WEBVTT - Chicago

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>On the Bell Cast, the questions asked if movies have

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>women and um are all their discussions just boyfriends and

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:11.879
<v Speaker 1>husbands or do they have individualism the patriarchy? Zef and

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>best start changing it with the Bell Cast. Hey, Jamie,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey Caitlin, you know how we are both in jail

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>right now for murdering our lovers classic us. Yes, well,

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>here's what I'm thinking when we get exonerated, because we're

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>so hot, We're so sexy and peregantinette. Yeah exactly, So

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>when we get exonerated, would you like to start a

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>podcast together? Oh my god, can you imagine a Villa Mkelly,

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Roxy Heart Puck. Okay, that is like the best worst

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>basic cable sitcom reboot I've ever heard of in my life. Like,

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, yes you're the answer to your question

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is yes, yes, amazing. That Wait so horrible. Wait who

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>would they cast as Vilma, Kelly and Roxy Heart doing

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a murder punk? Oh my god, they'd be like Kristen

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Ritter and Kristen Bell are Roxy and Velma and oh

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, sign me up. Honestly, CBS call me. I've

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>got the worst idea ever. Oh my god, it would

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>be on CBS and there would be like laugh tracks

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. Yeah, oh my god, it would be an

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>absolute nightmare and millions of people would watch. It would

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>be America's number one show. Anyway. Hello, and welcome to

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Beckel Cast. Jamie. It's your birthday episode day. Happy birthday, Jamie.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Uh yeah, I um, I can't

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>believe it. Another year, another year has past. I've spent

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>half of my twenties on this podcast. Wow Fully, we're

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>coming up on the five year anniversary. We are, which

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>means I've spent half of my thirties on this podcast.

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean, we look at God. Look at God.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>When God invented podcasting, she really had us in mind.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Thank you for the birthday wishes. On the

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>actual day of my birthday when this comes out, I'll

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be in Boston. I think that I'll buy I'll do

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the Jamie Classic Boston Special, which is that

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I will get a large cold brew, drink the whole thing.

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Then I will go to a bar and have a beer,

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll cancel each other out and I'll be

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of tired, and then I'll do the same thing again,

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll sleep for twelve hours. I think that's

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be how I spent my birthday. I did

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>that for so like, why live your life like that?

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's what I did. I mean, it's your life,

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>your choice. I'm just sad that I'm not there to

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>spend it with you because I'm still in l A.

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I would, oh my god, I would peel all of

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>my skin off to be back in l A. But

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what I love. I love Boston, I love

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>my family, So it's fine. Yeah, so so no, I

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited to finally be covering a movie that

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we were okay. So we're covering Chicago

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two, a modern classic, one of my favorites,

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like we were originally putting off covering

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this movie because we wanted to do a live show

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago and cover Chicago. Was that the reason? I

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>believe so well, So, with all due respect to Chicago,

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I could not wait any longer. I couldn't. I couldn't

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>wait another second. And uh, you know the way things

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are going right now, who knows when we will be

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>performing regularly again. So we're doing Chicago and I'm so

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>oh my god. I okay, I can we can we like? Well, wait,

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a main feat episode. Okay, so this is

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bechtel cast. This is our It's my birthday. I

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be good at my job today. Do

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to take a load off and let me

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>do this so you can just sit back and relax

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>on your birthday? Oh my god, I'm going to have

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a sip of lean in food Google's Summer Shandy. Oh yummy,

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>take a swig, and I will tell the listeners that

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>what is the show again? We examine movies through an

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>intersectional feminist lens, using the Bechtel test simply as a

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>jumping off point, which is of course a media metric

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>created by cartoonist Alison Bechtel, sometimes called the Bechtel Wallace

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>test that requires for our specific purposes, because we've made

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>some slight variations to the test here and there. Our

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>version is due two people of any marginalized gender, how

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of names, They have to speak to each other about

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>something other than a man, for what is hopefully a

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>meaningful conversation in the movie or work of fiction. Right

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and boy is Chicago an incredible movie? To cover? For

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>these purposes, they are talking about. I feel like, you know,

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>we we've been adding asterisks to this test. I feel

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>like this asterisk canonically on this show may already exist

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that if you're talking about murdering a man who's an asshole,

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's actually as that does pass the test. I

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>agree this, not that we are condoning murdering men, but

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>like in the fictional space, it's cathartic. Okay there. This

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>movie gets me so fucking pumped for what I don't know,

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but it basically just like any time I think about

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this movie, I then have to draw everything and listen

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to the soundtrack and like go on like a three

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>mile walk and just be like, wow, how did they

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>do this? How did this come together? It doesn't sound

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>like it should work, but it does, but it does.

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>It's so good. Would you say that this movie gets

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you jazzed? It it gets me so fucking hyped. And

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>this is the kind of movie I feel like this

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>really um defines what makes a movie fun. Is that

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, like when you're I don't know, when you

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>really love a movie, you like picture yourself as all

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of the different characters, or like one specific character where

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>you're like that one's me in Chicago. I picture being

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>all of the characters like you're just like You've got

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>your days where you're like I'm being I'm being such

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>an amos today, I'm just getting run over. You have

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>your roxy days where you're like, I am just like

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>living on another planet and I'm not connected with reality

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>at this time. Then some days you're just hot and

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>your Velma Ellie and you're and then some days you're

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Billy Flynn and you're in you're feeling sneaky, and it's

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>just I love this movie. I love all the characters.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>They're all terrible people. They're all the worst, and I

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>really like when oh, I'm sorry, I'm just like Jamie,

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's your birthday, it's my birth it's my birthday. I

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy movies. I'm trying to think of other movies

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that kind of take this tech movies that are like

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>really fun and high energy but also have a pretty

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>low opinion of humanity. I love movies like that. And

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this is like this, like it's like scratches that little

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>spot behind my ear. It's so good. That is like

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Titania kind of like man, it kind of like goes

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in there too. There there's a little more empathy at

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>play in that movie than there is here. I mean,

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone in Chicago is a nightmare. They're they're all so bad,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but you like understand, I don't know, I just love it.

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>But I'm rooting for all of them. Honestly, why am I? Yeah,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the other thing, Like, why am I root for

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>these motherfucker's They're just they're all except with and I

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>do kind of like, I don't know, I'm just going

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to make a million exceptions for this movie because I

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>don't like when the only like truly, like, oh, unquestionably

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>sympathetic character is some guy. But for some reason, when

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it's Chicago and it's John c Riley, I'm like, whatever,

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever his performance and Mr Cellophane even I'm gonna argue

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>with that, no way, no way, it's too good. I

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>think you could also make the argument that he's not

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that sympathetic or redeemable. I'm not saying he's a great guy.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that it's it's very easy to feel for

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>his predicament to be kind of someone who is not

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>equipped to handle a situation that includes scrutiny, nuance, or

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>public attention. But yeah, I mean no, everyone in this

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 1>movie in this story like sucks to some degree, except

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for vill m Kelly, who I think is kind of

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>above criticism. Um. But also but like, I don't mean that.

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Also Christine Barrand amazing. She's so good. She's just oh

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>my god, this is I and sorry to all the

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Mamma Mia heads out there, but this is Christine Baranski's

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>best musical movie. Sorry, which she has a tiny line,

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a few tiny lines here and there in the song

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>about they both reached for the gun. But other than that,

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we see her sing right. No, but

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that verse with Richard Gear and they're dancing around and

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>then Rene's Alwiger does that little smile. I love this

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>movie so much. Did you see it when it first

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>came out? Or no? I wasn't allowed to see it.

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I was was movie came out, And yeah, I was

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>like eight or nine when this movie came out, so

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't allowed to see it. But I remember very

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly my grandma r. I. P. Pat loftis the best.

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>She Her whole deal was that she would tell you

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>things you weren't supposed to know when your parents weren't around,

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and then your parents would be like, why the fund

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>did you tell her that? Um? So she I remember

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>very clearly. We were at uh. She brought me out

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for like a report card lunch, and she described everything

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that happened in Chicago to me. She told me the

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>whole movie and she was like, it's so good. I

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>saw it with my friend May and it was just

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the best thing I've ever seen. And she told me

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>about the whole movie, and then I think, I think

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I would have seen it when it came out on DVD,

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>so like I was pretty young when I when I

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>saw it, I just didn't see it in theaters and

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was just like so hooked on it. This was my

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>first This was my introduction to Richard Gear because I

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>still haven't seen Pretty Woman. What wow, I know, but

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this was my introduction to Richard Gear and he went

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on to become a very formative childhood crush of mine.

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Sure off of this movie, as did Katherine Sada Jones,

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and so I just, uh, I love this movie and

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to watch back in because unfortunately I feel

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of the themes and like messages in

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this movie are timeless in a way that people are

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>always bad, right, But I don't know just I mean,

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this is like a very low hanging fruit angle to take.

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But I was like, oh, watching Chicago, you know carefully

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>after the last five years in the US, you're like, wellshit,

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>it's wild. Yeah, yeah, what's your what's your history with Chicago?

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see it right away. I don't think I

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 1>saw it until until after it won the Economy Award

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>for Best Picture, and then I was like, oh, I

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>guess I should see this. Um. I was in high

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>school at the time, and as listeners of the podcast

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>might know, I am generally not a fan of live

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>action movie musicals, but there are a handful of exceptions,

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and Chicago is one of them. When I did see it,

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 1>I liked the movie enough to buy it on DVD.

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a romp. It's a romp, but for some reason. Okay,

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So a friend of the cast, Katherine Leon Spy Kids episode.

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, she and I used to like. She would

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>come over, we would sit in my bed. I would

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>show her like quintessential movies that she had never seen.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I was like, you haven't seen Star Wars. Here are

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the Star Wars movies. You haven't seen this, blah blah blah.

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I would we would like rifle through my huge binder

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of DVDs and she's like, oh my god, you have Chicago.

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I love Chicago. And then for some reason, course Katherine

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>loves Chicago. She has got a great taste. But for

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>some reason, I was like, do you want it? I

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>never watched this movie. Here you can have my DVD.

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>And now I regret it because I'm like, I would

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>like that back, Catherine. Catherine, have you asked? Yeah, she's not.

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not like she's refusing to give it to me.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I just she doesn't know that. I um. Also, it's

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>like streaming, so who cares. But but I I purchased,

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I really made. I made a lifelong commitment and I

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>purchased Chicago Diamond addition to watch whenever I wanted. It's

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>remastered and it has all these fun features and I

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>had such a fun time watching them. The production of

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>this movie looked so fun, Like do you ever any

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>time I would watch a First of all, Rob Marshall

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 1>directed this movie and is further proof that the choreographer

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to director Pipeline is immaculate and needs no adjustment. See

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Kenny or take Up. I was gonna say yeah, and

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the only other example. I'm sure there's others,

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>but that's too. That's two pretty strong choreography good examples.

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Rob Marshall choreographed and directed this movie and all the

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes. It just looks like a bunch of

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>celebrities went to summer camp to put together a school

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>play and then one of my favorite movies came out

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. Like is so cool? I love Wow? Well,

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>should I do the recap? And yes, but I need

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to tell you something about Rob Marshall first, Okay, please,

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering if you located this fact. This is

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>something that like, okay, much like my other fun fact

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that has nothing to do with this movie, but we

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about the other day. This is a fact that

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I know in my bones, but I forget and I

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>relearned once every couple of years, and I love it.

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>It's about director Rob Marshall, and it's that he began

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>as a dancer then became a choreographer. Makes sense. But

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing that launched him into choreography and directing and

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>got him out of the full time dancing game is

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that he suffered a herniated disc while performing in Cats.

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So the only reason that Chicago two thousand two is

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>as amazing as it is because I feel like that

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>choreography and like the understanding of stage language is so

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>much of what makes this movie awesome and why I

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>like it more than a lot of other live action

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>movie musicals. Yeah, as it actually like understands cinematic language

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and like how to put together a musical in a

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>way that's like totally I can suspend my disbelief for

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the things that are happening, etcetera. It's so yeah, it's

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>so good. And if he hadn't suffered a herniated disc

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>while being a full body cat, it wouldn't have happened. Imagine.

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting to me how it's like I guess

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that I'm I still haven't seen in the Heights, and

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>like whatever, there's that Steven Spielberg West Side Story coming out.

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's going to be any good, because

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like big directors are given popular Broadway musicals

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and very often like I don't know what to do

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>with them, and they're so I mean, it's like you've

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>got Joel Schumacher fant about the opera a lot of swings.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>He didn't know what he was doing. Chris Columbus did Rent,

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the worst like director to project

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>matches I can think of. Like, there's just so many

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>examples of people getting it wrong, and it's like, yeah,

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>cats cat whatever, I forget his name, but the guy

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>who did what's his name, Tom Tom Pepe, Yeah, who

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>also funked up La Miss, but everyone gave him awards

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for it for some reason. It's like, oh, can you

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>make every famous person sing out of key and cover

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>them in dirt? Like I don't get but but yeah,

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like this this whole I think is so interesting about

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>this movie because it's like this movie and Mulin Rouge

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>came out very close together, and I feel like people

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of thought, oh, there's going to be this big

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>resurgence of the movie musical, but then there kind of

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't because then they just like hired all these famous

0:16:55.520 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>directors who didn't understand musicals. But Lan Rouge one of

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the few other live action movie musicals that I can

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>fully get behind. It's amazing. I was. I feel like,

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I've ever said his name correctly,

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>bas Learman. I think that's right. He definitely has like

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>an understanding of like movement and pacing and like that's

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>so much of his style and that's why it works. Anyways,

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>pisses me off. Stopped getting really famous people who make

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like war movies, war horses, like musicals. What are you

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>doing anyways? Um, maybe we should take a quick break

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the recap, because we've just been

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>chatting for so long about how great Chicago is. All right,

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>so let's take a quick break and we'll come right

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>back and we're back. Okay, let's summarize the movie. I

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>promised not keep talking about. Oh wait, but I have

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>one more fun factor. No please, we talked about it

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the other day. I'm sure it's connected to Chicago tangentially because,

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>oh because the two people in this fun fact, we're

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>both living in Chicago. We're very famous in Chicago. Roger

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Ebert and Oprah used to date in the eighties. That

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is a Chicago fact. That's just Chicago canon. Chicago canon

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>includes this musical and the fact that Roger Ebert and

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Oprah briefly dated, which I didn't know about until you

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>told me. I don't know why that's not more common knowledge.

