WEBVTT - How Dems Shred All Norms

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the Freedom Hudge. Attorney General Barr nails

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the crazy left Trump to testify over impeachment. FedEx gets

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>called out by The New York Times, but FedEx claps back.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Prince Andrew does a disastrous interview, Blasi Ford gets an

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>ACLU award, and Charlie's Angels flops. We got that and

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>more coming up. This is the buck Sexton Show, where

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the mission or mission is to decode what really matters

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>with actionable intelligence. Mag no mistake, American, You're a great

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>American Again, the buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. Now,

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the buck Sexton Show. Everybody, thank you for

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>being here with me. It's a bit of a cold

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and dreary Monday in New York City, hopefully a little

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>more charming wherever you are across the country and around

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the world. But the good news is when it's not

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>beautiful and sunny outside, there is no better place to

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>be than in the Freedom Hunt. Here with producer Mark,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>who even on the darkest days, is a ray of

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 1>sunshine for all of us. So let's get to what

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>when I wanted to begin are a deep dive into

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 1>all things that matter today. With and that is the

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General speaking over the weekend. Now we have all

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of this focus on the impeachment proceedings and more witnesses

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>this week. Vin Minn is going to be one of them.

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>There are a few other witnesses I believe, in aid

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>to Vice President Pence will speak. And there is a

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>clear idea from the Democrats on the left of what's

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>supposed to happen here, which is that the steady drum

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>beat of witness witness witness polls that are negative for

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the president, witnesses that are negative for the president, that

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this will shape opinion over time. Even if you don't

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>view this, or you haven't viewed this from the beginning

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>as a worthwhile exercise, you feel like they're trying to

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>make this allegation against the president seemed much more damaging

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>than it really is. They're hyping this whole thing up.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Even if you feel that way, certainly I do, and

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>then some even stronger, even more strongly than I've described there.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>The media understands that part of the effect of propaganda

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is to shift opinion through repetition. One of the things

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that they can accomplish is just by saying day in

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and day out. The president's going to be the president

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 1>should be impeached. He's going to be impeached. The public

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is against the president. People start to even subconsciously say

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to themselves, Wow, I guess there really is a means

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for there really is a necessity for impeachment here. And remember,

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to convince you and me, or at

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>least those of you who like me are very supportive

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of the president despite understanding his flaws. What they're hoping

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is that they can just edge up enough of the

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>opposition to the president from the roughly forty percent of

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>liberals who will believe anything about Trump, will do anything

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of Trump, to get it just above

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that you keep saying these polls the fifty one percent mark.

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>They're hoping that if they can manage that accomplishment, then

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>there'll be enough of a ground swell to get rid

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of this president, and perhaps not through the removal proceeding

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>by the Senate after a Senate trial, but that he

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>will go into reelection wounded in the court of public opinion.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>He will go into reelection with a newly emboldened left

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>wing opposition against him and a somewhat chasten demoralized Trump support.

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>That is the purpose of all of this. That's what

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>they have been saying all along. But I wanted to

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>take a step back from this for a minute, because

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the justification of the impeachment proceeding part whatever,

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>now it's now it's full impeachment. It was an inquiry

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever they're calling this now now the impeachment investigation is

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that the president has been so terrible that he has

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>shredded the constitution. This is what you often here. He

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>has been shredding the norms that really hold this country politically, culturally,

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>legally together, and that there's really a they're making an

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>argument that it is the totality of all things Trump

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that is impeachable. It's not even just any one specific act,

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, it can't be. They keep changing what that

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>specific act would be with every passing week, with each

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>passing day. In some cases, Molluman's clause, Russia collusion, quid

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>pro quo, twenty fifth Amendment. Just go down the list

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of all these different things that they say they're going

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>to either use or will be the justification for using

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>as a means of getting rid of the president. It's

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a it's a cycle it's a rotation. It's this, it's that,

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's this, it's that, and now you're seeing that. To

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>hold all this together to be the overarching theme for

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the series of narratives about Trump being reckless and destroying

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the country is that he is destroying the norms. He

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is shredding the rule of law. And what I really

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>liked is that this week at Attorney General bar who

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you know is effective because the left hates him. This

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who's a very yeah, pretty uh laid back,

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>i'd say, in his demeanor, a lawyer's lawyer. Was in

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the specifically in the part of the Dutch Department before

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>where the lawyers who evaluate what is what is department policy,

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>what is constitutional, what is not. So he's a brilliant lawyer.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>They keep saying he's a hatchetman for Trump, even though

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>he had already been Attorney general and there was no

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>one saying he was a hatchetman them. Then he's a

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>brilliant lawyer. Though he spoke at the Federalist Society of

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the weekend and it was a brilliant speech. I know

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you aren't another time to watch the

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>whole hour and thirty minutes or so of it. But

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I would tell you could just jump to the latter portion,

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>last thirty minutes or so, where he really gets into

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the meat of what's going on right now, of the

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>way the resistance is waging its campaign against the president,

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and how it is they who are trashing the rule

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of law. They're the ones who are discarding norms and

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>engaging in a scorched earth campaign against the president. And

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this one we had a couple moments here, But first

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>he gets into the tactics of a left and then

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>he will get into who really who are the left

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>these days? When I use that term, we get to

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the phrase, But first, let's start with the tactical approach.

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>This was a brilliant amation from a fantastic lawyer who

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>knows what the president is up against, who's on the

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>front lines as the attorney general of the judicial overreach

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that is a tool against the president. They're pretty open

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>about the hashtag resistance judiciary. Here's the Attorney General saying

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for himself, please play clip two. Unfortunately, just in the

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>past few years, we have seen these conflicts take on

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>an entirely new character. Immediately after President Trump won election,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>opponents inaugurated what they called the resistance, and they rallied

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch and his administration.

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>The fact of the matter is that in waging a

0:07:52.920 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>scorched earth, no holds barred war of resistance against this administration,

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it is the left that is engaged in the systematic

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>shredding of norms and undermining the rule of law. Every

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>American needs to hear that speech. A lot of them

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>will disagree say that Barr is just a tool of Trump.

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the crux of what we are seeing right

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:27.119
<v Speaker 1>now with impeachment, with the Democrat and the lefts war

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>on this president, abusing the bureaucracy, weaponizing the intelligence community,

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>usurping executive authority through the judicial branch. This is what

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they are doing, and it is in fact, very much

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the Saul Olinsky playbook. This goes back to

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the community, the origins of community organizers and doing things that,

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>while not explicitly illegal, are meant to use the system

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:03.479
<v Speaker 1>against itself to shut it down. We'll get into universal injunctions,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>which the Attorney General speaks about at some length in

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>just a few minutes. That's one of the primary methods

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of sabotage used against this administration. Judges have been essential

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in this process to the left, and they've been acting

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in bad faith, and their decisions are appalling, and they

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>do violence to the rule of law while saying they

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>are protecting the rule of law. But the systematic shredding

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of norms and undermining the rule of law is what

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the left has completely embraced in the era of Trump.

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And they accuse us, they accuse our side of doing that.

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones who say that this president is a fascist,

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>this president's an authoritarian. Meanwhile, there are six hundred judges

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>on the federal bench from what bar sent him his speech.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>If you count them all up, you know all the

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>different judges, circuit judges, and feder judges across the country.

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Any one of them has been able to shut down

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>administration policy at any point in time. It's appalling what

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>they have been doing. How could anyone have faith at

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the rule of law is universally applicable to all people

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>in this country, that the justice system isn't just now

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a series of excuses used by the left to get

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>what they want when they want it, that's what the

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>system has delivered. Or to undermine the system and say

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>that it's biased, it's unfair. The ideology of intersectionality, the

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Marxism underlying all of this on the left is a

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>constant excuse for, well, the very system itself is imbalanced.

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>One day, it's we have to do whatever the system

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>says when they like it. When the election happen. When

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Obama wins the election, it's election, elections have consequences. When

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump wins the election, it's let's get rid of the

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>electoral college, let's add seats to the next president who's

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat, so that they can stack the Supreme Court.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>That all of a sudden, institutions don't matter. And they

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>keep doing this, and they seem to think that we

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>don't recognize, but we do recognize. We understand that they

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>want what they want. But perhaps even more important in

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>some ways than when Barre illustrated the processes by which

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the left is undermining the processes of government, the ways

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in which they are duplicitous when they talk about institutions

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and rule of law. How it's not serious, it's not

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>rooted in principle, it's completely the system a la carte.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Some days they want to order this, some days they

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>want to order that. It doesn't matter what they did

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the day before. Barr also understands why liberals feel this way.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>What is it about the left wing mentality? And this

0:11:54.960 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is true, This is the primary psychological emotional motivation that

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the left has for so many of the policies, really

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>for the majority of the primary issues that you look

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at today that this country faces. Why does the left

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>take the approach that it does. What is their governing philosophy,

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>or rather, what is their philosophy of life that makes

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>them want to leverage the government so that it can

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>control every aspect of life? Why do they want this?

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Why does the left think this way? Well, the Attorney

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>General in his speech nailed it. Please play Prus marclip three.

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>In any age, the so called progresses treat politics as

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a religion. Their holy mission is to use the coercive

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>power of the state to remake man and society in

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>their own image, according to an abstract ideal of perfection.

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Whatever means they use are therefore justified, because by definition

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they are virtuous people pursuing a end. They are willing

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to use any means necessary. To gain momentary advantage in

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>achieving their end, regardless of the collateral consequences and the

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>systemic implications. They never ask whether the action they take

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>could be justified as a general rule of conduct equally

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>applicable to all sides. When the left has power, it

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>must be utilized in service of this mission of the

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>daification of man through government. Government will make us better

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>than we would otherwise be. But whatever power is used

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to that end is inherently justified. But when people that

0:13:55.600 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with their government ends are in power, then

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that same mentality goes in reverse. It's no longer justifiable

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>to use government, say to protect individual freedoms to do less.

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Now it must be the case that anything is justified

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>against that cause. If they can do anything they want,

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>because they know that if they have the power of government,

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they will make a utopia here in this country. Then

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>when people who disagree with them are in power, they

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>must do in their own mind whatever they have to

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to rest power away from those people to

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>create the utopia that they have been promising. It is

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the best summations of left wing thought left

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>wing ideology I have ever come across. It is devastating

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in its truth, and it is necessary for all people,

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>even leftists who will discount it, to hear because it

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is what we face right now in this country, and

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>not just turning for a moment to the specifics of

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>how the process is used against the President of the

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>United States and the ways that this is done in

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>bad faith. I mentioned universal injunctions when I was in DC.

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Spoke to some senior Department of Justice people about this

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>behind closed doors on more than one occasion, and this

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>has become a major frustration of the administration, that this

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is really a perversion of the role of the courts,

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and that not only should the courts not be doing

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this as a general rule, there's a a clear change

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in the attitude of left wing judges appointed by left

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>wing politicians who think that just because they don't like

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a thing, they have the right to stop it from

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>happening and find the flimsiest legal rationale, the flimsiest the

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Administrative Procedure Act, or some other such utter nonsense not

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>intended for the purpose that the left is using it.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Here is the Attorney General speaking about those universal injunction

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>pay twenty two. The court's indulgence of such claims, even

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>if they are ultimately rejected, represents a serious intrusion on

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the president's constitutional prerogatives. The impact of these judicial intrusions

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on the executive responsibility have been hugely magnified by another

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>judicial innovation, the nationwide injunction, first used in nineteen sixty

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>three and sparingly since then until recently. These court orders

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>enjoined enforcement of a policy not just as to the

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>parties before the court, but nationwide against everybody. Now, since

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has taken office, district courts have issued over

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>forty nationwide injunctions against the government. By comparison, during President

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Obama's first two years, district courts had issued two nationwide

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in junctions, both of which immediately vacated by the Ninth Circuit.

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It is no exaggeration to say that virtually every major

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>policy of the Trump administration has been subjected to immediate

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>freezing by the lower courts. No other president has been

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>subjected to such sustained efforts to debilitate his agenda sabotage

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>by judges in the name of the very system that

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they are using for the sabotage. It's appalling a twenty

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>x increase in universal injunctions from federal judges from Obama

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to Trump of the same period. Does anyone think that

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that's an accident? You might say, well, then why is

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>it that this happens in this way? Because the Left

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>go back to the justification for all of their actions

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that he gave the day offication, the deification of the

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>state and the people in it through government power. How

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>can you compete with that? We'll come back team. So, so,

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>as I was saying about universal injunctions, the basis for

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this is flimsy enough as it is, because initially you

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>would think that it would just enjoy the two parties

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in court. But what ends up happening is someone brings

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they go jurisdiction shopping, usually it is the Ninth Circuit,

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>and for pure reasons of policy difference, they will bring

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this suit in a federal court, and any federal judge

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>can just say, I forbid the Trump administration from doing

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>this thing anywhere in the federal jurisdiction of the United States,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and until an appeals court comes along, until it makes

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>its way up the chain. That is the way the

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>system works right now. The only way to go around it,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the only to deal with it, would be if Trump

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>did do something that would start to kick a little

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>bit at the load bearing walls of the very separation

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>of powers that we have and say, well, we're just

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>going to ignore the court. That could happen. Some might

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>argue even that that's a necessary thing to happen on

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these issues, but that would clearly create a standoff,

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and people would start to ask, well, who which branch

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of government is correct in this one? The decisions that

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>are being made by the way these injunctions against Trump

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 1>are wrong. That's one thing about it that's so interesting

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>is that they make their way up to higher levels

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>in the courts, and overwhelmingly the Trump administration is victorious

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>on this. You see this with the travel ban. I

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>remember the travel ban. That was what Sally Yates, the

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hashtag resistance Obama appointee interm Attorney General, refused to enforce.

