WEBVTT - Ukrainian Resistance Has Russia Rethinking Strategy

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News Present bundes in Poland,

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>his second stop today, taking him to Warsaw. He has

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>met with US troops, He's meeting Ukrainian refugees. He's expected

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to also make a major address tomorrow, and one of

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>the most read stories on the Bloomberg is about how

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the buying administration officials are worried that Russian President Vladimir

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Putin may lash out dangerously as Russian troops find themselves

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>bogged down in Ukraine and Western sanctions begin to bite. Tim.

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot to digest, it is. Unfortunately, we have

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Anne Marie Horder and Washington correspondent for Bloomberg TV with

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>us now on the phone from warsaw Enemory. You've been

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in Europe before the president, since before the president even arrived. Um,

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>how would you characterize what he's accomplished thus far on

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the trip versus what he set out to accomplish. Yeah,

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Luckily I actually used to live here, so I could

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>say as well that there is a sense of there's

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a welcomeness in Europe right now, and you can see

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>that in the Poles as well for this administration and

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>actually of the unity they've brought and I was thinking Poland,

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a sense that they want to welcome and

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>have Ukrainian refugees. That the president did today called them

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>their guests. You haven't only seen that in European countries,

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>with refugees coming through other countries, notably a few years

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>ago from Kyria. It's hard to characterize the success right

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>because these trips are very much so also symbolic. But

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>yesterday was a school of diploma scene. He had NATO

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>had cours G seven Extraordinary meeting, and then he went

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and a dressed the European uh Commission and you did

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>walk go away with a feeling that leaders are united

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of wanting to make sure there is resolve

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and standing up to President Puchin. The big question is

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>going forward, how far can this last? It will be

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>pressured to increase sanctions, but also there's gonna be a

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of uh pushback and reverberations on all of these

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>economies as well, especially in Europe, which are very reliant

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on Russia, including a number of businesses but most notably

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>natural gas in oils. So, and I think we've talked

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>with you about this before. So who is kind of

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the leader on all of this. I am curious if

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody is looking to President Biden or is it really

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, European leaders, because they are obviously geographically and

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, economically, going to feel and are in feeling

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the impacts of this, uh, you know, much more severely,

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>much more closely than the US is well. Definitely the

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>United States is taking a headlestand in all into but

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>they have been in luck sets. If there's a lot

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of stuff with the European leaders that and they remind

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you of that that what they are doing, they are

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>doing alongside their partners. When it comes to Europe's very

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 1>difficult because this is a union of a number of

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>nations that they're only as strong as their weakest link,

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that they can only go as tough

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>as they're willing to as all the countries are willing

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to go. So I think the Latin in president yesterday,

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>he says he's ready to cut off Russian oil and gas.

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.399
<v Speaker 1>He says, we shouldn't be paying for this, it's we're

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>paying for Ukrainian blood, and he says there's a cost

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of freedom. But then you talked to Germans who very

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>much so want to loosen their dependence on oil and gas,

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>which we should note is a complete one. Eight when

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we saw into the Mercal chancellorship who really wanted to

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>have this nord stream too, and SPD had a lot

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of not her exactly, but the stbc He party had

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of connections with Russia. And now you see

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>them even going to cut her. Looking to nine stats,

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they're building l ND terminals, so you see that there

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are cracked. But I would say that it would be

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Germany given how big that economy is and how reliant

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>they are, specifically when it comes to natural gas. About

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty five coming from Russia. One thing we've been grappling with,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>as far as questions go and ray for the last

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>month or so has been on the other side of

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>this what things look like and when you know, without

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 1>trying to, without asking you to prognosticate or even predict

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens. I'm wondering how the appetite for decreasing reliance

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>on Russian energy, how to what extent that actually sticks

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>across the continent. Yeah, you know, we just don't know yet.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>The way the infrastructure set up is that r Extream

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>one a number of other pipelines about the third of

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>natural gas goes through Ukraine. Actually they get billions of

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>transit feeds like these, like an ev path almost are

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>allowing that gas to go through. But you do see

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Europe looking for other alternatives. Now, Europe was already putting

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money in investment in renewable they wanted

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to elector by their continent. But now, I mean, it

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is pretty astonishing seeing the German economy minister who's the

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>leader of the Green Party show up and cut her

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to try to ink ellen g deal. And he had

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>said when he was in Doha, we may have to

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>be rely on Russian guests for the next month, maybe

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in a year, but this might not always be the case,

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and he who has ears should listen. So really availed

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>threat to President m Hey. One of the benefits of

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>having you actually out there on the ground with the

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>President as he makes his moves around Europe is what

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you are seeing directly, something that I can't Tim can

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>in our studio and most of Americans can't do. What

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>have you been seeing? And we've just got about a

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>minute left. Well, I'll just say quickly at the moment

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm stuck on a street corner with the President, Motoricata,

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>just come through to the security everywhere. But you cannot

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>walk a block in Warsaw right now without seeing individuals.

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at a woman right now wrapped in the

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian flag. I'm seeing people sell Ukrainian flags and seeing

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian flags and Rauciti everywhere. This is a city that

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is standing in solidarity with Kiev, and that is very

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>apparent the moment you step off the plane. All right,

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll save travels, kiddo, and really appreciate it. We know

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you've been running around a lot, but really great to

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>check in with you. Bloomberg TV Washington or Bloomberg I

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>should say TV and Radio Washington correspondent and Marie Horden

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us. She's on the ground in Warsaw, Poland, and

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>she's been there with the President as he moves around. Yeah,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we're also expecting to hear from the President once again tomorrow,

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>following up on yesterday's major addressed from what I understand right,

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see what he has to say. Um. But

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the energy, you know that Energy news and then working

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>at a deal of the EU to get more US

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>l n G. We've seen that impact some of the

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>E n P players. I mean, energy has been to

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>standout performer last year this year, but you definitely see

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>different sectors move based on these different headlines. Questions, Carol,

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>is it a permanent shift on the other side of this,

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a question we've been grappling with for weeks. You

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>make deals, right, they stick around own. I guess something.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. We're just

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>getting started on this Friday. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. As we've been talking about Germany's COVID situation.

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It is getting worse meantime. Just yesterday we talked with

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Ian Marlowe about how Hong Kong went from zero

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to one of the worst areas of the world when

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to COVID in the health pandemic. So what

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>does that mean for the United States and the next

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>few weeks here at the Round. Well, that's a question

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna post to. Dr Ian LUs Bader, clinical

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.239
<v Speaker 1>professor of medicine at n y U Lang's Medical Center.

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from New York City,

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Dr Lusbader, how are you hey? Happy Friday, guys. So

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone is doing well? Yeah, we're good, Thank you. Um So,

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I was startled to see this UK COVID headline among

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the others that Carol read surging by one million in

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just a week. Oftentimes with over the last two years

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>what's happened in the UK, we've seen happen here in

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Is this any exception, you know, like

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen the Spanish flu. You don't want to always compare

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>one pandemic to another, but so far I think that's

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>provided a pretty good model. Um It took about three years,

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're still seeing a number of places

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>around the world that are seeing a surge another wave

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of COVID, in this case primarily over crowned the B

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>A two variant, which is much more transmissible, maybe fifty

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 1>more transmissible, fortunately not more deadly. And we're really seeing

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this in different parts of the world. For example, in

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>China and Hong Kong, they tried the lockdown approach. We've

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>seen data that that does not work well. Their vaccination

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>rates were not particularly high as a small island um.

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>They also used the sign of fact vaccine, which we

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>don't really know that much about where it is unclear

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>how effective that is. And certainly for many of the

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>people in uh China and Hong Kong, they've only had

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>one or two vaccines, not the three or now that

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we're contemplating four here, not nearly as much as in

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the US. So I don't think we can really compare

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the world, but certainly the surge in

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the UK is concerning. I think we're in a better

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>position in the US. I think our case numbers are dropping.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>Could we see another minor peak um with the B

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>two variant. I think we might we're not seeing an

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>increase in hospitalizations or deaths. And I think part of

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that is because we've been generally very good with vaccines

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, MOUs and sort of simple procedures. But

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we have a lot of antibodies around, both

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>from getting ill and uh and from vaccinations. Well, okay,

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's funny some of the conversations Ian. I mean,

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I've you know, things have happened in terms of contract

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing, even at our office, you know, been reached

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>out where I kind of thought, wait, everything was getting coming.

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, if I just want to say, you're four

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>feet away from me. So, so how do we because

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of those antibodies? Because I've had three shots, Um, it

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean I won't have some symptoms, but or or

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I could possibly or anybody could or or nothing. Right,

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's kind of where we are because of

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because of mutation, people can have they kind of their

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>three shots, can have had COVID or the alpha variant

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and are often still getting O macron. But what we're

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>noticing is it's very mild. And in your case, you

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 1>you had a positive swab, but really no symptoms. Wasn't

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a false positive maybe, but we're seeing very mild to

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to really no symptoms, some people a little bit more

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>with cough and and laryngitis. So I think I had

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that variant, But I think the key metric is hospitalizations

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.599
<v Speaker 1>and fatal disease. And really what I would say is

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>many people are concerned should I get a fourth vaccine

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>right now? Cdc UH is limiting it. Really the only

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>people who are im you know, compromised. My bet, like

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>israel As, we will approve it for people sixty five

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and older or people with underlying disease, and I would say, yes,

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're in that high risk group, sure it's worth

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>taking another vaccine. How effective that is not quite clear

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>because remember we keep giving alpha boosters and the and

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the virus has mutated. You know, if we could develop

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>an omicron vaccine, that would make a lot more sense

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in your view, Dr LUs Beder, Have we gone from

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>pandemic to endemic yet? I think we're in that transition,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and if we see covid in the full, which we might,

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>my bet is it will be more of an endemic.

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>We might get you know, flu shots combined with COVID shots.

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>But in my mind, I think we need to. What

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this tells me is we need to work harder on

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>an appropriate vaccine like omicron and a universal vaccine for

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>coronaviruses which would protect against other common cold viruses. Yeah,

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's a story in the Bloomberg about that. Uh

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and also in our weekend show looking at booster development

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and ongoing. Hey, Ian, thank you so much, have a

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>great weekend. Ian LUs Beda, Dr Ian las Beda over

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>at n y u Lango Medical Center. This is Bloomberg

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. A lot going on on the

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Russian Ukrainian front today, you know that, And that includes

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>something that we heard thanks to our Bloomberg's Maria today

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>or she caught up with Ukrainian President Zelinski's chief of

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>staff igor Zakova, and he told her the Ukraine will

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>never surrender. He don't want the peace agreement on the

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Russian terms. They wanted us to have a peace agreement

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Russian forms at the beginning. They wanted to

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>all their provisions to be implemented, all their demands of dreadlines. No,

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>but we don't have any agreement any any peaceful agreement

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>or the peaceful women at any terms. We will want

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the peaceful women at Ukrainian terms because we're served in West.

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Survivan again that as Ukrainian President Zelanski's chief of staff Egorzakova. Um,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>we are so lucky to have access to this next guest,

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>her expertise and Russian President Vladimir Putin has just been

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>uh so important and valuable to us. Back with us

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>as Angela Stent, Senior advisor to the Center for Eurasian,

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Russian and East European Studies, also served as a National

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence Officer for Russia and Eurasia at the National Intelligence

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Council and before that served at the U. S Department

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of State. Her latest book is on Vladimir Putin. It's

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>entitled Putin's World, Russia against the West End with the

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>rest once again on the phone from Washington, d C. Angela,

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you again for just checking in with us or

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>giving us some time again. Um, where are we on this?

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you think might be next? In terms of

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin's efforts and moves? So interestingly enough, the Russian

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>military today held a press conference and said, well, actually

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to focus on securing the Donbass region,

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the region in southeastern Ukraine with the two separatist entities.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So suddenly they're not talking anymore about the whole of Ukraine,

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>about Kiev, and they're saying, well, we never meant to

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>do anything else but that anyway, which of course is

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>completely different from what they said a few weeks ago.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>If that's true, then that means that, you know, the

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians have successfully been resisting them. They're not going to

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to take key of any time soon. So

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see what this brings in the next

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>few days. So what do you make of that specific move?

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that a way for Putin in his

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>military to to save face, to get out. It appears

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that it could be they could say we said all

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>along we wanted to secure these republics. Uh, they will

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have them secured, and they can say now we know that,

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Ukrainian quote unquote fascists and Nazis won't

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>get them, and we can go home. I mean, I

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't jump to conclusions that's that's going to happen immediately,

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>but they are giving themselves now a way out. It

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is there there there a lot of questions about whether

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>or not Zelinski and the Ukrainians would actually seed on

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the don Bus region right there. Certainly is and you

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>know it would depend. Then you'd have to have negotiations

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and you'd have to see, you know, what the Russians

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>are demanding and what the Ukrainians are willing to concede.

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And obviously there you know, if they've done well the

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians as they have, they're going to be tougher in

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>these negotiations. But is this just a case if indeed

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we see President Putin and Russia retreating on this, is

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this just a case of okay for now, but that

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>his intentions haven't really changed about his uh feelings and

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>plans for Ukraine. Yeah, I don't think we can say

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point that his intentions have changed. I think

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that he you know, his goal remains the subjugation of

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and having a government in power and KEIV that's

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>pro Russian and gives up on trying to join the West.

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Those were his goals you know, years ago, months ago,

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and they remained the same. But you know, you could

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at least have a lot, You could have a siege fire.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have a regrouping, and then let's see what

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>happens going forward, and let's see if Russia changes some

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of its gold depending on how badly all of these

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>sanctions hit. Going forward, if there is a regrouping, what

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>happens to the rest of the world. Has have things

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>changed indefinitely at this point, whether it comes to where

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Europe gets its energy, whether it comes to strengthening of NATO,

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>has that changed at least for the mid term. I'm

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to think of duration, what's the right duration. Have

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>these kind of changed They definitely, yeah, I think they

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely have, because you know, the Europeans, outside world has

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>realized that Russia undertook this unprovoked invasion in the middle

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of Europe, causing this humanitarian catastrophe, refugee crisis, displaced persons.

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>We've heard that Ukrainians have been abducted and taken to

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>different locations in Russia. So nobody is you know, going

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to It's not going to go back to what it

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>was before. The question is whether the conflict would in

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.479
<v Speaker 1>fact be over um at some time in the near future,

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and that meant might that make people rethink things? But

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I think for the medium term, nothing's going to change.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>People are going to realize that the system we had

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>before Febry twenty four, before the invasion is broken, and

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, something needs to be done to fix it.

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Just real quickly. What's medium term that? Three five years? Yeah,

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's it's a few years. I would say, definitely, definitely, Angela.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>You wrote a book, as Carol mentioned, called Putin's World,

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Russia against the West and with the rest. What do

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you think is going on in Putin's head right now?

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>How do you think he is feeling and how do

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you think he how do you It's hard to be

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>It's impossible to predict what he's going to do. But

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>given that he thought he was going to take Keep

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in a matter of hours or days, and here Russian

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>troops are in a stalemate outside many of the major

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>cities right now, well, I mean, he must be very

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>angry at those advisors of his who reinforced what he

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to believe, which was this was going to be

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>a cakewalk and the Ukrainians were going to concede, you know,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>within seventy two hours. So he must be very angry

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>at that. I think he's amazed, really by the fact

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that you've had allied unity on these very tough sanctions.

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he thought the sanctions like this would

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>be imposed, and now Russian has to scrambled to see

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>how it's gonna deal with you sanctions going forward. Uh,

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>he's and I think he's seen, um, you know, very

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 1>surprised by Ukrainian resistance. Hey, really quickly twenty seconds, because

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you understand this world. Do you think the oligarchs are

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>calling him up and saying enough already, Vladimir, knock it

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>off just quickly. Well, they may be, but they don't

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>really have that kind of influence over him. The people

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>who have influence overhead of the people from the security

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>said this is not the oligarchs. You're a gem. Thank

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much. When we heard all the news and

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>headlines again this morning, we're like, this is who we

0:18:57.960 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to. So Angela, thank you so much.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Aways appreciated. Angelis Stent, advisor to the Center for Eurasian,

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Russian and East European Studies. Check out her book called

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Putin's World. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.959
<v Speaker 1>flet of crypto headlines among them, and Caroline mentioned at

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hyde earlier about eight Ether up for a second day,

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>extending it's a performance compared with Bitcoin. There's a lot

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of excitement over an upcoming software upgrade, promises to reduce

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the blockchains carbon footprint, paved the way to improve the

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>network scalability and efficiency. So that's given a little bit

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of a boost. Let's get into it with our next guests.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>We're really pleased to be joined by Bret Harrison, who's

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>president of f t X US. Before f t x

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>he was the head of semi systematic technology at Citadel Securities.

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Before that, he was at Jane Street, where you led

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the firm's algorithmic trading system development. Brett, good to talk

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to you again. How are you Yeah, great to talk

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to you too. How are you We're doing well? Thanks. Um.

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with just what you're seeing on

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the platform right now. We did talk just a few

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>moments ago about the rise of is that we're seeing

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>with Bitcoin is up for a second day in a row.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It's getting another bid today, best levels in more than

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a month. What are you seeing on f t X

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>USS platform. Yeah, we're definitely seeing increased volumes across the board. Um.

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>The top asset on the platform right now is Ether,

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of excitement around as you mentioned the upcoming

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>upgrades on Ether promise about future scalability, lower transaction costs

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>or emissions, and so Ether followed by Bitcoin, followed by

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Salona the top three assets on ft X. You asked today,

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>so what would you say an increase in volume? Give us,

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>give us some numbers, were Bloomberg. We're nerdy, we like

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to know numbers. So how much are you seeing an

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 1>increase in volumes? And I'm curious about types of users

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>new users? What kind of growth are you seeing there? Sure? Um,

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, dish increase, uh, compared to let's say the

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>last month or so. UM, we are are bought volumes

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>tends to have and slow, not just with you know,

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>increasing prices, but also with just general volatility and a

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of institutional market makers. On the last form UM

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>users send a just subtly increase. Of course, it's not

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just the prices of assets, but also the budget that

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>we've been putting into marketing and trying to acquire and

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>used onto the platform as well. Hey, Brett. Um, I

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>want to I want to talk a little bit about

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>follow you on Twitter. A lot of people follow you

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. I'm not the only one. UM. I want to,

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>uh just get you to expand on something that you

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>tweeted last week. It was all about marijuana related companies

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>and digital assets, cannabis and digital assets, and you know,

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of our listeners are familiar with

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the the challenges that these cannabis companies face because they

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>are not able to use banks per se. They poured

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cash. You see security guards outside of

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>cannabis shops right now as a result of that. Um,

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>what did you mean when you said that that that

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>cannabis that digital assets could really help when it comes

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to cannabis. So, something that we're looking at in general,

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and not just with cannabis companies, but underbanked and unbanked

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>populations in general are ways in which people might not

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>have access to traditional financial services and their disadvantage as

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a result. So, for example, UM, even in Chicago where

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we live, there are people who are underbanked or unbanked.

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>They get paid as a paycheck, in as an actual

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>physical check, and instead of being able to cash out

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of a bank, they have to go to a local

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>currency exchange and give away thirty percent of their paycheck

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>just to cash that check. And crypto exchanges having these

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>modern banking services can provide some of these kinds of

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>depository services that otherwise banks have provide, and to do

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so with better technology, with mobile applications. Also global remittances,

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>being able to transmit payments, you know, across border for example. Uh,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>someone who is sending paysouse back to their family in

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Mexico from Chicago. Again, they're gonna get killed the currency exchange.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just with with cannabis companies in general.

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at cases where crypto exchanges can help using uh,

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, borderless quick low fee transactions, using stable coins,

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>other kinds of cryptos to be able to assist in

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>places where financial services aren't really available. Gotta say, Rosscober

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly well known to our audience. We have them on.

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>He's like, do it when it comes to I think

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody commenting on your Twitter feed, which we've been playing

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for our YouTube viewers, you know, rosscarversing, do it when

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>it comes to a crypto option. If there is a

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>crypto option for cannaby cannabis, um Brett. Do you think

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it will be its own or is it tapping into

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>ethereum or is it tapping into bitcoin? What is it?

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's probably none of the above. The first

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>goal would be would be to be able to use

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just you know, for example, stable coins like USDC, some

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of digital form of us D where you're not

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>exposed to the politi atility of crypto, but you are

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>getting the benefit of digital currencies being easy to hold,

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>easy to transfer, um able to to be to hold

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>those in in a wilet where they might not be

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>able to hold those in the bank account right now,

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting stuff again, tweeting and comes like a stay

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>tuned speaking of well, speaking of staying tuned, I want

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit about f t X stocks,

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>because we did that as we approached the launch date

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for f t X stocks. We look forward to sharing

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>more on how we're thinking about the above questions, mainly

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>payment for order flow, how you're going to offer the

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for people to trade stocks on the platform, uh,

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and quote the decisions that we've made. UM. Do you

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have a launch date for f t X stocks? When

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>are you think abou launching not yet, but um let's

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>say sometime in the next couple of months for sure,

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And how do you anticipate paying for it? Payment forward

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to flow is something that you talked about in the

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in the tweet thread, but you brought up some challenges

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to payment forwarder flow, So what does

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that look like? Yeah, again, we're gonna be happy to

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>share those to get closer to launch date. In the meantime,

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we're exploring a couple of different options for possible or

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>order outing and execution. You know, for us, our primary

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>business is crypto and it is currently a pretty high

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>margin business where there are still per trade fees as

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the norm on ft x U s are fees are

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>something like se lower than many of our competitors in

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the space. Um, so we take that very seriously, but

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's still a pur trade commission or fee. So the

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>primary goal of having stock on the platform might not

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily be to generate the maximum possible profit from the

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>stock trading, to give people a holistic investing experience that

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>captures those users onto a platform, putting your deposits at

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>one place and engaging in both the crypto and the

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>stock side from the same interface, Bret, so, is it

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a launch maybe in the first half or second half?

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly aiming for first half. All right, we're gonna

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. We really appreciate your time. Have a

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>great week in Brett Harris and he's the president of

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>f t x US joining us on the phone in Chicago.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week, Carl Master, Tim Stanovic.

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Radio. I'm yeah, but you let me drive?

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no no, no, honey, please, I'll do the riding.

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's the question. This is the

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>drive to the globe thing? Well, radios, it just about

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes left in today's treating session. Yeah, I know, right, Yeah,

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy. Uh yeah, it's been a busy another busy

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>day here, um and we've been bounced around though. It's

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>really it does feel like stocks just looking for direction here. Yeah,

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's literally what I've been thinking about for

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the top of our what Tim said to me in

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the break. But it's true. It's it's gone between gains

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and loss today at least ten times. It's traded within

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>a relatively narrow range about one percent today, so really

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>struggling for direction. Let's get into it with Ryan Dietrich,

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>chief market strategist at LPL Financial. He joins us on

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Charlotte, North Carolina. Ryan, how are you. Yeah,

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's good to have you back with us. UM, help

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>us give us your take of what's going on with

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the market right now, because usually when we talk to

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you are pretty bullish when you're looking at these technicals. Um,

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>but we haven't talked to you since the most recent

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>sell off and you know, close to recovery that we've

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>seen over the last what ten days or so. What

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>do you make of it? Yeah? Pretty amazing, right, I mean,

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>you know we were looking at one of the larger

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>two week bounces we've seen in years. I mean, thoughts are,

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>like you said, kind of flatish today, but for the

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks were higher. Um. You know, there's

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of ways to look at it. I

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>guess I'll start it like this. You know, the first

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty trading days of this year, the SMP five hundred

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was down ten percent. That's one of the worst starts ever,

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>was sixth worst start ever two a year. You look

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 1>at the other previous worst starts ever. Though we've had

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>some really big comebacks, most recently two thousand nine and

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty, really big comebacks. And the last point

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>on this March for whatever reason, has been kind of

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a bear market killer, right two thousand three, two thousand nine,

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty. So yeah, markets, markets, you know Mark

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Twains about you know history under Pete at the Rhymes,

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we think, once again we could be looking at another

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>March low. I mean, it really feels like that and

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that could be an opportunity here. Um once again, why

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't this just a bear market bounce? Yeah? That the

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>ultimate question, Carol, and I think when you look at

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>our take is this bear market bounces there like a

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>day or two, they're really strong. I mean, what happened

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>last week? We had four straight days on the SMP

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of at least a one percent game. That is extremely

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 1>rare when you go back in history, it's only happened

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>four other times. And the two most reason we're the

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>right at the election in twenty and then in late

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty two. When you look a year after four straight

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>days of one percent gain in a small sample size,

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm all admit only four times, but higher at least

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty every time up twenty eight percent on average. We're

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>not saying we're gonna be higher twenty percent a year

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>from now. In fact, we don't probably think that, but

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it is saying that blast of strength we've just seen

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>recently isn't the hallmark of a bear market balanced but

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>likely a kind of a kickoff of potentially move bullish cycle. Well,

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, and you know it's funny. Who was it?

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>It was it um who was on our ear earlier today?

