WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2021 NFL MegaPod Week 12 Preview 

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Check it in Man Now down Man, Tuesday morning, November one,

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Beating the Book podcast megapod Live from the D. Our

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Home at the D, Mikey Skill, Alexander, Mike Palm next

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 1>to me here at the D. By the way, if

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you've never been to the D in Las Vegas, it's

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>downtown and uh, as you look at Circle, then sort

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of turn your vehicle and you'll be at the D.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>You'll and you'll be like, wait, I thought there was

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>a certain no, it's the D. But we love our

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>our home at the D because there's room there, the

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>tables huge, and we have a good time here. It's

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>perfectly built for social distancing before we knew there was

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be social exactly right, Mike Palm, by the way,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the conciliary. Derek Stevens at Circuit Sports, Vice President Operations,

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I did a whole breakdown on your circus survival on

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game this morning, the whole segment of your

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>remaining a hundred thirty four entries. We'll get into that momentarily.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Todd wishing to have the other stable the show from

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>his mom's cork Addics somewhere in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. You're doing

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Dodd Baby, I got it done for us and ladies

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and gentlemen. This is because it's Thanksgiving. We get Happy

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving everybody, by the way, Happy Thanksgiving. Because Thanksgiving a

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>week we were not doing our normal Thursday show, so

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we shifted to Tuesday. UM on the heels of a

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Brett Musburger appearance last week. How good was that, by

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, everybody thought it was the best part of

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the years best part. He was so open, he was

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>very open. Here's what's ailing the raiders lads, you know,

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and he just goes off on it. It was like

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>a fireside chat. It was. It was like y'allta, it's

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>y'all toa conference. We had it here. Uh. So there's

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a there's a podcast that has done in simultaneous concurrent

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>with ours, which is what they do over it covers.

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So the first time we've only had two occurrences this

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>year where we didn't on Thursday. One was a Wednesday night.

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>We brought in Las Vegas Chris, who's on that podcast,

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and today we do it on Tuesday, so we bring

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in the host of that podcast. He also does the

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Simple Handicap on a daily basis. Adam Chernoff ladies and

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>gentlemen wearing his Covers sweat shirt. How you doing man,

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm doing well. It's kind of a tough act

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to follow when you stage it that way. So it's, um,

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like the it's like the five hitter behind the

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>cleanup hitter going forth and it kind of that gap

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in the line up. So I'll try ye, yeah, except

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the five hitter is seventy seven and thirty eight all

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the season. Is that true? It's it's true. It's it's

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>as good as it gets. But it's been going well.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So is that total sides and props that everything about

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety of the hundred and fifteen bets are side in

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>totals pre game and then there's about five thirty props

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>so far this year? Oh my god. So so let

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>me just ask you this, first of all, do you

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>think that this is a sustainable thing? Um? Because what

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is that percentage wise? Boo? What is that? That's like

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>close to seventy Yeah, nothing about this is sustainable. Trying

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>not to let it fall off that badly the rest

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of the year, but it was, Yeah, it started off

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of a comical. Um, it's just the first four

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>or five weeks which everything bounced right late in games

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and now it's just it's just trying to hang on. Really,

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to get a good balance every once in

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a while. Adam simple handicap is what you do by

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>yourself every day. What's the one you do it covers

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>with Las Vegas, Chris. What's that called? It's the Covers

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Contest countdown. So as soon as the circle lines come out,

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>we're reacting to them. Um from a top five consensus standpoint,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we try to judge who's going to make the consensus

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>top five that they have a circle, and then we

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about survivor as well. Listen this, Mike,

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you have a whole cottage industry of people like Adam

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and me who like do segments and podcast just based

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>around your contest. That's gotta make you feel good. It's good, right,

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that was That's what the purpose of the

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>contest was. We don't make any money off. In fact,

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we lose one point nine million and guarantee this year,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>so you know, to create awareness about about our brand

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and that and so it's it's been okay, it's been okay, okay,

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So a hundred and thirty four entries left in Survivor

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>out of four thousand eighty make I asked you this

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>question back when we had people. I said, what are

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the odds that no one will go twenty? And? Oh?

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think you said it's got to be at

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>least five to one. Yes, I'm pretty sure. I don't know.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember make the number now? Yes, no, stop somebody,

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>We'll go twenty and O're not getting there. I don't

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think so with these two Gauntlet three three three game windows,

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>brutal Sunday is Bruce Sunday. Sunday is really Sunday's brutality.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>But here, here's the thing off your remaining one thirty

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>four uh three people have three entries best we can tell, right,

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>because we don't know if people use different names. Three

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.559
<v Speaker 1>people have three entries left, eight people have two entries?

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>Were those lost? Y both? And so what does that mean?

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That means that there are that there are one hundred

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>want to get this right? I believe one hundred and

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen people left with entries is essentially what that comes out.

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Let me make sure that that that I am not

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>misstating that. Yes, yes, so it's one hundred and that's correct,

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and nineteen different. The intrinsic value of each

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of the remaining on four is currently forty four thousand,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred and seventy six dollars. So we're talking about

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>some serious dough here. Yeah, if you had an entry

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>left and somebody else wanted to buy in wind to

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>buy your entry. I had a conversation with somebody about

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this the other day. It's it's not really hypothetical, but

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>how much would you charge at this point? Right? I mean,

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>what would the market bear for something? I mean, it

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>depends on what teams you have left. Here was the

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>context of which I answered it. Somebody with two said

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>if I want to pay, if I want, somebody wants

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to buy for half, but they're guaranteed the second one,

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the last one. Uh, and there's some rules associated with

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>you can't split entries until Christmas. Let's say I think you,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you it's almost you have to pay at

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>least fifty I think I think that's right. The value

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>bless a little, that's fair. Yeah, Um, at least that's

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>where it starts. So the last things about this, because

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm I was just so deep dive on of the

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>three with the three left. One has used Buffalo and Dallas,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>both already heading into Thanksgiving, so you figured maybe two Chicago,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>one Detroit, whatever. Another trio of picks burned Buffalo still

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>has Dallas, so you gotta figure two Dallas, maybe one Chicago.

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Third guy has both Buffalo and Dallas available, so maybe

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they pick three on three favorites. Probably the number one

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>power ranked person is that guy or girl. But in

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the end, the real question, by the way of the

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of the people with two, only one person has used

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>only two people have used both Buffalo and Dallas. Anyway,

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>there's all these different scenarios, and the question I want

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to ask is this, because this gets back to what

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I was saying last name, But is I said for

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>all year? If you have multiple entries and you're bragging

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about having six after week seven, just shut up. It

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. There's so few people who

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>get to Thanksgiving, it doesn't matter till right now. Until

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 1>right now now it matters. But here's the real quirk.

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Does your brain do this to you? Now? So all

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the people, that's eleven total people ended up with multiple entries,

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that's it, eleven ended up with multiple There were three

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and sixties. Some people that bought six, by the way, yes,

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and and eleven have two or three eleven two or

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>three left. Those eleven people have now gotten to the

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>promised land of where they wanted to with multiple entries.

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>My question to Adam into both of you guys is

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>they've waited all season for this moment. Does their brain

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>now screw with them and say I don't want to

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>split entries now. I want to send them all through.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to get them all to Christmas, and they

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>don't do the split thing. I wonder how many of

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the eleven would be tempted if I had Dallas to

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>put all three on Dallas. Even with the injuries, this

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Raiders team is dead. Did you watch much of that

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>game against It look like a preseason game. I mean

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it was just a listless performance. Yeah. Man, beyond the

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and tight end, there's nothing left. And and Darryl

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Waller finally showed up again in the in the box

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>score this week. That was what Brent was saying. They

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>had trouble once Scruden left you. Yeah, survivors awesome. It

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>really is, though, it is. It's so much cooler than

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the millions because it's just so hard. But guys like

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Adam and Chris can beat the man. You know, regular

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>human beings can do that. No, no, are you in?

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I am? I'm right now. I'm in the money and

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been hanging on. But like it's still eight eight

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks to go of maintaining this pace. It really,

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just incredible Chris, and Chris is a multiple contest.

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>When he's in the last man stand, he still did

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>he get by this week? Chris? He was heads up right, Yeah,

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. It was him and another guy

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he's I haven't asked him yet. He's texted me he

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>said he didn't have the best weekend. So I'm I'll

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>catch up with him the moment. Get the story on that.

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I wonder at what point he started hedging. He's so

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>great at that too. That's his biggest survey balls is

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>his hedging hedge ability. Did I did I steal your

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>survivor thunder? Im? Sorry? Not at all? No, not at all, um,

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>And every let me ask you this. If I jump in,

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the over run there after Sunday for remaining contest? Oh?

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I I asked this of Parlay this morning. He said

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven and a half was the total. He said

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>something like that, I make it lower than number I

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>went under, under thirty seven and a half. I'll go over.

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>You go over, you'll say it's I'll say it's right

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>around half. If there is a doomsday scenario and Thanksgiving

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>all three underdogs win out right, let's just say you

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>might think of it. You might You'll have like three

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>or four. You might be done this week because those

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>three or four then have to have a winner on Sunday.

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>What is the what is the chop rules? Do you

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 1>will you contact people with each other? Or no? If

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>if someone of if there's four entries left and somebody's like, hey,

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to chop this, how do I get in contact?

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Will you facilitate it only if the person agrees to

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>give out their information? So if I say I would

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like the other three, Jeff would take the other three?

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to share your information? Because if they don't,

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they're not really they don't. They don't write. And when

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is the deadline for Thanksgiving? It's the it's uh three pm,

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the day before. I believe I might be wrong, we

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>said at five pm Pacific this morning, we might maybe

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe I might be wrong. Let's I might hold us

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to that. I might look at the roomy text, Jeff,

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>let me text. All right, we'll figure that out. Christ

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>One is worse because it's Saturday and then Sundays another week.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean. Yeah, it's the Christmas window

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is unbelieving. I think you have to get him in

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>by um midnight. That's Saturday night going into Sunday for

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday following Christmas. By the way, somebody on Twitter

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>today said, what if? What if somebody splits their entries

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on Thanksgiving and then the game ends up in a tie?

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Could you imagine losing it? I can see the Bears

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and Lions time and we go to over time. The

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>water pistol is playing, so I don't think I think

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna sport. Todd's new hero Andy Andy Dalton is

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>your startup. I want to tell you a little thing

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>heretill about last week. So I have this thing where

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. You can do this in college too.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a nice little angle. If you have a ridiculously

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>low scoring first half a football game. For example, the

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Bears against the Ravens last week, six nothing at the half.