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, but they were. But it's like at first year,

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>like but he's like so much older than her and

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>she's so much cooler than him. And Steadman is such

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a you know, Steadman is so canon, right, but yeah,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like he was basically her last boyfriend before Steadman came

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>into the picture, one of the last ones wild. That's

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>just that's I'm Richard Gear putting my hat on, and

0:18:54.720 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that's Chicago. Oh my god. And that's going to be

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>one of those facts that I will forget and then

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.479
<v Speaker 1>relearn in a couple of months or years or whatever,

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and then be like, oh my god, I can't believe it.

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>It's just like Rob Marshall getting a herniated desk in Cats.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just a delightful thing to learn over and over again.

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>So what so what happens in this movie anyways? Okay,

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you. It's the roaring twenties in ch Chicago.

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>There's jazz music, they're flapperds, there speakeasies, it's the whole

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>nine yards. He Digs is in charge. Oh my gosh.

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I was so delighted to see him. Who's my first

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>height Digs movie? Too? Was? It really is going five six, seven, eight?

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And then what you're ten and you're like, what is

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>exqueeze me, who's that exciting? Just a reminder. T Diggs

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>now follows me on Twitter thanks to our Stella got

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>her groove back episode, so incredible. Tag him in this

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I will. And another celebrity connection I have to this

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>movie is that John c Riley I saw at a

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>roller skating rink in Glendale, California. Oh my gosh. And

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>he's like a regular and not to docks his hobbies,

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, isn't he like a regular there? And he's

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>like really good. That's what I've heard. He was a

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty good roller skater. It's true. And uh, I I

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know how frequently he he attends this roller rink,

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but um, I'm so glad that John c Riley exit.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's so many dads that have been

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>able to connect with their children over a mutual appreciation

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of John c Riley. What a beautiful thing. Dads are

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with John c Riley. The deeper, the cut, the better,

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and I understand why. I get it. Okay, So we're

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in the jazz age in Chicago. We meet vil m Kelly.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>That's Katherine's to Jones Hot. She shows up at this

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>jazz club to do her vaudeville act, which she normally

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 1>does with her sister, but her sister isn't there, and

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Velma is washing blood off her hands, and we're like,

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.719
<v Speaker 1>what's what's going on? And then it's one of the

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>best openings of any movie ever. She's so hot, she's

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's like I in our defense, she like her

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>whole She's obviously very hot, but like her whole attitude

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is like hot, Like she's just hot at a very profound,

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>like in this confident way. You're like, I'm never going

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to feel that way for a second of my entire life.

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It's so amazing to just behold it, truly is. It's great.

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And as you mentioned, Tay Diggs is also there playing

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the piano and all over the place. Also there is

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>roxy Heart that's Renai's elbowger. She is in the audience

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>watching Velma. Then she goes home with this guy that

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>she's having an affair with who I forgot to write

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>his name down? Fred Caseley? Fred Caseley? Yes, whose Fred

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Casey Mike's boyfriend? Why did you shoot him? I was leaving, etcetera.

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>R Yes. She finds out that Fred Caseley has been

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>lying to her about being able to help her break

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>into show biz, which is her dream. She wants to

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>be just like Vill m kelly. Basically, Fred Casey is

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>basically a guy who will drive you to an open

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>mic and say that he can get you up at

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the open mic, but then it turns out he can't

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>even he can't even get himself up at the open mic,

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, hold on, and then you understand her

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>motive for shooting him, because that kind of guy, you know,

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the kind of guy. Yeah. So he then gets really

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>aggressive with her and physically assaults her, so she shoots

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and kills him. Yeah. Roxy then tries to get her

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>husband Amos that's John c Riley to take the fall

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>for it, saying that this guy was a burglar and

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that Amos shot him in self defense. Another amazing number.

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It's so funny. Honey Rocks. Not one of my favorites,

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but still pretty good. I love I love it. I

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>love when Rene's Algar is just casting looks at John

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>c Riley and he's like, but what, but what? But what?

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And you're like, oh my gosh, someone helped this guy out.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And then she pushes him right because he is slowly

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>realizing that this guy who has been shot is someone

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>who Roxy knows and is having an affair with. So

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Roxy ends up getting arrested and getting sent to Cook

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>County jail, and the d A wants to see her

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>hanged for her crime. Right, that's like a big, big deal,

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>which I guess which I didn't realize, Like how like

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>historically accurate that was at the time too, of just

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the kind of blood lust that came with normalized hangings

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and death penalties in the US. Yeah, scary, So the

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>stakes are high, yes, And in jail, Roxy meets Mama Morton.

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>That's Queen Latifa, who I want to see an entire

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>movie about her character. I wish. I've never seen the

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>stage production of this. I do like in the movie.

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I definitely want to know more about

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Mama Morton, Like how did she get start working there?

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>What is her background? Like what does she do when

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>she's not working? Like, I don't know, there's I have

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>a bajillion questions, And I wonder if there's more to

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>her in the stage production. I've never seen it on stage.

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I was love too, but yeah, like Queen Latifa, just

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean she was nominated for I think, like everyone

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>was nominated for an Oscar for this movie, but Queen

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Latifa was I think, I mean, Catherine's Aida Jones ended

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>up winning and she was also amazing, but I think

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Queen Latifa for me, kind of takes it because she

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>just kills it. It's so good. And yeah, it's like,

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>because of how good she is, you just want to

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>watch this character forever. And she's funny when she has

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the blonde wig. Oh my gosh, it's also good. I

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>read that there was a musical number that she and

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Katherine's Data Jones saying in a movie called Class that

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>they cut from the movie. Yeah, it's in the credits instead,

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we maybe learn more there, but yeah, I

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like we and we'll talk about this, but yeah,

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we do not get a lot of background on her

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>but her role in the So she is also a prisoner, right,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>but she has taken on this role of helping out

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>other prisoners in exchange for money. Ever heard of it?

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So we meet her and she gets a great song

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>which I think is my favorite in the movie, which

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>how does it go? When You're good to Mama, When

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you're good to mama, Mama's good to you. Oh my god,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>it's so good that whole number. And then in the

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes they show you how they shot it,

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and I guess they shot it like the first time

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they shot it in the like stagey version where she's

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>wearing the flapper outfit. Um the first time, they had

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>her stay on stage the whole time, and then Rob

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Marshall's like, let's try it, and this time like go

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>into the crowd and interact with people, and they ended

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>up using stuff from both versions, and it's so I

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>was like, I love that. It's it's so good. It's great.

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So Roxy meets Mama Morton. She also meets vil M Kelly,

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>who has since been arrested for murdering her husband and

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>her sister who were having an affair with each other.

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And then we also get introduced to the six Mary

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>murderouses of the Cook County Jail, who have mostly murdered

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>men because they were cheating on the women or the

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>women were annoyed with popping bubblegum. I found that to

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>be pretty funny as a motive. So Roxy asks Vilma

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Kelly for advice on how to avoid being hanged, but

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Vilma like kind of blows her off, so Roxy goes

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to Mamma Morton who tells roxy that she needs a

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>good lawyer. Enter Billy Flynn. Well, yeah, and I as

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>MoMA Martin is not a prisoner. She's not. Oh no,

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>she's not. She's like the superintendent as she's like the

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>warden of the prison she's employed by, So that's why

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where her power comes from. So she's I feel

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>like she is kind of like a stand in for

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.239
<v Speaker 1>how the prison system is extremely corrupt because she is

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>like taking money from prisoners and accepting bribes in order

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to communicate with the outside world because she has access

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to it. Yeah, she's like a prison warden. Got it.

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't tell because the prison staff were dressed very

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>similarly to we all have the same prisoners. So it's like,

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is she a prisoner? No, she's not, got it? Because

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I've seen Shawshank Redemption a million times, I thought she

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was like the Red character of that movie, who plays

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a very similar role in like procuring things for the

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>other prisoners. But Red is a prisoner as well, so

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of assumed it was the same situation.

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Mama isn't she is, She's the warden and that's why

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>she is able. I think it's like when she takes money,

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>she's able to like contact the press, contact Billy Flynn,

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>contact whoever. That makes more sense. Okay, So Mama Morton

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>tells Roxy to hire Billy Flynn, who is very good

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at defending women murderers, but he's also a very sleazy,

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>money grubbing lawyer. Guy. It's like a cartoonish yeah, criminal

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>defense lawyer. Yeah. So Billy Flynn already represents Filma and

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>he eventually takes on Roxy's case as well, thinking that

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>he can spin her as this like sweet reformed Southern

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>bell type. Because the whole thing with these murderous is

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is that they have to get like the public and

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the press to empathize with them, like empathize with this

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>persona that they cultivate in order to clear them of charges.

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is what both Velma and Roxy are trying

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to do for their like defense, and the public falls

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in love with Roxy heart. Billy Flynn is paying a

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention to her case, which makes Velma very jealous,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and Roxy is also trying to capitalize on her fame

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>as a murderer and turn it around into a successful

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>show business career, assuming she gets out of prison right,

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>which she is like directly stealing that from Velma Kelly

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>who's in the middle of doing it, and it's Roxy

0:29:54.760 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>is so naive. And then Velma, who the public is

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>starting to forget about, tries to suck up to Roxy.

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>She pitches that they do an act together when they're

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>released from prison, but Rocket number Tay Diggs being like

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Vilma Kelly and an act of desperation and we're like,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>t he he it's so good. And then Catherine Aanda Jones,

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, it's so good seeing like a really well

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>executed like song and dance number, but also like you

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>know that the characters like really at the end of

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>their rope, and she's so desperate and sad and oh,

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I love this movie so much. So Vilma pitches this idea,

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>but Roxy, who remembers when Vilma was really mean to her,

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is like um pass. But then people momentarily lose interest

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in Roxy. When a new murderous takes Chicago by a

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>storm yep, Lucy lou Is saying I have three for

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you go to Hell. It is like ja, oh my god, Pulitzer. Yeah,

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>her character's name is Kitty Baxter. Um and everyone's obsessed

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>with her for a while, so as a publicity stunt

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to get back in the spotlight, Roxy pretends to faint

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and then says, oh, no, I hope the fall didn't

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>hurt the baby a k A. She's pretending to be

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>gregnant gregnant, she's pretending to be heavy with greg That brilliant,

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>shitty person thing to do in that moment. Truly, she

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>would make a great influencer TikTok personality today she essentially is, Yeah,

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>she's like a flapper influencer, where she's like a flash

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in the pan. She's not doing anything special, but she's

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like cut throat in a way that you're like, oh

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>my god, this woman is terrifying to me, or just

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean person in general, terrifying influencers, No, no gender,

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's everybody, truly. Um And this publicity stunt works.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>But then Amos figures out that he couldn't be the

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.479
<v Speaker 1>father based on this like fabricated do date, so he

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>plans to divorce her. Mr Cellaphane comes on and we're like, oh,

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it's so sad and good, and then my dad's like,

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe I do like musicals. Well that happened yeah, because

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's and that's the power of John c Riley

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to get my dad to watch a whole movie musical

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and be like, I kind of like that. Wow, Mike,

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I like John c Riley song. Shout out to Mike

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Loftus shout out like Meanwhile, one of the lady murderers

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in jail loses her appeal and is hanged, making her

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the first woman in Illinois to be executed. Also, we

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have met a reporter named Mary Sunshine. That's Christine Baranski

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>who we see throughout the movie. She's reporting heavily on

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>all of these cases of the women in murder throw Yeah,

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just to shout her out. She's incredible. The outfits that

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>she wears, I mean iconic. This was I think my

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>first time when I saw this movie. It was my

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>first time seeing so many famous people. This definitely would

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have been like my adwitter, Richard gear renaz Alwig Er Katain's,

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Aida Jones, Queen Latifa, John c. I mean, I wouldn't

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have seen any of these people before because I was nine.

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But the only person I had seen before was Christine

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Baranski because she was in How the Grinch Stole Christmas.

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Martha May who so her influence, she had a strangle

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>hold on millennial children. What a What a career? She said,

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>what a career. So then it's time for Roxy's trial,

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>which goes well. At first it seems like this defense

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that Billy Flynn and Roxy have created is working on

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the jury, but then Velma is called in to testify

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and she lies about some information that makes Roxy look bad.

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>But then Billy works as magic and Roxy is ultimately

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:11.879
<v Speaker 1>found not guilty. But the moment she's exonerated, another woman

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>commits a murder on the courthouse steps, so the public

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>frenzy moves on to her and no one cares about

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Roxy anymore, or Lucy Lou or Lucy Lou or Velma.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>So one day Velma approaches Roxy and she's like, hey,

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>remember that double act I pitched. Let's do it, baby,

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And then Roxy's like, well, I hate you but fine.

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>That's my favorite, one of my favorite line reads in

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the entire movie, where she's like, should we do it?

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>And then Roxy is like no, and then she says

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>why and she because I hate you away It's then

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Velma's like, there's only one business in the world where

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't matter, and then we're like show business. The

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>way that Catherine's Aada Jones speaks is so like wealthy.

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how she she makes words just they

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>just keep going. There's this um on one of my

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcasts, Who Weekly Um, which is a celebrity gossip

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>podcast that is I do recommend it. It's really good.

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>But they've been covering Catherine's Dada Jones quite a bit

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>recently because she is starting all of these small businesses

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>that don't make any sense. But she recently posted a

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>TikTok with these like gourds that she had grown in

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>her garden. Picture of this Katherin's Aida Jones holding an

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>enormous gourd, right, and she says it's extremely large, Like

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:49.479
<v Speaker 1>she's just like talking about gourds, but she's Katherine's Dada Jones,

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and so it just sounds like so theatrical. It's that's

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the energy she's bringing to Like there's one business where

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't matter at all. You're like, oh my god,

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>she sounds like a long cigarette Like it's it's wild.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she was perfectly cast, she really was. So.

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Then the movie ends with Roxy and Velma performing on

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a big stage for lots of adoring fans and that's

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the movie. Yeah, so let's take another quick break and

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 1>then we'll come back to discuss and reac I wanted

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to just start this conversation by acknowledging something that is

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>by far one of the worst elements of this movie,

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>which is the fact that it's produced by the Wine

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Stains having and and this is I mean, we've talked

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about it on the show before. I don't think that

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 1>there's really occasion to rehash everything now, but obviously the

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that the wine Stains are attached to this production

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is horrific and it and it just you know, it

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:01.839
<v Speaker 1>takes kind of a little bit of the wind out

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of a really amazing production. Fortunately, it as far as

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, it doesn't seem as if the Weinsteins

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>were like around in an onset capacity. Um. It seems

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>like the production of this movie was relatively smooth. There

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>was some news items I was seeing about I believe

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Goldie Hawn almost being in an adaptation of Chicago by

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the Weinsteins in the mid nineties, and then she was

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 1>harassed by Harvey Weinstein and the project ended up not happening.

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh well, linked to that in the description, but obviously

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 1>want to acknowledge their involvements, and I mean it goes

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>without saying that they're fucking monsters, but the production team

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on this movie, I mean, it's kind of interesting where

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this movie is written and directed by men. They are

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>both gay men and openly gay men. In uh in

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood and in early two thousand's that was still a

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty um unusual thing to be an openly gay director

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>directing movies of you know that were this huge. So

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Rob Marshall and his hopefully recovered disc

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 1>for that and and their queer directors who have gone

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.919
<v Speaker 1>on to have huge careers afterwards. This is I don't

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 1>think Rob Marshall ever, you know, returned to the height

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago, but you know, he directed Into the Woods,

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>which I didn't see. He directed the Emily Blunt Mary Poppins,

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>He's directing the New Little Mermaid, and then the screenplay

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>was written by Bill Condon, who started as a writer

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and is now a huge director. He wrote Chicago, but

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>he also wrote and directed Dream Girls, another faive of

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>mine from this time, directed to Twilights, directed both Breaking Down.

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Mr Bill was was there um and also directed the

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>uh what he he wrote The Greatest Showman. Okay, that's

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the point against him. But and then he directed The

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Emma Watson Beauty and The Beast That Sucked. All that

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 1>to say, the two kind of top brass. Here are

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>queer men who went on to have very successful careers.

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So shouts out there, good for them. Yeah, should we

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>do a little context. Yeah, the context for this movie rocks.

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I knew I knew some of this, but going back

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and like finding out how much of this movie at well,

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>this musical is pulled from actual history is so wild.

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to take it? I can take whatever

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. How about this? Take another swig of your

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>your beer? All I ran out? Oh no, I'm so sorry.

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, I'll take the reins on this one.

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 1>But if there's anything I messed up or that you'd

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>like to add, by all means, I'll just chime in.

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll just chime in my nase. Okay, So Chicago The

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Two movie is based on a nineteen stage musical of

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the same name, which had a revival in which became

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the longest running American musical and Broadway history. Bob Fossey, Baby,

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that Fossy Magic. Yes. Um, that musical was based

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>on a nine Broadway play by Maureen Dallas Watkins, who

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>we will be talking more about, and that play is

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>about to real life jazz era murderers. These names I

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>might get wrong as far as pronunciation. Um, it's these

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>names sound to me like you're forgetting val m Kelly

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and Roxy Heart. Like it just sound like you're like

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>um Belva Gartner and you're like no Velma Kelly, so

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Belva Gartner who Velma Kelly is based on, and Boula

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Bela Ann who Roxy Heart is based on. So basically

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen twenties in Chicago, I don't know if

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>there was like an unprecedented number of women in jail

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>for murder in this time and place, or if it's

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just that women being in jail for murder in Chicago

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in the twenties was especially publicized, and that's why we

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>know a lot about it. I have. I have a

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>tiny bit of insight here that connects to quick Plug

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>ac cast just still being released right now. You can

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to it and you can hear Caitlin's voice in

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it as well in it. But so my understanding of

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this is at least in the way it was covered

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in the media, which is like, what that whole play

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>was satirizing, is that this kind of comes at the

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>tail end, Like the crimes that this is based on

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>comes a couple of years after women get the vote. Uh,

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes at the tail end of the first wave

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>feminist movement. And so the whole Flapper era, I mean

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it was, and we'll discussed this as well, it was

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>very still centered on middle class and above white women,

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:26.800
<v Speaker 1>which this story is no exception too. But uh, what

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>what I learned in researching for the show is that

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 1>usually periods of success for really any social movement, but

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in this case, the feminist movement is then met in

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the years following with a wave of backlash and at

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>least focus on, um, the negative aspects of literally anything

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a woman is doing that is negative. And so my

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>read on this with that lens is that this sort

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of came in the kind of fallout of this huge

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>success for the feminist movement and by really putting media

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny on women who were murdering their sexual partners, whether

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they were you know, in Roxy's case, you know, she's

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 1>cheating on her husband or vill mcklly, like she's you know,

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:19.760
<v Speaker 1>portrayed as kind of this loose woman who's like living

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>her own life and so demonizing those people in the

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 1>fall of a big feminist win in women's liberation kind

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of closely matches up with how those things tend to go.

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So I wasn't super surprised to know that. You know,

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it's very I think it would have been very easy

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in the early twenties to be like, well, look, feminism

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>fucked everyone, like women are are murderers now, we gave

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>women the right to vote and another killing Peo. Yeah,

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that was like, that was kind of my my read

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 1>on this period. But I mean, but I you know,

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not for sure, but that was either way, it

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>seemed like women being murderers was so hot. It was

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>so hot at that time, and especially in Chicago specifically

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 1>for some reason. So that was what was going on historically,

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Cook County Jail in Chicago in the twenties,

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>there was a section called Murderous Row where more than

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a dozen women were like all the coolest, most recent

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:30.879
<v Speaker 1>woman murderers were all just we're all hanging out being

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:35.919
<v Speaker 1>detained their wild waiting to stand trial for murder. Most

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of them had been accused of killing their husband or

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>lover then. So there were these two women in particular

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>who were getting a lot of media attention because they

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:55.800
<v Speaker 1>were traditionally by Western beauty standards attractive. So this was Bulah, Beulah, Beulah,

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>let's go with that, Beulah and On and Belva Gardner.

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 1>These women, they were receiving fan mail, they were giving

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>each other makeovers in jail. I thought that was more interesting,

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Like that was something that I wish that they kind

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 1>of focused more on in the adaptations, is the fact that,

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like in the adaptations, definitely Velma and

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Roxy are put into conflict, which makes sense in the story,

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds like the people they're based on were

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>friends and like close friends, and I kind of am

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 1>more interested in that angle of them being kind of

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>allied in this like similar fucked up situation from the beginning.

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so you know, all these women were like

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 1>giving each other pedicures and stuff, basically making themselves as

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty unpopular as possible, knowing that it was rare for

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the all male juries at the time to convict women,

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:55.759
<v Speaker 1>especially attractive women, of murder, even though even if there

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:59.319
<v Speaker 1>was like mountains of evidence against them, I will say, yeah,

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it seems pretty it seems like Beulah and Velva Um

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>did it seems certainly. So. Then Maureen Dallas Watkins, who

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>was one of the few women reporters at the Chicago

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Tribune at the time, was assigned to report on murderous

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Row and it was assigned to her specifically because her

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 1>editors thought that that particular subject of covering women awaiting

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:33.800
<v Speaker 1>trial for murder would be too boring for men to

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>report on how wrong they were right, So kind of

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:44.400
<v Speaker 1>with the help of all of this press from Maureen

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Watkins on Beulah and Velva, they were not convicted

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>of murder. They were set free. And they did this

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:55.240
<v Speaker 1>because they kind of leaned into the defense of having

0:46:55.400 --> 0:47:01.840
<v Speaker 1>been corrupted by jazz music and booze. So that's something

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that we'll talk about a lot um. Yeah, like all

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>things that are associated with personal freedom, which was not

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>cool for women to be having, right, and then they

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of, as we see in the movie, they put

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:20.719
<v Speaker 1>on these personas of oh, no, I'm reformed, now I'm

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm I was a sinner, but now I'm I'm sweet

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and innocent, and I even have a baby on the

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>way because this fake pregnancy thing that we see roxy

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Heart do and the movie is based on what Beulah

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and On actually did in real life to try to

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 1>garner sympathy from the public. So I was truly shocked

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:41.280
<v Speaker 1>at how close they're right. The Villa m Kelly stuff

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to be like somewhat fictionalized, like the whole sister

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 1>thing I think is made up, but the yeah, roxy

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Heart and Beulah An are like one and the same,

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>like down to like the mechanic husband who wasn't totally

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 1>sure what was going on right right exactly. So I

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>have a quote here that I'll share, which, unless you

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 1>have any other additional preliminary context that I think will

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>lead into a discussion about kind of what's thematically happening

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in this movie. I think, Well, I think the only

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 1>other thing I wanted to touch on was the fact

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that Marian Dallas Watkins so she like covers the story

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in her twenties and releases it. I thought it was interesting,

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like she the play and the musical, But the play

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 1>started out as like a pretty like heavy handed satire

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>because it was a play that was running in Chicago

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>about murders that had taken place in Chicago two years prior.

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Like everyone was watching it like it was I mean,

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously like an iconic, well crafted story, but it was

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>like everyone knew exactly what this was about, and it

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>was interesting too. I read a little bit about her life.

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:52.919
<v Speaker 1>It didn't do a super deep dive, but just how

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 1>her attitude towards her this play kind of changed over

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>time where I think she started to feel as time

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>went on, and she she like left public life in

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the forties but lived to I think the late sixties,

0:49:07.239 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 1>early seventies or something like that, but as time went on,

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>she sort of didn't want the play to be continued

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to be adapted, even though it was adapted into a

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:22.359
<v Speaker 1>movie with Ginger Rogers I believe in the forties called

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Roxy Heart. But I think she's she started to feel

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:29.880
<v Speaker 1>like people are taking the wrong message away from this

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 1>famous play I wrote, and I don't know if I

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:36.280
<v Speaker 1>really want to keep perpetuating this story. And so Bob

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Fossey approached her in the sixties and was like, I

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:42.279
<v Speaker 1>need to make this into a fossy Hands musical. It's

0:49:42.320 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>an emergency. You need to let me do it, and

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 1>she said no. And it wasn't until after she died

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that he was able to get the rights. Because I

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:56.280
<v Speaker 1>think that money plus estate plus not living creator equals

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>oh whoopsie, Daisy, I have the rights. So I think

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>that it is like, I mean, am I glad that

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Bob Fosse scammed his way into the rights to this

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of but it is, but the ethics of that,

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, that's kind of sucked up. She said,

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 1>she said no, Bob, she said no, Um, I don't know,

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:17.840
<v Speaker 1>bizarre right, that was the only other thing that I

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 1>had that I was like, that's something, yeah, and that

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 1>it kind of relates to this quote that I will

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:28.839
<v Speaker 1>share from an article on sci fi dot com hot

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 1>entitled the real story behind Chicago's Mary murders is roxy

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Heart and vill mkelly. And this is speaking to the

0:50:38.000 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 1>general atmosphere and what Marine Dallas Watkins was reporting on.

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So quote, the press and the public ate up the gossip,

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the details on dresses, and the sob stories about bad men,

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>booze and devilish jazz. Prosecutors began to think you couldn't

0:50:55.600 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 1>convict a pretty woman in this town. As for Watkins,

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 1>she believed her influence was he to the acquittal of

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>both the Mary murderouses, as she felt the pair were

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:07.800
<v Speaker 1>guilty and likely lying through their teeth. She had mixed

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>feelings on that, so she wrote about it in Watkins

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:16.480
<v Speaker 1>went from reporter to Broadway playwright with Brave Little Women,

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a satirical stage play that would later be retitled Chicago.

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 1>It was she who transformed a non gartner, their victims husbands, lawyers,

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.319
<v Speaker 1>peers and reporters, and two characters like Roxy Heart, Van

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:31.880
<v Speaker 1>m Kelly, Billy Flynn, Mary Sunshine and Go to Hell Kitty.

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:36.279
<v Speaker 1>She hoped this dark comedy would highlight how appearances and

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>sex appeal had become too important in the justice system. Unquote.

0:51:43.520 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's really interesting. I mean that's like

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that the such a bizarre journey for all of this

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to go on, And I think it's an interesting way too.

0:51:55.560 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, the ethics are certainly up

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for debate, because you could argue this is not necessarily

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:06.000
<v Speaker 1>her story to tell. Well, it's I'm sort of like,

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:08.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it doesn't bother me that much. I

0:52:09.320 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's because it's she's not claiming that it's the

0:52:12.160 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>story of you and on she's you know, changing things.

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:18.239
<v Speaker 1>She's sad like I don't know, I think that that

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's really interesting how this got made and how

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm always interested in like how creator's opinions

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:28.919
<v Speaker 1>changed towards their own work once it's sort of out

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of their hands. And the fact that like Mary Sunshine

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>was I didn't even realize this until I was doing

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>this research segment, but that Mary Sunshine was like this

0:52:39.719 --> 0:52:43.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of amalgamation of reporters that Marie and Dallas Watkins

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>thought were too easy on and kind of you know,

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:52.399
<v Speaker 1>eating up this bullshit from clearly guilty people. And also

0:52:52.640 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like a way of poking at herself, uh, for how

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 1>she covered the story at the time, and almost like

0:52:59.080 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a way of I don't know, like giving the finger

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to herself in her own work. It's very it's like

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 1>complex ship because Mary Sunshine is noticeably the only woman

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 1>reporting on these cases in the movie. So right, that's

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>very funny. Yeah, um, but to me that kind of

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 1>just it's sort of the cornerstone of what this movie

0:53:25.000 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is about, which is that And this is something that's

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 1>come up on different episodes for different movies that we've

0:53:32.040 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>discussed in the past, but it explores the lengths that

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:41.120
<v Speaker 1>women sometimes have to go to in order to survive,

0:53:41.320 --> 0:53:47.360
<v Speaker 1>which in some cases means like flaunting their sexuality, capitalizing

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>on their quote feminine wiles, but also kind of simultaneously

0:53:55.280 --> 0:54:00.800
<v Speaker 1>demonstrating that they are exactly what society expects of a woman,

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 1>especially at this time where oh my gosh, yes, I

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:08.360
<v Speaker 1>was seduced by you know, these sinister things like jazz

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and booze and like putting on like that veneer of

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 1>weakness that wasn't actually there. Yeah, and then but but

0:54:15.640 --> 0:54:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but what I've always wanted was a stable home where

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I can darn my husband's socks and iron his shirts

0:54:23.280 --> 0:54:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and and have a baby and take care of the family.

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And like these are all things that are like very

0:54:29.840 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously fabricated because that's what the public will eat up

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:40.839
<v Speaker 1>because of society's expectations of women. But I guess I'm

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:44.240
<v Speaker 1>just like, there is commentary on that in the movie.

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't I don't, well, I don't even

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:50.640
<v Speaker 1>know really how I feel about it, because I'm like,

0:54:50.920 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>but then, but these women were murderers, so right, like

0:54:55.719 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not so it's like that kind of hard because

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:02.319
<v Speaker 1>there are there are other examples of this type of thing,

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:06.840
<v Speaker 1>where like women have to kind of exploit societal expectations

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 1>or kind of exploit their own sexuality to survive because

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they have no other choice. But they are otherwise, you know,

0:55:15.840 --> 0:55:21.560
<v Speaker 1>morally upstanding people and not murderers kind of thing. But

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, well, these people are also they're doing that,

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>but then they're also murderers, so they're a little harder

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to sympathize with. But again I'm still rooting for them.

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's complicated. I have complicated feelings about it. It's

0:55:32.640 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what And I'm like, here I am in my

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:40.320
<v Speaker 1>little Chicago two thousand two cape, but like, yeah, and

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like what saves it and and the fact

0:55:43.840 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that the source material was written by a woman tract

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:50.960
<v Speaker 1>for me for kind of this reason where what saves

0:55:51.040 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this for me is that it's based on something that

0:55:53.960 --> 0:55:57.800
<v Speaker 1>truly happened, and so it's not it's not really I

0:55:57.840 --> 0:56:00.800
<v Speaker 1>mean it is, it's not really a more reality tail

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:03.480
<v Speaker 1>because it is kind of just like satire on something

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that was happening at this time. And everyone in this

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is terrible, Like there's no one of any gender in

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this movie, except for some people would argue Amos and

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the woman what is her name in Katerina who is

0:56:19.200 --> 0:56:22.640
<v Speaker 1>truly profoundly innocent, Like those are the only characters that

0:56:22.840 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you can you know freely. And I think Katerina is

0:56:27.239 --> 0:56:30.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like she's the character you can freely empathize

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:33.240
<v Speaker 1>with because she didn't do anything and she's being eaten

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:36.279
<v Speaker 1>up for because of this language barrier, because she's not

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:38.279
<v Speaker 1>really able to defend herself, and because she doesn't have

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 1>any money, and so it's like that is like the

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:46.880
<v Speaker 1>purity character, but everyone else fucking sucks, and it's like

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:49.439
<v Speaker 1>doing what they need to do to get from point

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:53.280
<v Speaker 1>A to point B, and it's not like commendable behavior

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:54.719
<v Speaker 1>at all. And I don't think that the movie is

0:56:54.800 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>like endorsing the behavior either, Like I I do appreciate

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that the movie, I don't like, you can't help but

0:57:02.400 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>root for Roxy and Velment at different points even though

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you're like, they definitely did it, but the way that

0:57:09.160 --> 0:57:11.919
<v Speaker 1>they have to navigate get it, because it's like, first

0:57:11.960 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of all, you need to consider why did they do

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it and how you know, completely inhospitable. And I don't

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 1>even think that this is something that Maureen Dallas Watkins

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 1>would even agree with because she seems to feel bad

0:57:25.160 --> 0:57:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that she kind of like built up their personas and

0:57:27.960 --> 0:57:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the way that she did, and clearly wasn't happy that

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:34.920
<v Speaker 1>they got away with murder. But but it's like contextually,

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like, Okay, why would women kill at this time?

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>And whatever? There's a bajillion documentaries and podcasts about that

0:57:43.520 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 1>exact subject. But both Roxy and Velma's and and I mean,

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole cell blocked Tango number, with the exception of

0:57:52.320 --> 0:57:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the one person who is innocent, is all about like

0:57:55.680 --> 0:57:59.680
<v Speaker 1>women trying to like live their life the way they

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:04.440
<v Speaker 1>want to, being thwarted or deceived or lied to by

0:58:04.560 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 1>men who feel entitled to their bodies or their time

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:11.280
<v Speaker 1>or their marriage or whatever it is, and then killing them.

0:58:11.360 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Like so, I feel like the context is very clear

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of like it's not endorsing murder, but it is telling you, like,

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a period of time where I mean, it's like,

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what options does Roxy have if if her dream is

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a famous cabaret singer but she's got no money,

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:33.120
<v Speaker 1>just got to vote a couple of years ago, and

0:58:34.040 --> 0:58:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like, what are her options? I don't know?

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And the same goes for really, I mean every woman

0:58:41.160 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in the in the story and I in what I

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 1>what I really wish is that because in Cell Block Tango,

0:58:47.080 --> 0:58:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think historically in the play as well, there

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are black women and women of color included in the cast,

0:58:54.280 --> 0:58:56.720
<v Speaker 1>but you don't get to spend a lot of time

0:58:56.760 --> 0:59:00.720
<v Speaker 1>with them, and you don't get to examine how there

0:59:00.960 --> 0:59:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is I think that there is pretty solid commentary in

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:08.880
<v Speaker 1>this story of white women weaponizing how white women were

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:12.080
<v Speaker 1>viewed at this time. They're weaponizing white fragility by the

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:15.000
<v Speaker 1>bursting into tears and just the things that you would

0:59:15.040 --> 0:59:19.680
<v Speaker 1>commonly associate with, you know, traditionally attractive white girls at

0:59:19.680 --> 0:59:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this time. But you don't really get to see the

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>other side of that and how, you know, how would

0:59:25.040 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a black woman put on murderous row in Chicago be treated?

0:59:30.200 --> 0:59:34.240
<v Speaker 1>You would imagine quite differently. And I feel like there's there.

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:37.600
<v Speaker 1>It sucks because there's I think that there's room for

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:41.040
<v Speaker 1>more of those stories, especially you have. Do you remember

0:59:41.280 --> 0:59:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the pop star Maya, She's in this movie. I remember

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Maya Maya. We were all there. I hope she's well,

0:59:50.200 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what she's enough to but but

0:59:52.600 --> 0:59:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's I don't know what my original point was.

0:59:55.480 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I think that you are given the context

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for why they're murdering without saying, hey, go out there

1:00:03.160 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and murder someone, which is a difficult line to toe,

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like the movie does it pretty well.

1:00:07.680 --> 1:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Sure well, that's my main criticism of the movie, where

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>there is this focus on these attractive white women because

1:00:18.200 --> 1:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that was the focus of what the press and the

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>public and what they were obsessed with at the time

1:00:25.200 --> 1:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and still now like and still now yeah, I mean,

1:00:27.960 --> 1:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the president has long been set for this. I would

1:00:32.520 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>have liked to have seen and maybe were this to

1:00:36.160 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be adapted again today, we would get more focus on

1:00:41.960 --> 1:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the women of color who were on murderous row, who

1:00:46.400 --> 1:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>again we see in the movie, but it's not explored

1:00:49.600 --> 1:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's not explored at all. Okay, So there's

1:00:52.920 --> 1:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>there's one woman who her story is that she stabbed

1:00:56.760 --> 1:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>her jealous husband ten times because in like a bit

1:01:00.120 --> 1:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of jealous rage, he was like, you're screwing the milkman.

1:01:03.320 --> 1:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>He ran into her knife. He ran into her knife

1:01:06.400 --> 1:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>ten times. That character is played by Deirdre Goodwin Um.

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the character who is played by Maya,

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>who had murdered a lover because he cheated on her.

1:01:18.640 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Even within that song, those little snippets of their story

1:01:24.320 --> 1:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>take up less screen time than yes, the white women's

1:01:28.880 --> 1:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>um so we get less about them. So I was like, Okay,

1:01:33.720 --> 1:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>who are these women? Is there? Are they based on

1:01:37.080 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>real women who were on Murderous Row during this time.

1:01:42.160 --> 1:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I tried as hard as I could to find some

1:01:45.200 --> 1:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>information about that, but every article I found, which was

1:01:49.240 --> 1:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot a lot has been written about this,

1:01:52.040 --> 1:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>those articles, even ones that are written you know, within

1:01:55.160 --> 1:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the past few years, still only focus on Beulah and Belva, Right,

1:02:00.640 --> 1:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So I like couldn't find any information about who were

1:02:04.560 --> 1:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the other women on Murderous Row? Were there women of

1:02:07.600 --> 1:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>color present, what were their stories, what were their names,

1:02:10.880 --> 1:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>what were their crimes and situations? So I was just

1:02:14.560 --> 1:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>disappointed that there is just not a lot of information

1:02:19.560 --> 1:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>on that out there, probably because good records were not

1:02:23.880 --> 1:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>kept at the time about it, or if they were kept,

1:02:26.960 --> 1:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they weren't widely reported on in the same way that

1:02:29.560 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>these stories with Yeah, I totally agree, and I think

1:02:31.760 --> 1:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that that also connects back to what we were talking

1:02:33.400 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, where Mama Morton is this incredibly dynamic, awesome character,

1:02:39.560 --> 1:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know anything about her back story, which

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is like such a frustrating and persistent trope surrounding black

1:02:48.120 --> 1:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>characters in a supporting cast, where it's like, why do

1:02:51.480 --> 1:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>we never see their back stories? And it's because these

1:02:55.080 --> 1:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>majority white writers and directors and creators, And I mean,

1:02:58.240 --> 1:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this story from its or and all the way down

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is controlled by white people. They're not caring enough, you know.

1:03:05.480 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And and so I totally agree with you, and I

1:03:08.880 --> 1:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>think that it's doubly shitty and a big missed opportunity.

1:03:14.120 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>First because clearly there should be people of color who

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>are involved behind the camera with projects like these, and

1:03:21.360 --> 1:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly we're not to any significant degree for this movie.

1:03:25.720 --> 1:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>But also because with Velmat and Roxy, you see like

1:03:30.440 --> 1:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a master class in weaponizing white fragility, which would have

1:03:35.440 --> 1:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>made it all the more, you know, impactful to the

1:03:38.760 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>story too, to really like call that out for what

1:03:42.400 --> 1:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it is, because I feel like we can watch this

1:03:45.640 --> 1:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>now and be like, oh, that is like a classic

1:03:48.480 --> 1:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>white fragility thing for white women specifically to do in

1:03:52.800 --> 1:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>these situations, but it's more characterised. I think at the

1:03:56.520 --> 1:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>time I was more characterized. Is this is something women do,

1:04:00.160 --> 1:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and not specifically white women who are traditionally attractive. So yeah,

1:04:06.560 --> 1:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's it's shitty because the talent is

1:04:10.080 --> 1:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously there and the story has room for it. And

1:04:14.680 --> 1:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, all you need is a fucking halfway decent

1:04:17.680 --> 1:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>archival researcher, and these stories exist. So where are they?

1:04:23.040 --> 1:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, where are they? There were even so I

1:04:26.600 --> 1:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>not to brag or anything. Was a guest on a

1:04:28.960 --> 1:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast entitled Women Who Kill, hosted by a friend of

1:04:33.160 --> 1:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the cast, Kai Choice. My episode was on a serial

1:04:40.160 --> 1:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>killer named Tilly Climax, a k Mrs blue Beard, who

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>was living in Chicago in the nine twenties. Um, I

1:04:50.320 --> 1:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think her crimes were committed like two years before Beulah

1:04:55.280 --> 1:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and Belva were murdering their people. Yeah, she was ahead

1:04:59.160 --> 1:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of the curve. She came from a poor Polish immigrant background.

1:05:06.760 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>She was not considered attractive, which the papers commented on

1:05:11.840 --> 1:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>when they were telling her story. Like, so basically anyone

1:05:16.960 --> 1:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>who wasn't like a middle class or upper middle class,

1:05:21.440 --> 1:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>conventionally attractive white woman was, like I guess, demonized in

1:05:26.960 --> 1:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the way you would expect a murderer to be demonized.

1:05:30.600 --> 1:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>By the press. But because these two women were again

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>considered attractive and came from backgrounds that you know, allowed

1:05:43.600 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>them some privilege, they just exploited that and left everyone

1:05:50.160 --> 1:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>else in the dust. Basically, there's a first of all,

1:05:54.720 --> 1:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that story is wild. I'm gonna listen to that. That

1:05:57.920 --> 1:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and and I love Kaispot. Yes, it's really good. It's

1:06:01.240 --> 1:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite uh walking pods. Um, I have

1:06:05.400 --> 1:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of a reverse story to that that. I wasn't

1:06:11.040 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>able to super confirm this, but it does seem like

1:06:14.560 --> 1:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the sorry her name is Katerina in the movie The Hungary,

1:06:18.960 --> 1:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the young Hungarian woman was hung, So it seems like

1:06:22.920 --> 1:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that story um was at least pulled in part with

1:06:26.240 --> 1:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a very different ending from a woman named Sabella Nitti,

1:06:30.520 --> 1:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>who was an Italian immigrant who didn't speak a lot

1:06:34.160 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of English and much like you were just saying, she

1:06:37.040 --> 1:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>was not considered traditionally attractive. This was also and I'm like,

1:06:41.000 --> 1:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, deep in the hole on in Kathy

1:06:44.320 --> 1:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast research, so whatever. At this time, you know, recent immigrants,

1:06:51.640 --> 1:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>even if they were white, were often considered unattractive in

1:06:54.440 --> 1:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenties and would be kind of demonized for

1:06:56.760 --> 1:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>not having literally like wasp feet er. Anything that wasn't

1:07:01.240 --> 1:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>wasp was not attractive. So Sibella Ninti was an Italian

1:07:06.800 --> 1:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>emigrant who was accused of the murder of her missing

1:07:11.880 --> 1:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>husband and she it doesn't seem like she did it.

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>There was no evidence, she had no motive, there was

1:07:17.760 --> 1:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>no proof. But it was the kind of case where

1:07:21.240 --> 1:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like these prosecutors need to win, so we're going

1:07:24.640 --> 1:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to and she she got sentenced to death. She doesn't

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>end up getting executed though, because she gets a lawyer

1:07:34.040 --> 1:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of comes to her rescue and saves her by

1:07:37.600 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>giving her a makeover because she was characterized in the process. Look,

1:07:42.200 --> 1:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, she's not attractive, she she doesn't speak English.

1:07:45.720 --> 1:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>You have all this all this stuff that is just

1:07:47.800 --> 1:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like aggressively mothering her in order to convict her of

1:07:51.600 --> 1:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a crime she didn't commit. And she's saved by a

1:07:55.920 --> 1:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>makeover and being and so that, I mean it feels

1:08:00.920 --> 1:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>super duper Billy Flynn of just like bat your eyes

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at the jury. They're not smart enough to you know,

1:08:06.320 --> 1:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>if if you look the right way and you act

1:08:08.120 --> 1:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the right way, you can manipulate their behavior, which is

1:08:12.640 --> 1:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know, I mean like like we've been

1:08:14.320 --> 1:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about. That's a really complicated topic because it's not

1:08:17.360 --> 1:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>like people should be able to get away with murder necessarily, right, Um,

1:08:23.840 --> 1:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I think unless there's an abuser involved, and then I

1:08:25.920 --> 1:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>don't really care. But um, but but but but the

1:08:30.160 --> 1:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's there are so many real life examples

1:08:33.240 --> 1:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>from that era of that working, and so it's like, well,

1:08:36.439 --> 1:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>how toxic does a culture have to be to literally

1:08:40.960 --> 1:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to get away with murder pretty reliably and

1:08:43.479 --> 1:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>consistently as long as you look the part like and that,

1:08:48.760 --> 1:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, that is something that I think this, um,

1:08:51.600 --> 1:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>this story does pretty well, although I do agree that

1:08:55.800 --> 1:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not it doesn't go far enough in terms of

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>like showing different women's stories at all. Um. I didn't

1:09:03.200 --> 1:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>want to say really quickly. This is unfortunately the second

1:09:06.000 --> 1:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>time this year we have to talk about this. But

1:09:08.960 --> 1:09:14.599
<v Speaker 1>speaking of looking the part, this is yet another movie

1:09:15.200 --> 1:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that Renee Zellweger does a fabulous job in where so

1:09:20.400 --> 1:09:23.519
<v Speaker 1>much of the coverage that she got around the time

1:09:23.560 --> 1:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of this movie was hyper focused on her body. We

1:09:28.040 --> 1:09:31.839
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this in our Bridget Jones episode earlier

1:09:32.000 --> 1:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>this year for the opposite reason, where Renee Zellweger. I

1:09:35.600 --> 1:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like I don't. I mean, to some degree, it

1:09:38.760 --> 1:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>just seems like unlucky timing on her part. But she

1:09:41.880 --> 1:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>has just been so aggressively scrutinized for every part of

1:09:46.000 --> 1:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>her body. It feels like at some point where during

1:09:48.600 --> 1:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands, it was very much a focus

1:09:50.640 --> 1:09:55.519
<v Speaker 1>on her weight, because she had a normal body when

1:09:55.600 --> 1:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>she played Bridget Jones, but everyone called her fat. She

1:09:59.160 --> 1:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>lost weight to play Roxy Heart and everyone said she

1:10:02.360 --> 1:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>looked sick, and no matter what she said herself about

1:10:08.840 --> 1:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>how she felt about her body and how she didn't

1:10:10.920 --> 1:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>like having her body commented on, like, no one listened,

1:10:14.120 --> 1:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And so I wanted to just share there there is

1:10:17.360 --> 1:10:21.519
<v Speaker 1>a whole a very well sourced Vulture article that came

1:10:21.560 --> 1:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>out a couple of years called a history of people

1:10:24.960 --> 1:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>commenting on Rene's Alwiger's face, because that was what it

1:10:28.080 --> 1:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>became later, people aggressively scrutinizing her plastic surgery, which is

1:10:32.040 --> 1:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>just let her list the woman has two oscars? Can

1:10:35.400 --> 1:10:42.719
<v Speaker 1>you chill out? Like anyways? Um, I wanted to share

1:10:43.120 --> 1:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>this quote from her. This is from around two thousand

1:10:45.479 --> 1:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and one, when she was playing Bridget Jones. She said

1:10:50.560 --> 1:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>quote when the film was coming out, the question I

1:10:52.479 --> 1:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>was asked the most was regarding my weight. I was

1:10:54.880 --> 1:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>followed around Heathrow Airport by a guy who wanted to

1:10:57.720 --> 1:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>take pictures of my backside. I don't understand the obsession.

1:11:01.280 --> 1:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And then on the flip side, because Bridget Jones came

1:11:03.840 --> 1:11:05.479
<v Speaker 1>out in two thousand one, Chicago came out in two

1:11:05.479 --> 1:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand two, and Rene's aller. I mean, she's very thin

1:11:09.200 --> 1:11:12.479
<v Speaker 1>in this movie, and and people were like, in the

1:11:12.640 --> 1:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>reviews for this movie, people were saying, you know, she's

1:11:15.360 --> 1:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>shockingly gaunt, and she's setting a dangerous precedent and all

1:11:19.720 --> 1:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, and no one ever asked her how she

1:11:23.840 --> 1:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>felt about it. It was just like baseless comments and whatever.

1:11:28.320 --> 1:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And so she, you know, disputed the claims that she

1:11:31.720 --> 1:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>was unhealthily thin at the time. And it's just, I

1:11:35.360 --> 1:11:39.519
<v Speaker 1>don't know, It's just another example of like, she gave

1:11:39.520 --> 1:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>an incredible performance, Like what is your like, shut the

1:11:42.720 --> 1:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>funk up, man, truly, So I just wanted to uh

1:11:47.439 --> 1:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>say that again, just leave Renee alone. She does a

1:11:51.080 --> 1:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>good job, she seems like a good person, she's very talented,

1:11:54.439 --> 1:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>she's got two oscars. Just let her. Just let her chill.

1:11:58.120 --> 1:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>She has like a I heard I learned this on

1:12:00.360 --> 1:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>who Weekly as well. She has a Normi boyfriend right

1:12:03.439 --> 1:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>now and they're just hanging out on balconies together like

1:12:06.479 --> 1:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>good for Renee them love it. It's is this irony

1:12:12.360 --> 1:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>or I'm not sure how to classify this, but like

1:12:15.920 --> 1:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the movie Chicago being about how women's appearance is so

1:12:22.160 --> 1:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>heavily commented on and publicized and like the topic of

1:12:27.800 --> 1:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so much press. Again that's one of the main components

1:12:32.280 --> 1:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>of this movie. And then for a bunch of people

1:12:34.600 --> 1:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>to turn around and then do that very thing to

1:12:38.800 --> 1:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the actor's body, right like do you not do you?

1:12:42.479 --> 1:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you hear yourself? It's I'm like, maybe Marie and

1:12:46.920 --> 1:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Watkins was right, maybe as She's like, people clearly

1:12:50.200 --> 1:12:53.599
<v Speaker 1>aren't getting what I'm trying to say here because it's

1:12:53.640 --> 1:12:56.639
<v Speaker 1>like the same breath. No one's learned a damn thing

1:12:56.760 --> 1:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in eighty years. Yeah, yeah, It's like and unfortunately watching

1:12:59.400 --> 1:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean these murder cases or nearly a hundred years

1:13:02.120 --> 1:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>old at this point, and we see this same dynamic

1:13:06.400 --> 1:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>exists between the press and the public and the spectacle

1:13:09.479 --> 1:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's still alive and well, and like with the

1:13:13.400 --> 1:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>exception of like the communication channels basically unaltered, which is

1:13:18.880 --> 1:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>so depressing, and I'm like, God of all its it

1:13:22.479 --> 1:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>sucks that this is a timeless story, but it like

1:13:25.040 --> 1:13:27.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of is. Yeah, I wanted to shut out when,

1:13:27.600 --> 1:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean this shout out is not the correct thing here,

1:13:30.640 --> 1:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but just when when last sort of point on how

1:13:35.600 --> 1:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>whiteness and traditional attractiveness is clearly weaponized in this story.

1:13:42.200 --> 1:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>The phrase that came to mind and I had to

1:13:44.200 --> 1:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of go back in my head and be like,

1:13:45.840 --> 1:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>where did I hear this? Where did this come from?

1:13:48.320 --> 1:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Was the two pretty for prison? Have you heard that

1:13:51.720 --> 1:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>phrase before? I don't think I have. It's a phrase

1:13:55.720 --> 1:13:58.519
<v Speaker 1>that I couldn't remember when I when I first heard it,

1:13:58.680 --> 1:14:02.519
<v Speaker 1>and I sort of basically it ties into I think

1:14:02.560 --> 1:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you see it very present in Roxy's behavior, where she's like,

1:14:05.479 --> 1:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't sentence me to death. I can't be in prison.

1:14:08.000 --> 1:14:11.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm too pretty for prison. And it's it's this very

1:14:12.520 --> 1:14:15.479
<v Speaker 1>given that Roxy is a murderer. I'm not pro prison

1:14:15.560 --> 1:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>at all, but it's given that she's a murderer. You know,

1:14:18.080 --> 1:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>she's trying to get away with it on the basis

1:14:20.360 --> 1:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of being traditionally attractive, white woman. Right, And so the

1:14:25.360 --> 1:14:29.479
<v Speaker 1>too pretty for prison phrase comes from two thousand and five.

1:14:30.200 --> 1:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>It's based on a case that is absolutely horrific and

1:14:32.600 --> 1:14:35.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to rehash it here, but it essentially

1:14:35.680 --> 1:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>comes down to a female teacher who sexually abused a student,

1:14:41.200 --> 1:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and while on trial, that was the phrase that was

1:14:46.680 --> 1:14:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it was evoked in the courtroom,

1:14:49.680 --> 1:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>but that was the phrase that was connected to this case.

1:14:52.800 --> 1:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>But all that to say, like Chicago is based on

1:14:55.160 --> 1:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>cases from this phrase too pretty for prison is it

1:14:59.360 --> 1:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>was a ascribed to similar behavior that was happening eighty

1:15:03.080 --> 1:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>years later, like it's it's depressing, that's some real Karen ship, Yes, Karen.

1:15:11.479 --> 1:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And then something you know, it's white privilege. It's hot privilege.

1:15:17.600 --> 1:15:20.439
<v Speaker 1>What's the phrase for that? You know what? I think? Yeah,

1:15:20.520 --> 1:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about hot privilege enough. I think as

1:15:24.000 --> 1:15:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a as a culture it is discussed. I don't know

1:15:26.479 --> 1:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that we've we've discussed it on the show in depth,

1:15:30.520 --> 1:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>but it definitely does seem like it's at play in

1:15:34.920 --> 1:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>this story. Yeah, it is weird because, like, well, it

1:15:38.920 --> 1:15:41.479
<v Speaker 1>also kind of speaks to the one of the double

1:15:41.720 --> 1:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>standards that are voisted on women, where You're expected to

1:15:46.880 --> 1:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>be extremely attractive and really sexy, but not too sexy

1:15:52.040 --> 1:15:54.679
<v Speaker 1>because you don't want anyone to think you're a slut.

