WEBVTT - Gun Fu + John Wick: Ballerina

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Any of his Jason Concepcion and on Roseay Night and

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to X ray Vision, the podcast where we

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>dive you to your favorite shows, movies, comics and pop culture.

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Coming to you from iHeart Podcast, where we're bringing you

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>three huge episodes a week every Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday plus

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>news plus news.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>On today's episode, we are talking about the upcoming new

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 2>John Wick movie.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 3>Have you heard of it?

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>It's called Ballerina, which is interesting. Ballerina. That's because it's

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 2>a spinoff. Yes, exactly, So it's a spin off.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 3>It starts on a damas. We haven't seen it.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 2>So we're gonna use this as a chance to talk

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>about the Drunk franchise, talk about gun Fu, one of

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 2>my favorite sub genres that takes the close quarters of

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.119
<v Speaker 2>martial arts and a kung fu film and adds a

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>shit kind of crazy guns being used in completely illogical

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>but fantastic ways. And I'll also talk about what Ballerina

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>needs to do to be a hit.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay John Wick. John Wick's Ballerina starring on an armis

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>coming out this week, directed by our favor one of

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>our one of our werewolf in Vampire Phaves Len Wizman.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>The film takes place during the events I Love the

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Love the People, I Love It, I Love Timeline Shifting,

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>UH spinoffs, Fast and the Furious style chronology. So this

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>film takes place during the events of John Wick Chapter

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>three Parabellum, which is an interesting note for the apparent

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>john Wick cameo, or maybe it's more than a cameo,

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it's less that takes place in the film

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and it follows Eve maccarl out of Diarmis, who is

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>beginning her training in the assassin traditions of the Ruska Roma,

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>which is apparently a subgroup that is then involved in

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the overall assassin culture of the John Wick films.

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 2>We saw them training in the kind of theater in

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the Fust movie, I.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Believe, and according to Variety, Lionsgate which is at this

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>point like much the same way that New Line was

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the House Built by Freddy, this is like the House

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Built by John Wick is targeting a so SO start

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of about twenty eight to thirty million from thirty four

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred North American locations in the first weekend of release.

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Vallerine is looking to add another thirty million from international

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>markets after that. SO we're gonna get a chance that

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about the film after we see it,

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>but this is our conversation to get you ready for it.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>We talk about various things related to john Wick, Anody Armis,

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and Len Wizman. First of all, Rosie, what does this

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>movie need to do to be a quote unquote successful

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>entrance into the john Wick franchise.

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 2>I think the reason that the john Wick movies are

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 2>so beloved is because they are inventive, stunt focused, something

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 2>just totally different than we'd seen before. Obviously, you have

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 2>a great omnibus this episode coming up about Gunfu, but

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 2>we hadn't really seen a Western Gunfu movie in the

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>same way that we've you know, someone like john Wick

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 2>John Wu deals with them, or even the way that

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the Matrix in the late nineties early Zeros kind of

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 2>played with it a little bit. John Wick felt completely

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 2>different and it gave Keanu Reeves a new franchise. It

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 2>reintroduced him to audiences. It had a really easy, you know,

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 2>original but completely classic revenge motif, but it was about

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 2>a dog and the emotional connection to a dog. It

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>gave us different kinds of villains by making the Mafia

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Russian mafia focused kind of villains, which often these kind

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 2>of movies where somebody takes revenge after their family die,

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 2>like a death Wish or the Notorious Peppermint, often come

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>across as very racist because they're just about killing a

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 2>bunch of black and brown people. So this really was

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 2>a complete shot to the system for action and I

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 2>think the dream version of this is that this can

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 2>be that for Anadames for female action movies. But will

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 2>it deliver on that, I don't know, because so far

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 2>they're already heavily connecting it to John Wick.

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 3>I think this comes from an era where they wanted.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 2>To do a lot of John Wick sequels without Keanu,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 2>including The Continental, which was a very belagued series a

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 2>beleagued network, and it ended up not hitting in the

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 2>same way. So I'm interested to see I hope this

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 2>goes well. We have seen this is the thing that

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm most interested about. We've seen Anada Armis in one

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 2>of the best action sequences of the last I know

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 2>ten years in the Last James Bond movie with Daniel Craig,

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 2>where the pem.

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Meet up No time to die.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 2>It's so good they meet up, they're kind of immediately

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 2>thrown into this fun, crazy action sequence. She totally holds

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 2>her own. She's absolutely incredible, and I'm hoping that they

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 2>get to channel that into this movie, because she really

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 2>was a star. But the trailers are don't show a lot.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 2>We haven't seen the movie yet. The movie comes out

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 2>in a few days. The embargo is not up, so

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't always bode well, but I'm hoping that this.

