WEBVTT - 8am-9am ET: Hoffman, Rattner & Stanley

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Surveillance. We don't know where the next

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>procession is. All we know is that the expansion is

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>about six and a half years old, and that's longer

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>than the average expansion. We're getting signals which are the

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>started cause interest transfer too long. It would be a

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>terrible commentary and the terrible thing in reality if it

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>takes an overt crisis to get agreement or get progressive,

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>then you're risking things going crazy. Bloomberg Surveillance your link

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to the world of economics, finance, and investment on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Good morning everyone, Michael McKee and Tom Keene this Thursday

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>before Jobsday, coming up Stewart Offman of p n C.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll look at a fair, using balanced view of the

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>American economy from Dr Hoffman. Really looking forward to talking

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to Stewart Hoffman. Bloomberg Surveillance this morning brought to by

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Cone Resnick Accounting, tax advisory, regulatory changes can impact your business.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>See how the experts at Cone Resneck can help you

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>navigate these complexities. Find out more at cone Resnik dot com.

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>C O h n R e z n I c

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>K cone Resnik dot com. Jobs Today Tomorrow started catching up.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've got Governor Romney speaking today. There'll be

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of political news out of that. With all

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>due respect with perspective this evening, Mark Halperin and John Heilman,

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to get back into economics, finance, investment, the

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>linkages into our international relations. And I guess you do

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that at eight thirty tomorrow morning, Alan Krueger, Bill Gross

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>joining us among other worthies right now, Michael McKee, Stewart

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Hoffman joining us, which is wonderful because what I've never

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>seen anything plunge, crater, surge, dominate whatever in the research

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>work of Stewart Hoffman. It is a careful, measured look

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it where we are. That's a good thing. Stewart off

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>wands been too long, good morning very much. Try to

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>be measured, but never afraid to take a stand within

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to take the stand. What is the linkage of this

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>job's report to what share Yelling and other worthies will

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>do at the March sixte meeting. Are they linked? Of

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>course they're linked, But I think it's a very high

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>bar to get the Fed to move, you know, in

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in in their meeting in two weeks. You know, I

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.399
<v Speaker 1>suppose if this number, we're just off the charts. Three

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>or four hundred thousand jobs. Another five tenths increase in

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the average ary earnings, maybe that could change the dynamics.

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think the number is important. But given what

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the Fed has said that they're monitoring and they need

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>some more time to figure out what these international events

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and start market events and tighter or wider spreads, I

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>think they just say let's buy some time no matter

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>what this job's report shows us tomorrow. Interesting because if

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the the markets had not cratered in January, would the

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Fed be on track to raise rates in March given

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the data that we have. The hypothetical, given that the

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>inflation data, not the expectation numbers, but the actual inflation data,

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the PC deflator, the cores was cruising along one point

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>three percent in the first three quarters of last year

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>with some upward revisions, and now turns out to eat

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>up a little to one four in the fourth quarter.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And then that January number, although it's still one month,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was a biggest increase we've seen in years.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Shall I suppose if the Judge report tomorrow was super

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>strong and the stock market was higher than it was

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the year and spreads were narrower,

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Fed would be on track. But you know,

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to deal with the reality that the markets

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>are telling them, at least biblettle time go a little slower.

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>They probably don't want to see the dollar go up

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot, especially if next week the e c B

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>is they're highly likely to do, are going to expand

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>their monetary policy, go deeper on negative rates, extend and

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>probably in large QUEWI so, yes, how many heads, how

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>many pin? How many angels can you fit on the

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>head of the pin? But right now is the data

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they have? You know, you know, I look, I look

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>stewarted it. Why will C plus I plus G plet's

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>n X. Let's start with the basic idea Mike and

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I address us in our trip to Washington the last

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>few days. I think we have a handle of the

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>state of austerity in the United Kingdom. What is the

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>state of austerity within the G part of g d P.

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't call it austerity. I mean it's pretty neutral.

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It certainly was austere in the sense that for the

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>last three years federal spending was pretty flat, which maybe

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in the short run, is a little austere, but you

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>know precisely what we need for the intermediate or longer run.

