Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio show podcast. All right, fifteen days
Speaker 1: to go. Glad you are with us. I'm loving all
Speaker 1: of these Democrats talking about voter fraud. Uh as if
Speaker 1: they never claimed they believed in rigged elections. Now the
Speaker 1: president's more like a power ball, That's what he said.
Speaker 1: I would just like to know what you can say
Speaker 1: to reassure us that this election will not be rigged
Speaker 1: or stolen. Well, I tell you what. It helps in
Speaker 1: Ohio that we got Democrats in charge of the machines. Um.
Speaker 1: But but look, I come from Chicago, so so I
Speaker 1: want to be honest. It's not as if it's just
Speaker 1: Republicans who have monkeyed around with elections in the past.
Speaker 1: Sometimes Democrats have to. You know, whenever people are in
Speaker 1: power there, you know, they have this tendency to try
Speaker 1: to tilt things in their direction. Oh so you actually
Speaker 1: now what is he saying today about Donald Trump and
Speaker 1: and what he thinks about voter fraud. So I'm telling
Speaker 1: you Florida, your vote does matter, your vote does count,
Speaker 1: and this whole notion of voter fraud. Listen. One study
Speaker 1: shows that out of one billion votes cast, there were
Speaker 1: exactly there. There were thirty one proven cases of voter fraud,
Speaker 1: thirty one out of a billion. You are luckier to
Speaker 1: get you. You are much likelier to get struck by
Speaker 1: lightning than to have somebody next to you commit voter fraud.
Speaker 1: You you'd you'd win the powerball, You'd win the power ball,
Speaker 1: struck by lightning. Well, that's not what he was saying
Speaker 1: back when it was his election, when it mattered to him.
Speaker 1: It was like Hillary Clinton's the same thing. Look, you know,
Speaker 1: does anybody remember if I hear one more pro Hillary
Speaker 1: Democrat like Obama telling us no evidence of voter fraud,
Speaker 1: and that has been a wide, stead widespread problem. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna reach through the TV and bustin. I can't take
Speaker 1: it anymore. By the way, it is unwatchable television now
Speaker 1: it is you. You know you cannot trust the news media.
Speaker 1: You know that they are an extension of Hillary's press office.
Speaker 1: You know that. Now we've proven that. Now Wiki leaks
Speaker 1: has proven that. So it's a little frustrating to get
Speaker 1: lectures because the way they cover topics, the way they
Speaker 1: don't cover topics. For example, James O'Keefe. He'll be on
Speaker 1: the program later today. We we've got this guy. Creamer
Speaker 1: has been to the White House three two times on
Speaker 1: tape saying that, well, Hillary Clinton has demanded that we
Speaker 1: go out and Donald Donald duck Donald Trump. She's she,
Speaker 1: in other words, she's signing off on all of this.
Speaker 1: And after all, it's her campaign that's paying the bill.
Speaker 1: It's her campaign that is out there, you know, funneling
Speaker 1: the money to the d n C. The d n
Speaker 1: C funnels it to another group which funnels it to
Speaker 1: the people to go out there and and foment violence
Speaker 1: and are orchestrating a massive voter fraud operation. Oh excuse
Speaker 1: me if I watch it, and I actually believe the
Speaker 1: Democrat that did foemen violence are also working in voter fraud,
Speaker 1: the voter fraud capacity that they're caught on tape saying.
Speaker 1: By the way, in case you've forgotten, I urge you
Speaker 1: to google the word Acorn, as in the voter fraud
Speaker 1: operation that Obama used to be the attorney for now Acorn.
Speaker 1: Fox News points out, once a powerful advocate for low
Speaker 1: income minority voters, shut at his operations amid plummeting revenues.
Speaker 1: In March, six months after conservative activists posing as a
Speaker 1: pimp at a prostitute. Who would that be? Let me think,
Speaker 1: who was that? Oh James O'Keefe. That's right, and caught
Speaker 1: on videos some of the group's employees offering them tax advice. Yeah,
Speaker 1: James O'Keefe's first big bust. Now, Nevada officials have charged Acorn,
Speaker 1: their regional director, their Vegas field director, with submitting get this,
Speaker 1: thousands of fraudulent voter registration forms last year. Larry Lomax,
Speaker 1: the registrar of voters in Vegas, as he believes forty
Speaker 1: percent of Acorns forms are clearly quote fraudulent. Prosecutors in Pittsburgh,
Speaker 1: p A Have have charged seven Acorn employees with filing
Speaker 1: hundreds of fraudulent voter registrations before last year's election. The
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal Fred Voit, deputy election commissioner in Philly,
Speaker 1: protested after Acorn submitted at least fifteen hundred fraudulent registrations
Speaker 1: last fall. This has been going on now for a
Speaker 1: number of years. He told CNN in October, Well you
Speaker 1: wouldn't know it. I mean, CNN reports it, but their
Speaker 1: own media reporter can't actually get uh their own reporting
Speaker 1: together and get that straight anyway. According to St. Louis
Speaker 1: Democrat Matthew Potter, the city's deputy elections director, had similar complaints.
Speaker 1: Washington State prosecutors find Acorn grand after several employees were
Speaker 1: convicted of voter registration fraud and O seven the group
Speaker 1: signed a consent decree at King County, Seattle, requiring it
Speaker 1: to beef up its oversight or face criminal prosecution. And
Speaker 1: then in the two thousand and eight election, Acorn's practices
Speaker 1: led to investigation, some ongoing in fourteen other states. Fox
Speaker 1: News reported in Miami, seven former Acorn voter registration canvassers
Speaker 1: were convicted of quote false swearing in false swearing in
Speaker 1: an election, sentenced the probation community service, banned from participating
Speaker 1: in future political campaigns. According to court documents. In Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: noticed the states, they're all coming from our swing states.
Speaker 1: Six of seven former Acorn workers were charged in an
Speaker 1: investigation were convicted of unsworn falsification, interference with election officials,
Speaker 1: or reach plea agreements and reduced charges and served two
Speaker 1: years probation. Cases against two others have entered please and
Speaker 1: reduced charges. That's still pending. In Milwaukee, three former Acorn
Speaker 1: workers have been convicted of guess what, election fraud. Kevin
Speaker 1: Clancy sentenced ten months in prison for his role in
Speaker 1: submitting falsified voter registration forms before the O eight election.
Speaker 1: Clancy will start his sentence once he finishes another sentence
Speaker 1: that he's currently serving for arm robbery. Clancy's co worker
Speaker 1: Maria Miles, who pled guilty to election fraud in August,
Speaker 1: will be sentenced December six. In September, Frank Walton pled
Speaker 1: guilty to submitting fifty four fake voter registrations during the
Speaker 1: two thousand eight presidential campaign. He faces up to forty
Speaker 1: two months in prison and a ten thousand dollar fine
Speaker 1: when he is sentenced in December. I can keep going.
Speaker 1: In Washington State, Kendrill Lynn phil was convicted in March
Speaker 1: of voter registration forms in the mid term election. And
Speaker 1: it goes on from there. I mean, sorry, what's what's
Speaker 1: so hard about this? And Donald Trump out there saying, well,
Speaker 1: I'll concede if the election is fair. Okay, if the
Speaker 1: election is fair, you'll concede. Of the public actually agree
Speaker 1: with Trump, the election could be stolen And I'm quoting
Speaker 1: here Politico Morning Console poll registered voters say they agree
Speaker 1: that widespread voter fraud could be used to steal the
Speaker 1: election from the GOP nominee, including who say they strongly agree.
Speaker 1: I guess it's not so far fetched after you look
Speaker 1: at the actual record. So I'll have to wait and
Speaker 1: see him. Obama's out there. It's more likely to be
Speaker 1: struck by lightning than witness any voter fraud. You're more
Speaker 1: likely to win a lotto. All right, we've got this
Speaker 1: latest um, we got this latest Project Veritas video that
Speaker 1: will be sharing and James O'Keefe will be joining us
Speaker 1: in the course of the program today. Looking forward to that. Uh,
Speaker 1: fifteen days out. What does that mean to you, Well,
Speaker 1: that means in two weeks from tomorrow is election day. Now. Look,
Speaker 1: people are asking me everywhere I go. Do you think
Speaker 1: he's got a chance, Do you think he can win?
Speaker 1: Do you think he's still in this? Do you think
Speaker 1: he can win? I have never ever felt as I
Speaker 1: don't even know what to say. I don't have a
Speaker 1: pulse like I usually feel in most elections. So let
Speaker 1: me say that first and foremost. Number two, let me
Speaker 1: tell you that I believe in the polls. Now, I
Speaker 1: know a lot of you are going to be upset
Speaker 1: to hear that. You don't want to hear that I
Speaker 1: believe in the polls. You want me to say, you
Speaker 1: want me to tell you what you want to hear. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm not here to tell you what you want to hear.
Speaker 1: I mean here to tell you what I think is
Speaker 1: the truth. I mean, We've got the I D. P.
Speaker 1: Pole Investors Business Daily Tip Pole and they literally have
Speaker 1: it dead, even Hillary and Trump. Instead, even today, Trump
Speaker 1: is up by two and the rest of you some poll.
Speaker 1: Clinton is up by one in the l A Times poll. Well,
Speaker 1: then you can take a look at the Washington Post
Speaker 1: poll and what that shows us twelve for Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: That's a big number. Why are they so wrong? Well,
Speaker 1: I've got a reason for that, in an explanation for
Speaker 1: that we're gonna get to. Interesting. There's a new podestin.
Speaker 1: We have a lot new a lot of new wiki
Speaker 1: leaks out today actually exposes a playbook for rigging polls
Speaker 1: through over samples. This is a wiki leaks. You can't
Speaker 1: make this up. There's such corruption being exposed. I'm being
Speaker 1: widely panned and beaten up, and I'm fine with that.
Speaker 1: That's part of my role in life is to get
Speaker 1: the crap beat out of me, I guess, and I
Speaker 1: can accept it because I said that Julian Assange has
Speaker 1: done a service to this country, and people keep quoting
Speaker 1: what I said back ten years ago that he should
Speaker 1: be put in prison. Now, when Julian Assange was on
Speaker 1: this program for ninety minutes, I addressed what I said
Speaker 1: about him head on with him. Did I not, Linda?
Speaker 1: Did I not tell him? Hey, ten years ago, dude,
Speaker 1: I had no faith in you whatsoever because I thought
Speaker 1: that somebody might get killed with your releasing information. But
Speaker 1: if you really stand back for a second. Now, the
Speaker 1: same Clinton supporters that, and even Hillary whining during the debate, Oh,
Speaker 1: this is unfair. There's the Russians did this. There's no
Speaker 1: evidence that I have seen. She says sixteen agencies? What agencies?
Speaker 1: She's full of crap. She makes stuff up, just like
Speaker 1: she denied the six billion dollars that was lost under
Speaker 1: her tenure at the State Department. Anyway, Look, I am
Speaker 1: just saying, he exposed that this country has no cyber security.
Speaker 1: He was sixteen years old, hacked into NASA sixteen years old.
Speaker 1: Now maybe he's a boy genius, maybe he's just an
Speaker 1: average computer guy, maybe he's above average. But if he
Speaker 1: can break into NASA and the Department of Defense, and
Speaker 1: he's only sixteen years old and we have all of
Speaker 1: these emails coming out, we better take a very good, long,
Speaker 1: hard look about how we're gonna protect, especially top secret
Speaker 1: information of our country. So he's on us a service.
Speaker 1: The second thing is, as much as I in thirty
Speaker 1: years of radio and believe my government and the people
Speaker 1: running it are corrupt. I've always known it. As as
Speaker 1: much as I declared in oh eight, journalism is dead.
Speaker 1: Now we have all the evidence and all the proof
Speaker 1: we could ever want, and there's been no consequences whatsoever
Speaker 1: for any of these journalists, so called journalists, so called
Speaker 1: media outlets that have been colluding the entire campaign with
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, which is basically everybody but me and a
Speaker 1: few others out there. Yeah, it's pretty much me right.
Speaker 1: I'm out there on a branch, all on my own,
Speaker 1: the Hannity branch, by the way, I've been out there
Speaker 1: alone before. Look at the end of this process, I
Speaker 1: feel I will have done everything I can to warn
Speaker 1: my country, the country I love about how dishonest and
Speaker 1: how corrupt Hillary Clinton is. I will feel at the
Speaker 1: end of this process that I kept my word to you,
Speaker 1: my audience, that I would not pick a pick any
Speaker 1: of the seventeen that we're running for the Republican nomination,
Speaker 1: that I would give them all the airtime they wanted.
Speaker 1: Some took advantage more than others. That's not my fault, uh,
Speaker 1: And I get let you make the choice yourself. We
Speaker 1: have scores to settle on November nine. Scores with the
Speaker 1: Republican Party first and foremost. Scores with the media that
Speaker 1: is abusive to you and corrupt and has betrayed a
Speaker 1: solemn trust that you should have with them. We've got that.
Speaker 1: We're gonna deal with two on November nine. We've got
Speaker 1: other issues in terms of corruption and everything else. But
Speaker 1: I'm hoping in the meantime that you know, to just
Speaker 1: remind you every day what is its take here? And
Speaker 1: you know, for John Podesta to admit in wiki leaks
Speaker 1: that they have a playbook for getting their media friends
Speaker 1: to rig the polls with over sampling, how can we
Speaker 1: possibly trust these polls. I'm gonna go through exactly what
Speaker 1: they did so you understand it. Because I know exactly
Speaker 1: how this poll went from four points Trump down now
Speaker 1: to twelve points Trump down. There is a reason for it,
Speaker 1: and I'll explain that and much more when we get back.
Speaker 1: But what Podesta says, you know, you want to talk
Speaker 1: about the sampling bias in the latest ABC Washington Post poll,
Speaker 1: you know, showed a twelve point national advantage for Hillary.
Speaker 1: I don't believe this poll. This poll, to me gets
Speaker 1: thrown out like many other recent polls. But I will
Speaker 1: say that I think Trump is down. There are two
Speaker 1: poles that have him down one and down three in
Speaker 1: North Carolina. If Donald Trump doesn't win North Carolina, it's over.
Speaker 1: If maybe blunt. If he doesn't win Florida, game over.
Speaker 1: If he doesn't win Ohio, game over. Hillary will be
Speaker 1: your next president. Okay, I am telling you the truth.
Speaker 1: He doesn't win Iowa, game over. If he doesn't win
Speaker 1: all the states, if it doesn't win Texas and george
Speaker 1: everyone's talking about Texas and Georgia, it's game over. She
Speaker 1: will be your next president. Doesn't matter if she wins
Speaker 1: by one electoral College vote or three hundred, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: She would then be your president. She will pick Supreme
Speaker 1: court uh vacancies. She will not vet refugees and increased
Speaker 1: refugees five, she won't say radical is long. She's gonna
Speaker 1: raise taxes one point two trillion, race spending one point
Speaker 1: for a trillion. She's gonna move towards a single payer
Speaker 1: health care system. She's not. She's gonna put coal mining
Speaker 1: out of business, coal miners out of work. We're not
Speaker 1: going to be energy independent. We're not gonna build a wall.
Speaker 1: Education will be any a common cored top down. All
Speaker 1: of that's true, and the swamp will never be drained.
Speaker 1: In her corruption, she'll be emboldened. Why should she ever
Speaker 1: be honest. There's no reason for her to be honest anyway.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of steak here. So I'll remind you,
Speaker 1: and then we'll finish this other business when the time comes,
Speaker 1: which is November nine, Win loser, draw, Well, we're gonna
Speaker 1: have a fight. It is going to be ugly, and
Speaker 1: I'm gonna keep my powder drive from now until then.
Speaker 1: But I'm picking a fight with the media. I'm picking
Speaker 1: a fight with the Republican Party. They created Trump and
Speaker 1: I'll explain in Toto on November nine, and then the
Speaker 1: Republican saboteurs and the never Trumpers and the people that
Speaker 1: have behind the scenes been helping Hillary. We'll get to
Speaker 1: all of that, but you got fifteen days to go.
Speaker 1: In the meantime, let me go over some of this, Linda,
Speaker 1: I think is probably rightly pointing out because the way
Speaker 1: the media is covering this, I know it is probably
Speaker 1: in part designed to deflate Trump supporters, but it's also
Speaker 1: part of the reality of what it would take for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump to win this election. And if you look at,
Speaker 1: for example, the way most I'm looking at the Real
Speaker 1: Clear Politics average and the different polls for examples that
Speaker 1: are out there, I mean, for Trump to win, he
Speaker 1: has to get every toss up he just does. For
Speaker 1: Trump to win, like, for example, they have in terms
Speaker 1: of the Real Clear Politics average, they have Alabama, Idaho, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Arkansas, Kentucky,
Speaker 1: North Dakota, West Virginia. That's solo Trump. That's forty nine
Speaker 1: electoral votes, not a lot. As a matter of comparison,
Speaker 1: Hillary's solid states, California's All those states I met just
Speaker 1: mentioned don't even equal California seven. It's electorally, it's very
Speaker 1: very you gotta it's a razor's edge. You've you've got
Speaker 1: a threat of needle. And then you add to that
Speaker 1: New York that's another twenty nine. And then you add
Speaker 1: to that Massachusetts eleven, Maryland ten, Hawaii for d C three,
Speaker 1: Vermont three. All right, not a big deal. Now we
Speaker 1: go on the likely. These are states that are more
Speaker 1: likely than not they're gonna go Trump. Alaska, Louisiana, Montana, Tennessee, Kansas, Missouri,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Mississippi, South Dakota all right, and mains second
Speaker 1: congressional district. So that's forty nine and likely forty one.
Speaker 1: All right, So now let's look at you know, Hillary
Speaker 1: solid is one fifteen locked in California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Vermont,
Speaker 1: d C. That's one fifteen. Still not even close. With
Speaker 1: your solid and your likelies, I'm giving you truth. I'm
Speaker 1: giving your reality here a reality check. And if you're
Speaker 1: in any of these states, your vote matters. Any of
Speaker 1: these Republican states. Now you had likely for Hillary. You've
Speaker 1: got New Jersey fourteen, Illinois twenty, uh, Michigan sixteen, Rhode
Speaker 1: Island for Washington state twelve, uh, Delaware three. That's seventy
Speaker 1: more so right off the bat, solid likely almost a
Speaker 1: hundred percent reliably Democrat. The only one I might pull
Speaker 1: out of there and put into lean for the Democrats
Speaker 1: would be New Jersey. It's a way outside shot. I'm
Speaker 1: just giving you real numbers here anyway. So that is
Speaker 1: one and eighty five solid Clinton, solid blue, no matter
Speaker 1: who's running as a Republican. That's it. Now you've got
Speaker 1: lean Democrat Colorado. If Trump could ever get that back
Speaker 1: and play it would be phenomenal. Al right, Now, that's
Speaker 1: leaning Democrat. Now nine electoral votes New uh, New Mexico five.
Speaker 1: That would be huge. If Trump could move that Pennsylvania twenty,
Speaker 1: that would be a game changer if it moved over
Speaker 1: to the Republican side. Wisconsin ten, Virginia thirteen, Oregon seven,
Speaker 1: New Hampshire for New Hampshire from needs New Hampshire, just
Speaker 1: saying it's leaning Hillary. Okay. So now if you add
Speaker 1: that all together, that's another seventy seven. So you got
Speaker 1: one forty four and one fifteen. What's that number, that's
Speaker 1: two sixty two. She's eight electoral votes based on the
Speaker 1: Real Clear Politics average from getting to to seventy. Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: on the other hand, right his solid and likely he's
Speaker 1: are what eighty nine if you add the leanings, which
Speaker 1: is Indiana, South Carolina, Missouri, Utah, I don't think you'll
Speaker 1: lose any of those. That's thirty six. More, he's still
Speaker 1: not that close. That's a D six. He's still far
Speaker 1: far away. Now for Trump to win, he's got to
Speaker 1: run the table for the toss up states. These are
Speaker 1: states now. I think he's gonna win Iowa six. I
Speaker 1: hope he. I don't think there's gonna be a big
Speaker 1: problem with Georgia. I hope not. If so, it's this game,
Speaker 1: set match, it's over. If he lost Texas thirty eight,
Speaker 1: over loses North Carolina over Arizona, he's gotta win Arizona eleven.
Speaker 1: Gotta win now. Now it starts getting hard. Now he's
Speaker 1: got to win Florida, Nevada six, Ohio a team, Minnesota ten,
Speaker 1: and then he's up to what's that how many one
Speaker 1: seventy six? He really needs the four electoral votes from
Speaker 1: New Hampshire because I'm not sure Minnesota. Even though there's
Speaker 1: a poll out today that had at a one or
Speaker 1: two point race in Minnesota, I've never heard of the
Speaker 1: polling company before, So I'm just I'm just telling you
Speaker 1: you think it's a good poem. Alright, So for Trump
Speaker 1: to win, if you're looking at the real clear politics,
Speaker 1: average state by state, the electoral map, he's got to
Speaker 1: run the table. Anybody that tells you this is easy
Speaker 1: doesn't know what the hell they're talking about. Let me
Speaker 1: repeat the states that Trump has to win. Alabama, Idaho, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Arkansas, Kentucky,
Speaker 1: North Dakota, West Virginia. Those should be pretty easy for him. Alaska, Louisiana, Montana, Tennessee, Kansas, Mississippi,
Speaker 1: South Dakota, the second congressional district of Maine. He needs
Speaker 1: all of those, Indiana, South Carolina, Missouri, Utah, he needs
Speaker 1: all of those. He needs Arizona, Georgia, Texas, North Carolina again,
Speaker 1: the main that I'm sorry, Nebraska Congressional district number two
Speaker 1: he needs. And now he also needs the main congressional
Speaker 1: district number two. But he's got to win Florida, Iowa, Nevada, Ohio,
Speaker 1: North Carolina, Texas, Minnesota. Now he could get rid of Minnesota,
Speaker 1: but he's got to move something with four more into
Speaker 1: his column. New Mexico. New Hampshire would be the most likely.
Speaker 1: That's how he has to win. It's you know, it's
Speaker 1: not easy. Tell me, well, this president could have won
Speaker 1: all of those nice try because you know, if they
Speaker 1: could take poor old Mitt Romney, who's probably as decent
Speaker 1: a human being as I ever met. I mean, and
Speaker 1: I to this day, I'm manage Mint Romney for how
Speaker 1: he's behaved in this election, I really am. And his
Speaker 1: people have been worse, and the Bush people you know
Speaker 1: that were working for bushop and worse. But Mitt Romney
Speaker 1: would have been a really good precedent, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: good man, good values. I think he's a decent person,
Speaker 1: probably too decent to run for the job. And they
Speaker 1: turned him into Satan. If you can turn a guy
Speaker 1: like Mitt Romney into the devil, then you're gonna take
Speaker 1: anybody else and turn them into Satan too. So you know,
Speaker 1: for everybody say, well this person would if it was Rubio,
Speaker 1: he'd be you have seen nothing. They would have pulled
Speaker 1: out every stop and you could argue, well, Trump helped them, Yeah,
Speaker 1: he probably did. He's been in politics eighteen months. He
Speaker 1: helped them, made a lot of mistakes, but he's still
Speaker 1: in it. Which is interesting. Now some of you who
Speaker 1: probably sitting and say, Hannity, you're making us feel bad.
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to make you feel bad. I'm trying
Speaker 1: to tell you the truth about how this collection has
Speaker 1: to be won. You want to win this election, and
Speaker 1: you're in New Hampshire, you better get your ass out
Speaker 1: and vote. You want to win this election and you're
Speaker 1: in New Mexico, you better get your ass out and vote.
Speaker 1: If you're in Arizona, Georgia, Minnesota, if you're in North Carolina.
Speaker 1: Paved a lot of attention there. Texas Main Congressional District
Speaker 1: to Ohio, Nevada, Iowa, Florida, Get your ass out to vote. Indiana,
Speaker 1: South Carolina, Missouri, Utah, you better get out to vote. Alaska.
Speaker 1: I know you come in late. You better get out
Speaker 1: to vote. Louisiana, Montana, Tennessee, Kansas, Mississippi, South Dakota, Nebraska
Speaker 1: Congressional District too. You better go to vote. Alabama, Idaho, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Arkansas, Kentucky,
Speaker 1: North Dakota, West Virginia. You better go vote right there.
Speaker 1: I've given you a formula to win. If all those
Speaker 1: states come in Trump you win if all those states
Speaker 1: one of those states, you know, like for example, if
Speaker 1: he wins New Hampshire but not New meta Ago, he
Speaker 1: could still win. If he wins New Mexico but not
Speaker 1: New Hampshire, can still win. The margin of error is
Speaker 1: next to zero. You need an inside straight if you're
Speaker 1: any Republican UM. That's just the reality. Now I can
Speaker 1: tell you the national polls that they don't mean crap.
Speaker 1: I mean that those national polls they're interesting and but
Speaker 1: it's not going to get you to the Promised Land.
Speaker 1: What I just told you is what you need to
Speaker 1: know about elections. And it was interesting to listen to
Speaker 1: Bob Woodward this this weekend. Chris Wallace asked them about
Speaker 1: the allegations of the Clinton Foundation, pay to play and
Speaker 1: the twelve million dollar deal between Hillary, the Foundation the
Speaker 1: King of Morocco. This is what Bob Woodward said, allegations
Speaker 1: about the Clinton Foundation and pay to play, which I
Speaker 1: asked Secretary Clinton about in the debate, and she turned
Speaker 1: into an attack on the Trump Foundation. But Bob, I
Speaker 1: want to go back to the conversation I was having
Speaker 1: with Robbie. Look before, when when you see what seems
Speaker 1: to be clear evidence that Clinton Foundation donors were being
Speaker 1: treated differently than non donors in terms of access. When
Speaker 1: you see this new new revelations about the twelve million
Speaker 1: dollar deal between Hillary Clinton, the foundation and the King
Speaker 1: of Morocco, our voters right to be troubled by us. Yes,
Speaker 1: it's it's corrupt, it's a it's a scandal. And she
Speaker 1: didn't answer your question at all, and she turned to
Speaker 1: embrace the good work that the Clinton Foundation is done.
Speaker 1: And she has a case there. But the mixing of
Speaker 1: speech fees the Clinton Foundation and actions by the State
Speaker 1: Department which she ran are all intertwined. And uh, it's corrupt. You,
Speaker 1: I mean, you can't just say it's unsavory. That, by
Speaker 1: the way, is not Sean Hannity, It's not the vast
Speaker 1: right wing conspiracy that is Bob would Work of the
Speaker 1: Washington Post, Woodward and Bernstein. Yeah, it is corrupt. He's right.
Speaker 1: It was an honest answer by him. Trump. I you know,
Speaker 1: I've been saying a couple of things throughout this election
Speaker 1: that I thought would be good ideas. One of them
Speaker 1: was a contract with America. Trump did that, and I
Speaker 1: thought probably his best speech of the campaign on Saturday Gettysburg,
Speaker 1: and he laid out bills that he would pass in
Speaker 1: his first hundred days and one is the Middle Class
Speaker 1: Tax Relief and Simplification Act, designed to grow the economy
Speaker 1: four percent a year and create twenty five million new jobs.
Speaker 1: And and the Offshoring Act new terrorists on goods brought
Speaker 1: to the US by American companies that are hiring outside
Speaker 1: workers jobs outside, putting jobs outside so they can bring
Speaker 1: their cheap use cheap labor. The American Energy and Infrastructure Act,
Speaker 1: and that is to create tax incentives and generate one
Speaker 1: trillion in infrastructure investment. School Choice and Education Opportunity Act
Speaker 1: speaks for itself. For peel and replace Obamacare with health
Speaker 1: and health care savings accounts, the Affordable Children an Elderly
Speaker 1: Care Act, the End the Illegal Immigration Act, Restoring Community
Speaker 1: Safety Act, Restoring National Security Act, and a Clean Up
Speaker 1: Washington Drain the Swamp Act. And that's my words. Although
Speaker 1: the Trump is talking a lot about and he makes
Speaker 1: a contract, and he gives a whole preamble to the
Speaker 1: whole thing, and a you know, a pervasive corruption threatens
Speaker 1: the rule of law in our representative form of government.
Speaker 1: A relentless and steady erosion of the original constitutional principles
Speaker 1: of self government is sapping the very liberty, loving spirit
Speaker 1: of the people necessary to sustain freedom and the constitution.
Speaker 1: This is his contract on Corruption Regulation Expiration Act. And
Speaker 1: we went through all of this. It's really good. I
Speaker 1: don't have time to go through it all with you now,
Speaker 1: but um I liked it a lot. And basically twenty
Speaker 1: eight specific things that Trump said he would do on
Speaker 1: day one, you know, constitutional amendment to imposed term limits.
Speaker 1: I love the idea. It was part of my Conservative
Speaker 1: Solution Caucus back in bad idea. Time has come. Hiring
Speaker 1: freeze except exempting the military, public safety, and public health.
Speaker 1: Stop the growth of government. For every new regulation, you
Speaker 1: gotta get rid of two current regulations. Five year banned
Speaker 1: White House congressional officials from being lobbyists, lifetime ban on
Speaker 1: White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.
Speaker 1: A complete ban of foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections.
Speaker 1: Get out of NAFTA, withdraw from the deal in Article five,
Speaker 1: withdraw from the Trans Pacific Partnership. Direct Secretary of the
Speaker 1: Treasury to labe China a currency manipulator. Direct the Secretary
Speaker 1: of Commerce and Trade to identify all foreign trading abuses
Speaker 1: and unfair impact on American workers. Lift the restrictions on
Speaker 1: the production of fifty trillion all is worth a job
Speaker 1: producing energy reserves, including shale oil, natural gas, and clean coal.
Speaker 1: Lift the Obama Clinton roadblocks and allow vital energy infrastructure
Speaker 1: projects like Keystone. Canceled billions and payments to the u
Speaker 1: N Climate change programs. Use that money to fix America's
Speaker 1: water and and environmental infrastructure. Cancel every unconstitutional executive action
Speaker 1: of Obama. Begin the process of selecting a replacement for Scalia.
Speaker 1: Cancel all federal funding of sanctuary cities. Get rid of
Speaker 1: all criminal aliens. Suspend immigration from terror prone regions, extreme vetting.
Speaker 1: Work with Congress on a middle class tax relief to
Speaker 1: increase growth war percent a year. Work with Congress to
Speaker 1: end Offshore Act, establishing terrorists, discouraging companies to fire American workers,
Speaker 1: and iron cheap labor. And then it just goes on
Speaker 1: to their repeal and replace Obamacare all the other things
Speaker 1: I said, really good stuff. That's your choice of selection.
Speaker 1: You know, look, my my conscience is gonna be clean.
Speaker 1: Fifteen days from now. If this country stupid and alex
Speaker 1: her like I warned you about Obama, You've got a
Speaker 1: choice to make. Fifteen days. There's time, there is time.
Speaker 1: I gave you the states that are important. I told
Speaker 1: you the truth, and I do believe the polls. So
Speaker 1: I'm not lying to you. I'm not misleading you in
Speaker 1: any way. It's not looking great. Candidate the future president
Speaker 1: United States and warning ducks on the ground. If I
Speaker 1: got we will give ducks on the ground. Is candidate.
Speaker 1: We'd like to hear a mask, But the vendors is
Speaker 1: she wants to be down just saying designating. But that's
Speaker 1: story is not exactly what you want to hear about
Speaker 1: how the president he says that they can't have somebody
Speaker 1: answered to Christina was the usual president United States wanted
Speaker 1: ducks on the ground. We will put ducks on the ground.
Speaker 1: The duck has to be Americans United for change into
Speaker 1: his head to do only with this problem between Donna
Speaker 1: Brazil and ABC which so in bout Disney. I guess
Speaker 1: they were ready about a trade market shoe. That's why Okay,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, New York, New York. I don't care about Okay,
Speaker 1: so it's just a trade mark issue with this. Yeah.
Speaker 1: We we originally watched this duck because story Clinton was duck.
Speaker 1: Some of these rattles right, share every reality. Yeah, so
Speaker 1: are you where are you know, people with him to
Speaker 1: protect the superd because I think I think this duck
Speaker 1: is going to get somewhere somewhere. It may happened the
Speaker 1: Irish shape p this week. His piance is there and
Speaker 1: the dart planning and follow him around, not the duck itself. Now, okay,
Speaker 1: because that's the only reaction to the duck. Call science.
Speaker 1: Because once they pull out these science some supporters literally said,
Speaker 1: punch his head. What did on Monday morning? I mean
Speaker 1: President Duck. We launched the duck because Hillary Rodham Clinton
Speaker 1: wants the duck and that from this guy Kramer, the
Speaker 1: same guy that met with and went to the Obama
Speaker 1: White House three d and forty two times, the same
Speaker 1: people on tape saying they are fomenting violence at Donald
Speaker 1: Trump events and scheming and plotting and planning a massive
Speaker 1: voter fraud scheme for this election cycle. Now, this, of
Speaker 1: course is now part three of the undercover project out
Speaker 1: over a year, well actually two years I think in
Speaker 1: the making by Project Veritas and James O'Keefe, who is
Speaker 1: here to discuss this third release in this line of videos.
Speaker 1: You know, it's kind of like a I feel like
Speaker 1: I'm watching Netflix, you know, and it's like I get
Speaker 1: a new addition every other day or every other week.
Speaker 1: It's kind of like, how's the card, Sean. And by
Speaker 1: the way, before we proceed, I just want to say
Speaker 1: thank you, Sean, because if it wasn't for you, and
Speaker 1: I'm not just saying it, if it wasn't for you,
Speaker 1: this story, this true story, would not get out you.
Speaker 1: You've made the phone called Scott Fogel Americans United for Change.
Speaker 1: You purported that he lost his job. So I just
Speaker 1: wanted to say thank you for everything. Well, to be honest,
Speaker 1: you're really kind to say that, but you did all
Speaker 1: the hard work. And I'm just glad to be able
Speaker 1: to try and get my audience to see exactly how
Speaker 1: ruthless and unethical and dishonest these people are. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, this whole campaign, we've been hearing Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: donald Trump violence at Donald Trump campaign events, and you
Speaker 1: were able to capture on tape a well funded orchestrate
Speaker 1: a effort. Money coming from Hillary's campaign and the d
Speaker 1: m C funneled to these people to go out there
Speaker 1: and foment a false impression, manipulate the minds of the
Speaker 1: American people about about violence at Trump events they're orchestrating
Speaker 1: at all, and how they're also involved in this, you know,
Speaker 1: up to their eyeballs and a voter fraud effort, and
Speaker 1: how Hillary Clinton is making decisions in conjunction with these people. Well,
Speaker 1: this is this. This video really is a nuclear uh
Speaker 1: bomb because this video proves that Hillary was personally involved
Speaker 1: and ordered the illegal coordination. Um, this is incredible. You
Speaker 1: heard the video, you heard the sound just a moment
Speaker 1: ago that it was. This is Kreamer, Bob Kreamer, who's
Speaker 1: now left the d n C has been forced out.
Speaker 1: This is note, Bob Kreamer is no low level guy.
Speaker 1: This is the beating heart of the institutional left that
Speaker 1: has been forced out. He used to go to the
Speaker 1: White House, he met, he met in the Oval office
Speaker 1: forty seven times of Obama. He says, quote, it was
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton herself who wanted ducks on the ground. Don't
Speaker 1: tell anybody. And if you watch this fifteen minute video
Speaker 1: that we just released, you'll see everything. You'll see the
Speaker 1: communications director for Hillary saying, quote, Hillary would like to
Speaker 1: have the following mascot. You'll see Scott Fovill of Americans
Speaker 1: United for Change, the nonprofit. You'll see him say we
Speaker 1: had to clear this with the d n C. You
Speaker 1: will see the whole story about the illegal money that
Speaker 1: flowed and how it was all Hillary's idea. Unbelievable. Now,
Speaker 1: tell us a little bit more about the players, how
Speaker 1: you got to this point, how Hillary now is implicated
Speaker 1: in all this. I want to know what did she
Speaker 1: know and when did she know it? I want to
Speaker 1: know what did you know about the flow of money
Speaker 1: and when did she know it? Well, Sean, in this video,
Speaker 1: you have a couple of different players. First of all,
Speaker 1: you have Bob Kreamer. Bob Kreamer is the man who
Speaker 1: is the partner of Democracy Partners. He was a community
Speaker 1: organizer in Chicago. He's been the big story here. He's
Speaker 1: been the White House log showing him going to the
Speaker 1: White House three hundred forty times. He's shown to have
Speaker 1: been in the Oval Office and maybe meeting with the
Speaker 1: President as many over forty times. Then you have an
Speaker 1: organization called Americans United for Change. It's a non for
Speaker 1: profit organization headed by this guy named Woodhouse who's featured
Speaker 1: in the video, Brad Wood. Brad Woodhouse, Yes. And then
Speaker 1: you have Scott Fogel, who has also been fired from
Speaker 1: Americans United for Change, and what Scott Boebel says, and
Speaker 1: then I'm gonna quote this this bit here as he says,
Speaker 1: So the operation is to insert the duck and clear
Speaker 1: it with the Democratic National Committee. We have to clear
Speaker 1: which message we're going to be targeting at which event.
Speaker 1: And Scott explains that the idea is to induce violence,
Speaker 1: to induce a reaction. Then you have Christina Reynolds, who
Speaker 1: is the communications director for Hillary for America, that's the campaign,
Speaker 1: saying I have good news and bad news. The good
Speaker 1: news is Hillary would like to have the following mascot.
Speaker 1: And then you have and this is a story about
Speaker 1: the campaign violating campaign coordination law. After Watergate, Congress passed
Speaker 1: the campaign coordination Law. And there are three prongs that
Speaker 1: there's the payment aspect, the conduct aspect, and the content.
Speaker 1: So what you have here is a dark money conspiracy,
Speaker 1: a payment by a non for profit, a conduct the
Speaker 1: campaign being involved in at the Hillary campaign, and the
Speaker 1: content that's election advocacy. And Hillary was responsible for all
Speaker 1: of it. This is a smoking gun. Some people have
Speaker 1: actually said this makes Watergate look like petty shoplifting. This
Speaker 1: is from the White House to conduct these um agit
Speaker 1: prop movements to induce violent reactions. And it's all on video.
Speaker 1: And it's going to be really remarkable to see what
Speaker 1: Hillory has said, Sean, because she's been asked twice about it,
Speaker 1: once in the debate by Donald Trump and also on
Speaker 1: the airplane, and she has avoided talking about it. Entirely unbelievable.
Speaker 1: But nobody in the media. Now we know that the
Speaker 1: media is complicit from the Wiki League Stump, They're totally
Speaker 1: complexity complicit without any consequences whatsoever for them in term
Speaker 1: of their behavior. Michellan. The media is implicated in this
Speaker 1: because the whole point of this whole operation here that
Speaker 1: we've exposed is to get the media to report on
Speaker 1: the violence. Well, now we've we've shown in the videos
Speaker 1: that they're trying to manufacture something in the media. So
Speaker 1: the media is complicit. And you know, when I was
Speaker 1: at the bait and I saw you there on the
Speaker 1: red carpet. When we were standing there, it was remarkable
Speaker 1: at the media that nobody wanted to look me in
Speaker 1: the eye. I was you know, I was there, Nobody
Speaker 1: wanted to look me in the eye because I loved
Speaker 1: you in the eye, I talked you did you did?
Speaker 1: You did? But most people did not want to look
Speaker 1: at me because this whole story and my existence, uh,
Speaker 1: it implicates them. They're caught here red handed, working with
Speaker 1: the d n C, working with all these players. So
Speaker 1: Hillary's narrative and the mainstream media's narrative is a total
Speaker 1: and complete lie. And she cannot deny this because all
Speaker 1: of her people, what are they gonna do? Fire all
Speaker 1: these people. This is the heart and soul of the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. This is our communications director, Scott Scott Fobel,
Speaker 1: Bob Kramer, and Brad Woodhouse. These are the this is
Speaker 1: the institutional heart of of of what she represents. So
Speaker 1: it's gonna be very fascinating to see what she does.
Speaker 1: You guys gotta keep putting pressure on her. Well, I'm trying.
Speaker 1: I'm doing my very best, and I frankly think it
Speaker 1: is a conspiracy not to put these tapes on. I
Speaker 1: mean the idea that the media, what other media outlets
Speaker 1: have actually played the tapes that we're talking about, Well,
Speaker 1: what other media played the tape actually, to be honest
Speaker 1: with this has now broken through Sean It's been on
Speaker 1: The New York Times. George Stefanopolis actually on ABC News
Speaker 1: played the video to his credit, he and everyone who's
Speaker 1: seeing this video just attacks me and calls me a
Speaker 1: criminal and denies it. Megan Kelly was, you know, after
Speaker 1: the debate night was playing the video to Donna Brazil.
Speaker 1: Donna Brazil is implicated in this video as well. Donna
Speaker 1: Brazil was was responsible for working on this duck agit
Speaker 1: prop stuff, and the d n C said they were
Speaker 1: no longer associated with doing it. But behind the scene,
Speaker 1: Donna Brazil and Hillary Clinton, we're still running the show,
Speaker 1: breaking campaign coordination laws. So judge the evidence now. Is
Speaker 1: there gonna be any criminal investigation to all of this?
Speaker 1: For example, they talked about Donald Trump stolen tax returns
Speaker 1: everywhere and and all of that, but you know, we
Speaker 1: got evidence of so many dead people registering the vote. Well,
Speaker 1: is there going to be a criminal investigation? There's probably
Speaker 1: gonna be a criminal investigation. To me, we live Sean
Speaker 1: as you as you as you well aware, we live
Speaker 1: in a sort of banana republic, especially with the state
Speaker 1: Attorney General's going after people they don't personally like or
Speaker 1: they don't agree with what they're saying or doing. But
Speaker 1: the good news is, here's the good news. The good
Speaker 1: news is I'm seeing social media now, I've said this
Speaker 1: to you, and I saw you there at the debate.
Speaker 1: Is probably more powerful than the mainstream media, because I
Speaker 1: can there are no words to describe how this story
Speaker 1: is lighting up the internet. It was the number one
Speaker 1: most watched video in like the world last week. It's
Speaker 1: trending on Facebook, trending on Twitter, and people are flooding
Speaker 1: the inboxes of these attorney generals saying, what is wrong
Speaker 1: with you? Why aren't you prosecuting this? Donald Trump said
Speaker 1: on Saturday that he wants this prosecuted. He said he
Speaker 1: was going to launch litigation. Ted Cruz has sub poenas.
Speaker 1: Jeff's sessions announced the loss a lawsuit. Do I think
Speaker 1: that people are gonna be held up to account. I
Speaker 1: do not. I don't have any faith in the law
Speaker 1: enforcement agencies of this country anymore. The only faith I
Speaker 1: have is in the people putting pressure on on the media,
Speaker 1: putting pressure on on institutions to report on this and
Speaker 1: to cover it, and to that we're very successful. I
Speaker 1: think this video today launched an hour ago. I think
Speaker 1: this is a game changer. I think Hillary will be
Speaker 1: forced to address it. She cannot deny it. If they
Speaker 1: fire anybody else, it's just gonna look bad on her.
Speaker 1: I'm very interested to see if they do um, But
Speaker 1: I gotta be honest. We're fifteen days out of the election,
Speaker 1: and I think their only goal now is to just
Speaker 1: let this skate. The media is gonna help them. The
Speaker 1: meeting is gonna insist, and the media is gonna do
Speaker 1: what they do all the time. You know, look, you say,
Speaker 1: you know, just look at all of the stuff that
Speaker 1: you've released here. You've got a plot nous team to
Speaker 1: foment violence. You've got a plot in a scheme to
Speaker 1: increase massive voter fraud to help her in this election.
Speaker 1: You've got a plot in a scheme now to to
Speaker 1: infiltrate Trump events. And you have direct a direct statement
Speaker 1: that implicates Hillary in this. And the fact that she's
Speaker 1: not and the fact that she's not even asked, I
Speaker 1: think tells you everything you need to know. Sean, I'll
Speaker 1: tell you the one thing that your audience can do
Speaker 1: is this is I'm telling you right now, this video
Speaker 1: is Our attorneys have said it, Other attorneys have said it.
Speaker 1: This this third video that just came out. There is
Speaker 1: solid evidence of campaign law violations, like serious. This is
Speaker 1: the Watergate Congress past, the campaign coordination law. This is
Speaker 1: a smoking gun. Wiki leaks is just text, and I
Speaker 1: understand that's important. This is video people making statements. They're
Speaker 1: caught on tape. They've resigned. The FEC, the Federal Elections Commission,
Speaker 1: can and have the power to investigate and press criminal charges.
Speaker 1: So what we're going to have to do as a
Speaker 1: country is we're gonna have to put pressure on the FEC,
Speaker 1: put this in front of their faces, and say what
Speaker 1: are you going to do about this? All right, let
Speaker 1: me ask you about this. You actually tweeted out anything
Speaker 1: happens to me. There's a dead man switch on part
Speaker 1: three that will be released today at Hillary Clinton, at
Speaker 1: Donna Brazil implicated. Now, do you really think that your
Speaker 1: life's in jeopardy and over this? I don't worry my my,
Speaker 1: I don't think about this as much as I as
Speaker 1: much as people other people do. I've been inundated with
Speaker 1: like a million messages from people and that's not an exaggeration,
Speaker 1: a million tweets, emails, Facebook like or do you fear
Speaker 1: for your life? So I put out a statement saying, look,
Speaker 1: if you believe that the government has the power to
Speaker 1: kill people they don't like their journalism, then I guess
Speaker 1: I am afraid from my life in that respect. But
Speaker 1: I don't think about it. But I wanted to let
Speaker 1: people know that if anything happens to me, if there's
Speaker 1: some rare case where where I disappear or something happens
Speaker 1: to me, the videos are still going to come out.
Speaker 1: I wanted people to know that because that was how
Speaker 1: much more is coming? And what else can we expect? Well,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what, Sean, Let's see what Hillary says.
Speaker 1: She's dodged it twice. Now I want to see I
Speaker 1: know that. For example, at Bear tweeted that he's gonna
Speaker 1: be doing a big special report on this tonight on
Speaker 1: Fox and and James Rosen is asking the White House question,
Speaker 1: let's see what they say and if they lie and obvious,
Speaker 1: skate and deflect, we're gonna put out another piece this week.
Speaker 1: I don't want to show my cards, but it's gonna
Speaker 1: be either tomorrow Wednesday. Wow, And what else do you have?
Speaker 1: Who else is implicated? And as you had mentioned, media matters,
Speaker 1: when will that come out we Media Matters is implicated
Speaker 1: the David Brock and the president of Media Matters were
Speaker 1: they didn't meet with our undercover people, Sean, we were
Speaker 1: invited to the White House. Our undercover reporter was actually
Speaker 1: invited to the White House, and we have some evidence there.
Speaker 1: We're we're talking to our attorneys about it. Um. We
Speaker 1: didn't break any laws at any point during this investigation,
Speaker 1: but we want to make sure that when we put
Speaker 1: this stuff out, we're doing the right thing. So were
Speaker 1: we have another video coming, we have to watch the reaction,
Speaker 1: we have to account for that, and then we're gonna
Speaker 1: break the next story. So there's only one more video
Speaker 1: or multiple more videos. There's multiple more videos? How many
Speaker 1: will there be? How many between now and election? Because
Speaker 1: that's what it matters. It's it's hard for me to
Speaker 1: say because these are these are combining a lot of
Speaker 1: material into these videos. But there's gonna be at least
Speaker 1: a couple more, all right, James o'cave Project Veritas, thank
Speaker 1: you so much. We appreciate you being with us. Nine
Speaker 1: for one Shawn is a toe free telephone number. It
Speaker 1: is an absolute disgrace that your media decides what you
Speaker 1: get to see and what you don't get to see,
Speaker 1: what they ask, what they don't ask. I mean, if
Speaker 1: Wiki leaks has improven, how in the tank they are
Speaker 1: for Hillary? I don't know what will anyway, two weeks
Speaker 1: from tomorrow America goes to vote. Which way are you
Speaker 1: going to vote? All right, let's get to our phones
Speaker 1: as promised, and at the top of the hour, Peter
Speaker 1: Schweitzer will join us, and then we'll take a real
Speaker 1: deep look at the economy. Also in our final hour today, Uh,
Speaker 1: let us say hi to Sherry Is in Indianapolis. Sherry, Hi,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called? Hey? Son? Keep up
Speaker 1: the good work. I just want to know, this is terrifying.
Speaker 1: Life as we know it is going to be completely different.
Speaker 1: It's Trump's loses. What do we do? What do we
Speaker 1: do if if she leins? I don't think she will.
Speaker 1: I hope she doesn't. But what do we do? How
Speaker 1: do we listen? I would say, I would say, looking
Speaker 1: at the polls, Trump is behind. Now, is there a
Speaker 1: possibility of a Brexit effect? Sure? Is there a possibility
Speaker 1: of a you know a number of or percentage of
Speaker 1: people that aren't admitting they're gonna go Trump? Shore Am
Speaker 1: I counting on that. Nope, I like to be straight
Speaker 1: up with my audience. You know, for all the talk
Speaker 1: about me not supporting Poles, they're absolutely wrong. I do
Speaker 1: support Poles. I do believe in polling. I do believe
Speaker 1: in research. I've read research about myself all the years
Speaker 1: I've been in radio and TV. Uh and most times
Speaker 1: I find the audiences right and I listen to what
Speaker 1: they tell me. So it look, there's a lot of
Speaker 1: unfinished business that I can't get into now. We have
Speaker 1: a media informational crisis unlike any that we ever really knew.
