WEBVTT - Friday Flight - Ginormous Jackpots, Expensive Algorithms, & Geriatric Roommates #546

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How the Money. I'm Joel and I am Matt,

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and today we're discussing ginormous jackpots, expensive algorithms, and geriatric roommates.

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Joel. This is our Friday Flights where we

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>are talking through some of the different stories we came

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>across this week. We're gonna specifically talk about how they

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to impact our finances and your finances. If

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you're listening, and before we get to the stories, though

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>the time has come, you likely have heard about the

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>How the Money socks rumors are flying. These are the

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>meticulously designed socks that we created with the nice folks

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>over at Sock Fancy. I am holding a pair in

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>my hands right now, Matt. They look so good. They

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>are not only are they gorgeous, they are so ridiculously company.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And again, the reason these took so long is because

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we really did want to make sure we had some

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>merch that we were proud of, not some of these

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>soft companies where they just printed the pictures. And we

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>joked about sharing the pictures of the some of the

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>crappy ones. I we will totally do that, will throw

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it up at least on Instagram. I just held them

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.559
<v Speaker 1>by the way, they smell like Hinton can either to listen,

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you can eat them, but they smell so yeah. We

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>gave a few of several pairs of these away to

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>some folks who submitted listener money tips back for ourisode,

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>but we are now giving away five pairs to listeners

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>out there who leave a review over on Apple podcast

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>or if you give us a rating on Spotify or

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the other platforms as well, like podcast Addict.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of folks who listened over there

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on that app as well, So all you gotta do

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>leave a review, even those old reviews that you may

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have left previously, those count as well. But then send

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>us a screenshot or an email to resubmit your review

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for the giveaway. Send those two how the money pot

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com. Just make sure to do that

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>before end of day this coming Wednesday, and we will

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>announce those five winners on our next Friday flight, that's right,

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And then we'll ship these gorgeous, lovely things out to

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you and you'll be like, this is the best clothing

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>eye on my own. You might even throw away all

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>your other clothes and only where the hat of money

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>socks um. Although we don't suggest. If that's the case,

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with it. Uh that before we get to

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of all the meatia stories we have to get

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to this week. One thing I want to mention I

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>just talked about. We just talked about how crusty my

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>phone was getting. And it was one of those things

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>where I, as a frugalalite, was hoping to keep my

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>phone for a minimum of three years, and I threw

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in the towel man I bought a new phone. Um,

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it crossed my mind. But here's what pushed me over

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the edge. I got the new I pre ordered the

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>new Google Pixel six A. Right now, I'm rolling with

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the four A. The six A is at the newest.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>The six A is the newest. I like literally just

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>came out, Like it's sitting at my house now and

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't even opened yet. But so, because of all

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the issues I mentioned, the crack screen, the battery life,

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>messing up the charging board is is actually the biggest annoyance.

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>It's so hard to actually get my phone to charge

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>these days. But because of all those things, I was like,

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 1>I was at least interested. I was gonna look and

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna see, you know how much can I

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>get from my phone? And some from folks in the

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook group, We're like, hey, check out Swap, check out Gazelle.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about the most websites on the show in

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the past, but I was like, you're right, I should

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.119
<v Speaker 1>go check those out. And uh, guess how much Gazelle

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>offered me for my two year old phone? Two year

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>old phone? How much was that phone? Brand new fifty

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of busted up, So I'm gonna guess

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>like sixty bucks? Okay, So they offered me twenty one

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>very much even worse. And then I went to cell Cell,

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of like an aggregator, and the best

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the most I could get paid for that phone was

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty five from there, but decently, Yeah, that's still fair

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for for what you got going on. It's okay, but

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>guess what. I went through the Google steps to see

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>how much Google would give me from my phone if

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.119
<v Speaker 1>I were to pre order the source the Pixel six

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>A and two sixty two dollars what they offer. Yeah,

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so it was like almost like a free phone for

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. Did you realize I'll bust

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it up? It is? Yeah, So they asked that once

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you receive it, are they're gonna be like, oh, sorry, buddy,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna if I had money, I hope that they

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>asked if it had a bus to screen. I'm like yeah,

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, And if it hadn't, I think I would

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have gotten three hulls, which is still shocking that you

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>could only lose fifty bucks on the phone after two years.

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>So it's one of those things where, um, it made

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.559
<v Speaker 1>sense because of that. That's a great deal. It changed

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the economics of of getting into a lot of folks

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>out there who might have an older pixel like you.

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you trade in some of your some

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of the older pixel pixels as well? I think so. Yeah,

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Well I think actually no, I think the four A

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is the oldest down So if you're rolling with a

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>three or three A, it's probably not valuable enough. Um,

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>but if you got a four A or newer, it's

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a great deal. Yeah, the upgrade might make sense. And

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I think right now, yes, right now they're doing for

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like a limited period of time. I think yeah, I

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>think so. I think it's literally just for a few

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>more days. So get out of folks, and and there's

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a you get a free Google pixel buds that your

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>buds to with the pre order, and I'm like, I

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if I want them. I might sell them,

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>but uh and make some of that money back. But

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>it felt like a no brainer when your kids will

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>use them for for something I'm sure they're trying to

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>steal on my cave. Okay, so the real question, will

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you get a case for this phone discussion? We'll see,

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll see probably, or are you're just gonna ride this

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>wave of cheap phones straight to the landfill Over the course,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna just have to deal with this on your conscience,

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you're laying there on your deathbed and

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I ruined the planet. That being said, I still don't

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have a case or a screen cover, and if I

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>crack my stupid screen, I have no place to complain,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I will not come on the show and complain

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>about it. But that being said, I definitely want to.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I just keep forgetting, but at least your screen get.

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>The protective equipment is more it's more solid than than well,

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it's heavier too, which mean you know, the heavier, the

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>bigger they are, the harder they fall. That's true. All right,

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>let's move on let's get to the Friday flight, the

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>sampling of stories we found interesting this week. Let's quickly

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>touch on kind of the big headline from yesterday, which

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that we are we are now technically

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of sort of in a recession, right, So we're

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>technically not in a recession, right, So like according to

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the National Bureau of Economic Research, they're the folks who

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>gets us say that, yes, this is, as they're pushing

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>up their glasses, we are now officially in a recession. Yeah,

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>they have not come down from on high and spoken

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and and said that that this is the case. But

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the typical definition of recession has been met, right, which

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is two quarters of declining growth um in a row.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't know, it feels like the definition

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of recession is kind of up in the air right now.

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>But for most folks, we're kind of in one. But

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we are. But that doesn't this is really that we're

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be here as well. Yeah, we we we

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>figured this is gonna be the case, but that doesn't

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>mean that this is. Recessions can look different, right, they

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have to all look the same. And right now,

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>as we've talked about on the show, there's still a

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of positive economic data to point to a lot

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of people are still if they didn't read the headlines,

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't realize that we were in a recession. It

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to have impacted really a whole lot of folks.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Yeah, everyone notices the higher prices, everyone notices inflation,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but the recession part of the story maybe a little

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>bit less. So a quick p s A for everyone

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>out there, don't play the lottery. I'm sure this is

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a conversation you and your friends have already had. Maybe

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about going in on a like within a

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>pool together where it's like, okay, let's all get together,

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll promise to split it, because really, who needs a

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars? I mean, really, beyond like a few million,

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>does life really look all that different for for most folks.

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It's more attempting now than ever before. Though, when you're

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about a billion dollars jackpot, that is well, that's

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing you can go into in a pretty huge

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>pool of folks and everyone could still end up benefiting

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty handsomely. But just bottom line, this is a bad

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>wealth building strategy because of the odds of winning are

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>one in three two million. Again, that jackpot is for

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>more than a billion dollars. Now that drawing happens tonight,

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>which is exciting for a lot of folks, But there

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>are countless other things that you likely should be thinking

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>about rather than the infantasmally small chance that you're gonna

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>win big. But plus, you know we've talked before how

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.239
<v Speaker 1>winning the lottery, how it's usually bad for your life.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>People die, people o d on drugs, it's bad for

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>your relationships. It's something like seventy present a lot of

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>winners to clared bankruptcy at the point, and exactly just

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>imagine how many how people start to look at you

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>if they know you're a billionaire. They they're looking at

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you for money. Now they want to loane and it's

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>going to drastically change. It's gonna alter the course of

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>your life. And you might think that it's all good,

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of downsides too. Yes, you need

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to think about the negatives. Although I'm not against people

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>playing it, Like if you want to do it because

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it's fun, just know that you're doing it. You're paying

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>two dollars thinking that, Okay, this is gonna provide me

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of fun. Like if that means that

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you can be a part of all of the excitement,

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I am okay with that, but don't count like, don't

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>think of it as like an investment strategy by by

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>any means. And I also like how it can cause

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>people to think about and how it could get them

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to ask some bigger questions in their lives. Because if

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking through, okay, oh, I would do this, and

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I would do this, and I would do this if

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 1>you would change your life in a significant way, I

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's worth thinking through, okay, what steps could I

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.119
<v Speaker 1>take now that could allow me to start to replicate

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>some of those changes now, right without having won the lottery.

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 1>And if you're lucky enough that you're thinking, I don't

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think there would be a ton of changes I would

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I would make. Well, then I would say that that's

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a great sign that you are you know, you're doing well,

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you're working hard, that that you are on the right

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>track with how it is you want to live your life.

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So I do like that it can cause you to

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe have some bigger questions about life. It makes me think.

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>We did an episode, episode four ten, was entitled what

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>if You want the lottery, and I think it's it.

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is a good time to go breeth visit

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that one if you didn't get a chance to listen

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>because some food or thought right about what what you

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>would actually do and how that impacts Well, you're probably

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>not gonna win a lottery, so how how should you

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>live life? In life of that? Um? But let's move on.

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about personal loans here for a second, because

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>there was an article in CNBC basically stating that that

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>some some people are taking out personal loans in an

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>effort to build wealth. Uh. That struck me as ridiculous,

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>sounds a little backward surprising. I'm like, who takes out

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>like debt that's in the upper single digits or low

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>double digits in order to build wealth like that? That's

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>not smart. So yeah, inside of that CNBC article, math

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>they they talked about a survey by lending Tree which

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>said that people are using personal loans in order to

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>make improvements to their home. And I guess I guess

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>those people are hoping that that's going to increase the

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>value of their home, there by increasing their net worth. UM.

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But that seems like some pretty flawed logic to me

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>because when you look at the numbers, very few home

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>improvements actually pay off. You typically lose money by making

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>upgrades to your residents. And we'll actually link to some

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>recent research on this. In the show notes. You can

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>actually see kind of what the payoff looks like for

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different things that you could do to

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>your home. The truth is, on top of that, there

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>are better products if you're wanting to do work to

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>your house. So why would you take out a personal

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>loan when you could take out a home equity line

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of credit instead, which is going to carry better terms,

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a better interest rates. Personal loans mostly suck. We want

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>people to avoid them. And I was just shocked to

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 1>think that some people think taking out personal loans is

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>actually going to lead to more wealth for them in

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the future. It's the exact opposite. Every dollar you decide

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to take from a bank or credit union that is

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>class time as a personal loan is going to hamstring

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>your ability to build wealth to the future. That's right. Yeah,

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>And what's interesting too, they were talking about how borrowers

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>who have lower credit score scores, how they don't have

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the ability to take out these personal loans, thereby denying

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>their potential ability to build wealth. And I was thinking, yeah, no,

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like like they that's that's great, Like that's how the

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>game works. You don't want the lenders do not want

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to lend credit, lend money to folks who have proven

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to not be able to maintain a high credit score,

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>whether that's because they are using too much of their credit,

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>whether that's because they don't make their payments on time.

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>But I feel that this is uh an example of

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the system working well. We do not want folks who

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have not handled money well to then take on more debt,

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically personal loans and just because you have a great

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>credit score and banks are willing to lend you money

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you should take it. Right, there are certain

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>instances where it does make sense for you based on

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>your personal financial situation, how carefully you've been with money,

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you prioritize saving and investing to take

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>on debt to help you accomplish other goals such as

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>buying a house or maybe doing some renovations to that house.

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, uh, not everybody can save up cash and

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and and buy a house. You know mortgage tree, right,

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>But just because it's there doesn't mean you should be

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>jumping all over that exactly. And and and for folks who

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>have lower credit scores, the goal shouldn't be to get

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>your credit score high enough to warry. Now, oh you

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>qualify for personal loans, you know, like, there are other

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>reasons you want to get your credit score up so

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>that when you do have enough, and you have saved

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>up enough for a down payment, you can get the

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>best mortgage that's available to you, But not to get

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>a personal loan. Uh do, Let's let's keep moving. Jason's y.

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>He had this this great article in the Journal recently

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 1>about some companies who are offering super high savings rates,

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and he sounds promising. It does u but even as

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>rates are going up, they're still pretty crummy from a

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>historical perspective, especially given the reality of what's happening with inflation.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>So some folks are making risky your bets in an

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>attempt to get higher returns on their cash stable coins. Actually,

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like those are one avenue that some have taken that

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>hasn't panned out very well. But some fintech companies that

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>like kind of sort of look like banks. They are

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>offering between like three and five percent returns right now,

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>even higher on basic savings type vehicles, or at least

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they purport to be that. So, for instance, is why

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>he highlighted a company called Save and they're promising returns

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in the four to ten percent range, which sounds pretty great.

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Just your liquid cash. That sounds nice, right, I mean

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it'd be great, true, but Save they are investing your money,

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>they're not saving it, So of course there was going

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a catch. So it's it's sort of like

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's more of a hopeful pinky promise than anything else,

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and we would not recommend for you to do this

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>with the liquid cash that you're planning to keep on

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>hands or something like an emergency fund. When you look

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>at the fine print, it is more like a pinky promise,

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and it looks good displayed in big type on the

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>screen based on historical returns over the past ten years.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But we've only been around for ten months. So and

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about savings, right, it's it's a different

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>ballgame for for money you need liquid, you can't take

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>those risks. And so yeah, a lot of these fintech companies, Matt,

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they are f d i C insured, but you're gonna

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that that is definitely the case

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 1>before you even attempt to put your money with one

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of these guys. But so the money you deposit isn't

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily at risk, but there's a real chance that your

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>returns on the money, uh it could be something like

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>zero percent. And so instead of that, we would suggest

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>going with the bank that's tried and true, right like

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>ally Discover or see I T. The banks we've been

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about for years now. Marcus is another good one,

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and yesterday see I T. We've I feel like this

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is the case every week now, like every two weeks,

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>rates are just going up. Bump these things up, which

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>which is great because he just is awesome for all

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the savers out there, bump their savings connect account up

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to one nine so pretty close to two. Yeah, not

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>as good as those theoretical promised returns right from some

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of those other guys, But it's starting to look like

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it used to look like ten years ago, which is

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it makes me feel good about being a savor and

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>having that money in uh in savings. Yeah, it sucks

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit less to be a saver right now,

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>which is good. And and and one other thing that

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>we just have been mentioning and will continue to mention

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is I bonds as another place for guaranteed returns because

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing, though, you have to lock your money

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>away for at least a year. But the rates on

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I bons right now, we're almost ten percent, and so

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things and they're not going to

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>come cratering back down to earth anytime soon. I don't

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>think I bonds are still one of the best kind

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of short ish to medium term savings vehicles for lots

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of folks. That's right. Yeah. Another place you should avoid

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>storing your money though, is with the biggest banks because

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>they pay you almost nothing, which is super sucky. But

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not your only problem that you'll encounter with them,

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>because overdraft fees are out of this world on many

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of those checking accounts. Back in twenty nineteen, banks, all

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>those big banks, they made fifteen billion dollars from folks

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>who overdrafted their accounts. And so now Congress is looking

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to do something about it. I mean, like they don't

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>actually get things done most of the time. That's probably

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that's probably not likely that things will change. But it's

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>like the life cards on my local pool when they're

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on their phone, and I'm like, oh man, what a

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>what a coushout. But that's what Congress seems like because

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't really actually do much legislating through more glad

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>handing and cable news appearances. It's true, uh that that

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>being said, the Overdraft Protection Act could potentially step into

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>lesson or eliminate the ability for banks to to charge

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous overdraft fees, which by the way, mostly hurts the

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>most financially vulnerable of folks. But this is an instance

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of where I think we don't need to necessarily wait

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>around and like sit on our hands and hoping that

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the banks are going to do something or hope that

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Congress is actually going to act, because that's what I meant.

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Yeah, if you're not for that, like you,

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you might be sitting around a long time exactly,

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>might grow a nice gray beard before that comes to past. Right. Well,

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is, too, it's just not necessary because like,

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>this is not something that's overly complicated. I think there

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>are some industries in some sectors where maybe some government

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>intervention is necessary because it's it's just a really complicated process. Right,

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But we're talking about savings and checking accounts like these

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>are accounts that you can open and set up for

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>your kids, and even they understand how they work. It's

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>not overly complicated. It's not like this makes me think

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of the semiconductor bill that just passed. Cool, that's probably

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>necessary because that's in the best interest of our entire country, right, like,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>like the future of our country is at stake here,

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and like of semiconductors are made in Taiwan, and we

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>like Taiwan, but China they don't like Taiwan in China. Anyway,

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we're getting political here or whatever. But all this being said,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>this is something that you can easily do, and hopefully

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>an act does pass. But in the meantime, make sure

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that you are banking with the banks who aren't trying

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to financially ruin you. That's exactly right, because it's it's

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 1>other banks have actually already disallowed over draft fees. They

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 1>don't charge their customers any over draft fees, and so

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the market is actually providing some solutions to this. Over

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>draftees are obviously too high, they're crazy costly. They screw

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>over a lot of people, especially the most financially vulnerable.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see them done away with. But

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the great thing is some great banks have already done that.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's City, Ally and Capital One. Are are three

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>banks that have eliminated over draftees for their customers. And

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning that. So if you're if you want

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to support a business that is that is doing the

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>right thing by their customers without being told to by

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the federal government, then we'd say, do business with the

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>bank that doesn't suck. And those are a few of

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>them that don't suck. That's right, all right, Joel, we

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>have several other stories we're gonna get to today. We're

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about student loans. We're gonna talk about groceries,

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about fake reviews and more. All right,

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>after this, all right, Matt, we're back. Let's keep going

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Friday Flight. And of course we always gotta

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>get to our ludicrous headline of the week. Indeed, and

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this one comes from the New York Mark on the

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Friday Flight. It's a mainstay, and our friend Ron Lieber

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>over the New York Times wrote this article. It was

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>called the case of the five thousand dollar Springsteen tickets.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>And so let's talk about algorithms for a second, because

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>they're having this rapidly increasing the impact on what we

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>pay for lots of different items that we purchase and

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>events we choose to go to write prices are as

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a terminus kind of came up with their their squishier

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>than ever before, right, and they they vary a whole

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more than they ever used to, and so much

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of that is due to the algorithms that determine what

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we pay and when we pay it. And so these

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Springsteen tickets, apparently some fans were trying to buy tickets

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>for shows, and they were being shown prices of north

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of five thousand dollars right for tickets, and obviously they

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>they didn't really like that. They weren't sure if it

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>was worth that much to go see the Boston person.

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And and it's not that these tickets were being sold

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>by scalpers, right, it was. It was truly an algorithmic

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>decision saying that mid five figures was a fair price

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for this show. And I kind of have a few

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>different thoughts about this. I think one, I'd rather see

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>money go to the artist than to a scalper, right, right, Um,

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>so I'd rather see fewer people in the middle taking

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a cut. It doesn't make sense right, right, So let's explain. Like,

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the way it works right now is if you set

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a static price and you happen to shoot too low

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and there's an overwhelming demand for it, all the scalpers

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna swoop in. They're gonna buy up all the tickets,

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they've got the software, they got the box. Then they're

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna jack up those prices and they're making all the profits, right,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>effectively screwing over the artist. So like everybody gets hurt

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>except for these like few individuals who get loaded because

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they've got the superior technology. The the challenges though, if

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 1>you set your prices too high, then the artist is

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, you run the risk potentially of having empty seats.

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, within an arena, you're not performing to a

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>sold out show, and that's kind of a bummer as well. Um,

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and obviously your prices might be too high for a

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks. And so it's just difficult to know

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>where does set the prices because how do you predict

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the popularity, how do you predict the demand for a

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>specific show. There are so many factors. That's kind of

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>where they go into it. Dynamic pricing comes in and

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of sense. Yeah, we see it

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>with air fare, we see it with entertainment, other areas

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of entertainment, with with even like sporting event tickets and

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. And and so we're seeing more of

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a reliance on dynamic pricing, which I think does make

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>sense in a lot of ways. Prices on Amazon right

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>change dozens of times in a single day, and so yeah,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>these these swift changes, though, can make it harder to

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>be to be a smart shopper. Um but it's something

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to be aware of. And we also just need to

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>be more price sensitive. Right. If I'm looking to go

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>see an artist and make a decision, and I think

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a couple hundred dollars to go see

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite artists, but now now it turns

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>out it's gonna be a couple of thousand dollars, I'm

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>going to leave that website as quickly as possible. And um,

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>so unless it's your absolute favorite band and this is

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the last show they might ever do, like you know,

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of factors. I mean, even Ron Lieber,

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he was just like, it's it's worth it. Yeah, maybe

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>not five thousand dollars. But he's just like, I'm willing

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay hundreds and hundreds of dollars to go see

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Boss because he's a legend. Yeah, exactly. And there

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>are maybe a couple of people I would pay a

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>couple hundred dollars to go see. I don't know that

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>there's anybody I would pay thousands of dollars to see,

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>but right now, Yeah, I think what this comes down to, though,

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that this is being run by Ticketmaster, right,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>and and they have like a basically a stranglehold, a monopoly,

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and they service something like over s all venues, and

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>so in my mind, the algorithm is good or it's

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>good enough, but maybe a lot of pricing algorithm that

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>just yeah, generally speaking, that dynamic pricing. But how do

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>you make these specific algorithm better? And you do that

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>by providing more competition to Ticketmaster, right, and so like

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't have this more direct sales by artists out

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Ticketmaster that middleman too. Um. And I think there's there's

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>more and more We're seeing more and more of that

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>happening as well, and I hope we see a lot

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>more of that because I would like to see Ticketmaster

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>go down of flames. We're not gonna lie. But what

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that means though, are some other folks stepping and providing

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>some sort of service to these artists that allow them

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to because even still, it's difficult for an artist to

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>build that right, to kind of build that network, to

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>build that kind of direct communication with their fans. That's

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>why they are dependent on folks like Ticketmaster. But generally speaking,

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this is an industry that is overdue for some competitions

0:22:56.280 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>should come in and unseat Ticketmaster who's been sitting on

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the throne for a long time. Actually, NPR they just

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>published this piece about sort of like the like these

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>funky algorithms this week as well, because depending on how

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>long it takes you to finish a transaction when you're

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>online shopping, after you put something in your cart, the

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>price might get bumped up in the meantime. Uh. And

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>we share this because we want you to be aware

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>of this trend, you know, some of the different sneaky

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ways that it can cost you more sometimes without even

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.959
<v Speaker 1>knowing it. Uh. And So bottom line, I feel like

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this dynamic pricing model it's still kind of the best

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>alternative for what's out there. But we just need to

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>be aware that this is the direction that it seems

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>like things are going. Uh. And while we're talking about shopping,

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about fake reviews. That's another mounting problem in

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the world of e commerce. A recent study found that

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>folks are more likely to buy inferior products based on

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>glowing but fake reviews about that product. That makes sense.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of us are just looking at the star

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>ratings on a product and we're like, Okay, it seems

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, and let's click, you know, click to buy,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and we might read maybe one or two of those

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>actual reviews, but there are thousands, and so we certainly

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>don't wait through all of them. But it turns out

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those are or at least on some products,

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>are completely fake. They're ramping up the star level even

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>though the product is not a great one. Yeah, and

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>these are products that we have not even hardly laid

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>eyes on. Obviously, we're not seeing them in person, so

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not quite sure what we're gonna be getting. May

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.479
<v Speaker 1>not even know anything about that specific brand. Because there

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>are like so many of these new thingled companies selling

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of stuff online, it can be difficult to

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>manage and to interpret all the data that is out there.

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>So bottom line, like it kind of comes down to

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you as an individual, like you said, reading the reviews

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>looking for items that might only have only five stars,

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.959
<v Speaker 1>like that's a red flag basically, right. Um, there are

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>ways that you can read through the reviews and tell

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>was this created by a bot or is this a

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>real person who uploaded a legitimate photo of their product? Um?

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, for me, when I see two three four

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>stars on a product, for me, that gives me a

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit of reassurance that, oh, this is a legit product.

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>There's always gonna be people people out there who are

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>not happy that. A lot of times they put the

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thing together wrong and they're like, oh the thing broke

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>after like three seconds, and it's like, well, I think

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you broke it yourself. You can tell that when you

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>couldn read read some of the actual individual reviews, whereas

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're just leaking at the star level, sometimes you

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>can be misled. And I think, what fake spot is

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>one of those cool sites and Chrome browser plug ins,

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it's worth they've got it on Safari's are they okay? Great?

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So so yeah, then that way, every time you go

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon or some of these other websites. They'll give

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>you a rating like, hey, guess what the reviews on

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this or a C or there a be, and you

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of know, like, all right, I have

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to try a little more more carefully before buying this

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>product because it looks like there are more fake reviews

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on it. Yeah, and you know, fake spots good because

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they actually they got good star ratings app stores. I

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>love It's so good. Who is policing the police, right exactly?

