WEBVTT - OpenAI Boom and Coinbase Layoffs

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline High and bloom Bugs World headquarters in New York,

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and I made Lovelow, also in New York. This is

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg technology coming up all in on AI. Artificial intelligence

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>is emerging as the next big investment in Silicon Valley.

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>That's Microsoft ways a ten billion dollar investment in the

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT creator. But Crypto continues to make headlines with

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>coin based announcing layoffs and Cameron binkle Bloss pushing for

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the ouster of d c g CEO Barry Silbert and

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.959
<v Speaker 1>a lackluster launched from Virgin Orbit puts on a dent

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>into England's first ever space launch. And let's dig into

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:49.639
<v Speaker 1>that so much more ed because it was the talk

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of the town and talk of the world. There's all

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>eyes on whether Microsoft would put such an enormous chunk

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of change to work when it comes to chat GPT.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about it with bloombug Intelligences and run just

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>talk us through why Microsoft will put such a significant

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>amount of money, yes, distributed over several years. Why go

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>into this isn't all about being Oh no, not just

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>about being I think it's about every product that they have.

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would say that you know, everybody's been

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about AI for over the decade. We've heard Watson,

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think this investment shows that, um, you know,

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>it is the season for AI going forward. Because one

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of the things you have is you have a customer

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that is taking your software product, or is you brought

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a software product. Now you've got to give something more

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>and return to that particular person to enhance that productivity.

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And AI or you know, natural ligumage processing is one

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>way to do it. You know, whether it's tails automation,

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an email, whether it's office, you can see

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>any software backage. Microsoft has um this can enhance the

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>productively of that particular applicating and arractive reports suggests that

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this transaction should value open ai it around twenty nine

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>billion U S dollars. I points out that both Open

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>ai Microsoft declined to comment on the story, which of

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>course is based on on Bloomberg sources. Is this chat

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>GPT the next big development in global technology? Is this

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>going to be the story of the year for your world?

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it's just chat GPT. I think

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a question of whether there are certain advancements in AI.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, it could be natural language processing, it could

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>be vision, it could be other areas as well. You know,

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>what can you do with it in your normal day

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to day products. You know, it's not that they're going

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to sell this chack product to you know, somebody as

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>as a stand alone thing. But let's imagine that you

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>have a you're a salesperson and you're using Microsoft products

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to manage all your sales lead and you walk into

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the office and the and the system tells you that

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>your highest probability of closing the deal today is these

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>five people. And that's based on a lot of the emails, conversations,

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>what's happening outside um. All of those things can enhance

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the value of your your thought with which then you're

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed to sell much more than Let's take a competitor,

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>whether it's article, let's your push really fascinating as to

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>how this is going to be a creative and our

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>grandam we thank you was always bring back intelligence. Meanwhile,

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>let's dig into whether this is a movement in terms

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of profitability, whether this is some sort of paradigm shift.

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Even Nico nactusers with us is managing director at General Catalyst,

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and you've been quoted as saying just that Nico talking

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>about how this might be some sort of new new

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>mobile kind of paradigm shift, the move to AI, generative AI.

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Just talk to us about the opportunities you see. Yeah, Hi,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>excited to be here. I has been a lot in

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the news lately for a few reasons. There has been

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a slew of big brave rut in the form of

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>foundation models, combined with all the useful demos that we've

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>seen recently like TRADGPTY where the profile fixture generators have

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>re literally captured the imagination of developers. This developer attempts

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is always a great time of an emerging ecosystem. We're

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that all these models are now tracting also a

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>different than the larger class of builders, more product people.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>All the previous and reasons of AI and AMAL systems

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.559
<v Speaker 1>before needed a lot of technical expertise that was mostly

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>PC students that were a PC folks that were working

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for really big companies in order to create anything useful.

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So now it's very much a question of imagination and

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>open AI is one of the few companies that have

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>been driving this way, one of the innovation, but we're

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>still in the very early days. We at GC are

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of young technical gen z founders want

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to build product for themselves, and oh my god, one

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>out of three of them that walked to our office

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>are pitching us ideas. Hen Karen and I have had

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun with chat GPT in our spare time.

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>We get the use cases, but I think we're kind

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of really interested in the business model and the valuation

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>here right, the reported valuations for open aie billion dollars,

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>but the idea it right is the open AI licenses,

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Chat GPT and the underlying algorithms to developers as a

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalists, why is this such an attractive potential investment. Look,

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't comment you on that particular you know, transaction,

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'm mostly spending my time on all things you know,

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>early states. But AI indeed the new take part dying

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>that we've been waiting for, after mobile, after a cloud, um,

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to change everything that we know it.

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>It's now happening for two major reasons, you know, especially

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>for all things generative. A. I. The output of these

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>models can have very clear practical applications. If you're a

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>creative person, for example, now you can have this set

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of superintelligence that can help you have ideas, pat up

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>your work, and generally help you be more creative and productive,

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>so you can see results right away. You can produce

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a new blog cost and your creative campaign with images

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>really quickly and triply. Um You can also interact with

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>these AI models and natural language. You don't need to

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>learn some complex computer applications to use them, which you

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>can be a game developer pretty much overnight, Nico. What's

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>so interesting is that, look, Google and Microsoft, these companies

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>are AI experts, and they've dominated the field and certainly

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>R and D in the space for a long time,

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but hasn't been sort of the pr headaches in many

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>ways generative AI has exposed them to in the past.

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>That has left a space for some of this really

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>exciting startup culture to breed within AI. Absolutely so, when

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you have like young founders who can now think you're

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>with all these foundational AI models and the question of imagination,

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be able to build whatever they have

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in mind. The youth live in the future in their heads,

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to reinvent online dating. They're gonna reinvent

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to do their homework. They're going to

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>reinvent how to build games. Um, if you work for

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a big company, it's really tricky to build new products

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because at the minimum you need to ask your attorneys.

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>G C would be living responsible innovation. That's our investment

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>pieces and we on inverst of course, and folks who

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>have good ethics and integrity. This old way of like

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>moving quickly and breaking things, that was the ear of

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>building products and siliconbild in the past has come to

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>an end when you gender racing the founders really, you know,

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>don't embrace that, Henico, we just had thirty seconds here.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>What have you used chat GBT for? What's your favorite

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>use case? My favorite use case is to put together

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>investment memos. It's amazing. I have to do it, it's

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>part of my job, and with chatty, I can do

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it in like three minutes. That's incredibly pragmatic. Well, have

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you on again for a more robust discussion about how

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to best use chat GBT? Nikko but not source, Managing

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>director at General Catalyst, Thank you very much, Gosh expect

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>something a little more exciting coming up. What's the future

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of meme stocks as bed bath and beyond catches attention,

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll discuss all this and more next with the CEO

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of the social platform for traders stock twits. This is

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg in terms of a company that's teetering and probably

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>going to go over the bridge. I mean, there's one

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>copy that comes to mind. Uh, it's it's it's bed

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Bath and Beyond. I think that you know, they're not

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be around a year from now. I mean,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they have too much that they're they're irrelevant. Um and

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>uh and and by the way, the housing market, like

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I said as well for clip and that's not going

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to help them either. Blue Capital Markets analyst Anthony to

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>come with there pretty grim about bed Bath and Beyond

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals. At least, let's just take a look at

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the shares because despite the fundamental story where we're worrying

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>about bank up, see you're actually seeing the company closing up.

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Yes it's just two dollars, but still and I mean

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>continues to really rally on the back of well meme

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>stock investing. Is it back? Sask a man who knows

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Rohi Kanno is with us. He is the CEO of

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>stock twitch. It's a real time social network for investors

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and traders. Six million news is known ness. And we

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>asked our own audience whether they think meme stock trading

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is back, and no, it would see you. We put

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a pole outsw to Twitter and overall they said the

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>trend is dead. What are you seeing in terms of

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a desire to be backing these meme companies again? You know,

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the trend went compared to the context of

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>one and the game stop fiasco over early twenty one.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>You know that that that I don't think we'll ever

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>see those kinds of craziness again. But you know, the

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>meme stocks, your bed Beth and Beyond and others are

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>very much still alive in the world of the trading

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and investing community that's quite active. They're still here, um

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, alive and well might be aggressive. And

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.599
<v Speaker 1>with these you know, as we just saw in the

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>segment there, Bed Bath and Beyond, there's a lot of

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>questions of whether it will be alive. You know, they

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>made their announcements last week around going concerns and you

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>know with the wider than expected loss that they posted

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>today and kind of misrevue expect expectations. Uh, you know,

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of barriers sentiment around there. But you know,

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but the community is still actively talking about it, you

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>know from you know, from our community. The message volume

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the last few days has been extremely high. Um.

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And with meme stocks in general, the message volumes have

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>retained for some So you know, AMC still finished last

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>year two as the number one most talked about Stockholm

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>stock wits. It was number one in one as well.

