WEBVTT - Riding the Hype Cycle With Web3

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you? Well? I think it's

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>time once again to consider the hype cycle, largely because

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we are leading up to south By Southwest and south

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>By Southwest has as part of it a big tech

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>conference and usually you see a lot of height around

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>emerging technologies and that's not always a bad thing, but

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it can frequently lead to overstating the capabilities of technologies

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that have not matured yet, and that in itself can

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>end up being dangerous or embarrassing or costly. And so

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the hype cycle, specifically with

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>regard to Web three. That's gonna be a topic one

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>of many topics of discussion at this year's south By Southwest,

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>as will the metaverse and many other related subjects. So

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the hype cycle is a concept that is usually presented

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as a little line chart. If you were to look

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>at one, you would see kind of like an X

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Y axis and a line would be emerging from the

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>center that's going out to the right, and then it

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>quickly climbs up, peaks, drops off into a valley, and

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>then slowly rises out of that valley to hit a

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of flat section. And the purpose of this is

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to kind of describe not the evolution of a technology specifically,

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but rather how people react to and receive certain technologies.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And there's no hard set timeline that the hype cycle

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>has to adhere to. It's really more of a description

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:06.919
<v Speaker 1>of the stages that the public reception of a technology

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>will go through. It's kind of similar to the stages

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of grief. So you've probably heard of the stages of grief.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Those are denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and then acceptance. And

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>again there's no specific amount of time that's assigned to

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>every stage. Every person will experience the stages of grief

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>on their own timeline, and in fact, the same person

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>might have to go through the grieving process multiple times

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>throughout their lives, and that timeline could be different from

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>instance to instance, so there's not like a set uh

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>length of time for each of these. It's more like

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>this is generally the the process that you go through. Well,

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in the hype cycle, everything begins with what is called

0:02:55.120 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>a technology trigger. Typically the trigger is when a technology

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>has been announced or covered by the media early early

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>on while it's still in development, So the tech is

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>not in its final form, it hasn't matured. It may

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>still just be a lot of possibilities and potential, so

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>we know more about what the tech could possibly do

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than what it actually can do. Now, I would

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>argue that Web three falls into this stage where we

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are between the technology trigger and that peak I was

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about. There are a lot of ideas about what

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Web three will eventually be, and we'll talk about those

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>later in this episode, but the truth of the matter

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is it's still something that is coalescing, and so it's really,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, impossible to say what Web three will

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>be because it ain't a thing yet. It's still being developed,

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of similar are concepts, but

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>they're going about it in slightly different ways. There's no

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>consensus as to what Web three ultimately is going to be. Now,

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>in this early phase in the hype cycle, you end

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>up hearing a lot of buzz about the technology, and

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this is fed by the media, right the media gets

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>really excited starting to cover the stuff, and that in

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 1>turn feeds back into people's enthusiasm about the the evolving tech,

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so people start to imagine potential versions of this technology,

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>like what it will ultimately turn into and what it

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>might be capable of in the future. So, as an example,

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>just recently, I talked about invisibility tech on this very

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast and how through the use of meta materials and

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>some other techniques, researchers have been able to redirect certain

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>bands of electromagnetic radiation to turn a solid object quote

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>unquote invisible, but only invisible two specific small ranges of

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic frequencies. So you might be able to turn something

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote invisible to microwaves, but it would still remain

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.799
<v Speaker 1>visible in the visible light spectrum. So in other words,

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you as a human being would see that there's an

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>object there, but a device that was using microwaves to

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>detect an object would not see it. They would the

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>microwaves would bend around the object and continue forward as

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>if nothing were there, and so to the microwave detector,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing there, but you would still be able to

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>see the object because it's not invisible to the visible

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>light spectrum. Well, as media outlets started to cover stories

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>about meta materials and these experiments with stuff like microwaves.

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Then this naturally prompted a lot of what if scenarios

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>projecting into the future, saying, oh, if we can make

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>something invisible to microwaves, then what if you can make

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>a meta material that could redirect all visible eight the

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>same way this microwave experiment is doing with microwaves, Then

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you would have the equivalent of Wonder Woman's invisible jet,

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>but for real, and that would be a phenomenal method

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of camouflage. Right you could say, Wow, that's amazing, That's

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the stuff of science fiction, and people began to get

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>excited about this idea. Meanwhile, you had some researchers who

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are trying to say stuff like, we are nowhere close

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to being able to do that, and in fact, we

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>might never be able to cover the entire spectrum of

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>visible light and make something totally invisible to human sight

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>because we may not have a method that works across

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that spectrum of frequencies. We might be able to cover

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>some of it, but not all of it, which means

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it would still be visible. It would just appear to

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>be a specific kind of color based upon whatever frequencies

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>were reflecting off of it. But that didn't stop the hype.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>There were a lot of people who are really excited

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>about it. Now we were heading to the next age

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.679
<v Speaker 1>of the cycle. This is what Gardner calls the peak

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>of inflated expectations. So this is where we top out

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>where futurists are predicting incredible results based on young, immature,

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>still developing technologies. So they're starting to draw conclusions that

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have enough foundation to be reliable, and investors at

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>this stage might be pouring a ton of money into

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>startups that are developing the technology or looking to exploit

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the technology in some way. And keep in mind the

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>technology itself it's still not mature, so people are talking

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>about ways they're going to use or exploit the technology

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>before the technology has even been proven to be able

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to do those things. So this could be so early

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>on in the development of a technology that there's really

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>not much to talk about on a technical level. You're

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>just thinking about the possibilities if that tech chnology comes

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to pass. So Paraos was definitely in this stage before

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it all came crashing down with an expose. You had

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this technology that reportedly was going to be able to

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>run hundreds of different medical tests on a micro drop

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of blood, a single micro drop, and people were still

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.239
<v Speaker 1>really jazzed about that and excited and enthusiastic and believing

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that this was a possibility when the expose showed that

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>things were not as they seemed at the company, and

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in fact, it had been drastically overpromising what was possible.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Next up in the hype cycle, people start to lose

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>confidence in a technology. This can be because the tech

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is taking longer than people want for it to mature

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and become a capable tech, or it may be that

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it is maturing but it doesn't actually have all the

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>features that folks were excited about earlier on the hype cycle,

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>where they find out, oh, it works, but it doesn't

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>work as well as I hoped, or it doesn't do

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing I was hoping it would do. So in short,

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the reality of this technology is falling short, sometimes fall

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>far short of what the promise was. So when normal

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>folks like like yours truly first got a chance to

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>use virtual reality technology once VR had emerged, and prematurely,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>some would argue, out of research labs, the results were

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>far more modest than what pop culture had been imagining

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>right in the media, VR was going to be this

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>thing that would would almost literally transport you into the

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>computer world, but the actual experience of using VR was

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>far more limited than that. I would argue that the

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>technology was truly impressive. I mean, having head tracking technology

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>alone blew my mind, and I thought it was super

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>exciting showing what the capabilities were. It's just that the

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>actual implementations were pretty limited. But that didn't discourage me.

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I just thought, Wow, this technology has so much promise. However,

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other people just felt like disappointed and

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>let down that it wasn't the knockout hit right out

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of the gate that they were expecting, and as a result,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they kind of turned on the technology. They dismissed it

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties, and that led to the next stage

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>of the hype cycle, which is the trough of disillusionment.

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>This stage is where people have become disenchanted with the

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>technology because it failed to live up to their expectations.

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Often at this stage, investors will stop supporting companies that

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>are involved in this technology. Ledgling companies that got into

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the sector often fail at the stage. They just ceased

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to exist, and technology itself can die at this stage

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's still in the maturation process and has not

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>fully been developed. The technology it's could just lose enough

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 1>support that there's no one left to develop it. But

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 1>often you'll have a few holdout companies and organizations that

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>will continue to work on it and keep enough people

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>interested and happy for the cycle to continue development, and

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>VR very nearly died out after the public became disenchanted

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>with it. In the nineties, funding for VR dropped significantly,

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and research institutions and universities found themselves struggling to support

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>further development. In fact, at this stage, a lot of

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>researchers who are hoping to use VR for some really

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>innovative use cases like treating phobias, for example, they found

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 1>themselves developing tools by repurposing other technologies. They were looking

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>at game systems like the Wii or the Sony Move

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>controller system and they converted those into VR tools. Or

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>they looked at Microsoft Connect the peripheral for the Xbox,

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and they took that and repurposed that. Researchers they lacked

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the resources that they needed to build hardware for themselves,

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>so they were doing their best by repurposing existing hardware

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that was intended for other uses. And so the work

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>was able to continue, but it was at a pace

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that was way way slower than earlier on in the

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>hype cycle. So VR could have just died right then

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and there, but it lived to VR another day. Now.

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Next up in the hype cycle is the slope of enlightenment.

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>This stage happens as people come to terms with what

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>a technology can actually do, as opposed to all those

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>nebulous potentials that we were dreaming about earlier on in

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the cycle. Now it may turn out that the tech

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't an incredible solution to all the world's problems, but

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe it turns out to do certain things really well,

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, people support the technology more. At

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this stage, we have a better understanding of what the

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>tech can do, and while it might not enjoy the

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>monumental success everyone was hoping for earlier in the cycle,

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>when everyone had just dollar signs in their eyes, it

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>can have a healthy place in the space. Now we're

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break. When we come back, i'll

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>finish up talking about the hype cycle. Then we're gonna

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>focus specifically on Web three. But first these messages. Okay,

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>when we were leaving off, before the messages, we had

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the slope of enlightenment in the hype cycle. You could

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>actually argue that VR is currently in the slope of enlightenment,

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that while it survived the trough due to the emergence

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of the oculus in general, like really the oculus particularly

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>helped a lot, that VR was able to make a

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>recovery and start moving on the slope of enlightenment. Uh.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And you might say that, all right, well, maybe it's

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>still on in the slope of enlightenment because while it's

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>more popular than it was in the nineties, it has

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>not achieved mainstream adoption. The VR market is still a

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>fairly niche market. And we see that not just in

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the sales of VR headsets and and trust me, there

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>have been really good sales, like lots of people have

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>bought them, but we also see it because it's not

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like we're seeing a ton of really innovative development in

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>VR in the commercial space. The reason for that is

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a developer is not going to spend the resources needed

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to create VR experiences if there's not enough of a

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>market out there to make it make business sense to

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>do so, right, You're not gonna make something like it

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't make any sense for you to set up a

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>lemonade stand and sell lemonade for twenty five cents of glass.

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>If it turned out that it cost you fifty cents

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of glass to make a right, you wouldn't You wouldn't

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>do that. You would either mark up the elimonade or

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you'd say, no, I'm not getting into that racket. I'm

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>doing something else. So that's kind of where VR is now.

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>If it's in the slope of enlightenment, we can still

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>see adoption over time as the technology continues to reach

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>its mature level. And maybe that's where VR is at

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this moment. It at least is where everyone who's working

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>on the metaverse concept is hoping VR and mixed reality

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>or X are is, because if it is in the

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>slope of enlightenment, it's still moving toward mainstream adoption because

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the last phase in the cycle is called the plateau

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of productivity. Plateau tells you people's expectations are not going

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to really increase from here, right. They pretty much feel

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that the technology is where it needs to be. It

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>does what it it does, and maybe it's good enough

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so that it's a really popular technology, or maybe it

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just ever emerged from a niche market. So this is

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>where we would expect the technology to evolve over time,

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>but those evolutions will be small, Right, You're not going

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to see a dramatic change generation to generation. It'll just

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be improving along with other technologies, but not to such

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic point that it becomes almost like it's a

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>new tech. I would say the smartphone is definitely in

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the plateau of productivity phase. Uh. This might be to

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the chagrin of some Apple fans. There was a time

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>early on in the iPhones life where everyone would wait

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>anxiously each year for the next model's release, because the

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>improvements in generation to generation were fairly significant and easy

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to understand and see. But the technology reached a mature

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>stage several years back. There are still some Apple fans

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>who expressed disappointment when they go and look at the

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>events where there there's an unveiling of a new model

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>of iPhone, and it's not because the new iPhone models

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't good. Instead, it's because they aren't different enough from

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier ones to feel like a huge leap forward. And

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.239
<v Speaker 1>early on that wasn't the case, like it felt like

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>every iPhone was a big leap over the past one,

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>but you eventually reach a maturity where those big leaps

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>just aren't gonna come anymore. They'll improve, but not in

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the same span that you would see in earlier versions.

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>That is the mark of a truly mature technology. Each

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.959
<v Speaker 1>generation of iPhone has at least some improvements over previous generations,

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>though some design changes may also disappointment you know a

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>subset of users. So, for example, my wife doesn't like

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition tech, and so she's still upset that the

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>iPhone ditched the fingerprints since their several generations back. In fact,

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>she resisted buying a new iPhone for a long time,

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:00.479
<v Speaker 1>specifically because the newer ones didn't have the finger and sensor.

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Eventually she gave in, but it was hard fought battle.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Now at this plateau, there is a clear understanding of

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the relevance of the technology. There's an established market for

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the tech. Adoption of the technology has likely reached close

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to a saturation point, meaning all the folks who are

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>interested in this technology have bought in, and the folks

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>who are not interested in the technology are not likely

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to change their minds very easily. VR and XR companies

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>really hope the VR hasn't reached this point of the

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>hype cycle, because if this is where VR is now,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>then we may never see a mainstream adoption of virtual reality,

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>which in turn would mean that the most visions of

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse are built upon a shaky foundation, because if

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a company's vision of the metaverse incorporates mixed reality in

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>any significant way, well, then it stands to reason that

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>mixed reality itself has to be pretty mainstream, you know,

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>something on the level of smartphones. Like smartphones definitely change

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the web. The mobile experience with the Web is very

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>different from the desktop and laptop experience, and the metaverse

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>proponents are really hoping that VR will enable the metaverse

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to have that same kind of transformational effect on how

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we interact with the online world. But for the metaverse

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to be more than just an online community for a subset,

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a small subset of the overall online population, mixed reality

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a big thing among the mainstream, and

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it just isn't yet. All the companies that hope to

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>cash in on the metaverse, whether by providing virtual infrastructure

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>or creating ways to conduct business within the metaverse itself,

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they can find themselves over extended. If the basic technology

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>needed to access the metaverse never actually takes off, and

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a risk, and some risks end up paying

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>off and others don't. And we don't know which way

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.479
<v Speaker 1>this one's going to go yet. There are a lot

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of very smart people who think in the end the

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>metaverse is going to be a big winner, specifically a

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>metaverse that incorporates mixed reality, that it's going to be

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the way of the future, And you know, they very well.

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe right now, I say that because I am extremely

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>skeptical that the metaverse, at least that vision of the metaverse,

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>will be the next big thing. But I have also

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>famously been really wrong about prediction stuff in the past,

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>so just counted as skepticism. But that doesn't mean I'm right.

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I will say that so far I'm right because mixed

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>reality has not become a mainstream technology. It's popular, but

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>not popular enough to be considered even close to as

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>mainstream as cell phones and smartphones. And the reason again

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm talking about this psycho, which I've done many

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>times on this show, is to emphasize how critical thinking

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>is key to navigating the stages of hype. It is

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>important to ask questions even uncomfortable hard questions as hype

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>ramps up. Those questions can help you avoid disaster, and

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>they can also help shape the path of a technology

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>so that it has the best chance of turning out well.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So I want to re emphasize that point too. I'm

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>not just advocating critical thinking because I want people to

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>avoid scams or you know, schemes that end up being

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>based on faulty premises. That is important. I do not

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>want you to get fleeced. That is way up there.

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But also through being critical, you can give any process

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>the best chance of addressing your concerns, and thus the

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>end product ends up being better because you address the

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>concerns early on instead of having to fix something after

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it's already been baked in. And if we don't ask

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the tough questions, then that baking process may go all

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>sorts of wrong, and then the thing we end up

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>with ends up not being as useful or ends up

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>not benefiting the right people, and we just have ourselves

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>to blame because we didn't ask those tough questions. That

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm trying to do now with Web three,

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna be straight with all y'all. Web three

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 1>still puzzles me. I mean, I understand the big picture

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>stuff about Web three, but I feel we're in that

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>initial part of the hype cycle where we haven't really

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>hit the peak of inflated expectations yet and that we're

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>still headed to the trough of disillusionment. But let me explain,

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, So first, how do we define Web three.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>There's actually a really big problem here, and part of

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>that problem is that, you know, folks are still working

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to create what will be Web three, so we don't

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>have a finished thing we can talk about. So again

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:10.959
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with probabilities and possibilities and potential and blue

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>sky dreaming and hype, and it becomes difficult to draw

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 1>any firm conclusions. Generally speaking, proponents of Web three tend

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>to describe it as the next phase of how we

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>experience the online world. And the easiest way for me

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to do this is to walk through what Web one

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and Web two are. So Web one point, oh, the

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>initial version of the web was a worldwide web filled

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>with static web pages, and you would go to a

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>web page you type in the U r L, or

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe you would find it in a in an early

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>search engine, or a link or whatever. You go to

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>this web page, you would read what was written on

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the web page. Then you would bounce, and there was

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>no real way to interact with the material, and the

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>material itself wouldn't typically change because making changes to a

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>web page was a hassle. You know, you would actually

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>have to go into the HTML code and then change

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the layout in the text in there, and then you

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>would have to save it and publish it again. There's

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of work if you wanted to make

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>changes to a web page, Like if your web page

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>was I don't know about the birth of the British Navy.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>That was actually one of the first web pages I

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>made when I was fresh out of college. So you

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>could think of this era as the web being in

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.959
<v Speaker 1>read only mode. You can't make changes to it if

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you're a user, like you're not the web page administrator,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you're just a visitor. You can't do anything that actually

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>changes the web page. You can just read it. That's it.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Web two point I would introduce interactivity and user generated content,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 1>as well as dynamic elements on the web pages themselves.

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So now a web page could become a living document.

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>It's one that could actually evolve over time, instead of

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>just being the same page day in and day out.

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>People also developed ways to swap out elements on web

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>pages more easily, so you could update stuff more frequently

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and with a little less hassle. And sites began to

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>include ways for users to leave their own input, so

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you can have message boards, you could have user reviews,

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you could have social network sites. Now the web became

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>read right instead of read only, because now you could

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>actually go to a web page and influence it. You

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>could type stuff in, You could leave a comment on

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>a video, or leave a review for a product, or

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>create a web journal that people could comment on. This

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>was a more interactive web. But something else was also

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>happening during this phase. So in web one point a

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>web pages were these little independent islands. You know. They

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>were hosted on servers, and those servers were all over

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the place. A single server might host tons of web

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>pages that had no real connection between them other than

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.959
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they all ultimately quote unquote lived on

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the same machine. So the web was decentralized, it wasn't

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>concentrated into little like areas. However, with Web two point oh,

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw the emergence of companies that would become monoliths

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>on the web, companies like Google, Amazon, and Facebook slash meta.

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>These companies began to consolidate power and influence, and importantly,

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they also began to trade in the personal data of

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>folks like us. As we visited various sites, these companies

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>learned more and more about us and our habits and

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>our likes and dislikes, and they use that information in

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>various ways. They used it to sell more effective advertising

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to their own clients, and they would also buy and

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>sell our data, turning our personal information into a commodity

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that could be traded. And the Web became a little

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>more centralized around these monoliths. Not necessarily from a technology standpoint,

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>though you do have companies like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that do big business with cloud based platforms that lots

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of other services depend upon, But definitely from a market perspective,

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>it became more centralized, and within the context of where

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>our personal information ends up, it became more centralized. Then

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>we finally get to the concept of web three, which

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>some have framed as read right own O W n

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 1>as and I own that, and that ownership concept extends

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>both to the systems that would make up web three.

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>The organizations that make up Web three as well as

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>our own personal data. So the era of Web three

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>would ideally mean that users would regain control over their

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>own information. Again, that this would not be the commodity

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>for other companies to buy and sell, that transactions across

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Web three would not include handing over your personal data

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to some other entity that could exploit it for their

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>own gain at our expense, and that we would actually

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>own a piece of all this through the participation of it. Well,

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>how is that possible? I'll explain when we come back

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>after this break. Okay, So what is it about Web

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>three that enables this ability to own our own information

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and also to own the systems that make up Web three?

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>While the underlying technology that most Web three proponents point

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to is the blockchain, and of course that was made

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>famous by bitcoin, and in fact, a lot of Web

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>three talk revolves around cryptocurrencies in general and blockchain in particular,

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>though not all Web three talk includes blockchain, because again

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about something that ain't a thing yet, and

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and some weathere implementations blockchain doesn't really play apart, but

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.719
<v Speaker 1>in most of them it does. So with blockchain, you

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>typically have blocks of data blocks of information. Each block

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>actually will only hold a certain amount of information, and

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>once it fills up, that block is done. The blockchain

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>system has to confirm or verify the data that's within

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that block, and then once verified, that block joins the

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>end of a chain of earlier blocks of data. So

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>with Bitcoin, each block's identity is tied to the blocks

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that came before it, and that means you can't go

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>into the history of bitcoin transactions and change something that

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.719
<v Speaker 1>happened in the past, because if you make a change,

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>then there's a ripple effect that goes all the way

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>down the chain and every block subsequently added to the

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>chain chain ages as well, and the system would immediately

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>be alerted that something hainky is going on and it

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>could be stopped and reversed. The reason for that is

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>without this protection, where the blocks identity depends upon all

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the blocks that came before it, well, you could spend

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin and then wait a certain amount of time,

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>then go in and tweak the chain of of data

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>blocks so that you it looks like you didn't spend

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin and that the bitcoin is still in your wallet,

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you could spend it again. So by tying

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the data all the way through the chain. It prevents

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you from being able to do those sorts of things.

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>At least theoretically. It gets a little more complicated, but

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.479
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to dive into all of that. So

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>another important element in bitcoins blockchain is that this this

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>chain of data is publicly viewable by any computer system

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that's part of this Bitcoin network, and it serves as

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a ledger of transactions, a record of every transaction made

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:08.719
<v Speaker 1>across bitcoin. And because everyone can see the ledger, everyone

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in the system that is, can see the ledger that

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>keeps things safe, at least in theory. In practice, again,

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it doesn't quite play out that way all right.

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So a Web three system would consist of a computer network,

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a peer to peer network, where all

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the computers are connected with each other through this Web

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>three interface, and they would participate in the operation of

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a blockchain, perhaps a blockchain that's specific to this Web

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>three based application or organization. This system could meant its

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>own tokens, similar to cryptocurrency or even similar to n

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>f t s, but these are tokens that represent ownership

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of this particular system. The tokens can be used to

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>reward people, or really reward computers for completing certain tasks,

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>such as verifying a block of data. That's how bitcoin works.

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what bitcoin mining is, is you verify a block

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.719
<v Speaker 1>of transactions. If you're a computer is the first one

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to do this by solving an arbitrarily difficult computer problem,

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>then you are awarded a certain number of bitcoin, and

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it's an incentive to participate in the system and therefore

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>verify transactions. It's this self perpetuating process as long as

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>people find value in the currency. So these tokens can

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>also represent voting power within these Web three organizations. So

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>let me give you a hypothetical. Let's say that you

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>are an investor, and let's say you've got a million

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars to burn and you decide to invest it in

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a Web three startup. This startup has its own blockchain

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's menting its own tokens on that block chain,

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and in return for your monetary investment in the Web

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>three startup, the company issues you one hundred thousand tokens

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:12.479
<v Speaker 1>on this blockchain to represent that investment. We'll just call

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>them techy tokens. It's the tech stuff currency. So these

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>tokens represent not just your investment, they also represent your

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.959
<v Speaker 1>voting power within the organization itself. It's kind of like

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>buying shares in a publicly traded company. The more shares

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you buy, the more voting power you have. So now

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes time to make a decision for the

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>direction of the organization, let's say you've get yourself one

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand votes. Because we're just simplifying this, we're saying

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>one token grants you one vote in the system, you

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>have a hundred thousand tokens, so you have a hundred

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand votes. But this is just for the purposes of

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>this example. So let's say there's someone else who's joined

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this network, but they have earned their tokens organically. They

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't poured a million dollars of investments in. They've just

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and participating. Maybe they've verified some transactions, They've got a

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of tokens have been awarded to them, so they

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>have one or two votes. You have a hundred thousand votes.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>This is where some Web three critics jump in. They

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>point out that venture capitalists, by investing into these systems,

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>are effectively making themselves into the monoliths that companies like

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Google and Meta serve as in the Web two point

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>O world. That sure, in theory, everyone who participates within

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a given Web three system is partly an owner of

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that system. But some folks are going to own such

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a large number of tokens that effectively they dictate the

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>decision making process for the overall organization, and everybody else

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any real power. So it doesn't become decentralized.

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 1>It is centralized. It's just centralized with different people. These

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>organizations also have a name. The thing we call these organizations,

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>these Web three based ones. Typically we call them dowels.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm not talking about DOW as in the Dow

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Jones Industrial Average, that's d o W. I'm talking d

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a O. That stands for decentralized autonomous organization. It is decentralized,

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>though perhaps to an arbitrary degree, because ownership spreads across

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the members of the organization, as opposed to there being

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>say a CEO. Right, you don't have a clearly defined

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>leader of this organization. Though again, in practice, if there's

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>an investor who has essentially bought their their powerful way

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>through by acquiring more tokens than anyone else, than effectively

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you're in the same position, but at least conceptually, it's decentralized.

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>It's autonomous because it operates based off rules that have

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>been encoded as computer processes. And it's an organization because

0:35:56.200 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's organized. But wait, if a doll runs off

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>computer rules, then where does voting come into play? What

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? Well, the voting power determines what those

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>computer processes actually are doing, so essentially you decide what

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the rules are through voting. And there are some serious

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>challenges with this kind of organization. So, for one, if

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>members are inactive, if you've got a lot of people

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>who own tokens but they're not actively voting, it can

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>become difficult or even impossible to pass a vote with

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the needed amount of support to enact change just because

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the people who own the votes aren't voting. If you've

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>got a whale or two in the system, people who

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>have accumulated way more votes than the rest of the

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>community collectively, then they effectively can dictate whatever the dowel

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>does or doesn't do, without regard of whatever the rest

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of the community wants. And you might be thinking, all

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>this sounds pretty vague, like I'm getting the general idea,

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 1>but you're you're not being specific, and you are right.

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>That's one of my biggest frustrations when I read about

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Web three stuff, or whenever I watch explainer videos on it,

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>because I've watched a lot, I kept thinking, I'm not

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>getting it, there's something I'm missing. And there's a lot

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of conversation around these ideas, along with other blockchain related

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff like n f t s, but there are very

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>few explainers that include specifics. At most, you might get

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>something like you pay an artist with some tokens for

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 1>some digital art and you don't have to worry about

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>your data being shared. I'm like, well, that's okay, But

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I could do a lot of stuff on the web.

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.919
<v Speaker 1>There's so much I can do on the web. How

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>does that work in a Web three environment? How is

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that manifested on Web three? What does that look like?

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>And it's hard to find really good examples of how

0:37:56.320 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>a Web three implementation would play out in the real world,

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>probably because we are in that nebulous phase where Web

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>three is not a full thing yet, and I've seen

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot from the hype side. I've seen a lot

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>from the technical side of how stuff works at a

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>code level, with concepts like smart contracts, but getting beyond that,

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to get to like specific give me real world examples

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of how this would play out and be useful, how

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it would be a benefit and better than the way

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it works now. Then it gets really hard to find

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>specific examples. I think a lot of people, including myself,

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately just want to know what using Web three really

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 1>would mean in a day to day life and how

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it would play out and why it would be better.

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 1>One question that also has to be answered is will

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain approach be a scalable one? And if it is,

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>then that's great, but it's There are a lot of

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>questions about this, like will building things all around blockchain

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>technology still work once you have grown beyond a niche community.

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>The cryptocurrency community is huge, but is not as huge

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>as like the general population of folks who are using

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, and some transactions on certain blockchains like bitcoins,

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, they take a while to verify and thus

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they take a while to resolve the transaction, and due

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to volatility in cryptocurrency value, a transaction can actually take

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>long enough to resolve that the amount of bitcoin that

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you've spent can have a drastically different value in say

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>US dollars than it did when you initiated that transaction.

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>So let's put that in a real world example, as

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>if you were just using your regular currency. I'm going

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to use US dollars because I'm an American citizen. So

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I say, imagine you walk into a coffee shop and

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>on the wall you see that a cup of coffee

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is three dollars, and you had three dollars over to

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the cashier to buy you a cup of coffee, and

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you buy your coffee. However, in the process of this,

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>as you are buying your coffee, there is a spike

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>in inflation, and the three dollars that you handed over

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>now has less buying power. It's still three dollar bills,

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 1>but it can buy less than what it used to.

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe now it's worth about a dollar in pre inflation money.

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.479
<v Speaker 1>That would be really bad news for the coffee shop,

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.760
<v Speaker 1>right because they just got one third of the value

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in buying power than what they wanted for They would

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>mark their prices up. But this has happened too fast.

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>It happened when the price was set at three dollars,

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but they got one dollar of value out of that

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>transaction because of inflation. And you would I think the

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 1>value of the coffee itself hasn't changed, right, The coffee

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't get worse, didn't get better. It's the same coffee.

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>It's worth three dollars of pre inflation, and we can

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.240
<v Speaker 1>say that because you are willing to spend three dollars

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to get it. That's what tells us it was worth

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that much because you were willing to pay it. But

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the value of the currency has changed. This is an

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>immediate term problem for the coffee shop. And the next

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 1>time you go and you might look and say, oh,

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>now a cup of coffee is nine dollars because a

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 1>dollar is worth a third of what it used to be.

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a trivial example, it's not realistic for US dollars.

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>But that sort of stuff does happen with cryptocurrencies that

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are depending upon the amount of time it takes for

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a transaction to get verified. With bitcoin, you're talking like

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes, and the value of bitcoin can actually change

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>fairly significantly within ten minutes depending upon what is going on.

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is one of the reasons why bitcoin doesn't

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>work so well as a as a currency, because you

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>almost feel punished for for spending it. If if the

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is suddenly worth way more than what it was

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>when you started the transaction. Then you're like, well, now

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm throwing money away because this thing wasn't worth as

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>much as what the bitcoin is now worth. Or the

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>flip side, if you're selling something and the value of

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin drops, then suddenly the value of what you're getting

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 1>for selling that thing is different. My whole point here

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.280
<v Speaker 1>is that by building a web on top of the blockchain,

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>there are challenges associated with scaling this operation up to

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 1>support a global user base, as well as making sure

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that the transaction process is fast enough so that people

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't faced with a system that is very slow to respond.

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't even get into the challenges that come with

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 1>larger organizations that have to contend with millions of participants,

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>all of whom have voting power for the direction of

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the organization itself. Like if these dowels grow truly enormous,

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 1>then the governance is going to become a nightmare. Everyone

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 1>gets a vote, some people have more votes than others,

0:42:56.320 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and man, it can be really hard to reach consensus.

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Beyond all that, we then have the bad actors out

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 1>there who are using the hype around cryptocurrencies and n

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>f t s and Web three and related things to

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to run scams and steal money and try to cash

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in on excitement and enthusiasm with no real intent to

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.839
<v Speaker 1>follow through on that. And these groups are doing more

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>than just fleecing people, which is already bad enough, right

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Stealing money is already bad. But what they're also doing

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is damaging the image of these technologies, and if the

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>images get damaged enough, folks will withdraw support and then

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff will fizzle out, kind of like VR, and then

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe find themselves on a much more modest path toward

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 1>maturation if they managed to stick around at all. Ultimately,

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there are some interesting concepts at play with

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Web three. I think there is value in the concept

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of Web three, But I also think we're still in

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the early hype cycle, and that while there's no law

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that an emerging technology has to go through these various

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>phases that Gardner has identified, there are a lot of

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>other technologies that have followed that specific path. So we've

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of precedents, and I think we that

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>if we're to see Web three even accomplish a fraction

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of the promises that we've been told as people have

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>hyped up Web three. It's going to require a ton

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of work. Not just a lot of work, but that

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to approach this work in a

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 1>very methodical way that holds the people and organizations that

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 1>are building these things accountable. We have to we have

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to also acknowledge the challenges and the pitfalls around us,

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and only then will we have a chance of building

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:48.359
<v Speaker 1>something that could have an overall benefit for everyone, as

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 1>opposed to just finding a new way to benefit a

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>select few at the expense of the many, which is

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 1>where I think we're going. But we could avoid that

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>if we're super careful. I just don't have a lot

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of confidence that that is going to happen. And I'm

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:10.959
<v Speaker 1>skeptical we're going to see a truly useful, beneficial Web three.

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Not that we won't see a Web three at all,

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but that will see a good one. I remain skeptical

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of that. However, I think it's possible that it could happen.

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just hard to do, and in my opinion, it

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>will be impossible to do unless we continue to ask

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 1>hard questions and rely on critical thinking. That is always

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:39.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be key. So hope for the best, prepare

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:43.280
<v Speaker 1>for the worst and question everything is what it comes

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>down to, and be compassionate along the way. Some people

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>are definitely out there to scam you, but not everyone is.

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:53.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think you should necessarily start off with

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the base assumption that everyone's out to get me and

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 1>I just got to figure out what their angle is.

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's necessary. Really the right approach either

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>use a little compassion at least until someone proves that

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 1>they aren't they are deserving of that compassion, and then

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, go a hole hog, knock yourself out.

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.919
<v Speaker 1>All right. That's it for this, And it was top

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of my mind again because south By Southwest is coming up.

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I am going to south By Southwest. I will be there.

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I will talk more about it as we get closer,

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>because I you know, details are still being worked out,

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:32.359
<v Speaker 1>so I want to make sure that those details are

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:36.360
<v Speaker 1>hammered out and figured out before I mentioned anything, because

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I'd hate to tell folks when and where I'm going

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>to be someplace and then it falls through. But once

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>those are solidified, I will share them. And I don't

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:47.919
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm talking about yet. If it's Web three,

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll probably here and you're there you'll probably hear something

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 1>very similar to what I said now, except much shorter,

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>because I'll be one of several people, and uh, I'll

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 1>try to be more concise. You know me. That's never

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. They'll just turn my mic off. It'll be fine,

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 1>all right. If you have suggestions for future topics for

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, reach out to me let me know. You

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>can do that on Twitter. Just send a message to

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 1>text stuff hs W. That's the handle we use for

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 1>this show, let me know, or you can download the

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app. It is free to download. It's

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 1>free to use if you navigate over to tech Stuff

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>by typing it into the search bar. You will see

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>on the tech stuff page there's this little microphone icon.

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Click on that. You can leave a voice message up

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to thirty seconds and link Let me know what you

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 1>would like to hear in the future, and I'll talk

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my heart Radio,

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.