WEBVTT - Maria Konnikova

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Welcome, Welcome, Welcome back to the Bomb Left podcast.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is the iconic sort of the best

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>seller of the Biggest Bluff. Thanks so much for having me,

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Bob So in this COVID nineteen era. Are you playing

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>any online poker? I am. I actually just got back

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>from New Jersey a few weeks ago because I'm in

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>New York, where online poker is illegal, but it's legal

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey. So my husband and I rented an

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>airbnb for two weeks so that I could play the

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>World Series online. Um, you have to be physically located

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey or about it to do that. So

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I spent two weeks in a lovely studio on the

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>Jersey shore playing poker. And how did you do in

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the World Series? Um? I'm I was down by but

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>just by a few thousand dollars, which to me is

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>winning because when you are buying in for tens of

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars, being just a few feels like a win. Okay,

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>so how much? Um, it's multiple events. There's an event

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>every single day. So the way that they did it normally,

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't happen right now. The World Series was supposed

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to be happening in Las Vegas. Everyone was going to

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>be there. It was all going to be live. My

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>book UM, which came out on June, was originally coming

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>out the week before the main event, so it was

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>all planned out perfectly. And obviously you can plan all

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you want, and then COVID happens and all of a sudden,

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no World Series of Poker, there's no live poker period,

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>no no poker tournaments, and so they scrambled and they

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>decided to do a semblance of it online, and the

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>way they did it was to do thirty one events,

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>one every single day of July UM and the buying's

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>range from four hundred dollars for the lowest UM to

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>around four thousand dollars for for the highest and you

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can re buy into most of the events. Then they moved.

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>As of August first, it's still going on, but now

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it's on an international platform g G Poker. So I

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>was planning to go to Canada, but the border is

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 1>closed because I wouldn't let us in either. UM. So unfortunately,

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not playing, but a lot of people who are

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>outside of the United States are, and they're the buyans

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>can actually be higher and they're doing a mini main

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>event for five thousand dollars, but I will not be

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>taking part because I'm not in Canada. Well, is it

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>higher just because it's Canadian dollars? No? No, no, no,

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this is all in US dollars. Okay, let's just go

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a little slower for the uninitiated. How does the World

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Series of Poker work? How do they come up with

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate Champion? So the World Series of Poker is

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>actually it's a series, so there are lots of events.

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So normally for about a month and a half, poker

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>players from all over the world come to Las Vegas

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and play a number of tournaments. And when people talk

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>about the World Series of Poker, they're usually just thinking

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>about the main event, which is the single most important one.

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a ten dollar buying and it determines the World champion.

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It determines who the World Champion of Poker is for

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that year. And so normally people just think, who don't

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>play poker, just think the World Series that one tournament,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but that's just the pinnacle. That's the last tournament of

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the series. And people can play what's called side events,

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but you can also win bracelets. Bracelets a bracelet is

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what you win when you win a World Series of

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Poker title. But if you win a bracelet in anything

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>other than the main event, you're just a bracelet winner.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>You're not the world champion. Okay, to play in the

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>main event, you have to qualify in one of these

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>other events. They're completely independent. As long as you've got

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>ten grand you can play. And have you played in

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the main event? I have. I've played in it multiple

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>times and done. Um the first year, this is the

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>opening scene of my book. I came down with a

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>migraine on the first day and spent the better part

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of the second half of the day throwing up on

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom floor of the Lovely Rio Hotel and Casino.

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I did not do well. I made Day two and

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>then probably busted. The next year, I cashed. I actually

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>came in the top I don't remember, but it was

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe top five hundred, top six hundred players, but out

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of tens of thousands, So I felt pretty good about myself.

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And do you like playing poker? I do? I mean

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I used to not. I didn't know anything about poker

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>um as of you know, if you and I were

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>having this conversation five years ago, Um, I wouldn't have

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>known what poker is. Really. The only exposure I had

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>had to poker was Rounders, UM, which I thought was

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>a great movie, and I thought Matt Damon did a

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>wonderful job, and I really loved Teddy KGB. And that was,

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>seriously the only poker I had ever seen. I didn't

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>know how many cars were in a deck. I had

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.679
<v Speaker 1>zero interest in the game whatsoever. I'm not a games player.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in a household that reads books. We

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't even have a TV when I was growing up,

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>so I just grew up with lots and lots of bookshelves,

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and for entertainment in the evenings, we read or my

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>parents read to us. And there wasn't even a deck

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of cards around, no board games, no chest, nothing like that.

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And so, like I said, five years ago, if you

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and I were talking, I would have laughed if you said,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>did you know that one day you're going to play

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>poker professionally? Um. I got into it as a book

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>project because I became fascinated by the notion of luck

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>and the role that luck plays in our lives. So

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I came to it from from the side, from a

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>very different angle but I did fall in love with

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the game and found that it taught me much more

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>about life than I thought possible, and I'm still learning.

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's such a beautiful game that really challenges

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you on a constant level. Um. And to me, the

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>best things in life are the ones that force you

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to grow, force you to become a better version of yourself,

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>constantly force you to think better. Are the things that

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>don't let you plateau and don't let you just kind

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of past through. And to me, one of those things

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>is poker. Okay, forgetting the number of what you learned psychologically, etcetera.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>How long did it take you to master the game?

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>To understand what the game was? I'm talking about on

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the most raw level. If you're sitting there with someone

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>who literally knows nothing but doesn't know their fifty two

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>cards in a deck, how long would it take them

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand the game? Well, it depends on what you mean.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>If you mean learn the rules, not long at all.

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Within a week, we can have you playing and knowing

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it's going on in terms of the rules. Um.

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>If you're talking about really understanding the game. Um. My

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>coach Eric Seidel is one of the best players in

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the world and has been playing since the eighties and

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>winning since the eighties. And if you ask him, he'd

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>say that he still doesn't understand it and he still

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hasn't mastered it. So you've got those two extremes. Okay,

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to the beginning, as you say, five

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>years ago, when you didn't even know how to play

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>at hand. What was the motivation for writing the book.

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I went through a period in my life where nothing

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>seemed to go right. I became sick, and no one

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>knew what was wrong. It was an autoimmune condition, but

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>ideopathic was the was the final diagnosis, which means we

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>really have no idea of unknown origin for being specific.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And I just became allergic to everything. My skin became

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>allergic to everything. I couldn't go outside oftentimes because I

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>was just erupt in hives whenever anything touched my body.

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean by a in hives, I mean face, neck, body, everything.

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>It was painful to put on clothes, and so I

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>had lots of time to think about things because I

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>was at home, not not able to do anything. On

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>massive doses of steroids. As people tried to figure out

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>what was wrong and get this under control. And at

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the same time as this is happening and I'm trying

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what's wrong with me, my grandmother dies.

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And she wasn't sick or anything like that, totally independent, healthy,

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>living by herself. She just slipped in the middle of

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the night. I think she was going up to go

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to the bathroom and she hit her head and didn't

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>wake up. And it was one of these things where

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you realize, you know, it's just an accident. You could

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>happen to anyone and you can't plan for it, and

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we didn't without her being sick, no one said goodbye,

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we just had no idea. And my husband

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>lest his job, my mom lost her job. Just all

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of these things kept happening, one right after the other,

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and it made me stop and just really realize how

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>important luck is. That when things are going well, we

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 1>we like to take credit. So often we say, oh,

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I've worked really hard. You know, I've

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>been working towards this, um I've earned this. And the

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>truth is, sure, you need to work hard, but you

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>also need to get lucky, and things have to go

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>your way, and luck has to come together in a

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of different ways. And there's so many things that

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>are just beyond us, and someone else might have worked

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>just as hard but not gotten lucky and not be

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>where we are. And I wanted to write about that

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and explore it and figure out a way to learn

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to tell the difference between skill and chance, between the

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>things we control and the things we don't. And when

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I started reading about all of these different elements, I

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>came across game theory, which is an interesting framework for

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at chance, and learned when I started reading the

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>foundational text of game theory, the Theory of Games and

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Economic Behavior, that John von Neuman, who's the father of

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>game theory and also one of the geniuses of the

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, um one of the fathers of the computer.

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So you and I would be sitting here talking right

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>now if it weren't for him. That he was a

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>poker player, and that poker was the origin of game theory,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that he actually believed that solving poker would give you

0:09:55.559 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a rubric for looking at life's most complicated decisions, and

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>he the way he described it really intrigued me. It

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed that poker might be a way to tease the

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>part all of these different themes I was thinking about.

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>So I started reading about poker a little bit, a

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit slower. So all these all these bad things

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>are happening. What makes you pick up the game theory book?

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I started reading whenever I knew that I wanted to

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>write my next book about luck and about skill versus chance.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>That is not a book. That's just a question, philosophical enquiry.

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It ain't a nonfiction narrative. Um. You need a story

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for any book. You need a way in Um what

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I do at the beginning of any project. It doesn't

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>matter how long or short I might be writing. Uh

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>often I might be writing a New Yorker piece or

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a book. I read a lot. I think that writers

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>need to first and foremost be readers. And for everything

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I write, I've read thousands and thousands of words more

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that I've written. And I just started reading everything I

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>could find that had to do with luck and had

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 1>to do with chance. And if you're reading about chance,

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>game theory comes up. Because game theory is one of

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the foremost ways of looking at chance. It's one of

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the foremost economic theories of the twentieth century, and it

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>teaches you about thinking probabilistically. It teaches you how to

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>make decisions in uncertain environments. And I knew this. I

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>have a PhD in psychology, so I knew that game

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>theory is where I went. For those who are not

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>up to speed, what exactly is game theory? Game theory

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is just a way of looking at the world where

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you try to figure out, how do I act in

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 1>a way that no one else can exploit or take

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>advantage of my decision? That's it. Okay, give us a

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of exact, non poker examples where game theory would

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>come into play. Nuclear war, that's actually that was mon

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Nouman's example. He thought that solving poker would help you

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>avoid nucle your war. If you're trying to figure out

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>whether your opponent Cuban missile crisis that actually happened, that's

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>game theory. What is Kruschev going to do? What is

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Jeff k gonna do? How far can we push them?

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>How far is he going to do? Go? Is he

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>actually going to press the proverbial red button and fire missiles?

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Is he bluffing? So this is a perfect quintessential game

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>theoretical example. How can you gather information to try to

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>figure out what the payoff matrix and game theories speak

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>looks like, how can you gather information to figure out

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>how we can get to a point in the matrix

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>where neither one of us has any incentive to deviate?

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>How can I figure out if he's bluffing or not?

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>How can I figure out how far he's willing to go?

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And in order to do that, you need to input

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things into that mental model. This is

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>why game theory isn't just about math. It is about math,

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's also about psychology. It's about trying to put

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers in probably abilities, on human emotions, on human actions,

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>on human decisions. And that's why von Neuman turned to poker,

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's why game theory can give you an approximation.

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>But it's just an approximation. Everything in life is an approximation.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>He realized that you can't solve anything, So let me

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just you ask let me answer your question. So, if

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>you think about something like a Nash equilibrium, which is

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>when you actually find that square where no one deviates,

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it exists in theory, but in practice it's almost impossible

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to reach that square because people are people, and you

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>can think that you understand them, but Ultimately, there's always

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the chance that you don't UM, and so it's a

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>probabilistic answer. It's not a definitive answer. Well, in game theory,

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is there a specific paradigm or is it as simple

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>as you say, we're gathering information talking about the nouns

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 1>and the unknowns. What do you mean by that? Specifically?

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>You talked about the matrix? What did you know you

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about game theory. It's like, I'm about the matrix

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the movie. So you actually you actually draw a matrix.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>So you have Bob on one side and you have

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Maria on the other, and in the simplest one, you

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have four squares. Let's say yes, no, yes, no. And

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>if we're trying to figure out what will Bob and Maria,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, what will their payoffs look like in the

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>four little squares of that matrix? So if both of

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>them say yes, then agree to whatever proposition. UM, let's

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>say you know that. Let's say we're choosing ice cream

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to and if you and I agree

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>on an ice cream flavor, we both get sent gallons

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of this ice cream flavor. We can't talk to each

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>other beforehand. Obviously, in real life, you can but in

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>your so ideally you coordinate, but if you can't coordinate,

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you and I both come up with the

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>same flavor, we get into the yes yes box, right,

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and our payoff there. Let's say it's of four is

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>four and four. We're both really really happy, right if

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>But let's say you and I or actually it might

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>not be four and for because what if our two

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>flavors are different. What if I know that your favorite

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>flavors chocolate, My favorite flavor is vanilla, but I want

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>some ice cream rather than not having any ice cream.

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And so if I know your chocolate, and I don't

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>think that you know that I like vanilla, I might

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>say chocolate. So we both get into that box. But

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a four for you and it's actually one for me. Right,

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So now now it changes, so you just get different

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>ice cream flavors. So let's say now we're in the

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>yes no, you stay chocolate, but I say vanilla. Well,

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, we're in a different box, and

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we're in a box where your payoff is lower in

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>mine is higher, and we need to try to figure

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>out how do we get to the box where we

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>both kind of maximize it. Maybe both of us kind

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of like vanilla, it's in the middle. Maybe vanilla would

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>be a three for both of us. That would be great,

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>not vanilla, sorry strawberry, but we need a new flavor.

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So maybe strawberries actually second best for both of us.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So strawberries are three for you and a three for me, Well,

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>then maybe we should try to coordinate on strawberry, right,

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>because that's actually going to give us the most the

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>best optimal mutual payoff because the total of that box

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is six, whereas your chocolate my vanilla boxes just five. Right,

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So we can start playing like that, and then you

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>have to try to figure out Okay, well, how are

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you thinking? How am I thinking? I use the type

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of person who's gonna want to coordinate on strawberry if

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't see you or talk to you, um, and

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>should I risk it? Or are you the kind of

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>person who's just gonna go chocolate all the way you're

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>going to You're going to betray me, so to speak.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So we can't coordinate because you want that chocolate and

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't care if I don't get any ice cream.