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh so you know, still around um, you know, and

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the conversations are still happening with these companies. Hey, Rischie,

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>good to see. We're just showing some of the top

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>stock tickers on your platform. And see another kind of

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>known meme stock, Tesla being another one. But where I

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>love your jumper, It says for our audience New York

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>or nowhere you just sweatshirt, sweatshot. Here we go. We

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>just talked about the energy on your platform, right. I

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the headline. When when do you ever get headlined?

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It says X company headed for bankruptcy and you see

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a stock jump. My question is what is it that's

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>driving the energy on your platform? Is it this herd narrative?

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it the idea that there are short sellers there?

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>What is it that is actually causing volume of conversation. Well,

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it is the the volatility around it, right,

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It is the combination of those. So you have you know,

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>those short sellers and those that are fundamental investors and

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>are telling us for all the reasons why you know,

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>bed bath and beyond likely you know, may not be

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>around in a year from now. At the same time,

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you have those that you know, believe in you know,

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the price action, believe in the opportunities, you know,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and get together and say, hey, you know this is

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>a company like they can reorganize, and you know, what

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>value can we find in this? And so the the debate,

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the conversation remains, there's passion around moving these you know,

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>today's move, we don't you don't really know, like I mean, hey,

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a pretty big move on a percentage basis.

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Today is that short covering you know from the loads

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of last week and the announcements of last week, right, uh,

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, and when the news finally coming out today,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>so sell on the news or cover on the news.

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the conversation continues to happen, and it's

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>this you know, discovery process between the bears and the bulls.

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And while you know, the bears are very strong right now,

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and the sentiment around bad bathroom beyond specifically is extremely bearish. Uh,

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the conversation still happens. The markets are alive, right, people

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>are still trading it. It's you know, the volumes are

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>there and the cash tagging. I say, I didn't realize

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that it was your guys. It was stock Twits that

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>came up with a when the cash tag I'm interested

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>in We talked sentiment, We've talked particular names. What was

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so interesting in all the most active names on your

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>platform was a lot of them were evs, not just Tesla,

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>but ones that are based out in Asia and Vietnam,

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>some smaller known companies. Is the I'm gonna be evy?

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna be Ai? Can you see the beginning

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the pickups and certain narratives, you know, we uh, we

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>are speaking of AI right, And I just saw the

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>second on chat ept fascinating. Um though I've also only

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>used it for boring things thus far. Um. But uh,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I think you look at that and

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 1>for us, actually we're that's the area that we want

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to invest into, try to help us understand better. Even

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>all the data and the and the content that we

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>have underlying it. You know, we have our sentiment analytics

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and some of these other things, but you can definitely

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>start to see trends. You know, maybe not far ahead,

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know, in some cases you know a little

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>bit ahead of them. What you know, kind of the

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe mainstream and media picks up on UM. And you know,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>evs are a very interesting space because evs, a lot

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>of them went public through spacts. Spats have a large

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>retail community around them, and so there's a lot of

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>passion around the evs. Obviously, you have Tesla, which is

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of the godfather of not only just

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>all you know stocks, but the ev world. But you

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>have your Mullins and your Lucids, and you know, uh,

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>your Fhiskers, etcetera, etcetera. And you know we have we

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>have CEOs from them something that believe the CEO of

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Fisker is active on stock to its um. But you know,

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>these these companies have really robust followings and highly engaged followings,

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe because they got in at this back or maybe

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>because hey I love Tesla and I hate Mullen, or

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I love you know what. You know, the next you know,

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>product to come out of Fisker and so you know,

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna you know, destroy Mullin or whatever

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the case may be, right, um. And so these are

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>very retail driven stocks. I think just you know, the

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>genesis for a lot of them coming out of the

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>back world being very spac retail driven. UM. And so

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you will continue to I do think ine will continue

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of conversation around the EV world.

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, there's a lot of interesting things

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that are gonna happen in the e V space. We're

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna see, if you know, what happens with Tesla and

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna be a bell weather for the conversation there.

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>But uh, there's I don't know, the AI has really

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>made it in to um the kind of public stock

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and public markets that guys, right, you know, I don't know,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of companies you'd trade on their Hey, Richie,

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>when when that moment happens? Though, come back on the

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>show and let us know, because we're trying to stay

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>on top of trends and this is the new era

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of markets engagement. That's Rishi Kanna, the CEO of the

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>social platform stock Twits, is not the only social platform

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and markets in the news will cover that later on.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Over the last three years or so,

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we've added forty billion dollars of organic revenue to that business,

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so there's tremendous growth, and in part it's through innovation,

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and you articulate an example, a digital formulary or the

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>evolution of our virtual care capabilities and taking virtual care

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>not just the Triagion urgent care event, but actually to

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>coordinate behavior health services who are virtual primary care from

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that standpoint, so we see tremendous interest adoption for those services.

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>That was signal CEO David Cordani on expanding digital health services,

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>part of an interview from JPMorgan Healthcare conference in San Francisco,

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>which is well underway. Kaylee Lines is on the ground

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>braving the storm's wind, rain and hail. Is it like

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that in the conference room? Kayley, Well, it's very crowded

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in the conference room, and I will tell you that much,

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people walking in here with umbrellas

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and raincoats over the last several hours because the rain

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>has been coming in sideways. But it's really noteworthy that

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there are so many people here in San Francisco in

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the middle of this storm. This is the largest in

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>person gathering of the health care industry we have seen

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in about three years, and that really speaks to this

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that the post COVID world and what that digital

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>health world really looks like is a key theme here

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>at this conference. This idea that you have to have

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>accessibility to healthcare remotely in a more expanded way, and

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that also over the course of the pandemic, a lot

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of those physicians we're dealing with burnout. What can you

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>do you from a technological innovation standpoint to help providers

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in the industry but also really just accelerate the industry

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>going forward. In AI in particular is a big theme

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that has been talked about over the last two days

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>here Cools. It is we've been talking about AI throughout

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the entire show, so ALTI and Intenlligent is going to

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>meet from incenter and healthcare too. But one of the

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>applications that Katie on one other areas of technology of

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>being talked about, well, on the AI front, you are

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing some deals to health existing companies accelerate their footprint

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in that way. Beyond tech actually today announcing in six

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>four million dollar deal to buy Insta Deep, which is

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a UK company really based on AI. You're seeing some

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>other deals actually taking shape as well. Granted they're relatively small.

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>We've only seen about a few billion dollars worth announced

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>over the course of this week, but this is still

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>an industry that has been very starved for deals. Over

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the last year, two U S healthcare companies had forty

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>three fewer deals announced than in one for biopharma. It

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>was the lowest in numbers, and we're really looking to

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 1>see if there is kind of a pickup in that

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>deal making appetite in Hey, Kayleie, I think I'm right

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and saying you spoke to the CEO of Novovacs, right,

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>what was the what was the takeaway? Well, it's really

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>for that company how they capture more share of the

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>endemic market since during the pandemic they were a bit

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>behind on their pure COVID vaccine. But we had an

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting conversation around pricing now that that is going to

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>be shifted to the commercial market. Just take a listen

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to what he said about his expectations. I think Weiser

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and Maderna have set the stage and I think what

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>they've started at a reasonable level. If you look at

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>what the cost benefit analysis is for for that type

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of pricing. I think it's reasonable, and there's always a

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>discount from that hundred hundred and thirty dollar rage, and

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>each company will find his own way. So it's really

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be a conversation about what that private pricing

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like. Frankly, what the appetite for COVID vaccines will

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>still continue to years we get further and further out

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>from the most most acute stages of the pandemic, and

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>how these companies reinvent themselves in a post COVID world

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as well amy an area we can, despite a recession,

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to be optimistic about sunny healthcare, so many applications.

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Blue mos Kady lines weathering it out there in San Francisco.

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>We thank her for it. Stay well, keep drying. I'lcome

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>back to Bluemo Technology. I'm Karain High in New York

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and one I love good afternoon. It is fun to

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>be in the same place and and I mean all

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>day we have been talking about one Microsoft potentially buying

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>while not buying, but investing some ten million dollars into

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>open Ai. Of course a parent chat GBT, but what

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about actual startup acquisitions, what about big deals with about

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>activity there now? Actually we know that it dropped venture

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>backed M and A dropped some from twenty two, but

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>there are glimmers of hope and one Katie Ruth for

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>about it for this Business Week, Kasey just took us

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>through the thinking. So I POS kind of dead, But

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>does that mean what we get a little bit more

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>M and a intens of exits exactly? So you know,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>as you know, venture capitalists can only make money in

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>two ways I p O S or M and A.

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are the two primary types of liquidity events. And

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>so the I p O window has largely been closed

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>for over a year, and so that's going to put

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>pressure on more companies to sell. Even Adobe Figma, which

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>we broke the news of last year, they partly sold

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>because there was no I p O window. It was

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a great price. They sold for twenty billion dollars that

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>was more than double their last private evaluation. But there

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>was no alternative in the near term and they knew that.

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And so we're going to see some deals that are

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>going to sell maybe above their last private valuation. But

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>what we're probably going to see a lot more of

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>is companies recognizing that they have to sell for below

0:20:55.800 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>their last private valuation. Evaluations are obviously down significantly. There's

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>no I p O window, and there's also, you know,

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of investors skepticism about investing at the same

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>prices as before, and so that will lead to that. Hey, Katie,

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>you and I were both in Vegas last week, very busy,

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're very busy. You go to all the parties

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know who to talk to. I kind of got

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a mixed picture, right, There is some opportunities that folks

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>see in terms of deals that can get done. I

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>guess when Caroline and I are talking to venture capitis

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in particular, they talk about kind of seed stage as

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>being an opportunity, for example, where you can make some

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>vets in an environment like this. But what kind of

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>deals where do you expect activity to happen at least

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of this year. Sure, certainly investors

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>who invest early are less phased by the difficult exit

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>environment because they have a longer term um outlook. But

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>for companies that are growth stage, they're going to have

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>to be more open to potential buyers. There's unicorns on

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>paper and um, you know, that's that's too many in

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this environment, and so we're going to see more consolidation.

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing maybe fintech is going to see, you know,

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>there's maybe too many payments companies and they're gonna have

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>to consolidate. I always hear that about cybersecurity, and um,

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we're going to see a few

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>different types of start up acquisitions. We're gonna see strategics

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>recognizing they can get a lower price than maybe they

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>could have last year or the year before. For some

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of these companies. We're gonna see um, you know, unicorns

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>buying each other. And then we're also going to see

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>private equity firms buying private companies that are venture backed.

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they see slowed growth, but they see some potential

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>there to help fix them and help them grow into

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>bigger businesses. Kasey. What has to happen though, is that

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>there has to be more of a meeting in the

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>middle of I'm pretty sure last year there was a

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of money to be put to work and what

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>were many felt was cheap companies, But the founders aren't

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>going to want to let go of that company at

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>those sorts of valuations. What gets a founder there to

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 1>realize that they have to take that price point. Is

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it ultimately that they've run out of runway exactly? And

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that you're going to see more and more

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of that. I mean, certainly a lot of companies raised

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money in and so some still have

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of runway and they may not be

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>feeling that pressure yet. But when companies start to look

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and say, oh, we you know, have less than yours runway,

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we're having trouble raising, then a burden hand just looks attractive.

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, bloom bers Katie Ruth, who was good to

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>hang out. Thank you, come back more scoops please, that's

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>what we like. I think it's interesting because CAA, you

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and I have had a range of voices on right.

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>We had equities in on twenty four hours ago. Second

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>half of this year, I p o s but select names.

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, they kind of investors looking for some quality,

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, some some strong balance sheet revenue generating companies.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>But there still deals out there to be done. That's

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>at least what the takeaway I get from Katie. Let's

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>hope that it's not all AI and that all we do,

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>every single show is going to be talking aboutficial intention

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to knock it love a little

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>bit of sprinkling of AI, but it seems to be

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the dominant force at the moment, certainly from the deals

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been hearing about. And I do wonder where the

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>first areas to start to see that consolidation that Casey

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>was just talking about, and indeed where the cracks are

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>in the I p O market that is going to

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>see a shot of light that was being talked about

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>by equities. And I thought it was really interesting about

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the conversation yesterday is the secondary market is still resolively active.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And look, there's still gonna be a lot of people

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>working for these companies that have life moments that need

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to be able to have a liquidity event, right, and

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the secondary market can be a precursor to

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>activity in the I p O market down the line.

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And as Richie said, e VS that play is still popular.

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking shop a little bit, of course, but maybe

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a big year three. Let's talk crypto that it's not

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be big, Oh, it's going to be a big

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>coin base. Just the latest company to announce another round

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of job cards. Meanwhile, Gemini crypt are Exchange co founder

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Cameron binkle Voss is calling on the board of DCG

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to remove CEO Barry Silbert, accusing him of quote bad faith,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>stool tactics, best person for the job here bloom bag

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Shnati Bassak following these developments, Let's start with the accusation. Uh,

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>what is this all about. We've seen very open public

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>letters from Cameron win Boss that addresses Digital Currency Group

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and Barry Silber here. Remember Genesis, the lending platform, was

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the partner for the Gemini Earn product. And remember when

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes that earned product, there are hundreds of thousands

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of retail investors that had exposure to that lending product here.

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of things have gone wrong in the

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks, and now you have Cameron Winkle

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Boss calling for Barry Solber to step down at the

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>CEO of DCG, really accusing him for a lot of

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>bad faith tactics, really getting to the edge of accusing

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>him misleading investors, really for engaging in something that was fraudulent.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we have DCG importantly also fighting back and

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>saying that this is also the Winkle Boss effort here

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to deflect blame over to DCG, and at the end

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of the day, what you have is to count our

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>parties here in a very difficult decision, both difficult position,

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 1>both on their own as well as together. It's interesting

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>DCG was sort of saying, look, behind the scenes, the

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>conversations are more productive, some you'd hope a little bit

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>more cordial, but in public it's an airing of grievances

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that's painful to see. What's been interesting is amid all

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>this fallout, many looking to other areas of Barry Silbert's

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>empire to maybe be a place to take a bet, right,

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>can you just talk us about what's happening with gray

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Scale and some of the bitcoin trust area. For weeks now,

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe even months, really, there has been this really significant

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>discount and the gray Scale Trust, and there's this question

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>about whether you could take over the gray Scale Trust.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a question of that's even simpler. Is is worth

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>buying at these discounts? And has the meaning of the

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Gray Scale Trust really changed? Before it was one of

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the most significant institutional ways to get access to bitcoin,

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and over time it became a bigger bet on whether

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it would become an ETF approved by the SEC. At

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>some juncture and if that doesn't happen, what then is

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the investment thesis and how does it change from there?

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Remember this has been a cash count through the feed

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>product the fee pool for Digital Currency Group, but then

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at how much it becomes necessary

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>for Digital Currency Group. We're talking about layoffs across the industry.

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Digital Currency Group. You have an open letter from Barry

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Sober out to investors today. Fascinating to see him be

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>public like this. He's not all that public usually, we

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.479
<v Speaker 1>have not seen him out there on television or on

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter all that much like we've seen some others. But

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about having to close down a wealth

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>management sin citiary as well as cut costs aggressively the

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>last couple of months, which makes a gray scale even

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>more important for him. Right cuts, layoffs, crypto, those are

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the headlines right now. Let's let's talk about coin base.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Another round of layoffs, the latest round of layoffs. What

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>do we know about this particular round of layoffs? You know,

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>one thing to look at is how investors have reacted

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 1>to it. They reacted very positively today, and not just investors,

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>you have also cuth side analysts also reacting pretty positively

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>towards this because they believe that it will cut expenses

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>significantly enough for par on the screen right, the Stoll

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>cop thirteen percent in the session on Tuesday over a

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>two day basis, So you're right, positive reaction, very positive

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>reaction here. And the idea here is will this help

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>them reduce expenses enough to make it through the rest

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of this crypto winter, this huge downturn, this downturn and

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>trading volumes that we're seeing now. The question then becomes

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for coin based and all of them, is what does

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>this mean for the products that that they're building? Do

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they still are they able to remain competitive here and

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>offer new innovative things when you're watching these massive massive

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>headcount reductions now. Interestingly, one crypto trade publication has accounted

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven thousand cuts across the industry. So all in all,

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>with what we've seen so far, so we really definitely

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of pain out there and at the

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of people of our coin based in addition to

0:28:55.840 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>hundreds before the reality of it is even aces that

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>are growing. You take Galaxy Digital, they cut fifteen percent

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:04.719
<v Speaker 1>of their head count. They think they're going to end

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>up gaining a lot of that back through acquisitions later.

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So what do these cuts really mean in terms of

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>how they built through this cycle? Well, said Shinnale Bassa

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and quick disclosure that my husband is the senior manage

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>over at coin Waste. But let's talk about perhaps the

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>movement of talent within this at the moment end, because

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>what's so interesting is that while many in fintech crypto

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>lose their jobs, there are areas in which maybe they

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>could find a head hunter in the future, and not

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the most usual places the one you'd expect Liquidity, which

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is I'm pretty sure most people in finn Twitter as

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it's known Financial Twitter, follow it. It's a massive digital

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>media company basically set up by an ex fall street

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>guy or girl we don't know anonymously, but they're now

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>getting into the world of well jobs right, head hunting.

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So unsurprisingly one of the best read stories of the

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>day Liquidity partnering partnering with Whitney Partners kind of classic

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>head hunt. Uh. You know what's so interesting. You know

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we talked about crypto osnali job cards pay. What Liquidity

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>has done is amazing. You know, they get fed information

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>by everyone working in finance about opening salaries raises and

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>they've kind of taken that and said, well, how do

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>we move it forward. It's an astonishing platform. It is

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>very ridicule and meme and satire focus. But if all

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>these people are being laid off and they're looking for

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a job, is liquidity now an option? And it just

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>also speaks to the growth of where you can take

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>what is a social media startup literally is a social

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>media start and then becomes a digital media company. I mean,

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the founder has gone into angel investing, but notably is

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 1>now thinking how can I continue to expand how can

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I serve this particular community of junior bankers many of

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>them are junior looking for expertise. And they said, well,

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it was the adverts digital advertising that people kept coming to,

0:30:56.320 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly around fostering their own skill base, being what to upskill,

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>being able to find out what the view on jobs,

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and how to enhance their own experience. So it looks

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>as though millennials but also mainly gen z, are looking

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>not just to LinkedIn for networking when it comes to

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a job, but to Instagram and to social medium more broadly. Yeah,

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I'm a follower stock, Twits and other

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>platform don't put us out the job, please come on.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So I want to take a look at some of

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the tech names that rely on advertising revenue. Right this

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of pivotal year where we had the war in

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine that dented the confidence of advertisers in Europe, we

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>had changes in the industry. Long Must buys Twitter, and

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you can see on the chart behind me the kind

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of state of play for what analysts think we end

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:51.479
<v Speaker 1>two in in terms of sales. Of course, we're waiting

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for those earnings reports from the last three months of

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the year, but we're also thinking about how market share

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>might change, how the world of advertising has changed because

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>consumer trends are changed. This is data from the Loomberg

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence Forecast two on kind of where market share lies.

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet largely through Google Search, but don't forget YouTube kind

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of dominates in that tech space away from traditional tech.

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>This data excludes China, by the way, where there are

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>many other players when it comes to search and domestic products.

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Then you look at Meta that comes up a big

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>second wall. Is that going to change? There are names

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>out there in Wall Street that see Meta as a

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>top pick for three because we're coming off a low

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>base and we might see a rebound, and then there's

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the optimists that look at Amazon and say that's a

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>sleeping giant when it comes to adds. I think it's

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to take this as an inflection point twenty

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>three because that's the snapshot of the year as a whole.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But what we know in those final three months of

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the year going into the first half of this year

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that data carrow is changing, and actually we might see

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>some new names emerge and some legacy names suffer as

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the advertising space changes, and the advertising space so richly

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>changing terms of players, not only with well the TikTok's

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>which keep on taking market share, but also the fact

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.479
<v Speaker 1>that TV is getting into the space the Netflix of

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this world, some other key advertising space that Amazon is

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>now owning. Please say A great story written by Alex

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Brinka is on dot com and on the terminal today.

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Certifi of course one of the key tech editors, going

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to join us to talk through all of this and

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the movements within Meta and very other various other social

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>players today just talk to us about the changing of

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the guard and how much people are anticipating this three Well,

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in two we've seen that Meta

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and Google together are less than half of the overall

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>digital ad market according to Insider Intelligence, and that is

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not happened since and they expect that share to continue

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to erode as we go into three and beyond. And

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that's due to a number of factors. You mentioned the

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>rise of more options on TV and with e commerce

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>players like Amazon on and I mentioned Walmart as well. Um,

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's also because of some of the challenges in

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the market. Um. Beyond the skittishness due to Ukraine and

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>other economic factors, you've got the fact that their ads

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>simply aren't as effective anymore because Apple has instituted some

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 1>some tracking changes so that they can't get as much

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>as much personal information to target those ads effectively. So

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the same ads are not as useful to advertisers, so

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>they've been looking for elsewhere to put their money. Um.

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>So that's been really difficult for these big players who

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>at the same time or under under scrutiny by regulators,

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>especially for antitrust and m privacy. So it's it's going

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to be different going forward. They may not be this

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this big scary do woppoly that the regulators have been

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>telling us about for so long. Um. That share may

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>road and we may see players like Amazon and Netflix

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok take up more. You're just talking about sort

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the data that a lot has sort of disappeared

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 1>from the likes of Meta, the ability to track certain

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>people given apples changes. But also there's some self regulation

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 1>going on perhaps as well as to who they target

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>how they target them. There's a great piece by cut

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Wagner today about teenagers gender and whether or not that

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>can still be thought of as a data piece for

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>advertisers and marketers, and and now they're not going to

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to look at that. Well. Mena's trying to

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:31.760
<v Speaker 1>improve the way that it manages teens on the platform

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>after after a lot of scrutiny. We've heard a lot

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>about mental health online um and how Instagram in particular

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>has been affecting teen mental health. So they in part

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of this pushback from advocates and regulators,

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>they have been reducing the ad targeting capabilities for teens.

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So gender is one of those categories. They also reduced

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the abilities to target teams based on their past behavior,

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and that's all an attempt to try to make their

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>internet experience a little bit safer, and they didn't go

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>directly into whether there was a particular catalyst, But I

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>really think that it's been a theme for Meta over

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the past few years, and they realized that the way

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that young people are are operating on their app is

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a matter of great concern to parents and regulators, and

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they need to do something about it, all right. Leading

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.240
<v Speaker 1>our big tech coverage out of San Francisco, Sarah Fryer,

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Now coming up, what happened at

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>England's first space launched. The UK's first space Lawns had

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a midflight mishap, smooth take off, you can see it

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>there will explain more, trust me, that's all. Next, this

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg going viral, perhaps for a negative reason today

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 1>because Richard Branson's Virgin Orbit when it fell in terms

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of share price, us off of the company's first launch

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:07.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the United Kingdom, failed to reach said orbit

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that it has in its name, and we can talk

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to the reasons why and why everyone was therefore searching

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>in on Google and seeing it trend on Twitter. It's

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>putting bugs lawn rush, she covers space for us and

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>clearly the share price speaks a lot of words here.

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>It did not go as planned. No it did not,

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, unfortunately it's it did look as if

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it was going to go as planned. The way that

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Virgin Orbit launches, it's not what you typically think of

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>as a rocket launch, where the rocket takes off from

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the ground. They do an air launch style. So what

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they how they get into space? They have a seven

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>forty seven modified plane called Cosmic Girl, which carries their

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>rocket launcher one underneath its wing. That plane took off

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>as planned from spaceport Spaceport Cornwall. It reached its intended

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:56.240
<v Speaker 1>drop zone, it reached the target altitude for dropping the rocket,

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and then it ignited that engine. Everything looked fine, and

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>then something happened midflight. We don't exactly know what yet,

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't reach orbit. It didn't make it to space,

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but not to orbit. Yeah, I mean, this was supposed

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a key moment for the UK space industry,

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 1>right the Cornwall new key. It's like the surf mecca

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for for the UK. The UK was ready. The UK

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Space Agency, which imagine hasn't been that busy for a while,

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>was sort of really excited. What is the response from

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>from the company been, Because this was only their sick

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>attempt at launching with the Boeing seven four seven mechanism

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>right for successes, but this is their second failure. I'm

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand what went wrong. I think we're all

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to understand it as well. I think

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.959
<v Speaker 1>we as the company has stated, something went wrong during

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the second stage booster ignition UM and if you were

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 1>watching the live stream last night, there was some funky

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>data coming in. It looked as if the rocket was

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.439
<v Speaker 1>trending in a wrong direction. However, the livestream hosts were

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>saying that everything was going well. The social media, the

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter account was tweeting out that they had actually reached orbit,

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but then we learned, you know, that was a premature

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>tweet and they actually ended up de leating that tweet

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>once they found out that that was incorrect. So it's

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>still really unclear what happened. All we know is that

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the all nine payloads were lost, and uh, they're gonna

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be doing an investigation to really figure out what happened. Hey, Lauren,

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>irrespective of the failure, what was three D two be

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for for the jin orbit in the UK? Were there

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>any kind of big milestones they were hoping to hit? Well,

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.919
<v Speaker 1>they were definitely looking to increase their flight cadence for sure.

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the benefits that they tout with this

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>air launch method is that they're able to be more

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>flexible and where they launched from. All they really need is,

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the right runway and then they can and

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the right airspace and they could potentially launched from a

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.919
<v Speaker 1>number of new locations. Plus, this was the first time

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they had launched outside of their normal UH launch facility

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Majabbi, California, So it was a big and

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, because of the national pride is so

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>created with it, there was a lot of big spotlight

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on this launch, but so unfortunately a lot of people

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>did see it go right. So it's unclear if Virgin

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Orbit is going to be able to expedite its launches

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>as it as it intended. However, it did only make

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it to orbit twice last year, so it's not not

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a high bar to clear. Yeah, a lot of dash hopes,

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>some afraid Bloomberg Space report to Lauren Groush. Thank you

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>very much, Caroline. Yeah, I mean knock for anyone in Cornwall.

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 1>We still love you. Meanwhile, that doesn't for this edition

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 1>of bloemag Technology. We Wednesday, and we've got some great conversations.

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.319
<v Speaker 1>We're diving into crypto that little bit more. Salon has

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Head of Strategy, is gonna be here in the studio.

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 1>He hit up podcasts, I Heart Radio, Spotify, Apple, This

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg.