WEBVTT - Episode 43: Chris Como

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>The guys from paying They've kind of showed me how

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>much the equipment matters. I just love that I can

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>hit any shot I kind of want.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna be able to tell some fun stories about

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 2>what goes on here to help golfers play better golf.

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to the Pinging proven Grounds Podcast. I'm Shane Bacon.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 3>That is Marty Jerts and Marty I say this a lot.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 3>We've got a special guest today, a very exciting guest

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 3>at that.

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a fun one. This is one I

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>think all golfers out there have been have been touched

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>by his what he's brought to this game and in

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 2>one way or another.

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris Como, Hey guys, thanks for having me.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Chris, How how did you get into instruction? When did

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 3>when did that interest hit you? When did you see

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 3>that as an avenue in your world?

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I think kind of like really early on. I took

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>up golf somewhat late, like when I was like sixteen,

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and I've always loved sports, and and you know, I

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>got pretty good at golf pretty quickly. But I I

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of I had this idea in my head that

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>if I could like study everything, read all the books

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. I could expedite the process of getting better

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>at golf just by like learning as much as possible,

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>because I got completely just like obsessed with the game.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, once I started playing that was misguided, right,

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like the pathway the game really good at golf. It's

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>not like reading every golf book that there is, but that, like,

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, really started me down this path of just

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>being like so intrigued by the game and how do

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you get better at it? I mean, like and just

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there's like so many different opinions. I

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.839
<v Speaker 1>mean I remember reading books on you know, a guy

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>who's the number one coaching golf and the number two

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>coaching golf and the number three coaching golf, and they

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>had like wildly different opinions, and it's like whoa, like

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what gives? So it just really triggered this curiosity about

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the game and just the overall mystery of like, you know,

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>how can you hit this incredible shot in one moment

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and then the next moment you're like, you know, chasing

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a ball into the woods or it goes out of

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>bounds or whatever. I think there's just a lot of

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like kind of mysteries to the game. In some ways

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a big puzzle, and early on that grabbed me.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, the natural segue from sort of

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the curiosity of the game and how to get better

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>at it is is then how do you help other

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>people get better at it? And that's kind of you know,

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>really early on, I start down that pathway of coaching essentially, Chris.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what we love about having you as

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>an ambassador is how curious you are, how you've asked

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 2>us to in the research end to help answer some

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 2>very deep questions. Do you feel like you have Do

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>you feel like you've had all these questions in your

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>head and a bunch of them are answered and you're

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 2>getting closer to the end or do you feel like

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.399
<v Speaker 2>as you've answered some of these questions it's opened more

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 2>doors to more than ever Where are you out on

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 2>that kind of spectrum?

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean you definitely start to make progress, and

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you know you have more and more like

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna, if you will, kind of like understood a

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. And then you know, as a teacher,

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you get more tools and your tool set type of thing.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But you probably, like most things, as you start to

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>open it up and ask the questions. You know, more

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>questions arise and and you you know, finally sort of

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 1>concede that this is going to be a never ending thing.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you'll be whatever years old and you'll

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, you know, that was a lot of fun.

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But here's sort of like the next set of questions

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>for the next generation to kind of play with and

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>make their own progress with. So it's probably like anything

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>else you do with you know, what you can with

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the time you have in it, and it is sort

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of this never ending thing, which is is also part

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of the fun and challenge of it all.

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, Chris, I mean the doors in golf open

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and close as well for players, right, I mean you

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 3>you evolve and you get better, and you work on things,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and maybe a part of your game deterior rates and

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>you're trying to work on that. I can only imagine

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 3>in the world of instruction, you're always ahead because you've

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 3>got to kind of stay ahead of the golfers. I mean,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 3>you think about the way we launched drivers versus the

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 3>way players in the late nineties and early two thousands

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 3>hit their drivers, right, it's completely different. I mean, you

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 3>go watch John Daly in ninety two ninety three pound

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 3>is driver and that ball is coming out low and

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 3>spending and now obviously the way Rory launches it, it

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 3>is starting out way up in the air, right off

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 3>the face. How if you, I mean, for lack of

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 3>a better term, how ahead of the golf curve are

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 3>you in terms of paying attention to new technology and

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 3>new thoughts? How hungry do you have to stay to

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 3>be where you're at right now in the world of instruction?

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think, I mean, you're trying to help

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>people get better, right and then like say, you know,

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on the PGA Tour or whatever, I mean it is

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the PGA tournament is in essence a zero sum game.

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like if if someone plays better, then other guy

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to make less money, right, So, like there

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is that element of it. So there is is trying

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to find like edges for the guys that you're working with.

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>So there is that sort of zero sum game kind

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of like competitive mindset that does exist of helping a

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>guy find an edge, and those edges you know, again

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's probably this never ending thing and the edges

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>get smaller that you're trying to push and you know,

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>as equipment changes, you know, the whole set of variables

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're trying to find edges with change. You know,

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>if all of a sudden they do a ball roll

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>back or whatever it is, it's essentially changed the rules

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of the game. So and all of a sudden you've

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>got to have to find edges within that new new

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.559
<v Speaker 1>rule set sort of speak, right, But then there's also

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like the macro of it, where you're just trying to

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>like help the game grow. You're like, you know, you're

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to grow the GDP of golf and golf instruction

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and help people enjoy the game. And that's not zero sum, right,

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>That's where you can help other people be better too,

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and that part's fun as well. So for me, it's

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>always kind of that dance between those two worlds of

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.799
<v Speaker 1>trying to find the edge in a very competitive sense,

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's also trying to make you know, impact act

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>or progress that can help like everybody in the golf industry.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're trying to do both at the

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>same time at some capacity, But uh yeah, I don't know. Again,

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't it doesn't ever end, right, It's just the

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>variables are changing, the rules are changing. So you're always

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>you're always finding I don't know if it's ahead of

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the curve, it's it's the landscape's changing enough that if

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you are going to find edges, you know you got

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to you got to sort of keep looking. And for me,

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the hunger part, like curiosity has always been like a

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong driving force for me. So as long as

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>there's questions that's like I don't know the answer to,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>or there's there's things where it's like, oh, that's interesting,

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen that before. I think that sort of

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>natural hunger that comes from that curiosity will will probably

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>always be there.

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Chris, you touched on some of it. I have my

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 2>own hypothesis on why you've taken this approach, but I've

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 2>always wanted to ask you this question you talked about

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>in terms of helping the golf community, other golf instructors

0:06:58.000 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>get better, That's kind of why I let off with

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 2>You've you've you've touched a lot of players, whether they

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 2>know it or not, but you've taken this approach to

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 2>be very open with sharing your questions, your ideas, crowdsourcing,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>getting answers to those questions to the other best golf

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 2>instructors in the world where I I would think that,

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, other great teachers might keep some things like

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 2>trade secret or close to their chest on their findings

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>or what they're trying to research. Why have you taken

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>that approach? What's been the inspiration story behind this approach

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 2>to be a little bit more open with asking these

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>questions and these these deep scientific or biomechanical questions that

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 2>you've done over the over the last decade or so.

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting question. Huh. I'm not sure if I

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>fully know the answer to that. I would say I

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I think I genuinely like like just sharing

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and seeing industry grow. I mean, I again, I didn't

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>grow up playing golf, and no one my fans played golf,

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, golf expensive, and I didn't grow you know,

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I had whatever, Like, I didn't grew up in like

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a very sort of like affluent environment or anything. And

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>golf has like provided so many incredible things for me.

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So there is an element of like just an appreciation

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for the game. So if I can like impact and

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>give to it, that's that's awesome. Like I love that

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I have an appreciation for teachers, like the teaching industry.

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a tough gig, right, Like I've I've

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>done it in so many different versions teaching at driving rangeery.

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>You can barely pay your bills or whatever. So I

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>just have a strong sort of like appreciation affinity for

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>people in the business. So there is just a genuine

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of like I like kind of like sharing it.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I like the dialogue. I feel like having it be

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>more open sourced allows more people to think about it.

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's you know, a higher acceleration at

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>my own learning because it's like, yeah, you can ask

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>like a question or give an insight to something. But

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>the bigger the population of people who are like maybe

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about something, They're gonna have their own ideas, which

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to have its own sort of like you know,

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of like you know, loop to it to where

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get better with it. So there's that

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like you have these different aspects of you as like

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a human, right, I'm very curious. There's like a part

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of me that likes to like share with the community,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>but then there's also part of me that's competitive and wants,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>like my guess to play really well. So how do

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>you like, how do you have all those things be

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>true at the same time and like get the most

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>out of it. I think I'd at least like to think,

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is a little cocky, but I'd like to

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>think that part of my edge in the competitive sense

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is the way I kind of put it all together

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and the problem solving aspect of it. So I don't

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>look at this and like here's some rote knowledge and

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>now you know it, and now all of a sudden

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like easy. Like you still got to like figure

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>out how to put the puzzle together. How do you

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>take an individual in front of you who's got their

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>own crazinesses or golf swing, the way their mind works,

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the way their emotions process things, And then you got

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to like put in maybe some sort of understanding of

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, golf swing technique, groundwraction, whatever the thing

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is you know you're factoring in, and then take this puzzle,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>put it together and help a guy play better with it.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>That's its own thing that one. Even if I wanted

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to like try to like teach it to someone else,

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like it's kind of impossible to do. So, you know,

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like my real edge is the problem solving

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>aspect of it, and putting it all together. So in

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:15.959
<v Speaker 1>some ways, I'm not really worried about, you know, giving

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>that away. I guess, now someone else might be have

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>their own way that fits another person better or whatever

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it is, and you know, so they could be better with,

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever set of people. But the way I

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>put together is in a sense, my monopoly of that

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>good or bad, like it or not like it. It's

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of mine. So I'm not really worried about,

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, competition that in that way.

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess, Chris, what was your I made it moment?

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, we all have had it in

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 3>this world. You're talking about teaching lessons at a driving

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 3>range and you know, barely getting by. When did you

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 3>have the moment where you went, oh, my goodness, X

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 3>paid attention to me, or somebody called me, or you know,

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 3>somebody wants my opinion on this? Did you have one

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 3>of those? That comes to mind?

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So when I graduated undergrad I was at this like

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have been in the golf business unless I

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>was teaching, Like that's the only thing I had interest

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in doing in the golf missess, I would have done

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>something else. And I I felt like in part because,

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>like how I said earlier, there was so many different

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>opinions on which you have in the golf swing. It's

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like I've already talked to too, you know, physicists and

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be like, if I let go of my phone, what's

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>going to happen? They're all going to say, well, it's

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>going to go to the ground because you know, Newtonian

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>physics is sort of understood right. So to me that

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>there were such different opinions, I'm like, there's a gap

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in the body knowledge at some level. And and you know,

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I felt like that was an opportunity and I'm like,

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go out there and really try to

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>be like good at this. I'm gonna try to be

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the best at this. And that's what kind of like

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>set me off on the whole golf coaching path. And

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I went and traveled the country. I worked

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>led for a little bit, worked for Haney for a

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit, spent a couple of years, uh, you know

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>with maclgrady kind of hanging out with him, did all

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>all the certifications like TPI, Paul Czeck, YadA, YadA, YadA,

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and I ended up in Dallas to do an academy,

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and the first year at this academy, I was working

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>like sixty seven hours a week and I made nineteen

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars at this academy. I mean they made no money.