1:15:55.920 --> 1:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Like the exact line that they're towing here is like right,

1:16:00.360 --> 1:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's like you like, you have you have to like,

1:16:02.800 --> 1:16:06.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, look a certain way and adhere to every

1:16:06.600 --> 1:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Western standard of beauty. But you also have to be

1:16:11.160 --> 1:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a loyal and devoted wife, and you have to be

1:16:14.840 --> 1:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>gregnant with a baby and be ready to make a

1:16:19.360 --> 1:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>home for your husband and for your children, and to

1:16:23.479 --> 1:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>iron his shirts and to do all that stuff. And that,

1:16:28.120 --> 1:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to me is like the most effective thing that this

1:16:31.240 --> 1:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>movie accomplishes in terms of just like pointing that out,

1:16:35.000 --> 1:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>making that commentary. Similarly like the idea of oh, these

1:16:40.600 --> 1:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>these delicate women were seduced by these evil forces of

1:16:47.080 --> 1:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of such evil things as a genre of music and alcohol,

1:16:53.840 --> 1:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>which yeah, just again the these such rigid gender roles

1:16:59.040 --> 1:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and and standard that are placed on women in terms

1:17:01.760 --> 1:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of like you can never misbehave, you can never drink

1:17:06.160 --> 1:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>an alcohol. You have to also be really pretty and attractive,

1:17:12.160 --> 1:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but you only can have eyes for your husband, and

1:17:16.160 --> 1:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>just like all of these standards, it's like the classic

1:17:20.040 --> 1:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it's an impossible bar to clear. So many of their

1:17:22.479 --> 1:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>expectations are at odds with each other because it's to

1:17:25.920 --> 1:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be demure, but you also have to be wildly sexy,

1:17:28.360 --> 1:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and depending on the situation, you can be punished for

1:17:31.080 --> 1:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>being either of those things. And right and how yeah

1:17:34.439 --> 1:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>like and how hot I mean whatever, like being traditionally attractive. Like.

1:17:39.640 --> 1:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>There's sides to that coin as well, where it's it's

1:17:43.240 --> 1:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that I mean. Obviously, in some of the

1:17:45.840 --> 1:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>cases we just described, women who are considered to not

1:17:48.920 --> 1:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>be attractive, apparently you can just kill them, uh for

1:17:54.120 --> 1:17:58.599
<v Speaker 1>not doing murders. Um, that's an oversimplification. But but then

1:17:58.640 --> 1:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, it's you know, women who do

1:18:01.320 --> 1:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of fall into that traditionally attractive whatever are often

1:18:05.920 --> 1:18:11.479
<v Speaker 1>hyper sexualized against their will and harassed, and so it's just, um,

1:18:12.280 --> 1:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible. There's just so many ways to lose in

1:18:15.439 --> 1:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this world. Uh, it's interesting. I just learned something that

1:18:20.760 --> 1:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe smile please sure, sorry please still yelling? Um, well,

1:18:25.080 --> 1:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>he's wishing you happy birthday. He's like, I love you, mama. Anyways.

1:18:30.960 --> 1:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Jerry or Bach played Billy Flynn in the original Broadway

1:18:35.160 --> 1:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>production How Fun Is That? In the goodness and Cheetah

1:18:43.360 --> 1:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Rivera played Velma Kelly like icons icons. So I was

1:18:49.360 --> 1:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>just happy to learn that Jerry Orbach and Richard Gear

1:18:53.320 --> 1:18:57.640
<v Speaker 1>played the same part. I like that. I'd like that too. Um,

1:18:58.080 --> 1:19:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Richard Gear kills it as Billy Flynn. He really is amazing,

1:19:03.600 --> 1:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's really him tap dancing. That's really him tap dance. Yes,

1:19:07.479 --> 1:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I watched all the featurettes and he said it was

1:19:10.280 --> 1:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of funny because it was like he had sung.

1:19:12.640 --> 1:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>He he like had sung before. Um, and so, and

1:19:16.400 --> 1:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that he and John c Riley were I

1:19:19.120 --> 1:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>think the main members of the cast that didn't have

1:19:21.960 --> 1:19:26.519
<v Speaker 1>dance training that needed to dance, and they both tried

1:19:26.760 --> 1:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>so hard, and they both were talking about how they're

1:19:29.800 --> 1:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>like it's intimidating being in the same room with Rob

1:19:32.040 --> 1:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Marshall he was in Cats and I can't even tap

1:19:34.600 --> 1:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and like all this stuff. And then there's videos of

1:19:37.000 --> 1:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like Rob Marshall like taking it really slow with John

1:19:40.960 --> 1:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>c Riley and like it's just such wholesome footage. Um,

1:19:47.200 --> 1:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that's so. I don't know. I just love when choreographers

1:19:49.439 --> 1:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>direct because it's like when you once you see like

1:19:52.240 --> 1:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>footage of a choreographer directing a musical movie. You're like, oh, yeah,

1:19:55.720 --> 1:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>how else would you even do that? Like what you're

1:19:58.880 --> 1:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be like, You're like, if you can't do

1:20:01.400 --> 1:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it yourself, don't tell me to do it. But Rob Marshall,

1:20:05.160 --> 1:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>like he's fucking on it. He's doing all that jazz

1:20:08.960 --> 1:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>right next to Katherine's Ada Jones, And it's exciting that

1:20:12.520 --> 1:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>there is like a whole half hour making of documentary

1:20:15.960 --> 1:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that's on YouTube as well that if you're a Chicago head,

1:20:19.360 --> 1:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd recommend it because it's just such a blast. Who

1:20:22.840 --> 1:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think Rob Marshall played in Cats when he

1:20:26.080 --> 1:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>got injured? Do you think it was like Mr Mustaphiles

1:20:30.520 --> 1:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>or rum tum Tugger? Thanks the question, which of the

1:20:36.520 --> 1:20:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Cats is doing the kind of movement? I mean, they're

1:20:39.560 --> 1:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>all kind of doing wild movements, but like, who is

1:20:42.840 --> 1:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>most likely to herniate a disc? I feel like that's

1:20:45.080 --> 1:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>some rum tum Tugger ship to be herniating a whole disk.

1:20:48.560 --> 1:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Who's your favorite one again? With the pants and the suspender?

1:20:51.600 --> 1:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>My god, skin Ble Shanks. I feel like it could

1:20:55.080 --> 1:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have Marshall. Skimble Shanks would have done a good Skimble Shanks.

1:20:58.479 --> 1:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I wonder it doesn't his His Wikipedia page is very

1:21:03.280 --> 1:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>vague about it. They're just like he was in Cats

1:21:05.360 --> 1:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and herniated a desk. No, we're not taking any more

1:21:08.520 --> 1:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>questions at this time. We need more information. I'm like, okay,

1:21:11.720 --> 1:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>he was a Jelical I need more info which one,

1:21:15.800 --> 1:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>which one? It matters which jelical cat was he though

1:21:19.800 --> 1:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>he could he could have been Monchu Strap. You know,

1:21:23.240 --> 1:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. There's a lot of cats that are

1:21:25.120 --> 1:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>at high risk for herniating a disk. Uh, So it

1:21:28.560 --> 1:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really it's so funny. It's like, oh, members of

1:21:30.840 --> 1:21:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the Cats, cats that could have her needed a disk.

1:21:32.680 --> 1:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>That really doesn't narrow it down at all. They're all

1:21:37.360 --> 1:21:41.519
<v Speaker 1>over the place. Um do anything else for this movie,

1:21:41.760 --> 1:21:45.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we touched on it briefly, but just the

1:21:46.120 --> 1:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>relationship between Roxy and Velma being highly antagonistic for most,

1:21:55.280 --> 1:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if not all, of the movie, because even at the

1:21:57.320 --> 1:22:00.519
<v Speaker 1>end when they are working together, we yeah, I get

1:22:00.560 --> 1:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>why they don't like each other, right, yeah, because well,

1:22:04.479 --> 1:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>so like Velma is mean to Roxy at first for

1:22:09.360 --> 1:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what appears to be a petty reason. She's well, I

1:22:12.120 --> 1:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>don't even know, it's maybe it's not even any reason.

1:22:14.560 --> 1:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>She's just mean to her because she's like the newbie there.

1:22:18.760 --> 1:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Unless I'm misreading or misremembering something, I don't think you are. No,

1:22:22.560 --> 1:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's it's I was really interested to

1:22:25.160 --> 1:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>learn that the two, like the too real life people,

1:22:28.360 --> 1:22:31.360
<v Speaker 1>seemed to get along just fine, because it seems like

1:22:31.520 --> 1:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the the logic that this story is subscribing to. And

1:22:37.120 --> 1:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm making too many excuses for it. I mean,

1:22:39.080 --> 1:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like they are just our two female leads are

1:22:41.400 --> 1:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>being put at odds the way I guess I I

1:22:44.800 --> 1:22:47.719
<v Speaker 1>had like solidified it in my head over the years

1:22:48.040 --> 1:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that maybe I need to question a little bit, But

1:22:49.720 --> 1:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>like was that I don't know the the reason that

1:22:54.400 --> 1:22:58.360
<v Speaker 1>women are often put in these antagonistic situations, and the

1:22:58.560 --> 1:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>internal logic of this story is there's only room for

1:23:01.200 --> 1:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>one woman in the headlines at a time, and so

1:23:04.160 --> 1:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like this, it almost feels like they're viewing it

1:23:07.640 --> 1:23:10.519
<v Speaker 1>as a competition, and like why would I you know,

1:23:10.560 --> 1:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like reality show logic of like I didn't

1:23:12.880 --> 1:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>come here to make friends. I came here to be

1:23:15.240 --> 1:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the most famous murderer ever or whatever. That was kind

1:23:18.960 --> 1:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of but it was like, but that's not even what

1:23:21.240 --> 1:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>happened in real life, Like that was what happened in

1:23:23.800 --> 1:23:25.439
<v Speaker 1>real life, I would sort of let it go. But

1:23:25.560 --> 1:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not so why add that in Nor is it

1:23:28.439 --> 1:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>what happens at the very beginning of their antagonistic relationship.

1:23:33.160 --> 1:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I could maybe understand if right when Roxy got there

1:23:36.960 --> 1:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and she was like already the hottest, like the talk

1:23:40.080 --> 1:23:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of the town kind of thing, right, she's not at first,

1:23:43.360 --> 1:23:47.360
<v Speaker 1>where then Velma would feel threatened and that would motivate

1:23:47.520 --> 1:23:50.599
<v Speaker 1>her being cruel to Roxy. But that's not what happens.

1:23:51.240 --> 1:23:57.559
<v Speaker 1>Roxy doesn't take Velma's spotlight until later. So it first

1:23:58.000 --> 1:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Velma is mean to Roxy for no reason, and when

1:24:01.320 --> 1:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Roxy is like mean back, that does seem more motivated,

1:24:05.200 --> 1:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>because that's sort of like a retaliation thing, like, well,

1:24:08.360 --> 1:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you were mean to me, I'm going to be mean

1:24:09.920 --> 1:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to you now. But you're right, Yeah, the beginning is

1:24:11.960 --> 1:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>not very motivated by much. Yeah, and then they continue

1:24:15.640 --> 1:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to not get along. But then it's all just it's

1:24:19.720 --> 1:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're saying in terms of because we

1:24:22.080 --> 1:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've we've talked about this to a lot

1:24:24.080 --> 1:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>where like especially when men right women being extremely antagonistic

1:24:29.600 --> 1:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and like petty to each other, they never consider the

1:24:32.240 --> 1:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>context of why that would be because if that does happen,

1:24:35.240 --> 1:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the context is usually well, women are only afforded so

1:24:39.439 --> 1:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>many spaces or our spots or there's only room for

1:24:43.160 --> 1:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>one woman. So women do feel like they have to

1:24:45.840 --> 1:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be competitive and antagonistic toward each other too, again like

1:24:50.280 --> 1:24:58.559
<v Speaker 1>just secure their survival. But that isn't what's happening it right,

1:24:59.120 --> 1:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>it does. It does become that way with because yeah,

1:25:02.720 --> 1:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>like Roxy takes Vilma's spotlight and then so they're kind

1:25:06.200 --> 1:25:09.519
<v Speaker 1>of like constantly battling for the spotlight. And then when

1:25:09.800 --> 1:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>when the Roxy starts like steal Velma's like court deceptions

1:25:16.160 --> 1:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, like the garter and the enemy, Like I

1:25:20.800 --> 1:25:22.479
<v Speaker 1>get why they have become enemies. But but that is

1:25:22.520 --> 1:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a good point that it's not super motivated, especially because

1:25:26.560 --> 1:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Velma is like who Roxy wants to be at the beginning,

1:25:30.880 --> 1:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and you do see like, yeah, I mean I think

1:25:33.280 --> 1:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the Velma is like being I don't know, I mean

1:25:36.479 --> 1:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's like there's multiple ways to look at

1:25:38.400 --> 1:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>it where it's like, yeah, Velma is kind of is

1:25:41.560 --> 1:25:44.759
<v Speaker 1>like pretty arrogant at the beginning of the story because

1:25:44.880 --> 1:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>she is the famous one at the beginning of the story,

1:25:46.880 --> 1:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and why would I talk to you, I'm the famous one,

1:25:49.600 --> 1:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>which Roxy then does the exact same thing to her

1:25:51.880 --> 1:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>later on. It doesn't feel good. That's sort of Velma's

1:25:55.479 --> 1:25:59.360
<v Speaker 1>arc of like this is very temporary, and I am

1:25:59.600 --> 1:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a fool. Well if I think that, you know, I

1:26:02.000 --> 1:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>can just you know, be a famous murderer forever. So

1:26:05.479 --> 1:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and I and I do like how it ends, because

1:26:08.280 --> 1:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in real life it's like kind of a bummer. I think,

1:26:10.160 --> 1:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>like Beulah died of like tuberculosis, tuberculosis like pretty soon

1:26:14.760 --> 1:26:17.479
<v Speaker 1>after getting like so that I'm glad that they didn't

1:26:17.520 --> 1:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>do that, but I do, like, I mean, just to

1:26:20.240 --> 1:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>tie up the story, how they end up working together

1:26:23.439 --> 1:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>and realizing that they it's like they're still terrible people, right,

1:26:27.520 --> 1:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like they're still murderers, but but that they're stronger as

1:26:31.880 --> 1:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a unit than they were separately, and that they needed

1:26:35.320 --> 1:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to just in the way. That's like the world very

1:26:38.720 --> 1:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>much wanted to forget them and move on to the

1:26:41.000 --> 1:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>next thing, and they had to find a way to

1:26:43.720 --> 1:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>remain relevant so they could continue to live the kinds

1:26:46.520 --> 1:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of lives they wanted to live. Where it was like,

1:26:49.479 --> 1:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Roxy could have gone back with Amos, Velma

1:26:53.000 --> 1:26:56.519
<v Speaker 1>could have settled down and and you know, lined up

1:26:56.560 --> 1:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with the societal expectations of the time. Neither of them

1:26:59.400 --> 1:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>want that, and so they find a way to put

1:27:02.240 --> 1:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>their differences aside and make that happen for themselves. And

1:27:05.160 --> 1:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is like interesting. It doesn't make

1:27:08.360 --> 1:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it noble and necessarily because they still fucking suck, But

1:27:12.120 --> 1:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I but I like and and then the end, I mean,

1:27:13.800 --> 1:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like a little ham fisted watching it now,

1:27:16.200 --> 1:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>but we're like, Roxy's like, this couldn't have happened without you,

1:27:20.280 --> 1:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's like, yeah, no one would give a shit

1:27:22.920 --> 1:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>about them, if, you know, if the media circus wasn't

1:27:27.240 --> 1:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the way that it is. So I don't know, Yeah,

1:27:30.880 --> 1:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>their relationship, I think that I think that the story

1:27:33.320 --> 1:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>would be kind of generally improved and would work. Could

1:27:37.479 --> 1:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you could you could say the exact same things that

1:27:39.680 --> 1:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>this story is trying to say and have them get

1:27:42.240 --> 1:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>along and so adding in that conflict even if, like

1:27:47.320 --> 1:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, like even if they I don't know, betray

1:27:50.080 --> 1:27:52.559
<v Speaker 1>each other and piss each other off later, which makes

1:27:52.600 --> 1:27:54.519
<v Speaker 1>sense in the context of the story in the in

1:27:54.560 --> 1:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the historical period, seeing them get along, I don't think

1:27:57.680 --> 1:27:59.559
<v Speaker 1>you lose anything And if in fact, it might even

1:27:59.640 --> 1:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>raise this stakes if they start as friends and then

1:28:02.320 --> 1:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like this media circus of well, only one of

1:28:04.920 --> 1:28:08.479
<v Speaker 1>you can be famous enough to not be convicted of murder,

1:28:08.840 --> 1:28:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Like that's higher stakes. It doesn't seem like Roxy has

1:28:11.680 --> 1:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>any female friends in her life, and it seems like

1:28:13.520 --> 1:28:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Velma's only friend she killed because that was her sister,

1:28:16.800 --> 1:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and so there's I was like, Okay, maybe that is

1:28:20.160 --> 1:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>actually a stronger story choice, because then you're not just

1:28:22.600 --> 1:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>losing you know, your your life, You're losing your only friend,

1:28:27.560 --> 1:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>your friend. That's basically the plot of All About Eve,

1:28:32.280 --> 1:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>where that's true. They start out on good terms and

1:28:36.720 --> 1:28:39.479
<v Speaker 1>then I don't even remember the character's names now, but

1:28:39.560 --> 1:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>one of them starts to get jealous of the other one,

1:28:42.520 --> 1:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and then the start well, one of them is definitely Eve.

1:28:45.360 --> 1:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the one that isn't Bettie Davis, right, Um, And

1:28:48.600 --> 1:28:51.479
<v Speaker 1>I just don't remember which one is Eve? Is Eve

1:28:51.720 --> 1:28:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Bettie Davis or she was the younger woman? Okay, right,

1:28:54.479 --> 1:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I'm butchering remembering. But I love that movie,

1:28:58.360 --> 1:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and yet I don't know what the characters ain't are?

1:29:00.080 --> 1:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Um story of my life? But yeah, I mean that

1:29:04.840 --> 1:29:06.439
<v Speaker 1>now that we're kind of talking that through, that would

1:29:06.439 --> 1:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>be a more interesting choice. And then it would, and

1:29:08.320 --> 1:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>then you can keep the ending as is and have

1:29:10.439 --> 1:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>them reconcile and get that friendship back by being like, oh,

1:29:14.320 --> 1:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that media circus was bullshit. Let's take this on the

1:29:17.080 --> 1:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>road and make money off of all these losers who

1:29:20.479 --> 1:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>vaguely remember that we've murdered people. Like, yeah, whatever, that

1:29:24.560 --> 1:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>rocks fine. I like that better. Yeah, this just felt

1:29:28.120 --> 1:29:31.479
<v Speaker 1>like the writer was like, it's a movie, we have

1:29:31.640 --> 1:29:34.559
<v Speaker 1>to throw more tension in it. Where could a source

1:29:34.600 --> 1:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of tension be? Oh, of course between two women, because

1:29:38.120 --> 1:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>women are petty and jealous and bitter, right, And it's

1:29:43.000 --> 1:29:47.519
<v Speaker 1>not like this story lax tension, like like there's kind

1:29:47.560 --> 1:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of no need for it. It's like there's an incredible

1:29:50.160 --> 1:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of tension between Roxy and basically everyone that she's

1:29:54.200 --> 1:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>ever met, because she's a pretty selfish and abrasive person.

1:29:59.200 --> 1:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Um that said, and I mean it's again, it's like

1:30:02.520 --> 1:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>she's such a tough character because she fucking sucks. But

1:30:05.439 --> 1:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>like you're like, okay, you know, to an extent, I

1:30:09.000 --> 1:30:11.519
<v Speaker 1>get it, and I do like like the moment where

1:30:12.160 --> 1:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Roxy is it works against her, but she's so quick

1:30:15.240 --> 1:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to call out Billy Flynn for being a Charlatan asshole,

1:30:21.200 --> 1:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and it blows up in her face. But it is

1:30:22.920 --> 1:30:25.519
<v Speaker 1>kind of cathartic to see, you know, someone who's so

1:30:25.880 --> 1:30:29.599
<v Speaker 1>clearly in it for money and cloud and doesn't actually

1:30:29.680 --> 1:30:32.599
<v Speaker 1>care about the women that he's defending, to see her

1:30:32.760 --> 1:30:35.759
<v Speaker 1>just be like, what fuck you? You know you're fired?

1:30:36.040 --> 1:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, um speaking of people who are in

1:30:39.479 --> 1:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it for the money, I thought, because I didn't super

1:30:42.439 --> 1:30:45.799
<v Speaker 1>remember this movie until going back to prep for this episode,

1:30:46.600 --> 1:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Mama Morton, she is sort of presented at first as

1:30:50.960 --> 1:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>like a big hard ass, and I thought, oh, I

1:30:53.720 --> 1:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>wonder if there's going to be a lot of antagonism

1:30:56.160 --> 1:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>between her and the prisoners, because that also would have

1:31:01.680 --> 1:31:07.879
<v Speaker 1>felt like a unexpected choice to introduce tension into the situation.

1:31:08.080 --> 1:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But I was kind of surprised that there isn't much

1:31:11.479 --> 1:31:14.519
<v Speaker 1>tension there. Like she at first she's like, oh, something

1:31:14.600 --> 1:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>bothering you? Well, I don't give a ship. Also, I

1:31:17.320 --> 1:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>love money. But then after that, like she seems pretty

1:31:22.080 --> 1:31:26.559
<v Speaker 1>willing to help the people who have money, so she's

1:31:26.720 --> 1:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like a capitalist, and we don't love to see that

1:31:29.720 --> 1:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>super capitalist feel like she I mean, I feel like

1:31:32.400 --> 1:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>she's just kind of a stand in for like, I'm

1:31:35.960 --> 1:31:39.479
<v Speaker 1>on the side of whoever is paying me. She's she's

1:31:39.520 --> 1:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>not really on the side of the prison industrial complex

1:31:43.560 --> 1:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>because she's accepting money from murderers, but she'll take a

1:31:47.760 --> 1:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>check from the prison industrial complex. Like yeah, she's just

1:31:50.800 --> 1:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>like a she she's lawless. It's interesting that they cast

1:31:55.120 --> 1:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a black woman in that role. I agree, considering the

1:31:59.640 --> 1:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>prison industrial complex disproportionate effects and abuses black people. So

1:32:06.760 --> 1:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that was confusing. Yeah, I do think that it is

1:32:12.000 --> 1:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>uh telling and bizarre. I mean, it's it's what I mean,

1:32:17.800 --> 1:32:20.439
<v Speaker 1>It's like, can I picture anyone in this movie except

1:32:20.479 --> 1:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Queen Latifa in this role? I know, like she's fucking incredible.

1:32:24.520 --> 1:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And what is interesting based on a rapid google we

1:32:30.760 --> 1:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>just paused the podcast to do that this role was

1:32:34.240 --> 1:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>generally played by white women up until Queen Latifa was

1:32:38.800 --> 1:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>cast in this role, and since then the role is

1:32:42.000 --> 1:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>generally played by black women. I believe that the same

1:32:45.200 --> 1:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>actress has been playing Mom and Morton on Broadway for

1:32:49.240 --> 1:32:52.519
<v Speaker 1>some time. Yeah, a famous black Broadway actress. I don't

1:32:52.560 --> 1:32:56.439
<v Speaker 1>know Broadway actresses. I'm sorry, um, but but all that

1:32:56.560 --> 1:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to say yeah, that, uh, that doesn't seem to be

1:33:00.120 --> 1:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in the d n A of the part. But then gradually,

1:33:04.200 --> 1:33:08.479
<v Speaker 1>because of Queen Latifa's casting and performance, became kind of

1:33:08.560 --> 1:33:11.439
<v Speaker 1>integral to the part. Yeah. As of so for the

1:33:11.560 --> 1:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>last ten years or so, Mom and Morton has been

1:33:13.800 --> 1:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>played by black actresses on Broadway. Um, yeah, not an

1:33:20.080 --> 1:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>ideal part too, right, I mean, I love Queen Latifa.

1:33:27.800 --> 1:33:32.679
<v Speaker 1>She steals every scene she's in that part where like good,

1:33:34.040 --> 1:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>she's telling Roxy, oh you're we're actually taking you to

1:33:38.920 --> 1:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the special section murderous row, and then Roxy's like, oh

1:33:43.560 --> 1:33:46.799
<v Speaker 1>is that nicer? And then it was a look to Moreton,

1:33:46.920 --> 1:33:49.639
<v Speaker 1>like looks over her shoulder to like a prison guard

1:33:49.760 --> 1:33:53.439
<v Speaker 1>or something, and it's just like this bitch basically right

1:33:54.680 --> 1:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and there. I mean, I yeah, I do as far

1:33:57.120 --> 1:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>as that character goes, and I think that your point

1:33:59.880 --> 1:34:03.479
<v Speaker 1>is extremely valid. But her like lawlessness of like she

1:34:03.720 --> 1:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>buys into the Roxy hype, but then the second it's

1:34:06.280 --> 1:34:09.599
<v Speaker 1>not working in her favor anymore, she's like the blonde

1:34:09.640 --> 1:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>wig is in the trash and you know, her allegiances

1:34:12.200 --> 1:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>with whoever can make her the most money. Yeah, so yeah, yeah,

1:34:17.600 --> 1:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>do you have anything else? I think that is this

1:34:22.520 --> 1:34:27.479
<v Speaker 1>movie does pass the Bechtel test. I'm sure of it. Yes, Oh,

1:34:27.600 --> 1:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it's super does They're often they're often talking about killing men,

1:34:32.880 --> 1:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but for us that has the test. But but even

1:34:35.200 --> 1:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>without it, I mean, it does pass plenty of times,

1:34:38.120 --> 1:34:43.280
<v Speaker 1>between Velmot and Roxy, between Roxy and Mama Morton, between

1:34:43.400 --> 1:34:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Velmot and Mama Morton, between Um. Actually there's a good question.

1:34:47.720 --> 1:34:50.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many of the prisoners are actually named.

1:34:50.880 --> 1:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that many. Yeah, if any, because I'm

1:34:55.040 --> 1:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>racking my brain and I don't know if we get

1:34:57.439 --> 1:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>names for an even not let me fact check that.

1:35:01.200 --> 1:35:03.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's possible that it exists in the state.

1:35:03.760 --> 1:35:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know in terms of adaptation, but I don't

1:35:06.520 --> 1:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>believe you learn their names in the um in the movie.

1:35:11.479 --> 1:35:13.840
<v Speaker 1>You know so. But but that said, it does pass.

1:35:13.840 --> 1:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it also passes between Mary Sunshine and Roxy.

1:35:16.600 --> 1:35:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Like there are a number of dynamic, highly motivated female

1:35:20.680 --> 1:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>characters who talk to each other about all sorts of

1:35:22.600 --> 1:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ship in this movie. But as far as our nipple

1:35:27.080 --> 1:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>scale in which we rate the movie examining it through

1:35:31.240 --> 1:35:38.240
<v Speaker 1>an intersectional feminist lens, this is another tricky one. While

1:35:38.360 --> 1:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it is commenting on and providing satire on these like

1:35:45.000 --> 1:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>double standards that are foisted upon women. It makes the

1:35:50.200 --> 1:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>same mistake of only focusing on the narratives of middle class,

1:35:57.640 --> 1:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>conventionally attractive white him in, which is also what the

1:36:02.240 --> 1:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>media was doing at the time. So I like, again,

1:36:06.040 --> 1:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the precedent was set, so I understand that that's sort

1:36:10.920 --> 1:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of why the adaptations went that way as well, But

1:36:15.320 --> 1:36:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it. I would it would be more

1:36:18.880 --> 1:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me, For example, if dynamics were explored in

1:36:22.320 --> 1:36:25.639
<v Speaker 1>terms of, yes, there are these attractive white women who

1:36:25.880 --> 1:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>are exploiting the privilege that they have to get exonerated

1:36:31.320 --> 1:36:35.439
<v Speaker 1>from their crimes that they are clearly guilty of, versus

1:36:36.320 --> 1:36:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the women of color who were right alongside them, who

1:36:40.600 --> 1:36:45.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't have those same privileges to exploit, and how what like,

1:36:45.680 --> 1:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>what are their outcomes? I'd like to know. So I

1:36:49.120 --> 1:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>think that, um, you know, in an ideal world, the

1:36:52.200 --> 1:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>movie would have explored that more. But that's also not

1:36:56.040 --> 1:37:00.559
<v Speaker 1>what people in two thousand two were really concerned about doing. Yeah,

1:37:00.720 --> 1:37:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a bummer, But if this were to ever

1:37:03.880 --> 1:37:07.800
<v Speaker 1>be adapted again, and you know, it seems like this

1:37:07.920 --> 1:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>movie gets adapted every forty years, or something. So yeah,

1:37:13.280 --> 1:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>against against the wishes of the person who wrote the play.

1:37:16.080 --> 1:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Go figure right, because it's all it was also a

1:37:18.840 --> 1:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties seven I want to say, Cecil be Silent movie. Yeah,

1:37:25.800 --> 1:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>who I wasn't able to track down. It seems like

1:37:28.960 --> 1:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of a rare I don't know, I didn't I

1:37:31.280 --> 1:37:33.439
<v Speaker 1>wasn't able to find it. Yeah, I mean, it's just

1:37:33.520 --> 1:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like a super popular story and unfortunately it's like, I mean,

1:37:36.520 --> 1:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still relevant. But if I completely agree that it's

1:37:41.280 --> 1:37:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of begging to be updated and modernized,

1:37:44.320 --> 1:37:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and the issues that it's like, you know whatever, it's

1:37:47.439 --> 1:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>extra frustrating because it's like all either the source material

1:37:51.280 --> 1:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and the characters are there, you're just not using them.

1:37:54.760 --> 1:37:57.599
<v Speaker 1>You're not exploring their right exploring them. They're just kind

1:37:57.600 --> 1:38:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of left there. We only know that a woman stabbed

1:38:02.479 --> 1:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>her husband ten times and another woman. Good for her,

1:38:06.320 --> 1:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's good for but I need more information, yeah, exactly.

1:38:11.520 --> 1:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So um, for those reasons, I'll give the movie a three.

1:38:17.680 --> 1:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It's getting some extra points because it is a movie

1:38:20.640 --> 1:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I very much enjoy. It is very watchable. The song

1:38:24.000 --> 1:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and dance numbers are spectacular, So three nipples and they

1:38:31.360 --> 1:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>go to the women whose stories have been unrepresented, revolving

1:38:37.600 --> 1:38:43.439
<v Speaker 1>around this like microcosm of lady murderers in the jazz

1:38:43.479 --> 1:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>era of Chicago. What about you, Jamie, I'm going for

1:38:49.240 --> 1:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that this movie is in this story are

1:38:54.320 --> 1:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>doing so much. I completely agree with you that, for

1:38:57.920 --> 1:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>for all this story does to examine, you know, kind

1:39:01.439 --> 1:39:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of weaponized white fragility, Um, it does not examine the

1:39:06.920 --> 1:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>issues that women of color were facing during this time

1:39:10.040 --> 1:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>specific and it's it does come down, you know, particularly

1:39:13.600 --> 1:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>because this story is commenting on the prison system to

1:39:17.120 --> 1:39:20.479
<v Speaker 1>some extent, and the prison system in the US, especially

1:39:20.640 --> 1:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>disproportionately affects black people, specifically black men. And there's and

1:39:25.160 --> 1:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's not like we know anything about A. Diggs's character,

1:39:27.520 --> 1:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and he's the only black man who appears in the

1:39:29.320 --> 1:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>whole movie. So I do think that there's absolutely issues

1:39:34.360 --> 1:39:37.360
<v Speaker 1>there that if this were to be updated again, and

1:39:38.040 --> 1:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>as much as I don't really care for like the

1:39:40.120 --> 1:39:42.720
<v Speaker 1>rebooty culture, I would be I would be down for

1:39:42.800 --> 1:39:46.720
<v Speaker 1>another and updated version of Chicago because there is so

1:39:46.880 --> 1:39:51.080
<v Speaker 1>much there, and um, I think that particularly if people

1:39:51.120 --> 1:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of color were included in in the production behind the camera,

1:39:55.439 --> 1:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there's so much to work with, and there could be

1:39:57.080 --> 1:40:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot more examined, so that, I mean, and that

1:40:00.840 --> 1:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Weinstein involvement I think are the main things

1:40:04.160 --> 1:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that are going against this movie for me. But I

1:40:07.760 --> 1:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>just think that this movie is doing so much cool

1:40:10.960 --> 1:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff in terms of showing us some truly like despicable

1:40:16.479 --> 1:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>across the board female protagonists that you still deeply understand

1:40:21.240 --> 1:40:24.559
<v Speaker 1>why they're doing what they're doing. You're given the proper

1:40:24.720 --> 1:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>historical context for who they are and what they're doing.

1:40:29.080 --> 1:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And and it's I mean, I I don't think that

1:40:32.680 --> 1:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of movies that are like fine to watch,

1:40:36.560 --> 1:40:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that are massively successful, that examine topics like this effectively,

1:40:42.360 --> 1:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that examine topics like you know, why were these women

1:40:46.000 --> 1:40:48.880
<v Speaker 1>driven to commit murder? And I think that it's pretty

1:40:48.960 --> 1:40:52.800
<v Speaker 1>clear what drives them. It's the you know, oppressive expectations

1:40:52.960 --> 1:40:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of the men that run the world around them. I

1:40:56.760 --> 1:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>can't really think of the movie that better kind of

1:41:00.479 --> 1:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>indicts this inflammatory American media culture that has just gotten worse,

1:41:06.240 --> 1:41:08.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, a hundred years out from this in a

1:41:08.640 --> 1:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>really engaging, funny, smart way. And I and I like

1:41:13.880 --> 1:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that that Velma and Roxy end up uh it's kind

1:41:17.880 --> 1:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of it's like a depressing but positive ending where they

1:41:21.400 --> 1:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>are able to they have to kill and lie and

1:41:25.920 --> 1:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>do a hole this fucked up ship to do it,

1:41:27.960 --> 1:41:30.639
<v Speaker 1>but they are able to finally kind of live their

1:41:30.840 --> 1:41:33.720
<v Speaker 1>lives the way they wanted to and in a way

1:41:33.800 --> 1:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that they should have just been able to. But in

1:41:36.040 --> 1:41:38.439
<v Speaker 1>order to do it, all this fucked up stuff happened,

1:41:38.920 --> 1:41:42.519
<v Speaker 1>had to happen. Yeah, I mean, it truly is for me,

1:41:42.720 --> 1:41:46.479
<v Speaker 1>mainly that women of color are not given the narrative

1:41:47.000 --> 1:41:49.519
<v Speaker 1>importance that they deserve in this story. But I think

1:41:49.560 --> 1:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that you see also Lucy Lou like she's in the

1:41:52.040 --> 1:41:56.720
<v Speaker 1>movie three minutes basically a cameo. But I do think

1:41:56.800 --> 1:41:59.439
<v Speaker 1>that there are a lot of different kinds of women

1:41:59.760 --> 1:42:02.879
<v Speaker 1>that are highly motivated, that are making their own choices,

1:42:03.439 --> 1:42:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that are fucking up, that are succeeding, that very thoroughly

1:42:07.280 --> 1:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>understand the tools of oppression being used against them and

1:42:11.080 --> 1:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>spinning them in their advantage to get away with some

1:42:13.479 --> 1:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>funked up stuff. And you don't see that kind of

1:42:15.760 --> 1:42:19.920
<v Speaker 1>story with women very often, I feel like, especially in

1:42:20.240 --> 1:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like historical movies, and so I just I think this

1:42:24.080 --> 1:42:27.519
<v Speaker 1>movie is doing so much that in this musical in general.

1:42:27.600 --> 1:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I like that it's adapted by um, that the source

1:42:31.200 --> 1:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>material is from a woman, and that the story is

1:42:33.720 --> 1:42:36.439
<v Speaker 1>still generally honored. I like that there's a lot of

1:42:36.479 --> 1:42:39.360
<v Speaker 1>queer representation in the production of this movie, although it

1:42:39.520 --> 1:42:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is very white. Um. I just I don't know. I

1:42:43.360 --> 1:42:46.160
<v Speaker 1>think that this movie is doing a lot that even

1:42:46.479 --> 1:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>current movies aren't able to do. And I just like

1:42:49.400 --> 1:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoy when a movie is able to say a lot

1:42:52.439 --> 1:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>without feeling like you're getting bashed over the head with

1:42:56.200 --> 1:42:58.479
<v Speaker 1>a frying pan. And I think that this movie is

1:42:58.560 --> 1:43:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a good example of that. Uma and any movie that

1:43:04.120 --> 1:43:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is fun and funny and musical and draws the conclusion

1:43:08.439 --> 1:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that humanity is a lost cause is my favorite kind

1:43:13.160 --> 1:43:16.519
<v Speaker 1>of movies. So I'm gonna give it four nipples, and

1:43:16.920 --> 1:43:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give nipple to Queen Latifa. I'm going

1:43:21.320 --> 1:43:24.639
<v Speaker 1>to give a nipple to Richard Gere because he's my crush.

1:43:25.479 --> 1:43:27.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give a nipple to Katherine Data Jones

1:43:27.560 --> 1:43:29.720
<v Speaker 1>because she's my other crush. And I'm gonna give the

1:43:30.080 --> 1:43:38.400
<v Speaker 1>final nipple to Lucy lou Hell. Yeah, well, Jamie, happy birthday,

1:43:39.439 --> 1:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Thank you for watching this movie for me.

1:43:42.080 --> 1:43:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I love it so much. Of course, where can people

1:43:45.439 --> 1:43:50.840
<v Speaker 1>follow you? Jamie Wow, I get my birthday flugs. Listen

1:43:50.880 --> 1:43:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to ack Cast. It's uh listen to ack Cast. It's

1:43:54.240 --> 1:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>still coming out right now, and it will be I

1:43:57.600 --> 1:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>think it will be releasing its final episode if I'm

1:44:00.080 --> 1:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>working on schedule, uh next week. It's an in depth

1:44:04.320 --> 1:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the Kathy comic strips and kind of what

1:44:07.760 --> 1:44:10.439
<v Speaker 1>they say about the time they appeared in and I

1:44:10.600 --> 1:44:12.240
<v Speaker 1>was able to use a lot of research I did

1:44:12.360 --> 1:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>for that podcast to have this discussion today. And there's

1:44:15.439 --> 1:44:20.760
<v Speaker 1>episodes about movements of feminism and how deeply flawed and

1:44:20.920 --> 1:44:24.320
<v Speaker 1>centered on middle class and above white women. Uh they

1:44:24.400 --> 1:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>were there. I just finished working on an episode that's

1:44:27.040 --> 1:44:31.400
<v Speaker 1>all about the formation of American beauty standards and how

1:44:31.600 --> 1:44:37.080
<v Speaker 1>mired they are in imperialism and colonialism and white supremacy

1:44:37.120 --> 1:44:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and all. I mean. It's a fun podcast because it's

1:44:39.360 --> 1:44:42.120
<v Speaker 1>about Kathy comic strips, but it's also a lot of

1:44:42.280 --> 1:44:46.679
<v Speaker 1>still suppressing serious ship as well. So uh yeah, that's

1:44:46.720 --> 1:44:48.519
<v Speaker 1>if you want to give me a birthday present, give

1:44:48.560 --> 1:44:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the battle Cast five stars on iTunes and listen to

1:44:51.120 --> 1:44:54.240
<v Speaker 1>act Cast because I worked hard on it, Yes, and

1:44:54.439 --> 1:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>give a cast five Stars as well. While you're at it,

1:44:58.520 --> 1:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>might as well at hurt Wow. Jamie Well, I love

1:45:03.200 --> 1:45:06.519
<v Speaker 1>you dearly. I wish you the happiest of birthdays. I'm

1:45:06.600 --> 1:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>so glad we do this show together. Yeah, we do

1:45:11.120 --> 1:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>almost five years, baby, I know. I hope to I

1:45:14.280 --> 1:45:16.760
<v Speaker 1>hope that we're in the same city again soon so

1:45:16.920 --> 1:45:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that we can actually see each other and hang beginning

1:45:21.360 --> 1:45:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of September. Um you can follow us on Twitter and

1:45:28.439 --> 1:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Instagram at bectel Cats. You can go to our Patreon

1:45:31.280 --> 1:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>ak Matreon subscribe for five dollars a month. It gets

1:45:34.439 --> 1:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you two bonus episodes every month at patreon dot com,

1:45:38.720 --> 1:45:42.439
<v Speaker 1>slash becktel Cast. And then we've got merch. Tell us

1:45:42.479 --> 1:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>about the merch, Jamie Well. You can buy it and

1:45:46.200 --> 1:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it's at de public dot com, slash the backdel Cast.

1:45:50.640 --> 1:45:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Go ever, get the merchant if you're so inclined, it's

1:45:53.760 --> 1:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a blast, it's a blessing. It's a gift for you

1:45:57.000 --> 1:46:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to have merch to consume products, because as we live

1:46:00.439 --> 1:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in a society, then you know, get some or don't.

1:46:03.040 --> 1:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>We won't know the difference. We truly won't, We truly

1:46:07.000 --> 1:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>profoundly won't. And that's Chicago bye,