Speaker 1: The media collusion with Clinton is a huge major story.
Speaker 1: The issue of corruption is not going away. If God forbid,
Speaker 1: Hillary would win, that's not going anywhere. And probably the
Speaker 1: biggest piece of unfinished business for me is going to
Speaker 1: be with the Republican Party that created Donald Trump and
Speaker 1: that sabotage Donald Trump. So but but my focus right
Speaker 1: now for the next fifteen days is trying to keep
Speaker 1: people up to date informed in the hopes that Trump
Speaker 1: pulls this off. Now, I would say he's got the
Speaker 1: media establishment obviously against him, Republicans against him, the Republican establishment,
Speaker 1: the globalist establishment, the democratic establishment, so you know, the
Speaker 1: guy's fighting a million fights at once. And you know,
Speaker 1: it was funny. Somebody said to me this weekend. I
Speaker 1: forget who it was. You know, all right, I'll concede
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump is a little crass at times. If
Speaker 1: you can see that Hillary Clinton is corrupted a thief,
Speaker 1: I'm like, okay, that's a fair analysis. So anyway, um,
Speaker 1: look my focus and I think what your focus should
Speaker 1: be for the next fifteen days. Assume you are behind,
Speaker 1: because I believe you are. He's behind by one point
Speaker 1: and three points in two North Carolina polls out today.
Speaker 1: He has to win North Carolina or it's game over.
Speaker 1: He's got to win Florida or it's game over. He's
Speaker 1: gotta win Ohio or it's game over. And then he's
Speaker 1: got to win Iowa. And then he's got to win
Speaker 1: New Mexico, hopefully Arizona. He's got to win. He's he's
Speaker 1: you know, it's very close there. Nevada's gonna win. It's
Speaker 1: very close. It's just really really hard for any Republican
Speaker 1: to win. Now, some people will say, well, Hannity, you
Speaker 1: should have endorsed. Well I didn't. That wasn't my plan
Speaker 1: to endorse my plan. My promise back in March was
Speaker 1: to give you access. I'm not even a registered Republican.
Speaker 1: I couldn't even vote in the primary, so and then
Speaker 1: in to continue to give access. There's a reason why
Speaker 1: Trump was chosen, and people seem to be forgetting it.
Speaker 1: And the people that I'm most angry at right now,
Speaker 1: if you want to know, I'm angry at these hypocrites
Speaker 1: in the press, and I'm angry at Republicans. I expect
Speaker 1: Democrats to be up to the same dirty tricks. You know.
Speaker 1: I'm not shocked or surprised in any way that Wiki
Speaker 1: leaks shows us that the Clinton ad featuring a machado
Speaker 1: was planned for months and months in advance. I'm not
Speaker 1: surprised at the media collusion either. And now they're talking
Speaker 1: about there's an article out today about, oh well, let's
Speaker 1: go after talk radio. Trump critics call for a crackdown
Speaker 1: on conservative media, and I'm mentioned specifically in this article.
Speaker 1: I guess we're gonna just silence people that are honest
Speaker 1: and those that are dishonest and phony and fraudulent and
Speaker 1: fake and pretend to be something they're not, which is
Speaker 1: fair and balanced than objective We'll let them keep their jobs,
Speaker 1: but we'll run Hannity out of business. We'll attack their advertisers.
Speaker 1: Even fellow talk show hosts are supporting this, and they
Speaker 1: make their living with free speech. So we're gonna have
Speaker 1: on November nine, win, lose, or draw. I promise you,
Speaker 1: I'm laying down a marker and there's gonna be a fight,
Speaker 1: and I'm starting a fight. People talking about let's all
Speaker 1: come together. Uh no, thank you. I have no desire
Speaker 1: to come to together with people that have that are
Speaker 1: trying to assist either overtly or covertly, Hillary Clinton. And
Speaker 1: they will own every bad thing, dumb thing she does.
Speaker 1: And it's gonna be that list is gonna be long.
Speaker 1: All right, back to our phones. Let us say hi
Speaker 1: to Tracy. Tracy. I don't know where you're calling from Texas.
Speaker 1: How are you, Tracy? What's going on? It says Tracy
Speaker 1: from Tracy, Hey, so, and I have two very point
Speaker 1: questions and then I'm gonna make a statement. The first
Speaker 1: question is it when it comes to the wiki leaks,
Speaker 1: dropping the emails. I'm not gonna even argue or dispute
Speaker 1: the validity of the content, but I what what I
Speaker 1: want to ask you specifically, and it's in line with
Speaker 1: what Marco Wibius said. It's one. This is the first question.
Speaker 1: Don't you feel that the wiki leaks, even if it's via,
Speaker 1: if this Russia via wiki leaks, if rush for anybody's wikily,
Speaker 1: isn't that an attack on our nation because some of
Speaker 1: that information, which could very much be very well true,
Speaker 1: could still be disseminated with false information and that's a
Speaker 1: bad thing. And the second question is this, don't you
Speaker 1: think that out of ball if you write the media
Speaker 1: does seem be leaning towards Hillary and I am you know,
Speaker 1: I'm filility and I can say you and I can
Speaker 1: detect somebody. But my question to you, you don't feel
Speaker 1: that sevent d five to eighty percent of what's happened
Speaker 1: with Donald Trump is Donald Trump, especially like like saying
Speaker 1: that I said, they've been using his own words against him.
Speaker 1: And finally, this is not a question. Look, donald Trump
Speaker 1: is not He's not a professional politician. Donald Trump has
Speaker 1: made his own fair share of mistakes. Donald Trump probably
Speaker 1: could have listened a lot more to other people. Um.
Speaker 1: But on the other hand, I mean you can look
Speaker 1: at it in reverse and say what he is accomplished
Speaker 1: in eighteen months is beyond significant. And I think that
Speaker 1: the environment created for Trump was created by the Republican Party,
Speaker 1: not by the Democratic Party. I mean, had some very
Speaker 1: good people running here, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio and
Speaker 1: Ram paul I, like those guys. You know, Rick Perry, Well,
Speaker 1: what about the attack on wiki leaks and you did
Speaker 1: endorse Trump? Well, what about Wiki leaks? Wikie League shows
Speaker 1: just how dishonest than corrupt Hillary is. I don't know,
Speaker 1: I don't know what else to tell you. I mean,
Speaker 1: the fact that the fact that she's been exposed, well,
Speaker 1: I didn't see everybody all up in arms when Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's taxes were illegally released. I saw, I saw the
Speaker 1: Clinton campaign talking about it and Hillary pounding it at
Speaker 1: the debate. So let's let's get away from the holier
Speaker 1: than now, Well this shouldn't have been released, nonsense. You know, look,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you right now, this country better get a
Speaker 1: grip that we have no cyber security. And you know what,
Speaker 1: you can thank Julian Assange for that, because he exposed
Speaker 1: just how pathetic our cyber security, if you even want
Speaker 1: to call it that is. And number two, he exposed
Speaker 1: just how deeply corrupt. Why don't you deal with the
Speaker 1: corruption issue? And yes, our government needs to fix cybersecurity absolutely,
Speaker 1: and we continue to allow this to happen, then we
Speaker 1: are we have learned nothing. So but it's the corruption.
Speaker 1: You don't want to seem to pay attention to it
Speaker 1: because you don't like where the information came from. I
Speaker 1: actually like, I actually like knowing that Hillary is is
Speaker 1: is deeply corrupt and our media is worse than I
Speaker 1: even thought. I'm glad that I know it. I've been
Speaker 1: in this business and radio thirty years TV. I'm in
Speaker 1: my twenty first year, and I've always known instinctively that
Speaker 1: the media is abusively biased. And I said they were
Speaker 1: dead in two thousand and eight. Now they're dead, buried
Speaker 1: and gone. They mean nothing to make Who did Yeah?
Speaker 1: I did? I did. I did what I said I
Speaker 1: was gonna do. I said I would support the Republican nominee,
Speaker 1: and I'm supporting him enthusiastically. Yes I am. But the
Speaker 1: difference between it. But I'm not a journalist. I'm a
Speaker 1: talk show host. I have an opinion. I don't hide
Speaker 1: my opinion. I tell you straight up where I am.
Speaker 1: So I don't know what you're talking about beyond that? Uh,
Speaker 1: Sandy is in California, Sandy, how are you glad you
Speaker 1: called good? Um? The reason so many of us fell
Speaker 1: in love with Donald Trump as we finally had a
Speaker 1: leader that recognized there was a problem on the border.
Speaker 1: And he's grown into this leadership position by taking positions
Speaker 1: on the issues that always put Americans first. And that's
Speaker 1: why I think so many people should vote for him.
Speaker 1: And then Saturday he gives a wonderful speech where he
Speaker 1: outlines a contract with America. I hope that he continues
Speaker 1: to include that as part of his rallies. Um. I
Speaker 1: don't know if he will, but much of what he's
Speaker 1: saying he's been telling us all along. He's doing what's
Speaker 1: right for America. And the Democrats are simply the party
Speaker 1: of dirty tricks and dirty deeds. To me, it's almost
Speaker 1: like the media and the Democrat politicians have entered a
Speaker 1: sewer where everything they do is corrupt a lie, and
Speaker 1: then they laugh at Americans about lies. You know, Hey,
Speaker 1: Gruber says, we counted on the stupidity of the Americans
Speaker 1: to pass Obamacare. Um, Harry read lie. He lies about
Speaker 1: Romney and then he laughs about it afterwards. Uh, and
Speaker 1: it just goes another thing that I'm hearing. I'm hearing. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, if maybe one of the other guys, they're
Speaker 1: not as controversial as Trump, they'd be up by ten
Speaker 1: people telling I'm like, no, then, wouldn't they took a
Speaker 1: good man like Romney? I don't know what happened to
Speaker 1: him in this election. Romney is a good guy. Romney
Speaker 1: was a boy scout for God's sakes, and they turned
Speaker 1: him into Satan. It doesn't matter whether it's real or imagine.
Speaker 1: They're gonna say it anyway. Donald Trump, just help them
Speaker 1: out a little bit more. But you know, after thirty
Speaker 1: years of her being a public servant and now having
Speaker 1: two d fifty million dollars in her account, the the
Speaker 1: American people need to wake up to the fact that
Speaker 1: they are just a party of corruption and dirty deeds
Speaker 1: and we need to throw them out and we need
Speaker 1: to elect Donald Trump. And I'm sorry that the uh,
Speaker 1: the never trumpers are so foolish, but I think they
Speaker 1: entered the sewer too. It's either that or they're a
Speaker 1: special kind of stupid. And that includes back. There's just
Speaker 1: something wrong with you. If you can say that, I'm
Speaker 1: morally superior to someone. But I'll vote for this lady
Speaker 1: who's lied in every issue. To me, she committed a
Speaker 1: crime by deleting evidence that was subpoened by Congress. Why
Speaker 1: Congress thinks she would be good? They gotta be totally
Speaker 1: out of their minds. So people go out and vote
Speaker 1: for Trump. He's the right guy for this time. I
Speaker 1: hope they do. I hope they do too. I hope
Speaker 1: every day. I gotta tell you, I was so I
Speaker 1: was so impressed with him on Saturday, And you know,
Speaker 1: to me, I'm a little frustrated because I've been saying
Speaker 1: for a long time that the Republicans need to nationalize
Speaker 1: the election and run on ideas and make promises and
Speaker 1: put them down on paper. Uh, that's gonna be part
Speaker 1: of the aftermath. Also, I don't care what the Republicans
Speaker 1: do anymore. I'm laying out the agenda that I think
Speaker 1: is gonna be good for the country, and I don't
Speaker 1: give a rip who supports it. If you support my agenda,
Speaker 1: I'll support you. If you support eighty percent of my agenda,
Speaker 1: i'll support you. If you don't that that maybe some
Speaker 1: things are are just I don't know, maybe there's a
Speaker 1: line in the sand. Maybe there's certain issues. You have
Speaker 1: to say radical Islam. If you don't say radical Islam,
Speaker 1: I can never vote for you. If you don't vet refugees,
Speaker 1: I can vote for you. If you're not supporting a
Speaker 1: border wall, I can't vote for you. Those are basic
Speaker 1: fundamental things for me. We could disagree on other issues,
Speaker 1: but we'll see. All right, let's get uh. Josh in
Speaker 1: Indianapolis has an interesting question. What's up, Josh? How are
Speaker 1: you glad you called Sir hi Son earlier? You you
Speaker 1: were talking about Senator ran Paul. And actually my question
Speaker 1: kind of comes from what Ran Paul said earlier last year.
Speaker 1: He said that the Republican Party has grown moss covered
Speaker 1: in stale. And I have to agree with that because
Speaker 1: I'm I'm thirty three, and I know a lot of
Speaker 1: other friends of mine who are we're all in our thirties.
Speaker 1: Some things, we're kind of like people without a party
Speaker 1: because we're social progressive. We believe in gay right, you know,
Speaker 1: all that stuff, but we're also fiscally conservative. A lot
Speaker 1: of us are also pro gun ownership. But the only
Speaker 1: thing I would say, I don't think most I'm a
Speaker 1: conservative and I think most conservatives, you know, they might
Speaker 1: have private thoughts, like, for example, I don't support gay marriage,
Speaker 1: but you're not going to hear a more passionate voice
Speaker 1: than mine about the absolute atrocious treatment of gays and
Speaker 1: lesbians under Sharia law. Now you could be mad at
Speaker 1: me because I don't want to change the definition of marriage,
Speaker 1: but Hillary Clinton has taken money from countries that throw
Speaker 1: gays and lesbians off the roof and as a matter
Speaker 1: of course, kill them just for being gay and lesbian.
Speaker 1: But I think most Americans. Maybe I don't know what
Speaker 1: your experience has been, but I think most Americans are
Speaker 1: probably like me, and they'd be perfectly honest. Josh, and
Speaker 1: I really I've got more better things to worry about
Speaker 1: than whatever you're doing in your bedroom. Dude, I don't care,
Speaker 1: you know, I think people don't care. I think it's
Speaker 1: just nobody really gives a rip. Does that make sense, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it does. I just in my lifetime, I would like
Speaker 1: to see a Republican party that I can be proud
Speaker 1: of again, because but I think it's become more libertarian
Speaker 1: in that way. I mean, I don't want to talk
Speaker 1: about any of the stuff. It's nobody's business. I mean,
Speaker 1: you do you want to know about my uh my marriage?
Speaker 1: You want to know about it? No, I'm no, seriously,
Speaker 1: you don't care. Do you know we're all kind of
Speaker 1: self consumed in that way? You know, we're all a
Speaker 1: little self absorbed. And really, do you think I want
Speaker 1: to know what other people are doing? I've got we
Speaker 1: all got bigger fish to fry here. There are more
Speaker 1: important issues now. Look, I don't want anybody discriminating. I
Speaker 1: don't want anyone treating you horribly or or anybody in
Speaker 1: your life. I think you ought to be able to
Speaker 1: go visit whoever you want in a in a hospital.
Speaker 1: I think it's wrong not to um, I think that,
Speaker 1: you know, I just don't want to change the definition
Speaker 1: of marriage. That's all. That's really that simple. But I
Speaker 1: think in terms of inheritance and all that stuff, I
Speaker 1: don't have a problem whatsoever. Anyway, eight one, Shawn, you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. So there's
Speaker 1: like a moist code between the DNC and super PACs,
Speaker 1: and you guys have been more so than is it
Speaker 1: a text a text conversation? I never The thing that
Speaker 1: we have to watch is making sure there's a double
Speaker 1: blind between the actual campaign and the actual DNC. You
Speaker 1: know what we're doing. There's a double blind there, so
Speaker 1: they can positively deny tote me ready about it. The
Speaker 1: candidate would like to hit a mask. She wants to
Speaker 1: be down. That story is not exactly what you want
Speaker 1: to hear about. How president, we have a call with
Speaker 1: a campaign every day to go over the focuses undertaking
Speaker 1: and the end it was the candidate Clinton, the future
Speaker 1: president United States, who weren't in ducks on the ground,
Speaker 1: so I gotta we can get due. Don't read that
Speaker 1: we were contracted directly with the d n C and
Speaker 1: again him, Yeah, I am contracted to him. But my
Speaker 1: eye answer to the head of special events for the
Speaker 1: d n C and ahead of this Petel events in
Speaker 1: political for the campaign, d n C, DNC paste Democracy
Speaker 1: Partner's Democracy Partners, pasting, the fold group, the follow group
Speaker 1: who goes and executes. When you see what seems to
Speaker 1: be clear evidence that Clinton Foundation donors were being treated
Speaker 1: differently than non donors in terms of access. When you
Speaker 1: see this new new revelations about the twelve million dollar
Speaker 1: deal between Hillary Clinton, the Foundation, and the King of Morocco,
Speaker 1: are voters right to be troubled by this. Yes, it's
Speaker 1: it's corrupt, it's a it's a scandal. I am happy.
Speaker 1: In fact, I'm thrilled to talk about the Clinton Foundation
Speaker 1: because it is a world renowned charity and I am
Speaker 1: so proud of the work that it does. We um
Speaker 1: at the Clinton Foundation spendent of all the money that
Speaker 1: is donated on behalf of programs of people around the
Speaker 1: world and in our own country. Actually it's more like
Speaker 1: six percent. And of course that was more of the
Speaker 1: project Veritas Tapes News Round Up Information Overload Hour Here
Speaker 1: on the Sean Hannity Show, one Shawn our toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number. Peter Schweitzer is with us, author of the
Speaker 1: New York Times bestseller Clinton Cash, the untold story of
Speaker 1: how and why foreign governments and businesses helped make Bill
Speaker 1: and Hillary rich. He's also the president of the Government
Speaker 1: account Accountability Institute. And we have a lot of new
Speaker 1: reports we're gonna get to today. But what percent of
Speaker 1: the Clinton Foundation of money actually does go to charity? Well,
Speaker 1: they give about six percent, as you said, to outside charities. UM,
Speaker 1: and then they claim that they have some internal programs.
Speaker 1: But problem is, Sean nobody knows what that money goes for.
Speaker 1: And and here's the interesting thing. One of the things
Speaker 1: that has come out from the podest emails was this
Speaker 1: internal review that was done of the Clinton Foundation at
Speaker 1: at Chelsea Clinton's bequest, and the Chelsea Clinton, by the way,
Speaker 1: give her credit. She pointed out how on ethical it was.
Speaker 1: And then she even questioned whether or not they lose
Speaker 1: they lose their tax exempt status for crying out loud,
Speaker 1: absolutely Sean. And and so she brought in Simpson Thatcher,
Speaker 1: which is a big, large, well known law firm in
Speaker 1: New York, to review the internal operations of the foundation.
Speaker 1: When they asked Clinton Foundation employees to chart the effectiveness
Speaker 1: on a scale from one to ten of how effective
Speaker 1: the Clinton Foundation was, the highest the Clinton Foundation employees
Speaker 1: gave it themselves was a four. Some of them actually
Speaker 1: gave it a one. So even within the Clinton Foundation,
Speaker 1: there's wide recognition that this is not a charitable organization
Speaker 1: that is very very effective at all. Hillary can sort
Speaker 1: of throw out the as numbers and they can talk
Speaker 1: about the great things they do. Within the Clinton Foundation itself,
Speaker 1: they do not give themselves very good marks for effectiveness. Well,
Speaker 1: six percent of the money going a charity is hardly effective,
Speaker 1: and they have all their friends on the payroll. What
Speaker 1: do you make of this twelve million dollar Moroccan deal,
Speaker 1: especially considering that her state department had them on a
Speaker 1: list of well, that's some nice countries. Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's hugely troubling because the email makes it very clear
Speaker 1: that Hillary wanted to have this c g I meeting
Speaker 1: in Morocco, the Kingdom of Morocco. The Moroccans said, yes,
Speaker 1: that's fine, but she needs to be here and think
Speaker 1: about this. She had announced as a president and so
Speaker 1: they're thinking we may have a future president of the
Speaker 1: United States visiting US. It was based on the twelve
Speaker 1: million dollars itself specifically, and again, Sehan, if you go
Speaker 1: to this internal review that was done of the Clinton Foundations,
Speaker 1: one of the other findings, and this is quoting from
Speaker 1: the report, was that Jonas had quote quid pro quo
Speaker 1: expectations for their donations end quote. That was that's the
Speaker 1: words of Since Simpson Thatcher's review of the Clinton Foundation.
Speaker 1: So the Moroccan example, the multiple other ones we know
Speaker 1: ship the pattern, and the Clinton Foundation self it knew
Speaker 1: that there was a quid pro cool at play in
Speaker 1: these kinds of financial dealings. What about some of the
Speaker 1: other things that we've discovered about their shady dealings and
Speaker 1: money making schemes. Well, there's lots of them. I mean.
Speaker 1: One of the things that we have been working on
Speaker 1: in the Wall Street Journal, James Freeman reported on today
Speaker 1: is John Podesta. You know, John Podesta has been talking
Speaker 1: about this this Russian uh, I guess, conspiracy to to
Speaker 1: elect Donald Trump. And and certainly we believe in, you know,
Speaker 1: transparency both sides, etcetera. But here's the problem, as we
Speaker 1: outlined in a report in two John Podesta. Sorry. In eleven,
Speaker 1: John Podesta joined the board of a small energy company
Speaker 1: that four months later got a billion rubles forty five
Speaker 1: million dollars from the Russian government, specifically a government fund
Speaker 1: called russ Nano that the Russian science Minister calls Putin's child. Now,
Speaker 1: when when John Podesta goes to work in Obama's White House,
Speaker 1: he lists on his financial disclosures that he is divested
Speaker 1: from that company, what has come out in the Podesta
Speaker 1: emails Sean is that actually he's set up an LLC
Speaker 1: and put his daughter into scares in that company to
Speaker 1: an LLC controlled by his daughter and continued to maintain
Speaker 1: his relationships. So he in effect tried to hide and
Speaker 1: is trying to hide the fact that he is an
Speaker 1: effect business partners with the Russian government in this entity
Speaker 1: called Jewel Energy. Unbelievable. So isn't that basically his money
Speaker 1: and wink wink not not the daughter is going to
Speaker 1: give him the money back and he still has an
Speaker 1: interest in just like the Clintons was selling access of
Speaker 1: the people she met his Secretary of State where all
Speaker 1: people that had donated or committed money. Isn't it the
Speaker 1: same game he's playing. The chief played absolutely Sean, And
Speaker 1: in fact he transfers the shares to the LLC, But
Speaker 1: as James Freeman points out in his report, he continues
Speaker 1: to pay the legal bills that Jewels sends. His daughter
Speaker 1: doesn't pay them, he pays them, and there are numerous
Speaker 1: emails where he is being consulted on new more board
Speaker 1: members coming on board at Jewel and other things. So
Speaker 1: it's really just a charade. The movement of the shares
Speaker 1: to the LLC, he is effectively still the shareholder and
Speaker 1: there are numerous emails in the Podesta emails that confirm
Speaker 1: that one of the things that I think that has
Speaker 1: come out here that you know, we're not really going
Speaker 1: to have a time to digest all of this before
Speaker 1: the campaign, but how complicit the media has been and
Speaker 1: their collusion with Hillary and her campaign. But you know,
Speaker 1: for example, there's a story out today that no consequences
Speaker 1: for any of the media appears for reporters caught colluding
Speaker 1: with Hillary. Well, that would be NBC and CBS and
Speaker 1: ABC in the New York Times and Politico and the
Speaker 1: Boston Globe and CNN and MSNBC. How did they get
Speaker 1: away with that? And through the prism of going back
Speaker 1: when you came out with Clinton cash, a blockbuster book
Speaker 1: and and all of this evidence, a lot of which
Speaker 1: has been corroborated since the time you wrote it. Did
Speaker 1: the media treat you fairly at the time? How did
Speaker 1: they treat you the same people we now know we're
Speaker 1: colluding with Clinton? Well, it's a great question, Sean. I
Speaker 1: mean some of the media obviously treated me very fairly,
Speaker 1: and sometimes they were tough. I mean I did Chris
Speaker 1: Wallace Fox News Sunday, and he was fair, but he
Speaker 1: was tough. But what the emails show is that there
Speaker 1: were people like George Stephanopolis and others who were collaborating
Speaker 1: with the Clinton's in an effort to sort of discredit
Speaker 1: the book. There are dozens of emails that that relate
Speaker 1: to the book and their strategy to sort of undermine it.
Speaker 1: My personal Sean is that several aids had a conversation
Speaker 1: with Hillary about Clinton cash about the book, and according
Speaker 1: to the email quote, a conversation did not go well
Speaker 1: end quote. I guess they take a little bit of
Speaker 1: you know, well, there was one of the wiki leaks,
Speaker 1: you know, if you look at the latest ones that
Speaker 1: showed the has to suggested going postal on the press,
Speaker 1: and that was over the expression of concern over the
Speaker 1: content of Clinton's Wall Street speeches. Yeah. Now, this is
Speaker 1: what emerges is you have basically your lapdogs, and these
Speaker 1: are members of the press that correspond with them, that
Speaker 1: are looking for access, They're looking for favors from the
Speaker 1: Clinton team, and in return they will carry water for
Speaker 1: the Clinton's in their message. And then there are some
Speaker 1: reporters that deal sort of very professionally and very directly
Speaker 1: with them. But you're quite right, and there have been
Speaker 1: no consequences for this. I mean, think about this for
Speaker 1: a second, you had this, you know, really you know,
Speaker 1: ugly video with with you know, Donald Trump and Billy Bush.
Speaker 1: Billy Bush got fired by NBC. You do not see
Speaker 1: that happening to anybody else that's mentioned in these emails,
Speaker 1: who are frankly a Pental's with John Podesta. They're offering
Speaker 1: offering advice. Uh, they're sort of crowing about what a
Speaker 1: great job they did at getting Trump. These people are
Speaker 1: at NBC. They certainly have done much more, I would
Speaker 1: argue to underline the journalism profession than Billy Bush did
Speaker 1: in that ugly video. But they're not going anywhere. And
Speaker 1: I think part of it is shown that this is
Speaker 1: so deep and so profound that if they start firing
Speaker 1: people for this, it's basically an admission by the brass
Speaker 1: of these media organizations, Uh, that yes, collusion and collaboration
Speaker 1: is taking place, and they just refused to admit it. Well,
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, I think that's the big story.
Speaker 1: I look, I said back in the way the journalism
Speaker 1: was dead, that we have all the backup. One of
Speaker 1: the things that I think is so interesting because you
Speaker 1: have been following the money, and I think when you
Speaker 1: follow the money, you get a bigger story. But you
Speaker 1: go back to wiki leagues and you know you have
Speaker 1: a January this year email from Mandy Grunwald, who's part
Speaker 1: of their team and concerned over the content of Clinton
Speaker 1: and her Wall Street speeches. This is where you got
Speaker 1: Podesta saying he's going to go postal on the press
Speaker 1: over the issue of speeches, and she's saying, oh, it's
Speaker 1: pretty bad. You know, she's critical to some extent as
Speaker 1: us to what happened to the crash, but the more
Speaker 1: memorable stuff is totally accommodationist, she wrote to the entire campaign. Now,
Speaker 1: the Goldmen Sax CEO says, of of course we engage
Speaker 1: with Hillary. Well, now we know that the head of
Speaker 1: Goldman saxes voting for Hillary, and why shouldn't they because
Speaker 1: they know they've got a palate Hillary. Because behind closed doors,
Speaker 1: we've now discovered only a small piece of what those
Speaker 1: speeches were telling, which is she's totally in their pockets.
Speaker 1: She's bought and paid for, just like the Saudis bought
Speaker 1: and paid for her. Basically, I've never seen people that
Speaker 1: have enriched themselves and lie as much as these people do. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's pretty amazing. Sean I mean, look, we we all
Speaker 1: unfortunately have gotten used to, you know, politicians who who
Speaker 1: kind of tell us one thing and then maybe do
Speaker 1: something else. In the case of the Clintons, what really
Speaker 1: comes out to me and these emails is how much
Speaker 1: they try to massage every statement and how they try
Speaker 1: to have you know, in both ways or sometimes even
Speaker 1: three or four ways on any given issue. And the
Speaker 1: real question is is that you know, what kind of
Speaker 1: leadership this that? Um you know, you can you can
Speaker 1: have debates over policy, but what's the point of having
Speaker 1: a debate over policy. It's what the person is telling
Speaker 1: you is not really what they're gonna do, and they
Speaker 1: don't believe it, so, you know, to me, this goes
Speaker 1: kind of to the heart of the issue and the
Speaker 1: frustration that people have with American politics. Number One, seventy
Speaker 1: percent the American people in a recent survey said they
Speaker 1: believe there's widespread corruption in Washington, d c. And Number two,
Speaker 1: by even a higher margin, people say we don't believe
Speaker 1: what our political leaders are telling us. Those two things together,
Speaker 1: in my mind, create a national crisis in leadership and
Speaker 1: should be of a villain. It's about the integrity of
Speaker 1: our systems listen, everyone's on my case because I've interviewed
Speaker 1: Julian Osane twice and I had been very critical when
Speaker 1: the story first broke ten years ago, but I now
Speaker 1: Number One, people haven't died because he doesn't release information
Speaker 1: that would allow people to get killed. That's interesting. He
Speaker 1: made that conscious decision, he told me. Number Two, he's
Speaker 1: never been wrong in ten years. Number Three, he's done
Speaker 1: us a favor by showing us that we have no cybersecurity.
Speaker 1: Number four, you know, he literally is out there pointing
Speaker 1: out just how corrupt our government is. And in that sense,
Speaker 1: he's provided us a public service. Let me give you
Speaker 1: one example. There is uh this is part of the
Speaker 1: new batch of Wiki leagues, but you know there was
Speaker 1: a Center for American Progress that's Nearer Tandon, who's the
Speaker 1: president CEO of this And an email to Jake Sullivan,
Speaker 1: the director of communications, Jennifer Palmari and Podesta about the
Speaker 1: possibility of pressuring Justice Roberts on the courts second major
Speaker 1: Obamacare decision, and it says it's most likely that this
Speaker 1: decision has already been made by the court, but on
Speaker 1: the off chance that history is repeating itself, and it's
Speaker 1: possible that they are still deciding. Last time, it seems
Speaker 1: like Roberts went from striking the mandate to supporting it
Speaker 1: just weeks before. And as Jennifer will remember, it was
Speaker 1: pretty critical that the President threw down the gauntlet the
Speaker 1: last time on the court, warning them in the first
Speaker 1: case that it would politicize the role of the war
Speaker 1: for them to rule against the a c. A. And
Speaker 1: as a close reader of the case, I honestly believe
Speaker 1: that's Vitals scaring Roberts off. It almost sounds like they
Speaker 1: feel like they can pressure the Supreme Court justices and
Speaker 1: feel they've been successful at it. Yeah, you know, Sean,
Speaker 1: I think on on this whole issue of wiki leaks,
Speaker 1: there are two separate issues. First, there is the legal issue. Okay,
Speaker 1: hacking as a crime, law enforcement needs to deal with that,
Speaker 1: and I think we would all agree with that. But
Speaker 1: there's a second component here, which is journalism. Journalism is
Speaker 1: not law enforcement. And if you look through the history
Speaker 1: of American journalism, whether it's the previous leaks by wiki
Speaker 1: leaks related to the Iraq War, American intelligence policy, or
Speaker 1: you think about the case remember a few years ago
Speaker 1: when when new Ingridge, there was an illegal intercept of
Speaker 1: a phone conversation involving new Ingridge. The media at that
Speaker 1: time didn't have any problem running with those stories. And
Speaker 1: that's because the media's job is not to be a
Speaker 1: law enforcement agency. So I think you are exactly right.
Speaker 1: Look what happened. That is illegal and league action. Law
Speaker 1: enforcement needs to deal with that. That is their job.
Speaker 1: That is not the job of the media. And for
Speaker 1: them to sort of say, well, you know, we're not
Speaker 1: sure we should report this stuffer. Listen, listen that they
Speaker 1: are in the tank. They're bought and paid for. They
Speaker 1: are an extension of the Clinton campaign. I gotta run though,
Speaker 1: Peter Schwitzer Clinton Cash author, Thank you, Sean. How bad
Speaker 1: is the economy? We're gonna ask Anthony Scaramuchius with us
Speaker 1: next as an example of the power structure and fighting
Speaker 1: a T and T is buying time Warner and thus
Speaker 1: CNN a deal we will not approve in my administration
Speaker 1: because it's too much concentration of power in the hands
Speaker 1: of two fews. Likewise, Amazon, which through its ownership controls
Speaker 1: the Washington Post, should be paying massive taxes, but it's
Speaker 1: not paying and it's a very unfair playing field. And
Speaker 1: you see what that's happening and what that's doing to
Speaker 1: departments doors all over the country, very very unfair. And
Speaker 1: you're talking about billions and billions of dollars. They should
Speaker 1: be paying those taxes. Additionally, Comcast purchase of NBC concentrates
Speaker 1: far too much power in one mass of entity that
Speaker 1: is trying to tell the voters and what to do.
Speaker 1: Deals like this destroy democracy, and we'll look at breaking
Speaker 1: that deal up and other deals like that. My economic
Speaker 1: plan will deliver at least twenty five million jobs in
Speaker 1: one decade. Now. Our jobs have been taken away. They've
Speaker 1: gone to Mexico, they've gone to so many other countries.
Speaker 1: It's a one lane highway where they get the jobs,
Speaker 1: they get the factories, they get the money, and we
Speaker 1: get the drugs and we get the unemployment. And it's
Speaker 1: going to change. Believe me, it's going to change, says
Speaker 1: and that goes for all countries. When you look at China,
Speaker 1: when you look at every country, every trade deal we
Speaker 1: have is horrible and we should be ashamed of what
Speaker 1: people and the people that let those deals happen. They're defective,
Speaker 1: and they knew they were defective, and they were done
Speaker 1: for a reason. And believe me, they will be unwound
Speaker 1: so fast, and we will have trade. We will have
Speaker 1: great trade, and it will be free trade, but it
Speaker 1: will be fair trade and it'll be real. Alright, glad
Speaker 1: you with us. That was Donald Trump and his Gettysburg
Speaker 1: speech on Saturday. I thought it was probably his best speech.
Speaker 1: It was sort of his contract with America. There's so
Speaker 1: many simple but profound things we can do to help
Speaker 1: the sailing economy. Number one, I think you cut the
Speaker 1: business tax to from thirty five. What what does that mean? Well,
Speaker 1: that means that incentivizes multinational corporations that don't want to
Speaker 1: pay our high tax rate, that have taken their business elsewhere.
Speaker 1: That incentivises them to come back here with trillions of
Speaker 1: dollars so that they can invest in factories and manufacturing
Speaker 1: centers and put Americans back to work. That's a huge
Speaker 1: incentive for business, just like the trillions of dollars we
Speaker 1: know multinational corporations have parked overseas because of our confiscatory
Speaker 1: corporate tax rate, one of the highest in the industrialized world.
Speaker 1: If we lower it to fiftent, it would be one
Speaker 1: of the lowest. A one time repatriation tax of say
Speaker 1: ten percent would probably bring a few trillion dollars into
Speaker 1: the country again, invested jobs created, manufacturing centers build, factories built,
Speaker 1: and Americans getting back to work. Just like energy independence,
Speaker 1: America makes a decision four years will be energy independent.
Speaker 1: What does that mean? Millions of jobs for those Americans
Speaker 1: in Ohio and Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin and other other
Speaker 1: other states that are out of work that have millions
Speaker 1: of jobs, high paying jobs that also offer great career
Speaker 1: paths for people. There's so many different things that we
Speaker 1: can do what we're not doing, Hilary, She's gonna increase
Speaker 1: taxes one point two billion, increased spending one point for
Speaker 1: I'm sorry trillion, and increased spending one point four trillion. Anyway,
Speaker 1: probably one of the smartest people I've gotten to know.
Speaker 1: He's now a really good friend of mine. Anthony Scaramucci. Uh.
Speaker 1: He's the Trump campaign national finance member in New York State,
Speaker 1: co chair and co host of Wall Street Week on
Speaker 1: the Fox Business Network. Anyway, he's got a brand new
Speaker 1: book out that's called Hopping Over the rabbit Hole, How
Speaker 1: Entrepreneurs Turned Failure into a Success. Now, why is this important?
Speaker 1: Because we don't know what's gonna happen in fifteen days
Speaker 1: from now. We don't know. Anyone that tells you they
Speaker 1: know doesn't know. Could be a blowout one way or
Speaker 1: the other. It could be a very close election. You
Speaker 1: could have somebody win the popular vote, but when the
Speaker 1: electoral college, uh, you know who knows, could be a squeaker.
Speaker 1: We don't know anyone that tells you was lying to you.
Speaker 1: So I'm just telling you I don't know. But what
Speaker 1: about yourself? What are you gonna do for your family
Speaker 1: in spite of who runs your government? We know Social
Speaker 1: Security they never had a lock box and they wasted
Speaker 1: all that money. We know that Obamacare, we didn't keep
Speaker 1: our doctor or plans were saved dollars per family a year.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, since Obamacare was implemented, four thousand,
Speaker 1: one hundred dollars increase in Obamacare or healthcare payments for
Speaker 1: the average family. How can you as an entrepreneur, you know,
Speaker 1: how do you deal with the adversity of bad government policy?
Speaker 1: How do you deal with unforeseen events? How do you
Speaker 1: build up a winning financial team for you and your family?
Speaker 1: I was shocked. Seven and ten Americans now don't have
Speaker 1: a thousand dollars in a safety net, put away in
Speaker 1: a in a an account for themselves seven out of ten.
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable. Got nine million Americans out of the labor force,
Speaker 1: the worst recovery since the forties. You've got thirteen million
Speaker 1: more Americans on food stamps, eight million more Americans in poverty,
Speaker 1: fifty one year low as it relates to the homeownership rate.
Speaker 1: And you've got the first president in history that has
Speaker 1: never had one year of three percent GDP growth. And
Speaker 1: on top of that, he's accumulated more debt than all
Speaker 1: forty three presidents before him combined. So how do you
Speaker 1: deal with your side of this? How do you succeed
Speaker 1: in spite of them? And joining us now is my
Speaker 1: friend Anthony Scaramucci. How are you, hey? John? Is the
Speaker 1: terrific to be on. I just want to add one
Speaker 1: more thing is the burden of regulation. And so you know,
Speaker 1: we're just thinking about entrepreneurship. If I tried to start
Speaker 1: Skybridge Capital, the firm I founded in two thousand five
Speaker 1: today Sewan, the first nine employees would have to be lawyers.
Speaker 1: And so it what it does is it cripples the
Speaker 1: insurgents in our industry, the insurgents in our industrial capitalism,
Speaker 1: and and it makes it really good for the fat
Speaker 1: cats because it's very hard to create Skybridge today. Uh
Speaker 1: it's it's it's harder for me to get knocked off
Speaker 1: the block, you know. I mean this is the thing. Look,
Speaker 1: you have been able to thrive regardless of whether there's
Speaker 1: a Democrat or a Republican in the White House. I mean,
Speaker 1: you're actually one of the smartest business guys I've gotten
Speaker 1: to know, and and I like, well, I like to
Speaker 1: pick your brain. Anytime we've been together. You noticed that
Speaker 1: I asked a lot of questions because I want to
Speaker 1: learn well vice versa. But I mean, my my thing
Speaker 1: and the reason I wrote the book is I wanted
Speaker 1: I tried to write a very naked book, Sewan, about
Speaker 1: the ups and downs of entrepreneurship. You and I have
Speaker 1: both read those uh sanitized versions of success where you know,
Speaker 1: I know that you were a bartender, I know that
Speaker 1: you were mowing lawns and painting houses. And I tried
Speaker 1: to write a book that was very relatable to the
Speaker 1: people that you and I grew up with, so that
Speaker 1: they could open it up and say, Okay, this guy
Speaker 1: failed a couple of times. I got fired from Goldman Sacks.
Speaker 1: I failed the bar. Why did Why did you get
Speaker 1: fired from Goldman Sacks? You never told me that? Okay.
Speaker 1: So I got fired from Golden Zacks because I wanted
Speaker 1: the coolest job coming out of Harvard Law School, and
Speaker 1: that was on the investment banking side, and so I
Speaker 1: went in as an investment banker. I was terrible at
Speaker 1: the job, sean uh in February I high. I got
Speaker 1: hired in August of nine. I got fired February one
Speaker 1: of not not that it was two painful, that I
Speaker 1: remember the exact dates or anything, but I got fired
Speaker 1: on February first, nineteen nine one uh. And then, believe
Speaker 1: it or not, two months later I got rehired back
Speaker 1: into Goldman Sacks, into the sales area. So so my
Speaker 1: resume looks great. I had seven eight years of Goldman,
Speaker 1: but there was a period in there where I was
Speaker 1: actually lousy at the investment banking job, very good at
Speaker 1: the investment management job. And so I put it down
Speaker 1: in the book. I wanted people to know that they
Speaker 1: could have fits and starts in their career. They could stumble,
Speaker 1: but if they stay on path, they stay persistent, they
Speaker 1: stay passionate and in love with the things that they're doing.
Speaker 1: That thing's gonna there's a good end to the story. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that was a very painful time. Well, he sounded a
Speaker 1: little bit like a blanket. He had a lot of
Speaker 1: failure before he ended up being very successful. I mean,
Speaker 1: I didn't know you failed the bar twice. By the way,
Speaker 1: a lot of smart people have failed to bar twice. Well,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you why I failed it, Okay, because of
Speaker 1: immature arrogance as a youth. So I'm coming out of
Speaker 1: Harvard Law School. I had never gotten a sixty five
Speaker 1: on any exam. Ever, they told me I needed a
Speaker 1: sixty six to pass this thing. I was water skiing
Speaker 1: on my dad's fishing boat out on Manhasset Bay on
Speaker 1: the north shore of Long Island, and I took one
Speaker 1: week instead of the four necessary weeks to study for it.
Speaker 1: And then guess what happened to me? I got I
Speaker 1: I got one. I missed it by one multiple choice question. Okay,
Speaker 1: so I got a sixty five point six on the exam.
Speaker 1: You needed a sixty six. New York State doesn't round up, sean,
Speaker 1: And I was back taking the exam, and then I
Speaker 1: had already started my job, and so I couldn't study
Speaker 1: for it the second time. It wasn't until I went
Speaker 1: to my boss at Goldman, a terrific guy, who I said, listen,
Speaker 1: I gotta take two weeks off and study for this
Speaker 1: thing to pass that otherwise my mother's gonna kill me.
Speaker 1: So so this was immature, this was youthful arrogance. Uh.
Speaker 1: And you know, and then of course I passed it
Speaker 1: once I studied for it. But I like writing about
Speaker 1: this stuff because, like you, my career success has not
Speaker 1: been perfect. There's been a jagged line to the slope
Speaker 1: of my success. That's the same for every I don't
Speaker 1: know anybody that had its objectory only up um. And
Speaker 1: I love what Tony Roberts said, you gotta gladiate your
Speaker 1: spirit with your own inspiring story about reinventing your business
Speaker 1: after the financial crisis. Here's what I want to ask off,
Speaker 1: because most people barely are keeping their head above water.
Speaker 1: They're paying more in taxes, they're getting less in services,
Speaker 1: they pay more for healthcare. Most people haven't seen any
Speaker 1: appreciable increase in salary in years and years and years.
Speaker 1: They're not you know, they're they're the average person of
Speaker 1: one and seven Americans doesn't have a thousand bucks in
Speaker 1: their savings account. I mean, that's that's a dire situation
Speaker 1: to be in. Or they live in credit card on
Speaker 1: credit card debt and they're paying fifteen percent interest rates.
Speaker 1: You know, how do you how does that person get
Speaker 1: their act together? Or what if they're married and they
Speaker 1: have two kids. Now their life becomes that much harder.
Speaker 1: If they want to step out and do something else, well, well, listen,
Speaker 1: I mean, there's there's a lot loaded in there. But
Speaker 1: the thing they have to do is is is the
Speaker 1: first thing they have to do is pay themselves first.
Speaker 1: And so they've got to figure out whatever their disposable income.
Speaker 1: They've got to ask themselves if they can live with
Speaker 1: just five percent or seven percent less than what they're
Speaker 1: currently living on. I mean, like when I had no
Speaker 1: money and I couldn't afford to go to a restaurant
Speaker 1: or even buy fast foods. That was a point in
Speaker 1: my life when I was living paycheck to paycheck, barely
Speaker 1: paying my rent. So so me too. I had a
Speaker 1: I had a flattened Westbury, Long Island that I was
Speaker 1: sharing with three guys while I was commuting into the
Speaker 1: city and I was eating at the Taco Bell on
Speaker 1: Old Country Road. You remember that Taco Bell. I mean,
Speaker 1: so I can't tell you the number nights that I
Speaker 1: ate there, but but what I would say is I
Speaker 1: always tried to put a little bit of money away.
Speaker 1: Was it fifty dollars a week? Was it twenty dollars
Speaker 1: a week? Um? And so what happens is is very empowering.
Speaker 1: If you can watch that grow, even if it's a
Speaker 1: modest amount sewn, Uh, it gives people a little bit
Speaker 1: of comfort and a little bit of security. And so
Speaker 1: the first thing you have to do is pay yourself first.
Speaker 1: The second thing you have to do is you've you've
Speaker 1: you've got to try to get your arms around, uh,
Speaker 1: what what job opportunities there are right in front of you.
Speaker 1: If the job that you're working on right now is
Speaker 1: not working for you or not paying you enough, what
Speaker 1: skills can you get? And this is one of the
Speaker 1: big problems in our economy now, and you and I
Speaker 1: both know this. We were not developing the trade skills
Speaker 1: and we're not developing the educational footprint for the average
Speaker 1: aspirational working class member of our society, and so so
Speaker 1: if they've been dislodged from a great job and they've
Speaker 1: got two part time jobs, want at home depot and
Speaker 1: one say at McDonald's, we're not helping them get retrained
Speaker 1: and retooled for the better job, the better high paying job.
Speaker 1: And you know, there was actually a good segment about
Speaker 1: this on sixty Minutes last night. Were exactly sure, you know,
Speaker 1: And they had a group of factory guys they had
Speaker 1: worked at what twenty eight years, one guy in particular,
Speaker 1: And I'm and they're retraining these guys and I'm watching
Speaker 1: they don't know who to vote for, some of them,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, looking at these guys, I'm like this,
Speaker 1: Hillary is not going to help you. Well, there's always
Speaker 1: see there's a lot of misinformation out there. What the
Speaker 1: left has done in the society is that they've hijacked
Speaker 1: the emotion. And they've also for some reason, You'll have
Speaker 1: to explain this to me. How did they get the
Speaker 1: moral high ground, Sean. I cannot figure that out. You know.
Speaker 1: So I walk around in liberal New York City. I'm
Speaker 1: a Trump supporter, and as a result of which I'm
Speaker 1: supposed to be shamed for my support of him, and
Speaker 1: I'm morally inferior to those that do not support him,
Speaker 1: And so I don't even understand how that's possible. Because
Speaker 1: the things that you and I care about, which are
Speaker 1: as spirational working class, those are families that both of
Speaker 1: us came from, a burgeoning and growing middle class. The
Speaker 1: only way you can do that is through the society.
Speaker 1: Policies that reduce taxation, empower people, give more power to
Speaker 1: the individual, less power to the government. You've got to
Speaker 1: reduce regulation. There's no way that we can live in
Speaker 1: this overly regulated society. They're trying to make us too safe.
Speaker 1: You know, I was speaking a Sacred Heart University last
Speaker 1: week on the book, and I said, it's like refing.
Speaker 1: The regulation is so bad. It would be like you
Speaker 1: and I watching a basketball playoff game where they're calling
Speaker 1: a foul every two minutes in the game, and they're
Speaker 1: now distorting and ruining the whole process of the competitive
Speaker 1: spirit of what's going on on the field. What big
Speaker 1: business we would want to invest here? I wouldn't want
Speaker 1: to invest here. Well, that's why there's so much cash
Speaker 1: on the SMP balance sheet. We have the highest historical
Speaker 1: level of cash on the SMP balance sheet. Since nineteen one,
Speaker 1: there's close to three trillion dollars of cash on the
Speaker 1: balance sheet of the sp and that is basically nation,
Speaker 1: our nation CEO saying, Okay, wait a minute, too much regulation.
Speaker 1: The United States is not really open for business. Let
Speaker 1: me hoard cash until I can get into a better
Speaker 1: business environment. Which is another reason why the Trump Plan, Shawn,
Speaker 1: would unleash a torrent of growth in the society because
Speaker 1: with that tax footprint and his regulatory repeal would give
Speaker 1: these guys the comfort to start investing that cash into capital, labor, training,
Speaker 1: all the things that we need. We'll have you back
Speaker 1: because we're running out of time here. But the book
Speaker 1: is in on Amazon dot com, it's on my website,
Speaker 1: Hannity dot com, and it's in bookstores now everywhere. And
Speaker 1: it's called Hopping Over the Rabbit Hole. How Entrepreneurs Turned
Speaker 1: Failure into Success. Anthony Scaramocchi, my friend, Uh, look, this
Speaker 1: is we're gonna need good advice, God forbid if she
Speaker 1: ever gets elected. And how do you circumvent horrible government
Speaker 1: policies and regulation and survive and do well for you
Speaker 1: and your family, Because that's what's gonna matter Anyway, Anthony
Speaker 1: loved the book. Congratulations my friend, alright eight hundred nine
Speaker 1: four when Shaun is a number,