WEBVTT - Lack of Bids For EM High Yield Debt: Bloomberg's Sassower

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Emerging

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Markets debt this is a big question mark right now

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of fund managers. You have seen outflows

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>continue from the largest emerging markets debt e t F

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and emerging market high yield yields are currently lower than

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>similarly rated debt yields in the US UH. This has

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>only occurred twice. In both instances, it has reversed in

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>less than one month. Here to talk about that with us,

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Damien Sassauer, our own of Mberg Intelligence, who focuses on

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>everything having to do with emerging markets. Thank you so

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. So tell us what is

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>going on and why has there been this resilience in

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets do you haven't seen as much in other

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>US as a classes. Well, first of all, Happy Year

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Dog, Lisa pim Um. So you know, wait, yeah,

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know China is emerging market, so anyway, UM, yeah,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about emerging market high yield relative to

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>US high yield. So yes, only twice before since twelve

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>have emerging market high yield yields will yield to worse

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>uh drop below or dip below US high yield. And

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the reason for that, quite frankly, is because US high

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>yield monk to date has sold off at a quicker pace.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for that is the prevalence of call

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>features in US junk debt. Right, So what that does

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>adds extension risks. So when yields are rising, you see

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>an exaggerated impact, well an exaggerated effect on US high

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>yield relative to e M high yield. And that's actually

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing right now. But let's talk about the

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>actual market dynamic, because you pointed out some thing that

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was fascinating I thought, which is the bid ask spread,

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>basically the differential of what people want the price that

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>people want to sell the bond for versus what people

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>are offering to buy. It's widening out a sign of

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>illiquidity in the emerging market complex. Can you talk about

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that and what does this signify to you, Well, it's

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>happening in US highyield as well, but yes, and e

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>M high yield. What it signifies for me? And you

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>really have to kind of drill down and see exactly

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>which junk bonds in emerging markets are are effectively where

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>the bid offer spreads are widening. And it's these single

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>b these you know, I mean Zambia or Angola, these

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of smaller small terms of market value, small terms

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of the size of their country and their economies. There's

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>just no demand there, the bids aren't there. When liquidity,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of drives up like we saw last Friday,

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and so when that happens, you know, it gives a

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of investors costs for concerning what they are then

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>forced to do, especially the big fund managers, is they

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>have to sell their higher quality investment grade debt in

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>order to meet redemptions, which as we all know, are

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>coming through this month. I mean we've seen that not

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>just in the world's largest emerging market bond ETF, but

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in all emerging market that ETFs hard currency. That is,

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of redemptions month to date, and

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>we're only halfway through. And the Act of funds they

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have to meet redemptions at the end of this month.

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And uh, if they're seeing the same trend we're seeing

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>uh in ETFs, it could get it could get a

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>little uglier. So let me understand this, Damian. If an

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>investor wants to lend their money to a middling credit

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>emerging market company, they're going to receive less money than

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>if they decide to lend their money to a similar

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>rated company in the United States. Right, well, phim, let's

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just differentiate. I mean, it's really sovereign debt, right, I

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>mean we're talking about a country, not a company, right,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>which is even worse to your point, I mean, so

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>so you're right. So, so you're telling me that if

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to lend my money to the government of Angola,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get less than if I lend my

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>money to the United States government or to the United

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>States I know and equivalently rated you s high old corporate, Okay.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for this is not because the United

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>States is a better or worse bet, although you could

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly make the case that it might mean a better bet.

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>It's because no one wants to buy your angal and

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>sovereign debt, So you stick it in the drawer and

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you look for something that someone will buy, and then

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it shows up and it goes, oh yeah, US debt

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>will sell that because we know someone will buy. But

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 1>there lies the opportunity ten because what it does these

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>fund managers are forced to sell higher quality, better bonds

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in order to meet in order to raise cash to

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>meet redemptions. Right, So you're seeing these kind of outliers

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>so and and they're exaggerated in environments like this, and

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>this is where you know, the real savvy EM fund managers,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, really earn their keep, right if they're able

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to kind of manage their cash balances. So what is

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:48.679
<v Speaker 1>one of these So, what is one of these uh,

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of savvy investments that is being thrown out because

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>someone is trying to meet a redemption call and they

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>can't find anyone to you know, by their paper from

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Angola at a price that they're willing to take. Well.

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 1>And and I mean look the two largest most liquid

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>credits in e M high yield our Argentina and Petrol Buss, right,

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are huge issuers of high yield emerging

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>market debt and invariably, if you need to sell m

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>e M high YELD debt to meet redemptions. I would

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>imagine those are a source of liquidity for fund managers.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So learn Portuguese, learned Spanish and lineup for some petrol

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>bras and some Argentine bonds. Pretty much. Yeah. So, so

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>here's my question right now, how much of this is

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a currency bet? Because you did see a bit more

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar strength I mean obviously now, I mean I don't

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>want to say that a bit mar because now we're

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>back at four year lows with a dollar. But you know,

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a little bit more strength which would which

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>would make these investments less valuable for people who hadn't hedged,

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>right because e M currencies were losing value against the dollar.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, can you talk to us about how much

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that plays into this or is this something to me?

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>At least it's all about the dollar and em local currency,

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>especially today. And I mean this has been a big

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>story all day long with the dollar declining to three

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>or lows, but I mean it has fully decoupled from

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>safe safe haven assets such as this was frong the

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>en and gold and um. And that's good for emerging

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>markets for now, right because you know that's Basically e

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>M and commodities are are continuing to perform well, but

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it is a In fact, it is the second most

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>crowded short and global financial markets today if you listen

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to Bank of America and I just I'm not sure

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>how long dollar bears can hold on given the magnitude

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of this week's move. Okay, so let's say the dollar

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>does strengthen. How much of a problem is that for

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>these investments. Oh yeah, I think that's going to be

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a problem, certainly for e M local currency debt. I mean,

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot of emerging market managers come and go,

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting barished on the dollar. It's it's just,

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it works when it works, and when it doesn't,

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it really really doesn't. How much fear are you hearing

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>from portfolio managing? You know, I don't think it's a

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of fear, really. I think it's just more, um,

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just more that people are trying to get accustomed

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to this new paradigm. I mean, we all yields are rising.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean we have autom than US yields and the

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>impact and total returns in all emerging market asset classes,

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 1>hard and local currency here to date have been you know,

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>materially impacted by rising US yield has just dominated the

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>impact on spread, compression and carry. So um, so that's

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing. What happens if this continues? Um, well,

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much higher US heils are gonna go.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to bring Ira Jersey and to answer

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that question. But let's say you get the tenure at

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>three Um, you know, I mean what we're almost there

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>when we twelve BIPs away? Right, So I think I

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>think the US tenure. Look if it continues to go,

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>if it goes to three and a quarter, three and

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a half, I think ginus and four percent. I mean,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>things can get really bad for emerging markets at that point. Sure,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>but um, but for now, I think you know, it's

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be uh, it's gonna be steady sail until the

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the month and we see what redemptions have

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in store for us. All right, thanks very much, you're

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>going to us informed. As always, he's got great research.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend it. Check it out. Yes, that is

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Damian Sas. He's our fixed income strategists. When it comes

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Intelligence, all about a merchant market at approximately

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>on people are diagnosed with colon cancer in the United States,

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and over fifty thousand people die from it annually. Here

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to help us understand this disease and ways to combat

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it are his Cameron Reynolds. He is the president and

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive of Volition r X and he joins

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>us from London. Cameron, thank you very much for being

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>with us. Tell us about your company and about how

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>you became involved with Volition r X. Yes, I think

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>cancer is something which touches everyone, and at Volition we've

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>developed a range of different tests for different types of cancer,

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>beginning with cole rectal cancer as as you mentioned, and

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the way best way to treat cancer, short of

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a cure, which is unfortunately not not upon us, is

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to find it early and get the cancer removed. And

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if you can do that in stage one or stage

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>two or is a pre cancerous poll up, then your

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>chances are surviving more than five years are very high,

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>well over ninety. So that's what we're developing a range

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of different blood tests which can detect cancer and in

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a routine blood test, which means it can be part

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of your normal blood work at a very low cost. Cameron,

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about the costs. That's what I wanted to pick

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>up on because a colon ascopy, which is the traditional

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>method of detecting calling cancer, is very challenging and people

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>have to be partially anaesthetized and drink all sorts of

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff and have somebody bring them home. I mean, it's

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a big complicated or deal. Imagine. It's also pretty expensive.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a sense of what the price

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>differential would be from the test that you're developing versus

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a colonoscopy. Yeah, the colonoscopy is a very good test

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>as far as accuracy goes, but as you say, it's

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>very unpleasant and costly. Depending on what what state you're in,

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you can range up to three or four or five

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>or six thousand dollars, so you normally don't see that

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>except through the COPAI, but the co pay can be

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>very large as well. So, unfortunately, because of its cost

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and unpleasantness, there's about thirty million Americans who are not

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>currently screened for colon cancer. So one of the ways

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of getting around that is to have a low cost

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>blood test. Ours is on a very simple platform called

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a lizer, So it's part of your routine blood work

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and we aim to price around the hundred dollar range,

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's very affordable for pretty much everyone. And because

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it's affordable and the decision is really taken out of

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>your hands, if the doctor takes that extra BOXUM, like

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>your cholesterol test, like your PSA, like all the blood

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>tests you currently have, that really should put compliance way

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>higher than it is now. Compliance is not something people

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>talk about a lot, but if you're not doing the test,

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the accuracy is very easy to work out, which is zero.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So by doing a very routine blood test is the

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>best way of getting the most people screened. And if

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you do screen you can find the cancer early. Normally,

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you're in very good shape. Talking about tests, can you

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>give us an update on your diagnostic test? Is that

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>already launched in Europe? UM, We're just in the process

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>now of doing some very large trials in Europe. We'll

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have about fifteen thousand patient samples run this year. UM

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>we've made public. We're about to announce this month at

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the first read out on the first of those trials,

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>which is six eight patients, which we haven't got the

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>data from, but we're very hopeful to announce it soon

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 1>and we're very hopeful that it will show something very unique,

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>which is ability to detect early stage cancer and pre cancer. Again,

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>that's where you really want to be diagnosed before it's metastasized,

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>before you need chemotherapy and all those things. So we'll

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>have a read on out on that very soon. And

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>then we have the two big trials in Europe underway

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this year, which we'll have read outs on both of

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>them this year as well. So we're very hopeful of

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>having a product on the market for next year in

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Europe which is ce marked, which means we can sell

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eight European country. Is to to anyone clinically, Karen,

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>just preliminary studies, do they show that the accuracy is

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>enough to replace colonoscopies or would this be an additional

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>test that would be done for people who might shy

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>away from the procedure that is more invasive and so

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in other words, this might be another cost rather than

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>reducing the cost of the colon asky because it wouldn't

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>be a replacement. Yeah. No, I think ultimately, if you're

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>currently having a colonoscopy, if you can afford it, you

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>are prepared to do it. My advice and the correct

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>advice is to continue taking it. It's a very accurate

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>test and pull ups can be removed straight away. But

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the tragedy is that thirty Americans of screening age either

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>not up to date or have never been screened. So

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the only way to reduce the massive cost not only

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>on the healthcare system, late stage cancer patients cost up

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>to half a million dollars to for the last few

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>years of their life, and it's not a very pleasant

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>few years. The only way to really deal with that

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to get those people screened is a low cost, easy

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to run routine blood test. So yes, it's correct if

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you if you are positive, you need a colonoscopy to

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>follow it up. But it's a way of driving people

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>who have a much higher chance of having cancer because

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>they're positive in our test from actually having a colonoscopy.

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately being a very low cost test, it would

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it would save a lot of money from the healthcare

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>system because it's apart from the human toil, it's extremely

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>expensive treating late stage cancer patents. So we think it's

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the only way of really dealing with that of people

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>who just refused to take a colonoscopy. Well, I want

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to push back a little bit because there are other

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>biod tests that you know, for example, are really not

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>very accurate one for say, varying cancer. Uh. And you know,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>one one concern with blood tests that have limited accuracy

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is that they lead to a lot more unnecessary testing

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>um and it might end up adding to costs just

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>by virtue of uh you know, extra perhaps I needed surveillance,

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>uh and and and false alarms. I mean, how do

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you how do you respond to that? That's absolutely grect.

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got to be very careful. You're not just diagnosing

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a small number of late stage cancers, which many routine

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>blood tests do do. So when you're looking at our

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>data which is coming up very soon, looked, if you

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>can find the cancer early and and a good percentage

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of them, you've got to be in the sevent or

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>more or range of getting those numbers of cancers. If

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you can do that at the low cost, then you

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>are saving the system a lot of money. You're very correct, though.

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>If you look at a lot of screening modalities, mommography,

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the p s A for prostate, they're very widely carried out,

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but there are under a lot of criticism because if

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>they can add more burden to the healthcare system. But

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>if if you do what we're aiming to do, and

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll get a good read out on that in in

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this month, is if you can do it in a

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>very low cost routine test, you then drive the people

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>who are positive towards colonoscopies and then you save them

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>at an early stage to have the treatment, which then

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>are not only save the healthcare system the half a

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>million dollars ODD in the treatment, but also gives that

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>person another ten or twenty years or thirty years of

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>productive life. So there is a lot of concern out

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>there and very well dodge concern that you don't want

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to over diagnose. And the p s A for prostate

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is probably the ultimate example. But if if our test

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is as accurate as we think it's hoping has been

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in the previous trials, then we'd be in a very

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>rare category of an accurate blood test that's routine, that

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is also low cost. And one thing which is also

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>important is there's also a small amount of blood, so

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not a separate blood draw it so it can

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>be done in your normal lab. You don't have to

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>send it off somewhere else. Um. I think if we

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>can show all of that which we're hopeful of. Then

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll be very unique and add a tremendous

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of the healthcare system and save an awful lot

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of suffering. Cameron Reynolds, thank you so much for being

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>with us. Cameron Reynolds as president and chief executive officer

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of Volition our X, which is based in London and

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is currently testing a blood test to detect colon cancer

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and avoid call it well non avoid call it ask

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps direct a greater number of people to get them

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>should they test past it is. I want to turn

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>our attention to infrastructure. The President did release a plan

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>for how to unleash one point five trillion dollars of

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>investments in the US infrastructure. Here to talk about that

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with us, as Christina Swallow, president of the American Society

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of Civil Engineers, coming to us from Washington, d C. Christina,

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that there was one really big question right now,

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>which is how to spend this money. I mean, aside

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>from the fact that this isn't going to necessarily uh

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>get done in the form that he's proposing, but what

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>needs to happen right now? So from your perspective, let's

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>start there. So from our perspective, we look at all

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>categories sixteen categories of infrastructure, and we recognize that there's

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollar investment gap. So when we're starting to

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>look at that, we need to make sure that we

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>prioritize any funding that we put towards, that we prioritize

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>it and put it towards projects that will have the

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>most substantial economic and public benefit. We need to really

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we're prioritizing our projects and spending the

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>money where it will have the most long term benefit. Okay,

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that seems reasonable. Maybe we could go through

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 1>some of the states that specifically need this kind of

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending if we can. Let's start with Massachusetts. Massachusetts,

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>by many measures, has an issue with its water system.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Their estimates that it needs about a seven and a

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>half billion dollar flow of money in order to fix

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:49.959
<v Speaker 1>the water infrastructure. Is that something that you see as being, uh,

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>as you just described, you know, like the biggest bang

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for the buck. So definitely, as Americans, every single American

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>should be able to have access to quality drinking water

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>as we need it. So that is definitely something It's

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a public health and a safety issue right having proper

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>treatment and availability of water, so that is definitely something

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that should be a priority on a national level. We

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>know that our surface transportation system is the largest piece

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of that infrastructure investment gap, so that's also a place

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>where you can see the need to invest um as

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a priority because it drives so much of our economy. Christina,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>if you were designing the infrastructure plan, what would be

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>your first location and first project. That's a good question.

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I really I don't know that I have a first

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>location of first project. I would want to look probably

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>first at our transportation system. Like I mentioned, it's half

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of the gap, and it drives I mean, it really

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>does drive our economy. Infrastructure, the sort of transportation system

0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>in urban settings or in rural settings. Urban settings have

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the most impact on us as people, as well as

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>on safety. When you consider that hundred on average a

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty eight million trips are made over structurally

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>deficient bridges each day, that's something that's definitely an area

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>that we want to make sure we focus on to

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>improve safety and also reduce congestion so our our freight

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>bottlenecks don't continue to exist. So that's a focus, but

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't ignore our rural areas because the freight travels

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 1>across the nation, and so we need to make sure

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>rural areas are also maintained. But definitely urban areas needs

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a focus. There is more of a focus,

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems from the President's plan on the rural areas

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and sort of fortifying the rural grade. Do you think

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>that is a bad approach. I think the President is

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at the fact that our gut instinct often is

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to fund the urban areas, and just recognizing the fact

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that if we ignore the rural areas, we will be

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>um short changing ourselves. I think about so many of

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the states that have these major freight networks. You know,

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>when you think about I forty and I and I

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>tend that crossed these significant areas of just rule. If

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>we don't make sure that those are maintained, are the

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>frame won't be able to get to where it's going.

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>So we need to make sure that we also focus

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>on that. And I think that was the intent, was

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>just to make sure we don't ignore it. Okay, Now,

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the American Society of Civil Engineers, you're based in Reston, Virginia,

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>so maybe just even close to Virginia, we can talk

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>about in Maryland, because if you live anywhere near the

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.719
<v Speaker 1>nation's capital, you know that you faced daily disruptions. Right

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>there was this big steam pipe explosion last June. What

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>about the deficient bridges there, there's some estimates that six

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of them are deficient. The average commute to work is

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>over thirty two minute. What kind of money and what

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>specific roads or infrastructure would you recommend that we've focus on.

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about bridges, and we definitely know in the

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>DC area they're working on improving the Frederick Douglas Bridge.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>That's one that's been talked about for really a long time,

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and they're finally at the point where they're going to

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 1>be investing in that. I think we also need to

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>look when you look at that whole DC Metro area,

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.719
<v Speaker 1>how do we increase investment in transit. Metro has been

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>doing a really good job recently at focusing on that,

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>but they could still use some additional investment and that

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>would help alleviate some of the congestion on the roads

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>if people went back to trusting the transit system. So

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>there's opportunities there not just to invest in the roads

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>and the bridges, but also to invest in transit On

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a national level, Transit received our lowest grade at a

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>D minus. Christina, you probably have a lot of discussions

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with some of the workers who would be trying to

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>design and make these infrastructure projects happen. Are there enough

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>people in this country at this point to fill the

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>jobs that would be required with some kind of substantial

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure plan. The people are there. Um, If the funding

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>came through, it wouldn't come through all tomorrow. It would

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>come out in a phase phase manner, in which case, um,

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the people that are already in the industries would be

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>able to ramp up and do additional work and capacity

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as we continue to develop new entry entry level workers

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>into the broad spectrum of the industry. So the money

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>would come, the current workforce would step up, and additional

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>workers would enter, and we would start to see changes

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>in our infrastructure within the next three to five years.

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But overall, to bring the grades from a D plus

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to everyone at a B, it's going to take us decades.

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>We didn't get here in a matter of a short

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>time frames, and we're not going to get out of

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it in a short time frame either. It's going to

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>take time. What's the position of the American Society of

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Civil Engineers on increasing the the federal gasoline tax in

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>order to add more money to the Highway Trust Fund.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>We've supported increasing the federal gas tax for years. It

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been in increase since n It's buying power is

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>significantly decreased as a result. Additionally, we know Carls cards

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>have become more fuel efficient, so we need to find

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a way to increase investment today. And we're excited about

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the US Chamber and even I heard

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>yesterday the President support the concept of or increase in

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the gas tax that will help us meet the needs

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>today but also modernize and improve our system for the

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty one century. Christina, I'm just wondering. You said that

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this problem has taken decades to happen, and we will

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>take probably decades to fix, even with some substantial appropriations

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in the near term. Whose fault was it that there

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't more real time investment made? I think that that

0:23:57.720 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we're we all share a little bit of that. I

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>think there's the concept that when the infrastructure was built,

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't a lot of thought about the long term

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>ongoing maintenance. It was we built it, and it was

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a great success. You think about the major construction of

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of the early twentieth century and how successful those were,

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but then but nobody was really thinking about the long

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>term maintenance of those projects, or even though a project

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that was built in the early d with would would

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be expected to be still functioning today a century later.

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.959
<v Speaker 1>I visited a lock system in Seattle that celebrated its

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>centennial last summer. So there's a lot of pieces of this.

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>We weren't thinking about the long term maintenance. We weren't

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>expecting the projects to have to last as long as

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>they were, and so we've underinvested for a full generation.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>And now it's time that we all at all levels

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of government and private step up and start increasing that

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>investment and modernize our system. Um. One of the things

0:24:56.080 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>we we've been focused on is also the combination of

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>spending but also the goals. In other words, whether there

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>is a specific economic goal other than saying all right,

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>yes we want better roads, we want better bridges. But

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, in the Mississippi, the idea that you would

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have a specific goal that would either cut weight times

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for soybean farmers and exporters in order to be able

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to get their products to market. Is there any specific

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>economic goal that you can point to that we would

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>then focus on so that we would know whether we're

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>spending the money on the right kinds of infrastructure projects.

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Each project is going to have to have its own

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>its own goals, but on a national level, we know

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that if we don't invest the additional two trillion dollars

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>needed between now and our economy will suffer three point

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>nine trillion dollar loss in our GDP. So there is

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely an economic impact to this. It's not just a

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>public health and safety issue, which we talk about a

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>lot in terms of the water systems and the bridges,

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>but it also impacts our economy and we need to invest.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's not it's not just the GP that

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>will be impacted. Seven trillion dollars in lost business sales,

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>two and a half million million jobs lost in alone.

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>There are economic impacts to under investing in our infrastructure.

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much for joining us.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Christina Swallow, president of the American Society of a Civil Engineers.

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>They are based in Rest in Virginia. We want to

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>visit now with Robert Langrity as our senior healthcare reporter

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg and Robert just to set out a little

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>bit about Amazon and the healthcare industry. Amazon does about

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventies seven billion dollars worth of business

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a year, and on its most recent inference call, the

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>earnings call, one of the executives spoke about the Amazon

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>business offering. This was in October, and they were saying

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that the one of the institutions, one of the areas

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that they are targeting with this offering, along with schools, laboratories,

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>government agencies, is the healthcare industry for dentists, doctors, hospitals.

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about gloves, syringes, other kind of healthcare items.

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>What is Amazon doing and who is going to feel

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the heat? Well, so, like you know, there's been a

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of buzz about what is Anmazon at last several

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>months about what is Amazon going to do in healthcare?

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Are there has been uh talk uh And they've I

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>guess been quietly looking at, you know, for years what

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to do in the in the drug sector. Uh, and

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly that's affected lots of drug related stocks. But what

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 1>they appeared to already be doing and they have been

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of working on for a couple of years, is

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in their Amazon business. They want to expand it b

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to be and this is a way. Of course, there's

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>a huge market for health care supply, so they are

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of starting in healthcare and I guess a small

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>way on kind of basic supplies. And what our sources

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>has said is you're one way to start to penetrate

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the supply market is UH for you know, medical good.

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>UH is before you get to the high tech, highly

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>regulated stuff like medical devices and drugs, which are complicated

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 1>sometimes of special delivery requirements, lots of regulations, you can

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>start with the simple stuff, you know, grov's bandages, stutors

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff that, and and and you can start with doctors

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>offices and and that is a market that is from

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>sources we talked to say are underserved compared to UH.

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>You know that the the more and more acute hospital

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>market and hospitals and buying up lots of doctors offices

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and now they have lots lots of far flung offices

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and the distribution isn't as efficient because you know they're

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>distribut and systems are built for the central hospital. So

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is trying to you know, get into this sector

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in a big way, establish a foothold. Uh, you know,

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in the big medical supplies market, and it's I've been

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>talking to hospitals or with the focus on our patient

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>clinics and uh and that could potentially threaten you know,

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>medical supply companies. There's a company, Henry Shine that has

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>calls on doctors off his veterinarians, dentist. There's another company

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>owns and minor. Uh and they acknowledge in a conference

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>call yesterday, Hey, I was talking to our customers. Uh

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and so far, you know, Amazon is more in the

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>doctor office, but they're talking to our big hospital customers. Uh.

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is a way for Amazon to start to

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>get into the medical supply market. But uh and if

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this works, I would imagine they would ramp up two

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>more expensive, higher tech stuff eventually, Robert, is this stuff

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly those sort of gloves and the sutures and the

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>band aids? And are these things low profit margin types

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of goods? In other words, are they starting Is this

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.719
<v Speaker 1>an experiment for them or is this lucrative in its

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.719
<v Speaker 1>own right? Well, I mean it's just looking you know,

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Henry Shine itself, that's one company with supplies and stuff.

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>They they alone of a few billion dollars in sales,

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, medical supply and several more billion dollars

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in dental supply. So they're like, I think around I

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>probably you know, somewhere around ten billion dollars in revenue company. Uh,

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're not just one company, so I'm sure it's

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>nowhere near as the Other thing about Amazon is that

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's been about revenue growth, and investors have wanted to

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>see you know, uh sterling a revenue growth kind of

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>profits come later and they've been rewarded for the revenue

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>growth and new markets, and they're looking for new markets

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to get into. And you know, healthcare is one of

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the big, big big markets there not in now and

0:30:55.600 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in much of a way, rob You know, the the

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>issue of Amazon taking over other businesses is not brand new.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Where have all these I mean, Robert, where have all

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>these businesses been? Are they waiting for Amazon to come

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in and give them competition? Because doesn't this apply to

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>just about any kind of product and service that's delivered

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to your door? Um? Yeah, potentially does. But and the

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>one reason that that you know, doctor's offices, didental clinics,

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>outpatient surgery clinics. Uh uh, these types of clinics and

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>smaller operations were because you know, they also have to

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>order office supplies and basic stuff too, and so they can.

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It works very well because some of them may already

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>be lading to office supply supplies from Amazon business. And

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>if you throw advantage and sutures and other basic medical

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>supplies that don't have to refrigerator, it aren't being implanted

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in the patients. There's not complicated the regulation there. They

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>can combine order. It fits very well. And this stuff,

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's businesses. Basic stuff can be stored in

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the warehouse with refrigeration. It's not not the high tech

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff you have, and they can build up to the

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>higher tech stuff. So it's a good starting point, uh

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>for Amazon. The one thing and they've been you know

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>talking to some major hospital systems, uh, you know over

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about you know, what they can do in health over

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the past several months to a year. We talked to

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>one that's been talking to Amazon for a year, another

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>one that's been talking to Amazon for you know, three

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>or six months. Uh. And Amazon would be a big

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>change from the way things are done because they would

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have ordered the hospitals and health systems because a lot

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of the supplies are in a contract basis. Now it's

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of fixed price at my last or six months

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a year. Amazon really built up that relationship with hospitals.

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Unfortunately have to leave it there.

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Robert Langworth, health care reporter, Senior health reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>You can some scribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox, I'm

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.719
<v Speaker 1>abramowits one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bluebirg Radio