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question. All right, Let's talk about student

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>loans for a second, because we're still in the middle

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of a student loan payment pause that's supposed to resume

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>UM September one, and the question is that going to happen?

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is probably not. Will any amount of

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness come to fruition? That's another question on people's minds

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to student loans. UM. That's a political

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>football that is is still kind of being batted around,

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna do our best to not get political

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>here and talk about how forgiving a bunch of student

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>loans might even lead to more inflation. But that's not

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>something we're gonna get into. We mentioned that before then.

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not our favorite policy idea, but the political

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>writing was kind of on the wall that there might

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>be another forbearance extension. That's something we were kind of

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking might come to pass. It's it's looking like it, right,

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and and so now there's more and more rum link

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>pointing in that direction. That comes Uptember one, people who

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have student loans who have not been paying on them

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>for the past couple of years will be able to

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to not pay on their student loans. And yeah, well,

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll certainly revisit this topic when the details firm up.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>We still want you to be financially prepaired for those

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>payments to resume come September, even if it's unlikely to happen,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Yeah, And honestly, kind of going back to

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>what we're saying about that Overdraft Protection Act, this is

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>another instance, I feel where there's been some congressional ineptitude.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say like this, because it shouldn't come down

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to the President deciding whether or not there's going to

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>be a forbearance extension, whether or not there's going to

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>be student loans that are gonna be forgiven. This is

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Congress's job, and so regardless of what side of the

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>aisle you're on, I feel that this is it's just

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a little discouraging. It's kind of annoying that this is

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>something that it feels like somebody who's just continues to

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>get the snooze button and it's just like, dude, either

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>just turn the a long o'clock off or get up

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like like just but just aside and the fact that

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>there are borrowers out there who sure they've benefited from

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>not having to make payments over the past two year,

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, two and a half years now, but still

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we don't know what is going to

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>happen is kind of mind boggling, and it's something that

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I wish our leaders could figure out. The congressional gridlock,

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the inability to really kind of work together on anything,

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is bad for the country as a whole, right, And

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it still confidence in us as us as people? Um, Okay,

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's move on. Let's talk about ways you can

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>save on rent, and you could do that by potentially

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>getting an older roommate. This is your geriatric roommates. Uh.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Part of the headline that you mentioned at the beginning

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Joel Uh. And what we're talking about here is a

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>much older roommate. Because Business Insider they just wrote about

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>how multigenerational living is on the rise, uh, and how

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>could save you money. Because some colleges have been doing this,

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>They've they've got these programs in place in order to

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 1>help some of their students live rent free given the

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>changing demographics in our society as are as well the world,

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>but America as well, like as we have an older

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and older population. I love this idea. And it's like,

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing for the students to live in

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a place where they can pay less rent or live

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for free. And it's also a good thing for these

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>older people to have those younger folks um in their

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>live style exactly. Yeah, And it seems like the younger

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>generation uh, seems to be more willing to consider this

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>as a way to cut costs. Specifically, there's a website

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>nest eily they're trying to make this easier to accomplish,

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>although it's only working in a few cities right now,

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>mainly Boston seems to be the largest area where they

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>are doing, you know, making a lot of in roads.

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>But check it out if you're interested. We're all about

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>outside of the box ways to cut back and save

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and and like you said, there's like a richness to

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>life that you gain by being in contact with folks

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>who are who are older. Like we've got some neighbors

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>who are in their seventies and eighties, and you can't

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>there's there's not like a dollar amount, you can't quantify

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the benefit that you receive from having a connection like

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that to an older generation. And like you said, it's

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's great for for older folks as well.

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a girl in the story and she's living with

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a lady who's closer to the age of her grandma,

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and she's able to stay in her house like this

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>old family home because now she's got somebody to help

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>her pay the taxes, she helps out with chores. It's

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>just it's just a win win situation. And seems like

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to use emails, yeah you know, I

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.959
<v Speaker 1>mean that's like a legit. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's just

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a great solution for for everyone involved. I love seeing that.

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I got to be because my next fur neighbor, she's

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>oh snap, and she she lives alone because as her

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>son lives across the street from me, So it is

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that multigenerational street living at least um, at least where

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm at. Somebody shouldn't move in with her. Yeah, I'm

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>sure she's got extra rooms she's not using. I'm sure

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>she does. But it's Yeah, it's cool to see, and

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's nice to kind of live in a place

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>where you are. My neighbors are at different ages and

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>stages of their lives. I think that is a good thing. Well,

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about groceries here for a second, Matt, And

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>because brand loyalty has it seems to be waning. As

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>prices are rising right as inflation at the grocery store

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>is somewhere in the twelve plus percent range, people are

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>starting to trade down for for store brands. There's another

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>article that said that people are downgrading two cheaper booze

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>beer and cigarettes right now to amount of No, you're

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>only drinking Jim Beam right for the time being, not

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>even water, like, not against Jim Beam. If I wasn't

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>drinking water, then that would increase my budget significantly. Yeah. Well, um,

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>some some Americans still remain incredibly loyal to some specific brands,

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, but that's really to their financial detriment because

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>see that just published a story about how much store

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>brands can save you, and they claim, based on the

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>data that they pulled from multiple grocery stores, that the

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>average savings by switching from name brands to store brands

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is something in the range of believe that. Yeah, that's

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>backed up from that's so true what we've seen with

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>our own very eyes and wint to the grocery store ourselves,

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but also from just kind of other data we've seen

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Store brands are one of the quickest

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>ways to help you save money on your grocery bill,

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's a trade off that more people should

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>be making. Definitely. Yeah, if you've only ever gone to

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Public's I challenge, you go to Aldi and by all

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the same types of items, you're not going to get

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the same name brands for the most part, and I

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>guarantee you will see a forty reduction on that receipt

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>even if right, like they talked about shopping at Whole

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Foods and how if you just opt for the store

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>brand items at Whole Foods. But I want them to

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.239
<v Speaker 1>have that ALDI experienced it too. I mean, but if

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you went from shopping name brand at Whole Foods to all,

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you're going to cut your grocery bill at least in half, probably,

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>but at least at wherever you shop at least opening

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>for store brands is going to save you. Yeah, So

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of saving money on store brands is paying

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for something like or twenty dollar socks because the Journal

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>they just wrote a story about that phenomena. And honestly, like,

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't I do not know who these people are,

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>not met them. If I have four hundreds of dollars

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on socks, like I get it for like a pair

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of like Darn Tough socks. Those are my favorite nicer socks.

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>But like we're still talking about socks that cost like

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>around twenty bucks a pair. Uh, And you can get

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>socks that are way cheaper at Costco or buying them

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in bulk online where you're buying like eight twelve pairs

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>at once. But like, like for instance, Darn Tough, they

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>makes them seriously comfortable socks, and their warranty is unmatched,

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>like literally they will take any pair back if they

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>have holes in them. I'll just read them about that.

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And they actually expanded their warranty page and they're showing

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>pairs of socks and yeah, they look like old socks

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and they have holes in them, and they're like, yeah,

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>send them back. We will send you a new pair

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that's phenomenal and the kind of brand I like to

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>get behind. But it just doesn't seem like you're getting

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>much in return if you're gonna spend like many times

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that on some super fancy socks here, you know, spending

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of dollars just to signal that you've got that money.

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>This is conspicuous consumption, is all it is. It's it's

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>luxury consumption. It's not like you're paying for something that's superior.

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>You're really paying your paying for a feeling to show

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>people you've got money. You're trying to show it off. Yeah,

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>then this is a sure fireway to to lose all

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of your money. Uh. And as we're talking about socks,

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a reminder for you to leave us a review.

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>That is how you get entered to win one of

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the five pairs of How the Money socks. And these

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>are performance crew socks. Joel, Like, these go like midway

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>up the calf, would you say midway like almost up

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to the knee. They're beautiful up to the knee. You're

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>not like soccer socks. You've got long legs, dude. For me,

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they almost go to my knee. I've got really short legs.

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Instead of paying hundreds of dollars for socks, get some

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for free by leaving a review UM and your favorite

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>podcatcher for our show. We really appreciate it. It It helps

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>us reach more people with money saving advice. And remember

0:33:58.080 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you just have to do that by this coming Wednesday

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>at the the day and send us an email to

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>how to Money pod at gmail dot com. We'll get

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you entered. And if you've left her view in the past,

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you can still enter. Just send us an email with

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that screenshot and we'll get you entered in. That's right,

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:11.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, Joel, that's gonna be it. We hope everyone

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 1>has a great weekend and until next time, best friends Out,

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Best Friends Out.