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:55.119
<v Speaker 3>Could be great.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Also, I will say, as we mentioned then Wiseman, this

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 2>is a man who has directed many female led action

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 2>movies in the shape of the Underwhelmed franchise.

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 3>So there's a version where it could be good. But

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to do by the way, so let's

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>let's briefly talk all things. Len. Here's my thing with Lynn.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>I love It's a guilty pleasure, but I love all

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the Underworld movies.

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 3>Of course, they're not enjoyable.

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Quote unquote good really, but they are. The casts are

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>almost uniformly wonderful. The action is and the story and

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>setup is just wildly over the top, and they get,

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like I mean, they get incredible performances from some really

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>really talented actors in these films. And the action is

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this kind of Matrix inspired horror action that is wonderful,

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in your face, over the top. It's just very watchable,

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>like Saturday Afternoon like fair for me.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 2>It's very It's very Pool w s Anderson on Yes,

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 2>with an evil franchise like him and Lenn with their

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>wives that were starring in the movies, were very, very

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 2>clearly excited to make action againaws out of that wife

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and I who can blame him?

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and again, the talent is fantastic. I get Kate

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>beckhamsale like, don't get it twisted because of the kind

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of B movie framing of the underworlds. Here, She's a

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:45.679
<v Speaker 1>legitimately very talented actor. And Bill Nihey, is it these films?

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sheen? Is it these films? Mike chewing up scenery? Yeah,

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>shirt off Michael Sheen, full like werewolf mode. Now Here's

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>so love love Len. Here's the issue. I don't want

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to see him doing anything other than vampire wearwalth movies,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which gives me some pause about Ballerina because two thousand

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and sevens Live for Your die Hard. I think the

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a much forgotten and rightfully sow entrant into

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the long running Diehard series Awful twenty twelve, the if

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen it, don't see it remake of the

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties Arnold Schwarzeneger hit Total Recall. The twenty twelve

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>when we've been directed, Total Recall is awful. Get just

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>none of that, Dems and go watch you please watch

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the Paul Verehoven version, which is weird. It is campy, practical, wonderful,

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>practical effects. This kind of sly subversiveness that for Hoven

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is known for. The Weizman thing is just like when

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not doing the werewolves in the Vampires. It's like

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a straight action movie and it's so straight that I'm

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it doesn't have any charge for me.

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>They don't even go to Mars.

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>They don't go they don't even go to Mars, which

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>is what are we doing?

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>That?

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Crazy?

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Crazy? And so that part of it, I'm a little

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little worried Rosie.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 2>So so I will say, I think the thing that

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>lem Weiseman does well is hard genre right. He yes

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 2>was the executive producer on Sleepy Hollo. He was an

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 2>executive producer on Lucifer The Great Tea.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Under Wonderful underrated Lucifer Yeah.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Gifted the early X Men TV show that we've got

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 2>in twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, also surprisingly good swamp thing.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 2>We all know how I feel about that TV shs philosophy,

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 2>But like, I think that he has a good eye

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>for weird, hard genre stories.

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 3>I hope that what this can do is lean into.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 2>The magical realism of the High Table as the Ruscaroma

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 2>and which essentially from what we've seen so far in

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 2>the franchise, is like a black Widow program or a

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 2>redwom program, or the Jennifer Lawrence movie Blackbird. There's many

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 2>different kind of versions of this, like Russian children, especially

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 2>women being trained from you know, we love to become

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 2>a sac.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I love Russian mobster baddies ever like it.

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 2>I know America can't get enough, and I just I'm

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 2>very interested to see where it goes. I think that

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 2>the pair of the I think that Len Wiseman and

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Ana Damas could be a great She has got kind

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 2>of a similar vibe to Beckham Sale, where she takes

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 2>unexchecuted roles. She can be in a rom com, but

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 2>she can also be in an action movie.

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So let's see.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested because the story of this movie is that

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>there was bad test screenings, there was reshoots, there was

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money put into it. You know me,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm always like I would probably rather see whatever that

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 2>version was like two years ago when it was probably

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>a super low budget, weird movie. But the big question

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I think out of all of it, as with any

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 2>and this is not to put anything unfair onto Anna.

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 2>This is to ask the question that we ask of

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 2>any movie like this, like we asked of Gladiator too

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:36.119
<v Speaker 2>with Paul.

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Mescal Does Ana Damas have the juice?

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Jason, I am a little concerned that she doesn't have

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the juice simply because I think if she had the juice,

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it would have been juicing by now.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 3>It would have already been selling the juice.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's been several years since. You know, when

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>was the I think it was like PLoP p probably

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>war Dogs or Blade Runner twenty forty nine, when you

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>when you first started hearing oh Anadharmas is coming, knives out,

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>oh Anna Dharmas is coming, so yeah, and then certainly

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>no time to die, and then the starring role. It's

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>not that she hasn't starred in stuff. But the most

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>notable stuff you know her in is stuff where she

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>was a co star and I don't know, I don't

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>know that she has to do. She's done a lot

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of kind of romantic type roles, including a absolutely weird,

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>weird Adrian lined erotic and no one loves an erotic

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>thriller more than Adrian, but like weird, weird erotic thriller

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in which she co starred across from Ben Affleck, who

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>she's dating.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 3>It's such a weird movie.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is a weird movie.

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Sexy snail movie. She was already in three movies with.

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Keanna Reeves, including the movie that I was talking about,

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 2>not of a Drome Wake episode, the wonderfullly cheesy and

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 2>terrible Eli Roth movie Knock Knock, which I love but

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely terrible.

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And I've seen a lot of her films, I honestly

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>can't say that there's one time, including the deep Water

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>directed by everybody's favorite erotic thriller King Adrian Lyon, that

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>were I thought, Wow, Annie Armis's chemistry with the cast,

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>with her co star with whoever really pot whoa really

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>pops off the screen, and I think that's something. It's

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that kind of X factor thing where maybe she just

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have it, or maybe there's something holding back the juice.

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I also think that it's a lot of action roles

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>at this point, Like it's a lot of these kind

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of roles, and I wonder if there's she does take

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>weird stuff, but I wonder if the choices are not

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily there kind of a big movie for any Armis

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>like this is this is.

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 3>A hard set off a new era.

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Because this is a hard genre film where the franchise

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is as big as of a star, arguably as the

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>star of the film, and expectations are medium, not high,

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and so if it doesn't go it, I think it's it.

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not great for both the john Wick franchise, who

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to expand past Keanu Reeves who is sixty, and

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>for Andy Armis, who we've been waiting to kind of,

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, break big into a different level and it

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>hasn't happened yet. Your thoughts.

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I would love for this to surprise us. I will say, like, as.

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 2>We know, john Wick was not some when it started.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 2>It was not some like hugely surprising. It was not

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 2>some expected hit, you know, it was very much like

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 2>a slow burn smash that ended up launching a franchise.

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I think with everything with franchise movies, this does sadly

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 2>seem like it has the in the world of John Wick, like,

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 2>let's connect it to this thing, and it's like, is

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 2>are you making something that was as original as John Wick?

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Are you making something that was as interesting as John Wick?

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you have people like Chad Stileski behind the scenes.

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>But I will say I have read a lot of

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 2>interviews with lem Wiseman about this because I do find

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 2>this movie to be in a very interesting place.

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 3>If you look at the success of the John.

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Wick movies, this should be one of the blockbusters. They

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 2>should have been doing fans screenings. They should already have

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the reviews out like this should be like and it

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 2>feels unusual that they are not in that space. So

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I've been reading to kind of try and find out. Definitely,

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I think sees this movie as a He is calling

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 2>it a spin on instead of a spin off, which

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I kind of like because I'm like, Okay, well, if

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 2>you're just doing John Wick again but with a woman,

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of fine with that.

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, But I think what he really means.

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it happens in the chronologue in the chronology of

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the movies, whereas spinoffs often don't. But the thing I

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 2>have been interested. He has talked a lot about wanting

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to explore the folkloric elements and the weird kind of

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 2>realities of the rest.

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Of the simmar and that's kind so I agree.

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully, maybe the reason that it's not getting greater views

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 2>is because it's kind of weird and it can find

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>its own place.

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 3>But I do think it's.

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Tough because all these movies, you know, it has one

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 2>of those blooming posters that makes it look like they

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 2>see get a bunch of people's faces into it. I

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 2>don't think currently it looks like showing enough individual Yes,

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 2>it looks like the bloody end Game post and it's like,

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I just don't I don't know that it's gonna I

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 2>want it to be more original than it currently seems.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 2>So let's hope this is a marketing issue rather than

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 2>an actual issue.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>How here's a question that I think anyone who's closely

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>watched the trailer will have. How much is Keanu Reeves

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>actually in this film? And will he and Anna actually

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>be in the not in the same scene, in the

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>same shot where they were clearly in the same space

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>at the same time.

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Post credit sequence.

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean they have worked together three times, so

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm kinda hoping that it gets to be something a

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>bit realer than that. But it does look like from

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the trailer that it's very much like shooting from behind

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a brunette woman's head who's in the same rim as

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Keanu Reeves, and then shooting from a brunette man said,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 2>who's in the same room as added armis, So yeah,

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 2>he He's probably gonna be in it for like three minutes.

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I would love if it was longer, because I do

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 2>think that john Wick mostly stands on the really great

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 2>weird relationships that Keanu makes throughout with his cast members

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 2>and the characters, like the stuff with him and Laurence

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Fishburn or well on the Ferne. Like, there's so many

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>good weird moments that don't have to go on that long.

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 3>So I would love that.

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 2>But I also think that sadly, the original John Wick

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 2>movie was super weird. Nobody thought it was gonna make

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 2>any money, and I think that probably allowed them to

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 2>do a lot more weird stuff with it. I don't

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 2>know if we're going to get you know, twenty minutes

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>silent action sequences in this.

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Movie, which is kind of what made john Wick great.

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know.

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully they're in the same room, but realistically I'm saying

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 2>under five minutes, probably not in the same you know

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>in really.

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>You know what, this movie makes me kind of pine

0:18:55.880 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>for the uh john Wick mainstay. Director David Lych project

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Atomic Blonde twenty seventeen staring Charlie's That is kind of

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like pre john Wick Joan Wick, Like it's yeah, and

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it just kind of got forgotten. I hope that doesn't

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>happen with this film. And I hope that that was

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a weird movie also, like There Were every One is.

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 2>A deeply weird movie, I believe, also in a good

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 2>way to be that person.

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 3>It's also based on a comic book. Guy, Yes, that's true,

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 3>based on a.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Comic book, and uh yeah, I think that's a really

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 2>weird fun movie. Also, you know what, maybe this can

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 2>be that movie for Ana Damas. Maybe that's the best

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 2>case scenario because truthfully, it was not like some huge

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 2>smash it for Charlie's.

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 3>But then she was in Fantastic, then.

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 2>She was in you know, the MCU, then she was

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 2>in most no, I think the Fast and Furious movies

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>as like an action star. So maybe this is gonna

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 2>hit in that way that has Anna recognized as an

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 2>action star and see where she could where she could

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 2>hopefully go What are I mean?

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:15.719
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of like the larger question, right what

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>are what are hit movies anymore? Outside of we outside

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of having.

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 3>This conversation like what does that even look like?

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's move outside of IP, like what is

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a hit?

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'll tell you.

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 2>We do have a fantastic We have a fantastic situation

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 2>going on right now. We have a perfect example and

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 2>this is gonna change Hollywood for the next couple of years. Currently,

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 2>a successful movie is looks like sinnots. It's an original

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>IP movie that you give ninety million dollars to, but

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 2>that makes four hundred million dollars. That is a huge

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 2>smash hit that becomes this kind of new mental zeitgeist, churning,

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 2>scene stealing film that makes every other movie around it

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 2>look bad. But that again is a lightning in a

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 2>bottle situation. I also think that we're still in a

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 2>world where successful movies are and Sinners is part of this.

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>They are genre movies often because the budget is lower.

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're gonna have Megan two coming out soon.

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that that is gonna probably make a lot

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 2>more money than it costs. And I think that you

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 2>make a good point though, because what does a huge

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 2>franchise movie.

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 3>How does it have success?

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Because I'm sure this movie costs a lot of money,

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 2>It's had reshoots, it's a John Wick movie. Those movies

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 2>budgets have ballooned. So what does a successful movie look like?

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 2>And how would Ballerina become successful? I mean, I'm gonna

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 2>tell you one thing. Look, I'm sorry Lionsgate because this

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 2>is definitely a Lionsgate issue.

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna tell you number.

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 2>One reason that this movie proble will not be massively successful.

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Why did they put From the World of John Wick

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Colon before the name?

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Just trust the name.

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 2>We've met the Ballerinas, we understand the notion like that

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff. I think, like no movie really has

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 2>ever done with a catchy name like From the World

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 2>of John Wick Colon balle You just trust.

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>The people John Wicks, John Wick's by John Wick. Ballerina

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>He's and then you're gonna be like, okay, but he's

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>only in it. Actually I'm never in the same places.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>But who cares? Like you're just trying to you know,

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>like who who cares?

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Ballerina did cost they're saying around eighty to ninety millions,

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 2>So let's see what it happens that Steward ball I'm yes.

