Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome back to another episode of The Mark
Speaker 1: Moss Show, where we talk about, of course, the decentralized Revolution,
Speaker 1: talking about the way the world is changing, of course
Speaker 1: each and every week, looking at it through the lens
Speaker 1: of politics, finance, and technology. We have to look at
Speaker 1: those three things in unison together in order to get
Speaker 1: context of what's going on. So we can understand, of course,
Speaker 1: how we got here, more importantly, what's going on, and
Speaker 1: even more importantly what is going to happen. And so
Speaker 1: you know, if you tune in each and every week,
Speaker 1: I try to bring to you some some interesting perspectives,
Speaker 1: some new education, some ways to look at the world differently,
Speaker 1: some of the latest breaking news, and of course some
Speaker 1: new and insightful and interesting guests. You have to listen
Speaker 1: to me all the time. And I have a big
Speaker 1: topic that I want to talk about today that happens
Speaker 1: again and again through history. It happens all the time
Speaker 1: through history. As a matter of fact, what do they say,
Speaker 1: you know, those who don't know history are bound to
Speaker 1: repeat it. History doesn't rhyme and repeat something. You've heard
Speaker 1: those things before. And this is a topic that happens
Speaker 1: again and again, and unfortunately when we see this happening
Speaker 1: in a society, it tells us what's going on in
Speaker 1: that society, tells us what's going to happen next in
Speaker 1: a society, and unfortunately, it's not super good. And we
Speaker 1: are seeing these signs, these warning signs. We are seeing
Speaker 1: this just flashing red everywhere we look. It couldn't be
Speaker 1: more obvious right now. It's a very very dangerous situation.
Speaker 1: It's one that you and I should be taking very seriously.
Speaker 1: We should be pay attention to. We should be doing
Speaker 1: everything in our power to bring attention to this and
Speaker 1: to push back on this because, as I said, this,
Speaker 1: when we see this in a society, it is a bad,
Speaker 1: bad sign, and again it leads to bad things. Now,
Speaker 1: hopefully we can we can overturn this. Do you know
Speaker 1: that I am not a Duman gloomer. Of course I
Speaker 1: talk about the problems, but I believe that problems lead
Speaker 1: to solutions. And so we're gonna talk about the problem,
Speaker 1: We're gonna talk about what we can do about it,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna talk about the opportunities, the solutions and
Speaker 1: opportunities that could be present from So it's not a
Speaker 1: due gloom, but it is something you need to know about,
Speaker 1: and it's something that's front and center, and it's a
Speaker 1: front and center for the world, as front and center
Speaker 1: for the United States. And this week we have seen
Speaker 1: a full court press, a frontal assault on this. What
Speaker 1: am I talking about talking about the war of information?
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the war against truth, all right, this
Speaker 1: is a big deal. You might have heard of disinformation
Speaker 1: or malinformation. You might have heard of some of those things,
Speaker 1: and that's what I'm talking about now. Of course I
Speaker 1: talk about this quite often, so unless you're been sleeping
Speaker 1: under a rock or something like that, of course you've
Speaker 1: been hearing me talk about this as well. But this
Speaker 1: is a big deal. As a matter of fact. It's
Speaker 1: not just a big deal for me. It's not just
Speaker 1: a big deal for history or societies. It's a big
Speaker 1: deal for the rest of the people in the world,
Speaker 1: most most importantly those that are trying to hang on
Speaker 1: to control over the world. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: the World Economic Forum, the WEFT, of course, they had
Speaker 1: their big meeting. I talked about it in January and Davos,
Speaker 1: where you know, the self elected elites, the people who
Speaker 1: have self elected themselves to run the world, and I
Speaker 1: say self elected, because of course we didn't vote them
Speaker 1: and nobody, none of us had any say in this.
Speaker 1: We didn't vote for these people, but they were in Davos,
Speaker 1: and again I covered it back in January. But the
Speaker 1: main topic that they were talking about there was the
Speaker 1: danger of disinformation, the danger of disinformation. A matter of fact,
Speaker 1: one of the I talked about it, former CNN host
Speaker 1: Brian Stelter, did a panel with a few people and
Speaker 1: it was dubbed the danger of Disinformation and hate speech
Speaker 1: laws coming to the US. All right, the panel was
Speaker 1: out of the Clear and Present Danger of Disinformation. Now
Speaker 1: I have to say that Brian Stelter is the former
Speaker 1: host of CNN former because he lost his job. He
Speaker 1: lost his job because nobody wanted to watch him, and
Speaker 1: nobody wanted to watch him because as he constantly distorted
Speaker 1: and bent the truth constantly, nobody would watch him anymore.
Speaker 1: He lost all credibility and so he lost a job.
