WEBVTT - Climate Crisis, Meet Democracy Crisis

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Drill. I'm Amy Westervelt, and today to

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>kick off the new year, we're talking to longtime progressive

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>organizer Max Berger about two really big questions for climate

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>how do you build an effective movement? And what do

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we do about the unraveling of democracy in America. I

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk to Berger in particular about these questions

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>because he's been involved with some of the most effective

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>social movements in recent history, the Sunrise Movement and Occupy

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. And he's also worked in politics for a

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>wide range of folks, including Howard Dean, Corey Bush, and

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren. Today, Berger works with More Perfect Union, an

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>advocacy group that helps working people be seen and heard

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>in media coverage. We spoke back in November twenty twenty

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>one for a wrap up episode of Seen on Radio's

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Climate season, focused on what needs to be done now

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>to avoid the most catastrophic impacts of the climate crisis.

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll link to that episode in the show notes. It's

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>well worth a listen. But I also wanted to bring

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>folks this longer conversation because I think it's just so

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>relevant to the task at hand as we start a

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>new year. Hope you enjoy the conversation. It's coming up

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>right after this quick break.

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 2>So I was hoping maybe you could start with just

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of your own personal background. I knowe

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you've been an organizer in progressive spaces for a really

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>long time.

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me on. It's a pleasure to

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>be on. Yeah. So I have been doing progressive and

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 3>left politics for what now, it turns out to be

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 3>quite a long time. I first started when I was

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 3>in high school actually doing organizing against the war in Iraq,

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 3>and I started a little group called Freedom Not Empire,

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 3>which I'm still very proud of the branding. And it

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>was actually a pretty formative experience for me because I

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 3>grew up in a small town in central Massachusetts that

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 3>was pretty evenly split politically and about as normal as

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 3>could be. And it really helped me, I think, understand

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 3>how to try to take what could be considered radical

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 3>ideas and try to make them very approachable in mainstream,

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 3>which I think I've tried to do and everything that

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I've subsequently done. After that, I was actually at an

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 3>anti war protest and somebody gave me a fly this

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 3>flyer for Howard Dean's presidential campaign, and I thought to myself, Okay,

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 3>that's a plausible that's a plausible theory of change, that

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 3>if that guy won, we could actually end the war.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 3>And so I went and I worked for his campaign

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 3>as an intern in Burlington, And so that kind of

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 3>set up the two main threads of my career, I

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 3>guess is sort of social movement stuff more in the streets,

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 3>and kind of left of the democratic part and trying

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>to bring some of those same values and ideas into

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 3>mainstream politics. I sometimes joke I've I've worked for every

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 3>tea Party of the left organization that has ever existed,

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 3>even like putting like all these deep cuts that like

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>no one's ever really heard of before. But you know,

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 3>so I worked for Rebuild the Dream, which was a

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 3>move On spinoff that was supposed to kind of be

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 3>the counterweight to the Tea Party that was started by

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Van Jones. I worked for the Progressive Change Campaign Committee,

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 3>which is one of the first organizations I claimed to

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 3>be doing what a lot of the groups on the

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 3>right do around elections. And then eventually most I tried

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 3>to start with myself in twenty fifteen twenty sixteen with

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of people who have since gone on to

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 3>do a lot of really cool and interesting things. And

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 3>then that group, which was called All of Us, we

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 3>ended up merging with Justice Democrats. So I was around

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 3>when Justice Democrats was first kind of getting started, and

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I had a chance to meet some of the folks

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 3>there and work with Corey Bush in twenty eighteen, and so, yeah,

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 3>it was early to that organization. And then on the

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 3>social movement side, I could tell this chronologically, but I

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 3>sort of story is kind of bouncing back and forth

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 3>between these two kind of bodies of work.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. No, that's great.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 3>On the social movement side, so while I was at

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 3>Rebuild the Dream, they were like, can you go help

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 3>start a social movement against austerity? This was in like

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 3>twenty ten, after the Tea Party took over. They're like,

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 3>can you start a youth move movement against austerity? And

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 3>I was I remember thinking myself, I know, I don't

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 3>know how to do that. That is really hard, but

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 3>I agree that that's needed. And that was my job.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 3>When Occupy Wall Street broke out, and I was living

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 3>in New York at the time, and I went down

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 3>the first week and I remember thinking myself, Okay, like

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 3>here these guys did it. I'm just gonna jump on

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 3>this thing. So I threw down pretty hard with Occupy,

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 3>and I think I was one of the first kind

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 3>of NGO connected folks who had been working in politics.

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 3>So I ended up helping, I think, bring some of

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 3>those types into the movement and planning some of the

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 3>big mobilizations that we did, the big days of mobilization,

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 3>and after Occupy, you know, my mind was kind of

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 3>blown because I very clearly saw both how this random

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>ragtag group of folks had started this global movement that

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 3>was so bigger and more powerful than anything that the

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>NGOs that I had worked for had ever been able

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>to come up. But also, as anybody who was part

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 3>of Occupy Wall Street could tell you, it was an

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 3>absolute shit show, disaster shambles in its own right. And

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 3>so I spent some time thinking about what it would

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>take to create a social movement that had more structure

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 3>and strategy and had a chance to actually win the

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 3>things that I was fighting for. And through some of

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the things I was exploring at the time, I ended

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 3>up getting connected with Carlos Savadra and Paul and who

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.799
<v Speaker 3>were students of Yvonne Maravich, who was one of the

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 3>lead organizers of the Serbian Revolution that overthrew Slovanan Loosovich

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 3>and Paul and carlos are you know, Americans who had

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 3>a lot of movement experience and were studying Yvon's ideas

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 3>about movement building, and I sort of agitated them, and

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 3>together the three of us ended up starting with a

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of other folks an organization called the Momentum Training

0:06:55.920 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Organization that has a theory of organizing or or teach

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 3>us some practices around organizing that help folks think through

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 3>how to have more structure and strategy so that you

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>can have highly autonomous movement where people can operate without

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 3>central command or organization, while at the same time having

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 3>clarity around what the goals are and how to achieve

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 3>those things. Together and the Momentum Organization ended up training

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people. After we started Momentum, the Warren

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Gaza broke out, so I kind of took the ideas

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 3>that we had been starting to cook in Momentum and

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>applied that to the sort of nascent Jewish left, where

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 3>I helped start If Not Now, which is a Jewish

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 3>American movement against the occupation in Palestine and learned a

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 3>lot about how different it is to apply a theory

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 3>than it is to come up with one, But very

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 3>proud of the young people who created that, who really

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 3>led that movement. And then I think when we were

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 3>doing all of us, I wish I referred to previously.

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a very small group of people at that time

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 3>who were taking this momentum stuff seriously. A lot of

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>the people who I was personally most invested in were

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 3>these kids who ran the Divestment Student Network, which you know,

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>I thought was the coolest climate organizing happening at the time.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 3>And I remember Varsh came to me in twenty sixteen,

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty seventeen. I was like, hey, we want to do

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 3>we want to front load, we want to plan a

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>movement coming out of DSN. And we were hoping that

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 3>like the folks from if Not Now could train us

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 3>and how to do that really absolutely, like let us

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 3>know what we can do, do anything to help you guys.

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 3>And that movement became Sunrise. And so I feel I

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 3>sometimes joke, like with the Sunrise kids that I'm like

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the uncle that's like prouder of the movement than like

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 3>even the parents or like the kids themselves like, no,

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I will not hear you talk badly about yourself. Okay,

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to hear. I worked on the Warren

0:08:55.840 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 3>campaign in twenty twenty doing progressive outreach, and after that

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I helped start with Fazshakir, who is the campaign manager

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 3>for Bernie's campaign. I helped start an organization called More

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Perfect Union, which is a media advocacy organization that builds

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 3>power for working people. And that's why I work now

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 3>as the editorial director.

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 2>Can I help you define front loading also for people

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 2>that don't know that term.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, frontloading, it's this term of art that we came

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 3>up with in momentum. It essentially just means planning, but

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 3>it specifically means planning for a movement that you hope

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 3>will decentralize. So if you look at movements like Occupy

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 3>in Black Lives Matter that broke out spontaneously or somewhat spontaneously,

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, they may have a group that really helped

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 3>kick them off and get them started, but it basically

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 3>went viral without a plan to operate at scale. And

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 3>so what ends up happening, in my experience is those

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 3>kinds of decohere very rapidly because there's not really especially

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 3>when you're talking about the actual institution of the movement,

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 3>there's very little holding it together because it wasn't really

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>planning to get as big as it got. And so

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 3>basically front loading is just a process by which you

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 3>spend time thinking about what do we do if this

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 3>gets huge? Right, And so as people are entering into

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 3>the movement, you can arm them with the knowledge and

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 3>the frameworks that they need to operate as part of it,

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 3>even if it gets really big. And I think that's

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 3>something that has served Sunrise really well in that they

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 3>had a pretty not that you don't have to answer

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 3>a million different questions, and it's not like this just

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of like unfolding protein that just then, you know,

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 3>collapses into the shape that it needs to be. But

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 3>it certainly allows you to It guides your decision making

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 3>once the movement is unfolding in a way that I

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 3>think it can be really helpful both for leaders and

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 3>for even new people coming in the front door to understand, Okay,

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 3>if I sign up for the movement, this is what

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm signing up for. This is why they believe what

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 3>they believe, this is what we're fighting for, This is

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 3>how we're going to fight for it. And so it

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 3>allows you to then take leadership in your local community

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 3>and be make decisions that make sense for your local

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 3>context while still being part of something much much larger

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 3>and more coherent.

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 2>The thing that has always struck me about Sunrise too

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 2>is that that it does have this this way of

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, just of flattening hierarchy in a way

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>like there are leaders, and there are people who take

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>on that mantle, like like Varshnie and whatnot. But but

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 2>then that have this ability to kind of step back

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and just be part of the movement again. And I

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 2>wonder if that's a planned thing, like if that's something

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>that you I don't know, that that gets sort of

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 2>set up up top.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>That's sort of the that's always the goal. I think

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 3>it's not. I mean, we could spend the whole hour

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 3>just on the kind of organizational theory stuff. So I'm

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 3>this is less my strong suit when it comes to

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 3>different areas of the movement. But you know, the folks

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 3>who help come up with these ideas spend a lot

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 3>of time studying different organizational structures, reading about Honestly, one

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 3>of the biggest inspirations is the Evangelical Church and the

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 3>way that they can create these kind of small groups

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 3>that really foster leadership and create tiers of engagement for

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 3>people to move up that give people a ton of

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 3>agency and autonomy, but within a structure so that as

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 3>you're going about your journey that you are you're part

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 3>of something bigger and it's kind of laid out. So

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 3>the goal is not necessarily to completely do away with hierarchies.

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 3>It's not a kind of anarchist like flattening of all difference,

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 3>but to allow for the hierarchies to emerge in ways

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 3>that serve the movement and that allow people still to

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of choice and freedom in kind of

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 3>like how they want to participate in what that means.

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 3>And I think especially that helps create a culture in

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 3>which there's a lot of accountability and the people at

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 3>the top are understanding their role as kind of servant

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 3>leaders in fostering fostering a movement that people actually want

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 3>to be a part of and that feels good to

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 3>be a part of. And I think that's one of

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Sunrise as many great successes, is in taking the culture

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 3>aspect of that really seriously and wanting to invite people

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 3>in and to make it feel friendly, and the Left,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 3>I think doesn't always do that, and I think, more importantly,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 3>doesn't even really try a lot of the time. And

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 3>I think Sunrise has. The folks who helped start it

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 3>have been a part of the left enough to know

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 3>that that doesn't work, right, Like, if you don't create

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 3>a welcoming space for people that folks actually want to

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 3>be a part of, then they'll go home, because there's

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 3>a million other things that they could do, and this

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 3>stuff is really hard. I think that they took that

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 3>seriously in a way that a very few other groups

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 3>do and have, and I think it's a significant part

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 3>of their success.

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 4>I have been hearing a lot of people recently talking

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 4>about systems change, but talking about it in this way

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 4>of like making tweaks to the existing system.

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Rather than sort of a more like an actual change

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 2>of the system or a replacement of the current system.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 4>And I've seen you at least tweeting a.

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Few things recently like the it might not be possible

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 2>to just improve the system that we have, that there

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>might actually be a need for what some would call revolution,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 2>And I'd love to just I don't know hear you

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 2>expand on that, Yeah.

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 3>It's a great question. I'll be honest that my answer

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 3>here is going to be very preliminary. I think I'm

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 3>in the process of trying to figure out what it

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 3>would look like to engage with these questions more serious

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 3>as is for the broader momentum community. And I would

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 3>not claim I'd say in the same way that like

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 3>eighteen months out, Sunrise was kind of like, Yeah, we

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 3>like want to start a new movement that's not just

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 3>about ending the fossil fuel industry, but that has a

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of positive vision of what we're trying to fight for,

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and we want to frontload it, and we want it

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 3>to be big, and we want it to be political

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 3>and not just a social movement, but we don't really

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 3>know what it is yet. That I'm sort of in

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 3>that kind of a place with this conversation. So with

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 3>that caveat that I'm still early in trying to figure

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 3>out how to talk about and think about this stuff,

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I would say I think, well, first, let's like define

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 3>the problem, right, because I think my intuition, hypothesis sense

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 3>of where this is going is that essentially it's not

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 3>really so much a question of should we keep the

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 3>current system that we have, or should we throw it

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 3>aside and get a totally new system. Unfortunately, I think

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 3>this decision has some already been made for us, and

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 3>that I don't think that this current system will can

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 3>sustain itself through the course of the decade. Because what's

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally happening here is the United States is a country

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 3>we like to think of ourselves and historically have you know,

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 3>really been very different from a lot of other countries

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 3>and sort of the pre eminent whatever American exceptionalism. But

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 3>if you just were to step back and look at

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 3>the US as a country, it would be very clear

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the current constitutional arrangement is not long for this world.

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 3>You have a significant subset of the population, particularly the

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 3>white population, although not only that, is really terrified about

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the transition away from a white majority population to a

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 3>multi racial majority. And that's happening in the context of

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 3>world historic inequality. Right, So, you really do have the

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 3>conditions for ethno nationalist authoritarian politics right like call it

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 3>fascists call it ethno nationalist authoritarian white supremacist politics, in

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 3>which there is a significant number of people that are

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 3>willing to use violence and do not really subscribe to

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the beliefs that are required of participating in a democracy

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 3>because they're afraid of losing power within that democracy to

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 3>other ethnic groups. That's the kind of beginning of my

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 3>analysis here. And if you take that as a kind

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 3>of skeleton key for what's going on, you're a lot

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 3>becomes more clear in that that group of people, that

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of white supremacist plurality, is not big enough to

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 3>govern the country, but it is big enough to take

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 3>over the Republican part as Trump showed, and through their

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 3>control of the Republican Party, are able to take control

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 3>of state and federal governments because we have a very

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 3>anti democratic political system, because our political system is the

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 3>result of a compromise with slaveholders and so vastly over

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 3>represents small rural states that white people have more power,

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 3>and so that white supremacist plurality can take over the

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 3>federal government, state governments with a minority of votes, and

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 3>because of other aspects of our anti democratic political system,

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 3>the Senate, as we're seeing now, the electoral college, as

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 3>we are kind of threatened with every four years that

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 3>there's going to be another instance in which the winner

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 3>of the popular vote does not become president that has

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 3>happened recently in a number of times, and the two

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 3>party system which allows for that, let's say, twenty five

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 3>to forty percent of the population to govern, we are

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 3>not We're not going to see the multi racial majority

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 3>have an opportunity to turn its will into law in

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 3>the next ten to fifteen years. And I think the

0:18:55.280 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 3>amount of tension that that will generate will break the

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 3>political system. I don't think that. I don't think that

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 3>the amount of friction that will be created in the

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 3>in the in the popular will of being steymied in

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 3>that way, particularly when the people in power are taking

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 3>active steps to move us away from competitive elections and

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 3>limit people's rights, I cannot imagine a situation in which

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 3>the multiracial majority takes that lying down. And I also

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 3>don't think that the white nationalist plurality is going to

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 3>become less vociferous in their opposition to multiracial democracy. So,

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 3>and if you were to talk about this with a

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 3>comparative political scientist, they would tell you, if you have

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>this kind of demographic transition happening, the worst case scenario,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 3>our political system is basically designed as poorly as possible

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 3>to manage that kind of a demographic transition because the

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 3>two party system collapses all divisions in society into a

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 3>zero sum, all or nothing competitive existential conflict, and when

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 3>that gets racialized or ethnicized, it can become dangerous very quickly.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 3>We're as polarized as any time since before the Civil War,

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 3>and in addition, with the separately elected presidency and a

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 3>bi cameral system, we have what a political scientists referred

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 3>to as a profusion of veto points right. So it's very,

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 3>very difficult for bills to become law, as we see

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 3>with anything. But the example I always use is gun control,

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 3>and after name a massacre, people always ask, if this

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 3>stuff is eighty five percent approval rating, why can't it pass?

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 3>And the truth of the matter is that very little

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 3>can pass, very little, very few laws make it through

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 3>the our system. And there's a stat that I think

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 3>is not bode well. I tweeted this the other day

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 3>and people thought I was saying not in jest, but

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's there's a stat that the United States

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 3>is the only system that has a separately elected executive

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 3>branch that is not at some point collapsed into dictators

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 3>because in presidential systems, systems with a separate, separately elected executive.

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 3>What happens is there's a conflict between the president and

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 3>the Congress and there's some external crisis that requires action,

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 3>and the Congress is incapable of or unwilling to respond,

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 3>and then the executive takes the authority to do so

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 3>without the approval of the legislature. And once that is broken,

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 3>it's very hard to take back. And I think some

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 3>version of that is more or less inevitable in the

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 3>next five years.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 4>So I.

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 3>The way I say it is like, look, we're going

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 3>to get a new political system. The question is does

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 3>it happen before authorityitarian authoritarianism, and civil war or after?

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.199
<v Speaker 3>And I would love for it to be before. As

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 3>an American, I would love to not have to experience

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 3>those things, but I don't. I don't think we're going to.

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think we're looking more at a post dictatorship,

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 3>post conflict situation and less at like how do we

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 3>organize a political revolution before? But it's not so neat

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 3>and tidy as that, right, Like I it's there's probably

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.719
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more overlap in those scenarios than I'm

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 3>given credit for.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's interesting that you say that because I feel

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 4>like people.

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Are seemed to be actually increasingly calling for Biden to

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 2>do that, you know.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 4>To just just use executive power to do X y Z.

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 2>And I think out of this frustration with the fact

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 2>that votes are being suppressed and then even when you know,

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 2>you do kind of elect someone that you think is

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 2>going to pass different palsy. Not that I mean I'm

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 2>under no, I was not, like I was not excited

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 2>to vote for, but like that, it's it's difficult to

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:14.719
<v Speaker 2>get any kind of significant change past, right, and then

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 2>that there's this sense of, oh, well, who knows if

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 2>this will stick, because in three years time someone else

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 2>will come in and change it back. I think people

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 2>are yeah, I just.

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 4>I just yeah.

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't really see how that continues without some kind

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 2>of boiling point and then restructuring of some kind.

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's not, it's not. We don't live in a democracy.

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Like the thing. The thing about the kind of common

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 3>liberal story around this that I get incredibly frustrated with

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 3>is that and this gets to sort of where I'd

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 3>like the conversation to go, and where I'm you know,

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 3>only beginning to try to figure out how to bring

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 3>it there. But you know where I think it needs

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 3>to go is we cannot simply make this about defending

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 3>the existing constitutional order, because it's precisely the existing constitutional

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 3>order that was failing that led us to this point.

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Trump is not aberrant in that respect. He is. Actually

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 3>there's a way in which you could argue he is.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 3>He is a defender of the underlying structures of the

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 3>constitution right they serve him. So despite his willingness to

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 3>get rid of the parts of the constitution that don't

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 3>benefit him, he doesn't want to change the underlying political

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 3>arrangements because they're good for Republicans. So I and like

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 3>you said, I mean, like in most other countries, the

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 3>way that democracy works, the way it's supposed to work,

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 3>is you vote for a new government. The government passes

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 3>the laws based on what they said they were going

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 3>to do in the election. Then voters get to decide

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 3>did that work for us? And depending on whether it

0:24:57.880 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 3>did or it didn't, they get rid of the people

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 3>in power, or they give them more opportunities to do

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 3>other things that they promise that they're going to do.

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 3>In our system, none of it works like that. People,

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 3>when you elect a new government, no matter what they

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 3>ran on. They probably can't actually do the thing that

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 3>they said that they were going to do. And it's

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 3>not because they weren't super committed to it or that

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 3>they don't really believe in it or whatever. It's because

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 3>literally our institutions make it impossible for them to do that.

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 3>And then people get mad because stuff isn't happening, because

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 3>things are going bad, and our system makes it damn

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 3>near impossible to figure out whose fault that is right,

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 3>whose fault is it that build back better got watered down?

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I follow this stuff super closely, about as

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 3>closely as anybody could, and I get confused sometimes. I

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 3>can't imagine how working class people who don't follow politics

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 3>that closely and just want to understand what our politics

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 3>to do more to help people like them, why they don't.

