WEBVTT - Tech News: Mt. Kilimanjaro Gets WiFi

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio. And

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>how the tech are you. It's time for the tech

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>news for Thursday, August twenty two. Here in the United States,

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we are headed toward another election. This one is a

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>mid term election. That means that the president is not

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>up for re election, but a lot of folks in

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Congress and in local positions around the US are It

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>also means that there is a heightened concern about the

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>spread of misinformation online. And you know, that's been an

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>issue for years, but it really came under the spotlight

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in and it has stayed in the spotlight ever since,

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>hogging center stage. Now to that end, in twenty twenty, Facebook,

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the platform and actually the company itself, because the company

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>had not yet changed its name to Meta in anyway,

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 1>it took the significant step of banning new political ads

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>from being published in the week leading up to the election.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Now Meta is going to do the same thing for

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the US mid terms this year. And if you listened

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to Tuesday's episode this week, you know that there was

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a watchdog group that called out Meta for failing to

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>follow its own content moderation policies on Facebook. In Brazil,

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the group had submitted several ads purposefully containing misinformation within them,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook accepted all of those ads. Now, it's true

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that in English speaking countries, Facebook's content moderation is, you know,

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>slightly less incompetent. But rather than deal with the flood

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of possible attack ads and misinformation campaigns, Facebook is gonna

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>wash its hands of the whole business, at least for

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the week leading up to the election itself. It remains

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to be seen if Facebook will copy exactly what it

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>did in because while the plan was just to have

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a temporary band that lasted a week, Facebook actually kept

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that ban on political ads in place all the way

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.959
<v Speaker 1>for six months. Pretty sure that's not gonna happen this year,

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>but maybe it will. TikTok is taking a similar approach

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to political content. Now, the company has

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a band that restricts influencers from posting paid political content.

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty much been the case from day one. The

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>company has never accepted political ads. But it does start

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to get tricky when you understand that TikTok influencers aren't

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>necessarily looking to TikTok as their payday. They take sponsorship

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>deals instead. And one of these days I really need

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to do a full episode on how various influencers make

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>their money, because it varies from platform to platform, and

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it's never as straightforward as you might imagine. Anyway, TikTok

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't banning political content outright. You can still post a

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>video where you express your political beliefs or where you

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>critique a politician or policy or whatever, so long as

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>you don't break the other rules. For instance, if your

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>video spreads misinformation, or it's meant to incite violence, or

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that you were paid to put that

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>specific viewpoint up online, all of that is right out.

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>The video is likely going to get deleted or at

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>least heavily restricted, and there's a chance that the account holder,

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the person who made the video, might find themselves without

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>an account before too long. TikTok says it will make

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>available information to creators so that they understand the rules.

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's making sure that people know what they're

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>getting into, especially people who might be new to TikTok,

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know they're they're taking sponsorship deals maybe they

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't aware of the ban on political content when it

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>comes to sponsorship and paid content. I don't know if

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the steps that Facebook and TikTok are taking are going

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to have a significant impact on the spread of misinformation online.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I do think they are steps in the right direction,

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but I imagine that all this really will do is

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>make those who are are determined to spread misinformation to

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>just find new ways to do it. Amazon is reportedly

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>testing a short form video feature in its app that's

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of similar to TikTok. That's how I'm seeing it reported,

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>though I I don't. I don't draw it as close

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.239
<v Speaker 1>a connection as others do. So instead of it being

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a platform for dances and pranks and sketches and dubious

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>life hacks and that kind of thing the way TikTok is,

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's version is meant to let users post short videos detailing,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a review or a demonstration of a

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>product that's found on Amazon's store. So let's say you

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>pop onto Amazon in order to buy yourself a brand

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>new sewing machine, and when it arrives, maybe you shoot

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a quick unboxing video, or maybe you show how to

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>set it up for its first use, particularly if the

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>one you butt has poor and auctions. I've had that

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>happen with stuff I've bought, where you know, I spent

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>way more time trying to figure out how to just

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>set it up than necessary because the instructions were terrible.

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe you shoot a video to demonstrate how the

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>device works as you actually finish a project on it.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the kind of stuff that Amazon is looking into.

