WEBVTT - California v. Confidential

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to History on Trial, a production of iHeart Podcasts.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Listener discretion advised. On the evening of November fifth, nineteen

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty four, Florence Cotts got ready for bed as usual,

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>a thirty seven year old secretary living on Quiet Wearing

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Avenue in West Hollywood, Los Angeles. Cotts put her curlers in,

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>slipped under the covers, and turned off the lights. It

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was a Friday, so maybe she even planned to sleep

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in the next day, but she wouldn't get the chance.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>In the middle of the night, Florence's door exploded inward

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>in a shower of wood and glass. Before she could react,

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a group of men rushed in. A blinding light flashed

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in her face. Florence huddled in her bed, paralyzed by

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>fear and then nothing. She heard one of the men yell,

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we've got the wrong place. They turned around and ran

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>out through her kitchen, breaking glasses and leaving a mess.

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Once she was certain they were gone, Florence called the police,

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>who couldn't make heads or tails of the event. It

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>must have been an attempted burglary. An officer told the

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>terrified woman she was lucky to have escaped unhurt, and

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>because she hadn't seen any of the men's faces blinded

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>by the bright lights they'd shown, there wasn't much for

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the police to go on. The case wasn't likely to

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>get solved. Florence learned she would just have to live

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>with the fear. But less than a year later, a

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>shocking break in the case arrived from an unusual source

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a tabloid magazine. In September nineteen fifty five, Confidential magazine,

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the tops celebrity scandal sheet in the country, published a

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>story about the break in at Florence Cott's apartment. It

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 1>might seem like a strange story for a celebrity magazine

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to care about, but Confidential had good reason. The men

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>who had broken into Florence's apartment that night, the article claimed,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>were none other than Frank Sinatra and Joe DiMaggio. In

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the article titled the Real Reason for Marilyn Monroe's Divorce,

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Confidential explained how the famous singer and the Yankee star

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>had come to be there. Florence Cotts, it turned out,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>lived in the same small apartment building as one of

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Marilyn Monroe's friends, an actress named Sheila Stewart, Joe DiMaggio,

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>still reeling from his in Monroe's divorce, had become convinced

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that Monroe was using Stuart's apartment to meet with the

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>man he thought Monroe had left him for. Acting on

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 1>information from the private investigator he'd hired and likely fueled

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>by more than a few drinks, DiMaggio had enlisted some friends,

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>including Sinatra, to help him catchman Row in the act.

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a sloppy plan, and it had unsurprisingly gone

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>very wrong. Instead of going into Sheila Stuart's apartment on

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the second floor, the group had broken into the first

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>floor home of Florence Cotts. So Florence finally got some

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>answers about what had happened to her that night, and

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>she eventually got some reparations. She sued DiMaggio, Sinatra, and

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the other men and got a settlement. But the story

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Wrong Door Raid, as it came to be known,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>was far from over because California officials had some questions

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>about how Confidential magazine had gotten their story. In February

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty seven, California State Senator Fred Graft held a

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>series of hearings to determine if Confidential had gotten the

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>story by paying off a private investigator. You might be

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>wondering why would a state legislature care where a scandal

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>magazine got its stories from. Well, Confidential Magazine wasn't just

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>any scandal magazine. It was one of the most powerful

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>publications in the country, with a reader base in the

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>millions and the ability to ruin a star's career with

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a few carefully worded sentences. People all across America worried

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that Confidential's salacious content would corrupt the country's youth. In California,

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>politicians and entertainment executives worried that its shocking stories would

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>destroy the lucrative movie industry, and so by nineteen fifty seven,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the studios and the government were lo looking for ways

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to take the magazine down. The state Senate hearings into

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the Wrong Door Raids story were only the first step.

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Three months later, in May nineteen fifty seven, a grand

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>jury convened by the ambitious California Attorney General Pat Brown,

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>indicted Confidential, along with several key employees and partner businesses, on,

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>among other things, charges of conspiracy to commit criminal libel

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and conspiracy to publish obscene and indecent material For years,

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Confidential had held Hollywood hostage, using a network of informants

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to dig up dirt on America's biggest celebrities. But now

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood was fighting back with the assistance of the government.

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>The ensuing trial would put the right of freedom of

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the press into question because Confidential stories were nasty, no doubt,

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>but the magazine would claim they were all true, and

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>could publishing the truth, no matter how indecent, ever be

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a crime. Americans were about to find out. Welcome to

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>History on trial. I'm your host, Mira Hayward. This week

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the State of California v. Confidential. Confidentials creator and publisher

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert Harrison was no stranger to scandal. After coming up

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>as a reporter for the New York Gossip Rags, Harrison

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>had gone into business for himself, creating a number of

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>so called girly magazines, publications filled with images of scantily

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>clad women. Harrison was a hands on magazine executive, regularly

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>acting as a photographer for his magazines and sometimes even

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>posing in photos himself. He was also an ambitious man.

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>When his girly magazines failed to make ends meet, Harrison

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>began casting around for a new, more profitable concept, and

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>he found it on television. Throughout nineteen fifty and nineteen

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty one, a Senate committee led by Senator estes Ki

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Fauver investigated the state of organized crime in America in

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a series of hearings that were broadcast live on television.

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Americans were glued to their TV screens as a procession

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of mobsters testified in front of the committee. The March

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty one hearing in New York attracted an estimated

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty million viewers. Harrison was also inspired by the Confidential

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>series of books, which came out between nineteen forty eight

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen fifty two and profiled different American cities New

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>York Confidential, Chicago Confidential, and so on. The Confidential series

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>claimed to reveal what was really happening in these cities.

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The books shocked their readers with depictions of crime, sex,

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and debauchery happening allegedly in the heart of every city.

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>They had a distinct point of view, As historian and

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>law professor Samantha Barbis puts it in her book on

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the magazine Confidential Confidential, the Confidential books were racist, sexist, homophobic,

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and largely false. They were also best sellers. Seeing the

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>public interest in the Key Father hearings and the Confidential books,

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Harrison had a realization the American people craved this kind

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of content, the story behind the story, a glimpse into

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the private lives of public figures and the dirty underbelly

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of modern life. Thus Confidential Magazine was born. The first

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>issue of Confidential, which hit newsstands in September nineteen fifty two,

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>set the tone for what was to come. The cover,

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>printed in lurid, eye catching blue, yellow and red, featured

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>giant headlines that leapt from the page. Photographs were grainy,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>blown up, and unflattering, and like that of its namesake

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>book series, the magazine's content was sleazy, shocking, and bigoted.