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the tax hikes of thirteen of you know,

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>been absorbed. Last year. We did get a budget, uh,

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>and federal spending is going to go up a bit

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this year defense and non defense. We didn't get any

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>additional tax hikes. So at the federal level, I would

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>say it is not austere neutral. At the state and

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>local level, I think it's actually positive. We're seeing you know,

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing jobs growing. Uh. In the construction report that

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>came out on public instruction, and you know, those numbers

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>are very jumpy. That's why I don't use words like plunge,

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>because I'd like to use three month moving average, which

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>often smooth out a lot of the plunges and the

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and the spikes. But if you look now over the

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>last or four months, construction at the public level, highways, roads, bridges,

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>its desk but we needed is definitely doing better. And

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly you see construction jobs going up, so they're not

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>hiring those people to do to sit around and do nothing,

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>both on the public side and on the private side.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So yes, I think I would say government, state, local,

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and federal is a positive for the US economy this year. Well,

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we have the jobs report tomorrow and everybody we're looking

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>at wage growth when we get a little more of

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a hint from the unit labor costs number that comes

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>out today. But what are you expecting are is the

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>trend going to continue? Yeah? I think the trend of

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>going up slowly is going to continue, you know. We

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can use the employment cost index or

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the number that of course comes out is the average

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>hourly earnings index comes out monthly with the employment report.

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that measure. Really both measures were stuck at

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>two percent or little under thirteen fourteen. I'm sure that's

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>where some of this angst, not only that short run

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>but longer run uh we see in the in the

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>political environment. But last year, finally, particularly in the second

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, we started to see some acceleration

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in that. I tend to like to look at it

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as a two quarter moving average or year over year.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>In the year over year number in January was two

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>point five. I think the MARS number particip for a

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>month of February will back off maybe a tenth or two,

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>but still be up two and a half percent from uh,

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>this time last year. So I think ways are accelerat.

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Let me recast what I asked Scott Wren earlier, who's

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>an investment equity strategist, same question, folks, For an economist

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like Stewart, often the basic idea of a single digit

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>world in your language, Stewart, a new lower damn phenomenal

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>g d P, a new terminal rate or potential g

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>d P. Are we prepared for that? By we do

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you mean or the nation? I don't think the nation,

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>whether they're prepared or not, they're not taking it well.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we look back at this recovery. It

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>has fortunately continued this long, and I still think we're

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe in the seventh inning. I don't think I've never

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>been in the recession camp. You know, a month or

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>two ago, it kind of felt like the markets were

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>saying the economies in the ninth inning, there's two out

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and the pictures of bat and the home team is

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>about to go down. Well, I never thought that that

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that view anyway. But if you look at the as

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, slow wade growth of the last five years,

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>over the last fifteen years, uh, I think the country

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>wants to grow faster. It needs to grow faster. And

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where, you know, some of this frustration

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing both on the coach i'll call it left

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and right is coming from that we got to do better,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's productivity. It's in the prescriptions I had to do.

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It are quite different between less government regulations or you know,

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on the left, a big tax site. But there's a

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>feeling that the US economy is not living up to

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>its potential and that if that's the best our potential is,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got to figure out a way to get it.

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's drive that for Our conversation continues with Stewart often

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of P and C. Mike Herbal Life has a bid

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>UH to review fifty six down to a printed bid

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of forty eight. And I'm not sure the pre market

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>stock price got there, but that forty eight is lifted

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>up to fifty one thirty. There's a i'm gonna call it,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, an eight percent mover. So fifty six down

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to fifty one, yeah, um, and and that's better than

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>where we were earlier. Again, some real challenges all in all,

0:09:54.520 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>UH with their unit accounting, UH complex and convoluted set

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of headlines. You wonder where this story will move drive

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>forward Price Waterhouse Coopers, is there um there auditors? According

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Herbal Life right now fifty one, I'm gonna

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>center tendency fifty one on Herban Life. Futures of negative one,

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>doubt futures negative ten. We look at equities, bonds, currencies, commodities,

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 1>oil thirty four sixty two Flat Brant Your thirty seven,

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty six seventy nine. Michael McKee manchiny Gold earlier elevated

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve forty four. Good morning to not the goldbugs, but

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>people that have rationally talked about a stronger gold market

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>off of an extended two and three year bearer market,

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>people like James Steele at HSBC the Yen one thirteen

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>ninety weaker yen this morning. But let's check out with

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael bar and get the latest world in national headlines. Michael,

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike Town, thank you very much. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Romney will give us speech later today calling out Donald Trump. Romney,

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>who was the Republican presidential nominee, says Trump is a phony.

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Four Republicans will gather on stage for tonight's Fox News

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>presidential debate in Detroit. Ben Carson will be a no show,

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>having signaled that he is on the verge of officially

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>quitting his white house bid. A white Alabama police officer

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>has charged with the murder in the shooting death of

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a black man. A family lawyer says Greg Gunn was

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>walking home when he was killed outside a neighbor's house.

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>An attorney for Montgomery officer, Aaron Smith calls the arrest

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a political witch hunt. Global News twenty four hours a day,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>powered by our twenty four hundred journalists and more than

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty news bureaus from around the world. I'm

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Barr, Mike Micha, thanks so much. We're gonna rip

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>up the script of Stewart Off and P and C.

