WEBVTT - Is the Anti-Immigrant Reform UK Ready to Take Charge?

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News. Welcome to in the City.

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Each week we unpack a story that's crucial to the

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>world's financial capitals.

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm from sin Leatwa and I'm David Merritt and Dave.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>This week a conversation with Zia Usoof, businessman turned rising

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>politician in the Reform UK Party.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 3>That's right, and this comes as a new survey by

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>IPSOS puts the Reform Party, which is led by Nigel Farage,

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 3>on thirty four percent. That's nine points ahead of Labor

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 3>and the Conservatives a distant third. So if the figures

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 3>in the survey were to be replicated across the country

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 3>in an election, Reform UK would win a majority. It's

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 3>quite a change from the results we saw less than

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 3>a year ago at the last general election.

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So we wanted to get Zia Usoof on to talk

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about what he thinks is behind reforms rise in popularity,

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but also more importantly, what policies we could expect from

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a form government, especially in challenging geopolitical time like these.

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 3>And after the conversation was here you'll hear from our

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 3>UK Politics correspondent Lucy White. She's been covering reforms rise

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 3>and policy platform, and we wanted to get her perspective.

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 4>One of our.

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Conversation Welcome to the City of London, the city of the.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 4>City of the City of London.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Mind the gap between the.

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 3>Financial hearts of the country, the city, the city. Welcome

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 3>in the.

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>City, clear of the doors, Siyah Yusuf. Thank you so

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 2>My pleasure to be here.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Now. You have quite an unconventional actually past your businessman

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>You worked for a lot of the big American banks

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and then you set up a company which you then

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sold and went into politics. Tell us about that.

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So I'm the son of Sri Lankan immigrants into

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 2>the UK. They came to Britain in the early nineteen eighties.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 2>My father just qualified as a doctor there to go

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 2>over the work. While so I was born up in

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Bellshill in Scotland. I studied at the LSC, worked at

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 2>a couple of American investment banks, quit that job to

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 2>start a tech company, grew that for nine years, successful

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 2>outcome thankfully sold it to an American bank. Then when

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Nigel Fraus said he was coming back into British politics,

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I could see there was a glimmer of hope for

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the United Kingdom, the country that I love. So I

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 2>decided I wasn't going to jump ship. I was going

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to stay here and fight to try and turn the

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 2>country around. And that's what I'm doing.

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>This podcast dives into the issue that really matter around

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 3>here in the square mile, and Reform is about reforming politics,

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 3>about reforming the economy. Is your city background core to

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the policies that you're what was the.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Definitely, Look, it was the formative stage of my career.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 2>The first five years after I graduated were spent on

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 2>a trading floor on one of your terminals, twelve hours

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 2>a day pretty much, and I loved it. I was

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>so grateful for the teams I got to work in.

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 2>They really invested in and look, you also get a

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 2>real sense of I got to go and visit great

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 2>companies like air Bus and companies like Daimler and you know,

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 2>British engineering companies like Spyroxaca, and you really get an

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 2>understanding when you walk around these factories of what makes

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 2>a great company, what makes a less good company. And

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.679
<v Speaker 2>one of the things I think Reform has got in

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 2>its leadership team is, frankly, just people understand however reasonably

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 2>good understanding of how the world actually works.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>But it was my understanding actually by speaking to people

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that were close to this, that you were so when

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you were chairman for eleven months of Reform, your job

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>was to professionalize the party. So this gives an idea

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that actually, you know, you were there to make it

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>more credible, to give more policies so that people understood

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>what Reform actually stood for. At the moment, it feels

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>more like culture Wars, and so.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 2>I disagree a bit with that. When I joined the

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>party's chairman, but Nigel asked me to do that job.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 2>They basically wasn't a political party, frankly. So one of

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the things I don't think people necessarily appreciate about Reform's

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 2>journey over the last year. It was only in June

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 2>last year in Nigel announced he was coming back to

