WEBVTT - NFL: NFC Preview (Ep. 96)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to betting pros. It's me, Joey p

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Zapia and today, Oh Baby, we're gonna have our

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>NFC preview. Last week, in case you missed it, we

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>had arial epstem from Sports Grid takeing us to the AFC.

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And today it's one of my favorite people, one of

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.959
<v Speaker 1>my members of Team Black book himself. You can check

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>him out on the Action Network and Rodoviz and a

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of other places. He is always working and

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that's why I love him so much because he reminds

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>me of me. He's the one, the only Mike Randall.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>You can follow him on Twitter at Randall Rant. Mikey,

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it is so nice to see you. I'm so used

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to in the years gone by, doing shows with you

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>every week. Now we don't get to do that. So this,

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>my friend, is a special treat to spend some quality

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>time with you. Joey.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 2>It's about special moments, and this is certainly one of them.

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 2>I am honored to be here. You and I have

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>done great work together. Now we're doing on a video.

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna talk NFC Football's around the corner. Let's get

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>after it.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's get after a baby. So today we're gonna talk

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>about those divisions, how they're set up, and of course

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.199
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be using Betting Pros. And if you haven't already,

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure you go over to Betting Pros and don't

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>forget about our apps and everything that we offer here

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a Fantasy Pros too, that we can get all the

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>updates on things that are going on when lines are moving.

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But betting Pros gives you that consensus, and if you're

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>new to wagering, it's a great place because if there's

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>wagers you like, you can always move over and find

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the betting house that you think have the best odds

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>for that wager if you're really hot on it, and

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of it. So basically, it's like calling all

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the houses, having all of them one time, one stop

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>shop and makes life a lot easier. And I like that.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>I like them. A busy guy, I need efficiency and

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what Betting Pros is going to give you. And

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>let's start here with the NFC East. Oh, everybody's favorite division, Mike,

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>because you know, it was so exciting to watch no

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>team with a five hundred record in this division last year.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, that Washington fotball team plucky. I

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed them. I was rooting for them. It was them

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>against the world. With that incredible defense, One can only

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>imagine that defense will be better. Ryan Fitzpatrick comes into

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that division. The Cowboys hopefully will have Dak Prescott healthy

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and ready to rock in Week one. Then there's the

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Giants and the Eagles. The Cowboys, though, are the favorite.

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course they are because they're the public team. Plus

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>one forty five on the Cowboys, the Washington football team

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>plus two thirty the Giants at plus three seventy five,

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and plus five hundred for the Philadelphia Eagles, And again

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>these are the consensus betting pros numbers. So when you

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>look at the East, Mike, obviously, every time you look

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at the Cowboys the Yankees teams like that, there's always

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>that big public money and that kind of influences the spread.

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But is this plus one forty five actually a pretty

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>good number on a Cowboys team that has an offense

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that is really just ready to rock and roll.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a decent number, But I have questions about the Cowboys.

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Their defense was so bad last year that they spent

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 2>the first six picks in the NFL draft on defense.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.119
<v Speaker 2>Dak has returned and the offense was exploding when he

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 2>was there and healthy last year over thirty points per game.

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 2>But my problem, Joe is the offensive line isn't quite

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 2>as elite as it used to be and the defense

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 2>is revamped in comes dan Quinn Listen. Dan Quinn struggled

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 2>in Atlanta, had the peak moment with the Super Bowl

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 2>went downhill. I don't know if he's the defensive guru

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>to solve the problem. So I like plus money with Dallas,

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think they're going to win the division.

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go in a different direction. And as

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>you said, America backs the Cowboys. That's always going to

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:30.559
<v Speaker 2>inflate that number.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, So who do you like, Harey? Is it

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the Washington football team defense with an actual quarterback, because

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>last year, I mean the quarterback play was let's just

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>say MESSI is that? Is that a kind way of

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>putting it?

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Seven and nine with Alex Smith, Dwayne Haskins, and Kyle

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Allen at quarterback. Their defense last year third in defensive DVOA,

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 2>second against the pass. I like to look, Joe, in

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 2>these divisions at the most reliable unit, and that unit

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 2>is the Washington defense.

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 3>In this division.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 2>There's no chance that Iron Vera defense is going to

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>come in and not be elite. So they bring in

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Fitzpatrick. That's going to be better quarterback play. Their

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 2>offensive line should be better, and they won the division

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 2>last year with that limited quarterback production. Antonio Gibson, by

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the way, he used to be a wide receiver. Now

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>they're finally using him in the passing game. So many weapons, consistency,

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 2>and they almost won a playoff game with Taylor Heineke.

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 2>My favorite is Washington. I think they should be a

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 2>favorite on the board. I like him here to win

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the division once again. You and I see eye to eye,

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>and that's why I.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy doing shows of you. Sometimes there's debate, but I'm

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>with you, man, I think Washington might just win this out.

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>You're right. This is the best unit there defensively by far.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And also if they could just get enough offense. And

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>there's already some talk about Antonio Gibson getting a CMC

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like workload. Ooh, baby, sign me up for that in fantasy.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's possible.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 3>What's funny Joe is. They've said that about JD.