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>She was so that the Trump administration was violating the

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Constitution that she disobeyed a direct order from the commander

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in chief as the acting attorney general had to be fired.

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Turns out Trump administration was correct on the merits that

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>they're completely within their rights under executive power to have

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a temporary withdrawal of permission to come to the United

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>States for aliens from countries that are harboring or have

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>terrorist issues. Turns out Trump was right. Do we ever

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>hear about how well? Why did wait a second, how

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>could the acting Attorney general be so wrong? How could

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>she be so ignorant of the law that she would

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>disobey a direct order? And turns out the order's lawful

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>because she's hashtag resistance. She's also the same person who

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was involved in the pretext of setting up General Flynn,

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>sending over FBI agents pretending like their colleagues and just

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>work through a quick issue and then maybe you lie

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>to us. They changed the three O two the record

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of that FBI meeting after the fact. Lisa Page, in fact,

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was the one who changed it. We remember what she

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>thought about Trump and people who voted for Trump, people

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>who worked for Trump. We're told that's all a coincidence.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Though nothing to see there. Oh, that was all a

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>completely legitimate law enforcement effort. Universal injunctions are the hijacking

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of the judiciary for anti Trump ends. That's what has

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>happened in this country. It has slowed down Trump's agenda

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for people who are upset and I saw the headline

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>today that would drudge that there were less deportations under

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump than they were under Obama. Will keep in mind

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that Obama not only did not have the judiciary taking

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>away his powers as president United States because there are

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>some left wing judges who don't like him, they in

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>fact would sit by and let him exceed his authority

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>as commander in chief, exceed his executive powers as he did.

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>When finally the I believe it was the Fifth Circuit

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Court had to say, no, you can't just use prosecutorial

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>discretion effectively enforcement prioritization another way of saying it, to

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>not only let people stay in the country who are

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in violation of law. This is the whole Dreamer thing.

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>This is DACA right deferred action for childhood arrivals. Not

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>only is that, by the way, an abuse of executive discretion,

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>but to say DAPPA now the parents as well. Well,

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>what if the president just says dreamers. If President Obama

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>had said dreamers, the parents of dreamers and anybody who

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>knows somebody who's either a dreamer or a parent of

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a dreamer, you know, their associates, they all get to

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>stay in the country. That's just mass amnesty the executive

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>feat would that be okay? I assure you there are

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of left wing federal judges who would say, yes,

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to do because they like it. It

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter what the law means, what the system would produce.

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.719
<v Speaker 1>If people who are dispassionate about the outcome looked at it,

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>they want a certain outcome, they will justify a certain outcome.

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>The ends justify the means. That is the approach of

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the American left always. But to add insult to injury,

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Obama does this. The Fifth Circuit says, no, you can't

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>do Dappa as well. You can't give people work permits

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>and confer all these rights just because you feel like

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it in contravention of congressional intent, which is there are

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>immigration laws they have written that are supposed to matter.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't just wipe that all away. It's an enormous

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>actual abuse of executive discretion. Obama himself had said he

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>did not have the authority to do this as a

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 1>means of trying to pressure Congress to do something, and

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>then they didn't, as is their right, and then Obama goes, yeah,

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll just do it anyway. Was anyone calling him a

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>fascist in the paper, was anyone saying he was an authoritarian.

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>He was wiping away the laws of this country because

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he felt like it, because it was the right thing

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to do. That's what he say is the right thing

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to do. And then to bring this full circle, an

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>act of discretion by one executive is countermanded. The Trump

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>presidency begins. Trump looks at this and says, all right,

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to have some kind of a

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>negotiation over immigration here. But I'm not going to continue

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this policy of my predecessor, where he decided that under

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>his discretion as the president of the United States, there

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>would not there would be a top down order through

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch that these dreamers as they are called,

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>these young illegal aliens not all that young now, but

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that they wouldn't be prosecuted. Trump goes, well, no, we're

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to continue with this official policy of the government.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And what do you know. A judge in California goes, nope, sorry,

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what Obama half done? You cannot undo. How could any

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>person justify this? How could anyone who calls themselves a lawyer,

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a legal scholar, a judge, somebody who is steeped in

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>these issues, you would think would really know what the

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>implications are of this kind of emotion based recklessness when

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the law. You would think that a

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>judge would know better. But of course judges don't know

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>better because they're getting what they want in the process,

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>slowing it down. As a result, President Trump, because of

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>federal judges in the state of California, or one federal

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>judge in the state of California in particular, President Trump

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>has had to continue for three years the policy of

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>his predecessor on immigration that was rooted entirely in executive discretion.

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>No Act of Congress, no statute whatsoever, was an abuse

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of that discretion in the first place, And now judges

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>say that Trump can undo it because of the Administrative

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Procedures Act. You must be kidding me. This is why

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted out after Baghdaddy was killed himself with our

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>operators Special Forces operators or Delta Force operators right on

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>his trail, I said, oh, I'll just give it a

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>matter of a matter of hours before the Ninth Circuit

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>overturns Baghdaddy's killing under the Administrative Procedure Act. I mean, obviously,

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm making a joke. But this is farcical. This is

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>preposterous that people are being taught, and I know they

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>are in law schools that what's going on right now

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is respecting the process and the law. They're destroying the law.

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>They're destroying what's supposed to be applicable to both sides.

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Power that one side has in a certain circumstance the

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>other side is supposed to have. There is no good

0:26:56.600 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>faith anymore in the way they approach this administration. And

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I think going forward you'll see this with any administration.

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>It is just political total war. Whatever they have to

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>do to get what they want, however they have to push,

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever construct they have to come up with. The media

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>will magnify their lies, their shoddy analysis and say, oh no,

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this is what's great. Trump a Trump is a racist.

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump is an authoritarian. He's a fascist. Forget about the

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that it is in fact the left that is

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>willing to destroy this system in order to tear down

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the president of the United States. And it comes from

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>even before Trump. The case that he felt was the

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>single greatest usurpation of executive authority was Bumtian, which had

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to do with the detainment of an all unlawful combatant

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>during a time of war. In the Global War on Terror,

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>when the courts came into rule, the federal judiciary system

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>decided that the President of the United States has to

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>confer the same internal due process and legal rights to

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>an unlawful combatant in a time of war as they

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>would for somebody who was detained inside this country. Well,

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is there any area of the law where the president

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to have a greater degree of leeway and

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>discretion to include mistakes and collateral damage than in repulsing

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>foreign adversaries, foreign invasion, foreign attackers. If you go back

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to the vision of the founders, this is why one

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons for an executive branch, which initially was

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be really almost an errand boy of the legislature,

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>if you go back to the before the Constitutional Convention.

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But one of the reasons for this creation was specifically

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>because they knew that if you get if all of

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a sudden the British invaded, as they did again, you

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>need somebody who can give orders that will be executed

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to repulse that invasion and to defend the very political

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>community that the Constitution is meant to protect. An auld

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and now the courts are coming and saying no, you

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. In fact, the courts tried to create

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in the whole mess over the so called Muslim band,

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a universal right around the world to get into a

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>US court to challenge, as a foreigner with no rights

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>or ties whatsoever to the United States, to challenge your

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>exclusion from the country based on executive authority. I mean,

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I know that, you know, it's easier to sit around

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and yell about the swamp and the swamp rats and

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>drain the swamp and Maga and the wall and everything else.

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And look, I'm all for the cultural aspects and the

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>communication aspects of the Trump vision because we have to

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>win elections. So I'm not putting all that down. I'm

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>just saying what is happening here, What is happening in

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the judiciary, and with a left wing that views itself

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>as inherently justified in taking any act, this has ramifications

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>even beyond the Trump administration. And this is really really important.

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>They are corrupting, They are undermining some of the most

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>powerful institutions in our government. They are imbalancing the balance

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of powers intentionally, so they are proving to any American

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>who's willing to open his or her eyes that they

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>do not approach these issues with good faith. They do

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>not care what the collateral damages to the system. And

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>as they do this, they claim they are saving the

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>system in the error of Trump. The left is willing

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to burn down the village of this American experiment in

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>order to save it. That is what they may not

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>recognize it as such, that is what they are doing.

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>There is no person who could look at the way

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that they have been leveraging, specifically the judiciary as a

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>weapon as a club to batter this Trump administration with,

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and not say, how are we supposed to have faith

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in this institution going forward? This is also why it

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>looms so large in the mind to the left, the

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>prospect of not being able to count on a left

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of center Supreme Court, of not being able to count

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>on an ultimate judicial body that will give them the

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>most important policy and cultural and political victories that they've

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>been wanting for decades. Many leftists feel like they can't

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>live in America, or that's not the case. The least

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll say that openly. If they can't have a left

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of center court, a bunch of dictators in robes deciding

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>what will be in America irrespective of what the law

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>actually says. Then they no longer respect the law. This

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>goes back to progressives, as the Attorney General said, treating

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>politics as a religion, with the holy mission to use

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the coercive power of the state to remake man and

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>society in their own image according to an abstract ideal

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of perfection. Whatever means they use are therefore justified, because

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>by definition they are a virtuous people pursuing deific ends.

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>For the left, the utopia they seek is the only

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>justification for any means. We are seeing that play out

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in real time in this country, including in the weaponization

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment as an explicitly partisan tool. Why are we

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>going to use the impeachment mechanism against this president? Why

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>are the leftist? Why are Nanci Pelosi walking around saying

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>things that they must know to be untrue. They're not

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that stupid. They know what they're saying is a lie.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Because anything to defeat Trump is inherently justified. Anything to

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>her his chances at reelection, or even to remove him

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>from office has to be justified. My friends, This kind

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:12.479
<v Speaker 1>of absolutism is the wellspring of totalitarianism. Do not forget it.

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that what you're going to see in the

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>next weeks to come is this president will be impeached,

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and he should be impeached. And he should be impeached

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>because he has used his office to obstruct justice. He

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>should be impeached because he is in violation of the

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Emolument's clause of the Constitution, and where he is very blatantly,

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>i mean really incredibly used his office to make more

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>money for his family. And lastly, of course he should

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>be in peach because he has used national security aid

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to Ukraine in order to try to undermine a potential

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>political opponent. And those are roll grounds for impeachment. Why

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have this whole sham of an investigation. If somebody like

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders, who's a sitting senator and who therefore will

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>be called upon as this goes along, to cast a

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 1>vote in favor of removing the president United States, we

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>really have to sit around and pretend that the Democrats

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't already made up their mind here. People like Nancy

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi look at us and say, wait, we don't know

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>if it's going to be impeachment or not. No, they're

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>going to impeach this president, and if they could remove him,

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>make no mistake about it, if they happen to have

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the two thirds votes required in the Senate, by the way,

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they'll be complaints about that, and they will

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 1>start to say it should just be a bare majority, right,

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>just a basic majority in the Senate should be enough,

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>because then the Democrats would feel like they could probably

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>pressure one or two, maybe three Republicans switch. They'll be

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>complaining about that part of the system. Because they complained

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>about any part of this. It doesn't give them what

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they want. But if they're going to tell us that

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Trump is already guilty, why have this political trial? It's

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>all sham, folks, welcome back team. So what exactly do

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats say, this whole impeachment thing is is about

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.240
<v Speaker 1>how's it's going to go? You know, what's their position

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>on this? Nancy Pelosi was saying some bonkers stuff over

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, which I guess not surprising, is Nancy Pelosi.

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi's out there saying that the president has the

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>right to defend himself and this impeachment inquiry if he

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>wants to, and people would say, well, why would he,

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>why would he do that. Here's Nancy telling us all that,

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe the president has some super secret things

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>somewhere that he just wants to present us. I can't

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>believe this woman, speak of the House, folks. But here

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we are play six. That vote has not taken place

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to proceed necessarily with impeachment. But do you think you'll

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>go through all of this and not vote to impeach

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the president? That remains with the facts of the president

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>has information that demonstrates his innocence in all of this,

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>which we haven't seen. His trans transcript of a phone

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.959
<v Speaker 1>call is tucked away in a high high at least

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>sensitive compartmentalized intelligence server, so we can't see that. If

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he has information that is exculptatory that means X taking

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>away cult the blame, then we look forward to seeing him.

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like maybe he's got some you know, magic genie

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in a bottle somewhere. It's gonna just like make him

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>innocent of everything. I mean, Nancy Pelosi, do anyone does

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's a serious even being listener and say, yeah, yeah,

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to impeach the president. Sure, there's a

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a possible future in which they're gonna say, wow,

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you mean Trump is and it's into all the horrible

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>things we've been saying about him for three years now.

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>She speaks to us all like we're idiots, folks. She

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:11.720
<v Speaker 1>really does. No one holds her accountable for it. Would

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you ever vote to not impeach a president? Well, you know,

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe he is going to be defending us against an

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>invasion of space aliens and at that point we'll have

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>to just rally around our presence, So maybe we want

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>impeach him then, I mean, that's more or less what

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>she's saying. This is absurd. But she can't she can't

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>give away the whole game here, can't tell us what's

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>really going to happen, which is that all of this

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>pretense that there's they're presenting information to get to the

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom of this, to get to the facts. We already

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 1>know the facts. We already know what was said of

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the phone call. They already released the transcript. So what

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw today a poll that said that seventy percent

0:37:53.719 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of people seventy percent of people in the poll think

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that the president's conversation was wrong. I don't think it

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>was wrong. I think it was unwise because he would

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>he should know that there are deep state elements that

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have access to his conversations that could twist it and

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>do exactly what we have seen happen right now. I

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 1>think he should have been more careful, But then again,

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure some of you would come back to me with, well, Buck,

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>how careful can he be when they're willing to twist

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 1>his words and lie about him and break the law

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in some cases to leak about this president or some

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of his advisors and what they've done. They're willing to

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>do anything, as the Attorney General said, They're willing to

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 1>justify whatever it is that they think they have to do.

