WEBVTT - Single Best Idea with Tom Keene: Ira Jersey & Pat Haskell

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 2>A single best idea, and since we've had two hours sleep,

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I think two nights in a row is a collective

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>team here at Bloomberg's Surveillance that we're gonna make this

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>quick today, but we can't because the guest quality today

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 2>was so much. I can't say enough about the conversation

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 2>with ed El Husseini and Ira Jersey. We broke a

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>rule at the beginning of the nine o'clock hour and

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 2>we talked very sophisticated short term paper fixed income stuff

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 2>like what pros in the street talk about. We really

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 2>try to stay jargon free, and ed ed L. Husseini

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 2>of Columbia Thread Needle was actually quite good about that.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't say it about Ira Jersey. He was on fire.

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 2>He is a true expert for Bloomberg Intelligence on the

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 2>short term market, what I call the trust market. And

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>you know who's looking at that right now, the Fed.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Here's Ira Jersey on the FED.

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 3>I think the Federal Reserve has a job to do here,

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 3>and it's more of a traditional job that we've kind

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 3>of forgotten about over the last seventeen or eighteen years,

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 3>and that's that they are the lender of last resort

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 3>and who are they going to lend to at this point. Well,

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 3>they've created some liquidity programs that just haven't worked the

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 3>way that they had hoped. So there's the standing REPO

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 3>facility that they thought would be able to replace the

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 3>traditional open market operations, liquidity operations that they had done

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 3>every day. They used to do these operations every single

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 3>day prior to two thousand and eight. But it's not

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 3>working because it's design. It has design flaws, and you

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 3>know that's probably too wonky for most of your listeners.

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 3>But let's think about the Federal Reserve as a first

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>step doing traditional open market operations, just like it did

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 3>after the REPO hiccup in twenty nineteen. So they do overnights,

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 3>they do one week repos. They basically they basically allow

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 3>balance sheets to expand a little bit for people to

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 3>take advantage of relative value opportunities in the treasury market.

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 3>And I agree with Ed that is the you know,

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 3>that would be a beneficial outcome. The second thing that's

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>very easy to do that you know, I hope that

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 3>the FSOC, the Financial Stability Oversight Council, gets together in

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 3>an emergency meeting soon and says, hey, let's do something

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.119
<v Speaker 3>that we were thinking about doing anyway, and just get

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 3>rid of the supplementary leverage ratio from treasury. So exempt

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>treasuries from some of the bank capital rules, that allows

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 3>balance sheets to expand. It incentivizes dealers and banks to

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 3>actually buy some treasuries. Those are two easy things that

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 3>could be done today, right, So it's not And those

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 3>aren't things that are unusual either. We did do them

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 3>in March of twenty twenty.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 2>The advantage of a podcast, you can rewind it and

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 2>listen to that again. That is a window into the

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 2>adult perspective of Bloomberg Intelligence. There unfixed income our Jersey,

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>but Gina Martin Adams today, inequities, Damien Sassauer and em

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 2>these people are grizzled Wall Street pros. We rarely do that,

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 2>but you just got a window into the inside baseball

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 2>and the trust market. That's what we try to do

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>here at Bloomberg Surveillance. We also like to look at

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 2>people's biography. Pat Haskell is at Blackrock and yes it's

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 2>municipal bonds, but far more than that, he has decade

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>of experience out of Union College of being on desks

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 2>and with a tension we saw this morning at four am,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>five am to worry about hedge funds and all. It

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>was a joy to have Pat Haskell with us, just

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 2>to give perspective across previous crises. Here the gentleman from Blackrock.

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 4>If we step back, one of the great traders I

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 4>work with early in my career and a client of mine,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 4>always said, first rule of trading always fade emotion. So

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 4>if we step back, now we think about this and

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 4>we're like, all right, what's going to happen? Is a

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 4>recession likely to result from this?

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Is the FED likely to have lower rates a year end?

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 4>So when I think about that and I back into

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 4>my market and you look at some of the levels

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 4>that are available today, super attractive. And if you're going

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 4>to take a CounterPunch at this market and you're going

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 4>to buy something with a little bit of some high

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 4>quality spread, you're going to do something that's not affected

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 4>by global supply chains. What's that essential services immunities.

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 2>He repeated that a number of times, I don't have

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the exact piece in front of me, but he mentioned

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Pat mentioned a New York City muni that has been

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>so beat up and he believes it's of quality. He said,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 2>it's been so beat up it generates a ten percent

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 2>equivalent return in that old triple text free New York state.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 2>This is single best idea across nation and our commute.

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for listening on YouTube and on

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 2>YouTube podcasts. It is single best idea.