WEBVTT - Strange News: Hidden Cameras, Randy Travis, and AI Dating For You

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>From UFOs to psychic powers and government conspiracies. History is

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>learn this stuff they don't want.

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 2>You to know.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>A production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Hello, welcome back to the show. My name is Men,

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 3>my name is noelh.

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 4>They call me Ben.

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 2>We're joined as always with our super producer Alexis, code

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 2>named Doc Holliday Jackson. Most importantly, you are you. You

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 2>are here. That makes this the stuff they don't want

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 2>you to know. It is the top of the week,

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>which means it's time for some strange news, and we're

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about some crime. We're going to talk

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>about some surveillance. We're going to talk about, of course,

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 2>a couple of heist gone wrong. We are going to

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>ask what rough beast slouches towards the Bethlehem of the

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Dead Internet theory before we do any of that. Fellow

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy realist, we are fans of music in all form,

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 2>and Noel, you found a pretty amazing story.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 4>Well yeah, I mean, you know, a lot of the

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 4>conversation around AI, especially as it pertains to corporations using AI,

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 4>sort of feels like this desperate attempt to capitalize on

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 4>the hot new technology or whatever, not even to mention

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 4>the dystopian aspects of AI the job depriving the future

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 4>aspects of AI or a machine learning to be a

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 4>little more accurate. So it's kind of rare even when

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 4>you see one that seems a little innocuous, Like you know,

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 4>the Beatles released a pretty nothing burger of a song

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 4>that I've already literally forgot in the name of where

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 4>they used AI to clean up the audio on a

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 4>John Lennon demo. Essentially that was like I think him

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 4>playing a tune on the piano, and they used AI

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 4>as you know, an interesting tool. It wasn't like to

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 4>resurrect John Lennon's from the Dead, you know, to fully

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 4>create this thing that never actually happened. It was you know,

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 4>using you know, machine learning as a forensic tool of

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 4>audio reconstruction.

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 2>I do like John Lennon's.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 4>By the way, John Lennons, there's there's there could be

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 4>more than one. If hey if if, if big corporate

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 4>America has their way, there will be many John Lennons

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 4>fed by machine learning. But you know, there was a

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 4>lot made of that story when it came out because

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 4>there were a lot of people saying, oh gross, using

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 4>AI to you know, dishonor the dead and create this song.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 4>Not cool beatles, but a lot of those stories buried

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 4>the leader at the very least people chose not to

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 4>look into a little bit deeper beyond the headlines to

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 4>determine yes and fact. That was just a use of

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 4>that kind of software, that kind of technology as a tool.

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 4>And you know, Matt and I work pretty extensively with

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 4>audio and stuff and using tools like isotope RX to

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, clean up noisy recordings, get rid of things

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 4>like room tone or the drone of an air conditioning.

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>And while I know a lot of audio plugins are

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 4>starting to use more machine learning algorithms to figure that

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of stuff out, it's sort of still kind of,

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, the early days for that kind of stuff,

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 4>and you're really just starting to see some of those

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 4>tools incorporating this technology. I think we could all agree

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 4>that's pretty cool. That's a use of that tech that's

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 4>neat and that actually is a value and is still

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 4>requiring engineers to implement the tool and to use it,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, to create great audio, whether it be in

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 4>podcasts or in music. You know, with so many people

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 4>recording records at home. Being able to clean up audio

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 4>that maybe wasn't recorded in the most optimal situations is

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 4>a really cool thing.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, just really quickly on that, think about all of

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the amazing tools that exist for video editing and how

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 3>far that's come. Right, being able to isolate elements back

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 3>the image and like do all that kind of stuff.

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Adaptive whatever it can sense, the edges it can sense,

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 4>you can replace elements to create really cool video effects,

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 4>not just deep fakes.

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's super good at this, by the way, folks.

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 3>But what I'm saying is even before any of this

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>AI integration, video effects and editing and the way you

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 3>could manipulate a visual image became was becoming extremely powerful

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 3>the things you could do right. But with audio for

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 3>a long time, I think it has to do with

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 3>the nature of the wave and the signal and what

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>you actually get when you record right. With microphones and things,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 3>it's very hard to separate pieces, right. Let's say, if

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 3>there's a sound that occurs at the same time as

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 3>another sound. For a long time, there was almost no

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 3>way besides isolating specific frequencies to do anything.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 4>I used to work at a guitar shop. You probably

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 4>have an idea or can't imagine how often people came

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 4>in and said, hey, you got to miss That'll cut

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 4>the vocal out of this scene so I can make

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 4>it into a karaoke track. I kid you not. It

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 4>happened once every couple of days. So now to your point, Matt,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 4>through machine learning, that is possible, and I couldn't exactly

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 4>explain to you how it's done, but there are quite

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 4>a few tools that can do just that. And the

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 4>long winded way of getting to today's story that I brought,

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 4>which is about the country singer Randy Travis who in

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty thirteen suffered a severe stroke that left him unable

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 4>to speak, which of course means unable to sing. He

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 4>also had had issues with mobility due to that and

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 4>has you know, largely faded from the public spotlight since

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 4>that point. You might know Randy Travissey. I think he

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 4>had hits like as far back as like the early eighties.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 4>My girlfriend, who's a bit of a country enthusiast, it's

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 4>not my particular genre of choice. I think I like

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 4>classic country. I like outlawk country, that kind of stuff.

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 4>More of the schmaltzy kind of radio country stuff like

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't really do it for me, but you could

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 4>argue Randy Travis sort of straddles those genres. And I

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 4>think one of his famous songs is called like for

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 4>I Love You Forever and Ever a man as long

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 4>as Old Women talk about Old Man or something like that,

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 4>and didn't quite bail it, but it's apparently a really

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 4>really sweet song. And he was known for having a

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 4>very kind of non traditional, very laid back delivery, and

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 4>that was sort of his you know, stocking trade, and

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 4>so he was very beloved, not necessarily known as like

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 4>a belter per se or having like this some kind

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 4>of crazy range, much more of an everyman kind of singer.

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, that's worth it for like twelve people.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 4>On the other hand, is that a ready Travis dress.

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 2>On the other head, of course, he is a we're

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about this off air. He's kind of a comfortable,

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 2>hangout singer. That's exactly right, right.

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 4>So essentially what's happened here, and again, this is an

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 4>initiative through this record company, Warner you know, Warner Brothers,

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 4>Warner Media whatever their record wing of that giant media conglomerate.

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 4>But I would argue a pretty good one of like, hey,

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 4>we're going to try it out the use of this

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 4>AI technology to give Randy Travis his voice back, with

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 4>full cooperation from Randy himself, from his legacy producer of

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 4>many years, and a fellow country singer named James Dupree

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 4>who kind of laid down what you might call the

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 4>guide vocal for the track. So basically, you sing the

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 4>song kind of knowing how Randy's cadences might go and

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 4>the way he might deliver the song, and then by

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 4>going through forensically scraping I guess, I mean, I think

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 4>that terms kind of become a little gross too, but

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 4>you get what I'm saying. His back catalog. I think

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 4>they took forty two of his isolated vocal tracks, which

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 4>you might call stems in the parlance of recording. It's

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.119
<v Speaker 4>just the vocal part solo. No AI required, right, because

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 4>you have the original master tapes, which is multi track,

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 4>so all of those things can be then split out out.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 4>So forty two of his vocal isolated recordings were then analyzed,

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 4>let's say, and overlaid on top of this James Dupree vocal,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 4>and apparently the results A it's charting, it's debuted where

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 4>that came from the song, the new song from Randy Travis.

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 4>And in this situation where there's agency, I think you

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 4>can call it by Randy Travis. What do you guys

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 4>think about that? Let let's start with that first of all,

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 4>if there is co signed by the artist himself, not

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Drake dropping an AI rap verse on a you know,

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 4>disk track from Tupac of course, who is not with us,

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 4>and also from Snoop Dogg. Weirdly, we actually didn't talk

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 4>about that in our Drake segment. That's one of the

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 4>weirdest parts of that whole rap u. That is no

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 4>agency that is done without the permission of the people

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 4>living or deceased, their families that have that have been

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 4>left behind, and you know, Tupac's estate had a real

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 4>problem with that and had it taken down. But in

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 4>this case there has been all of the things and

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Randy himself. So can you really call this a Randy

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Travis song? This is really kind of a new frontier

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 4>of media, Like he didn't actually sing it. This other

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 4>guy sang it, but then they took his voice and

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 4>they overlaid it and he was involved. You know, it's

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 4>very interesting question. I don't know what you guys think

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 4>about that, And then we'll get to some other stuff

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 4>with some other aspects of this story.

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I haven't heard it, guys. Does it sound like

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 3>it's just him recording in a booth?

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 4>I think so. I mean, you know this kind of

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 4>very polished country. It's got a certain sheen to it.

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 4>You know a lot of theah, there's auto tune used

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 4>in big country artists, and auto tune again as a tool,

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 4>he's gotten more and more transparent where it doesn't sound

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 4>like auto tune. There's even this other auto tune is

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 4>actually these days, in my experience, used more to sound

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 4>like auto tune, where it is very much meant to

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 4>be an effect, like in trap music or or you know,

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 4>a Polish pop. It's almost like that robot voice that you.

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Know he being could actually singul to know that. Check

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 2>out the Tiny Desk concert. The guy has a voice

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 2>of an angel.

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 4>Picasso could paint landscapes. The guy it was classically trained artists.

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 4>He just chose to paint like a like a small child.

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm kidding. I love Picasso, but I'm saying people often

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 4>joke about like, how, oh man, anybody could do that?

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Blah blah blah. No, a lot of these artists, they

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>made those choices. That is often the case with auto

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 4>tune these days. It's a choice, it's an aesthetic choice.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Melodine is another tool that is much more for correcting mistakes,

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 4>correcting little warbles, and it's real precise and I've used

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 4>it and it's it's miraculous. You've probably seen uh sort

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 4>of jokey videos online where someone will take a song

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 4>and retune it and like make it sound completely different.

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 4>That's all using melodye. So in my opinion, it does

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 4>sound like a real Randy Travis on me not being

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 4>a you know, Randy Travis super fan, I couldn't say

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 4>for sure, but by all accounts, he loved it. Apparently

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 4>he you know, when they played it for him. There's

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 4>a video of him kind of taking it all in

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 4>and you see him sort of go through this range

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 4>of emotions, and I believe the emotion that he lands

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 4>on is gratitude. He uses the word grace, you know,

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 4>in his discussion of this song, and he believes this

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 4>was a form of a divine second chance.

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>So like when a Frank Sinatra watched Pavati singing some

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 2>of his hits.

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 4>That's a good point, man, That's my question to you, guys.

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Though it is like that sort of but it's also

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 4>different because it is charting as a new song from

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 4>the country megastar Randy Travis. But it's also that ship

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 4>of thesis kind of question, isn't it guys? Like, is

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 4>it really him? If it's actually sung by someone else

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 4>in the overlaid with pieces of him? I don't know.

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 4>I think it's that's a philosophical question, right, I don't

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 4>really have the answer.

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's licensing at that point.

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 4>It is licensing, that's right, it's But at the same time,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 4>it's a little different than Abba or Kiss selling their

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 4>likenesses to the the Hologram factory, you know, for constant

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 4>perpetual touring. You know, that's on rails. They've created this show.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 4>There's see this is kind of on rails too. I

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 4>don't know, guys, I'd love to hear from conspiracy realists

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 4>out there. Is this really Randy Travis? Is that? Even

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 4>the point? I don't know. His producer, Kyle Lemming is

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 4>the one who went through the old recordings. The lyrics

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 4>are ten years old. So this is something that I

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 4>think was meant for him in the first place. I'm

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 4>not one hundred percent sure, but it does have three

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 4>point three million streams in its very first week, which

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 4>is pretty neat. I just think this is sort of

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 4>like a feel good, a high story in the midst

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 4>of a lot of real scary, doom and gloom AI stories.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 4>And I think I don't think anybody could argue that

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 4>this is a pretty interesting use of this tool, you know,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 4>and other AI related I guess positive news or you

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 4>know where AI with agency news If anyone's familiar with

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 4>the singer and dancer, pretty amazing artist fka Twigs. She

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 4>actually spoke before like a house committee, I believe, on

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 4>the use of AI, and she has developed an AI

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 4>deep fake avatar of herself that she with agency from

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 4>her and her team want to be able to have

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 4>interact with fans. So, you know, is it a genie

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 4>out of the bottle kind of situation? If it's done correctly,

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 4>can you put the reins on it? Can it be

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 4>rained in? I guess there's a better way of putting that.

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I'd like to think so, but I

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 4>want to end. But I want to end this segment

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 4>unless you guys had any other stuff to add.

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 3>No, I can't wait to listen to the song.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 4>I also want to give it another listen.

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I will point out again broken record style. Hope me

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 2>on this. It is fundamentally philosophically fraudulent to describe any

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 2>intelligence as artificial.

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 4>It's fair. I think that's fair and a good reminder.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 4>So this is really quick, and this is really just

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 4>for for laws, y'all. I think this is a really

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 4>sweet story. I recently came across a kind of a

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 4>new I guess burgeoning hilarious sort of joke scene on

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 4>the internet. We talked about dead Internet theory. A lot

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 4>of that is being perpetuated and really escalated by AI

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 4>content creation, right, but a lot of that stuff, I mean,

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 4>it's gonna get more advanced, like it does require prompts

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 4>from human beings. And I stumbled upon a treasure trove

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 4>of AI generated country songs. And this one here was

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 4>entirely AI generated. A human had to have prompted it.

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 4>Because you're gonna hear some some real themes here, y'all. Well,

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 4>let's just this is here real quick. This is a

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 4>big red cups. I got beer in my boots, dirn

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 4>on the truck, corn on the mone and a god

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 4>of my butt.

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 5>It's a stop town, leister's dirt, bleister's beer trucks.

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 4>And sure.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>This is not bo Burnham, by the way.

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Consent butts, red cups, dirty beer, folks.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I wish you could see Matt's pace right now. I

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>wish you could see an old dancing to this one.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 5>The butts are proud, y'all, biscuit in my boot?

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, all right enough, Oh my goodness, gracious, what do

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 4>you guys think about that?

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, guys, I live out in the country.

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Now, yeah, you got big, you got boots and boots, trucks,

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 4>get mud, and there are any guns and butts out there?

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Of course that's all. It's all true. No, no, it's

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 3>I feel offended on behalf of everybody that lives within

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 3>with several miles Listen.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 4>That's why I point out that someone didn't just right

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 4>AI make a country song. Someone said make a country

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 4>song about guns and butts. Okay, that didn't come out

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 4>of whole cloth, I guarantee, because as we know, with

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 4>these tools, they require prompts, and sometimes these prompts can

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 4>be very targeted and focused, whether it be for visual

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 4>stuff or what have you. I thought that was really funny.

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 4>It made me laugh. I shared it with anyone who

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 4>would listen. Now I shared it with you.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 2>AI is o Henry's Monkey Paul, also coming from parts

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 2>of rural Appalachia. I think they would dig this song.

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 4>I think they would do. It's a banger of a chorus, yeah,

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 4>and it certainly does when you when you when you

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 4>step away from the jokiness of it. If an AI

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 4>did compose the melody and hook of that, whether the

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 4>prompt you know that probably Again, I haven't messed with

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 4>one of these audio AI things like that, but pretty

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 4>impressive and a little scary in terms of what that

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 4>means for pop music and artists like James Blake. I've

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 4>really come out saying how the record industries are really

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 4>pushing this narrative of like ten second clips for a TikTok,

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 4>five second, fifteen second clips from TikTok, which is pushing

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 4>the way music is consumed much more towards a world

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 4>where AI generated stuff would fly.

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's not coolish. I would dig this song.

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 4>It's a real fist pumper, y'all, and I just think

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 4>it's gonna get weirder from there. So I use that

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 4>kind of jokey bit just to point out some of

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 4>the scary parts of this stuff too. Weren't you weren't

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 4>going to get an AI story on stuff that I

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 4>want you to know without a little bit of doom

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 4>sprinkled in there for good measure. So at least we

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 4>could wrap that doom. And you know, guns and butts.

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Big red cups, dirty trucks, dirty truck dirty but.

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 4>A biscuit in my boot, corn on my mind. You know,

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, I'm always out there thinking about that corn. Wow.

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, guys, this is fun and scary and sweet.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm feeling a lot of emotions. Let's take a quick

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 4>break here, a word from our sponsor, and then come

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 4>back with more strange news.

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 3>And we've returned. Guys, We've got a bit of a

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 3>mystery that's going to take us down let's say a

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 3>forking path, and we'll explore it as it forks. The

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 3>first story comes from CBS News or k COW News.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a California. It was posted on May eighth, twenty

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty four, and it is regarding one woman's experience. The

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 3>title is hidden Camera Found planted outside of Chino Hills

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 3>woman's home. And I'm just going to read a couple

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 3>of the details here and then let's discuss A woman

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 3>living in Chino Hills, California, was disturbed to learn that

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 3>a camera disguised as a rock had been planted outside

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 3>of her home. The camera was planted in the ground

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 3>across the street from her house. It's believed that the

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 3>camera was placed on April twenty ninth, where it sat

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 3>for several days before being spotted by a neighbor. It

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 3>was a camera wrapped in clay to make it look

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 3>like a rock, and it was attached via cable to

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 3>a very large power bank that was actually larger than

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 3>the entire you know, fake rock itself. So like a

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 3>long term yeah, just sitting there across the street from

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 3>this house. The neighbor who found it was able to

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 3>actually download some of the images from it, so it's

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 3>not as though it was attached to Wi Fi. Well

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe it was, but if it was attached to Wi Fi,

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:33.479
<v Speaker 3>it was also capturing images locally to the device. So

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the neighbor downloaded an image from the camera that showed

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 3>the moment the hand places it there. Somebody was wearing

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 3>a glove like looks like a gardener or something, places

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>it down there. But then the neighbors, knowing the date

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 3>and time, looked at their own security cameras and found

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 3>the moment that somebody rides up on a scooter and

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 3>just kind of, you know, stops for a moment, goes down,

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 3>puts something or messes with the ground in some way, right,

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 3>and then just rides right off. And that's it. That's

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 3>all they know. Uh So everybody is just trying to

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 3>figure out why, and the woman obviously is going, oh, okay,

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 3>what am I dealing with here? We've got several options, guys,

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 3>what do you think is most likely that this could be.

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 2>It's tough to guess without more information.

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, no, right options. I'll throw the first one out.

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 3>What if it is, and this one's way out there.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 3>What if it is a BTK style person that is

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 3>casing a human being, watching a human being to see

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 3>their movements, their patterns and everything like that, like a serial.

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Killer, a predator scoping like the bomb torture killed Dennis

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Radar guy. Cinematic possible, but maybe not plausible. Those fates

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 2>are kind of rare.

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well, what would be more common then maybe uh,

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 3>burglar or someone who's casing the joint just to steal

0:20:58.560 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 3>from it.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's I almost said a good one. That's a

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 2>more plausible one.

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 4>It's also a commitment to the bit, right, I mean,

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 4>you know.

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 2>The possibility of a stalker without necessarily serial killer level

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 2>predation at this point. You know, Matt, in the notes

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 2>you you said, this could also just be someone trying

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 2>to rob a house or chasing the joint for the

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 2>worst hoa ever.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it could be that. What if it's a private

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:36.239
<v Speaker 3>investigator that was hired by some outside party that is

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 3>trying to capture something specific or activity going on?

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh? Well, have you guys been watching this show Sugar

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 4>on on Apple TV. It's a private investigator type show.

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 4>It's set in the modern day, but it's kind of

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 4>got these old school you know, Noir detective advised. But

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 4>dude is constantly placing hidden cameras on stuff, right all

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 4>the time.

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, bigtim We'll get in situations.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's a common thing, right, especially if you're in

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 3>a cheating spouse situation, A PI will place camera us

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 3>in front.

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 4>To be completely wireless, it would have to have a

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 4>big old power supply like that you couldn't how would

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 4>it would be such a giveaway if you tapped somebody's

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 4>electricity or you know, it have to have a big

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 4>old battery too, and then you probably have to go

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 4>back in and replace it with a charge one.

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 2>And not to victim blame at all in any way,

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 2>but to understand this story, Matt, it sounds like we

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 2>need to learn more about the woman in Chino Hills

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 2>she identified, Like is there do we know anything about

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 2>her background or possible like malevolent forces that might have interacted.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 3>With No, we have, We have no information. This is

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 3>like a one off story that at least to my knowledge,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 3>came out last week and it's that's all I've seen

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 3>about it. And I haven't even pursued it further because

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 3>I kind of don't want to know. That's that lady's business.

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to whatever she's getting into. The reason

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm bringing to you guys is to kind of go

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 3>down this pathway of why would someone place a hidden

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 3>camera across the street from a house. The only other

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 3>thing I have like thinking about it would be some

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 3>kind of law enforcement issue where they're trying to watch

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 3>either a house or a specific walkway where people are traveling.

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 3>But usually for law enforcement, you would have to have

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 3>a human being monitoring that stuff. So you've got that

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 3>chain of custody thing.

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, in a windowless van, right.

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, usually a human being on hand somewhere making sure

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 3>that at all times people know what is happening in

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 3>time stamping things.

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:35.959
<v Speaker 2>So and also I hope she's okay.

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh absolutely, I was joking about what did she do?

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 4>No victim? Let me hear at all. I just want

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 4>to add, Matt. I think one thing that piques all

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 4>of our interests about this is the very clever, you know,

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 4>camouflaging of the camera. It's not something that I've really

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 4>thought about it or seen before. It's like a fake

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 4>rock looking thing. Somebody puts some thoughts or time and

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 4>some energy into.

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 3>This, Yeah, but then they just kind of covered it

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 3>with leaves with a giant metal power thing attached to it.

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's like a tracking compliment, You're right.

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's a weird combination of things, right, which

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 3>just makes you go, what.

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Is going on? Laziness?

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess so it is possible to be stupidly smart.

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 3>Hey, there you go. There you go. So, guys, the

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 3>next story that I wanted to jump to from this

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 3>thinking about this story is a story here from Boston

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty five News from a while ago. This is April

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixth, But it made me think about this story.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 3>There was a group of four men who were recently

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 3>arrested for casing and burglarizing forty three homes. These four

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 3>men carried out forty three successful burglaries and stole more

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 3>than four million dollars worth of that's an estimate worth

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 3>of valuables. It was across twenty five towns in Massachusetts

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 3>from twenty eighteen to twenty twenty four.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's a long time window.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 3>It is a really long time window. And here is

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 3>the part that astounded me in reading the story. You guys,

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 3>think about all the ring cameras out there, all of

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 3>the simply safe and blah blah blah, all the r

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 3>low cameras. These guys were only caught on camera out

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 3>of forty three burglaries one time. One time. Isn't that

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 3>kind of astounding. It makes you wonder how in the

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 3>heck they could do that. And I learned about something

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 3>through this article. I didn't know that you could jam

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Wi Fi signals in a local area as somebody who

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 3>was not law enforcement or not, you know, and in

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.479
<v Speaker 3>working for an intelligence company, you can just get a

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 3>device that will jam Wi Fi signals, essentially making all

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 3>of these camera systems inert because if they're not connected

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 3>to the Wi Fi generally they don't function unless there

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 3>are a specific type of camera. Of some of them

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 3>will function whether they have signal or not, and they

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 3>store locally and then upload.

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, really popular one is called the camera.

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Mamma jamma, camera, mamma jamma.

0:25:58.440 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 4>I just made that up. That's not true.

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:01.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh I thought it is.

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Now we just lack mirrored it. Also, also, it is,

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to be fair, folks, it is completely legal to buy

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 2>those products or to manufacture them on your own.

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Is that because it's all public air, like where you're

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 4>jamming at like like I don't know, like who owns

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 4>the air?

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's like it's illegal to shoot a person in general,

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 2>but it is not illegal to buy a gun. It

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 2>is legal to buy these sorts of things, these contraptions

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 2>and the components that compose those contraptions, but the way

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>you use them determines the legality or the illegality and.

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 4>These great architectors.

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, it's a good comparison. I don't know why

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I say comparison, Like I don't speak this language. I'm

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 2>still learning it.

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 4>But no, it's one of those things that, like you know,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 4>has intended for law enforcement or what have you, and

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 4>then it made its way to the public sector. I

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 4>think it's technically a legal to use them for nefarious purposes,

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 4>but it's a pretty gray area about that kind of stuff.

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the right color for it. It's a great area.

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>And these So these guys did get caught though, right Matt,

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 2>despite only being sited on camera once like some sort

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 2>of true crime cryptid. They did get popped.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 3>They did get caught. They're currently charged. So I guess

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 3>this stuff is they allegedly did all these things. They

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 3>haven't gone through the whole process, right, but they did

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 3>get caught. There was one other thing. This was a

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 3>sophisticated group of folks doing this because they also never

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 3>brought cell phones with them when they were, you know,

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 3>casing a joint or going into a place. They were

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 3>very careful with their signals intelligence. Basically they almost wouldn't

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 3>have gotten caught, probably just because they really were moving

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 3>pretty effectively in the shadows, I think, unless there were

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 3>some kind of sting or something like that. But hey,

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 3>this is a weird one. They got caught. That's good.

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how you really protect yourself against that

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 3>stuff unless I don't know, you just super upgrade your

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 3>security systems and think about all the potential holes and

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 3>then go crazy and paranoid and maybe don't do that.

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Spend your life unhappily anxious.

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's not do that. That's not a great idea.

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Take it from me somebody who has dealt with that

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and is always and is still dealing with that.

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, maybe we should get some coffee.

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 3>Hey, there we go. Uh well, so here's another potential

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 3>reason for that camera to be out there. By way

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 3>of another story that was in The Guardian on May eleventh,

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 3>titled US woman charged with concealing bleach in husband's coffee

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 3>avoids jail. Okay, so here's one to get all our

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 3>paranoias up. There was a US Navy serviceman who was

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 3>stationed outside of the United States. He noticed that the

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 3>coffee he was drinking in the mornings that he would

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.959
<v Speaker 3>brew it home, started tasting a little off, so he

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 3>decided to weirdly enough to check it for pool chemicals

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 3>like chlorine in those kinds of things. Sure, so he

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 3>checked it and turns out, oh, there's bleach in there.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 3>So he thought, how did bleach get in my coffee? Like,

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 3>checks out the coffee maker. Oh yeah, the water in

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 3>there tastes real funny, cleans it out, puts new water in,

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 3>and then all of a sudden, it tastes weird again.

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 3>So he sets up a hidden camera in his kitchen

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 3>and he watches his spouse put something into the coffee

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 3>maker's water holder, right in the back of the coffee maker,

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 3>and he's like, huh, I wonder what that was. That

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 3>was really weird. So then he waits until they move

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 3>back to the United States. He just by the way,

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 3>he pretends like he drinks his coffee in the morning.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 3>From this point on, he doesn't actually drink it. He

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 3>knows there's something in it, and his wife puts something

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 3>in it. He's not sure what's going on, so he

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 3>waits till he get back to the US. Then he

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 3>sets up another camera in this new kitchen and he

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 3>catches her taking bleach, putting it into container and then

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 3>putting that the contents of that container into the coffee maker,

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 3>and she had to go to jail.

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 4>But wait, didn't her husband like argue in her favor

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 4>against long term jail time And she got off with

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 4>some like probation. And then they I think they're getting

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 4>divorced or they just you know, but they're still living

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 4>together with their kid. Yeah, why do you tell the

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 4>kid mommy and daddy love each other very much, but

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 4>mommy tried to kill daddy or was.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 2>It more of a Munchausen's by proxy situation?

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question this. Well, I mean, we obviously

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 4>don't know any motive right in terms of abuse or

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 4>anything like that.

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, But again, I guess what I'm saying is, I

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 3>guess there are a lot of reasons to want to

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 3>have cameras set up and to conceal those cameras so

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 3>the people you're trying to capture don't know they're there.

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just a weird situation.

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Can you imagine the thought process?

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I like that there's a thematic point here too, because

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 2>in general, now one must always assume one is being

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 2>filmed or recorded in some way. It's just the safest

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 2>assumption we're not trying to ruin anybody's day or anything

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 4>And I also don't think we're all necessarily proposing that

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 4>we put round the clock hidden cameras in every aspect

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 4>of our life to make sure no one's trying to poisonous.

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 4>What I was gonna ask, though, Matt, was can you guys,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 4>are both of you can you imagine the thought process

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 4>that would lead to this conclusion? And like the slew thing,

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 4>and like, surely she's not Wait a minute, maybe she is.

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh god, she definitely is.

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 2>You immediately test for pool chemistry.

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:43.719
<v Speaker 4>That's a weird one the context, you know, who like

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 4>have you like we've.

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 2>All had beat me here, doc, and thank you. We've

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:51.239
<v Speaker 2>all had the drinks at some point, right, you know,

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 2>you get something from a fast food place that soda

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 2>founds off. Who on earth? Like what leads you to

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 2>this point in your life where you sip coffee it

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 2>tastes off and you say, time to test for the

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 2>pool chemicals.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 4>There's that bit in the pilot episode of twin Peaks

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 4>where the guy goes there was a fish in the percolat.

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 4>That's what it made me think. But guys, I mean

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.479
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if anyone's accidentally tasted a little bleach

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 4>in their life. I haven't, but I know what it

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 4>smells like, and we know that there's a lot of

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 4>connection between taste and smell. I could imagine that he

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 4>tested for pool chemicals because the coffee tasted a little bleachy.

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, and it was a taste that lingered for

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 3>a long time. And again, like you just want to know, Well,

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 3>is it just this batch of coffee that's tainted or

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 3>is something wrong with my coffee maker? What the heck's

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 3>going on? Maybe it was in my cup?

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Well the gaslightingness of it all too, is the

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 4>whole Like, am I insane? Like I totally cleaned out

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 4>the coffee maker and now it's back. You know, at

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 4>what point does he decide I better get to the

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 4>bottom of this. This isn't in my head he had.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 4>You have wrestled with that for at least a minute.

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 4>You know, is he.

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Testing everything for pool chemicals?

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, he had test strips, right, and his first thought was, oh, crap,

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 3>something is getting into our water supply because they were

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 3>stationed in Germany, and he was like, maybe there's just

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 3>something I don't know about so we tested the water

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 3>faucet and it was clean. So he's like, that's weird. Well,

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 3>so he tested the water that was sitting there in

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the percolator and it was wrong.

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Hats off to this guy's deductive skills of reasoning and

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 4>then you know, process of elimination. I would say he

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 4>saved his own life. Yep.

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 2>All, don't drink bleach, folks.

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 3>No, good God, please don't do that.

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Not even diet bleach, about the calories. Just don't drink bleach.

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 3>But what if it tastes like midnight cherry midnight zero. Yeah,

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 3>it's my favorite too. It's right there. All right, we're gonna,

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, think about this stuff, y'all. We're gonna

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 3>take a break and we'll be right back with more

0:33:59.320 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 3>strange news.

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 2>And we have returned a quick cavalcade of updates. Good

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 2>news for a very specific demographic of people in Indiana.

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 2>An Indiana judge has ruled that tacos and burritos qualify

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 2>as sandwiches. So st yeah, yeah, yeah, the future. Who

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 2>is this a judge in Indiana? A judge by profession,

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 2>He's not like a judge Reinhold or whatever that actor's

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 2>name is in Fort Wayne, Indiana. He ruled as part

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of a commercial development case that burritos and tacos count

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 2>as sandwiches.

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 4>I think this is out of his league, saying, you're lane, judge.

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.720
<v Speaker 2>This is the most conservative opinion I have heard.

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 4>You have nol to do with you.

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 3>Look, we've been in a.

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Matter of legality, it's a matter of common sense, dude.

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 3>We've been asking for like an official ruling on this,

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 3>and this judge gave it to us.

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 2>He wrote, the proposed famous taco restaurant falls within the

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 2>scope of general use approved in the original written commitment.

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 4>Blah blah blah.

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Blah blah, YadA YadA YadA da da Uh. The original

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 2>written commitment does not restrict potential restaurants to only American

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>cuisine style sandwiches. So that's a big win for Big Taco.

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 4>The court. Baby, all right, the justices, deway.

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 2>All right, we'll text them. We'll text them because your

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 2>voice should be heard. Also, if you own a yacht,

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 2>bad news. The Orcas are out to get you. Just

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 2>knocked another way out of the straight to Gibraltar, and uh,

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Team Orca.

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 3>To be quite honest, wasn't a really big nice boat too,

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 3>like a yacht.

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 4>Or something that gets the distinction is on the big

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 4>and or nice side. But this was a bigger yacht

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 4>right above.

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, I know I saw like Pacino and Devil's Advocate,

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, Tea Morca. So also, we were talking about

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 2>this a little bit off air, this last one before

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 2>you get to our big piece. Shout out to our

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 2>friend doctor Damian Patrick. Williams was speaking with him a

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit earlier. There is a flood of fake science

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 2>hitting academic journals. We talked about this a little bit

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:29.240
<v Speaker 2>in our previous episode on the academic journal problems, the controversies,

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 2>corruption and conspiracy surrounding that a lot of these journals

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 2>now are closing down because there is an industry using chat,

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 2>GPT and AI to plagiarize papers. They're called paper mills

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 2>and they are so I told myself I wasn't going

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to curse you guys, but Doc, with great thanks, beat

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 2>me again. They are so fucking dumb. They're not good.

0:36:56.520 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 2>They do this thing where they ran they ran and

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 2>synonyms through so instead of saying something like this study

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 2>is about breast cancer, they say this study is about

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 2>bosom peril.

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 4>It's like the the like kind of bootleg Halloween costumes

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 4>trying to avoid being sued for intellectual property, like for

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 4>Wednesday atoms. It's spooky mid midweek QT.

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 6>Stuff like that is true, It's very true. It's a thing,

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's a spirit and spooky midweek beauty. Really

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 6>quickly though, I mean just to add, like these types

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 6>of operations have been around as long as there have

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 6>been papers, right, you know, with varying degrees of quality.

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 6>You know, we certainly have heard stories of astute scam

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 6>artists in schools, you know, doing this, going into business

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 6>for themselves, and oftentimes they'll sell the same paper like

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 6>three or four times.

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.760
<v Speaker 4>So this is just sort of an escalation of that, right.

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:54.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes, just as the Internet itself is an escalation of

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the gregarious nature of human beings. Here you go, another

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 2>couple of examples of these synonym griffs. Fluid dynamics was

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 2>called gooey stream.

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's yeah, Okay, weird.

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 2>About that one. We're all so Artificial intelligence was also

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 2>referred to as counterfeit consciousness. And I think this is

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:27.399
<v Speaker 2>a segue to our last story for tonight's program. Did

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 2>you guys ever do online dating?

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 4>Not? Oh? Yeah, my current relationship that I have been

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 4>in for lo these three plus years at this point

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 4>was the product of online dating. You know, I got

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 4>divorced from someone that I did not meet in online dating,

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 4>and then after that it just kind of became the

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 4>way you do it in a bigger city where you

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 4>maybe don't know as many people. So it made sense

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 4>for me. And I've had good and bad experiences.

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, Matt and I are maybe a little

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 2>more old school. We meet people the old fast and way,

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, getting deported at customs.

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I just get into minor car accidents with people I

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 3>find attractive.

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 4>To meet cute.

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 2>So obviously, no shade on online dating. It works very

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 2>well for a lot of people, and it can be

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a difficult speed bump, right Like it's it's already difficult

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 2>to meet folks, to find the person that you want

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:41.280
<v Speaker 2>to spend time or your life with. And what gets

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 2>me with this is I was always startled by the

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 2>idea of online dating. And I remember when some of

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 2>my friend groups started dating online using the apps of whatever,

0:39:56.719 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 2>and they eventually told me it was like a series

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 2>of auditions. They felt like they were always auditioning, and

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 2>they felt like they were auditioning for roles they didn't

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 2>necessarily want, but it was Saturday and they had to

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 2>do something. And this brings us to our final story,

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 2>which includes artificial intelligence again fraudulent term as well as

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:26.760
<v Speaker 2>online dating. You guys. Recently, one of the high ups,

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:31.240
<v Speaker 2>one of the grand pubas of the dating enterprise Bumble,

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Whitney wolf Heard, said, we're going to take the awkwardness out.

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 2>We are going to eliminate this small talk, eliminate the

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 2>dead ends, the red herrings and so on. We are

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 2>going to create an AI concierge for each user of Bumble,

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 2>and that AI concierge will talk to another AI concierge

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 2>to figure out what the vibe is where the actual

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 2>people ever meet.

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh god, amazing, right, they just want to double their

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 3>user base by creative users.

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so wait a minute. So so the person it's

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 4>sort of like a stand in, like a fill in,

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 4>Like I don't I guess I don't quite understand the technology.

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 3>She's saying. The AIS interact, right, that's what you're saying.

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Ben, Yeah, that's the idea.

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 4>So, like, if your AI avatar interacts with another person's

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 4>AI avatar that has built a profile based on your

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 4>god knows how much data.

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 2>So like an Ai Ben Bullen and an Ai Fran

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Dresser have a series of amazing conversations, and then later

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:48.359
<v Speaker 2>they notify the human Fran and the human Bed and

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 2>they're like, hey, you guys both like the nanny, you

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 2>should hang out.

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But and then the Ais had been hooking up

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 3>for like a week or two, and they're like, I

0:41:58.040 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 3>guess we should tell them.

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 4>It's doing all your for play chat for you? Is

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 4>that basically the idea here? I'm sorry, I know that

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 4>that's not necessarily the term, you know what I mean?

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Though the precursor getting to know you micro flair. Isn't

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 4>that part of the fun of it? Though, I guess

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 4>maybe there's some people that this is for. I don't.

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. You can usually tell within one or

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 4>two quick exchanges whether someone gets you or is worth interacting.

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 2>With you say it on air.

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Mean, yeah, I couldn't tell you. I don't have a

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 4>specific one. It's been a long time at this point

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 4>since I've done it. But I just try to be real.

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't remember exactly. I never have like a go

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 4>to one. I'm sure I tried different ones out but

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a lying kind of guy. But when you do,

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 4>there is something to be said though, of the fun

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 4>and sort of spontaneity of engaging with someone who and

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 4>realizing that you, guys have a vibe and that it's cool.

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Is this meant to you? Just get rid of that entirely.

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 4>I'm a little confused. Who's asking for this seems more

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 4>to benefit they than the individuals guys.

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go out there on a limb and say,

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:07.240
<v Speaker 3>I think this is for a very specific audience. There's

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 3>a quote from one of the articles you shared back.

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 3>Can I do you mind if I read one of

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 3>these please? It says there is a world where your

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 3>dating concierge could go on a date for you with

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 3>other dating concierge. This is from What's what's the person's name?

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 3>Somebody Wolf Witney, Whitney. Yeah, okay, And she says, and

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 3>then you don't have to talk to six hundred people,

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 3>and it'll scan all of the San Francisco area for

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 3>you and say these are the three people you really

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:37.919
<v Speaker 3>ought to meet.

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Who.

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 3>Look, I'm putting this out there. I've never used one

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 3>of these dating apps, but people I've heard about some

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 3>friends of mine that have been using them don't get

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 3>six hundred matches or whatever. Every once in a while

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:53.720
<v Speaker 3>get a match and hope for the best.

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's me, baby, I'm not gonna lie. It is

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 4>not like raining matches. And it's also dudes in a

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.359
<v Speaker 4>in a big way too. In general, they don't care

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 4>as many matches as women. But women that I've heard

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 4>it described as like just having hot dogs thrown at

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 4>your face.

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Horror show. You know, it's it's terrible. I like the

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 2>point that we're bringing up here because it goes back

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 2>to the earlier idea in our episode about dead Internet theory,

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 2>the old parable of Fantasia and The Sorcerer's Apprentice. The

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:29.879
<v Speaker 2>concept is to automate interactions, initial interactions, and like you said, Matt,

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 2>that that quote from Whitney Wolf heard stands out because

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:42.320
<v Speaker 2>she's estimating that this AI concierge would talk to not four,

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 2>not eleven, not forty two or forty three or whatever,

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 2>but six hundred different AI representatives avatars. And then, as

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 2>you said, Matt, find the three schlubs in San Francisco

0:44:57.560 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 2>that might vibrate or.

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 3>No, the three tech bros who are gonna you know,

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:05.879
<v Speaker 3>make seven figures or whatever. I don't know, man, I

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:08.320
<v Speaker 3>just don't. I don't like any of the whatever.

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't Again, though, I think the question of who

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.839
<v Speaker 4>is this for is still is largely answered by it's

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 4>for the data brokers, you know. And then like if

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 4>somebody thinks this is a good idea, they're like, you know,

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 4>an individual, Yeah, take my data. I love this, have

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 4>it all, give me the better chance at finding the

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 4>right match. But I think unless we see some real,

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 4>insanely believable success stories from this, this is all smoke

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 4>and mirrors just to get more juice out of the

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 4>meat bags that are you know, Internet users, the remaining

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:41.240
<v Speaker 4>ones the real.

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Indeed tempted to agree with you in that regard, because

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:50.240
<v Speaker 2>you can see the original conversation over on Bloomberg dot

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 2>com wherein at a tech summit, this this executive is

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 2>speaking about this and also to your point about data

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 2>retechn or data aggregation. Uh, she says, wolf Heard says,

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 2>this will also make you a better person. This AI

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 2>concierge will help you learn about yourself. Can give merizzler.

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the medium plan, Yeah, skibby, And we also we

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 2>got to say this too, uh, There are now, of course,

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 2>multiple other digital things that are normalizing this sort of

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 2>I guess you would call it cognitive cybernetic approach right

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 2>to consciousness, and this, uh, this is perhaps most apparent

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 2>in things like AI girlfriend apps, which I experimented with

0:46:54.239 --> 0:47:01.320
<v Speaker 2>one because I had to find out uh back in college, right, yeah, college,

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 2>in college, right.

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Experimenting college.

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think this is first off, they are aggressively mediocre,

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:13.720
<v Speaker 2>no offense. I'm sure I can imagine technology will improve

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 2>at some point, but I do wonder whether humans are

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 2>ready for this precipice upon which they stand. You know,

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I'm not necessarily thinking about us listening tonight

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 2>as adults. I'm thinking about your kids, you know, your

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 2>kids who grow up, like, is it that bad because

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people have imaginary friends growing up. Is

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 2>this not just an imaginary friend that texts you back

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and ask you for your credit card number.

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 3>I guess we'll all have to try it out.

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Ben.

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's a good idea. We're not here

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 2>to yuck anybody's yum. But it does feel like it

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 2>does feel like an extension of what we're talking about previously,

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 2>with the idea of the inner accelerating past the point

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 2>of human intervention. Right. We ended that episode spoiler folks,

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 2>with the idea that Earth could end up being a

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 2>haunted house in some way, just a series of algorithms

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 2>repeating and interacting and iterating with each other long after

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 2>humanity had gone the way of the Dodo. However, in

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 2>this case, what if you found out, let's spin it out.

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:32.279
<v Speaker 2>What if you found out years after the fact that

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:36.879
<v Speaker 2>you had an AI representative that you were not necessarily

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:40.839
<v Speaker 2>aware of, that had become in a close relationship, an

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 2>intimate relationship with an AI representative of a person you

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 2>have never met, and what if it's gone on for years?

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 2>The question would you want to meet that person? Soon?

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:54.240
<v Speaker 4>As topiing for me to even wrap my head around. Guys.

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 3>It reminds me of that Netflix movie from a long

0:48:57.200 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 3>time ago called I Am Mother. Did you guys ever

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 3>see Yeah? Yeah, I don't want to. Shouldn't spoil it

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 3>for anybody if you haven't seen it. I enjoyed it

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot. It's just the wanting to meet that person,

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:10.840
<v Speaker 3>like that question, Ben, I think feels like that to me,

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:13.439
<v Speaker 3>like would you want to know the truth or really

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:17.400
<v Speaker 3>meet the person? Oh the original maybe.

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh, before we get out of here, one really important

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 4>final question. If burrito is a sandwich? Is a rap

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 4>also a sandwich? They're all wraps, sandwiches, NEETs.

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 2>You would say there is no God to stop us.

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 4>Jeez, I'm gonna lose sleep over.

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 2>This also shout out to a past Ben who one

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 2>time left a post it note in a freezer that said,

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 2>puh plus a burrito, fa rito.

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 4>Tell no one, I won't.

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 2>These are gems we drop. We end tonight with a

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 2>philosophical quandary similar to how we began. Right, No, we

0:49:55.560 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 2>are asking ourselves what the role of humans will be

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 2>in the future. We want to hear your thoughts, be

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 2>you human or bought. We can't wait to interact with you.

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:10.759
<v Speaker 2>If we don't have a I don't think we have

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:14.839
<v Speaker 2>an AI powered interaction yet. You'll have to find us

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 2>as ourselves online.

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but Ben, in Dallas, there's a restaurant that serves

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:21.840
<v Speaker 3>a fa rito. We gotta go.

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:24.800
<v Speaker 2>We've got a farrito gap.

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Seems like you'd be really wet. We are you gonna

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:28.839
<v Speaker 4>put you dip it in the broth? Maybe you dip

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:30.280
<v Speaker 4>it in the brath? I thought I in.

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 3>No, dude, it just looks awesome.

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 4>It looks that it's a good idea.

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 3>It's an all right.

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Parallel thinking is really all. Parallel thinking is real. So

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 4>why don't you let us know about any crazy inventions

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:45.880
<v Speaker 4>that you may have come up with out there in

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 4>conspiracy real Islam. You can find it to the handle

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:51.920
<v Speaker 4>Conspiracy Stuff, where we exist on Facebook, on XFK, Twitter,

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:55.399
<v Speaker 4>and on YouTube, where we've got video content rolling out

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 4>every single week, on Instagram and TikTok where conspiracy Stuff show.

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 3>We have a phone number. You can call it one

0:51:02.280 --> 0:51:06.960
<v Speaker 3>eight three three STDWYTK. When you call in, you've got

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 3>three minutes, give yourself a cool nickname, and let us

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 3>know at some point in the message if we can

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 3>use your message and your voice on the air. If

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 3>you've got more to say, why not instead send us

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:17.360
<v Speaker 3>a good old fashioned email.

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 2>We are conspiracy at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Stuff they don't want you to know is a production

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 3>of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.