WEBVTT - Canada's Big Liberal Phony

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. A massive scandal has

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>rocked Canadian politics. You have Justin Trudeau the Prime Minister

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in multiple instances and not that long ago of blackface conduct.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So we will talk about what that means for the

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Prime minister up there. He's in a reelection battle. Also,

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a whistleblower who says that President Trump did something

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>very very bad. We don't know what it is. The

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>deep State strikes back that and more coming up on

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>where the mission or mission is to decode what really

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a

0:00:54.600 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>great American. Again, The buck Sexton Show begins. Analyst brother,

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>He's a great guy. No, I think this is something that,

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>like everything that you have to evaluate on a case

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>by case basis. This is something that I take seriously

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and I take responsibility for. I'm just off of myself. Obviously,

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm disappointed in myself and I'm apologizing to Canadian Welcome

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to the buck Sexton Show. All of a sudden, we

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>are focused on Canadian politics. A Justin Trudeau. He is

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat beloved figure on the left he is considered

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>very telegenic. He is a self professed male feminist, and

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>now we find out had not just one instance, but

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>really a habit, a habit of dressing in at least

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>three instances in black face or it's also people have

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>preferred to it as brown face to look like he's

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>from South Asia, for example. I believe they think that

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>or the Middle East. There one photo I believe he

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>dresses up as is it at Arabian Nights party. So yes,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that we Middle Eastern. So he painted his face and

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>his arms brown. You can see the photos for yourself.

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>This let me just say, and I you know this,

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I hate cancel culture. The day will come, mark my

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>words when all of you are going to have to

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>stand beside me when I say something that's not wrong

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>or bad, because I'm a good person who doesn't say

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 1>wrong or bad things, but says something that somehow the

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>left will try to turn into me being a bad guy,

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>or me being a racist, or me being whatever, And

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it will be on all of you to just say, no,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we know Buck. We've listened to Buck for a long time.

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>We know, we know his heart, we know his mind,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's just not real cancel culture is terrible, all right.

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>This decision that was made within the corridors of the

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>elite lag in journalism, media, the academy over the last

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>ten years or so, to just try to find something

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in someone's background, even if at the time it was

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.399
<v Speaker 1>more more commonplace or less. And I'm not talking about

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>blackfaced specifically, just any number of things. Support of gay marriage,

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, support of same sex gosh sport of traditional marriage.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>What I'm trying to say is enough to get you

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>fired from your job, even at a time when Barack

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Obama himself was a traditional marriage politician, right saying that

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he was for a traditional marriage. So they've gone back

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>into people's past to try to destroy them. We know

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens here, right, hypocrisy. We know that conservatives are

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>held to one standard, Liberals are held to another. And

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the conservative standard is if we can get you, we're

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna get you. The liberals standard is, oh, let's talk

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>about nuance and all the good This person has done.

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>This just in Trudeau conference was astounding. This guy was

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>It was just he was groveling, pleading. Oh, I'm so

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so sorry, and I just I understand my privilege and

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I've I've lived a life with so much privilege, and

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that that privilege. He just kept repeating the

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>word like there's some evil guy named privilege that made

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>him do this. Was it one case, by the way,

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't like he got drunk. One nine said

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do this stupid thing. He went to a party.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>He did this three times, he according to the Daily

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Mail here. The three photos have emerged in the last

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours, showing him in black face. In one,

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he addressed up to seeing Dao on stage at a

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>high school, which is a well known Jamaican folk song

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>about the country's working class, according to Daily Mail here.

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>In another one, he wore brown makeup to attend an

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Arabian Nights party at age twenty nine, and a third

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>undated photo showed him in full black face in a

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 1>video three times. This guy does this three times and

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in the two thousands. This isn't thirty years ago. It's

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like ten, fifteen years ago, fifteen years ago. This isn't

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>back in the eighties. Not that I would make it, okay,

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but this is even more recent. And this guy is

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>all the libs love him. He's their favorite. Oh my gosh,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>he's so they say, he's so handsome and smart and

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>liberal and worldly and sophistically. His dad was prime minister.

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a spoiled brat. Oh, but I am so good

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for Canada. I'm here, I am very handsome. Just In Trudeau.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say the most liberal platitude in

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>this stuff possible, and not to know today he's got

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a different a little bit of

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a different situation going for himself. Today he's got a problem.

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that people have particular schadenfreuder here. It's a

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>great word that you know. Germans do have some words

0:05:57.680 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that are really really useful. Schadenfreud is one of them.

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>We are enjoying watching Trudeau in particular squirm and man

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is he squirmy right, I am so sorry about my

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>privilege because all of the privilege that I've had for

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the many decades of my prig It's like, dude, come on,

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 1>wokeness in the past isn't supposed to be a free pass,

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>or rather wokens today. He isn't supposed to be a

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>free pass to do anything in your past. But he

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>seemed to think so this is the same Justin Trudeau,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't really have a French act. I like

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to do like a cross between Justin Trudeau and some

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>guy named Jean Pierre, who is you know, trapping beever

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>pelts up in Hudson Bay. You know where you get

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the offense the best prize in the trapping in the

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Hudson Bay, monsieur. I like that French Canadian mountee kind

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Anyway, he doesn't sound like that, I know,

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>so I should stand my Justin Trudeau impression really needs

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to get a lot better. But here he is speaking

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of Justin Trudeau and how he sounds. Here he is

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>at a at a some kind of forum, and a

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>woman who's on his side, mind you, a fellow liberal,

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>gets up to speak, and he corrects her. Maternal love

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is the love that's going to change the future of mankind.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So we'd like you to look. We would like to

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>say people kind, not necessarily mankind. It's more inclusive, exactly.

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>We'd like to say. We like to say people kind.

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I think John your correct Sir Trudeau just mansplained to

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>say that it must be people kind. He doesn't let

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>her live her truth. He doesn't know what kind of

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>struggles she has had with the usage of the term

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>mankind versus people kind. Why not humankinds your Missieur Trudeau,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But that's he is a smug, sanctimonious live I mean,

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the worst kind. And we've seen so many people. We

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just had a an SNL. SNL cast member got fired

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>from his job in this obviously that's in this country,

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>although Lauren Michaels is Canadian. Fun fact, the guy who

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>runs SNL, we had him. I don't remember the guy's name.

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>He didn't really make it onto the cast. He's got fired.

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>He said he said he used a racial slur about Asians,

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know that's going to get you in a

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of trouble. But I would just note that, okay,

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>he's a racial slur. Justin Trudeau is dressing in blackface

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>multiple times. He clearly thought this was really funny. He

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly thought this was like edgy and cool. What a moron.

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's always been, by the way, he's always

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>been an empty suit. He's always been a guy that

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, just because he looks a certain way and

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>uses a certain phrases. You know, Oh, I am I

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>just think that we should say people kind, and I'm

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>good to stare longingly into your eyes Canada. Does you

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>know it's the whole thing. It's just intellectually flimsy got

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>where he is because of who daddy is. And you know,

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>now here we are dealing with once again liberals cannot

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>live by the rules that they want to make conservatives

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>live by. They can't live by them. You had Northamb

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia, not just not just in a black face photo,

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>also with a KKK guy, you know, in a costume,

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and his story, I mean, the Trudeau is just saying, please,

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>don't be don't hate me. I am, I will do

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>all of the social justice things you want. I promise.

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. Northam's thing was like, yeah, that's not me. Well,

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>like my friend, it is you. Okay, we're not idiots,

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it's you. No, no, that's not me. And then Mark

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Harring came out. And Mark Harry, who is the not

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the number two but the number three in the I

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>think he's a state attorney general in Virginia. He says, yeah,

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 1>he should, you know, Northham should probably step down. And

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>then it comes out that Mark Harring had a black

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>face issue, if memory serves, and he's just like, what

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is with these guys, Libs, Democrats, Justin Trudeau. If you're

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>making a global index of the top ten social justice

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>warriors in politics, I think Justin Trudeau would be a

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>top ten, probably be top five. Who stops somebody and says,

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we prefer to say people kind. I mean, what kind

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of smug nonsense is that? And yet now we find

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>out that not only is he annoying, it turns out

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>he has horrible judgment horrible generally three times. I even

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think Northam was in three instances of

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>black face, as much as he's a liar about the

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>black face incident that he had three separate times this sky.

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I haven't been to that many costume parties

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>as an adult period, So I mean, I mean, by

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, when he was asked, oh my gosh, there's

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>even more when when he was asked at this press conference,

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>which was great viewing today. I watched almost all of it,

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but occasionally would switch back into ah way, monsieur jumpel

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Justin Trudeau he going to the whole He actually would

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>switch into the French. He had to watch it go

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. But one of the one of the

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>members of the press, all of a sudden said, uh,

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, hey, UM, can you just tell us are

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>these all the black face photos that are going to emerge?

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And he can't. He's like, well, I don't know. It's um,

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there are certainly three of them. And I am so

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>sad because my privilege just got the best of me

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and privilege is so pervasive, and you know, he just

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>just blatter, just trying to Oh, I'm so sorry, I'm

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so sorry. I'm so sorry. But he can't tell us

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>if there's I mean, John, here's here's here's a fun

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>here's a fun game. Do you know how many you

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>know how many black face photos there are of me

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in existence? Zero? You know how many black faced photos

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>there are of you in existence? Zero? It's just not hard.

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>This is not hard. So what is this? Uh? I

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know if there's Marrie, this guy Trudeau. Oh, he's

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just such a self righteous fraud folks about all this stuff?

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>How homogic cares? And because here, let me just say this.

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>If Trudeau were a guy who was always fighting for

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>free speech and he was one of these liberals that

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>still believed in liberty at some level, I don't think

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we should have cancel culture. I think we should give

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>good people the benefit of the doubt. People can misspeak,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>people can share the wrong idea at the wrong time.

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>You know that can happen. If you were that guy,

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say, Okay, you know, maybe maybe you gave

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit of slacker. But no, the guy

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>who says you can't say mankind say people kind can't

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>even tell you if there's a fourth or fifth Maybe

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. He doesn't know. Black faced photos of him

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>out there. This, my friends, is liberalism today. This is

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>leftism in America, in Canada, in Europe. It is an

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>ideology that is all about the elevation of ego at

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the expense of reason and truth and facts and decency

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and honor and integrity. It's just believe this thing, do

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>what we say. Believe this thing, and you'll be one

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of the good people, and you'll be able to get

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>away with things that the other people won't. You will

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 1>be elite by just by virtue of agreeing with this

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>political machinery. Use the words we say, agree with the

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>policies that we prescribe, and you will be among the elite.

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>You'll be on the side of the good people and

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the smart people. Meanwhile, the rest of us say, what

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>happened to decency, honor, integrity, individual freedom, individual rights? How

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>about any of that? Does that ever get talked about

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>here now? Of course not. Social justice is the only

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>justice that matters to them. Do I think Trudeau is

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>going to lose because of this? I'm not a good

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>person to gauge where Canadian politics are going, but I

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>can tell you this. They'll forgive him whenever a liberal

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>messes up, whenever a liberal should be canceled. Under cancel culture,

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we have conversations about nuance and forgiveness and second chances.

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>When a conservative makes a mistake, even a much much

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller mistake than this, any Republican, anyone in Trump's circle,

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump himself, it's because he's evil, needs to be cast out,

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>lose his job, lose his career, lose his reputation. The

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>only way to stop this is to fight back. We

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>either make them live by these rules, or we refuse

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to live by these rules. But we can't let them

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>have it both ways. And we'll see what happens here

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>with Trudeau. But I can promise you Libs want to

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>have it both ways. We got a much more show.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Come and stay with me. I was on Outnumbered today

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>on Fox and the subject of Greta Thunberg came up,

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>or rather I brought it up in the context of

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a climate change discussion. And let me just say that

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I one hundred percent stand behind exactly what I said,

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>would say it the same way, and I respectfully disagree

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and would say that some of my colleagues on the

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>couch today we're wrong in what they said to me

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in response. So we were talking about climate change and

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the absurdity of some of the climate change stuff that's

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>going on. Later we'll discuss confessing your climate change sins

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>at NBC. Here is how this exchange at the very

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the show today, which has now been turned

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>into a left wing news story, and they're saying that

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a kid basher. Play the clip. And they also

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>had this young girl who's spent sixteen about the FED

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>rate next mine because he's a kid. Yeah, no, I'm

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>not picking, but she start fining about climate change in

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>front of Congress. She actually, well, let's talk about this.

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about no kid bashing. Yeah, no kid bashing,

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>especially a kid who is more alert to the challenges

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that are facing our planet. Thank Okay, I'm sorry. No,

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry all the women, and I like them all

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>very much. They're very kind to have me on their show.

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>They were all wrong there. That is wrong. I was

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not kid bashing. I said, should Congress ask her about

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the Federate? That's a completely legitimate way of posing the question,

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>which is, should Congress be asking a sixteen year old

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>girl about an enormously complicated scientific, environmental, and economic issue

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in the United States Congress? Should this be done? The

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>answer is no, unless you're a crazy person. I did

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>not bash her. I did not make fun of her,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and no honest person could say otherwise. I am sorry,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>but my colleagues that on the couch were wrong. They

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>were wrong. You heard the audio. That was what happened. Ah.

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>But now The Daily Beast, one of the great trash

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>heap websites in existence, just full of wokeness and leftists

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>or trying to out hit each other, I mean out

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, being more hip than one another. Here's what

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they wrote. Conservative pundit Buck Sexton seemingly thought on Thursday

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>afternoon he was in a safe space to mock sixteen

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>year old climate activist Greta Fundburg by appearing on Fox

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>news he apparently thought wrong. While sitting as the lone

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>male guest of Outnumbered, Sexton joined forces with co host

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Blah Blah blah climate change of religious belief for people

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>who think they're too smart for religion sex and said,

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>which is true. By the way, they're asking for forgiveness.

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's a world where it makes a difference.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>The biggest weakness with this stuff this is again quoting

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>me has always been the spokesperson for the movement. They

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>also have this young girl who is what sixteen? We're

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask her about the FED rate next, he snarked,

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you're damn right. I did. Absolutely, I will double down.

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I will triple down. It is absurd, absolutely absurd to

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have a sixteen year old girl testifying to Congress and saying,

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I want you to be scared, you must take action.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>The world's gonna end like we're all a bunch of morons.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>It's on Congress for bringing her in there. If they

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>brought a five year old in to give us a

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>lesson on voter suppression, I would say that Congress is

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>being stupid and they shouldn't ask a five year old

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>about this. And anyway, I mean Jessica who he's a Democrat,

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and I like Jessica, but the whole she's more a

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>lot more that Greta is more attuned to the No.

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Greta is a sixteen year old girl who doesn't know

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>what she's talking about, So Congress should not give her

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the platform. I stand behind it. Bring it Daily Beast,

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sorry, but the ladies in the couch today

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>they're a little bit out of order on that one.

