WEBVTT - Nick Fuentes Explains Pornography to Tucker Carlson 0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:05.000 Cool Zone Media. 0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.720 This is it could happen here. I'm Garrison Davis joined 0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:14.200 by Robert Evans. Last week, I released an episode on 0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.680 the ascent of white nationalist live streamer Nick Fuentes and 0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:23.759 his groper fans among particularly young gen Z Republicans. The 0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.920 episode also tracked the conservative infighting at Heritage Foundation and 0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.880 Ben Shapiro's Daily Wire in the aftermath of Tucker Carlson's 0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:37.120 Friendly sit Down interview with Nick Fuentes. In the episode, 0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:41.000 I mentioned that I had an extra segment covering the 0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.720 final section of the interview. Now, most coverage of this interview, 0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.200 including my episode last week, focused on like the first 0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:54.080 two thirds, which ranged from like Nick Fuentes's political background, 0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.640 early beef with Ben Shapiro and his like Nazisque anti 0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:02.640 Semitic theories of a quote unquote organized world jewelry corrupting America, 0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.720 which he now lightly couches in anti Israel framing to 0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:11.040 profit off of the genocide in Palestine. But the last 0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.000 third of the interview changes course to discuss the mechanisms 0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:21.120 of quote unquote reality distortion which are ruining young men, drugs, alcohol, 0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:27.920 the Internet, and most importantly, pornography. After receiving a universal 0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.360 response demanding the release of the porn cut. I have 0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.080 sat down with Robert here to finally, finally air what 0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:39.240 no other news platform is brave enough, brave enough to cover? 0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.560 Yeah, well, no, what new other news platform can legally 0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.920 cover because they have a duty to their employees to 0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:47.520 not make them research this stuff. 0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.080 Yeah, or like an actual healthy HR department. 0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.720 Yeah, we have not finished our classes on what we're 0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:57.720 not allowed to make people do. So said now, to 0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.040 be fair, Garrison couldn't be stopped from researching this. 0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.520 There was no way of stopping you from doing this. 0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:05.880 I have a sick drive. 0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.280 You would have started working for someone else, so we 0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:10.520 didn't let you do this. 0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.240 Now, if if Sophie told me I wasn't allowed to 0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.359 cover this, I would have quit immediately. 0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.840 Yeah, started working for Wired or someone. 0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.160 So now I am very pleased to present to you 0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.360 probably thirty thirty minutes of Nick foint As explaining to 0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:33.840 a performatively confused Tucker Carlson the concept of pornography. And 0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.600 I guess if we're gonna view you know, Fuenttes and 0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.960 the gropers as like a serious, legitimate threat that's able 0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.800 to sway national political discourse. I think it's also important 0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:48.320 to cover his weird sexual politics, just as explaining the 0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.120 weird sexual practices of like, you know, the Proud Boys 0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.240 is important for understanding their whole deal as like a 0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:58.240 neo fascist streak gang, the kind of closeted gay in 0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:03.440 cell women. The issues of the gropers is actually really important, 0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:08.640 especially for Nick, and let's discuss that. But thankfully we 0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.360 get to start off with the majority majority of the section, 0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.960 which is which is on pornography. Let's start one of 0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:17.760 the first clips. 0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:23.480 What is porn exactly? Like, describe how available is porn? 0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:24.320 What is it? 0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.120 My god? 0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.040 Because he does ask that like a man who's legitimately 0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.200 never heard of pornography. 0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.760 He does. He later says like, obviously he is familiar 0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.960 with the rough concept of porn, uh huh, but maybe not, 0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.520 but maybe not this sort of internet porn obsession, to 0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.720 which Nick refers, let's let's skip ahead about a minute 0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:56.160 where where Nick kind of closes on his explanation of 0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:58.240 Internet porn specifically. 