WEBVTT - NOLAN WELLS BOMBSHELL: DEATH-THREAT "BLOOD, SO MUCH BLOOD"

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Crime Stories with Nancy Grace Bombshell tonight and the investigation

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>of the death of a young man, Nolan Wells' death

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>threats are flying. One actually says there's gonna be blood,

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>so much blood. Another death threat says don't go outside.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>How can anybody do their jobs when they're getting death threats.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Not only that, we understand this case is headed to

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>eight grand jury. We also learned tonight that the state's

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>autopsy is complete, but is being kept secret. Isn't an

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>autopsy a public document? Why is it being kept hidden

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>from us the public? What is in that autopsy? The

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>first autopsy of Nolan Wells. Good evening, I'm Nancy Grace.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Crime Stories. I want to thank you being

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>with us.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 3>The young lady Katie that he was hanging out with,

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I saw a text message from her alluding to the

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 3>fact that she never saw him get on that boat

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 3>at all. They could have been saying don't die or

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 3>is it dead referring to the bill as pump. Somebody

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 3>would have seen something if there was a dramatic commotion

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>like this occurring on that boat.

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope no one wills died by accident. I'm not

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>shutting down our crime stories investigation until I know.

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 4>O god, hey, we're the West tip of born at

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 4>our Billage soft work and we're going, we're thinking, can

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 4>you all please? Can we have I've never should jo,

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 4>what'd you say?

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You know? If that sound is real? There's no getting

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>away from that and all this business about there's no connection. Well,

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I listened to a good forty seconds of Ctoe Sea

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>second Word tow on Hold, listen to their music. There

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is plenty good connection. But before I can even get

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to the death threats of blood, so much blood, blood everywhere,

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and don't step outside, and more, before I can even

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>get to the grand jury, before I can get to

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the autopsy that's being kept hidden from us. I want

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you to meet someone very important critical to this investigation.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Her name, Janetta Brantley, MSS Brantley is the audio engineer

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>who enhanced the nine one one call, the STO call

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>in the Nolan Wells case. So everybody claiming some ding

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>dong on YouTube did it, or somebody on Insta TikTok

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>did it, No, she did it. I've spoken to her,

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I've read her statement. I want you to judge her credibility.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Credibility is normally the sole province of a jury, and

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>tonight you serve in that function, Miss Brantley. I'm sure

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're getting all sorts of abuse, threats and so forth.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a cacophony that seemingly won't cease. That said, thank

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you for being with us tonight. Explain to me where

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you got the audio, how you got the audio, and

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>what if anything you did to enhance the audio.

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 5>First and foremost, I basically downloaded it off of YouTube

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 5>from WLOX News's YouTube site. And when I downloaded it,

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 5>I ripped it off of YouTube. That's the terminology that

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 5>we use when we take something off of YouTube. But

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 5>when I ripped it off of YouTube and I pulled

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 5>it in.

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>Pause place, objection, Miss Brandley, Isn't it true? Said the

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>audio you got was taken directly by XLO from m

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>d m R. Correct, the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources.

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that true?

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 6>Yes?

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, please continue, miss Brandley.

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 5>So when I downloaded it from YouTube, I pulled it

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 5>into my dog, which is logic pro x that's my

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 5>dog choice.

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 7>And when I first listened to.

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 5>It, I realized that it was like a dual mono recording,

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 5>which most.

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 7>What is it, like most.

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 5>Phone services or operators used utilize when they're recording conversations,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 5>And so it was already split between the caller, the

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 5>dispatch and the callers in the in the background. And

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 5>so that's what made it easy for me to isolate

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 5>it without having to do much to it. So that isolation,

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 5>when I separated the left channel from the right channel,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 5>that just made me be able to really focus on

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 5>everything that.

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 7>Was on the call. And what I was hearing was like.

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 5>Like I couldn't I honestly could not believe what I

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 5>was hearing.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Mischianetta Branley. Isn't it true? This is the same audio

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that was released by the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 7>Yes, that is absolutely correct.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's listen to it one more time. Oh my god.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 4>Hey, we're at the west tip of Born and uh,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 4>our village stops work and we're going we're thinking, can

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 4>you all please come? We have a membership?

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't stop?

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 7>What did you say?

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 4>It's coming up? It's it's we're just thinking.

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like we're going down there, I don't know.

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 8>The phone number.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 6>It's it's either I think it's try that.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 4>I know we have a membership, like guaranteed, I don't

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 4>have the tag on here.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 6>You got ripped off?

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 9>What I.

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 6>No, we do not any of that.

0:06:55.279 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Long drop got to jump in and pull the plug

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 4>while you're going, they gotta here.

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:08.559
<v Speaker 7>Got hello?

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what's going on?

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>What's up?

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 4>We're at the west tip of Born and uh are

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 4>dose st working.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 6>We're going, We're thinking, can you all please? Can we

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 6>have a membership?

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 7>A Hey, we're at the west tip of.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 9>Born and uh our dog sat working.

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 7>We're going, We're thinking, can you'll please can we have.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 6>I ever should.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Back to Janetta Brantley joining us tonight, and she shows

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>herself in that video showing what she is doing. What

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>does adding eq mean? Miss Brandley?