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Neil Dutta just out with a fabulous chart showing the

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>bipolar nature of this American economy. You need to stay

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>tuned for that future negative to Bloomberg Surveillance. The news

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>update brought to you by Mercedes Ben's. This month, here

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Mercedes Ben's Tri state dealers welcome Spring with limited time

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>offers on select models like the Sporty c L A

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 1>and Versatile g l A, each engineered in price to move.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Visit m b USA Dot com today. Surveillance continues global

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>business news twenty four hours a day. If Bloomberg dot com,

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the radio plus mobile app and on your radio, this

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is a Bloomberg Business flash. And I'm car in Moscow,

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>US dock in. Day's futures are a little change to

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>lower this morning. Let's go to the First Word Breaking

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>news desk for today's morning call. And here's Bill Maloney.

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Bill, Good morning Karen. That's right us. You

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>just are quiet today. Doubt future is currently lower by

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty points, as apps and as a futures are lower

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>by two. The US ten yield at one point eight

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>five percent, and your PM markets are mostly lower this morning.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Frances down point four percent on the US economic front

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>dight thirty non farm productivity and initial jobs claims at market,

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.599
<v Speaker 1>US services p M I and at ten o'clock I

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>s M, non manufacturing, composite factory orders and durable goods orders.

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>In other news, Herbal Life said active new member data

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>had errors. Shares a down eight percent pre market, and

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a deal news. The Wallstreet Journal reported Samson Night said

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>near a deal to buy too Me after de Bellous Knight,

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>American Eagle Q and EPs view top to estimates, Costco

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>missed and regarding errings. This morning, joy Global Q and

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>loss was wider than expected. Tech Data beat and CIANA

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Q when adjusted EPs also beat. Finally, some Q wall

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>shoot upgrades and downgrades at Bank of America, Alcola cut

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to neutral, Lateral Energy raised to neutral, and Marathon Petroleum

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>raised to buy. Sharon Williams raised to buy over at

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>City Group, Intel raised to outperform at Robert Baird and

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Freeport mcmarhon cut to neutral versus by over at UBS.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Live from the First Breaking News Desk on Bill Maloney

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Karen All, thanks bailan to hear live breaking news over

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>your Bloomberg type squaw could go on your terminal, that's

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>ask you you a w K go and that's a

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business flash. Tom and Mike Karen, thanks so much.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Futures negative two and a churn into the screen as well.

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance. Brought to you by Investco. Investco believes it's

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>time to bench the benchmarks to consider active management and

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>factor based strategies. Find out more at investco dot com.

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Slash high Conviction without Question. The chart of the day.

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Neil Data, Renaissance, Macro folks. I'm not gonna send it

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>out because it's his proprietary chart. We protect copyright here.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Contact Renaissance Macro for his wonderful chart. Stewart often, you

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>know the chart layoffs and layoff announcements the American economy

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and then separate energy. I have no idea how stark

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it is. I mean, we know energy is flat on

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>its back, but the layoff announcements for the rest of

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>them America are shockingly good. How does the FED to

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>handle that? Well, the FED knows, I mean, it can't

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>directly target the energy industry. I haven't seen the chart,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know the Challenger of Gray Christmas number was out.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It did show a drop in UH layoffs in January

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and February January February, though, we're still up by thirty

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>three percent from a year ago. But as you mentioned,

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of the layoffs, twenty five thousand people in the month

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of February. Now those are announced layoffs. That doesn't mean

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they're out of the job yet, but will be soon.

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>But look at what's happened now for we'll see you tomorrow,

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>probably tomorrow. The fourteenth straight month losses in the energy industry,

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and they've been averaging about ten thousand a month uh

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>since frankly January of twenty fifteen. And this suggests they

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>may be picking up the pace of that uh. And

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the reasons why. I mean, I've got

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred and rising jobs tomorrow, but for the

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>whole year, you know, we're thinking we'll google date closer

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to two million jobs. Last year we created two point

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>seven million. And part of that difference is layoffs in

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the energy industry going in to adding to laying off

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in and probably even deeper in. But from the FEDS

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>point of view, uh, you know, they can't target the

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>energy industry. They know there's a supply issue. I think

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they have to look, as you said, at what's happening

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>outside of energy. Knowing both in energy and manufacturing there

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>what economists like to call multiplier effects. You throw the

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>stone into the lake and the ripples go around, and

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that is going to affect other industries, other companies, and

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>other individuals. But you're right, so far it's been extraordinarily contained.