0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.080 So, something that is almost ever talked about is that 0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:05.520 this is a generation that's totally sexually dysfunctional, I think 0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.080 because of pornography and some people are able to cope 0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.920 with it. Some people don't have a problem, but I 0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.040 think a lot of people, and maybe the small minority, 0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:16.760 have a serious problem with it. 0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.120 And the problem people sexually dysfunctional. 0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:25.800 I think that it's impossible for a real woman to 0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:30.320 compete with the availability and the novelty of pornography. 0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.880 So that is that is Nick's kind of ending argument 0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.960 at the tail end of his definition of porn and 0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:41.200 how porn is affecting specifically American men. A little bit 0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.080 of his in cel status is obviously seeping through there. 0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:48.919 More of it will become increasingly evident throughout throughout this interview. 0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.479 But this idea of sexual dysfunction, how porn is ruining 0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.040 men's ability to get into relationships, is ruining the ability 0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:00.760 to get into marriages, lasting marriages, and it. He frames 0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.839 this kind of slightly as the fault of men, but 0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.640 also really as the fault of women. Women aren't able 0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.640 to compete with how much porn there is, the different 0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.080 categories of porn. How can one woman please a man 0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.720 when a man can go on to the internet and 0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:22.120 look up, you know, fifty different Niche fetishes that not 0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.200 one woman could provide. Yeah, and that's part of his 0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:27.719 argument at this point. 0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.280 Yeah, and that's always like been the Okay, so you've 0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.400 just you've never had a relationship. 0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:38.440 Which Nick is open about at least Nick claims that, right. Yeah, 0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.360 It's unclear how true a lot of Nick's claims are 0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.760 about his like in cell vall cell in voluntary celibate, Yeah, 0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.440 a type deal, But no Nick, Nick does claim that, 0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:53.159 and the sort of pushback Nick will receive later on 0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.000 in the interview on some of these aspects is actually 0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.000 way stronger than any of the world jewelry, anti semitic 0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.599 stuff from earlier in the interview. Yeah, which Carlson was 0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.200 vague actually kind of like trying to shape Nick quent 0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.560 as his rhetoric to make him like appeal to a 0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.919 bigger audience, but did not really push back on to 0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.920 the same extent he does on a Nick's like relationship 0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:18.480 with women. But the sexual dysfunction aspect, I think is 0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.640 the is the ending argument for Nick here in terms 0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:27.000 of what actually makes porn bad. He extrapolates on this 0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.839 point in this next section which I'll play Now. 0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.240 Porn is you could have one hundred different women in 0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:42.160 one sitting doing anything that whatever niche or idiosyncratic thing 0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.120 a person might be into. It's there, and so I 0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.560 think that novelty combined with that availability and makes it 0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.919 so that, you know, when you think about courting a woman, 0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.000 juice isn't worth the squeeze. So there's like also a 0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.080 problem of like a rectile dysfunction, people that can't enjoy 0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.960 regular sex because it does not compare to the intensity 0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.680 the novelty and the availability of porn. It's hyper stimulation. 0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.800 And so I think that's sabotaging a lot of normal 0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.240 sexual relationships. It seems like it's making a lot of 0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.480 people gay too, Yeah, and trans you think that's true? 0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:19.680 One? 0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:21.440 What is that? 0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.040 Oh my god, what is that? 0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:29.280 I don't even know where to start there. 0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.120 I mean, like it's it's what these people have always believed, 0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.440 right that, Like that's the There's got to be an explanation, 0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.600 some kind of cause why people like things that that 0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.000 they're not allowed to admit to liking in public. And 0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.720 it's got to be the fault of pornography, right, or 0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:46.880 libraries whatever. 0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:52.800 Every time Tucker interjects the beauty of his of his 0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.840 little like befuddled interjections, what is that? Is that real? 0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:02.640 Is that true. It's it's fantastic, but yeah, no, I 0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:07.720 mean Nick kind of blames the rise in homosexuality and 0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:15.160 transsexuality on this like novelty of pornography and this sexual desensitization. 