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>This type of magazine focused on expose's and gossip were

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>often called scandal magazines. Confidential wasn't the only scandal magazine

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>on the market, so Robert Harrison had to find a

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>way to set it apart plan a lie. If his

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 1>reporters couldn't find juicy enough stories, they could just make

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>up better ones. Early issues of Confidential featured completely invented

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>tales of sex and crime, bolstered up by posed or

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>composite photos. But even Bonker's creations like a mob barun

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>grave robbing ring couldn't boost the magazine's circulation. Harrison needed

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a new angle. In the summer of nineteen fifty three,

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>he found it. In the August issue, Confidential ran an

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>article about the relationship between Joe DiMaggio and Marilyn Monroe,

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>who were then dating. The piece, called why Joe DiMaggio

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Is Striking out with Marilyn Monroe, alleged that Monroe's mentor,

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the seventy six year old co founder of twentieth Century Fox,

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Shank, was interfering in the relationship, either out of

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>concern for Monroe's career or because Shank was sleeping with

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Monroe himself. The magazine heavily implied it was the latter,

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and Americans ate it up. Confidential circulation doubled overnight. Harrison

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>knew he was onto something. If people liked reading about

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the secret lives of mobsters, they loved reading about the

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>secret lives of movie stars. Throughout the rest of nineteen

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>fifty three and nineteen fifty four, Confidential increasingly focused its

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>coverage on Hollywood. We've got to have more Hollywood stories.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Harrison told his staff, the hotter, the better. A decade earlier,

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it would have been impossible for a magazine like Confidential

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to get the kind of Hollywood stories they wanted. For

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the twentieth century, Hollywood had been

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>tightly managed by the movie studios. Studios controlled every step

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of the film business, from production to distribution, and they

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>controlled the lives and images of their contracted stars with

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the same iron fist. The only way for journalists to

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>get access to stars was to play along with the

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 1>studios and to produce the kind of positive coverage they wanted.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>But by the nineteen fifties, the studio system was crumbling.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen forty eight, Supreme Court decision United States v.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Paramount Pay Pictures, Inc. Had ruled that the studios held

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>an unfair monopoly. Studios were forced to give up control

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>over many aspects of the business, dealing them a serious

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>financial blow. At the same time, the rise of television

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>had decreased movie attendance. As the studios lost power, their

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>threats to blackball journalists who didn't cover stars in the

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>right way lost weight, and the stars who were used

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to the studios covering up their bad behavior were suddenly

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>very exposed. The gossip cup was running over, and Confidential

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was ready to catch every last drop. Harrison began coordinating

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a network of informants across Los Angeles. Everyone from sex

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>workers to police officers to studio employees, and even movie

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>stars themselves soon learned that Confidential would pay well for

0:12:54.800 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>good dirt. Confidential paid nannies to spy on employer's wressers

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen in on client conversations, and waiters to remember

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>who wait with whom to get their stories. Confidential equipped

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>its sources with all sorts of spy gadgets, including bugs

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.359
<v Speaker 1>to tap phone lines and watches that held hidden recorders.

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Harrison's niece, Marjorie Meade and her husband Fred eventually moved

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to Los Angeles and established a company called Hollywood Research, Inc.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Which coordinated and organized the information coming in from tipsters.

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Harrison had correctly gauged the public's interest in Hollywood Gossip.

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>By nineteen fifty five, the magazine's circulation was close to

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>four million. Most copies were passed along to additional readers,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and estimated four readers per copy, putting Confidential's readership at

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:53.719
<v Speaker 1>close to sixteen million people, or one in every ten Americans.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>With that kind of audience came great power. Confidential stories

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>could make or break a star's career. A March nineteen

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty five story about an alleged interracial romance between the

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>white actress Ava Gardner and the black singer dancer Sammy

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Davis Junior led to Gardner's films being boycotted and banned

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in parts of the country. Two months later, a story

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>about the actor Rory Calhoun's criminal past and how he

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>had turned his life around thanks to religion earned Calhoun

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand fan letters and completely revitalized his career. As

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Confidential's influence grew, the movie studios increasingly came to view

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the magazine as a threat. The studios were more vulnerable

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>than ever. Their profits were down and their audiences were straying.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>People also thought Hollywood was corrupting the country's morals. The

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>studios even faced a Senate inquiry into whether movies could

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>be tied to a rise in juvenile delinquency. The last

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>thing Hollywood needed was a magazine digging up all of

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the industry's buried bodies. In the mid nineteen fifties, the

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>studios decided to fight back and they were prepared to

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>fight dirty. In the summer of nineteen fifty five, studio

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>publicity heads met in secret at the Beverly Hills Hotel

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the Confidential problem. Shortly after the meeting, one

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of the publicists traveled to New York to meet with

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Confidential editors. Wouldn't it be better for everyone, he asked

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the editors if the magazine focused on athletes, or politicians,

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>or really anyone besides Hollywood stars. Confidential editors laughed him

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>out of the office. This straightforward approach having failed, the

0:15:55.600 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>publicists moved on to something more cloak and dagger. Enlisting

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>movie producers and an actress to help them, The publicists

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>cooked up an elaborate trap for Confidential. The team planted

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>gossip about the actress, backing up their story with witnesses.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>They made sure the story eventually got to Confidential via

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a chain of tipsters. When Confidential sent a private investigator

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to look into the story, everything seemed to check out.

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But had Confidential run it, they would have been vulnerable

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to an enormous libel suit because the story the publicists

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>had planted was entirely, verifiably false. At the last minute,

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>though the magazine had doubts and killed the story. The

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>studios were foiled again. If they couldn't control Confidential, the

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>studios decided maybe they could control the flow of information

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>out of Hollywood. Each of the six largest studios agreed

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to contribute to a fund which would pay for private

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>security force to monitor star's behaviors and interfere with Confidential's

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>information gathering network. But the studios eventually balked, fearing that

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Confidential would discover their plans and attack. A plan to

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>blacklist anyone thought to be a Confidential informant was abandoned.

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>For similar reasons, Celebrities, sick of having their dirty laundry

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>aired in the magazine's pages, wanted the studios to fight harder.

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Many stars felt powerless on their own. They had the

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>option to file libel suits against Confidential. Yes, but there

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>were a number of reasons not to. First, a suit

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>could draw attention to the very thing that the stars

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>hoped to keep hidden. Filing a suit would only give

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Confidential the publicity they want, said Marlon Brando, and maybe

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd get an award of eight cents. There was also

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the that a suit would provoke Confidential into spilling even

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>more information about the star. It was well known that

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Confidential often published only parts of the stories they received

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.479
<v Speaker 1>from tipsters, holding on to the most damaging titbits as

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>insurance against legal action. And finally, there was the problem

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of jurisdiction. Confidential was a New York based company. Most

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>of the stars it wrote about lived in California and

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>filed their rare libel suits against the magazine in that state,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>suits that judges quickly dismissed, saying that California did not

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>have jurisdiction over a New York company. The New York

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>courts were notoriously backed up, and filing there might have

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>meant a year's long wait to be heard. As stars

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>considered how best to deal with Confidential, the studios escalated

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>their battle to the federal level. In August nineteen fifty five,

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>several studio heads reached out to Postmaster General Arthur Summerfield

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>with a bold request. They wanted the Post Office to

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>revoke Confidential's mailing privileges. One movie producer was alleged to

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>have told Summerfield, unless they take away Harrison's mailing privileges,

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this industry is done. For Summerfield, who saw obscenity as

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>one of the gravest threats to American society. Had his

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>own reasons for disliking Confidential. On August twenty seventh, he

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>issued a withhold from dispatch order on the November issue

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of Confidential. Under the order's terms, no issue of Confidential

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 1>could be mailed without first being reviewed by the Post

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Office and being found free of improper content. The determination

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of whether content was or was not improper was entirely

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>up to the Post Office. Harrison responded by filing suit

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>against Summerfield, and a judge eventually ruled in the magazine's favor,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.360
<v Speaker 1>saying that the Post Office was violating the magazine's right

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to do process by threatening to ban it with no notices,

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>charges or hearings. Confidential had won again. The fight with

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Post Office had even raised the magazine's profile and

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>with that, its circulation. But a raised profile also brought

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>unwanted scrutiny. The studio executives were not alone in their

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>concerns about Confidential. Segments of the American public were worried

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>about the effect scandal magazines might have on the nation's morals.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>To some, these magazines seem to represent everything wrong with

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the country. As one Californian told the newspaper, quote, all

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>scandal magazines should be taken off the market. They are

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a menace to society. They caring nothing but trash, and

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that is no good for our youth. Scandal magazines weren't

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the only target for criticism. Many Americans worried about the

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>effect of any reading materials that freely discussed hot button

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>topics like sex, violence, and race. Throughout the nineteen fifties,

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>many communities set up review boards which determined if publications

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>were inappropriate. If they were found to be so, local distributors,

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>including booksellers, newsstands, and libraries were strongly encouraged not to

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>carry these items under the vague threat of legal action.

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>What about freedom of the press, you might ask. Here's

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>one magazine writing on that very question in nineteen fifty seven. Quote,

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the framers of the Constitution never meant the First Amendment

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to protect filth peddlers who poisoned minds. And this magazine

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the only one to take this position. Many journalists

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and publications believed that scandal magazines like Confidential were not

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>entitled to the same legal protections as more traditional publications.

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>They feared that aligning themselves with scandal magazines could end

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>up damaging their own rights. Back in Hollywood, the studios

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>sent that the tide of public opinion might be turning

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>their way. In October nineteen fifty six, when Harrison appeared

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on The Tonight Show to defend Scandal Magazine's the audience

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>booed him it was time for the studios to strike.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>In December nineteen fifty six, MGM released Slander, a movie

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>about an unscrupulous scandal magazine publisher unfairly ruining the life

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of a well meaning actor. The movie was melodramatic, it

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>ends with the publisher's mother killing him, disgusted by what

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>her son has become, and flopped at the box office,

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but its heavy handed message did not go unnoticed. Slander

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>quote reeks with the motion picture industry's long pent up

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of vengeance, wrote Texas's Amarillo Globe. Harrison responded in

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>a typically cheeky fashion, hiring models to picket the movie

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>outside a Broadway theater holding signs that read Slander is

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>unfair to Confidential. But the studios weren't done there, though

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>their attempt to get Confidential through the post office had failed,

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they now recognized the power of governmental attacks on the magazine.

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.959
<v Speaker 1>In January nineteen fifty seven, the California State Senate formed

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a committee to investigate the practices of private detectives in

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the state. Or at least that was the committee's alleged purpose.

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>In reality, the committee had been formed at the behest

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of the studios and planned to look into how Confidential

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>got its stories. This was the committee mentioned in the

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>prologue that looked into the wrong door raid at Florence

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Cott's apartment. The committee's investigation eventually fizzled out in March,

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>with lead Senator Fred Kraft declaring that though the magazines

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>were a quote national disgrace, the field is beyond this

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>scope of a single state legislature. But the state's war

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on Confidential was far from over. California Attorney General Pat

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Brown announced that his office, in tandem with the Los

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Angeles County District Attorney, would now be pursuing charges against Confidential.

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Brown said his decision was motivated by a desire to

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>protect children from the magazine. He also claimed that Confidential

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Quote caused divorces and broken homes and led to blackmail,

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but behind the scenes, the studios were again pulling the strings.

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Brown was pursuing a run for governor, and the film

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>industry had made it clear to him that they would

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>look favorably upon a candidate who supported their crusade against Confidential.

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>In May nineteen fifty seven, Brown and Los Angeles County

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>District Attorney William McKesson convened a grand jury to look

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>into Confidential. On May fifteenth, the grand jury indicted Confidential

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>members of its staff, its printer and distributor, and its

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>sister Magaze Whisper on four charges, including conspiracy to commit

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>criminal libel and conspiracy to publish obscene and indecent material.

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Robert Harrison addressed the charges directly in an editorial and Confidential,

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this magazine is under assault in the California courts. Harrison wrote,

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a determined effort initiated by a segment of

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the motion picture industry to get this magazine. He positioned

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the Confidential as a brave truth teller, a publication unafraid

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to reveal to the American people what the elite did

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>not want them to know. Is an American jury going

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to get us for daring to tell that truth? Harrison asked,

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't believe so his assumptions would soon be put

0:25:51.640 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to the test. Confidential's trial was scheduled to begin in August.

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>It almost ended before it started, though, because it seemed

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that both sides had lost their appetite for the fight.

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Throughout the summer, Harrison's lawyers had been issuing subpoenas for celebrities.

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Most stars had managed to avoid the summons, flipping out

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of back entrances, heading to Las Vegas, even leaving the country,

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>but some hadn't. Dean Martin, Launa Turner, and Gary Cooper

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>were among those who had received subpoenas. Studio executives panicked.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>The last thing they wanted was for their biggest box

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>office draws to have to confirm or deny their sins

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>under oath. Arthur Crowley, the high powered Los Angeles lawyer

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>running the defense, knew just what he was doing. I

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>want to make it clear that the reputations of many

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>persons will suffer if this case goes to trial, because

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we are going to offer the truth as a defense,

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>he stated. Studio executives heard Crowley's message loud and clear,

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>and they started to have second thoughts about the trial.

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>George Murphy head of the Motion Picture Industry Council, approached

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors and urged them to reach a compromise. The

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>defense was receptive. Harrison knew that this trial, no matter

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the outcome, would be enormously expensive, so the two sides

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>came to an agreement. Confidential would stop focusing on celebrities

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>in exchange for some of the charges being decided by

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>a judge and others being dropped. But Judge Herbert Walker

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>rejected the deal. The state had brought charges for good reason,

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>he said, and this compromise didn't do enough to address

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>those charges. The trial would proceed. Stars and Confidential executives

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>alike held their breath. No matter who won the case,

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone knew scandal was sure to ensue. On August second,

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty seven, the trial began at the Los Angeles

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Superior Court. Robert Harrison wasn't there. In fact, only two

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 1>of the people charged and the grand jury indictment were present.

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>All summer, Confidential's lawyers had been battling to prevent the

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>extradition of their clients from New York, and they had succeeded.

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>The face of Confidential at the defense table would not

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be its infamous publisher Harrison, but his niece Marjorie Need

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and her husband Fred. Marjorie and Fred had flown back

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>into Los Angeles in May to surrender, and Marjorie, decked

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>out in furs and diamonds, had asked reporters, then, don't

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you think this whole thing has a little to do

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>with destruction of freedom of the press? Now she sat

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>quietly in the courtroom, her dyed red curls and large eyes,

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>drawing admiring looks. The prosecutors, William Ritzy and Clarence Lynne,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:59.479
<v Speaker 1>presented quite a contrast to the glamorous Meads. Ritzy, a

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney, and Lynn, an Assistant Attorney General,

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>were both serious religious men. Lynn taught Sunday school back

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>home in San Francisco, and they weren't letting the spotlight

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>dazzle them. Though the trial had largely come about due

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to political pressure, Ritzy and Lynn were confident that the

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>law was on their side. One of their first jobs

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>was making the connection between the meds and confidential clear,

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>given that the Meads were the only defendants present. That

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>connection came, the prosecutors claimed, through a company called Hollywood Research,

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>This was the Los Angeles business that organized and followed

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>up on informants tips and sent them back to Confidential.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>The magazine had long claimed that Hollywood Research was a

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>completely independent organization. This was part of their strategy of

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>claiming to have no corporate presence in California, thus making

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it harder for stars to sue them. But the prosecution

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>thought otherwise, and they had good reason to think so,

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>because Hollywood Research had been run by none other than

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Marjorie Mead. The prosecution took several steps during their case

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to prove their point, submitting phone records that showed a

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:22.239
<v Speaker 1>huge volume of calls between the Confidential office and the

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Researching Office. They also brought out a witness, Paul Gregory,

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>who claimed that Marjorie Mead had extorted him over keeping

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a story out of Confidential. Gregory's testimony had provided a

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>dramatic moment. As he testified about Marjorie, she began to sob,

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and once the jury left the room, she collapsed entirely furious.

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Her husband, Fred had stalked over to the prosecution table

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and slamming his fist down, yelled at prosecutor Ritzy, you

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>must want to win this case pretty bad by putting

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that lying character on the stand, Ritzy was unfazed. The

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>defense would later provide records proving that Meade could not

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>have been with Gregory when he claimed she had the

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest scores for The prosecution's argument about the California Confidential

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>connection actually came during Fred Mead's own testimony. He revealed

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that Harrison had been the one to suggest that he

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and Marjorie get into the gossip business. Harrison had even

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>given them money to get started on cross Ritzy got

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>need to admit that Marjorie's brother was the company's vice president,

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and that the supposedly independent Hollywood Research had only ever

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>sold information to two magazines, Confidential and its sister magazine, Whisper.

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Whatever the exact nature of the relationship between Hollywood Research

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and Confidential Engine, true prosecutors were right. Hollywood Research had

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>been set up by the magazine. It was clear from

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the testimony that the Needs were involved in this business

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>up to their necks, and in the course of this business,

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the Needs and the rest of the Confidential crew, the

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors claimed, had conspired to commit obscenity and libel. The

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors now set out to prove these charges. First up

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the question of obscenity. What is obscene material. That's a

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>hard question to answer, a question that even the law

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>struggles with, because what makes something obscene is often subjective

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in California law. At the time, material was obscene if

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>quote it has a substantial tendency to deprave or corrupt

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>its readers by inciting lascivious thoughts or arousing lustful desire.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if it turned people on. The magazine

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>had been charged with not just the publication of obscene material,

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>but also the conspiracy to publish it, meaning that two

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>or more people had arranged knowingly to commit the crime.

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So now Ritzie and Lynne had to prove not only

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that Confidential had published obscene material, but also that they

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>had knowingly done so. The prosecution argued that Confidential had

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>done just that. They brought Ronnie Quillen, a sex worker

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and frequent Confidential tipster, to the stand. Quillen testified that

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Harrison had wanted stories quote primarily dealing with the sexual

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>activities of celebrities, and that he'd made it clear that quote,

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the more lewde and lascivious the story, the more colorful

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the magazine, But the defense rebutted that notion, claiming that

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the magazine had always been careful not to cross the

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>line into obscenity, and how had they defined that line.

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Ross, one of the magazine's lawyers, explained that he

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and Robert Harrison had compared the magazine to others published material.

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>To prove Ross's point, proudly, the defense attorney submitted into

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>evidence a whole stack of books which Ross claimed to

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>have used to learn what the public found acceptable in

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 1>terms of obscenity. The stack included best sellers like John

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Steinbeck's East of Eden and Grace Mettalius's Peyton Place. Whether

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>or not these books made senses benchmarks for obscenity, and

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, whether or not Confidential had ended up publishing

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>obscene content despite these precautions would be up for the

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>jury to decide. The next charge was libel. The state

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 1>had again gone with a conspiracy charge, so they would

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 1>have to prove two things. That the magazine had published

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>afammatory material and that it had done so with intent,

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Because the magazine was charged not with civil libel but

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with criminal libel, a little used charge that basically doesn't

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>exist today, the burden of proving whether or not the

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>stories were true fell to the magazine. Prosecutor Clarence Lynn

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>had said when the charges were announced that he didn't

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>think the magazine would be able to prove that their

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>stories were true. Like many people, he seemed to assume

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that Confidential was sloppy in their standards, publishing anything, no

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>matter how questionable, as long as it sounded good. But

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in that assumption, Lynn was very wrong. Though Confidential had

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>started out by publishing made up stories, once they graduated

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 1>into the world of Hollywood gossip, Robert Harrison had wanted

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that Confidential was legally safeguarded. When the

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>magazine decided to move forward with a tip, private investigators

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>were hired to double check the information. We have to

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>have the exact type, exact date, everything documented just in case,

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Harrison said. Then the magazine's lawyers would prepare affidavits for

0:35:55.880 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 1>their sources to sign, which read quote, I swich that

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>all the events described in the above story are true

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and that I was a participant in these events. Based

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on these affidavits, confidentials writers would then put together a piece,

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>but the legal review wasn't over yet. Lawyers would now

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>check over every word of a story, often demanding rewrites

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>or deletions. Their oversight was so intensive, one reporter said

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that he once requested a disclaimer that an article was

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>an attorney's work, not his own. Writers quickly learned that

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the best approach was to imply conclusions, not state them outright,

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in order to protect themselves from liability. Confidential, the testimony suggested,

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was very, very careful with the truth, but two of

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the trials most eye catching witnesses would reveal that Confidential's

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>fact checking process was not infallible. Hollywood's fears about stars

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>being called by the defense hadn't materialized. Defense lawyer Arthur

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Crowley didn't want to risk being bound by the testimony

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of witnesses who might perjure themselves to protect their reputations. However,

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there were some stars who wanted to testify. Their names

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>were Maureen O'Hara and Dorothy Dandridge. O'Hara, an actress, came

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to court to respond to a March nineteen fifty seven

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>article titled quote it was the hottest show in town

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>when Maureen O'Hara cuddled in Row thirty five. The article

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 1>alleged that O'Hara had had a sexual encounter with a

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>lover in the back row of Grammin's Chinese Theater in

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles. O'Hara vehemently denied it, and she had proved

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 1>to back up her denials. On the same day that

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Confidential claims she was getting busy in Los Angeles, O'Hara's

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>passport showed that she had been in London. Dorothy Dandridge,

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a singer actress, also testified. Confidential had published an article

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>called only the Birds and the Bees Saw What Dorothy

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Dandridge Did in the Woods, claiming that Dandridge had had

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 1>sex with a man in the woods near a resort

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in Lake Tahoe, Nevada. Now, Dandridge appeared on the stand,

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 1>stating for the court that what Confidential claimed could never

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>have happened. Dandridge was black, and the man the story

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>alleged she had had sex with was white. During the

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>period in which she had been in Lake Tahoe, Dandridge explained,

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 1>racial prejudices there had not only precluded her from interacting

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>with white people, but also from walking freely around the

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:44.720
<v Speaker 1>resort grounds. She couldn't have even gone into the woods,

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 1>let alone met a white man there, so Confidential was

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>not infallible. But had they meant to defame the subjects

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of their articles. Opinions on that varied. One disgruntled former

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>reporter testified that he had wanted to hear those he

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>wrote about, while others claimed that they were just reporting

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 1>facts like any other news publication. The real blame for

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 1>any damage done, when witness said, lay with the movie studios,

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>who did not enforce the moral clauses in their stars contracts. Again,

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it would be up to the jury to decide. In

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>closing arguments, the prosecution doubled down on their themes. They

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>pointed out the familial and financial bonds between Confidential and

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Research. They argued that Confidential had no motive for

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>exposing scandal other than financial gain. They railed against the

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:45.280
<v Speaker 1>low morals of the magazine. Look at them, shouted William Ritzy,

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>pointing his finger at Marjorie and Fred Mead. They are

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the self appointed purveyors of filth and gossip in the

0:39:54.800 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>United States. For the defense, Crowley fought back, Oh, was

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Confidential so much different, so much worse than any other publication?

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>He asked, what about girly magazines with their erotic content.

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Why wasn't the government pursuing them unlike those magazines, Crowley continued,

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 1>confidential is accepted by the community. It is sold over

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 1>the counter, not under the counter. And then he brought

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>up another point, one that had nearly gotten lost amongst

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the discussion of celebrities and gossip and smut, the issue

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:40.879
<v Speaker 1>of free speech. The prosecution wants to indulge in censorship,

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to do your thinking for you. Who is the prosecutor

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to tell you what you can and can't read? He asked,

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 1>If you find my client's guilty, Crowley told the jury,

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you will be taking a precious piece of liberty. Would

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>this plea be enough? After more than a month of

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>testimony and nearly thirty witnesses, the trial ended and the

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 1>decision was left in the jury's hands. Soon it became

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>clear that it would not be a quick deliberation. One

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>day passed, and then another, and then another. The jury

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>returned to the courtroom to ask Judge Walker some clarifying questions.

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.720
<v Speaker 1>They left again. Things were getting heated amongst the jury.

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>At one point marshals had to step in. Several jurors

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 1>had allegedly threatened to throw another juror out of the window. Finally,

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>after a then record breaking fourteen days of deliberation, the

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>jury returned to the courtroom on October first, but they

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>still had no verdict. They were hopelessly stuck, they told

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Judge Walker, and could not reach a unanimous verdict. Reluctantly,

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he declared a mistrial. Later, it would emerge that the

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>jurors had voted seven to five in favor of conviction

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 1>on the charge of conspiracy to commit criminal libel and

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>eight to four on conspiracy to publish obscenity. Now the

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 1>government had the option to retry Confidential, but did they

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>want to publicly? California Attorney General Pat Brown was quick

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to declare his desire for a retrial, but privately he

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted the whole thing to be over and done with,

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and so did the studios who had first urged him

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to take the case. The trial had been expensive and exhausting.

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>He wrote to Prosecutor Clarence Lynn on October ninth and

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>urged him to settle the case with Confidential. Publicly, Robert

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Harrison was thrilled by the trial's outcome. He threw a

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.240
<v Speaker 1>lavish dinner to celebrate Arthur Crowley in New York City

0:42:55.560 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and hired a violin player to serenade him privately. Was terrified.

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>The first trial had cost him an estimated three and

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a half million dollars in legal fees in today's money.

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 1>He was worried that another trial would ruin him and

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even land his niece Marjorie in jail. So when

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors reached out to discuss a deal, Harrison was receptive.

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 1>The lawyers got to work hammering out terms. Meanwhile, Pat

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Brown announced his run for governor. He was elected less

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>than a year later and served two terms. On November twelfth,

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Judge Burton Noble approved a proposed deal between California and Confidential.

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>The terms were simple. The state would drop all charges

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>except the count of conspiracy to publish obscenity. A judge

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 1>would determine the magazine's guilt on this charge based on

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the grand jury and trial transcripts. In exchange for the

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>reduced charges, Confidential agreed to stop publishing exposes about celebrities.

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 1>They also agreed to take out ads publicly announcing this

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 1>change in editorial direction. In December, Judge Noble found Confidential

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and her sister magazine whisper guilty of conspiring to publish obscenity.

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Each magazine was fined five thousand dollars. Where were the

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:24.720
<v Speaker 1>studios in all of this? During the trial, Now aware

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that taking the legal route ran the risk of unwelcome exposure,

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the studios had created another internal anti scandal magazine committee members,

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>including a politically ambitious actor named Ronald Reagan, brainstormed measures

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to fight Confidential and its cronies. In mid October, they

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:51.359
<v Speaker 1>announced a campaign to root out magazine informants. We will

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>organize effective opposition to fight these people, writers, said one

0:44:55.640 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>committee member. But their efforts proved unnecessary because though Confidential

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>had made it through the trial, they had not come

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:11.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the battle unscathed. In the spring of nineteen

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:14.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight, the magazine revealed its new approach to readers.

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 1>We're quitting the area of private affairs for the arena

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of public affairs. Read the announcement. If wiseacres say we've

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:26.919
<v Speaker 1>retreated from the bedroom, we'll say, yes, that's true. From

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>now on, we'll search the thoroughfares of the globe for

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>stories of public interest. These so called public interest stories

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 1>including gems like what's wrong with the oil burner in

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the White House Basement and Penicillin Can Save Your Life.

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Unsurprisingly failed to interest the public at all. Circulation numbers

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>collapsed after three issues of the new Confidential. Robert Harrison

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>had had enough. He wanted a magazine that drew attention,

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that started conversations, and most of all, that made money.

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Under their restrictions placed by the California Deal, Confidential could

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:12.360
<v Speaker 1>no longer be that magazine. Plus Harrison was now facing

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a number of celebrity libel lawsuits. He announced that he

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 1>was selling the magazine. The new publisher tried to revive interest,

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but couldn't find an audience. The magazine steadily lost readership

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and eventually folded. Many people saw Confidential's collapse as a

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 1>victory for American morality. One newspaper editorial put it like this,

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>these magazines still may not be fit for most living rooms,

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but it is generally agreed that they are not quite

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>so bad as they were before. The heavy expenses of

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the trial appear to have made the publishers and editors

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of Confidential and her scandalous sisters more conscious of their responsibilities.

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But other observers were concerned about the potential chilling effects

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of the trial, the journalist Maurice Solitau expressed these fears

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>governmental power has been used to alter the editorial content

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of a national magazine. It has been shown that the

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 1>cost of defending such a charge is so expensive that

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>by merely threatening an indefinite series of prosecutions, any publication

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:24.240
<v Speaker 1>can be put to death. Regardless of one's personal opinion

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of Confidential, many may regard the use of the judicial

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>power to muzzle a magazine any magazine, as an act

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>discouraging freedom and controversy. Fortunately, Zlatao's views were not immediately realized.

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:43.320
<v Speaker 1>In the decade after the Confidential trial, the American public

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>and the judicial system seemed to lose their appetite for censorship.

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Many of the local and state level literature review boards

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>which served as de facto censorship organizations, disbanded, usually due

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to court rulings against them, but censorship has never fully

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>vanied from our landscape. Recently, the country has seen a

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>rise in community efforts to ban or censor books from

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>public and school libraries. The American Library Association reported in

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 1>September twenty twenty three that the first eight months of

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that year contained the highest number of book challenges since

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it began recording the data in two thousand and three,

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the number of book challenges had already nearly doubled between

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:30.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one and twenty twenty two. Unlike Confidential, which

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:35.319
<v Speaker 1>was invested in reinforcing racist, homophobic, and sexist stereotypes, most

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the publications being challenged today are those that explore

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 1>or are supportive of gender, racial, and sexual diversity. But

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the question at the heart of all these challenges has

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>remained the same. Who chooses what the public gets to read?

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>The American Library Associations Deborah Caldwell Stone is a statement

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 1>about book challenges. Said quote, to allow a group of people,

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:02.239
<v Speaker 1>or any individual, no matter how powerful or allowed, to

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>become the decision maker about what books we can read

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>or whether libraries exist, is to place all of our

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 1>rights and liberties in jeopardy, Or, as Arthur Crowley put

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it in the Confidential Trial, who is the prosecutor to

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:22.719
<v Speaker 1>tell you what you can and can't read? There are

0:49:22.719 --> 0:49:27.440
<v Speaker 1>some lighter parallels between Confidential and today too. Though Confidential

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 1>itself may not have lasted long, it set the tone

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for nearly all of the celebrity gossip we consume today.

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Before Confidential and other scandal magazines like it. Hollywood stars

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:43.760
<v Speaker 1>had highly polished images. Confidential revealed the truth behind the glamour.

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Once the truth was out, there was no going back,

0:49:48.200 --> 0:49:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and many stars decided that it was better to capitalize

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on the public's interest in their foibles than try to

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:59.280
<v Speaker 1>deny them. In nineteen sixty four, Robert Harrison was profiled

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in esquire Ma magazine and told the reporter quote, you

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>couldn't put out a magazine like Confidential again because movie

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:09.799
<v Speaker 1>stars have started writing books about themselves. They tell all.

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 1>No magazine can compete with that. Many magazines, of course,

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:19.359
<v Speaker 1>have tried. From confidentials Ashes Rose Publications has varied as

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 1>The National Inquirer and People Magazine, as well as online

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 1>gossip sites like TMZ and television programs like Entertainment Tonight.

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Robert Harrison, for all his quirks, knew what news sold,

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and as I sit here now telling the story of

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the hidden forces at work behind his magazine's trial, I

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:44.319
<v Speaker 1>can't help but think of some of his words. I

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:49.160
<v Speaker 1>sincerely believe the basic vehicle of the story behind the

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:53.399
<v Speaker 1>story will be here long after we are all dead.

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>That's the story of California. V Confidential Stay with Me

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:01.800
<v Speaker 1>after the Break to learn more about the tragic rise

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and fall of one of the magazine's star writers, who

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:11.839
<v Speaker 1>embodied many of the nineteen fifties darkest trends. In the

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 1>spring of nineteen fifty three, Robert Harrison was looking for

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 1>a reporter to write a hit piece about one of

0:51:18.280 --> 0:51:22.040
<v Speaker 1>his loudest critics, the New York Post editor James Wexler.

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 1>None of his usual freelancers would do. Harrison wanted to

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:30.879
<v Speaker 1>highlight Wexler's youthful membership in the Young Communist League, and

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>thus wanted a noted anti communist journalist to write the piece.

0:51:35.200 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So he reached out to the source of all things

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 1>anti communists, the office of Senator Joe McCarthy. Three years earlier,

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy had made national news by declaring that he had

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a list of hundreds of Communists working at the State Department.

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Since then, he had ruthlessly and often baselessly accused hundreds

0:51:56.760 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>more Americans of Communist sympathies, ruining reputations and lives with

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 1>his hearings in the Senate. One of the main sources

0:52:05.640 --> 0:52:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of information for these hearings was a prominent anti communist

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 1>journalist named Howard Rushmore, who now worked for McCarthy. When

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert Harrison called McCarthy's office in the spring of nineteen

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>fifty three, it was with Rushmore that he wished to

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>be connected. Rushmore had not always been an anti communist.

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:29.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, he had once been a passionate communist. Born

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 1>on July second, nineteen twelve, in Sheridan, Wyoming, Rushmore grew

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:37.799
<v Speaker 1>up in profound poverty. As a young reporter in Missouri,

0:52:38.080 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he had been radicalized by witnessing both terrible working conditions

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and the lynching of a young black man. Rushmore was

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>desperate for a better world and admired the conviction with

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 1>which communist organizations railed against injustice. By the nineteen thirties,

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 1>he was prominent in the communist movement and served as

0:52:57.480 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>film critic for the major communist newspaper, Daily Worker. But

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:05.359
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen thirty nine, Rushmore had a catastrophic falling out

0:53:05.400 --> 0:53:08.319
<v Speaker 1>with the Communist Party over his positive review of the

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:12.440
<v Speaker 1>film Gone with the Wind. Other Daily Worker employees accused

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 1>him of being racist and of sympathizing with the Confederacy. Outraged,

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Rushmore left both the paper and the Party and decided

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to devote himself to destroying communism in America. His rise

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the anti communist movement was just as swift as

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it had been in the communist movement. He was hired

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 1>by the right wing journal American Newspaper and became the

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 1>country's first full time reporter on the communist movement. By

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen forties, With his anti communist expertise established, Rushmore

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>became a popular witness for government investigations. He was a

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 1>key witness in the House on American Activities Committees' hearings

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>on communism in Hollywood. In nineteen fifty three, Senator McCarthy

0:53:55.719 --> 0:54:03.319
<v Speaker 1>made Rushmore his research director. His power seemed limitless, but

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 1>under the surface cracks were appearing. Rushmore was an alcoholic

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with violent tendencies. He had a prickly personality, a combative nature,

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and a condescending manner. He also had a tendency to

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:20.240
<v Speaker 1>fabricate evidence. Once, he had claimed to have an FBI

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:23.799
<v Speaker 1>report showing that whe hundred and fifty government employees in

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Washington State were Soviet spies. When the FBI asked him

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to produce this report, he gave them a letter he

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>himself had written, and he would eventually lose his job

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 1>with McCarthy after it was revealed that he was using

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:39.680
<v Speaker 1>private testimony from the Scent hearings for his articles in

0:54:39.719 --> 0:54:44.280
<v Speaker 1>The Journal American. After agreeing to write that first article

0:54:44.400 --> 0:54:49.000
<v Speaker 1>for Confidential onn Wexler, Rushmore had contributed occasionally to the magazine,

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:53.319
<v Speaker 1>writing mainly anti communist expose is Like the Strange Death

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of J. Robert Oppenheimer's Red Sweetheart. Rushmore thought the tabloid

0:54:58.080 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>business was beneath him, but when and the Journal American

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:05.359
<v Speaker 1>fired him in nineteen fifty four over personality and pay disputes,

0:55:05.760 --> 0:55:11.320
<v Speaker 1>he came to Confidential full time. Eventually, Rushmore became Confidential's

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:15.279
<v Speaker 1>chief editor. His main passion was exposes of stars for

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>communist leanings or homosexuality, but he'd chafed against Harrison's requirements

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that he also report on what Rushmore saw as a

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>less consequential celebrity gossip. In turn, Harrison was annoyed by

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Rushmore's obsessive focus on politics. By nineteen fifty five, the

0:55:32.120 --> 0:55:35.320
<v Speaker 1>two men had fallen out, and Rushmore left the magazine

0:55:35.360 --> 0:55:39.839
<v Speaker 1>that September under less than amicable terms, though Confidential gave

0:55:39.880 --> 0:55:43.239
<v Speaker 1>him severan's pay and promised to assume liability for any

0:55:43.320 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 1>libel suits on articles published under his watch, as he

0:55:47.239 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 1>had done with the Communist Party. Rushmore became determined to

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 1>destroy the organization he felt spurned by. He took his

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:58.719
<v Speaker 1>severance pay and bought a plane ticket to California, where

0:55:58.760 --> 0:56:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he met up with an A. Turneri, who was representing several

0:56:01.920 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 1>celebrities in suits against the magazine. He would eventually testify

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:10.000
<v Speaker 1>at Pat Brown's grand jury hearings, where his testimony that

0:56:10.200 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>quote some of the stories are true and some have

0:56:13.120 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing to back them up at all, would go a

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:18.239
<v Speaker 1>long way towards convincing the grand jury to bring an

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:23.719
<v Speaker 1>indictment against Confidential. At the trial, Rushmore testified for the prosecution,

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:28.720
<v Speaker 1>continuing his assault on the magazine. When Arthur Crowley pressed

0:56:28.800 --> 0:56:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Rushmore on cross about his goals in writing for Confidential,

0:56:32.680 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 1>asking did you have this specific intention yourself to injure someone?

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:41.400
<v Speaker 1>The lawyer clearly expected a no, but Rushmore shocked Crowley

0:56:41.400 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in the courtroom by replying, I certainly did. Though Rushmore

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:48.640
<v Speaker 1>seemingly got what he wanted with the destruction of Confidential,

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the trial also ruined him. This was the second time

0:56:53.000 --> 0:56:56.439
<v Speaker 1>he had publicly turned against an organization that had employed him,

0:56:56.920 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and no one could trust him anymore. THEO. Willson, who

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 1>reported on the trial for the New York Daily News,

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 1>called Rushmore quote a professional turncoat on the skids. He

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 1>was unemployable, unlikable, and sinking ever deeper into the bottle.

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:17.000
<v Speaker 1>When prosecutor Clarence Lynn approached Rushmore in the fall of

0:57:17.080 --> 0:57:20.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty seven about testifying in a potential confidential retrial,

0:57:21.520 --> 0:57:25.120
<v Speaker 1>he found a broken man, he told me. Lynn said

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that he thought he had been ruined by his activities

0:57:28.480 --> 0:57:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Confidential trial. Much of Rushmore's anger ended up

0:57:32.400 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 1>being channeled against his wife, Francis, who he physically abused.

0:57:36.760 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 1>On January third, nineteen fifty eight, the worst happened. Rushmore

0:57:41.520 --> 0:57:44.360
<v Speaker 1>killed Francis and then himself in a taxi in New

0:57:44.440 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 1>York City. Robert Harrison received the news in another taxi

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:51.360
<v Speaker 1>on his way home from the airport. The driver asked

0:57:51.440 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 1>him if he'd heard the news that the publisher of

0:57:53.880 --> 0:57:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Confidential had just shot himself. Harrison, who was actually the

0:57:57.760 --> 0:58:02.440
<v Speaker 1>publisher of Confidential, was baffled. Howard Rushmore's story is a

0:58:02.480 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>sad and sordid one, but his journey also tells us

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:08.480
<v Speaker 1>so much about the country he lived in. As a

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 1>young man, he witnessed terrible things and hoped for a

0:58:11.200 --> 0:58:14.560
<v Speaker 1>better world. When he could not achieve that, he set

0:58:14.600 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>out to watch the world burn. He wrote the progressive

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:21.560
<v Speaker 1>wave of the nineteen thirties, rallied behind nationalist causes in

0:58:21.600 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen forties, and played on fears during the Red

0:58:24.840 --> 0:58:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Scare in the nineteen fifties. He recognized the country's interest

0:58:28.880 --> 0:58:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in celebrities, and he made money off of it, but

0:58:32.000 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it sickened him too. He was a mess of contradictions,

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a difficult man, and despite his protests that Confidential was

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 1>beneath him, there is probably no better avatar for the

0:58:42.560 --> 0:58:48.680
<v Speaker 1>magazine's potent brand of scandal. Thank you for listening to

0:58:48.840 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>History on Trial. The main sources for this episode were

0:58:52.600 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Samantha Barbas's book Confidential Confidential, The Inside Story of Hollywood's

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 1>notorious scandal magazine and Henry E. Scott's book Shocking True

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Story The Rise and Fall of Confidential, America's most scandalous

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:11.760
<v Speaker 1>scandal magazine. For a full bibliography, as well as a

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:15.680
<v Speaker 1>transcript of this episode with citations, please visit History on

0:59:16.000 --> 0:59:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Trial podcast dot com. History on Trial is written and

0:59:22.040 --> 0:59:25.800
<v Speaker 1>hosted by me Mira Hayward. The show is edited and

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:29.840
<v Speaker 1>produced by Jesse Funk, with supervising producer Trevor Young and

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:35.760
<v Speaker 1>executive producers Dana Schwartz, Alexander Williams, Matt Frederick, and Mira Hayward.

0:59:36.320 --> 0:59:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Learn more about the show at History on Trial podcast

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com and follow us on Instagram at History on

0:59:43.520 --> 0:59:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Trial and on Twitter at Underscore History on Trial. Find

0:59:48.960 --> 0:59:54.280
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from iHeartRadio by visiting the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:59:54.640 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.