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>The week before it was Seattle against Green game was

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>three nothing to half, and that Seattle game for sure

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>should have gone over at the second half. They they

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>got this winterception in the end zone. But I always

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>bet the over in those games because for some reason

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the second half go over. Maybe the adjustments the coaches make,

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might be. But they made the second half.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>They made the line twenty five and a half in

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens game. That's only nineteen and a half four

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>point in the second half of the Ravens Bears game,

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>which even in the Bears Ravens game, it wasn't like

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they weren't moving the ball at all. They were moving

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So I took you over. Anyways, I

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>had no chance at all until they brought in the

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>beige water pistol and he hits the fourth at eleven

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>bomb for the touchdown. And then the Ravens come down

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>its course, And not only that, I were embarrassed plus

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>three half I went over too. I'm telling you there's

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely an angle to be exploited there at halftime and

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the score is three nothing or six nothing, three three,

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just go over blindly any college, any pro game. It's ridiculous.

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>But you just said that, you just kind of intimated

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>how blind lucky that was. Though right in that game,

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying even my proof is even in a game

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that had no business getting over, I still still went over.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That's how crazy conviction is. Real time is real. Okay, whatever,

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to you don't have to go with me.

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just telling you it's it's week after week. You

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 1>see it in college and pro when the score is

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>like three nothing or three three or six nothing and

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>they have like six points in less than the first half.

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Just blindly I thought it was I thought I was

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>so smart when the line crashed because Lamar Jackson was

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>ruled inactive and then the line crashed in Baltimore was

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>like a one point favorite or pick him whatever it

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>was they had, and I took Baltimore in the first

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>half in the full game, thinking a Keem Knicks and

0:12:57.800 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and Khalil Macker out of this game anyway, I love

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to more, and I end up winning both. And it's

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>just such blind nonsense luck right that I win both.

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>So it's like the ultimate takeaway was I shouldn't have

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>bet it at all, even though I ended up on

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the right side of that particular game. But I was

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>talking to somebody who at Chicago. I was like, believe me.

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't right and you weren't wrong, which is how

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>most of these NFL games end up, which is why

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>your record at him is so unbelievable and so much

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of its late game bounces. Or it's just that's all

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to. There's maybe a couple of percentages

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>one way or another based on the number you get

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the week or how good your timing is,

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>but the rest of there's charges. As a perfect example,

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers have absolutely zero point zero chance. They're the

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>complete wrong side the entire game, and somehow they get

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:54.599
<v Speaker 1>tell me and the score Gilly. I just did it

0:13:54.640 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>with my friend because he there is almost zero point

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>there a percent chance that you can cover even after

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball. But the only way it could happen is

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the way it happens. Yeah, and it's just that the

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>NFL was just it despises me, despise me. But Adam,

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>just you're being very humble. But just Todd, if you

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>could go over our records, this will give you an

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>idea how good seventy seven and thirty eight is, Todd,

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>What do we do last week. Well, what since the

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>regular season started last week, we all went to in one,

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>so we're all two in one. No, I'm just kidding.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>We all did go We all did go to in

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>one last week. And that move Gil up to a

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>stellar fifteen and eighteen, just a half a game behind Mike,

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you who also went to in one. Who's fifteen seventeen

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and one, and I am a game and a half

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>pack at fourteen and nineteen. On the teaser side, it

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is now a tie for first place as Michael Paul

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one last week and me and Gilly did not. It's

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>now six and five for me and Nike, and Gil

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>moves to five five and one. It's tight. Everywhere in

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this national we are we are flipping coins. It's just

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable what this season has been. By the way, this

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is us. Yeah, I'd like to this year. I'd like

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to make three notes. I'd like to make three notes.

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>One Todd they're playing with a red ball and Kiev

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>because the snow is a white on the internet, it's

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a red ball. Number two. Adam. Adam is our guest

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>this week because no American could do it during it

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>with Thanksgiving, but for him it's not Thanksgiving week three.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>The deadline is ten pm Pacific Wednesday night for Thanksgiving,

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's neither of what we thought ten o'clock Wednesday

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>night Pacific or one am Thursday morning Eastern to get

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>your survivor picks in for things, and then the normal

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>times three pm. Okay, okay um any so we have it.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>We usually go we start with Thursday night games, but

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously three on Thanksgiving. If they're part of your

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>best bets, say so. If they're not, just any thoughts,

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Adam will start with you. Any conviction or what's your

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>most conviction on anything on Thanksgiving? Is it part of

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>your best bets? Here? Sure, so I got one. I've

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>already bet, but I will leave a note that is

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.359
<v Speaker 1>now turning into a very interesting handicapping spot in Chicago,

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Naggy coaching his last game for the Bears

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>announced this morning, how much truth there is? But we know,

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like a coach fired the game after, especially when it's

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of toxic like Chicago, always leads to something. But

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember a situation where it's been like this

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's like openly announced that he's going to be out.

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't and so I don't. I don't. I don't

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>know how to handle that from a handicapping situation, but

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it's um that could be interesting. But I bet the

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Bills at four and four and a half, and I

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>think that this is now a spot where off a

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of bad weeks, there's now kind of growing pressure

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>on day Ball and Alan to come up with a

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>game plan. And on paper you look at and say,

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the Saints run defense should have no issues here because

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bills have no ground game whatsoever. But I think

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>last week what Hurts did against the Saints defense and

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>how easy he was able to run sort of opens

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>things up for the Bills quite a bit. Alan the

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>last time we've really seen him really good with his

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>legs with that k C game, and I think there's

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of the same game plan emphasis here that the

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Bills are gonna have. So I think that opens things up.

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>But the Saints defense all year, they've given up the

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>seventh most explosive passes against. Like the Saints defense, you

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>can hit the home run against it in the basque game,

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think with these three wide receivers for the

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Bills that just it's gonna be hard for the Saints

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to contain, and like on offense for the Saints, I

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>mean this is a preseason offense with how it is

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, Like, there's not likely to be Kamara on

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the field, and I think the Bills defensively can can

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>hold them if the Saints have to keep up. I

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's a tough spot, so the Bills will be popular,

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't mind it. I'm pretty happy to take

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo here at four or four and a half. Yeah,

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the Alvin Kamara news is not trending in the right

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>direction for the Saints, at least we don't think it is.

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Here on Tuesday morning, UM Bills the third of the

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>three games on Thanksgiving? Have we uh? Have we gone

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>overboard bearing the Bills at them? Because I lost on

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>him a survivor when they lost the Jags, it was

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>just a listless performance. They've looked terrible since. Um they

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't beaten anybody all year. They're now a half game

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>out in the a f C East. If the playoffs

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>were to start today, that actually be the seventh seed.

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe. UM no on them to miss the playoffs

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>is four to one. Where do we stand on them?

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Because their schedule is not like particularly easy down. There's

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>not particularly hard either, but the easy part, the easiest

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>part is behind them. I still think they're fine, and

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we've seen this happen to every other team

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C at some point this season,

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Like Kansas City went on that cold streak and we're like,

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>are they done and where do they stand? Then we

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>saw the Tennessee Titan rattled off all those wins and

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>now all of a sudden they look broken in their

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>own right. Um, it just keeps happening to teams at

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the top of the a f C. I think Buffalo

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to stick to what we've seen from

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>them at least early in the season and the promise

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>this roster delivered. So definitely not out on Buffalo just yet.

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's just kind of how the AMC

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is playing out this year, where there's a new best

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>team every single week. The Titans are the most fascinating

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of that bunch. Like I don't remember remember season where

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.959
<v Speaker 1>with like six games remaining, you could say about a team.

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>They're the number one seed today as currently constituted, without

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry or Julio Jones, they are a shell of

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>their former selves. They are really bad at football right

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>at this moment. But if they can figure that the

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>hardest games that are behind them, which they've won their

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>easiest than though we could have said this about this

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>past Sunday to noted um, they're easy games that they

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>have the second easiest schedule moving forward, only the Eagles

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>have an easier schedule. And so it's this weird, full

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>core moment where it's like, if they can overcome these games,

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they could end up the number one seed and have

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the easiest path and get Henry back, or they could

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>just crap out entirely and not even get there, Like

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing you can get the court about my forty

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 1>one to one Pats? What about my Pats. Everyone's just

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>sleeping on Billy. I'm just keep sleeping on Billy. I'm

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not as sold on them as others are. Adam, where

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>do you stand on New England? Well, one more note

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>about Tennessee, that's weird. The last couple of years they've

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>been kind of that weird team that we're like, look

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>how bad their defense is. Eventually this is going to

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>catch up to them, and it has every year once

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>you get into late December, in January this year. It's

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>their defense playing well in spite of their offense. So

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of backwards and I feel like that matters.

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>New England's a weird team too, because they're kind of

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this the trendy team in the a f C. Now

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>they rattled off of all these wins, everyone bumps them up.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones looks really good, the defense looks good. But

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 1>there's Kevin Cole, who I follow from PF who's awesome.

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:53.479
<v Speaker 1>He equates it to a really hot three point shooter

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on a run in the NBA, because if you look

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>at mac jones numbers, he like he doesn't have huge

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>volume for passing, but his third down stats and the

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>success that he has on third down and has the

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>entire season is like all time high. And so how

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>does that look as things tighten up down the stretch

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>in the schedule, And like we were, he's still a rookie,

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Like at some point, you know when you're having that

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>much success because the Pats put him in that with

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>how much they run on first and second down, it's like,

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>can you really sustain that through a run? It's a

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>really different paths tame so interesting by the way through

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>out the statistics on the Patriots, like just like throughout

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>all their Super Bowl years, throw out all the statistics.

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>This is a Belichick heat, his finess, just brinding teams

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>down with that running game at the defense. You watch,

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you keep laughing, but my one is looking better and better.

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm not laughing. I think I will say it's Ben

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>MGM put out odds. Number one seed in the a

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>f C. Titans are the short shot plus one. A

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of that has to do with their easy scatter.

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>You can still get the Colts at nine to one

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to when the UNFC South. If you think this is

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>crashes ahead for Tennessee, yeah I don't think it will,

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but yeah you can't. That's a that's a pretty nice sprice.

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I am famously I have the Titans to win it

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>all ticket. I was like, I think, if there's a

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>path where they end up in a great position, but

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously they sucked. Now I have the Texas. I said,

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you used the bills against Jacksonville because you thought they

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>were and you you weren't going to use them later, right,

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And looks like you may be right. Yeah it didn't help,

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't help me, but your theory you had the right. Theory, Oh,

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>so many theories. By the way, Adam, was that one

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of your best three? The Bills play on Thursday? Yeah?

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I like the Bills quite a bit and that spar

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Where would you rank that one? Two or three? Just

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for giggles, two to two Mike Palm writing these downs, well,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Todd is Todd Official Stenograph Courts for Todd Wish. I

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>just like to I keep tracking myself as well. Did

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys have any thoughts on the Thursday games? Dad

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>or mikey? I I just have a thought that I'm

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of leaning towards the Bears with the beige, right.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that that that Andy Dalton really gives them

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a better chance than Fields. I don't know what you

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>guys think, but when I watch him, he looks much much.

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>They look just much more offensive minded. Not not I'm

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>not saying they're a great offensive tea, but maybe they

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>moved from like a three out of ten to like

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a five and a half out of ten. When he's

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in there, five out of ten, he just looks professional. Now,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Grant did he say any adult? And he's not great,

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think he moves them from a blow average

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to like just slightly blow average. Is that the better

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>play for the franchise moving forward though, to play him

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>instead of Fields? Oh no, Obviously the franchises in disarray,

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>and obviously you gotta do what you gotta do. But

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying it's it's kind of like Fitzpatrick. Remember

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>we had that year where Fitzpatrick came in and people

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize it's Pat for Miami was gonna be good.

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Dalton is really I mean, he's not good, but he's

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>better than Field, right, yeah, right, that's all I'm saying. Um,

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the naggy thing is interesting though, because you really don't

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>know are they going to row you around? Naggie? You

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>can't write like, how can you can't quantify such a thing.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like are they gonna are they gonna rally round them?

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna be like, well, we don't have to

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>play today. The last time, that's why you can game,

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you can in game it. That's why end game is great.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>The last time I remember this happening, although not at

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>this level, was when Notre Dame announced they weren't going

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring Jerry Faust back and their last game was

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Orange Bowl and Jeffy Johnson being seven, the

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>famous game where Era what's the color guy on the

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>game in air Procen complained about them running up the score. Well,

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you guys this and so like, obviously

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.959
<v Speaker 1>there was other circumstances at play, but I think a

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of players on the Raiders before the Bears game

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>knew that it wasn't looking great for Grooten, And I

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>mean he obviously did things that upset some people within

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the locker room, But like, is this potential Like that

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was a complete no show from the Raiders in that game.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>This all within like that category is great that you

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>brought it up, because that's the most similar thing, right,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I think. So Survivor that God, I mean, I don't

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's such a tough game. Like I said, imagine,

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine you're in Survivor and your brain he was, and

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>now we go to over time if Troy okay, you know, so,

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's a that's a tough one. Um, would you

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>tease Dallas down? We don't know about Ceedee Lamb. We

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>think Tyron Smith is back, uh and uh Maori Cooper

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is definitely out, but we don't know about Ceedee Lamb.

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>That's my teaser. That's part of my There was an

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>update on Lamb just before we came on and said

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>he's participating in activity. Okay, does that mean you'll play?

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't know, participating in activity. All right, Well, let's

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>start with the best bets. Let's do it. Adam, you've given,

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>You've given your number two, but let's get your number

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>one first. I'm glad everyone's sitting down. You gotta go Jets. Oh,

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the Texans can't lay to anybody in the league. I

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't have anyone behind them in my ratings.

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Last week they beat Tennessee, but they benefit from five

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>turnover and in that game, the Texans allowed four hundred

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards of offense to the Titans and put up

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 1>just one ninety of their own. Like Tyrod Taylor's not

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>gad pardon me, is not making this team any better

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>than they are. They release another running back today, so

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Ingram's gone, Lindsay's out. They're down to Rex burkehead and

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a shell of David Johnson. I just the Jets biggest

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.959
<v Speaker 1>issue the last five to six weeks has been their defense.

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>They give up five hundred plus to New England, five

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>plus the Indie five of the Bills. They can't stop anyone,

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>but does Houston have anyone that can threaten them downfield?

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just a big step down in class

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for Jets and the opponents they face. If they hold

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Houston points, I think the Jets can get over against

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.959
<v Speaker 1>this bad Texans defense. The Jets have decent weapons and

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>probably Wilson at quarterback, which I think is decent, but

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>um decent relative to Flacco. I should clarify, But I mean,

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you gotta bet the Jets here. I don't know how

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>how you can have it. Texan's rated higher. To your point,

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Houston will get in that win over Tennessee. Fifteen total

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>first downs, as you said, a hundred ninety total yards,

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>only a hundred and seven of which were passing yards.

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's the plus five in turnovers. You go plus

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>five in turnovers. You know the Tennessee had five, they

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>had none. You're probably gonna win every single football game.

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And yet the Titans had the ball with six twenty

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.719
<v Speaker 1>left after Cully decided to punt up nineteen to thirteen

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>fourth and inches from his own thirty four. So the

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Titans had the ball with the chance to go ahead,

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and then Ryan Tannehill threw the third of his four

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>picks and then another interceptions. He threw three fourth quarter picks.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I bet Houston and it's two oh five. Early in

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter when they were up thirteen and nothing

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>with the ball, and and E, who was hoping they

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>would Tennessee would lose for the Survivor impact of it,

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>said to me, you're they're not losing this game. There's

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>no way Houston's winning this game. And I texted him back,

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, I have Culli, Taylor and Fairburn. How could

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I lose this game? Had like you know, I had,

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and I had Tennessee plus nine, and I thought, I'm

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in now that they're down six, and then they give

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>up another interception in the field, goes. I pushed, but

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it was like, oh, by the way, you tell your Freddie,

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>if you buy back into Survivor, you're not winning. You

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>don't win Survivor. That like, just just shut up about that.

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>If he buys back in and he acts like he's

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's like from the beginning, it survives there

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like a secondary I'm still alive. He found somebody that

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>had multiple entries at that had one left that wanted

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to get out of you know, possibly losing the whole

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>three thousand if they did it, win and let him

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>buy in a half steak in it to cover the

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 1>guy's outlet. That's fine, that's wonderful. Just don't act like

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you're guess it's just ridiculous. It's like, yeah, great, awesome, Sparris.

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a good move for him because he's gonna be

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>betting way more than that on these games for what

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>he's investing, and he's got all that, you know, the

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>joy of it. Maybe you win. Just don't act like

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you want survivor. I mean that is it's only a

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>phaghazy if you claim, if you claim, I don't know, Yeah,

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he's Oh he's siphtict. I moved on from Brent to

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>eat that Brent. By the way, that went well with

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>brent On on last week when when Mike didn't actually

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>go crazy with him last year, I Mike toned it

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>down from one thousand percent sycophantic down to Lake seven.

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It was fantastic. Could you do the invitation of Mike

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>last year with bread? Could you do that? Oh? Yes, well,

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>brand remember that one time when you went to Starbucks

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and you got the coffee and I never saw someone

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>ordered coffee that well. It was just it's incredible. You

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>ordered We're able to coffee. I've never seen anything like that.

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I've seen full storage order coffee cost You can Jimmy

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Great order coffee and orders them long. You're the best.

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And by the way that I ever sell you out

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>great because it's all because we're losing your mic on that.

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, So Buffalo and the Jets are Adams one

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in two. No excuse me, Jets and Buffalo one in two. Um,

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we have an alarm here at the day? Is that

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we're here in the background. Yeah, okay, we're here. It's

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the it's the alarm. Were thirty minutes in and we

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten a big from from any of the three

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of us. Okay, that's the alarm. Okay, Mikey, you're number one.

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>You know. I'm gonna do this just so Todd can

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>sing his song. I like the Miami Dolphins this week,

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Go Todd, I haven't. I have not sung the song

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in the number of but I'll give it to you

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. Dolphins. Maybe there's a resurgeons. They beat the

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>New York Jets and and as he couldn't even do it.

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphin and my depos taking them. So let's groot

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the hell out of the other team. Let's get sorry.

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I I don't think Carolina should be favored on the

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>road here, especially in the midst of this Cam Newton experience.

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yes, he was limited and he'd only been there,

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, two weeks and what he knows out of

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the playbook, but he was very limited in New England

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and that he'd been there a year and didn't know

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that much out of the playbook coming in as well.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this Dolphense defense is the top eight defense

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Maybe I'm I'm I'm undergrading, but I

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>think this is a very good defense. Brian Flores didn't

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>stop being a good coach this year just because they

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>had such poor quarterback playing Jacoby Brissette. This is really

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>really denigrated from what he was in in in in Indianapolis.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they are a decent offense. I mean, obviously

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>two is not going to stretch the field that far,

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>but you see you can move the ball with a

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>short passing game and running the ball against the Panthers.

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>As as Washington. Did you know, I thought Washington was

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>actually dominant in that game. Uh, and the score was

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>closer than the game really was. I think Miami, this

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>game should be at worse to pick. So I'll take

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>points at home Miami from one in seven to four

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and seven. And Kim Newton Warren Sharp used to say

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this about Cam new so right, the greatest front runner

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>there ever was. Man. When things are going well, he's

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>race sprit into midfield, playing the flag whatever he's doing.

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>But as soon as they fall behind, Oh, Cam, you're

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>very quiet. All of a sudden, he's a backup order

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>back and he's running to the middle of the field

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and putting the ball. I mean, come on, seriously, you

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>have less self awareness. I mean, come on, it's a

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>little ridiculous. And by the way, p J. Walker is better, Well,

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>he's easy. But I think Mike said it right, Like

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do anything last year in New England. The

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>pass didn't won him. And at some point this year

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers won at Sam Donald more than they wanted.

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton and like stuck with that for half the

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>season and then they got a little bit desperate because

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone was hurt. And so it's like his energy is

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>disguising this lack of play on field for sure. I

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you something. Matt Naggie, by the way,

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>denying the reports he is saying that is not accurate. Well,

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the report of his imminent mind. He gets fired on Friday.

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It looks a little bit foolish. Where do you think

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Rule is coaching next year? Do you think he sticks?

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I do too. I think it's just too attractive of

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a job. Matt Rule does not appear to be wrong

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for the NFL. That's so that's the word that he

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't love it. So that's my guess. Um. Remember when

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>he came in and they're all the videos of how

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>positive everything was in the locker room, and it was

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>this big deal and he just never really heard anything

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>about it. Since it's it's story kind of went away. Todd, Todd,

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>your number one pick is DoD I'm gonna go back

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to the well with what brung me last week. I'm

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna pounding away on these jackson Will Jacks unders because

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville Jaguars cannot score the football. I mean, it

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is just it is ridiculous on offense with the Jaguars,

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and how do you get the forty six point unless

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta is gonna score a billions? Who knows what Mattie

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>gives you. I'm going under forty six in that game.