0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.240 Like once regular porn it doesn't do it for people. 0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.080 They get pushed to more and more extreme categories, of 0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:26.160 which transporn is somehow particularly effective at like influencing and 0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.040 you know, manipulating human behavior. Right, this is like the 0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:34.480 sissy hypno theory that porn can like make somebody trans. Yeah, 0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:39.360 very goofy stuff. Specifically for Nick considering his curious catboy 0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:45.720 background and his alleged leak viewership of transporn, which might 0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.800 we might discuss later. I'm going to play play another 0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.040 clip kind of on this note, a shorter one. 0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.239 I think that if you are somebody that uses pornography 0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.080 multiple times per day, which many people do, actually, oh absolutely, 0:08:59.240 --> 0:08:59.960 that's a lot of druk. 0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:01.760 That's a huge problem. 0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:03.719 Yeah, that's a. 0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:04.720 Lot of cherking off. 0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.479 Former Fox News anchor Tucker. 0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:09.560 Car jerking off. 0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.600 Yeah, that's a lot of chirk it off. I so badly, 0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.320 I just wanted to cut some of these clips out 0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:17.599 of like out of contact, just put them in my 0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:18.920 other episode. 0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.680 Tucker only comes once a year, and he can only 0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:26.000 come by wrapping his dick inside of two frozen Swanson's meals. 0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.160 He's got to kind of use like, you know how 0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.720 it's got like there's a little diffits on the back end. 0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.319 He's got to use that to cushion his penis. It's 0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:34.440 the only way he can come. 0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.319 It's a fairly edipal thing with his you know, family business. 0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:41.679 This this sort of like psychosexual drive. Wow, the Swans 0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:46.400 of it all. Of course that makes sense for Yeah, 0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.640 that makes sense for Tucker. But Nonick says that porn 0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.360 like operates kind of like drug tolerance levels, which like 0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.000 over time after repetitive use, in order to get high, 0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:03.040 the user must seek out strong drugs or dangerously intense doses, 0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.120 of which he views transport. Is this like dangerous dose? 0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:07.600 Yeah? 0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.800 Yeah, because I do love like the the through line 0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.520 with these people that like both this is like a 0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:18.840 sickening degeneracy and also is so appealing that people absolutely 0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.880 cannot help themselves to it, like it affects them like heroin. 0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.760 It's it's it's so inherently attractive. 0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.240 I mean, so some of that might be their actual 0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:30.080 proclivities kind of yes, I think, kind of peeking out 0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.840 from under the surface there, because all of these guys 0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.520 love watching transport, all of these like anti trans people, 0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.520 whether it's Alex Jones or like Nick Fuentes, Like obviously 0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.320 they have they have an interest in that, and that's 0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:43.960 what kind of drives them of their obsession. 0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.120 Yeah, which is it's it's just weird, Like I don't 0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.120 know anyone who talks about any pornography that way, Like 0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.000 you know, every everyone's got whatever it is they're into, 0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.160 like something that they'll be particularly interested in, but no 0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.280 one describes as like it's just this kind of thing 0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.560 no one can resisted obviously. 0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:06.120 Sort of like powerful obsessive nature in which these types 0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.720 of right wing freaks like refer to it as the. 0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.240 Like actual perverts will say stuff like no, no, no, 0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.800 I've been shoving things inside my phole for the last 0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:15.600 twenty seven years and now I can get up to 0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.360 something the width of a mag light and I know 0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.920 that's crazy, Like I know no one else does that. 0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:21.120 That's just a me faith. 0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.640 Oh, someone needs to explain sounding to Tucker Carlson, is 0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.839 what I'm what I'm saying, Like I if, I if 0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.360 he interviews me, I'm gonna walk him through sounding I'm 0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.080 gonna use together a PowerPoint with photos. 0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:39.040 He's obviously he's obviously uh open open to this line 0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:44.600 of discussion. Are we allowed to have ads on this episode? 