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Mcizzick and Antonio Gibson and all the running backs there.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 2>But the big key to me is the one set

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 2>I like to look at is the re result in

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 2>close games, one score games. Last year, Washington was three

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.799
<v Speaker 2>and five oho and three in games decided by three points,

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>that usually regresses. I'll take last year's division champion.

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 3>With a little bit of positive regression.

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I love that. The positive regression. I like to be positive.

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on to the north. Here, the

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Packers are at the top heavy favorites minus one seventy seven.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the consensus betting pro's number. Then you have the

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Vikings at plus three hundred, the Bears at plus five

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>point fifty, the Lions at plus twenty five hundred. God

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>bless them, they're so sweet, the Lions, right, So let's

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>leave them out of it. You know, justin Fields gave

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>some people something to think about, certainly some excitement in

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that first preseason game, running around making some plays. The

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Vikings defense seems on paper to be going in the

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>right direction, although my goodness, Mike Zimmer was none too

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>happy with his defense against the Broncos last week and

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>their performance. Is this just a foregone conclusion you stay

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>away from this division because the Packers and Aaron Rodgers

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of have something to prove.

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Yet again, no, it's not.

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going with the Vikings and I love that

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.679
<v Speaker 2>performance because it's going to sync the number. The key question,

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 2>and you and Ariel talked about that last week, is

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings defense at home. First off, they were affected

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 2>by no crowd noise. You talked about that in Minnesota.

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>That's going to return last year? No, Danielle Hunter, he

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 2>was fifth and sacks in twenty nineteen, Anthony Barr, Eric

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Kendrix linebackers combined miss nineteen games, and defensive tackle run

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 2>stopper Michael Pierce he opted out because of COVID. They

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>signed Patrick Peterson, They signed Bashad brielin. I think the

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 2>defense returns again. I bank on Mike Zimmer at home.

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 2>He has a great number against the spread and they're

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 2>very tough to beat. And by the way, in the

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>last nine games between the Packers and the Vikings, because

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 2>if you're going to win this division, you have to

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 2>be able to beat Green Bay Minnesota five three and one.

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 2>I look for a bounce back in the vikings. I

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 2>like the number of plus three hundred. I grabbed it earlier.

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Now that Rogers is back, I think the money and

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the public sentiment is going too far in the Packers' way.

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I like the vikings here in the NFC North.

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not the biggest Aaron Rodgers fan. I

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>have great respect for Aaron Rodgers, so this kind of

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>warms the cockles of my heart when you say things

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. And I remember last year too, they went

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>in there to Green Bay and they put a whooping

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>on them. That was a fun game. Not if you're

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a Packers fan, but if you're a football fan. That

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a fun game last season. Always weird

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>not to see people in lambeau Field for that game,

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but still a great stat there with the head to head.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Because you're right, it is gonna come down to them.

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Bears are quite ready yet, but

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly keep a team to keep our eyes on. Let's

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>move over to the South. Ear very different South, I

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>think year over year because Drew Brees is gone. The

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers the defending, reigning undisputed champs minus two hundred, but

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the Saints at plus three point fifty, the Falcons plus

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred, the Panthers at plus one thousand. Now you know,

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm a Tom Brady guy. That's that's well known

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>here in the course, well documented, well revered, but justified, justified.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>This is to me is the Bucks again that defense

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>so good, Tom Brady, so good, having fun, loving life.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that could stop the Bucks for me,

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>from winning this division is just a rash of injuries,

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>including maybe even Brady. That's the only thing that I

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>think can hold them back. Because even if they have

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>an injury to say a Fournett or Ronald Jones, well,

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you still got running back depth here on the team.

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You have wide receiver depth on the team. You have

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>some young guys too who can fill in and step up.

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>We saw that even last year at times happen. But

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean when you look at ab and Chris Evans

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and Godwin, and you look at the Saints and what's

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>become of them now between no Drew Brees and the

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas drama that's unfolding in front of us here

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>with his injury and whether or not he ever comes

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>back and plays it down for them, I mean, the

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Falcons are gonna rebuild. Is this a hard stay away

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for you? And when you're look at it at this South.

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 2>It's the Bucks and there's no competition here. Once Michael

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Thomas went down the changeover in quarterback, I can't go

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 2>with the Saints Santsa with a great defense. We're certainly

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 2>not going with the Falcons with a first year head

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 2>coach and the Panthers.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 2>However, I don't mind minus two hundred going with the

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Bucks because I think they're the clear division favorite. I

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 2>think they're one of the strongest favorites in the entire NFL.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 2>But another area I want to look at is Carolina's

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>over under number. I'm taking the Panthers over seven and

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 2>a half. I think that number is too low. I

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 2>think it's a second year. Now we're talking about the

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 2>coaching staff, Matt Rules. Second year Sam Darnald comes in.

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Joe.

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Sam Darnald's reputation went down the drain because we heard

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 2>him say the phrase I'm seeing ghosts.

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 3>If there was no mic.

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 2>And that did not happen, we would not be thinking

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 2>so low about Sam Darnald. He's had terrible offensive line play.

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Carolina should provide that a little bit better than he

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 2>has in the past, and most importantly, Carolina's strength. The

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>schedule thirteenth overall, but they get off to a great start.

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Listen to the teams.

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Carolina plays to start home Jets at Houston home Philly.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 2>That's four home games in the first six weeks.