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean the fact this movie does kind of have

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 2>a banger cast, like Angelica Houston, who we've seen before

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 2>as the leader of the director of the Resciroma, gabrielle

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Bert Burne. I love him, He's in so many different

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 2>great movies. Lance Reddick, he reprised his role before he

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 2>passed away as Karen. Also Norman Readers, who I also love,

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and Ian McShane also in this before.

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 3>And Keanu Reeves.

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 2>So I do feel like I'm like, there is something

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>here that could be special.

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you something about Oh, Norman Readers hair dependent, Right,

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>He's like the Orlando Bloom He's somehow made a career

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>out of always have long hair exactly, never cut it.

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Never cut that hair, bro don't do it.

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So let me tell you this, this is one

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 2>of the most deranged things I've maybe ever heard. Okay,

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 2>in twenty seventeen, Lionsgate Films acquired Shay Hatton's action thriller Ballerina,

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 2>which itself was inspired when Hatton viewed the trailer to

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 2>John Wick Chapter two, and they decided to produce used

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the film with him rewriting it to be part of

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 2>the John Wick franchise. Already a problem, I'll tell you

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 2>that that's that's where the notion of taking a script

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 2>and as we call it, like you know, uh, filing

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 2>off the the IP or inserting the IP, filing off

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the serial numbers or inserting the serial numbers. I feel

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 2>like that's always This movie has been in production for

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 2>so long that in May twenty twenty they were looking

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 2>at like Chloe Grace moretts, Wow, this is like how

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 2>long ago this has been going on? I just I'm

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 2>very interested. I want to know what happened. I mean,

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 2>at one point, Emerald Fennel, who most famous now for Saltburn,

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 2>but who at the time was very much in the

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 2>conversation about Phoebe waller Bridge because she had written the

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.719
<v Speaker 2>next season of Killing Eve. She was involved in this.

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Like there feels like there has been a whole world man.

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>The Phoebe, the Phoebe post mm hmmm post flea Bag.

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not. It's really stalled out on trying to write

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>for movies and start and stuff.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the whole thing is interesting.

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I also I am learning a lot here because I guess

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Keanu was originally.

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Supposed to be Jedi Master Soul in.

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 2>The Acolyte makes a lot of sense. That would have

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 2>been very interesting. But Yeah, basically this movie has been

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 2>through a lot, been through let's say, I'm not gonna

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 2>say hell, but it's been through a production struggle.

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 3>It's come from an unusual kind of space.

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Of being a movie that was its own original movie

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that was then rewritten into the franchise.

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, let's we're gonna see.

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 2>This is a very big I mean, I feel like

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, which is very rare for me.

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I literally have a theory or or a guess, but

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 3>I feel like there's.

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>A positive note up in the air. It's been fun

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>to go to the movies this.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 3>This spring and something we had much good movies.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, even the ones that are bad are kind of fun.

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm gonna I'm gonna continue to enjoying going to

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the movies and seeing from the world of john Wick Ballerina.

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 3>Yes, from the lot of john Wick Ballerina.

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break and we'll be right back

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Omnibus on Gunfu. Yeah, and we're back. Welcome

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to another edition of the Omnibus where lore and analysis

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>and understanding come together. Today we are discussing the cinematic

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>subgenre gun fu, a bullet ballet through the lens of

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the John Wick franchise, perhaps its most famous exponent. Yes,

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>gunfu is exactly what it sounds like, folks. It's a

0:26:56.160 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>style of modern action that combines martial arts style, choreography

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and gunplay. The results, at their best, as in the

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>John Wick series, brings shape to the chaos of combat,

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>creates a deadly dance. The roots of the subgenre go

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to the Hong Kong action films

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of the sixties and seventies, the Kung fu films, the

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Wusha epics, and its branches reached through the decades and

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>across the ocean to Hollywood's adopt adoption of the style

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in films like Desperado the Matrix, which is perhaps the

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>most famous and popular combination of Wusha and Hollywood style gunplay.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>The Wanted, the kind of criminally underrated wanted film, and

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's book based on a comic book by who, let's

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>forget who wrote, and of course and of course the

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>John Wick film series. This is a wild ride, So

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and grab two release the doves. Let's dive

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 1>in slow motion. In slow motion, even if you're not

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a fan of Shaw Brothers films or you know classic

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>kung fu and Wusha films, Wusha being a style of

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Chinese storytelling involving adventure, martial arts, medieval weaponry, and kind

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of like righteous justice. You know the tropes involved with

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of things, most notably perhaps the image of

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a lone hero, perhaps armed with a sword or spirit,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps unarmed, taking on a horde of enemies, dozens

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of enemies.

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 3>All alone, with lots of wirework.

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, these films dominated the Hong Kong based cinema of

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the sixties and seventies, and the style eventually trickled through

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to the US with nineteen seventy one's kind of martial

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>arts landmark Billy Jackow a forgotten film at this point,

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course with the superstar star comet that was

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Lee. But by the mid eighties, Bruce had passed,

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and martial arts films, even in Hong Kong entered a

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of transition period. In the US, these kind of

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>films which were so associated with Lee, almost alone with him,

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>had retreated to the realm of b movies. I See you,

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Jim Katta, I see you. You know, the Ninja franchise

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>also as well.

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, this is an omnibus for another day, but

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 2>it was so connected to Bruce Lee that we entered

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 2>into an era of what we call Bruce ploitation, which.

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Was movie they got the fake people.

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Who were fake Bruce Lee's. So it really was that

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 3>connected to him.

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 2>And then yeah, those American stories like Jim Cotton, like

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 2>American Ninja three, American you know.

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I love I love the American American Ninja three. I

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>believe is the one where she's possessed by the spirit

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of the ninja. Right, Yeah, I love that one. Okay.

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>So by the eighties, Hollywood action had become dominant, and

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the action of this period was much more heavily armed,

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>much more heavily muscled. We're talking, you know, Arnold Schwarzenegger,

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.239
<v Speaker 1>sly stallone, and they were still taking on masses and

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>masses and massive bad guys. It's just that they were

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>gunning them down with like M sixty machine guns and

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>with you know, assault rifles with grenade launchers under the barrel.

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Chan's landmark police story from nineteen eighty five took

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>these action oriented Hollywood influences like car chases, gunplay, etc.

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And blended it with Jackie's trademark kung fu choreography and

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>his iconic daredevil stuntwork to create this kind of modern

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>day cops and criminal story that provided the energy of

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a kung fu brawl, but in a contemporary action setting.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Here were the stirrings of a new kind of action language.

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>The Hong Kong tours were essentially asking, how can we

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>take what we were good at, what we know, the wushu,

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:20.479
<v Speaker 1>the martial arts, and combine it with this new world

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of firearm driven action, and so enter jhn Wu. Wu

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>came up through the kind of Hong Kong kung fu,

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>wusha and romantic films of the period, but by the

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties, influenced by American action films, he began to

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>create something new. He took the elegant, the precise choreography

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of kung fu and then honestly simply added guns, usually

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>two nine millimeter barettas, one in each hand. This genre

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong and in Asia was called heroic bloodshed,

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably it's the closest analog that we have

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to the style that we call gunfu.

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Here.

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Wu launched his cinematic fuselage with a Better Tomorrow nineteen

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>eighty six. He followed up with my personal favorite film

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of his, The Killer in nineteen eighty nine, So many doves,

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so many exploding cars, so much action, so much romance,

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and then followed those up with what many consider his

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>masterpiece nineteen ninety twos, Hard Boiled. These films almost alone

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>really created an entirely new language of action cinema, as

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Leong wrote in the Films of John Wu in

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the Art of Heroic Bloodshed quote. Before nineteen eighty six,

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong cinem was firmly rooted in two genres, the

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>martial arts film and the comedy. Gunplay was not terribly

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>popular because audiences had considered it boring compared to fancy

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>kung fu moves or graceful swordplay of Wusha epics. What

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>movie grulers needed was a new way to present gunplay

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to show it as a skill that could be honed,

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>integrating the acrobatics and the grace of the traditional martial arts.

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what John Wu did. Wu did that

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>by shooting action scenes with incredible deliberation and precision and style,

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>using every tool he had tracking shots. It's kind of

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>sweeping Dolly moves, all of it, often drenched in languorous

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>slow motion. Incredible amount.

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 2>If you have said mission impossible too, Yeah, how much

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 2>this man loves slow.

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Motion love, And perhaps most importantly and subtly, he shrunk

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the range of a gun. No, your hero can shoot

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy from across the street, from across you know,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a football field, but that's not fun to look at.

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what the traditional Asian audiences were considering pouring. And

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>so the idea was to shrink the effective range so

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that a gun is more like a knife or a sword.

0:33:56.080 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And the results were both incredibly violent and style but

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>also intimate. And I think this is incredibly well exemplified

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>by The Killer, where your hero the anti hero assassin

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>gone rogue. He does gun down like dozens and dozens

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and dozens of suit wearing hit men who are trying

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to kill him Hollywood style, but also when he confronts

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>his foil, the heroic cop, who is the also the

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>only person who who's he's both pursuing the assassin the killer,

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>but he's also the only person who really understands him.

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's very lame his robs.