0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:45.240 Yeah? 0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:50.000 Probably not, but let's throw to him anyway. 0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.920 All right, we are we are. Nick Fuentes is gonna 0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:08.520 continue continue to describe pornography towards a slightly confused Tucker Carlston. Now, 0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.080 now Nick is able to really speak from a sense 0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.200 of authority as someone who claims to have never had sex, 0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.520 He's able to really speak with authority on this topic, 0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.360 which I will, I will. I'll play this next clip. 0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.040 And there's something too about what it does when you 0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.199 look at it, when you because people don't realize that 0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.320 it is a fundamentally different experience. 0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.320 People don't realize being. 0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:36.840 Involved in intercourse versus watching other people have intercourse. 0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.800 And I think that actually does something to you. Tell me, 0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:40.360 what do you mean? 0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:46.080 Sorry, I'm just stop there for a sec. People don't 0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:50.960 realize this amazing observation from alleged version in cell Nick Fuentes, 0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.640 He's trying to make this point about like body depersonalization 0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.320 or like disassociation when watching porns like this, like out 0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:03.840 of body experience because you start associating yourself with people 0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.400 on screen. That's eventually what he starts talking about, right, 0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.000 And but he couches this in saying that, like, people 0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.000 don't realize that this is what this is, you know, 0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.040 different from actual sex, which is really funny because Nick 0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.679 is proudly proclaims that he's never had sex before, so 0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.319 he is in no position to argue at this point. 0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.560 No, Yeah, that's the other thing. How would you know 0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.280 that it's inherently better than sex, Like. 0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.240 Because he's never had I think that he has to 0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.000 assume that because that's the only information he has. But 0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.080 I love his framing of this is like new novel 0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.839 information that no one else has access to, that no 0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.480 one realizes that watching port is different from having sex. Yeah, 0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.640 Tucker's response is just phenomenal at the end of this, 0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.480 because Tucker's like trying trying to coax more and more 0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.360 shit out of him. It's really the only time where 0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.320 he's kind of being a sly interviewer is at this 0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.439 ending porn section. It's not the it's not the are 0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.199 you a fed section. It's not the Daily Wires stuff, 0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:02.120 it's not the anti Semitism stuff, it's it's specifically the 0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:06.680 port section. But to explain this like out of body 0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:12.280 theory that Nick that Nick has here, Unfortunately, Nick gets 0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:17.319 into trying to explain the Blanchardian theory of trend sexuality 0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:22.280 towards towards Tucker Carlson, of which I will only play 0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.000 a certain segment of because we don't need to hear 0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.200 that whole thing. But there is a section of this 0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.720 next clip that which we'll get into that as well 0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.600 as take you on kind of a beautiful journey showcasing 0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.560 Tucker's objection to pornography. 0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.080 I think that you know, for example, I think Steve 0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.680 Sailor has written about this that there's multiple kinds of transsexuals, 0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.760 and he says a one kind of transsexual is somebody 0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.520 that likes the idea of seeing themselves as a woman's 0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.640 auto ginophilia. Yes, And I think that you know one 0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.120 of the theories for that is you you watch a 0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.120 man having sex with a woman that is in you 0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.400 so much, you kind of achieve an identity with the 0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.000 woman in like a worstic way. You almost identify with 0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.160 the woman, and so there's weird things that happen when 0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:12.600 you're watching that and having such strong emotional and sexual experiences. 0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:13.000 Interesting. 0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:14.080 Interesting, Nick, that's. 0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.000 Interesting stuff, Nick. 0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.560 I've always been I've sensed for a long time having 0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.240 had a lot of young male employees mentioned porn as 0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:25.720 a problem. I mean, the big porn companies give visibility 0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.400 to foreign intel services on the. 0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.200 Back foot, so that means people know what. 0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:35.080 You're looking at. There's likely video and audio of you watching. 