Speaker 1: Good news here Fox. The Supreme Court has decided to
Speaker 1: take the case of Mark Janis. He's an Illinois state
Speaker 1: employee who objected to mandatory union fees in his state.
Speaker 1: Thirty five thousand government employees are represented by various unions.
Speaker 1: In early two thousand sixteen, a similar case brought by
Speaker 1: a California school teacher was brought before the Court. When
Speaker 1: Justice Scalia died, the court split forward to four, leaving
Speaker 1: the issue unresolved. It was widely believed that the full court,
Speaker 1: with nine justices would have ruled against the state unions,
Speaker 1: which would have been a huge blow to liberals, loosening
Speaker 1: their stranglehold on the twenty two states without right to
Speaker 1: work laws. Now, don't think for a minute the left
Speaker 1: doesn't know what's at stake here. The four largest government
Speaker 1: unions and National Education Association, the American Federation of Teachers,
Speaker 1: the Service Employees International Union, and the American Federation of State,
Speaker 1: County and Municipal Employees, they're all unhigh alert. They're calling
Speaker 1: the case a well funded plot to use the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court to further ring the economic rules against everyday working people.
Speaker 1: This case is about giving everyday working people the right
Speaker 1: to opt out of a rigged system that benefits Democrats.
Speaker 1: Government employees are forced to hand over hard earned money
Speaker 1: to unions, which then funnel that money right back to
Speaker 1: the Democrats. Next June, the Supreme Court can finally unrigged
Speaker 1: this particular money laundering scheme. That's why the unions are
Speaker 1: in full fledged panic, as it should be