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, it was I was eating into savings whatever, right,

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was such a what's the right way to

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>say this, it was it was. It was not pleasant.

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It was it was I don't know if you guys

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>can cents this, but it was a kick and it

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was just a kick in the butt where you're just like, yeah.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Just a it's a total grind, I mean just grinding,

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 3>grind and grind, and it.

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Was one of those things. I had some friends who

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>had gone to law school. Yeah, and I'm making no

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>money and I'm like, man, this was a bad decision.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't because my heart was still like so

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>into it, right. So I ended up. Long story short

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of Marty probably knows this, I end up. I had

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>joined a free poker league. Had done on that free

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>poker league, which the one player of the year they

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>fled to Vegas to play in a tournament. Came and forth.

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>In this tournament, the Bolagio win forty grand one night,

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>which doubled my year salary, take that money, break away

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>at a driving range, and basically start to build like

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a golf book. But I was also playing poker at

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>night in like the Dallas underground poker scene for a

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>few years. So I'm like funding my golf passion instruction

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>through playing poker at night, which is so ridiculous in hindsight.

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Start to really through a couple of like, you know,

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the right people playing well. There was a guy named

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Madonna who used to play for the Dallas Stars.

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>He'd start playing some good golf to help generate some

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like business. Scott Foster, the Guy of a Decade, actually

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>met him in a poker room. He got a partial

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>status on the web dot com tour. I was helping him,

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>had some really good juniors, and then all of a sudden,

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I start building a book and they wake up one

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 1>day and I'm like, actually like making a living teaching golf.

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But it was my own book too. It was like autonomous, right,

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't at an academy. It was like my business. It

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't where I could get fired the next day. It

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>was like if I had left that driver range, the

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>people would go to me. Someplace else. So it was

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like a true sort of like autonomous. I built like

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a business teaching golf where I can pay my bills.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>And this was this was before I went to grad

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>school for biomechanics. This was before I started teaching like

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>tour guys. But it was like a place where it's

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like I actually can like do this and make a

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>living doing it, like a decent living. I was actually

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>started to get really busy and was able to make

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a nice living. And that that's when

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I felt like, Okay, I made it, because you know,

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I was actually able to eat from teaching golf.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 2>So Shane N's in a little bit of a connection

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 2>here to Victor playing playing Poker two and talking about

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, trying to get those little edges and making

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>those little bets. Right. I think that's pretty interesting, Chris.

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 2>What about let's let's talk about what happened next there?

0:14:55.960 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 2>And like, I think, you know, you've a lot of

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 2>the academic I think been sort of like the best

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 2>applied scientists or applied problem solver taking some very academic principles,

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>and then as you stated yourself, you know, you think

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 2>your expertise is how you glue it together and apply

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 2>it holistically to your players. So tell us about that journey,

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 2>some of the things you've done. I mean, you've written

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 2>a couple of papers in the Journal of Sports bio Biomechanics.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 2>How how did you get into that and how important

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>has that been for you in your skill set? Is

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 2>a foundation, is a is an instructor?

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So so yeah, so I you know, done all that.

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Where I'd worked for different guys was teaching, had built

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>like a nice teaching business. And at this point I'm

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>now at a country club called Glen Eagles, and I'm

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>like grinding on the range, teaching all day. In some ways,

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I was always like running away from you know,

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>like that it wouldn't work. So you know, if someone

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted a lesson, if it was at sixth in the

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>morning or night, like they're getting a lesson, and I

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>was out there all day like just grinding, right, and

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome. It was such a fun window. A

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine, his name is Chris Robinson. I've lost

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>touch with them. I don't know where he is. Chris Robinson,

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>here's this. Hit me up, curious about what you're doing.

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>So he was doing his PhD at TWU and he's like,

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>there's this really cool biomechanicslibe. You got to come check out.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>So I go to this lab and you know, they

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>had the VITE I didn't even there was just the

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>fancy cameras that you see like in like you know,

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>video games or whatever is they're Vicom three D motion cameras.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>They had this crazy lab and there was this professor

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>there named doctor Kuan. So I go to doctor Kwan

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, and they weren't doing any golf research

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>at the point. I'm like, do you have any interest

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in studying golf? He's like, yeah, bring me golfers. So

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I start bringing my students, different people from the club.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>We start collecting a bunch of data and just me

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>being curious, I started asking them all these questions and

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he's like, why don't you just take my undergraduate Bao

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>mechanics class. So I take the class and I like

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>loved it. And there was like so many little things

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>where I was like, oh, that makes sense why I

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>see this in a swing or that, or starting to

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>understand better the constraints of the human body, and I

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>just I felt like I had this like flooding of

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>like insights of things that I had seen in teaching

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>or other teachers, things that I had learned, and it

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like gave it a framework and sort

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of the context for those things to make more sense

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. Like this is really cool. So I take

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the class, did one in the class in Kwan's like, hey,

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>you got an aptitude for this, you should do like

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the graduate program. So anyway, do some other stuff to

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of like prerex sits and YadA, YadA YadA. I

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>end up in his graduate program and to do a

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>master's game bo mechanics, and I remember the first semester.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>The first class was like just like a mechanics class

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was all like form. Kwan's this amazing professor.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>He's very much like a math first type of professor.

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>And I sitting there and I'm like, oh my god,

0:17:58.080 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I get myself into it. I remember going to him.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>I was like it was like a month in the

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>class on like a golf pro Like I don't know

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>what I'm doing, and he's like he gave me this

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>like pep talk sort of. He was like he was

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like there's this proverb where like Koreean general if the

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>army is like facing which feels like an insurmountable foe

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that the general will back the army up against the

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>body of water so they have no place to run.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you're basically calling me a whats aren't you.

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>He's like, guess, So I stuck it out. That first

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>class was actually the hardest, and then and then we

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>went to it like on a nice flow. I was

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>taking the coursework, I was working during the day. We

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>were collecting data on golfers, like you mentioned, we published

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of papers that were really cool. You know,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd eventually completed all the coursework for masterstream and bio Mechanics,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>so I've done everything except for I have like a

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>ten page thesis or something to write. But that's when

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Woods called me. Was like, right when I was

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>finishing it.

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna take this call. Yeah, you know.

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the things where, yeah, just starting to

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>get on the technology, looking at three D data, looking

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 1>at force plate data, and then having what I felt like.

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I felt like because I had all those years of teaching,

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>which was a decade at this point of teaching at least,

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>and then going to grad school and then kind of

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like connecting the dots just I don't know. It's just

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a very really cool like window of time where I

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>felt like I was getting all these like aha moments

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>because of that context. I don't think I would have

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>had that if it was just like sort of the

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 1>degree first type of thing. So it's really like, you know,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>fortunate in that way, and you know it. I don't

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>want to say. I actually think in terms of teaching,

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the best window for me have developed, like might say

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a set of teaching seal would be when I was

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>teaching on the range and you like, you know, you

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you only again pay your bills if you help people

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>get better, So it forces you into a very sort

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of like pragmatic approach to teaching. No like you've got

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to be here or this position or whatever that you

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>can get away with if you maybe had like a

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>marketing machine or brand, because people are going to come

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to you per that. Like I was kind of this

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>unknown person at a driving range that they're not going

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to come to you unless their friend said, hey, I

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 1>hit it a lot better type of thing, right. That

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>was the place where I really I feel like cut

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>my teeth, just like in terms of actual teaching. But

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>then post that the research side of it, again, it

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>becomes this like small edge that I think amplified that

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>previous experience, you know, like anything else, I think over time,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>as you get maybe better, more proficient at something, it

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>becomes harder and harder to find those like edges. But

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the more academic side of it, blended with the previous experience,

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for me was just like just tons of aha moments,

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.239
<v Speaker 1>and I just I think it just helped me kind

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of take it to, you know, a bit of a

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>higher level.

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 3>So, Chris, you mentioned work in a bit with mac Ogrady.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I feel like there's two names in golf that when

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 3>when people hear it, their kind of ears perk up

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 3>in terms of forst it's Maco Grady and Anthony Kim,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 3>especially modern day Anthony Kim, Like where is he? What's

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 3>he doing? How was it with mac Ogrady, Because again,

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm not sure you can just I'm not

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna let you just pass over the fact that you

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 3>worked a little bit with mac over the years. So

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 3>how was it like picking his brain listen to him?

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 3>How did you find him? I mean, how did that

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 3>whole thing go down?

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So I found him? He was playing a US Open

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>qualifier elk Cab and I watched him play if he

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>played lefty, al righting, he's playing righting, Okay. I watched

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>him play, and then I like cornered him in the

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>parking lot and started to ask him, like, you know,

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>just struck up conversation. We sat out there for at

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>least two hours. It was. It went from like, you know, whatever,

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>hey and big fan, like really love like you know,

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the golf swing stuff, whatever, to this long conversation he recommended.

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what are some books you recommend? He

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>recommended me five books. None of them were golf books.

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>They're all just like philosophy of science and like Adamy. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>It was great. He gave me his number. I called

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>him for years, he never responded, and then I found

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this email somewhere online, sent an email, responded to that,

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and then I started doing the schools with them. It

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>was great. I mean it was great, like, uh, you know,

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I was I think I was smart enough. For the

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>first year. I didn't ask too many questions. I just listened.

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And then after the first year, you know, I like

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>asking tough, challenging questions, and you know, anyway, different people

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>respond to to tough questions differently, right, And that's where

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, uh, for me at least, you know

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>guys like Kwan or Sasha McKenzie or you know Mike Duffy,

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>or you know, like a guy like Mark Brody and

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Brody who was over at Ping. There becomes this

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>discourse where it's like the heart of the question, the better,

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Like I personally, I want people to challenge me, like

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to be asked the tough questions because I

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>get better from that. So that's in general the environments

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I like to put myself in because those are the

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>ones where I think, you know, it really can kind

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of like sharpen thought and help people advance. But anyway,

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>how is his swing? His swing is so good, like

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, it's it's beautiful, right, I don't

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know enough about like his PGH career and

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>how much like how good of an actual ball striker is.

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is not sort of to saying to Mac,

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>but but in general, I think sometimes like when people

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>hit shots where they take a big divid the ball

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of comes out and it sounds really good. People

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>get sort of like enamored and it kind of gets

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>romanticized a little bit, but like Jack Nicholas, like he

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 1>picked it and like people don't really rave about him

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>as a ball striker, but from a practical sense, that's

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>like probably the best ball striker of all time, right,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's I think people got to be

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit careful not to romanticize things because of

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the look at it of it. But it's like, you know,

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>how does it actually practically hold up in the conditions

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're trying to play in. You know, if you're

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to win majors, hitting it really high to hold

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 1>on fast screens can be pretty helpful. So again, I'm

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>super appreciative of the time like spent with him, you know,

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so it was great. It was a great window.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Chris uh kind of springboarding on that a little bit

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and maybe maybe making it putting all this that we've

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 2>talked about in context for the listener. You know, the

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 2>biomechanics stuff might sound a little out there for some

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 2>folks or maybe you know, not tangible how it can

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 2>help their game. I think one of the big things

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 2>you and I still remember that video you and Sasho

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 2>did and put out on YouTube maybe six eight ten

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 2>years ago somewhere in that neighborhood or you guys are

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 2>talking about the three D flat spot, right, and you

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 2>were the first one, I think to kind of come

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to us, sashow others yourself personally and try to figure

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 2>out what is this concept all about? Explore this concept

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 2>for the listener out there that may have never heard

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 2>of this concept. Can you just kind of tell the

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 2>story of that, like, you know, how did you get

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 2>interested in this, and how does it impact your teaching today?

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>What is it?

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 2>What can players do to maybe try to get a

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 2>little more flat ish spot maybe not flat as we know,

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 2>but and just kind of tell us that story a

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 2>little bit.

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this, I mean this can be a bit of

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a rabbit hole, Yes, can come out. So you know

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>this is like has to be thirteen plus years ago. Now. Yeah.

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>There's like an air Quotes rate of closure debate on

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the forums, and you know, there was some

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>people in the academic world that was saying, like rate

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of closure has nothing to do with like it has

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>no correlation with like handicap whatever. And I think this

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is where it was a little bit helpful to have

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>some of like the boom mechanics background some of the courses,

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, well, I think here's the problem

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is that golf coach has an intuition and they're asking

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a question, but they were using the language. They were

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>using it sort of a different language than than like

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>say the PhDs, or they're using words differently than how

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the like a PhD would interpret those same words, and

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>there became fundamentally like a miscommunication between the two worlds.

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And so rate of closure at that point was being

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>measured as you know, anger velocity per second, like at impact,

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>so like sort of like an instants anger velocity. But

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the golf coaches they're looking at a camera and they're

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>slowing it down and they're seeing the face look a

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>certain way coming into the ball, and they're saying that

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>looks like that has a lower rate of closure. And

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>when they say rate of closure, that's essentially what they

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>were getting at. But by the PhD sort of language,

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not what RATEI closure would be. So in my

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>mind I came up, I'm like, well, what the golf

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>pro is really asking is what is the change in

0:26:53.880 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>the face rotationally per how it changes in space, like

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>how its movement is in space. So I came up

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 1>with this measurement of closure per displacement, so instead of

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>closure per time, closure per how much it's moving linear

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in space. And then and then it came to me

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it was like, well, if you were to do that

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>with the face, would you do that with the loft?

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Would you do that with the club path? Would you

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>do that with the angle attack? So now all of

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a sudden it became could you take these variables that

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we know make the ball do what it does and

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>say what is the change in the path per displacement?

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>What is the change in the angle attack per displacement?

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Was the change of the face per displacement, the change

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of the loft per displacement? And again people sometimes mistake

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>flat spot is being flat to the ground. It's not that.

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:41.959
<v Speaker 1>It's just saying what is the change of it? If

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you had less of a change in the path, you

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>would have more of a straighter direction of it in

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>some direction, so it have it would be less of

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>an arc inissense, so that straightness could be you know,

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>five degrees down, it could be five degrees up. It

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>could be five degrees to the right of the target,

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>It could be five degrees to left the target. It

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with being flat to the ground,

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>which is saying is there less change in that path

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and that angle attack and again in the face in

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the loft during an interval, Because the whole idea is,

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, is there a window of space where impact

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>could happen and is there less change of those club

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>three D club had variables during that spatial interval, and

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>if there is, does that have somewhat of a relationship

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to the overall shot distribution to person hits. So the

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>idea would be, you know, this is one of the

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>great sort of mysteries in golf. To me, it's like,

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 1>and I think to everybody, and I kind of had

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>alluded to before, Like there's plenty of five handicaps, ten handicaps.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, somewhere in the world, there's an eighteen handicap

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that today will probably hit a hole in one. Right,

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of golfers hit really great shots, like

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe like the best shot possible, and that whole would

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be a whole in one, right, So if they could

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>do that over and over again, they'd be the best

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>golf forever. Right, always hit holes of ones, but for

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>some reason, like we also hit these like weird shots, right, Like,

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at least I do. And if you're not like a

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>toy guy, you hit weird shots, right? Where did that

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>come from? And I think a lot of like the

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>instructional like philosophies or frameworks have been an argument to

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>how does the golfer be more consistent? You know, keep

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>your head still, make your left arm across your test,

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>how do you be more consistent? And that seems to

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>make sense if I want the ball to be consistent,

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>wy don't I be consistent? But then you get like,

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I remember watching Trevino hit balls and he's

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>like moving around and talking, and I mean he's freaking

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>not consistent, and the ball's just every time poof, you know,

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>And then you get you know, I'm sure we've all

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>seen its someone who's got like the alignment sticks out

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and everything's perfect and like all the checklists and then

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball is going lept everywhere. Right, It's like they're

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>really consistent. And if you were to look at their swing,

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>like I think, imagine your friend, you know, whoever it is,

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards away, you watch them, so you know it's him.

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Like people's swings are actually kind of consistent, right, So

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like, what makes certain swings have ball flight distributions

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>be consistent more so than other ones? And I don't

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>think the answer is just like you got to be

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>more consistent. And again, like these things have come through

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like keep your head still, get put your left arm

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>here or there or whatever it is. And it's like,

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>well it's a hypothesis, let's test it. You know, rock

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Commedia moves off the ball, Bunch flushed it, Tiger Woods,

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Strange, they had like movement. And these guys were

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>all very straight hitters. So the argument of this three

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>flat spot stuff is, is there certain things that are

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>contained in in you know whatever techniques that essentially make

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the ball flight less sensitive to human error And human

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>air could be you know, you slide on a little

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>bit more or whatever it is. Or it could be

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>environmental stuff too, right, or I should just say air,

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>not human air, but just air which could also be environmental.

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Could be like a downhill lie a side, he'll lie,

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it's inudivid whatever it is. All these different sort of

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>like inherent variables that are existing around the golf. Are

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>there certain techniques that fundamentally make it easier to have

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the contact you want and that shot flight, the ball

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>flight distribution you want because of that technique. So that's

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the question. And then those are the

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>variables that we were starting to look at. And this

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is where like technology like focal as well as you know,

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys being kind enough to start to like write

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in the code to like really look at this matter,

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is giving us the opportunity to start to like, you know,

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>potentially answer this question. You know, is there correlations between

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>guys who drive it really well are very good iron

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>players and this variable that is its own continuum, right,

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>like two people, two tour guys could have slightly different

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>changes in path or angle, attack or face whatever it is.

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not like a binary thing. So it's got its

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>own continuum to it. And does that have some relationship

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to you know, their ball striking ability? And then there's

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously going to be other variables that can are going

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to play a role, like you know, a person's emotional

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>state and mindset and you know who knows. But but

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to me, that air quotesess consistency question or that repeatability question,

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I think is you know the biggest, really the biggest

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>question in golf that determines like differences in skill set,

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>because again there's plenty of whatever ten handicappers with enough

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>club at speed that can hit a drive that looks

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>like a tour player. But then you know, a couple

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>drives later, they're they're their balls like hitting a house.

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know that, that to me is one of

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the phenomenas in the mysteries of the game. That's that's

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>fun to try to figure out.

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Chris, you did an awesome job connecting. You know. I

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 2>think the listener out there might be like, hey, biomechanics,

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, what is that, what's that going to do

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 2>for me? I think that you kind of hit on,

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 2>like that's kind of the holy grail. You're trying to find,

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 2>right of that like consistency aspect which will help the

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 2>every day golfer. And you've seen it. The Travino story

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 2>is perfect one, right, you know, I think the golf

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 2>prosol observed that in one way or the other. It's like,

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 2>how do you get to the actual you know, mechanics

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 2>of how you can teach that and influence it in

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 2>a practical sense, right.

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And I mean that at the end of

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the day, it's like, you know, I think people miss

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it for at least me. I'm like, I'm so pragmatic

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>with things, and I was a teacher first before I

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>went down this path. But all these are to mirror

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>tools to answer very practical questions, like at the end

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of the day, that's my end game is how do

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you just like figure out how to get better at

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. So I do think people can kind of like, oh,

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>by my things, it's like yeah, and of itself whatever,

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But these are tools to answer what I think are

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>really meaningful questions that you know. Again, this is part

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of the things that grabbed me about this game is

0:33:56.000 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that there is like phenomena, there's really interesting things that

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>happened that aren't fully understood.

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Again, it's like, how do you have guys, I mean,

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>there's like whatever, like say Michael Jordan or some world

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>class athlete that clearly has got you know, out of

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 1>this world hand eye coronation a great athlete and their

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 1>good shots are unbelievable, but they do not have that

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of repeatability as a tour player does. It's probably

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>not a function of their coronation because they're great athletes, right,

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, what are some of the other reasons

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to explain what is sort of a phenomenon of golf

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 1>is like why can you hit a great shot and

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>then you know a minute later it just hit a

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>shot that's like, you know, not that great Chris.

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 3>The Trevino story was so interesting to me because I

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 3>remember talking to Brad Faxon about putting and he would

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 3>say that a big part of his great putting was

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 3>he was a try to leave shots in certain areas

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 3>where he would have the easiest putt. And then there

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 3>were times, you know, you think about a great player,

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 3>a great putter someone I mean you mentioned you know,

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 3>like a Justin Rose right, who's on the range. He's

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 3>got all these systems going, and he's got alignment rods

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 3>and he's got the ball and all those types of

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 3>things to make sure the swing is perfectly online. And

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 3>then you got somebody like Lee Trevino who's out there

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 3>making all sorts of different golf swings and he's considered

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 3>one of the great ball strikers of our generation. I

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 3>was listening to Steph Curry on a podcast a couple

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of weeks ago, and they said, Steph, what are you

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 3>focused on when you're shooting? And he said, my entire

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 3>focus now is just balance. If I'm balanced when I'm

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 3>set to shoot, I feel like I'm going to make

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 3>the shot. And you know, you watch Steph play basketball,

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of shots where he's fading away, or

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 3>he's stepping back, or he's shooting a one leged kind

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 3>of floater in the lane and they all go in right.

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 3>So for him, the focus is on balance. In your opinion,

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 3>what is that constant from a Fax and putting to

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 3>a Travino ball striking, to Tiger to Steph Curry shooting

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 3>that they all do well even though they're all kind

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 3>of juggling the ball.

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>This is why I think golf is for a of unique.

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think, like all the stuff of like having

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the target and balance and all that like that that

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe like a stuff with shooting is important, and that's

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>probably important through all sports. And you know, like I

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>think putting maybe a little bit different, but I think

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to like ball striking, all that stuff matters.

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>But I do think there's another variable, and this is

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like say some of the flat spot stuff that I

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>do think is going to have my bat. My prediction

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be this is going to have a big

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of prediction on what makes someone hit it better

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>than another one, because the reality of it is is

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 1>like you know, let's say, even like Justin Rose, right,

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>he's got all like you said, you're with the alignment sticks.

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Even to take away all his aliment sticks, and I

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>already give him like seven shots at tequila, he's still

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>going to hit it better than I am, right, so

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like with all my aliment sticks, because I think he

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>does what I would call like air quotes, the really

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. I think he's kind of always done that

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, So he's going to be a

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>really really good ball striker. Even if you disrupt some

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of the things that he would makes him feel more consistent,

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>he's still going to have an inherent consistency to his

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 1>motion that I think is going to kind of trump

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>these other versions of like making it less consistent. So

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of an abstract thing. So this is why

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it's always tough to talk about. But like I appreciate

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>you bring it up because it's it helps me sort

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>of like maybe communicate it better. Whatever. And this is

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a weird analogy, and you can you can hammer this morning,

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>but so to me, I think it was like this,

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like like, let's say I had a die right, and

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I was you know, like a crap sty or whatever.

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And let's say I can't really actually read what the

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:31.959
<v Speaker 1>dye says, but I can read it once it lands

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and it stops. And let's say I have a die

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and five sides say bad shot on it, and one

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>side says good shot. Okay, and I rolled the die

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and good shot comes up. It's like, okay, what did

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I do there? I had my elbow here, Okay, let's

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>see my head was here, bad shot? Oh what happened?

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>What did I do on that one that I had?

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Good shot? Okay? Hold on, I had my heir, I

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>had my my my shoulder here, bad shot. It's like, oh,

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? Like I thought I had it right,

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So that to me would be like a high handicapper.

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other stream would be like a

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>tour guy, which would be five sides would say good

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>shot and once I would say bad shot, and they're like,

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.839
<v Speaker 1>good shot, round the back, good shot, you know, oof,

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>good shot. It's just like sort of easier. Now, maybe

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>they could go through their process and put their lubble there.

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe in a very small way, they can maybe roll

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the good shots a little bit more often, but really

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the probability of the shots that they're

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>hitting is contained in their die, and the die is

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the analogy is they're sort of that

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>late interval stuff that we're talking about before. So that's

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>at least part of this big golf kind of like

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>puzzle mystery. That's that's part of kind of how I

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>see it as a again sort of an analogy to

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to try to help with like something that sort of

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like out there a bit. But I don't know how's

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that Does that make sense? Right?

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I know, I think it's looking at it probabilistically and statistically.

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's what the game, especially you talked about

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 2>in the tour level, Chris, where you framed it really

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 2>well at the beginning, you know, word zero s you're

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 2>trying to find the micro edge.

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is where I think from from a

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 1>teaching perspective. If like I've helped make, if you may

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.399
<v Speaker 1>help a player make, there's certain changes you make where

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the game, not even a tour guy,

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but like a high handicapper, they make a change and

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the game feels easier to them, just like the strike

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is better, the whole shot distribution changes. So it's like,

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is just a I think this

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is in some ways where players, if they're actually interested

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in like making improvements of their game, can make massive improvements.

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So I actually think it's not just a small edged place,

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but like when someone if they're willing to make a change,

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 1>can really experience the game in a completely different fashion.

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, no, I totally agree, Chris. One question I

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted to ask you, uh, is on the equipment side.

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 2>Tell tell us a little insight into either, you know,

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 2>using a change in equipment let's say, you know, driver

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 2>or another club in the bag to help influence a

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 2>change that a players making right or have you what

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 2>examples have you seen of players playing equipment maybe a

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 2>driver loft is too low and they're doing some things

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 2>mechanically that's going to fight what you want them to do. Basically,

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 2>what I want to get to is just kind of

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:21.760
<v Speaker 2>talk a little bit about equipment slash fitting, equipment slash

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:23.760
<v Speaker 2>coaching and how those two things marry together.

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean you can't separate them. I mean just

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the easiest sort of example is, especially if

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>someone's got like some back issues. If the loft is

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>too low, they're going to figure out a way to

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 1>hit it high enough. Especially a better player, they're gonna

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna hit shots that fit their eye. So I

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:43.799
<v Speaker 1>think you're always whether it be like the trajectory that's

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>launching at or if it's like say, you know, got

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>more of a draw bias or a fade bias, that's

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>all massive role in terms of the changes you're trying

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to make with the guy, because they're they're going to

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>make the ball do what they want to do. So

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, as of for instance, if someone's got say

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>some back stuff and they're kind of like hanging back

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>on it, you know, I'm always gonna try to get them,

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>not always, but oftentimes try and get them into a

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>more lofted driver so they have that same move they

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:13.839
<v Speaker 1>hit it too high, and then it sort of like

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>encourages them to you know, have their chest not be

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>so kind of backed out of it and get sort

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of stressed on the lore back.

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And there's so many different for instances of these, right,

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 1>So it's like if I'm if I'm trying to get

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>change the release pattern or something, you know, it's could

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>work either way, but like either in the spectrum, but

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>like you know, maybe it's something where I want a

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>club that's more right biased because I need them to

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 1>do something to like try to air quotes square it

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>up earlier, and for them it's to take out the

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>right or vice versa. Right. So, but but at the

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, it's it's you know, making changes

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in the golf swing is is sort of like it's

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's part of an ecosystem, and you got

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to understand how these pieces play a role and then

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>how the player is always going to end up reacting

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>to making the ball do something and you kind of

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 1>have to get ahead of that and that's part of

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that's part probably put the puzzle together for sure.

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Chris, do you still play poker?

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:13.479
<v Speaker 1>No, not really. I stopped. It's funny, I uh two

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two thousand and seven, I played in the

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>World Series. I played in the main and I for

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I did not I bust out day one. I qualified

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for thirty dollars and I actually made it very late

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in the day one and had I had trip almost

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>tripled my chip stack and I got it. And there

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>was one of the guy at the table who I

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't know who he was, and he was just give

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>him so many fits. And I played a hand with

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 1>him and he just completely outplayed me. He was the

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>only guy at the table had me covered, so like

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 1>an hour before the day one broke, he he busted me.

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm kind of like, I'm pretty good about like

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>if I feel like I'm making a good decision and

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 1>things don't work out, I'm good with. Like I'm pretty

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>stoic about like I made the right decision. Whatever I lost, right,

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it's life experience, right, But uh, I had clearly gotten

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>outplayed and made like a bad decision. So I was

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>like in the lobby it was at the rio, and

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I was like ahead, I was like, oh my god,

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I was just so mad at myself. And he comes

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and sits down next to me because I feel like

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I had actually played pretty good at that point. He

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 1>comes down and sits next to me because he had.

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It was like right before the day one broke and

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:22.359
<v Speaker 1>then it broke, and I'm sitting on like the bench

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and he sits next to me. He's like, he's like,

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>he played pretty good, and he's and he introduced himself

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to me, and he was like one of the best

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:31.839
<v Speaker 1>online players at the time in the world, And if

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I had known it was him, I would have like

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>just sat on my hands, waited for day two and waited, wait,

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>waited for a table break because it was actually a

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 1>really really bad spot because of just how good he was,

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and I got, I just got, I got toyed with basically.

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 3>So it's like showing up to a money game and

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 3>it's Victor Hoblin and you don't know who he is.

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, I shouldn't play this guy for five hole.

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy. Yeah, it was. It was. It was I

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>was clearly out of my league. And then after that,

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:02.959
<v Speaker 1>after that, is right when the golf was like really

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>starting to get busy, and I just stopped playing. It's

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 1>just it was too hard to be both. Poker was

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>like a blessing. I didn't want to become a losing player,

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and I'd worked pretty hard at it, so I felt like,

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I wasn't putting the time into it,

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be like, I wouldn't be any good at it.

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So I stopped playing. Once in a while, play you know,

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>like whatever in Vegas or like different spots and I'm

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm the donkey in the room.

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 2>So Chris Gray, stuff, man, it's been fun having you

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 2>on the team. And you know, I think it's you know,

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 2>we have this kind of symbiotic relationship with you on

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the research side, which is like, you know, we need

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 2>you to keep asking us questions to push us further right,

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm you know, let's it's been fun journey for us,

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 2>the all the team, you know, doctor Eric, doctor Paul,

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the team. How much kind of fun

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 2>questions we've had trying to answer questions through our focal system.

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 2>It's been super fun. So uh, let's let's keep this

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 2>journey going. And uh, we really appreciate having you on

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 2>the pod.

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I tell you, tell you what, Like,

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the relationship with Ping has been so meaningful to me,

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So I appreciate you saying all that for me personally,

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I just get so much value out of the

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>relationship with you and Paul and Eric and Chris and

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:29.919
<v Speaker 1>and and just the way you guys like go about it.

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It's so funny because you know, I've been doing stuff

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with PING for quite a while now, and and uh,

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>whenever there's like my sort of like relationship with you

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:41.279
<v Speaker 1>guys is contractually up. The start of the negotiation is

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>always like, all right, we both know that I'm never

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna go anywhere else, So it's it's it's it's one

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of those things wherever.

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:51.720
<v Speaker 3>It's just gone, Chris, it's like leverage.

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, Like there's no there's no point of like

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, not not accepting what it is. There's just

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:00.879
<v Speaker 1>so much value I get from you guys, And people

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>will ask me because I'm always trying to be like

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty like transparent with stuff, and it's like, well, you

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>know what about all the It's like there's probably lots

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of like I think all the big club companies are

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:13.319
<v Speaker 1>really good, right, Like they're making good stuff. But I

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>feel so confident in saying that, like from an R

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 1>and D perspective, the team that Ping has in terms

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 1>of just that genuine kind of like curiosity of really

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure stuff out. Now, maybe someone might like

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:26.439
<v Speaker 1>one club the way it looks or whatever, who knows, right,

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just being a human the subjective aspect of

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it all. But in terms of the R and D

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>part of it, it's just like it's hard for me

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to imagine a company like really doing the things that

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys do, so at least for me, I can't

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>tell you, guys how I appreciative I am to have

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the relationship and it's it's made me a way better

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 1>coach for it. So thank you, guys.

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Love it, Love it.

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Chris, we appreciate it.

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:54.280
<v Speaker 3>It's been great chatting with you for Maco Grady, to science,

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 3>to poker and beyond. We appreciate all your insights. We'll

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 3>have you on again. Thanks so much. This is paining

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Proven Grounds podcast.

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm