WEBVTT - German Finance Minister Joerg Kukies Talks US/EU Trade

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Now we're going to stay in Washington because that is

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 2>where the IMF Worldbanks Free Meetings are taking place right now.

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 2>And of course, this week we learned that the IMF

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 2>has warned recession risks will increase as long as the

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>uncertainty remains. Our very own Lisa Bromwoz is there now

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 2>with the German finance minister. I want to hand things

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>off to her.

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Lisa, Hey, Scarlett, thank you so much. I am here

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 3>with Germany's finance minners. Your gookies who is here has

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 3>been here for a number of weeks and said to

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 3>my colleagues this.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Moment ago, moments ago.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 3>That you think that it's feasible to get some sort

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>of trade deal with the United States within that ninety

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 3>day timeframe. What makes you so optimistic that that can

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 3>be achieved.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, first of all, the European Union is negotiating this

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 4>for us, so Germany has delegated on all the European

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 4>countries have delegated authority to strike trade deals to the

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 4>European level, and we are fully supporting the European Commission

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 4>and the feedback that they are giving to us and

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 4>that's confirmed by the discussions I'm having here in Washington,

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 4>is that the discussions are going very constructively. Of Course,

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 4>the devil is in the detail, and there's still a

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 4>lot of topics that are open and that need to

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 4>be iron out. But there's a willingness on both sides

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 4>to come to an agreement doing.

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 3>A sense of what exactly the demands are from the US.

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 4>Side, well, Europe has said we want industrial tariffs to

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 4>go to zero zero on both sides. The US side

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 4>has responded and said, we also have to talk about

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 4>agriculture and services.

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>We also have to talk about non.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 4>Tariff impediments to trade, and all of those are of

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 4>course fair game and need to be discussed. So those

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 4>are really the issues. And then of course there's some

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 4>sectorial issues, especially in the automotive sector, which is very

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 4>important for Germany, needless to say, but also further sectors.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>That are important. There's a lot to unpack there.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Are you optimistic you could get to zero zero with

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 3>respect to no tariffs on either side?

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean that would be the ideal outcome, and from

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 4>an economic perspective, it would certainly be the most efficient

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 4>outcome for both sides. Whether we actually get there, and

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 4>whether in the United States, if tariffs are reduced, Congress

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 4>would have to approve. So there's a lot of topics

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 4>that are outside of the control of the direct negotiators.

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, if it's generally the.

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 4>Direction of travel, were for tariffs to come down instead

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 4>of go up, I think the markets would see that

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 4>as a very positive signal.

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 3>How confident are you that the sectorial tariffs, in particular

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 3>on German auto manufacturers, will come down in a way

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 3>that gives them some breathing room. We've heard some pretty

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 3>dire projections from some of their earnings.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, of course that is still there's still uncertainty around

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 4>that and it will have to be negotiated.

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>As I said, there's still differences in views.

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 4>But if you look at the entire package of the

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 4>goal of reducing tariffs overall, of addressing issues outside of

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 4>the tariffs that impede trade, for example, the topics of

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:13.399
<v Speaker 4>standardization and what's called homologization in technical terms, which essentially

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 4>means if a car is safe to drive in the

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 4>United States, should it be safe to drive in the

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 4>European Union, and vice versa. It would be a huge

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 4>breakthrough if that were achieved, because it would allow economies

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 4>of scale between the United States and Europe to grow

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 4>and would improve the competitiveness of both of our automotive

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 4>industry against China, for example. So there's a lot of

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 4>elements that sound very positive and that go in the

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 4>right direction, and that would be mutually beneficial. But again,

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 4>the question of can we agree on all of this

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 4>needs to be ironed out in the next ninety days.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Why do you think there's been such a shift in

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 3>tone from this administration over the past couple of days.

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, first of all, when I was in

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Washington that was immediately after the auto tariffs were announced.

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Everyone I spoke to said, we want to see this

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 4>as a beginning and a starting point of a negotiation,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 4>and we don't want escalation.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So I do think it was in a way already.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 4>Incorporated that after the announcement there could be discussions, and

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 4>I think the European Commission reacted in the absolutely correct

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 4>way by saying Plan A is we want to negotiate,

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.799
<v Speaker 4>and we want to strike a deal that is actually

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 4>mutually beneficial and avoids a race upwards in tariffs, which

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 4>would be mutually negative, but we also have plan B.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 4>If we don't find an agreement, then of course Europe

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 4>will respond with countermeasures.

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>You keep talking about Europe and Europe negotiating as a block.

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>How much is Europe negotiating as.

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 3>A block versus each individual country?

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt.

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this is a authority that the European Commission

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 4>has and that all member states have given to the Commission.

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 4>It is completely unified, and the European Commission is doing

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 4>a fantastic job, is coordinating with everyone, is keeping everyone

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 4>up to date. So in that sense, this is a

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 4>completely harmonized policy area. And I do think it increases

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 4>the negotiating power of the Commission if it's not only

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 4>negotiating for one country but twenty seven. Of course it

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 4>increases the power because the European Commission controls the access

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 4>to consumer market of four hundred and fifty million people.

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 3>How much is some of the pressure that President Trump

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 3>is putting on the European Union, bringing the European Union

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 3>together close more closely and giving some fuel to more

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 3>of a cohesion in the Financial Union, as well as

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 3>some of the other measures that has been in contention

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 3>for a while.

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but don't forget the European Union has come to

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 4>the recognition that we have to move closer together, far

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 4>before the US election. So the Drogi Report, the Letter Report,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 4>all of the documents where that challenged us and said

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 4>we are becoming less and less competitive.

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And the biggest asset that we.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 4>Have, namely an internal market of four hundred and fifty

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 4>million consumers and companies and citizens, isn't there where it

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 4>needs to be. And we're over bureaucratized. We have too

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 4>much red tape, we have too much regulation in some areas,

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 4>and we need to tone down carefully, but we do

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 4>need to become much more efficient in Europe. That all

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 4>of that predates the election the of President Trump. So

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 4>in that sense, the recognition that we have to do

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 4>a better job in becoming more competitive.

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Has already taken place in the middle of the Biden administration.

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 4>So it's clearly not a linkage of oh, all of

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, a new president comes up in Europe, all

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden changes everything.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Feeling like you have to choose some capacity between the

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 3>US and China, especially given that there is a feeling

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 3>right now that China and the UFS are kind of

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 3>at odds, and that China is going to try to

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 3>use Europe to unleash a whole bunch of goods that

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 3>they cannot sell into the United States quite in the

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>same way.

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 4>But it's the wrong choice, I think the if you

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 4>just look at the strategy that China has of dual

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 4>circulation China twenty twenty five, they do not want the

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 4>old German business model of manufacturing cars and chemicals and machines,

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 4>putting them on ships and sending them to ports in

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 4>China as finished goods.

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>China doesn't want that anymore.

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 4>They want manufacturing to happen locally in China, and therefore

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 4>now believing that China could become an alternative is just naive.

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Germany exported more goods and services to Poland

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 4>last year than to China, and that trend is not

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 4>going to I don't. I think it would be very

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 4>naive to think, given the clear message from the top

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 4>in China, from the President to the Prime Minister to

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 4>the Trade minister on down, implemented everywhere in China that

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 4>they want the manufacturing base in China to grow and

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 4>become much bigger, to believe that Germany could now instead

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 4>of exporting to the United States all of a sudden,

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:33.239
<v Speaker 4>go back to the old days, the good old days

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 4>of exporting to China.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It's naive what would work.

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 4>And I'm convinced that that's the strategy, and we're pushing

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 4>the European Commission to do that.

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>That if we were.

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 4>To conclude trade agreements with India, with Indonesia, the already

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 4>signed trade deal with mercoa store in Latin America, to

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 4>get it ratified and finalized, that would be a great alternative.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Just thirty seconds going forward, how come arregu given that

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 3>there is likely to be some sort of trade deal

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 3>in the next ninety days, that Germany can avoid recession

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, that is the biggest hurdle that we have.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 4>The other big hurdle is the economic reform program with

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 4>the fiscal spending and the structural reforms that are agreed

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 4>in the coalition contract. And we are working day and

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 4>night now in the outgoing government so that the incoming

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 4>government can immediately unleash both the fiscal power of the

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 4>military and infrastructure spending and start legislating the economic reform

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 4>program to give a clear message to our businesses and

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 4>consumers that We are serious about economic reform and getting

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 4>back to the growth path, and there's a very high

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 4>chance of doing that because the new majority in the

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Parliament has already signed agreed on a contract to implement

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 4>exactly that and implement it quickly.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Minister Koukies, thank you so much for being with us.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 3>That was the foreign minister of Germany.