WEBVTT - Under Armour Cuts Sales View on Softer Demand Around the World 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, let's talk about one of the big

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 2>businesses or one that aspires me a big business, and

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>that would be under Armour. It's the ath leisure company

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Athletic where company maybe at Leisure is pushing it a

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 2>little bit. Punam Goyela's senior US e commerce and retail

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>analysts here at Bloomberg Intelligence, and Pam under Armour. It

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 2>feels like it's been this reorganization restructuring story for a while.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 3>Where are we.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>In that reorganization restructuring story for under Armorth because the

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>stock performance today shows that there's still some way to go.

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 4>I've been through this turnaround story several times over the

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 4>past two decades, so clearly it's happening once again. Now,

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 4>what I'd say for them, you know, I think they

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 4>are focused on the right things the question as well.

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 4>The consumer respond right sizing. Inventory is down just three

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 4>percent in line with the sales decline is a positive sign.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 4>That said, it was interesting that they called out that

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 4>the consumer is actually weak because when I look at competitors,

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 4>some of the larger ones like Atiightos and Nike, they're

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 4>actually doing pretty fine in North America, and I think

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 4>that may have to do with just their bigger boat

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 4>and also the World's Cup and their bigger presence there.

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I was wondering about why demand was softening with

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 5>under Armour. I know under Armours kind of a middle

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 5>of the market brand, is part of what's happening here.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 5>Maybe that the demand for kind of middle of the

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 5>road brands is softening. Well, maybe demand for higher end

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 5>brands is gaining ground, or is it something else entirely, Yeah.

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 4>I think it's it's a mix a few things. So first,

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 4>I do think that it has to do with the

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 4>higher end customer is doing better than the midd or

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 4>the Laurent. So we do see that across the spectrum.

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 4>That said, under Armour, while it is middle of the class,

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's not Nike Adidas, but it is still

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 4>a strong brand when you think of at leisure, especially

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 4>compared to like some of the other brands that are

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 4>up and coming. I think under Armoured does still in

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 4>North America have across the board, not just in Metro

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 4>City's a name. That said, I do think the last

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 4>quarter weakness does stem a little from just when you

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 4>think about what was going on, especially in the US,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 4>it is all about the World Cup, and under Armoured

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 4>doesn't really have a meaningful presence there, so when consumers

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 4>are shopping the stores, when they're going online, it's just

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 4>not the brand that comes front and center. That said,

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 4>under Armour is largely apparel, right with the exit of

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Steph Curry, so that different sheets it from our Nike

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 4>and Aditas, which are predominantly footwear brands with an apparel offering.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm so glad you brought up Steph Curry because I

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 2>feel like that's how a lot of people encountered under

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Armour if they weren't wearing, you know, the cold Tech

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 2>or heat tech shirts that the company made. What do

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 2>we know about what happened there and how under Armours

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>thinking about maybe replacing or finding another celebrity endorser or

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 2>celebrity partner to work with it.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 4>So I think replacing Steph Curry isn't an easy task

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 4>because when they signed Steph Curry, Steph Curry wasn't the

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 4>Steph Curry that we know today, right. It was a

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 4>younger talent and it was also probably more in line

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 4>with what they could afford, as Nike and Adidas have

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 4>deeper pockets and under armour to support some of these

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 4>brand collaborations. That said, I think the focus now is

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 4>on just developing the right product. If they're going back

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 4>to their DNA, they're going back to the basics, which is,

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 4>can we develop a product that speaks for itself and

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't need a brand a master. It's a hard

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 4>task and yes you can do that for some things,

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 4>but in at leisure, you do need that brand endorsement,

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 4>that athlete credibility to really rise further along for them.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 4>I think the one product that they've been talking a

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 4>lot about, they actually talked about it several times on

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 4>the call, was a bouncy T shirt, which is an

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 4>it's a really cool product that they've developed and it's

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 4>innovative where you can wear this T shirt. You can

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 4>wear it to the gym, you can wear it to

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 4>the bar, and you can wear it every day and

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 4>it kind of fits the whole spectrum of your lifestyle.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 4>So that T shirt is doing really well and they're

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 4>looking to use that as a stepping board to kind

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 4>of launch more products and really drive customer interest.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, the bouncy T shirt, I'm looking online sixty five

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 2>dollars and it has a four point nine star rating.

