WEBVTT - Mike Murphy: Rogue Republican

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Brian Goldsmith. Hi Katie Kuric. So happy to be

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>with you and so happy to talk about politics. You know,

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it's been a little over three weeks since election day

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and people, I think Brian, are still trying to process it.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>It's almost if they're going through those stages of Greek

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that Elizabeth Coopler Ross talked to us about. At least

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're on the losing side, and many of those

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>folks are still at the denial stage, don't you think, Well,

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that's clearly true because a lot of them are sending

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars to Green Party Canada Jill Stein Online

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to pursue recounts in three places where the famous blue

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Wall broke for Hillary Clinton, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. And

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I am probably more likely to grow wings and start

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to fly than for those recounts to overturn the results

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of the election. It's just not going to happen. The

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>margins are too big. Meanwhile, Trump Tower has been the

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>site of very interesting comings and goings with a lot

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of different candidates and almost feels like the dating game

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>where people are coming and they're courting Donald Trump, They're

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>having conversations with him most recently for Secretary of State.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it's been a fascinating thing to watch because

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>it's been so public, hasn't it. Brian, Yeah, it's it's

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>almost like a reality show, you could say. I mean,

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>normally this process is very hush hush. Certainly the president

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>elect doesn't communicate publicly about who the candidates are and

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>how excited he is to meet them or to interview them.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's like it's like he's sixty four. He

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>was a general, he was behind the Iraq Sir. He

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>had a bear with his biographer. Ladies and gentlemen, please

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>welcome dun dunt dun du. General David Buttres Now is

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Woolery, the host of the Dating Go Oh No,

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that was Jim Lange, Baby Jim Lang. Anyway, let's move

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>on to our guest. Brian tell us about him. Brian, Well,

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a little bit better at breaking down

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>politics than seventies game shows. But we're gonna have to

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of bear with him. Uh. He's really a central

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>figure in Republican politics. He's advised almost every big name

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>GOP candidate, from John McCain to Mitt Romney. He had

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>his own podcast earlier this year, and he offered a

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>very fascinating look into what Trump selection means, how it happened,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and the path forward for the country. Mike Murphy, Welcome

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to our little podcast. We're so excited you're here. Thank

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. I have a lot of time

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on my hands now I have to ask you, Mike,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>how's it. What's a nice kid like you doing in

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a profession like this? How did you get into political consulting?

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>For crying out loud? Well, I may be out of

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it now because I was ethically wrong this year. I

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>was like the automic that's true, it's a big room.

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But I was saying all year mathematically, I did not

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>think Trump could get enough votes to win. It turns

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>out that you can lose by doing half million and

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>still win. So it's been a character building experience. But

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I got into this. I'm from Detroit. I'm from a

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>political family of Democrats, so I kind of grew up

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>around it, and I kind of got the bug for

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>domestic politics. So I was still a college student. I

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>worked for this congressman nobody thought could win out of

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>my dorm room making radio commercials. And he won, and

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>so one thing led to another, and now I'm a

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>political consultant. So I called back to Democrat headquarters at

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>our house in Detroit and told my parents I'm gonna

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>drop out of Georgetown and go run off and join

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party. And yeah, only converting to an Episcopalian

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>might have been worse. It was. It was a bumpy conversation.

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So I took a leave of absence from Georgetown. Uh,

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and I've never gone back. I do really more corporate

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and kind of grown up stuff now. I pretty much

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>retired from doing campaigns, though Jeb did drag me back

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>for one more great effort because I believed in him.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought he'd be the best president. So I ran

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the Jeb Bush Superpack, which gives me the unique credential

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of having blown over nine million dollars and not. And

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we should we should let people know that Murphy's kind

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Zelig of American politics. His clients have included

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bush, as he mentioned, Mitt Romney, John McCain, Arnold Schwarzenegger,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Thompson, Christie Whitman, so many others. Um I'm always

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>very amused on Twitter when people give him suggestions about

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>how political strategy, strategy should be done, and his response

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>as always, well, how many senators and governors have you elected?

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Which that I'm My specialty is winning governor races, which

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I did, you know, worked hard to help Jeff Bush

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>win in Florida or Mitt Romney and Massachusetts. Then later

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>on when they lose the presidential stuff, I always take

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>my share of the blame, but I'm very proud of

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the governor's I worked for in the senators. Well, and

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you're more of a hopeless romantic, as you've described yourself

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in presidential politics. What does what does that mean? Well? No,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and I have a rule that in the presidential field

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you should not be mercenaries. So I always pick the

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>person I think should be president, regardless of where they

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are in the pulse, which is not a great career decision,

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at my record, I've done very

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>wealth senators and governors have about the best record in

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party. But at the presidential level, I worked

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for Lamar Alexander. I thought he'd be the best guy.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>We started one percent and got to nine. You know,

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.559
<v Speaker 1>we never quite made it. I worked for John McCain

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand because I thought he'd be the best.

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I took two thousand and eight off because I was

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>close to McCain and Romney, and I thought it was

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>an ethical conflict to work for either one of them.

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I did work for George H. W. Bush and eighty eight.

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I also worked earlier in that primary for Bob Dole.

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.679
<v Speaker 1>So I always think the presidential thing is a higher

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>level deal and you should really pick the best person,

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>regardless of Poleon, and you know, have the argument within

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the party and see which faction wins. And I've been

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>less lucky at that, but I'm I don't regret working

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for any of those guys. I think they all would

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>have been excellent presidents. So to take us forward to

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>this year, you you know the criticism, you know, raised

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this historic amount of money, and Jeb Bush had the

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>name and the connections and the endorsements, and it was

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a big flop and therefore all your fault. Um, what's

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>your what's your response to people who sort of questioned

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>your acumen coming out of the Bush Superpack experience, Well,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>this job being a political consultant or running a big

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>play co operations, like being a Big ten football coach.

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Everybody with a bar stool in fifty states thinks they

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>can do your job. I spent a lot of time

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about things we could have done differently, and I

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine as there's other senior people at right to rise

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>have We had some of the best consultants in the

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>party with Larry McCarthy, Eliza Hickey had had a great

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>run at the NFCC, and we all think about things

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we could have done differently, but none of us come

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>up with the outcome of we win the primary. We

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>just weren't what they were looking for. And I would say,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, though, you know, you never want to

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>justify a loss his businesses about winning. Jeb stuck to

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>his principles and never had to apologize for anything you

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>did in that campaign. And I think if he was

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a nominee, we would have won the general election and

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the country would be united behind him. Today people didn't

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>take Donald Trump seriously, including you. How were you so wrong?

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>How were so many people so wrong? Might well, we

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>took him seriously, but not. I mean, here's our view

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>because we you know, we talked to a lot of

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Republican primary voters, so we had a pretty good landscape

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of what was going on and we saw there was

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>about a third of the vote that was interested in Trump,

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and none of those people were interested in Jeff Bush.

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>We were never going to get Trump and Cruise voters

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to vote for a guy like Jeff Bush. Uh. And

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>so there might have been things we could have done

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>better on Rubio, better on k Sake. Uh, we might

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>have sold Jeb in better ways, But Jeff was never

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>going to go to the border and start rounding people up.

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>He was never going to take that grievance message. To

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>his credit, I joked that we were we were selling

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>classical music records at the Tractor Poll, and sixty of

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the primary was wasn't interested in what we were selling.

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>And so there it is. You know, I'm struck by

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>something you said a little bit earlier that you had

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the best professionals and the party, these highly regarded consultants.

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And Hillary Clinton also had the most highly regarded, highly

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>paid Democratic consultants working for her, and she Yeah, she

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>won the popular vote, but she's not gonna be the

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>next president. Do you think that the era of the

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>professional political tactician is coming to a close and being

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>replaced by something new and different. No, I think that's

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a conventional. It's a very fashionable opinion. So I know

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for pretty much a fact that the single most surprised

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>person on election night was Donald Trump when he won

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and his staff, some of whom were embedding pools, taking

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>him as a loss among political consultants. So now we're

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>going to have kind of the classic process story of

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>let's throw out everything we know about politics because we

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>had this flukish kind of win and the things that

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have been true and predicted for forty years no longer count.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And maybe I'm a traditionalist, but I don't believe that

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we were involved in some senate races helping hold the Senate,

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the same political consultants are the

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>idiots who worked for losing presidential campaigns were running winning

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>senate campaigns. So I I've been around too long and

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>seen too many fads come and go, particularly in the

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Easy magazine writing to believe a big indictment like that

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that said we can learn things from the Trump victory

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and get better at what we do. Didn't Donald Trump

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>only w the eligible vote. So when you think about

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>like a mandate or an overwhelming victory, isn't that a

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a misnomer? Well, He won about forty six

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent of the people who did vote,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>which is a lower percentage than Mitt Romney got four

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago. It's a lower percentage than you know, many

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>losing candidates over the years, like Hubert Humphrey and Gerald Ford.

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think you're right that the mandate question

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is is a real one. What do you think, Well,

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's true. In percentages and raw vote he

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>did pretty well. I mean, this was not a freakishly

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>low turnout election. I think the real story of election

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Day was the composition of the Republican vote that elected

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump to the Electoral College was different than we've ever

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>seen before, and that's one reason a lot of us

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>missed it. So for people who are just trying to

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of wrap their brains around what happened, Trump lost

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the swing counties, He didn't perform as

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>well as winners normally need to perform, and Hillary hit

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>her marks and a lot of the Democratic counties. But

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>what happened was in Florida and in other places, Trump

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>got big turnout and big margins out of counties where

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the Republican normally wins by fifteen or twenty. He would

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>win by thirty or more. He had huge spikes in

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a relatively small number of places, though he got a

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>closer and many people thought to begin with. So you

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>had two things going on. Lack of enthusiasm for Hillary,

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>who was a pretty bad candidate. I don't know what

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>her messages to this day. Stronger Together sounds like a

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>glue slugan to me, um. But the point is, if

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you were swinging a hammer bendon metal in Macomb County,

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>another county in north of Detroit, industrial county where Obama

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>won last time, and he won big this time, you

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>weren't that interested in the gender rules about bathrooms for LGBT.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You were wondering what people are gonna do about jobs

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for blue collar people like you. Trump spoke to those people,

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>many of whom historically have been Democrats, many whom are

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>industrial union members. She did not, And I think that's

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty big malepractice on the Democratic side, and you know

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>there will be some repercussions in their party. But she

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>rolled over when it came to blue blue collar workers.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems she just abdicated that whole voting

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>block to Donald Trump. If I was reading a piece

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times that Bo Copley, who we

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>had on Yahoo News the night of the election, a

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>coal miner. You know, people were saying in West Virginia

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that all Donald Trump had to do was mentioned coal miners,

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and they basically, you know, they flocked to him because

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they have felt so marginalized and so out of the

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>mainstream for so long. Just a mere acknowledgement of their

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>existence was enough to win their vote. Well, there's no

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>doubt that the modern Democratic Party, and they've had some

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>success with this. But if you look at kind of

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the intellectual elites that drive them, their thinkers, and you

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the donor class that has huge influence, it's

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>heavily dominated by people kind of from the social issues

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>on the more libertarian i'll call it side uh more

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>equal rights for people regardless of sexual preference, things like that,

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and the strong environmental groups. So if you're you know,

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're working in a plant with a smokestack uh

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>running on coal powered electric city, it doesn't look like

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>your party anymore. And I think they paid a political

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>price for that. But I have no doubt this was

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>a real lockpicking of the electoral college. That's why the

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump guys were surprised as the rest of us because

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a very weird coalition he got and normally,

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>if you lose by two and a half million votes,

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you lose. Um, So this thing, you know, the media

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>has to be careful about calling it a big mandate.

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>It's really still a divided country. But we saw a

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>pain scream, kind of a political riot of sorts from

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>about fifty counties where people have not had a raise

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in real wages for a long time. They work in

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the old economy, which doesn't seem hip and doesn't seem cool.

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>She didn't talk to them, and Trump did. Trump talked

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to him pretty base language. I think there's some stains

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>on his campaign from the way he conducted himself, but

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it worked. It was enough to get him close overall

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and to trip those counties. Uh. And now he's the

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>president elect. Well, when we come back, let's talk about

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>how he's doing as president elect and about some of

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the moves he's made us are both in terms of

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>personnel and on Twitter. But first we're going to take

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a break to hear from our sponsors and from you.

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back with Mike Murphy right after this. During

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>our last episode, we asked to hear from some of

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>our conservative listeners and here's what you all had to say. Hi,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Bryan and Katie, this is Margie from Mississippi. I am

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a conservative voter, and in regard to the future of

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, a couple of things. First comment is

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're correcting your last podcast in saying that callen

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>uneducated white voters. Feels like it is an inferior vote

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>compared to others, and that characterization is seen negatively. The

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>second thing is in regard to the Republican Party, that

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that continue to be based on economic progress. I have

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>post for a Donald Trump administration in those respects and

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>further the Republican Party on those bases. You know, it's interesting.

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>She says that she was offended by some pundon's talking

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>about uneducated voters or non college voters. Donald Trump himself

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>said I love the poorly educated, and nobody in that

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>camp seemed to take much offense. So I guess it

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>depends on the messenger as well as the message. Well,

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we talked about it, and it does seem

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of smug and patronizing, So I appreciate that Margie

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>feels that way too, because I've always felt slightly uncomfortable

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>with the overuse of that characterization personally. Hey, Brian and

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Katie is Greg Gordon in Texas and I normally vote

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Republicans for president. This time I couldn't do it. Um.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump scares me. He scares me because he's not presidential.

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>As a kid, I mean even now as an adult,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I look up to the president not so much that

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they're smarter than me or better than things, but they

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>just need to be presidential. George Washington, Franklin Roosevelt like,

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and even Teddy Roosevelt, all those folks, Lendon Johnson, They're

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>just this big, humanous figure and I just don't see

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it with him in his Twitter account. So anyway, thanks,

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and I love y'all's podcast. Well, thank you Greg Gordon

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in Texas for liking our podcast. You know, I wonder

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>if anybody can be larger than life and completely presidential

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>given the ubiquity of social media and how much access

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the public has to these individuals. It's so accessible. What

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think of that, Brian, I think there's something

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to that. I think a lot of our greatest presidents

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't pass through the filter of modern media. They wouldn't

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>get away with not being able to walk. Hiding their

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>physical infirmity is like Franklin Roosevelt did, or being as

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>as unfaithful to their spouse as John Kennedy was. But um,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there's something else there too, which is that if you

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't like Donald Trump as a candidate, I don't think

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you're liking Donald Trump as president elect. Right now He's

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not operating in a dramatically different way than he did

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>before November eight. Meanwhile, for our next episode, we'll be

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Valerie Jarrett, President Obama's longtime senior advisor and

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>very close and longtime friend. What questions do you have

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>for her about her eight years working closely with President

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Obama in the White House. Please call us and leave

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>us a message at nine to nine, two to four, four, six,

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>three seven. If you're still struggling to find the perfect

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>gift for someone who has it all in socks aren't

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly your thing, how about some meat for the carnivore

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in your life? And that would be me, Brian. It's true.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Omaha Steaks offers unique gifts for gourmet food lovers and

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>just meet consumers like you. Katie, and right now you

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>get exclusive savings just for being a listener of this podcast.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Listen to everything you're gonna get for less than fifty bucks.

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>It to filet mignons, two top sirloins, to boneless pork chops,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>four boneless chicken breasts for kill Bossa sausages for burgers,

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a twelve ounce package of all beef meatballs for potatoes,

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>o gratin for caramel apple tartlets, one Omaha Steaks seasoning packet,

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and four additional kill Bossa sausages for free. So go

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to Omaha Steaks dot com, enter our offer code Katie

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in the search bar, add the Family Gift Pack to

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>your cart and get a seventy seven percent savings. It's

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the gift guaranteed to be a hit. Yeah, I'm hungry.

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Cook out at Katie's. So we're back with the GOP Svengali,

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike Murphy and you go back a long way with

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Mitt Romney. You actually were the consultant for the only

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>political race he's ever won for governor of Massachusetts in

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two. When we first met, you were plotting

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the early moves of that campaign. And you know one

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I like to tease Mitt that I'm the only political

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>consultant has handed him a victory speech. Um, he reminds

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>me there were some primaries that he won in a

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>nomination that I did not help him with. So he's

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a good guy, he's a patriot, and I think, um,

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Elect Trump would be well advised to bring

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>some people into actually know the world. Well, President elect

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump is putting met Romney through the ringer right now

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>by encouraging or at least allowing some of his top

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>aids to throw mud on Mitt Romney. To mix my metaphor,

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And do you think Romney, if he's offered the job

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of Secretary of State, should take it. Do you think

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>he'd be positioned to succeed in that job or what's

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>going on? Well, if you watch the Trump campaign, there's

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a juvenile culture of silly in funding among his staff.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that we had about five purges. It was

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a banana Republic of a campaign. So now we have

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody Kelly and Conway who comes from the bottom tier

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Republican posters. So I think kind of one a lucky

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>lottery here, Uh is out trashing Governor Romney in the press. Well,

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the President elect is trying to put his cabinet together

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>having a fairly thoughtful process. I think of meeting with

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>people and sounding them out. So I'm going to try

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to set an example for Kelly and of how staff operate.

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not going to comment or speculate at all

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>on what Governor Romney may or may not do. Uh,

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>just to say that, um, he's eminently qualified, and I

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>respect the president elexibility to make this decision not be

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>buffaloed by the public antics of staffers. But do you

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>think he's walking into a situation in which he's going

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to be second guest and criticized and anytime he makes

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a move as Secretary of State, Well, we know what

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign culture was, we don't know what the

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump white House culture is. It's either evolving toward a

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>better thing or it will be the same. So I

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's an open question, and there's one person on

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the planet who can drive that, which is the president elect.

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>He's got to choose and uh, I think a lot

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>of people are surprised that it's not been kind of

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>tightened up, but that it's his operation, his culture. He's

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the one. So we're waiting to see. Well, reading the

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Tea leaves. What do you what do you anticipating? Mike, Well,

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I've learned not to handicap the and

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>predict the activity of Donald Trump. I thought he was

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>very gracious on election night, and I think he's had

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>days where he's succeeding. He's had days where he's been

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>tweeting silly things and shaking the confidence and some of

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>us who know what the job is. Uh So, I

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's still an open question and these this silly

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>staff trashing nominees that the president elect is interested in.

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean I saw even Axel Rod tweeted something about this.

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>None of us who have worked in serious presidential level

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>staff work have ever seen anything like it. So I, um,

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not going to fuel that fire by

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>speculating about what Mitt might or might not do. I'll

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>just say he's a grown up who knows the world. Uh.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>He was proven, right. I think some of his criticism

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>President Obama on foreign policy, so his wisdom is proven.

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a real fan of Mitt Romney's I mean, I

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>like him very much, but when I think of foreign policy,

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the name that Romney does not come to mind immediately.

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>What really does qualify him to be Secretary of State. Mike, Well,

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the job as Secretary of State is to both represent

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the US abroad as the president's top surrogate in international relations,

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and definitely looks the part. Yeah, that's the sexist remark.

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that he is a good negotiator and he

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>has relationships around the world. He is diplomatic and temperate.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>He also made a principal criticism of some of the

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>weaknesses of the Obama foreign policy, uh, both about Russia

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and about the Middle East, that I think have born

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 1>more true than not. So he is uh. I think

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>he's as well briefed and by temperament as well equipped

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to be Secretary of State as anybody. But again what

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I think doesn't matter. It's down to the decision of

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the president elect. And I would encourage people to not

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:28.239
<v Speaker 1>watch the juvenile antics of of figurehead campaign managers on

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Sunday shows and wait to hear from the president elect.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Conway online too, for you, Mike, she was a figurehead.

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>We all know Bannon ran the thing along with Trump,

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>but really ran and he's a one man show. So

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not going to join the media heard of canonizing,

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>particularly this kind of behavior, which I think undermines our

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>own candidate. But from the Romney perspective, this is especially

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>striking because he gave a devastating speech in March attacking Trump. Um, so,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>how can you turn around and work for someone you've

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>called a fraud and a phony, someone who would make

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the world more dangerous and whose trademark is dishonesty? How

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>can you represent that person as you know, the chief

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>implement er of their foreign policy. Well, my guests, and

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm speculating here is the argument that people who would

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>urge mint Ronny you have offered to take such a

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>job as that the national interest is the highest thing,

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and the more competent people who join a campaign team

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that may be a team of rivals, to use a

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>familiar phrase, would be serving the country wealth. The president

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>asks you, it's hard to say no. Now, it's up

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>to the President elect to do the asking, and he

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>may never do that. But if you're asked and the

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>president elect things that the campaign is over and it's

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>time to unite and he could use your skills to

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>further national interests, it's a hard thing to say no to.

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>You know. There's been controversy around another Trump appointment Jeff

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Sessions for attorney general. I think this is correct, right.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You worked for Sessions when he ran for the Senate. Ironically,

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in Jeff's first campaign, his consultants from myself and John Weaver,

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>who worked for Ca Sick. Yeah, exactly, both Trump critics.

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a guy who was denied, as you know,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>a federal judge ship about thirty years ago because of

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>allegedly racist comments he made. Do you think he'd be

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a good attorney general? Do you think his credentials on

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>race or are strong enough to unite the country? Brian,

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>how did I become a surrogate for the Trump transition

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>team here? I'm asking your opinion as a political expert

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and as somebody who worked for the attorney general designate.

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I do not believe he has a racist bone in

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>his body. I worked for him in one campaign. I

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>did not do the reelection. Um. I think it will

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be up to his Senate colleagues to look at his

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>full record, and my guess is he will be confirmed. Um.

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have my own views about who ought

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to be attorney general. I have my own views about

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>who ought to be in the Trump White House. I

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>have my own views about Trump's hairstyle a lot of

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be but you know, I have no standing here, so um,

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but they ever reach out to you, Mike, and I

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>think you'd be doing a podcast with noted meteorologist on

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the phenomenon of hell freezing over before I think they'd

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>ever reach out to me. And I think, well, you

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>know who, who who would have thought that they'd reach

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>out to Mitt Romney after he gave that, as Brian said,

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>devastating speech during the campaign. I mean, stranger things have happened. Well,

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I think if the idea of Mitt Romney is Secretary

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of State, a widely respected guys enough to drive Poort,

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and Conway to distraction, that my name would probably

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>put her into intensive care. So in the interest of

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>her health, let's hope there's none of that speculation. But no,

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I have. You know, I'm friendly

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>with I care a lot about the domestic agenda we're

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>going to have, which I think could be really good

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for America with Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan, both people

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of respect for So I'm I'm pretty

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>focused on whatever I can do to help the Republican team,

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, create economic growth, lift up wages for everybody,

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and not have a trade war, which is the scariest

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>part of Trump's campaign promises. Though I've learned that Donald

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump is flexible and I'm not sure people should take

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>his campaign rhetoric at face value, which I think would

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>be a good thing. Well, speaking of that, I have

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about about some of these blue collar

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>folks who supported him. There have been a number of

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>articles since the election saying basically, he's not going to

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to deliver on these campaign promises. He is

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be the messiah that many of these

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>folks hoped he would be. Um, what's going to happen

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>when he's not going to be able to deliver? Well,

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a big question. I think if we get enough

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>economic growth and wages lift up, he'll get a lot

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of credit for that. But you have to be careful. Um,

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of like steroids. Uh yeah, you

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>made grown muscles quickly, but all of a sudden you've

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>got hard problems. So you've got to be careful with

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>some of that rhetoric. And I think one of the

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>things that Trump administration is going to have to do

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is manage expectations that he's clearly raised in these places

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>that he can wave a wand and make makes some

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of the problems of manufacturing jobs go away. Vanish that said,

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a growth agenda um with cheap energy, cheap electric power

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>which we haven't grasped in America now because of our

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>abundant energy resources, and things the government can do can

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>make manufacturing more competitive in the US, and I think

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>we can stem that tide. So there could be some

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>good news with the right policy, but those expectations are

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>now pretty high in those places. I saw a chart

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Washington Post Mike that said manufacturing output is

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>actually up, its employment at those manufacturing establishments that is down.

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>In other words, automation is really responsible for these jobs

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>being reduced. So you know what's he going to do

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>about that. Well, that's a challenge across the economy because

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we have increasing productivity, which means fewer people are producing more,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>which is good for the economy, creates more wealth, lifts

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>up the country. But take self driving cars. If they

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>do become a huge thing in ten or fifteen years,

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna put a lot of truck drivers out of work.

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to have to get a lot better

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>than the government has been traditionally at retraining people for

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>better skills, and I think we have to take a

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>new look at our our educational system. The German model

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good about training people and kind of vocational

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>skills are the jobs of the future, because the hardest

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>thing to do is get any kind of toothpaste back

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in the tube. And having the old approach, which is, hey,

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you were a master machinist, you're fifty four. Uh, now

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna learn how to uh teach children's theater because

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a ridiculous night course here. Um that

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we know that doesn't work, so doing more of the

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>same doesn't do it. But you said you're optimistic that

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump's agenda could spark economic growth and be good for

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the country. The core of his agenda seems to be

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a big regressive tax cut. I mean, there's no evidence

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that the that the George W. Bush tax cut, or

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>even the Reagan tax cut was responsible for big economic growth.

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>There's no evidence that eliminating the estate tax and the

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>gift tax would be good for economic growth. So you're

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>smiling because you think I'm giving you democratic talking points

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>where you are but keep going well. And the other

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>big part of his agenda is attacks credit to support

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for profit infrastructure developers, which is also deeply problematic because

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>most of our most highly needed sort of infrastructure projects

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>are not the kinds of things that would be attractive

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to these for profit developers. So what what gives you

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>hope in his agenda? The fact is that the best

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>thing for wages is economic growth because it creates more

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>demand in the labor market and raises wages. That's our

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>big problem. Um, if you're in the working poor, we

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>have a great social welfare system. If you fall a

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit into poverty, we're not so great at the

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>institutions of upwards social mobility for people in the working

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>poor or in the middle class. So we need more

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>labor demand and we need to be better at retraining.

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>The bigger question for me an economic policy is not

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>our text cuts good. It's Will Trump, who's a populist.

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And when I think about the stick policy, by the way,

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm listening to McConnell and Ryan a little more than

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>i'm listening to prisioner like Trump right now, because I

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>my guess is they're going to be leading on it

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and he'll be okay with that. But Will Trump is

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a populacet to have the guts to take on the

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>entitlement problem, which is a huge suck on the candidate.

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:22.479
<v Speaker 1>He wouldn't do right well, there's appetite to take some

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>political pain in the House and the Senate on the

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Republican side to do it. And I think that in

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>trade could be the too big domestic fracture points. I

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think people should also never forget that despite all the

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>focus on personalities, the Congress really has the power in

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>domestic policy. The presidents no push over. He has ability

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>for executive orders and to appoint people, but the budget,

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the big things come out of the Congress. Institutionally, there's

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>always pressure. So will Trump fight that or he kind

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of outsourced domestic policy to the Republicans there and focus

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on foreign policy. That to me is one of the

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>big decisions you'll have to make, because if he starts

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>fighting with the congressional guys and nothing will happen, which is,

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, something we proved for a decade now, it

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>seems unlikely that his base is going to be content

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>with the kind of Marco Rubio style domestic policy agenda

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.239
<v Speaker 1>of free trade, and big tax. I don't know. It's

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of an open question. I mean, I agree he's

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>made some promises on trade, where see if he believes him.

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope he doesn't because the trade war would be

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>devastating for the economy and it would really hurt the

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>people that he ran to help. But you know, his

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>face is built more. His appeal on the party is

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>base more in personality that he's a can do guy

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>who's going to come to Washington shake things up. He

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>was a way to punish a political system that Americans

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have lost faith in. So ideologically, one lesson we learned

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in the primaries that all the campaigns assumed early that

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>yet Trump's gonna He's famous from television, he's interesting. The

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>media is in business with him, you know, because he's rating.

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So he'll have a spike. But then the ideological stuff

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>will catch him. Because in the last thousand Republican primaries,

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>ideology was a huge deal. This year it took a break.

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>People gave Trump a huge ass on ideology. We've never

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>seen that before. That's one reason we were all wrong.

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if the ideological schism will work

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in the future. It didn't work in the primary now

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>normally over the fullness of time, it does work, and

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with you, But then again, that's why

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought Trump would probably not be nominated, and I

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was You're wrong. One story that I wanted to get

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.719
<v Speaker 1>your view on, UM that's gotten a lot of attention

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the last few days is this recount effort in the

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>three states you mentioned Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania being helmed

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>by the Green Party Candida jill Stein for what she's

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>been able to raise millions of dollars online. Some people

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>are saying that that might be a scam, but I'm

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>curious whether you think there's any chance that could that

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>could make a difference in one state, let alone three,

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and kind of what the purpose of all of this is.

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think she's already done enough to help

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. UM, if you're looking at some of the

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>votes and places where she had little spikes, uh and

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>heard Hillary Clinton. Look, I don't get it. It is

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a very close result in Michigan, it is a very

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>close result in Wisconsin. But even if those were more

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>actiously overturned by recount, which none of the kind of

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>political grown ups in those states that I know think

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the Pennsylvania is still there. In Pennsylvania, sixty thousand votes

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is a good number. It's close, But the Pennsylvania recount

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>system is very cumbersome too, and I doubt that Jill

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Stein people have the organizational acumen to even be able

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute that. So I think it is not a

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>good thing for the country to argue over the legitimacy

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of an election. If you don't like this, then argue

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>for a new electoral college system, the Compact, which is saying,

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, which would allocate electors by popular vote and ratio,

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>not winner take all in each state that doesn't need

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the constitutional change. What do you think that should happen?

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm torn about it. I'm a Republican, so

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I like the fact we have a little English on

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the ball in electoral college. Um, but I think it

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is let's put this way, We've had enough of these outcomes.

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>We've had two in sixteen years where the electoral college

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>decided and the the other domular vote that I think

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we're roting confidence in the popular vote. We're roting confidence

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in the system. So the Compact is more attractive to

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>me now that used to be. I'm a market guy.

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what I like about the Republican Party, and in

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the markets of votes. You know, we've created a party

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>where we've lost six of the last seven contests, so

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we've we've succeeded under the rules because of the electoral college.

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not sure building a system where you're not

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the most votes is a good thing.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm kind of warming to the What do you

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 1>think of this tweet by Donald Trump, uh this week

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 1>where he said I won the popular vote if you

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:39.399
<v Speaker 1>deduct the millions of people who voted illegally. Where I mean,

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>don't we always heard that from Republicans and there's no

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>basis for that assertion. Well, you had me to you

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>went into the Republican thing at the end, and I

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like the quack noise. I haven't heard that from Trump. Look,

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was beneath the office of president. I

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.280
<v Speaker 1>was deeply disappointed with it, and it was absolutely factually wrong,

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and reacquainting the president elect with the truth will be

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a big part of hopefully what a competent staff I

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>will be able to do. I mean, both parties have

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>played the legitimacy game against each other, but look, it

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was wrong and he should be called out for Well,

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you just did that. I have to ask

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you before you go, because I know you have to

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>scoot about the role of the press. What did the

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>press do wrong? And how does the press make it right? Um?

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>And and under the circumstances, given that Donald Trump is

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>proving to be as unconventional president elect as he was

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a candidate, how can these two entities get along or

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>should they not be getting along at all? It feels

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 1>like a big mess to me, Mike, and I don't

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 1>know what to make of it. Yeah, it is a mess.

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I worked there, and so I see a

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of journalists work really hard to try to get

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the story right. The problem is, we've had this crossover

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of pop culture. And I've seen it before. I work

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.919
<v Speaker 1>for Arnold Schwarzenegger when you ran for governor of California here,

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's not new to have kind of famous people

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>from the world of entertainment move into politics. But this

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was at a whole new level. And I think on

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>one hand, you have the economics of news where the

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 1>more seasoned, older experience reporters have been pushed out and young, hardworking,

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 1>ambitious reporters who tend to though traveling a herd linked

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:16.720
<v Speaker 1>by their Twitter accounts um have have emerged, and so

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the coverage is fast, but not necessarily smart and ring wise.

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>The other weakness I think the media has is to

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>cover politics like sports, and it's all scorekeeping, it's all coaches,

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>poll um, it's all these damn poles. You know. The

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>polls are a weird thing where the media creates the

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>story and then covers it. And now we find out

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the state polls were wrong. So I

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think the media is obsession with process and the celebritization

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of consultants, all that stuff they could step back from.

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the last thing I'd say, and I've I've

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>said this publicly and again. I you know, I worked there,

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>so maybe I'm part of it. But whenever I was

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on television at NBC, I tried to tamp down this

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>instinct that every day is the Hindenburg explosion. Everything that

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>happens is a most important thing in the campaign, because

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the more heat, the more eyeballs, the commerce

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of it. I get it, we get paid. They have

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>to sell you know, cable rights and ads to do it.

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>But every day is not the most important day in

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the campaign, and so that that velocity craze, that that

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>flashing lights and exclamation points. Um, it makes the really

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>important stuff get lost. Because if everything is important, then nothing.

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's hard to search for truth, isn't it when

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody has their own version of it? No? Absolutely well,

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And even if the mainstream media gets better at bringing

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 1>real reporting and perspective to these stories, the voters that

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 1>matter in a lot of these elections aren't. Aren't watching

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that right? And the interesting fact we had this year,

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that power of digital media to be ubiquitous has been

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>around for a while, but now we had organized efforts

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>to put fake, lying news through the unfiltered world of

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:57.720
<v Speaker 1>social media, some of it a lot of it coming

0:38:57.760 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>from our good friends over in Russia. I mean I

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>read half of these emails in the original Russian and uh,

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 1>it is troubling because it was we now know from

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>our own intelligence services there was a real effort to

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>screw with the dialogue of our election, particularly through social media,

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>by countries that are geopolitical rivals. And uh, that's the

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>problem with the Internet. Everything can go everywhere for free,

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and you can get all kinds of information, but there's

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>no filter, there're no editor Why don't people find this

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>more upsetting? You know, the role that Russia might have

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>played in in the election process. It's doesn't seem like

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>people are taking it that seriously. Yeah, I don't know.

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 1>It troubles me a lot. The only thing I can

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 1>say is, when we make our politics a reality show

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:48.320
<v Speaker 1>with reality show candidates, trivia being screamed seven um, instant

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>snappoles and kind of a postmodern eye roll to the

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, we take the stakes down. And when the

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>stakes are down, why do you care? And that is

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the real danger. I think of this new style of

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of politics light and uh, it could we could

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>pay a price, or it could be a phase and

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a reaction against it, and the next campaign

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>will be the opposite of this one because people will

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>decide they didn't like what they got that that's the

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>open question to me. Or it could just be that

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the Clinton supporters were very troubled by the Putin bromance,

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the Trump supporters either didn't believe it or bought Trump's

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>excuses for it, and and we all kind of move

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>forward from there. It's it's, you know, one side believes

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>x the other side believes negative X. Yeah, it could be,

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but I just think when you when you add clowns

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 1>shoes to a campaign, you take the reason to take

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>things seriously away. What do you predict for the mid terms? Micers,

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>It just too early to tell. Well, you know, in

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen there are a lot of Republican state

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>selecting senators. So the traditional analysis would be Republicans should

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>have a really great two thousand eighteen and building on

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:56.839
<v Speaker 1>their center majority. I would say one, in the modern era,

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>beware traditional analysis. Although the bography, oh it does favor

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans. And two, there's no doubt that in the

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Blue States the sleeping giant has been awoken of angry Democrats.

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Uh So I have a feeling two thousand eighteen to

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 1>be a real epic battle. And why I would handicap

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans is having the advantage. We got to see

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>what President elect Trump does for two years and how

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>he manages his new stewardship of the Republican brand. And

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a big question. Mike Murphy, We've been looking forward

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to this for many many weeks. Were so thrilled to

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have you on our podcast and so excited that you

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have your own, cleverly called radio Free gop um. Are

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you enjoying doing a podcast, Mike, You know, I've had

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun with it. I put it on

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a hiatus for a while because I didn't think it

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>was right to be complaining about the president elector we

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>give him a chance to succeed. But as I tell people,

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I have buried the resistance transmitter in the secret location,

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and it can always be dug up and reignited, so

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe it'll come back. But yeah, I enjoyed a lot,

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and I enjoy listening to this podcast. Thank you for

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>having me, Thanks Mike, Thanks as always to Gianna Palmer

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>for producing the show and Jared O'Connell for engineering and

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 1>mixing it. Thanks to Mark Phillips for our theme music.

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Remember you can also email us at comments at Currik

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast dot com. You can find me on social media

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>at goldsmith Be on Twitter. You can follow Katie at

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>at Katie Currik on Twitter and Instagram, and Katie dot

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Kurk on Snapchat. She's ubiquitous. Best of all, you can

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>rate and review us on iTunes. Don't forget to subscribe

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to the show as well. It really helps other listeners

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to find it, so we'll talk to you next time,

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and please let us know your questions for Valerie. Jared,

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much, Thanks for listening everyone. I always wanted

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a contestant on the dating game well, helping

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>us to make sense of politics instead of while helming.

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:05.959
<v Speaker 1>That was such a fake laugh