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's a very silly example, but you can that's

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of how you. That's how you that's how you

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the matrix. You assign different ways well articulated.

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So you're reading the book and he mentions poker. Does

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a lightbulb go off in your head? Or is it

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>an evolutionary process to decide to write a book? Um,

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it's both. At the beginning, it wasn't a light bulb.

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>When I read von Neuman, I became intrigued by poker,

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, huh, this is interesting. And then when

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I started reading about poker, all I did that I

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>had zero poker books in the house, so I just

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>googled poker and started reading a little bit about it online.

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>That's when a light bulb went off, when I just thought, Hey,

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this game seems really interesting and it actually seems to

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>get out a lot of these things that I'm curious about.

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>It has an element of skill, it has an element

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>of chance. Von Neumann thinks that it actually has the

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>perfect balance of skill and chance to make it a

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>good analogy for life. I don't know much about it,

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>but if I even thinks so, it's good enough for me.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the guy's brilliant. So that's when a lightbulb

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>moment actually went off, and I thought this could be it.

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And right away I actually just emailed my agent and said, hey,

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>what do you think does this seem like a good idea?

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>And at this point we've been going back and forth

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>for six months and she'd been saying no to every

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>single thing I've proposed, and this one she said that

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the sounds promising. See what you can find. So so

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the start of the book. So what what

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>was the process of actually selling the book? So first,

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and this was true of all of my books. Um,

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel very very strongly that you need to work

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>very hard on your proposal, no matter how many books

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you've written, and no matter what your reputation is, because

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it not just for selling it. You're doing

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it for you because it helps you think through the

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. It helps you figure out whether this is

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>actually going to work as a book, whether it's going

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a good story. So it's a really good exercise.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of the proposal is actually writing scenes

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and writing parts of chapters to try to figure this out.

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>And so I actually, before I sold the book, I

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>spent putiple months playing. So I approached Eric Sidell, one

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest poker players in the world who agreed

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to become my coach. And I actually started on my

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>journey before selling the book because I needed material for

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the proposal. I needed to see if it was going

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>to work. I needed to see whether the game was

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>actually going to fulfill its promise of teaching me what

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to learn. I wanted to see if I

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>liked it. I mean, I didn't want to sell a

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>book and then go play poker and realize that it

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>made me sick and that I absolutely hated it and

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that it bore me to tears. It's going to be

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>multiple years of my life. Any book is multiple years

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of your life, so you better you better think hard

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and pick something that's right for you. Um. And so

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the process looked like me starting to learn to play

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>with Eric. I went to Vegas. I even made my

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>first a little bit slower, a little bit slower told

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the book. Yet this stuff be doing because you've already

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>met Eric Seidell. Okay, how did you meet Eric and

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>how did you approach him? I'm a journalist. I cold

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>called him. I had no connection to him whatsoever. I

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>followed him on Twitter and sent him a message. And

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the reason that I chose him was a very sophisticated reason.

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I did a Google search of best poker buyers of

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>all time, and his name came up in multiple lists,

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and I did some research because his name wasn't the

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>only one who came in, and he seemed to check

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the most of my boxes. I wanted someone who was older,

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>who had been around a while, and who had a

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>more broad approach to the game. I didn't want someone

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 1>who was young and just starting out and just had

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 1>of the mathematical stuff that's the hot ticket today. I

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted someone who could really speak to my psychology background,

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>so that was number one. So I needed someone from

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from from the past, so to speak. But I wanted

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>someone who was still relevant. And Eric was actually the

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>only person who checks both of those boxes, who was

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>winning in the eighties and who was a winning today.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that just doesn't happen. Most poker players careers

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>are much shorter, and they don't they can't keep performing

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>at the same high level. Then I looked at videos.

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>He seemed like a nice guy. He's very quiet, seemed

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>very self effacing, very humble, and a lot of the

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>other poker players were out there like in your face, screaming, swearing, yelling,

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>throwing temper tantrums, you know, throwing cards and trips in

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the air. And Eric was just kind of sitting there quietly,

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, I'm going to spend a year with

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 1>someone as my mentor. I want someone nice and I

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>want someone I can get along with. And then I

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>realized that he was the guy from Rounders, so that

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>was just a bonus that he was the guy in

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the in the red visor in the Rounders videos. And

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought, wow, it's a Rounders guy. It's they gotta

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>gotta email him. So I found him on Twitter and

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I just contacted him and I said, hey, you know,

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a journalist. I was still at The New Yorker

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>full time then, um and said I'm working on a

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>new project. I'd love to talk to you about it.

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something that might interest you. Um And

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>he wrote up and he he was just immediately open.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>There were no like tell me more about you. I'm

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>not sure how much time this is going to take.

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>That he loves my writing. The guy reads the New Yorker,

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he loves the New Yorker. He knew exactly who I was,

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>so that helped and I didn't realize how lucky I got.

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Most poker players do not know what the New Yorker is. Okay,

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>so you meet Eric. What's the next process in this

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.239
<v Speaker 1>run up to selling the book and deciding to do

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the book? Well, first I had to pitch Eric and

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>have him agreed to take me on. So I convinced

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>him that it was a good idea. Um. The way

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I did that was, you know, I told him that

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>my background was psychology and as a journalist observing people,

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and he thought that and I'd studied decision making specifically,

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for my pH d. And so

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I actually had studied a lot of the things that

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>are important for playing poker, So that was part of it.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think for him that was a challenge to see,

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, can he take someone from zero and can

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>my background? Can a psychological approach still work? Because right now,

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>most new players, if not all, entering the game are mathematical,

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and I had taken my last math class in high school,

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>so that was never my strong suit and so he

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>was curious to see if that approach could still work.

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think the other reason he took me on

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>was that he loves the game, and he saw in

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>me an opportunity to spread the love of the game

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to other people, to the non poker world, because I can't.

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't part of the poker community, and the people

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>who read my books weren't poker players, and so I

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>think he saw it as a long term investment, so

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>he agreed to give it a try and to see

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>if it would work. And we ended up getting along.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>So if we learned pretty early on that it was

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>going to work in terms of us being able to

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>work together, then I needed material before I could put

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>together a proposal to sell the book. So he started

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>teaching me. We started working together. UM, I started learning

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to play. So before I sold the book, UM, I

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>spent a few a few months going daily to New

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Jersey back and forth to play online because online poker

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is legal in New Jersey and not legal in New York,

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>which is bizarre, but it's but it's the case. So

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I did that, and then I went to Vegas for

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>my first live real life let's go just a little

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>bit slower. You you go to New Jersey, you created account,

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>what are those initial experiences playing online? Like? I hate

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>playing online, I still do. I'm not I'm not a

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>fan you it's not what I love about poker, but

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>why Eric wanted me to learn to play online, and

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he was absolutely right with the experience. Online

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>is much faster. You can play thousands of hands these days.

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Online players get experience in a month that it used

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to take live pros people who didn't do this professional

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>years to acquire. That's the difference in speed. And so

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>if you're learning, it's really helpful to see a whole

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>array of situations and to see an array of behaviors

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and to start learning by experience. That's how the human

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>mind learns best. And so playing online, I got to

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>see hand after hand after hand, and it was just

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>at first, it was very, very overwhelming, um and everything

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>stressed me out. I didn't know how to use the interface.

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't like timers, and you have timers, how long

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you can take to make a decision. All of this

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff was very stressful, but it started teaching me how

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to play. It started teaching me all of these different situations.

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And the really good thing about it is I could

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>actually record all of my sessions because you can just

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>screen record. So i'd play a tournament, I'd record the

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, and then I'd be able to take it

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to Eric and we could go through it and he

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>could help me, so we could go through decision by decision.

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>What I was doing to start teaching me how to

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>think through things and how to think about poker. So

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in that sense it was invaluable. But in the sense

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of am I having fun yet? No, I wasn't having

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>fun and I didn't love going to New Jersey. To

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>be perfectly honest, you want to be able if you're

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>already playing online. You want to play from the comfort

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of your home. You don't want to be sitting in

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a Starbucks with strangers looking over your shoulder and asking, hey,

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing, which is exactly what happened to me. Okay,

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>So what is the difference between the people who play

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 1>online and what did you learn about people and luck

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>in those initial sessions? Very little? I mean, this is

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>just me learning the ropes. This, This is why this

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>journey ended up taking three years instead of one. Um.

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>So this at this point I'm not I'm not learning much.

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just still trying to figure out whether it's straight

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>piazza flush or flush pizza straight. You have to remember

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that I'm a total notice. I have to I don't

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>even know the rules of the game. So look, starting

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>online is me trying to figure out what I'm doing.

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And we're not even at the scale versus chance yet.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we're still at the very rudimentary stage of

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>how do you play? Okay, So, in your online career

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey, before you get to Vegas, how much

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>did it cost you to learn how to play? Oh?

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I ended up winning two thousand dollars, a little over

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>two thousand dollars, okay, But before you were up in

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the black? How far deep in the red were you?

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>If at all fifty dollars was minnitial deposit. I never

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>re deposited. That's pretty good. So how long do you

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>play online before you decide to hit the big world

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas? A few months? And how frequently? Um? Three

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>or four days a week? And so how do you

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or does Eric decide you're ready to go to Vegas? Um?

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Part of it was bankroll. So when I saved up

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>enough money because Eric wanted me to take it seriously

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>as a profession, and so he said that I had

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to earn my way up, and so we waited until

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I made enough money where I could finance my trip

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to Vegas all through what I already what I want

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>from poker? Is that the same same two thousand dollars? Okay,

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>so good a thing I want. I withdrew it all

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>and we we went to Vegas. I mean, Eric was

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas most of the time, most of that time anyway. Okay,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>So you go to Vegas. Where do you stay? Um?

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I stayed at different places I made. I spent multiple

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>months in Vegas, so I stayed in airbnbs, I stayed

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>at the Aria. So it just depended, okay. And the

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>longer you stayed does the hotel cut you a rate? Really? Really? Okay?

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So you go to Vegas. Go to Vegas, and what's

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the first step, Um, start playing baby tournaments, the dailies

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that cost you know, thirty five dollars and the nightlies.

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not allowed to play any of the more

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>expensive tournaments. I have to start from the bottom. And

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>until I start winning those, says Eric, I cannot make

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my way up to any further stakes. Well, well, you're

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a high achiever. How did it feel to be in

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the little league? Oh, I don't care. I'm I'm not

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's not a there's it's a very it's

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a it's a very different thing to be a high

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>achiever and to be embarrassed to be in the little leagues.

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm never embarrassed to be in the little leagues. I

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's how you learn. I mean, I've spent my

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>whole life saying I don't know how to do this.

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Please tell me, and please teach me. I don't understand.

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what I do. I write about people who are

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>much smarter than I am and who know much more

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>than I do, and I interview them and I write

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>articles about them and about their work. So I love

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not knowing. Um, for me, it's fine. I got to

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>start at the bottom. You have to learn everything. You

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about these baby tournaments, and that's where you start

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to learn. You wonder what effect being a woman is

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in the game. Certain people try to intimidate. Could you

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>amplify that a little bit? Sure? Of course, are we

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>still talking about selling my book because at this point

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I've told my book. Okay, so literally literally, where in

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>this process did you sell your book? After? After I

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>had been in Vegas for a little bit, then I

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>went back to New York sold the book and then

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>came back to Vegas. Okay, how much to make it worth?

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to get how in terms of the

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>number that the company gives you. Are you saying, well,

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I need enough to live for X per year and

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the criterion. Nope, that's not how it works.

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean my books sold that auctions. My third book,

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>my first two were best sellers. It was a It

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty straightforward process. I have a good agent. Okay,

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so that now that you're deep into the process, you're

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>not worrying about cash. You have enough to live on. No,

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean you always have to worry about cash, especially

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>because I left the New Yorker, so my income went

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to zero completely, and you have to even at the

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker, there's all writers are freelancers. So no that

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's no health insurance, this is all stuff I

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for. And I have suddenly stopped writing.

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I've realized that I need to be playing poker full time,

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and so all of my income streams went to zero.

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>When you get a book advance, it's not what you

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>think it is because you have no idea how long

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the book is going to take, So you need to

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>make sure that it will last you. You don't get

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it all, you just get a quarter of it goes

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to your agents. So so there's that you pay your

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>own taxes. So there's that I leave in New York City,

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>so the tax right is very very high. So there's that,

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and you need to I have a mortgage. You need

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to kind of know that you're paying for planning for

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>all of these things. So no, I have zero dollars

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to spend on poker. Okay, so you you played online,

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you went to Vegas, you sold the book. The next

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>step is starting starting to uh grind my way up

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>until I can start winning these little baby tournaments so

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that I can make money, so that I can actually

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>see if I can move up to the next level

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in the poker tournament. Because my advance is going towards

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>paying my mortgage and my health insurance and all these

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>other things, it's not going towards paying my poker tournaments.

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I did put a little bit aside because I knew

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:14.479
<v Speaker 1>that for the book, I wanted to play the main

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>event that you and I started off talking about, So

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I knew that ten thousand dollars was going to be

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>budgeted for that no matter what, UM, and so that

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>was put aside. Otherwise I needed to earn my way

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>up or not as the case. Maybe Okay, going back

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to those initial experiences in the baby tournaments, what did

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you learn? I learned this is where I really started

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>learning a lot um. At the beginning, I wasn't doing

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>well for a number of reasons. I mean, first, I

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>was intimidated. Playing live is not like playing online. UM.

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know how anything worked. I didn't know the mechanics.

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I felt like a literal fish out of water. I

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>say literal because in poker or the term for bad

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>players who don't know what they're doing is fish. And

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I was definitely a fish, um. And so I and

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I felt it. I knew that I didn't know anything.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And it would have been one thing if it had

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>been just this really warm and friendly and welcoming environment

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and people said, oh, it's okay, like you're you're okay,

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll help you out, um. And that's what it was.