Speaker 1: So the irony of him hosting a panel based on
Speaker 1: this title the clear and Present Danger of disinformation when
Speaker 1: he is one of the main peddlers the CNN, one
Speaker 1: of the main peddlers of this disinformation, one of the
Speaker 1: shocking things that came out of this, though, was European
Speaker 1: Commissioner Vice President Vera Jirova said, quote illegal hate speech,
Speaker 1: which you will have soon also in the US. I
Speaker 1: think that we have a strong reason why we have
Speaker 1: this in the criminal law. So I hate to break
Speaker 1: something to you. I'm just going to be honest with
Speaker 1: you for a second. Some people are mean. Some people
Speaker 1: are mean. Some people say mean things. They're gonna say
Speaker 1: mean things all the time. They're gonna say you're mean,
Speaker 1: You're gonna rude there, They're gonna say that you're fat,
Speaker 1: you're ugly, you're dumb, you're stupid, you're white, you're black,
Speaker 1: you're whatever. Some people are just mean. Where's the line
Speaker 1: between mean and hate? It's very blurry line, it's very
Speaker 1: grade line. So if I say, oh, you're black or
Speaker 1: you're a woman, is that hateful? Or am I just mean?
Speaker 1: If I say you're fat or uglier, stupid? Is that okay? Now?
Speaker 1: I'm not okay with people being mean. I believe in
Speaker 1: the teachings of Jesus. He said the number one commandment
Speaker 1: is to love others, love your neighbor more than yourself.
Speaker 1: That's what I try to follow. I wish the whole
Speaker 1: world would follow that. I am not for hate, I'm
Speaker 1: for love. I'm for the opposite. But we have to
Speaker 1: understand that some people are just mean. Little kids in
Speaker 1: preschool are mean. Some adults never grow up and they're
Speaker 1: also mean and they say mean things. And so where's
Speaker 1: that line between being mean and being hurtful and being hateful?
Speaker 1: And when does it become illegal? It's illegal to be mean.
Speaker 1: So if I call you fat, ugly, stupid, that's okay.
Speaker 1: But if I call you black, then that might be hate.
Speaker 1: I don't know. My daughter hates vanilla ice cream, So
Speaker 1: if I talk about that, is that hateful? And there
Speaker 1: in lies the problem? Who defines this anyway? So this
Speaker 1: is the big problem, right, this is the big conversation
Speaker 1: the world. Lou Coming Forum says, it's the biggest problem.
Speaker 1: We have the clear and present danger of disinformation. The
Speaker 1: Davos Elite warned us that it's an existential threat. It's
Speaker 1: an existential threat, like this is the biggest thing. Now.
Speaker 1: The Washington Post, which was of course bought by Jeff
Speaker 1: Bezos so he can run disinformation and misinformation there. Their
Speaker 1: slogan is democracy dies in darkness. It should be that
Speaker 1: truth dies in darkness, right, truth, so I'll set you free.
Speaker 1: The truth is what sets us free. The truth dies
Speaker 1: in darkness when there's no transparency. Would we're not able
Speaker 1: to discuss ideas, where we're not able to argue back
Speaker 1: and forth to sharpen our own ideas against each other,
Speaker 1: That's when the truth dies. That's when democracy dies. Apparently,
Speaker 1: I don't know what the definition of democracy anymore, because
Speaker 1: our leadership in the United States and the world consistently
Speaker 1: constantly tells us that by having transparency and by showing
Speaker 1: the truth, by showing two sides of a conversation or
Speaker 1: an argument, supposedly, that is how democracy dies. Apparently, So
Speaker 1: I don't know what the definition of democracy is anymore.
Speaker 1: I don't even know anymore. I mean, because I thought
Speaker 1: democracy was the will of the people. In order for
Speaker 1: the people to have their will, then they should have
Speaker 1: the information they need to make a decision, and then
Speaker 1: should be allowed to voice that. But if you take
Speaker 1: away there to have any information or to voice their
Speaker 1: information or share it or discuss it, then that is
Speaker 1: not the will of the people. They're not It's not
Speaker 1: the consent of the people, and the people do not.
Speaker 1: They don't. They don't have it. So I don't know
Speaker 1: what they mean by democracy anymore, if if that's what
Speaker 1: they mean. But let's dig into this, all right. So
Speaker 1: there's a couple a couple of things that were going
Speaker 1: around this week. This is a this is an issue
Speaker 1: that is not ending now just for some historical context,
Speaker 1: because you know how much I love my historical context.
Speaker 1: This is nothing new, all right, This is nothing new.
Speaker 1: Every government has always tried to manage the flow of information.
Speaker 1: Of course, they tried to manage the full of informations
Speaker 1: they can hold onto power. And this happens in every
Speaker 1: country under strict authorityan regimes like Hitler's Germany, Mao's Revolution.
Speaker 1: If you said the wrong thing, you thought the wrong thing,
Speaker 1: they would just kill you. But it happened in the
Speaker 1: United States as well. The bombing Cambodia in nineteen sixty nine.
Speaker 1: That was all private. Uh, you know, the Watergate scandal,
Speaker 1: that was all private. We can go on and on
Speaker 1: and on, we can go back through history, but let's
Speaker 1: talk about more present times because there's some big, big
Speaker 1: things that are happening right now that I want to discuss.
Speaker 1: But if you're just tuning and you're listening to the
Speaker 1: Markmas Show. We talk about the decentralized Revolution, how the
Speaker 1: world is breaking apart. We're talking about a problem of
Speaker 1: disinformation today. Apparently it's the biggest problem that we have.
Speaker 1: Of course, decentralized technology solves that problem for us. And
Speaker 1: we're gonna talk about problems and solutions in a little bit.
Speaker 1: I got a whole lot to cover when I got
Speaker 1: to take a quick break. Don't go away, I'll come
Speaker 1: right back, all right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Markma Show. We're talking about, of
Speaker 1: course every week, the decentralized Revolution, how the world is
Speaker 1: changing today. We're talking about disinformation, misinformation, malinformation, whatever you
Speaker 1: want to call it. Apparently, according to the World Document Forum,
Speaker 1: it's the greatest threat to the world. According to these
Speaker 1: hyperbolic leaders in the United States, it's the greatest threat
Speaker 1: to our democracy. If we have open discussion and democracy dies.
Speaker 1: So again, I was saying before the break, I don't
Speaker 1: know what democracy it means in their minds. It's certainly
Speaker 1: not the classical definition of democracy, certainly not that. But
Speaker 1: you know, there's lots of things that just continue to
Speaker 1: keep coming up over and over and over. I saw
Speaker 1: this article this week and it talked about how the
Speaker 1: United States Special Forces want to use deep fakes for psyops.
Speaker 1: So after you know, the US government has spent years
Speaker 1: warning us about deep fakes. If you don't know deep
Speaker 1: fakes are, it's basically where they take your face and
Speaker 1: your voice and they use like AI to make it
Speaker 1: look like it's a video of you saying something, but
Speaker 1: it's not really you. So they could get you know,
Speaker 1: President Biden, or Joe Rogan or even me, and they
Speaker 1: could make a deep fake of it, and they could
Speaker 1: make it look like I was saying something that I
Speaker 1: would in And so while the US government spent years
Speaker 1: warning us that it could quote destabilize democratic societies, now
Speaker 1: it comes out that the US wants to actually use it.
Speaker 1: Of course, they do what government doesn't. Governments have always
Speaker 1: been engaged in propaganda since day one. I mean World
Speaker 1: War one, World War two, they dropped flyers out of airplanes.
Speaker 1: They were dropping flyers out of planes. That was the
Speaker 1: easiest way to get them, get them to the people.
Speaker 1: And so at the time when they're warning is that
Speaker 1: this could happen, they're also trying to figure out how
Speaker 1: they can use it. Of course they are. Now on
Speaker 1: top of that, we have, you know, very very rich
Speaker 1: and powerful leaders who are trying their best to sense
Speaker 1: of the truth. As a matter of fact, everybody's a
Speaker 1: favorite villain. Well Knocklaus Schwab, the older villain. I'm talking
Speaker 1: about George Soros. You know, he's uses his billions and
Speaker 1: billions of dollars to influence the world. He's doing what
Speaker 1: I am encouraging you to do, which is build the
Speaker 1: world that you want. And I know that George Soros
Speaker 1: and Bill Gates are building the world they want with
Speaker 1: their billions of dollars. But are you Are you building
Speaker 1: the world that you want? We'll come back to that
Speaker 1: in a little bit. But we saw that a state
Speaker 1: department backed group is severance connections with a disinformation Index
Speaker 1: group backed by the progressive megadonner George Soros, following reports
Speaker 1: about the group's efforts to muzzle conservative media outlets by
Speaker 1: blacklisting them. So George Soros and this group is putting
Speaker 1: all this information, they put together what's called a disinformation index,
Speaker 1: specifically to blacklist the opposing voice. The National Endowment for Democracy,
Speaker 1: a private foundation created by Congress, whose funding is part
Speaker 1: of the State Department budget, said it will no longer
Speaker 1: provide grants to the Global Disinformation Index. So a government
Speaker 1: organization was giving money to George Soros's group, the Global
Speaker 1: Disinformation Index, to silence the other side of the aisle.
Speaker 1: That's what's happening. So, look, if your ideas are better,
Speaker 1: they'll win in the open and honest discussion of public right.
Speaker 1: So you don't have to coerce people to take action
Speaker 1: on things that are good for them. If they're good,
Speaker 1: they're gonna want them. If the ideas are good, they're
Speaker 1: gonna want them. You don't have to force them into that.
Speaker 1: And it's gotten so bad that most people can see this.
Speaker 1: I guess if you're listening to this, you can see this.
Speaker 1: I saw this week obviously. Yeah, I've talked about extensively.
Speaker 1: So if you've been tuning in at all, if you've
Speaker 1: heard me talk about how you know Elon Musk bought
Speaker 1: Twitter and how he thinks it's the most important thing
Speaker 1: that we have, this open dialogue. It's the town, the
Speaker 1: public square as he calls it. You know, he's been
Speaker 1: very well. It appears let's say it appears that he
Speaker 1: is really trying to bring transparency back. So we you know,
Speaker 1: had these Twitter files where he opened up the documents
Speaker 1: and showed reporters you know how the government was coercing
Speaker 1: people in Twitter to censor people and stuff like that,
Speaker 1: which that's a really big deal. Now it looks like
Speaker 1: the government's coming after him. How dare he have transparency?
Speaker 1: See when you have to hide something, that means you
Speaker 1: have something to hide, that's the disinformation. The truth doesn't
Speaker 1: need to be hidden. The truth should be public for everyone. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Elon Musk hints, and this is great, that he should
Speaker 1: slap CNN with a special warning label over the network's
Speaker 1: pandemic coverage. He suggested on Monday that he could slap
Speaker 1: SNN with a warning label after a new report this
Speaker 1: week alleged that the company stopped reporters from looking into
Speaker 1: whether the pandemic originated in a Chinese lab in wuan See.
Speaker 1: I can say that now a year ago, I would
Speaker 1: have had all my channels deleted. I'd been deleted off
Speaker 1: of YouTube, I'd been deleted off a Twitter. I would
Speaker 1: have been d platformed if I would have said that.
Speaker 1: But now apparently it's okay to say now, apparently because
Speaker 1: the US Energy Department, you know, because all these government
Speaker 1: organizations have can now come out and said that. The
Speaker 1: Department of Energy now came out and said it. The
Speaker 1: FBI is now coming out and say it's supposedly now,
Speaker 1: I guess we're allowed to say it now. But CNN
Speaker 1: actively stopped, actively blocked reporters from doing their job into
Speaker 1: looking into that. The Wall Street Journal reported last week
Speaker 1: that the Department of Energy now assesses that the pandemic
Speaker 1: originated from a lab leak, an assessment that FBI Director
Speaker 1: Christopher Ray said that the bureau agrees with. Musk responded
Speaker 1: to Twitter user who asked, Musk, when you're going to
Speaker 1: label CNN is a state and filled media, and he said,
Speaker 1: good point. If an organization portrays itself as balanced but
Speaker 1: is not, it should be labeled to inform the public
Speaker 1: who's the perpetrator of disinformation misinformation. Now, there's a couple
Speaker 1: of big topics that I want to dig into, specifically,
Speaker 1: one that has blown well, there's a couple that have
Speaker 1: been blown wide open this week. Actually two really really
Speaker 1: really big ones. I mean these are like ground shaking,
Speaker 1: earth shattering, and I'm gonna have to warn you up front.
Speaker 1: It might have you ever heard a cognitive distance? What
Speaker 1: that means is that I might tell you something that
Speaker 1: you don't want to believe, because if you believe it
Speaker 1: to be true, then all the other things that you
Speaker 1: hold to be true have to be questioned. And so
Speaker 1: a lot of times people want to continue live believing
Speaker 1: a lie because they don't want to accept that because
Speaker 1: they know if I believe that lie, then everything I
Speaker 1: know is false. And we got a couple of big
Speaker 1: ones here. The first one is this whole January sixth thing. Holly, Molly,
Speaker 1: this blow wide open? And how did it blow I open? Well,
Speaker 1: it blew wide open with transparency. You see. It turns
Speaker 1: out when you stop a lying and censoring and hiding
Speaker 1: and the truth comes out, turns out it blows things
Speaker 1: wide open. Now we can just say right now, there's
Speaker 1: an FBI whistle blower that came out this week claiming
Speaker 1: that the BI agency forced him to juice up the
Speaker 1: domestic terrorism numbers. According to the FBI. You know, extremist
Speaker 1: white supremacists are the greatest threat to this country right now.
Speaker 1: Apparently the greatest threat not the nuclear war that could
Speaker 1: potentially happened in Ukraine. Not the five million illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: that have come across the border. Not the non Antifa
Speaker 1: that burned down cities through twenty twenty, Not the groups
Speaker 1: that are firebombing and spray painting and graffiti all the
Speaker 1: planned parented pro life businesses. Not those. Apparently it's domestic
Speaker 1: terrorism from white extremists. But according to a whistleblower, the
Speaker 1: FBI is basically forcing them to juice those numbers up
Speaker 1: in order to get the narrative that they want. Of
Speaker 1: course they are. But let's dig into some facts. All right,
Speaker 1: Well is the whistleblower. I mean, we can kind of
Speaker 1: believe take his word for but let's dig into some
Speaker 1: more facts that we know. If you're just tuning in
Speaker 1: and you listen to the Mark Moa show, we're talking
Speaker 1: about disinformation and misinformation and what this means for us
Speaker 1: and where we're going. I got a whole lot more
Speaker 1: to cover when I come back. I'm gonna have to
Speaker 1: talk really fast. You don't want to miss it, so
Speaker 1: don't go away. We're back, all right, Welcome back. If
Speaker 1: you just tune in, you're listening to the Markmas show,
Speaker 1: we're talking about of course, each and every week the
Speaker 1: decentralized revolution, how the world is breaking apart. Part of
Speaker 1: the way the world is breaking apart, of course, is
Speaker 1: always about technology. It's always technology that causes the decentralization.
Speaker 1: Centralization of content gets us all on the same page.
Speaker 1: When we can have different thought, we become decentralized. Goes
Speaker 1: back to the Protestant Reformation in the fifteen hundreds. There
Speaker 1: was a new piece of technology that came out about
Speaker 1: seventy years before that. It was a brand new piece
Speaker 1: of technology. It was called the printing press. And the
Speaker 1: printing press allowed for mass production of Bibles at first
Speaker 1: and then other books, and that information allowed people to
Speaker 1: receive information directly of having to be told by some
Speaker 1: central administrator what the truth is. The Internet has been
Speaker 1: that for us. CNN tries to control the narrative there.
Speaker 1: You know, before the Internet, we had you know whatever,
Speaker 1: three newspapers and three news stations and that was it,
Speaker 1: and they controlled the narrative. But with the Internet, people
Speaker 1: like me can get out there and say other things
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan, etc. And you can now hear other things.
Speaker 1: Now to me, that's a good thing because, as I
Speaker 1: say all the time, the truth is found through open
Speaker 1: and honest dialogue. I see it all the time. Like
Speaker 1: I'll see someone post something on Twitter. I'm like, oh, man,
Speaker 1: that's good. I didn't think about that. Wow, that's crazy,
Speaker 1: that's whatever, right, And then I'll start reading the comments
Speaker 1: and then I'm like, oh, well that's actually wrong. Oh
Speaker 1: this guy disproved that. Oh that's why that's wrong. And
Speaker 1: in the comments in that conversation, people collectively bring that
Speaker 1: information together and can instantly disprove that. You know, I
Speaker 1: get forward to a ton of stuff. By the way,
Speaker 1: please continue to forward me stuff. If you see in information,
Speaker 1: if you see stories, if you see topics you'd like
Speaker 1: me to cover that you'd like to bring to my
Speaker 1: attention so I can cover them on my shows. Please
Speaker 1: send them to me. Just reach out on social media
Speaker 1: at one Mark Moss. Just at number one Mark Moss
Speaker 1: and just DM me if you have any that. But
Speaker 1: I get foward of these stories all the time. I
Speaker 1: love it. Please do that. But I don't instantly want
Speaker 1: to just run with those stories. I need to go
Speaker 1: fact check them. So then I'll go do my research
Speaker 1: and then I'll look at all both sides of the story.
Speaker 1: I'll see what's out there, and so that is how
Speaker 1: the truth is found out. But as you know, the
Speaker 1: January six trials that the Democrats were holding, and not
Speaker 1: to make this a left or right thing, but it
Speaker 1: was obviously very controlled by the Democrats. And you know,
Speaker 1: supposedly it was the worst attack, you know, since the
Speaker 1: Civil War. Never mind you know, the trade tower bombing
Speaker 1: that killed thousands of Americans, never mind that, never mind
Speaker 1: you know, Pearl Harbor, never mind that. Apparently this was
Speaker 1: the greatest attack ever on America. That's what they tell us.
Speaker 1: And of course, you know, they don't show us any
Speaker 1: of the information. You know, they had. There's about, well
Speaker 1: as we know now, about forty thousand hours of security
Speaker 1: footage that they wouldn't release. They wouldn't release any of
Speaker 1: the reports. And so how are we supposed to believe
Speaker 1: any of this when they politicize it and they don't
Speaker 1: give us any information. Just shut up and just take
Speaker 1: our word for it is what they tell us. But
Speaker 1: that just doesn't work, all right, that doesn't work. You know.
Speaker 1: I use this analogy all the time. If I was
Speaker 1: lying in bed late at night and texting on my
Speaker 1: phone and my wife asked me, hey, Mark, you who
Speaker 1: you texted in bed this late at night, and I
Speaker 1: was like nobody, and I like hid my phone, and
Speaker 1: I tried, and I got mad at her and tried
Speaker 1: to switch the subject. She would start to be suspicious
Speaker 1: of me, right because I hid the truth. I didn't
Speaker 1: I didn't have transparency. I wasn't open with her, and
Speaker 1: that leads to wild speculation. The way that you stop
Speaker 1: wild speculation, it is by being open, having transparency. All
Speaker 1: I have to do is just show my wife the
Speaker 1: phone and go look at my mom and she go,
Speaker 1: what's you want? Oh, she wants to have a birthday party. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's easy. It's easy. All I do is just tell
Speaker 1: the truth. The only reason you don't tell the truth
Speaker 1: is if you have something to hide. That's hit. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna come on, this is simple. You learn this stuff
Speaker 1: when youre an elementary school. Now, what happened this week
Speaker 1: is that the leadership in Washington changed from a Democratic
Speaker 1: control to a Republican and Speaker McCarthy. Now Speaker McCarthy
Speaker 1: has taken over, and he gave the footage this is
Speaker 1: just video footage. He gave the video footage of the
Speaker 1: Capitol to Tucker Carlson, and now he's offering to give
Speaker 1: it to all anyone else who wants it. He just
Speaker 1: gave him the footage forty thousand hours of all the
Speaker 1: security cameras. And what we can see with our own
Speaker 1: eyes is what happened. We don't have to have somebody
Speaker 1: else tell us what happened. We see it for ourselves.
Speaker 1: What we can see, and you've probably seen by now
Speaker 1: over and over and over, is that crazy guy, the
Speaker 1: qn On shaman, the guy that had like the buffalo
Speaker 1: hap with like his painted face and et cetera. The
Speaker 1: one who was the leader of this insurrection, this violent insurrection,
Speaker 1: the worst insurrection in all of history since the Civil War.
Speaker 1: Apparently he was literally being led, being escorted through the
Speaker 1: Capitol by the Capitol police or security. I'm not exactly
Speaker 1: sure they're title. I want to make sure I'm correct.
Speaker 1: I believe it's Capitol police escorting him, I mean, like
Speaker 1: leading him. There was two offers for a lot of
Speaker 1: the video clips. There's two officers him in the middle,
Speaker 1: walking through the hallways, and the lead officer is checking
Speaker 1: the door. Oh no, this door's locked. Let's go to
Speaker 1: another one. Oh no, this door's locked. Okay, let's go
Speaker 1: back over here. And then at one point they walked
Speaker 1: through being escorted two officers with him in the middle,
Speaker 1: walked through a group of like six or eight other
Speaker 1: officers just standing there, just walked right through them. And
Speaker 1: then the officer led him into the capitol area, where
Speaker 1: the eventual famous picture of him sitting at the speaker's
Speaker 1: desk was. I saw this with my own eyes, and
Speaker 1: you might have seen this with your own eyes by now,
Speaker 1: all right, he was being led. He walked through like
Speaker 1: six or eight or nine officers. He was not armed.
Speaker 1: They could have grabbed him, they could have stopped him,
Speaker 1: but no, this officer led him, checking doors and guided
Speaker 1: him to the room he was supposed to be in.
Speaker 1: Now it's the same officer who went on an HBO
Speaker 1: special talking about the dangerous insurrection and how his life
Speaker 1: was threatened. The same officer that's in these videos. Now,
Speaker 1: of course, people don't like this. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: Now apparently everyone's coming out. Well, by the way, this guy,
Speaker 1: the shirtless you know, bullhead guy was sentenced to forty
Speaker 1: one months in a federal prison. Forty one months but
Speaker 1: for what for being escorted and led? I mean you
Speaker 1: can see in the video they're actively checking for lockdoors,
Speaker 1: and they guided him to the room that he was
Speaker 1: trying to go into. There was no attempt to stop him.
Speaker 1: He was not armed. One officer could have grabbed him.
Speaker 1: Certainly the nine could have grabbed him. Now, apparently this
Speaker 1: is a big problem. Apparently people don't like this. Now,
Speaker 1: apparently this is what will destroy our democracy. They tell us,
Speaker 1: how dare Tucker Carlson put this conference this information out there?
Speaker 1: Other other information? There was a Capital cop, Brian sick Nick,
Speaker 1: and supposedly, you know, they told us that he was
Speaker 1: one of the victims of January six, He was murdered
Speaker 1: by President Donald Trump's supporters Right and Capital, even though
Speaker 1: an autopsy report showed that he died of a stroke
Speaker 1: the following day. So the autopsy report told us that
Speaker 1: that's not what happened. But that's what they told us happened.
Speaker 1: But surprise, surprise, Now we have video footage. Imagine that.
Speaker 1: And so now there's video footage that says he was
Speaker 1: slain on that day. But as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: we have video footage shows him walking through the building
Speaker 1: after he was supposedly murdered by the mob. Outside. We
Speaker 1: have the video footage, all right. Now they're trying to
Speaker 1: tell us that this is you know, this is this
Speaker 1: is this is a threat to the democracy, This is
Speaker 1: going to destroy the democracy. Schumer. You know, Chuck Schumer
Speaker 1: goes on and tells demands. Fox shuts Tucker Carlson down.
Speaker 1: How dare he share this information? Tucker Carlson invited Senate
Speaker 1: a majority leader Chuck Schumer to come on and talk
Speaker 1: about it. He said, hey, come on, come and talk.
Speaker 1: Let's let's let's talk about this footage. Now, what do
Speaker 1: you think happened? Do you think Chuck Schumer was willing
Speaker 1: to go discuss the truth? Remember, the truth is found
Speaker 1: through open, honest discussion. If Schumer actually has some facts,
Speaker 1: actually has some points, shouldn't he want to go bring
Speaker 1: them on Tucker Carlson's show to challenge this misinformation? Of
Speaker 1: course not. Of course he denied the chance to go
Speaker 1: set the record straight, because if you don't have the truth,
Speaker 1: how are you going to go How are you going
Speaker 1: to go lie against what people can see with their
Speaker 1: own eyes? Obviously you can't, you obviously can't. And this
Speaker 1: is only the beginning. This footage is coming out strong
Speaker 1: and heavy. If you're just trying to listen to the
Speaker 1: Markmas Show, we're talking about misinformation, disinformation and where this
Speaker 1: leads us as a society. I got a whole lot
Speaker 1: more to cover. I'm just getting started. Don't go away,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be right back, all right, welcome back. If
Speaker 1: you just tune in you're listening to the Markmas Show,
Speaker 1: we're talking about the misinformation and disinformation and malin formation
Speaker 1: and all those disses and misses and mouths and whatever
Speaker 1: they are. According to your leaders, you're too stupid to
Speaker 1: know what you're seeing or reading, and so they believe
Speaker 1: that they need to just you know, shut everybody down
Speaker 1: that doesn't say their desired opinion. That's basically what it is.
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson got access to forty thousand hours of capital footage,
Speaker 1: like the actual video footage, like you know, like there's
Speaker 1: like my side of the story, and then there's like,
Speaker 1: you know, your side of the story, and then they
Speaker 1: say there's like the truth in there somewhere. You know.
Speaker 1: Cops now are supposed to wear like body cams so
Speaker 1: we can see the footage because the camera actually captures
Speaker 1: what really happened. So then like both people can tell
Speaker 1: their story, but we could watch the camera and then
Speaker 1: we could make our own conclusion. And we got the footage. Okay,
Speaker 1: we got forty thousand hours of footage. You can see
Speaker 1: it with your own eyes. You don't need Chuck Schumer
Speaker 1: to tell you what to believe or Nancy Pelosi that
Speaker 1: you don't need them. We can see it for ourselves,
Speaker 1: and we can see that everything they told us is
Speaker 1: a lie. And of course they have no other choice
Speaker 1: but to try to shut down the truth. So now
Speaker 1: they're demanding that Fox News, you know, get to get
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson off the air. They're going out on full
Speaker 1: scale alert, you know, trying to shut down anything Tucker says,
Speaker 1: trying to discredit what he's saying. But of course, when
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson invited Chuck Schumer on to Fox to come and,
Speaker 1: you know, speak his mind, tell him what he got wrong,
Speaker 1: explained to the American people that what they saw wasn't right. Now,
Speaker 1: of course, if what we're seeing isn't right, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe it's taken out of context or something like that,
Speaker 1: they could show us the other evidence. But remember they've
Speaker 1: sat on that video footage for over a year. Remember
Speaker 1: that never once did they release of that. They had
Speaker 1: the footage for a year, they didn't want to release it.
Speaker 1: Now that we're seeing it, there tells, Oh, but what
Speaker 1: you see isn't real. Don't believe your own eyes. You're
Speaker 1: an idiot. Your eyes are playing tricks on you, and
Speaker 1: you don't believe it. Now they're more than they're more
Speaker 1: than welcome to release their own footage. They've had it
Speaker 1: for a year, but of course they won't, said Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer said in a press conference that Fox News and
Speaker 1: speaker McCarthy are willing, capable, and powerful accomplices aired one
Speaker 1: of the most shameful hours we have ever seen in history,
Speaker 1: in the entire history of cable television. Schumer said, Tucker
Speaker 1: Carlson is a propagandist publicly pretending to be a newsman.
Speaker 1: He continued, their liars. They're destroying America for some kind
Speaker 1: of monetary advantage. M Well, what I saw was he
Speaker 1: showed a video clip that allowed me to make up
Speaker 1: my own decision. What I saw. What I saw is
Speaker 1: video clips that were sat on for over a year
Speaker 1: and weren't allowed to be seen, And now that we're seeing,
Speaker 1: they're claiming that Tucker Carlson is the problem. And as
Speaker 1: I said, he would not come on, and he wouldn't
Speaker 1: come on and talk about it. They're trying to censor,
Speaker 1: They're trying to lie. Now we know this is lies.
Speaker 1: We know that officers Sydnick sick Nick wasn't murdered. We
Speaker 1: know that Ray Epps lied under oath, We know all
Speaker 1: of these things that happened. We know that the q
Speaker 1: N and Shaman was actually escorted. Wisconsin GOP Senator Ron
Speaker 1: Johnson says his staff saw footage of a large door
Speaker 1: left open that allowed more than three hundred protesters to
Speaker 1: enter the capitol. So this whole thing about this violent insurrection,
Speaker 1: according to the video footage, they were escorted in. According
Speaker 1: to the video footage, the door was left open and
Speaker 1: people just walked in. Ron Johnson says that the January
Speaker 1: sixth narrative will continue to morph as more security footage emerges. Remember,
Speaker 1: the Democrats constructed a narrative. They told us what happened,
Speaker 1: but they never once let us see any evidence. Now
Speaker 1: the evidence is out. Now we're gonna choose for ourselves. Now.
Speaker 1: Oh man, I spent a lot of time talking about that.
Speaker 1: What else happened this week the pandemic. Now this has
Speaker 1: been covered up. You knows has been covered up. Everyone
Speaker 1: knows has been covered up. We know we know it's
Speaker 1: been covered up because if I said one thing, I
Speaker 1: would just be deleted Again. Why are they deleting people
Speaker 1: because there's something too high? The truth doesn't need to
Speaker 1: be hidden. And now we saw this week the previous
Speaker 1: head of the CDC, not some conspiracy theorist, not some
Speaker 1: whacked out doctor or internet researcher. No, no, no, I'm
Speaker 1: talking about doctor Robert Redfield, the previous head of the CDC. Okay,
Speaker 1: he went before went before the government testimony testified on
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill, and he was asked about the benefits or
Speaker 1: the dangerous gain of function research that happened. He was
Speaker 1: asked if he could point to a single pandemic gain
Speaker 1: function research and if it had ever prevented anything. They
Speaker 1: asked him, you know what happened, where this came from, etc.
Speaker 1: And I don't really want to say exactly, because you know,
Speaker 1: I still don't want to get my accounts deleted and
Speaker 1: turned off, which, by the way, I'm afraid of YouTube
Speaker 1: censoring me. And if you want, you can always watch
Speaker 1: these on YouTube. They're on the Market Disruptors YouTube channel.
Speaker 1: You can check them out over there, but not some
Speaker 1: right wing crazy conspiracies. The head of the CDC basically
Speaker 1: came out and said it was doctor Fauci. The NIH
Speaker 1: and the state funded the lab and we know the
Speaker 1: Department of Energy and even the FBI says it was
Speaker 1: a lab leak. Now, the former head of the CDC
Speaker 1: said doctor Fauci is basically responsible for the greatest pandemic
Speaker 1: that happened in the entire world. That's what he said. Now,
Speaker 1: that's not the that's not the narrative that they're trying
Speaker 1: to have been trying to feed us for the last
Speaker 1: couple of years. We know that, we know that that
Speaker 1: the Fauci authored a paper medical paper to disprove this
Speaker 1: lab league theory. And apparently the group that put out
Speaker 1: the paper at first had said that it was from
Speaker 1: a lab leak, but then after Fauci went and talked
Speaker 1: to them, they mysteriously changed their opinion and said it
Speaker 1: wasn't from a lab league. And even more suspiciously is
Speaker 1: than about a week later, nine million dollars showed up
Speaker 1: in their accounts, so they completely one eightied and changed
Speaker 1: their opinion, and then nine million dollars just magically showed
Speaker 1: up in their account. Pretty interesting. So basically what we
Speaker 1: know now according to the Department of Energy, according to
Speaker 1: the FBI, according to the head of the CDC, the
Speaker 1: former head of the CDC, we know that everything we've
Speaker 1: been told about the pandemic was a lie. We know
Speaker 1: that the entire response was based on lies. An opinion.
Speaker 1: That's not misinformation, that's not malifiation. They gave us misinformation
Speaker 1: and malinformation. They are the ones that lied to us.
Speaker 1: The truth would have been found out. What about the war.
Speaker 1: There was an article that came out Seymour Hirsch, one
Speaker 1: of the He's not some blogger. The government's tried to
Speaker 1: paint him as some blogger. He is one of the
Speaker 1: oldest and most respected investigative journalist. You know people that
Speaker 1: journalists that would actually do research. He's a Pulitzer Prize winner,
Speaker 1: He's a fame journalist for articles that he's had. He
Speaker 1: came out and said that the US is the one
Speaker 1: that blew up the pipeline. Now, now, of course, the
Speaker 1: government's trying to run misinformation on that. They're saying that's
Speaker 1: all a hoax. They said it was friends of the Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Did it friends of the Ukraine? Now the Ukraine is
Speaker 1: trying to dis themselves. Wait a minute, Wait a minute,
Speaker 1: no, no no, no, no no, we didn't do this. There weren't
Speaker 1: friends of us. So we're supposed to believe that just
Speaker 1: you run of the mill terrorists used a sailboat and
Speaker 1: went to one of the most highly patrolled areas of
Speaker 1: water in the world, went thousand of mile down under
Speaker 1: the ocean, and we're able to blast through layers of concrete.
Speaker 1: There's like a couple of countries that have navies capable
Speaker 1: of doing that job, not some random person on a
Speaker 1: sailboat does that. But that's what they're telling us today. Misinformation, malinformation.
Speaker 1: That's what we've been fed on J six, that's what
Speaker 1: we've been fed on the war. That's what we've been
Speaker 1: fed on the pandemic. The truth sell shut is free,
Speaker 1: but the truth only says free if we're allowed to
Speaker 1: openly discuss it, if we're openly able to look at
Speaker 1: the information, if we're able to have transparency. And that's
Speaker 1: what's coming back. Decentralized protocols are bringing back the truth
Speaker 1: and transparency. It's going to change the world. Otherwise we're
Speaker 1: going to a very dark and dangerous place. If you're
Speaker 1: just tuning and you're listening to the Mark Moss Show
Speaker 1: talking about the decentralized Revolution, talking about the misinformation today,
Speaker 1: that's what I got. Thanks for listening.