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 2>run to be an MP in Clacton and the party

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 2>had no MPs. We had about nine counselors and we

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 2>were polling at around ten percent. Today we're polling at

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 2>thirty thirty four percent. The book makers have us as

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 2>the favorite to be the next government, Nigel favorite to

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 2>be the next PM. We've got north of a quarter

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of a million members, that's grown fourfold, and so we've

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>built all of this. We've got four hundred branches across

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 2>the country. You know, you mentioned that IPSOS poll that

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>IPSOS pulpits reform just six points away from having more

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 2>support than Labor and the Tories combined.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, he's a controversial figure. I can't see

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>many business people around him apart from you. Is it

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>because the opposition is weak? Or is it because Reform

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is really doing the right things? I mean, is this

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>like a moment for reform?

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, it definitely is a moment for reform. Richard Tights,

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 2>the deputy leader and former leader, is also a successful

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 2>entrepreneur and businessman and has contributed immensely to this journey

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 2>and policy formulation like the ones that we just have.

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 2>So look what we have at Reform. It is a

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 2>small team. We only have five MPs. Now they're formidable MPs.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>We only have five, but we have a men's support

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 2>across the country and what we have done already as

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>a result of those made the first election, this wasn't

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 2>a poll, this was a natural election. So I wouldn't

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>understate what's just happened now We've still had a lot

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 2>of work to do. We are still years away from

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 2>a general election. I can tell you partly because I've

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>got asymmetric data on this.

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 3>There are so.

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Many brilliant people coming forward wanting to help reform, both

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 2>behind the scenes and to be front of house and

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 2>front line.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether reform has the A list, the

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>A game. I mean, everyone's trying to kind of find

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>space for itself and speaking to a population that's maybe

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>fed up with something. Yeah.

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's perfectly reasonable to say that the British public

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 2>are utterly sick and tired of the two old parties.

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Given this is Bloomberg and we're talking about the economy,

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Britain should be one of the most prosperous countries in

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 2>the world. We still have great assets in this country,

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>a dynamic fun system. We still have I think, the

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 2>best people, the best language, the best time zone. We

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 2>have the rule of law in an excellent way here,

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 2>and we have a talent base in areas like finance

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 2>and AI for example, in the AI era, which should

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 2>mean that British people writ large are benefiting. Instead, what

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing is an unprecedented brain drain British people and

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 2>wealthy non doms are fleeing the country at an unprecedented rate.

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 2>They're going to Singapore and Dubai, and they're even going

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 2>to America. We've got to turn all of that stuff around.

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 2>The only way that's going to happen is if you

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 2>have a first principles approach as and you're really focused

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 2>on how you're going to get the economy growing again

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 2>on a per capita basis, and that's what Reform are doing.

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 3>This process of kind of professionalizing the image of Reform

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 3>feels like a big challenge. Robert Headlines have been on

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 3>in fighting controversies around individual members. Yourself stepped back from

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 3>your role just this month, saying how you were feeling

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 3>burnt out. You know you've done high pressure jobs in

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 3>the past. Tell us a little bit about that process

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 3>this week, why you left, and then why you came

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 3>back so quickly.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 2>So look, I basically I had a day off in

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 2>eleven months, and people listening to this business brings a

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 2>certain level of pressure. Politics is a whole different level

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>of pressure. And as I said, not just building and

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 2>assembling a political party from scratch in real time, also

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 2>doing everything else that the political party need to do

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 2>and tell us why I came back. Look number one

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>I received I was inundated, which is lovely heartfelt messages

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 2>from reform supporters, voters and members who expressed just how

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>important the reform movement is to them. It's not just

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>a political party for many people. That represents the last

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 2>hope the country has to This great country has whom

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>so many people have laid down their lives for to

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 2>turn itself around. And look, as I said, I was

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 2>exhausted and my decision making at the time wasn't great.