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>At the highest levels, they are excitels of the world.

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>They opened their arms wide and they were all incredibly

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>generous and helpful. All of the big high stakes players

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>gave me their phone numbers, said they'd help me, and

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we're really excited about my whole journey. When you enter

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a random casino off scrip and are playing in a

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty five dollar tournament, those aren't the same players. These

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>are people who are here to have fun. They're drinking.

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>They are mostly men. The poker world is male um,

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and they don't really care for a female at the table,

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you're already there, they're not gonna mind their

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>manners because they're here to have fun and they shouldn't

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have to act differently because a woman is at the table.

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>So I initially I wasn't playing well because it was

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>really intimidating, and I would let them bully me, and

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want conflict. I wanted people to like me,

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>so i'd fold, and even when I had good cards,

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't necessarily bet as much as I should because

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want them to think, Oh, that's the bitch

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>who was always so aggressive. You know. I wanted them

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to think I was a nice person. That's not the

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>way to play poker. That was not that's not the

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 1>game theoretical answer, And I was I was just letting

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>them walk all over me. And then it took a

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>while for me to realize what was happening, And it

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>took a while for me to realize that this was

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>actually an advantage. That they were all underestimating me and

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>what I was capable of, and correctly, at the beginning,

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>they weren't underestimating me because I did exactly what they

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted me to. You know, they'd bully me and I'd fold.

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 1>They do this, and I'd go away. You know, That's

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what they wanted, and they got it. But once

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I realized that I was able to take that dynamic

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and put it up and turn it around and really

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.919
<v Speaker 1>figure out, Okay, fine, if you think I'm just a girl.

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:21.959
<v Speaker 1>There was a guy who kept calling me little girl

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>over and over and he really got to me. Um.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Good for him, you know, he he got me to

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>make bad decisions. That's what you're supposed to do. Um,

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>but he he really got to me. And but then

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I realized, if, okay, if you think of me as

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a little girl, then I can get away with things

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that I wouldn't have otherwise been able to get away with.

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>If you think I'm incapable of bluffing, I'm going to

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>bluff more. I'm going to run big bluffs because you're

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>going to fold. Because if you think that I couldn't

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>possibly be doing that, then you think I must have

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a strong hand. If you're someone who would rather die

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>than fold to a girl or be bluff by a girl,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>well I'm not going to bluff you because that would

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>just be throwing money on fire, because you're going to

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>call me no matter what. But when I have good hands,

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or even marginally good hands, I'm gonna bet a lot

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>because you're gonna call me, and you're gonna call me

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.879
<v Speaker 1>with hands that are worse than mine. If you're someone

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't want to take my money because you want

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a gentleman, there are guys who are very

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>condescending and patronizing and telling me all the things I

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.439
<v Speaker 1>was doing wrong, um, and wanted to help me out

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>by calling me honey and showing me their cards. You

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>know you made a good fold, honey, here you go,

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>here's my hand, um, And I'd say, okay, fine, this

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is great, thank you for showing me your cards. Information

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is very important, so I love seeing what what cards

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you hold. But also I now know that when you

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 1>bet a lot, I should fold, even if I have

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good hand because you don't want to take

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>my money because you're a gentleman, or you'd like to

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>see yourself as a gentleman. Once I could figure out

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>how people saw me and how they wanted to see themselves,

0:36:57.600 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, do they want to see themselves as a

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>big macho ga or asked the gentleman? Or is this?

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Or is that? Once I could figure out those more

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>human elements, that I started being able to really take

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>advantage of them. And that's when I started winning and

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 1>making real money. And when you made this money, did

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the men get angry? Yeah, of course, that's a simple answer.

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Not all of them, Um, I mean Eric was ecstatic

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.760
<v Speaker 1>when I won my first tournament, as was my husband,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>as where all of the players who Eric had introduced

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>me to, I mean everyone who Everyone was always very

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>very supportive and excited. The guys I was playing against, no,

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they weren't. In the first tournament I won, Um, it

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>was a baby tournament. I don't remember how much. The

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 1>entry fee was around fifty dollars at Planet Hollywood. And

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>when we got to the final table, um, I was

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the chip leader. I had most of the chips in play,

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and they all started pressuring me to chop, which means

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>stopped playing and just divide up the money. Um, and

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really know what that was. Eric and I

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>had never talked about it because I'd never been in

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that situation. And I was going to agree because okay,

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to be nice, I want to

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>be amenable. Then one of them just turned to me

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and said, yeah, you know you don't you know you're

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna just lose all those trips. You're in a position

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of power now, but you're just gonna lose them. And

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I was like, okay, well screw you. No, I'm not

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna chop. So they were not happy. They and then

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>they just kept and then another one of them busted,

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and another one and they just kept pressuring me to chop.

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But at that point nothing was going to compel me

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to chop. So I ended up winning and I was

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and they were not happy because they just wanted me

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to give up my money and give it to them.

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we talked about the arc from being

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>intimidated to winning. Uh, you know, it takes a psychological

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>makeup to be at the top and endure others people's

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>hate or anger or that you how did you learn

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>how to cope with that. How did you gain a

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>thick skin? Well, I mean part of it was my training.

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 1>So my graduate advisor, who I worked with for many

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>years and who then became a close mentor and friend

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of mine, was Walter Michelle and two people who aren't

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the name, they're probably still familiar with the

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>work because it's become part of the popular culture. The

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Marshmallow test the famous psychological experiment that had little kids

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>set at a table with a marshmallow or another treat

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever they liked the most in front of them, and

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 1>there was a bell next to the treat, and they

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>were told, you can you can ring the bell at

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>any point and you're allowed to eat your treat. But

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>if you don't ring the bell, if you just wait

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>for us to come back to the room, we'll give

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you many more treats and you'll be able to eat

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>as many. You'll be able to eat more of them.

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>And what they wanted to learn was how long would

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this child weight? A three year old or four year

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>old and there's this delicious things setting right in front

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of you, it's really hard to wait, and one minute

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>feels like an hour. I mean to a kid that young,

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it's actually really hard to delay gratification. And what Walter

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>found was that the kids who were able to wait

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the longest had much better life outcomes. So they followed

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>these kids. They're still following them. Walter unfortunately died a

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, but the kids are still being followed. Um.

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And so now it's you know, over forty years later, um,

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and they were the kids who waited longer, did better

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in school, better SAT scores, went to better colleges, have

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:41.320
<v Speaker 1>better health outcomes, are just much more successful in life.

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And so this was kind of the foundational study of

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>self control and of how important the ability to regulate

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>your emotions and regularly cool hot stimuli. So the marshmallow

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in this case is the hot stimulus. You want it,

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 1>it's right in front of you, yourity to wait, your

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>ability to cool it off. There were kids. I love

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the interviews with the kids. So home said, you know, oh, well,

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I put a frame around it in my head because

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't eat a picture. Others that said, you know,

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>oh I pictured it. I pretended that it was a cloud,

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can't eat a cloud. Others just turned the

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>chair around so they weren't looking at it. Now, these

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are kids coming up with these strategies spontaneously. But Walter

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>found you could teach them. You could actually teach these strategies,

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and kids who learned those strategies were just as successful

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>as the ones who had them intuitively. And so I've

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>been doing this work for a long time, and so

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I had a lot of the arsenal and

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the vocabulary for realizing what was going on and having

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:45.760
<v Speaker 1>some techniques in play so that I could remove myself

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>from the situation that said, I mean, I wasn't successful

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning. I had to work hard, and I

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>ended up actually working with a mental game coach, someone

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 1>who could help me, someone who could see me objectively,

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>because even if you're me, I mean, I was very

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I was a little overcompetent at the beginning

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of my ability to regulate my emotions because I thought, oh,

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have a psychology PhD. This is what

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I studied. I'm a natural. Well, when you're at a

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>poker table in a new environment and there's lots of

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>pressure and the stakes are rising, you're gonna you're gonna

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:26.280
<v Speaker 1>mess up. And I realized that I did need help,

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and so I a lot of the things that I learned,

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I only learned because I was I had someone on

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the outside who I could talk to and who would

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>be able to in a sense, mirror me back to me.

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But to to say, oh, so, it seems like, you know,

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you get really upset when these guys are trying to

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>bully you. It seems like when you're in those situations,

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you default to this more passive thing. And I'd say, oh,

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're right, because he was right. He just

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I would just explain what happened and tell him the day,

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>but he could synthathize it in a way that it's

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to do when it's you who's going through it.

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Which is which is all to say that, sure, I

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of the skills and a lot of

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge, and I think that helped me, and that

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>helped me ramp up more quickly. But I still need

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>it outside help. I still needed someone who could help

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>talk me through it. Um. And I think that that's

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>something very important to realize. Whether you paid or not,

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>what is someone like that normally charge for their help? Um.

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It depends on the person. Uh, there's there's a huge

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:36.399
<v Speaker 1>scale and mental game coaches. I mean it starts at

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred dollars an hour, and I know some

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I never worked with them who charged over a thousand

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars an hour. Okay, Just so there's a point in

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>your book that a lot of people are interested in

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that does not directly relate to poker. You have a

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>line there we say you don't believe in the ten rule?

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Could you go a little deeper there? Sure m. I

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot out of time arguing back and forth

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>with Andre's Eriksson, who is the father of of the

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>research into into deliberate practice, who recently passed away. He did, yes,

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>he died a few weeks ago. Unfortunately. I liked him

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot. He was a great guy. We disagreed on everything,

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and we never got into a fight because he didn't.

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>He would just listen to you and he just never

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>raised his voice, and he just would not and say, yeah, no,

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't agree, and he would and he would go on,

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>and it was it's so rare, you know. And I

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>was attacking his work because I wanted to challenge him

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:38.240
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of the things that he was saying,

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and he just he was okay with that, and that's

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:44.799
<v Speaker 1>I really admired that. I think that's such a rare

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>characteristic for a researcher. So what is what is your

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>actual belief relative? So I think that I think that

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>practice is absolutely important. No one is saying that it's not.

0:44:56.239 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You need to work hard, and you need to need

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to practice, and you need to practice deliberately. I think

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Honders was brilliant in so many ways in figuring out

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 1>that these components matter. However, he insisted that that's all

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that matters, And what I say is that's absolutely not true.

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Genetics matter, Talent matters. Who you are when you start matters.

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:22.879
<v Speaker 1>The same amount of hours done in the exact same

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 1>way as not going to translate for person A to

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>person BE, and PERSONNE might need a hundred hours to

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.439
<v Speaker 1>get amazing. Person B might never get to that level

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>even with a hundred thousand hours. So there are lots

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of individual differences. There's a lot of variability, and yeah,

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to work hard, but that's not enough, and

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 1>you have to also figure out where your skills are

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and you have to figure out what you're able to do.

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Had I decided that I wanted to write a book

0:45:53.160 --> 0:46:00.399
<v Speaker 1>about playing golf, there'd be no book. My hand eye

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 1>coordination is zero. I cannot hit a golf ball, for

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the love of my life, and I can't, especially for

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a baseball book. If a ball is flying at my face,

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I duck, I can't. I can't do that.

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not someone who's good at any of that. And

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>believe me, even if I practice for ten thousand hours,

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>even something like golf, which is a very which is

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>something that's very amenable to learning, never going to be

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>able to hit balls with tiger woods or or go

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on any sort of a decent level. I know that,

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and I and I'm willing to bet a lot of

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:39.240
<v Speaker 1>money on it. And that's the difference between me and uders.

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Unders would say that's absolutely not true. You can be

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>tiger Woods, and I'd say, no, only tiger woods can

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:46.319
<v Speaker 1>be tiger Woods. And he said, no, Well, you didn't

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>practice well or you didn't practice deliberately enough. Okay, Uh.

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:53.919
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot in the psychology in the book. One

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>thing we didn't cover is the game you're playing is

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Texas Hold Him. You make a big point in the

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:01.320
<v Speaker 1>book where you're analogizing that to life, and you believe

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 1>it's the best analogy in in games. It's not me,

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 1>it's von Neuman. So let's just let's just get that

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:11.360
<v Speaker 1>straight because I didn't make it up. I just stole

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>his uh with with full attribution, but it's his idea.

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So which we're looking for is what is the balance

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of known information to unknown information? What is the balance

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 1>between the things that we have in common and the

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:31.360
<v Speaker 1>things that we have in private. Because poker is a

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:34.359
<v Speaker 1>game of incomplete information, like life. So there are things

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there are things that I know. There

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:38.879
<v Speaker 1>are things we both know, and we need to make

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the best decision possible knowing that we don't know everything right,

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we can only guess at some of this hidden information.

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Other games like chess are really bad analogies for life.

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Von Neuman dismissed it completely because chess is a perfect

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>information game. There's always a right move. You can solve it.

0:47:57.280 --> 0:47:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And he said, if you give me enough computing power,

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you exactly what you're supposed to do. And

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of course chess has been solved, and so he said,

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not life. Life is not a chess game. You

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 1>can't see all the pieces, you can't see the board.

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:10.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you might think you're looking at a queen

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and then while the disguise comes off and it's actually

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a bishop or or whatnot. So life is full of deception.

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Life is full of things you don't know and things

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that are concealed, and so you need an imperfect information

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 1>game to be like life. But within poker, there are

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of different variants. And the reason that no limit

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 1>hold them is the one that I chose, and the

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>one that seems to be the best is the exact

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 1>balance of knowns to unknowns seems just about right. There

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 1>are other variants of poker where there's too much unknown,

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and so it becomes too much of a gamble. So

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>if there are five cards that every single person has

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:52.359
<v Speaker 1>that you can't see, all of a sudden, they're just

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>too many X factors and it becomes too much about

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:59.759
<v Speaker 1>a guessing game and too little about skill. If there's

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:02.239
<v Speaker 1>only one card. There's some variants where there's only one

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:05.320
<v Speaker 1>whole card. Then it becomes too mathematical, too much like chess.