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 2>This is just a plain T shirt that you know,

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 2>looks good enough to wear.

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 6>The bounces.

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand how a T shirt can bounce. I'm

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 2>not sure why it's called bouncecad you wear.

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 4>That the fabric it doesn't stick to you.

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 5>Does it like deal with your sweat or is it

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 5>just that its style is such that.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 7>You could wear to the gym then out.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, is this a performance wear?

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 4>It's everything. It's performance, it's going out and it's every day,

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>which is what makes us so versatile. And that's what

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 4>the that's what they're basically saying that this is a

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 4>versatile T shirt that you can go to the bar

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 4>on Friday night, you can wake up and go to

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 4>the gym Saturday morning, and then you could wear throughout

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 4>the day. It works for everything, and it's done really

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 4>really well for them. It is I would say, you

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 4>know something that's working and if they continue to innovate

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 4>in this manner more extensively, they could start to gain

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 4>some traction. But that's not going to happen overnight. I

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 4>think there's still, you know, to your original question, a

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 4>long way to still go from here before we can

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.679
<v Speaker 4>say that we see a straight lineup. At this point,

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 4>it's still very mixed.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Blueberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 3>Through Matt Shuttenham and Matt.

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>You're joining us because the FCC has removed nationwide cap

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 2>limiting local TV ownership.

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 3>That's quite a headline. What does this mean in your world?

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so the media environment has changed a lot over

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 8>the past couple decades, but FCC rules haven't, and so

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 8>broadcast TV station owners for years have been stuck with

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 8>this limit on how big they can grow. The FCC

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 8>rules said no company can can reach more than thirty

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 8>nine percent of US households. And what the FCC did

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 8>yesterday is scrap that rule and say, look, we're not

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 8>going to have this numeric limit on companies. And more so,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 8>this presents a really big opportunity for companies like Nextstar

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 8>Sinclair that own the TV stations across the US to

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 8>grow larger because they're not, you know, hamstrung by this

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 8>this long existing FCC rule anymore.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 5>What does this mean for media consolidation? I feel like

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 5>there's always this statistic we hear that there are these

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 5>six conglomerates that now control ninety percent of US media?

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 7>Is that likely to get more extreme?

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that doesn't seem like necessarily a great thing

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 5>for voters.

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 8>Right So this, you know, when you listen to FCC

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 8>Chairman Brendan Carr, he said, this is really about empowering

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 8>local TV stations so they can compete with those big

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 8>national media companies. Right now, those stations really have very

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 8>little leverage when they negotiate with ABC, CBS, NBC and

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 8>with cable companies when they have to get there their

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 8>media distributed. So in Brendan Carr's view, this is about

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 8>sort of empowering a new set of entities in that

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 8>media ecosystem, the owners of these local stations that right now,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 8>are you know, they're they're limited or previously were limited

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 8>by this FCC rule. They could only get so big,

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 8>so they had no leverage. This gives them more of

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 8>a voice, in Brendan Carr's view, against those national media companies.

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 8>So maybe it leads to a little more competition in

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 8>that space.

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>So this is deregulation essentially, and the broadcast industry has

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>been waiting for it for a long time. Which companies

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>are going to jump on this and make a move.

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 8>So Nextstar has already jumped on it with its acquisition

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 8>of Tegna, but there was sort of a legal cloud

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 8>around whether they could do that. You know, by acquiring Tegna,

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 8>they went way beyond the thirty nine percent US ownership

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 8>cap and the FCC at the staff level set up,

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 8>you know, will that requirement. Don't worry about it. That

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 8>was sort of legally questionable. This is the right way

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 8>to do it, to do it through a rule making,

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 8>to actually change the rule. So it's an opportunity for

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 8>Next Star to get past legal hurdles on its Tegna acquisition.

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 8>Company like Sinclair could could also look at this. It

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.599
<v Speaker 8>featured prominently in the company's earnings call a couple of

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 8>days ago. There could be opportunities to grow much larger,

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 8>go way beyond the thirty nine percent. But one big

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 8>and important footnote, there's going to be a legal challenge

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 8>to all of this that's coming next. It's not totally

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 8>clear the FCC can do what it did or whether

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 8>only Congress can do it. That's going to be the

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 8>fight that plays out next.

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 5>What is the legal challenge exactly?

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 8>So, in two thousand and four, Congress told the FCC,

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 8>let's set that limit, that ownership limit at thirty nine percent,

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 8>and it said, FCC, change your rule to make it

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 8>thirty nine percent. Question is when Congress did that in

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 8>two thousand and four, did it mean that the FCC

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 8>can't update that rule later? Is it only Congress's call?

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 8>And there are strong arguments on both sides that, you know,

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 8>the FCC says, look, we still have our power to

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 8>modify our rules. Congress didn't take that away. The other

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 8>side said no. Congress was pretty clear, we want thirty

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 8>nine and it said that five times in its statute

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 8>thirty nine percent. So it's not clear that the FCC

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 8>can use its general modification power. That's going to have

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 8>to play out in appeals court and in the Supreme Court.

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 8>Did Congress give the FCC its general discretion to update

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 8>its rules or was this a call that Congress reserved

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 8>for itself.

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, Matt, one final question before we let you

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 2>go from where you sit Paramounts Guide Ence, Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Is anything going to happen in the next couple of weeks?

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean so so. Lots of moving pieces on

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 8>that on the anti trust side, and jenre is really

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 8>our go to on all of those questions, so, you know,

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 8>really interesting questions there as state antitrust enforcers have stepped

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 8>up when the federal regulators have taken more of this

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 8>deregulatory approach.

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Stacey, you know a thing or two about

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Grand Theft Auto the video game franchise, right.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, I mean I know, it's really huge.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 5>I actually had a cousin who sold a song to

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 5>Grand Theft Auto, So it was one of the songs

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 5>that you might hear on the radio in a car

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 5>inside of the game, and it was a really big

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 5>deal for them. They actually make quite a bit of money.

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 5>It's a huge, very wealthy universe.

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a cultural I mean totally basically, so many

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 2>people live in that universe, and we're going to get

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 2>a new update Grand theftdot of six GTA six for

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 2>those in the know at some point. Nathan I do

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Intelligence technology research analyst, and Nathan I say,

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 2>at some point, because it feels like we've been waiting

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 2>for the release of GTA six for months, if not

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a year.

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I remember talking about this quarter after quarter after quarter.

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. Actually, people have been waiting, especially fans. You say

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 9>cultural totem, I think it's more like a cult at

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 9>this point. People fans have been waiting for thirteen years.

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 9>That was how long ago the GTA five was released,

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 9>and there's such a strong pand up demand for this franchise. Yeah, exactly,

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 9>And even in the last thirteen years, still eighteen million

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 9>people played every single month across PC and console, and

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 9>it remains the third most played game of all time

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 9>as of March. This just tells you how much there

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 9>is a demand, and you can see the shares of

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 9>take to the parent company actually is training up today,

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 9>and that tells you that even though the guidance, which

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 9>we think is on the conservative side, peoples to believe

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 9>that the games might actually perform better than what the

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 9>company is saying.

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 5>So this might sound like a naive question, but why

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 5>did it take them so long to get this new

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 5>version of the game ready?

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 7>I am seeing here.

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 5>That the CEO has said that the expectations around this

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 5>are quote terrifying.

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's it is quite terrifying, because you know, there

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 9>is a lot of estimates pointing to I mean as

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 9>much as many as eighty five million unit sales at

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 9>the top and based on salesize estimates. But I'm a

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 9>lot more conservative on that front. And why it takes

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 9>the company so long. It's a huge production. It takes

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 9>more than a billion just to develop the game, and

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 9>for contacts. I think a Star Wars or the Avengers

0:13:56.040 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 9>movie like costs like half a billion. And it's it's long.

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 9>There's a lot of aspects that go into the game.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 9>Is not just selling it upfront. It's also sustaining recurring

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 9>sales for more than ten years. I mean because GTA

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 9>five continued to perform in the last thirteen years, and

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 9>every year it continued to turn out you know, three

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 9>hundred to four hundred million in revenue to take to

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 9>and rock Start, the maker of the game, even after

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 9>upfront sales was captured in the first year. And GTA

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 9>six should prove to be able to do the same.

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 9>And actually we can see in the online mode of

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 9>GTA five, which is the current version, like people still

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 9>to spend about sixty bucks a month to play the game,

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 9>and that's what context three x the standard ad free

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 9>Netflix subscription. So there's actually photos who pay, there's a

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 9>cut following, and people continue and it just can't get

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 9>enough of this game, and you know, it's high budget,

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 9>is I guess the company just want to make sure

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 9>they get it right because it's literally the make up

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 9>break game of the century.

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Nathan. We only have like twenty seconds left. But I'm curious.

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure they make this game available to reviewers. Do

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 2>they make it available to analysts early?

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 9>No, there's no early access, so you but there's pre

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 9>orders momentum that we can engage some early wins. Yeah, yeah,

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 9>there's pre orders, and preorders apparently is blowing past expectations,

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 9>Like New Zoo is estimating that preorders is at two

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 9>hundred or more million globally, and you know they're expecting

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 9>upward of five billion by end of November in cross sales.

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 9>I mean, Consensus is only pegging this at four billion

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 9>or below. So that tells you how Consensus even is

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 9>being a bit conservative on that front.

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Blueberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 6>You know, on a day like today, what would be

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 6>better than a Frosty very little? Have you ever had one?

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 5>Of course, of course I've had Frosty's.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 6>You know what, nothing better frost the other day like today,

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 6>But I might be the only one thinking that with

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 6>Stacy and I might be the only ones thinking about that.

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 6>Wendy's pulling us out, look also cutting their dividend. Dave

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 6>Thomas is probably rolling in his grave.

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 7>Oh I loved those ads. He was great.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 6>What was the other one? Where's the beef?

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 9>Oh?

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 7>Where's the beef?

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 6>Michael Hanlon Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Restaurant and Food service handles

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 6>joining us. Now where's the beef? Or no, what's the beef?

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 6>With Wendy's.

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 10>Listen, I'm going to take the other side of that trade.

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 9>I bet you.

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 10>Dave Smith is somewhere smiling and Dave tom wasn't it.

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 10>I'm sorry, Dave Thomas. Yeah, it's some up there somewhere smiling.

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 10>Because new CEO Bob Wright, who had previously worked for

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 10>Wendy's for quite some time, you know, has a really

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 10>good plan to bring this brand back to glory. And

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 10>he and his new CFO Steve cerulis that they did

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 10>a phenomenal job turning around pot Bellies, and I think

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 10>it was a great first call for both of them. Yeah, sure,

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 10>they cut the dividend and they you know, retracted twenty

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 10>twenty six guidance, but that's really just to give them

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 10>some time for their turnaround plants to start gaining some traction.

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 7>So what is the turnaround plan?

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 5>Because I feel like this is such a tough moment

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 5>for food companies, I mean beyond just cyclospora, but you know,

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 5>prices are going up, margins are getting thin, consumers are

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 5>getting pickier.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 7>What is the plan.

