WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Rush to Judgment?

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:20.159
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's time for the Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:39.919
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>It is Tuesday, September twenty first two, twenty one, season seventeen,

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Episode number twenty five. Welcome to the latest edition of

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>The Break Life in the s WBC Mortgage Studios at

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the Star, Nick, give me a twenty five. Oh, Junior Tadatasi.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>That is my favorite player of my favorite name of

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>all time. He played a running back in nineteen eighty nine.

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>How about say that was before my time? Junior titles.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that. I just love the name. I

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>just love that you're like confidently and I assume correctly

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>pronouncing it. Yeah, I think so. I don't know if

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that guy joined the team today, you'd be like, I'm

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>calling you Junior two. You make the team. I don't care. Yeah.

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>In eighty nine, he mean, I mean he was on

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the team, but I mean that doesn't mean anything. Everybody

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was on the title Tassi. Okay, it kind of rolls

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>off the tongue kind I kind of like it. Yeah,

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he was a good player, but but

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you only played on the nineteen eighty

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>nine Cowboys and like no other team, yeah, and he

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>might have played for it. I don't know. Maybe played

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Eagles. I don't know, but I'm just saying,

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, just because you played on the eighty nine Cowboys,

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're great NFL player. Was our guy Charlie

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Williams twenty five? He was? He also was forty two.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I like Charlie. I wish he would have said twenty

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>five for Charlie because that's my dude. Like, I haven't

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>seen him in a long time. He used to come

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>around a lot, cool Valley ranch. I like Charlie. I'll

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>see him, but you don't get many opportunities to say

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>junior junior title good Points played the Eagles for three years,

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and eighty nine with the Cowboys was his final year

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in four year prot fitting guy. He played for both

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of the teams that are playing this week. There we go,

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>look at Nick, that's my dude. There we go, all right,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>into that one. Today we're gonna talk about today. We

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>actually are going to uh the Yesterday, the Cowboys gave

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 1>us an opportunity. The media gave us, I mean gave

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the media the opportunity to talk to the coordinator's offense, defense,

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and special teams. There were some things that came out

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of those press conferences that I thought we'd dissect today.

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna start first with the offense. Kelvin Moore. I

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>was looking at some of the numbers through two games,

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and obviously, let's put this in context. It's two games.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>This is not what you are for the season. It's

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>just two games. But it does give us a little

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of an indication on some things right now. The

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys offense is fourth in total offense, there's seventh, and

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>rushing offense sixth, and passing offense. Here was a part

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that was interesting to me their fourteenth in points scored.

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think there's so much lower in the

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>amount of points that they're scoring relative to the number

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>of yards that they're getting both overall and pass and

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>UH and Russian. Well, they sucked out loud in the

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>red zone in week one. I think that's the and

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>then I'm pointing it. It was my red drink. Oh

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I wasn't. I was. I was like, I

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on over there, but I'm just

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna answer the question. Sorry, Um another one today? Yeah,

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>really say that's good. That's good. I like the energy,

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>keep going day. They were awful in the red zone

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in Week one and then Week two was a very

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>um shortened game. For one thing, the Cowboys only had

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>seven possessions. They only made it into the red zone

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>three times. Um. So yeah, I think I think that's

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the main culprit if I had to guess how they

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>get better. They you know, don't play as good a

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>defense as the Bucks and maybe the Chargers. I mean,

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know last year, if you think about it, you

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>know they wanted a couple of games, and then the

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>knock was they haven't beaten in any team with a

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>winning record on that that stuffs out the window. They've

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>played two good football teams, I think, and you know

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they've won one of them. I had a chance to win.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The other one had a chance to lose this one,

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>so I mean even doubt. But I think you know,

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the competition will won't won't be as good and I

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>think that they'll they're getting their pieces back too. I mean,

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they're figuring this thing out on offense. I don't know

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>if Lyle Collins helps a lot more. Obviously he's better,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>so he'll come in and they'll they'll just be kind

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 1>of a well oiled machine. I think that they'll you know,

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>figuring out things in the red zone with Pollard, and

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, because think about it, the Pollard touchdown I

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>think helped the Zeke touchdown, you know. I mean, I

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>just think when you're showing things wide like that, then

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you can run up the middle. So I think that

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be fine. I think that I saw

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>some encouraging things out of the red zone this last week.

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the Chargers, and I think we all agreed,

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>even last week, we agreed that they are a good team.

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I started thinking about a context, and I'm still kind

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of torn where I think they are relative to other

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>teams in the league, and specifically even in their own division.

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>If I had to put them in order, I think

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they're probably the third best in their own division. I

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>would say the Raiders and the Chiefs are probably better

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>teams at this point. But I don't know that for sure,

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and Denvers two and oh, we don't know what they're

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>going to try out to be. I don't think they're

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that great, but I think obviously they're two and oh.

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now, do you do you think when it's all

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>said and done that because you gotta go through that division,

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think that that's gonna be a really tough

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>road for the Cowboys if that's the thing, if they

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>end up being the third best team in that division?

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Chargers you mean, yeah, time its Chargers. Yes, I think

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go as far as as Herbert's development takes them,

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, he he has it all in

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of you know, just how good, strong, all that stuff,

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but he makes some some bad decisions in the red

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>zone too, and you know he's had I think they've

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>had three turnovers in the red zone in their first

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>two games that probably you know, that costs them and

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>win there could have cost them another one. So, um,

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>if he continues to make you know, develop and all

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that he's got all the tools, he'll I think he'll,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if he gets a big jump in

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>his development, I think that they can probably be the

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>second best team in that division. I think for all

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the jokes we make about the Cowboys, I think the

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Chargers are one of the more uniquely snake bitten teams

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Like it seems they always have a

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>good roster, and like they've had years. It was a

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>while ago at this point, it was when Rivers was

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>still closer to his prime. But they were like best

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in the league in offense and defense and finished with

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a losing record. They were good last year and finished

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>seven and nine, and then two years ago, like the

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>very last good year of Rivers career, they went twelve

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and four and they upset the Chiefs and looked like

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>they were going to make a run. So I guess

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>my point is I think they've had a better roster

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>than their record implies the vast majority of the last decade,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>probably well, and the Keys, they've had a quarterback for

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>long time, which is not what most franchises can say.

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>They've got a worse record in one score games over

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the last few years than the Cowboys do, which is

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>something to think about. I don't know. I don't that's

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a college football thing for me. I don't care, Like,

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I think the Raiders are better

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>than the Chargers just because they're too a no right

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>now and it doesn't really matter. You just win the

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>games in front of you. I think those teams are

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in front of you. I mean part of them.

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>But I guess my point is I'm not concerned about

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the quality of this win in terms of like how

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>good are the Chargers. I do know they had their

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>offense at close to full health. They didn't have their

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>right tackle, but they have a very nice receiving corps

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and one of the better quarterbacks they're going to play

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this year. I feel confident saying that Mahomes is better.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Who else they have to play this year? They Brady

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Brady was better, But like one of the five, I'm

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that, I'm having a hard time coming up

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>with the the ones I think are better than this. One

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of the five best quarterbacks on the schedule they just

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>beat Well, that's huge. Ranked it back in you know,

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the summer, I think he was fourth or fifth. Okay,

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Um Matt Ryan, some people view him better just because

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of you know, he's a good quarterback back. They don't

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have a weapons better and he's in a former MVP. Uh,

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there's also a former MVP that's not on a roster

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, so that doesn't always be a pointing. Okay,

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm I have the schedule in front of me. I

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have to guess at this anymore. I'm just looking

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>at it. Uh Mahomes obviously, Brady obviously, Brady obviously. And

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>then you can, depending on how you feel, you could

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>argue Kyler Murray and Derek Carr. And really I only

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>throw better than Derek Carr in my opinion. No, no,

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying yeah, yeah, yeah, And I only even threw

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>car in there because he's on fire right now. Yeah,

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Like going into the season, I would have been like,

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>justin Herbert's way better than he's having a good Yeah,

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Cousins, I'll take Herbert over both of those guys,

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>not even hesitating. Yeah yeah, yeah, he's right up there. Again,

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>you can a lot of times you can tell the

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>quality of the team, but quality of the quarterback. So

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I know this has been discussed probably before. I just

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of thought of it. When you're talking about the

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>right tackle out, you think Parsons lines up to a

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>defensive end. If Bulog is out there bloggings later, you

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>think you think that they decide to do that, because

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>if if Bilaga is better than Slater, then nobody was

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>really going to be getting a lot of pass rush.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question. I didn't even think about it

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>until you just said they were playing without the right tackle,

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, man, because I mean, he kind

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of worked that guy in the second half. Honestly, Storm

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Norton was what people thought Terrence Steele was going to be.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about that. I think they would have

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>still done it because I think they did it not

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>because they wanted to. They did it out of necessity. Yeah, personally,

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think they would have still had the same

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>need to do it, and they still would have done it.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point though, because and that's why, and

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>there's there's already a lot of talk about like maybe

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike should just play end until until DeMarcus Lawrence comes back,

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, I don't know. I don't know if

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael wants to smoke with Layne Johnson on Monday at

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>least not forty times like he got on Sunday. And

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I think and Dan Quinn put out, you know, made

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a good point when he talked about it yesterday that

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not you know, seventy snaps. You can play

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy snaps at linebacker. You can't play seventy snaps at

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>defensive end either. The past rushing that going every the

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>physical beating that it takes to rush the pastor and

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>get up there. Now, I mean, this is gonna sound dumb,

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, I guess it. On the offensive side,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it's different, you know, because you're not rushing up the

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>field or whatever chasing guys around. So but but basically

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is is that he can only play

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a limited amount of snaps or you're gonna play defensive end.

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>A linebacker, he'll probably be on the field a lot

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>more all the time, all the time. But he he

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>said this week, he said, we've moved him for this week.

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>He said he's gonna be a really good linebacker for us.

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>He didn't sound like he wanted to make this full

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>time switch. Yeah, I'm gonna get back to that. I

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>want to get to that, and we'll talk about that

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>when we get into the defensive side. I did have

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>one more question for you guys regarding the offense. Something

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Callum Moore stands to me kind of stuck out. He said,

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in the press conference that stuck out to me. He said,

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they want to aggressively take what the what the defense

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>gives them. And I thought it was interesting because it

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just like you hear all the time, take what

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>they give you. He said, we want to aggressively take it.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, okay, so what does that really mean?

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>But the question I have for you guys is do

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you like this approach better than having a specific identity

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that the team goes into. You know, a lot of

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>teams you kind of know going in they are a

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>running team they're gonna pound you, or they are a

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>passing team, they're gonna air it out. And for those teams,

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>they do it really, really well, and even though you

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>know it's coming, you can't stop it. Do you think

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that's better than just having the type of team where

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you can morph every week and you can try to

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>do both. And by the way, you may not be

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>as great as those teams who do one thing extremely well,

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>but you have two things you can do pretty good.

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that an identity? Maybe that's an identity that you're like,

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we have studs everywhere and we will do whatever you

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>think hurts less and we'll hurt you at it. I

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>love it. I mean, I've talked about it a lot

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>already this season. But I think that's an identity unto itself,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is you know, people are all up in arms that

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the running game really wasn't a part of the Week

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>one game plan because Tampa is amazing at it, by

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the way, the Falcons through the ball fifty times Week two.

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, like people know the book, the book

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>is out, not obviously not on beating Tampa. They're two

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and oh but why are you gonna bother running into

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a brick wall. It's a waste of time. So Cowboys

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>come right back and you got to keep up with point.

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Chargers are famous and not their chargers

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't famous. Brandon Staley is famous for playing with a

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>light box and so they run for two hundred yards

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 1>as a team. And I think I did love that

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>quote from Kellen because it's kind of an oxymoron, right,

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think that just means we're gonna take what

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you give us, but we're still going to be creative

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and try to be explosive and make big plays. You know,

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>whether that's the goofy swinging gate formation with the three

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>offensive linemen or you know, Dak took one deep shot.

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>It wound up getting intercepted, so I could argue, maybe

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't the best idea, but they tried it handing

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>off to Cede Lamb. I mean, they made aggressive calls

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>within the flow of the game, but it was within

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the context of what is what are the Chargers presenting us? Yeah,

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Tyren Smith Terren Steele split out left like that, Like

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I liked it. I liked it too. Yeah, And then

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>like the second down play of it, I liked the

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>second two. I was fine with that too, because I

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mentioned it in the win Week one,

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>he did a some of the thing. He did something

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of unconventional, and and then he came back later

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in that same tribe and tried to use the same

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of unconventional concept but did something different with it,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and it ended up being a big game for them

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>downfield to Ceedee Lamb. This game, he tried to do

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the same thing they did. They took a concept, they

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:37.599
<v Speaker 1>used it earlier, and then they tried to lure it.

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>I liked it too. I just think DA made a

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>bad decision there because he said I'm gonna throw it

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>way out here and for a four yard loss. He

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>threw it out here. CD versus Durwin Jane James in

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the open field. That's probably not a favorable matchup in

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a one on one um but but but I mean,

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the best part is you're gonna play off of that

0:13:58.040 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna see it again, and then you know,

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sooner or later, Tyran Smith's gonna go out for a

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>pass and you know, here we go. I don't know that.

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh God, I hope. I don't know about that. I

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know this. That's a possession receiver right there.

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Zeke ran like a Texas route on that play, and

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Murray is a really good player and just played

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it really well and it it looked to me like

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Dak kind of pumped in the direction of Zeke and

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was like, that's covered. But that's what he won. If

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it hadn't been well covered, it was Zeke had twenty

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>yards between the linebacker and the safety, and so maybe

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Dak could have thrown that away instead of throwing it

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the CD. But I like these, you know what's going

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to happen off of that? I think I think you

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>can do this. I know you can't in college. Just

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>wait for that. I'll probably I'm not giving away any

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>game plans here, but you put the tackles out. Why

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>look that you can put guards out there, They're gonna

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>sneak it tied in like a jar win or something

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on the line, and he will go out there because

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>because you just could look at it like center or

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>two guards and it's like, well, they're you know, they're

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the lineman. One of those guys can be eligible. Though

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe, I know you can do that in college.

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you can do it in the NFL.

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>But you just kind of you'll get used to seeing it.

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You'll used to seeing these guys and it'll be one

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of these guards right up in the middle. It's gonna go.

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And going back to your original point on that, I

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know that like under those circumstances, if Zeke's covered

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's what you really want it, I don't have

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a heart. I'm not I don't think it is a

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>bad decision rather than throwing it away to give your

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>guy CD an opportunity to beat a guy in the

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>open field. I don't care who he is. I know

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Derwin James is a good safety and he has the

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>ability to tackle in the open field. But Ceedee Lamb

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>also can make guys miss. He also can get off

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to break tackle. So for me, I'm like, give it

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a fifty fifty chance that he actually makes a play

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>out here in the open field and see what you

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>can do. It ended up not working for them, but

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I love the nature of the call. I love what

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to do there. If you watch last

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>night and DeVante Adams is an amazing receiver, but he

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>catches a lot of passes within a yard of the

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage, and they trust him to beat his

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>man and he does a lot. And yeah, I trust

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Ceedee Lamb to make a guy miss more often than not.

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But Derwin James is a hell of player, right, and

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it happened sometimes. All right, We're gonna take our first

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>break when we come back when talk about the defensive

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball, and Nick kind of teed it

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>up for us. We will talk about Parsons and what

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>they think of Parsons, And my question for you guys

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>will be is Parsons the second best defensive end or

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>actually say pass rusher, not defensive and second best pass

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>rusher on this team. We'll talk about that when we

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>before there was a draft. You get sized up a

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>cowboy by three simple factors. The crease in his hat,

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the bend of his brim, and his unbending attitude a man.

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Stetson didn't just protect him from what life through at him.

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American,

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>made with pride. Right here in Texas. There's still the

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>unofficial crowd of all self respecting cowboys, and Stetson is

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Find

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a retailer nearest you at Stetson dot com, slash Cowboys.

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys Way, where sixteen Hall of Famers and five

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>championships shows us what success looks like. Where Turkey is

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>always the second's part of Thanksgiving Day, where we are

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>all defined by one single thing, the Star, where we

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>as fans know it's our job to keep the tradition going.

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America is proud to be the official bank

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys and to support the quest of

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>living life. The Cowboys Way copyright twenty twenty. Bank of

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>America Corporation. Want to use what the pros use? How

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>about the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. Right now you can get the Jack Black Starter,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Black skincare favorites plus a full sized and tense therapy

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>lip bomb. Go to get Jack Black dot com slash

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and use the code word team JB. That's get

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys the Jack Black Starter,

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:52.239
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks, free shipping. Honey, big news, scary are you? Okay? Oh?

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not Gary anymore. I'm Jackie Flash. What see? I

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>want the latest smartphone, but the best deals are only

0:17:57.880 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for new customers. So to get a new customer deal,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I changed my name to Jackie Flash. Okay, but the

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>best smartphone deals at AT and T are for everyone,

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>new and existing customers. That's huge. Then guess who's getting

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>a deal. Is it Jackie Flash, Jackie Flash? It's not

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>complicated at AT and t our best smartphone deals are

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. Restrictions apply. Is it att dot com for details?

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders making the Team

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is back for another exciting season. Don't miss new episodes

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>every Friday at nine eight Central only on CMT Welcome Back.

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 1>It is the second segment of The break Life from

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the s WBC Mortgage studios at the Star. I just

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>saw this tweet. This actually may have come out a

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>little earlier, but I just saw that Nick Sirianni, the

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>head coach of the Philadelphia Eagles, confirmed at Brandon Graham

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.239
<v Speaker 1>they're defensive end His season is over after suffering an

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>injury last week. We'll talk about that more tomorrow, but

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a really, really, really big thing of the Eagles.

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>With the Cowboys coming up, that's probably probably their best

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>defensive player, if not their best among their best defensive players,

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>definitely their best pass rusher. So that'll be huge for

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys especially Again, what do they say? Uh, what

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>do the kids say? Fletcher Cox has entered the chat?

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that what they say? Well, something like that. That's

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.239
<v Speaker 1>always gonna be a challenge, but you know, I mean,

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>what do you say he is our best defensive player?

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, good point, yeah, good point, good point. Um.

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that's something to keep an eye

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on as something note with the Cowboys, uh this week again,

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we would assume Terrence Still is going to be the

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>starter again this week, So that'll be a little interesting

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to see who they're gonna put out there. He'll face something.

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You gotta well, let's talk about Terrence Still real quick.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I know we're going back to defense, but but about

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. I mean, you know, the Cowboys aren't gonna

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>get credit for that, but if he does turn out

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to be, you know, a pretty good option here, good

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>good back up. You gotta give the Cowboys not only

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe Field been offensive line coach for working with him,

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>but also last year they stuck with them, and we

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>were all like, why why are they doing this? And

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.719
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have a lot of options, but they were

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>also building it for down the road, like let's just

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>keep working with him, working with him, and he looked

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like a guy that was a little bit more polished

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and not overwhelmed by the situation in the game. And

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I mean, they stuck with him last

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>year and I think for at least one game it

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>paid off. There's something to be said for them or

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>coaches seeing something in a player and saying Okay, this

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is a young guy. We see traits that we can develop,

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to develop them and then seeing that workout.

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't work all the time, but in this instance,

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you're right, it may end up being something that works

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>out for them. I'm not ready to say it's there yet.

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I am willing to say that last week he certainly

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>showed us more than he showed us last week last year,

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>which means he's getting better. I think Brandon Knight was

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>a better tackle last year, but early I think so.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think by the end of I know, but

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think just better. You know, he was

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a better tackle. He came in and did a better job.

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think he had more of a ceiling at tackle.

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Steele had a bigger ceiling. And they're like, we're

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go with it, go with it, even though

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got to go two steps back to

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of go forward, and we're getting ahead of ourselves

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. We'll see. I mean, he had, he

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>had a nice game. He's gonna have to keep doing

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it though. Yeah, I will say this. After we talked

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>about yesterday on the air, I went back and watched

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>some of that game on replay. Still can't get the

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>all twenty two yard, but I was able to watch

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>at least a little bit more of him, and one

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>thing I did notice. They did give him a lot

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of opportunities where he was out there by himself. But

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:34.959
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like a lot of those times where when

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>they were getting rid of the ball quick. There were

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a few times when he got beat, but they were

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>quick gott they were quick throws, so it didn't end

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>up hurting them. And they tended to give him help

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>when they wanted more, you know, plays that developed a

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>little would needed more time to develop. They tend to

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>give him a little more help. But overall, as I

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>watched him, there were some plays when I was really

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.239
<v Speaker 1>impressed with him. In the run game, he was there

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>was some plays he was like throwing guys around. Yeah,

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>he was playing some go football in the run game.

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So again, he's better than he was last year. And

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that's all you can ask from what players are you

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>getting better every week? And I think he is. I

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's I just think of it as two lines

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of conversation, and it's weird to think about now because

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it's ancient history. But in that five week stretch before

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Dak got hurt, I was like, y'all are being stubborn

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like Zach Martin might give you the best chance to

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>give Dak the best chance to win without these tackles.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And then once Dak got hurt, I was like, yeah,

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>I played the play the young guy who needs to develop,

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>who gives a damn like sorry Andy. So once it

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>got to that point, I was like, yeah, play him

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and get him all the experience he needs. But there

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>was a window where I was like, I'm not convinced

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>y'all are doing everything you can to help the quarterback.

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>But right now it has paid off because they got

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>all of that time to play him. If you know,

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>when Lyle does come back, they're probably going to be

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in the best situation that they've been in knock on

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>wood but for an off line in a while. When

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you think about Steele as the backup for both sides,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>and he's played a lot of games, Connor McGovern as

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a swing guard who also can play some center for you,

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>then he Brandon Knight, a guard who can play some tackle,

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not even thrown in in secky. I want

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to see kind of what happens with that and Farniak

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and all that, but you've got young experience that has

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>played and started in games. That's that's with flexibility, position

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>flex That was all through the summer. It was like,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>if Terrence Steele can make a year two leap, then

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna mean a lot for this offensive line. And

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's only one game, but it's a hell of an

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>encouraging game. It was absolutely all right. Let's move on

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to the defense. Dan Quinn talked to the media yesterday.

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>My question I came out of it with is and

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Nick I mentioned this to you. We were looking at

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>his stat line, Michael Parsons. He had one sack, he

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>had two tackles, he had four quarterback hits. Dave, you

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>said you saw it. I didn't see it on my

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>stat sheet, but you said you saw somebody credit him

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>with eight back pressure. Was pum That all being said,

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>like that stat line, if you just saw that stat

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 1>line for any defensive end in the NFL, you would

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>say he had a really good week. That being said,

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>my question for you is absent uh tank Lawrence? Is

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he the best pass rusher that this team has right now?

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember he did that on two days of practice.

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Two days of notice. Yeah, not ready to say that

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>until I've had more of a chance to see Randy Gregory. Okay, yeah,

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think I think he's going to be either

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>second or third best pass russure and then he doesn't

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>have to line up a defensive end to do that.

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's why I was careful, not defensive end,

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of course. I think I think he's a really good

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>pass pressure. We saw that. That's one thing that just

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>jumped off the tape in college is that these guys

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>couldn't block him, and competition is going to get better.

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>But they he just has a way of kind of

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, knifing through and around people. So and he

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>did that and he got better as the game went

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on and figured that out, and the competition will get

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>better too. But um, we talk eight pressures, that's what

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they said, we I mean sounds about right, especially a

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>lot is d Law. I mean at the end of

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the season forty five pressures. Is was like really good

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>forty five season. So I don't know good at man.

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they do on on bolt Talk

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Weekly or whatever they call it. Boat. I'm taking week

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and taking talk joke talking bolts talking Bolts. I bet

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>they'll bring in with the Bolts. I bet they'll be

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about Storm Norton. Sounds good. I bet they'll be

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about Storm Norton the way we talk about Chaz

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Green for a while. If I had to get wow,

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know, he didn't give up seven he

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>annihilated him. I know. I mean he didn't give up.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>He didn't give up six sacks. But I mean Micah

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Parsons wrecked the Chargers game plan in the second half.

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean Storm, he just you're still thinking of talk

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>show names because his name with a storm Oh got it? Sorry? Sorry,

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>um storm on the on the Charges, like that's actually

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a great name to fit for the team. He might

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>not be there that much longer. One, I mean one

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>stand Quinn was his deal. I don't know, you don't

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>know anythbody. I think he's like a veteran guy that's

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>like just kind of filling in for a hurt guy.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who he is. But Mica, once they

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>gave up on trying to rush him against Rashawn S later,

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he just all it wasn't as bad as

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>chat screen. That's that's not anyone who different level, but

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>he I mean he was in the backfield every other snap,

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>it really was, and they definitely got away withholding them

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>two or three times. They're gonna be good. They're gonna

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.479
<v Speaker 1>be good if Blagger comes back and slows that down

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>because Keenan Allen and Mike Williams and and of course

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook like Cowboy fans were tired of seeing that

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>guy like Jared Cook likes so everywhere. Yeah, okay, he

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>goes to different teams and still teams that the Cowboys

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 1>are playing. Yeah, big games, Yeah all right, um uh Parsons, Yeah, Parsons.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we are talking about No, I mean I

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>thought I was going back to Okay, yeah, we're back

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to Parsons, but but actually I wanted to move on

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>from Parsons. Dallas right now is twenty eight in sacks,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty ninth and pressures the How can they get more

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>pressure than what they've gotten to this point, because obviously

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about that stat line for Parsons, but really

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you look across the other guys that are rushing the pass,

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they're getting enough pressure. Now we

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.719
<v Speaker 1>know a week one you're playing a quarterback to get

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>rid of the ball extremely quickly. Do you think it's

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>just who they face to this point or do you

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's like this is a problem they got to

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to get more pressure. I mean it's

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of both. Yeah, they I mean these

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>have both been matchups where you're gonna be hard pressed.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Bread he gets rid of the ball super quickly. And

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, justin Herbert, they might have sacked him six

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>times if he wasn't such a freak. And I don't,

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>like he's not in he's not sneaky athletic like the

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>classic euphemism for a white quarterback, like he is athletic.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>He is huge and fast and can get away from pressure.

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I mean. That's what made MICA's sacks

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>so impressive was that he still got to him. So,

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a hard guy to get on the ground.

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Probably not gonna get a lot easier week three, by

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, hurts Um And then and then you, I

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>mean you don't you didn't have either of your best guys.

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>That's maybe it's a homer answer, but I'm just like, well,

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>how much do you want him to do without either

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of the big guys that they expected to rush the

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>passer this season. You know, I mean, right now, you say,

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>who are the two best quarterbacks they faced? I mean,

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously they faced two Brady and Herbert. In six weeks,

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that's still going to be the answer. You know, the

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>best receivers they faced are Mike Evans and Keenan Allen

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>and Godwin and Antonio Brown, and in six weeks, the

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>best receivers they're gonna face are probably gonna be those guys,

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe a Kenny Galladay if he can calm down.

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>When I love how Kenny Galladays. I wasn't yelling at

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones, yelling at Garrett. I was like, oh, okay, um,

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>but I mean I don't think I've ever heard of

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a player come out and say no. I wasn't yelling no,

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>not you him at the coach. I was yelling, and

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody was like, oh, yeah, that makes sense. Okay. I

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>would yell at Jason Garrett. Yeah. Um. But I mean

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they face some really good play. I mean, I'm not

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>saying the Eagles don't have town because because Hurts is

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of beast. I mean, he's he's running back.

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He can be a check and throw, and he can

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>throw I'm not saying he's not in a quarterback because

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the eighty yard passed the Daniel Um Deshaun Jackson last year,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I was like, everybody was like, oh, oh, he's last game,

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't he he can sing? I think somebody told I

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think I read somewhere he had like a sixty or

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:30.959
<v Speaker 1>seventy yard passed this last It was like they say,

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that was probably the only great play they had. But

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a lot like da To me, he really is

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this the the you know, the trajectory of his career.

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very similar. You know you're gonna have

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have doubters, but you're like, you know what,

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>he just kind of goes in and does well in games.

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Can figure it out, and he'll figure it out. And

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, if he figures it out before the coordinators

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>figure him out, then you know, I think, I think

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be a really good player. It could be

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a problem for this team because I still think they

0:29:57.920 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>face the best receivers and quarterbacks they're gonna face in

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the first month or two. To get back to your

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question, which is something that I think

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about and I wonder if Dan Quinnell change it. They

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>have not blitzed much yet, and as impressive as Micah

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>looked as an edge rusher, I'm look, I look at

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that closing speed and i'mlike, this guy send him through

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the a gap and even a guy like Jalen Hurts

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>he might have the closing speed to get to him.

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's that is an element that I want to

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>see and it's why I you know, people are talking

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about moving him to end and I'm not about it

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.959
<v Speaker 1>at all, especially in a matchup against better tackles than

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>what the Chargers had out there on the right side.

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Not saying he shouldn't do it at all, he absolutely should.

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's the fun of a guy like this. He

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>should be doing a little bit of everything. And he

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>keeps answering the bell, So just keep putting more on

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>his plate. If he if he's if he shows that

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>he can handle it, why stop. You know, I want

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to see, you know, with a guy like Brady,

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you know you're not going to really confuse him, you know,

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but he's seen it all, but he sees it in

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>his sleep. But you know, these guys coming up here

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and even Herbert, you know, confuse him a little bit.

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>They confused him. If you go back and watch some

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of those, they did a nice job of kind of

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>showing Blitz backing off he was. He was kind of

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>making the wrong read wrong decision there. So I want

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to put Parsons up the middle on the a gap.

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to put him at the end. I want

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to I want I want Hurts looking for him, Daniel

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Mac Jones and Darnald you know who's coming

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>up here. I mean, he's sort of a veteran. But

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying it. Just show Parsons at all spots

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and whatever point they can have one of these dominant

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>or both of these dominant. We well, the most dominant

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>pass rushers that the Cowboys have a defensive and once

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they get those guys back, and now teams start looking

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>for Parsons and he lines up on one side and

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they slide protection to that side, and now you've got

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that frees up a guy on the other side to

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>now have a one on one. That's where you really

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>start hitting. That's what it meansporunity to call him a

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>queen on the chess. Yeah, exactly. People that just want

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to rook. Sorry, Wow, that's good No, that was which

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>actually I was about to I was about to call

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>him a rook, not in the punnyway. I was like,

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>if you just want to move him to end, you're

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>just creating a rook. You're just a guy that goes

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>straight to the quarterback, which he's good at. But you

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>want him to be as three dimensional as possible. Wow.

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't get over that. No, but that's but that's

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the point, Like, he's too good and too versatile for

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you to just put him at defensive end, right, you

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>really want to put him everywhere, and you want to

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>make defenses have to account for the fact that he

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can line up anywhere and they're gonna have to count

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>for him and wherever he lines up. That's just one

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>more thing they got to prepare for, one more thing

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>they got to do. Every time he kind of line

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of scrimmag just figure out where he is and try

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to adjust that. All right, we're gonna take our final break.

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we'll talk some about the special teams.

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>John Fossil had something to say yesterday about that decision

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to try to go and get that punt. We'll tell

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you what he had to say. And we want to

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>get some opinions from you guys. It will tell you

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>what Jerry Jones said about it as well. Today awesome

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. Hi, I'm Clint Tullison with you United aggin Turf.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Before you can park yourself in front of the game,

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>park yourself in a John Dear and power through your chores.

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Our land Run package is a ten twenty five R

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five horsepower tractor with a loader, rotary cutter and

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a box blade for two twenty nine a month. And

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the price you see is the price you'll pay. No surprises,

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>so don't miss another kickoff. Visit United Agginturf dot Com.

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Offer ins February first, twenty twenty one. Restrictions aplenty see

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>dealer for details. Now let's get to work, Honey, big news, Gary?

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Are you okay? Oh? I'm not Gary anymore. I'm Jackie Flash.

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>What see? I want the latest smartphone, but the best

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>deals are only for new customers. So to get a

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>new customer deal, I change my name to Jackie Flash. Okay,

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but the best smartphone deals at AT and T are

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for everyone new and existing customers. That's huge, then, guess

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>who's getting a deal. Is it Jackie Flash, Jackie Flash,

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not complicated at at and t our. Best smartphone

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>deals are for everyone. Friction supply, is it att dot

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>com for details New Doctor Pepper zero sugar. You deserve it.

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I do deserve that. You deserve decadent flavor without sugar,

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and a day at the beach without sand getting everywhere,

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and a relaxing bath that your children don't interrupt. I

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>deserve all that. It's least a visual metaphor for doctor

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Pepper zero sugar. Everything you want, nothing you don't. A

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>visual metaphor on the radio. I do deserve that, Doctor Pepper,

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>zero sugar, the zero you deserve is finally here. Before

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>there was a draft, you could size up a cowboy

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>by three simple factors, the crease in his hat, the

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>bend of his brim, and his unbending attitude a man.

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Stetson didn't just protect him from what life through at him.

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>It projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American,

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>made with pride. Right here in Texas. There's still the

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>unofficial crown of all self respecting cowboys, and Stetson is

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team find

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a retailer nearest you att dot com slash Cowboys Back

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to the Break. Football season is definitely here. That means

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>it's time for some new gear. It rhymed. Just head

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to the pro Shop your official story Cowboys Nation scored

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 1>some classics like your favorite player, Jersey's teas and hats,

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>plus exclusive exclusive collections and the unique successive exclusive Visit

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 1>your local Dallas Cowboys pro shop are online shop Dallas

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot com. Welcome back to the second the final

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>segment of the Break Life from SWBC Mortgage Studios at

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the Star. We are talking about the coordinators they met

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>with the media yesterday. We gotta talk about special teams.

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>John Fossil said something in his press conference yesterday that

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>made me raise my eyebrows, and I'm sure probably did

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people out there. When asked about

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the decision to what their decision was as far as

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a situation where the Cowboys went and got called for

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>roughing the kicker on a punt, his response was, and

0:35:57.760 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll read it, and this was the quote he says,

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Cowboys fans aren't the play it safe type.

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I was going to give them what they wanted. Hope

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>they are happy. They're not. They're not. But let's Leo

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on just to be I kind of want to take

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it back first and and explain, like what happened on

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that play? What did he say happen? What was the decision,

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and how did they get to that point of even

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>having guys that end up in rolling into the punter.

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it goes way back. But before that, this

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>guy wants to be involved with everything. Okay, he does not,

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>This isn't the third phase of it. He wants to

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>be involved. Let's look at him at training camp. He's

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>got the referee shirt on, he's got the whistle, he's

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's got a mike. He's yelling. He wants

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to be aggressive. Let's fake punts and all that stuff.

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>He can't just sit there and just and just let

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the game go to him. He's trying to dictate the game.

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think Mike McCarthy they give him a little

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.399
<v Speaker 1>too much, too much leeway on it. There's no reason

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to rush the punt right there. Yes, you could block it,

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>but the way Dak and them are moving the ball,

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>they can move the ball. Don't take the ball out

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>of Dack's hands. He's the best player on the team

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. So that that was just like Dave said yesterday,

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>risk reward, it's not there. Did they did? They kind

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of block him into it maybe, but that's not a

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>reviewable play. You know, Dave said all this yesterday, and

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree that that ref is looking. Does the punter?

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Does the punter get hurt? Does he get hit a

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 1>b does he go to the ground. Yes, Wow, that's

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>fifteen yards, no doubt about it. It's all they care about.

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the same And if you if a guy comes

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near a quarterback below the knee there, the same

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 1>flag is gonna fly regardless neck and guess what, you

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>can get thrown into the quarterback by his offensive tackle

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and the refs don't care, and they're going to they'll

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>block a punt this year. They'll block a punt you think, so, yeah,

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>probably haven't done it in years. They won't. I mean

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>if they're if they're rushing like this, I mean they

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>probably will. They'll block one. But is it? Is it

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be worth it at the end of the day, Like,

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is it? And I'm I'm glad you mentioned that, and

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I brought it up yesterday. Week one, Pittsburgh did block

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>upon it was a game changing block. They scored a

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdown off the scoop and score helped them upset the Bills.

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh's offense sucked in that game. They could not move

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Big Ben looks washed as hell. You know

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>who looks great? Kak and the Cowboys offense. You know what,

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have the ball at the twenty or twenty five.

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. Do you remember where CD Fair caught

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it before it got moved back. I want to say

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it was like around the ten or fifteen, but I

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know which. It might be wrong. It's a long field.

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. They had already scored fourteen points. By

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the way it's it's I think at that point they

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 1>were going to be down like two minutes left. They

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>had a minute fifty three to play, and they would

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have had two timeouts to work with. So probably you're

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>getting you're getting a field, but you're getting points, or

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not giving them the ball back one of the two.

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But either way, nothing bad comes from net right, And

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that was just John Fossil's way

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>of kind of being funny about like, well, I thought,

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.800
<v Speaker 1>y'all want us to be aggressive, and I do. I

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>want you to be aggressive, but not reckless. And I

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>think that was reckless. Well, let me ask you this

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 1>because I think it even goes back to last year.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>There was some decisions that were made and a lot

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of decisions. Baking a punt on your own twenty in

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a Thanksgiving game that you're still in on fourth and

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>ten not even that's reckless, right going for you know

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>what we haven't mentioned one fricking time was when they

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>went for it on fourth down in the first half.

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 1>What I'm looking at that right now, ye turnover on

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:23.760
<v Speaker 1>fourth and five on the other side of the field,

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:27.399
<v Speaker 1>that's aggressive. Doing it on your own twenty is reckless. Well.

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Also also if you're gonna go for it, See, I

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:32.439
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't think that the special teams and this team.

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think special teams has to be aggressive at all.

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>You do not have to be aggressive. You don't really

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>have to run a lot of fake punts unless you

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely see something that will work, go for it.

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>But the Chris Jones passed to C. J. Goodwin on

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fourth and five that they threw it down and he

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>dropped it. While your punter is throwing to a cornerback

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>who can't get on the field as a cornerback, why

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>don't we just let Dak throw it to Amari? Different

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>coverage probably, but I'll take my chances now that fourth

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and five, I hated that because he ran a fourteen

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>yard when the guy was off of them. Get to

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the sticks seven yards stop. That's pitching catch all day.

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>They ran a fourteen yard route and it went low.

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>That didn't make sense to me. But either way, I

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't think this is a team that needs to

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:12.800
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive because if you want to really go for

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.879
<v Speaker 1>it on fourth down, get your pro Bowl quarterback throwing

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to your Pro Bowl receiver with pro Bowl blockers in front,

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>not you know who's the punter anger throwing it to

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Goodwin with you know, Drill Cox blocking up front. I'm

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>not all the way I agree with you for the

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.479
<v Speaker 1>most part, but I do. I kind of like knowing

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that that's in their bag of tricks, and we know

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for a fact that teams are going to change the

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>way they play the Cowboys because of Fossil's reputation. I

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.720
<v Speaker 1>think that gives you something and they'll steal a possession

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even score points because of that. At some point, punters,

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 1>punters want to play for him because because their net

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>average is going to be outstanding, because everyone's worried about

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a fake, so they just put it up. I mean,

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the fake against Pittsburgh last year was incredible, and that's

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that was fun and I like knowing that that has

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the potential to happen on any given Sunday. But I

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>just this, I don't think this was the time for

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that call. Yeah, I agree with you, Dave, when it

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to the whole nature of it being you know,

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>reckless versus something that that's just aggressive. I like aggressive

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>mindset because I do think there will create you'll create

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for yourself and if nothing else that, you know,

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you give a team that much more that they have

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>to prepare for on a given week, and you only

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>got so much time in the week. So if you

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>give them a little extra that they got to deal with,

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>what else are they neglecting to spend time on in

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>order to make sure they spend time on that? So

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I do like that. Yeah, I just think there are

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>times when the timing just not right. It opens up

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>another discussion but but to me, fifteen, your appenalties that

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>are automatic first downs need to be reviewed in my opinion,

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and a play like that needs to be reviewed because

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that is a turnover really and you know, I'm not

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 1>saying it was probably wouldn't have changed, but it's such

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a bang bang play that if a guy gets blocked

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 1>into you know, and you could kind of block him

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 1>into the guy, and if that happens, they need they

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 1>need to review that. I don't know if they want to,

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just saying I have no faith that they

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>would have overturned it anything. I don't think so either

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in that case, but I do think that there's some

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>times where it kind of gets a little muddy in

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.320
<v Speaker 1>there like that and then yeah, so I mean, and

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a turnover. That's what makes it so risky

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is again the Cowboys didn't technically do anything wrong, but

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the refs don't care. They saw the punter fly up

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in the air and the ground and protecting him. You know,

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot worse, you know, where the foot

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come down all the way, it just kind of

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>hits a player like in a back not not he

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't even go to the ground. It's just his foot

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>can't come down and they call that as a fifteen

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 1>yard penalty. Another thing that was interesting to me on

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this topic. Fossil said that it was his call. He

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>makes a decision when he wants to try those kinds

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of things. My question for you guys is should it

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>be is this when you're the head coach and you

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.800
<v Speaker 1>know you've got a special teams coordinator that tends to

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive and can do it a lot of different

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>points in a game, is it a better situation for

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the coach to be the one either making those calls

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:08.799
<v Speaker 1>or making sure he has to check with him before

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>making those calls if he's having If the head coach

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>responsible for managing the entire game and you're trying to

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>play complimentary football, I love the idea that the coordinator

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 1>makes the call, the head coach should have a final

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>say over whether it should happen. I mean, it's Mike

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy's job to manage the ebbs and flows at the

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:27.879
<v Speaker 1>end at the end of the day, So I don't

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>expect Mike McCarthy to say, I like this, look, this

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is where this is a good spot for this, Like

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 1>that's John fossil's job to know the ins and outs

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 1>of what their coverage looks like and stuff like that.

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:40.879
<v Speaker 1>But he should click in and be like, hey, Mike,

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're thinking. What do you think? And

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike's like yes or no if he's making that call,

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and the head coach is just as surprised as the

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>rest of us about what happened. No, I don't like

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that at all. Did you get that impression, because that's

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the impression I got from the way he was talking,

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:55.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, I just make the call. It's almost like

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.399
<v Speaker 1>you call in an offensive player or a defensive play

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>from the offense or defensive coordinator, and you don't necessarily

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>check with the which on every call. And it makes

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:04.280
<v Speaker 1>seem like he just makes this call by himself without

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 1>really and I don't Again, I don't know if that's

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the truth. That's just the way the impression I got.

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>The head coach gets on there for everything and says, hey,

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>let's yeah. I mean, it all happens in his ear,

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so I would remember. But the head coach can get

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in there and say, hey, let's let's back off here,

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>let's let's get a safe return, you know, let's let's

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:22.320
<v Speaker 1>be smart here, but you know you're also thinking too, like,

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:24.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the difference between maybe going to get a

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in a field goal. You know, because you get

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the ball to your fifteen yard line, you're probably gonna

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>get and arranged for a field goal. You get a

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:33.480
<v Speaker 1>punt block there, and even if you just recover it

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:35.800
<v Speaker 1>right there. Now you're thinking, let's go get a touchdown.

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.279
<v Speaker 1>The problem is you got a penalty. Is should have

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:41.760
<v Speaker 1>been a six points swing, three points off the board

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for you, three points for them, but they missed the

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>field goal. Yeah, so because of the Fossil's great defensive block.

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, here I got another issue with Fossil too,

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and somebody pointed there another thing, another thing. Okay, this

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>aggressive guy wants to be aggressive. Do you know how

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>many guys rushed the kicker for the Buccaneers game winning

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>field goal? Uh? Six? Six out of the eleven. The

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:04.840
<v Speaker 1>other five were kind of they pulled back at the

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>last second. Jalen Smith's back there. Obviously obviously the Bucks

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>are gonna run a fake there with two seconds to go,

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>so they could, you know, instead of winning by three,

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they want to win. What I mean, why aren't we

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>sending eleven. Why aren't we sending eleven? And if we

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>rough the kick, we rough the kicker. That's one I

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>don't understand. I thought we were super aggressive here trying

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to block of kick and win the game. That is,

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>if if there's a scenario where murdering the kicker is okay,

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that's that go for. What's the worst is gonna happen? Right, Well,

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>he misses and then you get another fifteen and all that.

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:38.439
<v Speaker 1>But if you, like you said, then let's have a shot.

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:40.439
<v Speaker 1>You don't have a kicker at this point. Your kicker's gone.

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:42.879
<v Speaker 1>We took care of that. Everyone has that backup heath

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>like a backup. It's right. I wonder who the backup

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>kicker for the Cowboys, well, because it would be probably anger.

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>But then you have a holder. Cedric Wilson. He does

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>everything else, parsons thing interesting. Probably throw him out there,

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:58.320
<v Speaker 1>let him do everything interesting. I don't see why not

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't done. I'm about don't think they found anything yet.

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>He can't do, so keep giving him. I don't know,

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe I don't know. Possible. All right,

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>let's got a phone call. We got a call from

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt in Jersey, Matt, what up, what's going on? Break? Hey? Yeah,

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.839
<v Speaker 1>good good had a great victory Monday. Um, you really

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>got on a vossil topic. I was gonna say because

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I am a fan and it's not what I want

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to see. I mean, kind of cute like aggressive call

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>gives them, I like your point topics, gives other teams

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 1>something to look at down in the year. But but

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>are these coaches a little bit surprised in the way

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this defense is playing from last year? They're not. I

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they saw on camp, but what I'm

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing he's in the next in the in these first

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>two weeks is a really really kind of a solid defense.

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, three and out right there, we got a

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:58.400
<v Speaker 1>couple three and outs, we got an interception earlier, we

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>got another late interception. I'm just saying, why would you

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>even attempt when the offense was rolling? I just can

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you tell me to score at that particular time of

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the of the game? Was it fourteen three? It was

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteen eleven exactly, We're getting the ball back to take

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>more time off the clock. Out of a To be honest,

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Herbert is going to take over the control of the league. Um,

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>so honestly, we're taking the ball out of a really

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:32.399
<v Speaker 1>good pastor's hand and putting it into our good pastor's hand,

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:36.839
<v Speaker 1>and to call that play right there is dan Quinn

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a little upset that his defense got a three and

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>out and then it has to come right back on

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the field. All right, thanks for probably good question. I'm

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 1>sure you're not going to tell us that anyway. Yeah,

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sure it's not like, oh, all right,

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>let's go do it again. Guys, let's go get back

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>out there. We just did our job. We'll have to

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 1>do it again. Well, let me say they did. Let

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 1>me ask you this question, though, and I don't I

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 1>don't think nothing that he said suggests that he had

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:02.240
<v Speaker 1>this much thought was put into it. But let's assume

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>for a second. Could it have been a situation where

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they trust the defense enough to say, if something this

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is worth the risk, because if something does go bad,

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this defense can stiffen up, especially they can

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 1>stiffen up when it comes to not allowing a touchdown.

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So the risk is worth the possible reward. No, No,

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a six point swing because they roughed him into

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>field goal range. I mean, you gotta expected and McCarthy.

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>If he thinks his kicker could make a sixty yard

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>kick in the middle of the Tampa game, then he

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.280
<v Speaker 1>probably thinks that the Chargers guy's gonna make a forty

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>five yard or you know, you have to assume that

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 1>stiffening up is I mean, yeah, once the penalty is assessed,

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they're on the Dallas thirty nine. Theyde five yards to

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>be in make and I guess, but that would be

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the calculation is wrong calculation. No, hold on, let me

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:52.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you the calculation. The calculation is worst case scenario,

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>our defense will hold him from getting a touchdown. So

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the risk here is that we give them three points.

0:48:57.880 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>The reward would be we could possibly a touchdowns. You

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:02.799
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, you get a block. Now you're in position

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>where you can actually get a touchdown. You don't have

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to just get a field goal. So that's where I

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:07.919
<v Speaker 1>think the calculation can come. And by the way, I'm

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:09.839
<v Speaker 1>not saying this is what happened, because nothing that John

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Fossil said suggests that he did that kind of calculation

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in his head. I'm just saying, would that have been

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a calculation and made all of us feel better about

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the decision. If that's the way they thought about it.

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I just wanna maybe I'm giving Dakota too much credit.

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Screw a field goal minute fifty three with two time outs.

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:29.240
<v Speaker 1>You can get an enzone getting the end zone easy.

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>So no, And then I thought the caller he didn't

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 1>directly say this, but he brought up a point that

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is worth remembering as well. The Chargers were

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>getting the ball after halftime, so you're risking and low

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and behold, that's exactly what happened. You're like, if we

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>mess this up, we're not touching the ball again. And

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>then they get the ball at the start of the

0:49:48.040 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 1>third quarter. I just I don't think there's a way

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to swing it as the right thing to do. And

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Chargers never led in the game, right, I don't think

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:57.920
<v Speaker 1>they know they did not. I think they got They

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:00.760
<v Speaker 1>got ahead on the scoreboard for a second when they scored,

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and then they took it off the board. Yeah. No,

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:05.800
<v Speaker 1>they took the lead a couple of times for twenty seconds,

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and then the ref said no. But no, they never

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:11.759
<v Speaker 1>never officially had the lead. All right, let's get a

0:50:11.800 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 1>call from Devin in Pennsylvania. Devin, what up? We lost? Devin?

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>All right? Um, you know, actually, I think that's gonna

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>be a rap for us. We were gonna get a

0:50:22.960 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of calls, but I think that's a rap. We

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 1>will be back on tomorrow. We're gonna do some We're

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna score car start getting you guys ready for Cowboys

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 1>versus Eagles. We'll talk tomorrow about Philadelphia offense versus Dallas defense.

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 1>To then for Nick Eatman, Dave Helmet. I'm Derek Eagleton.

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>This has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

0:50:46.280 --> 0:50:48.919
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.