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:09.800
<v Speaker 1>There's too little that's unknown, and and hold him in Texas,

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:12.240
<v Speaker 1>hold him. He thought that this was actually the variant

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>with the best balance, and the reason that you choose

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>no limit as opposed to limit. So the differences in

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>limit your bets are limited. There's always a cap to

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>what you can you can bet, and no limit there

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't he said, Well, life is no limit. You can

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 1>always go all in, you can always bet everything. Nothing's

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>keeping you from it. So if you want an analogy

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:33.919
<v Speaker 1>for life, it better be no limit. Okay. A couple

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of things you brought up. You mentioned a couple of

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>times math and the people with mathematical skills. To what

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>degree do they have an advantage and where are they

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in the poker hierarchy and sphere. Well, it depends. Um,

0:49:47.920 --> 0:49:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that you need both. I think that you

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:54.319
<v Speaker 1>need both math and psychology. And I think that the

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>best players have both. And the best players know which

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>one is their skill and that's where they've focus, that's

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:03.840
<v Speaker 1>where their edges. But they also learned to master the

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>other thing to the best of their ability. So for

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:09.399
<v Speaker 1>someone like Eric Seidel, he's a psych guy and he's

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>not a math guy, and yet he has the most

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 1>advanced mathematical software that he uses to try to figure

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>out what the math guys are thinking. Someone like Stephen Chidwick,

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:23.400
<v Speaker 1>who is currently considered one of the best tournament players

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.479
<v Speaker 1>in the world. He's much younger. Um, he's a math guy,

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:29.319
<v Speaker 1>He's the one who knows exactly how to set up

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 1>all of these simulations. Or someone who I worked with, Um,

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>who's just a great guy and a great player at

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:38.879
<v Speaker 1>someone like I Caxton. They know the math, that's their

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>strong suit, that's where they've run all the simulations. Their

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers leave me and Eric far behind, but their psychology

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 1>might not be quite as strong because they are much

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:55.279
<v Speaker 1>more in their heads about the math and might not

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be picking up on some of the physical cues, might

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>not be picking up on some of the psychological dynamics. However,

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>at the top, I mean, I actually think that Stevie

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and I probably are picking up on all the psychology

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 1>because there I've just named two of the best players

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:12.839
<v Speaker 1>in the world, But almost everyone else is not them.

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And there are people who rely way too much on

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the math and they miss a lot, and I can

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:20.719
<v Speaker 1>actually sometimes they're the easiest to play against at the

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>table because you know what they're thinking, you know what

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do, and you know that they're missing

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of information because they've already figured out mathematically

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they need to do here, and there are

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 1>people who don't care about the math at all. They're

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>also easy to play against because you can exploit them

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 1>because they're going to make bad mistakes because they don't

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 1>care about the math. They don't care about the odds.

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:45.760
<v Speaker 1>They're just playing the man. And you need to understand

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:47.759
<v Speaker 1>the math. And you need to understand that part as well.

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned at the beginning you hadn't taken a math

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:53.480
<v Speaker 1>course since high school. To what degree have you? Uh,

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, spit up and become accustomed to and learn

0:51:56.000 --> 0:51:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the math. I mean I count on my fingers and

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Eric still do. And Eric told me at the very

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 1>beginning that there's no hard math the math. He said,

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it's so easy that a sixth grader can do it.

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>If you can add, subtract, multiplind, divide. So I have

0:52:12.520 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not picked up any advanced math skills, but I have

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:18.320
<v Speaker 1>become better at because I've had more practice. Is mental

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 1>math um and I I'm someone who was always fine

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 1>at math. I mean I took advanced calculus. I just

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:25.960
<v Speaker 1>took it in high school and I haven't taken it

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 1>since I always could understand the math. I just didn't

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>like it. It wasn't interesting to me. So I have

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 1>those muscles somewhere back there, UM, and I was able

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to wake some of them up, so I can calculate

0:52:38.680 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>POD odds pretty quickly. At the beginning, it took me

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a while and I'd have to be sitting there counting.

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Now I still use my fingers, but I do it

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>very very quickly. Okay. Another element you talked about in

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the book is aggressiveness. So, uh, is that something that

0:52:56.160 --> 0:52:58.840
<v Speaker 1>people just tend to play aggressively and they don't modulate

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:01.959
<v Speaker 1>their behavior And are the aggressive players a certain type

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:04.879
<v Speaker 1>that you can then adjust to? Well, it depends once again,

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the player. So at the beginning, I

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:09.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like players start off in one of two modes.

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Some are way too aggressive now I'm talking about amateurs

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:15.120
<v Speaker 1>who are just starting out, and some are like me,

0:53:15.480 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>way too passive. UM. So I was too scary, UM

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and not nearly aggressive enough. And there are a lot

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of players, UM, and I think actually most players are

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:27.359
<v Speaker 1>on the other end. They play too many hands, they're

0:53:27.400 --> 0:53:33.240
<v Speaker 1>too aggressive, they like bluffing and they enjoy that. And

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:36.759
<v Speaker 1>as you learn more about the game, UM, there are

0:53:36.840 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 1>players who keep being super aggressive always and back in

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the day um as Area told me it was before

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>my time, but he said that that used to work

0:53:46.880 --> 0:53:49.319
<v Speaker 1>because all the thinking players would think, go, well, if

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you're being that aggressive, you know you must have a

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>really good hand. Um And so there was once upon

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:56.919
<v Speaker 1>a time when the whole general level of the game

0:53:57.000 --> 0:54:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was lower. Super aggression got people very very far are

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Once people started catching on, they, as you said, adjusted,

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they started realizing, wait, this guy is just running everyone

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>over because no one's standing up to them. Now, if

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you start standing up to them, all of a sudden,

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the aggression is not paying off anymore. Because you are

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>people are pushing back, and you have junk you have

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a strong hand at all. You're bluffing

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:22.319
<v Speaker 1>way too much, and all of a sudden you start

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 1>losing money. And as Eric said, the guys who failed

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:29.719
<v Speaker 1>to adjust, who stayed super aggressive, wint bust. They went broke,

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they lost all of their money. And so the best

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 1>players are players who This is actually a similar answer

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:38.239
<v Speaker 1>to the one I gave about math and psychology. The

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>best players are players who figure out what their natural

0:54:41.200 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 1>level of aggression is and who figure out what works

0:54:44.160 --> 0:54:47.879
<v Speaker 1>for them, what feels comfortable to them, and then who

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:51.879
<v Speaker 1>are able to do that and to adjust to other players.

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.719
<v Speaker 1>So someone like Eric is not someone who's an aggressive

0:54:54.760 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 1>person in real life and not someone who's like a

0:54:58.280 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>maniac at the table. The at certain tables, he's capable

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of very maniacal plays because he's very good at adjusting.

0:55:05.239 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 1>He's good at reading what people are doing and what

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 1>people think of him, and so you need to learn

0:55:10.680 --> 0:55:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to use people's perceptions of you against them. So if

0:55:14.360 --> 0:55:17.919
<v Speaker 1>people are sitting there thinking underestimating Eric, thinking that oh,

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 1>he's someone who's you know, he's never going to go

0:55:21.000 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>maniac on me, well then it's time for him to

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 1>go maniac on them. Um Or there are other tables

0:55:27.040 --> 0:55:29.760
<v Speaker 1>when you're at a table with maniacs, and in those tables,

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you become very quiet and you wait for a very

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:34.879
<v Speaker 1>strong hand, and that's when you fight back. You don't

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:38.320
<v Speaker 1>fight maniacs with maniac tendencies. That's a mistake that people

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:45.000
<v Speaker 1>often make. Okay, how about tells. Tells are something that

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:49.719
<v Speaker 1>is not nearly as important as people think, and very

0:55:49.760 --> 0:55:53.280
<v Speaker 1>different from what people think. So originally, you know, everyone

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:56.280
<v Speaker 1>always thinks poker face, right, you you have to stare

0:55:56.320 --> 0:55:59.920
<v Speaker 1>at people's faces and the eyes are the window to

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the soul. My last book was about con artists, and

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:05.080
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you, if someone's a good liar, you're

0:56:05.080 --> 0:56:08.520
<v Speaker 1>not gonna find out. Um. I spent multiple years with

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 1>people who deceived on a daily basis, very very intelligent people,

0:56:14.480 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and when I met them, I knew who they were,

0:56:16.320 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and I was still taken by them because that's how

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 1>good they are. And the psychology tells us that people

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:25.520
<v Speaker 1>are really really bad at spotting liars. We spot liars

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:30.239
<v Speaker 1>on average, no better than chance. Where we suck at

0:56:30.320 --> 0:56:34.200
<v Speaker 1>learning to tell whether someone's being deceitful or not. And

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the face is actually the worst place to look because

0:56:36.920 --> 0:56:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the face leads you astray because the face has fake cues,

0:56:40.480 --> 0:56:43.279
<v Speaker 1>even if people don't mean to have them there, Their

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:47.440
<v Speaker 1>face tells you something because subconsciously we look at faces,

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and there are certain traits that communicate certain things like trustworthiness.

0:56:51.680 --> 0:56:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Certain cuts of the jaw and certain eyebrows say trustworthy,

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:59.840
<v Speaker 1>others say aggression. It's not something we're consciously aware of.

0:56:59.840 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 1>It just something that we experience and react to within

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:09.440
<v Speaker 1>just micro seconds, within fractions of a second of staying

0:57:09.440 --> 0:57:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a face. And so when people are trying to stare

0:57:13.160 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 1>someone down saying, oh, is your left eyebrow twitching? Is

0:57:16.240 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>your nostril doing this? That's wrong. It's probably not going

0:57:18.760 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to tell you anything. It's probably gonna screw you up,

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna make mistakes. That said, the human body

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:27.840
<v Speaker 1>does convey a lot of information, but most of it's

0:57:27.840 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 1>not coming from the face. And it turns out, um,

0:57:30.320 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I met this really cool researcher um who actually studies

0:57:33.640 --> 0:57:38.160
<v Speaker 1>secrets and was looking at tells in poker, because poker

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is natural secret keeping, right, You're you're trying to keep

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:44.520
<v Speaker 1>other people from guessing how strong your hand is. And

0:57:44.600 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 1>so he looked at videos of people playing the main

0:57:48.560 --> 0:57:51.120
<v Speaker 1>event of the World Series of Poker. He had people

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:54.800
<v Speaker 1>analyze them and ask how strong someone's cards were, how

0:57:54.840 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 1>strong was their hand, And he had them look at

0:57:57.640 --> 0:57:59.919
<v Speaker 1>unaltered videos. He had them look at just the face,

0:58:00.200 --> 0:58:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and then he had them look at just the arms

0:58:01.760 --> 0:58:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and hands. And what he found was when people just

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:07.240
<v Speaker 1>looked at the video, the unaltered one, they were no

0:58:07.320 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 1>better than chance as predicted. When they just looked at

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the face, they were worse than chance. So the face

0:58:14.760 --> 0:58:17.320
<v Speaker 1>screwed them up. They actually thought that they knew much

0:58:17.360 --> 0:58:20.560
<v Speaker 1>more than they did, and they made they made bad

0:58:20.640 --> 0:58:24.960
<v Speaker 1>mistakes when they looked at the hands, though they actually

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:29.440
<v Speaker 1>improved and they were predicting at much better accuracy. And

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:32.040
<v Speaker 1>so he found that the hands are giving off a

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:35.120
<v Speaker 1>lot more information than any other part of the body.

0:58:35.680 --> 0:58:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And he's done a lot more work on that since then.

0:58:38.840 --> 0:58:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out that it's not just in poker,

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that when we look at hands and a lot of

0:58:43.400 --> 0:58:46.360
<v Speaker 1>different contexts, we can predict a lot about the behavior

0:58:46.400 --> 0:58:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of the person. So do you employ that information when

0:58:49.840 --> 0:58:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you play? Do you look at the hands and what

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 1>might you see that might affect your play. It's all

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about how people handle their cards and their chips, how

0:58:59.160 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they under their bets, how they know how smooth their

0:59:02.560 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>motion is. And this is really important. You have to

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:11.760
<v Speaker 1>observe someone over time. One time doesn't mean anything. You

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>have to see how their actions and how the way

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that they move changes from normal. Right, So how do

0:59:20.080 --> 0:59:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they how do they normally bet? Is this same or

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is it or is it smoother? Or is it you

0:59:25.800 --> 0:59:28.480
<v Speaker 1>know or is it less smooth? So a lot of

0:59:28.520 --> 0:59:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it is about deviations from baseline and in order to

0:59:32.320 --> 0:59:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to see if someone is deviating from baseline.

0:59:35.400 --> 0:59:38.320
<v Speaker 1>You need to establish a baseline. How do you do that.

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>You do that by looking at people over and over

0:59:41.360 --> 0:59:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and over and observing hands even when you're not playing

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with them, even when you're just when you don't have

0:59:48.120 --> 0:59:50.280
<v Speaker 1>any cards and you're just looking at them when they're

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 1>playing against someone else. Okay, Now, one of the big

0:59:53.680 --> 0:59:55.720
<v Speaker 1>stories in the book is before you make it to

0:59:55.760 --> 0:59:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the big game, you're playing I believe it planning Hollywood,

0:59:58.920 --> 1:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are one of these so called baby games, and you

1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have an incredible hand, but you're beaten by a better hand,

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:10.439
<v Speaker 1>and you go to tell Eric the story and I'm

1:00:10.480 --> 1:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>beaten by a worse hand. That's hence the bad beat.

1:00:14.520 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So when my when the money gets in, I have

1:00:17.800 --> 1:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the best hand, and I should be winning there most

1:00:20.680 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of the time. I should be winning there over the time,

1:00:24.920 --> 1:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and actually even more. I think at that point I

1:00:28.080 --> 1:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>was in almost favorite, and this person hits their miracle

1:00:32.440 --> 1:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>card and wins, and I'm knocked out of the tournament.

1:00:35.720 --> 1:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what's called a bad beat. When you get your

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>money in as a favorite, statistically speaking, and then the

1:00:40.880 --> 1:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>other part of the variance happens. Because there's no such

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>thing as I've gotten my money in as favorite and

1:00:47.840 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I've lost. So two percent happens, and it happens a

1:00:51.000 --> 1:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>lot more frequently than you think it will happen. So

1:00:54.320 --> 1:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so this is one of these things where you're supposed

1:00:59.480 --> 1:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to Vaughan and say I made the right decision, and

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>then variancet and go my way. That's not what I said.

1:01:05.240 --> 1:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I ran to Eric and I started telling him as

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>they started crying to him, not literally crying, but complaining, saying,

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, I can't believe this happened. And he

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>shut me up. He said, I don't want to hear it,

1:01:16.960 --> 1:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and I just I couldn't believe that he didn't want

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to hear what I had to say. I mean, he's

1:01:21.120 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>my coach. He's supposed to listen to me. And he

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>asked me, he said, do you have a question about

1:01:26.120 --> 1:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>how you played the hand? And my answer was well no,

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know I had top set, which is

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about as strong as it guts. And he said, well

1:01:35.520 --> 1:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Hand over, and he said, let's make a deal.

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I never want to know how a hand ends. All

1:01:43.720 --> 1:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I care about is your decision process. All I care

1:01:46.680 --> 1:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>about is what you were thinking. Are there questions, are there,

1:01:51.560 --> 1:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>nodes are They're parts of the decision that you weren't

1:01:54.880 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>sure of. If so, let's talk about it. But the ending,

1:01:58.320 --> 1:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the outcome, just forget it because that's not what you control.

1:02:02.600 --> 1:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So this goes back to my original question, skill versus chance.

1:02:06.320 --> 1:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Skill is the process, it's the decision. It's how you

1:02:09.680 --> 1:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>made the decision. It's whether you were thinking clearly, whether

1:02:13.960 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you put your money in well as a favorite, whether

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you were using the information that you had to the

1:02:20.320 --> 1:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>best of your abilities. Outcome, that's luck. That has nothing

1:02:24.200 --> 1:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to do with you. Now the money is already in

1:02:26.440 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>your decision is done. Now the cards have to cooperate,

1:02:29.440 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and you don't control the cards. That's the chance. And

1:02:32.280 --> 1:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>so we don't care about the chance. We don't. We

1:02:34.120 --> 1:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>don't focus on that. What we care about is the

1:02:36.400 --> 1:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we actually can change, which is how we play,

1:02:39.520 --> 1:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>how we think about something. And so that was his rule.

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>No bad beat stories. He said, that's someone else, that's

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>never you. You are not allowed to tell a bad

1:02:47.800 --> 1:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>beat story. Okay, At some point he says, you have

1:02:50.520 --> 1:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>enough experience to play at the ARIA. I have a

1:02:53.720 --> 1:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of questions here. When you're at the ARIA, not playing.

1:02:57.600 --> 1:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Does everybody allow you to see your their car or

1:03:00.440 --> 1:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>just Eric? What is the process there, and what is

1:03:03.520 --> 1:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the process where you ultimately get in the game. And

1:03:06.960 --> 1:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>what if somebody who's at one of these baby games

1:03:09.480 --> 1:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>decides they want to play the aria, what happens? Then

1:03:12.840 --> 1:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone can play any tournament. Anyone can play if you

1:03:15.840 --> 1:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>have enough money, just that buy in and there you

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>are in terms of whether I can see people's cards.

1:03:22.440 --> 1:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So I had quite a unique arrangement. Eric played in

1:03:28.680 --> 1:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of high roller events at the area. So

1:03:30.920 --> 1:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>these are tournaments that are dollars dollars to enter, so

1:03:37.640 --> 1:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>not not anywhere near the level that I'm playing. And

1:03:41.480 --> 1:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>there are a limited number of people who play those games,

1:03:45.680 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and how many people are there and depends on the day. Um,

1:03:52.480 --> 1:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>but we're talking tense. That's thirty would be a good day.

1:03:57.240 --> 1:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Usually it's fewer. And the way that it worked normally

1:04:03.240 --> 1:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is tournaments aren't cash games. No one is allowed to

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>sit behind players and look at their cards. It's not

1:04:09.040 --> 1:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed period. This was in a cash game, someone can

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sweat behind you, that's fine, No one cares. In a

1:04:16.560 --> 1:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>tournament this this is actually against the rules. However, this

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is the area can run its own tournaments, and I

1:04:24.800 --> 1:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was learning, and Eric said that he wanted me to

1:04:27.600 --> 1:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to see his cards, and the tournament director

1:04:31.000 --> 1:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>there said, if every single person is okay with that,

1:04:33.880 --> 1:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>then I'm okay with it. And so I asked every

1:04:36.160 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>single person and all of them said sure, not a

1:04:39.560 --> 1:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>problem at all. And so I was allowed to sit

1:04:42.680 --> 1:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and sweat with Eric to see his cards while he

1:04:45.280 --> 1:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>was playing UM. And then other players as I got

1:04:48.600 --> 1:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to know them, and as they became friendly with me

1:04:51.560 --> 1:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and started helping me with different elements of my game,

1:04:54.360 --> 1:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>other players would say, hey, why don't you sweat with

1:04:56.240 --> 1:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>me today? So I UM. All in all, I played with,

1:05:01.000 --> 1:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>played with, sweaded with three different players during my time there.

1:05:04.880 --> 1:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I sweateated with Eric most frequently. UM. I also did

1:05:09.880 --> 1:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a sweat a few times with Jason Coon and with

1:05:12.600 --> 1:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I Caxton. Those are two amazing players, both of whom

1:05:15.800 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>were really helpful to me. But everyone else I've never

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>seen their cards. Okay, just talking irrelevant of you. All

1:05:21.440 --> 1:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the high state game poker players know are at the area,

1:05:25.400 --> 1:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>well for that those tournaments, yes, so they're there are

1:05:28.880 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>cash games coming up playing happening all the time. This

1:05:32.040 --> 1:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't a cash game, So the high state cash games

1:05:34.640 --> 1:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>are happening at Bobby's room at the Bellagio, at a

1:05:36.720 --> 1:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>different casino. That's a different player pool, because tournament players

1:05:41.720 --> 1:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>are not cash players, and vice versa. Just for the uninitiated,

1:05:44.840 --> 1:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>explain the difference. In a cash game, every single chip

1:05:48.480 --> 1:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is worth a certain amount of money. So you buy

1:05:51.160 --> 1:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in for a hundred dollars and you get a hundred

1:05:54.160 --> 1:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of chips, and that's exactly how much you have.

1:05:58.240 --> 1:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you lose them, you can read, you can

1:06:00.640 --> 1:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>add on whatever you want um and you can walk

1:06:03.560 --> 1:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>away at any point. Maybe you want a huge hand,

1:06:06.080 --> 1:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, your hundred trips became five hundred,

1:06:08.960 --> 1:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and you say, you know what I want to go now.

1:06:10.360 --> 1:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>That's called a hit and run. Then you take your

1:06:12.880 --> 1:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>tips and you leave. In a tournament, trips have zero

1:06:17.040 --> 1:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>cash value. You buy in for certain amounts, a hundred

1:06:20.240 --> 1:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars and you get ten thousand ships, and so does

1:06:22.120 --> 1:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>every single person. And the chips are just a way

1:06:24.520 --> 1:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of keeping score. So they're just like points, and your

1:06:27.360 --> 1:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>goal is to gather all of them, and your chips

1:06:30.840 --> 1:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>are only worth something relative to the chips of the

1:06:34.800 --> 1:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>other players, and you can never you can't get up

1:06:37.600 --> 1:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and walk away when you suddenly find yourself with a

1:06:40.080 --> 1:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand ships. Nope, gotta gotta keep playing because they're

1:06:43.840 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>worth zero um. And if you if it's a freeze

1:06:48.560 --> 1:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>out tournament, which means you can't re enter. If you

1:06:51.560 --> 1:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>lose them, you're done. You're out of the tournament. And

1:06:55.360 --> 1:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of players give or take anywhere from depending on the

1:06:59.440 --> 1:07:01.439
<v Speaker 1>exact turn, meant are going to go home with zero

1:07:01.480 --> 1:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars because they will bust before the money and everyone

1:07:06.120 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>else is going to make money. And in a cash

1:07:08.440 --> 1:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>game that just doesn't happen. That's not the same. Okay,

1:07:12.160 --> 1:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. So let's say I'm at the

1:07:14.240 --> 1:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>area in the tournament begins. Is there a time limit, Yeah,

1:07:18.920 --> 1:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at the high rollers, Yes, you have thirty seconds to

1:07:21.440 --> 1:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>make every decision. No, I mean for the whole tournament itself.

1:07:24.640 --> 1:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, it ends when it ends. Okay. And let's

1:07:27.720 --> 1:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>say I'm playing in a cash game and I walk away.

1:07:31.320 --> 1:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>The other players are cool with that, Yeah, they keep playing.

1:07:34.840 --> 1:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're someone who always hit and runs,

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>so you're someone who always comes and as soon as

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you win, you leave, they're probably not gonna want you

1:07:43.080 --> 1:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to play with them anymore. Um. But if it's an

1:07:45.320 --> 1:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>open game, they can't do anything about it. If it's

1:07:47.440 --> 1:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a private game, they can. Then you're saying, these are

1:07:50.680 --> 1:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>different players who play cash games and play tournament games.

1:07:54.440 --> 1:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a different it's a different strategy. It's a different

1:07:56.720 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>game because in a cash game, you are are always

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>playing with the same number of blinds. So if you

1:08:04.760 --> 1:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>are playing at a low stakes game, say one dollar

1:08:06.960 --> 1:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>two dollars, it's not suddenly going to become a two

1:08:10.200 --> 1:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar five dollar game or five dollar ten dollar game.

1:08:12.880 --> 1:08:16.519
<v Speaker 1>Just doesn't happen. In a tournament, the blinds keep going up,

1:08:16.640 --> 1:08:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a very different strategy because your chips,

1:08:19.600 --> 1:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>relatively speaking, suddenly start being worth less and less and less.

1:08:23.720 --> 1:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>It's something that has a beginning. The beginning is like

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a cash game because you're deep stack, you have lots

1:08:28.840 --> 1:08:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of big blinds, and then it becomes much less like

1:08:31.560 --> 1:08:33.799
<v Speaker 1>a cash game because all of a sudden, the blinds

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>are you know, was one, two, and all of a sudden,

1:08:35.880 --> 1:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a thousand, two thousand, and if you still have

1:08:38.280 --> 1:08:40.839
<v Speaker 1>your ten thousand and chips, all of a sudden instead

1:08:40.840 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of you know, blinds, you all of a sudden have

1:08:45.240 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>five and you're gonna bust. Um. And so the pressure

1:08:49.280 --> 1:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>is very different, The dynamics are different, the decision making

1:08:52.560 --> 1:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>process is different. A lot of players play both. Now

1:08:55.600 --> 1:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I play cash as well, but most people specialize in one.

1:08:59.320 --> 1:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately, uh, when you're at the area, do you

1:09:02.360 --> 1:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>what's the biggest buy in tournament that you ever played

1:09:05.760 --> 1:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>at the area. I've only ever played their daily tournaments,

1:09:08.680 --> 1:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>so two forty dollar? Okay? Low? Uh. So ultimately you

1:09:14.080 --> 1:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>go to Monaco and then you go to the Carabean

1:09:17.600 --> 1:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>where you ultimately win. UM. Tell us the process there,

1:09:24.320 --> 1:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was just it's more of the same.

1:09:26.720 --> 1:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I just I kept working and studying and studying with

1:09:31.720 --> 1:09:38.479
<v Speaker 1>more and more people, UM, and just improving slowly, UM

1:09:38.560 --> 1:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>and slowly working my way up. UM. Once I would

1:09:42.479 --> 1:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>do well at a certain level, so I'd constantly challenge

1:09:45.439 --> 1:09:50.639
<v Speaker 1>myself UM. And no one could have predicted that I'd

1:09:50.640 --> 1:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>win a tournament, a major tournament at that UM. And

1:09:55.640 --> 1:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that's one of these things where you have to work hard,

1:09:57.960 --> 1:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but you also have to get lucky. And I most

1:10:00.160 --> 1:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of those things had to come together and as a

1:10:02.960 --> 1:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>result of winning, uh, you get on the Poker Stars team.

1:10:07.439 --> 1:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about that. So Poker Stars, which is one

1:10:10.120 --> 1:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest poker companies in the world, has something

1:10:13.040 --> 1:10:15.519
<v Speaker 1>that's called Team Pro. So it's a team of players

1:10:15.600 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>which are their professional players that are sponsored by the brand.

1:10:18.880 --> 1:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So whenever you play, you wear a little patches. Let's

1:10:21.720 --> 1:10:24.519
<v Speaker 1>say you know, Poker Stars Team Pro. So you're like,

1:10:24.880 --> 1:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you become like a NASCAR or Formula one where you're

1:10:29.920 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>suttenly put putting all these decals on you. Um, but

1:10:33.400 --> 1:10:37.599
<v Speaker 1>it's really prescigious and it's something where they kind of

1:10:38.439 --> 1:10:41.599
<v Speaker 1>they endorse you and you represent them, but you all

1:10:41.640 --> 1:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden also have more of a budget to play.