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And then Mike, you know, it goes to Kruger's to America's.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a different debate. There's a debate about labor

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>economy and wage growth. In a broader macro view, this

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is about the micro dynamics of job formation and disformation.

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a different story. Yeah. I mean one of the

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>least followed numbers by economists is the Challenger Job Cuts Report,

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's worldwide, not just in the United States, and

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>many of those jobs never actually get cut or it's attrition.

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>But when you uh, the real question Stewart is, of course, uh,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>when you have we knew that there is there have

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>been layoffs and left more laoffs coming in the energy industry.

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It's when it follows on, when when the energy people

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are no longer working in, no longer spending money at

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the local stores, and the local stores go out of business.

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a problem. And I note that in North Dakota

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate is still two point seven even after

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>all the layoffs. Well, Mike, and I think that gets

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to the idea that you know, well we are reading

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>about announced layoffs in energy, Nobody in maybe the transportation industry,

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the airlines, or the hotels or the motels, or technology

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>or some parts of manufacturing said we hire twenty thousand

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>or a thousand people this month because our energy costs

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are down, and that is a big savings and we're

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>seeing a little stronger demand. So you you see, you know,

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>you always hear the bad news, and there is plenty

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of it and legitimate, but what you don't see is

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the good news. The only way you kind of see

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it in general was look at the total job numbers

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and if they're up two hundred thousand tomorrow despite the

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.959
<v Speaker 1>layoffs and energy, and looking over the last twelve or

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>thirteen months, jobs are up about two hundred thousand a month,

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>even absorbing the losses and energy. So there are positive

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>effects of people getting jobs or keeping jobs, or maybe

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>now getting better wages because of the dropping energy. And

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been adamant about the fact that the net impact

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>on the US economy of lower energy prices as positive,

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of distributional effects and there's not much

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED can or should do about it. And by

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's also helping Europe, it's helping Japan, it's

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>helping China. Maybe not enough, but think of where the

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>U s economy and some of those economies might be

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>if gasoline was coming up on or fifty a gallon

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and oil prices were still nine hundred bucks a Gallon. Yeah,

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not to say the least. Stuart Off in brilliant,

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much with p n C H Financial,

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKie, John Tucker emailing me yesterday in the middle

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of the show. I think you know as our as

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>our proxy for cheap New Jersey gas. Mr Tucker was

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>suggesting a dollar fifty six. That was my memory. Could

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we get under a dollar and I'm not ready for

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that as well. On an inflation of justice basis here

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there um, but we need John to come in and

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>tell us what he's spending his extra money on. Yes,

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>we do no question about that. Economic data. Will review

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>product of any later today. Bloomberg Surveillance coming up there,

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>with all due respect. Highlight brought to you by land Rover.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 1>If it's in your nature to cast off the every

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>day and seek adventure, the Discovery Sport was built to

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>help your search. Visit landover tri State dot com for

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>special offers during the only Adventure Sales event. Land Rover

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Above and Beyond broadcasting live to New York, Bloomberg eleventh

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to Washington, d C, Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg twelve ons

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco, Bloomberg n to the Country Series Exam

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Channel one ninety and around the globe the Bloomberg Radio

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Bus and Bloomberg dot Com. This is Bloomberg Surveillance. It

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>is a thirty on Wall Street. I'm Michael McKee along

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>with Tom Keen. Our Economic indicators today, brought to you

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>by Commonwealth Financial Network. When it's time to change the conversation,

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>talk with a broker dealer? Are I a that's ready

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to listen? Call six six six two three six three

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>or visit common Wealth dot com to learn more. Here's

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Vinnie deal Judais. At the first word desk, Micael Economic

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>News jobless claims. They are up by six thousand a

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 1>two hundred seventy eight thousand, topping forecast. Revised data on

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter productivity meantime down two point two percent less

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>than forecast. Unit labor costs up three point three percent again,

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>jobless claims rising last week, up by six thousand to

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>two hundred seventy eight thousand. At couple of first word

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Desk'm Vidye del Judai. Let's go back to New York

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Vine Dell ju Uh. Well, I don't know whether you

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>call a move from a negative three percent a three

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>percent contraction in productivity to a two point two percent

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>contraction is good news or not, I suppose on a

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>relative asis, but the unit labor cost job three point

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>three percent is catch people's eye. Can you adjust the

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>mic of our next steam guest? He is UM, he's

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>been he's been searching for something to do moving into spring,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 1>and some were in onto Cleveland and Philadelphia. Maybe we

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>could get them to be the gop SR. I mean,

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a job opportunity. I don't. I don't

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think I'm qualified, but they definitely need somebody go ahead.

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Where we're watching what's going on with fascination and wondering.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>We were talking over the last two days while we

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>were done in Washington about how Wall Street is seeing

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>all this, I mean, leaving aside individual candidates, with the

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>fracturing of one party, um, the move to the left uh,

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and in the other party, um, the people with the

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>money and a lot at stake, how they're viewing all

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of this at this point, I think with fear intrepidation.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I think people on Wall Street. People on Wall Street

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>are basically not that ideological in many ways. They have,

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they have a point of view, they have

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they may belong to a party. But they're not extremists.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of pragmatists. They're kind of centrists, a bit

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>like the majority owner of Bloomberg LP. And there's our

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>there's our Disclaimers radio stage, uh and and so they

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>view all this with alarm. They they you know, in

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>an extreme case, they worry that we could go off

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the deep end into into some unknown political area, the

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>way countries in europeath from time to time. And even

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>short of that, they worry about about, you know, who's

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the White House. Mr Trump enjoys,

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can tell, zero support on Wall Street.

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anybody in the business community, but I

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't say anybody, but virtually nobody in the business can

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>be supporting him for any number of reasons. I think

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>on the Democratic side, things have gotten a bit what

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I would call better, in that I think Hillary Clinton's

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>path to the nomination is now quite clear, and so

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>while she may have moved a bit to the left

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>during this primary season, I think I don't think we're

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a socialist as the Democratic nominee. Let's see,

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>right now, that's the issue. You nail it. Absolutely, People

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>shift through an election year. Do you see any perception

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that any of the three Republican front runners right now

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>can shift is right and did to the middle of

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>this nation's psychology. I'd say I would say, I think,

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's possible that Ruby O can and and

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether this is a backhanded compliment, but

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's shown that he is, how shall I

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>put it, flexible in his opinions, pragmatic on immigration. As

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's had a variety of opinions on choice,

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>He's had a variety of pro choice, choice choice versus

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>life issues. He's had a variety of opinions. So I

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>think he is capable of moving. Ted Cruz is a

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>complete extreme idealogue who in some ways would be worse

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Republican Party I think in a general election

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>than Trump, and Trump has Trump has deep psychological problems

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>that make him really unfit. You are a student of

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>our history on this, I think of William Jennings, Bryan

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>or any of the other movement coalescing eight forward, coming

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the civil or the word the last few

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>days has been moved meant if it is a movement

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that Mr Trump is affecting, how to institutions staunch that

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>movement so it doesn't get over thirty x percent of

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the electorate in the long run. This is what I'm

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>about to say. Has been discussed many times, but but

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>what seems very clear to all of us is that

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump represents a group of Americans who have not done

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>well economically over the last five, ten, fifteen, twenty years,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>who feel marginalized, who therefore feel threatened by immigrants and

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>things like that, and makes them more nativists. And the

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>way to deal with this is not there's no short

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>term fix. The way to deal with this in the

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>long term is to take care of these people and

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>find them jobs, help them with increase their incomes, and

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>give them a better life. That's really what that's really

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.239
<v Speaker 1>what's bothering them? Why are we doing When you look

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>at the markets, there doesn't seem to be any reflection

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of horror in what's been going on uh in the

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>stock market versus what's going on in the campaign trail.

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Investors have to discount the future even as they look

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at this and the negatives that you're sighting with these candidates.

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Is there a view as they game things out that yes,

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>these people may get elected, but the way the American

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>system works, not much terrible is going to happen. I

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>think there's a few things going First of all, I

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>think that, uh, the probability of any one candidate getting

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>elected is obviously not even because you still have primaries

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>going on. Then you have a general election, and so

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>if you started doing probability math, I think you calculate

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>that the chance of Trump being elected are maybe twenty

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>or between having to get nominated and then having to

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>get past Hillary Clinton. I think the market probably today

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we guess that Hillary Clinton is going to be the

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>next president, and I don't know that that's that threatening. Yes,

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>she has some different ideas, but she's a sensible, rational person.

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>But I think the other thing you alluded to that

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the market is relying on is the gridlock in Washington

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that it's unlikely that no matter who

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>gets elected, there's to be some massive policy shift. UH.

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Getting from Congress, Steve Ratners, thank you so much, short

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and then Governor Romney again speaking. This will be cover

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Michael Barrow have full coverage of this, uh through the

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>morning and into the afternoon. Is well, onto Michigan and

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>then onto Florida. Look for the announcement of Steve Ratner's

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>go ops are coming from the White House sometime in

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the near in the near future. Futures negative to down,

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 1>futures negative ten uh West Texas thirty four A barrel.

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's just bring in Michael bar and get

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the latest news. Michael, Mike Tom, thank you very much.

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Former Republican presidential nominee mid Romney plans to deliver some

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>strong words against Donald Trump. Romney plans to call Trump

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in a speech later today phony and a fraud. The

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>former Massachusetts governor says Trump is playing the American public

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for suckers. The excerpts are from the speech Romney plans

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to give later today at the University of Utah and

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the bids who dislaunched Trump from the top of the

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party's presidential race. Meanwhile, Trump fired back on ABC.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Trump called Romney a failed candidate and should have beaten

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama. Millions of people are joining the Republican Party

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>because of me, and you know what, the republic establishment.

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Republican Establishment's probably going to give it right back and

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>go back to the old days of Mitt Romney, who

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>couldn't win. Trump will take part in to Night's Republican

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>presidential debate on Fox News. Only four podiums will be

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on the stage tonight for the debate in Detroit. Ben

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Carson issued a statement yesterday saying he does not see

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a political path forward and will be on no show.

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>South Korean officials say North Korea fired six short range

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>projectiles into the sea off its east coast today. The

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>launches came hours after the UN Security Council approved tough

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>sanctions on pyong Yang for its recent nuclear tests. Global

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>News twenty four hour Today, powered by our two hundred

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>journalists more than a hundred fifty news bureaus from around

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the world. Mike Labark, Mike Tom, thank you, mich A

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>little time now for the Bloomberg NBC Sports update. Here's

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>John Sesshion, my greater and act. The flake Gate is back.

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Oral arguments today in New York as the NFL appeals

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to a three judge panel that's lost last year in

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>district court. If balls were deflated, and if so, how

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>not really the issue here? The NFL will argue Commissioner

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Roger Goodell had the collectively bargained right to suspend Tom

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Brady for four games the Union will contend the NFL

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>made mistakes in its application. Neither Goodell or Brady will

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>be in court, and the decision could be many months away.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>The Yankees exhibition opener in Tampa was a wild one.

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Yanster down seven nothing, ended up winning tend to nine

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in a drop fly ball in the ninth inning. Manitor

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Joe Girardi was asked about the month long suspension just

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>given to his new closure or old As Chapman, for

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence and use of a firearm. The thing to

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>do when you have issues like this is to learn

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>from him and try to be there for people. I

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>think he's ready to move on, and then he took

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for what happened, and he wants to be better

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>as a as a player. Ran a person ch happening

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to pitch in spring training, but now in the regular

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>season until May nine. Yankees and Phillies today and the

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Mets open up with the Nationals. March Madness Conference tournaments

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>underway in the Northeast, Winds for l I Youth, Fairly

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Dickinson and the top scene Wagner St. Francis was ounced.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>In America East, top seed Stony Brook moves on and

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>gets help when second seed and three times if any

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>league champ all but he got upset Seaton all his

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>four game Winstrey came to an end at butler Fordham

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>beat Ducane. Rutgers still winless in the Big Ten, had

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to play second rank Michigan State and lost by thirty one.

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>With the Bloomberg NBC Sports Up Day, I'm John stashell, John,

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much. A futures negative two deaf features at

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>negative thirteen again a churn all in all to the market.

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>You really gotta believe we're slotted into a job's day move.

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>As we moved to eight thirty tomorrow morning, Alan Krueger

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and Bill Gross will join us to review that data.

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna scroll down here to get to a thousand

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is the final sample. We make it a tick on

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that here as we get to tomorrow, with the unemployment

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>rate similar four point nine percent, Michael McKee and Tom

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Keene coast to coast worldwide Bloomberg Surveillance. Bloomberg Surveillance has

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by NYCB ask about their my community

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>interest checking with three NYCB online and mobile banking earned more.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Getting more of is an NYCB family dot Com for

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:40.479
<v Speaker 1>details global business news twenty four hours a day at

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, the Radio, Plust mobile app, and on

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>your radio. This is a Bloomberg Business Flash and I'm

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Karen Moscow. The number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>rose last week to a level that's consistent with steady

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>improvement in the labor market, while Jova's claims unexpectedly climbed

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to buy six thousand to two hundred seventy eight thousand.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>The week that ended February twenty seven, the four week

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>average dropped to the lowest since the end of November,

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>European stocks halting their longest rally since October, oil falling

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>from an eight week high, and bonds in the region

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>rising as investors await fresh indications of the strength of

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the U S economy. We checked the markets every fifteen

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>minutes throughout the trading day on Bloomberg. Snp E mini

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>futures are little changed to lower down one and a

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>half points, DOWI mini futures down ten NASDAKI Many futures

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>down less than a point, the decks in Germany's down

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>two tenths per cent, the tenure treasuries down one thirty

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>second the yield one point eight four percent yelled on

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the two year point eight four percent. Nimex screwed oil

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>down six tenths per cent or twenty cents to thirty

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>four or forty seven A barrel comes Gold is little

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>changed of fifty cents to twelve forty two thirty announced

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the euro a dollar oh nine oh four. The N

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>one thirteen point eight five Kroger down almost eight percent

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in early trading after a fourth quarter comps store sales

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>missed analysts estimates, and Urban Life is down six percent.

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>The New Christian Company, under federal investigation for allegations of

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>fostering a pyramid scheme, said it overstated growth of new

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>customers and distributors last year because of database errors. That's

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg business flash. Tom and Mike Karen, thanks so much,

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciated Bloomberg surveillance folks worldwide. We say good morning,

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee and Tom Keane. It is eight forty nine

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street. The following is from Bloomberg View, opinions

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and commentary from Bloomberg columnists. I'm Jonathan Bernstein, a columnist

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg View. Ben Carson has finally dropped out of

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the Republican presidential race. Ted Cruz is presumed most likely

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to benefit, since he and Carson do best among Christian Conservatives.

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Although Carson supporters may not have been a monolithic block. Still,

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>small shifts and votes can make a huge difference. In

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday's Arkansas primary, for example, Carson received six percent of

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the vote while Donald Trump beat Cruz by two percentage

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>points if Carson hadn't been in the race, with Cruise

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of one. Perhaps true, a proportional allocation is rare on

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the Republican side. Winning even if I just want to vote,

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is disproportionately rewarded. That system of winner take more, winner

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>take most, and winner take all delegate distribution explains why

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Cruz and Marco Rubio could still easily gather enough delegates

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 1>to win the nomination, even though both Rubio especially are

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>off to slow starts. All one of them has to

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>do now is win consistently. A four candidate field with

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Ben Carson out doesn't hand Cruise or Rubio anything, but

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Carson's exit gives both of them a slightly better fighting chance.

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Bernstein. For more view, please go to Bloomberg

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>View dot com or View go on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>This has been Bloomberg View and Bloomberg View commentaries can

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>be heard hourly weekdays on Bloomberg Radio. Jonathan Burnstein has

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>been very strong recently. He's written short, pungent, immediate notes

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>out on Bloomberg View with all that we've seen. I'm

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>sure he'll do that. As we moved to Michigan and

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>onto Florida in less than two weeks, I write on it, Mike,

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>less than two weeks. I guess that's Tuesdays Michigan and

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the Tuesday after that is it's not It's not just Florida,

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's Illinois and a whole bunch of other states as well.

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Our next guest was smart on Tuesday. It sounds like

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that old what were the Cure their song? Monday Tuesday

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday Data Data. Stephen Stanley has been just outstanding on

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a centrist, cautious tendency on American GDP. He works with

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Robert Sinch and Amer's Pierpont and joins us. Now, Steve,

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you've been dead on on a more muted yet okay

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>economic growth. Can you move the vector up? No? I

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. I mean and I think The productivity

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>numbers this morning speak to that as well. Even though

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 1>it was upward division in the fourth quarter, productivity for

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the year last year was a half percent. So you're

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>just with population growth slowing down and productivity not really

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>doing much, you're not going to get a ton of

0:35:56.120 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>trend growth. What what does that lie for the longer

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>for for the I want say longer run, but for

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the this year, well, I think you know, from the

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>fence perspective, it's it's a mixed bag, right, because the

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>economy doesn't look as strong, But at the same time,

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if if potential is lower than we thought it was,

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:20.240
<v Speaker 1>then we've probably made more progress in terms of taking

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>up slack than we thought. And that's exactly what we're

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the economy now. The labor markets have gotten

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>pretty tight, even though growth has been at a pace

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that we would have considered very mediocre throughout this expansion.

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>What's the then, the forecast for your forecast for the

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 1>pace of expansion at this point, Well, you know, we've

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 1>been growing at her a little bit two percent for

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>several years, and I think we may kick up a

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit from there. In two thousand and sixteen. I

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>think there are a couple of things that were drags

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>last year that are not going to be quite as

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>as big a deal. I think once we get past

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the early part of the year, this inventory correction is

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be mostly behind us. So I don't

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think inventories are going to continue to drag on growth

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>as they have over the last few quarters. Um. And

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing is we're probably getting much

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>closer to the bottom in terms of UH oil and

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>gas drilling activity. That's been a huge drag on GDP

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>over the last several quarters, and and certainly not done yet.

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think, you know, certainly as the year progressist

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>will probably um see less of a drag there as well.

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Is the markets in tune. We had a little bit

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of a recipe here the last two weeks or so

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for you as an economist, when you argue with Bob

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Sinch and throw coffee cups at him, is Bob Sinch's

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>world more in tune with Steven Stanley's world. Um, we're

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>coming into somewhat better alignment. I think if you go

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>back a month, the markets were thinking that the U.

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>S economy was absolutely positively headed right into a recession,

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think that was a gross over reaction,

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>and people are kind of stepping back from the precipice

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on that. UM And as a result

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of that, UM feed expectations have moved up a little

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>bit and the markets are almost pricing one whole for

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the entire year now, whereas there was a brief period

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of time UM last month where there was basically nothing

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>baked into the cake. So we're moving in that direction.

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Um My guesses there's still more to go to get

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>us into better alignment, but you know, we're at least

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 1>not quite as divergent as we were UM a month ago. Well.

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because there have been a lot of people

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 1>in the bond markets who have suggested that maybe the

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>markets are not prepared for what the FED is going

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 1>to have to actually do. Are you in that camp? Yeah,

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a that's a theme UM and and

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly have been very early on that, unfortunately. But I

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's something that I've talked about for several years,

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that once the FED finally did get going, they're likely

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to have to move faster and buy more than the

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 1>markets are are expecting. I think the first inkling of

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that really was the was the inflation data for January

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>where we got point three increases for both of the

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>core measures. Um, that's the one thing that could press

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the FED, I think, into acting more aggraphically than what

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they'd like to do. Along that line, I'm glad you

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>bring it up. If there's twenty in flavors of measuring inflation, Mike,

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I have a tendency to the Cleveland CPI, which is

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>core like but with the adjustable outliers every month months

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and month a month, the mixed changes that's elevated above

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the measures are the Are the other measures

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>catching up? It's more elevated, more malleable measures. Well, I

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to see that. Um, we we have.

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>The one that's been the outlier to the downside is

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the one that the FED, of course pays the most

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>attention to, the core PC deflator, and that one has

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>moved in the last three months from one point three

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to one point seven. So we're starting to see a

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit of convergence there. The gap between the CPI

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 1>measures and the and the PC two flator measures have

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:58.319
<v Speaker 1>been unusually large, and I think those will close begin

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 1>to close this year, and more than likely closed by

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the PC deflator measures creeping a little higher. Um, But

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I mean there's an analogous measure for the

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>for the PC to flatter day that comes out of

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas FED, and that measure has been running. You know,

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty five basis points are so higher than the than

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the core PC numbers. So um. And I think a

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people the FET have started to emphasize that

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 1>alternative measures, so I think they're they're understanding of it.

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>I think what's interesting is just at the point where

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems like inflation might be ticking higher, all of

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, people to FED are starting to, you know,

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 1>play the shell game again. And now we're going to

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about inflation expectations, which stay fear may be moving lower.

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's always a reason to be devilished, I guess

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh And we'll see how it goes. But if

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>these inflation numbers continue to be firmer, I think they're

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be forced to uh to to respond talk

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to us from an economic point of view, leaving the

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>FED out of it. But how inflation expectations relate to

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>inflation forecasts, Well, you know, I think what we've learned

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in economics of the last twenty or thirty years is

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that inflation expectations are very important. I still don't think

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>economists have a very good handle on how exactly inflation

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>UH develops. But I think one thing that people will

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>agree on is that UM one important input is what

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>people expect inflation to be. Because there's a certain inertia there.

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>People expect too percent inflation and you're you're kind of

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>presposed to get that in the absence of some sort

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>of a shock. UM. I think for me, I don't

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>think that the average person out there is so sophisticated

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that they you know, that they can give you a

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>ten basis point swing in their inflation expectations that it's

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>very meaningful. So I take the numbers more qualitatively than quantitatively.

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But but I certainly think that when the FED runs

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>policy is easy as it's run for several years, that's

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.760
<v Speaker 1>one example where people may be surprised, but the fact

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is that that should leave a market in terms of

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation over time. Steve, if you have a chance to

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>get in the Manhattan sometime in the next three or

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>four years, can your people talk to our people. We

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 1>would love to get you into the studio, Steve, we

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 1>could do, Mike, the nirvana of a one hour Steve

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Robert Cinch extravaganza. That would be extraordinary. Stephen Stanley

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>with Amer's pierrepont, having to put up with Bob Sinch's

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>discussions on end and the rest of it. I Mike,

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't you know, somebody gets it right, and uh,

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty pretty impressive how they took Morning in America

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and brought it down a little bit. Futures negative, one down,

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Futures negative. A bonus round, Mike, McKie and I in

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>New York City in one piece after Super Tuesday, Your

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>bonus another hour of Bloomberg surveillance