1
00:00:01,320 --> 00:00:06,400
Speaker 1: There is shocking new evidence that Google has interfered with

2
00:00:06,519 --> 00:00:11,360
Speaker 1: our elections, in fact, at least forty one times over

3
00:00:11,400 --> 00:00:15,280
Speaker 1: the last sixteen years. That's what the Media Research Center

4
00:00:15,360 --> 00:00:19,160
Speaker 1: is now saying in a new report that totally exposes

5
00:00:19,800 --> 00:00:24,200
Speaker 1: the bias and influence that Google has over our elections,

6
00:00:24,600 --> 00:00:28,080
Speaker 1: with new accusations that they actually could be changing the

7
00:00:28,200 --> 00:00:32,400
Speaker 1: number of votes by millions, tilting the scales for the

8
00:00:32,440 --> 00:00:36,040
Speaker 1: candidates that they choose. Now, we've known for a long

9
00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:39,680
Speaker 1: time that Google has been biased, we had no idea

10
00:00:39,880 --> 00:00:43,159
Speaker 1: just how bias it was until we found out that

11
00:00:43,280 --> 00:00:47,240
Speaker 1: Google picked winners and losers with major elections in the

12
00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:49,640
Speaker 1: United States of America forty one times over the last

13
00:00:49,640 --> 00:00:54,720
Speaker 1: sixteen years. No organization has more control over information than Google.

14
00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:58,120
Speaker 1: That is a fact Google. We now are there being

15
00:00:58,160 --> 00:01:02,520
Speaker 1: accused of interfering with major elections in the US over

16
00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:07,839
Speaker 1: forty one times. The MRC research found forty one times

17
00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:10,840
Speaker 1: quote where Google interfer in elections over the last sixteen years,

18
00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:15,160
Speaker 1: and its impact has surged dramatically maken even more harmful

19
00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:20,000
Speaker 1: to democracy. In every case, Google harmed the candidates, regardless

20
00:01:20,040 --> 00:01:24,400
Speaker 1: of party, who threatened its left wing candidate of choice.

21
00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:29,959
Speaker 1: That is what the MRC Free Speech America Vice President

22
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:33,919
Speaker 1: dam Schneider and editor wrote in a summary of their findings,

23
00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:37,000
Speaker 1: quote from the mauls of Google executives, the tech giant

24
00:01:37,080 --> 00:01:40,399
Speaker 1: let slip what was never meant to be made public.

25
00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:43,880
Speaker 1: That Google uses its great strength and resources and reach

26
00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:50,920
Speaker 1: to advance its leftist values. Google outsized influence on information

27
00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:55,880
Speaker 1: technology the body of the politics and the American election

28
00:01:56,520 --> 00:01:59,520
Speaker 1: became evident in two thousand and eight, after failing to

29
00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:03,400
Speaker 1: prevent ken for President Donald Trump from being inaugurated. Following

30
00:02:03,400 --> 00:02:06,880
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen election, Google has sense made it clear

31
00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:11,679
Speaker 1: to any discerning observer that it has been and will

32
00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:17,160
Speaker 1: continue to interfere in America's elections. Google pushing back this morning,

33
00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:19,799
Speaker 1: insisting that it has a clear business incentive to keep

34
00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:23,800
Speaker 1: both sides happy and that safeguards ensure non biased and

35
00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:29,400
Speaker 1: accurate research results well. MRC Free Speech America division of

36
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:32,560
Speaker 1: the Conservative Media Research Center believes the most recent example

37
00:02:33,320 --> 00:02:38,280
Speaker 1: was recorded after Google's artificial intelligence Jemini, refused to answer

38
00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:44,960
Speaker 1: questions damaging to President Joe Biden. The group's research found

39
00:02:45,160 --> 00:02:47,519
Speaker 1: that from two thousand and eight through February of twenty

40
00:02:47,560 --> 00:02:51,760
Speaker 1: twenty four, Google has utilized its power to help push

41
00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:55,840
Speaker 1: for electoral victory the most liberal candidates, regardless of party,

42
00:02:55,840 --> 00:03:00,880
Speaker 1: while targeting their opponents for censorship. Examples, which is what

43
00:03:01,040 --> 00:03:03,600
Speaker 1: matters to all of us the most include appearing to

44
00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:06,440
Speaker 1: favor Barack Obama over John McKennon in two thousand and eight,

45
00:03:07,320 --> 00:03:12,960
Speaker 1: favoring Obama over Mit Romney in twenty twelve, refusing to

46
00:03:12,960 --> 00:03:17,240
Speaker 1: correct a Google bomb that smeared then leading GOP primary

47
00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:22,200
Speaker 1: candidate for president Rix Antorum, using its algorithm to exclude

48
00:03:22,360 --> 00:03:26,519
Speaker 1: auto fill results that were potentially damaging to Hillary Clinton

49
00:03:26,520 --> 00:03:30,120
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, not doing the same for then candidate

50
00:03:30,160 --> 00:03:34,520
Speaker 1: Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders, and working with partners to

51
00:03:34,560 --> 00:03:38,720
Speaker 1: help likely pro Clinton Latino voters go to the polls

52
00:03:38,800 --> 00:03:42,800
Speaker 1: the same year. This according to the New Bombshell Research.

53
00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:49,560
Speaker 1: Other examples cited include disabling Tulsi Gabbard's ad account just

54
00:03:49,640 --> 00:03:53,480
Speaker 1: a just as she became the most searched candidate following

55
00:03:53,600 --> 00:04:00,000
Speaker 1: the first Democratic primary debate in twenty twenty, suppressing new

56
00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:05,640
Speaker 1: news critical of Joe Biden, for example, and concealing most

57
00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:11,320
Speaker 1: Republican campaign websites for the twelve competitive Senate races in

58
00:04:11,400 --> 00:04:16,599
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two. Let me say that again. They suppressed

59
00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:22,840
Speaker 1: news this is Google news that was critical of Joe Biden.

60
00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:29,040
Speaker 1: At the same time they were concealing most Republican campaign

61
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:35,560
Speaker 1: websites for the twelve most competitive Senate races in twenty

62
00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:42,400
Speaker 1: twenty two. Okay, that's very significant, and aiding Biden in

63
00:04:42,520 --> 00:04:47,360
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. They're now accusing them of by burying

64
00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:51,640
Speaker 1: in its search results the campaign websites of every one

65
00:04:51,839 --> 00:04:57,000
Speaker 1: of his significant opponents. And that's what's happening right now

66
00:04:57,080 --> 00:05:01,039
Speaker 1: in real time the case study. He cites several other

67
00:05:01,160 --> 00:05:05,000
Speaker 1: examples as well of where Google is tipping the scales,

68
00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:09,919
Speaker 1: saying quote, utilizing the many tools in its arsenal, Google

69
00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:14,640
Speaker 1: aided those who most closely aligned with its leftist values

70
00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:17,640
Speaker 1: from election cycle to election cycle sentence as far back

71
00:05:17,680 --> 00:05:21,400
Speaker 1: as the two thousand and eight presidential election. Meanwhile, it

72
00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:25,120
Speaker 1: targeted for censorship those candidates who posed the most serious

73
00:05:25,160 --> 00:05:31,080
Speaker 1: threat to Google. While its interference was first evident in

74
00:05:31,160 --> 00:05:34,560
Speaker 1: twenty two thousand and eight, its meddling is turned into

75
00:05:34,560 --> 00:05:38,560
Speaker 1: an organizational mission to ensure that it's candidates win on

76
00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:43,680
Speaker 1: election day. Many studies reveal the results of the tech giants' commitment.

77
00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:51,480
Speaker 1: They also cited doctor Robert Epstein, who performed additional research

78
00:05:51,520 --> 00:05:55,760
Speaker 1: and found that Google's search algorithms likely shifted at least

79
00:05:55,839 --> 00:05:59,600
Speaker 1: two point six million votes to Hillary Clinton twenty sixteen,

80
00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:04,040
Speaker 1: and that Google's results and get out the Vote reminders

81
00:06:04,200 --> 00:06:08,560
Speaker 1: favored Democrats in targeting of them and shifted the twenty

82
00:06:08,640 --> 00:06:11,520
Speaker 1: twenty election results by at least six million votes. They believe.

83
00:06:12,640 --> 00:06:18,359
Speaker 1: So it's not just that they're stifling information that's positive

84
00:06:18,400 --> 00:06:23,000
Speaker 1: for conservative candidates and harmful maybe to Democrats. It's the

85
00:06:23,080 --> 00:06:26,040
Speaker 1: fact that when they're out there in their algorithm, they

86
00:06:26,080 --> 00:06:28,839
Speaker 1: look at who they're marketing to to get out the vote.

87
00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:34,240
Speaker 1: So Google is reminding liberal voters those that are more

88
00:06:34,320 --> 00:06:37,040
Speaker 1: likely to vote for Hillary Clinton or a Bernie Sanders

89
00:06:37,120 --> 00:06:41,640
Speaker 1: or Barack Obama or Joe Biden to get out the vote. Hey,

90
00:06:41,640 --> 00:06:43,839
Speaker 1: reminding you got to vote, reminding you to register to vote,

91
00:06:43,839 --> 00:06:45,719
Speaker 1: reminding you to register to vote and get out to vote,

92
00:06:45,720 --> 00:06:49,520
Speaker 1: and remind you to election tomorrow. They were reminding Democrats,

93
00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:53,760
Speaker 1: not Republicans, on purpose. They believe the power because almost

94
00:06:53,760 --> 00:06:57,600
Speaker 1: every American that's on the Internet uses Google. I use

95
00:06:57,640 --> 00:06:59,320
Speaker 1: it every day. I think you probably most of you

96
00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:01,760
Speaker 1: listening right now. I use it every day. They would

97
00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:06,480
Speaker 1: have the ability to then remind those voters who are Democrats.

98
00:07:06,560 --> 00:07:08,440
Speaker 1: They have all your data, They know who you are,

99
00:07:08,480 --> 00:07:09,960
Speaker 1: they know who you voted for, they know if you

100
00:07:10,040 --> 00:07:12,280
Speaker 1: vote in the last elections, and they know if you're

101
00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:16,360
Speaker 1: registered to vote. They would then market to you and

102
00:07:16,480 --> 00:07:18,400
Speaker 1: remind you to go vote, knowing that you're going to

103
00:07:18,520 --> 00:07:22,960
Speaker 1: vote Democrat over Republicans. This new research says that they

104
00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:25,680
Speaker 1: shifted the twenty twenty election results by at least six

105
00:07:25,720 --> 00:07:30,000
Speaker 1: million votes. Google is coming out this morning and Google

106
00:07:30,040 --> 00:07:32,920
Speaker 1: spokesman is denying quote any wrongdoing, which is exactly what

107
00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:35,920
Speaker 1: you would expect from them. By the way, quote, there

108
00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:38,920
Speaker 1: is absolutely nothing new here. Google says a new statement

109
00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:42,600
Speaker 1: just to recycle list of baseless, inaccurate compt complaints that

110
00:07:42,640 --> 00:07:45,040
Speaker 1: have been debunked by third parties and many that failed

111
00:07:45,080 --> 00:07:48,320
Speaker 1: in the courts. Politicians on the left have a long

112
00:07:48,400 --> 00:07:51,400
Speaker 1: history of making similar claims too. We have a clear

113
00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:54,080
Speaker 1: business incentive to keep everyone using our products. By the way,

114
00:07:54,120 --> 00:07:57,440
Speaker 1: that's not true. I'll explain that in a moment. Google

115
00:07:57,480 --> 00:07:59,360
Speaker 1: goes on to say we have no desire to make

116
00:07:59,400 --> 00:08:02,800
Speaker 1: them by or inaccurate and have safeguards in place to

117
00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:06,080
Speaker 1: ensure this. Numerous conservatives have been particularly successful in using

118
00:08:06,080 --> 00:08:09,280
Speaker 1: our platform to spread their message to a wide audience.

119
00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:12,840
Speaker 1: Google has said it restricted the types of election related

120
00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:16,040
Speaker 1: queries on Gemini out of an abundance of caution. That's

121
00:08:16,080 --> 00:08:21,560
Speaker 1: their AI basically mothership, directing users to Google Search instead.

122
00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:26,280
Speaker 1: As for Tulsea Gabbard's ads, Google's pointed to a federal

123
00:08:26,320 --> 00:08:28,880
Speaker 1: judge just missing a lawsuit she filed against the company

124
00:08:29,240 --> 00:08:31,920
Speaker 1: on the matter, saying see nothing to see here. The

125
00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:36,120
Speaker 1: Conservative WATCHSDAW group deels that this is an important issue

126
00:08:36,160 --> 00:08:39,440
Speaker 1: that actually should be going to Congress, saying that free

127
00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:44,560
Speaker 1: speech Americans offered three recommendations of what should happen. They say,

128
00:08:44,640 --> 00:08:47,760
Speaker 1: Number one, Speaker Mike Johnsons should direct relevant committees and

129
00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:54,800
Speaker 1: committee chairmen to investigate Google for basically attacking and abridging

130
00:08:54,840 --> 00:08:58,400
Speaker 1: the people's constitutional rights in this country by coordinating with

131
00:08:58,640 --> 00:09:03,280
Speaker 1: government to violate freedom of speech, as well as interfering

132
00:09:03,280 --> 00:09:07,920
Speaker 1: in elections by making unreported in kind contributions to the

133
00:09:07,960 --> 00:09:12,080
Speaker 1: Democratic candidates, and for defrauding its users by failing to

134
00:09:12,120 --> 00:09:15,880
Speaker 1: meet its terms of service. The group also feels state

135
00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:19,720
Speaker 1: legislators should legislatures should resolve any questions of whether Google

136
00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:23,480
Speaker 1: is a common carrier and urge Americans to stop using

137
00:09:23,520 --> 00:09:28,160
Speaker 1: Google products, particularly its search engine, saying this from our research,

138
00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:33,319
Speaker 1: alternatives appear to be better to produce better, less bias results.

139
00:09:34,320 --> 00:09:39,439
Speaker 1: This is significant, folks, and Google, of course coming out,

140
00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:42,280
Speaker 1: we're going to deny it. Side note here if you

141
00:09:42,280 --> 00:09:44,600
Speaker 1: try to Google the story, it comes down halfway through

142
00:09:44,600 --> 00:09:46,760
Speaker 1: the page, not at the top. Just thought i'd throw

143
00:09:46,800 --> 00:09:50,480
Speaker 1: that in there. Yeah, so you can decide for yourself

144
00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:55,319
Speaker 1: if you think they're suppressing information. I think it's pretty

145
00:09:55,320 --> 00:09:59,280
Speaker 1: clear that they are. Media Research Center has found forty

146
00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:03,680
Speaker 1: one different They say we're Google directly interfered in elections

147
00:10:04,280 --> 00:10:08,760
Speaker 1: and it had a major impact and surged dramatically of

148
00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:13,200
Speaker 1: the side they wanted to win. In every case, Google

149
00:10:13,280 --> 00:10:17,320
Speaker 1: harmed the candidates that they wanted to harm, regardless of party.

150
00:10:17,880 --> 00:10:21,520
Speaker 1: Those who threatened it's left leaning and left wing candidates

151
00:10:21,520 --> 00:10:25,000
Speaker 1: of choice. That is a new accusation by the Media

152
00:10:25,080 --> 00:10:29,960
Speaker 1: Research Center. Free Speech America Vice President Dan Snyder is

153
00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:33,840
Speaker 1: now going to join me to talk about this exact detail. Dan,

154
00:10:34,000 --> 00:10:39,840
Speaker 1: I appreciate you coming on, and Google is something that

155
00:10:39,880 --> 00:10:42,840
Speaker 1: we know is powerful for the left. We know that

156
00:10:42,920 --> 00:10:46,800
Speaker 1: they have an ally, we know that they have suppressed

157
00:10:47,280 --> 00:10:51,280
Speaker 1: just basic search engine issues, but this is the first

158
00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:54,240
Speaker 1: time that we're actually seeing what Google is doing directly

159
00:10:54,280 --> 00:10:58,000
Speaker 1: to interfere with our elections. Tell us a little bit

160
00:10:58,000 --> 00:10:59,960
Speaker 1: more about the background in this and how you guys,

161
00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:01,280
Speaker 1: we're able to find all this out.

162
00:11:01,880 --> 00:11:05,520
Speaker 2: Well. Look, Google has been actively involved in elections for

163
00:11:05,559 --> 00:11:10,720
Speaker 2: a long time, and on a legal basis, their president, CEO,

164
00:11:10,960 --> 00:11:15,360
Speaker 2: Chamber of the Board endorsed Democrats for office all the time.

165
00:11:15,720 --> 00:11:21,320
Speaker 2: Its employees have largely given exclusively to the left ninety

166
00:11:21,320 --> 00:11:25,679
Speaker 2: plus percent of the time. Under federal election campaign disclosure requirements,

167
00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:29,000
Speaker 2: you can see Google statements have been all left wing.

168
00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:31,640
Speaker 2: But what we have not been able to see is

169
00:11:31,720 --> 00:11:35,600
Speaker 2: what they're doing with their one point seven trillion dollar

170
00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:40,000
Speaker 2: corporation behind the scenes. You can't look into their little

171
00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:43,360
Speaker 2: black box of algorithms and see exactly how they're working.

172
00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:46,160
Speaker 2: But we've been able to piece together lots of different

173
00:11:46,160 --> 00:11:49,920
Speaker 2: things and see the consequences of their work, and time

174
00:11:50,040 --> 00:11:54,319
Speaker 2: and time again, the evidence shows that if you are

175
00:11:54,679 --> 00:11:58,080
Speaker 2: an opponent of their candidate of choice, Google's going to

176
00:11:58,120 --> 00:12:00,000
Speaker 2: bury you.

177
00:12:00,120 --> 00:12:03,040
Speaker 1: So let's talk about how they pick winners and losers here.

178
00:12:03,040 --> 00:12:04,880
Speaker 1: And when you say they're going to bury us, give

179
00:12:04,960 --> 00:12:07,720
Speaker 1: us examples of what that actually looks like. You're running

180
00:12:07,760 --> 00:12:11,920
Speaker 1: for office, Google doesn't like you, You're not their candidate

181
00:12:11,960 --> 00:12:14,760
Speaker 1: of choice. How much impact can they actually have over

182
00:12:14,760 --> 00:12:15,440
Speaker 1: your campaign?

183
00:12:15,920 --> 00:12:20,760
Speaker 2: Well, look, in the twenty twenty two Senate races, there

184
00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:24,600
Speaker 2: were about a dozen Senate races that were being hotly contested,

185
00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:27,839
Speaker 2: and we did a study, and we did this repeatedly.

186
00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:31,560
Speaker 2: We would search for, you know, the campaign websites. We

187
00:12:31,559 --> 00:12:36,079
Speaker 2: would simply search for, you know, like Adam Laxalt, you know,

188
00:12:36,240 --> 00:12:40,960
Speaker 2: Senate campaign in Nevada, and Google would not give you

189
00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:45,600
Speaker 2: his campaign website. But Google would certainly, you know, turn

190
00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:48,200
Speaker 2: over the website of his opponent when you did the

191
00:12:48,200 --> 00:12:52,040
Speaker 2: same search for her, and over and over again, ten

192
00:12:52,160 --> 00:12:57,120
Speaker 2: out of the twelve Republican Senate campaign websites would be

193
00:12:57,200 --> 00:13:00,320
Speaker 2: buried by Google, either not showing up at all all,

194
00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:03,320
Speaker 2: were showing up way low in search results. But a

195
00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:06,360
Speaker 2: majority of the time, literally Google would not produce the

196
00:13:06,400 --> 00:13:10,040
Speaker 2: campaign website for the Republican seeking the Senate seat in

197
00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:15,080
Speaker 2: that in that race. More recently, before each of the

198
00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:20,960
Speaker 2: four Republican presidential campaign debates, We did two searches. We

199
00:13:21,040 --> 00:13:27,000
Speaker 2: searched for Democrat presidential campaign websites and we then searched

200
00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:31,079
Speaker 2: for Republican presidential campaign websites. And look, we expected to

201
00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:32,920
Speaker 2: see Joe Biden at the top of the list when

202
00:13:32,920 --> 00:13:35,720
Speaker 2: we search for Democrat presidential campaign websites, and he was

203
00:13:36,280 --> 00:13:39,320
Speaker 2: every single time, Joe Biden was at the top. But

204
00:13:39,400 --> 00:13:42,600
Speaker 2: guess what, our FK Junior didn't show up at all.

205
00:13:43,400 --> 00:13:47,199
Speaker 2: Google buried RFK Junior's campaign website, the single greatest threat

206
00:13:47,600 --> 00:13:50,840
Speaker 2: that Joe Biden winning the nomination. They buried a site.

207
00:13:51,320 --> 00:13:54,080
Speaker 1: But here I want to be clear, though, it's not

208
00:13:54,240 --> 00:13:57,600
Speaker 1: what you're saying. Is it's not that Google is just

209
00:13:57,720 --> 00:14:01,400
Speaker 1: out to get conservatives or Republican candidates that they don't like.

210
00:14:02,240 --> 00:14:05,320
Speaker 1: It is if you're not the candidate they choose, even

211
00:14:05,360 --> 00:14:09,920
Speaker 1: in the Democratic primary, if they decide, hey, we like

212
00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:13,120
Speaker 1: this person more because they're going to be better for us.

213
00:14:13,720 --> 00:14:16,240
Speaker 1: We're going to help you win even in the Democratic

214
00:14:16,320 --> 00:14:18,080
Speaker 1: races over other Democrats.

215
00:14:18,640 --> 00:14:23,000
Speaker 2: That's right, Tulca Gabbard RFK Junior most recently, but even

216
00:14:23,080 --> 00:14:26,240
Speaker 2: going back to two thousand and eight, when the young

217
00:14:26,440 --> 00:14:31,000
Speaker 2: Senator Barack Obama was challenging Hillary Clinton. Google was bearing

218
00:14:32,720 --> 00:14:39,240
Speaker 2: pro Clinton blogs and highlighting pro Obama blogs. Wow, but here,

219
00:14:39,280 --> 00:14:41,360
Speaker 2: let me get to this. But here's the most shocking

220
00:14:41,440 --> 00:14:46,360
Speaker 2: example here. When we search for Republican presidential campaign websites, well,

221
00:14:46,480 --> 00:14:48,160
Speaker 2: just like we saw Joe Biden at the top of

222
00:14:48,160 --> 00:14:51,680
Speaker 2: the heap, we would have expected to see Donald Trump

223
00:14:51,720 --> 00:14:53,880
Speaker 2: at the top of the heap. But not only was

224
00:14:53,920 --> 00:14:57,160
Speaker 2: Donald Trump's campaign websit not produced at all by Google.

225
00:14:57,640 --> 00:15:01,080
Speaker 2: It only produced two campaign webs And this is every

226
00:15:01,120 --> 00:15:04,200
Speaker 2: single time we did this study. The first one was

227
00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:09,600
Speaker 2: Mary Ann Williamson, a Democrat, again searching for Republican presidential

228
00:15:09,680 --> 00:15:12,960
Speaker 2: campaign websites. One of the only two campaign websites that

229
00:15:13,000 --> 00:15:16,800
Speaker 2: Google would give us Marian Williamson's campaign website, and the

230
00:15:16,880 --> 00:15:21,960
Speaker 2: other was Will Hurd, who was scoring zero in the

231
00:15:22,040 --> 00:15:25,920
Speaker 2: nationwide polling. But Google would not give us Joe Biden,

232
00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:30,280
Speaker 2: the ak Ramaswami, Ron De Santis, Nikki Haley, anybody else,

233
00:15:30,360 --> 00:15:35,920
Speaker 2: any Republican, just one Democrat and one Republicans pulling at

234
00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:36,600
Speaker 2: zero percent.

235
00:15:37,200 --> 00:15:40,560
Speaker 1: You and I both know that in politics, and my

236
00:15:40,640 --> 00:15:43,120
Speaker 1: guests from me is Dan Schneider Media Research Center. They

237
00:15:43,120 --> 00:15:46,600
Speaker 1: do an amazing work to expose what we're talking about

238
00:15:46,680 --> 00:15:49,240
Speaker 1: right now, you should check them out, help them, support them,

239
00:15:49,680 --> 00:15:52,400
Speaker 1: because they're doing amazing work and without you, guys, they

240
00:15:52,480 --> 00:15:54,280
Speaker 1: cannot get it done. So I want to make that

241
00:15:54,400 --> 00:15:59,280
Speaker 1: very clear. But you talk about these moments in politics

242
00:15:59,320 --> 00:16:01,000
Speaker 1: where I can, it would surge.

243
00:16:01,080 --> 00:16:01,240
Speaker 2: Right.

244
00:16:01,920 --> 00:16:04,400
Speaker 1: Toulsi Gabbard is a great example. In the Democratic primary

245
00:16:04,760 --> 00:16:07,360
Speaker 1: when she was running for president, she had a moment.

246
00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:11,400
Speaker 1: And what happens after a candidate has a moment is

247
00:16:11,480 --> 00:16:13,960
Speaker 1: people immediately go to Google to find out more about

248
00:16:14,040 --> 00:16:17,520
Speaker 1: the person or to even you know, get involved in

249
00:16:17,560 --> 00:16:20,440
Speaker 1: their campaign. Talk a little bit about what they did

250
00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:23,000
Speaker 1: to influence and suppress her. For example, when she was

251
00:16:23,040 --> 00:16:24,000
Speaker 1: running as a Democrat.

252
00:16:25,440 --> 00:16:29,160
Speaker 2: Right, so, she did an amazing job in a debate,

253
00:16:29,800 --> 00:16:32,760
Speaker 2: and the whole world suddenly was looking at Tulsi Gabbard

254
00:16:32,960 --> 00:16:37,240
Speaker 2: as an alternative to Joe Biden, and right as she

255
00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:41,160
Speaker 2: was searching, right as everybody was interested in her, Google burieder.

256
00:16:41,520 --> 00:16:44,960
Speaker 2: They eliminated her ads. Right when you would need to

257
00:16:44,960 --> 00:16:47,160
Speaker 2: be able to you know, when her campaign needed to

258
00:16:47,200 --> 00:16:49,800
Speaker 2: tell everybody who she is and also to raise money,

259
00:16:50,440 --> 00:16:53,200
Speaker 2: Google eliminated her from search results.

260
00:16:53,720 --> 00:16:56,280
Speaker 1: What was the reasoning behind that that Google gave for

261
00:16:56,800 --> 00:16:59,359
Speaker 1: shutting down her ad accounts, so she could not advertise

262
00:16:59,400 --> 00:17:01,560
Speaker 1: when she had that moment to people that maybe were

263
00:17:01,600 --> 00:17:02,320
Speaker 1: searching for her.

264
00:17:02,840 --> 00:17:06,119
Speaker 2: You know, Google seems always to have these glitches, and

265
00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:08,639
Speaker 2: Google say, well, there was just a glitch. There was

266
00:17:08,680 --> 00:17:12,600
Speaker 2: a glitch when Hillary Clinton's in two thousand and eight,

267
00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:17,120
Speaker 2: when Hillary Clinton's you know blogs pro Clinton blogs were

268
00:17:17,160 --> 00:17:19,560
Speaker 2: suddenly buried, and there was just some kind of a

269
00:17:19,600 --> 00:17:23,000
Speaker 2: glitch with Tulsi Gabbard, And there's just there's always a glitch.

270
00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:25,679
Speaker 2: And sometimes they don't have any responses at all. By

271
00:17:25,680 --> 00:17:28,879
Speaker 2: the way, in this most recent study of ours, Google

272
00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:32,600
Speaker 2: has said that every one of our forty one examples

273
00:17:32,600 --> 00:17:35,800
Speaker 2: has been refuted. That is just a lie. You know.

274
00:17:36,200 --> 00:17:39,480
Speaker 2: For example, the the I just told you about the

275
00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:43,000
Speaker 2: presidential campaign searches that we did where Donald Trump is

276
00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:46,280
Speaker 2: completely buried over and over and over. Google has never

277
00:17:46,520 --> 00:17:51,480
Speaker 2: refuted that. Nobody has ever suggested what we reported was wrong.

278
00:17:51,760 --> 00:17:56,400
Speaker 2: So Google just makes up stuff? Response, was it all? Yeah?

279
00:17:56,440 --> 00:18:01,399
Speaker 1: Google pushback saying, quote, we have a a clear quote

280
00:18:01,480 --> 00:18:05,760
Speaker 1: business incentive to keep both sides happy, and that safeguards

281
00:18:05,840 --> 00:18:10,159
Speaker 1: ensure non bias and accurate search results. That's a great

282
00:18:10,240 --> 00:18:13,520
Speaker 1: line written by a PR person at Google, but it

283
00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:15,800
Speaker 1: doesn't back up with the facts. Is what you're saying.

284
00:18:16,480 --> 00:18:19,720
Speaker 2: Those are words. Those are mere words. I can say

285
00:18:19,720 --> 00:18:22,199
Speaker 2: the sky is green. It doesn't make it so Google

286
00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:25,160
Speaker 2: can say anything at once. It didn't point to any evidence,

287
00:18:25,560 --> 00:18:28,120
Speaker 2: you know, to support the words that it spewed out

288
00:18:28,119 --> 00:18:28,680
Speaker 2: of its mouth.

289
00:18:29,680 --> 00:18:33,720
Speaker 1: Establishment Republicans have also not fared well when they are

290
00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:38,720
Speaker 1: the nominee. An example of this is it was obvious

291
00:18:38,800 --> 00:18:41,520
Speaker 1: that Google was favoring Barack Obama over John McCain in

292
00:18:41,520 --> 00:18:44,359
Speaker 1: two thousand and eight, more the establishment candidate. It even

293
00:18:44,880 --> 00:18:49,040
Speaker 1: screwed with Mitt Romney in twenty twelve, refusing to correct

294
00:18:49,040 --> 00:18:53,760
Speaker 1: a Google bomb that smeared the then leading GOP primary

295
00:18:53,800 --> 00:18:58,120
Speaker 1: candidate for president, for example, Rick Santorum, with using its

296
00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:02,560
Speaker 1: algorithm to exclude auto results that were potentially damaging to

297
00:19:02,640 --> 00:19:05,560
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton. Explain that as well, these auto field results

298
00:19:05,600 --> 00:19:06,359
Speaker 1: and the other things.

299
00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:10,439
Speaker 2: Yeah, so let me just remind everybody Rix Santorum was

300
00:19:10,560 --> 00:19:14,440
Speaker 2: actually leading among all Republicans in that in that primary,

301
00:19:15,119 --> 00:19:18,080
Speaker 2: and just as he was surging, there was a thing,

302
00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:19,959
Speaker 2: you know, it is a popular thing back then, these

303
00:19:20,000 --> 00:19:24,200
Speaker 2: Google bombs where people would kind of create false websites

304
00:19:24,280 --> 00:19:28,680
Speaker 2: and and redefine a person or an issue, and these

305
00:19:28,680 --> 00:19:32,520
Speaker 2: Google bombs were created that said the most heinous, abhorrent

306
00:19:32,600 --> 00:19:36,679
Speaker 2: things about Rix Sntorum. Now, Google had a policy anytime

307
00:19:36,760 --> 00:19:40,720
Speaker 2: that some organization or some person got bombed, Google would

308
00:19:40,720 --> 00:19:43,600
Speaker 2: take down those sites, you know, because it was it

309
00:19:43,640 --> 00:19:46,720
Speaker 2: was misinformation, it was false, it was they were lies.

310
00:19:47,480 --> 00:19:50,960
Speaker 2: When it came to Rick Santorum, Google refused to take

311
00:19:51,000 --> 00:19:53,440
Speaker 2: down those Google bombs. So if you tried to google

312
00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:56,280
Speaker 2: Rix Sntorum and find anything out about him, you were

313
00:19:56,280 --> 00:20:01,880
Speaker 2: directed to these false, inflammatory, libel campaign sites that were

314
00:20:01,880 --> 00:20:05,760
Speaker 2: attacking him. Saying, again, you can't even say these things,

315
00:20:06,840 --> 00:20:09,520
Speaker 2: you know, without being too embarrassed, because they're just the

316
00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:13,000
Speaker 2: most vile, disgusting things that people were being told about.

317
00:20:13,400 --> 00:20:16,639
Speaker 2: Falsehood's about rix Andorum. I mean, just outright, you know,

318
00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:17,719
Speaker 2: fabricated stuff.

319
00:20:18,840 --> 00:20:21,320
Speaker 1: Dan, let me ask you another question about Google, and

320
00:20:21,359 --> 00:20:24,800
Speaker 1: this goes back to Mitt Romney John McCain that I mentioned.

321
00:20:25,760 --> 00:20:29,320
Speaker 1: What we're seeing with Google is they're not saying they

322
00:20:29,320 --> 00:20:33,240
Speaker 1: hate Donald Trump and MAGA. They're saying we hate anyone

323
00:20:33,280 --> 00:20:37,000
Speaker 1: that's not our guy, and every year that guy can change.

324
00:20:37,400 --> 00:20:40,840
Speaker 1: So we'll treat Donald Trump the same way we treated

325
00:20:40,840 --> 00:20:44,520
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum or John McCain if the

326
00:20:44,640 --> 00:20:47,120
Speaker 1: person we want to win is on the other side.

327
00:20:47,359 --> 00:20:49,320
Speaker 1: So if you think they're only being mean to like

328
00:20:49,400 --> 00:20:54,160
Speaker 1: MAGA conservatives, you're wrong. They want these Democrat hardcore lefties

329
00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:56,320
Speaker 1: to win every election no matter what.

330
00:20:57,080 --> 00:21:00,720
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. And as we discussed earlier, will include

331
00:21:00,840 --> 00:21:06,080
Speaker 2: picking you know, a more liberal Democrat and suppressing a

332
00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:11,520
Speaker 2: slightly more you know, or less liberal Democrat. And so

333
00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:14,960
Speaker 2: they've got their candidate of choice, and you better not

334
00:21:15,040 --> 00:21:17,720
Speaker 2: be the opponent otherwise you're gonna they're gonna be hell

335
00:21:17,800 --> 00:21:18,200
Speaker 2: to pay.

336
00:21:18,760 --> 00:21:22,560
Speaker 1: This isn't just on the national level of presidential campaigns,

337
00:21:22,600 --> 00:21:26,159
Speaker 1: and that's where Google stops doing this. You guys also

338
00:21:26,880 --> 00:21:29,800
Speaker 1: looked at some of the most competitive, the twelve most

339
00:21:29,800 --> 00:21:32,960
Speaker 1: competitive Senate races in twenty twenty two. What did you

340
00:21:33,040 --> 00:21:35,200
Speaker 1: find out when it came to Senate races?

341
00:21:35,640 --> 00:21:41,120
Speaker 2: Right, So, the so Google buried you know, the Senate

342
00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:46,159
Speaker 2: candidates in those twelve competitive races every time except for

343
00:21:46,200 --> 00:21:51,240
Speaker 2: two for whatever reason. You know, in the Washington Prime.

344
00:21:51,560 --> 00:21:55,080
Speaker 2: In the Washington race the state of Washington, Patty Murray

345
00:21:55,640 --> 00:21:59,240
Speaker 2: actually fared worse than the Republicans. But in every other case,

346
00:21:59,720 --> 00:22:02,439
Speaker 2: you know, the Republican was buried. Now here's where it

347
00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:06,479
Speaker 2: gets really really interesting. It shows how clever Google really is.

348
00:22:07,080 --> 00:22:10,200
Speaker 2: People will recall that there was a runoff in Georgia

349
00:22:10,880 --> 00:22:15,600
Speaker 2: where herschel Walker and his Democrat opponent neither got fifty percent,

350
00:22:15,720 --> 00:22:18,080
Speaker 2: when under Georgia law, they had to go to a runoff.

351
00:22:18,600 --> 00:22:21,600
Speaker 2: So we went to Georgia and again these are using

352
00:22:21,680 --> 00:22:25,679
Speaker 2: clean computers, no cookies, all that, and we went to

353
00:22:25,760 --> 00:22:30,080
Speaker 2: the precinct level again looking for herschel Walker's campaign website

354
00:22:30,080 --> 00:22:33,080
Speaker 2: and looking for his opponent's campaign website. And at the

355
00:22:33,119 --> 00:22:36,439
Speaker 2: precinct level we discovered that those precincts that were heavily

356
00:22:36,480 --> 00:22:40,080
Speaker 2: Democrat there was no bias, and those precincts that were

357
00:22:40,080 --> 00:22:44,240
Speaker 2: heavily Republican no bias. But in the precincts that were

358
00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:48,439
Speaker 2: going to toss up precincts where the Democrat needed votes

359
00:22:48,480 --> 00:22:51,280
Speaker 2: to be able to win beat herschel Walker, that's where

360
00:22:51,320 --> 00:22:54,119
Speaker 2: we saw the bias again. That's where herschel Walker's campaign

361
00:22:54,119 --> 00:22:57,080
Speaker 2: website was buried, but the Democrats was elevated to the

362
00:22:57,080 --> 00:22:58,360
Speaker 2: top of search results.

363
00:22:59,119 --> 00:23:02,240
Speaker 1: It's incredible. Let's dive into how much of an influence

364
00:23:02,320 --> 00:23:04,399
Speaker 1: this actually could have had. Because it's one thing to

365
00:23:04,400 --> 00:23:07,800
Speaker 1: give the accusation and to show that proof, but then

366
00:23:07,880 --> 00:23:10,520
Speaker 1: to talk about how much of an impact that could

367
00:23:10,520 --> 00:23:14,040
Speaker 1: this have had on our elections. You guys worked with

368
00:23:14,080 --> 00:23:18,040
Speaker 1: doctor Robert Epstein, who performed additional research and found that

369
00:23:18,160 --> 00:23:24,199
Speaker 1: Google search algorithms likely shifted millions of votes just to

370
00:23:24,280 --> 00:23:27,840
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen alone, for example, and then

371
00:23:27,880 --> 00:23:30,800
Speaker 1: you found even after that, even more votes. We're talking

372
00:23:30,800 --> 00:23:34,439
Speaker 1: about millions that would have favored Democrats in twenty twenty.

373
00:23:34,520 --> 00:23:36,520
Speaker 1: Dive into that for us, right.

374
00:23:36,560 --> 00:23:41,280
Speaker 2: So, doctor Epstein is a PhD statistician. He did all

375
00:23:41,280 --> 00:23:44,560
Speaker 2: of his work at Harvard. He is a liberal himself.

376
00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:48,399
Speaker 2: He is a self proclaimed Democrat. He admits he voted

377
00:23:48,400 --> 00:23:51,760
Speaker 2: for Hillary Clinton. He is not a partisan. He is

378
00:23:51,840 --> 00:23:54,400
Speaker 2: not doing this work to try to help Republicans. He's

379
00:23:54,560 --> 00:23:59,240
Speaker 2: just very concerned about democracy. So he yea his research

380
00:23:59,240 --> 00:24:05,040
Speaker 2: and is very sophisticated. It's seen how Google interacts with users,

381
00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:08,240
Speaker 2: what kind of results are produced, and how that alters

382
00:24:08,240 --> 00:24:11,280
Speaker 2: people's behavior. So he is estimated in the twenty twenty

383
00:24:11,320 --> 00:24:15,840
Speaker 2: election alone, anywhere from six to eight million votes were

384
00:24:15,920 --> 00:24:20,840
Speaker 2: swayed against Donald Trump in favor of Joe Biden nationwide

385
00:24:21,280 --> 00:24:24,800
Speaker 2: six to eight million. Had it not been for Google,

386
00:24:25,400 --> 00:24:28,240
Speaker 2: it would have been a landslide victory for Donald Trump.

387
00:24:29,480 --> 00:24:33,960
Speaker 2: And let me just reiterate, Doctor Epstein is a liberal,

388
00:24:34,160 --> 00:24:40,840
Speaker 2: and he's testified before Congress he has no interest in

389
00:24:40,920 --> 00:24:45,320
Speaker 2: seeing Republicans win races. He only cares about the rights

390
00:24:45,320 --> 00:24:47,919
Speaker 2: of the voter and to have that voter's votes be

391
00:24:47,960 --> 00:24:48,719
Speaker 2: counted fairly.

392
00:24:49,320 --> 00:24:53,840
Speaker 1: Talk about the amount of influence so people understand. I mean,

393
00:24:53,920 --> 00:24:56,800
Speaker 1: I look, I use Google every day. You guys are

394
00:24:56,840 --> 00:24:59,480
Speaker 1: now saying it's time to use another search engine because

395
00:24:59,520 --> 00:25:03,720
Speaker 1: of what they're doing. I totally support that idea, but

396
00:25:04,200 --> 00:25:07,679
Speaker 1: the reality is overwhelming. The majority of Americans go to

397
00:25:07,720 --> 00:25:10,560
Speaker 1: Google for pretty much anything they need to search. How

398
00:25:11,800 --> 00:25:14,560
Speaker 1: much penetration and market share does Google have over the

399
00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:15,240
Speaker 1: American voter?

400
00:25:16,119 --> 00:25:19,040
Speaker 2: You know, there are different numbers. It's anywhere from ninety

401
00:25:19,080 --> 00:25:22,119
Speaker 2: three to ninety six. Ninety seven percent of all search

402
00:25:22,280 --> 00:25:27,040
Speaker 2: is done, you know, using the Google search engine. Yeah,

403
00:25:27,080 --> 00:25:30,119
Speaker 2: and it's got so many other products too, like Google News.

404
00:25:30,680 --> 00:25:35,639
Speaker 2: And this is another shocking thing. There's one legitimate outfit

405
00:25:35,720 --> 00:25:38,080
Speaker 2: out there that sort of rates media outlets of whether

406
00:25:38,240 --> 00:25:40,520
Speaker 2: they're left of center or right of center. It's called

407
00:25:40,680 --> 00:25:44,240
Speaker 2: All Sides. It's a reliable organization. We don't always agree

408
00:25:44,280 --> 00:25:48,920
Speaker 2: with them, but they're pretty good all using All Sides data,

409
00:25:49,040 --> 00:25:52,399
Speaker 2: you can see that Google News. If you're searching anything

410
00:25:52,400 --> 00:25:57,119
Speaker 2: about Trump, Biden or elections, Google News would link to

411
00:25:57,640 --> 00:26:05,040
Speaker 2: zero zero right of center media outlets, almost exclusively to

412
00:26:05,280 --> 00:26:09,520
Speaker 2: left wing outlets. Occasionally some some what are called neutral outlets.

413
00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:13,439
Speaker 2: But yeah, Like, if you're searching on Google News for

414
00:26:13,520 --> 00:26:19,040
Speaker 2: stories about the election, ninety seven percent of the articles

415
00:26:19,040 --> 00:26:23,439
Speaker 2: that were linked to were to left wing outlets Donald

416
00:26:23,480 --> 00:26:25,800
Speaker 2: Trump and Joe Biden. If you're looking for stories of

417
00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:29,760
Speaker 2: on Google News about either of them, again, zero percent,

418
00:26:30,400 --> 00:26:33,600
Speaker 2: you know, linked to conservative outlets. The great bulk were

419
00:26:33,640 --> 00:26:37,040
Speaker 2: linked to to left of center or left wing outlets.

420
00:26:37,359 --> 00:26:39,520
Speaker 2: This is what Google. This is how Google News and

421
00:26:39,560 --> 00:26:44,080
Speaker 2: Google more broadly influences the mind. People think they're learning,

422
00:26:44,160 --> 00:26:48,480
Speaker 2: people think they're getting information news, they're only getting Google propaganda.

423
00:26:49,040 --> 00:26:52,720
Speaker 1: Lastly, what are you guys asking Congress to do? I

424
00:26:52,760 --> 00:26:56,879
Speaker 1: know there's been conversations with Speaker Johnson about this because

425
00:26:56,920 --> 00:26:59,760
Speaker 1: this seems like this would fall under an in kind

426
00:27:00,080 --> 00:27:04,160
Speaker 1: contribution to democratic candidates. What Google is doing? Is there

427
00:27:04,200 --> 00:27:06,639
Speaker 1: a chance that we could see some sort of significant

428
00:27:06,720 --> 00:27:10,479
Speaker 1: reform here to make this not happen every single election cycle.

429
00:27:11,240 --> 00:27:14,800
Speaker 2: Yeah, Ben, I want to make sure people understand this

430
00:27:14,920 --> 00:27:18,400
Speaker 2: is shocking. The media has an exception here. So let's

431
00:27:18,440 --> 00:27:21,120
Speaker 2: take the media out of it. Your media, so you're

432
00:27:21,119 --> 00:27:23,359
Speaker 2: not a part of what I'm about to say. But

433
00:27:23,520 --> 00:27:27,919
Speaker 2: today in America, you're an individual. You do not have

434
00:27:27,960 --> 00:27:31,760
Speaker 2: free speech rights. If I want to say something political

435
00:27:32,160 --> 00:27:36,399
Speaker 2: and I want to promote what I am saying, So like,

436
00:27:36,480 --> 00:27:38,760
Speaker 2: let's say I write a speech and I want to

437
00:27:38,840 --> 00:27:43,560
Speaker 2: send my speech about a candidate or about a policy matter,

438
00:27:43,840 --> 00:27:45,800
Speaker 2: and I want to send it to a thousand friends,

439
00:27:45,840 --> 00:27:47,920
Speaker 2: and I print out my speech to send to a

440
00:27:47,960 --> 00:27:52,600
Speaker 2: thousand friends. By law, I am required to file with

441
00:27:52,640 --> 00:27:56,280
Speaker 2: a federal election commission. I have to log my speech,

442
00:27:56,320 --> 00:27:58,760
Speaker 2: and if I don't, it can be considered a crime.

443
00:27:59,040 --> 00:28:02,520
Speaker 2: It can be fine by the federal government for speaking,

444
00:28:03,080 --> 00:28:07,199
Speaker 2: for trying to amplify my voice. But if you're Google today,

445
00:28:07,359 --> 00:28:11,159
Speaker 2: the Federal Election Commission says it can do whatever it wants.

446
00:28:11,200 --> 00:28:14,960
Speaker 2: It can bury, it can use its resources, it's fast resources,

447
00:28:15,119 --> 00:28:18,600
Speaker 2: it can bury campaign websites. It can treat the Democrats

448
00:28:18,640 --> 00:28:21,280
Speaker 2: far better than the Republicans. And it's not considered a

449
00:28:21,320 --> 00:28:24,879
Speaker 2: campaign contribution, it's not considered an in time contribution, and

450
00:28:24,920 --> 00:28:29,840
Speaker 2: there's no filing required. Today, big tech has far more

451
00:28:29,920 --> 00:28:31,640
Speaker 2: free speech rights than I do.

452
00:28:32,320 --> 00:28:35,480
Speaker 1: Unbelievable. If people want to get this report and want

453
00:28:35,480 --> 00:28:37,360
Speaker 1: to find out more, where can they go?

454
00:28:37,440 --> 00:28:43,000
Speaker 2: Dan Right, So the media research centers big publications called

455
00:28:43,120 --> 00:28:46,880
Speaker 2: NewsBusters NewsBusters dot org. You can go there to find

456
00:28:46,920 --> 00:28:49,800
Speaker 2: this report. You know the study. It's about a twenty

457
00:28:49,840 --> 00:28:53,600
Speaker 2: page study documenting you know, these forty one times over

458
00:28:53,640 --> 00:28:56,040
Speaker 2: sixteen years that Google has interfered in our elections.

459
00:28:56,440 --> 00:28:59,440
Speaker 1: This is going to trickle out. I have a feeling more.

460
00:28:59,520 --> 00:29:02,280
Speaker 1: I'm going to cover it all for you. Make sure

461
00:29:02,320 --> 00:29:04,960
Speaker 1: that you download the Ben Ferguson podcast every day. We'll

462
00:29:05,040 --> 00:29:08,160
Speaker 1: keep you updated. Hit the share button on our podcast

463
00:29:08,280 --> 00:29:11,320
Speaker 1: as well. If you miss a show, go back and listen.

464
00:29:11,360 --> 00:29:13,760
Speaker 1: We're going to cover it all and I'll see you

465
00:29:13,800 --> 00:29:16,120
Speaker 1: back here tomorrow on the Ben Ferguson Podcast