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 3>They were three and eight one score games.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 2>They were zero and three in games decided by three

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 2>points or less. They played Tampa Bay in weeks sixteen

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 2>and eighteen, which means Tampa Bay could be resting because

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 2>they could have locked up division. So I'm all in

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 2>on the Bucks. There is no challenge here from the

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Saints or anyone else. But I also like Carolina is over,

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>which is seven and a half.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Week eighteen still sounds weird to me when you say it.

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I just I still gotta still gotta wrap my mind

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>around week eighteen. But I'm with you, man, I think

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Darnold can really turn things around here. Joe

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Brady one of the best play callers in my opinion,

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the soon to be head coach of the Cincinnati Bengals

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in a year from now. That's that's what I think. Anyway,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if I'm right. Is there money I can

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>put on that somewhere because I'd like to Randall if

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I could, I'd like to put money on possible.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 2>The Bengals don't like to pay for coaches though that

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 2>that aren't there, so I might have no choice.

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I have no choice with with the with the crowd

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>they're putting together, with Burrow and jamar Chas and those guys,

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it just feels like the right fit. But I'm with

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you one hundred percent. I do like that Panther's number

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>as well on the over because you get that healthy

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>CMC back Donald with something to prove, a lot of

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>good stuff there and some winnable games. You know, the Saints.

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Saints got old. The Saints kind of

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>had their window and it's kind of stopped. And I

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man Taysom Hill, Teddy Bridgewater, I mean to

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Taysom Hill and James Winston. It's just the lack of

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>decision here on that really just kind of puts me

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in a tough spot when it comes to the Saints.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree, Marcus Calloy listen great for fantasy with

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 2>the options and the value he has, not great that

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 2>he's your top wide receiver for at least Joe seven

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 2>to eight games and maybe longer this year for New Orleans.

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go over to the very competitive division here,

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>which is the West. You got the Rams of plus

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>two hundred, the forty nine Ers can send his number

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>plus two hundred, then the Seahawks plus two seventy five,

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Cardinals at plus six hundred. So look, I

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like the Cardinals. I like Kyler Murray. I think they're

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be fun to watch. The play calling still

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes is questionable, but I think it's a three team division.

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>How do you see this one working out? Because I'm curious,

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>this is very tight. You have Russell Wilson, you have

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt Stafford now in town, and who knows, Trey Lance

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>could even be the Week one starter. I still think

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it's unlikely, But will a Jimmy Garoppolo gets hurt. It

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>might be sooner than later, just because whether they like

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it or not. How do you see the West here unfolding?

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>From a wagering perspective? With these teams so close plus

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>two hundred Rams, plus two hundred nine Ers and plus

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>two seventy five Seahawks.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna call Coolio because this is a better's Paradise

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the NFC West, it's between the Rams in San Francisco.

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>For me, I'm gonna toss Seattle out. Their offensive line

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 2>is always in shambles, and sure the book has been

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 2>on Russell Wilson that he starts slow and he's like

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback fought fourteen in fantasy and then he has

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>a miraculous finish.

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Last year it was reverse.

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about Russell Wilson, no doubt MVP, and then

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>things slow down. I know Pete Carroll gets a defense together.

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna put them a notch below. It's the Rams

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 2>of San Francisco, and I'm gonna go with San Francisco

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 2>for three reasons. First is the rushing attack. Center Alex

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 2>Mack is now back with Kyle Shanahan, and that should

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 2>be huge for their offensive line. If we can just

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>get his sweating problems done, Joe, he's having a lot

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 2>of sweating problems on the exchange with the ball to

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback. Everything should be fine. Maybe he's just excited

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to be there. But that offensive line with Trent Williams,

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 2>who's the highest graded tackle per PFF, is going to

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 2>be solid. Let's talk about their running backs. Raheem Moster,

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Trey Sermon, of course, is shooting up fantasy draft boards.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Jamichael Hasty impressed in Week one. They have a litany

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 2>of running backs that are impressive. Second reason is the schedule.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 2>They get the AFC South along with the Falcons, Bengals, Eagles,

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 2>and Lions. They have the easiest strength of schedule per

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Warren Sharp in the league, and it's not close. Lastly,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 2>the Niners just need some injury regression. Last year they

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 2>won six and ten. Jimmy Garoppolo out for ten games,

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Deebo Samuel nine, Nick Bosa, d Ford miss time, and

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Moster was out for eight. When they were healthy, was

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 2>only two games. What happened Week six and seven? Beat

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the Rams and one at New England. Give me Kyle Shanahan,

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>give me some average quarterback play, and I think they

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>should go over their win total, which is ten and

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 2>a half. People think that's high. There's a reason it's high, folks.

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 2>I like the forty nine ers in the NFC West.

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 2>I think this is gonna be competitive. I think it's

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 2>gonna be down the wire. But I'm gonna take the

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Rams in this one. And here's why.

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Matthew Stafford unleashed now is going to be

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>very different. Matt Stafford, You're basically taking one of the

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>more underrated quarterbacks in the game and taking possibly one

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of the worst places you could possibly be and dropping

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>him one of them the best offensive mines in football

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>and Sean McVay. You've got a bunch of wide receivers

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to throw the football. You've got a really good tight

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>end in Tyler Higbee. I do think the cam Akers

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>injury does hurt them. I'm still curious to see if

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>they pick up somebody else, but hey, maybe they do

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like the kids that they have, Maybe Jones and Funker

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>guys that they like. We'll see, But I don't know, man,

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it feels to me like Aaron Donald in this defense.

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>What this team was really lacking was, you know, the

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback play. Jared Goff just could not get it done

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in the big spots. I think Matthew Stafford will and

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think as much as I love Trey Lance, and

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I do, I am mister Trey Lance at the end

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of the day, I just have a hard time thinking

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that the rookie can take Hi past Matt Stafford. This

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a fascinating division I think it's fun

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that neither of us went Seahawks in it, even though

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the best number.

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I have no problem.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I think Stafford's gonna have a monster year, and I

0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>think the injury to camp Akers means he's going to

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 2>even more. I'm just a little headstand with the Rams

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 2>offensive line a little bit old. The defense is certainly solid.

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I have no problem with that at all. I think

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a coin flit between those two teams. I do

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 2>put seat a little bit behind these other two. All right,

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 2>let's take a look now at the NFC. The winners.

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Potentially we have the Bucks at plus three hundred. Here

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the favorites, of course, Actually the three to one actually

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>have a better number than I thought you'd get on the Bucks.

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>If you can find anything above that, get on there

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and take it. Because I know it's boring. I know

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it's frustrating, folks. I know you hate Tom Brady, but

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a really complete football team, and it's got continuity,

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and that is a tough thing to break. It's the

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>continuity year over year, the fact that these guys really

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>enjoy each other's company that goes a long way. Like

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this whole good vibes thing. It's not something to overrate.

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>It's something that actually is investible in a lot of ways.

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Plus three hundred there for the Buccaneers, the Packers at

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>plus five point fifty, your forty nine ers. That's why

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call them your forty nine ers out plus

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>six fifty, and of course the Rams at that same number,

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>plus six fifty. So of the favorites. To me, Mike,

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>when I look at this board, I see the Bucks

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and I see the Rams. Those are the two teams

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I could see coming out of the NFC. I just

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time. Aaron Rodgers, you know, in the

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>big spot, just always comes up short, just what history

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>has taught us. And you know, the forty nine ers again,

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you gotta get past Brady, you gotta get past Stafford

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs and on and Aaron Rodgers or some combination.

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I find that a little hard to believe. But for you,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is there certain place or places you would want to

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>place bets?

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for the favorites, those are fine, and I think

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 2>plus three hundred for Tampa Bay is very strong, given

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 2>that they're probably gonna have home field advantage. Well coached,

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 2>as long as there's no major injuries. You said, I

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>think they should be fine. I have concerns with the

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Packers the offensive line. Corey Lindsay is now with the Chargers.

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Rick Wagner now with the Ravens. They have David Bactiari,

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>of course, the master Chugger from my Milwaukee Bucks title

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>run there in the Fiord.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>When did you become a Bucks fan? What did that know? Oh?

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I've been a Bucks fan. I have a good

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 2>friend that works for the Bucks. Here fear the deer

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Bucks and six of course Joe. Okay, but they reputation

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 2>of the Packers defense to me is still soft per PFF.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 2>They were ranked twenty first and twenty seventh in pressure

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 2>rate the last two years. Their secondary, by the way,

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 2>is a little overrated. Jay R Alexander fantastic all pro.

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 2>But everyone else I'm not sure about that. I don't

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 2>like the Packers there. I would roll with the Niners

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 2>as well. I think the Niners, like I said, injury

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 2>regression is going to make a big, big difference, so

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 2>with the favorites for me, if you want to go Bucks,

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm fine with it.

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Also like the Niners of plus six fifty.

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, did anybody ever tell you you look like

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you could be a head coach, especially with the with

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the hat and the outfit today. You really I mean,

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting here on the show here, and of course

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you can always watch us over on Betting Pros on

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube side of Fantasy Pros, and I'm looking at it.

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at Randal and thinking, this is like a

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>press conference with a head coach here. The way you're

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>all done up today.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, and this was such a big thing for me.

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I went to look at al Pacino and his motivational

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 2>speech about those inches. That's what I'm on the team.

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Jammie Fox is behind me, clapping right now.

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Jamie Fox actually his character and that

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>reminds me a little justin Fields. I got a similar

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of swagger about them. That's the way I would

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>go with that. All right. Some of the long shots here,

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and some are longer than others. You got the Seahawks

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>plus eleven hundred, the Cowboys plus fifteen hundred, then the

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Saints of plus sixteen. That's lighting money on fire. Don't

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>do that, boys and girls, the Vikings plus twenty two,

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals plus twenty two, and then there's the Washington

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>football team at plus twenty five hundred. Now, I'm an

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>old school football guy, and there's something about playing defense

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in January, running the football that it works. It's one

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>of those things that it really works. And if you

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>could take one of those elite quarterbacks off the field,

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>play defense, control the football. And what's the kryptonite of

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady is a pass rush. Just you want way

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to beat hims, do put him on his rear end.

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.239
<v Speaker 1>That's something the Washington football team can do. If you're

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna sprinkle a little bit, Chips, the sprinkle for me

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>on a long shot is the Washington football team this year.

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>As crazy as that sounds, you're kind of not in

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>your head. I feel like you're kind of feeling that

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>too a little bit.

0:18:58.119 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 3>You took the words out of my mouth.

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 2>That's why a great mind think of like I want

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 2>a defense and I want to run the ball, And

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 2>that's why I like Minnesota plus twenty two hundred and

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I like Washington a plus twenty five hundred offensive line,

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 2>stop the run pressure. Keep in mind Tampa Bay almost

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 2>lost to Taylor Heineke. Just keep that in mind in

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs last year. That's the type of teams I

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 2>want as much as my Saints had here without Michael Thomas.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think they can do it. And they

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 2>have to work out the quarterback play. Sean Payton's gonna

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>do some great things with Taysom Hill. But I just

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 2>think these other teams are better built for that win

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 2>that they need in the cold Minnesota, Washington, no problem

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>going on the road here. I like both of those.

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Plus twenty two hundred plus twenty five hundred, I will

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 2>take it.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Plus twenty five. You don't have to put that much

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>on it, you know, put a little bit, and then

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, if it starts to look good,

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.959
<v Speaker 1>then you double down later on. That's what you do.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's take a look at some win totals

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and some player props in the NFC. Let's start with

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Cardinals. We already kind of talked about the

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers, which I'm glad Mike brought it up, because

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a team that I think is not being taken

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>as seriously as they should. Also, very young defense. They

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>spent every single draft pick two years ago on defense,

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>and they were very green. But if you walk closely

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>last year that Carolina Panthers defense started to get it.

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>They started to look very young athletic, and they weren't

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>nearly as taken advantage of as they were in the

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>first part of the season. I'm fascinated to see what

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that unit looks like in twenty twenty one. Let's talk

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Cardinals though. The number for them is eight

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half plus money on the over, plus one

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>oh five minus one twenty five on the under. Ken

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and again we have to, like I said last week,

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>we have to readjust our brains here about this eight number,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>because as not for No. Five hundred anymore. You're either

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>a winning team or you're losing team unless you get

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a tie. And nobody likes that. Nobody eight and a half.

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the number. What do you do with the Cardinals here?

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Over under or stay away?

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Didn't share my notes with you prior to this, but

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 2>you said five hundred, and that's the key number, Joe.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>In Cliff Kingsbury's career, both as a college coach and

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 2>a pro coach, he has got over five hundred just

0:20:55.720 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 2>twice in early years. He's getting this reputation as this

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>is fake sharp in the fantasy community. Thirty five and

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 2>forty career record in college as a head coach, thirteen

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 2>eighteen and one as an NFL head coach. They were

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 2>eight and eight last year when San Francisco was six

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 2>and ten. I am taking the under here. I know

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 2>they added JJ Watt, but they added a lot of

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 2>older players, which during this year with COVID still as

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 2>an issue, could be a problem. JJ Watt thirty two,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 2>AJ Green thirty three, Malcolm Butler thirty one. James Conner's

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty six, but he's had injury history, just came off

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 2>the COVID list. The Cardinals face the sixth most difficult

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 2>slate of pass defenses per Warren Sharp. I'll take the

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 2>fake sharp Cliff Kingsbury, he will go under eight and

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I love it, man, you crushing it all right. Let's

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>go to the Dallas Cowboys. Here again the public money

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes I like to take advantage of this. Now

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the numbers nine and a half here plus one p

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>fifteen on the over, minus one thirty five on the

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>under on that nine and a half. So look, I

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>know you talk about the defense being bad, but man,

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>this feels like a team that could really just outscore

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 1>everybody or at least most people to get to ten wins.

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys feel like a ten win team to me, especially

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>cause they play the Eagles and the Giants twice. I mean, yeah,

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you gotta go three and one. You gotta imagine like

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that's three wins right there, at least in my mind.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think about this team? I know

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they drafted Michael Parsons, I know they've made some moves

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>here at least in the offseason, But nine and a half.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Can they get to double digits? I feel like they can.

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think any team in the NFL is more

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 2>destined for nine and eight than the Dallas Cowboys. They

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 2>have a defense that still I still think is gonna struggle.

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the offensive line is that much better

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.719
<v Speaker 2>than the defenses of both Washington and the Giants. By

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 2>the way, in this division, the Cowboys get the public

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 2>money that the number always gets inflated.

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Is Dak healthy? I think so?

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 2>But the second arm MRI is a little concerning, and

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 2>if you know, if he misses time, this team is

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 2>going south. Little note here, Joe, since two thousand with Dallas,

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 2>because they receive all the public money, they are fourteen

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>and seven to the underwin total since two thousand, I'm

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna make at fifteen and seven. We will go under

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 2>here with the Cowboys.

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Very nice, Okay, all right, So we're gonna differ on

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that one. We're together on one. Different on the other.

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Packers. The number is ten and

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a half minus one twenty on the over, plus one

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred on the under. So ten and a half. I mean,

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty strong season. Obviously a division that could be

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty competitive. Though, So when you're looking at this North

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're looking at the Packers here, can they get

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the over ten and a half? Is this number you

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>like or don't this one?

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm staying away. I think it's the Vikings and the

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Packers clearly ahead of everyone else in the division. Lions

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm not into. I think the Bears are headed in

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the wrong direction. So could I see Minnesota Joe getting

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 2>eleven wins and then the Packers also getting eleven in

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota winning the tiebreaker or possibly twelve and eleven?

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't like the defense. I think they're soft. I

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 2>don't like the offensive line. I also have this thing

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 2>with Mojo, you know, the whole thing with Aaron Rodgers

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 2>in the offseason. I'm telling you who I want, Randall Cobb.

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna stay away from this one. I could see,

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 2>even though I'm down on the Packers, them cresting this number.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 3>So it's to stay away from.

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Me crusting this number. Nice vocab. I enjoy that. You

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>come for the football, you stay for the vocab, everybody.

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Rams. The over under for the Rams this year.

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>That number is ten and a half plus one twenty

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on the ten and a half. Getting nice number there

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on that minus one forty on the ten and a

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>half on the under. So your thoughts here on the Rams? Again?

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Tough division, So what are your thoughts here on this one?

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, super competitive division, but the plus money on the

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 2>over ten and a half is attractive to me. This

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 2>is the most competitive division, but they could have two

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 2>teams that are just that much better. Seattle is sort

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 2>of the wildcar here, but the Rams do look solid.

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 2>They can put points up. Aaron Donald Jalen Ramsey. The

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 2>plus money is the key here. The fact that I'm

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.479
<v Speaker 2>getting plus one twenty if they can get eleven wins

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is too attractive to pass up. Even though I like

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco to possibly win the NFC.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the over here with the Rams.

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.479
<v Speaker 1>This next one, I want to smash the under. I'm

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell you, smash it. New Orleans Saints nine nine

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>without Drew Brees Now, Michael Thomas, I'm sorry, I just

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>cannot get there plus one hundred. I know it's minus

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>one twenty, but you know what, I think this is

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the few times I see a minus number

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just gonna go with the under. And I'm

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna just grin and Barrett, because I don't see how

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>they get there. I don't see how this is a

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>winning team. I really don't. I mean, look, they've strung

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it together. Sean Payton is a wonderful football coach. But

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the more there's losing Drew Brees

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback, use Drew Brees the leader, and I think

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that is just something you can't account for enough year

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>over year, and I just think this is gonna be

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>an ugly year for the Saints.

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Personally, I agree. I think it's a challenging year. I

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 2>like Taysom Hill over Jamis Winston. I think he went

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 2>three and one. I think it was last year in

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 2>one of those games was the Denver game. I understand

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 2>that with the quarterback issue, that was a give me yeah,

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 2>but there was a disconnect between Camara and Taysom Hill

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 2>getting those dump offs. They don't have any receiving options.

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 2>They really need Adam Troutman to pop as a tight end.

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 2>If he doesn't, they're gonna be in trouble. The defense

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 2>is great, but they're in a division here where they're

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 2>going to be challenged. They have Tampa Bay that to me,

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be two losses without Michael Thomas. Marquez Callaway's

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 2>their leading receiver. I just can't see it. I think

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Kamarai is gonna hit some regression as well. We can

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 2>talk about that later. I'm with you on the under,

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 2>even though the minus money is there, I'm gonna take

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 2>it and I'm gonna lay the juice.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Troutman needs to have a good game this week. I

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>need to see something needs.

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 3>To be Jimmy Graham for them to be if this

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 3>jew's got to be Jimmy Graham.

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but I need to see something, some glimmer of

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>that this week because we're not gonna see anything in

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Week three, because everyone's gonna see it like that. That's great, like.

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>This is such a weird pattern too, because we have preseason,

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>so we have Game one where you're gonna get like

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a little glimmer series or two of guys, and then

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the secondary guys come in and the thirst

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>string guys come in. And then this week I'm anticipating

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see a half of football, maybe from some

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>of these teams, some more than others. But then the

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>following week I expect to see nothing again. It's gonna

0:26:57.840 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be like the old Week four. I would imagine now

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe a couple position battles and things like that to

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>look at, but I don't know. This is kind of

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a make or break week for Troutman there to kind

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of give you at least some confidence going into the year.

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's transition here and finish with some fun stuff. Let's

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>do some player props in the NFC, and let's start

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>with my favorite quarterback in the world, Aaron Rodgers, who

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is never, never negative and obviously is a big team guy.

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Forty five hundred and fifty and a half. That is

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the number, forty five to fifty and a half. Minus

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 1>one twelve on the over, minus one twelve on the under.

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>You want to go over under on the forty five

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>fifty and a half number. For Aaron Rodgers, it's a

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty big number.

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Vegas is so smart they're adding the extra game, and

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.959
<v Speaker 2>that is tempting people to do the over on these bets.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's remember, folks, how do you know the quarterbacks are

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 2>not gonna sit in that last week?

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, we sure that it's going to be seventeen games.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers has.

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 3>Say it with me.

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Joe crested this number once in his entire sixteen year

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 2>NFL career, and that was in twenty eleven when he

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 2>only played fifteen games. I think the number is too high.

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, they want to run the ball. Aj Dillon is.

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Going to get rushing attempts. They want to control it.

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 2>If you think the Packers are going to be good

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and there's gonna have positive game script and you're dealing

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 2>with an older quarterback, I will hit the under here

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 2>minus one twelve.

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>This next one is a fascinating quarterback number at the

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>time we're talking about it because of the injury. Now,

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, I think Dak Prescott going into the

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>season quote unquote healthy, had a real shot at five

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand yards because two years ago he nearly hit that

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>number in just sixteen games, So now you're adding that

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>extra game, the number is forty eight twenty five and

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a half. So four eight hundred and twenty five and

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a half the over plus one zero two the minus

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>one thirty on the under. I think this is an

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>over and don't I don't think this is close again

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>if healthy, And I think the only reason you're getting

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the numbers you're getting on it right now is because

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>people are a little concerned. And I think this number,

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you know, if reports get better, maybe

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you see this number jump in terms of where it's set.

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So what are your thoughts on Dak? Are you you

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing a little bit more hesitant on the Cowboy than I.

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Am on the Cowboys? Yes, on Dak.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 2>No to hit this prop, he has to average three

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 2>hundred and one passing yards per game for only sixteen games.

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 2>He could be off Week seven seventeen and still hit this.

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Or suppose the Cowboys are battling like I project them

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 2>to be at nine to eight and he actually plays

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 2>seventeen last year before he got hurt, three hundred and

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 2>seventy one passing yards per game two point four touchdowns,

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty point four fantasy points. Give me plus money. I

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 2>understand it could be hurt, but that's baked into the number.

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll take a chance here. I will take the over

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 2>with Dak in what I think the Cowboys are going

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 2>to be battling for a playoff spot and he may

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 2>have to play seventeen games.

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley, some people think in the fantasy football community,

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>has an outside shot at being wide receiver one overall.

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And I was a very big Calvin Ridley guy last

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>year partially because Julio Jones was actually still there. I

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>thought that's actually something that's good for the young wide

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver to continue to learn under somebody like Julio and also,

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, continue to have coverage pulled over. But when

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Julio wasn't around, Calvin Riddan still balled out. So that

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is good. Now, this number is one thy three hundred

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and seventy five and a half. That's the number. That's

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty solid number that, my friends, is a Julio number.

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>The question is it's a different head coach. Is it

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a different philosophy. You have Kyle Pitts, you have Gage,

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you have Mike Davis. Ridley is your premium weapon. Let's

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>be honest. Okay, I mean I think Kyle Pitts is

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal prospect. Let's see how he transitions into the NFL.

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think about this number? Thirteen seventy

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>five and a half over under is minus one twelve.

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you do with Ridley here?

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 2>He had thirteen seventy four last year with Julio still

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 2>hanging around Falcons. Pass plays per game last three years fifth,

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 2>first and third. I know Arthur Smith new head coach,

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 2>so we're uncertain. Are we grounding and pounding with Mike.

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Davis and Caydrialison? We are not?

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't think so?

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 2>No way, and listen, I don't think they're going to

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 2>be very strong as a team, so I think they're

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 2>going to be passing a lot. Ridley last year first

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 2>among wide receivers in air yards, fourth and receiving yards,

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 2>seventh in targets, but only thirteenth in target share on

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 2>the Falcons. That obviously goes way up. I think he

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 2>has the same production with more volume efficiency plus volume,

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 2>he could lead the league in receiving yards over for

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Calvin Ridley.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about his teammate Kyle Pitts the

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>rookie sensation, and look, I understand why people are excited.

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>They should be excited about him. The number for him

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought was fascinating eight hundred and a half. That's

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the over under minus one twelve on both. So what

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think about Kyle Pitts? Can he be the

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>anomaly when it comes to rookie tight ends eventually?

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, this year No.

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Most receiving yards by a rookie for tight end Mike

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Dicka one thy seventy six, Shocky back in two thousand

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 2>and two, eight ninety four, Keith Jackson eight sixty nine,

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Chase Young eight sixty four back in seventy three, and

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 2>John Mackie seven sixty four. Do I think that Kyle

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Pitts is going to have the fourth best season ever

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 2>of a tight end as a rookie.

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 3>No, I do not, even in.

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>The current climate of the way the NFL structured, like

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the way it's so wide open now and the need

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Falcons have. That's fair and they're going to

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>pass a lot, But he's not gonna play tight end only.

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>He's probably gonna line up some times out there as well.

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>That's my argument for this number is. That's why I

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's so fascinating. It's like, do you believe he

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>gets work, you know, as a wide receiver basically, or

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is like this weird hybrid player.

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I think he does, Joe, But I think there's a

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 2>learning curve for wide receivers, rookie wide receivers coming in

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the NFL, and we know there's a learning curve for

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 2>rookie tight ends. Hayden Hurst is going to be a splinter.

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Gage will catch some passes, Zachias will catch him passes,

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Mike Davis will catch him passes, all under the umbrella

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 2>of Calvin Ridley. I think he has a very strong year,

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think he could eventually become this dominant of

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 2>a tight end. I don't see it in year one.

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I will take the.

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Under all right, Christian McCaffrey. The rushing total twelve hundred

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half. This is kind of built into whether

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>or not you think he can stay healthy, because it

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>feels like if he's healthy, he smashes this number twelve

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and a half minus one twelve on the over

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and the under. Now, look, I understand he gets a

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of work in the past game as well, but boy,

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>What a difference for Sam Darnold to be dropped into

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this offense with all these these options. DJ Moore, his

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>old friend Robbie Anderson, Terrace Marshall looks like a nice player.

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You got McCaffrey, So I guess here's the question. Is

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Carolina going to be careful with McCaffrey or is it

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>back to business as usual? And how does that impact

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this number?

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 2>What we need to remember is the under is always

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the sharp play because people want to root for things

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 2>to happen, they don't want to root against them. With

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 2>COVID as the variable here, you have to realize that

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 2>that could also play a role. Does Christian McCaffrey play

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 2>all seventeen games. It's unlikely for any running back, and

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even talking about COVID. It is SUPERB twenty

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 2>nineteen season, two hundred and eighty seven carries four point

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.719
<v Speaker 2>eight yards per carrie. Let's go with two hundred and

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 2>sixty carries at four point six yards per carrie, which

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 2>is still really strong. That's eleven ninety six run defenses

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 2>they face this year the Panthers, Pats, Washington, Buffalo, Tampa Bay,

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 2>and New Orleans twice. It's a great number. I think

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 2>it's right there, but I do like under A McCaffrey.

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's see what you think about Camara his

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing total nine to fifty and a half minus one

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve on the over under for him nine to fifty

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Look, they're gonna have to use Kamara

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but historically it's been a lot of work

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>through the air. Do you think he's going to scratch

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>out a thousand yard season potentially here with just the

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>need of what they're gonna need from Alvin Kamara and

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>getting hold up to the amount of workload that maybe

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna demand of him this year. We're aready hearing

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:27.919
<v Speaker 1>some talk about Olatavius Murray might not make the team.

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's madness. I don't know. I was Freeman

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>better than Murray. I don't know what they're doing over there.

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think of this nine to fifty

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half number when it comes to Kamara's rushing total?

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Pop quiz Joe, Sure or false?

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Alvin Kamara has rushed for one thousand yards in a

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>season in the ESL.

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, false, that is false? Sure or false?

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Alvin Kamara has rushed for over nine hundred and forty

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 2>yards in a season.

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh, that's also false.

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:54.240
<v Speaker 3>That is also false.

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>One more, but they all had Drew Brees attached to

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>them that well, in some capacity for the most part.

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Not these last two so much that the last one, this.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Will be the bonus question. Alvin Kamara has rushed for.

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Wait wait wait wait wait wait? Do I win for

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>the bonus question? Like I feel like I've I've got

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the It's like the pyramid, like my eternal respect?

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Is what you get? That worth more?

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Answer it anyway? Okay, go ahead.

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Alvin Kamara has rushed for over nine hundred yards twice

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:20.720
<v Speaker 2>in his four year career.

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>That is also false.

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.439
<v Speaker 2>That is, it's only once. Whoever is the running back?

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think it'll be Murray or Freeman. I think

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 2>teams are going to center on Camara. He obviously is

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 2>elite in the passing game. Eighty one eighty one eighty

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 2>one eighty two receptions is four years. I am going

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 2>under on this number. He's a superior weapon. But I

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 2>don't think he's going to get the rushing attempts. I

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 2>think he is fragile to a certain extent, which is

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 2>why they're not going to hammer it to him. And

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 2>I think we have some recency biased Joe, because I'm

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 2>a little sensitive about Alvin Kamara's six touchdown game.

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I know you are. Oh in our league, boy, Mike

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Randall had a hell of a season. Boy, he dominated.

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Everybody was five hundred. Not Mike Grandell, he was twelve

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and two. I think going into that unde seated. I

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 1>almost beat you. I lost by a couple of points

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that that one week. I wanted to be the guy

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>to do it to you, because if you're gonna lose,

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 1>lose to a friend, that's what I always say. I

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>thought you were the team and you still had a

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>great week, and you you should be bitter. You absolutely

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>should be bitter about that. I know now six six.

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking can have a great year, but still go under.

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, look I've won your respect, which is nice.

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully Mike Randall's won you some money here with some

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of the discussions we've had. So once again, make sure

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you go over to bettingpros dot com check out those

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>consensus lines and if you see better numbers on anything

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that we've talked about today, you say, wow, this is

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 1>even better number. I'm gonna go ahead and bet that

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at MGM or fandor or DK or wherever you want

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to go do that. That's what betting pros is for.

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 1>You can see all the lines at one time and

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>make your decisions there. And of course it's always a

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>good decision. To follow Mike Randall on the Twitter machine

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>at Randall Rant. You could check out his work in

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 1>My Fantasy Football Black Book. He did the whole way

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>dering section like always, because he's very smart when it

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to that. That's why I like to have him

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>on the shows. And that's on Amazon. You can also

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.359
<v Speaker 1>check out his work at Rodo Underworld, Rodo Viz and

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the Action Network. Mike Randall, it is always a pleasure

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to chat with you, my friend. Great stuff, great stats,

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and I mean I've won your respect. I mean, it

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get much better than.

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.280
<v Speaker 2>That, nothing better than that. I owe you a beverage,

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 2>my friend. Thanks for having me there.

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You go, all right, that'll do it for us, But

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:24.879
<v Speaker 1>the story of the game goes on for Randall. I'm

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids,