Now, as I understood this

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 3>passage when I was young, this description would have been

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 3>of a sort of half created world, a creation in progress.

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>It was like the first state of affairs. God created

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 3>before the imposition of light, and before the land and

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the day and the night, and plants and beasts and

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 3>human beings. And for a long time this was I

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 3>think the most common understanding among Christians, at least, I'm

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 3>not actually sure what is the most common understanding among

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Jewish readers, But the common view that I encountered growing

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 3>up as an American Protestant was that the Biblical creation

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 3>story was a manufacturing type creation. Because the very first

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 3>words are in the beginning God created.

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it makes it sound like this is not adapted

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 2>screenplay category. This is screenplay. This is not supposed to

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 2>be based on anything prior, right, But I know exactly

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>what you're you're getting at with all this, you know,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 2>growing up in the church as well, like when you

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 2>begin to hear readings of these early early passages, or

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.719
<v Speaker 2>more to the point, I think most of us, our

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 2>earliest experiences are not with direct Bible quotations necessarily, but

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 2>various like picture book Bible stories, you know, illustrations for children,

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 2>versions of the stories for children that very much simplify

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 2>things and certainly gloss over anything that might be confusing.

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>But then but then things do get confused, you know,

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 2>you start thinking about, okay, the darkness on the face

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 2>of the deep, what is the deep? Or certainly when

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 2>you get into the New Testament, I remember the first

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 2>time I've begin picking up in this whole. Okay, in

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the beginning, there was the Word, and the word was

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 2>with God, and the Word was God, and I think

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 2>that was often poorly explained, and it is also kind

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 2>of inherently confusing. So I would just be setting or thinking, Okay,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>you're telling me that before the creation of the universe,

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>there's just a Bible kicking around, Like what, It's more

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 2>complicated than that. But I do remember the initial confusion.

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I actually had to do a sidebar on this because

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 3>I know exactly what you're talking about. Though in the

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 3>beginning was the word in the Gospel of John. That's

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 3>a whole other can of worms. It is a very

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 3>common Protestant interpretation of that verse that the word refers

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to the Bible, because they say, like, you know, let's

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 3>now hear the word of God, and they mean reading

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>from the Bible. This is almost definitely not what the

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 3>author meant in that passage. The English word word is

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 3>a translation of the Greek logos, which has a host

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 3>of meanings including word, but also means like reason, logic, discourse,

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 3>maybe order. And there are literally whole books on what

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 3>the author of the Gospel of John meant by the

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 3>word logos there. So it's like a very fraught and

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 3>complex and highly entangled theological and philosophical concept. But at

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the risk of oversimplifying, it seems to have something to

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 3>do with the author's belief that Jesus is the embodiment

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 3>of a divine principle that existed before creation with God,

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 3>as a part of God or as an expression of

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:47.479
<v Speaker 3>God's power in a way that is actually manifested as words,

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 3>So in the way that God speaks things into existence

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 3>in the Genesis narrative by saying their names, like in

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 3>the in the very next verse after those first two verses,

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 3>I was just reading, God says, let there be light,

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 3>and then there is light, so he speaks the word,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 3>and then the reality comes into being. And I would

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 3>even relate this to other things outside of ancient Judaism,

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Like we've talked about the way that words have literal

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 3>power to transform reality in Egyptian magic. I mean, this

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 3>is a common way of thinking in the ancient world,

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 3>that there is some kind of magical or creation potential

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 3>in language itself, and that when the words are spoken

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 3>by God or by the gods, they have even this

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 3>greater power. So like God's word is in itself a

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 3>kind of infinite divine potential.

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean, and really, like the whole discussion

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>we're having here is possible because of words. I mean,

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 2>there's of course the simple version of that, but also

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 2>like language allows us to deal with increasingly loftier and

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 2>complex subjects and topics, that allows us to talk about

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 2>things like the time before the beginning of time.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, that nature yeah, but to be clear, yeah,

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 3>the word in the Gospel of John, don't think I

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's supposed to mean the Bible and it

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 3>doesn't just mean word. It's this like highly complex, multi

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 3>layered theological, philosophical load that is being delivered there.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 2>But when you're a kid, yeah, you think you could

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 2>just say here word and you're like, what does that

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>even mean? And then, like I said, I think half

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the time it's very poorly explained or the person that's

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 2>reading is like, don't worry about that, Yeah, just move

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 2>on to the next topic, that sort of thing.

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 3>But so, anyway, so we jumped off of that from

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 3>talking about how my understanding used to always be, and

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 3>the common understanding for a long time was that the

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Biblical creation narrative had this manufacturing quality in the beginning

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>God created. Now imagine my surprise years later when I

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 3>encountered a different English translation of the exact same passage

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 3>in the Bible. Again. This is Genesis chapter one, the

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 3>first couple of verses. This translation says in dead when

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 3>God began to create the heavens and the earth, the

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 3>earth was complete chaos and darkness covered the face of

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 3>the deep, while a wind from God swept over the

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 3>face of the waters. So this is from a more

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 3>modern translation. The first one I read was the King James,

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 3>which is hundreds of years old. This is from the

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 3>updated edition of the New Revised Standard Version or n RSV,

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 3>which uses modern scholarship to try to capture more faithfully

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the meaning of the original Hebrew. In this case does

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 3>the Hebrew and the Greek of the New Testament, but

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 3>still it has that haunting description of the darkness enveloping

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 3>the deep waters. It has the wind of God rushing

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 3>over the surface of the ocean. But the first few

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 3>words are very different. It is not in the beginning

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 3>God created, implying the raw manufacture. Instead, it says when

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 3>God began to create the heavens and the earth, the

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 3>earth was, suggesting that the darkness was wrapping the deep water,

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 3>and the rushing wind or the spirit of God was

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 3>above the face of the ocean, and this is what

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 3>things were already like when God began the creation. And

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 3>from what I can tell, most scholars agree that this

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 3>newer translation is closer to the plain meaning of the

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 3>passage in Hebrew. And I think that's so interesting because,

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 3>like so many people read this story and they think

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 3>this is how the world was made, and this is

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 3>a totally different understanding of the initial state of affairs.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, absolutely. The idea that there's something out like

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 2>some makes it sound like there's like some very limited

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 2>wasteland that already existed. Now, why is it a wasteland?

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Was there something before this? Is this just what was

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 2>left after the lizard men blew it? I don't know.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 2>The Bible doesn't get into that though.

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, actually that'll tie right into something about I want

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 3>to get into further about the translation of this passage.

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 3>So I was reading about this in a twenty twenty

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 3>two paper by University of Toronto professor Robert D. Holmstead

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 3>in the Journal for Semitics called the Syntax of Genesis

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 3>ie Verses one to three. And in this paper, the

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 3>scholar Homestead analyzes the linguistic features of the first three

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 3>verses of Genesis, and he says there are two plausible

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.359
<v Speaker 3>ways of translating this passage, or he calls it analyzing

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 3>this passage saying what it is supposed to mean most literally,

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 3>But he says in both of these analyzes, the description

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 3>of that dark world and the deep waters that we've

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>been talking about is a parenthetical describing what the world

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 3>was like before God began his work. Now, interestingly, in

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 3>this translation and in all of the updated translations that

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 3>I've read, God does seem to instantiate or manufacture some

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 3>of the raw materials of reality. So it's not like

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 3>God doesn't have the power to create things from nothing.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 3>For example, in verse three, the story says that God said,

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 3>let there be light, or in Holmsteat's translation, let light exist,

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 3>and then light begins to exist, so he speaks it,

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 3>and then it does come into existence. So I think

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 3>that is truly meant to be read as raw creation.

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 3>And of course light is a very important ingredient in

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 3>the universe. So I don't think this is this way

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 3>of reading the story has any less implication of God's

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>power to create. It's just telling a different kind of

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 3>order of affairs. But this dark world and the deep

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 3>water and the hovering wind of God over the surface

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 3>of the water that was all there before, And in

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 3>keeping with that, in Homestead's two possible analyzes of this passage,

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 3>the first sentence does not use the word created at all.

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Homesteadt cites another scholar named Walton who makes extensive arguments

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 3>that create is the wrong translation of the Hebrew verb

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 3>in question, and Holmstead himself instead uses the term ordered.

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 3>He says, so God ordered the heavens and the earth.

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 3>He also acknowledges a scholar named Ellen van Wolda who

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 3>argues that the best translation is separate. God separated the

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 3>heavens and the earth. Either way in the story, this

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 3>is not an act of making, but of organizing, bringing

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 3>structure and character to these deep cosmic fathoms that came before.

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 3>By the way, just since we're on the subject of

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 3>this paper, one more interesting argument that Homestead makes is

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 3>about the very first phrase of Genesis, one which is

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 3>usually translated in the beginning with a definite article referring

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 3>to the only beginning, the beginning of all time and space,

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 3>for various linguistic reasons. Holmsteat says, actually, there are two

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 3>possible translations which better capture the original meaning. One is

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 3>in a beginning rather than in the beginning. So in

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 3>a beginning, God ordered the heavens and the earth. You

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 3>can take this opening as similar to the phrase once

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 3>upon a time, denoting a point of beginning among many

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 3>worlds or possibilities and then the other possible reading he gives,

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 3>which has a pretty similar ultimate meaning, is in the

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 3>beginning in which God ordered the heavens in the earth.

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 3>This is once again setting the beginning of the story

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 3>as one among multiple possibilities. Kind of like if you

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 3>were to say, hey, tell the story that starts with

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Mary finding a kitten. Oh, okay, in the story where

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Mary finds a kitten. So it's kind of like that

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 3>in the story where God, where God orders the heavens

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 3>and the earth. But both of these phrasings really cause us,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 3>i think, to take differently the intended meaning of the

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 3>Creation's story being told not just as the beginning, but

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 3>as one of many possible or many actual beginnings of

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 3>the world in the teller's view. So Homestead says, quote,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 3>either way, the door is logically open to other beginnings

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 3>that were before this particular one. Bring us back to

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 3>what you're just say, after the lizard people blew it

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 3>up or whatever.

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the door is biblically open for lizard men

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and great old ones and whatever you want to put

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 2>in there in the prequel.

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, at least that's the case. Homestead makes that the

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 3>best way of the most faithful translation here would say

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 3>that the story is not saying this was the only

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 3>way that the world was ever created. There may have

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 3>been many other creations before, There may be other creations after.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 3>This was a beginning, one way God decided to do

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 3>it one time at least?

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, do creationists know about this yet, because it

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 2>seems like this would open up new possibilities.

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to just like slam on Young Earth

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 3>creationists here. I mean, obviously we know that the Earth

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 3>is not just six thousand years old, but I'm not

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 3>not trying to hate on people who believe that. But

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 3>I do think it's interesting how as far as I'm aware,

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 3>people who have the young Earth creationist viewpoint seem to

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 3>sometimes be really resistant to scholarship that offers readings of

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 3>the Bible that would alleviate some of their concerns. You know,

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 3>like this would actually reduce, like I think, a more

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 3>faithful reading of the creation narrative. It would actually give

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 3>you more room to say, oh, Okay, it's not so

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 3>much a problem that this conflicts with science, because maybe

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm not supposed to read this literally. Maybe that is

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 3>not actually what the author or what God even intended

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 3>but I think there's just a lot of resistance to that. Yeah, yeah,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 3>because I think I mean, if I can just psychologize

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, I think a lot of times, when

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 3>we get really rigid about representing a point of view

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 3>like Young Earth creationism according to your interpretation of the Bible,

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of times what we're really showing fidelity to

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 3>is our own past experience, Like we don't want to

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 3>budge from the way we have always felt about the narrative.

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 3>So if somebody offers you a revision of how the

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 3>narrative should be understood, you will resist that as well.

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like the same thing that you're resisting, but

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 2>from a different direction.

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but anyway, So that's what I wanted to talk

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 3>about in this series, is these visions of the world

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 3>from different types of creation accounts, visions of the world

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>before what is commonly understood as the act of creation

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 3>took place, and also maybe looking at what in these

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 3>stories had to change about the world in order for

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.479
<v Speaker 3>it to be seen as now ready for the beginning

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:10.239
<v Speaker 3>of history or for the beginning of the story. So

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 3>before we move on to talk about specific examples of

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 3>pre creation narratives, Rob I know you've got a really

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 3>interesting one I'm excited to look at today. But before

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 3>we get to that, I just wanted to mention a

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 3>few more things, like reasons I find this topic of

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 3>the world before creation really interesting. One thing I wanted

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 3>to harp on a little bit more is just the

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 3>aesthetics of it. Like I've already talked about how I

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>always found it haunting to think about that sketch from

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Genesis of the darkness upon the deep waters and the

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 3>wind of God rushing above. But there are other visions

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 3>of the world before Creation that are beautiful and strange

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 3>and frightening in similar ways. But sometimes they are illuminating

0:22:55.040 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 3>about ontologies, like visions of the world before creation can

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 3>inform us about what a culture and a people thought

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 3>it meant for things to exist. So one that I

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 3>find really striking is the description of the pre creation

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 3>world in the Babylonian Epic of Creation. This is sometimes

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 3>called the enuma a leash, which comes from the first

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 3>two words of the poem in the original language numa Aleish,

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 3>which means usually translated as something like when on high

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 3>or in the skies above or something.

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 3>My Oxford University Press edition of the Myths of Mesopotamia,

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 3>translated by Stephanie Dally, It goes like this here, when

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 3>skies above were not yet named, nor earth below pronounced

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 3>by name, Apsu the first one, their begetter and maker Tiamot,

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 3>who bore them, all had mixed their waters together, but

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 3>had not formed pastures nor discovered reed beds. When yet

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 3>no gods were manifest, nor name pronounced, nor destinies decreed.

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Then gods were born within them, Lamu and Lahamu emerged,

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 3>their names pronounced. So a lot of things are interesting

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 3>about this, and we may return to it in a

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 3>later part in the series. But one thing I really

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 3>like about the Dali translation in particular here is the

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 3>blurring of the distinction between the existence of things and

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 3>the naming of things. So, instead of just saying sky

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 3>and earth did not exist, as some translations I have found,

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 3>they translate it more like that. Here it says they

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 3>were not named, And in ancient Mesopotamian thinking, it seems

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 3>that there may actually be some conceptual overlap here. To

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 3>what extent do things exist if they are not named?

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Is existence a thing separate from observation and recognition? Maybe

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>if a thing is not actually named. It's just sort

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 3>of a chaotic potential, and it is not really itself

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 3>yet until it is recognized. So either way, before the

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 3>naming and possibly before the existence of earth and sky,

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, before we get the what the pastures or

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 3>the metalands, before the marshes or the reed beds, there

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 3>are these two substances or principles. They're both watery in nature,

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 3>and they're joined in this union. You've got Opsu, who

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 3>is the god embodying fresh water or just maybe is

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 3>fresh water or is the subterranean waters. And then you've

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 3>got Tiamot, the goddess embodying salt water or bitter water.

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 3>And this part of the story, the creation event, is

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 3>not a god exerting its will and imposing order like

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 3>we get in the biblical narrative, though there is something

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 3>like that later in this story. Instead, it is this

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 3>joining of chaotic potential, almost a biological telling of creation,

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 3>where you have the mingling of salt water and fresh

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 3>which results in a sort of divine pregnancy and the

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>birth of the gods, leading to many generations of gods

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 3>whose activities will define the later parts of the story.

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 3>But the interesting thing is that much later in the

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 3>story there is a second act of creation by divine

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:24.239
<v Speaker 3>imposition of order. So the second act of creation in

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 3>it is the classic creation by combat narrative. As we mentioned,

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 3>it's common to many mythologies. We'll probably talk about some

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 3>other examples of it in the series. But in the

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Babylonian Epic of Creation, the short version goes like this.

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Apsu becomes unhappy because the younger generations of gods are

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 3>making too much noise, way too noisy, really annoying, so

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 3>he plots to kill them. But the younger gods rebel

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 3>and they kill Apsu, and then, enraged at this offense, Tiamot,

0:26:55.920 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 3>his mate, makes monsters descend against the young gods as revenge,

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 3>and then the young gods, represented by Marduke, the hero

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 3>deity of the city of Babylon, slay their ancestor Tiamot,

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 3>and then they fashion the world, or mar Marduke does.

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 3>They fashion the world out of her dead body. And

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 3>so if you take this part of the story to

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 3>be the act of creation instead of the earlier like

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 3>mingling of Tiamat and Apsu and the birth of the

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 3>younger gods, the world before is the body of the

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 3>chaotic deep salt waters, the body of Tiamot, so her

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 3>body parts after her defeat are chopped up by Marduke

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 3>and made into the land and the sky and you

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 3>get the mountains and the vault of Heaven and everything

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 3>like that. So it is a repurposing of the body

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 3>of a god, a repurposing of material into the created,

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 3>ordered world in which history can take place.

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you're right, we're going to see I think,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 2>multiple examples of this as well as these other factors.

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes you'll see you'll see the different different variations

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 2>within a single creation story. And as I think, as

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 2>what we'll also be discussing, sometimes talking about a single

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:14.479
<v Speaker 2>creation story itself is kind of a misleading idea because

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 2>any given you know, ancient culture is going to probably

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 2>have multiple different traditions, traditions that are forgotten at times

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 2>that are then folded up into other traditions, imported traditions,

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and then eventually they're written down and they may take

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 2>on a different flavor then, So a lot of different

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 2>chefs coming in and out of the kitchen.

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, you know, one rabbit hole I went down that

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I didn't end up creating any kind of notes about

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 3>for today because it was but just an interesting rabbit

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 3>hole I went down while doing research for this episode

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 3>was about methodological problems in establishing narratives of mythology, because

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, what some scholars today have started pointing out

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 3>is that you might, like, look at a story like

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 3>the Numa aliation, say, this is the creation narrative of

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, some people in ancient Mesopotamia, of ancient Babylonians

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 3>or whatever, and you might, well, that might well be

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 3>true to in some sense. But you can also look

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 3>at a lot of these narratives that have come down

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 3>to us as artifacts of the particular time and situation

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 3>in which the text form was created. So you know,

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 3>most of these narratives probably do have some kind of

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 3>oral basis. You know, they're coming from some well of

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 3>oral tradition. Maybe not all of them, and maybe some

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 3>are original compositions by the original text creator, but most

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 3>of them probably have some oral tradition behind them, and

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 3>then at some point in history somebody sets it down

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 3>in a text form, which then of course has its

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 3>own history after that because of you know, copying and versions.

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, so texts change as well, but often the

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 3>version that becomes the first text we know in some

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 3>cases is a kind of combination of pre existing mythologies

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 3>with the textualizer's own personal additions and structure imposition of

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 3>structure and things. So it's just easy to start thinking

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 3>of a lot of things as the mythology that emerges

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 3>from the people and the you know, common folk belief.

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:27.719
<v Speaker 3>But a lot of things we may think of that

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 3>way actually are coming from the act of turning a

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 3>tradition into the text. Sorry if that was convoluted, but

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I was just trying to recreate that from memory. Yeah, anyway,

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 3>one more tangent I wanted to do before we get

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 3>to your great example to talk about today, Rob. In

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 3>this series, we're not planning on doing a like a

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 3>running comparison between mythological accounts of creation and our best

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 3>scientific theories of how the universe began. I don't think

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 3>that's a very useful exercise because obviously, like the people

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 3>who told these stories did not have access to technology

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 3>or the theoretical grounding to the kinds of things that

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 3>we have to understand the universe today, So it doesn't

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 3>make sense to judge their stories on the basis of

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 3>questions like did they get the facts right.

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, because sometimes they sort of do, and it's nice

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 2>when it happens. It's kind of it's noteworthy, and we'll

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 2>probably bring that up a few times. But it also Yeah,

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 2>it's not like that means the creation myth is bad

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 2>or incorrect because it doesn't line up with the current

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 2>most popular astronomical model or something.

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah it doesn't. I mean, it's neither for nor

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 3>against whether it lines up or not. Yeah, I think

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 3>we're just we're trying to understand these stories on their

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 3>own terms and think about what they reveal about us

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 3>and about the people who told them. But I thought

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 3>it would be worthwhile, just for a bit of grounding

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 3>to make clear that in physics based cosmology, we currently

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 3>do not have a solid way of knowing what, if anything,

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 3>existed before or outside of our local universe. So our

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 3>best model of the history of our universe is an

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 3>updated version of what usually gets called the Big Bang,

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 3>And in short, the theory goes like this, About thirteen

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 3>point eight billion years ago, the observable universe existed in

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 3>an incredibly hot, dense state, and then this region of

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 3>space and the energy within it began to expand rapidly

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 3>and cool energy took the form of particles, including matter.

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Matter aggregated to itself through gravitational attraction, and it formed

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 3>things like stars and planets, and the universe has been

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 3>expanding and cooling ever since. We know this from multiple

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 3>lines of evidence that the Big Bang theory is not

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 3>just guesswork. There are a lot of different lines of evidence,

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 3>all converging, all pointing toward it, and some of the

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 3>main pieces of evidence include the observations of the cosmic

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 3>microwave background. This is the energy glide left over after

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 3>the universe first cooled enough to become transparent to light,

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 3>and we can actually see this glow directly with our

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 3>telescopes in every direction. Another major piece of evidence is

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 3>the red shift of distant galaxies. So because the light

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 3>from distant galaxies is red shifted, we know that those

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 3>galaxies are moving away from us. Not moving away from

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 3>us in the sense of flying further away from us,

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 3>but moving in the sense that the space between us

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 3>is expanding, and this is evidence of the past and

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 3>continued expansion of space in the universe. And then another

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 3>major piece of evidence often sited is the relative abundance

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 3>of elements like hydrogen and helium. Basically, you find these

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 3>elements in almost exactly the quantities that are mathematically predicted

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 3>by the nucleosynthesis model of the Big Bang. So a

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of different evidence all backing up the Big Bang

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 3>theory as the basic history of the universe of its expansion,

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 3>and the Big Bang theory has been updated since its

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 3>earliest inception. It's not exactly the same as it was

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 3>when people first thought it up. For example, most physicists

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 3>now accept a modification called inflation or cosmic inflation, where

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 3>this is complicated, but basically, in the earliest fraction of

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 3>a second of our universe, space expanded and cooled exponentially

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 3>much more rapidly, and then this led into a phase

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 3>called reheating, which created the hot, dense early state of

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 3>the universe consistent with the Big Bang. And then the

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 3>expansion after this settled into a still dynamic but overall

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 3>slower rate thereafter. But even with these modifications like inflation,

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the Big Bang theory is only a model of the

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 3>history of our observable universe, and it does not answer

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 3>what if anything, came before the beginning of the expansion

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 3>thirty point eight billion years ago. I mean, you can

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 3>talk about inflation, but still that's just tracing it back

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.359
<v Speaker 3>to a point about thirteen point eight billion years ago

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 3>when this expansion began. Physicists do try to come up

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 3>with models that could pre date or lead to this

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 3>initial state of the Big Bang. For example, some have

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 3>proposed a cyclical universe, like a universe that continually expands

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 3>and then contracts on itself over and over, or have

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 3>proposed methods through which new bubble universes could be created

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 3>out of old universes. But we don't have direct evidence

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 3>for these worlds before. The best you can do right

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 3>now is try to create a mathematically consistent model that

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 3>is consistent with the things we observe, but you're not

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 3>going to have direct evidence for it. So currently science

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.280
<v Speaker 3>doesn't really give us a picture of the world before.

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 3>If there even was or is such a thing, it is,

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 3>at least for now, beyond our reach. So we don't

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 3>have scientific acts to the world before.

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to say the least, things get very complicated when

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 2>you start thinking about about time and in all of

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 2>this and how time seems to work, and so sometimes

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:17.280
<v Speaker 2>questions of before don't really make a lot of sense. Yeah. Yeah,

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 2>And then likewise, like to your point, if if there

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 2>was a before and that before was in like essentially

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 2>before like everything got scrapped and crunched down, like, then

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 2>all the evidence is lost, like as far as we

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 2>can understand it, so you know, the evidence is destroyed. Likewise,

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 2>if the evidence exists outside of this universe, in other

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 2>universes or pocket universes, also beyond our grasp and understanding.

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, though I do want to say, looking beyond the

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 3>boundaries of our observable universe in time or space is

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 3>not you know, I don't think that is like fringe behavior.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it's a perfectly reasonable thing to

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 3>try to create models for and see like what would

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 3>actually be plausible. But we don't currently know of any

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 3>way those models could be. You know, we can't look

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 3>directly for evidence of those things, at least as far

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 3>as we know.

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Right right, And we don't want to open those portals

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 2>through which the lizardmen and they're great old when gods

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 2>could just swarm back into our reality.

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I just want to say, we have no reason to

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 3>assume that the lizard men have hostile intentions that should

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.800
<v Speaker 3>be perfectly benevolent lizards from another dimension.

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or it could just be transactional. They're just like

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 2>we want your peanut butter, and we are willing to

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 2>trade for it, and we'll just hear them out. Who

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 2>knows what they have. We might like it more than

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.879
<v Speaker 2>we like peanut but are hard to imagine, but maybe

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 2>they've had they have something, Rob.

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 3>I think you wanted to talk about a really interesting

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 3>example from Chinese mythology.

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's right. I want to talk a little bit

0:37:55.320 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 2>about Panghu or pangou Shie. This is a creator her

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 2>entity in Chinese mythology, but it's a little more complicated

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 2>than that, and I think you'll find, like I was

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of teasing out earlier, this is the tradition surrounding

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 2>this entity kind of get into a number of different

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 2>creation story types. And I'm going to be drawing on

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 2>a couple of different texts that I've referred to in

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the past when we've talked about Chinese mythology. So is

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Anne Beryl points out in her book Chinese Mythology and

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Introduction there were various Chinese cosmological myths and they fit

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 2>a general pattern, and that is that the universe is

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 2>not created out of nothing, but out of some form

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 2>of pre existing matter, and she writes that this generally

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 2>takes the form of some sort of primeval vapor that

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 2>must somehow be differentiated into the two fundamental opposing forces

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:57.839
<v Speaker 2>of yin and yang to become reality as we know it.

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 2>She also notes that the myths and their early view

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 2>of the cosmos they have some similarities with say, ancient

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Egyptian thought, but they are distinct from Judeo Christian models

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 2>in that there is no divine will involved in the creation,

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 2>so on the whole there's no like pure creator or

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 2>creatrix character. Though that's not to say there are no

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 2>divine acts of creation in Chinese mythology, but because there are,

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 2>especially when you get into acts of say, you know,

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 2>the creation of humans and so forth. But as far

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 2>as the world or the universe, for the most part,

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 2>it seems to emerge without divine intent.

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Right, So what you're describing is something we have seen

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 3>already in stuff we've talked about today, and we'll see

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 3>in other examples of a kind of mixed or undifferentiated

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.959
<v Speaker 3>entropic state of matter, in this case not We've talked

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 3>already about waters being mixed and just all swirling together

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 3>and having having not been separated yet. But here is

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 3>a mixed form of vapor or some kind of cloud,

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and that somehow the separation of it into these two

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 3>distinct and opposite qualities of yin and yang. That is

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 3>the initial act of creation, even though there's nobody to

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 3>do it. It's not like a god says, now these

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 3>two will be separate.

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Right right. And it's also worth noting that, like you know,

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 2>all these different when we're talking about the creation of

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the universe, that means something completely different to us when

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 2>we think about it, because we have a like a

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 2>NASA informed science education informed and probably like Star Trek

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 2>and Star Wars informed idea of what that means or

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 2>doctor who informed and so forth, you know, so we,

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 2>like you instantly turn to thinking about multiple planets and

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:54.319
<v Speaker 2>possible other universes and multiverse and so forth. But like

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 2>for the Chinese, the ancient Chinese, for example, like they

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 2>were dealing with a single world and there was not

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the there was no idea of there being additional worlds.

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 2>This is like a big I've seen it described as

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 2>like a big square world, and that was generally what

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:12.240
<v Speaker 2>was thought of as being existence. That was the world,

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that was the universe and these other concepts didn't quite exist.

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:20.240
<v Speaker 2>So coming back to Pangu here, the name literally means

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 2>something like the ancient coiled one, or, according according to

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Anne Burrel, coiled antiquity, coiled interesting. And he is coiled

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:34.760
<v Speaker 2>because he is coiled within another another thing that pops

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 2>up in a number of different creation stories, and that

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 2>is the cosmic egg. Hmm, okay, So I'll come back

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 2>to the cosmic egg in just a second, but I

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 2>want to turn to another source that I used, and

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 2>that's the Handbook of Chinese Mythology by yang An and Turner,

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and they point out that one thing to keep in

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 2>mind about Pangu here is that actual Chinese literary mentions

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 2>of Pangu only seem to go back as far as

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 2>the Three Kingdoms era, so that's two twenty through two

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 2>eighty CE, and there's a certain amount of back and

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 2>forth about whether it's completely of Han Chinese origin or

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 2>if it was imported from another another ethnic group or

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 2>another area. Anyway you slice it, though, it has a

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 2>great deal of sticking power, and again wasn't written down

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 2>until the third century CE, but certainly is based on

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 2>ideas that existed for a long time before that. So

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about before we get back to the egg,

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about coiled Antiquity himself, Pangu. What does he

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 2>look like? Well, descriptions vary. Sometimes those descriptions take on

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 2>a kind of Chinese dragon or animal hybrid sort of vibe.

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:52.280
<v Speaker 2>But when it comes to visual depictions, he's almost always

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 2>shown as a great, shaggy horned humanoid giant. So some

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of a big shaggy giant with its generally like

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 2>a couple of bumps, a little couple of horns on

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 2>top of his head, not.

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Like big horns, like rams horns, but little buds almost.

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, almost like two cartoon bumps from being hit on

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the head with a cartoon sledgehammer, that sort of thing. Yeah, Now,

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I know you and I have seen these horns before,

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 2>and longtime listeners, I've heard us mention these as well.

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Because this might bring to mine Old Shinong, the divine

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 2>farmer and culture hero who, among other things, tried out

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 2>all the plants to determine what was medicine, what was poison,

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and what was food and sampled. I believe the story

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 2>says seventy poisons a day in this quest to understand.

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Wow, that's got to be a record, yeah, but a

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 3>very important job.

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah, so you know, very much a culture

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 2>hero culture bringer type character like here is a mythological

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 2>entity that solved problems for us or passed on some

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of knowledge or gave knowledge to us that it

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 2>was in the stronghold of the gods, that sort of thing.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 3>But Chinong is also depict with horns. It has some

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of bovine quality.

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that seems to be the key. He's he's

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 2>tied to the ox and or the water buffalo, and

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 2>it's this has to do with his association with that animal,

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's why he has oftentimes depicted as having horns.

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Now coming back to Pongu here. According to Yang'n and Turner,

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 2>this use of horns, or this appearance of horns may

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 2>be connected to Chinese myths that humans all used to

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 2>have a horn or horns, which they used in hunting,

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and they would weaken or loosen as humans approach death.

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 2>As this happened, however, workers would realize, Hey, I'm starting

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:47.839
<v Speaker 2>to die. My horns or my horn or horns are

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 2>getting loose. I'm just going to go over here and

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 2>not work anymore, and just wait for death. And the

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 2>God of Heaven wasn't crazy about this development and was like, Okay,

0:44:56.560 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 2>we're canceling horns. It's making it's making the humans give

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 2>up hope and or not work all that hard. So

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:03.919
<v Speaker 2>horns are confiscated.

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 3>No more horns because people were slacking on Fridays.

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, wow. Now, incidentally, to bring things back to

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:16.799
<v Speaker 2>Judeo Christian traditions, or certainly, I guess more appropriately to

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 2>bring it back to early Christian and onward traditions, and

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:25.760
<v Speaker 2>in the Middle Ages you have depictions of Moses with horns,

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 2>similar horns, and this actually does show up in some

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Chinese depictions of Moses. There at least used to be

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.839
<v Speaker 2>an example of this at the met in New York.

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I didn't notice the last time I was there, but

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 2>it may not have been in that section long enough.

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 2>But this generally is attributed to This idea that Moses

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 2>had horns is generally attributed to a mistranslation of a

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Hebrew term in Jerome's Latin Vulgate Bible and then reflected

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 2>in European works of visual art up to the age

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 2>of Michaelangelo. So you know, it would seem to be

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 2>more of a connection to European traditions as far as

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Moses goes, has nothing to do with the idea that

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 2>humans used to have horns or anything like that. But

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I did run across. I was looking into this a

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit more to see there's something I didn't know

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 2>about or had missed, and I ran across a paper

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 2>in the Eurasian Journal of Anthropology from twenty twenty four

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.800
<v Speaker 2>talking about the idea of Moses having horns and certainly

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 2>acknowledging that it's connected to this mistranslation issue. But it

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:35.439
<v Speaker 2>was by an individual by Frank fan or Frank Fahn,

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure which it is, but he presents a

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 2>possible connection in these depictions to actual cranial deformities due

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 2>to thallacimia, an inherited blood disorder, and the idea here

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 2>is that it's tied to the idea that this illness

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 2>basically creates certain protection against malaria infection, and therefore there

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 2>would be like a survival advantage in having it, so

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:10.760
<v Speaker 2>you might have used used to have had more people

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 2>with horns, or at least things that looked like horns

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 2>that were just cranial deformations. Hopefully, I'm not misrepresenting any

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 2>of this, this scholarship, but it's an interesting idea. I'm

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 2>not sure how much I'm willing to bet on it,

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:28.840
<v Speaker 2>but I always love a paper that kind of says, Okay,

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 2>this is this is clearly what the case is. But

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 2>what if it were this? And so here's an here's

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 2>an alternate route, an alternate road that you know, we

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 2>can all agree might not be as a reasonable hypothesis,

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 2>but certainly we can stack up some some arguments why

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 2>it could potentially be the case.

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Right does not. This hypothesis does not satisfy Oakham's razor,

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:54.399
<v Speaker 3>but is interesting at least.

0:47:54.640 --> 0:48:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so at any rate, Pungu has horns, and

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 2>again he's the ancient coiled one, and he's coiled within

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the primordial or cosmic egg, which itself has coalesced out

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 2>of the formless vapor. So nobody made the egg, nothing

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 2>laid the egg. The egg has just formed out of

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the vapor that pre existed everything. And again this is

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:24.320
<v Speaker 2>a common motif for cosmic egg. But Pongu is inside

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the cosmic egg, coiled within the egg of chaos. And

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.320
<v Speaker 2>while he is in there, the complimentary opposing forces of

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:34.919
<v Speaker 2>yin and yang are separating within the egg until one day,

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 2>after eighteen thousand years, according to this story, for uncertain

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:44.399
<v Speaker 2>reasons or no reason at all, the egg hatches. Now, Joe,

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:47.360
<v Speaker 2>have you ever separated an egg for a recipe? I

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:52.720
<v Speaker 2>assume you have. Let's talk about this because this becomes

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the primary metaphor for understanding the form and function of

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the universe in this story. Do you have a preferred

0:48:58.080 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 2>method for separating an egg.

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what the term for this is, but

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 3>I just fingers. You dump it into your fingers, and

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 3>you kind of hold them slightly apart from each other

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:11.839
<v Speaker 3>and allow the white to slip through, but you don't

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 3>let the yolk go through, and you kind of flex

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 3>them and press them together until you have sort of

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 3>cut the white off from the yolk. That that's what

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 3>I usually do if I need to separate them. And

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the problem I have more often is not with separating

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:28.720
<v Speaker 3>eggs and yolks. I don't do that all that often.

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:31.479
<v Speaker 3>It's when I'm trying to make eggs and I crack

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 3>the egg and break the yolk on the shell. I

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 3>hate that.

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's always that happens to me when I'm like

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:41.800
<v Speaker 2>frying eggs for the family, and it always irks me

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:44.320
<v Speaker 2>because I know that certain members of the family really

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:47.759
<v Speaker 2>like like a jammy egg, and once you've done that,

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 2>it's like the egg's not gonna You're not gonna get

0:49:49.680 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 2>a jammy egg out of that.

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, for me, it's just always like, Okay, I'm making

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 3>poached eggs or I'm making fried eggs, and you know,

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 3>I break a couple of yolks while I'm getting them out,

0:49:58.640 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 3>so I'm like, well, I guess I got to make

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:01.760
<v Speaker 3>scre eggs too. I'll do that when I'm done.

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:06.920
<v Speaker 2>We used to have these little earth or maybe a

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 2>couple of these. We have these earthenware egg separators with

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:13.400
<v Speaker 2>like a little face and a mouth where you would

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:15.799
<v Speaker 2>supposedly put the egg in there and be able to

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 2>pour it and then just the white would come out

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and the yolk, I mean just the center of the

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 2>egg would stay in and the rest would come out.

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:26.759
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen that, but my memory of that was

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:29.360
<v Speaker 2>more of a neat idea as opposed to a practical

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:32.320
<v Speaker 2>way of carrying it out. And then there's another version

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 2>where stuff comes out of the nose. I don't know.

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I haven't used that one. But yeah, most of the

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 2>time for me, it's like getting in there with a

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 2>spoon and then my fingers.

0:50:39.960 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 3>One quick kitchen trick, I do know. If you are trying,

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 3>if you're trying to make poached eggs and you want

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:48.920
<v Speaker 3>less of that wispy white that goes all through the water,

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 3>you just quickly put the egg in like a mesh

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:55.240
<v Speaker 3>strainer before you poach it, and you kind of whisk

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:56.840
<v Speaker 3>it around it or not whisk it, but you just

0:50:56.920 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 3>swish it around a little bit in the mesh strainer.

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 3>And what happened is the tight part of the white

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:04.319
<v Speaker 3>will stick to the yoak, but the very watery part

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 3>of the white will go out through the bottom of

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:08.359
<v Speaker 3>the strainer, and then when you put that in the water,

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:11.320
<v Speaker 3>usually it holds together in a pretty tight, nice little ball.

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, Okay, Well, Luckily for Pangu, he doesn't have to

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:18.759
<v Speaker 2>mess with most of that. So the egg hatches, he's

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 2>within the egg and like essentially the stuff of the

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 2>universe is all around him. But luckily gravity is coming

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 2>into play, so murkier, heavier yen is sinking down while

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that airy, lighter yang is rising up. So the yen

0:51:38.640 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of falls down and becomes Earth, and Yang rises

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 2>up and becomes sky. Okay, and then here's Pogu in

0:51:45.680 --> 0:51:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the middle of this. And by being in the middle

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 2>of this, he's he's in an interesting position because he's

0:51:52.120 --> 0:51:54.399
<v Speaker 2>kind of part of both. He's not you know, there's

0:51:54.600 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 2>there's En and Yang with him within him. He's he's

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 2>human in his own way as well. He's not really

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:03.359
<v Speaker 2>a human, but he's kind of like he's a humanoid being.

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:08.919
<v Speaker 2>And in some versions of the tale, he like finalizes

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the separation of Earth and Sky with an axe or

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 2>some other tool. What does well, that's that's a difficult question.

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I want to come back to that. In other versions,

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:26.719
<v Speaker 2>to put his role is really to prevent the two

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:30.719
<v Speaker 2>from merging together again. So you know, he may not

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 2>have had a role in actually separating the two again.

0:52:33.840 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes he does, but then he has this additional role

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 2>of like keeping them from coming back together, and so

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:42.840
<v Speaker 2>he ends up taking on the you know, almost like

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:46.759
<v Speaker 2>an Atlas roll, holding them, not holding the sky up,

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 2>but holding the Sky and Earth apart from each other

0:52:49.640 --> 0:52:54.200
<v Speaker 2>to prevent reconciliation into the universe's prior state. So it's

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:56.400
<v Speaker 2>not just that the sky might come down, it's just

0:52:56.800 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Earth and sky, Yin and Yang might come back together,

0:52:59.120 --> 0:53:01.600
<v Speaker 2>become one, and then that's that's you know, it's kind

0:53:01.640 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 2>of like the end of the universe. You know.

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh, but that's kind of almost again, I'm not I'm

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 3>not saying this was like pressions about physics, but just

0:53:09.800 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 3>by happy coincidence, this is uh, prefiguring the idea that

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 3>gravity is actually not just attraction toward the ground or

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 3>towards the center of the Earth, but the mutual attraction

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:20.399
<v Speaker 3>of all things to each other.

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think one of the things to keep in

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:25.839
<v Speaker 2>mind in all of this, especially in discussing cases where

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:28.719
<v Speaker 2>there's something about it that feels like it lines up

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 2>with our scientific understanding of the universe, is that all

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 2>these these ancient people, you know, they a they thought

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 2>long and hard about all of this in one way

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 2>or another, you know, creativity and creatively or you know,

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:43.920
<v Speaker 2>or philosophically. And then also they lived in this universe.

0:53:43.960 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 2>So they lived in a universe where emergence occurs, where

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:51.280
<v Speaker 2>gravity exists. Uh, you know, they they see complex systems

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 2>all around them, They see how these things work. They

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 2>see they see order coming out of chaos and chaos,

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, coming out of order in the world around them,

0:54:01.160 --> 0:54:03.799
<v Speaker 2>and so they have all of this evidence in their

0:54:03.800 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 2>perceptions of reality that are a part of the larger universe,

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and therefore it factors into their models of the larger universe.

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:13.280
<v Speaker 2>And that makes you know, complete sense.

0:54:13.880 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 3>That's certainly true. As we often emphasize on the show,

0:54:16.640 --> 0:54:19.839
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the biggest mistakes people make when

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:22.319
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the ancient past is for some reason, just

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 3>assuming that the people long ago were dumb or you know,

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 3>that they couldn't figure things out. Obviously, we know a

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:31.359
<v Speaker 3>lot of things that they didn't know a back then.

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:33.279
<v Speaker 3>We have a lot of tools they didn't have back then.

0:54:33.800 --> 0:54:36.800
<v Speaker 3>But based on the things they had, you know, people

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 3>have always been smart. People have always been able to

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:42.360
<v Speaker 3>figure things out. I mean, I'm kind of doubtful that

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 3>people in the ancient world actually figured out the like

0:54:46.880 --> 0:54:49.799
<v Speaker 3>the nature of gravity as the mutual attraction of all

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:52.239
<v Speaker 3>mass to mass, but I guess you can't rule it out.

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:58.120
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, that's interesting. Certainly, Certainly people have always been

0:54:58.160 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 3>smart and have always been able to figure things out.

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And now coming back to Pangu and another way

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:06.960
<v Speaker 2>that he sort of ties into who you can compare

0:55:07.040 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 2>him to Atlas Tales is of course, Atlas is all

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:13.799
<v Speaker 2>about trying to get somebody else to take on this

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 2>task for him. Can someone else hold up the sky

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:19.319
<v Speaker 2>wanting you know, run a quick errand that sort of thing.

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, Yeah, Hercules, I got something to do, or let

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:24.120
<v Speaker 3>me help you out. You just sold this for a second.

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah. And so we see a bit of that

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 2>in some of the tellings of pangu in which he

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:31.960
<v Speaker 2>molds an ox out of his own saliva and some

0:55:32.080 --> 0:55:35.200
<v Speaker 2>clay to help the separation to sort of do the

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 2>work for him. And then in some of these stories

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:40.719
<v Speaker 2>as well, he has to make a clay rooster as

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:43.480
<v Speaker 2>well to help keep the ox alert at all times,

0:55:44.160 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 2>and with the ox going asleep and then waking up,

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 2>this ends up being a way of explaining earthquakes.

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh interesting. Yeah.

0:55:53.120 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Now there's another variation on the story that gets very

0:55:57.160 --> 0:56:00.320
<v Speaker 2>much into this idea of some sort of primordial being's

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:05.080
<v Speaker 2>body dying and then becoming the world, because it's often

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:08.520
<v Speaker 2>said that Pangoo does not live eternally, but dies and

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:11.359
<v Speaker 2>part of his parts of his gigantic body become key

0:56:11.440 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 2>parts of the universe or the observable reality. So according

0:56:16.680 --> 0:56:19.640
<v Speaker 2>to different versions of the story. One eye becomes the sun,

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:23.239
<v Speaker 2>the other becomes the moon. His voice becomes thunder, His

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 2>limbs and trunk become the forests become the four extremes

0:56:26.480 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 2>of the earth and the five mountains. His blood becomes

0:56:29.640 --> 0:56:32.880
<v Speaker 2>the rivers, his flesh becomes the fields and the soil.

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 2>His teeth and bones become rocks, His semen and marrow

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:40.799
<v Speaker 2>become pearls and jade. His sweat becomes rain and dew,

0:56:41.400 --> 0:56:43.759
<v Speaker 2>and the insects that lived on his body become the

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 2>first humans. Though to be clear, this is not the

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:52.440
<v Speaker 2>only human creation myth in Chinese mythology. Wow, And another

0:56:52.480 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 2>interesting thing here is Okay, you can say, okay, well

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Pango is dead then, but it's not. I don't know.

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:01.319
<v Speaker 2>It seems like that might be the wrong way to

0:57:01.400 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 2>describe it. Again, there are different versions of the stories

0:57:04.640 --> 0:57:07.799
<v Speaker 2>concerning him. But also he is apparently still worshiped as

0:57:07.800 --> 0:57:11.560
<v Speaker 2>a god in certain parts of China, and so if

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:13.760
<v Speaker 2>he is dead, it's not, you know, in a mortal

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 2>sense of the word, and certainly not in every tradition.

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:21.960
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I think the story of Pungo is fascinating

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:24.520
<v Speaker 2>because you can easily detect the different sorts of creation

0:57:24.720 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 2>stories that are bound up in this figure. He's depicted

0:57:27.600 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 2>as a primordial being, as a world tree or pillar,

0:57:31.480 --> 0:57:33.959
<v Speaker 2>a decaying giant who becomes the earth, and more.

0:57:34.320 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 3>That is really interesting. I was not familiar with this

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 3>story before, and I like this a lot. Can I

0:57:40.160 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 3>actually come back to two different things you've mentioned while

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:45.720
<v Speaker 3>talking about this and something that connects them. So I

0:57:45.760 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 3>want to come back to the acts, where you know

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:51.640
<v Speaker 3>the question of where did Pangu's acts come from? That

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:54.600
<v Speaker 3>he uses to do the separation at least in some

0:57:54.680 --> 0:57:58.800
<v Speaker 3>tellings of the Earth and Sky. This is something I

0:57:58.840 --> 0:58:01.640
<v Speaker 3>was thinking about talking about the beginning of the episode.

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:04.800
<v Speaker 3>I didn't have time to develop it though, but it

0:58:04.800 --> 0:58:09.320
<v Speaker 3>it's a quality that I really enjoy about some creation

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 3>narratives that I was thinking about calling the Cain's wife factor.

0:58:14.840 --> 0:58:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Do you remember the story of Cain and Abel in

0:58:16.960 --> 0:58:20.840
<v Speaker 3>the Book of Genesis also so yes. The short summary

0:58:20.960 --> 0:58:23.560
<v Speaker 3>is that Cain and Abel are the first children of

0:58:23.560 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Adam and Eve after Adam and Eve are expelled from

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the garden, and the way the story is always understood

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:31.440
<v Speaker 3>is that at this point these are the only people

0:58:31.440 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 3>on Earth. You know, at Adam and Eve are the

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 3>first humans. They were expelled from the garden of Eden.

0:58:36.560 --> 0:58:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:58:36.800 --> 0:58:39.120
<v Speaker 3>They start to have children. They have Cain and Abel,

0:58:39.480 --> 0:58:43.640
<v Speaker 3>and then Cain kills his brother Abel uh. And then

0:58:43.960 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Cain is banished for this. He is sent away, so

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:48.560
<v Speaker 3>it says he, you know, he goes out of the land,

0:58:49.000 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 3>and then we're told he wanders somewhere else, and then

0:58:51.360 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 3>he meets a woman and gets married. Now, of course,

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 3>the obvious question is where did Cain's wife come from?

0:58:57.840 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Who is she supposed to be? She just kind of

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:02.280
<v Speaker 3>appears out of nowhere. I thought these were the only people.

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Where's she from? There have been over the years, I

0:59:06.760 --> 0:59:10.040
<v Speaker 3>don't know, kind of anti Christian activists or people who

0:59:10.080 --> 0:59:14.000
<v Speaker 3>are very critical of the Bible who use this as

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 3>an example of like, look how stupid this story is,

0:59:17.280 --> 0:59:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Like look how stupid it is that they forgot that

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 3>these were the only characters and here's another character coming

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:27.000
<v Speaker 3>out of nowhere. I don't view it that way. I

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 3>when I look at this, it instead seems to me

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:34.600
<v Speaker 3>to be evidence that this story is not intended to

0:59:34.640 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 3>be taken as a literal history of events and as

0:59:39.440 --> 0:59:44.040
<v Speaker 3>a totalizing narrative of reality. It just signals to me

0:59:44.280 --> 0:59:49.000
<v Speaker 3>that it is being told with a sense of lightness

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and understood creativity, that in the more in the original context,

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 3>that the teller of the story and the audience would

0:59:58.000 --> 1:00:01.680
<v Speaker 3>understand that the story is being told with a sense

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:05.400
<v Speaker 3>of freedom and creativity, and that there's a playfulness here.

1:00:05.440 --> 1:00:07.760
<v Speaker 3>And so it is not meant to be taken as

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 3>a literal historical recounting of the only people that ever

1:00:11.880 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 3>existed in the past and all that kind of thing.

1:00:14.560 --> 1:00:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there may have been some sense that this

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:22.640
<v Speaker 3>is conveying some truth, maybe in a more metaphorical sense,

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 3>about where people came from, But I don't know. I'm

1:00:25.680 --> 1:00:28.520
<v Speaker 3>connecting it more to the idea that we were also

1:00:28.600 --> 1:00:31.440
<v Speaker 3>talking about a few minutes ago about how I think

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>people in the past were smart and like they they

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:39.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe not were always as literal minded as we tend

1:00:39.760 --> 1:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>to assume.

1:00:40.320 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>They were, right, Yeah, or or certainly even as pedantic

1:00:44.040 --> 1:00:47.040
<v Speaker 2>as we can be concerning some of these stories. Yeah.

1:00:47.040 --> 1:00:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Where you know, if you if you seriously asked the

1:00:49.200 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>question like, well, where did the acts come from, it's like, well,

1:00:52.520 --> 1:00:55.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's just it's just part of the story exactly. Yeah,

1:00:55.920 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>And so many of these creation stories, they do end

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>up basing at least some part of it in human

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>tool used, human crafting, because that's how we end up

1:01:06.640 --> 1:01:10.040
<v Speaker 2>understanding and shaping our understanding of creation, because we have

1:01:10.080 --> 1:01:12.880
<v Speaker 2>to base it on human acts of creation, be that

1:01:13.400 --> 1:01:16.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, molding something out of clay, chopping something with

1:01:16.560 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 2>an axe, or you know, using the word processor of

1:01:19.560 --> 1:01:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the gods, you know, turning a blank page into into copy.

1:01:24.320 --> 1:01:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about that earlier. It's like when we

1:01:26.080 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 2>create a document for our podcast, it's like, you know,

1:01:29.440 --> 1:01:32.360
<v Speaker 2>it begins with nothing, just to blank white space.

1:01:32.920 --> 1:01:35.560
<v Speaker 3>But then but that's actually not nothing, is it.

1:01:35.560 --> 1:01:38.120
<v Speaker 2>It's not nothing? No, But then it also doesn't go

1:01:38.240 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 2>from you know, from you know, beginning to end super quickly.

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>There are different phases of creation. Like in my case,

1:01:44.360 --> 1:01:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I always apply some sort of a template, and that's

1:01:46.800 --> 1:01:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the first act of creation, uh, you know, and then

1:01:49.560 --> 1:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>on the third day God began to fill in the

1:01:52.040 --> 1:01:53.560
<v Speaker 2>template that sort of.

1:01:53.480 --> 1:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Thing, and then one and then the gods began developing

1:01:57.400 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 3>things that turned out to be completely useless wrong, you know,

1:02:01.120 --> 1:02:03.520
<v Speaker 3>like un let's not okay, can't do that. I'm gonna

1:02:03.520 --> 1:02:04.439
<v Speaker 3>shift to something else.

1:02:04.720 --> 1:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, we'll actually come back to that idea and

1:02:06.920 --> 1:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>some of our examples, Oh nice, the different drafts of creation.

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but so anyway, Yeah, I wanted to make the

1:02:13.920 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 3>connection between the acts and Kane's wife because I love

1:02:16.840 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>these little details and I and I take a different

1:02:19.800 --> 1:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>view of what they mean than some of the most

1:02:23.080 --> 1:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of myth critical people do, who think that this

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>is evidence of a kind of sloppiness in the storytelling.

1:02:30.240 --> 1:02:33.960
<v Speaker 3>I instead interpret it as a as a sign that

1:02:34.000 --> 1:02:37.480
<v Speaker 3>we should understand these stories in a more light and

1:02:37.520 --> 1:02:43.120
<v Speaker 3>sophisticated way, and not that the original context was all literalism.

1:02:42.920 --> 1:02:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Right right, Like, well, coming back to the idea of

1:02:44.800 --> 1:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>a cosmic egg, what laid the cosmic egg? That's the

1:02:47.120 --> 1:02:49.080
<v Speaker 2>still a question. I mean that it does get into

1:02:49.120 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the whole egg and chicken thing, and you know that

1:02:51.400 --> 1:02:54.080
<v Speaker 2>is a conundrum. But you know, think of it then,

1:02:54.160 --> 1:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>not as an organic egg. Think of it as enclosed substance,

1:02:59.680 --> 1:03:13.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, and just go from there. Now, I do

1:03:13.360 --> 1:03:15.280
<v Speaker 2>want to come back as we begin to reach the

1:03:15.360 --> 1:03:17.520
<v Speaker 2>end of this episode, I want to come back again

1:03:17.560 --> 1:03:19.960
<v Speaker 2>to what is the primary topic and play here what

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>was the universe like prior to creation? And so we.

1:03:24.680 --> 1:03:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Did talk about the vapor and the egg right.

1:03:27.640 --> 1:03:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so I have a little bit more on that.

1:03:30.040 --> 1:03:34.760
<v Speaker 2>So in most Chinese traditions, the answer is, of course

1:03:34.920 --> 1:03:39.880
<v Speaker 2>chaotic formlessness. This vapor a place before heaven and Earth

1:03:40.280 --> 1:03:44.640
<v Speaker 2>with images but no form. I really love that description.

1:03:45.200 --> 1:03:47.200
<v Speaker 2>How am I to interpret that? You know, it's like

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>information but no mass. You know, I'm not sure, But

1:03:51.320 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 2>as an Barreau comments, the state is rather similar to

1:03:56.640 --> 1:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the you know, you could even compare this to the

1:03:58.560 --> 1:04:02.600
<v Speaker 2>modern cosmological idea of the singularity. So everything is there,

1:04:03.360 --> 1:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>but it is not ordered in the sense that it

1:04:05.800 --> 1:04:09.240
<v Speaker 2>is anything yet or not. It is not like the

1:04:09.280 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 2>world we know it but all but everything is there,

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:16.720
<v Speaker 2>it's just you know, it's contained in a different form. Yeah. Now,

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:21.240
<v Speaker 2>in Dallas cosmology, this undifferentiated and formless state is known

1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:25.840
<v Speaker 2>as wuchi, the boundless emptiness, and it is the prime

1:04:25.960 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 2>mol state of the taol the Tao. And I'm hoping

1:04:29.640 --> 1:04:32.800
<v Speaker 2>that I'm pronouncing it correctly here wugi, because this is

1:04:32.800 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 2>one of those things when you're dealing with the Chinese

1:04:34.960 --> 1:04:39.080
<v Speaker 2>language if I use a slightly incorrect pronunciation that it

1:04:39.120 --> 1:04:42.960
<v Speaker 2>means nonsense rather than limitless or boundlessness. It can also

1:04:43.000 --> 1:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>mean a type of chicken. It can means a stain,

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:48.200
<v Speaker 2>it can mean dancing skill, or it can mean to

1:04:48.280 --> 1:04:52.600
<v Speaker 2>miss a plane, depending on exactly how it is being inflected.

1:04:53.400 --> 1:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>That's just you know the complexity of the language. But

1:04:55.920 --> 1:05:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I believe it is bugi, So to whatever extent I

1:05:00.440 --> 1:05:02.520
<v Speaker 2>actually hit that every time I say it, we'll see,

1:05:02.520 --> 1:05:08.400
<v Speaker 2>but I am going to try and pronounce it correctly. Yeah, Ouji.

1:05:08.640 --> 1:05:12.840
<v Speaker 2>So this state Wuji has the has, it has infinite potential,

1:05:12.920 --> 1:05:17.720
<v Speaker 2>but is itself non being? And these concepts are also

1:05:17.720 --> 1:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>incorporated into Neo Confucism as well, And in this Wuji

1:05:22.280 --> 1:05:28.800
<v Speaker 2>becomes Taji, the supreme ultimate. So movement begins based on

1:05:28.840 --> 1:05:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the dualities of Yin and Yang. However, there's plenty of

1:05:32.120 --> 1:05:35.600
<v Speaker 2>room to argue and disagree over whether Wuji really becomes

1:05:35.640 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Taji or if there are just these are just two

1:05:37.920 --> 1:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>sides of the same thing. And you know, we can't

1:05:40.880 --> 1:05:43.560
<v Speaker 2>really apply line or logic to it in that case.

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:47.440
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, the dow runs through all things. Yin and

1:05:47.520 --> 1:05:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Yang are in constant flux, competing but unable to exist

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>without each other. And if that's that churning nature, you know,

1:05:55.360 --> 1:05:58.760
<v Speaker 2>often depict it visually, you know, iconically as a churning

1:05:58.800 --> 1:06:02.160
<v Speaker 2>as a movement, if that movement is not taking place,

1:06:02.480 --> 1:06:05.400
<v Speaker 2>if everything is just like a sterile constant, like that

1:06:05.520 --> 1:06:08.800
<v Speaker 2>is that is the the primordial universe in this case,

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:12.760
<v Speaker 2>like it's it's like everything that makes our universe work.

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Everything that's a part of the you know, observable separation

1:06:16.280 --> 1:06:19.640
<v Speaker 2>of things and entities and conflicting energies, like, none of

1:06:19.640 --> 1:06:22.600
<v Speaker 2>that is in place. So it's almost you know, unfathomable

1:06:22.760 --> 1:06:26.040
<v Speaker 2>in that respect. At any rate, it'll be be a

1:06:26.040 --> 1:06:29.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of fun to get into some additional mythological models

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:32.240
<v Speaker 2>here and continue to discuss, like which of these various

1:06:32.240 --> 1:06:36.000
<v Speaker 2>creation tropes do they seem to be exploring and using,

1:06:36.880 --> 1:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>What new ideas are they bringing to it that we

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>haven't discussed in this series so far. We have some

1:06:42.080 --> 1:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>some exciting examples to discuss in the future.

1:06:46.880 --> 1:06:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Totally. This may be one of those series we need to,

1:06:50.160 --> 1:06:52.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, break up and revisit at different times.

1:06:52.680 --> 1:06:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, this, in all likelihood, this may be

1:06:55.640 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 2>one that we do a couple of episodes for and

1:06:57.720 --> 1:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>then we have to break and do some other content

1:06:59.480 --> 1:07:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and then come back back again. So we'll see how

1:07:02.440 --> 1:07:05.400
<v Speaker 2>it all plays out in the meantime, we would of

1:07:05.400 --> 1:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>course love to hear from all of you, because it's

1:07:08.920 --> 1:07:11.479
<v Speaker 2>very likely that there's some great example that we haven't

1:07:11.480 --> 1:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>come across yet, or perhaps there's a great example we

1:07:13.920 --> 1:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>were thinking about covering and we just need a little

1:07:15.880 --> 1:07:19.440
<v Speaker 2>nudging to point us in the right direction, So write in.

1:07:19.560 --> 1:07:22.560
<v Speaker 2>We would love to hear from you. Just a reminder

1:07:22.600 --> 1:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to everyone out there, This Stuff to Blow Your Mind

1:07:24.320 --> 1:07:26.840
<v Speaker 2>is primarily a science and culture podcast, with core episodes

1:07:26.880 --> 1:07:29.840
<v Speaker 2>on Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Wednesdays we do a short

1:07:29.840 --> 1:07:32.200
<v Speaker 2>form episode and then on Fridays we set aside most

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:34.280
<v Speaker 2>serious concerns, so just talk about a weird film on

1:07:34.400 --> 1:07:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Weird House Cinema.

1:07:35.760 --> 1:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

1:07:39.560 --> 1:07:41.000
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:07:41.040 --> 1:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

1:07:43.720 --> 1:07:45.600
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

1:07:45.800 --> 1:07:48.360
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact Stuff to Blow your

1:07:48.400 --> 1:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

1:07:56.880 --> 1:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio podcast

1:08:00.640 --> 1:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

1:08:03.840 --> 1:08:18.519
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.