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, that there's a lot of low hanging fruit here

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 10>because this brand has been severely mismanaged for some time.

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 10>And so number one is going to be revamping the

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 10>menu and making sure that there's everyday value on that menu.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 10>And what I mean by value isn't necessarily price. It's

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 10>what you get for what you pay.

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 9>You know.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 10>Bob right on the call mentioned that, you know, people

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 10>come away feeling from feeling that the experience was worth it,

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, and being happy about their overall experience when

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 10>they leave a Wendy's restaurant or drive through. There's also

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 10>a lot of low hanging fruit in terms of operations.

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 10>Operations have slipped. We see this when chains are struggling, right,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 10>When franchises aren't making money in a restaurant, you know,

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 10>they're gonna pull labor and then this ends up causing

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 10>you know, operations to slip further, right, and so there's

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 10>an opportunity here for some retraining, adding labor back to

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 10>the to the to the restaurants and marketing. I mean,

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 10>this chain was had done such a good job with

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 10>marketing for so long. You know, to your point, you're

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 10>talking about the old where's the beef ads, but even

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 10>you know, more recently, like they had a great online

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 10>presence with social media, very snarky Twitter account that that

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 10>got a lot of attention. You know, I remember some

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 10>years ago when when Fortnite was in its heyday, they

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 10>had a collaboration with Fortnite and they had the Wendy's

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 10>you know, a Wendy character in the game that you

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 10>could find in the kitchen of a restaurant and all

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 10>sorts of cool stuff that and and that's really falling off, right,

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 10>and so.

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's there's a.

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 10>Lot you know, digital improving, the digital marketing and the

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 10>and the digital experience. Loyalty things like that are going

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 10>to be another point of ethicism. And then the last

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 10>one is like making the franchisese money, right, you have

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 10>to make your franchisese money so that they're motivated to

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 10>build no news stores.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 3>So those are the.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 10>Five primary points for this turnaround plan.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 6>Okay, so they're telling the franchisees at this point be patient.

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.719
<v Speaker 6>I guess that's the same message to investors. At this point,

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 6>when does it start to take How patient do they

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 6>have to be?

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, listen, first of all, you know, I don't know.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 10>I bet you franchisees that listened into that call were

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 10>very happy with it, right, Like what Bob said was,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 10>you know, this chain is not run by private equity groups.

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 10>The franchisees are family owned people that he knows personally, right,

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 10>And so what he said was turning this brand around

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 10>was personal to him, right, And so you know, I

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 10>think the energy that the franchise e base is going

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 10>to be energized, right by having a guy in there

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 10>that they know that has had a lot of success

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 10>turning around Pop Belly, that did a great job when

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 10>he was with Wendy's. When Wendy's was, you know, a

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 10>pretty solid competitor in the quick service space. So I

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 10>think franchisees are happy with the change at the top.

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 10>You know, how long is it going to take. It's

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 10>going to take time. The good thing is they're lapping

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 10>really really weak comps in the second half. So management

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.199
<v Speaker 10>said that Saintstar sales are going to be down similar

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 10>to what they've been down, which was down about six

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 10>percent plus in the first half in the US. We

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 10>think they're sandbagging in a little bit because comparisons are

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 10>going to get easier through your end, and we think

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 10>as a result, results are going to go from bad

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 10>to less bad, you know, but the real turnaround will

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 10>probably kick in sometime in twenty twenty seven.

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 5>Another company we've been hearing a lot about this morning

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 5>is Sweet Green.

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 7>They've just been getting hammered.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 5>Apparently sales are way down a lot because of the

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 5>cyclospora outbreak.

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 7>What are you thinking for them?

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 6>And say in the twenty seconds, because that's all we have.

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, listen, that company was in dire straits prior to cyclospora.

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 10>Obviously this impacts them a lot more than everybody else

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 10>because they sell a lot of salad, but they had

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 10>their issues heading into this outbreak.

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:58.719
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal