WEBVTT - Koons: Valeant is running into trouble

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the Radio Plus mobile app, and on your radio.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash and I'm Karin Moscow.

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>The Bloomberg Futures Report brought to you by Interactive Brokers

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and CMI Group. If you're looking for global futures contracts

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.479
<v Speaker 1>with low trading costs, look no further. Interactive Brokers as

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the industry leader. Learn more at Interactive Brokers dot com. Slash,

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>c m E Group u S Dock Index futures lower

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>this morning, with stock still near their highest levels of

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the year, as investors consider the capacity of central banks

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to boost global growth. We checked the markets every fifteen

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes throughout the trading day on Bloomberg SNP EMNY futures

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>down eleven and a half points down, E mini futures

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>down eighty seven and NAZDAC E mini futures down fourteen decks.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>In Germany's down eight tenths percent and your treasury of

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>nine thirty seconds the yield one point nine two percent.

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Nimex screwed oil down one percent or forty eight cents

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to thirty six seventy of barrel. Comex goal down one

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>percent or twelve dollars thirty cents to twelve thirty three

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and ounce the euro a dollar eleven eleven the end

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>one twelve point eight zero. That's a Bloomberg business flash.

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Tom and Mike Karen, thanks so much. It is a

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>house of cards. We've avoided the hype and the hysteria

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>about Valiant, but unfortunately this morning it's nothing but an implosion.

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>The stock is down nineteen point five percent. The call

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>has just occurred. Joining us now Cynthia Coons, who has

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>followed his soap opera for Bloomberg and knows she has

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>her training from Penn State, where she was really a

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>major grizzled rec reporter for the Daily Collegian, and she

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>joins us right now. Cynthia, what did you learn in

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the call about the immediate desperation of Valiant? Well, I

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>think what was most interesting about the call was how

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>much they had to focus on debt and what they

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>took exactly, and this was something totally different. They've always

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>said weren't compliance with our covenants and they've moved on.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't been a call where in this instance they

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about debt. Probably thirty percent of the time, and

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they came back to it, and one of the main

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>issues is they talked about they're going to pay down

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>more than one point seven billion of debt. In December

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>they had said they were going to pay down more

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>than two point two five billions, so they've reduced them. Okay, okay,

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>But the basic idea is, there's a trip point on

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>equity price where debt becomes immediate. Are they anywhere near

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>at fifty six dollars to share the cell sides trip

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>point where equity the equity debt blend doesn't mix. I'm

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not sure about that metric precisely, but I do know

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>that they are running into trouble in terms of when

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>they file their ten K and what that means in

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of whether or not bond holder. Now what we

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>know from having actually canvas the market on this issue,

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been looking into this for quite some times. It's

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to be a major problem for them. Usually bond

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>holders will give you a waiver and you can just

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>keep going, you pay, sort of working out. They're a

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>huge debt holders. It's in the debt market's interest to

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.839
<v Speaker 1>not let them de fall on that issue. The near

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>reporting of Mr Ackman and the cell side and the

0:02:55.800 --> 0:03:01.279
<v Speaker 1>believers and the disbelievers. Is this a story about revenue dynamics,

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>no pricing in real mystery about unit growth at the

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>top line of the income statement? Or is this a

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet soap opera about investment deals gone bad and

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>some plays. It's both. I think right now everyone's trying

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to get their head around where the earning shortfalls are

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and why the numbers have changed. So draft is that

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on the income statement or on the balance sheet? That's

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the income statement, But obviously everyone always knew that the

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet was heavily levered, so it's just to flow through.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>The balance sheet has always been secondary because the expectation

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>has been that they've had these revenue levers that now

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's unclear why they aren't able to pull them and

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>why so much has changed from January to now, And

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's a lot of there's a lot

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of concern that they had numbers in December reiterated in January.

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike was gone. It was only two months and he's

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>come back and changed these numbers dramatically. Now a lot

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>has happened since he's been gone. But I think the

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>math ingnitude of what they're doing here with the numbers

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>has just really shocked investors. An analyst, and it's just

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>much worse than anyone like three years out, fourteen billions,

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>one billion on debt. It Uh. It seems to be

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>shocking to a lot of these analysts because Mike person

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>had some private calls with them, some of them, uh,

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just a week or so and now they have gotten

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>a completely different story. What's up with that? Yeah, you

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>can hear the incredulity and their voice voices. It sounds

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like when analysts get on there almost saying, hey, wait

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a minute. Some of them their questions and the way

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>they're phrasing them, what are you gonna do about your

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>credibility now? And what happened with thy faccon and we

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>thought those sales were going through Walgreens and with thy

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>faccin is one of their is actually their biggest ring

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. It's um it's a g I drug

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that they acquired through salex last year. And and so

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of questions in terms of hey, waitit, hey, wait,

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>what you've been telling us up to now it just

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like it's standing up. So you can just

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>feel the tone and I think we'll see it, and

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably will see that in reflection reflected in their

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>notes and perhaps their price targets. I mean, some analysts

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>still have two hundred dollar price targets on this stock.

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with that, Cynthia. When you look at the

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>ownership of this Mr Ackman, is the number two ownership

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>run kind of uh, you know the usual victims. Is

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>this a four all one K institutional holding or is

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it all a set of holders who are in the

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>game and understand it's a game of speculation. No. I

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think this is a widely held both stock and bond.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think where this this company becomes a major factor

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in in perhaps every anyone's throwing k is that if

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you're someone's in a bond fund, those bonds that's gonna

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a proportion of that that's in valiant

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's such a big debt issuer. So I think

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this stock, and also just the sheer size of it,

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a lot of everyday investors who

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>would get really significantly hurt if this company doesn't pull

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it off. And you know, they sort of hinted at

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>certain end games and someone asked the question, would you

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>consider breaking it up, and Mike Pearson said, look, if

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>things don't work out, we will have to consider other options.

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we're not thinking about that yet. So

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're they're they're not thinking about it, but

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>they're not avoiding it or dismissing it out of hand

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>as though they're not looking at the future as a

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>potential break up there. But that does still feel like

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a ways off in terms of what they're talking about today. Well,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>break up or sell part of the company. They issued

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of debt to pay for a lot of acquisitions.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Could they sell some of those acquisitions to raise money

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to pay the debt? Sure, they're already flagging that. They

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>said there and talks to divest the non core assets.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>They wouldn't really give enough clarity for us to know

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>what exactly those assets are. Perhaps as the calls still

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>going on, so perhaps they'll be more detail on that.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's the that's the real question. What do they sell?

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Cynthia, good luck with this. I love the

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>headline Valiant taking Walgreen's cost of good sold through the

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>s G and A line. There's a cardinal rule in

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>in see if the investment when you get the headlines

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like that you're in trouble. Who are their auditors? Are

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they telling these guys what to do? P WC. I

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>believe is there auditors? But these numbers are not audited

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, that's the other big question. Markets. They are

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>releasing on audited numbers for the think of giving the

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>market update because it has been a while that work

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>wants it. But um, but then if you read the

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>risk factors and the release and these are on audited numbers,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they could be subject to change. So we've got to

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>get you off the radio, Cynthia, because the stocks down

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>two points since you open your mouth. That's a bad thing.

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Cynthia Couse, thank you so much, greatly appreciate it, really

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate her coming off the call. She is with Bloomberg

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.679
<v Speaker 1>News with just terrific service. Us studying uh, this soap

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>opera called Valiant. When you get the markets open Bloomberg Surveillance,

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of get out of the opening bell. Brought

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to you by the Jeep Grand Cherokee, the most awarded

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>STUV every The Grand Cherokee continues to raise the bar

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>with its luxurious interior and legendary four by four capability,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>drive one at your local Jeep dealer today