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 5>Adding eq is basically selecting a certain frequency of the

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 5>actual sound and either deleting or removing a certain noise

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 5>something that's problematic to the ear, deleting that or boosting that.

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 7>That's literally all equing is.

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>What was your process, Janetta? Because I was sitting researching.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It was early, early, early in the morning, like five

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>point forty five am several days ago, and I was

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>researching the Nolan Whales case. And I saw the transcript

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>as it was being played, and my husband was also up.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>He said, what's wrong. I'm like, if this is real,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>this changes everything. It changes everything, because up until that point,

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it seemed as if no one's death could very well

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have been an accident. If this is real, it changes everything.

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>It's seismic. What was your reaction when you heard these words,

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Janetta Brantley.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 7>I think at my core, I was in disbelief.

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 5>I wasn't cleaning it or enhancing it to specifically look

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 5>for or identify a crime, or even point the fingers

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 5>at anybody.

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 7>I believe I wanted it to be an accident. I

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 7>think a lot of us wanted it to be an accident.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 5>So when I heard those things, When I heard damn

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 5>it Bart, that name stood out to me because I.

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 7>Hadn't even heard that name before.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 5>As I was listening to certain things that stood out

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 5>to me, I was at I was in disbelief because again,

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm just an audio engineer. I'm not an investigator, detective,

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 5>or anything like that. So when I heard a name

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 5>that I wasn't familiar with, it stood out to me,

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 5>and that alone made me want to hear what was

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 5>immediately said after dammit Bart. And so that's why in

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 5>that process where damit Bart came in loud and clear

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 5>to me, I decided to go over to the next

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 5>part to hear what the rest of that statement was,

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 5>which is where you saw me actually create a loop over.

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 7>That part, split that part and.

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 5>Then add a gain, which the gain is boosting the

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 5>volume overall. And that's pretty much what you saw me

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 5>do in that actual video. And so to hear you know,

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 5>damnit Bart, Nolan's really dead now that I couldn't believe it.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 7>I could not believe it.

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>My reaction to Janetta because when I first heard it,

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought, this, this has got to be a doctor.

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 1>This can't be real crime stories with Nancy Grace straight

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>out to a veteran trial lawyer, Franz Borcoart, a veteran

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 1>trial lawyer joining us out of the Baton Rouge jurisdiction

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>at Borghart's law firm. Franz, take off your defense hat

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>just one moment. I have introduced wire taps many times

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>at trials, which very hard to get, by the way,

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and I've never had one that I believed was doctored

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>at the time because they were taken by law enforcement.

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>This is from a completely independent source with no dog

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in the fight, no skin in the game. It's from

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>dispatch at Seto, And if this is real, this blows

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the case wide up. Now you saw Janetta Brantley, You've

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>heard her. I have no reason to disbelieve anything she's saying.

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 9>So if I'm prosecuting this, I need I'm worried that

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 9>I need a witness in twenty twenty six to exclude

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 9>the possibility that it's either AI generated or doctor just

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 9>like you suggested. And I think that she's very credible,

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 9>but I think we need to go one step further.

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 9>The other concern I have, Nancy, is if the independent

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 9>autopsy is showing inconclusive death results, now I really want

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 9>to see the other autopsy to see is there trauma

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 9>to the body? Is there something that happened. These are

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 9>the concerns I would have as a prosecutor. But we've

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 9>now opened the doors to these guys may in fact

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 9>have committed obstruction of justice.

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, hold on, you're put in the cart before

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the horse. Before we talk about obstructions such as allegedly

0:12:55.440 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>lying or covering something up, you've already mentioned two distinct

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>lines of inquiry one is that the audio that Janetta

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Brantley enhanced innocently I believe had been already AI or doctored. Okay,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>let's follow that through to its logical conclusion. You just

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>throw that out there like a stink bomb at the circle.

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>You know what a circle meeting is? Right in the

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>United Methodist Church, all the ladies have circle meetings. Okay.

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>To suggest this was doctored before Janetta got it means

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it had to have been doctored or AI created by who,

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources. No, no, no, don't

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>just go h. That doesn't work in court workards. You

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>can't just throw oh, that's like the Sade defense. Some

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>other dude did it. What dude, what are you talking about?

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying AI doctored by who? If it's not Janetta,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>then who? She got it the same sound that was

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>released by the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources. What you

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>think they doctored it?

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 9>There is nothing normal about this case.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And if if that's the same, I asked you, I'm

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>asking you to explain your premise, and you're not doing it.

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 9>I said, if I were a prosecutor, I would want

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 9>to be able to establish with expert testimony that what

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 9>we are listening to is real. And I would want

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 9>a witness because I'm telling you, with this case, with

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 9>as viral as it's been, I'm not disagreeing that it's real.

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 9>I'm saying I would want to be able to bolster

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 9>that very credible woman's testimony. And she is very credible.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 9>I have no doubt that what we're listening to and

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 9>what she did is credible. The issue is, I don't know.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>If she can go there, they come from the sky,

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>got it, got it, got it, got it. She cannot

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>testify as to whether MDMR had enhanced it or doctored

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it before it was released. But see the problem is

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you would have to ask someone to believe a clerk

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>or an official at the Mississippi Department Marine Resources doctor

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this before they released it to the extent that nobody

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>could understand it until they enhanced it. That's the hell

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of a doctor job. Okay, so you did that, then

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you got into the medical examiner findings. Okay, what was

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>your theory on that?

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 9>Very quickly, very quickly. If he's dead on the boat,

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 9>how did he die? It should be conclusive.

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>It should be joining us right now. Joseph Scott Morgan,

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>renowned death investigator, professor forensics Jacksonville State University with a

0:15:54.560 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>premier criminal pro department and building. Author of Blood Beneath

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>My Feet, star of a hit series Body Bags with

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Scott Morgan, and it goes on significant over ten

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand death scenes under his belt. Joe Scott follow up,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not arguing in borgharts. Let's learn if we can

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>from what he's saying. Jump.

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So whatever has been the causal factors here has

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 8>got to marry up with what they were seeing at

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 8>the scene, and perhaps the audio does fall into this,

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, these statements, and I think that probably from

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 8>a medical legal perspective, that is, the corner and the

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 8>medical examiner are going to want to be able to

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 8>fully appreciate what is being said here. From a timeline

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 8>this is absence the police's investigation. They're going to try

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 8>to rule in or rule out what they're seeing presenting

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 8>on Nolan's remains when they finally did receive them at

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 8>the State Medical Examiner's office and that examination began, and

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 8>this is going to be critical and key, you know,

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 8>because the causal effects here are going to be critical.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, we go back to these changes that the

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 8>second autopes you referred to on the back of the head. Now,

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 8>the doctor was not able to at that point in time.

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 8>Even though he did do a thorough what's referred to

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 8>as a layered dissection here, he could not establish the

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 8>causal effects here because the injury or the insult that

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 8>you see there, this presentation is compromised by decomposition. So

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 8>what did the state medical examiner see? My problem is here, Nancy,

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 8>how was the body treated before or after the first autopsy?

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 8>And the body is transported up to d C. I

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 8>have questions about this because they're talking about to the

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 8>degree with which the body was decomposed. The doctor up

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 8>in d C is seeing significant decomposition. We don't know

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 8>what they saw in Mississippi, but I do know that

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 8>you're only talking about out what I'm ballparking here. Please

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 8>give me some grace. Maybe forty eight hours tops before

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 8>the medical legal authorities have seen the body. So how

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 8>far degraded is the body to compromising this? And this

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 8>evidence is going to have to be borne out, not

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 8>just not just with the physical findings that you see

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 8>with the unaided eye, but also whatever's going on, tox

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 8>collogial I want.

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>You to take a careful look at this video we

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>have obtained. Let's see it. Look how tightly everyone is

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>packed in. There were hundreds of people out on Horn

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Island on July the fourth. What nobody saw? What happened

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to Nolan Wells? They all just left with him standing

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>there stranded, waving his arms like Gilligan that that did

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>not happen. Now that you're seeing this, what is an

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>innocent explanation? I'm trying to figure that out. Joining me

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'll circle back to you, Joe Scott, because I've

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of questions regarding the way he could

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>have died innocently and been left behind, and that sound

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>being true, the sound that Janetta Brantley enhanced. Is there

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>any innocent explanation? Is there a way? As my favorite

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>judge often said, Luther Alberson, it is your duty to

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>make all witnesses speak the truth, and if pen perjury

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to no one, is there a way that can be done?

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it can. It seems to me

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that someone is lying. But who joining me now? Teslin Figaro,

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>social justice political commentator, host of The Teslin figure O podcast,

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>miss Udo, thank you for being with us. I'd like

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear your thoughts.

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, that's what the family is saying. They don't

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 2>believe he died by accident. That's the point. That's the

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>reason why Nolan Wells mom is saying, I don't believe this.

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 7>I don't believe he died by accident.

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Before we had the audio, the audio simply confirms that

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 2>there are additional questions that needs to be asked. It

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 2>wasn't just one thing they said in the audio. They

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 2>said Nolan repeatedly. In the audio, they said, check his chest.

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 2>In the audio, they said.

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 7>Is he dead? In the audio?

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 2>And also notice this, Nancy, did you notice that the

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 2>operator also said, is anybody breathing?

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 7>Who says that? What operator says? Who all is breathing

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 7>on the boat? So is this all the audio? Nancy?

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 7>Is there more audio? That's my question.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to look, specifically, Tazlin at what was said.

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>At one point, we hear we think you killed him.

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>He's already dead. Already dead? Is he dead? Yeah?

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 10>No?

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>One, OMG, wake up. And as Janetta stated, then she

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>hears a completely different name Bart. Now we also hear

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very curious the phrase no no Tuslin figure o.

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Was that a nickname of Nolan Wells.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I could not confirm if that's a nickname of his

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 2>or not. But what I do know is we heard Nolan.

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 2>What I do know is we heard check his chest.

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 2>What I do know is that we said, is he dead?

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 2>What we do know is we heard screams. There's folks

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 2>at there suggested that perhaps they were talking to a

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 2>seagull or perhaps talking to somewhat random bird that was

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 2>flying around this called no No. There were folks out

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 2>there to suggesting, well, maybe they were talking about the

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 2>boat cad.

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 7>We got to knock this off, Nancy.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>We heard what we heard, and so we would have

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 2>put this before jury.

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Also, we hear damn it bart bart No knows really dead,

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>damn damn it bart No knows really dead, repeating it

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over. According to reports, his nickname

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>one of them is no No. Back to Telan Pherau,

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>what is no One's mother's theory about what happened in

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>light of these tapes?

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Before we even have the tapes, her theory is I

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 2>told my son, I've raised my son just like I've

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 2>raised my nineteen year old the same way Nancy, like,

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you raise your children, come back with the.

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 7>People you went with.

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Her theory has always been that he is a fantastic swimmer,

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that he is an athlete. Her theory has always been

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 2>that he did not drown. Her theory has always been

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 2>that there's something wrong with this picture. Her theory has

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 2>always been that the fact that you know he's left

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 2>his phone and left and left his keys.

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 7>Her theory has also always.

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Been that he did not just go off with some

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 2>random stranger and say, guys, don't worry about it, just

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 2>leave me on an island. Her theory is the same

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 2>thing before this audio. This audio only confirms with this

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 2>mother already knew.

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Joining me now. Susan Hendrix, investigative journalist, author of Down

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the Hill, My Descent into the Double Murder in Delphi,

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>who has been on this case from the beginning. Susan Hendrix,

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>we all know that everyone in our country is innocent

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>until proven guilty, and regardless of how you or I

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>or anybody else feels. That includes the young men on

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the boat with Nolan Wells. We have a lot of

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>questions that have to be answered. Is this sound real?

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Has it been enhanced. Who enhanced it? Was it AI

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>or doctored before Janetta Brantley pumped it up so we

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>can hear it. I want you to hear another version.

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 7>You can see that.

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 11>I have the c toe channel completely muted, so we're

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 11>only listening to the callers. Then I go through and

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 11>simply raise the volume of all of the chatter we

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 11>hear at the beginning of the call.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 4>Hey, we're the west tip of Born. Our billage stops working.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 4>We're going We're thinking, can you all please? Can we

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 4>have I've never should.

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:56.959
<v Speaker 1>Joy Susan. That was enhanced by my producer Sydney. I

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>know her like that. I I asked her enhance it

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the best you can. She again has no interest in

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the outcome of this case. She pulls up quote want

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>me to cover him up? I mean, Susan.

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 12>Way in, I was listening to the enhanced version, both

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 12>of them now not doctor by the way, there's a

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 12>big difference there. Have you ever heard Nancy on Instagram

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 12>where you listen to two things and your mind goes

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 12>to what you're thinking of, like green car or moonboat?

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 12>What are we really hearing? I believe that something nefarious

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 12>did happen where I think the answers will be again,

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 12>this is my opinion, but I believe something happened there,

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 12>and we're not hearing the full story. And you pointing

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 12>out Nancy how prouded that area was. So let's say

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 12>what people are claiming that it was an accidental growning.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>No one saw.

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 11>Look here at the crowd.

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 12>Nobody saw what happened, and all of us have our

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 12>phones on us all the time.

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>No one recorded this.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 12>I think the answers are in the timeline and also

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 12>the autopsy when we will hear answers there.

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing video from the Officer Tatum show and I

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they were trying to show with it,

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>but how can someone be dead and floating in the

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>water and nobody notice? Which leads me too, Susan Hendrix.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>The fact that we have learned tonight that the States

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>autopsy is complete, but it's being kept secret.

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, absolutely, being held for the grand jury to look

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 12>into that. And the fact that you brought up Nancy

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 12>earlier that part of.

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>His rote was missing. Will that be key?

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 12>There's so many questions around us, but right it's a

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 12>public record, but we're not hearing about it. I guess

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 12>they're waiting for the grand jury to show them that first.

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Joe Scott Morgan death investigator. I've never known an autopsy

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>report not to be a public record unless they're claiming

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 1>ongoing investigation. Now, in the D four VD David Anthony

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Burke case, the LAPD demanded the Medical Examiner keep it

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>secret because the Medical Examiner's office allegedly was leaking information,

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>possibly for money. Don't know that yet, but I will.

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>How common is that that the medical examiners ordered not

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to release the autopsy? Why is the autopsy being kept secret.

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 8>Because it's continued investigation. They're going to go to grand

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 8>jury with this. I can tell you that. I'll bet

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 8>you dollars to donuts if that's the case. We see

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 8>it with We saw it with Hoefor right. We didn't

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 8>have it there. We don't have it with Charlie Kirk.

0:27:55.720 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 8>You know that's an ongoing event. This is being investigated,

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 8>and you know the point of contact. Here is an

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 8>interesting situation here because you have the State Medical Examiner,

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 8>but you also have a county corner. The State Medical

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 8>Examiner provides a service to the county corner. The corner

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 8>is an elected official, He does not do these autopsies,

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 8>and so the coroner is going to be the gatekeeper

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 8>relative to any kind of document. But with that said,

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 8>under state, I think under state to statute, the DA,

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 8>the prosecutor, they can say, look, you're going to hold

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 8>off on releasing this report. So it's being held at

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 8>this point in time. Now the reports that we're hearing

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 8>are saying that it is complete. Now what does that mean. Well,

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 8>if you have a complete autopsy report, that means safety talks.

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 8>They've probably got histology which is going to be the

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 8>tissue studies, and they actually have the anatomical autopsy report

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 8>that has been completed. That's what I think it was

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 8>ABC that was reporting that. I can't validate that, but

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 8>that's what is being leaked out at this point in time,

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 8>so they have their support. I think the question is,

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 8>and this goes back to you, my friend, is that

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 8>if this is going to be a grand jury thing,

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 8>when is it going and when is the medical exander

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 8>going to be called and summoned to speak to this.

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 8>That's what everybody's going to be hanging on in my opinion.

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, on j just Scott, you mentioned the Talks

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>report that's a blood panel done. Was he drinking, was

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>he using drugs? A lot has been married, had been

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>given someone witnesses stating no one was drunk. Okay, does

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that really change anything? Does that change anything? Unless he

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>died of acute alcohol poisoning, because I guarantee you ain't

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>anybody on that boat that's afraid of a cocktail. Okay.

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So if he was drinking, what difference does does that make?

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And whether he was killed or whether he died of

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>an accident.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 8>Joe Scott, Well, listen, Nancy. I know you're a teetotaler,

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 8>but let me tell you something. The drunker you get,

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 8>the more alcohol you take on board, it lessens your

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 8>ability to defend yourself. It lessens your ability to make

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.959
<v Speaker 8>good decisions. And so we see just played out all

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 8>the time in the medical legal world, and that's going

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 8>to be the measure here, I think relative to the toks.

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 8>Everybody wants to see the toxicology because that's going to

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 8>give us an idea of chemically, what is in this

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 8>young man's system. Was he able to do for himself

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 8>at that point in time, And that's another problem that arises.

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a double edged sword. Joe Scott. You can argue, rightly,

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>he was drunk and could not defend himself against an attack.

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You could also argue he was drunk and hit his

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>head and then they go, oh, my stars, he's dead.

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>But wouldn't that have shown up in the auto if

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>he did, if he died by a blow to the head,

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>be it accidental or nefarious, wouldn't that have shown up?

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, And keep in mind the second physician that did

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 8>the autopsy, who by the way, is highly respected, the

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 8>former chief medical examiner for DC that was retained by

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 8>the family. He didn't see any evidence of fractures.

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 8>Now, that doesn't mean that there wasn't a concussive event.

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 8>I'm talking about being hitting ahead, and you can have

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 8>stuff that's contained within the cranial vault that might not

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 8>be presenting. But again back to what I said earlier,

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 8>I find it very interesting that this doctor is commenting

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 8>on the state of the decomposition when he sees the body.

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 8>And that's problematic. It's very problematic. When you're trying to

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 8>make an assessment. You're already absent. You're already absent the

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 8>organs of the neck, you're absent, intact lungs, and you

0:31:56.040 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 8>know because the specter of drowning is on the tape.

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 8>So if you want to make a thorough scientific assessment,

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 8>he's kind of handcuffed at me at this point. And

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 8>again going back to this idea, how long did it

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 8>take them to get his body to DC and why

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 8>was it in such a state of decomposition when it arrived?

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Crime Stories with Nancy Grace Franz Borghart joining US veteran

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.479
<v Speaker 1>trial lawyer out of the Baton Rouge jurisdiction, speaking of

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>talks toxicology results. Number one, they don't take that long

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>unless you want them to. Number two, there is doubt

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>if he died by accident having consumed a lot of alcohol,

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>was their cover up or did he die from a

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>nefarious act? So the alcohol intake could cut either way. Franz,

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you're spot on.

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 9>I think that the reasonable doubt if someone gets arrested

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 9>and accused of this crime is going to be if

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 9>the toxicology shows a high BAC in the absence of

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 9>anything else. What you yourself said, could it have been foul

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 9>play where he couldn't defend himself, or foul play insomuch

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 9>as he got injured because he was quote unquote drunk.

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 9>That that remains to be seen. But I don't discount the.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Fact that you're saying foul play. But it could have

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>been something as simple as horsing around on the boat

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and him hitting his head. It could be somebody whacking

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>him in the head. It could be finding him in

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the water face down. And this mark on the back

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of his head is some type of fluid dispersement, which

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe because it was nowhere else on the

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>body except right there. And if your blood is going

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to sink to the lowest level upon death, it would

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>be all over the body. But we're not seeing that.

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So why is the just the occipital have the deep

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>red markings? So many many questions, and let me stress

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>before you bother sending me another death threat. We don't

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:28.879
<v Speaker 1>know the answers. These boys, these young men on that boat,

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>could be completely innocent. But when I listen to this sound,

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of questions. Back to Tesla and Figaro,

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>who is joining us. She's the host of the Teslim

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:48.959
<v Speaker 1>figurea podcast. She is a social justice and political commentator.

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Have you noticed that people are making a lot of

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Nolan was quote drunk. A, how do

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they know that? And B does it make a dfence?

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Why they absolutely noticed it that he was allegedly there

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 2>saying he was drunk, And it doesn't make a difference.

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 2>And let me ask you this, Nancy. If he was

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:14.280
<v Speaker 2>drunk with other teenage kids, he certainly wasn't drunk by himself.

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 2>So if he was drunk, why was he the only

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 2>drunk one that.

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.959
<v Speaker 7>Ended up dead? Secondly, if this was an accident, let's

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 7>say he just got.

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 2>So drunk and just passed out, why didn't anybody report it?

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 2>So even if it was an accident, even if he

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 2>got drunk, which I don't believe, by the way, even

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 2>if all those things happened, why did.

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 7>His so called friends not report it.

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 2>That's the part that we're missing. So if where's the

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 2>answer to that, Nancy? He just went and just said

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm just gonna be drunk and just go in the

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 2>middle of the ocean and just die with hundreds and

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of people who are around, who are watching. Nobody

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 2>saw anything happen. His friends didn't see anything happen. And

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 2>again I go back to this tape. I will not

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 2>sit up here and pretend that I did not hear

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.439
<v Speaker 2>what was on bet tape, and I ask again, even

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 2>the operator said, who is breathing on the ball?

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 7>Don't you think that's strange? Fancy who's breathing?

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>That's when I first heard that, Tess, and I thought,

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard a dispatch say who's breathing? What she

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>did she hear all that in the background and do nothing?

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Or did you hear it and say something and release it?

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>We don't know, man. We got to paper everybody with

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>subpoenas to get to the bottom of this. But I

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>want to go to George Olivo and everybody on the panel.

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>You're experts in your own right. Please tell me if

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you have if you want to jump in, please, I'm

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>not clairvoyant. To George Olivo joining us. He's a former

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:51.720
<v Speaker 1>FBI special agent and polygraph examiner at George Alivo dot com. Okay, George,

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 1>listen to what Officer Tatum told me. Back to Officer Tatum,

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>star of the Officer Tatum on YouTube. Have the friends

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>taken polygraphs?

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, from my understanding, all but I believe one took

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 3>a polygraph, and from what was told to me that

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 3>they all passed and all of the ones that took

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 3>a polygraph took one without a lawyer and so, and

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 3>they cooperated with law enforcement. So from my understanding, everybody.

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Took understand did they tell you they took a poly

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and pass.

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 3>They told the yes, ma'am. They told me that they

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 3>did it. I wasn't there, so that's why I'm saying.

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 3>From my understanding, they told me that all the boys

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 3>except one, which is Warren, I believe, took a polygraph test.

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 3>All of them did not have lawyers and did it

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 3>and cooperated with police. Warren also cooperated police. I just

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 3>believe he didn't take a lot of tech the tests.

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 3>But Warren is the young man that I interviewed. So

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 3>according to what they told me, they all took a

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of tech tests and passed. And it's an equivalent

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 3>of a lot of technic tests. It's not a traditional

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 3>a lot of tech tests, but it's the same theology

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of trying to get to if a person is lying.

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't know the name of it is. It's the

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 3>equivalent of a lot of technologies of different methodology. Yeah,

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't believe it was a polygraph test. I believe

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 3>they took other stressors in order to analyze it.

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So then the answer to did they take a polygraph

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>would be no, he's charming, he's well spoken, but that

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>was no. That was a no. They did not take

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a polygraph test, and not all of them took the

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>as he is calling it the equivalent, Okay, Georgia Levo

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and my experience as a trial lawyer, there is no

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:45.760
<v Speaker 1>equivalent for a polygraph. Tell me the various bodily indicators

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a polygraph measures.

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 10>So polygraph does have very specific markers physically, and we're

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 10>looking for physiological changes in baseline or truth signature. So

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 10>we're looking at things like respiration, heart rate, electrodermal activity

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 10>which most people have interpreted swatland activity, or looking at

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 10>peripheral movements to try and determine if someone's trying to

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 10>cheat on the test. So it's quite it's quite extensive.

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 10>And I think what with the officer Tatum was probably

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 10>referring to whether you realized it or not, was the

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 10>voice stress analyzer. Seems that I think you used that

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 10>word one time, some kind of stressor test.

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 8>It's probably that they might have taken.

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm gonna have to ask you about what that is,

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but to my layperson, understanding and guys, I'm speaking to

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:43.439
<v Speaker 1>an expert, former FBI special agent polygrapher, George Olivo, As

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I recall, just off the top of my head, a

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>polygraph measures things you really cannot control unless you can

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have studied in practice beating a poly involunteery, physical stress

0:39:55.120 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>response is blood pressure, heart rate rate, whether you're sweating,

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>tubes around your chest and abdomen, track your breathing and

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>even not just how fast you're breathing, but the depth

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>of your breathing. Does your breathing become shallow? Do you

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>have to pause and take deep breast to calm yourself down?

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>A poly A traditional poly measures cardiovascular activity. There's a

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>blood pressure cuff on your arm and it measures your

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:37.879
<v Speaker 1>pulse and your blood pressure fluctuation. It also measures what's

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>called electrodermal activity. What is that? I've had to explain

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it a million times to jurors. Sensors attached to the

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 1>fingers measure your sweat, gland activity, and even your skin

0:40:53.480 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 1>electrical conductivity. The examiner then asks neutral questions like is

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>your name Georgia Levo? Are you from Cincinnati, Ohio? Are

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>you from La California. Are you a poligrapher? Were you

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with the FBI? Were you there when Nolan Wells died.

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>That's how that would work. You would lay a foundation

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>of non disturbing questions, baseline questions. They're called to get

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the person that's being subjected to a poly to get

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>their baseline heart rate, their blood pressure, and so forth.

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Then when you hit them with a question regarding the case,

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you see if there's any change in that. Okay, I

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 1>know I'm speaking as a layperson, Georgia Lvo. But those

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>are some of the things that polygraph measures.

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 10>And you nailed that. Yeah, that's right, Nancy. And let

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 10>me just add that the correlation between deception and physiology

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 10>is nothing new or it goes back for thousand years

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 10>back in China, when the emperor was questioning one of

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 10>his subjects, he would have a doctor standing by to

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.760
<v Speaker 10>listen to the heart rate to determine if the person

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 10>was telling the truth or not. We've been studying it

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 10>ever since.

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:16.439
<v Speaker 1>What is the test that Officer Tatum is talking about

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to what is he referring?

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 10>I think and he was kind of cryptid, maybe intentionally

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.760
<v Speaker 10>or unintentionally. Maybe he didn't really know but it sounded

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 10>like he was referring to a voice stress analyzer. Those

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:35.359
<v Speaker 10>are the machines that detect micro stressors electronically in the voice.

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 10>The research is very weak on that and that type

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 10>of technology. I guess it's better than nothing, But the

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 10>bottom line is, I mean, I'm speaking as a polygraph

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 10>examiner and I'm saying this no diagnostic tool. And you

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 10>know this obviously should should ever be used as a

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 10>final verdict. I mean, it is one just one piece

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 10>of the truth puzzle. But obviously if you had a

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 10>choice between a voice stress analyzing a polygraph that there's

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 10>really no comparison to polygraph is going to be way more.

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Preferable. Well, I mean, even polygraphs are not allowed in

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a criminal trial unless both parties stipulate they will be

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>allowed to upfront before the poly's even taken. They are

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed in civil trials. And isn't it true, Georgia Levo,

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you're the former FBI like Polugifer. Isn't it true? The

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>questions matter? They're critical because if you throw opening questions

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>like did you do anything wrong? Or were you what

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>happened that day? You can't ask questions like that, you

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>really have to ask yes no questions, then they can

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>expound upon it. Your questions must be very specific, isn't

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that true?

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:45.760
<v Speaker 6>One hundred percent?

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 10>Test question construction is something that is going to well,

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 10>a lot of things are going to make or break

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 10>a test, but test question construction is key, and something

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 10>is Let's say you know there's a missing child, a

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 10>missing person, and you ask someone of interest, are you

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 10>responsible for their disappearance? Well, that's a terrible question because

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 10>you know they may feel morally responsible if only I

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 10>had been more careful. You know they feel guilty, and

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 10>so you're asking the wrong question there, So you really

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 10>have to get it.

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Or you could have asked that grabs the kid off

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the street, are you responsible for the disappearance? And they

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>go no, because in their mind it's the parent's fault

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>because the child was out on the street, didn't have

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with me. I just gave him a

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ride before I killed them. That said, you can't leave

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>anything open to interpretation, just like you and I are describing.

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So when I would agree to a polygraph, I never

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>stipulated it would come into court ever. But when I

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>would agree to a polygraph as an investigative tool, I

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 1>would take part in selecting the questions and creating the questions, because, frankly,

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>let's just be honest, George, A voice stress test where

0:44:56.960 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutor or the investigator is not in charge charge

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of the questions ain't worth a hill of beans technical

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>legal jargon that means nothing to me.

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 6>I'd agree with you there.

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Let me put it more clearly, voice stress tests my

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>rear end that ain't coming into court. In fact, I

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even pay any attention to it. Now you give

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:25.320
<v Speaker 1>me a polygraph where I helped fabricate the questions. Maybe

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to know who is the polygrapher? Is is

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Hee somebody the defense hires all the time so they're

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>beholden to the defense. No, I want somebody like a

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:39.720
<v Speaker 1>lev O that did it with the FBI. So telling

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:42.879
<v Speaker 1>me these boys as they call them, they young men,

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 1>took first it was a polly. Then I find out

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a voice stress test. Took a test and they passed.

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Said one of them didn't take it. That means nothing.

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Put them on a poly with questions approved by the stay.

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Then I'll pay attention right now. It's really not worth

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>a salt that goes in my bread. You know what,

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 1>if I wanted someone to pass one of these lie

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 1>detector tests, I go with a voice test like these

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>young men took. I wouldn't let them take a polygraph.

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Susan Hendrix joining US investigative journalist and reporter death threats,

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 1>including one that says blood will be everywhere? What was that?

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 12>That was from a man out of Sacramento now arrested

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 12>and threatening the judge who was the stepmother of war

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:44.719
<v Speaker 12>and talk about frightening, saying a lot of blood. There'll

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 12>be a lot of blood like there was on the boat,

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 12>but yours will be much faster.

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>The purp is Joseph Alfredo Vesques du Mars, arrested Thursday

0:46:56.640 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 1>on charges of interstate transmission of threatening communication. Now these

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 1>are federal documents. What did he threaten? One of the

0:47:07.200 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>young men's mom with Susan.

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 12>The threats were against Warren, one of the boys on

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 12>the boat, his stepmother who is a judge, And it

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 12>was graphic. It was brutal, saying there will be blood everywhere,

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 12>threatening her life, talking about on the boat set.

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It really does. It says that he is sending a

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:32.760
<v Speaker 1>bomb to her office that will quote blow you away.

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.840
<v Speaker 1>When you see it. Once that package is open, the

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:38.919
<v Speaker 1>timer will start. Then you have ten seconds or less

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to ask God for forgiveness. So much blood everywhere hard

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to clean, especially from a boat that was in that letter.

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And there is another death threat Susan Hendrix to Mississippi

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement saying don't go outside. What happened with that?

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Cincinnati, Ohio woman calling two officials out of Mississippi

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 12>several times, more than twenty five times. Here is her mugshot,

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:13.800
<v Speaker 12>and you're right, don't go outside, saying there's a bomb.

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 12>So the threats, they're taking them seriously as they should

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:19.319
<v Speaker 12>to arrest.

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So far, that's right. A woman now accused of bomb

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>threats to government offices related to the Nolan Wills investigation.

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:32.760
<v Speaker 1>This is an Ohio woman facing federal charges. Michelle Francine

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Edwards just charged in the US District Court, Southern District, Mississippi,

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>one count transmitting threatening communications to interstate commerce. Okay, nobody

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>can do their job appropriately when they're under a death threat.

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:54.320
<v Speaker 1>That's against Mississippi law enforcement. Trust me, there are people

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 1>within law enforcement that are trying to do the right thing.

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Threats on one of the young men's mothers that's not all,

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Teslan Figaro. Nolan's family has gotten threats too.

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and you know, I don't condone violence on anybody,

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 2>but I do want to put some context behind this.

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Nancy as Well, I was a police officer in the

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Air Force. You're talking about government officials meeting. I'm sure

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the judge has received threats. I'm sure the police officer

0:49:29.480 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 2>has received threats. Although they are not they should not happen.

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 2>But these are individuals that have taken just like you

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 2>and I have taken on, you know, positions that it

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 2>comes with the territory. You have received death threats. I

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 2>have received death threats. So the people that's not being

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.360
<v Speaker 2>talked about that's receiving the death threats is Nolan Well's

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:52.759
<v Speaker 2>mother and father. Why is nobody talking about the death

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:56.240
<v Speaker 2>threats with them? They've reported it. Why isn't anybody arresting

0:49:56.239 --> 0:50:00.359
<v Speaker 2>the people who are actually harassing the victims. It's on line,

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 2>it's available for people to see. So I just find

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 2>it very interesting that there's so much sympathy for a

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 2>police officer who not only do they receive death threats,

0:50:08.960 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 2>they put their life on the line. They signed up

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:13.440
<v Speaker 2>and raised their hand to say, hey, pick me for

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the death threats and pick me to give my very

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 2>life as I did in the Air Force.

0:50:17.480 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 7>So it is not right what is happening.

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 2>But we also have to shine a light on the

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:26.720
<v Speaker 2>actual victims, the actual people who are grieving the loss

0:50:26.800 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 2>of their son, and nobody gives a damn about the

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 2>death threats that they're receiving.

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to be very clear, Ms. Figure. You say

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:40.359
<v Speaker 1>nobody cares, that's not true. I care. I care. I

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 1>care about the death threats on Nolan's my mother and

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 1>his family and his team. I also care about death

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:51.840
<v Speaker 1>threats on one of these boys mother and on law enforcement.

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:55.439
<v Speaker 1>And yes, my first death threat, oh my goodness, came

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:58.799
<v Speaker 1>back in the eighties. But guess what, they faxed it

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to me from the Fullton County jail. So that wasn't

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>much of a mystery. But with every time you take

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a position, you make people angry. The thing is, if

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:19.920
<v Speaker 1>these threats, including the ones on No One's mother, the mother,

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm doing all night long till two o'clock,

0:51:23.719 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Miss Figure, I'm packing my children to go away to college.

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what No One's mother should be doing tonight. She

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>should be getting him ready to go back to school. Instead,

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 1>she's visiting his remains and now death threats. We want

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>justice in this case. We don't want secret granjury proceedings.

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't want secret medical examiner reports. We want all

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:10.839
<v Speaker 1>threats investigated. We want the truth behind that audio. I

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>want to know and I want everybody on that boat polygraphed.

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We want answers if you know or you think you

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:26.439
<v Speaker 1>know anything about this case. Dial two two eight seven

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>six nine three zero sixty three. Tonight, we honor canine

0:52:34.719 --> 0:52:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Echo protected while serving the Sartel PD, Minnesota, because a

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 1>grip called vested interest in canines created a bullet and

0:52:47.120 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 1>stab proof protected vest and protected echo. These things aren't standard.

0:52:54.320 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Thereover a one thousand dollars each, and I've seen mini

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>canines die on crime scenes. Protect those canines who protect us.

0:53:05.920 --> 0:53:11.080
<v Speaker 1>We remember an American hero officer, Brian Huff, Detroit PD,

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:15.840
<v Speaker 1>shot in the light of duty after twelve years, leaving

0:53:15.880 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 1>behind his wife, Melissa and their son Blair. American hero

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Officer Brian Huff. Thank you to our guests for being

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:30.560
<v Speaker 1>with us tonight, but especially to you for joining us

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and our search for the truth. However it may pan

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:41.560
<v Speaker 1>out if it brings down the Courtouse Waltz, so be it.

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:49.479
<v Speaker 1>We want the truth about Nolan Wills. Nancy Gray signing off,

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll see you tomorrow night, and until then, good night friend,