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>A little bit, a little bit right now. And I

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>where I go lobbying or I was just spending like

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>three days straight with my organization zero Hour. We were

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Capitol for three days straight, just lobbying, having

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>meetings and meetings and meetings and meetings, and what we

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>get all the time as politicians who will not pledge

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>to take any action, they'll just pat us on the

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>head and be like, good job. You know you're so cute.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Ear soon firing. Maybe someday you should run for office

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>and you can take action on climate which is messed

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>up because we only have about eighteen months left in

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>order to create the political environment in order to solve

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the climate crisis before it's too late. So as a

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>seventeen year old throwing it on for them to throw

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>it on a seventeen year old shoulders and say, oh,

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>when you grow up, you can do this. Will know

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>by the time I grew up, it's too late. So

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, on Monday, I got to meet

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Alexandro Kazio Cortez, who is a congresswoman who is an

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:28.719
<v Speaker 1>icon of mine, and I look up to her, and

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>so the goal is, you know, I was standing out

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>there in the balcony where presidents are inaugurated, and I

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>was looking out and I was like, maybe I'll be

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>standing up here getting inaugurated someday. So it's not like

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that that dream is gone. But my dream is not

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>to become an elected official so I can solve the

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>climate crisis, because by the time I'm old enough to

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>be an elected official, it's going to be way too late. Now.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Am I allowed? I just want to know, am I

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.239
<v Speaker 1>allowed to criticize what was said here? I mean, this

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is a climate activist who's meeting with members of Congress,

0:19:56.040 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 1>who's getting airtime on TV, Seattle Times, Rolling Own all.

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're they're all doing these big, glowing editorials

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and pieces on climate activist Jamie Markolan. But she's seventeen.

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>So if I say what she's saying has no basis

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in reality and is entirely wrong, am I? That is

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that kid bashing? Can I wait till she's eighteen? Does

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that to criticize what she says? Is that the rule?

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I just want to know what the rules are. We

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>all knew all a long. It's just so funny. I've

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>been telling you that they send this this young girl

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>from Sweden to do this specifically. It's really just a

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>trap for criticism. It's meant to do exactly what happened.

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not going to back down. I don't care.

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's meant to be exactly what happened with me, which,

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>as you say, this is silly, which it is. This

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is stupid, which it is. Congress should not be giving

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a platform to a teenager on this complicated issue and

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>treating her opinions on this with some deference in elevating it.

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it is absurd. And now you've got another situation.

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Or Jamie Markland seventeen, I met with the I think

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>it's called the Sunshine Foundation or some thing, or the

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Sunshine Group. I forget that. But it's this climate change

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>activist group of kids. And I don't mean seventeen year olds,

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean like twelve year olds, and they gather and

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>they go and remember when I think it was Diane

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Feinstein was like, well, maybe like you should actually learn

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>something a little kid, and kind of patted them on

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the head when one of the kids was saying, you know,

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to save the world or else. They are

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>fearmongering to your children. They're teaching them this in public school.

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>They are brainwashing them with this lunacy. And then when

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 1>you try to deep program the kids or say what

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the kids are saying is even accurate, you're a bad

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You're kid bashing, classic victimology, left wing tactics. You're oh, oh,

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>could you use a kid. I'm I'm making fun of

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>these young girls. I would be that wouldn't be a

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>cool move. That's not okay. I'm not making fun of them.

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm making fun of the elevation of children into political

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>discourse by people who are being disingenuous, by adults who

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>are being frauds, who won't admit that what they're doing

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is crass, is exploitative. You know how many more teenagers

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>get to lecture me or the whole country and go

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to our United States Congress. Get on TV. Even Jake

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Tapper the most smug, annoying live on television. Jake Tapper

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>had did all peace on Greta Thunberg guest rate. Do

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you think that he was like, yeah, maybe this is

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit a little bit much. No, of course,

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not at all. She's so brave trying to help save

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the planet. You know, real fights, real existential conflicts involved,

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>choices involved, trade offs are hard. Walking around and talking

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>about how you want to save the planet all the

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>time by doing some vague thing that will maybe cut

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>some CO two is just a waste. It's a waste

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of air, a waste of energy, a waste of money,

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a waste of effort. But it's so self aggrandizing. Oh

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>it makes you feel so important. I'm saving the world.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm saving the world. Who could be more worthy? I

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>swear it. Really it's just drives me nuts. Drives me nuts,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>really does? It is so disingenuous the way this debate

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>ends up happening. And I've been telling you about all week.

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna have it edits sure enough, Daily beasts. Oh

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and other sides are picking us up now. Conservative pundit

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton thought he'd get away, thought he'd get away

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>with what saying that it's ridiculous that a sixteen year

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>old is testifying in front of the Congress about climate change,

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>not about like high school or what it's like to

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>deal with bullying. That I can understand. There's actual expertise there,

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>a sixteen year old on climate change. No, I'm sorry,

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know anything. Doesn't mean she's a bad person. I'm

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>not putting her down. I'm sure she believes everything she

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>says and she's well intentioned. That's all fine. But the

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and the Congress that are bringing it there are

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of clowns. Stand by it one hundred percent.

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Not gonna change. No one's gonna make me change on

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this because I'm right, and you know him right. Being

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>right these days not enough, Oh nope, Not when the

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>woke police come for you. Not when the social justice

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>warriors think that they can, you know, add add one

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>conservative to the body count. You're gonna have to do

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>better than that, Libs. Not today, Not on my watch, Hey, Libs,

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'll let you be arresting me today.

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Be hand. I think that's where we are on this one,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and I have to say I was I was disappointed

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>with the reaction on the couch. My point was not

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>only not only was my point not worthy of the accusation,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>My point was correct. I would make it again a

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred times. I'm right. You know that I'm right, which

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is why you listen to the show, because it's the

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>best show. We'll be right back. First of all, I

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>want to thank the whistleblower for coming forward, for having

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the courage to follow the procedures as they're written in law,

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to make a lawful disclosure to the Congress and to

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Inspector General of conduct that was gravely concerning to

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the whist a blower. Under the law, when a whistle

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>blower does that, the Inspector General has two weeks to

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>investigate that complaint, to determinis urgent and credible, and to

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>afford that complaint to the Director of National Intelligence. The

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Inspector General made exactly those determinations, found that this was

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>within the jurisdiction of the Director of National Intelligence, that

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it was an urgent matter, and it met the statutory

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>requirements that it dealt with a serious or flagrant abuse,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>violational law, or other misconduct or misuse of resources. What

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>then is supposed to happen is the Director of National

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence has seven days to review the complaint, and then

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they shall provide it to the Congress, and they shall

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 1>instruct through the Inspector General, the whistle blower how the

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>whistle blower can come directly to Congress. In the absence

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of that whistle blower law, there is no lawful mechanism

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for an intelligence community employer, detail layer contractor to raise

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a complaint about serious misconduct. Libs will never learn. Folks,

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Eddie, are so much from Shifty Shift there,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>But the libs will never ever learn. They just can't

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>help themselves. They will believe what Adam Shift says. They

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>will run with this story. You would think, given the

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>very recent and in depth and repeated history of oh

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>now they've got Oh there's a new thing that came

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>out about Trump, this is it, He's done, maybe newspapers

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a little more circumspect, just a little more

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>skeptical before they ran with, oh, whistleblower, very serious things

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>about President Trump, very serious. Oh my gosh, Trump's days

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in office are numbered. I assure you they're only numbered

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>by the next election, and the next elections looking really good.

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>What is that? What is the heart of this whistleblower complaint? Well,

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>before I even get into the details of it, I

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>can tell you this, there's no shortage of people inside

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the federal government, particularly inside the federal bureaucracy, who are

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the hashtag resistance. They think that Trump is

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a bad and evil man, and anything that they have

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>to do, anything that they must do in order to

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>fight back against Trump, including misuse of their official position,

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>including violating their oaths of office, they feel justified in that.

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And if they can find a way to use the system,

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like Komey and McCabe and Brennan and Yates

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>and Clapper and Struck and Page, and if they can

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>find a way to use the government system itself against

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the president for political purposes, they think that's a great idea.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>They see no problem with that or in that. In fact,

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they just see an opportunity. That's what they see, and

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>that's so that's the That's just the necessary backdrop I

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>think for our understanding of this whistleblower complaint. Oh my gosh,

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>what are we going to do here on the same

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>week when they're all they're they're subpoenaing Trump's taxes. Oh,

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a whistleblower complaint. Oh the emoluments class. It just

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it's hard. It's hard to keep up on this, it

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>really is. So this is from CNN aka Anti Trump Central.

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, don't get mad at me for

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>reading from CNN. It's just if you want to know

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>what the Trump haters are saying, you got a one

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>stop shop at CNN. It is the Trump Derangement News Network.

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's what it says. The Intelligence Inspector General suggested the

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>House intelligence community today that the whistleblower had concerns about

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>multiple actions. Oh no, good, heavens. The Inspector General did

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>not specifically say all the acts of concern involved the president.

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>One source said the Inspector General referenced a sequence of

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>events and alleged actions that took place. Another source disputed

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that the Inspector General provided substantive details regarding the whistleblower claim.

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>CNN earlier reported, citing a source familiar with the case,

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the complaint was prompted by concerns over a phone call

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>between the president and a foreign leader Inspector General Michael

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Atkinson was pressed for details, but was mostly resistant to

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the queries, saying he is not allowed to provide details

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of the substance of the complaint because he was not

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>authorized to do so. He's discussing the process for his

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>handling of the whistleblowers concerns. So here we go. Now

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>we have another Oh, it could be huge if true,

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>huge if true against Trump. That's what they'll say. And

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I saw today and now keeping on this is none

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of this is very First of all, Trump has already

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>said this is just fake news, it's crap. None of

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this has been verified. So if this turns out to

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>not be the exact story, then you know, excuse me

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for telling you what the crazy stuff is that they're

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>saying about Trump, but we have to we have to know.

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Here's what we have been told that Ukrainian President Zelenski

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>was on the phone with Trump and this is this

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is the allegation that's out there. And then Trump told

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Zelenski that if you reopen the probe into Biden and

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically whether or not Biden made a made the Ukrainians

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>fire a prosecutor who was looking at a Ukrainian gas

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>gas company or maybe an oil company, gas company, I

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>forget fossil fuel company that was paying Hunter Biden, who

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we all know has a very messy past and background,

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>paying Hunter Biden millions of dollars, so that prosecutor had

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to get pushed aside. This is the story. And if

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I recall my old colleague at the Hill, John Solomon,

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>was the one who broke this story. Colleague, or rather

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that prosecutor. How do you get pushed aside? And now

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>there's this story out there that maybe Trump would say

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to him, open up again. What's going to open this

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>up again? Take a look at this again? Is this true?

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think it's very unlikely to be true.

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the Lib media never learns its

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>lesson about whether or not they should just go all

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in on these stories. Although this then goes to my theory,

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>which is that the audience for these publications in Your time,

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:01.959
<v Speaker 1>CNN and elsewhere, they don't get mad when these stories

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>are wrong. They understand the intent behind the stories is

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>not the truth. The intent behind these stories is to

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>attack Trump. And if it works for a few days

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and then it falls apart, well then that's fine because

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for a few days. There was a perception that was created,

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>there was a negativity around this. There was an oh

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, Trump is, you know, terrible, And then when

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it turns out it looks like he's not terrible, or

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>at least he's not terrible. For this, they go, well,

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>let's just move on past it. Let's just move Once

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we've done the damage, then we move, We move on

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and don't pay any attention to it anymore. Now, once

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we've we've created this mess, we have no journalistic obligation

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to clean it up. I do think that's very likely

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>what happened here. Does anybody really believe that there will

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>be a reckoning for Trump based on this this whistleblower?

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Of course not. But then again, does anybody really believe

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's gonna be a reckoning for Trump based on

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the tax returns in New York State? Of course not.

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>New York State already has it at the I R

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>s already have you. This is just more blathered, more

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>nonsense than the left all the time. Oh, I'm wondering

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>when they're going to decide that they hate this. Guy O'Brien,

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>who is a President Trump's new national security advisor, just

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a quick note on this is the privilege to serve

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>with the president, and do we look forward to to

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>another year and a half of peace thro strength. We've

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>had tremendous foreign policy successes under President Trump's leadership. I

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>expect those to continue. We've got a number of challenges,

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but there's a great team in place with Secretary Pompeo

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and Secretary Esper, Secretary Minute and others. I look forward

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to working with them and working with the President to

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>keep Americas safe and continue to rebuild our military and

0:33:57.720 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and really get us back to a piece of strength. Boster.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll keep about the American people, I say, from the

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>many challenges around the world today, Oh my gosh, who

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>is this man? Liberal media is going to turn on

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>They've never heard of this guy before. Although he did

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>get sent he was like the special envoy at the

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>behest of the president, a free Asap Rocky, who I

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>believe is a hip hop artist whom I learned about

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>in the last few months because of some stuff that

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 1>went stuff that went down in Sweden and so O'Brien

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>was sent to get Asap Rocky out of Swedish prison,

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>which I gotta tell you. In Swedish prison. I think

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>they bring you a lot of very well appointed, inexpensive

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:40.760
<v Speaker 1>furniture that you can build yourself. And the food's probably

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>very good. It's a lot of a lot of pickled

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>herring and very very expensive beer. For those of you you

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.240
<v Speaker 1>who've been too Stockholm, you know what I'm talking about.

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>If I look, if I had to go to prison

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and like a relatively major company, I mean a country,

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be Sweden. I mean, if you could

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>go to prison in Monaco, there's only one jail cell

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>and it does have a of the ocean. I remember

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>reading about this. But if you're going to go to

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>prison in a country with more than ten million people,

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it would probably be Sweden. It'll be like,

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is your peer look comfy? Does your peer feel softer?

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that no, you'd watched Sesame Street Sweetish the Swedish

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>chef Okay whatever. So anyway, they try to get asap

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>rocky out or they did get a zap rocky out.

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And now this guy O'Brian is a natural security advisor.

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>We need to stop thinking that everybody who's going to

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>hold the senior government job is has to be a

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.439
<v Speaker 1>famous person or a person we've all heard of. I'm

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 1>sure he's been doing this a long time. He seems fine.

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll learn more about him over time. Libs will freak

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>out about this. They'll find a way, they just haven't

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>found it yet. Trust me, we're not here today because

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>of famous Arches or famous Smith. In fact, we're not here.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>We're not here because of man at all. I got

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>news for Elizabeth Warren. Without a man, you would not

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be here. In fact, without a man, none of us

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>would be here because in fact, there had to have

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>been a man involved in the procreation process for any

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>of us to exist. So to say that further, you know,

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>without a man, I'm just it's just not true. It's

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>just factually hashtag fact check. You need to have a

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>man or else. Without that, none of us would be

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And a woman, wow, look at that. It's almost you know,

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>unitive and procreative. And there's a there's the male and

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the female and they go together and this is what

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>this is the species and oh wow, two genders, not

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven two. But Elizabeth Warren gave her speech down

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 1>in Washington Square Park where as much as producer John

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 1>mocks me, and that's where I do all my speed

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>chess searching for Bobby Fisher. Remember that movie. I like

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that movie. I actually watched it a bunch of times.

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. I guess just like anything with

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence Fishburne and Ben Kingsley, I'm like, yeah, I can

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:59.959
<v Speaker 1>get into this. It's about a little bit. It's about

0:36:59.960 --> 0:37:02.439
<v Speaker 1>a old nerd who plays a lot of chess. Let's

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.439
<v Speaker 1>be honest. He's like, I just I want to play chess,

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but I also want to have friends, you know. It's like, yeah, whatever,

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I had a let to defeat people of

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the chessboard because that may make them feel bad about themselves.

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a kid, You're gonna get so many wedgies unless

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you just, you know, you gotta step it up, buddy.

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>You know you gotta be a rude, terrible person. That's

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>probably true. Apparently, and apparently a kid basher. All look

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>at this, all buckers bashing kids again, bashing little little

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 1>not you, Actually, Bobby Fisher, was that a chess player.

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>This guy's name was like Josh something or other I

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>think can't remember's name their character from the movie, But yep,

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>more kid bashing. Oh you're so mean to the kids.

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not true. What you know, we we understand. We

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>understand that people say all kinds of things about the

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Buckster that are not true. It's not fair, but that's

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the right life. Life goes on. We have to move on.

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So Elizabeth warrem is down there. And what I think

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is interesting is that today you have the Drudge Report

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially say saying that the big headline is Warren rising

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>her nomination to lose the crowds the momentum. I do

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>think that this is the borrow from Yogi Bearra deja

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>vu all over again. I think that Libs didn't learn

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.280
<v Speaker 1>any of the lessons they needed to learn from the

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>last time around with Hillary in twenty sixteen. And I

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>think that they they view Elizabeth Warren as being able

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to get done what Hillary couldn't. And she brings all that,

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, breaking the ultimate glass ceiling, you know, woman's

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>empowerment stuff, you know, feminism, blah blah, all that brings

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:43.399
<v Speaker 1>all that to the table too, all of it, all

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>of it. So the problem with Elizabeth Warren is that

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it will come up a lot during the campaign that

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>she's not just a fraud. It's not like she just

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>did things. Let's say that were shady in business or

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 1>which would be bad. But it's that she's a fraud

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that is worth the ridicule. I mean, she's a fraud.

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>And that she was listed in the Harvard Directory as

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the first Native American professor in the history of Harvard

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Law schools. That's something that is worth noting. There was

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a story today in the Babylon B which some of

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you I'm sure familiar with, that was Elizabeth Warren admits

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to appealing. Sorry, Elizabeth Warren admits to appearing in paleface

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>at party. So the Babylon B is just one example

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of what you can expect going forward. We have not

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>forgotten about the fact that not only did she lie

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>about that whole Native American thing to advance her career

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 1>for a very remember, these are all the same people

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. Trump lies about this and he lies about that.

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I always ask, what's the big lie that Trump has told?

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>You know that that his crowds are the biggest and

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>his buildings are the best, and you know that that's

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>really just braggadocio, that's exaggeration, that's hyperbole, salesmanship. What's the

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>big lie? We're like, oh my gosh, how could Trump

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>lie about that. I mean, I don't know what like

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this Stormy Daniel stuff. I thought that in the post

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton era, sexual conduct was considered you know, between

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>consenting adults was considered private. And we don't need to

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>worry about this, you know. It's just lives constantly changed

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the standards to suit there, to suit their women at

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>any point in time. Elizabeth Warren wasn't just somebody who

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:22.760
<v Speaker 1>used racial fraud to advance her career. She's also someone

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>who very clearly still believed or thought that she could

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>pull one over on us as recently as what was

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it a year ago now that she came out with

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that DNA test and it was like, look, I'm actually

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Native American. You're like, well you're yeah, you're about one

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 1>one thousand and twenty fourth Native American. Yalloon. It was

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>just a crazy thing to do. It was a crazy

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 1>thing to do, but she did it. And she's also

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I just think that she's a complete and utter demagogue.

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that she doesn't really believe out of

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that she says, or rather she knows that

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not true, but you'll say it because it appeals

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to people. But if it's between her and shooes me

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>or I don't know where I am Biden. I can

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>understand why they might want to go with Elizabeth Warren

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 1>over Biden. I mean Biden is. Oh, here's here's a

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 1>perfect example. We got a great biden Ism for you.

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>You get a tax break for racehorse. Why in God's

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>name couldn't we provide a eight thousand dollars tax credit

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 1>for everybody who has childcare costs. It would put it

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>would put seven hundred and twenty million back million women

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>back in the workforce. It would increase the GDP to

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>sound like a wonk here by about eight tenths of

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>one percent. It would grow the economy, not not to

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>sound like a like a wonk here, but uh you know,

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean at least seven hundred and twenty

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>million women in America back in the workforce. He said that. Okay,

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:01.959
<v Speaker 1>he said it. And look, I do three hours alive

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 1>radio a day. I misspeak sometimes I stumble. People are

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:06.720
<v Speaker 1>very hard in this audience. By the way, if I

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if I have a day or I'm a little tired,

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a little too many alms, a little too many, a

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>little too many, I means I hear about it. Fuck,

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I listen to you because of the precision of your speech,

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and you don't use unnecessary filler words. I expect that

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you keep that tradition going, or else I may just

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have to find somebody else to listen to it. Like

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, man, I was a little a little hungover.

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Me and producer Mark. We're out drinking some muzzo, and

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>things got a little crazy. You know what stuff happens?

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Do you like uzzo? By the way, could we do

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that at some point? I think so? Sure? All right, cool,

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>drinks a uzzo. I gotta celebrate your your upcoming nuptials.

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But sore, here's what happened, Biden says, seven and twenty

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>million women. Look, you can stumble like this. Fine. He

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>says it, though, and he doesn't catch it, which makes

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>you think that he is he's a practiced demagogue. You know,

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he's just gonna say these things because he thinks it's

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what he's supposed to say. But he doesn't think about

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>what he is saying. He doesn't give it any any

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>thought processes. It's just, well, this is what you're saying.

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 1>You got the people to clap, he Biden. I mean

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the approach. And that's what I mean by

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a He's a perfect demagogue. That's how he does things.

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Warren's a demagogue too, but at least she knows what

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:17.959
<v Speaker 1>state she's in, and she doesn't think there are seven

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty million women when as we know, there

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>are about three hundred and thirty million people in America.

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So unless there's a whole lot of women who are

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:31.280
<v Speaker 1>being hidden somewhere, I don't think that there's seven hundred

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>million of them here. But then you have, well, what's

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the alternative. Who who's in a who's in a better

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>spot than Elizabeth Warren or Biden. I mean, I'm just like,

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna go away yet because I'm I'm just

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I really think that we should take all

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of your guns. And and in case you are curious

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:01.840
<v Speaker 1>about like whether Betteau wants to take your guns away,

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the answer is like, yeah, he does. And he's talking

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of bro Cuomo, Oh yeah, Creatine and swoll Club baby

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>boo yah. Are you in fact in favor of gun confiscation? Yes,

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to R fifteens and AK forty sevens,

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>weapons designed for use on a military battlefield, the high impact,

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 1>high velocity round that is fired from those weapons when

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it hits your body. I gotta pause for as I've said,

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing, there's no such thing as a not high impact,

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:42.319
<v Speaker 1>not high velocity round coming out of a firearm. You know,

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>if you get shot with a with a thirty eight,

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that bullet's going very fast. It's gonna hurt a lot

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and will kill you. You get shot with a twenty

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:52.879
<v Speaker 1>two close enough, you will be very dead depending on

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>where it hits you. They're all high velocity. So unless

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone's gonna have a twenty two, but then you have

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:01.319
<v Speaker 1>well that's not useful particularly it. Now someone's gonna say, buck,

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I can kill a I can kill a deer with

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 1>a twenty two and six hundred meters. You know, we

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>always there's somebody in this there's always a wise guy

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in this audience who's like the gun supersmith, who could

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know? He's like I once had a sling shot

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and I killed the saber tooth tiger while we're in

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>myn NRA A T shirt. So I don't think that,

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm like, okay, fine, you know you are

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the sling shot guru or whatever, so good, good things.

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, Beto wants to take your guns. And

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>then you have mayor Pete who's just bitter, and then Kamala,

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>whoeverone's really forgotten about. The only ones that I the

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>only ones that don't really just agitate me that much,

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>are Yang and Tulsi. And Tulsi's left wing, don't get

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>me wrong, and she says things about the president that

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 1>are horrible, that are untrue, But I just I don't

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:48.320
<v Speaker 1>find her deeply unlikable the way I do most of

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the rest of these Democrat candidates. They're not inspiring charming people.

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. Say what you will about Trump, and I

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>think he's done a lot of great things as president,

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's been a very solid president and

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:02.800
<v Speaker 1>all things considered, and the guy's an incredible entertainer. Is

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable energy and electricity that comes from him when

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>he's on stage during these arenas, and you're gonna put

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden or Warren up against that. I'm here because I

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think that we should not have to rely on men

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to be here, Oh America, Do you really want to

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>hear that for the next eight years? Possibly, I hope not.

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>We'll go right back. So I'm proposing medicare for all

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:42.760
<v Speaker 1>who want it. It's it's just a little bit different

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>from the idea of medicare for all, whether you want

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it or not. The way I see it, if we

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>take a version of medicare, we make it available to

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the American people, and that public alternative, which I expect

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to be better, will outcompete the private ones. But instead

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of just assuming that I'm right and ordering you to

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>switch over whether you want to or not, we're gonna

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>see if we're right. We're gonna put it out there

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and let Americans choose, because I trust you to make

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the right decision for your family when it comes to

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>your health. Think about what this would actually mean they

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>at mayor Pete who is I think you could argue

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:19.879
<v Speaker 1>the I think you could argue the wonkiest of the Democrats,

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:23.800
<v Speaker 1>meaning the biggest wonk, like the the smartest on policy

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:26.680
<v Speaker 1>issue of of all the Democrats. I think you could

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>argue that. And I think that what he's saying here

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just goes to show you how far left the Democrat

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Party has really gone. Because if you open up a

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>public option that someone can just choose, then guess what

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:48.319
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be pushed onto that. Employers are

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:50.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, why why am I gonna why am I

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 1>going to pay for your healthcare? What I can just say,

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:55.399
<v Speaker 1>go get the public option. Everybody will just be pushed

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>on the meta. You know, the system will break down

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>very quickly in this way because a lot of employers

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>will say, well, I can get a great savings now

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:03.840
<v Speaker 1>by pushing you onto the public option. It's going to

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:09.239
<v Speaker 1>do it. And Medicare already does not pay enough to

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hospitals to cover their costs of the

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>procedures that are done. Medicaid is even lower levels of reimbursement.

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:20.760
<v Speaker 1>And if you have higher usage of Medicare by people

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in the system through this Medicare for All program, then

0:48:24.480 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you're just going to increase wait times. You're going to

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>create shortages, You're going to create rationing within that program.

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That's just what's going to happen. But liberals still, just

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 1>like with with all central planners, they think this time

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll get it right, this time it will be different.

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately they're wrong. There's another thing that Mayor Pete had

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk about here, and that is and this is

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:55.879
<v Speaker 1>just a ghoulish and deeply disturbing story. There were there

0:48:55.960 --> 0:49:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was a doctor, a doctor in South Bend, I'm sorry,

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in Illinois rather who had two thousand fetal remains found

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in his home. Here's what Mayor Pete said to react

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:15.239
<v Speaker 1>to this. Like everyone, I find that news out of

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Illinois extremely disturbing, and I think it's important that the

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>fully investigated. I also hope that it doesn't get caught

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 1>up in politics at the time when women need access

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to healthcare. There's no question that what happened is disturbing,

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it's unacceptable, and it needs to be looking. This does

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 1>remind me a bit of the liberal position after nine

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to eleven. Remember, the liberal position after an eleven is

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing that we have to be concerned about.

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>We had almost three thousand Americans killed, died in crashes,

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:48.360
<v Speaker 1>some of them died in fires, jumped out of buildings,

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>crushed to death, almost three thousand them. And the primary

0:49:53.239 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>liberal takeaway from this for a lot of publications and

0:49:55.760 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of liberal journos is I have to really

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>watch out for all that is homophobia. Here we have

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a story about a doctor who was keeping thousands of

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 1>dead babies at his home, and you notice how Mayor

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Pete immediately switches into Yeah, that's a little that's that's disturbing.

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's just hope it doesn't affect women's right to terminate

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a pregnancy and to do this procedure that leads to

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the dead babies. This is a piece today from David Mastio.

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Abortionist Ulrich Klepfur kept thousands of dead babies but inspires

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:40.360
<v Speaker 1>little curiosity. Yeah, this is a story that's gotten largely

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 1>buried by the mainstream media. There's something sick, he writes,

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in America's abortion industry. What else would account for a

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:51.359
<v Speaker 1>doctor who collected thousands of dead babies in some kind

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of twisted hobby that he hid from his allegedly unsuspecting wife.

0:50:56.320 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand, two hundred and forty six fetuses were found

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>medically preserved in Ulric Clepfor's garage last week after he

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:10.040
<v Speaker 1>died on September third, and now the attorneys general of

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Illinois and Indiana are investigating how the human remains got

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 1>from Klepf's network of Indiana abortion clinics to his rural

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Illinois home and what laws might have been violated. Klepfer

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.799
<v Speaker 1>isn't the only abortionist to enjoy keeping trophies of his

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>grizzly work close to hand. America's most infamous baby killer,

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Kermit Gosnell, also kept body parts in milk jugs and

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:39.840
<v Speaker 1>glass jars at his clinic in Philadelphia before he was

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:43.360
<v Speaker 1>convicted in twenty thirteen on three counts of murder for

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>snipping the spinal cords of babies born alive. Like Gosnell,

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Clepfor's clinic shut down after state inspectors found worrying medical

0:51:52.280 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>and record keeping problems two thousand dead babies at this

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>guy's house. He was keeping dead babies as though they

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:09.280
<v Speaker 1>were mementos or trophies. How is this not a major

0:52:09.360 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>national news story? Well, you got a sense from Mayor

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Pete as to exactly why that is. If they have

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to suppress this story, if they have to make sure

0:52:19.520 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that no one hears about the above ground mass grave

0:52:24.719 --> 0:52:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of dead babies at a doctor's home in Illinois from

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 1>abortion clinics, if they have to make sure that that

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 1>gets suppressed, no one really hears about it, because it'll

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 1>protect those abortion clinics from further scrutiny, then that's all

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:43.440
<v Speaker 1>completely fine. The Left goes along with it. They have

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 1>no problem with whatsoever, as long as it protects a

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>woman's right to choose. Single most important thing ever for

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the left. Mayor Pete, who lectures us all so often

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>about the Bible, well, the Bible says this, and the

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Bible says that. I'm quite certain the Bible would have

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot to say about keeping the bodies of two

0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand dead babies at your home over two thousand and

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>some kind of sick hobby ritual. We don't even know

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:15.360
<v Speaker 1>what this guy the guy's dead who was a doctor,

0:53:15.360 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 1>which is how we found out about this. But liberals

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>aren't outraged about this the way they a normal person

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:23.920
<v Speaker 1>would be. You know why, because they consider I just

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:26.719
<v Speaker 1>go back to the David Delayed in videos and the

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Center for Medical Progress. They consider these tiny bodies, these

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>tiny human beings, the remains of little human beings, to

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:39.120
<v Speaker 1>be just medical waste like someone's you know, like like

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a tumor that was cut out of somebody, or you know,

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:48.840
<v Speaker 1>someone's residue after a surgery. That's what they think of this.

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So and they won't admit that publicly, but that is

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the truth. And Mayor Pete is a disgrace for his

0:53:55.480 --> 0:54:00.239
<v Speaker 1>stance on this issue. But we already knew that. The

0:54:00.600 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>other test, and I think this is a test that's

0:54:03.080 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 1>not well understood by some of the candidates in the

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:09.160
<v Speaker 1>race and not what has not been well debated is

0:54:09.160 --> 0:54:12.279
<v Speaker 1>is our democracy up to this task? And that is

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a really non trivial question, because I mean, it clearly isn't.

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Right now, so far we have not. We haven't been

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and and and when you lose a national race, as

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>we did in sixteen to a climate denier, that creates

0:54:26.080 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a real concern because you can't act urgently on climate

0:54:30.280 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 1>if you have a climate denier in the White House?

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 1>What would acting urgently on climate mean? And I would

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:40.920
<v Speaker 1>want to ask why didn't Obama do this? When Obama

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 1>had a majority in the House and the Congress, I

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:46.360
<v Speaker 1>mean a House and the Senate. Why didn't he take

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 1>dramatic action? I mean, if we only had you know,

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 1>ten or or twelve years or whatever to live, we

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>only had what fifteen or twenty years to live when

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Obama came. If the science is so clear, why didn

0:54:58.960 --> 0:55:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Obama do something? Why does Obama not care if we

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 1>all die from climate change? Clearly it doesn't care. Why

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:07.880
<v Speaker 1>would Obama buy a fifteen million dollar house on the beach.

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:12.319
<v Speaker 1>If we were going to be certain that the entire

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Seaboard floored, a lot of place is going to

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:17.320
<v Speaker 1>be underwater in thirty years. It seems like a strange

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 1>purchase at least might affect your You could say, well, back,

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:23.360
<v Speaker 1>he'll sell it when things get really bad. But yeah,

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I would think that you'd be a little more concerned

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:27.759
<v Speaker 1>about this if you were concerned about it at all,

0:55:27.760 --> 0:55:32.560
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think Obama is. But this climate change thing,

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't even make up how absurd this has gotten.

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Now you now have what is it? I think it

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 1>was NBC. I gotta make sure I get this right.

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 1>NBC News had a confess your climate crimes. Yeah, here

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you go, confess your climate crimes on a website, and

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:02.800
<v Speaker 1>people started putting stuff out there like blast the ac

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:05.400
<v Speaker 1>cook at this is NBC News. I'm sorry, blast the

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:09.120
<v Speaker 1>ac cook a steak once a week. Where do you

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 1>fall short in preventing climate change? Tell us with climate confessions?

0:56:15.000 --> 0:56:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Climate confessions? Real thing, brucer Mark, do you have any

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:20.600
<v Speaker 1>climate confessions? Did you have a burger this week? You

0:56:20.719 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 1>evil selfish man. I mean, I've been on the diet,

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:26.759
<v Speaker 1>but I still eat pork and beat and all that

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of look at you. Are you going vegan just

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for that, you know, just to get into a wedding shape? Well,

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 1>vegan really put me in wedding shape. I don't know.

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I think vegan makes your teeth fall out. And you

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>know I'm meeting extra protein. There we go, extra protein? Oh,

0:56:39.600 --> 0:56:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I just kind You have a climate? You are? You?

0:56:42.000 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you a keep the apartment for I keep my

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 1>apartment of sixty eight degrees all the time, all the time. Yeah,

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I get very warm, very quickly. Yeah, Brucer John, what

0:56:50.239 --> 0:56:52.239
<v Speaker 1>about you? Where do you keep it? You don't have

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a mic? Okay, fine, he's not looking at the mic

0:56:54.280 --> 0:56:56.319
<v Speaker 1>right now. He's busy cutting the show. And I don't

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:59.719
<v Speaker 1>even have a c That's how environmentally friendly I am. Yeah.

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't buy that for one second. Nonsense. Have you

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:06.520
<v Speaker 1>ever been in Have you ever been in an apartment?

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 1>When the ac goes out, you have no choice but

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to sleep in it. It is a It is a

0:57:11.280 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 1>an eye opening experience. Let me tell you that, because

0:57:13.880 --> 0:57:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's very If you're used to sleep in a sixty

0:57:15.640 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 1>eight degree room and all of a sudden you're supposed

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to sleep in a seventy five degree room. It's not happening.

0:57:20.440 --> 0:57:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll sleep with at least a fan, at least at

0:57:22.920 --> 0:57:26.120
<v Speaker 1>least a fan as absolutely. But so people saw this

0:57:26.240 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 1>confess your climate sin craziness. Okay, he's some Bennett, they're saying,

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, he sounds kind of like good. Okay, guy

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:37.320
<v Speaker 1>from South Park? You know that guy. What's his name

0:57:37.360 --> 0:57:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know? The teacher guy? Who? What's that Michael Bennett? Yeah, no,

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know his name is Michael Bennet. Who's

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the teacher from mister Mackie? Thank you? Okay, here he's

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Bennett. Sounds like it. Why did you climate de

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Niro in the Wright House? Okay? People saw this confess

0:57:54.800 --> 0:57:59.840
<v Speaker 1>your climate sin thing, and they they decided to say that,

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like I sleep with the air conditioner on year round

0:58:03.120 --> 0:58:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and justify to myself by recycling. Oh my gosh, I

0:58:07.000 --> 0:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>fly too much, partially due to work. But on the

0:58:10.000 --> 0:58:12.840
<v Speaker 1>flip side, I do not own a car. I will

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:15.720
<v Speaker 1>use the easiest method of transportation for the distance I

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:19.160
<v Speaker 1>am traveling. I travel off into conferences. Flying, I think

0:58:19.200 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about the emissions and I try to justify with the

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:25.600
<v Speaker 1>plane is going there anyway? These are people's actual climate confessions.

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:29.200
<v Speaker 1>They feel guilty about this stuff, They feel concerned about this.

0:58:29.240 --> 0:58:32.919
<v Speaker 1>They think that there's some some issue, some worry that

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they should have because they fly on planes occasionally. Well

0:58:38.080 --> 0:58:42.880
<v Speaker 1>then some other people started pointing out how completely and

0:58:43.040 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 1>utterly bonkers this is, and they started trolling this thing,

0:58:49.320 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 1>which was a lot of fun. They're just like, I

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:55.440
<v Speaker 1>eat steak, I leave the acon at sixty year round. Yeah,

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what that's what we should do. Just lean into him. Man,

0:58:58.280 --> 0:59:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the people who leave this They they're nuts.

0:59:01.280 --> 0:59:03.400
<v Speaker 1>They're just wrong. They've lost their minds. It doesn't matter

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:05.439
<v Speaker 1>if we use straws, it doesn't matter if you use AC.

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:09.920
<v Speaker 1>These are all good things. Actually, AC has probably saved

0:59:09.920 --> 0:59:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of lives from heatstroke over the last one

0:59:12.760 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. But that's a conversation for another time. The

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:21.640
<v Speaker 1>origins of this were Ronald Reagan nineteen sixty seven, when

0:59:21.640 --> 0:59:23.360
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to clean up the air down in Los

0:59:23.400 --> 0:59:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Angeles the smog. It led to the Clean Air Act

0:59:26.040 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy. Richard Nixon in nineteen said, bipartisan they'd

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be rolling their graves right now of what the Republican

0:59:33.200 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>administration is doing, and moreover, what the Republican Party is

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:41.760
<v Speaker 1>doing complicit complete silence on states rights, but also free enterprise.

0:59:42.040 --> 0:59:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll repeat what I just said. They're calling private sector

0:59:45.360 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 1>corporations to the mat and threatening them. Again. I don't

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 1>think this. I know this from the personal conversations I've

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:53.560
<v Speaker 1>had and by the actions of the Apartment of Justice.

0:59:54.000 --> 1:00:00.880
<v Speaker 1>What happened to the Republican Party? What happened to California. California,

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for those who just won a little bit of a

1:00:04.560 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a refresher, was in fact a

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty reliable Republican state. At the national election level, California

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was a place that was solidly Republican. You had Eisenhower

1:00:22.680 --> 1:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen fifty two. Okay, so the Golden State.

1:00:26.280 --> 1:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>The Golden State went for the Republican presidential candidate more

1:00:29.800 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>often than not for a long time. He had two

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>solid Reagan victories nineteen eighty four. Nineteen eighty George W.

1:00:37.800 --> 1:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Bush won the state of California against Ducacus. But then again,

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I was seven years old, and I wouldn't I would

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have won the state of California against Ducacus in nineteen

1:00:47.440 --> 1:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight. But in the twenty sixteen election, For example,

1:00:51.560 --> 1:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton, the scandal ridden, charmless, pantsuit clad ultra grifter

1:00:57.560 --> 1:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and twice presidential loser. She crushed President Trump in California

1:01:02.960 --> 1:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty two point three percent to thirty one point nine percent.

1:01:06.640 --> 1:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>What has been the huge change there, Well, only twenty

1:01:09.720 --> 1:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the state's almost twenty million registered voters

1:01:12.600 --> 1:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>or Republicans. So this is now the ultimate liberal stronghold.

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You've had more than anything else. The single, the single

1:01:20.040 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest shift of any kind in California is demographics, and

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it's immigration, particularly illegal immigration from Latin America, notably Mexico,

1:01:29.320 --> 1:01:31.919
<v Speaker 1>but other places as well. And the state is now

1:01:32.440 --> 1:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>has now been flipped. It's a Democrat state. You're not

1:01:34.640 --> 1:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>going to win in California statewide, and you're not going

1:01:37.200 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to win as president. And so then you get to

1:01:40.200 --> 1:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>what happens in a state where there really is only

1:01:43.920 --> 1:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>one party in power. Well, there's no real accountability. And

1:01:47.520 --> 1:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that's why Gavin Newsom was complaining about Trump and environmental

1:01:51.760 --> 1:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>regulator rather the lack of environmental regulations. Doesn't seem to

1:01:56.920 --> 1:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>understand that the rest of us looking at this, say, no,

1:01:59.400 --> 1:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>California should have to live with the decisions that it

1:02:02.280 --> 1:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>makes is a state and live with them for quite

1:02:04.080 --> 1:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a while. California should have to deal with its own

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>bad policies. Right now, there's this big push to get

1:02:11.960 --> 1:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>federal dollars in to deal with the homelessness crisis there.

1:02:14.320 --> 1:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>You have a homelessness crisis in San Francisco, a homelessness

1:02:17.520 --> 1:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>crisis in Los Angeles. When I was in LA I

1:02:21.000 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe six seven months ago, going around, you'll

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>just see you'll see what looks like a tent city,

1:02:27.000 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>people living on the streets. And I would note that

1:02:29.000 --> 1:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of open air drug use, people who

1:02:30.920 --> 1:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>leave those drug needles in the street. I mean just

1:02:33.560 --> 1:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>when people say things like leaving a drug needle in

1:02:35.560 --> 1:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the street, I know it sounds like, well, you know, okay,

1:02:38.120 --> 1:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>how would you feel if you're eight year old, you know,

1:02:41.800 --> 1:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>was walking down the street and stepped on a used

1:02:43.520 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>hypodermic needle And it's a terrifying thought. But I do

1:02:46.040 --> 1:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's important to understand how would you feel about

1:02:49.640 --> 1:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that people are leaving needles all over the streets in

1:02:51.920 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, all over the streets in Los Angeles. New

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>York streets are getting more dirty and unsafe too. And

1:02:58.320 --> 1:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason for this. There are liberal policies that

1:03:01.040 --> 1:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have created this situation. Right, we should be getting more

1:03:06.280 --> 1:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>efficient to the government level. We have better we have

1:03:08.760 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>better technology, better resources. We're pouring all this money into it.

1:03:13.680 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>The problem of homelessness and housing. You know, I think,

1:03:18.400 --> 1:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the word housing insecurity? As I think what they

1:03:20.720 --> 1:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>call it. I mean, I've had to move ten times

1:03:22.960 --> 1:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in my life as an adult. This is not my

1:03:24.760 --> 1:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>eleventh time, so I think that in some way I'm

1:03:26.760 --> 1:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>housing insecure two and I asked to love. This is

1:03:29.840 --> 1:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>why we had the two roommates. They guess they're Bernie Sanders.

1:03:32.320 --> 1:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Nobody own a bit of a witch job can afford

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a two bedroom, two bath condole with water views, probably

1:03:38.800 --> 1:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a nice balcony, maybe into a parking Nobody can afford that.

1:03:42.560 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, yeah, I can't afford that now. And

1:03:44.640 --> 1:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a minimum wage job, and I'm almost forty,

1:03:49.440 --> 1:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>so I don't really know what the what the burn

1:03:51.800 --> 1:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is getting at there. But in California, the homelessness crisis

1:03:56.840 --> 1:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is a combination of a lot of factors. But what

1:03:58.760 --> 1:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I look, they have better weather, which this isn't a

1:04:02.240 --> 1:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>silly point. This is a real one. That means that

1:04:04.160 --> 1:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the nation's homeless are more likely if they can get

1:04:07.440 --> 1:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to California. If somebody wants to choose a life on

1:04:10.640 --> 1:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the street, much better to do it in Santa Santa

1:04:13.720 --> 1:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Monica than try to do it in you know, Minneapolis.

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Theneapolis is a pretty rough place to be trying to

1:04:19.600 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>sleep on the street in January. So the climate does

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>play a role. Okay, fine, but it's gotten a lot worse.

1:04:25.880 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>In California has been a warm you know, has been

1:04:28.920 --> 1:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a cozy place to set up shop for a long time.

1:04:32.280 --> 1:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So it can't just be that. So what else could

1:04:36.880 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>be the situation? Well, if you really want to look

1:04:39.720 --> 1:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>at a policy level as to why there's greater homelesses,

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's been Gavin Newsom can whine about TROMP and say

1:04:45.760 --> 1:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what happened the Republican Party. Yeah, we're we're for conservation,

1:04:49.680 --> 1:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we're for clean water and clean air. CO two doesn't

1:04:52.400 --> 1:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>make water and air not clean. The CO two thing

1:04:55.960 --> 1:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is a delusion that keep trying to fold this in.

1:04:58.120 --> 1:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a delusion. They're wrong And if they weren't delusional

1:05:03.800 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>about it, then they wouldn't listen to teenagers testifying on

1:05:07.560 --> 1:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>incredibly complicated issues in front of Congress. It is Congress

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that deserves and Democrats and the status who support them

1:05:13.680 --> 1:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the deserve mockery for this. They can try to do

1:05:17.200 --> 1:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole oh human shield thing. Oh she's a teen.

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I know what they were I know what they were doing.

1:05:20.960 --> 1:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I was disappointed that some of my colleagues that I

1:05:23.760 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on the couch jumped Look, they just jumped the gun.

1:05:26.200 --> 1:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>They were just they were wrong. They were wrong on

1:05:29.200 --> 1:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>outnumbered saying no no child bashing, no kid bashing up?

1:05:32.200 --> 1:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't bashing a child? Go back and read the transcript,

1:05:35.120 --> 1:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and that they all kind of parroted each other on

1:05:36.920 --> 1:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was I thought that was unfair clearly,

1:05:42.640 --> 1:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was unfair and incorrect. More importantly, but the

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>climate change stuff always gets folded into clean air and

1:05:49.360 --> 1:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>clean water. When I had that, when I was in DC,

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they sent out some notice not to drink water out

1:05:57.080 --> 1:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of the tap. This is true because they were concerned

1:06:00.400 --> 1:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that there had been a raw sewage leakage into drinking water.

1:06:04.200 --> 1:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So in DC, living a few blocks from the White House,

1:06:08.080 --> 1:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I got a note from the DC city government, which

1:06:12.760 --> 1:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is even more dysfunctional, I think than the new York

1:06:14.600 --> 1:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>City government, which is saying something saying, you know, hey, sorry,

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>but you may have like a little bit of fecal

1:06:19.880 --> 1:06:22.959
<v Speaker 1>matter in your water untreated, you know, just a little

1:06:23.040 --> 1:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>raw sewage. So if it's a you know, if you

1:06:24.720 --> 1:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit of that in your water, just

1:06:27.240 --> 1:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>heads up on that. You know, it should work its

1:06:29.320 --> 1:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>way out of the system in a few days. Needless

1:06:31.440 --> 1:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to say, I became an heavy on and peria man

1:06:33.880 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of days, even for brushing my teeth.

1:06:36.720 --> 1:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>It was like I was back in the Third World

1:06:38.120 --> 1:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>with the CIA. That's one thing. There's that feeling, man,

1:06:41.920 --> 1:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're in some place and you're drinking water that

1:06:44.680 --> 1:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that isn't there's not really indoor plumbing, but maybe they

1:06:47.080 --> 1:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>have a kind of a hanging cistern of sorts and

1:06:50.320 --> 1:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you can turn a little tap and you forget that

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you can do this to wash your hands. You do

1:06:54.800 --> 1:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>not want to brush your teeth without water. That stuff

1:06:57.520 --> 1:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that you get creepy crawlies in your mouth. Man, it's

1:07:00.200 --> 1:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to know what happens. So anyway, the

1:07:04.560 --> 1:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>idea that I don't care about clean water is obviously nonsense.

1:07:07.480 --> 1:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Because I was freaked out about the poop in the

1:07:09.880 --> 1:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>water in DC for days, even though I don't know

1:07:12.000 --> 1:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>how much there was and what could have happened. So

1:07:15.120 --> 1:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a straw man that liberals create that we

1:07:17.400 --> 1:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>don't care about the environment. That of course we do.

1:07:20.280 --> 1:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Everyone does. Nobody wants rivers to be so polluted that

1:07:23.480 --> 1:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can get sick from going in them,

1:07:25.800 --> 1:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's all kinds of heavy chemicals and everything else,

1:07:28.320 --> 1:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and so we have an EPA. The EPA does things

1:07:30.520 --> 1:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to prevent that from happening. But the EPA also has

1:07:33.360 --> 1:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of excesses and a lot of idealogues, and

1:07:36.480 --> 1:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of focusing on the real mission, which should be

1:07:39.680 --> 1:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>making sure water is clean. I mean, Flint, Michigan's a

1:07:42.160 --> 1:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>real problem. That was a real problem. Our climate change

1:07:44.640 --> 1:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is not. Climate change is an imaginary problem. But instead

1:07:47.800 --> 1:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of just agreeing to work with us on what's real,

1:07:50.040 --> 1:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they would rather try to mock us and ridicule us

1:07:53.360 --> 1:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>for not wanting to join them on what's fake, including

1:07:55.360 --> 1:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Gavin or Newsom. So they complain about us on the environment,

1:07:59.040 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and then they also plane when we don't want to

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>give them additional federal dollars to bail them out from

1:08:04.160 --> 1:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>their bad urban policies, and here are some of the

1:08:08.560 --> 1:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>areas where they are making this problem much worse. Housing

1:08:12.960 --> 1:08:16.519
<v Speaker 1>is very difficult and expensive to build in Los Angeles

1:08:16.520 --> 1:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>County and in San Francisco because of all the different

1:08:20.080 --> 1:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>zoning ordinances, all the different regulations, environmental regulations. It's a

1:08:25.960 --> 1:08:30.439
<v Speaker 1>very hard thing. Building housing for middle class people is

1:08:30.560 --> 1:08:34.599
<v Speaker 1>not cost effective in these places. And because it's not

1:08:34.680 --> 1:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>cost effective, guess what, lib socialists, people don't do it.

1:08:38.800 --> 1:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And because developers don't want to build cost effective housing

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>where they can make a profit because they're in business,

1:08:44.600 --> 1:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in those places, you have housing shortages. What happens with

1:08:48.280 --> 1:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a housing shortage, prices go up. This is a problem

1:08:53.320 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of econ one on one, they can pretend it's not there,

1:08:55.280 --> 1:09:00.599
<v Speaker 1>but the problem is definitely there. And then you also

1:09:00.680 --> 1:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>have the other side of this, which is just the

1:09:03.439 --> 1:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>quality of life crimes issue, which I was getting to

1:09:06.160 --> 1:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>with hypodermic needles and leaving this on the streets. I

1:09:08.760 --> 1:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>remember what it was like in New York when it

1:09:10.160 --> 1:09:11.639
<v Speaker 1>was a free for all. It was a very bad,

1:09:11.760 --> 1:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>scary place to be. You did not want to be

1:09:14.200 --> 1:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in New York City when things were looking really bad

1:09:17.920 --> 1:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, it was rough. It was rough.

1:09:22.240 --> 1:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>If you called someone because you had a homeless person

1:09:24.720 --> 1:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>who was living in your stairwell of your building, good

1:09:28.800 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>luck trying to get them to come and take the

1:09:30.360 --> 1:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>person out, and trespassing, and people would be urinating and

1:09:33.920 --> 1:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>leaving their drugs there and doing all kinds of things.

1:09:36.880 --> 1:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Nat was just life in the big city for a while.

1:09:39.360 --> 1:09:42.519
<v Speaker 1>And then eventually Giuliani, thank you, Mayor Juliani came along.

1:09:42.560 --> 1:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, you know what, We're just no more

1:09:44.120 --> 1:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of this. People work hard, people of all backgrounds, all ethnicities,

1:09:48.320 --> 1:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>all religions or work at hard in this city doing

1:09:51.000 --> 1:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the best they can. They deserve to feel like when

1:09:54.160 --> 1:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>they come home they don't have somebody taking a you know,

1:09:58.880 --> 1:10:02.599
<v Speaker 1>a urination break on the front on their front steps,

1:10:02.960 --> 1:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and they shouldn't have to worry about their kids stepping

1:10:05.120 --> 1:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>on needles walking home from school, and we're going to

1:10:07.360 --> 1:10:09.719
<v Speaker 1>clean it up. Libs don't like to do that stuff because,

1:10:09.760 --> 1:10:12.519
<v Speaker 1>you know why. It involves making arrests for things. It

1:10:12.560 --> 1:10:16.599
<v Speaker 1>involves arresting people. It involves putting people into the system

1:10:16.640 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and punishing them, not just saying, oh, we're going to

1:10:18.520 --> 1:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>give you a lot of free stuff, so you know,

1:10:19.720 --> 1:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>there's certain things you can't do even if you're really

1:10:21.560 --> 1:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>down on your luck. Quality of life crimes liberals do

1:10:24.920 --> 1:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>not want to enforce, and housing policy liberals are a

1:10:28.560 --> 1:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>complete mess on and they just want to shovel more

1:10:31.439 --> 1:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>federal dollars at this so that the very same Democrats

1:10:35.040 --> 1:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in California who have been doing this stuff to get elected,

1:10:38.280 --> 1:10:40.519
<v Speaker 1>they're going to continue to get elected because they're going

1:10:40.560 --> 1:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to shovel the federal dollars to the people of California

1:10:44.640 --> 1:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that you know, and they're gonna tell them, oh, look

1:10:45.920 --> 1:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>at all this money I brought in, And even if

1:10:47.680 --> 1:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't deal with the problem, they're gonna say, but

1:10:49.000 --> 1:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>look at all the money I got for us, all

1:10:51.120 --> 1:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the pork that I brought home. That's all this really is.

1:10:55.080 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that's that's what I see going on

1:10:57.120 --> 1:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>with California. Darn it. You sent to tweet recently blaming

1:11:02.960 --> 1:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Fox News for some of the uh for distorting some

1:11:06.080 --> 1:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of the errors in the reporting. Why are you blaming

1:11:09.120 --> 1:11:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Fox News for this failure? I actually didn't blame Joe.

1:11:13.040 --> 1:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I just retweeted the Vox article which I thought, you know,

1:11:16.520 --> 1:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of finally added sort of a little bit of

1:11:19.200 --> 1:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>balance to this, which is that I just have to

1:11:21.640 --> 1:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>jump in real quick. Okay, I hate this thing when reporters,

1:11:25.240 --> 1:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, here's an you know, Jake Tapper is the

1:11:26.800 --> 1:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>guy who does mister mister neutral Tapper. You go in

1:11:28.920 --> 1:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>his timeline, He'll retweet things that clearly show he's a

1:11:31.880 --> 1:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>liberal all the time. But he's just retweeting them. Man,

1:11:33.760 --> 1:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>He's just retweeting. He's not really, you know, making making

1:11:39.080 --> 1:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a statement one or the other. Just I'm just retweeting stuff.

1:11:41.400 --> 1:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of right wing stuff being retweeted from

1:11:43.560 --> 1:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>these CNN anchor types and the New York Times the

1:11:46.200 --> 1:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>same Thinger. Oh, I didn't blame them. I just retweeted.

1:11:49.240 --> 1:11:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I just shared all of my followers the vox piece,

1:11:53.720 --> 1:11:56.519
<v Speaker 1>which I really do think that you know, voxes is

1:11:56.600 --> 1:12:00.599
<v Speaker 1>beta male central um, the vox piece that was blaming

1:12:00.600 --> 1:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Fox News for this whole debacle, which any any honest

1:12:03.320 --> 1:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>observer sees this and says, Okay, this is the New

1:12:05.720 --> 1:12:09.639
<v Speaker 1>York Times just stepping on Rake, after stepping on Rake,

1:12:09.760 --> 1:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just come boying hit it right in the face over

1:12:12.880 --> 1:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and over again. But my man Sager and Jetty, he

1:12:16.400 --> 1:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>took over my chair at the Hill Sager's a great

1:12:18.720 --> 1:12:22.479
<v Speaker 1>guys from the Daily Caller. He's got big things ahead.

1:12:22.560 --> 1:12:24.799
<v Speaker 1>He did a really solid job today in this interview.

1:12:25.040 --> 1:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Continue please basically set out to do a book that

1:12:28.479 --> 1:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>revisits these events in kind of a calm way, with

1:12:31.320 --> 1:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of ten months of investigation. We've written a

1:12:34.000 --> 1:12:36.479
<v Speaker 1>book that's almost three hundred pages. We spent ten months

1:12:36.560 --> 1:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>doing it. It's you know, these paragraphs that have been

1:12:39.560 --> 1:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>pulled out and seized upon or two paragraphs in that book,

1:12:43.439 --> 1:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>so we haven't highlighted them. They're not the focus of this.

1:12:46.120 --> 1:12:48.719
<v Speaker 1>But your paper did that our Payton, No, on our paper,

1:12:48.800 --> 1:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we did this Debor Ramirez excerpt in which that was

1:12:51.400 --> 1:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>also one paragraph, and unfortunately that line was removed and

1:12:54.560 --> 1:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it was put back and corrected. Oh yeah, it was.

1:12:58.240 --> 1:13:01.519
<v Speaker 1>It was unfortunate that it was removed. It wasn't removed

1:13:01.520 --> 1:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>because it undercut the entire thrust of the piece. People

1:13:05.120 --> 1:13:07.519
<v Speaker 1>have been making jokes that this New York Times book

1:13:07.680 --> 1:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is the result of a couple of reporters who took

1:13:11.960 --> 1:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>on a project with for a book and didn't want

1:13:14.720 --> 1:13:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to give the book advance back, which I think is true.

1:13:17.800 --> 1:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think at some level, you know, they were so

1:13:20.479 --> 1:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>ideologically driven to try to find the counter narrative to

1:13:23.840 --> 1:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Kavanaugh that what they didn't do, what they didn't focus

1:13:27.439 --> 1:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in on, was wait a second, what if Kavanaugh is

1:13:30.600 --> 1:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>totally innocent and all the facts that we find are

1:13:33.080 --> 1:13:35.599
<v Speaker 1>really just going to prove that, no matter how hard

1:13:35.600 --> 1:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we try to find alternative facts. And now they're in

1:13:40.680 --> 1:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a place where because they've published this book and because

1:13:43.800 --> 1:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>they put their names on it, and they've already been

1:13:45.640 --> 1:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>out there in the public eye on this, then you know,

1:13:49.880 --> 1:13:51.799
<v Speaker 1>you look at this and you got to say to yourself, Okay,

1:13:51.840 --> 1:13:53.519
<v Speaker 1>I guess they're going to take the heat on this

1:13:54.240 --> 1:13:58.599
<v Speaker 1>and keep trying to defend it in public because they

1:13:58.680 --> 1:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>got to earn out the book advance. I really mean that.

1:14:00.840 --> 1:14:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's some degree of just old fashioned

1:14:04.960 --> 1:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we gotta we gotta make enough sales here, and if

1:14:07.720 --> 1:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that means we have to make fools of ourselves, we're

1:14:10.320 --> 1:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>willing to do it. But they're there. They haven't been

1:14:14.040 --> 1:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>willing to say anything other than it was just errors.

1:14:17.120 --> 1:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>They haven't owned up the fact that it's completely and

1:14:20.200 --> 1:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>totally ideology driven. It is ideology driven. And then you

1:14:25.920 --> 1:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>get to another and this really annoyed me today, and

1:14:28.760 --> 1:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>there are a few things I've been a bit annoyed

1:14:30.880 --> 1:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>today in general, but rightfully so libs. Libs are getting

1:14:36.080 --> 1:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a little rowy today, a little bit, a little bit,

1:14:38.080 --> 1:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Producer Mark a little bit, and libs are getting rowdy

1:14:42.040 --> 1:14:43.759
<v Speaker 1>with me, and I don't like it, and also saying

1:14:43.840 --> 1:14:49.599
<v Speaker 1>things that are untrue and that should annoy any any

1:14:49.760 --> 1:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's paying attention. And one of them is that

1:14:52.880 --> 1:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>these these New York Times reporters are out there saying

1:14:59.200 --> 1:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that I want to make sure I find exactly what

1:15:02.160 --> 1:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it was, but they're saying more or less that Kavanaugh

1:15:04.600 --> 1:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>asked them, yeah, asked them to lie. This is the

1:15:08.080 --> 1:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>huff Post headline. New York Times reporters say Kavanaugh asked them,

1:15:13.640 --> 1:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>It says, asked them lie so good job, huff Post,

1:15:16.840 --> 1:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Huff Post English, not so good, asked them lie in

1:15:21.880 --> 1:15:27.519
<v Speaker 1>exchange for an interview, asked them to lie. So this

1:15:27.640 --> 1:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is just a desperation move because it is almost certain

1:15:32.479 --> 1:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you would have to assume that what they're talking about

1:15:35.200 --> 1:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>here is that Kavanaugh said I will speak to you

1:15:37.200 --> 1:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>off the record. There is no way that Kavanaugh, who

1:15:43.040 --> 1:15:45.679
<v Speaker 1>is brilliant, who is far smarter than these two women.

1:15:47.160 --> 1:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>There is absolutely no way that they asked him for

1:15:50.200 --> 1:15:53.439
<v Speaker 1>an interview, and he said, only if you lie to

1:15:53.479 --> 1:15:58.519
<v Speaker 1>everybody about us having an interview. The real way to

1:15:58.560 --> 1:16:00.599
<v Speaker 1>do it, I mean, or rather, the way that this

1:16:00.640 --> 1:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>would have been asked is could we do an interview?

1:16:02.400 --> 1:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>He said, I'll speak to you off the record, which

1:16:04.880 --> 1:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>means you can get information from me, but you cannot

1:16:07.960 --> 1:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>use it or cite it or tell anybody that we spoke.

1:16:11.360 --> 1:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what off the record means. You have to wonder

1:16:15.520 --> 1:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>if the New York Times just does not know that

1:16:20.640 --> 1:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the answer is. Of course, they can't fail to know

1:16:24.080 --> 1:16:26.919
<v Speaker 1>what off the record means. That's not that's not possible.

1:16:28.640 --> 1:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>They clearly know. But this was too enticing of an

1:16:33.880 --> 1:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for them. This was too exciting a chance for

1:16:37.720 --> 1:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>them to find a way to bash Cavanaugh and to

1:16:43.080 --> 1:16:45.599
<v Speaker 1>say that, oh, he would have insisted that we lie

1:16:46.240 --> 1:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>if we had this interview, just because I mean, there's

1:16:49.840 --> 1:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>just no way. No one should believe them. No one

1:16:53.160 --> 1:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>should believe them because they've already been telling lies all week.

1:16:58.120 --> 1:17:01.679
<v Speaker 1>But notice how they keep trying to seize on something

1:17:01.760 --> 1:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>else to turn the onus, to switch this around and

1:17:04.720 --> 1:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>make Kavanaugh out to be the bad guy. It's just

1:17:08.880 --> 1:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>not it's just not gonna happen. It's not gonna work.

1:17:12.880 --> 1:17:17.799
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Mary Ann Williamson, what happened? Maryanne Williamson.

1:17:18.280 --> 1:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>You know this is a departure, but you know, we

1:17:20.960 --> 1:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>had we had a moment backstage at the bill Marshaw

1:17:23.479 --> 1:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Mary Anne and I. She was like, Buck, you're wrong

1:17:26.200 --> 1:17:28.439
<v Speaker 1>about everything. I know. I just don't think your policies

1:17:28.439 --> 1:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>are anny good. But Darling, Honey, if you can unleash

1:17:33.320 --> 1:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that spirit, if you can reach for the stars, who

1:17:37.080 --> 1:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>knows how far your spirit can go. And I said, uh, okay, Mariann,

1:17:42.240 --> 1:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get it. I'm gonna get a tequila soda. Now.

1:17:44.880 --> 1:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It's been real. But you know, she's out there still

1:17:48.320 --> 1:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>being treated like somebody who understands policy issues. That the

1:17:51.120 --> 1:17:53.519
<v Speaker 1>one thing I liked about her was that she seemed

1:17:53.560 --> 1:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>like she wasn't hateful and mean. But beyond that, there's

1:17:57.760 --> 1:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of stuff about mary and Williamson that,

1:18:00.360 --> 1:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>oh honest, people can look at and say, yes, she

1:18:02.680 --> 1:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really know what she's talking about. And one of

1:18:05.320 --> 1:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>those areas I would assume is nuclear energy. What are

1:18:10.360 --> 1:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>your issues with nuclear energy? Well, I know Germany had

1:18:14.640 --> 1:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>said at one point we're just going no nuclear. But

1:18:16.880 --> 1:18:19.479
<v Speaker 1>then when they said no nuclear, there was a problem

1:18:19.520 --> 1:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>because they had a hard time keeping up at the

1:18:21.400 --> 1:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>other standards that they agree to. What is wrong with that?

1:18:29.439 --> 1:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>If something goes wrong with nuclear energy? I don't think

1:18:35.479 --> 1:18:39.599
<v Speaker 1>people have really stopped to take in the harm. See,

1:18:39.640 --> 1:18:42.759
<v Speaker 1>we need an integrated politics. We need to go beyond

1:18:42.920 --> 1:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>hard data. We need to go beyond just thinking about

1:18:45.400 --> 1:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the facts. So I want you to think about this

1:18:48.439 --> 1:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>with your heart. Something goes wrong there? What have we

1:18:55.920 --> 1:19:00.519
<v Speaker 1>been talking about? How can we even consider us I'm

1:19:00.520 --> 1:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>with you, Mary Edge, So maybe we'd all be a

1:19:05.000 --> 1:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>little warmer, a little cool I mean, Americans, we have

1:19:08.880 --> 1:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to decide what is That's the problem I have with

1:19:11.800 --> 1:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>NCLAR What are we talking about? Are we a little warmer,

1:19:16.240 --> 1:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a little cooler, not too hot, not too cold, just right?

1:19:20.360 --> 1:19:22.559
<v Speaker 1>What are we even talking about? That's a perfect question,

1:19:22.600 --> 1:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Mary ed What are we even talking about? Stupid question? Yeah,

1:19:26.200 --> 1:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a stupid question, that's for sure. Let's talk about Iran.

1:19:29.320 --> 1:19:35.479
<v Speaker 1>What's going on there? Team, We'll be right back. You

1:19:35.520 --> 1:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>are now answering the Freedom Hot Capital Operation Center, all

1:19:39.840 --> 1:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sense of programs muski Cats strictly need to know Team

1:19:44.360 --> 1:19:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Buck is cleared and ready for the Buck brief. I

1:19:47.560 --> 1:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's abundantly clear, and there is an enormous consensus

1:19:52.240 --> 1:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in the region that we know precisely who conducted these

1:19:55.400 --> 1:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>attacks was Iran. I didn't hear I didn't hear anybody

1:19:59.720 --> 1:20:02.559
<v Speaker 1>in the region who doubted that for a single month,

1:20:04.120 --> 1:20:07.559
<v Speaker 1>the Iran folks. Unless you want to take the position

1:20:07.720 --> 1:20:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that you can't trust anybody in our intelligence community anymore.

1:20:11.720 --> 1:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>You can't trust the United States government, you can't trust

1:20:13.880 --> 1:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the Saudi government, which that wouldn't be hard to do

1:20:17.400 --> 1:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at some point unless you have access to yourself, to

1:20:21.840 --> 1:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the remains, the wreckage of the drones and the missiles

1:20:25.360 --> 1:20:29.479
<v Speaker 1>used to attack that Saudi oil infrastructure. I guess you

1:20:29.479 --> 1:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>could always say, well, I'll never really know. You know,

1:20:32.400 --> 1:20:34.839
<v Speaker 1>we'll never really know. You have to rely on others

1:20:35.520 --> 1:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>who are presenting you with information and facts and even

1:20:38.200 --> 1:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the evidence. They could show you, the photographs of the site,

1:20:42.080 --> 1:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the complexity of the of the attack. You know, the

1:20:45.080 --> 1:20:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Hoothies in the past have fired off rockets from Yemen

1:20:48.880 --> 1:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>into Saudi Arabia and it's blown up on an airport tarmac.

1:20:52.960 --> 1:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Or something, but it didn't hit anyone or anything. Generally,

1:20:55.960 --> 1:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it just was a miss. And the Iranians have a

1:20:59.160 --> 1:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>much greater sophistication clearly than the Hoothi rebels do. Now

1:21:02.720 --> 1:21:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Iranians are also arming the Hoothies and assisting them training them.

1:21:07.479 --> 1:21:10.599
<v Speaker 1>So is it conceivable that the Iranians gave the Hoothies

1:21:10.600 --> 1:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the training and the equipment. Sure, But then you also have,

1:21:14.000 --> 1:21:16.519
<v Speaker 1>as we've been discussing, where did this attack come from?

1:21:17.280 --> 1:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Where did it originate from? If it came from Iranian soil,

1:21:19.760 --> 1:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>then we clearly know it's Iran. There's some that have

1:21:22.160 --> 1:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>been saying it might have come from Iraq, which would

1:21:25.080 --> 1:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>be interesting because there you'd have Iranian proxies operating on

1:21:29.360 --> 1:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Iraqi soil, to give an extra layer of disbelief, for

1:21:35.520 --> 1:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>an extra layer, a fig leaf of protection really for

1:21:37.840 --> 1:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians for what they what they've done here. But

1:21:42.000 --> 1:21:44.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to see so far the President has not

1:21:44.680 --> 1:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>reacted with a military strike. As you know, I am

1:21:47.880 --> 1:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>opposed to US engaging in a major military strike on Iran.

1:21:55.120 --> 1:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And here we have Secretary of State POMPEII, who I

1:21:58.160 --> 1:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>still think is one of the most squared away best

1:22:02.360 --> 1:22:07.599
<v Speaker 1>voices in this administration on foreign policy issues. He's saying, Look,

1:22:07.600 --> 1:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going to be more sanctions. We're not going

1:22:10.920 --> 1:22:13.479
<v Speaker 1>to do nothing here. But let's let's remember this, folks.

1:22:13.840 --> 1:22:17.719
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't an attack on us. And if Saudi Arabia

1:22:17.800 --> 1:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is in the OH, if they get attacked, well we'll

1:22:20.920 --> 1:22:23.599
<v Speaker 1>fight in their place, or we'll take action on their behalf.

1:22:24.320 --> 1:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, Saudi Arabia is not in NATO. All right,

1:22:26.400 --> 1:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Saudi Arabia. We're not supposed to do their

1:22:28.680 --> 1:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>fighting for them. There will be more sanctions. We have

1:22:37.000 --> 1:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>set about a course of action to deny around the

1:22:40.200 --> 1:22:43.599
<v Speaker 1>capacity and the wealth so that they can conduct their terror,

1:22:43.880 --> 1:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to prevent it from conducting their terror campaigns. And you

1:22:46.920 --> 1:22:48.599
<v Speaker 1>can see from the events of US week there's still

1:22:48.600 --> 1:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>more work to do, and we're going to continue to

1:22:50.080 --> 1:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>drive towards that end. I think that's the right move. Um,

1:22:55.400 --> 1:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to make sure that the Iranians are economically

1:22:59.479 --> 1:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>starved as much as possible. The Iranian regime, I should say,

1:23:03.479 --> 1:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the IRGC, the elements of the Iranian government that support terrorism.

1:23:08.680 --> 1:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And then you also have Secretary of State Mike Pompey,

1:23:11.040 --> 1:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>who was just talking more about how diplomacy here could

1:23:15.160 --> 1:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>get it done as long as we make the right moves.

1:23:22.880 --> 1:23:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I was here in active diplomacy while the foreign Minister

1:23:25.840 --> 1:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of Iran is threatening all out ward to fight to

1:23:27.960 --> 1:23:30.959
<v Speaker 1>the last American. We're here to build out a coalition

1:23:31.000 --> 1:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>aimed at achieving peace and a peaceful resolution to us.

1:23:33.840 --> 1:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>That's my mission set. It's where President Trump certainly wants

1:23:36.880 --> 1:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>me to work to achieve, and I hope that the

1:23:39.920 --> 1:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Islamica Republic of Iran sees it the same way. I

1:23:44.000 --> 1:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think this should be that complicated. If the Iranians,

1:23:46.640 --> 1:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>if they did to us in some way, I mean,

1:23:49.080 --> 1:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>if they blew up a US ship and killed Americans.

1:23:52.800 --> 1:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Remember they've already had they went after an unmanned drone.

1:23:56.680 --> 1:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've been doing some things that are provocations.

1:23:59.200 --> 1:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But we're also blocking countless billions of dollars of economic

1:24:04.200 --> 1:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>activity to them, which I think is the right move.

1:24:06.320 --> 1:24:11.479
<v Speaker 1>But we're not failing to do anything here. That would

1:24:11.479 --> 1:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>not be an accurate statement, and I think that what

1:24:15.000 --> 1:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing is that the Iranian government, the Iranian

1:24:17.960 --> 1:24:21.559
<v Speaker 1>regime's feeling the heat. The most important thing for us

1:24:21.560 --> 1:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>here is just we don't want another war. We just

1:24:25.200 --> 1:24:30.120
<v Speaker 1>do not want a war in the Middle East based

1:24:30.200 --> 1:24:32.559
<v Speaker 1>on all of the factors that we talk about here

1:24:32.600 --> 1:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>on the show at a regular basis. We've done this

1:24:34.520 --> 1:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>too many times in the past. We have not gotten

1:24:37.880 --> 1:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes that we have wanted in the wars that

1:24:40.040 --> 1:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>we have waged in the Middle East. It has been

1:24:42.400 --> 1:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>very expensive. We have lost American lives and sometimes lost

1:24:46.120 --> 1:24:51.559
<v Speaker 1>American lives in circumstances where it would be difficult to

1:24:51.600 --> 1:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>explain what the real strategic objective was for putting our

1:24:56.120 --> 1:25:00.599
<v Speaker 1>soldiers in harm's way. And so I I do believe

1:25:00.640 --> 1:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>that there's a shift right now in the Republican Party

1:25:05.640 --> 1:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're still getting used to, which is we are

1:25:07.720 --> 1:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to do the rest of the world's fighting

1:25:11.040 --> 1:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>for it, even if we think that there's a strategic interests. Yeah,

1:25:13.320 --> 1:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we have. We have. We have an interest in keeping

1:25:15.400 --> 1:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>keeping oil flowing in the Middle EASi just because we

1:25:17.120 --> 1:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>want global gas prices to remain stable. But this is

1:25:22.080 --> 1:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>not enough in and of itself for us to engage

1:25:24.280 --> 1:25:27.559
<v Speaker 1>in a major military exchange with Iran. I am very

1:25:27.600 --> 1:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>confident that if we blew up a bunch of and

1:25:30.240 --> 1:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't say that I know. But let's just say

1:25:32.200 --> 1:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>that we sent over a carrier group and just laid

1:25:35.479 --> 1:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>waste to a lot of Iranian oil infrastructure and really

1:25:40.400 --> 1:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>punished them, kept casualties low, but really punished critical Iranian

1:25:44.960 --> 1:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>oil infrastructure. They would not then say okay, we're even.

1:25:49.080 --> 1:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>They would do something else. They do something a little

1:25:50.880 --> 1:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a provocation. And I do have some here.

1:25:53.439 --> 1:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's a theory that I cannot tell you is vetted

1:25:58.240 --> 1:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in any way. But perhaps the situation inside Iran right

1:26:02.240 --> 1:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>now because of the economic pressure, because of the three

1:26:05.120 --> 1:26:07.519
<v Speaker 1>percent drop in their economy last year looks like a

1:26:07.560 --> 1:26:09.559
<v Speaker 1>six percent drop in the economy. Remember, if we just

1:26:09.600 --> 1:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of quarters of negative growth, we consider

1:26:13.400 --> 1:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it to be a recession. They're in a recession. And

1:26:16.400 --> 1:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>then some perhaps the Iranian Guardian Council, which is the

1:26:21.080 --> 1:26:27.360
<v Speaker 1>true power inside inside Tehran in that Islamist government apparatus,

1:26:27.760 --> 1:26:31.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're under more pressure than we realize and facing

1:26:31.600 --> 1:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>an external enemy US Saudi Israel just because it's Israel,

1:26:36.439 --> 1:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>whoever it may be, is a way of maintaining some

1:26:40.600 --> 1:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>stability internally, and perhaps they're even willing to take major

1:26:46.200 --> 1:26:48.479
<v Speaker 1>risks as a result of that you know, remember the

1:26:48.520 --> 1:26:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Iranians fought and I think very few people recall this,

1:26:53.880 --> 1:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but there was an Iran Iraq war back in the

1:26:58.320 --> 1:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>eighties and it lasts did for almost the entirety of

1:27:02.479 --> 1:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the eighties, and there were there were huge numbers of casualties.

1:27:09.520 --> 1:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>It was the longest war. I mean, if you go

1:27:12.680 --> 1:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>back and you look at longest declared war of the

1:27:14.640 --> 1:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, the Iran Iraq War of the eighties was

1:27:17.840 --> 1:27:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the longest declared war. And the casualties are are believed

1:27:23.800 --> 1:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to be somewhere in the range. I mean, certainly hundreds

1:27:27.439 --> 1:27:35.719
<v Speaker 1>of thousands, perhaps above a million. Total casualties are about

1:27:35.840 --> 1:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>are roughly a million if you want to look at

1:27:37.840 --> 1:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>most of the estimates. I mean, that was a big, nasty,

1:27:40.479 --> 1:27:42.599
<v Speaker 1>vicious war between these two countries, and we were selling

1:27:42.600 --> 1:27:44.519
<v Speaker 1>a lot of arms to Iraq. By the way, during it,

1:27:45.360 --> 1:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a proxy component there because of the Cold

1:27:49.040 --> 1:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>War and the relationship that we had with Iraq and

1:27:51.640 --> 1:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the relationship that the Iranians had with the Soviet Union,

1:27:56.560 --> 1:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>which now of course is a relationship that the Russian

1:27:59.320 --> 1:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Federation as in that country with that country. So the

1:28:03.800 --> 1:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Iranians are no stranger to long, protract and protracted fights.

1:28:09.080 --> 1:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you're part of the molocracy, and if you're

1:28:13.400 --> 1:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the security apparatus, they're the irgc um the besiege,

1:28:18.920 --> 1:28:24.479
<v Speaker 1>you're the the paramilitaries. They're really the the Iranian equivalent

1:28:24.479 --> 1:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of the of the brown Shirts. You know, they'll go

1:28:26.200 --> 1:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>around and beat people up and and they're they're the

1:28:29.800 --> 1:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the official thugs of the thugocracy in Iran. If they

1:28:34.800 --> 1:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>have to fight some kind of war, at least that

1:28:37.920 --> 1:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>means in their minds that they get to maintain power.

1:28:40.720 --> 1:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And we're not going to want to take the country over.

1:28:43.640 --> 1:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, there's some complicated, complicated calculations that are

1:28:48.040 --> 1:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>going on across the table from us with the Iranians.

1:28:50.000 --> 1:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And keep in mind they also could be making miscalculations.

1:28:53.280 --> 1:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>They also could be very very wrong here. And that's

1:28:57.160 --> 1:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>something else that I think we have to keep in mind. So, um,

1:29:01.000 --> 1:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we have more coming up. Team stay with me. So, guys,

1:29:08.040 --> 1:29:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I have some updates from my efforts to uh find

1:29:15.760 --> 1:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the source of what is what is officially an illegal

1:29:20.280 --> 1:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>noise an illegal noise um in my apartment coming from

1:29:26.400 --> 1:29:30.559
<v Speaker 1>some nearby building. I have been able to get the

1:29:30.600 --> 1:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Department of Environmental Protection for the City of New York,

1:29:33.080 --> 1:29:35.799
<v Speaker 1>which is not the federal EPA. It's the local version

1:29:35.800 --> 1:29:39.519
<v Speaker 1>of the EPA d ep to come and and all

1:29:39.560 --> 1:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I need, all I need to get justice is a

1:29:42.360 --> 1:29:45.559
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper that should be freely available to me

1:29:45.880 --> 1:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that says exactly what was done in my apartment. Buy

1:29:49.800 --> 1:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a city employee as part of their job, right a

1:29:53.720 --> 1:29:56.439
<v Speaker 1>report that I know exists. You know what I found

1:29:56.439 --> 1:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>out today? Uh? Well it was actually great because they're

1:30:00.160 --> 1:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>very technologically savvy now, so they just send you these

1:30:02.200 --> 1:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>email notifications. I got an email notification today, Producer Mark.

1:30:06.080 --> 1:30:10.439
<v Speaker 1>How long for the Freedom of Information Act request from

1:30:10.439 --> 1:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the City of New York to get my maybe five

1:30:13.080 --> 1:30:15.479
<v Speaker 1>line DP report? How long do you think this is

1:30:15.479 --> 1:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>going to take? At least six months? That's right, my friend.

1:30:18.800 --> 1:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>February fourth is their estimated date, February fourth, Like, sitting here,

1:30:25.920 --> 1:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>how is this possible? How can how can it be helpful?

1:30:30.320 --> 1:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>What if I had like a toxic waste dump in

1:30:32.240 --> 1:30:34.599
<v Speaker 1>my apartment or if they take readings on that, they

1:30:34.640 --> 1:30:36.479
<v Speaker 1>I'd wait six months to find out if my legs

1:30:36.520 --> 1:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to fall off from all the radioactivity? Well

1:30:39.200 --> 1:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be an emergency. How do you be quiet?

1:30:43.000 --> 1:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You know what I'm saying. This is ridiculous, But even

1:30:46.040 --> 1:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>more ridiculous, the great part about this is that the

1:30:55.439 --> 1:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>same day that I receive an email from the City

1:30:58.280 --> 1:31:04.519
<v Speaker 1>of New York telling me that I am that I

1:31:04.560 --> 1:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>am going to find out about this February second, I

1:31:07.880 --> 1:31:10.599
<v Speaker 1>also receive an email maybe two hours later that says

1:31:11.800 --> 1:31:18.599
<v Speaker 1>your request has been posted online. And then the request

1:31:18.760 --> 1:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>posted online is followed up by an email, you know,

1:31:21.760 --> 1:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that your documents are posted. I go and then

1:31:24.360 --> 1:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and then I click and the link is dead. And

1:31:26.200 --> 1:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>then I'm like, I can't see There's no way to

1:31:28.000 --> 1:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>see anything here. And then risteven email is saying your

1:31:32.040 --> 1:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>foyer request falls under a part of like the City's

1:31:37.000 --> 1:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>something something code, where we cannot share the information with you.

1:31:41.640 --> 1:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So it seems that in one day, the City of

1:31:43.640 --> 1:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>New York has told me that for a simple piece

1:31:45.920 --> 1:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of paper to tell me about a noise reading in

1:31:47.720 --> 1:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>my own apartment that I need in order to get

1:31:50.120 --> 1:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>some relief from the situation, I have been told that

1:31:53.120 --> 1:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to wait until February. I have been told that my

1:31:55.760 --> 1:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>request has already been adhered to just click here. And

1:31:59.080 --> 1:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>then I have been told that Oh no, just kidding.

1:32:01.479 --> 1:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>We're never going to tell you this stuff. We're never

1:32:03.240 --> 1:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>going to give you the report. Welcome to city governance,

1:32:08.080 --> 1:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>my friends. That's what we're dealing with these days. It's

1:32:12.320 --> 1:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>crazy world we live in. Friends. I'll be right back,

1:32:21.840 --> 1:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Team Buck. It's time for roll call. Roll call everybody,

1:32:35.520 --> 1:32:39.559
<v Speaker 1>it is time for it. Let's see what we have

1:32:39.800 --> 1:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>here now. First and foremost, we have Team Buck at

1:32:46.160 --> 1:32:49.439
<v Speaker 1>iHeartMedia dot com. Is the email address with that, We'll

1:32:49.479 --> 1:32:53.679
<v Speaker 1>get to it. We have Benny, not the Jets, just Benny,

1:32:54.280 --> 1:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey Buck. How many more slanted, biased, non attributable, fake,

1:33:00.960 --> 1:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>misleading news articles will it take before conservatives on Capitol

1:33:04.960 --> 1:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Hill begin using Alinsky's tactic of ridicules, Man's most potent weapon.

1:33:11.280 --> 1:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>If a conservative is asked to comment on a story

1:33:13.360 --> 1:33:15.479
<v Speaker 1>from the New York Times, they respond every time they

1:33:15.520 --> 1:33:17.559
<v Speaker 1>didn't read it, nor do they comment on anything with

1:33:17.600 --> 1:33:20.519
<v Speaker 1>a particular fraudulent source, then maybe the American people begin

1:33:20.560 --> 1:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to see the New York Times as the joke. It

1:33:22.120 --> 1:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is shield time, Benny in Mississippi. Benny, I would like

1:33:29.320 --> 1:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to say that this plan of yours will work, but

1:33:31.400 --> 1:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think unfortunately that is unlikely. New York Times still

1:33:35.840 --> 1:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of resources, has thousands of employees. I

1:33:38.960 --> 1:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>find it very unlikely that if we're going to be

1:33:41.400 --> 1:33:43.639
<v Speaker 1>able to get The New York Times to shut its

1:33:43.640 --> 1:33:46.719
<v Speaker 1>stores anytime soon. Look, and this, let's keep this in mind.

1:33:46.960 --> 1:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't actually want I'm not a canceled culture person.

1:33:50.640 --> 1:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't want news outlets to go out of business necessarily.

1:33:53.400 --> 1:33:55.519
<v Speaker 1>Some of them should, like Gawker, that was good for

1:33:55.560 --> 1:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the world, But I'm in general, I just want there

1:33:59.160 --> 1:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to be honesty. What they do, I mean, what they

1:34:00.920 --> 1:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>do is dishonest. At The New York Times. They pretend

1:34:03.160 --> 1:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're an objective media outlet, and they most certainly

1:34:08.840 --> 1:34:13.879
<v Speaker 1>are not. And does anyone really think otherwise at this point?

1:34:13.640 --> 1:34:16.519
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I love to ask that question. Does

1:34:16.560 --> 1:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody want to have the debate about whether The New

1:34:19.960 --> 1:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>York Times is a liberal newspaper or not? You'll say

1:34:23.120 --> 1:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it and people say, no, no no, it's not, and they

1:34:25.080 --> 1:34:26.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to mutter this under their breath, and

1:34:26.760 --> 1:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>then I want to say, well, okay, well then what

1:34:31.439 --> 1:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is it exactly? Someone explained this to me. Karen writes

1:34:36.880 --> 1:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>she can't remember when or where or when that party was,

1:34:39.720 --> 1:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but she claims Brett Kavanaugh assaulted her. She remembers she

1:34:43.000 --> 1:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>only had one beer. When my alcoholic clients say one beer,

1:34:46.360 --> 1:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they usually meet a forty ounce bottle. Karen and Karen,

1:34:50.560 --> 1:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. It wasn't really a credible accusation. And the

1:34:53.920 --> 1:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>more we've thought about it, the more distance we've had

1:34:55.840 --> 1:35:00.519
<v Speaker 1>from it, the more absurd. The whole situation was. I

1:35:00.680 --> 1:35:04.479
<v Speaker 1>leave that, I leave that where it is. I just

1:35:04.520 --> 1:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't believe her then, I don't believe her now.

1:35:06.120 --> 1:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that her motivations to lie were very clear.

1:35:09.040 --> 1:35:10.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that kept coming up was that

1:35:10.840 --> 1:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you had the left pretending like, why would she lie?

1:35:14.760 --> 1:35:18.439
<v Speaker 1>She has nothing to gain by lying. Lie for reasons

1:35:18.439 --> 1:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of ideology, lies for reasons of fame, money, prestige, all

1:35:24.120 --> 1:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>things that the people that she cares about, who are

1:35:26.160 --> 1:35:29.519
<v Speaker 1>clearly leftists, will now ensure her for the rest of

1:35:29.520 --> 1:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>her life, and she'll be treated as a hero. They

1:35:31.880 --> 1:35:36.639
<v Speaker 1>will have the most appealing popular Hollywood actress in about

1:35:36.640 --> 1:35:40.559
<v Speaker 1>ten or fifteen years, playing the brave, the fearless Christine

1:35:40.560 --> 1:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>blasi Ford in the HBO movie In the Netflix series

1:35:43.160 --> 1:35:46.599
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be, I assure you, just give it time.

1:35:46.680 --> 1:35:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh and the New York Times reporters that Molly Hemingway

1:35:49.560 --> 1:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and Carrie Severino have just been wiping the floors with

1:35:52.360 --> 1:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last few days by pointing out all their

1:35:54.320 --> 1:35:59.720
<v Speaker 1>all their ridiculous errors and flaws. They'll be treated as

1:35:59.760 --> 1:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the one who really broke the true story. You know,

1:36:02.000 --> 1:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>they're they're the real journalists who got to the heart

1:36:04.439 --> 1:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of this, not a bunch of hack lib clowns, which

1:36:08.960 --> 1:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is in fact what they are. So yes, indeed, next

1:36:15.080 --> 1:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>up we have oh you know what, actually we will

1:36:18.120 --> 1:36:20.320
<v Speaker 1>get to I wanted to get into some of these

1:36:20.320 --> 1:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>there's some good stuff today in the Fate on the

1:36:24.040 --> 1:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook side of things, So let's let's get to that.

1:36:26.200 --> 1:36:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Member at Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton, we now

1:36:28.560 --> 1:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>do roll call in both places we have we have

1:36:33.200 --> 1:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>roll call multiple avenues for the role call, so please

1:36:37.240 --> 1:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>do check us out there on Facebook dot com slash

1:36:39.920 --> 1:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton. By the time you hear this, by the way, um,

1:36:45.160 --> 1:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I will already be underwear my speech at the Women's

1:36:49.080 --> 1:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Natural Republican Club courtesy of the Young Republicans of New

1:36:52.720 --> 1:36:55.920
<v Speaker 1>York City, and I will try to get full video

1:36:56.240 --> 1:36:59.439
<v Speaker 1>of that speech and post it on fate. Posted on

1:36:59.479 --> 1:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Buck sex dot com. We have a website, yes, right,

1:37:02.920 --> 1:37:06.519
<v Speaker 1>producer Mark, we do. It's pretty too. It's very very nice,

1:37:06.640 --> 1:37:08.720
<v Speaker 1>very nice website. So we're going to start putting more

1:37:08.760 --> 1:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>things on that, and we will indeed including hopefully the speech,

1:37:13.880 --> 1:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>assuming I can get the full audio video of it.

1:37:17.520 --> 1:37:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Benny rights Buck, I take grief every time I fry

1:37:21.520 --> 1:37:24.720
<v Speaker 1>bacon due to the mess, time and smell, and then

1:37:24.840 --> 1:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>bombarded with cute Hillary voice. Why don't you just bake

1:37:29.080 --> 1:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>it in the oven? Much like my eggs. I cook

1:37:33.280 --> 1:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>my thick cut pepper bacon low and slow and turn

1:37:36.120 --> 1:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>off in. Please back me up that no true bacon

1:37:38.840 --> 1:37:43.599
<v Speaker 1>connoisseur would ever deign to bake bacon shields high. Another Benny,

1:37:44.120 --> 1:37:47.599
<v Speaker 1>but a different Benny. Yeah, man. Look first, a couple

1:37:47.600 --> 1:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of things about the bacon. You cook bacon in a pan, people,

1:37:50.840 --> 1:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>let's say, oh, but it doesn't make a mess if

1:37:52.320 --> 1:37:53.599
<v Speaker 1>you cook it in the oven. To that, I always

1:37:53.600 --> 1:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>want to point out you have to use an entire

1:37:56.439 --> 1:37:59.639
<v Speaker 1>like an entire roll of saran wrap or silver foil

1:37:59.720 --> 1:38:02.519
<v Speaker 1>or what ever it is. So that's not true. I mean,

1:38:02.520 --> 1:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>there's just a there's a mess. You have to throw

1:38:04.200 --> 1:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff out, all you need with you're gonna

1:38:07.200 --> 1:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>cook bacon in a pan as somebody who cooks a

1:38:09.080 --> 1:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of bacon, is some grease catch cup where you

1:38:13.520 --> 1:38:15.439
<v Speaker 1>keep all the grease because if you dump it all

1:38:15.439 --> 1:38:17.240
<v Speaker 1>in the trash, it'll actually sometimes burn a hole in

1:38:17.240 --> 1:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>your trash and it'll smell like your whole apartment will

1:38:20.120 --> 1:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>smell like bacon. I don't know, John, do we like that?

1:38:22.200 --> 1:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that good bacon scent? Yeah? They're probably. I'm sure

1:38:25.040 --> 1:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>there are bacon scented candles. I don't know that it

1:38:27.080 --> 1:38:30.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely are there definitely are. Yeah, So I'm essentially doing

1:38:30.320 --> 1:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a bacon scented candle the old fashioned way. But you

1:38:33.640 --> 1:38:35.280
<v Speaker 1>want thick cut too. You know. I was in a

1:38:35.360 --> 1:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>rush the other day and I was in the store

1:38:37.200 --> 1:38:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and I bought normal person bacon, you know, like Oscar

1:38:40.439 --> 1:38:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Myer or whatever, and it was just and I cooked

1:38:43.840 --> 1:38:46.519
<v Speaker 1>this stuff and it's like it's just all grease. There's

1:38:46.560 --> 1:38:49.679
<v Speaker 1>nothing there. There's no actual bacon, damn it. You want

1:38:49.920 --> 1:38:53.559
<v Speaker 1>thick cut, and you want to go to a butcher

1:38:53.640 --> 1:38:55.559
<v Speaker 1>usually and have them cut it for you. If you can,

1:38:55.640 --> 1:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you can do in your grocery store, but have them

1:38:57.920 --> 1:38:59.559
<v Speaker 1>slice it and say I want it to be thick,

1:38:59.720 --> 1:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll taste more of the pork flavor, and it won't

1:39:02.960 --> 1:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>be such a greasy mess. As you can see. I

1:39:05.080 --> 1:39:08.599
<v Speaker 1>get into my bacon, my man t to the j

1:39:09.800 --> 1:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>asks Buck, How have you not made it on Shapiro

1:39:12.200 --> 1:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Special yet? I can't believe Kennedy beat you to it.

1:39:16.080 --> 1:39:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know. T J asked Ben.

1:39:18.080 --> 1:39:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy to go on anytime, Adam Buck on

1:39:22.800 --> 1:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Murphy, how can you not include the Golden Child

1:39:26.520 --> 1:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Shield's Eye? I don't think so. Man, I'm throwing a flag.

1:39:30.040 --> 1:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Have you guys seen the Golden Child? I don't think

1:39:32.960 --> 1:39:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Child is now. I can't. I can't get

1:39:37.760 --> 1:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>behind that as a good movie. I feel like I

1:39:39.439 --> 1:39:41.320
<v Speaker 1>saw it once a long long time ago and didn't

1:39:41.320 --> 1:39:44.439
<v Speaker 1>think it was very good. So do you agree with me?

1:39:44.479 --> 1:39:47.240
<v Speaker 1>By the producer mark, the best Eddie Murphy movies are?

1:39:47.439 --> 1:39:48.559
<v Speaker 1>You do not have to put them in order, but

1:39:48.600 --> 1:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the Top three or Beverly Hills, Cop Trading Places and

1:39:50.720 --> 1:39:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Coming to America? Yeah? Absolutely, yeah, I mean I think

1:39:53.640 --> 1:39:56.479
<v Speaker 1>this isn't that. I really like Doctor Doolittle also, but

1:39:56.880 --> 1:39:59.280
<v Speaker 1>really younger than you. I've never seen that one really. Yeah,

1:39:59.280 --> 1:40:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen that really, but it's funny. Pluto Nash

1:40:02.400 --> 1:40:04.519
<v Speaker 1>was one of the biggest box office bombs of all time,

1:40:04.640 --> 1:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>which is always a fun thing to look and see.

1:40:06.720 --> 1:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>How much money can be wasted in Hollywood on a

1:40:09.200 --> 1:40:14.559
<v Speaker 1>bad project. The answer is a lot. Anthony writes Buck,

1:40:14.560 --> 1:40:17.519
<v Speaker 1>you're an important voice for the modern day neo conservative movement.

1:40:17.960 --> 1:40:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I would call it in response to you're taking calls

1:40:20.479 --> 1:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the other day. I agree, less is more meaning. I

1:40:22.360 --> 1:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think there's important voices that need to get through to

1:40:24.360 --> 1:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you in your audience. And I have a suggestion. Make

1:40:26.840 --> 1:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it a bit of a competition, perhaps one day a

1:40:29.439 --> 1:40:32.439
<v Speaker 1>week or an everyday challenge. Offer up to the audience

1:40:32.479 --> 1:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>one caller who will win the opportunity to present the

1:40:34.640 --> 1:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>world the kinds of questions you'll love to respond to

1:40:37.280 --> 1:40:40.879
<v Speaker 1>or answer. Sorry, Producer John, this will be busy, challenging

1:40:40.920 --> 1:40:44.320
<v Speaker 1>work for you. But what better way? That way? You mean,

1:40:44.360 --> 1:40:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Producer Mark, But Producer John helps out too. This would

1:40:46.760 --> 1:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>be busy challenging work. That's very important part of this

1:40:49.320 --> 1:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>challenge perhaps the beginning of roll call. Put it out there,

1:40:52.760 --> 1:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Rucer Mark, do you want to take this on as

1:40:54.160 --> 1:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a project? I think roll Call works perfectly the way

1:40:57.120 --> 1:40:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it is. I think that's the right answer. I'm with

1:40:59.800 --> 1:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you on that for now, especially because we're we're trying

1:41:02.120 --> 1:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to move to a new studio which is gonna have

1:41:03.840 --> 1:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>all this video capability and all this other stuff. It'll

1:41:06.120 --> 1:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>happen by twenty twenty one. No, man, I'm gonna I'm

1:41:08.920 --> 1:41:10.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna put I'm gonna put my foot down. We're moving

1:41:10.760 --> 1:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>faster than the City of New York. I'm a noise complaint,

1:41:13.160 --> 1:41:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure. I look, I really think I got

1:41:17.360 --> 1:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a few ideas with the City New York. One is,

1:41:18.880 --> 1:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe Buck for may or really does need to happen.

1:41:21.600 --> 1:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>The only problem is that I'd have to I don't

1:41:23.040 --> 1:41:24.439
<v Speaker 1>know if I could still do a radio show if

1:41:24.439 --> 1:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I was running for may or? Could I? There is

1:41:26.560 --> 1:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>there a law against that? Didn't Bloomberg used to do

1:41:29.120 --> 1:41:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a spout once a week. Yeah, But I don't know

1:41:30.720 --> 1:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>if you can host a show if you run for

1:41:32.840 --> 1:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there's is an equal time thing?

1:41:34.720 --> 1:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Or John, Am I right about that? Could I run

1:41:36.439 --> 1:41:39.479
<v Speaker 1>for office while hosting a radio show? Maybe not hosting,

1:41:39.520 --> 1:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>but bloom Bloomberg used to co host with John Gambley

1:41:42.280 --> 1:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and got wr huh on Fridays, I believe, and uh,

1:41:47.240 --> 1:41:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the Blasio's on w NYC once a week. Yeah, but

1:41:49.880 --> 1:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that's as a guess. That's that's of course, politicians can

1:41:52.120 --> 1:41:54.519
<v Speaker 1>be guests. I just think that there's I don't know

1:41:54.560 --> 1:41:56.559
<v Speaker 1>why I think this, but I believe there's some regulation

1:41:56.600 --> 1:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that will prevent me from because otherwise, right, wouldn't the

1:42:00.120 --> 1:42:01.559
<v Speaker 1>thing if you're a politician you want to have your

1:42:01.560 --> 1:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>own media. Well, when I worked in Westchester, a lot

1:42:04.240 --> 1:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of the mayors from the different towns had radio shows

1:42:09.120 --> 1:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and they were in office at the time. Really yeah,

1:42:11.720 --> 1:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know if that was legal or not,

1:42:14.040 --> 1:42:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but it has I don't like it. I mean, buck

1:42:16.280 --> 1:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for mayor. Think about all the noise we'd make. It'd

1:42:18.200 --> 1:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>be so fantastic. I'm from here. I drive the Libs

1:42:21.200 --> 1:42:24.479
<v Speaker 1>in saying I'm gonna be way more interesting than whatever

1:42:24.840 --> 1:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>whoever their candidate is. It's not I understand. It's not

1:42:27.200 --> 1:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the Blasio again. It's gonna be somebody else.

1:42:29.000 --> 1:42:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not exactly sure who, but I don't know. I'm

1:42:32.280 --> 1:42:33.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that. Guys, are you ready for that? Prucer Mark,

1:42:34.000 --> 1:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>You're ready to be campaign manager. Absolutely, Brucer John, You're

1:42:36.960 --> 1:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the muscle. You know, anyone any like any

1:42:39.760 --> 1:42:44.519
<v Speaker 1>like union guys show up, like any any union guys

1:42:44.560 --> 1:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>show up, be like, excuse me you you talked to

1:42:46.720 --> 1:42:49.240
<v Speaker 1>producer John over here. They're like hey. They'll be like

1:42:49.280 --> 1:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>hey John, good to see you again, buddy. Uh. Anyway,

1:42:53.640 --> 1:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go back here to the the role called Monica Rides.

1:42:58.200 --> 1:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Brisket is the barbecue for the guy. Odds you are correct, sir,

1:43:01.160 --> 1:43:04.760
<v Speaker 1>It is number one. It is the ribbi of barbecue.

1:43:05.240 --> 1:43:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Now this is true. However, let's all be very clear

1:43:07.600 --> 1:43:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that brisket, while it is, I think when best executed,

1:43:11.280 --> 1:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the best of the barbecue meets. Although you guys gave

1:43:14.000 --> 1:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>me legitimate answers. I will take ribs, I will take

1:43:16.160 --> 1:43:17.599
<v Speaker 1>pulled pork. It's just as long as you don't say

1:43:17.680 --> 1:43:20.320
<v Speaker 1>chicken or people that would say like cheddar, sausage and

1:43:20.360 --> 1:43:22.479
<v Speaker 1>things like this. I'm like, that's what you keep in

1:43:22.479 --> 1:43:24.320
<v Speaker 1>your freezer for when you come home drunk and you

1:43:24.320 --> 1:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be hung over the next morning. You

1:43:25.680 --> 1:43:27.720
<v Speaker 1>don't go to get that at a That's like a

1:43:27.720 --> 1:43:30.439
<v Speaker 1>side dish, that's not a main The sausage they have

1:43:30.439 --> 1:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with those places. I know it's like a thousand calories

1:43:33.080 --> 1:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a link, but who cares. But the problem with brisket

1:43:36.200 --> 1:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is that it can be either it has to be

1:43:37.920 --> 1:43:40.559
<v Speaker 1>in that sweet spot. It can be too fatty, too

1:43:40.600 --> 1:43:43.559
<v Speaker 1>moist and fatty, or it can be dry. You gotta

1:43:43.560 --> 1:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>get it right in the sweet spot or else you're

1:43:46.080 --> 1:43:48.679
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be in bad shape. Um, but I agree

1:43:48.720 --> 1:43:51.519
<v Speaker 1>with you on and Ribbi is obviously the move. Look,

1:43:51.520 --> 1:43:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I would take a good, a good, solid, all American

1:43:54.000 --> 1:43:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Ribbi over and I've had Kobe beef one time before

1:43:57.600 --> 1:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>real from Japan Kobe beef. I'd take a good an

1:44:00.160 --> 1:44:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Rebi over Kobe beef. Anytime you eat Kobe beef and

1:44:02.920 --> 1:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you think your gall bladder might just spontaneously combust, it's

1:44:07.000 --> 1:44:11.479
<v Speaker 1>just so rich, and you know, it's like you're drinking

1:44:11.520 --> 1:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>baking greases, you're eating a steak. Some of you are like, yes,

1:44:15.400 --> 1:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>sign me up for the Kobe beef. Maybe maybe Jennifer,

1:44:21.880 --> 1:44:24.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, Hey, Buck, finishing up the podcast Wednesday. Now

1:44:24.320 --> 1:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you're set up in New York and expanding the show

1:44:26.479 --> 1:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple moos. We're talking about how you need to

1:44:28.000 --> 1:44:32.320
<v Speaker 1>do and instill live while cooking allah AOC, just don't

1:44:32.360 --> 1:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>be moronic like her. We love the idea of cooking

1:44:35.000 --> 1:44:37.599
<v Speaker 1>with conservatives. First show request how to sear the perfect

1:44:37.600 --> 1:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>rebi and a discussion of the solvency of social security. Also,

1:44:40.880 --> 1:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the correct answer for best BBQ is indeed brisket. All right,

1:44:48.080 --> 1:44:53.320
<v Speaker 1>there we go, Steven Buck. Thinking about your gun control woes,

1:44:53.520 --> 1:44:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you should have Ken Blanchard on from The Black Man

1:44:58.320 --> 1:45:01.120
<v Speaker 1>with a Gun Podcast. Never heard this before. I think

1:45:01.160 --> 1:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you'd be surprised to see the to be the roots

1:45:04.400 --> 1:45:07.519
<v Speaker 1>of gun control are actually very racist. I've heard about

1:45:07.520 --> 1:45:09.559
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit in the past, my friends. I

1:45:09.600 --> 1:45:17.280
<v Speaker 1>think I know what you are alluding to. Anyway, we

1:45:17.320 --> 1:45:19.519
<v Speaker 1>don't have much time here now, We've got one one

1:45:19.560 --> 1:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>more here, one more Kelly, right, Bunk. You'll love this

1:45:22.720 --> 1:45:25.400
<v Speaker 1>French bulldog and its attitude toward dieting. I know you

1:45:25.479 --> 1:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>love them. And it's a YouTube video. Angry French bulldog

1:45:28.080 --> 1:45:32.679
<v Speaker 1>on diet throws tantrum. It sounds like me an angry

1:45:32.720 --> 1:45:34.760
<v Speaker 1>French bulldog on a diet, although I'm not on a

1:45:34.800 --> 1:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>diet yet, so I need to make that happen. All right,

1:45:37.200 --> 1:45:41.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody countdown to downtown is coming up here. We'll be downtown.

1:45:41.800 --> 1:45:44.720
<v Speaker 1>It looks like the show will actually be available for

1:45:44.720 --> 1:45:48.479
<v Speaker 1>your on podcast third a week from today, right, producer Mark,

1:45:48.520 --> 1:45:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that's when it will actually happen. Think so, We think so.

1:45:51.520 --> 1:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>We're trying as fast as we can here. Yeah, what'd

1:45:56.120 --> 1:45:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you say. It's out of our hands. It's out of

1:45:58.320 --> 1:45:59.800
<v Speaker 1>our hands. We're doing the best we can. But it

1:46:00.040 --> 1:46:03.240
<v Speaker 1>will happen soon. So subscribe on iTunes or the iHeartRadio

1:46:03.280 --> 1:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>app to The Buck Sexton Show. Doctor Merl Shields High