1:10:44.960 --> 1:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So I never received a salary from them. That's not

1:10:48.280 --> 1:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>how it worked because I didn't want any sort of

1:10:50.360 --> 1:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>conflict of interest. But for their tournaments, I had a budget,

1:10:53.880 --> 1:10:56.479
<v Speaker 1>so they'd say, you know, you can spend this amount

1:10:56.600 --> 1:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on Buyen's for instance. So it enabled me to play

1:11:01.280 --> 1:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>without being quite as afraid of of going broke because

1:11:06.120 --> 1:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I had I had this cushion and I wasn't paying

1:11:09.439 --> 1:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>for all of my own tournaments. At the Poker Stars.

1:11:12.200 --> 1:11:15.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm not aligned with Poker Stars anymore. No, no, Um,

1:11:15.520 --> 1:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I left the team last year. And what was the

1:11:17.920 --> 1:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>decision process there? It was a it was a mutual decision. Um.

1:11:22.439 --> 1:11:25.519
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to be involved with any poker company

1:11:25.560 --> 1:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>when my book came out, I wanted it to you know,

1:11:29.080 --> 1:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to just promote the book and not anyone else.

1:11:31.400 --> 1:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want anyone once again to think there was

1:11:33.280 --> 1:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a conflict of interest. And they were moving on. They've

1:11:36.800 --> 1:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>actually cut most of their live pros. Um. Their strategy

1:11:40.400 --> 1:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is now much more online. Um. And I'm not an

1:11:44.000 --> 1:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>online player. Okay. So let's say you get a hankering

1:11:47.280 --> 1:11:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to play, doesn't matter who's playing in terms of names,

1:11:51.720 --> 1:11:54.519
<v Speaker 1>where the location is. Maybe you go to Atlantic City,

1:11:54.560 --> 1:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you play, or you say, you know, I don't like

1:11:56.880 --> 1:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the players there. Um, I don't like Atlantic City, I

1:12:02.080 --> 1:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>hardly ever. I mean I so I for me, because

1:12:05.439 --> 1:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm a tournament player. It's not a hankering. I go

1:12:08.479 --> 1:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>where the tour goes. So I look at the schedule.

1:12:11.280 --> 1:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>They're announced well in advance, and I plan out the

1:12:13.760 --> 1:12:16.599
<v Speaker 1>stops I want to play at. So I I plan

1:12:16.640 --> 1:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>out where I want to be so at any given point,

1:12:19.920 --> 1:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean right now, there's zero going on. Let's just

1:12:22.000 --> 1:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>be clear. In the middle of a pandemic, there's no

1:12:24.360 --> 1:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>live poker. But let's reverse, you know, two years ago

1:12:29.479 --> 1:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>when when this was still a thing. At any given

1:12:31.920 --> 1:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>point in time, there are lots of major poker tours.

1:12:34.720 --> 1:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>The World Series of Poker just happens once a year,

1:12:37.520 --> 1:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>but there's a World Poker Tour which has major events

1:12:40.520 --> 1:12:43.479
<v Speaker 1>once a month. There's the European Poker Tour, which is

1:12:43.479 --> 1:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the one that's run by by poker Stars, and that's

1:12:46.320 --> 1:12:49.599
<v Speaker 1>happening in Europe. There's an Asia Pacific Poker Tour which

1:12:49.640 --> 1:12:52.479
<v Speaker 1>is happening in Asia. Um, there are a bunch in

1:12:52.520 --> 1:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the US. You've got the World Poker Tour, You've got

1:12:55.120 --> 1:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the World Series Circuit events. So there are lots of

1:12:58.000 --> 1:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>things happening at any given point in time. Time and

1:13:00.320 --> 1:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so what I would do would be sit down and

1:13:04.360 --> 1:13:07.519
<v Speaker 1>map out a schedule, map out what events that what

1:13:07.760 --> 1:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>stops I wanted to go to, because they're all series.

1:13:10.840 --> 1:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So you go and it's a number of different events.

1:13:13.360 --> 1:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't do well in one tournament, you

1:13:16.520 --> 1:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>just enter another one and you have many opportunities to

1:13:19.280 --> 1:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>do well. Um. And so that's how I would choose

1:13:22.720 --> 1:13:25.479
<v Speaker 1>when to play, and then when I went home, I

1:13:25.520 --> 1:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to relax. I mean, in which was the

1:13:28.920 --> 1:13:31.519
<v Speaker 1>year that I really spent really playing full time. That's

1:13:31.560 --> 1:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>when I was a Poker Stars Team pro. I was

1:13:34.680 --> 1:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>on the road for over eight months of the year.

1:13:37.439 --> 1:13:41.719
<v Speaker 1>That's exhausting, and I was I was just I was spent.

1:13:42.360 --> 1:13:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Uh So every time I was home, I just wanted

1:13:44.720 --> 1:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>to recharge. I had zero desire to play poker. Okay,

1:13:48.640 --> 1:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>now we live in an arrow. Used to be pre Internet,

1:13:51.760 --> 1:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you had to go out to have experiences. Now all

1:13:54.280 --> 1:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the actions at home. But one thing I always say

1:13:57.040 --> 1:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>is when you walk out the front door, you ever

1:14:00.200 --> 1:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>know what will happen. Let me give you an analogy

1:14:03.360 --> 1:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to ultimately form the question there. I have a friend

1:14:06.680 --> 1:14:09.599
<v Speaker 1>who got divorced, and to use the vernacular, he'll hit

1:14:09.640 --> 1:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>on anything that moves. So have you learned that it's two?

1:14:15.240 --> 1:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Is engagement the key? Because of luck, you never know

1:14:18.080 --> 1:14:20.799
<v Speaker 1>how the play plays out. Is it about the number

1:14:20.800 --> 1:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of ups, shall we say? Or is it about strategizing

1:14:24.200 --> 1:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the ups? It's about all of these things. So engagement definitely,

1:14:28.200 --> 1:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>because engagement gives you an edge, and engagement allows you

1:14:31.920 --> 1:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to take in more information and information with power. Information

1:14:35.600 --> 1:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is key, but yes, it's also about strategizing the ups

1:14:38.880 --> 1:14:42.599
<v Speaker 1>and minimizing the downs. So poker isn't about winning every hand.

1:14:43.000 --> 1:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's about winning the most with your good hands and

1:14:46.200 --> 1:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>losing the least with your bad hands. And you can

1:14:49.560 --> 1:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you can take that not just in the immediate hand

1:14:52.200 --> 1:14:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to hand, but also in the long term in terms

1:14:54.520 --> 1:14:57.639
<v Speaker 1>of tournaments. In terms of the long term. A lot

1:14:57.680 --> 1:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of players go broke because they go on a hot

1:15:00.040 --> 1:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>streak and they're winning, and they don't realize that there's

1:15:03.320 --> 1:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>such a thing as regression to the mean that this

1:15:05.800 --> 1:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't sustainable, that they're just getting lucky. Sure, they're probably

1:15:09.439 --> 1:15:11.479
<v Speaker 1>playing well, but they're also getting lucky, and so you

1:15:11.479 --> 1:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>need to plan ahead. You need to figure out, Okay,

1:15:14.200 --> 1:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>how do I plan for the down swain which is

1:15:16.840 --> 1:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. A lot of people don't do that,

1:15:18.920 --> 1:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and instead they say, Wow, I'm great, I'm not going

1:15:22.120 --> 1:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to play one thousand dollar tournaments anymore. I'm going to

1:15:24.280 --> 1:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>play ten thousand dollar tournaments. I'm gonna play twenty dollar tournaments. Hell,

1:15:27.960 --> 1:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna play fifty dollar tournaments. And there goes their money.

1:15:31.800 --> 1:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Because they can't actually afford to do that. Now you

1:15:35.040 --> 1:15:37.799
<v Speaker 1>talk in the book that you are on one side

1:15:37.800 --> 1:15:41.839
<v Speaker 1>of psychological training and there's another side which might close

1:15:41.880 --> 1:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you out of professorships. What's going on there? Oh, I

1:15:46.080 --> 1:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>was just so. So that was just me talking about

1:15:48.920 --> 1:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>different schools of social psychology. So the person who was

1:15:52.240 --> 1:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>my mentor, who was my advisor, Walter Michelle Um is

1:15:55.920 --> 1:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>someone who is very adamantly opposed to the person reality

1:16:00.400 --> 1:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>trait research. UM. So there's a school of personality psychology

1:16:04.880 --> 1:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>which says that you know, we have the Big five,

1:16:07.160 --> 1:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the big five traits, and we have certain levels of

1:16:09.720 --> 1:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>extra version and neuroticism and open this to experience all

1:16:14.760 --> 1:16:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of these things. And Walter said, bulletshit, that is not true.

1:16:19.760 --> 1:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not how the world works. You can't decontextualized personality.

1:16:23.600 --> 1:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Personality only matters in context if you're going to predict behavior.

1:16:28.680 --> 1:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And he actually did this back in the sixties. He

1:16:30.920 --> 1:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book that looked at the correlation between these

1:16:35.160 --> 1:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>all of these different measures and actual behavior and found

1:16:38.160 --> 1:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that the correlation was point one or point two, so

1:16:41.720 --> 1:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>predicted ten to of what happened, which is nothing. It's

1:16:46.200 --> 1:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>very low. And yet people were saying, this is the

1:16:48.439 --> 1:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>holy Grail, and he said, here's your problem. People don't

1:16:51.840 --> 1:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>have a there's no such thing as someone who is,

1:16:56.280 --> 1:17:00.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, conscientious. Maybe you're conscientious that well, your teachers

1:17:00.920 --> 1:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>think you're the neatest person ever, and you never make

1:17:03.280 --> 1:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>your bed, and your parents are frustrated because everything is

1:17:06.400 --> 1:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>such a mess, your clothes are on the floor, and

1:17:09.000 --> 1:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you're the opposite of conscientious at home. Context. Maybe you're

1:17:12.960 --> 1:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>someone who is a risk speaker in certain situations, like

1:17:17.840 --> 1:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you love to skydive, you like to really do all

1:17:21.280 --> 1:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, go go go full on out there, but

1:17:24.840 --> 1:17:28.559
<v Speaker 1>you're incredibly risk averse when it comes too many. And

1:17:29.040 --> 1:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you're someone who you know who keeps all your money

1:17:32.080 --> 1:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in a piggy bank because you're scared of the banks.

1:17:34.600 --> 1:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So once again context, and he said that what matters

1:17:38.479 --> 1:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is behavioral signatures. If then signatures, if we're in this situation,

1:17:44.320 --> 1:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>then this person behaves that way. That all of the

1:17:47.320 --> 1:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>other personality work was really pointless when it came to

1:17:51.400 --> 1:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>actually predicting how someone would behave, and pretty pointless as descriptors.

1:17:55.560 --> 1:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>There's an entire school of psychology who hates that and

1:17:58.920 --> 1:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>does not like Walter. I'm attached to him. I was

1:18:01.920 --> 1:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>his last student. When I apply to academic jobs, I

1:18:06.360 --> 1:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>come with Walter's baggage because I represent his viewpoint. And

1:18:10.400 --> 1:18:13.599
<v Speaker 1>so if and I never was in academia, I don't

1:18:13.640 --> 1:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>like academia for these very reasons. Um, I think it's

1:18:17.200 --> 1:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it's very I think it's very incestuous, very much who

1:18:21.040 --> 1:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you know and whose school you're on, and all of

1:18:23.400 --> 1:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>these things. But imagine that I went on the job

1:18:26.080 --> 1:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>market and I applied to a school for someone who's

1:18:29.840 --> 1:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>really big in the Big five of personality is on

1:18:33.040 --> 1:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the hiring committee. I might have done amazing work in

1:18:37.000 --> 1:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>what I do, but I'm not going to get an

1:18:38.960 --> 1:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>interview because that person is very opposed to my point

1:18:42.160 --> 1:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of view and doesn't want me in their psyche department.

1:18:46.320 --> 1:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Or I might not even have one of them, but

1:18:48.479 --> 1:18:50.559
<v Speaker 1>I might have the department who thinks that all social

1:18:50.560 --> 1:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>psychology is total bullshit and that it's all about neuroscience.

1:18:54.360 --> 1:18:57.839
<v Speaker 1>And if I get that person who's making the decision

1:18:57.920 --> 1:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>or listening to my job talk or reviewing my paper,

1:19:00.960 --> 1:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm done. I don't have a fair shop. They're not

1:19:03.160 --> 1:19:05.519
<v Speaker 1>actually going to look to see if i'm saying anything

1:19:05.560 --> 1:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting or if my research is interesting, because fundamentally they

1:19:09.360 --> 1:19:11.599
<v Speaker 1>disagree with what I'm doing. That's one of the things

1:19:11.680 --> 1:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I loved about poker. Um, none of that matters. Doesn't

1:19:14.840 --> 1:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>matter what you look like, where you went to school,

1:19:17.200 --> 1:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>who you studied with, whether you even graduated, what your

1:19:21.479 --> 1:19:24.599
<v Speaker 1>last name is, what religion you are. Another matters. If

1:19:24.600 --> 1:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you play well, you get to play, and if you

1:19:27.320 --> 1:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>can afford it, you can buy into any tournament. No

1:19:29.600 --> 1:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>one can ever block you from buying into a tournament. Now,

1:19:32.400 --> 1:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you immigrated from Russia at a young age. To what

1:19:35.520 --> 1:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>degree did that and having foreign parents affect your life

1:19:40.320 --> 1:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and career trajectory? I mean, my life would have been

1:19:44.400 --> 1:19:46.519
<v Speaker 1>completely different had that not happened. I mean it was

1:19:46.560 --> 1:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union. I did not leave Russia. I left

1:19:49.400 --> 1:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union. This was before the fall of the

1:19:51.160 --> 1:19:54.599
<v Speaker 1>Berlin Wall. No one knew when that was coming down. Um,

1:19:54.840 --> 1:19:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and so how did I stay? And I mean, I'm Jewish,

1:19:58.240 --> 1:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>It's I'm actually saying the reverse. I'm saying, how did

1:20:01.840 --> 1:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it change someone who grew up or started in Russia

1:20:06.479 --> 1:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>had foreign parents as opposed someone who grew up in America.

1:20:10.439 --> 1:20:12.519
<v Speaker 1>I can't answer that question. Because I didn't grow up

1:20:12.520 --> 1:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in America, I know how my life was changed. I mean,

1:20:15.000 --> 1:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I know that had I stayed in Russia, I wouldn't

1:20:18.360 --> 1:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have had I wouldn't be a writer, I wouldn't have

1:20:20.080 --> 1:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>had any of these opportunities. What age did you come

1:20:23.760 --> 1:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to America and did you feel different from kids? How

1:20:27.760 --> 1:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>long did it take to assimilate? Um? It took a while.

1:20:30.840 --> 1:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I didn't speak English, so of course, had

1:20:34.080 --> 1:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I grown up here would have been different. Um. So

1:20:36.840 --> 1:20:39.519
<v Speaker 1>I think I was much more aware of the limits

1:20:39.560 --> 1:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of our abilities very early on, because I couldn't communicate.

1:20:43.040 --> 1:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't say a single word in English. But I

1:20:45.360 --> 1:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>was lucky that I was little, so I was able

1:20:48.439 --> 1:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to learn quickly. I don't actually remember learning English. It

1:20:51.280 --> 1:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>just happened naturally, the way I remember learning some other

1:20:54.439 --> 1:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>languages that I speak now, But my my four year

1:20:57.400 --> 1:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>old brain picked it up eventually. And what did your

1:21:00.200 --> 1:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>parents do for a living in America? Computer programmers? What

1:21:03.240 --> 1:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they did in Russia, that's what they were trained. And

1:21:05.680 --> 1:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>how many kids in the family? Four? Four that I

1:21:08.200 --> 1:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>grew up with, actually five, okay, well the four that

1:21:11.880 --> 1:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you grew up with the other three. What are where

1:21:14.680 --> 1:21:18.479
<v Speaker 1>are you in the hierarchy, baby? And what are their

1:21:18.520 --> 1:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>lives look like? Um? My oldest sister is an m

1:21:23.360 --> 1:21:26.519
<v Speaker 1>d PhD. She's an anatologist and runs a lab at

1:21:26.560 --> 1:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Yale University. My other sister is a veterinarian and lives

1:21:30.400 --> 1:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in Vermont, and my brother, Um, lives in Sweden with

1:21:34.439 --> 1:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>his wife and kids and works for Spotify. Really, okay,

1:21:39.000 --> 1:21:42.519
<v Speaker 1>so you go to Harvard, what's that experience like? That's

1:21:42.560 --> 1:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>really you're at the age when Zuckerberg is there in

1:21:45.040 --> 1:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Biggle they were so so that was Zuckerberg was

1:21:49.000 --> 1:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a year below me. Eduardo was my year, and not

1:21:52.240 --> 1:21:54.880
<v Speaker 1>only my year. You lived in the same freshman dorm

1:21:54.920 --> 1:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>as I did. I've known I know all of those

1:21:57.320 --> 1:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>guys from the beginning. I was one of the first

1:21:59.560 --> 1:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>few hunt producers of Facebook. And what was your opinion

1:22:03.080 --> 1:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of them? Um? I always I didn't know Mark well.

1:22:07.040 --> 1:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I liked a Guardo he was always a really nice guy.

1:22:09.320 --> 1:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And the the Winkle the Winkle Watses were always nice,

1:22:13.120 --> 1:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't know them really either. Okay, so going

1:22:16.040 --> 1:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to Harvard was a good experience. I loved it. So

1:22:19.000 --> 1:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>my my husband also went to Harvard and he hated it,

1:22:21.520 --> 1:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>so he and I had very, very different experiences, but

1:22:24.120 --> 1:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely loved it. Is that where you met No,

1:22:27.040 --> 1:22:31.519
<v Speaker 1>now we met later um through a friend who was

1:22:31.680 --> 1:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>my my co worker and his former roommate. So at

1:22:37.640 --> 1:22:40.559
<v Speaker 1>what point do you decide you want to study psychology.

1:22:41.120 --> 1:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I decided I wanted to study psychology when I was

1:22:43.840 --> 1:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in high school and took an Advanced Placement psychology class,

1:22:48.400 --> 1:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and the summer reading assignment was Oliver sax Is, the

1:22:52.080 --> 1:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>man who mistook his wife for a hat, And I

1:22:54.840 --> 1:22:57.799
<v Speaker 1>remember reading that book and falling in love and thinking,

1:22:57.960 --> 1:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, the human brain is the most fascinating

1:23:00.720 --> 1:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>thing in the world. I want to be all over

1:23:02.960 --> 1:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>sex when I grow up. Not the doctor part, but

1:23:04.960 --> 1:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the person who can write that way and who can

1:23:07.479 --> 1:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>describe the human mind that way. So after you get

1:23:10.720 --> 1:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>your PhD. The concept of becoming a writer was instilled

1:23:14.360 --> 1:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>back in high school. Oh, the concept of becoming a

1:23:17.000 --> 1:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>writer was instilled when I was six years old, five

1:23:19.200 --> 1:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>or sex. Apparently I had announced it to my family

1:23:22.560 --> 1:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>way back then that I was going to be a writer.

1:23:24.280 --> 1:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I wrote my first book in first grade. I've always

1:23:28.040 --> 1:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to write. I study in Harvard, I studied fiction.

1:23:30.240 --> 1:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I studied fiction writing. I had actually I actually graduated

1:23:34.080 --> 1:23:37.519
<v Speaker 1>with a writing portfolio. Okay, So if we look at

1:23:37.560 --> 1:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the country at large, specifically Trump, the election, etcetera, what

1:23:43.760 --> 1:23:47.519
<v Speaker 1>does your experience with game theory and psychology tell us

1:23:47.880 --> 1:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>about what is happening in America today. I'm very pessimistic.

1:23:51.840 --> 1:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean and I'm very scared. I am not a

1:23:54.640 --> 1:23:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Trump supporter at all. I've done everything I can. I've

1:23:57.479 --> 1:24:01.360
<v Speaker 1>written for every publication about I could think of. You know,

1:24:01.439 --> 1:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I started off with a piece in The New Yorker

1:24:04.240 --> 1:24:07.559
<v Speaker 1>right after the election, call it saying Donald Trump con

1:24:07.640 --> 1:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>artist question mark. Well that has since changed to exclamation

1:24:10.840 --> 1:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>point written about Trump and his lives for Politico. Um.

1:24:15.200 --> 1:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just wrote a piece about Trump and

1:24:17.080 --> 1:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>as a poker player, as a maniac poker player for

1:24:20.240 --> 1:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Politico just a few weeks back. Um. I've become more

1:24:24.400 --> 1:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and more pessimistic, and I think that we run a

1:24:28.800 --> 1:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>real risk of a second term, which scares me. Um.

1:24:31.960 --> 1:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think people cannot get complacent. Um. And this is

1:24:37.160 --> 1:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>just what a what a way to make the conversation

1:24:40.400 --> 1:24:45.360
<v Speaker 1>going a really depressing direction. Trump. It's funny because people

1:24:45.360 --> 1:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about every stuff and other stuff, but

1:24:47.680 --> 1:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>it's all really the people want to talk about. In

1:24:50.520 --> 1:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of game theory, what might you advise the Democrats

1:24:54.920 --> 1:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to beat Trump in the election? I mean, Trump is

1:24:59.040 --> 1:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a maniac, and the way you beat mania accident to

1:25:02.240 --> 1:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>be a maniac back it's too fine. Pick your spots

1:25:06.960 --> 1:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and play more conservatively, and but really concentrate on those

1:25:11.400 --> 1:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>few hands that you are playing. Um. I think that

1:25:14.280 --> 1:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>people make a mistake when they go down to Trump's level,

1:25:19.280 --> 1:25:21.599
<v Speaker 1>when they stooped to that level, when they actually try

1:25:21.640 --> 1:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a maniac back and return. You can't beat

1:25:24.080 --> 1:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>him at that game. I think you need to be

1:25:25.880 --> 1:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>much smarter than that, and I think you need to

1:25:29.200 --> 1:25:33.559
<v Speaker 1>be much more patient and try to try to beat

1:25:33.640 --> 1:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>him by by playing stronger hands and playing them well. Okay,

1:25:38.080 --> 1:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>so in terms of engagement, everything is up in the

1:25:41.000 --> 1:25:44.519
<v Speaker 1>year because of COVID. Would you tell Biden to debate

1:25:44.600 --> 1:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>him or not to debate Trump? Stay in the basement

1:25:48.360 --> 1:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>because you want to be you want to be as

1:25:52.240 --> 1:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>conservative as possible against a maniac. Don't give him any

1:25:55.479 --> 1:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>don't give him any occasions to uh to lash out. No,

1:25:59.160 --> 1:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>do not debate him. What's that going to do? Okay?

1:26:02.800 --> 1:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And then let's go back to the nomination process. Obviously,

1:26:07.120 --> 1:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden is a centrist. Bernie and Warren were further to

1:26:11.439 --> 1:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the left, believing the American needed systemic change. Certainly since

1:26:16.080 --> 1:26:19.559
<v Speaker 1>that time, Black lives matters happens, there are protests, we

1:26:19.600 --> 1:26:24.360
<v Speaker 1>have COVID nineteen, we have all these economic issues. Would

1:26:24.439 --> 1:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you advise l was a good decision to play conservatively

1:26:27.840 --> 1:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>with Biden. Would a decision further oute there like Bernie

1:26:31.520 --> 1:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>have been a better decision. Obviously it's never gonna happen,

1:26:34.280 --> 1:26:37.479
<v Speaker 1>But what's your opinion. My opinion was that Warren was

1:26:37.520 --> 1:26:41.559
<v Speaker 1>a much better nominee and that it should have been so. So. No,

1:26:41.800 --> 1:26:44.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Biden was the best decision. Um, but

1:26:44.560 --> 1:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that Sanders was the right decision either.

1:26:47.120 --> 1:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I was in the Elizabeth Warren. But let's

1:26:51.160 --> 1:26:53.839
<v Speaker 1>make it a little bit less about personality more about,

1:26:53.880 --> 1:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the vision. Both until she waffled a little bit,

1:26:58.560 --> 1:27:02.360
<v Speaker 1>both Warren and c Anders were saying, Okay, you know,

1:27:02.479 --> 1:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we have to break up the tech companies, we have

1:27:04.840 --> 1:27:07.599
<v Speaker 1>to be aware of corporations. You know, we need health

1:27:07.640 --> 1:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>care for all, which is certainly different from what Trump

1:27:12.200 --> 1:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Republicans are selling. When you're someone in that position,

1:27:17.120 --> 1:27:19.559
<v Speaker 1>can you win with being outside or do you play

1:27:19.600 --> 1:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it safe? I think you can win. I think I

1:27:23.040 --> 1:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>think that playing it safe is not always as safe

1:27:26.760 --> 1:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a strategy as people think. That was a fundamental mistake

1:27:29.720 --> 1:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that I made early on in poker. I thought that

1:27:31.840 --> 1:27:34.519
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't go wrong by playing it safe, and it

1:27:34.600 --> 1:27:36.519
<v Speaker 1>ends up that I could. That I was bleeding chips,

1:27:37.000 --> 1:27:40.519
<v Speaker 1>I was bleeding supporters because I was just being very,

1:27:40.640 --> 1:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>very timid. So I think sometimes you need to go

1:27:42.880 --> 1:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>out there and realize that extreme more a little bit

1:27:46.800 --> 1:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>more extreme doesn't necessarily mean unsafe, that actually the safe

1:27:50.840 --> 1:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>choice might be the less safe one, because that's someone

1:27:53.400 --> 1:27:57.400
<v Speaker 1>who's incapable of winning. I don't think Biden's incapable of winning,

1:27:57.400 --> 1:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I'm just saying that, Um, I think

1:28:00.000 --> 1:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it it's false to think that the quote unquote safe

1:28:04.040 --> 1:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>choice is actually safe. Another thing Eric says is essentially

1:28:09.360 --> 1:28:11.559
<v Speaker 1>played a win. You don't want to just be in

1:28:11.600 --> 1:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the money. Tell us a difference there, so, as I

1:28:16.360 --> 1:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>already um intimated, when you're playing tournament poker, it's very

1:28:20.840 --> 1:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>different from cash games because most people are going to

1:28:25.040 --> 1:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>walk away with zero, and so there's a point in

1:28:28.080 --> 1:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a tournament called the bubble, and the bubble is the

1:28:31.320 --> 1:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>point where the next person out gets zero and then

1:28:34.680 --> 1:28:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the person after that makes money. So let's say it's

1:28:37.479 --> 1:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollar tournament um and ten people are getting paid.

1:28:41.240 --> 1:28:44.719
<v Speaker 1>The person who is out in eleventh place gets zero dollars,

1:28:44.720 --> 1:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and the person who's out in tenth place gets, say

1:28:46.800 --> 1:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty dollars. Okay, so they make twenty

1:28:50.120 --> 1:28:52.559
<v Speaker 1>dollars because a hundred dollars is they're buying, and they

1:28:52.560 --> 1:28:56.639
<v Speaker 1>make twenty dollars. But the way that tournament payouts work

1:28:57.200 --> 1:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is that they're concentrated at the top. So if you

1:29:01.520 --> 1:29:04.599
<v Speaker 1>keep just min cashing, which means being out in tenth

1:29:04.600 --> 1:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>place right after the bubble, if you keep just squeaking

1:29:07.320 --> 1:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>your way into the money and you keep making twenty dollars,

1:29:11.120 --> 1:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you're going to go broke, because what about all those

1:29:13.760 --> 1:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>tournaments that you didn't cash, What about the travel expenses,

1:29:17.280 --> 1:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what about all these different things you need. Actually, to

1:29:20.080 --> 1:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollar tournament, you need to be making a

1:29:21.920 --> 1:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars or you need to be making ten thousand dollars,

1:29:24.960 --> 1:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>not twenty. And the only way to do that is

1:29:27.920 --> 1:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to make the final table where the real money is concentrated.

1:29:30.680 --> 1:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Because maybe out in tenth places a hundred and twenty

1:29:33.439 --> 1:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars and first place gets nine dollars. That that's a

1:29:36.400 --> 1:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>little that's a little extreme, but maybe, but it's it's

1:29:39.400 --> 1:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like that. And so what Eric was saying,

1:29:43.240 --> 1:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>don't try to squeak into the money so that you

1:29:45.240 --> 1:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>can say you cashed, because you want to try to

1:29:48.760 --> 1:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>accumulate chirps, to put yourself in a position to win,

1:29:51.720 --> 1:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to put yourself in a position to actually make the

1:29:53.800 --> 1:29:56.639
<v Speaker 1>final table, to actually make a deep run, because that's

1:29:56.640 --> 1:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>how you actually make money in this game. And it's

1:29:59.439 --> 1:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a very diff strategy. A lot of people will just

1:30:02.280 --> 1:30:05.519
<v Speaker 1>start playing very conservatively, unfolding every single hand because they

1:30:05.560 --> 1:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>just want to say they cast they want to make

1:30:07.800 --> 1:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that men cash. But that's a very short sighted strategy.

1:30:11.640 --> 1:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>You need to be more aggressive. You need to actually

1:30:14.040 --> 1:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>be willing to risk more, because only by risking more

1:30:17.439 --> 1:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier are you going to be able to put yourself

1:30:19.880 --> 1:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in a position to win the most. Okay, let's talk

1:30:22.960 --> 1:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>about different things where the numbers are different. In Gulf,

1:30:26.840 --> 1:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>they pay a long way down. Certainly the person who

1:30:29.960 --> 1:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>wins makes usually double what number two, But then from

1:30:33.080 --> 1:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there people can make hundreds of thousands of dollars being

1:30:35.960 --> 1:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten. Okay, and certainly there's costs to

1:30:38.720 --> 1:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>play golf now, a lot of those people play to win.

1:30:42.479 --> 1:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a fan of ski racing Bodie Miller, who's now retired.

1:30:46.040 --> 1:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>He would play to win, whereas it's a season long

1:30:49.120 --> 1:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>cup and people with lesser victories might win on a

1:30:54.120 --> 1:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>cumulative basis. The question becomes, do you at this elite level,

1:31:00.640 --> 1:31:03.439
<v Speaker 1>do you have to play to win in order to

1:31:03.560 --> 1:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>succeed or is there a role for the journey person

1:31:07.120 --> 1:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in this game? Now you have to play to win

1:31:10.200 --> 1:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>um in order to really succeed UM. I think that

1:31:14.080 --> 1:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the journey person needs to play cash games as well,

1:31:17.920 --> 1:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>UM if they want to. Tournament poker is very high variants,

1:31:21.280 --> 1:31:24.639
<v Speaker 1>So tournament poker, UM, if you're not, if you don't

1:31:24.640 --> 1:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have a few big scores every single year, you're gonna

1:31:26.880 --> 1:31:29.479
<v Speaker 1>lose money and you're going to go broke. A lot

1:31:29.520 --> 1:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of tournament players they like playing tournaments, but they also

1:31:32.120 --> 1:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>supplement with cash games, which are much steadier, much lower invariants.

1:31:36.280 --> 1:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's one way of doing it, so, so if

1:31:38.080 --> 1:31:40.439
<v Speaker 1>you want to go hybrid that that's one way. Another

1:31:40.439 --> 1:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>way of doing it is to just sell a lot

1:31:42.040 --> 1:31:45.959
<v Speaker 1>of your actions. So a lot of people who aren't

1:31:46.000 --> 1:31:48.519
<v Speaker 1>making those huge scores but who want to keep playing,

1:31:48.880 --> 1:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll sell nine of their tournaments, so they're just playing

1:31:52.280 --> 1:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for ten percent. They can only lose ten percent, but

1:31:54.760 --> 1:31:56.639
<v Speaker 1>if they actually hit that big score, they're only gonna

1:31:56.680 --> 1:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>win time percent of it, and their investors are going

1:31:59.120 --> 1:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to get ninety percent. So there are lots of ways

1:32:01.280 --> 1:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of mitigating risks. So in that sense, sure, there's there's

1:32:04.120 --> 1:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely room for everyone. And if you're just there to

1:32:07.280 --> 1:32:10.479
<v Speaker 1>have fun, I think there's also room for you because

1:32:10.920 --> 1:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>as long as you don't as long as you don't

1:32:13.240 --> 1:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>quit your day job, I think that it's something where

1:32:16.000 --> 1:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you can learn a lot and where you can actually

1:32:18.600 --> 1:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>become a better decision maker. And I think it's better

1:32:21.439 --> 1:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>not to quit your day job. One of the reasons

1:32:23.080 --> 1:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that I think I was able to improve quickly was

1:32:25.880 --> 1:32:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I knew I didn't have to write. I could always

1:32:28.479 --> 1:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>go back to being a writer full time, and I

1:32:31.280 --> 1:32:33.519
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to play poker to make a living, and

1:32:33.520 --> 1:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that liberated me to actually play better. So

1:32:37.080 --> 1:32:39.599
<v Speaker 1>what did you learn about your initial question, your premise

1:32:40.160 --> 1:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>life of visa VI, luck and chance. I learned that

1:32:47.240 --> 1:32:50.559
<v Speaker 1>in the short term you have to have luck on

1:32:50.600 --> 1:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>your side. So in poker, poker is a game of

1:32:53.960 --> 1:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>skill and there's a chance element. But over the long term,

1:32:58.200 --> 1:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the best players are going to win, and that I

1:33:02.800 --> 1:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think is true in a in a macro sense as well.

1:33:07.320 --> 1:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>But in order to get to the long term, you

1:33:10.360 --> 1:33:12.719
<v Speaker 1>need to get lucky in the short term. So any hand,

1:33:13.120 --> 1:33:16.679
<v Speaker 1>any game, any tournament, a much worse player can win

1:33:17.160 --> 1:33:19.639
<v Speaker 1>if they get lucky and if they actually look out.

1:33:20.000 --> 1:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So I can play against Eric and win. That doesn't

1:33:23.160 --> 1:33:25.479
<v Speaker 1>mean I've suddenly become better than Eric. That just means

1:33:25.520 --> 1:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I got lucky. But if Rik and I play ten times,

1:33:28.080 --> 1:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna probably win more than I win. If we

1:33:31.880 --> 1:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>play a hundred of times, he's definitely going to win

1:33:34.080 --> 1:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>more than I win. If we play a thousand times,

1:33:35.840 --> 1:33:38.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna have any money left. That's how much

1:33:38.640 --> 1:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>more skilled he is than I am. So over the

1:33:41.680 --> 1:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>long term, skill in the immediate term, look, but you

1:33:47.280 --> 1:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>need to plan ahead. You need to realize that good

1:33:50.080 --> 1:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>luck and bad luck one doesn't necessarily follow the other

1:33:55.640 --> 1:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and you never know how long the long term is.

1:33:58.600 --> 1:34:00.599
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like if I got on lucky today,

1:34:00.600 --> 1:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to get lucky tomorrow. Life doesn't work that way.

1:34:02.680 --> 1:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Probability doesn't work that way. So all you can do

1:34:05.600 --> 1:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is keep making good decisions and keep putting yourself in

1:34:08.000 --> 1:34:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a position to win, and never risk so much that

1:34:10.760 --> 1:34:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you can't recover. I think that's a very valuable life

1:34:13.720 --> 1:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>lesson because you don't know how long you're going to

1:34:15.840 --> 1:34:18.800
<v Speaker 1>have to stick it out while the variance is not

1:34:18.880 --> 1:34:20.719
<v Speaker 1>on your side, and you have to just be ready

1:34:20.800 --> 1:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and be there when luck turns your way again. Okay,

1:34:24.720 --> 1:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>so let's just assume if I snap my finger and

1:34:26.960 --> 1:34:29.439
<v Speaker 1>COVID was over, which of course is not going to happen.

1:34:29.960 --> 1:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you a writer? Are you a poker player? What

1:34:33.120 --> 1:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do you anticipate doing after this lull both? I mean

1:34:38.200 --> 1:34:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I had no plans of stopping to play poker, never

1:34:41.560 --> 1:34:44.599
<v Speaker 1>had any plans to stop writing, and they go very

1:34:44.600 --> 1:34:46.800
<v Speaker 1>well hand in hand. I can write anywhere in the world,

1:34:46.840 --> 1:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I can play poker in most places in the world,

1:34:49.320 --> 1:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>so why not do both? But I think I'm always

1:34:51.960 --> 1:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost a writer that's always my my first identity.

1:34:55.640 --> 1:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what I love. Um, that's where my heart is,

1:34:58.840 --> 1:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's what makes me I am. But I love

1:35:01.320 --> 1:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>poker and I was still learning a lot and still

1:35:04.439 --> 1:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>really growing in the game when COVID hit um, and

1:35:08.240 --> 1:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so I fully intend to keep playing, at least for

1:35:12.600 --> 1:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the foreseeable future, while I'm still winning and while I'm

1:35:16.040 --> 1:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>still enjoying it. Why would I stop? And are you

1:35:20.840 --> 1:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>pulling together a new book as we talk? Um? No,

1:35:24.280 --> 1:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not someone who's thinking about my next project before

1:35:27.120 --> 1:35:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with my previous project, and it always takes

1:35:30.280 --> 1:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>me at least six months to figure out what I'm

1:35:32.160 --> 1:35:34.479
<v Speaker 1>going to do next in terms of books, So I

1:35:34.520 --> 1:35:36.599
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what's next. I'm working on some other

1:35:36.640 --> 1:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>things that aren't books, um, that I can't talk about

1:35:39.160 --> 1:35:41.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. But so I am. You will be seeing

1:35:41.800 --> 1:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>creative output for me from me in the coming months,

1:35:44.960 --> 1:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>but they're not It's not going to be in book form.

1:35:47.280 --> 1:35:49.479
<v Speaker 1>But the next book is I'm not sure? But is it?

1:35:49.680 --> 1:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>The creative projects are writing yes, okay, into what do

1:35:55.360 --> 1:35:59.559
<v Speaker 1>we did the success of the book? Uh? Meat or

1:35:59.600 --> 1:36:03.280
<v Speaker 1>exceed your expectations? And what opportunities have come along as

1:36:03.280 --> 1:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a result of the book. I mean, so far, it's

1:36:05.960 --> 1:36:09.760
<v Speaker 1>only been a month since it's been out. So Um,

1:36:09.960 --> 1:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been very happy with the with the reception that

1:36:14.240 --> 1:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>people seem to be responding to it and enjoying it.

1:36:17.360 --> 1:36:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what to expect. It's very different from

1:36:19.479 --> 1:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>my prior books. It's much more personal. I mean, it's

1:36:22.040 --> 1:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a memoir, it's it's a first person book. It's the

1:36:25.240 --> 1:36:27.720
<v Speaker 1>first time I've written in my real voice, not just

1:36:27.840 --> 1:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>my journalistic voice, and I've actually shared what's in my head. Um,

1:36:32.240 --> 1:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And so I think it's always makes you feel very

1:36:35.400 --> 1:36:39.599
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable putting yourself out there like that. So I didn't

1:36:39.600 --> 1:36:42.720
<v Speaker 1>know if people would like it, and I've been very

1:36:42.760 --> 1:36:46.240
<v Speaker 1>gratified that I've gotten a good response and that the

1:36:46.280 --> 1:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>poker community likes it. Um. That's also something that I

1:36:50.200 --> 1:36:53.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't know, um, whether that was going to work out

1:36:53.439 --> 1:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>or not, because poker players can be a tough crowd,

1:36:56.200 --> 1:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and so I I'm really glad that they think I've

1:36:58.680 --> 1:37:02.760
<v Speaker 1>represented them well for the most part. Um, It's it's

1:37:02.760 --> 1:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>been hard. I mean I had to cancel my book

1:37:04.960 --> 1:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to our, I had to cancel all of my events. Um,

1:37:07.520 --> 1:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not at all like the book release that I

1:37:09.680 --> 1:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>had planned. Um, but you you, the funny thing is

1:37:15.040 --> 1:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what my book is about. Right. You can plan

1:37:17.040 --> 1:37:19.760
<v Speaker 1>as much as you want, and then chance is going

1:37:19.800 --> 1:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to be what it's going to be, and you have

1:37:21.080 --> 1:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it. Actually, the human narrative as opposed

1:37:26.040 --> 1:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to the psychology, was the most interesting for me, and

1:37:29.960 --> 1:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I almost wish there were two books, one without any

1:37:32.880 --> 1:37:37.439
<v Speaker 1>of the psychological analysis and one with it, because just

1:37:37.560 --> 1:37:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of times I would get really

1:37:38.760 --> 1:37:40.280
<v Speaker 1>into it and you, you know, you would talk about

1:37:40.280 --> 1:37:42.280
<v Speaker 1>all the theories, etcetera. But I said, you know, what

1:37:42.400 --> 1:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is a person feeling? You know, what are they gonna do?

1:37:44.800 --> 1:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>What's happening? In any event, Maria, thanks so much for

1:37:48.000 --> 1:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>doing this. Thanks for taking time out of your day

1:37:50.280 --> 1:37:53.599
<v Speaker 1>tell your story. Certainly fascinating for all those of us

1:37:53.600 --> 1:37:56.519
<v Speaker 1>who are interested both in poker in life. Thanks again,

1:37:56.880 --> 1:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Bob, It's been a pleasure. Until

1:37:59.439 --> 1:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>next time. This is Bob left Sex