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Was it who mentioned? It was? It was Mike Reagan

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>who talked about the two underday moving average and he

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>had this caveat on the SMP. But he had a

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.719
<v Speaker 1>real caveat with with technical analysis right now, because there

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>are so many fundamentals that can really change the way

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>investors are thinking about the economy. Weather, that's rising energy prices, UH,

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the terrible war in Ukraine in Ukraine, UH, inflation and more. Ryan,

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you balance that with the

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>technical analysis? Oh? No, we'd agree. There's an old saying,

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>right news Trump's charts, if you get bad news and

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that can that can matter more. But I think also

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about two weeks ago, just the expectations were

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>solo record put the call ratios, headlines are terrible, Investment

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>polls were very low, huge cash on the sidelines, all

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the stuff the hallmark of kind of what you tend

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to see near lows, and any good news that have

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to be like great news. There's any less bad news

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can get a rally. And let's not forget

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the smartest guys in the room, in my opinion, are

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the credit markets, right, Credit spreads, high yield, you know,

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>investment grade spreads, they've all they've popped a little bit, yes,

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>but they've come back significant lead. We don't think this

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>is like a big credit event that's taken place. It's

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>more of a standard run of the mill, you know,

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen or so percent correction like we saw in the

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>smp E fron Pike the trough, and that's you know,

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of what happens when you have almost rally. So

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not overly concerned when the credit markets are still

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty calm here. But we did talk about this week

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that as we saw kind of an upticking stocks again,

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that the volume was down. So it did feel like

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that there wasn't that much conviction despite the game. So

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>how do you explain that, Yeah, no, you're you're right, Carol,

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell I mean two years ago right now,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember exactly two years ago now we started bouncing

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>off the lows. We heard the same thing. Volumes low,

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>volumes low. I mean, we're not ignoring it, but I've

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>heard this for a while now. I mean, you know,

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>one one other thing to think about here. Um, you

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>know we're almost to April, and maybe volumes light, okay,

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>but just remember April cls the strongest month the last

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. April is the strongest month and the last

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>birthday month, and I just think it's maybe master birthday

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>already acta the indicator, the indicator, and then the last

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>ten years the second best month, so and your birthday months,

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so happy early birthday. But all those things to mind,

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>there is still some seasonals that could be at play.

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, you know, you stay above that two day

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like you guys talked about, could be a little higher still. Yeah,

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a fair amount of fundamental stuff. And

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do think we we've talked a lot

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>about FED policy, and I think it's fair to say,

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a lot of people getting a lot

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive. Jo felt he was a lot more aggressive

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this week. Certainly Jim Bullet and even other FED officials

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to some extent saying, you know, we could we could

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>see five points shift it was, but not all of them. No,

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>not all of them. But I would I would think

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>an aggregate, I mean, such a shift from last week

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>he did debate at the next Some people would say,

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>vibe shift in this stand. Could even be a food

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>fight at the next FOMC. I doubt it. I got

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it all right. So where do you put new money

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to work? That's always kind of my you know, million dollar,

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar, trillion dollar question, Ryan, do you put keep

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it on the sidelines, just wait to see where this

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is going? Have you missed the bounce back at least

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>for the time being? Um, what would you say? Yeah?

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I'd love to see a food fight

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>at the set. I think they can make pay per

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>view and make a lot of money with that one.

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Um, you know, I've become only guys for

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a while sing we like cyclical value. That's still the

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>camp we like. We don't think you've missed it. I mean,

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, energy industrials, materials, um financials, those groups we've

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>liked for a long time, and they've been doing really well.

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>We still think that's where investors probably should be tilting

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>their portfolios are a little more even weight. As it

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>pertains the technology. You have a big problem with it,

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but we just think cyclical value is still just kind

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of brought you to the party, and we still like

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of those areas going forward. You mentioned,

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like what's over bought or not, I mean banks or

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>where they were in two thousand and eight, right, A

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are. So it's not like banks are

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that over bought, so they're still in our view opportunity there.

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's just a shame rying that you're just

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>so negative, just kidding, just kidding, Ryan D. Trick, Thank

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Good to check in with you again,

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Ryan D. Trick, He's chef Markets Rigs over at LPL Finance.

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Is a good one for a Friday, Carolina. Yeah, I

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>mean and looking at you know, some of the historical

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>trends and certainly some of the articles are telling him

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, no, I get it. Thanks for listening to

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, or

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News