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I went under with them at last week against the Niners.

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.919
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't score. They give him a twelve minute drive

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter. Um, I just if you look

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.720
<v Speaker 1>at the Jaguars, how do they get the seventeen points

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>or even twenty points? They can't score? So I'm going

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>under forty six. I mean, it's an NFL board. It's

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to find good bets your pre game. But

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll take under jack. I love it. Um Todd and

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Adams number one bets are on the Jets Houston game,

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Atlanta Jacksonville game, barn Burners that time of year.

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It's that time of year. You know. They all cash

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the same way. Though. That's what I say about my

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>tennis place. It seems to give a dale, but they

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>cast the same way. Um. You know, do you find

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>you've done when you look at it? Much better? In

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the women's side, No, it's it's even, okay, pretty even

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>all rights. Because I had the snow game on and

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>now it's fun. It's it's one nothing thirtieth minute and

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>now you're the goaltender for Buyron just tried to play

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a ball and completely whipped on it, but it hit

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the post and went out. So you're lucky because my

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>feed went away thirty first minute want nothing Byron. You

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 1>know it works great on podcast talking about a live

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>soccer game and the people love it. People love to

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about weather. I love soccer. Total sweats are the

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>best kind of Do you remember that time you made

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 1>it snow and fill it out your No one could

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>make it snow the way you do. My number one

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>bet is the Washington football team. Oh so, talk about

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>another great game, right Seattle, Washington. It's Monday night. It

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>should be noted the three and seven Seahawks the worst

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>records in two thousand nine against Washington, who if they

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>win this football game, legitimately in the hunt in the

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>National and the Redskins are in the football team are

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 1>still alive. I said this last week before the games.

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>If Washington wins, there listen, Uh, Seattle could not look anywhere.

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And we all love Russell Wilson. Russell Wilson two games

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>back from injury. Uh does not look like the Russell

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Wilson we remember. Zero touchdowns in two games back from injury. UM.

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And then Pete Carroll has this whole thing where he

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>just he just like, we are going to run the

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>football if it's the last thing on earth to night

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>do kind of thing. And then there's Washington talking about

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>that Carolina game. Uh, Taylor Heinekey biggest play of the

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.240
<v Speaker 1>game again was the fourth and three at the Carolina

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>forty seven twenty three left in the fourth quarter, game

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 1>tied at one. Had just uh they just had a

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>third and twenty one. He scrambles out to the left,

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>he's flushed out and last minute makes that play. Debates.

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying Heinek is the greatest quarterback on our it,

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but right now he may be the better of the

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>two quarterbacks. I know that's crazy talk. Uh, But I

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>also said this. With the absence of Chase Young on

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>defense for Washington, as much as I love Chase Young,

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>as much as I hate seeing him hurt, I actually

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>think that makes that defense more disciplined. They certainly looked

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that way against Cam Newton. Maybe it's because Cam Newton

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 1>is not that great. UM, and so I think the

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Washington football team, who had no home field advantage whatsoever.

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Let me just note that for this Monday night game.

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Despite that, when we did guessing lines on Monday morning

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>with Chrissy, I guess that Washington would be a two

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Excuse me, I guess the three point favorite.

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>He says to me goes Seattle opened as a three

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>point favor. I was like, you gotta be kidding me.

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.879
<v Speaker 1>And apparently it's been bet to about a pick him.

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Now what is it right now? I'm not sure that

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>was the most ridiculous over So I actually like Washington

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in this situation. I don't know that had bet him

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 1>many times this year, um, but I bet him last

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 1>week to success, and I'm betting him here again. Where

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>will Pete Carroll beating? Well? He maybe he can go

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to one of these programs and cheating when it title

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't he want to be done? How old is that guy?

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, he's almost seventy. I think, yeah, it's

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>he's getting up there, getting up there. So Washington my

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>first pick, that's my second one? Is it? Yeah? You

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.439
<v Speaker 1>like it as I like it as well? Okay, same

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>reasons not putting you down. Also one I'm gonna ask

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you this, Yeah, but minus one is Terry McLaurin a

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.919
<v Speaker 1>top five wide receiver in the NFL. Gread he's unstoppable.

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know if he's top five,

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but top ten for sure. You can make an argument

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>for him for m v P this year. In my mind,

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>there's no clear MVP in this league. Who's the m

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 1>v P in this league? Kirk Counsen's Kirk Counsen says

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>an argument, he's of the Philip Rivers Award. Give him

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the Philip Rivers Award. We have to we have to

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>also distinguish people who were talking about m v P.

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You have to distinguish with the m v P and

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Offensive Player of the Year. M v P has given

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>almost exclusively to quarterbacks. Offensive Player of the Year historically

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 1>has been given the quarterbacks and running backs historically. So

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 1>like the Jonathan Taylor's of the world will win Offensive

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year, but they're unlikely to. So that's

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a whole sort of zamilies if you go by history.

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Now maybe that changes in any given week, but I

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>had I watched football last Sunday, not two days ago,

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>but nine days ago with Aaron Shots, the creator Football

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Outsiders at the Cosmo, and he says a lot of

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting things in a three hour period. You know what

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I did not know? He is a voter for m

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>v P. So when we talk about the Heisman, there's

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>like nine hundred plus Heisman is a voter. Not for

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>the Heisman, No, but I'm saying for yeah really yeah.

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So so there's nine hundred plus voters for Heisman. Do

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know how many voters vote on m v P

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL any idea? Uh, fifty? Exactly. You were wrong,

0:39:55.680 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>You're wrong. I'm sorry you lost your So so when

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we throw around that stat we're like, oh, Russell Wilson

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>has never got an m v P vot because there's

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>very few votes. There's only fifty and they only count

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the first place votes. So that's why. So when I

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>made a bet earlier this year on Justin Herbert to

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>win m v P, I wish I had not like

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert. Justin Herbert, right, but think about it, you

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have to be first on the fifty people's ballots, and like,

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert doesn't sound like a number one guy. He

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds like people would have him sprinkled at two and

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>three all over the place. So I like that Justin Herbert,

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 1>he's pretty good. He is pretty good, but is he

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna win M v P? I mean, I don't know.

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Let me throw one from left field out of you here.

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And like you said, Gil, with the quarterbacks and running backs,

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get around that. But I would argue

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that this year to date we've had less of a

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>standout quarterback than we've had in any of the last

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>five to ten seasons. Like there's just nobody out there.

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Brady has been good. But if the Rams end up

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>winning thirteen games above thirteen games and maybe they're at

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the top of the NFC and Cup breaks all of

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the Jerry Rice records, we've seen Stafford, who would usually

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>be the benefactor of that performance. There's a QB and

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver. They're connected. But Staffords looked horrendous in

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>their two primetime spots, and I think everybody sort of

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>took note of that in those two ugly losses. Cup

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>last week was as high as five hundred to one.

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Now he's about a hundred or two hundred to one.

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>If he breaks all of Jerry Rice's record and the

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Rams of that stand up team in the NFC and

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the QB play, there's not that clear front runner. I

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>think it has a chance. It's an interesting it's an

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing at him because I actually talked about this

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago in a Numbers game, which is so,

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry last year gained over two thousand yards rushing,

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and so if this were which I believe was the

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:56.320
<v Speaker 1>first two thousand yard rushing season since Eric Dickerson and O. J. Simpson,

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I might be wrong about that, maybe maybe somebody else

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 1>did it, but if this were nineteen and he did that,

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be like, oh my god, Derrick Derrick Henry

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>gained two thousand yards last year. He did it, and

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he didn't even sniff the m v P. Right, So

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering. I'm wondering if the same sort of evolutionary

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>logic applies against Cooper Cup, which is that's great that

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.399
<v Speaker 1>he broke those records, but those records don't mean as

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>much to us now as they used to. They definitely don't.

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's that's the trouble here, is it's

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>so narrow when you look at who's won it. But

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I last year Rogers from a quarterback perspective, was like,

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>stand out that there's no way anything was ever going

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to go around him, So I think that overshadowed it.

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Like if Brady slows down a little bit, Like you

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:45.359
<v Speaker 1>look at the qv play this year, I think it's

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a massive step down from like having a front runner

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>compared to last year. So that might help. But either way,

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be very difficult to get those votes.

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 1>But your your point about the fact that it's there's

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>no quarterback standing out, that was a great one, right.

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>We were we were talking on a on guessing lines

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>yesterday about because I had I was going through all

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>these quarterbacks that won games, you know, with less than

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>two hundred yards passes. So Whence won it with a

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred six obviously, Had Taylor Hurts won their game with

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>a hundred forty seven yards passing. Obviously he runs a lot.

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh to Rod Taylor won their game with a hundred

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.399
<v Speaker 1>seven yards passing. Obviously the plus five in turnovers. Garoppolo

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>won the Niners game with a hundred and seventy six yards.

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was passing. Mayfield won the Browns game

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>with a hundred seventy six yards. So there's all the

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>reasons why that happened, right, The Niners had that twenty

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>played drive. The Jaguars had run a grand total of

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 1>four plays by the eight thirty nine mark of the

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:39.800
<v Speaker 1>second quarters. So the reasons why this happened. But I

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>threw that out to Christian said, doesn't seem weird this

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>year that all these games are being won by quarterbacks

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>with these lame stats? And he said Stafford. Stafford is

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.760
<v Speaker 1>number one in total QBR this year, but the number

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>he has in total QBR at this time last year

0:43:54.200 --> 0:44:01.240
<v Speaker 1>would be twelve, which is unbelievable. That's that's incredible. Yeah, twelve.

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's just like the whole I don't know, fin

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Like I always, I have this theory. I can't prove

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>it that. It's like the adding the seventeenth game has

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>somehow cosmically affected everything in the NFL. But what do

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I know? Well, let me ask you this, when's the

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 1>last time you've seen this many starters sit in fourth

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 1>quarters of games mid season? Right? Like I've I've seen

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>four or five teams bench guys mid early fourth quarter

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the last to three weeks. Like it's becoming a real thing,

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that's happening. The Giants just fired Jason Garrett just fired,

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:34.839
<v Speaker 1>just fired coach Jason Garrett after that debacle last night.