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 3>They can't tell who's that fault for these things, who

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 3>they should be angry at, who they should reelect. It

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make any sense. So the accountability mechanism is completely broken.

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 3>And to your point about wanting Biden to take more,

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 3>to just do more, this is the trajectory of the

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 3>past forty years. Is the Congress is less and less

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 3>able to pass laws, and so what that means of

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 3>the presidency is it has to just do more, do

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 3>more through executive action, do more through what existing authorities

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 3>it already has. And some people talk about that in

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 3>terms of the imperial presidency, and it is. It is,

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 3>It is dangerous, and it is part of it is

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 3>one of the many threads leading us towards authoritarianism. But

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 3>it needs to be seen as a result of the

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 3>failure of Congress to govern. And Congress's failure is again

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 3>not simply the result of kind of people with bad

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 3>ideas or insufficient will, but the result of a political

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 3>system that is this Rube Goldberg device that simply can't

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 3>sustain itself. And I think it's really important here also

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 3>to give some credence to the founders while also recognizing

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 3>just what the hell we're talking about here. Like these

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 3>guys were, it was the first modern republican democracy in

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the world. They had no examples to draw from, and

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 3>they had a lot of beliefs that now we would

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 3>think of as aberrant, and they didn't have anything to

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 3>compare themselves to. And so I think there's a way

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 3>that we can come down on the Constitution and the

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of original political institutions of the country in a

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 3>way that both recognizes that there were real innovations and

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 3>real leaps forward for human liberation, while not ignoring the

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 3>reality that many of these people were slave holders, and that,

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 3>in a very practical sense, that the institutions that they

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 3>created were the result of compromises with the power of slaveholders,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 3>and that those compromises still live with us today. That

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 3>we can kind of not throw out the baby with

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 3>the bathwater, like constitutional democracy is still worth fighting for,

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 3>and many of the ideals that we consider to be,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, American ideals are worth fighting for. But I

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 3>would argue that the spirit of the founders would augur

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 3>in favor of us creating a new constitution today in

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 3>the same way that they did and not paying fealty

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 3>to the work of long dead men who don't understand

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 3>the world that we live in today. So I think

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 3>we can talk more about this some other time. But

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that trying to imagine what it would look

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 3>like to create a new constitution is not as impossible

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 3>as people think. Again, because the United States is a country,

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 3>and other countries have constitutions that are significantly better than

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 3>the United States.

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 4>And that are significantly more flexible. Like other countries change

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 4>and update their constitutions all the time, and it like

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 4>never happens here.

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, right, not only not only I think that's

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 3>so key. We not only do we have a kind

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 3>of uniquely badly designed political system, but we also have

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 3>one of, if not the hardest constitution to change. So

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 3>it's this. It's like, imagine if you had the oldest,

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 3>like the literally the first indoor plumbing system that was

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 3>ever created in the world, and you could never change it.

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 3>You'd be like, well, this house is pretty nice, but

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 3>holy shit, it's always flooding and leaking and maybe it's

0:29:42.440 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 3>just time for a new plumbing system.

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this time. Thanks as always for joining us.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week with another bonus episode and

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>back with part two of our season on the gas

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>industry just as soon as we can wrap it up,

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>hopefully by the end of this month, but it might

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit later, just depending on you know,

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this never ending pandemic. Do you want to give a

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>shout out to our latest Patreon supporters, Tanna Morgan, Katie

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>will Gollihu, Maureen de com and Gerhardt le Abracadabra Daniel Stubbs,

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Ventry, Robbie Michelson, Tam vou Zane, Selvin's Wryder, Bergrad,

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Philip Bell, Courtney McNaught, and Rebecca Schwartz. That support and

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the support of our many other patrons is absolutely critical

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to the continuation of this podcast. If you would like

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to support our work and get access to ad free episodes,

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>bonus content, and ex exclusive merge while doing so, please

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>check out patreon dot com. Slash Drilled. Drilled is an

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>original production of the Critical Frequency podcast network. Music This

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Week is by Martin Wissenberg. The show is written, reported,

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and produced by me Amy westerveldt Our producer is Jules Bradley,

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Audio engineering by Peter Duff. Our First Amendment Attorney is

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>James Wheaton of the First Amendment Project. Thanks again for

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>listening and we'll see you next week.