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>They believe it's inherently justified if it's anti Trump. So

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>how careful could he be? That's another point of view

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 1>on this, although I think the President probably could be

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more cautious in how he speaks about

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>things and what he says. But this then leads us

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to where they really want to take it. This week,

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the oh the president should testify in his defense. Chuck Schumer,

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>for example, hopping on this bandwagon. Here's what he said,

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>play ten. Donald Trump doesn't agree with what he's hearing,

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:24.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like what he's hearing, he shouldn't tweet, he should

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>come to the committee and testify under oath, and he

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>should allow all those around him to come to the

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>committee and testify under oath. I would just respond to Schumer,

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>how dare you really you think that your ridiculous little

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>committee of partisan hacks should be able to pull the

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>presence of the United States in a coequal branch of

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>government and harangue him and mock him and try to

0:39:54.960 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>entrap him, perhaps in perjury. Now, President Trump did tweet

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>about this and said that he would think about it,

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm here to say that it would be wrong

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>for the president to do this on many levels. It

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>would be wrong from the perspective of the lack of

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>respect that it would show for the separation of powers.

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>What's to prevent the next administration, the administration after that,

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 1>from having just a bare majority in the House of

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Representatives get to pull the President of United States in

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and use it as an opportunity to grandstand and assault

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the President of the United States verbally in front of

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the whole country for partisan ends. That's the precedent that

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we should have set here. This is absurd, But these

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>people are absurd. These Democrats who keep saying these things

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>about Trump and who keep making claims about their willingness

0:40:55.880 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to respect the system. They are lieing. They are lying

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>about this. We know what they're going to do, we

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>know how they feel. We are all smart enough to

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>figure this out if we just spend a moment thinking

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 1>about it. And yet here they have. Here you have

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a Senator Chuck Schumer telling us that the president should

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Could you imagine for a moment. I mean, this was

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>just like the old playbook, though, isn't it. They They've

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>got these these routines they go through to try to

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 1>undermine the president. Remember, originally it was they wanted him

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to testify to Muller, that sham of a probe run

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>by Weissman, now an MSNBC analyst, folks gee, I wonder

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>what his politics are. They were going to let Weissman

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and his Democrat attack dogs go after the President of

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States under oath, try to provoke a crisis,

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a moment perhaps that they would seize on as lying

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>under oath. Keep in mind that when it's a lie

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and not a lie is something that's always up for interpretation.

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 1>For Democrats, Bill Clinton, did he lie in the oath.

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course he did. But they say that that wasn't

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>a crime lie, that was just like a personal lie. Huh.

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>There we go. He ends justify the means whatever they

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>want they get. There's no real rules that apply. You're

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the president testify to them all approbe And

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>now they want to have the President subject himself to

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in Congress being able to pull him apart in

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>public and make all kinds of accusations. And then if

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the President responds by the way, it would also undermine,

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in my view, would undermine the Congress because this president,

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>if he did do this, it would be quite a spectacle.

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And I worry because this president's a fighter. I worry

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>about his judgment on these issues. Sometimes you do get

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the sense that if left to his own devices, perhaps

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 1>he would have testified or would have subjected himself, I

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>should say, to questioning the Mullet probe and left to

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:04.839
<v Speaker 1>his own judgment and his own devices, I can't say

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm one hundred percent sure that he wouldn't subject himself

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to this congressional impeachment inquiry. The whole thing, isn't it.

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just a fraud. It's just such a frauds, such

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a waste of everybody's time. And all these people who

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>are saying that they want they think the president should

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.280
<v Speaker 1>be removed from office. Maybe the president should be removed

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>from office. We'll find out in less than a year.

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>It's called an election. There's anybody who believes in our

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>system of government has good faith in the fact that

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you should be abled. You should be willing as an

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>American to concede power to the other side when they

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>duly win an election. Anyone who believes in that should

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 1>think that the deference here, if there's any question about

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the president's conduct and whether it even could be construed

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>as worthy of being removed from office, the deference should

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>be given to the next election. The deference should be

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that the system we have is all about the will

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of the people ultimately, and that is evidence through the

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>election process. That's what the president has the awesome powers

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that he does. It's because the people give that power

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to him through our system of government, and to take

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it away from him based on partisan whim and narrative

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 1>and these lies, It's just what do the Democrats really

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 1>think what happened after that? I always wonder about that too,

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:34.919
<v Speaker 1>If they did manage to remove the president and Vice

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>President Pence all of a sudden became the president of

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the United States going into a reelection. Do they think

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that we want to have more lectures from the left

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 1>about the need to respect our democracy and the system,

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and they really think that the Trump movement would go away,

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that the suspicion that many of us have that the

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>political system is rigged by a class of elites who

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>are much more bumbling fools than they are intellectual superiors.

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Do we think that that would go away? Or would

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it actually get worse? Would that sentiment be proven to

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>be true and it would actually just harden. We would

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 1>become even further entrenched in our opinions of this, We

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>would be even more separated, more polarized, a word the

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 1>media loves to use. I think we all know it

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 1>would just get worse. I think we all know that

0:45:30.600 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it would by no means damp in the frenzy right

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>now if you had this president removed from office. If anything,

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it would create a massive schism, not just

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a polarization of ideas, but a schism in this country

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and the belief that this is now still the country

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that was left to us by the founding fathers, that

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we still have a system that functions the way it

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 1>claims to. It starts to get scary when you think

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>about the removal of a president under these circumstances, with

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 1>such a mountain of evidence that they've been trying to

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 1>remove from from the very beginning, that he is not

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:12.359
<v Speaker 1>allowed to be president. Because they say so, people think

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>this will improve the situation. They're delusional. But the Left

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is very delusional these days. That's one of the reasons why.

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's so troubling. They have no self awareness whatsoever.

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi, for example, had this to say about how

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump is mean and he insults people. Play clip five.

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:37.919
<v Speaker 1>But the president and perhaps some of the White House

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>have to know that the words of the president weigh

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a ton. They are very significant, and he should not

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>frivolously throw out insults. But that's what he does. I

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:54.919
<v Speaker 1>think part of it is his own insecurity as an impostor.

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he knows full well that he's in that

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>office way over his head, and so he has to

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>diminish everyone else. Classic Nancy Pelosi moment. The President shouldn't

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>insult people because he's a big dumb, stupid face who

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:17.759
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be the president. Wow. Okay, Nancy, people should really

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>listen to you. You're giving them really fair minded advice

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on all of this. But notice how she used the

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 1>word impostor. I often speak to you about how the

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have not accepted the twenty sixteen election, and I

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:41.439
<v Speaker 1>mean that they have not accepted that they lost. Trump won,

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and that their rejection of him as a legitimate president

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is in fact a rejection of this system that we have.

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>They can't claim to love the system, to want to

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:54.839
<v Speaker 1>protect it, to want to hold it close and keep

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it safe in the warm at night, and be upending it,

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:03.359
<v Speaker 1>throwing it out in the dead of night because they

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 1>don't like what the system gave them in twenty sixteen.

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what they're doing. Impostor. That's quite a word

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to use. That's the Speaker of the House, my friends,

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful elected Democrat in the country, and she

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is saying that the President of the United States is

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:31.439
<v Speaker 1>not legitimately the president. Those are her words, and it's

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not the first time this has been said. They have

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 1>called him a traitor, they have called him a rapist,

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they have called him a racist, they've called him a

0:48:37.080 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>white nationals and now they call him an impostor. If

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody really was an impostor, should you respect the office

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that they hold and the way that they conduct, the

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>way that they use those powers while in office. Of

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>course not, it's all illegitimate. Well, if Trump really is

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>an impostor, and therefore everything that he has done and

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 1>seeks to do is I jimate, doesn't that then justify

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>any action whatsoever that the Left is willing to take

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to stop him, to slow him down, to

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:12.320
<v Speaker 1>make things harder. Ah, It's almost like what Attorney General

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Barr said about the true nature of the left and

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 1>their willingness to go scorched earth, stop at nothing to

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 1>obstruct this president. The Democrats themselves tell us this on

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a regular basis. They tell us what they think of

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>as president, and therefore they also are telling us what

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they are willing to do to stop him. The answer

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that is absolutely anything. Twenty fourth of September, it was

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 1>when I called for a fuller expansion inquiry. What's going on?

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But to proceed with the inquiry, and that kind of

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>changed our communication until that day in the room when

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, all Rose, mister President, with you lead to Putin,

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's giving them a strong or foothold in the

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, by what you did with Turkey and Syria. Well,

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:08.840
<v Speaker 1>what you did by withholding a grant was holding a

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to military assistance. Voted to buy Congress to Ukraine to

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of Putin Lemon thousand more than like thirteen

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand by now Ukrainians have died at the hands of

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Russians. They needed that military aid. And with his

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:28.400
<v Speaker 1>disparaging remarks about NATO and questioning our commitment to NATO,

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:33.479
<v Speaker 1>that's to Putin's advantage. So we do have, shall we say,

0:50:33.920 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a candid relationship. Nancy Pelosi can't be that stupid. I mean,

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think she's very bright. I think she's cunning.

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:44.240
<v Speaker 1>She's not wise, she's not in intellectual, but she's cunning.

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:45.719
<v Speaker 1>She does whatever she has to do to get what

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>she wants and has been doing it for a long

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:51.440
<v Speaker 1>enough time that she's pretty good at it. Everything for

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of Putin. They really needed that military Really,

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>where was wimpy Commander in Chief Obama on helping the

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians when it came to Putin. Oh, let's just send

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 1>them blankets. Let's send them, you know, sippy cups. No,

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they needed weapons. They needed weapons. Obama wouldn't give the

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>weapons Trump. Would you think the Putin liked that? Do

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you think that that was? Someone explained this to me.

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh and in Syria, where Trump decided to let the

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 1>battlefield commanders make the decisions necessary to defeat ices. That's

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>why I got wrapped up so quickly. The speed of

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the air campaign, very underreported in the media, by the way,

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>against the Islamic State, dramatically accelerated because of President Trump.

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Obama didn't want to deal with the risk and the

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 1>collateral damage, but that also included when Trump was in charge,

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:45.240
<v Speaker 1>blowing up a couple of hundred Russians in the desert?

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Was that doing Putin's bidding? Was it doing Putin's bidding?

0:51:49.960 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 1>When Trump put more sanctions on Russia than even Obama did.

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what exactly does Nancy Pelosi think

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 1>are the outer limits of her ability to just make

0:52:01.760 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 1>crap up all for the benefit of Putin. These people

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are grotesque in their mendacity or mendaciousness, one of those

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 1>words is right. These people will lie to you. They

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 1>will come up with narratives that serve a function in

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>politics that aren't rooted in truth or reality, and they

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>will run with it, and they will tell you that

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:35.040
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it for your benefit. The fact that Nancy

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi is the most powerful Democrat in the country tells

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you really everything you have to know about the Democratic Party.

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:47.799
<v Speaker 1>They are and justify the means, say what you have

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to say when you have to say it. There is

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 1>no principle of fair play, There is no approach of

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:55.479
<v Speaker 1>good faith. It is all just how do we win

0:52:55.920 --> 0:52:58.399
<v Speaker 1>and make the other side lose so then we can

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:02.520
<v Speaker 1>make them do whatever we want. No rules, no constitutional

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:05.400
<v Speaker 1>protections for them. Whatever we say the law is, that

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is what it shall be. That's Nancy Pelosi's Democrat Party

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>for you. Of course, the New York Times has to

0:53:13.680 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 1>attack the single biggest policy maneuver of the Trump administration

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 1>so far, which is the tax cut, and they're trying

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to help. Now there's a difficulty that Democrats face going

0:53:27.400 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>into this reelection. By the way, Mayor Pete Boodha Judge

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is now leading substantially in Iowa. My understanding is he

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:39.359
<v Speaker 1>has a huge ground game set up in Iowa, more

0:53:39.360 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 1>than anybody else, and it makes some sense he's from

0:53:42.080 --> 0:53:48.120
<v Speaker 1>neighboring Indiana. He is somebody who appeals to Midwesterners because

0:53:48.120 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>he's from the Midwest. And if he can win in Iowa,

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>then the storyline becomes, here's this young guy who's got

0:53:57.160 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 1>an impressive resume and he's not old like Biden. And

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 1>here's this young guy who if he's a front runner

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:05.520
<v Speaker 1>for our if he wins Iowa, maybe he should be

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the frontrunner overall, and you might have this mash a

0:54:09.360 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>massive shift in support that would result afterwards. Right that

0:54:13.520 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's his path to, if not outright victory in the primary,

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>eventually certainly being a very powerful vice presidential candidate, because remember,

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have to there are certain states that this is

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:27.240
<v Speaker 1>all going to come down to, in places like Michigan

0:54:27.239 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 1>and Wisconsin and Iowa. Those are places that Democrats need

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:32.560
<v Speaker 1>help if they're going to try to defeat Trump in

0:54:32.600 --> 0:54:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the election. Assuming that Trump is allowed to get to

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the election before without being removed by these Democrat partisans hyperpartisans,

0:54:42.360 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps I should say, but yeah, mayor Pete, who knew

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>apparently the Beto approach of being the most woke woke

0:54:51.840 --> 0:55:00.840
<v Speaker 1>person ever didn't work, and may repeats path of relative moderation. Hey,

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stop lecturing people about their Christian faith when

0:55:04.760 --> 0:55:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it seems that his grasp may or Pete's grasp of

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the Gospel is tenuous. But he's gonna stop doing that

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and just start to sound a little more like he

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he might be more reasol. His policies are not.

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:20.960
<v Speaker 1>But he's a left wing guy. Medicare for all. I mean,

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:25.879
<v Speaker 1>he's a left wing candidate. But he's got some substantial

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:30.439
<v Speaker 1>support that seems to be building, particularly in Iowa. I'm

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 1>expecting somebody other than Biden is going to win that primary.

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So we got to start thinking of who that's gonna be. Hello,

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:40.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about her later. Oh, she's still thinking about it.

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, she is still thinking about it. I'm thinking

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:50.840
<v Speaker 1>about you, America. Does it sound like Hillary Clinton? No?

0:55:51.320 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But did you know who I was talking about? Yes? So,

0:55:56.880 --> 0:56:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But back to the necessity among those in the media

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to come up with an alternate view of the economic situation.

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now, they're churning out this machinery of Democrats support

0:56:11.320 --> 0:56:14.400
<v Speaker 1>from the various newsrooms, the various major media outlets in

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the country, to say that the tax cuts didn't work,

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:21.360
<v Speaker 1>really they didn't work the way they were supposed to,

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and it really was just a giveaway to the rich,

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and the usual class warfare stuff all has to come

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 1>out now, the usual Marxist tinged Marxist sounding rhetoric about

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:39.319
<v Speaker 1>giveaways for the rich and the Republicans of the Party

0:56:39.360 --> 0:56:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of fat Cats. They've got all these liberal billionaires running

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:44.440
<v Speaker 1>around Silicon Valley run by liberals, Hollywood run by liberals,

0:56:44.520 --> 0:56:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street run by liberals, but it's always the billionaire

0:56:49.400 --> 0:56:52.400
<v Speaker 1>fat cats that are Republican that get all this attention,

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:55.399
<v Speaker 1>and people want to throw under the bus in one

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:57.279
<v Speaker 1>way or another. So what we have now is the

0:56:57.320 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 1>New York Times writing this piece about FedEx. They use

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:10.840
<v Speaker 1>FedEx as a prime example of exactly how this didn't work,

0:57:12.600 --> 0:57:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of how its tax bill, how FedEx cut its tax

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:21.960
<v Speaker 1>bill to zero. Now keep in mind that GE very

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 1>famously went for a while and paid no federal income tax.

0:57:25.080 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But GE wasn't vilified for doing that because became a

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:33.919
<v Speaker 1>left wing company with very close ties, I believe under

0:57:33.960 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Immolt to President Obama. So GE was left and essentially

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:44.680
<v Speaker 1>had become largely a financial services company that happened to

0:57:44.720 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 1>also make some stuff and have engineering and create lightbulbs

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and machinery and other things. But GE capital became a

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>huge part of the business, which is why GE is

0:57:52.840 --> 0:57:57.280
<v Speaker 1>now just in shambles as a great American a great

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 1>American corporation. That's a story for another day. How FedEx

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:06.560
<v Speaker 1>cut its tax bill to zero dollars, the company, like

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:09.080
<v Speaker 1>much of corporate America, has not made good on its

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:15.200
<v Speaker 1>promised investment surge from President Trump's twenty seventeen tax cut.

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a reason that they're running with this story.

0:58:19.160 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 1>They're using this as the pointy end of the spear,

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the thin end of the wedge for the narrative. The

0:58:27.720 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Democrats will need this primary that this economy right now

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that we are in that is low inflation, low unemployment,

0:58:37.120 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 1>super high stock market, lots of economic growth. I mean

0:58:41.120 --> 0:58:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that this is bad somehow there or not what it

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>should be. If only you put Democrats in charge, If

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you just hand it over one fifth of the economy

0:58:51.480 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 1>entirely to the Democrats central planners, to the socialists who

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:58.280
<v Speaker 1>now run the Democrat Party, if you will just be

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:02.680
<v Speaker 1>willing to do that, then we would all have an

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:05.760
<v Speaker 1>end to economic anxiety. Then we wouldn't have to worry

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:08.880
<v Speaker 1>about going bankrupt from health concerns. We'd all have better,

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we'd all have good housing and good jobs and goodness

0:59:11.560 --> 0:59:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and good that. The more they talk about this, the

0:59:14.160 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 1>more it reminds me of how in the Soviet Constitution,

0:59:18.240 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean this, in the Constitution of the Soviet Union,

0:59:22.240 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 1>there were very explicit promises made about everyone having a job,

0:59:27.200 --> 0:59:30.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone having food, everyone having clothing and a place to live,

0:59:30.520 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and even I believe, two weeks of paid vacation every year.

0:59:34.040 --> 0:59:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Soviet Constitution was like, it's going to

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:39.600
<v Speaker 1>be great. Everyone's gonna have everything they need. That was

0:59:39.640 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the promise. Oh, that's right, what is it? The bring

0:59:42.400 --> 0:59:44.680
<v Speaker 1>us back here to my friend, Attorney General bar the

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>deification of the state, the state and place of God.

0:59:49.360 --> 0:59:51.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right. The Soviet Union is going to give you everything.

0:59:52.320 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a very large country, very rich and natural resources.

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's gonna work for the common good. How would this

0:59:57.720 --> 1:00:01.440
<v Speaker 1>not work, they were saying, And we know not only

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>did not work, but it led to tremendous evils and

1:00:07.040 --> 1:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>misery and slavery and despair, unimaginable levels of violence and

1:00:13.320 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>oppression and torture and totalitarianism. But it was all supposed

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to be given everybody everything they need. Now, we are

1:00:21.280 --> 1:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>not the Soviet Union, and I'm not pretending we are.

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>But when you start hearing people promise that everything will

1:00:26.840 --> 1:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>be provided for you and you have to do nothing

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in response. All you through is vote for them or

1:00:31.600 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>put them in power, you should be very very skeptical.

1:00:36.400 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>And I would argue you should be very concerned really

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that this is a sign that things are going to

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>go quite awry. But so they use FedEx and they say, see,

1:00:47.680 --> 1:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>here's a company that isn't paying taxes the way that

1:00:52.840 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to. That FedEx is another one of these

1:01:00.080 --> 1:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>corporations that promises to invest in American workers and all

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, and they haven't done the way. They haven't

1:01:06.440 --> 1:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>done things the way that we would want them to

1:01:10.560 --> 1:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>if we were running those corporations as Democrat government officials. Right, Well,

1:01:17.600 --> 1:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it turns out FedEx isn't going to take this lying down.

1:01:21.120 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>They put out a statement and it was a doozy

1:01:25.880 --> 1:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>from Frederick W. Smith, the chairman and CEO of FedEx Corporation.

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he put out as an official statement quote.

1:01:36.160 --> 1:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times published a distorted and factually incorrect

1:01:40.920 --> 1:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>story on the front page of the Sunday, November seventeenth

1:01:44.160 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>edition concerning FedEx and are billions of dollars of tax

1:01:48.160 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>payments and billions of dollars of investments in the US economy.

1:01:52.640 --> 1:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Pertinent to this outrageous distortion of the truth is the

1:01:56.240 --> 1:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that, unlike FedEx, the New York Times paid zero

1:02:00.680 --> 1:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>federal income tax in twenty seventeen on earnings of one

1:02:03.680 --> 1:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eleven million dollars and only thirty million dollars

1:02:07.280 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen, eighteen percent of their pre tax book income.

1:02:13.000 --> 1:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Also in twenty eighteen, the New York Times cut their

1:02:15.880 --> 1:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>capital investments nearly and a half to fifty seven million,

1:02:19.680 --> 1:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>which equates to a rounding error when compared to the

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars of capital that FedEx invested in the

1:02:28.480 --> 1:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>US economy during that same year. I hereby challenge A. G. Salzburger,

1:02:35.040 --> 1:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>publisher of The New York Times and the Business section editor,

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to a public debate in Washington, DC with me and

1:02:43.480 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the FedEx corporate Vice president of tax. The focus of

1:02:48.200 --> 1:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the debate should be federal tax policy and the relative

1:02:51.680 --> 1:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>societal benefits of business investments and the enormous intended benefits

1:02:56.760 --> 1:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to the United States economy, especially lower and middle class

1:03:00.480 --> 1:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>wage earners. I look forward to hearing promptly from mister

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Salzburger and scheduling this open event to bring further public

1:03:10.640 --> 1:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>awareness of the facts related to these important issues. Wow,

1:03:18.800 --> 1:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I think it's a fantastic idea. Of course,

1:03:22.560 --> 1:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times Salsburg, I mean, Salisburger is not

1:03:24.960 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>an impressive guy. New York Times will never Not only

1:03:30.040 --> 1:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>would The New York Times not send their publisher who

1:03:34.240 --> 1:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>inherited the company, but side don't their publisher to do this.

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>They won't even send any of their experts, any of

1:03:42.240 --> 1:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>their columnists, any of their editors for this debate. I

1:03:46.760 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>can almost guarantee it. I mean, I'm guessing I'm looking

1:03:49.880 --> 1:03:52.479
<v Speaker 1>into the future here, but you'll see they won't send anything.

1:03:52.920 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Would this would be quite worthwhile for the public to see,

1:03:56.160 --> 1:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it If The New York Times is going to

1:03:58.480 --> 1:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>call out FedEx on its front page for profiting and

1:04:03.800 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>effectively lying about what it would do so that it

1:04:05.800 --> 1:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>would get the tax cuts, that it would do the

1:04:07.480 --> 1:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>stock buybacks to push up the stock price to help

1:04:10.360 --> 1:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the executives and help the shareholders and not help the

1:04:12.680 --> 1:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>common man, and not put the investments in and class warfare. Baby,

1:04:16.480 --> 1:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>this is how they do it. If The New York

1:04:19.400 --> 1:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Times is going to write that piece on its front page,

1:04:22.840 --> 1:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>then why shouldn't The New York Times be willing to

1:04:27.040 --> 1:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>meet the chairman of FedEx. I mean, this is not

1:04:29.400 --> 1:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>some random internet roll. The chairman of FedEx and CEO

1:04:33.040 --> 1:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to a public debate on what's really gone on here.

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you why they are scared, and they are

1:04:40.480 --> 1:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a right to be scared, because he would mop the

1:04:44.080 --> 1:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>floor with them. The New York Times wouldn't even exist

1:04:47.480 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>if it was not for ideologically driven left wing billionaire

1:04:52.360 --> 1:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>like Carlos, Billionaires like Carlo Slim and other very connected individuals.

1:04:58.400 --> 1:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times was going out of business, my friends.

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And the New York Times has a tremendous legacy advantage

1:05:05.480 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's been around for long enough that it's brand

1:05:07.680 --> 1:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>alone is worth a lot of money. But the people

1:05:09.560 --> 1:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>running it today are benefiting for what was done decades

1:05:12.880 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and decades before them. FedEx, on the other hand, shows

1:05:19.160 --> 1:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>us not just what the difference is between a company

1:05:22.880 --> 1:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that is employing a lot of people, and that is

1:05:25.280 --> 1:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>operating as a free market entity. That's not essentially an

1:05:28.280 --> 1:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>artistic endeavor. The New York Times is for a lot

1:05:30.560 --> 1:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of liberals a largely artistic endeavor. They support it the

1:05:32.840 --> 1:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>way you support your local philharmonic. FedEx has to deliver

1:05:38.280 --> 1:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in every sense. And so here is a company that

1:05:43.360 --> 1:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the left has always been a little bit uncomfortable with,

1:05:47.640 --> 1:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really like because FedEx took what had been for

1:05:51.840 --> 1:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a long time a government function. In fact, one of

1:05:54.200 --> 1:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the explanations for why government needs certain power, certain authority,

1:05:58.400 --> 1:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>certain funding. Oh we need we need roads, we needed

1:06:00.960 --> 1:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a post office. Well, let me ask you if you

1:06:05.280 --> 1:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>were going to send your aunt Ethel her brooch from

1:06:11.000 --> 1:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the Revolutionary War era, and you have to get it

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there overnight before she goes and gives her big speech

1:06:18.160 --> 1:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Rotary Club. Are you going to take aunt

1:06:20.840 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Ethel's brooch to the post office? Are you going to

1:06:23.280 --> 1:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>take it to Federal Express? I think we all know

1:06:26.640 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the answer. Federal Express. I'm not saying it's perfect, but

1:06:30.720 --> 1:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty amazing what it's able to do. It's stunning

1:06:35.320 --> 1:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that you can pick the time of delivery, and that

1:06:38.080 --> 1:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe I actually looked at this once because I

1:06:40.000 --> 1:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>FedEx something to myself that was very important, valuable, and

1:06:42.640 --> 1:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>then I got a little worried. I think they have

1:06:45.040 --> 1:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>an either ninety seven or ninety nine percent successful delivery rate,

1:06:52.440 --> 1:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>meaning not that they lose things, meaning that they get

1:06:55.040 --> 1:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it there when they say they're going to get it there.

1:06:56.840 --> 1:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's ninety seven or ninety nine percent of

1:06:58.840 --> 1:07:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the time. That's pretty impressive considering what they do. And

1:07:05.320 --> 1:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this is where the free market has shown you that

1:07:07.560 --> 1:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it can do something that the government had been the

1:07:09.480 --> 1:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>sole provider of for a long time, and in fact

1:07:11.480 --> 1:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>do it much better than the government can, and create

1:07:14.000 --> 1:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>jobs in the process and productivity and give a service.

1:07:17.960 --> 1:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>So they so FedEx is a perfect target for them

1:07:20.400 --> 1:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>because they really don't like it, AH privatizing the postal

1:07:24.960 --> 1:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>service essentially, that's or giving a private alternative the postal service.

1:07:30.840 --> 1:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And they say that they don't they haven't hired up,

1:07:33.360 --> 1:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they haven't spent enough money the way they said they would. Well,

1:07:36.520 --> 1:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>let's gives a private company and it's now paying less

1:07:40.480 --> 1:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>than taxes. Keep in mind, corporations don't pay taxes. People

1:07:43.320 --> 1:07:46.479
<v Speaker 1>pay taxes. So all that FedEx having a lower tax

1:07:46.560 --> 1:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>rate means that there's less money going to the government

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:51.479
<v Speaker 1>from FedEx, which means FedEx has more money to pay

1:07:51.600 --> 1:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>people and to invest in things than it would have otherwise.

1:07:55.200 --> 1:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>All those people that is paying, by the way, are

1:07:57.320 --> 1:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>paying taxes. So you tax the company, and then the

1:08:01.200 --> 1:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>people that get paid by the company they pay taxes

1:08:03.880 --> 1:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to the government too. This is also where we get

1:08:07.560 --> 1:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to the onerous tax burden. The Democrats not only defend

1:08:13.040 --> 1:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>today but want to expand dramatically because they think they'll

1:08:15.760 --> 1:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>be better stewards of the money that you have that

1:08:19.920 --> 1:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>you make, then you will be They know more than

1:08:22.720 --> 1:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you do. I would love to see this debate between

1:08:27.680 --> 1:08:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of FedEx and anybody from the New York Times,

1:08:31.560 --> 1:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>because what it would show is is that once again

1:08:33.240 --> 1:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the central planners don't know what they're talking about, are

1:08:36.840 --> 1:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>rooted in faulty assumptions, and people that believe in and

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>rely on free markets are the ones who are actually

1:08:44.280 --> 1:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>pushing us forward and doing good things for this country

1:08:46.360 --> 1:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that everybody benefits from. And saying that the conditions on

1:08:48.720 --> 1:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>our board, the mass expansions attention camps qualifies as a

1:08:51.760 --> 1:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>concentration camp. Everybody thought it was nuts right, until we

1:08:55.720 --> 1:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>realize this week that Stephen Miller is a no joke,

1:08:58.560 --> 1:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>die hard whiten rationalist. This is what our policy has become,

1:09:04.360 --> 1:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and in order for us to rectify and to begin

1:09:06.840 --> 1:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to heal as a country, he has got to go.

1:09:09.200 --> 1:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel duty bound to note that that Miller's defenders.

1:09:12.200 --> 1:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Miller himself would say, I'm Jewish myself. I

1:09:15.400 --> 1:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>come from a Jewish family, and it's offensive for you

1:09:18.800 --> 1:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to invoke that word, particularly as as regards someone who

1:09:23.880 --> 1:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is Jewish. Well, I'm sure that's also the way in

1:09:26.200 --> 1:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>which he's weaponized his identity, right, Like you know, they say,

1:09:30.680 --> 1:09:35.479
<v Speaker 1>and there's this, there's the color of your skin and

1:09:35.520 --> 1:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the and the identity you are born with does not

1:09:37.840 --> 1:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>absolve you of moral wrong. The perst brick looking person

1:09:44.000 --> 1:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to advance horrifically in humane immigration policy would be someone

1:09:48.439 --> 1:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that looks like me, or someone that looks like someone

1:09:50.880 --> 1:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in this audience, right, because that's what provides the cover

1:09:54.720 --> 1:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for these incredibly damaging and dangerous policies. So I'm not

1:09:59.840 --> 1:10:02.519
<v Speaker 1>here to weaponize my identity, and I don't think any

1:10:02.560 --> 1:10:05.799
<v Speaker 1>public servant should weaponize their identity in order to advance

1:10:05.840 --> 1:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>white nationalist ideas period punto, I don't care who you are,

1:10:09.840 --> 1:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that's who would be in charge if the Democrats had

1:10:12.439 --> 1:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>their way. But the people like Ocazio Cortez, people that

1:10:15.400 --> 1:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>share the thoughts of Okazio Cortez and Chris Hayes and MSNBC,

1:10:19.120 --> 1:10:21.519
<v Speaker 1>just just remember that I just played. There's so much

1:10:21.640 --> 1:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there's so much crazy and wrong and what she said

1:10:23.880 --> 1:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that I don't even have time for it today. But

1:10:25.680 --> 1:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just remember the people that want to tell FedEx how

1:10:28.280 --> 1:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>to run its business. It's the Ocazio Corteses of the

1:10:31.439 --> 1:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party, as if they have any idea team. I

1:10:34.200 --> 1:10:41.519
<v Speaker 1>have not forgotten anything from the fight over Justice Kabanaw's nomination.

1:10:41.800 --> 1:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It's seared into my brain. It was one of the

1:10:47.080 --> 1:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>most import for me, at least for my politics today,

1:10:51.400 --> 1:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important periods, if of post nine

1:10:55.040 --> 1:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to eleven American history, that I could point to to

1:10:58.439 --> 1:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>tell us why things are there, way are these days

1:11:00.760 --> 1:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and where it's all going. And I particularly remember the

1:11:04.240 --> 1:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>media's role on all of this. I remember we were

1:11:09.000 --> 1:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>living in an alternate universe where the word credible all

1:11:12.439 --> 1:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden meant the opposite of credible, where evidence

1:11:17.320 --> 1:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>was merely an accusation without any foundation or underpinning of

1:11:21.280 --> 1:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>fact to it whatsoever. And people were willing in the

1:11:26.320 --> 1:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>media to pretend to be or perhaps to just embrace

1:11:30.400 --> 1:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the reality of being so stupid that it was almost

1:11:38.400 --> 1:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>almost unimaginable. I mean, they were willing to say, no, no,

1:11:41.520 --> 1:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we in the mainstream media are too dumb to understand

1:11:45.880 --> 1:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here, because then we can just move

1:11:49.439 --> 1:11:53.759
<v Speaker 1>past the obviousness of what's really going on with particularly

1:11:53.840 --> 1:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Christine Blasi Ford, doctor Ford. As we were all told

1:11:58.920 --> 1:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we had to refer to Christine Blasi Ford. They would say,

1:12:05.800 --> 1:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and I remember this, why would she lie? A This

1:12:11.080 --> 1:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was a refrain, This was a talking point. Why would

1:12:15.040 --> 1:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>she lie? And people like me and you go back

1:12:18.800 --> 1:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and listen to the shows from the summer of a

1:12:20.840 --> 1:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen if you want, and it'll be quite clear.

1:12:25.120 --> 1:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Why would she lie? Because she's going to be a

1:12:27.080 --> 1:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>hero to the left, because she deeply, personally, ideologically believes

1:12:32.720 --> 1:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in abortion and the need to keep that legal for

1:12:36.320 --> 1:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>all nine months of her pregnancy in all fifty states.

1:12:40.200 --> 1:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>She got the opportunity to be a hero to left

1:12:43.680 --> 1:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>wing women, to boomer feminists for all eternity, to get book,

1:12:48.720 --> 1:12:52.719
<v Speaker 1>deals and speeches, and why would she lie? She had

1:12:52.760 --> 1:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>every incentive to lie under the circumstances of who she

1:12:57.120 --> 1:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was and what was going on then, and the media

1:13:01.000 --> 1:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>pretended like they couldn't figure that out, like we wouldn't

1:13:05.960 --> 1:13:09.479
<v Speaker 1>all know right away. We didn't know at the time

1:13:09.600 --> 1:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that she would be a share a heroine part of me,

1:13:12.760 --> 1:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>not a hero heroin to the left, buck, how did

1:13:17.200 --> 1:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know? Everybody knew, but the media was all over.

1:13:20.200 --> 1:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>She has no reason to lie, That's what they're all saying. Again,

1:13:25.920 --> 1:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Just like when Pelosi talks this about impeachment proceeding, they

1:13:29.400 --> 1:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>speak to us as though they really believe we are

1:13:31.720 --> 1:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>all idiots. And I don't know if they're so dumb

1:13:35.240 --> 1:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they believe that, or I just I don't know what

1:13:41.720 --> 1:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>we're how we're supposed to react. I hope the American

1:13:45.560 --> 1:13:47.839
<v Speaker 1>people are not so stupid as to listen to Nancy Pelosi,

1:13:47.920 --> 1:13:52.719
<v Speaker 1>But clearly I might give us too much credit. Here's

1:13:52.760 --> 1:14:00.599
<v Speaker 1>doctor Christine blasi Ford accepting the ACLUS Current Age Award

1:14:00.720 --> 1:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>play twenty one. It's really great when women step up

1:14:07.200 --> 1:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for other women, and it's really great when men show

1:14:15.880 --> 1:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>up for women, cheering celebrating her And remember, they're not

1:14:24.200 --> 1:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>just celebrating her, They're celebrating her specifically because she was

1:14:28.400 --> 1:14:34.479
<v Speaker 1>part of the ugliest smear campaign I have ever seen

1:14:34.600 --> 1:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in American politics, the nastiest, most underhanded, most dishonest thing

1:14:40.200 --> 1:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I have ever seen in my adult life go on

1:14:42.240 --> 1:14:45.559
<v Speaker 1>in American politics. It was It still makes me want

1:14:45.600 --> 1:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to throw up to this day, accusing someone of attempted

1:14:53.680 --> 1:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>really what was attempted rape? In her telling of the

1:14:56.200 --> 1:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>story in front of tens of millions of Americans with

1:15:01.439 --> 1:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>his wife and children watching, all of his friends, all

1:15:03.960 --> 1:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of his colleagues, everybody he knew, and it was all

1:15:06.280 --> 1:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a lie. It was all a lie. How could you

1:15:11.280 --> 1:15:15.559
<v Speaker 1>do that to somebody bearing false witness in that way?

1:15:16.120 --> 1:15:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how she sleeps at night, except maybe

1:15:19.720 --> 1:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>she's so looney that she believes what she said. That

1:15:22.720 --> 1:15:25.479
<v Speaker 1>is possible. I've always thought that was possible. So in

1:15:25.479 --> 1:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that sense, she wasn't knowingly lying, but the story none

1:15:30.080 --> 1:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the less was a lie. But they are celebrating her

1:15:34.120 --> 1:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>specifically for that, for the ritualized, televised torture and humiliation

1:15:41.040 --> 1:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>session of a very good, very decent, and very impressive man.

1:15:48.760 --> 1:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>But there is and has been for a long time.

1:15:51.360 --> 1:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>A bitterness and a vitriol that is at the heart

1:15:56.400 --> 1:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of the leftist feminist movement. There is a kind of

1:16:02.000 --> 1:16:05.479
<v Speaker 1>man hatred that emanates from it. That's there's no question

1:16:05.560 --> 1:16:10.559
<v Speaker 1>about it. A desire to bring men who are viewed

1:16:10.600 --> 1:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>as the white heterosexual, normative, white heterosexual patriarchal figures members

1:16:20.120 --> 1:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of the patriarchy, to bring them low, to destroy them,

1:16:23.479 --> 1:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to humiliate and degrade them. They deserve it. You see

1:16:29.240 --> 1:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Christine Blasi Forward getting awards from people now who could

1:16:33.040 --> 1:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>have seen this coming, anybody who wasn't an idiot. I

1:16:37.920 --> 1:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>saw it coming, You saw it coming. None of this

1:16:40.840 --> 1:16:44.479
<v Speaker 1>is a surprise, my friends, not in the least, but

1:16:44.520 --> 1:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the media was willing to pretend that it would be.

1:16:49.680 --> 1:16:52.519
<v Speaker 1>And that tells you so much about who they are

1:16:52.640 --> 1:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and what they really stand for. Appalling stuff. I was

1:16:56.760 --> 1:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>speaking of feminism. Charlie's Angels has had a remake now,

1:17:04.720 --> 1:17:10.519
<v Speaker 1>a remake that is staff with actresses, and one of

1:17:10.560 --> 1:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>them is from the Twilight movie. And then I don't

1:17:12.640 --> 1:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>know what the which I don't think I saw that.

1:17:14.760 --> 1:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I saw the first one, and the others I

1:17:17.120 --> 1:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have not. The others, I don't know who they are,

1:17:21.439 --> 1:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>but they Elizabeth Banks remade this movie. She's a pretty

1:17:24.479 --> 1:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>well known actress for the the a cappella movies that

1:17:27.520 --> 1:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>she made, Pitch Perfect and Show. She made those movies.

1:17:33.120 --> 1:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Those movies did very well. But then they try to

1:17:35.280 --> 1:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>do a remake of Charlie's Angels, which why even would

1:17:39.880 --> 1:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think that that would be? You know, this is what

1:17:41.760 --> 1:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to spend what one hundred million dollars on

1:17:44.240 --> 1:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>or fifty million dollars or whatever it is. And you

1:17:47.439 --> 1:17:49.719
<v Speaker 1>just look at this and you look at the script,

1:17:49.840 --> 1:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and that a feminist, a feminist twist on Charlie's Angels,

1:17:53.680 --> 1:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>which is really a show about or a show slash

1:17:57.080 --> 1:18:00.519
<v Speaker 1>movie about very very beautiful women doing daring things. But

1:18:00.680 --> 1:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>really the fact that they're all very very beautiful is

1:18:02.720 --> 1:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>really important in this whole process. So there's an inherent

1:18:06.000 --> 1:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>objectification of women. You would think that would be as

1:18:09.240 --> 1:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a result of this, and which is of course the

1:18:12.240 --> 1:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>norm in Hollywood. They pretend that it's not, but still,

1:18:14.400 --> 1:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you want, you know, beautiful women still

1:18:18.000 --> 1:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>sell tickets to things. I mean, beautiful women are still

1:18:20.120 --> 1:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the reason a lot of people want to go see things.

1:18:22.240 --> 1:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And we can say, oh, that's superficial, but there are

1:18:25.760 --> 1:18:28.479
<v Speaker 1>some biological realities that we all still have to live with,

1:18:28.560 --> 1:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>at least for the time being, until they try to

1:18:30.240 --> 1:18:34.559
<v Speaker 1>rewrite all the biological realities on the left. No person

1:18:34.600 --> 1:18:36.519
<v Speaker 1>would really think that this was a good idea for

1:18:36.560 --> 1:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a movie, right, I mean, this is just you hear

1:18:40.120 --> 1:18:42.559
<v Speaker 1>about this and you say, oh, it's kind of like

1:18:42.560 --> 1:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the feminist Ghostbusters that they made. Oh let's have a

1:18:44.960 --> 1:18:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Ghostbusters but with all women, and it's sort of a

1:18:47.640 --> 1:18:51.479
<v Speaker 1>girl a girl power take on Ghostbusters. It was the

1:18:51.520 --> 1:18:54.519
<v Speaker 1>worst movie. I've watched about fifteen minutes of it. I mean,

1:18:54.560 --> 1:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you could argue it might have been the

1:18:55.760 --> 1:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>worst movie ever made. That's a tough for its budget

1:18:59.640 --> 1:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and expectations. You have to make that relative, right, I

1:19:02.040 --> 1:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>mean LEPrecon five, LEPrecon in the Hood was probably a

1:19:05.720 --> 1:19:08.559
<v Speaker 1>worst movie. I did watch that movie, much to my

1:19:09.400 --> 1:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>everlasting shame, as well as LEPrecon in Space. There was

1:19:13.240 --> 1:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a LEPrecon in Space movie. They made a lot of

1:19:15.040 --> 1:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>those LEPrecon movies. I'm the LEPrecon. I could still you know,

1:19:18.400 --> 1:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm part Irish, so I could still do the I'm

1:19:21.320 --> 1:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the Lepreca. I remember when Mike Myers did his whole

1:19:25.720 --> 1:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>thing in Wayne's World two with the flashlight in his face.

1:19:28.080 --> 1:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I'm the Leprecai by the flashlight. It was

1:19:31.080 --> 1:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of scary actually, because I'm a LEPrecon guy. Fun fact,

1:19:34.760 --> 1:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that's actually Warwick Davis, who played the lead character in

1:19:39.000 --> 1:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the movie Willow, which was really a cheap rip off

1:19:43.120 --> 1:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Lord of the Rings trilogy, which I know

1:19:45.240 --> 1:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>people say, oh, Willow was its own book and stuff,

1:19:47.080 --> 1:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, come on, it's kind of It's kind

1:19:49.320 --> 1:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of like poor man's Lord of the Rings. But yeah,

1:19:51.240 --> 1:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Warwick Davis was in that movie, and then he played

1:19:54.080 --> 1:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the Leprecons later on, or played the LEPrecon I should

1:19:56.800 --> 1:19:59.479
<v Speaker 1>say later on. But nobody really thinks that Charlie Danel

1:19:59.479 --> 1:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a good movie, right. I mean, you

1:20:01.680 --> 1:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>ask a normal person, just like you gotta, you know,

1:20:03.280 --> 1:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you ask a normal person. Do you think that is

1:20:04.920 --> 1:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be? No? It made like eight million dollars domestically.

1:20:08.400 --> 1:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It's bombing in China, it's bombing in the United States.

1:20:11.360 --> 1:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>A terrible movie. What do you think the director? And

1:20:15.560 --> 1:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>now the woke media journals out there are saying, is

1:20:20.040 --> 1:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the reason for this tremendous flop that's going to cost

1:20:24.680 --> 1:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a studio millions and millions and millions of dollars just

1:20:28.200 --> 1:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>up in smoke. What do you think the reason that

1:20:30.640 --> 1:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a bad idea that people don't want to

1:20:32.840 --> 1:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>watch a feminist remake of Charlie's Angels, That Charlie's Angels

1:20:37.680 --> 1:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>really is rooted in what would be considered I think patriarchal,

1:20:40.960 --> 1:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>patriarchal notions of women in beauty and everything goes. So

1:20:44.560 --> 1:20:49.599
<v Speaker 1>a girl powered Charlie's Angels is probably gonna flop. And

1:20:49.880 --> 1:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you think that's? Oh, that's sexism, sexism. That's right,

1:20:55.240 --> 1:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's not doing well. It's a movie which

1:20:58.120 --> 1:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I would note is the same thing they said about

1:21:01.040 --> 1:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the horrifically bad Ghostbusters movie, which is almost worth watching

1:21:06.000 --> 1:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>because you think, to yourself, wow, are there different standards

1:21:11.160 --> 1:21:14.519
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of female comedians than male comedians? As

1:21:14.560 --> 1:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in the female comedians cast in that movie. Are they

1:21:18.040 --> 1:21:21.719
<v Speaker 1>able to be famous in their profession and rich without

1:21:21.760 --> 1:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>actually being any good at what they do? It's a

1:21:25.240 --> 1:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>fair question to ask if you see that movie, say,

1:21:28.560 --> 1:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>do female comedians have to even be funny in the

1:21:30.840 --> 1:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>current environment or they just have to be female and

1:21:32.800 --> 1:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>comedians and take the right political stances. Sometimes that movie

1:21:38.840 --> 1:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was so unfunny that it was painful. I'm not going

1:21:41.360 --> 1:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to see Charlie's Angels. I didn't even see the last one,

1:21:43.360 --> 1:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>which had Cameron Diaz back in her heyday. Although really

1:21:49.120 --> 1:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Diaz's best role was as the romantic lead in

1:21:51.800 --> 1:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the movie The Mask with Jim Carrey. What happened to

1:21:58.080 --> 1:22:01.519
<v Speaker 1>Jim Carrey? That guy got super unfunny and really annoying

1:22:01.640 --> 1:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>very fast, didn't he as he got older? Cameron Diaz

1:22:04.360 --> 1:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and Lucy lou And I'm forgetting who the third one was.

1:22:07.240 --> 1:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's Drew Barrymore. It's kind of a kind of

1:22:10.400 --> 1:22:16.759
<v Speaker 1>surprise anyway. Sexism is the reason that this movie is bombing. See,

1:22:16.760 --> 1:22:19.599
<v Speaker 1>this is the problem we have with with wokeness in Hollywood.

1:22:19.640 --> 1:22:22.559
<v Speaker 1>They had these built in excuses, so even when the

1:22:22.560 --> 1:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>market speaks, they will ignore it. Even when the market

1:22:25.880 --> 1:22:27.759
<v Speaker 1>tells them. People just don't want to see this movie,

1:22:27.920 --> 1:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>which is completely unsurprising. There's some rationalization for why it

1:22:32.840 --> 1:22:38.479
<v Speaker 1>has done so poorly. One the one the only way

1:22:38.479 --> 1:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that you can understand how Hollywood makes such bad movies

1:22:42.000 --> 1:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>and take such huge financial risks behind them is that

1:22:45.000 --> 1:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they're so there is such an ideological tilt to the

1:22:47.840 --> 1:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>left that it blinds them that they are unable to

1:22:51.760 --> 1:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>be objective about these things sometimes and they assume that

1:22:55.439 --> 1:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>there must be a much broader support for these ideas

1:23:00.320 --> 1:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>as shown to us through film, then there will be,

1:23:03.760 --> 1:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they're willing to risk so much money

1:23:05.439 --> 1:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>on what are just obviously bad ideas. But that again,

1:23:08.520 --> 1:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in this piece I read about it, they said that

1:23:10.880 --> 1:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the Jumanji remake made a lot of money, So I

1:23:14.840 --> 1:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>guess maybe they figure they just also roll the dice

1:23:16.800 --> 1:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>with remakes sometimes on these franchises and people will just

1:23:22.160 --> 1:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>go see it if they want to go see it,

1:23:23.640 --> 1:23:27.519
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, I have to. There's a little

1:23:27.560 --> 1:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of I get pulled in the is this all

1:23:29.360 --> 1:23:31.559
<v Speaker 1>just about social justice and wokeness that they make these

1:23:31.560 --> 1:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>bad decisions or they just Hollywood executives are risk averse

1:23:34.840 --> 1:23:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and lazy And it could be a combination of both.

1:23:37.840 --> 1:23:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh and speaking of using sexism as a response as

1:23:45.640 --> 1:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a justification for failure in the realm of whether it's

1:23:50.280 --> 1:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>art or politics, as we know, I talked to about

1:23:55.439 --> 1:23:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it last week, Hillary Clinton, who still claims that there

1:23:57.960 --> 1:24:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was some sexism at work with not winning the presidency,

1:24:02.200 --> 1:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not her terribleness as a candidate, utter lack of likability,

1:24:06.400 --> 1:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>utter lack of authenticity. That's not the reason that Chet

1:24:12.280 --> 1:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>went the presidency. No, it's because everyone is just so sexist.

1:24:16.200 --> 1:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill Maher had this to say about Hillary play club

1:24:21.040 --> 1:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>bait please. This week, Hillary Clinton said she did you

1:24:33.280 --> 1:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>know she got more votes? Okay? Anybody else? Well, someone

1:24:36.960 --> 1:24:41.759
<v Speaker 1>needs to put some XANX in her hot sauce, because listen,

1:24:41.840 --> 1:24:45.519
<v Speaker 1>here's your quote. She said, I say never never, never

1:24:45.600 --> 1:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>say never. I will certainly tell you I'm under enormous

1:24:48.360 --> 1:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>pressure from many, many people to think about it. Yes,

1:24:52.080 --> 1:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>those are called Trump supporters. I first of all, I

1:24:57.680 --> 1:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>noticed I don't even know who was on the panel there.

1:24:59.360 --> 1:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't tell from the voice. But that this is

1:25:01.920 --> 1:25:04.839
<v Speaker 1>another story we talked before about Trump is an impostor.

1:25:05.439 --> 1:25:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Here's somebody who's on a political show who assumes a

1:25:07.479 --> 1:25:12.519
<v Speaker 1>political expert saying that Hillary one. They'll say this openly,

1:25:12.520 --> 1:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll say that Hillary one. And we're supposed to just

1:25:17.720 --> 1:25:21.479
<v Speaker 1>accept us. Oh we have oh, Stacy Abrams somebody else

1:25:21.520 --> 1:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>who just pretends that the current governor of Georgia is

1:25:24.400 --> 1:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>an impostor that that she really won. And oh, by

1:25:27.200 --> 1:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, the system is right. Would you play a

1:25:29.160 --> 1:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>clip twenty please? Electoral college is racist and classist. We

1:25:33.360 --> 1:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>have to remember the electoral college was not designed because

1:25:35.439 --> 1:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>people were worried about Idaho not having enough volks. We

1:25:38.720 --> 1:25:42.599
<v Speaker 1>didn't know about Idaho. What we did know we didn't.

1:25:43.040 --> 1:25:45.519
<v Speaker 1>But what we did know was that in the South.

1:25:45.920 --> 1:25:49.719
<v Speaker 1>The populations in the South had equal or roughly equal

1:25:49.720 --> 1:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>populations to the North. However, because black people were not

1:25:53.439 --> 1:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>considered human or citizens, they wanted their bodies to count

1:25:56.920 --> 1:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of the population count, but not their humanity,

1:26:01.080 --> 1:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and the electoral college was designed to give Southern states

1:26:04.120 --> 1:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the ability to count the bodies of slaves, but not

1:26:07.200 --> 1:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have to allow them to cast votes, and thus the

1:26:09.680 --> 1:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>electoral college was born as a compromise. The other challenge

1:26:13.400 --> 1:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was in the North, a lot of them didn't want

1:26:15.439 --> 1:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>immigrants making decisions, and they didn't believe that immigrants and

1:26:18.280 --> 1:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that those who are not considered well educated should be

1:26:20.840 --> 1:26:23.640
<v Speaker 1>making decisions about who the executive of our nation should be.

1:26:23.840 --> 1:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>So it was a combination of racism and classism. Both

1:26:26.680 --> 1:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of those things should be flung to the far regions

1:26:29.840 --> 1:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of history and the electoral college needs to go. So

1:26:33.040 --> 1:26:37.479
<v Speaker 1>stay Abrams has essentially no understanding of the system of

1:26:37.479 --> 1:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>federalism that we have in this country and the states

1:26:40.200 --> 1:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and the way that the states play into our system

1:26:41.960 --> 1:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of God. I mean, let's just and she was going

1:26:43.320 --> 1:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the governor of a state, and she thinks

1:26:44.760 --> 1:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>she won that election. But let's just put all that

1:26:46.280 --> 1:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>aside for a moment. Classism, sexism, racism, Democrats lose. Pick

1:26:53.200 --> 1:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>one of those three. That's the reason Hillary Clinton loses,

1:26:57.640 --> 1:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>sexism or Russia Trump chief, but Stacey Abrahams loses he

1:27:02.840 --> 1:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>cheated and also sexism, racism, etc. Etc. Over time, these

1:27:10.479 --> 1:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>bad faith criticisms have an impact. People start to think, well,

1:27:15.960 --> 1:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe I guess there could be some truth to this.

1:27:18.320 --> 1:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that really what's going on. Let's certainly just back

1:27:21.920 --> 1:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to Hillary Clinton if I can for a moment. I

1:27:25.479 --> 1:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>disagree with mister Bill Maher here that the people who

1:27:30.680 --> 1:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>want Hillary to run are Republicans. I think there are

1:27:33.360 --> 1:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Democrats who want Hillary to run because

1:27:36.560 --> 1:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they say Trump's an impostor, they say he didn't really

1:27:39.040 --> 1:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>win the election. How can you set right what wrong

1:27:43.960 --> 1:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was done in twenty sixteen better than having the rightful,

1:27:50.160 --> 1:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote President of the United States from twenty sixteen

1:27:53.080 --> 1:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>finally take her place in the Oval office. The best

1:27:58.080 --> 1:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>repudiation of Trump that they could really have. I think

1:28:02.320 --> 1:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>even more so if you were just talking about this,

1:28:05.280 --> 1:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>forget about what is possible and just talk about what

1:28:07.280 --> 1:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>would be the ultimate victory for the left. Hillary beating

1:28:14.000 --> 1:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Trump would be the thing that would make them happier

1:28:15.680 --> 1:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>than I think anything else. So I don't discount what

1:28:20.520 --> 1:28:22.839
<v Speaker 1>she says here, even though she is kind of crazy.

1:28:23.320 --> 1:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't discount that there are people telling her run,

1:28:25.439 --> 1:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there are Republicans. I think that

1:28:26.960 --> 1:28:29.559
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of very powerful Democrats who want

1:28:29.600 --> 1:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>her to get back in It was a convenient place

1:28:32.080 --> 1:28:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to stay there. I mean, I mean, I've gone through

1:28:34.760 --> 1:28:38.519
<v Speaker 1>this in my mind so many times. At the end

1:28:38.520 --> 1:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of the day, with a benefit of all the hindsight

1:28:43.280 --> 1:28:47.559
<v Speaker 1>that one could have, it was definitely the wrong thing

1:28:47.560 --> 1:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to do, but at a time I felt it was

1:28:50.840 --> 1:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was the honorable and right thing to do.

1:28:53.560 --> 1:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And I admit fully that that that my judgment was

1:28:59.439 --> 1:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>probably colored by my tendency to be too honorable. But

1:29:05.320 --> 1:29:13.599
<v Speaker 1>that's just the way it is. Wow, Prince Andrew of

1:29:13.640 --> 1:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the Royal family, which I'm one of these people who

1:29:15.800 --> 1:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>says modern, industrialized and rule of law countries shouldn't have

1:29:21.120 --> 1:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>royal families, you know, I don't. I don't understand why

1:29:24.320 --> 1:29:28.679
<v Speaker 1>this is complicated, but it is for some people. Prince Andrew,

1:29:28.800 --> 1:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>second son of Queen Elizabeth, of the Royal family here

1:29:33.720 --> 1:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about why is it that he not only hung

1:29:36.400 --> 1:29:43.639
<v Speaker 1>out with Epstein and was officially accused of having sex

1:29:43.680 --> 1:29:46.479
<v Speaker 1>with a girl who was being sex trafficked by the

1:29:46.600 --> 1:29:50.519
<v Speaker 1>girl on a sworn AFFI David now a woman, of course,

1:29:50.520 --> 1:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>but was a girl at the time, and why did

1:29:54.000 --> 1:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>he not? So those allegations are already out there. And

1:29:57.439 --> 1:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>there is a photo which I've mentioned to you, of

1:30:00.160 --> 1:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Andrew holding Virginia Giffrey, I believe is how you say

1:30:05.840 --> 1:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>her name now? I think it was I forget her

1:30:08.120 --> 1:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>name from before she was married, but when she was

1:30:11.160 --> 1:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>fourteen or fifteen years old, and he's holding her around

1:30:13.880 --> 1:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the waist very closely. And this is not his daughter,

1:30:16.520 --> 1:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this is not a relative. What is going on here?

1:30:19.640 --> 1:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>The photo itself is suspicious, to say the least suspicious.

1:30:24.120 --> 1:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>He's a middle aged guy at the time. You know,

1:30:27.439 --> 1:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not He's not twenty hanging out with a with

1:30:30.240 --> 1:30:32.519
<v Speaker 1>a sixteen year old. It's not like, oh, maybe they

1:30:32.520 --> 1:30:35.479
<v Speaker 1>were high school friends or peers or something. Oh no,

1:30:35.640 --> 1:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he's like fifty and she's fourteen. So you just their

1:30:42.160 --> 1:30:44.519
<v Speaker 1>mere presence today, I'm not even talking about having any relations.

1:30:44.520 --> 1:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Just their mere presence together is strange, right, as suspicious.

1:30:51.160 --> 1:30:55.719
<v Speaker 1>So he is now trying to explain in this BBC interview,

1:30:56.439 --> 1:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>which has been pretty much by every analysis I've read.

1:31:00.760 --> 1:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some clips of it, didn't watch the whole things.

1:31:02.400 --> 1:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I really have to, because I get

1:31:03.720 --> 1:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it what's going on with this guy. They've called it

1:31:05.920 --> 1:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>nuclear explosion level bad, and he makes claims in it

1:31:12.880 --> 1:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that are just not credible to people watching. Like he says,

1:31:16.320 --> 1:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>first of all, that his honor led him to go

1:31:19.160 --> 1:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and break off his friendship with Epstein over the course

1:31:23.080 --> 1:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of a few days, staying at his home here in

1:31:24.880 --> 1:31:28.639
<v Speaker 1>New York City, after Epstein had already been convicted of

1:31:29.360 --> 1:31:33.679
<v Speaker 1>sex crimes involving underage girls. You don't think, You don't

1:31:33.680 --> 1:31:35.479
<v Speaker 1>think a phone call or a text message can get

1:31:35.479 --> 1:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that one done. You gotta go spend a few days

1:31:37.080 --> 1:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>at his house when he's a convicted sex offender and

1:31:40.320 --> 1:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you are not just some guy, you are part of

1:31:42.360 --> 1:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the royal family for whatever that means. Does anyone cared

1:31:48.120 --> 1:31:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to explain that one? And he wouldn't care to have

1:31:50.560 --> 1:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a h M. That's a strange claim for our British

1:31:57.240 --> 1:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>royal to make. And then he went on to say

1:31:59.040 --> 1:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that none of this even sounds like him, that he

1:32:02.680 --> 1:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not like him to go partying and be around,

1:32:05.200 --> 1:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, young women in this way. And he made

1:32:07.960 --> 1:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>these claims in his interview, and then people started producing

1:32:10.040 --> 1:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>photos of him or no, it does seem like he

1:32:11.680 --> 1:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>likes to be around attractive women and women who are

1:32:14.800 --> 1:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>considerably younger than So why lie about that, not even

1:32:18.200 --> 1:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about underage girls or relations sexual relations with them

1:32:22.080 --> 1:32:25.679
<v Speaker 1>in violation of law just in general? Why hold yourself

1:32:25.760 --> 1:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>up as somebody that you are not. Why would you

1:32:30.280 --> 1:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>use this? This is his come clean moment, isn't it?

1:32:34.720 --> 1:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>This is his This is the time in which you

1:32:38.320 --> 1:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>would want to be as as honest as possible if

1:32:43.280 --> 1:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>honesty was in your favor. But I think we all

1:32:46.200 --> 1:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>know that this did not look good for him, perhaps

1:32:51.000 --> 1:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>because honesty is not in his favor Jeffrey Epstein, he admits,

1:32:59.000 --> 1:33:01.639
<v Speaker 1>was it's a bad idea that he was friends with him. Well,

1:33:01.680 --> 1:33:09.519
<v Speaker 1>he was quite close with him. This guy also shows

1:33:09.600 --> 1:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>us that aristocracies are not sending us their best. You

1:33:16.720 --> 1:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>could say that this guy is deeply unimpressive and that

1:33:23.439 --> 1:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I just I can't imagine anyone coming away from this

1:33:27.240 --> 1:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking anything other than this was a disaster for him,

1:33:34.360 --> 1:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a disaster for him because the truth is not on

1:33:38.680 --> 1:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>his side. And then it brings me to something else here.

1:33:44.120 --> 1:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just going to continue to bring this up

1:33:46.439 --> 1:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>as I can, because you know, I don't have the

1:33:49.800 --> 1:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>time and the resources to you know, I'm not a

1:33:52.280 --> 1:33:54.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm not running a major newsroom with a thousand reporters

1:33:54.640 --> 1:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>or something, so I can't assign anyone to do this.

1:33:56.400 --> 1:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But I just refuse to believe the following. Rather, let

1:34:00.760 --> 1:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>me walk you through my thinking and then I'll tell

1:34:02.320 --> 1:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you what I refused to believe. There's another report out

1:34:04.760 --> 1:34:09.240
<v Speaker 1>today that Epstein had set up peepole cameras to catch

1:34:09.320 --> 1:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>people in intimate moments at his various super high end properties,

1:34:14.840 --> 1:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>where we know for a fact there was the trafficking

1:34:17.000 --> 1:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of underage girls as sex slaves. So he was taking

1:34:23.120 --> 1:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>video of people. He had set this up. It was elaborate.

1:34:27.240 --> 1:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Why is it that we haven't heard any new names

1:34:29.200 --> 1:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>of any individuals who were involved in this? And here's

1:34:33.960 --> 1:34:39.240
<v Speaker 1>another question, are we really to believe that Epstein had

1:34:39.240 --> 1:34:43.240
<v Speaker 1>set up a very elaborate blackmail operation? There are substantial

1:34:43.320 --> 1:34:46.479
<v Speaker 1>reporting another report today in the New York Post about this,

1:34:46.560 --> 1:34:48.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the women that he was trafficking, saying, look,

1:34:48.240 --> 1:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>he was, he had cameras and all these in all

1:34:51.160 --> 1:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>these places. Why have we found out nothing? But why

1:34:55.760 --> 1:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is there no evidence? Did he not Was he sending

1:34:58.960 --> 1:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>up cameras and wasn't record anything? Because that would seem

1:35:02.000 --> 1:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>completely counterintuitive. I don't believe that for a second. That

1:35:05.720 --> 1:35:10.679
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense. So he was recording people? Is there

1:35:10.800 --> 1:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence of people being recorded? Have we seen any of this?

1:35:14.680 --> 1:35:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So we have no additional names from the ones that

1:35:17.800 --> 1:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>have already been named, and we have no presentation or

1:35:22.080 --> 1:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>no reporting law from law enforcement side of any evidence

1:35:25.720 --> 1:35:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that they have come across that shows people engaged in

1:35:30.680 --> 1:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in illicit acts with underaged girls, which would seem to

1:35:33.160 --> 1:35:37.360
<v Speaker 1>be the whole purpose of Epstein's blackmail network in the

1:35:37.400 --> 1:35:41.519
<v Speaker 1>first place. At what point does this start to feel

1:35:41.600 --> 1:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>like something not credible is going on here in the

1:35:46.080 --> 1:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>process of getting the answers. It didn't get me started

1:35:49.080 --> 1:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>on like the hyoid bone, And at what point is it?

1:35:52.640 --> 1:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Does it seem like maybe nobody really wants to get

1:35:56.200 --> 1:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>these answers. We just had Prince Andrew give his whole Hey,

1:35:58.920 --> 1:36:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do anything wrong. Okay, well he didn't convince

1:36:03.280 --> 1:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>He certainly didn't convince me with the interview. Based on

1:36:05.439 --> 1:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>what I've read from the transcript and the clips that

1:36:07.160 --> 1:36:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I've seen, some very strange things this guy said. Does

1:36:11.840 --> 1:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>anyone want to dig into this story a bit more? Well,

1:36:16.080 --> 1:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I really do believe that some of the people who

1:36:18.120 --> 1:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>are are implicated, and we know one of them was

1:36:22.640 --> 1:36:25.479
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States for eight years and a Democrat. Okay,

1:36:26.280 --> 1:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>people that are implicated as at least being very close

1:36:28.240 --> 1:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to Epstein and should have known about Epstein. I think

1:36:30.160 --> 1:36:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that there's just a fear even among people. Maybe they

1:36:33.240 --> 1:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't maybe some journalists haven't found this stuff yet, but

1:36:36.160 --> 1:36:39.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't even really want to find it because of

1:36:39.720 --> 1:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>what it would mean, what it would mean for people

1:36:43.000 --> 1:36:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that they perhaps have idolized or I thought were necessary

1:36:46.320 --> 1:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>for a cause or necessary for political victory. Keep in

1:36:52.920 --> 1:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>mind that, yeah, I mean, Hillary Clinton is probably not

1:36:56.160 --> 1:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>going to run for president again, but the Clinton name

1:36:58.200 --> 1:37:01.519
<v Speaker 1>is still very much a political dynasty, and Chelsea Clinton

1:37:01.720 --> 1:37:03.559
<v Speaker 1>is I'm the same guy who told you Blasi Ford

1:37:03.600 --> 1:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>was going to be getting awards and stuff, and here

1:37:04.960 --> 1:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we are. Chelsea Clinton is going to run for office

1:37:07.120 --> 1:37:09.519
<v Speaker 1>and she's probably going to win, not necessarily the presidency,

1:37:09.560 --> 1:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but she'll be a senator from New York. She just

1:37:11.240 --> 1:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>pick a state to be senator from that blue state,

1:37:13.760 --> 1:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>no problem. She's boring, she's unimpressive, never had to actually

1:37:17.160 --> 1:37:19.439
<v Speaker 1>have a real job in her life, but she will be.

1:37:19.800 --> 1:37:24.559
<v Speaker 1>So there's a desire, a recognition among journalists, recognition among

1:37:24.600 --> 1:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the institutional left to protect the Clinton name. Could that

1:37:28.160 --> 1:37:30.280
<v Speaker 1>be factoring into why we don't get any more information

1:37:30.320 --> 1:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about the Epstein situation. That certainly seems plausible too. We

1:37:34.400 --> 1:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>know he's on him, not just pulling him in out

1:37:35.880 --> 1:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere. We know he was on the plane a

1:37:37.600 --> 1:37:39.240
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of times. We know the he was hanging

1:37:39.280 --> 1:37:43.840
<v Speaker 1>out there were friends Epstein and Bill Clinton. Is that

1:37:43.880 --> 1:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>why because there's just there's such a lack of it

1:37:47.200 --> 1:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>seems of interest from the mainstream media from these huge

1:37:50.920 --> 1:37:55.639
<v Speaker 1>news organizations with tremendous resources to get answers here. Everything

1:37:55.680 --> 1:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we've been told, this guy committed suicide in prison under

1:37:57.840 --> 1:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>shady circumstances. That was a huge black eye for the

1:38:01.280 --> 1:38:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Prisons at a minimum, I mean, depending on

1:38:03.880 --> 1:38:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I who we talked to. Also, there's other stuff that

1:38:05.880 --> 1:38:09.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe was involved here, perhaps Epstein was I've never thought

1:38:09.320 --> 1:38:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that he was killed. I do think that there is

1:38:12.439 --> 1:38:15.479
<v Speaker 1>a plausible way to get to maybe this guy was

1:38:15.560 --> 1:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed to kill himself, so to speak. There's plenty of

1:38:19.960 --> 1:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence you could point to. It says Okay, Well, he's

1:38:22.160 --> 1:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the first person in the history of the Manhattan Correctional

1:38:24.000 --> 1:38:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Facility in New York that was able to successfull commit

1:38:26.439 --> 1:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>suicide of these circumstances. It's been around for forty years, folks.

1:38:29.680 --> 1:38:31.519
<v Speaker 1>First one, there's people that right now, people are held

1:38:31.520 --> 1:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>every day. First guy just happened to be this guy.

1:38:35.360 --> 1:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a big coincidence, a lot of big coincidence. We're

1:38:37.840 --> 1:38:41.280
<v Speaker 1>being asked. I'm telling you they didn't touch the story

1:38:41.320 --> 1:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>for how many years initially, So it would really be

1:38:45.960 --> 1:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the media's willingness to just not pay any attention to

1:38:51.680 --> 1:38:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this whole situation would be in keeping with what they've

1:38:53.760 --> 1:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>done in the past. Something is up here. I have ideas,

1:38:58.640 --> 1:39:01.519
<v Speaker 1>I do not have proof, but there's something going on.

1:39:01.840 --> 1:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Continue to pay attention to this. You're gonna have to

1:39:04.400 --> 1:39:06.519
<v Speaker 1>read a little bit between the between the lines. You

1:39:06.520 --> 1:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>have to pay attention to the subtleties and the subtext

1:39:11.000 --> 1:39:15.519
<v Speaker 1>because there are a lot of very powerful people who

1:39:15.640 --> 1:39:17.479
<v Speaker 1>do not want to get to the bottom of what

1:39:17.560 --> 1:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>was really going on here. We know ABC News was

1:39:21.439 --> 1:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>willing to skip past this because of access to the

1:39:23.240 --> 1:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>royal family. Now we see one of these royal family guys.

1:39:25.560 --> 1:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you think ABC News should feel about this? Hey,

1:39:35.520 --> 1:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Team Bucket, it's time for roll Call Facebook dot com,

1:39:44.360 --> 1:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Flash buck Sexton or Team Bucket. iHeartMedia dot com and also,

1:39:48.000 --> 1:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, please spread the word about Channel two forty

1:39:51.040 --> 1:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>eight on Pluto TV, a free app you can download.

1:39:55.080 --> 1:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening to this podcast or this as a

1:39:57.120 --> 1:39:59.360
<v Speaker 1>radio show, you can watch what's going on here in

1:39:59.360 --> 1:40:01.599
<v Speaker 1>the Freedom Huts. See the clips that I talk about.

1:40:01.680 --> 1:40:04.599
<v Speaker 1>See me and producer Mark Eli's hear him. You can't

1:40:04.640 --> 1:40:06.800
<v Speaker 1>really see him, you have We're working on that. I'm

1:40:06.880 --> 1:40:08.920
<v Speaker 1>doing our thing here in the Freedom Hunt Channel two

1:40:09.080 --> 1:40:13.599
<v Speaker 1>forty eight, the first on Pluto TV. And also I'm

1:40:13.640 --> 1:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>getting notes from people saying that someone told them about

1:40:16.439 --> 1:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the podcast and they now listen to it and it's

1:40:18.040 --> 1:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>their favorite podcast. Let's keep that going, shall we? Please?

1:40:22.000 --> 1:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Please make that happen. Tell somebody about the show this week.

1:40:27.120 --> 1:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>It is a huge compliment and help to us here

1:40:30.280 --> 1:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in the show we put out every day. Tell them

1:40:32.120 --> 1:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they can listen to the podcast anytime they want iTunes, iHeartRadio, app,

1:40:37.640 --> 1:40:39.559
<v Speaker 1>you name it, wherever you listen to podcasts The Buck

1:40:39.600 --> 1:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Section Show. All right, staycy. I read the daily up

1:40:44.880 --> 1:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>first email from Pluto TV. There were some spelling ears.

1:40:50.120 --> 1:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks and shield side all right, Stacy, I'll make sure

1:40:53.280 --> 1:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that we we get some more proofreading. Go in there.

1:40:58.200 --> 1:41:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Let's see here, John, hold on a second. Whoa, John,

1:41:03.600 --> 1:41:05.760
<v Speaker 1>This is like a thousand words, so I can't read

1:41:05.760 --> 1:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this on air right now, but I will read it

1:41:07.280 --> 1:41:12.519
<v Speaker 1>when I can. Adam Buck disagree on Amelio Estevez and

1:41:12.720 --> 1:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>his best movie. I would put Men at Work in

1:41:16.040 --> 1:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the top spot. Shields High. Adam, I appreciate your opinion

1:41:19.920 --> 1:41:22.960
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that it is wrong. Young Guns is

1:41:23.040 --> 1:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>clearly better than Men at Work. I don't. I would

1:41:26.200 --> 1:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>put this out of the realm of opinion and into

1:41:27.920 --> 1:41:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the realm of fact. Facts. First, my friend, I don't

1:41:32.520 --> 1:41:34.439
<v Speaker 1>even remember I saw Men at Work. I don't even remember.

1:41:34.439 --> 1:41:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It isn't like garbage men who come upon some plot

1:41:37.120 --> 1:41:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of, like toxic waste or something. Producer Mark,

1:41:40.360 --> 1:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>did you see it? No? Well, isn't his best movie, well,

1:41:43.920 --> 1:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>other than The Mighty Ducks, Right, I mean Breakfast Club.

1:41:49.160 --> 1:41:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I was willing, I was getting ready to make fun

1:41:50.800 --> 1:41:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of your addition into this and actually, and now I

1:41:52.800 --> 1:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have to respect that the Breakfast Club might in fact

1:41:55.120 --> 1:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>be I mean, it's number two behind the Mighty Ducks trilogy.

1:41:58.160 --> 1:42:00.120
<v Speaker 1>But right, well, we've already established that you're wrong the

1:42:00.160 --> 1:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Mighty Ducks. But I'm just trying. You've never even seen it,

1:42:02.000 --> 1:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so you can't call me wrong on that, all right,

1:42:04.200 --> 1:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that's technically true? Yeah, but yeah, no, I think The

1:42:06.880 --> 1:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Breakfast Club would have to be in the in the

1:42:08.880 --> 1:42:12.280
<v Speaker 1>very top Young Guns a very entertaining movie though. But

1:42:12.360 --> 1:42:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Men at Work is also the name of it is

1:42:13.920 --> 1:42:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I think an Australian band. Who could it be knocking

1:42:17.600 --> 1:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>at my door? Yeah? It sounds like a band, right,

1:42:20.439 --> 1:42:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are they Australian or am I thinking of like, I

1:42:23.840 --> 1:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I don't know. No, they're not Australian. That's

1:42:26.760 --> 1:42:29.280
<v Speaker 1>tough to tell. Those Brits, those Aussies when they sing,

1:42:29.760 --> 1:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the fancy accent disappears. Oh when

1:42:33.000 --> 1:42:36.479
<v Speaker 1>you sing, you actually sound like an American. Isn't that

1:42:36.600 --> 1:42:40.519
<v Speaker 1>crazy how that happens like that? It's very rare that

1:42:40.600 --> 1:42:42.840
<v Speaker 1>singers have an accent. No, they don't. You know, when

1:42:42.840 --> 1:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you sing sound because this is the way. If you're

1:42:45.000 --> 1:42:47.519
<v Speaker 1>going to make the sounds that we make with our mouths,

1:42:47.880 --> 1:42:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you speak American. I'm trying to say, we do it

1:42:51.360 --> 1:42:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the right way. Yeah. Well, we just told like this

1:42:53.920 --> 1:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>all the time because it sounds so cool. It does

1:42:57.439 --> 1:43:00.760
<v Speaker 1>sound cool. You can't deny that it sounds cool. I know.

1:43:00.800 --> 1:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It's such a huge advantage. People in this business who

1:43:03.120 --> 1:43:05.760
<v Speaker 1>were like, oh, I've got a British accent, so now

1:43:05.960 --> 1:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>go on television never will think would USA is so small?

1:43:09.320 --> 1:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Does it work the same way the other way around?

1:43:10.960 --> 1:43:13.280
<v Speaker 1>If we go to London with an American accent, Nope,

1:43:13.280 --> 1:43:15.479
<v Speaker 1>they make fun of us. They're like, hey, my name

1:43:15.600 --> 1:43:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is Bob and I'm from Chicago. That's how they always

1:43:18.280 --> 1:43:20.439
<v Speaker 1>do American accents in the UK. It's totally true. They

1:43:20.439 --> 1:43:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think we all sound like that kind of like a

1:43:22.800 --> 1:43:25.760
<v Speaker 1>almost like a Midwestern meets New York accent. Yes, like

1:43:25.840 --> 1:43:28.840
<v Speaker 1>with their mouths really tight and talking like this. Because

1:43:28.920 --> 1:43:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of British friends, so I know

1:43:30.280 --> 1:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what they do. They make fun of us. Whatever.

1:43:33.800 --> 1:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Seventeen seventy six, boom, all, I gotta say, let's see

1:43:39.439 --> 1:43:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Richard wrights buck. So Virginia is going to pass the

1:43:43.400 --> 1:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Equal Rights Amendment, which expired something like thirty years ago,

1:43:48.000 --> 1:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>but the Dems say they're going to change the deadline,

1:43:50.080 --> 1:43:52.760
<v Speaker 1>so there is no deadline. How is the DEM's gonna

1:43:52.760 --> 1:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>say that states can't resend their amendment as four states have,

1:43:55.240 --> 1:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna take the ra ignoring or take up

1:43:58.240 --> 1:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the ear ignoring the seven year Richard, I don't know what.

1:44:01.320 --> 1:44:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what this is, man, I got

1:44:02.880 --> 1:44:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to look this up. I'm out up on the Equal

1:44:04.400 --> 1:44:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Rights Amendment and Virginia stuff. So I'm sorry, I got

1:44:07.520 --> 1:44:10.559
<v Speaker 1>nothing for for once, I have nothing to really add

1:44:10.600 --> 1:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>into the scenario here. Um Michael says, ask producer Mark

1:44:17.120 --> 1:44:20.519
<v Speaker 1>about the movie slap Shot. I've never even heard of

1:44:20.560 --> 1:44:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this movie. You've never seen slap Shot. No, it's the

1:44:23.320 --> 1:44:25.479
<v Speaker 1>best hockey movie other than The Mighty Ducks ever made.

1:44:25.720 --> 1:44:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it funny or is it it's hilarious? Yeah? Who's

1:44:28.800 --> 1:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>in it? The Handsome Burton? No no, it's the Handsome Brothers,

1:44:34.880 --> 1:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the kids from Umbop? No, no no, no, the Handsome Brothers

1:44:37.760 --> 1:44:39.760
<v Speaker 1>are the main characters. I don't think that's that's their

1:44:39.760 --> 1:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>actual names in real life. Oh yeah, okay, I was like,

1:44:43.439 --> 1:44:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it's based on a minor league hockey team. But it

1:44:47.000 --> 1:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is hilarious because I would argue that the song Umbop

1:44:49.560 --> 1:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is the most annoying song that has ever been a

1:44:51.600 --> 1:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>successful song in America, even more annoying than the Venga Boys,

1:44:55.160 --> 1:44:57.840
<v Speaker 1>The Venga Bus Is Coming and the Macarena. I think

1:44:58.840 --> 1:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Umbop might be the mos some annoying song

1:45:00.960 --> 1:45:05.880
<v Speaker 1>ever recorded in America. I like him, Bup. I don't

1:45:05.880 --> 1:45:07.760
<v Speaker 1>even know what to say to you right now. Well,

1:45:08.000 --> 1:45:10.439
<v Speaker 1>what's wrong with him? Bop? I just you know, folks,

1:45:10.479 --> 1:45:12.280
<v Speaker 1>he's under a lot of pressure. He's getting a couple

1:45:12.280 --> 1:45:14.639
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, so we're just gonna let him. He's gonna

1:45:14.720 --> 1:45:16.519
<v Speaker 1>let him have it. Have you ever heard of pregnancy brain.

1:45:16.600 --> 1:45:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I have white wedding brain, A new thing that there,

1:45:20.360 --> 1:45:22.439
<v Speaker 1>there we go. He's saying, a team that's gonna be

1:45:22.479 --> 1:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it for the show today. I hope you've enjoyed it

1:45:25.200 --> 1:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>as much as we've enjoyed doing it. I'll talk to

1:45:27.080 --> 1:45:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you tomorrow and every day this week. Oh that's right,

1:45:30.600 --> 1:45:31.519
<v Speaker 1>Shields high,