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's all of these. There's one extended standoff around

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the blind love interest that they both kind of share,

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>where they both have their guns out and they're holding

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>their guns against each other, you know, against the other

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>person's header, against the other person's side, while having this

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>normal casual conversation pretending to be old friends in front

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of this woman who can't see what's going on, and

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the results are so unique and again so intimate for

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>an action movie. Nineteen ninety two's Hard Boiled Again. Woo's

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>what many consider his masterpiece has probably his crowning achievement

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in film, a nearly three minute long take gun battle

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>which takes place inside of a hospital that is just

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>getting blown apart, and it is fantastic. The camera willet

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you will never forget it, and the camera prowls alongside

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Chaalian fat as he blasts his way through corridors of goons,

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>both up close and medium distance, the mayhem unfolding in

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>real time. It's a jaw dropping sequence that you will

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.720
<v Speaker 1>not forget. The long take not only shows the virtuosity

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of Wu, his skill is technique, and his stunt team,

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 1>but it also exemplifies Gunfu's core idea treating gun play

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>with the same discipline, staging, and spatial awareness as a

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>kumfu sparring match, and Hollywood noticed that this stuff was happening.

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Nineteen eighty nine is Teguin Cash starring so Uster Salona

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in a shockingly buff off liberally stole from Chan's nineteen

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>eighty five police Story, including its crowning stunt in which

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Chan like slides down a pole that is surrounded by

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>these kind of Christmas light type wire lights and the

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>lights all pop as he slides down. By the mid nineties,

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Wu had come to La been lured over, where he

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>arguably became the go to Iraq action director of the period.

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair to.

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:55.399
<v Speaker 3>Say, wouldn't you.

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Releasing a string of hits, including nineteen nine seven's Face Off,

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>which I think contains some of the most pure gun

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>fu sequses in in Wu's oof and is also one

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the weirdest movies ever made. It's so weird, so strange.

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I went to see it at videots for my birthday

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years ago, and it was so funny

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 2>to watch it in a sold out theater with a

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 2>ton of people and a lot of them definitely hadn't

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 2>watched it before, and like every single time they're like.

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna take the face everyone was like cheering.

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Like. I also think that something that Face Off has

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 2>and why I think John Wick ended up becoming so

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 2>popular and so perfectly suited to the era that came out,

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 2>and is Face Off is very silly.

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 3>It's Nick Cage, It's John Travolta, It's John Wu.

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 2>There is like very silly. There's a lot of laughs,

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of unintentional loves. There's a lot of

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:58.479
<v Speaker 2>like real melodrama, which which we love. Think, yes, John

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Weary very read a serious and I think that the

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 2>combination of gun fu and then like a kind of grim,

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 2>gritty American action aesthetic that really brought those two things together.

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Quentin Tarantino praised John Wu as quote a sheer

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>genius who reinvented the crime action genre, liking likening Wu's

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.879
<v Speaker 1>influence to that of Sergiolioni on westerns or Jean Pierre

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Melville on crime thrillers. I Love John Pierre Melville. Robert

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Riguez gleefully stole from John Wu or borrowed from John

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Wu's influence in his nineteen ninety film ultra low budget,

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>ultra indie action masterpiece Desperado. That film's hero and Tanner

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>benderis is a mariachi with a gun, dives in dual

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:49.359
<v Speaker 1>wields like Chowian Fat in John Wu film blowing away

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.959
<v Speaker 1>bad guys in a dusty Mexican bar to the tune

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of an electric guitar. Rodriguez openly acknowledged that Hong Kong

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 1>cinema was a major inspiration. In an interview at ascreenwriting

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>dot Com from twenty fifteen, Rodriguez said, quote Luke Skywalker,

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Luke Skywalker and Indiana Jones could have been any color.

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>That's what I learned from the John Wu movies. When

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you see a John Wu movie, you want to be Chinese.

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>You want to be one of those guys. I knew

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't because they were Chinese, it was how he

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>presented his heroes. I think a hero can be of

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>any color or any race, if the filmmaker treats him

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of respect and of course a lot

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>of style too make them look cool. All of this

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>evolution and cross cultural pollination paved the way for a

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>movie like john Wick to explode kind of surprisingly onto

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the scene with copious headshots. John Wick, directed by former

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>stuntman Chad's Dahelski and uncredited co director David Leach, is

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the culmination of decades of gun fu refinement and also

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of like UFC Brazilian jiu jitsu influence

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 1>as well, which is kind of amped up the genre.

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It distilled the genre to its its pure essence, a

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>highly trained assad mowing through wave after wave of guys

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in a series of beautifully choreographed combat scenes that mixes judo,

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>jiu jitsu, and glocks in equal measure. Stahelski approached the

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:15.240
<v Speaker 1>project with a reverence for Hong Kong action cinema techniques.

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He said that the key to grade action is training

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the performers relentlessly and shooting the fights clearly, with the

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>crew and camera operators all working in unison with the

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>stunt team, a philosophy explicitly learned from the feet of

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong masters like You and Wuping. While working on

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the Matrix with Keanu Reeves in Hong Kong, Stahelski has

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.879
<v Speaker 1>noted the action team operates holistically. Quote. The cameramen were

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>ex stunt guys, The editors were stunt trained. From the

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>editor to the director to the performers, all on the

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>same page. They were all at the rehearsals. Adopting this approach,

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Stahelski ensured Keanu Reeves was not just memorizing moves, but

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>actually trained intensively in gun handling and martial arts and

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 1>even in tactical driving, essentially turning the actor into a

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>stunt professional. And that's why the action in Wick looks

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so good, looks so fluid, looks so authentically brutal. You

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>can feel how real it is. The fights are executed

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>and filmed in these long, kind of flowing takes as

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>much as possible, with wide angles that let you see

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>everything that's happening, all the exchange of blows, all the gunshots,

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>all the cartridges expended from the gun. This is a

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>deliberate break from the kind of Jason Bourne driven quick cut,

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>shaky hand heldcam style of the two thousands. As Stahelski

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>points out, too often the American approach to action is

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.720
<v Speaker 1>overly edited to quote hide imperfections, whereas the Hong Kong approach,

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>which he seeks to emulate, is to train and shoot

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in the way that there's nothing to hide. The camera

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in John Wick doesn't wobble around just to create fake energy. Instead,

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>it tracks smoothly. It lets you see everything. It lets

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the physicality and the action speak for itself, and the

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>effect is what it is. It's exhilarating, it's shocking, it's surprising.

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>The influence of gunfu extends, of course, well beyond the movies.

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's permeated all of the pop culture landscape. For when

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it revolutionized how video games portray combat, the most obvious

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>example being Max Pain, the hit two thousand and one

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>video game and the ensuing sequels that is essentially a

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 1>love letter to John Wu, in which it's hero Max,

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that kind of grizzled cop dual wields nine millimeter burrettas

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and dives over things in slow motion bullet time, you know,

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 1>blazing away like Chili un fat. The developers even filled

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that game with levels. The developers even filled the game

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:44.760
<v Speaker 1>levels with Fluttering Doves as an easter egg to John

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Wu's films. And so here we are in twenty twenty five,

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the opening of from the world of John

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Wick Ballerina, from Hong Kong to Hollywood, from video games

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to the big screen to you know, Ballerina and beyond.

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Gunfu has proven to be one of action cinema's most

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 1>exhilarating evolutions.

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 3>That's true.

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 2>And this couldn't be better timed because we recently got

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 2>some very exciting news which is straight from Can that

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Hard Boiled has been restored.

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 3>From the original.

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Thirty five millimeter camera negative it premiered it Can and

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:27.280
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be available in North America through Shout

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Factory Studios, and they have actually started a new entertainment

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 2>label that we've all been really excited about called Hong

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 2>Kong Cinema Classics, and yeah, I cannot wait for this.

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:40.280
<v Speaker 2>It's also going to have the restoration of the original

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Cantonese theatrical mono track.

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Like it's gonna be great. And so if you've never

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 3>seen Hard Boiled, you're gonna be able to shit in

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:49.959
<v Speaker 3>beautiful four K very soon.

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 2>On the next episode of X Ray Vision we are

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 2>bringing you a roundup of the biggest nerd news of

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the week, along with my interview with the incredible Philipope Brothers,

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the directors of the new A twenty four chiller Bring

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Her Back, which is in theaters on wide release this week.

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 2>And if you've been saying, oh, I wish I could see.

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 3>You guys on the screen more, well, guess what. That's

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 3>also going to be on YouTube. So go to YouTube.

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 2>People watch it there and yeah, it's gonna be It's

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:19.359
<v Speaker 2>gonna be.

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 3>A lot of fun.

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>X ray Vision is hosted by Jason Concepcion and Rosie

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Knight and is a production of iHeart Podcast.

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Our executive producers are Joel Monique and Aaron Korfman.

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Our supervising producer is Abuzafar.

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Our producers are Carmen Laurent, Dean Jonathan and Bay wack.

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>A theme song is by Brian Vasquez, with alternate theme

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>songs by Aaron Kaufman.

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Special thanks to Soul Rubin, Chris Lord, Kenny Goodman and

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Heidi our discord moderator