0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:39.200 Okay, all right, there's so much I love that Tucker's made. 0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.360 Objection to photography isn't the stuff that Nick's talking about 0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.640 at all, but the idea that it poses a security 0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.760 risk because of foreign intel services. 0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:51.040 Yeah, that they're they're recording everyone masturbating. 0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:55.040 To blackmail every single person on the planet. And he 0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.680 couches us and saying that he's quote not a huge 0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:03.040 expert on the topic. Yeah, which is really good. But 0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.040 to go back a little bit, the level of projection 0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.840 Nick is doing here with this identifying as a woman 0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:14.600 in the in the porn thing is simply phenomenal. I mean, 0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.880 especially considering the whole you know, catboys scandal, which I 0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.640 covered on the show like years ago as when I 0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.480 was like a baby, as well as Nick's like alleged 0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.000 trans porn league, which I guess I'll explain to here briefly. 0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:33.040 This was in twenty twenty two. Nick allegedly was operating 0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.800 a SoC puppet Twitter account when he was banned on Twitter. 0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.440 This this account shared a clip scrolling through Nick Fuentes 0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.440 like analytics, like video analytics, like search of analytics, showing 0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.960 his popularity. And when scrolling through these various tabs, a 0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.520 little section of a tab that that didn't did not 0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.400 get into full view, but you get you saw the 0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.000 bottom of it which looked a lot like a very 0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:59.840 specific trans femboy porn video on porn hub. People found 0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.880 that video, and after they found the video, you know this, 0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.520 This this post with these analytics was like taken down 0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.880 and this account was believed to be operated by Nick Fuentez. Now, 0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.159 Nick claims that he obviously was not behind this account, 0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.600 that this was some like a groper fan who was 0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.960 trying to set him up for scandal by operating an 0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.239 account that appeared to be Nick's account on Twitter but 0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:24.520 actually wasn't. I Robert, I will show you a little 0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.800 bit of this analytics video we don't need to see 0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:34.080 the whole thing. But it's like this, okay, so various 0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.800 various tabs. Look, look at all these tabs. This various, 0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:44.160 Like when does Jake Lloyd explore what comparing his popularity 0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.440 towards other other like commentators. 0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.680 He was comparing his popularity to fucking Jake Lloyd from 0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:50.359 the Face. 0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:51.879 And Menace from the Phantom Menace. 0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.160 You should be beating him, Nick. 0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.760 But like web traffic analytics Joe Ken to Google trends 0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.120 and then let's see if I can find it right 0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.120 right here at the top. Yeah, right here at the top. 0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.720 Was scrolling through the tabs on the iPhone. Safari is 0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:15.560 a a little peorn tab, right yeah. So this this 0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.600 turned into a little, a little mini thing with people 0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.320 thinking that they secretly stumbled across the Knick's porn porn 0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.399 watching habits, of which it would be no surprise that 0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.760 he'd be watching transfenboy porn, especially again considering that he 0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:32.480 operated a catboy discord channel on his server. But he 0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.600 has staunchly denied this, as you know, as a based 0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:40.920 Catholic in cell obviously, so both Tucker and Nick believe 0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.199 that porn is a big factor affecting the decline of 0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.880 actual sex and marriage among gen Z. And it's not 0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.200 just a male problem. Nick argues that it has become 0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:56.040 a quote unquote so destigmatized for women to participate in 0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:01.000 porn as well, of which he's mostly referring to only fans. 0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.120 Here's a clip of them discuss it only fans. 0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:10.400 And it is completely casual, you know, because you could 0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.360 say that maybe ten years ago, even at the heyday 0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.919 of internet porn, to be in porn, you got to 0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.520 be a porn star, Like that's your life and that's 0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.200 your career, and that's who you are. And it's very 0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:24.640 shameful with only fans. It's like it's like having a TikTok. 0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:29.359 It's like here's my link tree, here's my Instagram account, 0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.600 here's my Facebook out, here's my YouTube, and here's. 0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:35.040 My only fans. Why would any of this be legal? 0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:41.080 I think that, well, there's, like you indicated, maybe there's 0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.840 an intelligence benefit to that. Yeah, maybe there's a political 0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.119 benefit to that. I think that, well, why wouldn't you 0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.359 arrest the people who run something like that? They should 0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.840 be if you had a Christian government, or how about 0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.399 government and cares about its people. I mean, is Iron 0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.959 a bigger threat or is only fans? A Ron's not 0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.720 turning my daughters to prostitution, I'm aware. 0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:05.480 Of right, Oh my god, is Iron a bigger threat 0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:07.200 or is only fans? 0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:07.720 Yes? 0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:12.040 Yes, that's the real geopolitical question the wisest minds. 0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.840 No, what a what a beautiful mind that is? 0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:15.320 Yeah? 0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.880 Yeah, like even be able to think of the sentence. 0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.280 Is Iran a bigger threat than only fans? 0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:20.720 Yeah? 0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.760 Like I could never even get myself to a point 0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.080 where where I conjured that thought in my own head. 0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:33.160 We have to ban pornography because it's the Iran of masturbation. 0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.480 It's frankly beautiful in order to get their minds so 0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:41.000 so degraded to even have this thought, it's so alien, 0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.800 man like. Later, Tucker pushes kind of on this point 0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.240 about the need to arrest people who run only fans, 0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.200 while Nick kind of quietly remarks that it's it's really 0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.240 the women or the quote unquote body assets who should 0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.280 be arrested. But Tucker Tucker is pretty firm on no, 0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.080 it's really like the facilitators, people hosting the website or 0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.800 enabling this. But you know, Nick and Nick would be 0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.600 totally fine if women on the platform also get arrested. 0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:14.119 Man Ah. Again, the insistence that the primary objection or 0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.359 like a causal a causal aspect of why why is 0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:23.200 this allowed? It's for like intelligence gathering services is simply beautiful? 0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.280 Do you know what else is beautiful? Robert? 0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:30.520 The sponsors of this podcast, they are for putting up 0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:30.720 with this. 0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:42.800 Yeah, all right, we're back. 0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.359 Before this final segment, we will we will transcend the 0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.560 discussion of porn and and just talk more about some 0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:55.600 of Nick's opinions on on like women, oh good, and 0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.800 other factors beyond porn. For why you know, marriage is 0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:03.840 a happening? Why aren't people getting married as much anymore? 0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.800 You know, of which both Tucker and Nick think porn 0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:11.919 is a factor. But there's other factors contributing to this crisis, 0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.720 which Nick and Tucker will will elucidate. Let's hear him out. 0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:18.119 So what are the. 0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.600 Other factors that prevent I'm sorry I called you gay, 0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.399 by the way, but I'm always I think I'm just 0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.840 too old or something. I'm like, what, why is anyone married? 0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.000 You tell me why isn't Why an't people married? 0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:35.240 Well, I mean, honestly, it's the women, all right, oh, okay, 0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:36.760 we solve that problem. 0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.560 Uh, yeah, that's it. I think that does it for us, 0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.600 that it could happen here. They got to the bottom 0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.199 of that pretty quickly. Sorry I called you gay, by 0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:48.200 the way, So no. Now it's time for the wise 0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.439 in selsation, Nick Fuentes to bestow his wisdom pertaining to 0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.040 relationships and marriage, and in his eyes, the main problem 0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.040 seems to be that not just women, but specifically that 0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:04.040 women are too liberal. Yeah, really breaking new ground there. 0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.840 Yeah, sure, that's uh, that's it. That's the problem because 0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.160 then they don't like all of the Nick flintest fans. 0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:15.160 The men are extremely conservative increasingly, the women are extremely liberal. 0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:16.960