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>We reversed that very quickly. Look, I came into politics

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 2>in no small part because of Nigel, and I'm going

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 2>to continue to spend all my time trying to make

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 2>him the Prime Minister.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I know you criticized her at poachin right, who was

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>basically urging cure Starmer to ban the burker and the

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>interest of public safety, and you said it was done

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for a party to task a PM to do something

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that the party itself, your party itself, wouldn't do. Do

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you stick by that.

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>I didn't criticize Sarah. Let me care about something. The

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 2>number one serias of phenomenal MP I speak almost every day.

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 2>She's a good friend. I was instrumental in getting her selected,

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>getting her elected, and she's going to be such a

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 2>formidable asset to the country. Look that tweet which I

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>sent out, which I definitely regret now what the point

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I was making to I was frustrated because I didn't

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.719
<v Speaker 2>know that question was going to get asked. In hindsight,

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 2>perfectly reasonable for me to have not known. I'm not

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 2>an MP, So I regret that tweet. I don't mind

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 2>saying that.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you just give us a sense? So when we

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>speak to a lot of people, they say I'd like

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to know a little bit more about reform, but we

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>don't really know where they stand on the economy, So

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it's you talk common sense without a lot of I

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>guess policy details. So can you give us an idea

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of what you would do, for example, for this UK?

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>DOAJE like the money is very limited right for any

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>chancellor to play around with? So where are you finding efficiencies?

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, that is a line that the establishment always uses,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 2>right the money. My favorite one is quote difficult decisions

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 2>need to be made. How many times have you heard that? Right?

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>But I mean we run the numbers at Bloomberry. I mean,

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>there's just not a lot of money.

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, hold on, hold on, So let me give you

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>some big numbers. That so fifteen billion in foreign aid, right,

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 2>five billion a year in terms of free accommodation to

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>asylum sequels and illegal migrants, and that's per year. The

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 2>twelve billion in net zero costs that will be found

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>directly inside government departments. The real number is much higher

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and I can go into that. So there's straightaway is

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 2>almost forty billion, and you're going to have and there

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 2>are so many other line items in the budget. When

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 2>you start peeling this stuff back, I mean you look

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 2>at the big consulting firms. Some of your listeners might

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 2>not appreciate this, but the big four accounting firms and

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 2>the strategy consultants won eight and a half billion pounds

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 2>in national government tool contracts over the last five years alone.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>So the notion that there is no money to be

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 2>saved is for the birds. Now, it is also true

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 2>this country is almost three trillion in national debt. But

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 2>the bottom line is the British economy is not growing.

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean talk about point seven percent. That's less than

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the population is growing just from immigration. If we do

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>not get the British economy growing meaningfully on a per

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 2>capita basis, this country is headed to an extremely bad place.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 2>The way we're going to do that is by cutting

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 2>spending on things that are wasteful. We have to get

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>our welfare bill under control, and difficult conversations do have

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 2>to be had about it. Of course there are some

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 2>people who need benefits not of course that is true,

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 2>but it has never been easier to get onto benefits.

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 2>So we have to get the welfare bill per capita

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 2>down to where it was back in twenty nineteen. That

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 2>will free up a lot of money to reduce the

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>tax burden on working people. And we also have to

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 2>buy the way be really honest that we need wealthy

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 2>international job creators wealth creators.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 3>To be here.

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 2>We don't need them fleeing. We want them here in

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the UK. That's a big part of what our policy

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 2>announcement was today. If you talk to us a demisacebas

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 2>at deep mind, for example, you know Jensen Wang from

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia was talking about he do you use the term

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>goldilocks a situation for AI in the UK. We have

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 2>a significant percentage of the world's finest AI engineers graduating

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 2>from our universities likewise in areas like biotech, and then

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>we also have to start manufacturing here again. We can

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 2>have a new manufacturing revolution with cutting edge manufacturing techniques

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>in the country, and we need people who understand economics,

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 2>understand business in charge of making the most important economic

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 2>decisions in this country.

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>When I speak to global investors, and I'm talking about

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in a Blackstone, black Rock, even some of your old shops,

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Colman Sachs, I mean, they're quite bullish on the UK.

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a bad neighborhood out there. The US because of

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>trade and tariffs, looks like less attractive investment right now.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Great, great, But here's the point. The British economy has

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>had virtually no growth now for a very very long time.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 2>And you can arguing about whether it's point three or

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 2>point seven, it's pointless. The reason why people in this

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 2>country feel like they're getting poor is because real wages

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 2>have done nothing now for about two decades. Real GDP

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 2>capita has done nothing for about two decades. This is

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 2>the other thing in business, there's accountability, right. You know,

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 2>if you're a chief executive and you're paid a lot

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 2>of money and you're very powerful. If you make bad decisions,

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the markets will see to it. You are not the

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>CEO for very long. Right in politics and inside the bureaucracy,

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 2>not only do you not face consequence as you're promoted,

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 2>you're put into the lords. That's what has happened on

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>these big military contracts that have gone massively and overspent.

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 2>HS two. This country is paying eight times more per

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 2>mile of high speed rail than China or France, eight

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 2>times more. Why is that? If we win a majority

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 2>in the House of Commons with Nigel as the Prime Minister,

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 2>we can make sweeping reforms. We will have a great

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 2>repeal Act and we can go and solve these problems

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>root and branch.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I was just going to ask how you're going to

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 3>do it, so you have a repeal Act for what specifically?

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 2>So well, that's what we're working on as we speak.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 2>I think this country has way too many laws, way

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 2>too many regulations. A lot of those have to be repealed.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 2>We can get into it. The e CHR that prevents

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 2>multiple convicted illegal migrants.

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Touring thousands of staff in Washington and across multiple government departments,

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 3>people being barred from entry. It's been pretty extreme. Do

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>you see a version of that here with a reform company.

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Not not necessarily. I mean, if you zoom out a minute, right,

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 2>what's happening is endless outsourcing. We're now at the stage

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>where a contractor is now running the recruitment program for

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.599
<v Speaker 2>the British Army. While that's happening, the cost and the

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 2>headcount of the civil service has ballooned by fifty percent

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>over the last decade in government in the civil service.

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Literally you're ramping up spending on outsourcing and agencies and

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 2>contractors and ramping up the size of the civil service.

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 2>I think you can have the size of the civil

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 2>service and actually deliver a better service to taxpayers.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>A couple of things on dough I mean, do you

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>have an early update on your DOGE project and working

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>with ten councils that reform now controls, So what sort

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of savings have you actually identified concretely?

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, look, we already have one number on its

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 2>early days and a lot of what we're doing is analysis.

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 2>But I'll give you one exact sample. One of our

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Cabinet Minister's Cabinet members in West Northamptonshire Council was presented

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 2>with a Microsoft contract for millions of pounds and told hey,

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 2>you've got like three days to sign this off, otherwise

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>they'd be penalties. Now that's funny that there'd be penalties

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>for a contract that you haven't even signed yet. He

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 2>pushed back and did a really good job and saved

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 2>nine hundred and sixty five thousand pounds on that contract

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 2>straight away, And that was within the first week of

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>arriving in the council. And what does that tell you?

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 2>It's actually a reason to be bullish on the UK

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 2>because there's so much waste there sort of people who

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 2>are sitting there signing those contracts off historically a big

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft contract where it's obviously massive gross margins. Right, Clearly

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 2>most of these companies have been taking councils and taxpayers

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 2>for a ride. I don't really blame them because it's

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 2>up to the councils. It's up to the civil servants

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 2>and the politicians to fight the corner for the taxpay

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 2>As soon as a reform person turned up, they did

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 2>that and they saved nine hundred and sixty five thousand

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 2>pounds within the first seven days.

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you say to the accusation that, actually, because

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you've also promised tax cards. It feels a bit like reminiscent.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Although so at local level we certainly haven't haven't promised any.

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Time, but you have at the at the national levelt Yes,

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Great. I mean some people are worried that

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the spell of a lost trust disaster type.

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Liz Truss did not announce any spending cuts Nigel's foot.

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Nigel stood up and gave a spech a few weeks

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 2>ago and announced three to four hundred billion pounds of

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 2>spending cuts to happen inside his first term as Prime minister,

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 2>funded full stop. That's exactly right. Here's the irony. We're

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>formerly the only people who have a leadership team with

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 2>experience of balancing some quite large budgets. What we're saying

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 2>is we need to dramatically cut spending on things. Like

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 2>I said, the twelve billion on net zero that'll be

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 2>found in director in budgets, the fifteen billion in foreign aid,

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 2>and the five billion in terms of asylum. There's a

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 2>lot more. I mean, you look at the money that

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>is hidden inside these quango budgets. You look at the

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 2>money that's being spent on these on these consultancies and

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 2>these agencies, vast amounts of money. That's the work that

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 2>we're doing.

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Now you're also trying to I mean I had a

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>question on you know, trying to basically take reform into

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream. And while you're leading in the polls, there's

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of voters, whether fairly or not fairly,

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that associate your party with racism. Are they wrong?

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Of course, And I think that that's now So if

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 2>you are leveling that claim reform, you are now calling

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 2>that epsos pole leveling that claim at more than third

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 2>of the public in the UK. Any human who has

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 2>been in the UK for more than five minutes knows

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 2>that that claim is absurd on its face.

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But there must be a perception. I mean, the perception

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is still there. You can't deny that.

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>It might be there for people who are brainwashed by

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 2>certain media outlets that they might watch. But look, frankly,

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 2>we're coming across that less and less and less, and

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the more that we have been attacked without hominem attacks.

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Partly it is because they can't engage us on the arguments. Secondly,

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 2>the result of all of this silliness being you know,

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 2>so ideologically possessed that that's the only argument against us

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 2>is that the country continues to go to the dogs.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>And I put it to you that the more people

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>here from reform, the more they hear from Nigel and

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 2>our MPs, the more they like us. That's the evidence,

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and the opposite is true of other political leaders in

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 2>this country.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Can I pivot a bit to again back where we

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 3>are in the city of London and what we care

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 3>about more than anything on this podcast is what the

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 3>future holds for the city. So what people think about

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 3>you say is important. Do you care what the city

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 3>thinks about you as a former banker and what plans

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 3>would you have in place to improve the fortunes of

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the financial services.

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 2>We need to know. The city of London was once

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 2>the greatest financial center in the world. We need a

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 2>strong city of London. I think it is. It is

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 2>massively overregulated, no doubt about that. You saw our cryptopolicy

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 2>for example. We've got to lean into the technologies of

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 2>the future. Yes, of course there needs to be some regulation,

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 2>but it's gone way way too far. We need to

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 2>do things on taxation and look, the first act that

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 2>we want to cut is the one for people earning

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 2>less than twenty thousand pounds a year. One of the

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 2>reasons why the city of London is suffering it's people

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 2>are worried about law and order. People are terrified of

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 2>walking around late at night. They can't wear a nice

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 2>watch anymore. They kind of hold their phone out in public.

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>I grasp it with two hands as if their life

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 2>depends on it, because in some cases it actually does.

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 2>So we have to do all of those things. And

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 2>one of the interesting things I'll tell you as well.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I spend a lot of time in Runcorn during the

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 2>run Corn and Hellsby Parliamentary by election. And there are

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 2>some pretty deprived areas, not all of it, but there's

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 2>some pretty deprived areas of Runcorn, and there are people there.

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 2>We would hear time and again on the doorsteps, people saying, look,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 2>we set our alarm clocks in the morning, we do

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>everything right. We pay into the system, so did my parents,

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and life has become endlessly more difficult. The cost of

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 2>the weekly shop keeps going up. Those energy bills because

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of that virtue signaling keeps going up. And then they

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 2>see someone next door on the same at state, who's

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 2>on benefits, with four kids, whose front gardens a complete mess,

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 2>doesn't do any work, and they think, why do we bother?

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 2>And I hear exactly not what. I met one of

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 2>my friends who still works in the city with a

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 2>sizeable income. I don't mind saying, you know, a sizeable

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 2>six figure household income between him and his wife, and

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 2>he said exactly the same thing. He said, you know,

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 2>we both work really hard. Yes we own good money,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 2>clearly much higher than the average. But we've got two kids.

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 2>We can barely afford to send them to the school

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 2>we want to send them to. Our relationship, it's starting

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>to pray because we don't really get a chance to

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 2>engage each other because we're so busy. And then we

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 2>see all that, we see this sense that people are

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 2>getting away with not working, not contributing. And the phrase

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 2>that stuck in my head was they both use the

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 2>phrase why do we bother? And I think that that's

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>a big reason why reform is getting to be successful.

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Come on, and why we're going to fight, why we're

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 2>going to fight for working people. It's really important. Contract

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 2>is the thing that is breaking.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, why do we bother? They don't want

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>to be on benefits? Like I understand that this is

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge concern and immigration, you know in this country

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 1>needs to be fixed, But why do we bother if

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you're if you have two jobs, you're in an OK position.

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Things maybe need to change, but it's tough to say,

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>why do we bother?

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Well that the tax burden on everyone that I just described, right,

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>even though and I'm using that example advisedly right because

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 2>they're at very different extremes in terms of the Bell

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 2>curve of economic distinction and salary. But the sentiment that

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 2>they have is that they are being taxed ever more

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 2>and they are getting less and less and less for

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>it when they want to go and see a GP.

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 2>It's incredibly difficult. Having children has never been harder economically

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 2>for people in this country, which is why a birth

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 2>rate has collapsed below replacement. And this real sense of unfairness.

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 2>We know people of mind paying taxes if they feel

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>like they're getting something valuable in return.

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 3>So obviously it's been a very significant weekend in the

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 3>Middle East. Part of preparing for government potentially would be

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 3>your geopolitical policies. Kis Darma's getting fairly good reviews around

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 3>the word. I spend a lot of the time in

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 3>the United States about how has been triangulating on the

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine issue and on the Middle East. Now do you

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 3>have a policy? Do you support the United States strikes

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 3>on Iran? And if you were in government, how would

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 3>you navigate this very delicate and difficult moment for the world.

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 2>The first thing to say is reform is about focusing

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 2>on the UK I tweeted out yesterday, A country that

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 2>cannot even defend its own borders has no business and

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 2>will not be taken seriously lecturing any other countries about there.

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Where should spending be Then, when you're looking at the

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 3>priorities and where money's going to be saved, But should

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 3>we be ramping up to three and a half percent?

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we want to be ramping up spending on defense.

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 2>So the way you're going to spend more on defense

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 2>ultimately in absolute terms by growing the economy, Right, So

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 2>that's the first thing. If you don't have a fast

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 2>growing economy and a buoyant economy, you will not have

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 2>a strong defense. Secondly, we need to spend it in

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 2>smarter way. So let's stay drone warfare where there's been

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 2>some high profile cases. For example, Russia had a whole

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 2>load of its nuclear aircraft fleet decommissioned by Ukrainian drugs.

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine is firing three to six thousand drones every single day.

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll let you take a guess as to the total

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 2>number of military drones available to His Majesty's armed forces.

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I want to take a guess how many less than

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 2>two thousand?

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 2>We are so ill equipped in this country for modern warfare.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 2>We obviously have amazing men and women who give their

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 2>lives and give their careers to service for this country.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 2>And so we have to grow the British economy and

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 2>if we do that, we will have a strong armed forces.

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that maybe just final question? Is there a country

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>or a politician that you admire?

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I admire the United States, and I admire I do

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 2>admire President Trump. I don't agree with everything he does

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 2>or says, but I do admire him. I think he's

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 2>a very determined man, and I think he has done

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of good for America, even though I don't

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 2>agree with everything he does. I'd also say Georgia Maloney

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>in Italy I think is someone who has done a

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 2>great job. But look, Britain is a proud country. It

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 2>has an amazing history. This is the other thing I

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 2>wanted to close on is We're not in the business

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 2>of saying Britain's in managed decline, and that is the

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 2>axiom on which every politician in Westminster, pretty much outside

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 2>of Reform knowingly knowingly operates. We think Britain can be

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 2>an awesome country again, that we can be excited to

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 2>live here and soa can our kids and their kids.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 2>But it's going to take a lot of work and

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>time is running out, is.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>The a useuph Thank you so much for joining yes today.

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>So that was a conversation we taped with Reform UK's

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is the AUSU earlier this week. Now, Lucy as our

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>UK politics reporter, you've been tracking Reforms right and popularity,

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>but more importantly trying to understand what the party stands

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for when it comes to economic policy.

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting, it's seemed quite a change over recent years.

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 4>So Reform UK can trace its roots really back to

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 4>the UK Party, the UK Independence Party, which was again

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 4>headed by Nigel Faraj. Nigel left that party after essentially

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 4>becoming one of one of the very few sort of

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 4>instantly recognizable figures in UK politics, and he's founded the

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Brexit Party that was sort of continuing in the same

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 4>vein as the UK Independence Party, but to to bring

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 4>the UK out of the European Union essentially was no deal.

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 4>He wanted a very clean split from the European Union.

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 4>After achieving that, well we did have a deal of

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 4>some sex, yes, the brexit bit, not the deal a bit,

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 4>we found him, you know, wanting to rename the party essentially,

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 4>and he landed on reform UK as he sees it.

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 4>The UK is broken, the UK needs fixing, and that

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 4>covers pretty much evering from reform of the welfare state

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 4>to cutting back on migration, which has always been a

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 4>huge vein in Niger Faragi's politics.

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 3>So that's the thing. So in the past it was

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the sort of the one issue thing was like get

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 3>brittin now the EU and then that mission accomplished. I

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 3>mean he failed to become an MP all that time,

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 3>didn't he. And now they've actually got some MPs now

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 3>that they've got a bit of a broad well technically

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 3>a broader agenda. But you know, listening to our conversation

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 3>with him, I guess what struck me was that we

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 3>were asking about lots of economic policies and they had

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 3>this big new non dom thing that came out, but

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 3>everything kept on coming back to that same thing, which

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 3>was always been the Nigel Farage policy number one, which

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 3>is about immigration. Yeah, still are they still actually really

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 3>a one issue party?

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting because I think Zia Yusef has been one

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 4>of the key figures in trying to professionalize reform UK

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 4>and so he has really been wanting to broaden out

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 4>that kind of spectrum of policy from just being an

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 4>immigration focused party to really looking at kind of economic policy.

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 4>You know, as you mentioned, we saw the non dom

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 4>issue raised earlier this week where they have trying to

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 4>attract wealthy non domicile people back to the country too,

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 4>as they see it raised tax revenue here, and Zia

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 4>last month talked about cryptocurrencies, you know, how he wants

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 4>to make the UK a real cryptocurrency hub. And we're

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.959
<v Speaker 4>really seeing a much bigger breadth of policies across the party.

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 4>But as you say, what they're really kind of what

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 4>they always hone back to is that issue of migration.

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 4>That's the kind of anger that they're trying to tap

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 4>into among the British electorate of people who feel that

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 4>they've been hard done by because we have seen such

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 4>huge numbers of migrants come to the country.

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's really important in the UK to remember, of course,

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>this is historically almost a two party system, and so

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>they really want to break away from that. But are

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they more right wing the Tory right.

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 4>It's on certain social policies, it certainly seems so. I mean,

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 4>we've heard various of their MPs that I mean, they've

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 4>only got five MPs at the moment, but we've heard

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 4>some of them talk about, you know, wanting to tighten

0:25:55.640 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 4>up abortion legislation, for example, make it harder for women

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 4>to get abortions. We've heard some of them talking around

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 4>a sister dying and sort of coming at that from

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 4>a very you know, kind of socially right wing angle.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 4>But it's hard to kind of say exactly because on

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 4>certain economic policy they are trying to challenge labor from

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 4>the left as well, because you know, you've seen them

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 4>sort of talk about reinstating the winter fuel payment to

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 4>elderly people that labor pulled when they first got into power.

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 4>I think, rather than looking at it as an issue

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 4>of right and left, what they're really looking at it

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 4>from is trying to tap into that kind of base

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 4>of working class people. Who feel like they aren't recognized

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 4>by either of the mainstream political parties and trying to

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 4>figure out what they want and what might appeal to them,

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 4>while also keeping you know, the wealthy, high net worth

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 4>traditionally right wing voters on side.

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>So that sounds like pretty good definition of populism to me,

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 3>isn't it?

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely yeah?

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 3>And that's a playbook. So you know, when we talked

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 3>to the Conversation, didn't we about you admire President Trump

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 3>and said he certainly does might musque and that obviously

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.239
<v Speaker 3>calls himself now the doge of the UK. So are

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 3>they just kind of cherry picking from the kind of

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 3>populist regimes, obviously the trumping the biggest one, and trying

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 3>to repeat that playbook in the UK.

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 4>It certainly seems that way in certain of the policies

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 4>that they have taken forward. I mean this, the Non

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Doms Britannia card that they're talking about, giving people a

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 4>Britannier card giving them the right to live in the

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 4>UK is pretty much a sort of direct translation of

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 4>the Trump card, even though it's an awful lot cheaper

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 4>than the Trump card.

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Two hundred and fifty thousand pounds every ten years is

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 3>it rather than what was it five million?

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Did I get that right?

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Several million pounds for sure.

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's a bit cheaper than the US basically.

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Whether they're doing down or not, I don't know, but no,

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 4>it's it's it's it's difficult to to see, you know,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of how the UK would be able to bring

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 4>in millions and millions.

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 3>And again we asked him in there in the conversation

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 3>around more specific economic or even things that were useful

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 3>for the city of Life, and I don't know, and

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 3>I just don't think they had much me on the

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 3>bones there, do they.

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, it's it's important to remember that we

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 4>are four years away from from another general election and

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 4>you could level the same criticism and the Conservative Party exactly.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So you know, it's a long way off yet,

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 4>but they are kind of coming at this really from

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 4>ground zero. You know, they've never had more than one

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 4>MP before. Now they've got five. But you know, there's

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 4>still a lot of questions around who's going to be

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 4>their cabinet if they if they do get into power,

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 4>who would be the chancellor? You know, there's there's a

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 4>few names in the pot already who could who could

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 4>probably fill that position. But you know, there's a whole

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 4>cabinet that they'll have to fill, and it's it's relying

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 4>a lot on trust from the electorate to think that

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 4>they would vote a party into power when they have

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 4>absolutely no idea who any of the people are.

0:28:55.720 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh see, so interesting. Thank you so much, thanks for

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>listening to this week's In the City from Bloomberg. This

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>episode was hosted by me Francins Laquis with David Merritt.

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>In the City is produced by Somersaudi and Moses and Dam,

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>with sound designed by Blake Maples. Brindon Francis Unim is

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>our executive producer. Special thanks to Zia Yusuff and Lucy White.

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Please subscribe, rate, and review wherever you listen to podcasts.