WEBVTT - EU's Dombrovskis Talks Ukraine Support, ESG Rule Pressure

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Now, after a summer

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that was dominated by trade talks with the United States,

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the European economy is facing new challenges from Chinese export

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>curbs on critical raw materials, as well as a continuing

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>debate of our best to support Ukraine. Joining us now

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>to discuss is Valdestanbraskos, the EU's Economy and Productivity Commissioner.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you with us. Good morning our Brussels studio.

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Starting with the issue that dominated the last of you

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>leaders meeting here in Brussels, a failure to agree on

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>a way of tapping frozen Russian assets for Ukraine. Has

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>any progress been made on the Commission's legal proposals since then?

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>So European Consul talks the Commission now to work on

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>a funding options and so that's why we're currently preparing.

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 2>But also we held made clear that we sees this

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 2>reparation loan steel as a main and most feasible options.

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 2>So we continue also of chnical work on preparation on

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 2>reparations loan, also engagement with Belgian authorities concerning the guarantees

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 2>which they need in a sense to agree to this

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 2>reparation loan. But in a sense this is a proposal

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>which addresses many issues. First of all, they are very

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 2>sizeable funding needs Ukraine is facing, so IMF is putting

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 2>it at sixty billion dollars for the next two years,

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>and that's without military support, which comes in a similar

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 2>order of magnitude. And also a memphi is a concern

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 2>about depth sustainability in Ukraine, so we cannot just continue

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 2>with giving loans. Obviously, grants is an option, but a

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>question whether member states would agree to provide grants on

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 2>that scale. So therefore this reparation loan, which Ukraine would

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 2>only need to repay once Russia pays, is a good

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>option because it addresses Ukraine's funding needs, it does not

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 2>create problems with depth sustainability in Ukraine, and it falls

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>short of confiscation of Russian assets, which as we know,

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 2>is say a step too far for a number of

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>member states.

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>What sort of engagements have you had with Belgium since

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that meeting and have you had any indication that they

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>are being reassured by the proposals that the Commission is developing.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 2>Well, we continue working on this. In a sense, it's

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 2>clear understunderstanding. Is there also on the Commission said that

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 2>we need to be serious about those concerns and we

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 2>need to find a good way to adism.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn to some of the other major challenges facing

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the EU economy as well. That you've been negotiating with

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>China over access to rareer It's after deal that we

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>saw signed between the US and Beijing to lift export curves.

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>You said you've seen positive signals from China coming on

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>those measures. What more can you tell us about those signals.

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, China basically agreed now to suspend those expert controls

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 2>or postpone those xpont controls by one year, so that

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 2>obviously give us more time for engagement and addressing this

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>issue in a forward looking way. So there is in

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 2>sense positive short term developments. But obviously we must keep

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>in mind that we need to work on diversification of

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>our supply chains because currently, as concerns rareres, critical minerals,

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>many of those supply chains are eighty ninety more than

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>ninety percent dominated by China. Therefore, we must work on

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>diversification because that's how we achieve resilience of supplies. That's

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 2>why we're accelerating work on our materials strategy. So that's

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>why I've been engaging in raw materials partnership with a

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>number of countries around the world, and also coordinating this

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 2>approach with like minded partners, including in a framework of

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 2>G seven.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So are you satisfied that the supply chain for now

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is stable while that exemption has been granted. I'm just

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>wondering about the broader risk to the European economy from this.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>We've had warnings and the likes of Volkswagen for example,

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about the impact I could have on their supplies upcoming too.

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, in a sense it addresses a short term concerns,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 2>but it also shows vulnerability which we are facing in

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 2>terms of the supplies, and therefore we also must work

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 2>towards diversification of those supplies.

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Where do you look for that?

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually, well, I would say to put simple around

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>the world. We have already engaged in a raw material

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 2>partnerships with various countries as diversed from Canada to Bakistan

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 2>and many many others. But the issue right now is

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 2>also to get more practical and more tangible to start

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 2>actually developing actual projects on the ground. Where As a

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 2>model of partnership we are offering researchache countries is that

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 2>the EU is ready to provide technology, know how, financing

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>and also help those countries to increase value added they

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 2>are getting from their raw materials. So it's not only

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 2>about extraction but also also developing processing capacities in those countries.

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 2>So looking for mutually beneficial solutions to.

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>The other issues that are in your portfolio as well.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>European governments are submitting their budgets now for the next year.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder how worried the Commission is about the

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>debate that's ongoing in France. It looks like it's going

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to be bigger in the O regional draft budget. We're

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at about five percent of what level would you

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>see that as being a particular concern for the European Commission.

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, indeed, so France has now submitted it's strap budgetary

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>plan to European Commission, but we note that the discussions

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>in French Parliament are ongoing, so we have to see

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 2>in acentse what comes out of those discussions. So at

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 2>this stage is difficult to speculate. Obviously, keeping a budget

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>deficit as close as possible to four point seven percent

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 2>would be preferable. We know there are also discussions on

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>a suspension on a pensions reform, but also the Prime

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Minister has acknowledged the importance of pension reform and also

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the need to compensate for physical effects on this while

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 2>in a sense this reform is being rediscussed, so there

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 2>are many important developments to follow.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, they have to find those savings elsewhere if the

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>pension reform is suspended, because it changes the fiscal trajectory

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>over the longer term as well well.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, it probably does not imply massive fiscal consequences immediately,

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 2>but it adds ups quite quickly over the time. So

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 2>it's important that also those discussions in France at the

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 2>end of the day addresses a question on long term

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>sustainability and adequacy of the pension system.

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>You're also overseeing the effort to simplify EU rules. That's

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>not a part of your portfolio now. The moves that

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen so far have seen certain climate rules implementation

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>pushed back issues where and sustainability reported change as well.

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering why the next target for simplification is.

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, we will continue to work very intensively on simplification.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>So the proposals which we have put forward so far

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 2>would generate annual savings around eight point six billion euros

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>in terms of reduction of administer costs. OUR overall aim

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>is a reduction of thirty seven point five billion euros.

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 2>So we have been for a strong start, but there

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 2>is still a way to go to reach our target,

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>which is twenty five percent reduction of administ burden for

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>all companies and thirty five percent reduction for semes. So

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 2>this is why there is this number of simplification proposals

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 2>and omnibuses still this year, including on a digital on automotive, environmental,

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 2>food and feed, some other areas, and also the next

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 2>year's European Commission's work program has a strong simplification dimension,

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 2>with more than half of all proposals having a strong

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 2>simplication potential, meanings that they are expected to be net

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 2>reducing in terms of administer burden.

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>On the question of the corporates due diligence regulations that

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the S triplet, which is something there's a debate on

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>going about with the European Parliament, there's been a warning

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>from Katar's Energy Manager minister that if Europe doesn't look

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>at how they can water down or cancel this regulation,

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll stop delivering ler G to Europe. How worried are

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you about risks like that and the pressure that's being

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>put on these sort of regulations.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Well as regards sister pul D. Indeed, there are many

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 2>businesses BOSS in the EU voicing serious concerns, but also

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 2>many partners outside the EU, and Qatar is just one example.

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 2>We have heard from many other countries and businesses on

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>those countries on the concerns.

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's why into accounts.

0:09:55.400 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>But that's why sistypul D was part of our first omnibus,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 2>where we are actually simplifying it quite substantially in including

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the question on reducing the scope so which companies will

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 2>be covered by CISTPLD, making requirements more proportionate, like obligation

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 2>to follow only direct business partners, not all the value

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>change up and down, obligation to do it once per

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 2>five years, not every year, and and and so on.

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 2>So there are many tangible improvements and simplifications. What would

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 2>be now important that the legislative process moves forward and

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>so simplifications actually become a reality.

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But is it a worry that you know, L and

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>G supplies could be affected by these changes.

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 2>In essence, there are two elements. So one, obviously, as

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>your opinionion, we retain our regulatory autonomy and our regulate

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 2>businesses which are doing business and are active in Europe.

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 2>On other hand, of course, we also need to listen

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and acknowledged concerns which various partners around the world are

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 2>having and reflect on the implications.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the US has also made it clear it's

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>very unhappy with the extra territoriality of these sustainable reporting

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and due diligence regulations. Is there any way that you

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>can accommodate these concerns?

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Well? I think the simplification proposal we have already put

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 2>on table both regarding due diligence and sustainability reporting addresses

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 2>already to large extends of concerns. What would be important

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>is to finalize a legislatile process.

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So no further changes planned to accommodate those concerns.

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Well. In any case, it's clear that the file is

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 2>now in legislative process, and legislative process for sure will

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 2>bring some changes.

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Pasta proskos these Economy and Product he Commissioner, thank

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you very much for joining us.

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Thank you