WEBVTT - Some Cigarettes: Accreditation, Memes, Naughty ESG

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. We haven't done this

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>for a while.

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>We haven't seen each other in two weeks, I know.

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 2>But after like ten days of going by your desk

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 2>and everyone's like, no, we don't know where she is.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, Like I told them all, just if

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that comes by, I'm not here. No, I don't know

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>where I've been. But now we're back in the booth.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Back in the booth. Hello, and welcome to The Money

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Stuff Podcast. You're a weekly podcast where we talk about

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 2>stuff related to money. I'm Matt Levian and I are

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>at the Money Stuff comn for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>It's good to be back, Katie, It's good.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>To be back.

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 2>What's gone on today?

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're going to talk about incredited investors what that is?

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Should it exist? We'll talk about beamstocks growing up or Meme.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Investors investment firms.

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>True, that's true, and we're going to talk about naughty esg.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>It's less fun that it's accredited investors.

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what are they? So? Currently two hundred thousand dollars

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>income is what you need to be or a one

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>million dollar net worth if I'm an individual.

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's all sorts of like bars. Right, So,

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 2>like the way it sort of like casually works is

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 2>that you can invest in private stuff if you're an

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 2>accredited investor, and you can and anyone can invest in

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 2>public stuff. And the accredited investor bar used to be

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 2>like I don't like one or two or five percent

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 2>of households, and now it's like twenty percent of households

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 2>because it's not index to inflation. So now you need

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>to have an income of two hundred thousand dollars a

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 2>year or three hundred thousand dollars for a couple, or

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>have networth of a million dollars, or have a series

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 2>seven or serious sixty five lescens. So if you have

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 2>like the securities license, you can be an accredited investor,

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 2>and if you're an accredited investor, you can invest in

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 2>various sorts of private investments, mainly like startups. And people

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 2>don't like these rules. Yeah, I should say, I read

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 2>about this the other day, and he'll point out they're

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>actually two like higher bars. So there's the bar for

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>investing in hedgehunds and private equity firms, which is basically,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 2>if you're an investment manager and you want to charge

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 2>performance fees like hedgehunds and private equity do, you need

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>to have qualified clients, which basically means like a two

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 2>point two million dollar networth, So it's a little bit

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>of a higher bar than the accredited investor bar. And

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 2>then the other thing is like there's certain kinds of

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 2>private investments that are only open to quibs qualified institutional buyers,

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>which basically means an institution with at least one hundred

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 2>million dollars. So like those are the higher bars, but

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>anyone can invest in startups in theory if they're an

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 2>accredited investor, which means, you know, a two hundred thousand

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 2>dollars income, which is like not that uncommon these days.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Like one thing I pointed out is that like the

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 2>number of people who meet that qualification is about equal

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 2>to the number of people who own stocks directly. So

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 2>it's like the investor class is pretty much overlapping with

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the accredited investor class. There's this perception that like these

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 2>days the good investments are the private investments. Yeah, like

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>we were talking about a lot, right, and so they're like,

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>why is it that, like people who don't have a

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of money can't get the good investments? And then two,

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 2>why is it that, like the term accredited just correlates

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 2>with the wealth, Like it sort of seems like accredited

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 2>means good or smart.

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Or perhaps qualified In some right.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 2>It seems unfair that qualified would just be in like

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 2>having enough money, and so there's always this push to

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 2>open it up for like a test. So it used

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 2>to be only the money qualification, and now if you

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>have certain securities licenses like this Ery seven, you can

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 2>also be an accredited investor because you're, like, you know,

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>if you like work at an investment bank, like, you're

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 2>probably like you know, probably know as much as the

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 2>average bear about like investments. And so the most recent

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 2>news is that, like the Senate is pushing for a

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>bill to make the sec write an exam that anyone

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>can take, and if you pass the exam, then you're

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 2>an a credited investor and you can buy private stuff.

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>This scratched a memory up to the surface. This is

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>slightly different, but it's related. In April twenty twenty two,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>FINRA called for comments on whether they should introduce knowledge

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>checks before you know, retail could buy what they defined

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>as complex products, which basically meant like leverage and all

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>these like funky ETFs that we talk about on this

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>podcast sometimes. And that was met with outrage. People hated

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that idea.

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, because that's like those products are public product. Anyone

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 2>can buy those, right. You don't have to be a

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>credited investor to buy a triple LEBRITYTF or zeroed A

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 2>options on socks. There's all sorts of stuff that is

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 2>available to the public, which basically sort of means like

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>it's meant disclosure requirements, right, there's not formally supposed to

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 2>be like really substantively of like whether it's a good investment.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's like a certain amount of pressure on

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 2>stuff to not be crazy stuff. But like in general,

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of public stuff that is risky, and

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 2>there's this weird situation where a lot of public investments

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 2>are very risky and dangerous and sort of hard to

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>understand and anyone can buy them. Yeah, And then there's

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of private market stuff that's like like space

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>stuck that like you're not allowed to buy because it's

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 2>limited to people with at least two hundred thousand dollars

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of income. It's weird that anyone can buy the products

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 2>that Finnerun's toy strict and then like they're trying to

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 2>expand the qualification for the act.

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Time again they opened it up for comments. They received

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>more than twelve thousand comments, which was pretty wild. That

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>shattered the record. I don't know if it's since been shattered,

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>if they've opened up comments to anything else crazier, but

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>usually they get like a couple dozen comments, so this

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>was wild. It is interesting, you know, the disclosure base

0:05:57.960 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of whatever is how we do it now. I

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know how it want to talk about that, but basically,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you can market all of this crazy risky stuff as

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>long as you put in like big bright letters that

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you might and probably will lose money on that. That's fine.

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, although like a weird aspect of that is you're

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 2>often buying it through your app, right, Yeah, Like there's

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 2>no requirement that you've read any of the disclosure The

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 2>firms can't market it without all the warnings disclosures, but

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 2>you can buy it, you know, you pushed button.

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what one of the points that Finn made at

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the time that since these rules were put in place.

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot more self directed investors in the market

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>now that aren't necessarily going through a financial advisor. There's

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people just clicking around on robin Hood

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>for example. That's a deep tease to what we'll be

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about next. And that's why they floated the idea

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of a knowledge check that was unpalatable. It's interesting that

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the Senate is pushing for some sort of test now.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and like private investments are the opposite, Right, you

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>can't buy them on it app. You do have to

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 2>you know, essentially buy them through a broker or a

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>financial advisor, right, And there is some history of skepticism

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 2>about how aligned the interests of some of these brokers

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 2>are with their clients. Right. I mean, there's a lot

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 2>of private market stuff that is very high fee has,

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 2>like lots of layers of fees for products that like,

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, you could probably do better by buying a

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, index CTF, but like the advisor gets paid

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>more for selling you the complex product. And making people

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 2>pass a test might make them more resistant to getting

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 2>pitched bad products, but it might just make them feel

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>more sophisticated and then make the advisors salivate of even

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 2>more over selling them bad products. Right, I don't know

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>about these tests.

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's not a lot of teach one.

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I would I wrote, I would love to write one, right,

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I would also love to I love taking standard I

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 2>s house but that tracks. Yeah, but like it would

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 2>be so fun to write this list. But like just

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 2>you sort of know what it would be like. It

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 2>would be like, you know, like compound interest and like that.

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 2>It would be like sort of like financing trivia. He

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 2>would potentially give you the illusion of being sophisticated and

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 2>being able to sort of see through. Yeah, but that's

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 2>that's all your financial advisor needs, sow you sort of

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 2>ruinous product. If you were starting from scratch, you would

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 2>not like divide the investment universe this way, right, Like

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>you would not let people buy all of the risky,

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 2>weird products that Fenner is nervous about. When the Senate

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>talks about this, they talk about like, you know, investing

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 2>in like local small businesses, right, Like you can't like

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 2>those they are exemptions to the rules. But in general,

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like difficult and risky for small businesses

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 2>to raise money from like people in their community. Because

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 2>like there are you have to bet SEC exemptions, like

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>there's a credit investor tests, and it might be nicer

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 2>if more people could make those sorts of private investments.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>And those investments in some ways seem like more appealing

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 2>or more like wholesome than like triple levertyts or whatever. Right,

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>the complex products that that Fenner is right, this is

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 2>more of a niche comment, but I liked it. So

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I used to be a convertible bond underwriter, right, And

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of bonds are done under an SEC

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 2>rule called rule one forty four A, which basically means

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 2>that you have to be one hundred million dollar institution

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 2>to buy them, right, And it just like it makes

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>their disclosure a little bit easier. But one reader was like,

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>why am I allowed to buy the stock of a

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 2>public company but not their one forty four A bonds?

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 2>The one forty fairy bonds are sort of by definition safer, right,

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>they're like senior in the capitol structure, but like he's

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 2>not allowed to buy them because he doesn't have a

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.719
<v Speaker 2>hundred million dollar fund, right, But like anyone can buy

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the stock. So there's a lot of stuff like that

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>where it's like what gets treated as like a risky,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 2>dangerous thing for retail investors, and what gets treated as

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 2>like no problem, anyone can buy that by clicking a

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 2>button just doesn't track any like economic or disclosure reality.

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know, I don't have a good solution.

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I've written my bad solution, which is that the SEC

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 2>should give out a certificate of dumb investment where you say,

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I know I'm buying something dumb, and they slap you

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and you say, no, I really want to buy something dumb,

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and then like they give you the certificate. But like

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the important thing in my original proposal was that then

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 2>if the thing goes to zero, you're not allowed to complain,

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 2>like to the press or to anyone, right because like

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of this stuff, it's like retail investors buy

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 2>this terrible thing and I realized that is a terrible thing,

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Like no, no, it's gonna be great, and then they

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 2>buy it and goes to zero and they're like, oh

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 2>I was defrauded. It's like, oh, you knew it was

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>a terrible thing. So the idea of like making people

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 2>sign a form saying they know they're being dumb is

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>appealing to me because when it would sort of like

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>obviate some complaints. And then two, like all this stuff

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 2>about accredited investors, like it comes from a place of

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 2>like thinking, those are the smart investors who get access

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>to the good stuff, and I suspect that the real

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 2>experience is kind of the opposite, where like those are

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the investors who get pitched the expensive, weird stuff. And

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 2>when you make it a test of financial sophistication, then

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>like people want to take that test. They want to

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>pass that test, and then they passed. This was like, oh,

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm so sophisticated, and then they buy the worst stuff

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 2>because like they have this illusion of sophistication, Whereas if

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 2>you make them sign of things saying this is dumb,

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 2>like it's less aspirational and like maybe maybe like deters

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 2>them from buying the worst things.

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>That's true. I mean it would be labor intensive to

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>have to line up like a staffer to slap every

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>single person that it's.

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Really a hypothetical, but like I like it, you know.

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I think we should kick it around.

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Write the test, Matt. We didn't insult any dentists when

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>mean stocks grow up? You know, Robin Hood, do you

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>know Robin I remember a time when their bare case

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>on robin Hood is that, you know, you would have

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>all these people who use robin hood as a gateway

0:11:54.600 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>drug and then graduate up into proper investments such as

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>index funds, and that they migrate over to like Schwab

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>or Fidelity for example. That hasn't really been the case,

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>hasn't that.

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you and I were reading this Baron's article

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 2>about how robinhood is growing up, and like the stat

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 2>that I found shocking is something like ten percent of

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 2>Americans have robinhood account Yeah, like American adults whatever and

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>rest adults, and robinhood has zero point three percent of

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 2>like retail financial.

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Assets, which is sixty five trillion.

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but like they are thirty three times bigger by

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 2>number of people than by assets, right, Like they have

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people, but like a tiny fraction of

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 2>those people's assets, or else they have only the people

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>with very few assets, right or some companies. Yeah, and

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 2>that does sort of suggest that that bear case had

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>some truth to it, which is that people do the

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 2>fund trading on Robinhood, but when they grow up to

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>like their index funds, they do it somewhere else.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, two points to that number One, the stock is

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>up like one hundred and ten percent this year, so

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like in terms of it being a bare case, it's

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly not playing out in the stock market. And two

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>that may be the case. Robinhood is working really really

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to grow up, which I find interesting. They had

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>their Hood summit in Miami. I think it was last

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>week or the week before, But in any case, they

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>have all these new features that are coming out. They

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>have this desktop trading platform. That's one thing. They're offering

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>index options for the first time. That's kind of exciting.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>But I thought that this was interesting. There's one to

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>three percent matching bonuses for investors who transfer assets to

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood's platform, so they'll pay you to bring your

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>money over to Robinhood. And as of June twenty twenty four,

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Robinhood has provided customers more than two hundred million dollars

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>in matches on asset transfers and retirement account contributions. That's

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>according to the company. So they are trying to grow up.

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, It makes little sense, right, I mean, if you're

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 2>a person who has like one thousand dollars robin Hood

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>account for fun and like your retirement savings at Fidelity,

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 2>and it is like, bring all your retirement savings over

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>to us, and we'll give you one percent of the

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 2>or three percent of them, Like yeah, why would you done? Right?

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 2>And if you're like relatively self directed in your retirement

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>savings or an ETFs anyway, like yeah, that's free money.

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 2>There's some lock up on it where you bring the

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 2>money over you you have to keep it at robin

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Hood for a while. So right, it's it's part of

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the strategy for them to go from being people's like

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 2>fun money play you know, shows confetti when you do

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 2>a trade account to being like their main you know,

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 2>savings and investment account. The other thing that I thought

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 2>was interesting about what they're doing is they're talking about

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>getting into building out a wealth management farmware. Instead of

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 2>just being self directed, they have some sort of advisory business.

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's probably not like opening branches with people, but

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 2>it's like, yeah, you know, some sort of robo advising,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>some sort of automated you know, AI driven advising where

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 2>if you are not a person who wants to watch

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 2>the markets all day and be on Reddit and like

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of you know, do your own investing, but you

0:14:55.560 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 2>want someone to help you do your retirement planning. If

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 2>robin Hood can offer that, Like, that's just a ton

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 2>of assets that you know, have to be tied to

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 2>some sort of advice.

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. They basically want to be like the one stop shop,

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>don't they.

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Which is like but you know, with like Fidelity and

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 2>all these people like to have some roots and being

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 2>self directed discount brokrages, but they're all like, you know,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to help people, you know, give people advice on

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>their retirement accounts.

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I should have looked into it. But don't they have

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a credit card as well?

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Or do you have a credit card?

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's like good, yeah card Goldman have some painful

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>news about that this week. It seems hard to just

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>create a credit card.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you have money market funds, Like

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 2>it's like a synergy there. I have to assume that

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 2>when robin had started, but you started from nothing, Like

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 2>there's so much opportunity in like showing people confetti when

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>they do trades, right, Like the pool of money that

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 2>you can extract by like helping people do fun trades

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 2>on their phone is enormous, right, And it is enormous,

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>but it's like, you know, it's a tiny fraction of

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 2>the pool of money from people like saving for retirement, right,

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and so like, when you get big enough, you're like

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the way to go to the next level of is

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>to get people's retirement money and not just their fund

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 2>trading money. Now, I will say the other thing about

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>the barecase of people graduating from meme stocks to retirement

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>funds is that Robinhood so far makes a lot of

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 2>its money on trading pad for order flow, right, And

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 2>two Sili's facts about that are one, if you are

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 2>just buying ets for retirement, you're not trading that often, right,

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 2>So Robinhood is getting less money from your buy and

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 2>hold investing than they are from your frantic day trading.

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 2>And then two where they get most of their money

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 2>from payment to order flow is options in crypto, Like

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>frantically trading stocks less good for them financially than frantically

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>trading options and crypto and buying and holding stocks even

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>worse than frantically trading stocks. So there is like a

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 2>margin compression as they go to the to the higher

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 2>dollar you know, retirement funds, but hopefully you make it

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 2>up on volume.

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, another bare case that you could put in there,

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and this falls more into the psychology category is we

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>might have moved passed this for Robinhood. But I was wondering,

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we were watching the fantastic fall of

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>all these meme stocks and just so much money was

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>being destroyed of retail dollars, whether instead of graduating into

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>index funds, et cetera, whether or not people would just

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>get totally disenchanted and leave the market all together. But

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems like that hasn't been too bad for robin Hood.

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know. I mean, I think a lot

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>of people interpret memestocks as themselves a phenomenon of disenchantment, right,

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 2>where like people feel like they can't get ahead, and

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 2>so they put their money into gambles rather than like

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 2>investing it sensibly in index funds or whatever. Yeah, And

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what comes after disenchantment with that, right,

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Like I I think some people are like, I'm going

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 2>to stop gambling and start saving responsibly. Some people are like,

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 2>we're disenchanted before, and now they're extra disenchanted, right, I

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it has sort of played out with crypto,

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that so many people lost money on crypto.

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about just like day traders lost money on

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto because this time around with bitcoin got pretty close

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to seventy thousand sometime in the past few weeks. It

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>just feels like Bitcoin at seventy thousand this time around

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is a lot different than before, like the FTX collapse,

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>when I think that did disenchant a lot of the

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>retail community.

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 2>I agree, although then I want you to tell me

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>why bitkind is back in tewenty thousand.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I the podcast just ends.

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree, But like this is my cryptos skepticism

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 2>coming out. Like go ahead, if you've got into crypto

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 2>for gambling and you got disenchanted and you stopped being

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 2>in crypto, like that's all like totally consistent, right, because

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 2>it's like should beat this out. But it's essentially a

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 2>gambling product, right, Like not all you know, like stayble

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 2>goo whatever, right, but like you know, like the stuff

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 2>that you see on like coin market cap is essentially

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 2>a gambling product, whereas like if you got into the

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>stock market for gambling, like that's a tiny, tiny fraction

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>of like why people are in the stock market of

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 2>what you can do this. It's mostly you're just like

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 2>you're investing in like the growing productive capacity of the world. Right,

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 2>Like that's what the stock market is, right, it is

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 2>like companies and like you have economic growth, so the

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 2>companies make more money and like that accrues to their shareholders. Right. So, like,

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>if you get into the stock market for gambling purposes

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 2>and there's a thing you can stay for that isn't

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 2>gambling purposes with cryptos, I'm not so sure that's true.

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 2>There are people in crypto are building good products blah

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah. Right, but if you're like buying the tokens,

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, like there's a lot. Yeah, it's like hard

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 2>to invest in those.

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Things anyway, that's that's in it for the tech.

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>But no, I mean, like, right, I agree, if you

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 2>get into memes stacks and you lose all your money

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and you get disenchanted and you like decide that investing

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 2>in capitalism is bad, then like that is probably bad

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 2>for your net worth. The popular perception of memes tax

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 2>is like they got into memestacks because they thought investing

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 2>in capitalism was bad. So like you know, yeah, the

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 2>disenchantment will maybe point them in the in a better direction.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Cut all of this.

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>No, this is good, I will say, I mean we're

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about Robin Hood's ambitions to become this one stop

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>shop and you know, grow up a little bit. It

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>is for context good to point out that Charles Schwab

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Fidelity they have ten trillion and fourteen trillion in total

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>assets respectively. Robin Hood is clocking it at one hundred

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and forty three point six billion dollars in assets as

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of the end of the second quarter. So it's a

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>long hill to climb.

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>It's an intriguing strategy of like being the like salient

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 2>fun brokerage and then trying to pivot from there to

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 2>being like the next Schwab. Like, I don't know, it

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 2>strikes me is like a reasonable thing to do and

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 2>like kind of cool.

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know, but yeah, you're right if I

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>was a CEO, Like by.

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 2>The way, you're like, yeah, they have a long way

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 2>to go, Like yeah, they have like one hundred times

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 2>upsided assets. Like that sounds like a pretty good position

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 2>to you.

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's an easier pivot to make to

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>like be the fun investment firm and then try to

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>become the mature one versus like, you know.

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Much easier. Can you imagine Fidelity be likeah, we've got confetti.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, hey, fellow kids. Right, Yeah, it's.

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 2>So much easier. It's so much here because also like

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 2>age moves in a direction, right, Like if you if

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 2>you're like a twenty three year old, then you start

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 2>on robin and then you become like a thirty three

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 2>year old and you're still on robin hood. Yeah, I'm

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 2>gonna save for retirement, right, whereas like Fidelity is like

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 2>average you know, account holder is older.

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Like they're not gonna.

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 2>They're not gonna be like maybe they have like a

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 2>midlife crisis and get into memes like gambling, but like

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's a better move to start to hook

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 2>them young and then sort of grow up a lot.

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So true. Yeah, it's like me with tail Or, Swift ESG,

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Naughty ESG, wisdom Tree. I'm not wrapping, uh, but wisdom

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Tree was fined four million dollars for miss marketing. They're ESG.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a selection of them in the world.

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people are worried about greenwashing, right, Like

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 2>there's this idea that people market ESG products funds or

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 2>market their companies of the s year or whatever, and

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 2>like they don't really mean it and they're doing bad stuff.

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 2>They're like you know, secretly doing coal or whatever.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>They might have a point, so what they have a point, sure.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>But like two, I think most people get mad about that,

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 2>would like someone to police that according to their own

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 2>beliefs about ESG. Right, So, like you know, people get

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 2>mad at like black Rock for having ESG funds that

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 2>like sometimes vote for the directors of call companies or whatever, right,

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and like people like, oh, they shouldn't do that, And

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's like it turns out there's no like

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 2>single accepted standard for what is ESG or like what

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 2>an ESG fund should do, and so different issues of

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 2>ESG funds have different opinions and they do different things,

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 2>And if you have like a strict view, then you'll

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 2>be mad at like ESG issuers who have less strict views.

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 2>And there's like nothing you can do about it. I mean,

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 2>you can like put your money at a different fund,

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 2>but like the SEC is not going to say to

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 2>a big ESG fund what you were doing is not

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>ESG because like the SEC doesn't like have a substance

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 2>of definition of what ESG is. Yeah, and you can

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 2>imagine that changing, but like not really in like the

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 2>current state of American politics and SEC rulemaking, it's just

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be ESG is like this sort of like

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 2>somewhat like voluntarily defined concept. But what the SEC can

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 2>do is look at every ESU firm's definition of ESG

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and see if they're following it. And it turns out

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 2>a lot of them aren't. And the reason they're not,

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 2>by the way, is like SG ETFs where like they

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's like fairly low expense ratio and like

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 2>they don't have a huge staff of people, you know,

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 2>investigating everything. They buy data from data vendors, and like

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 2>sometimes they mess it up and then they don't do

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 2>ESG things, but they don't do what they said. So

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Wisdom tre you got in trouble. I had this ESG

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 2>ETFs and it described them in fairly strict terms, you know,

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 2>instead of some of them like they don't invest in

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 2>companies that have any involvement in fossil fuels or tobacco,

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 2>like regardless of how much revenue they get from if

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 2>they have any involvement, they are screened out. And the

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 2>way they did that is like they went to some

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>data vendors and they bought lists of companies that do

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 2>things right, and like the lists were not quite right

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 2>for the thing they described. So they bought lists of

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>companies that were involved in tobacco. Lots of like big

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 2>stores carry cigarettes, right, and like the cigarettes make up

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, one percent of revenue or whatever, like they

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>are on the shelves, And the data vendor would only

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>flag a company of retailer if more than ten percent

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 2>of its revenue came from cigarettes, and so like most retailers,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.479
<v Speaker 2>that's not the case. And so they weren't flagged. And

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 2>so the SEC looked and Wisdom true was investing in

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 2>some of these in some retailers that like you know,

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 2>sold some cigarettes, and they said in their materials they

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 2>didn't invest in companies that sold cigarettes, and I was like,

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 2>you did not do the thing you said you were

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 2>going to do because of like a data error. Right,

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.959
<v Speaker 2>they said, we wouldn't invest in fossil fuels, and so

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 2>they bought the list of the data vendor that's like

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 2>listed companies in the energy sector. And then like it

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 2>turns out they're investing in like railroads that transported coal.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 2>So they got in trouble for that. So that's like

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the level of policing of greenwashing that the SEC could

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 2>do is like if you say something and you don't

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 2>do that due to like laziness or like buying the

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 2>wrong data set, then you'll get in trouble.

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I do like that. The defense is probably like, well,

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just a little bit of cigarettes. You know, if

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I have one cigarette a month, it's not that bad.

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, I mean like, I mean like they've been missed

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 2>in tobacco companies like Drugstars. That's old cigarettes.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I also think it's interesting, And this was a

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>point raised by my colleague wil Donna Hirich that you know,

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>wisdom Tree was fined here four million dollars not necessarily

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the third party data provider.

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm my impression is that the data provider actually,

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 2>for the most part, accurately described data.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Like the ETF description and prospectives didn't match up with

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the data that they would buy.

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 2>They were they weren't like buying an index. They were like,

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 2>we're excluding companies that do this. And then the way

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>they excluded companies that did that is like going to

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 2>a data provider and saying what companies do this, So

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 2>it was like it was like the data provider's name

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 2>was on the ETF.

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's interesting.

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 2>The tobacco stuff. I'm actually I'm not sure if they

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 2>got it right. But like for in general, the data

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 2>providers accurately described what was going on. Yeah, and Wisdom

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Tree just bought their own data.

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I've never smoked a cigarette. Just so everyone is clear,

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting. This kind of tracks with what we

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>were talking about.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I swear this podcast is basically for Katie's parents.

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>I've never spoked his cigarette. I swear to God, I believe. Anyway,

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>moving swiftly along, this is similar to what we were

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>talking about a couple of weeks ago. You were saying

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that the SEC won't define ESG. It really is the

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>same for all principles based.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 2>We talked about the Biblical we were talking about JWWJD, what.

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>John do and how they were Bible washing. I think

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>about that all the time. Yes, it's a great phrase,

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, principles based investing it's hard to define, but

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it seems easy to run a foulve of doing what

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>you said right.

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean like in the general case, like you

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 2>can't define principles best investing because you could have any

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 2>set up principles you want. It's just the SEC is

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 2>going to check up on your principles. One gets the

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 2>sense that the SEC as an institution sort of likes

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 2>some sort of ESG principles and would like investors to

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 2>invest in things that are environmentally and socially and governance minded. Right.

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 2>That's why the SEC has proposed rules back climate change disclosure,

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 2>not just because it thinks the disclosure is interesting, but

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 2>because it thinks in might like to invest in greener

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 2>companies and avoid maybe browner companies. I get the ounce

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 2>I could be wrong that the SEC is less interested

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 2>in biblically based investing, and the SEC doesn't think that

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.479
<v Speaker 2>investors should try to avoid companies that contribute to like

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 2>gar Right's charities.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, speculation, Yeah, one might think that speculation.

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 2>But the SEC, like doesn't get to choose, right. The

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 2>SEC just looks at your list of principles and says,

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 2>did you buy the right data? Is that to adhere

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 2>to your list of principles? And sometimes with both ESG

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 2>and with biblically based investing in the answers now and

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 2>then the SEC finds you. It's like a non substance.

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>It's just like going around checking the boxes. It's not

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>like interested in the substance of the things.

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I will say, it's been kind of fun to watch.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>There is this like big demand for ESG, or at

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>least you know, a lot of these fund companies would

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>tell you that there was all this fantastic demand, but

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that they just wanted to launch products because

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:57.199
<v Speaker 1>now you have a lot of ESG funds that have

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>been closing. That's the case in the US.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 2>It was a lot of demand, and I don't know,

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it was all backlash.

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Backlash, back, a huge backla, backlash, backlash. Maybe there was demands.

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Backlash, demands with rhymes of black rocks them.

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think that a lot of fun

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>companies launched a lot of VSG products because it was

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>in vogue, and then the demands maybe wasn't there to

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the way that maybe some of those fun companies thought

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>there would be.

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was in vogue among fun companies, and I

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 2>think there was a sense that like you're getting ahead

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>of the giant wave of demand that was coming, and

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 2>that wave was not quite coming out.

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a parallel to make sure well, first of all,

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing hundreds and hundreds of VSG funds shutter now

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>both in the US and in Europe. It's sort of

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>similar to how all of these automakers were like, we

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to phase out internal combustion engines and pivot

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to EV's, and a lot of these legacy automakers have

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>had to take a lot of losses because the EV

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>demand isn't really there, And of course when it comes

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to that, it's probably a combination of range anxiety, the

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>charging infrastructure in the United States isn't quite there. Evs

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are more expensive for now the normal cars, But you

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>could draw a lot of parallels to the ESG fund space.

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that like ESG investing is so interesting because

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 2>part of the thesis for ESG investing is we're gonna

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 2>avoid fossil fuels because in the future there will be

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 2>such public backlash against fossil fuels that it will be

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 2>impossible for fossil fuel companies to be profitable. There will

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 2>be regulation stopping them, will be you know, carbon taxes,

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 2>there'll be something that makes it uneconomical to run a

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel company. And to have that investing thesis, you

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 2>have to have this like view of the future of

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 2>public opinion that's like really quite stark, right, Yeah, you

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 2>see the same thing here. If you're an automaker and

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you're talking to like your shareholders, who are investment firms

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 2>that are launching a lot of es CHIEF funds. There's

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>this like widespread view of like the consumer demand for

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 2>clean energy and you know avoiding fossil fuels is going

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 2>to be so strong in the future that like you'll

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>need to have a robust ev business or like you'll

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 2>need to have a lot of ESG funds and like

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 2>you know eviens for that was kind of it was

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 2>like a little bit wishful thinking about ESG investors, and

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 2>it turns out that the rejections about like future consumer

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 2>demand or not. Right.

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>There's so much more to say, Matt, But I actually

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>literally have to go get the oil on my car

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>change right now. It's not electric. That was a choice

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I made because I don't know where I would charge it.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 2>There you go, and that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 2>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot com.

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>on Open Interest between nine to eleven Am Eastern.

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 2>email to money Pot at bloomberg dot net, ask us

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 2>a question and we might answer it on air.

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>people find the show.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 2>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anna Maserakus and

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Moses and and special thanks this week to cal Brooks.

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Francis Newnham is our executive.

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Producer, and Stage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 2>back next week with more stuff.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. If you

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>never want to miss a story, become a bloomberg dot

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>com subscriber today. Check out our special intro offer right

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>now at bloomberg dot com Slash Podcast Offer, or click

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the link in our show notes. You'll also unlock deep

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>reporting data and analysis from reporters around the world.