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>The feature right now is called Inspire, and Amazon is

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>testing it out, but there's no guarantee that the company

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>will actually integrate it into the app for everyone and

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>roll it out. It might be that tests show that

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>users aren't crazy about it or just never use it,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>but it is interesting to see how other big companies

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are testing the waters and trying to tap into the

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>appeal of TikTok like presentations. Tech Crunch has made available

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>a tool designed to see if your Android device is

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>listed on a database indicating that spyware is installed on

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that device. All right, I'm going to back up a

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So earlier this year, tech Crunch received a

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>large amount of data that came from US spyware groups

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>internal servers, and the information contains a list of all

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the Android devices that have been infected by the Truth

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Spy spyware and its network of spyware that includes other

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of other spyware apps, tons of them. And these

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>apps sit quietly on Android phones and they do stuff

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>like log activity and track the device. And obviously there

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of nefarious reasons someone might be using spyware.

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of any like legit reasons for using it,

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>but there are a lot of bad ones. And one

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>uh that tech Crunch pointed out that is particularly scary

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and of real concern is that a stalker might attempt

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to infect a target's phone with spywear in order to

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>keep tabs on that target. That is terrifying, y'all, and

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's all too real. We have seen instances of this.

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it not just with things like apps and

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and using spywear, We've seen it with using things like

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>air tags. Right. So tech Crunch has now create a

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 1>tool that makes it possible for Android device owners to

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>check and see if their own device shows up in

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that list that tech Crunch received, which led up to

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>all the devices that had been infected by these various

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>kinds of spyware up to June of two. So the

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>tool is located at tech crunch dot com slash pages

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Slash the Truth Spy Dash Investigation. Now, if you go

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>there and you want to check on your device to

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure it's not in this list, there will be

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a few steps you have to take, but the page

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>actually walks you through all of that. So I suggest

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>if you have an Android device that you go through

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the trouble of doing this, particularly if you suspect that

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>there could be spyware on your device. Now, if you

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>find that your device is a match in that system,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>which I would say is kind of a worst case scenario,

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the page also has links to guide you through the

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>steps of removing spywear from your device. Now that crunch

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>does issue a warning that I want to repeat. If

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you think that someone is using your device to spy

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>on you and you're in a stalker situation, you need

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to be very careful moving forward because removing the spyware

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is likely to alert whomever put it on your device

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.559
<v Speaker 1>that you're onto them and that you're doing this. So

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>just things to keep in mind to try and remain safe.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And this is also a reminder that you should always

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be careful with your devices. I'm not victim blaming here,

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>because it is not always possible to avoid getting hit

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>by stuff like this. We have seen really, really inventive

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>attacks where the target of the attack had had little

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to no chance of avoiding it. So this is not blaming,

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but just saying that taking precautions and following best practices

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to browsing on your device or downloading

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and installing apps, you know, doing your homework to make

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>sure you're being as or full as you can be,

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that can really improve your chances of staying safe. But again,

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>no shade thrown on people who are affected by this stuff.

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>It can be easy to fall victim to it, and sometimes,

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>like I said, unavoidable. Reuter's reports that major financial institutions

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 1>like banks are cracking down on the types of messaging

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and communication apps that employees are allowed to use while

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>they conduct business. And here's the thing. I often bristle

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>at the thought of a company, organization, or boss restricting

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>what employees can do and how they do it, and

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in this instance actually have to side with the organizations. See,

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>these financial institutions are responsible for moving huge amounts of

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>money around. Moreover, they are often responsible for transactions that

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>can indicate massive important things going on in business that

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>might not yet be public knowledge, and that opens up

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for stuff like insider trading or just getting head

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>start on everybody else on something. And because of that,

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the financial industry traditionally keeps a very close watch on

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>employee activities in order to remain compliant, so failing to

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>do so could bring regulators down on the financial institution

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with hefty fines to follow. Should it turn out that

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a lack of supervision led to employees of using their

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>position and knowledge and breaking rules, then enter the pandemic. Suddenly,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>these institutions needed to pivot, just like everybody else did,

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>so that their employees could work remotely and business would

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>not be disrupted, and some employees began using all sorts

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of different services to communicate with their clients. Some of

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>those services include features meant to ensure secure in private communications.

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not a bad thing. Secure and private communications are

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a good thing in most cases. I'm talking about stuff

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like end to end encryption or the communications services that

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>don't keep a log of past communication sations so there's

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>not a record. But that is a legal nightmare for

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>financial companies. They need to be able to present these

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>communications in the wake of an investigation. They need to

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to know what happened, who knew about it,

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>who were who was making decisions. And if you have

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of communications channels that aren't keeping track of

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, you have no proof and you're not compliant.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So right now, financial institutions around the world are one

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>they're setting aside large amounts of money to pay incoming

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>fines because of these types of communications that are going on.

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So the companies they're there's they're not even saying it's

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>not our fault. They're saying, yeah, we're saying aside money

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>because we know that these are violations. And meanwhile, they're

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to require employees to only use tools that can

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>record an archive communications in order to meet compliance with

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>various laws. So this is an interesting example of a

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>scenario where the very features I usually think of as

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>being important for personal communication are ones that are absolutely

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate it for this particular use case. All right, we've

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>got some more news items to go over, but before

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>we do that, let's take a quick break. We're back

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in Saudi Arabia. The courts have sentenced a woman named

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Salma al Shahab to thirty four years in prison. So

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what was Salma's crime, Well, she had been retweeting activists

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>who were calling for women's rights in Saudi Arabia and

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>for the release of certain political prisoners within the country.

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Salma had been attending university in the UK in pursuit

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of a PhD, and upon returning to Saudi Arabia for

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 1>a vacation, she was detained and arrested, then tried and

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>convicted on charges that she was aiming to quote disturb

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>public order and destabilize the security and stability of the

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>state end quote. This is absolutely horrifying, and to test

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a full stop on top of that, the Saudi regime

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>owns a significant chunk of Twitter itself through what is

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>called the Public Investment Fund. That's an interesting name for

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a fund that represents sovereign wealth and not you know,

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>public wealth. So this puts Twitter in an awkward position

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to write because this is the platform where the supposed

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>infraction happen. And meanwhile, the entity that has has incarcerated

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 1>this woman has ownership partial ownership of that platform. Not great.

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I am not sure what if anything can be done

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.719
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of Salma, who clearly doesn't deserve being imprisoned

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>at all, let alone for thirty or four years for

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>just retweeting social messages on Twitter. In India, government officials

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>are considering rules that would require Apple to abandon its

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>proprietary charging ports on devices like air pods and iPhones

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and switched to the Universal Standard of SBC. Now should

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>these officials decide that, Apple might have to make the

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>switch as early as four in India. This follows a

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>similar decision that we talked about in a previous text,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff that happened in the European Union, which also seeks

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to simplify the market and to make it easier for

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>consumers to swap out charging chords without worrying if this

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>cord matches that device or not. I suspect Apple will

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>migrate to USBC for those devices, at least for certain models. Uh,

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>It's aready done so for things like Mac computers, and

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>largely I think this is going to happen because while

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple was once primarily known as a hardware company during

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the Steve Jobs era, now we're in the Tim Cook era,

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and Apple has been repositioning itself to be more of

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a services company. I think Cook is less resistant to

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>conforming to industry standards than Jobs was. Jobs was kind

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of like my way or no way at all, and

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook is more like, let's do whatever it takes

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in or to continue to be able to provide services.

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg reports that the upcoming AD supported tier of Netflix

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>might have a few other restrictions for subscribers. The company

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>had announced plans to introduce a lower cost AD supported

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>tier in an effort to gain back some of the

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>subscribers it has previously lost and presumably put the company

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>back on track for growth, but we don't yet know

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the subscription price for that AD supported tier anyway, Bloomberg

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>reports that Netflix might turn off a feature that current

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>subscribers have, that being the ability to download content to

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>mobile devices in order to be able to watch that

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>content offline, for example, when you're on an airplane. And

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>this actually makes sense to me. For Netflix, you know,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it's in a position where it needs to prove to

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>advertisers that the ads on its platform will have value,

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and the company needs to be able to show that

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the ads are actually being played and watched, and you

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>can't really do that if the content is downloaded. For

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>offline viewing. Also, Bloomberg reports that user will not be

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>able to skip ads, and again that makes sense from

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Netflix's perspective. If users can just skip the ads, then

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't everyone just downgrade to the cheapest ads supported option,

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the and then just fast forward through all

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the ads. So Netflix has yet to comment on Bloomberg's report,

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's possible that these sorts of decisions haven't been

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>finalized yet. And hey, I know what you're thinking. Yeah,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to scale Mount Kilimanjaro, but then I wouldn't

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to play today's wordle and I need an

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>internet connection. Well, have I got good news for you,

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>because the mountain has now got high speed WiFi on it.

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>The Guardian has a pretty cheeky article about this news.

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>The article is titled Kilimanjaro gets high speed Internet so

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>climbers can tweet or instagram ascent And sure you could

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>do that, but honestly, I feel like Tanzania has installed

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>high speed internet service on kilimanjar Oh not so that

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>influencers can post videos while they look for the most

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>picturesque background. So it seems like their lives are perfect

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and without problems or limitations, but rather to make certain

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that there's a communications network in place to aid with

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>navigation and to help in the event of an emergency.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Having that safety net there could spell the difference between

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a successful rescue attempt and tragedy. I do think there

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>will be plenty of people who will say, awesome, now

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I can live tweet my climbing experience. But I'm okay

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 1>with that if it also means someone who got in

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>over their head has an opportunity to make it back

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to safety. And yesterday's Tech Stuff Tidbits episode, which ended

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>up being nearly fifty minutes long, I talked about how

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>VR has some barriers to entry that could serve as

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a hurdle for companies like Meta that they have to

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>get over in order to bring the Metaverse to life.

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>One thing I didn't mention is the unveiling of the

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>latest version of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's Metaverse avatar, which

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>subsequently got a ton of news coverage in jokes about

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the avatar looking like a soulless creature and other people

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>saying that's a fitting representation for Mark Zuckerberg, and I

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>am not here to make jokes like that. Instead, I'll

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>say I think this is an indication that Zuckerberg is

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to address some of those hurdles that I mentioned

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.959
<v Speaker 1>in yesterday's episode, because a big one is the cost

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of VR gear, and if VR is to be an

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>important component in the metaverse, which I should add is

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not a foregone conclusion, it's just one of the more

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>commonly referenced manifestations of the metaverse is that it's a

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>VR experience. Well, that would mean that companies like Meta

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>will want to make sure that the gear required isn't

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so expensive that it prices most people out of it.

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>The metaverse is only going to be insanely profitable to

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Meta if the company can get a metric buttload of

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>users to join it. So one way to ensure that

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the gear won't be too expensive is to make certain

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that the experience itself doesn't require top of the line

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>gear to render and process the experience. It's make it

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so that lower cost or in other words, cheap equipment

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>can work just fine on the platform. To do that,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>you have to make some pretty big compromises in graphical quality.

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Enter the avatar, which to me looks like an Xbox

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>three sixty era Avatar or maybe Nintendo Me avatar style.

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>It's hardly a compelling virtual representation of a real person.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>This presents a really interesting dilemma, I think because I

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you, but when I imagine the concept

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of the metaverse, my imagination conjures up this virtual environment

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>where people can have any sort of avatar they want,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and these avatars tend to look really cool and really impressive. Uh,

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>they're high resolution and well animated, and in fact, a

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>well designed avatar becomes something of a status symbol within

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse. Then that only works if the environment supports

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of a presentation, right, you need to be

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>able to actually have that on there. But if instead

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse needs to aim for the lowest common denominator

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to attract the largest number of people so

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that the cheapest equipment can run the darn thing, then paradoxically,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of folks won't want to join

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>because it won't look cool enough. It'll look kind of cheap,

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so they won't have that temptation of joining there, Like,

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not cool. I don't want to do that. So

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>then you're stuck. You either design something that looks amazing,

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but in turn requires equipment that's so expensive that most

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>people can't afford to participate, or you go super simple,

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but then no one feels tempted to join it in

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the first place. Now, I should add, we're still a

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>very long way out from the true realization of the metaverse,

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and in the meantime, I expect we're going to continue

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>to see advancements in technology that might be able to

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>address these problems sufficiently so that they're a non issue

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>when the ding dang darn thing is actually ready for

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>prime time. All right, I have one more news item

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>after this that I want to cover, but before we

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>get to that, let's take another break. Let's talk about

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the final news item for today, because it's a fun one,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, anyway, and it comes from a story from

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the Verge uh and it's it's a story that really

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>tickled me. But it's also a story that's long since

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>been moot because this is a story about the deep

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>past of computer history, back in the Windows XP days.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Arguably some places are still in the Windows XP days.

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I find it insane that there are people who are

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>still running on Windows XP machines. I get that there

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are certain conditions that that mean that people just that's

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>all they have access to. But you know that that's

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a truly defunct operating system. Although I mean, I gotta

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>admit I was a big Window is XP fan back

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in the day. Okay, getting back to the story. So

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the story goes that this unnamed laptop manufacturer began to

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>get complaints about computers crashing under very specific circumstances. Those

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>circumstances involved someone playing the music video for Janet Jackson's

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>hit Rhythm Nation. In fact, sometimes it wasn't even the

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>laptop itself that was playing it when the crash happened.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>It just happened to be close to another device that

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>was playing the music video, and then the other the

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>laptop from this unnamed manufacturer would crash. Uh. And I

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe you're just saying that the laptop hated

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Rhythm Nation because everybody is a critic, am alright, But

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>what the heck was actually going on? Well, according to

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Raymond Chen, who is a software engineer with Microsoft, the

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>problem was that the music video contained within it a

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>sound effect that had a specific frequency in it, and

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that frequency just happened to be the resonant frequency for

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the laptops hard drive. So the sound effect would introduce

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>vibrations into the hard drive and that would lead to

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>a system crash. And you might wonder, well, how the

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>heck did the laptop manufacturer deal with that problem? And yeah,

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>this specific music video would set off that laptop, but

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>then so would any other source of sound that contained

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>that frequency, right, it would introduce these vibrations into the

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>hard disk drive, and then the laptop would crash. So,

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>according to Chen, this manufacturer issued essentially a hatch update

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that would prevent the computers speakers from playing that specific

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 1>frequency at all. So, in other words, if you were

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to play Rhythm Nation, that sound effect would lack that

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>specific frequency. I don't know if the entire sound effect

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>would go silent, or if just that one frequency from

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the sound effect would no longer be audible. You might

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>not even be able to tell the difference, you know,

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>on casual listen. I don't know, but I assume if

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>some other machine we're playing that music video, the laptop

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>could still potentially crash. Though I also think things like

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>speaker quality would determine that, because you're talking about producing

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>a frequency with the proper amplitude for it to really

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>be an issue for the the affected laptops. Anyway, I

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>thought the story was really amusing, but it's also a

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>great reminder that it's cool to learn about physics. Resonant

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>frequencies are important for a lot of different stuff. Nicola

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Tesla was obsessed with the idea of resonant frequencies. Musical

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>instruments are obviously dependent upon things like resonant frequencies, but

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>these things can also lead to dangerous situations. I mean,

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>if you are able to resonate adjust the right frequency,

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you could potentially dis roy stuff as large as suspension bridges.

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The idea being here that this is a frequency that

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>resonates with whatever the material is and causes it to vibrate,

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and it can be kind of like being on a

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>swing set and having someone push you at just the

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>right moment and getting you to hire and higher arcs.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Sort of like that, and just imagine that you get

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 1>to a point where things begin to break. This is

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the classic example of this is where you hit the

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>resonant frequency for a crystal container and shatter it as

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a result. Or maybe you might use resonantive frequencies purposefully

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in an attempt to conduct industrial sabotage and a nuclear

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>facility by manipulating centrifuges rotational speeds and try and make

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>them destroy themselves. Cough stucks net cough. Science is both

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>cool and kind of scary. All right. That's it for

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>today's tech Stuff news episode. Hope you enjoyed it. If

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you have suggestions for things I should cover and future

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff, please reach out to me. There

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:04.239
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of different ways of doing that. You

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can download the i Heart Radio app and navigate to

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the tech Stuff page. There is a little microphone icon there.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>If you click on that, you can leave a voice

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>message up to thirty seconds in length. Let me know

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if you would like me to use the voice message

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in an episode, and maybe we'll have you lead into one,

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>or if you prefer, you can always reach out to

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter. The handle for the show is tech

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Stuff h s W and I'll talk to you again

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Tech Stuff is an I Heart Radio production.

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.