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Is Judge gun as well? No, just saying that the

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Giants have fired offensive ward near Jason Garrett. Joe Judge, No,

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>no word on him. That's from Tom Pella Sero at

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL Network. By the way, one Judge dodges another bullet.

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Judge jog dodges pointing at Ammy Managesh. Naggy, by the way,

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>was plus seven fifty ish first coach to be fired

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:05.760
<v Speaker 1>preseason Naggie. Joe Judge making making flirtation with it right now? Um,

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>number So that was your number two, Todd, your number two.

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>It's funny that you just said that because I I

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 1>have I was gonna go with who do you have? Mike?

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>You what's the line on the Eagles Giants game? You

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>know what's the line of the Eagles Giants? I would

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you three and a half, Todd three. You're not

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>going to accept it. Three and a half. I do

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:28.959
<v Speaker 1>want that because I want the New York Giants, the

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>n WYDE Giants. I'm gonna take him if I know,

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna hold my nose and I'm just gonna take them.

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I know they look to rent this last week, but

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:41.839
<v Speaker 1>they have had games where at home they show up,

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>they played defense, and the Eagles are coming in on

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>all this. Jalen Hurd is the m d P, the

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:52.320
<v Speaker 1>greatest quarterback in the story of Oklahoma and Philadelphia Athletics. Uh,

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, all this amazing emotion about how great the

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are, all this amazing emotion about how bad the

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Giants are. If I know anything about the NFL, You're

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>never as bad as you look the week you look bad,

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're never just to look the week you look good.

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Give me the Giants to hang under that book Bust

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>three and a half, and now I get the bonus

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of the platfor is out as offensive coordinator. The better

0:46:18.239 --> 0:46:22.839
<v Speaker 1>give me the Giants three todd with the Giants. God,

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:26.319
<v Speaker 1>is this the poop poo platter of picks? If you

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Giants, wait because the Eagles will move a

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 1>point and a half to three points. But on Sunday,

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:36.240
<v Speaker 1>single week, Adam, let me ask you a question, because

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's been like the theme throughout the year, where

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the sharps love the Eagles, the wise guys love the Eagles,

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 1>all these betting groups love the Eagles. Have you gotten

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom of what it is about them. They

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 1>like I wish I knew. It's like, I think we're

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:52.919
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of it in the last three to four

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>weeks with that offensive shift and now they've switched up

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>their play calling. But it's like you guys said, every

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 1>single week they're getting absolute smashed. And the other team

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that was getting that treatment was the Saints, and they

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:06.400
<v Speaker 1>played each other last week and the Saints were decide

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that took money or the Eagles took money against the

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Saints there, so that kind of settled that debate. So

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 1>it's like every week it's happening. But just like since

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Week eight, their number one offensively and the way they

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>were able to run the football, it's pretty overwhelming for

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:27.399
<v Speaker 1>some of these defenses that they faced. Wonder how long

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>one you be in one receiver basically hurts and Smith

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and the passing game can continue on. Four straight games

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 1>were a hundred with a hundred seventy plus rushing yards

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Eagles. They won forty nine, but it was

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty three to seven after three. Yeah, you're gonna say,

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they bet. They bet Philadelphia like they have tomorrow's newspaper

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>every single week and it's sharps And now the public

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and this week because of the Kamara and all the

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the COVID news, But they love this team it and

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:56.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're getting better maybe. I mean Michael Lombardi said

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like the Oklahoma offense, but now this week he

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 1>said it's like prepared and for Army is. None of

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 1>these teams are used to playing against this, this type

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>of an offense, and so it's a it's a one

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>off for them, and that's why they're having success to

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>an extent. People love Baltimore to the last two years

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and kind of a similar sort of makeup too. It's

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>not as strong this year, but it's kind of along

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that same theme, where like you said, Mike could just

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 1>have to prepare for what is the Tennessee New England

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 1>line consensus six and a half? Now, ye at six

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half, Okay, I'm gonna have to take Tennessee.

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Um I listen. I don't like him either right now.

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:40.479
<v Speaker 1>I had the Texans. They had the Texans last week.

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 1>That one got home quite easily. They went out right.

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Didn't think they went out right. But the ten points

0:48:44.880 --> 0:48:47.359
<v Speaker 1>is way too many. I actually think the pet who

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:49.800
<v Speaker 1>said that was going to be the biggest uh dog

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>winner on the board. Who did you didn't Todd oh biggest,

0:48:57.640 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest favorite, most likely to lose out right? That was you?

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Um okay, I think I have to take the Tennessee

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Titans here because as much as I like them long term,

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>as much as I dislike them short term, this seems

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to be And as much as people seem to like

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>New England now, I'm not quite an on board with

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the New England bandwagon as others are. This just seems

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a little too much for me. I had guessed four

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half on guessing lines on Monday morning, six

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half, some little nutty. The Tennessee defense, especially

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that front four, is good. Um, and I just don't

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>know if New England is that dynamic offensively to uh

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to get so many points that they cover a six

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I don't know if Tennessee wins this

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>game but six and a half again. Last week they

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 1>were minus five and turnovers Ryan Tannehill through four picks

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 1>three and the fourth quarter that's unlikely to happen again. UM.

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what kill I agree with you At

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>first glance, it seems like it's too many for in

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>New England offense. But on the other side, Winland's defense

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is just hammering people, and now Tennessee's offense is looking that.

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Aren't you a little concerned that you might get another

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee bad offensive performance? Makes me wanted even more that

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you love New England so much Tennessee. I don't love him.

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just asking you if you're concerned you don't love him,

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But you've said eight times about Yes, I like them overall,

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:19.359
<v Speaker 1>but I would not bet six and half. In fact,

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 1>if I had to bet, i'd take Tennessee. No, I'm

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>taking the plus six and a half. I think it's

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an overreaction, is what I'm getting it,

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's all I'm playing here. And again, I don't

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>think Tennessee is very good right now, that's for sure,

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>as much as I like them long term, So Tennessee

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:34.760
<v Speaker 1>plus six and a half is my number two. Adam,

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>do you disagree with my forty one to one from

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:39.359
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago with the Patriot? Do you think it's

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a bad betunder one? I think it's an excellent bet.

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But now you're backing away from it when confronted by

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:48.200
<v Speaker 1>your own love. I'm not backing away for whether they'll

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:50.640
<v Speaker 1>cover this week. Has nothing to do with my long

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:54.760
<v Speaker 1>term uh thoughts about the Patriot. I think they're pulling

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>it together and they're definitely making the playoffs and that

0:50:57.440 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 1>forty one one will be edgeable no no matter what,

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>well he he told you, when are you starting? When

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>will you start to answer me with Tennessee this week?

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you? And he'll tell you what the hedge

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it is because we know you have to ask him everything,

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 1>including whether Brent was the best pop order at Alright,

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>third picks because Mikey's on the deadline here, Todd second, Adam,

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, I couldn't believe it. Okay, go ahead, you

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 1>couldn't believe it. Don't believe it, Adam number three, sir,

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:36.799
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to be the third man in

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on Washington. Although that was the way I had circled

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. I'm with you guys completely there. Um.

0:51:43.520 --> 0:51:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm at six and a half because the way I

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:50.399
<v Speaker 1>look at this, it reminds me a lot of the

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Saints Falcons game a couple of weeks ago, where the

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Saints went on a bit of a run. They were

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:58.919
<v Speaker 1>beating up kind of bad teams are covering numbers where

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:01.359
<v Speaker 1>they were short favorites or a dog, and then they

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 1>got up to six, six and a half, and then

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:05.719
<v Speaker 1>we looked at the offense and said, this is not

0:52:05.760 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 1>really an offense that's built to hang huge numbers against

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:12.279
<v Speaker 1>decent teams. Just at the pace they move, one or

0:52:12.320 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>two drives stall out and all of a sudden, like

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of playing catchup. And so at six and

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a half, I don't know what you make Tennessee, but

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like I think most people kind of have them at

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 1>worst around an average team in the NFL to get

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to six and a half, like the Pats have to

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be top three basically in your ratings to get to

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this number. I think that's too much of a stretch

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>both ways. I don't think Tennessee's a top ten team,

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think they're worse than average. And I

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:41.839
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Pats are a top five team yet,

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:43.799
<v Speaker 1>So I don't get to this number either. So I'll

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:45.960
<v Speaker 1>go Titan Adam. I love being on your side. If

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't work out, it's all my fault, Tennessee. I'll

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:51.200
<v Speaker 1>take the blame for it. The way the season and

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>it's gotta turn some point Mikey, you're number three. I

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>like the Minnesota Vikings, of course you do. I do

0:52:58.360 --> 0:53:03.799
<v Speaker 1>like the Minnesotavia. When does they like the Minnesota? Well, I,

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that the you know, this San

0:53:08.760 --> 0:53:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Francisco team has has done a good job of running

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the football, but this guilt points out. I mean, Garoppolo

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is not throwing for two hundred yards a game. And

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I think when you face a team like Minnesota, you're

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to put up some points. I don't think

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you can sustain drives twelve plays, four team plays, six

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 1>team plays without getting a holding, without getting some sort

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of a mistake, a negative play. You've got to have

0:53:28.920 --> 0:53:32.240
<v Speaker 1>some explosiveness to your offense when you're gonna play the Vikings.

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Look this kid that didn't win the Rookie of the

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Year because uh, because Herbert had such a great year.

0:53:38.440 --> 0:53:41.919
<v Speaker 1>This Jefferson. God is he good? Yeah? He was. He

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 1>He was very very impressive against the Packers. I thought, um, incidentally,

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought the game that they won in overtime in Carolina.

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:51.239
<v Speaker 1>He had a very poor game that game, but he

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was very very good here against the Packers. I think

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings are definitely a playoff team. I think they're

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:59.399
<v Speaker 1>better than the Fortunite. This is a key game for them,

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the Viking. If they're going to make the NFC Wildcard here,

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they need to win this game in San Francisco. It

0:54:05.160 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 1>really is uh and I think it's a close game

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'll take a field goal in a close game

0:54:10.440 --> 0:54:12.719
<v Speaker 1>here to five. Never likes to lose by less than

0:54:12.760 --> 0:54:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a field he likes to win. By his comments, whoever

0:54:18.040 --> 0:54:22.600
<v Speaker 1>said Sunday Fundays Sundays aren't fun, Sundays are hard. Minnesota

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco both five and five. By the way, again,

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota on their five and five season, Let's remember they

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:31.160
<v Speaker 1>lost on a Dalvin Cook fumble in overtime in Cincinnati.

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:33.680
<v Speaker 1>They missed the thirty seven yard field goal to lose

0:54:33.680 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to Arizona with no time left that would have won

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it for him. They lost to Cleveland by seven, They

0:54:38.520 --> 0:54:40.440
<v Speaker 1>had the ball to Cleveland twenty six with no time

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>left on the clock. They did lose to Cooper Rush.

0:54:42.719 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 1>That was their worst game. Uh. They coughed up a

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 1>fourteen point second half lead against Baltimore lost that. So

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:51.840
<v Speaker 1>those five losses that I just mentioned by a total

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen points. So they all their five losses by

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 1>grand total of eighteen points. But now let's not let's

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 1>not forget about some of their wins. They'd be Detroit

0:54:59.239 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>by a miracle where they were down in the last

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:04.960
<v Speaker 1>minute because they fumbled, remember late. Then Kirk Cousins had

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:06.799
<v Speaker 1>to rally him back and Joseph hit the game away.

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't a miracle. It was Detroit letting him

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 1>have forty yards right down the middle where they still

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:14.279
<v Speaker 1>had two time out. True, and Joseph that Joseph along field.

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 1>That was another survivor survivor for UH. And then they

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:20.879
<v Speaker 1>beat Carolina in overtime after trying desperately to lose that game,

0:55:22.040 --> 0:55:24.239
<v Speaker 1>and then they win. They beat Green Bay by three

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 1>after they controlled the most majority of that They go

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:29.719
<v Speaker 1>up twelve points and then Zimmer kicks an extra point

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to make it three. Didn't why didn't Rabel go for

0:55:32.840 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 1>two when it when in that situation get nineteen it

0:55:36.120 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 1>was nineteen. He gets a touchdown, and he decides to

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:41.759
<v Speaker 1>go to nineteen seven instead of nineteen eight. Again, if

0:55:41.800 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 1>you can explain mathematics for me somehow and explain to

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:48.560
<v Speaker 1>me how you go from nineteen to six. It was

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:52.960
<v Speaker 1>rather voted nineteen to seven to eight. I'm not sure

0:55:53.000 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I understand mathematics anymore, because isn't that doesn't what is

0:55:56.920 --> 0:56:00.799
<v Speaker 1>he talking about? Why? Why are he doing that? My

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:04.919
<v Speaker 1>favorite Indians, my favorite I don't understand that. The best

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:07.560
<v Speaker 1>was the which was the Urban Meyer game where they

0:56:07.560 --> 0:56:09.919
<v Speaker 1>were down similarly, it was like twenty six to nothing,

0:56:11.680 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing and they got a touch on nothing but the

0:56:16.440 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 1>extra point and then they on side kick. It's like

0:56:19.320 --> 0:56:21.319
<v Speaker 1>one half of it right. One of those things can't

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>be right. One of the what is the What is

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>wrong with coaches? I mean it's it's not their their

0:56:27.560 --> 0:56:30.959
<v Speaker 1>first game coaching. What is going on? They can't even

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:33.840
<v Speaker 1>figure out like basic ideas? It's not it's not that

0:56:34.000 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of hard. Have you seen college football coaches? Dude, That's

0:56:37.040 --> 0:56:39.800
<v Speaker 1>what I'm do. You see these guys snapping the ball

0:56:40.120 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>with twenty on the play talk with and there's two

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:45.040
<v Speaker 1>forty left in their winning game. I'm like, I'm ready

0:56:45.120 --> 0:56:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to literally jump through the television said strangle the college.

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Can't believe what I see. College football coaches might be

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the most unintelligent cross section of human beings you could

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:56.720
<v Speaker 1>ever witness in a given day, at least David Shaw

0:56:56.840 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 1>when he when David Shaw, with three minutes ago, kicks

0:57:00.040 --> 0:57:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the extra point to go down seven kicks away deep,

0:57:03.280 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he fully gives up. Yes, at least he Constan Tubberville

0:57:09.600 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is in a Senator and he thinks the three uh

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:15.840
<v Speaker 1>three branches of government. He's very good on that stuff.

0:57:15.840 --> 0:57:19.120
<v Speaker 1>He's very very never went to an American history class

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in his life. Apparently nobody punchs across midfield better than

0:57:23.600 --> 0:57:28.600
<v Speaker 1>David Shaw. Nobody. And I don't know what he's going

0:57:28.600 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for it world, I don't get it. Yeah, for the

0:57:32.720 --> 0:57:35.560
<v Speaker 1>first twelve years he was famous for kicking the most

0:57:35.640 --> 0:57:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the number of eighteen and nineteen yard field goals and

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:41.480
<v Speaker 1>n c A football. Now he's going forth fourth and

0:57:41.600 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>from the six. Yeah. By the way, if we're if

0:57:45.560 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we're to believe Brent that Notre Dame is live to

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs, right, and Todd has a bet on

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it as well. If we're to believe that, how is

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame only in eighteen and a half point favorite

0:57:55.360 --> 0:57:57.960
<v Speaker 1>at Stanford. They're they're going to make the playoffs and

0:57:58.000 --> 0:58:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they're only that against Stanford. Stand for it is terrible.

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the narrative though about Oregon's loss there,

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's a tough place to play, and all the

0:58:07.200 --> 0:58:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all that garbage from the PAC twelve Garbena pack

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve GARBA. That doesn't mean they're like gonna make it.

0:58:14.120 --> 0:58:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously well if a well listen, if Alabama loses

0:58:19.800 --> 0:58:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to Georgia, Okay, Ohio State and Michigan are gonna lemonate

0:58:23.080 --> 0:58:26.640
<v Speaker 1>each other, Cincinnati can get in. And if Oklahoma State

0:58:26.680 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't run the table, there's there's Notre Dame's path. They

0:58:29.160 --> 0:58:33.400
<v Speaker 1>need those three things to happen. Happen. It could happen,

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:36.760
<v Speaker 1>It could absolutely happen. I am completely rooting for Cincinnati

0:58:36.800 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to go undefeated. Then the committee screws them and watch

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:41.480
<v Speaker 1>people lose their minds. That's what I'm rooting for. I'm

0:58:41.560 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 1>rooting for, not really because I'm rooting. I'm rooting for

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Alabama to win. And it's Georgia, Alabama, Ohio State, and

0:58:51.240 --> 0:58:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they put a one loss Notre Dame team ahead to

0:58:53.240 --> 0:58:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati and their losses to Cincinnati. That will blow the

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:59.840
<v Speaker 1>whole thing up. The joy of it would be fantastic

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because Luke Fickle would deserve it for what he did

0:59:02.360 --> 0:59:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in the bowl game. When it was raining, running hurry

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:08.440
<v Speaker 1>up inside the five yard line, and the worst travesty

0:59:09.720 --> 0:59:11.919
<v Speaker 1>they were carting people off the field every other play.

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 1>That was how bad the conditions were. Someone might have

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 1>had a bet on that game. Todd. I'm guessing, uh, Todd,

0:59:18.160 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 1>your last pick, because we've gotta get my gaut here

0:59:21.200 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>my last pick, boy, I'm I'm gonna go with the

0:59:24.920 --> 0:59:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Chargers over. Uh. I just watched this Charger

0:59:30.960 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 1>team and they seem to be the ultimate over machine.

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Their offense is unstoppable. I really love their often um,

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean they looked. They made the Steelers completed defense

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:45.040
<v Speaker 1>look very bad, but they make every team look bad. Offensively,

0:59:45.280 --> 0:59:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they moved the ball against everyone. I don't see. The

0:59:47.520 --> 0:59:49.560
<v Speaker 1>only team they really didn't move it against was that

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Ravens Camp. Other than that, they moved the ball against everybody.

0:59:52.920 --> 0:59:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think they can score. And I think their

0:59:55.320 --> 0:59:58.400
<v Speaker 1>defense is really not that special because Big Ben and

0:59:58.240 --> 1:00:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the and the Insers were movement on the and the

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Insers are not very good at off and so I

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was not impressed and I haven't been.

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And they give up forty seven to the Browns. I

1:00:08.920 --> 1:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>believe they give up forty seven. They give up a

1:00:11.040 --> 1:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of points. To me, they're just an over team

1:00:13.920 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and Teddy two gloves will get you a couple point

1:00:16.760 --> 1:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>at home and give me the charges. Then for Game O,

1:00:20.880 --> 1:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>my my third and last pick is I really don't

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have much behind this, but I don't know. I'm taking

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay over the Rams. What's the number there? Now?

1:00:30.240 --> 1:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do that, but I was scared that

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I have. I think it's like one. Let me just check. Yeah,

1:00:35.360 --> 1:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a less than three. I'm taking pick. Yeah, I

1:00:39.000 --> 1:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know three Bays one or a pick. You can

1:00:40.920 --> 1:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have what you can have, give him a pick. This

1:00:42.560 --> 1:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is one of those where I'm just like, if you

1:00:44.440 --> 1:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>can beat me Rams, tip of the cap and I'll

1:00:48.520 --> 1:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>accept it. I just don't The Rams have played two

1:00:51.440 --> 1:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>really bad games in a row. Um. Obviously that game

1:00:54.600 --> 1:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>got away from them against Tennessee, uh, and then San

1:00:57.360 --> 1:01:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Francisco just man handle them. And Green Bay ain't dumb.

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>They probably watched a lot of that and might have

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>taken a pointer or two. But of course they have

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. So it's a different animal than the Niners.

1:01:08.360 --> 1:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna completely adapt to what the Niners did.

1:01:11.000 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>But I just think Aaron Rodgers, to me, can do

1:01:15.920 --> 1:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>no wrong in this kind of situation. Say what you

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:22.479
<v Speaker 1>will about whatever happened him off the field recently, whatever

1:01:22.520 --> 1:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you think about that, what a football player he is.

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think the Packers will take some

1:01:26.120 --> 1:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>notes from the Niners. I think they will go out

1:01:28.280 --> 1:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald with a J. Dillon um. And I just

1:01:31.640 --> 1:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I just feel better about the Packers in this situation.

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Not supposed to be bad weather, um, so that's not

1:01:36.920 --> 1:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>probably a factor in this game. But I just like

1:01:38.760 --> 1:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the Packers better as a football team at home maybe

1:01:41.880 --> 1:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the few home advantage home fieldvantages that still exists. Adam,

1:01:45.720 --> 1:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>what do you have? Do you have home field advantage?

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Any teams having any significant home field at this point

1:01:51.040 --> 1:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in your numbers? Nobody greater than two? And who would

1:01:56.040 --> 1:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that be? Green Bay's at the top at the top.

1:01:59.600 --> 1:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But the inswers, what are the inswers in on the

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>home field advantage? That means Pittsburgh, Adam, Pittsburgh Stars, Pittsburgh.

1:02:07.920 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking now one point exactly on the nose. Who

1:02:14.160 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>has who are the top three? Green Bay at two?

1:02:16.680 --> 1:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And who's the other top? Green Bay? New England and

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the Saints Green Bay, New England and the Saints who

1:02:26.880 --> 1:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>has zero? Chiefs The Chiefs seem to have a pretty

1:02:29.240 --> 1:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>good Chargers have zero. So you can almost argue as

1:02:34.440 --> 1:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>negative Washington has zero. Agree on both um more zeros,

1:02:41.320 --> 1:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Houston has zero, Detroit has zero. Boy, you're so right

1:02:49.640 --> 1:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>about so far in the Chargers. That was like Heines

1:02:51.880 --> 1:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Field on Sunday night. It was almost flipped if you

1:02:55.880 --> 1:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>measured it. I'm sure it was North for the Steelers.

1:02:58.760 --> 1:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>And Washington has had eurow to negative home field for

1:03:01.840 --> 1:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>years now. You go those games overrun by visiting crowd too.

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And at one time, wasn't Washington like an incredible home

1:03:11.920 --> 1:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>up at RFK Stadium was the greatest place on Earth.

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in that. And then zation just fell

1:03:17.120 --> 1:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>apart right then the organization Daniel Sneyder Bottom they before that,

1:03:20.640 --> 1:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>they moved outside of the city to this antiseptic FedEx

1:03:24.280 --> 1:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>field and that was the end of that. Horrible, horrible

1:03:28.000 --> 1:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Steinder has kidnapped the love of my life. And

1:03:30.680 --> 1:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Jack Kent was Jack Kent Cook, the owner. Jacks owned

1:03:35.400 --> 1:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers in Washington. Then he got rid of the

1:03:38.080 --> 1:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Lakers and wanted to won three Super Bowls with Washington

1:03:41.480 --> 1:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in a converted baseball stadium. That's right, the Niners and

1:03:45.000 --> 1:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the and Washington very similar. They both won multiple super

1:03:48.200 --> 1:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Bowls in old baseball stadiums RFK and Candlestick, and then

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>at different times, left those horrible football structures where they

1:03:57.080 --> 1:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>won multiple super Bowls to go to the suburbs to

1:04:00.520 --> 1:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>just have an antiseptic, no home field advantage stadium. I

1:04:03.840 --> 1:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know what. He just killed it. Yeah, just killed it,

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>killed the whole thing, both of them. Um, okay, so

1:04:09.600 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>last things then teasers favorite two legs, six point teaser

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of the week. I'm in a bit of a losing

1:04:16.480 --> 1:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>streak with these teasers. By the way, Dallas, Dallas could

1:04:20.480 --> 1:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>not get home, and it was they were at the

1:04:22.080 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty yard line. I was like, kick a field goal.

1:04:24.080 --> 1:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Plays I knew something bad was gonna happen. It's like,

1:04:26.920 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>kick it for God's sakes. That of course he throws

1:04:28.920 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a pick. My friend had plus nine and the in

1:04:31.520 --> 1:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>game would just similar to way you had on the thing,

1:04:33.480 --> 1:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, okay, where getting the field goal? LEAs,

1:04:36.920 --> 1:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>why was why was McCarthy saving his time outs at

1:04:39.320 --> 1:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first half. I didn't understand what

1:04:41.000 --> 1:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>he was doing. There prob again, thirty six seconds left,

1:04:48.920 --> 1:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>they just tackled. There's no reason. What do you do, Adam? Adam,

1:04:55.480 --> 1:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>your your favorite two legs? You give yours? Yet? Ye Okay,

1:05:00.200 --> 1:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I go Jets up. And that's how boys down. Jets up,

1:05:06.880 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys down. Everybody's just wants to just dump on the

1:05:11.360 --> 1:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Raiders for good reason. God, you go first on the

1:05:15.680 --> 1:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>teaser for the rest of us. Okay, I'm gonna go

1:05:18.760 --> 1:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with Okay, I know you're gonna make fun of me.

1:05:22.000 --> 1:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to go with my Pats minus a half.

1:05:24.960 --> 1:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe in this Pats team. Now, I wouldn't be

1:05:27.760 --> 1:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>betting on them to cover the six and half. I'm

1:05:29.720 --> 1:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. That's a lot of a lot

1:05:31.160 --> 1:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of points. But just to win the game. You know,

1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I got Bill Belichick. He's gonna cooke something up with

1:05:37.920 --> 1:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a depleted Tennessee offense. Give me the Pats. All they

1:05:41.280 --> 1:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta do is win the game minus a half and

1:05:44.840 --> 1:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>uh give me Miami Dolph I am do. I know

1:05:54.880 --> 1:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get Miami Dolphins plus eight. I'm going Dallas

1:05:57.840 --> 1:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in Indianapolis. That's what I have I'm there. We got

1:06:01.600 --> 1:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>cowboys coat and wait, wait, wait, let me just get

1:06:04.560 --> 1:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>colts up through the three and the seven A Ward

1:06:09.160 --> 1:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>A Stanford Wong. I gotta just check the quotes to

1:06:13.400 --> 1:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>give me the official numbers. Quotes are what's that? Yeah,

1:06:19.200 --> 1:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>John Ferguson, did you just go around the pen name?

1:06:21.520 --> 1:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Then I did? John Ferguson suits him Stanford long, John

1:06:24.600 --> 1:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Ferguson from California. I'm told, let's just you guys have

1:06:28.440 --> 1:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys minus a half in Indie plus eight half. Okay,

1:06:33.520 --> 1:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>yes that is correct, half minus a half plus eight

1:06:36.360 --> 1:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half. All right, Then the final two questions

1:06:38.720 --> 1:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we end up it's ten forty seven. By the way,

1:06:40.320 --> 1:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we got two questions the big favorites. And by the way,

1:06:44.080 --> 1:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a very quick question because there's none of

1:06:45.840 --> 1:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>these this week. There's only two favorites of greater than

1:06:49.800 --> 1:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>four and a half points. It's Dallas at home versus

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas on Thanksgiving in this New England hosting Tennessee.

1:06:55.760 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's four and a half or like, yeah, that's it? Uh,

1:07:00.080 --> 1:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>was more like the Raiders shocked the world shocked the world.

1:07:03.600 --> 1:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Who's more likely shocked Todd, who's more likely to lose

1:07:07.320 --> 1:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Dallas or New England, Adam, New England. Stop well, Todd says, Dallas,

1:07:15.160 --> 1:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>New England. Oh for me, it's New England. Yeah, question,

1:07:21.480 --> 1:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously it is. But would you all love it if

1:07:23.440 --> 1:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders came back from the dead and knocked off

1:07:26.040 --> 1:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. So now, in a week, by the way,

1:07:29.200 --> 1:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>if all three underdogs went on Thanksgiving, there should be

1:07:31.760 --> 1:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>three or four survivor entries left. Did I say that already? Uh? Yeah, okay,

1:07:36.160 --> 1:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Now in a week where there's so many closely lined games.

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Last question, you live in a bizarro world. You had

1:07:41.800 --> 1:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to bet aside on every single game, but one, one

1:07:44.840 --> 1:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>game that was more Michugun than all the others, Adam,

1:07:47.680 --> 1:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>which is the game you want no part of on

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the side? One game I want no part of on

1:07:53.200 --> 1:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the side would be Cleveland Baltimore because there's way too

1:07:58.240 --> 1:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>many questions in a number that I think it's just

1:08:01.000 --> 1:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in a messy spot. Mikey Chargers and Broncos charges the Broncos,

1:08:05.880 --> 1:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Mike, Paul Todd Wishne. I'm with Adam. I

1:08:10.320 --> 1:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>who knows what's going on down in both God, there's

1:08:14.000 --> 1:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like twenty five of these games you could pick from

1:08:16.000 --> 1:08:21.639
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, so many of them. No, Uh, I'm gonna

1:08:21.640 --> 1:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>say Minnesota, San Francisco because Mike Zimmer is gonna make

1:08:25.840 --> 1:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Cousins is a Hall of Famer. We all know, Happy Thanksgiving,

1:08:30.840 --> 1:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Happy Thanksgiving. Um yeah, just because Mike Zimmer is gonna

1:08:35.560 --> 1:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>make sure it comes out of the last play either way.

1:08:37.439 --> 1:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'll say Minnesota, San Francisco, last thing before before

1:08:41.960 --> 1:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we go, and Mike is is running to do his

1:08:44.479 --> 1:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>show odds On co hosted by A Mall show at

1:08:47.200 --> 1:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>UH at Visa. So, Adam, I feel like because we

1:08:51.400 --> 1:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't we we talked over you too much. You're the

1:08:53.439 --> 1:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>guy with the seventies seven and thirty eight record and

1:08:55.800 --> 1:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I just want to get a sense from you. And

1:08:57.120 --> 1:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I know you're being super modest about saying how none

1:08:59.280 --> 1:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of this could possible be sustainable? Um. What would you

1:09:03.479 --> 1:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>say though, if you had to, if you had to

1:09:05.880 --> 1:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>pinpoint the top reason or two for your success thus far,

1:09:13.720 --> 1:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a certain thing you look at, it's a

1:09:16.360 --> 1:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>certain metric, whatever it is, what would you say? The

1:09:18.200 --> 1:09:23.439
<v Speaker 1>answer to that question is, I'm I'm very much on

1:09:23.479 --> 1:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>this subjective side of things, um, more so than I

1:09:26.920 --> 1:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>am any intense modeling. I like to sort of outsource

1:09:31.200 --> 1:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that and get it from people who are much smarter

1:09:33.040 --> 1:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>at doing that than I am. I know that they'll

1:09:35.120 --> 1:09:37.479
<v Speaker 1>always be better at that, So I used that to

1:09:37.560 --> 1:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>an extent. But I would say, like looking at last year,

1:09:40.560 --> 1:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>where I really struggled, the biggest difference between then and

1:09:43.600 --> 1:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>now is last year, I was trying to read everything

1:09:47.200 --> 1:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>like I was just give me more and more and

1:09:48.800 --> 1:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>more and more and more, and I was I was

1:09:50.960 --> 1:09:52.519
<v Speaker 1>listening back to stuff I said, and I was like,

1:09:52.560 --> 1:09:54.639
<v Speaker 1>what am I even talking about? And this year I've

1:09:54.760 --> 1:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to consume a lot less but go a

1:09:58.280 --> 1:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>lot deeper on subjects and just kind of keep it

1:10:01.840 --> 1:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>more simplistic. So rather than trying to do everything, I've

1:10:05.280 --> 1:10:07.479
<v Speaker 1>just kind of narrowed my focus a little bit, and

1:10:07.840 --> 1:10:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I think it's led me to have a lot better

1:10:11.040 --> 1:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>ratings overall and not overreact nearly as much and sort

1:10:15.080 --> 1:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of snap news. And so that's helped me a ton,

1:10:18.000 --> 1:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>because like last year, there were so many bets that

1:10:19.920 --> 1:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I made that were just snap reactions to news or

1:10:23.040 --> 1:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>injuries or anything like that. This year it's been a

1:10:25.800 --> 1:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>lot more sort of calculated or anticipated bets at certain

1:10:29.320 --> 1:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>times and it's made a huge difference. That is a

1:10:31.680 --> 1:10:34.519
<v Speaker 1>that is a fascinating answer because I I think there

1:10:34.600 --> 1:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of wisdom in that and it's it's

1:10:37.120 --> 1:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where, uh, I guess the the

1:10:39.320 --> 1:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>cliche peoples paralysis by analysis can happen sometimes. Uh Dr

1:10:43.320 --> 1:10:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Bob who was a who is a modeler um that

1:10:46.520 --> 1:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I used to work with, is like a pioneer and

1:10:49.080 --> 1:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>using uh you know models for sports betting. Oh great

1:10:53.120 --> 1:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>guy too, but even he like as he has added

1:10:55.439 --> 1:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>layers through the years, like acknowledges, it was too much

1:10:59.479 --> 1:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>like you just get too many different things. I will

1:11:01.840 --> 1:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>say that when I handicapped tennis almost in a in

1:11:04.439 --> 1:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a weird way, less is sometimes more. You can let

1:11:07.880 --> 1:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff polluted. So that's interesting that that

1:11:09.880 --> 1:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that has been a source of your success in football.

1:11:12.640 --> 1:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>That then, and the most interesting detail you said also

1:11:14.760 --> 1:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is that you listen to yourself from last year and

1:11:17.960 --> 1:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you're like, what the hell am I? What the hell

1:11:19.960 --> 1:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>am I talking about? That's fascinating. Well, and part of

1:11:23.640 --> 1:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that too was LVC himself Chris like, he's like the

1:11:28.040 --> 1:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>difference that you like how you sound this year versus

1:11:31.240 --> 1:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>how you sounded a year ago, it's like you're a

1:11:33.360 --> 1:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>completely different person. And a comment I got a lot

1:11:35.920 --> 1:11:38.519
<v Speaker 1>last year of people that listen to the show, they're like,

1:11:39.120 --> 1:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't understand how you're down or how you're making

1:11:42.439 --> 1:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>some of these bets because you're you're making a very

1:11:45.000 --> 1:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>clear case for a handicap and then you're going a

1:11:47.560 --> 1:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>different direction, and so it's like there's something they're like,

1:11:50.600 --> 1:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>we're listening to you and we're doing great. We don't

1:11:53.439 --> 1:11:55.639
<v Speaker 1>know how you're losing money this year, Like everything you're

1:11:55.640 --> 1:11:58.519
<v Speaker 1>saying is bought on, but you're just making really bad decisions.

1:11:59.200 --> 1:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And this year, I'm it's just so much more clarity.

1:12:02.640 --> 1:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And so he's helped me a ton of saying, like

1:12:05.439 --> 1:12:07.599
<v Speaker 1>listen to what you were saying last year versus this year,

1:12:07.640 --> 1:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and how much simpler it is, and how much easier

1:12:10.000 --> 1:12:12.519
<v Speaker 1>it is to understand. There's so much more clarity. So

1:12:12.600 --> 1:12:18.479
<v Speaker 1>that's been huge. Is like you did a show with

1:12:18.800 --> 1:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>Bob before March Madness, and like he to me is

1:12:22.640 --> 1:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>like the king of like that that overarching eye level

1:12:26.040 --> 1:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>angle that's so simple that when you hear it, you're like,

1:12:29.680 --> 1:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>how could I not have thought of that? Like it's

1:12:32.040 --> 1:12:34.839
<v Speaker 1>just the easiest thing to understand and makes so much sense.

1:12:35.320 --> 1:12:37.639
<v Speaker 1>And I got so far away from that to where

1:12:37.640 --> 1:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like I love hearing stuff like that when you

1:12:40.280 --> 1:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have him on, because every time I listen, I feel

1:12:42.200 --> 1:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>so dumb because I'm like doing all this stuff and

1:12:45.000 --> 1:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. Like there's just such an easier answer

1:12:47.880 --> 1:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of this. So that's kind of where

1:12:49.960 --> 1:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm at this year, and it's made a big Adam.

1:12:52.320 --> 1:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>You probably weren't as bad as you were last year,

1:12:54.920 --> 1:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're probably not as good as you are this year.

1:12:56.840 --> 1:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>That's together thing. You're probably much closer to you not

1:13:00.920 --> 1:13:05.759
<v Speaker 1>as good, you know what I mean, no question about it. Yeah,

1:13:05.760 --> 1:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it's in football, not as much as I want to.

1:13:11.040 --> 1:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I used to do it a lot with tennis, and

1:13:13.840 --> 1:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I've not done a ton of it with football. But

1:13:16.600 --> 1:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and now that I'm kind of slowing down as I

1:13:18.840 --> 1:13:22.479
<v Speaker 1>get a little older, here the in play pop market

1:13:22.640 --> 1:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's starting to emerge. It's lower limit, I know, but

1:13:25.920 --> 1:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>there's some really advantageous prices coming up in NFL games

1:13:29.840 --> 1:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that are becoming intriguing. Speaking your language there, Ton, you

1:13:34.160 --> 1:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>love that absolutely. Yeah, I'm doing great on in game.

1:13:37.000 --> 1:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't pick a winner of the NFL pre flop

1:13:40.960 --> 1:13:45.799
<v Speaker 1>against Spread. Its just it's so so difficult this especially

1:13:45.880 --> 1:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. I know we have guys that we love

1:13:48.120 --> 1:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and respect. You're just having miserable seasons and I don't

1:13:50.800 --> 1:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>think any less of them. I'm just like, it's the NFL, man,

1:13:53.600 --> 1:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>like anybody who can destroy it like you are. Um,

1:13:57.800 --> 1:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>all the power to you, man. Congratulations on success, Adam

1:14:01.240 --> 1:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and Uh. I don't know if we'll get another chance

1:14:03.280 --> 1:14:04.479
<v Speaker 1>to have you on this year because you do your

1:14:04.479 --> 1:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast at the same time we do. But if we

1:14:05.960 --> 1:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>do get that opportunity, would love to have you Uh

1:14:08.280 --> 1:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>come back like you did a couple of times last year.

1:14:10.960 --> 1:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the simple handicap podcast that you do daily. Do

1:14:14.840 --> 1:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you still do that daily? I've stopped doing it Saturday

1:14:18.400 --> 1:14:21.559
<v Speaker 1>mornings because it's just it's the first year I haven't

1:14:21.560 --> 1:14:24.559
<v Speaker 1>done Saturday mornings, but it's every other day. You did

1:14:24.560 --> 1:14:26.439
<v Speaker 1>it seven days a week. I was thinking you did

1:14:26.479 --> 1:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it five days a week, so now you just do

1:14:27.840 --> 1:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it six days a week. It used to be a

1:14:31.280 --> 1:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty days in a row for the first

1:14:34.360 --> 1:14:37.439
<v Speaker 1>two years. So this year nobody downloaded it on Saturday

1:14:37.439 --> 1:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's like a routine thing for a lot of

1:14:39.280 --> 1:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>people because it's so short that stops Saturdays. It's about

1:14:42.400 --> 1:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen minute podcast, ten to fifteen minutes something like that,

1:14:45.479 --> 1:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen or last Yeah, okay, so that should be that

1:14:47.720 --> 1:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody can incorporate that into their day. And then the

1:14:49.800 --> 1:14:52.519
<v Speaker 1>one that you do at covers you are the product

1:14:52.560 --> 1:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>manager at covers uh dot com. The one you do

1:14:55.360 --> 1:14:58.879
<v Speaker 1>with Las Vegas Chris is called what Again The Cover's

1:14:58.960 --> 1:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Contest Countdowns. So it's times our youthtube channel every every Thursday,

1:15:03.080 --> 1:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>right as the lines come up, all right, uh, and

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Chris is we're gonna find out if he's still in

1:15:07.320 --> 1:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the Last man Standing. Um, but he is obviously a

1:15:09.960 --> 1:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>multiple contest handicapping contest winner here in Las Vegas. So

1:15:13.479 --> 1:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a must listen as well. Adam appreciate it, man.

1:15:15.840 --> 1:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It's Adam Chernoff on Twitter. By the way, if you

1:15:17.840 --> 1:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>want to uh follow everything that Adam does. C H

1:15:20.800 --> 1:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>E R N O F F. Really appreciate you moving

1:15:24.200 --> 1:15:26.479
<v Speaker 1>stuff around and making the time man. We appreciate it.

1:15:27.120 --> 1:15:29.559
<v Speaker 1>Under present, love what you guys do every week. We've

1:15:29.560 --> 1:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>been listening to the show for years and years, so

1:15:31.560 --> 1:15:33.519
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of it fantastic and have a

1:15:33.640 --> 1:15:36.719
<v Speaker 1>very happy Thanksgiving. Thank you you too, Happy Thanksgiving, well

1:15:36.880 --> 1:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Canadian Thanksgiving last month, but you know we as I

1:15:40.720 --> 1:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>celebrated the same as the lifelong football man. There you go,

1:15:44.360 --> 1:15:46.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a big day too. There you go for Mike

1:15:46.680 --> 1:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Palm for Todd Wishnev kil Alexander. Thank you so much

1:15:49.800 --> 1:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours, Good luck

1:15:52.920 --> 1:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>with all your bets. We twelve in the National Football League.

1:16:00.080 --> 1:16:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Another Bagnan Batag Dogtan Bamata BigMan Bata Bo