WEBVTT - GM Suspends Guidance, Carney Wins Canada Election 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Coarcklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's get your earnings and go to GM. So, regardless

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 2>of the quarter, they pulled their guidance and moved their

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>earnings call to Thursday. They also froze their share buy back,

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 2>all on issues surrounding tariffs. David Welsh's Bloomberg Detroit Brio

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Chief to recap some of those earnings, David, why did

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 2>they push their call forty eight hours?

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 3>What are they going to learn in those two days?

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 4>As they were preparing last night for today's earnings call,

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 4>there were reports coming out from US and others that

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.599
<v Speaker 4>the Trump administration would relax some of the auto tariffs,

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 4>but there's no detail in there. There's some out there

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 4>that they won't stack metals tariffs on top of auto tariff,

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 4>for example, and there could be some relief on parts,

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 4>but until automakers look at the details and see exactly

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 4>what they're going to have to pay and what they

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 4>won't be paying. It's hard for them to forecast earnings

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 4>and sales and look, they have all kinds of ways

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 4>to try to plan for tariffs and mitigate them and

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 4>also model out the impact on the business, and they

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 4>can't do any of that until they know exactly what

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 4>it's going to say. So I think what GM did

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 4>is they looked at this and they just said, hey,

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 4>the guidance that they had given out did not count

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 4>really for any kind of major tariff scheme here, despite

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 4>the fact that Trump and campaign on it and said

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 4>he was going to levy them. They gave guidance that

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 4>had nothing to do with those tariffs. I think probably

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 4>the tariffs are bigger than GM thought, much more aggressive

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 4>than GM thought. So they've withdrawn the guidance and they

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 4>had a six billion dollar share buyback. Two of it's

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.559
<v Speaker 4>already funded and will be done in the second quarter.

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 4>The other four billions on hold again until they can

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 4>understand what the tariffs will mean for their profits and

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 4>their cash flow. So this is all about finding out

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 4>what the details are, trying to model and plan the

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 4>business going forward, and they just don't feel they can

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 4>do it right now.

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 5>What are GM and some of the other auto manufacturers

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 5>doing now, David, in terms of are they making any

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 5>changes to production, to sales incentives or is it just

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 5>business as usual? As they try to figure out what's going.

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 4>On, there are small changes here and there. It's really

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 4>difficult to change production or change your parts. I mean,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 4>you can't do that overnight.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 2>You can't.

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 4>It can take a year to do that, let alone.

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 4>We've been at this for a couple of months. But

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 4>the one thing General Motors has done so they have

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 4>four pickup truck plants. It's their highest volume vehicle that

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 4>the Chevrolet Silverado and gmcc Era. Two of the plants

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 4>are in the US, ones in Canada, ones in Mexico.

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Of course, those vehicles coming from Canada Mexico are subject

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 4>to tariffs at least on the parts, the nine US

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 4>parts inside them, and that's pretty substantial. So what GM

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 4>has done there is they've jacked up production at their

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 4>four Wayne, Indiana plant to get more pickups out of there.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>They've just increased when they were already running three shifts,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 4>but they've increased the line speed, so they're working at

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 4>faster to get more vehicles out. It'll add about fifty

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 4>thousand trucks a year, and that's one way to offset

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 4>tariff production of trucks and sell American made vehicles. And

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing stuff like that. You know, I think some

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 4>companies may be slowing production of some vehicles that have

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 4>tariffs on them because they either can't pass the cost

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 4>on to consumers or it's no longer as profitable to

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 4>sell so many of them. So you may be seeing

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 4>some of that stuff, but a lot of it's been

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 4>business as usual, but you're seeing some small moves like

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 4>GM has made really.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Interested to hear that that call on Thursday, David, Thanks

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>so much.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>David Welsh, Bloomberg, Detroit via Chief Joining us there.

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Coarclay, and Android

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's add to can Now you have Mark

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Carney's edge slips as Canada's election comes to a hectic end.

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 2>He won yet by a very very very thin margin.

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 2>David Gerr's correspondent for Bloomberg, host a Big Take podcast

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>I should say to his party one, but walk us

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>through the results.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 3>What we know.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, an incredibly close race. So Mark Carney emerges here

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 6>with the mandate, but it is not a majority mandate,

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 6>which is what he and his party wanted. So what

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 6>that means an effect, is in the coming days, he's

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 6>going to have to figure out how he's going to

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 6>work with other political parties in this country to pass

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 6>his ambitious legislative agenda, so much of which centers on

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 6>the economic predicament this country is in, and of course

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 6>the trade this country's engaged with the US on. And

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 6>so what Mark Carney said over the course of this

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 6>campaign is he intends to win that trade war. He

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 6>intends to go to Washington present himself in a meeting

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 6>with President Trump as somebody who's not going to back

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 6>down on Canada's position in that trade war. That's what

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 6>we're going to be watching for here in the coming days.

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 6>One effect that that meeting takes place again, it's something

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 6>that he promised would happen in shorter We'll see if

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 6>that's in days or weeks. But two things sort of

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 6>up ended the course of this race over the last

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 6>couple of months. The first of which, of course is

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 6>Mark Arney becoming the leader of the Liberal Party. The

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 6>second of which was Donald Trump returned into the White

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 6>House in Washington and attacking this country really on two fronts,

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 6>one on the side of trade in the economy, the other,

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 6>of course, on the country's sovereignty. And Mark Karney has

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 6>said from the get go here he never found those

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 6>remarks from President Trump about Canada becoming the fifty first

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 6>state as any kind of a joke. He took it seriously,

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 6>and that is something he said over and over again,

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 6>Alex and Paul is not negotiable.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 5>So talk to us about conservatism in Canada. Is it

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 5>as vibrant as it is in the United States, as

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 5>it is in some European countries like Germany. Is it

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 5>to the point where anybody in Canada will be okay

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 5>with being referred to as a fifty first state.

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 6>That is definitely not the case. But you bring up

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 6>a really interesting question that is where does the Conservative

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 6>Party in this country go from here? So Peer PAULIV,

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 6>the leader of the Conservative Party, who is in effect

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 6>running against Mark Karney, actually lost his seat last night

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 6>in a district just about thirty or forty five minutes

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 6>from where I'm standing, So that kind of throws things

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 6>up in the air in terms of will he continue

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 6>to lead the Conservative Party. Is there going to be

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 6>a situation in which he can kind of convince somebody

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 6>else in the party who was elected to step down

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 6>so that he could run in a by election for

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 6>that seat. That's all up in the air here, and

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 6>you ask just kind of about the breed of conservatism

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 6>that we see here. Peer Polyev is somebody who has

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 6>been compared in terms of political style to Donald Trump,

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 6>the president of the United States. If there's make America

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 6>great again in the United States, there's make Canada grade

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 6>again here in Canada, as sort of headlined by Peer Polyev.

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 6>So they had an amazing showing yesterday. By all kind

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 6>of historical records, they did extremely well, if they still

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 6>didn't best the Liberals, And that's really extraordinary again when

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 6>you look at kind of the not so long ago history.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 6>Just a few months ago, before Mark Carney entered this race,

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 6>the Conservatives had a twenty plus point lead over the

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 6>Liberal Party and that was squandered here over the last

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 6>few months. So there'll be a lot of soul searching.

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 6>Paul and alex within the party about what went wrong

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 6>and what the party can do differently going forward.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>So your's an insanely unfair question, considering that your reporter.

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:57.679
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I'll take this for the grand salt.

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>But if President Trump had not come aggressively after Canada,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>either in terms of tariffs or more importantly making it

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 2>a fifty first state, would this election have been different?

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Were there other issues that got kind of sidelined at

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 2>this point?

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 6>I think no doubt the fact that Donald Trump talked

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 6>about Canada as much as he did and made those

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 6>threats with something that Mark Karney, who is a career

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 6>technocrat he headed the Bank of Canada and the Bank

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 6>of England for a time, to serve as the chair

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 6>of bloomberg Ingk's board and Brookfield Asset Management. This gave

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 6>him an opening to present himself as kind of a

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 6>foil to Donald Trump, to be a foil to that

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 6>kind of breed of populism that we've seen in the

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 6>president of the United States, and it really changed the polling,

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 6>changed Canadian's engagement with this election. So yes, as that

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 6>soul searching takes place among the Conservative Party, I think

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 6>there's also an awareness of the fact that this is

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 6>a very unique circumstance and the Canadians, as a result

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 6>of what Donald Trump said and did, really kind of

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 6>galvanized the electorate here in Canada in a way that

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 6>they might not have three four five months ago.

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 5>David, you've been up in Ottawa for a few days now,

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 5>what's the feeling of the person on the street here,

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 5>because as it relates to their relationship with the US,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 5>because I don't think I've ever come across anybody in

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 5>my life that has anything negative to say about Canada.

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 5>But you know, so, I'm not sure how how President's comments,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 5>how reflective they are of US folks, But how did

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 5>the people in Canada feel?

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 6>Just as Mark Carney didn't find the comments from the

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 6>President about the fifty first state as a joke, nobody

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 6>with whom I've spoken has found them funny as well,

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 6>So they've taken it as a real serious threat also,

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 6>And there's a sensus you talk to people here as

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 6>I have over the last few days, of just kind

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 6>of bewilderment why the circumstances are that the way they are.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 6>They listened to President Trump, they listened to that rhetoric,

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 6>and they wonder sort of how they got here in

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 6>light of what you're talking about, Paul, which is this

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 6>is an allyship. This is a partnership that's existed for

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 6>a couple centuries now, a very happy and important allyship

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 6>of two nations.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 3>And to see it.

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 6>Kind of changed in fundamentally in the way that it

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 6>has been over the last few months has really astounded

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 6>people here. And I'm going back to what the Prime

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 6>Minister has said here. We're surprised by that rhetoric to

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 6>begin with, but they've moved past that, as Mark Karney says,

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 6>and now they have to kind of plot a new

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 6>path forward that's going to take place in those negotiations

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 6>in the White House, but also in just the way

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.599
<v Speaker 6>that the Liberal Party government here under Mark Karney is

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 6>looking at the world and kind of rethinking relationships with

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 6>other countries. And we've seen that over his rather short

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 6>prime ministership so far. He's made trips to Europe of

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 6>course into England as well. He's trying to find new

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 6>outlets for Canadian products and sort of new arrangements, new

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 6>relationships for Canada engage in as the US kind of falls.

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 3>To the side.

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 2>All Right, David really great reporting. Thank you so very much.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 2>David Gert. He's the host of Bloomberg a Big Take podcast,

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 2>also a correspondent for a Bloomberg News.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 2>So for the broader markets, the question is where are

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 2>those IPOs? Where's all the M and A. What happens

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 2>to private markets? We heard that report? Was it over

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the weekend that Harvard wants to be offloading? Was a

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 2>Harvard or Yale, I'll fload their private equity slots because

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 2>they really need the liquidity. Joining us now is Ted Swimmer,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 2>head of Capital Markets and Advisory at Citizens Bank. Ted,

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 2>what's your world like right now?

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>What are the concerns? What are the positives?

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, good morning Alex and good morning Paul. Things have

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 7>certainly slowed over the last couple of months. From an

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 7>M and A perspective. As we entered the year, we thought,

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 7>with lower regulation, potential upbeats and earnings, that we were

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 7>going to get off to a really good start in

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 7>M and A, and it started out that way. There

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 7>was a lot of really good activity going on. But

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 7>since Liberation Day we've certainly seen things slow down a

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 7>little bit. It's hard to find a buyer and a

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 7>seller who can agree on what the next six months

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 7>of the year two years look like and therefore get

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 7>concerned about whether they should ink a deal or not.

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 7>After saying that it is still very orderly out there,

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 7>we're not seeing We're still seeing a fair amount of

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 7>conversations going on. We're still we're still our pipelines a

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 7>citizens have never been bigger. So there still feels like

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 7>a lot of activity, a lot of discussions going on.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 7>It just feels like at the moment it's hard to

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 7>get to a actual final contract on a deal. But

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 7>it does not feel like the world the ground is crumbling.

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 7>It still feels like there's activity. We saw a couple

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 7>of deals get announced last week, so it's not the

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 7>end of the world, but it's still not as busy

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 7>as we'd hoped it would be.

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Tedday, I know it's Citizens Bank.

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 5>You guys Target, and a lot of your clients are

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 5>middle size businesses and a lot of folks are saying,

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 5>you know, in the mid to smaller companies, they might

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 5>feel the tariff impact more than the larger companies, the

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 5>Amazons of the world, the Ibms of the world. Are

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 5>you hearing that from your clients that, boy, we're a

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 5>little bit more. This is going to be an issue.

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 7>It's certainly industry specific as we talk about it. I mean,

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 7>we're in the data center space and they're not all

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 7>that concerned about tariffs, but certainly those who work with China,

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 7>we have customers who have drawn on their lines to

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 7>try to build up inventory pre pre teriff effect. So

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 7>we've seen some higher loan utilization as a result of that.

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 7>So yes, we're seeing and feeling some of that, but

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 7>truly very industry specific on who's having that impact on

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 7>who isn't.

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 2>So what do you make of where the private markets

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 2>are going to go? I just was mentioning how Yale

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.719
<v Speaker 2>wants to offload some of their private equity stake in

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 2>order to get some funding and get liquidity. What are

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:29.719
<v Speaker 2>you hearing on that end?

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 7>This is a good market for private for private capital,

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 7>especially on the on the loan side, with the banks

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 7>backing up a little bit on being able to give

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 7>certainty on underwriting positions. We're seeing, uh, we're seeing some

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 7>private capital reverse trends that we saw in the first

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 7>quarter when the syndicated market was going more banks. Now

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 7>private capital has a little bit more certainty on their deals,

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 7>So we're seeing that that impacts the leverage loan market.

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 7>What on the offset, it gives banks a lot of

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 7>a lot of ability to len to the direct lenders,

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 7>lend to the private capital, do equity issuances, do bond

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 7>issuances as those markets come back, So it works in

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 7>both ways. But we're seeing private capital have a really

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 7>good opportunity to put some loans to work on deals

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 7>that are more difficult time getting done the syndicated market

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 7>right now. So there's some good and some bad, I

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 7>think with everything with what's going on in the market

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 7>right now.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 5>You know, for my Wall Street days, I remember being

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 5>taught early early on that MNY activity in large part

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 5>is based upon confidence and certainty. The more a c

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 5>suite and a board feels about their business, more confident

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 5>they feel about the trends in the industry, more aggressive

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 5>they can be in terms of making a big capital

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 5>commitment or making a big m and a trade that

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 5>doesn't seem like the environment we're in today.

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 7>Again, it's industry specific, so I would agree with you, Paul.

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 7>In certain areas where tariffs or policy may have an impact,

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 7>it seems like the the M and A processes are

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 7>being delayed a little bit till there's more certainty around

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 7>what's going on. In other places, we feel very good

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 7>about people need to transact. What's different about what's going

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 7>on here than we've seen in a lot of other

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 7>markets is the loan market, the bomb market are acting orderly.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 7>There's still there. We're not seeing a time where there's

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 7>not execution of deals. We've seen people go to the

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 7>bomb market today, we're seeing them go, we saw them

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 7>go last week. So that we're not in a frozen

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 7>period of time, and so if you're in an industry

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 7>where it's not going to be impacted by terraffs, we're

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 7>still seeing not robust M and A flow by any

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 7>stretch of the imagination, but we're certainly not seeing us

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 7>shut down of the market altogether.

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 2>What do you think brings back the animal spirits? Like

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 2>what specifically what we need to see And I know

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 2>everyone's going to say clarity on tariffs but in theory,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 2>like what is that that your clients are like, press.

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 3>The go button.

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 7>I won't say what you just said not to say,

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 7>which is clarity.

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's like that, but something more more.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 7>Pots I think as more of this goes on, look

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 7>there there's still a lot of money sitting on the sidelines,

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 7>looking to make acquisitions, looking to expand businesses. I think

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 7>corporates have a decent I mean, we saw Global Payments

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 7>last week make a very nice acquisition, and so we're

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 7>seeing some of that still go on in today's market.

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 7>I think we will continue to see those non tariff

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 7>related businesses continue to make acquisitions. The headlines our M

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 7>and A is down, and that is factually correct, but

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 7>it is still we are still seeing and feeling conversations

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 7>going on in a lot of different industries, which I

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 7>don't think it's going to take a lot to bring

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 7>those deals to completion and continue to build some momentum

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 7>into the M and A markets. I think they are

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 7>going to be certain industries we won't see things happen

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 7>for six months to a year or maybe longer, but

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 7>I don't know that that's going to impact the whole

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 7>M and A market like it did in during COVID,

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 7>or it did in twenty twenty three right after the

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 7>banks filed, or it did out in the Great Recession.

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 7>I think we're in a different market and we're feeling

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 7>different things right now. Again, we've seen transactions getting get

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 7>announced even last week during all the noise that was

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 7>going on about.

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 5>The IPO market. Let's look at one stub hub. You

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 5>guys are named a co manager on that deal. That

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 5>seems like a deal that would walk out the door.

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 5>Give us talk to us about stuff up as just

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 5>emblematic of what's happening in the IO.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 7>I think you need in the IPO market to really

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 7>take off. That's where you really need confidence and you

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 7>need consistency. There are a couple of insurance deals that

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 7>we hope to get announced shortly that we think would

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 7>be another area that we could see the I P

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 7>O markets start to pick up. But it's still very

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 7>tough to test the markets right now with the fear

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 7>that you know, something in the middle of your your

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 7>your issue, your issuance day, would would hurt creater the stock.

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 7>So there's a lot there on the siland is there

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 7>a lot there ready to go? Stub Hub is a

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 7>good example of something that may go could go. I

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:57.479
<v Speaker 7>don't have no even.

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Maybe going could be going for how long.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 7>Now, But there are industries that are not going to

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 7>be impacted like this that I think you will see

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 7>as soon as there's a little more stability in the market,

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 7>tests the markets and bring the markets out all.

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, Ted, really appreciate it. Thank you for coming in.

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 2>Also great to see you, Ted Swimmer, head of Capital

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Markets and Advisory at Citizens Bank, joining us in capital markets,

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 2>IPO private, all the good stuff.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 5>If you listen to this programming, know Alex and I

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 5>really like to stay on top of the commercial real

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 5>estate business, certainly one of the businesses that was impacted

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 5>dramatically by COVID and in denounce long long recovery. Here

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 5>now in the midst of higher interest rates. Today we're

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 5>going to check out with Ben Miller, CEO of fund Rise,

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 5>joining us Washington, DC via zoom. Ben, I think when

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 5>you look at the stock market, the bond mark, at

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 5>the commodity markets.

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, the.

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 5>Common word is probably just uncertainty out there, volatility out there.

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 5>How about the commercial real estate market? What's the last

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 5>three months been in that space?

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.239
<v Speaker 8>The irony for real estate is bad news is good

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 8>news because interest rates have been higher for longer, for

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 8>the last few years, that's been weighing on real estate,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 8>especially commercial real estate, and so anything that brings down

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 8>rates is going to be a boon for commercial real

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 8>estate owners. And so uncertainty, tariffs, recession, those are all great,

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 8>great words for real estate industry.

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 5>So where so that driven primarily by lower rates? I

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 5>get that, Where do you think the best opportunities are

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 5>here in commercial real estate?

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:51.239
<v Speaker 8>Well, so, the functional effect of tariffs is that it

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 8>makes existing assets worth more. So my analogy is always

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 8>if I had one thousand cars on my lot, If

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 8>I was a dealer car dealer, and I had a

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 8>thousand cars on my lot, put a fifty percent tariffs

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 8>on all new cars, right, all those existing cars, all

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 8>the car inventory on my lots across the country be

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 8>worth more because the price just went up. And so

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 8>all the existing inventory of apartments and other assets are

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 8>going to be worth a lot more with tariffs, and

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 8>so it's a tax on flow and as a gift

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 8>to stock, if you know what I mean.

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 3>But what about the volatility? So rates are one thing,

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 3>stock is another.

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 2>But the volatility and uncertainty, how does that affect sentiment

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 2>in your market?

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 8>I mean real estate is a much slower moving asset.

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 8>It's it doesn't trade very often. People don't reorder their

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 8>leases very often, so it's much more It has much

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 8>more installation from volatility. I mean, because you can't really

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 8>trade it. That volatility doesn't matter as much as it

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 8>does for stocks or bonds.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 5>But if the uncertainty, not necessarily the terifts per se,

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 5>but at the uncertainty push it or slows this economy ramatically,

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 5>maybe even pushes us into a recession.

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 8>That can't be good for real estate. Well, it depends

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 8>on the kind of real estate you mean. So office,

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 8>which has already been hit by work from home, is

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 8>very pro cyclical, so people only expand office space and

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 8>new leases when the economy's hot. The economy's cold, office

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 8>is going to get hit again. I think office could

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 8>go from bad to worse. But consumer staples like food groceries. Housing,

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 8>you've got to live somewhere, you gotta eat something. Those

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 8>actually end up doing pretty well in a recession, and

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 8>so multi family housing I think will really outperform. And

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 8>low rates rates matter a lot more than the economy,

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 8>and so if rates come down like I think they will,

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be a win for most commercial estate.

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then in terms of construction and new building

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 2>and materials like either that's going to get a lot

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 2>more expensive or as we're talking about, that's going to

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 2>get a lot tighter, which then if you own already

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 2>those buildings, that's better.

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 3>What are you seeing right now currently?

0:20:59.320 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, there was a absolute housing boom in twenty

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 8>twenty one twenty twenty two there because rates were so

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 8>low and demand was so high, and so we just

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 8>are working on our way through I think the largest

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 8>supply of new housing in decades. So that that hit

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 8>the market last year, it'll be sort of done by

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 8>the end of this year, and then we'll kind of

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 8>fall off a cliff and we'll end up with no

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 8>new construction, high rates, expensive construction costs, tariffs, uncertainty. Bank

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 8>lending is still pretty tight. I think we'll see sort

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 8>of the end of new construction for maybe this decade.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 8>And that's again that's great for owners and maybe bad

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 8>for renters.

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 5>Ben talk to us about Florida. It's been a market

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 5>that really just goes up and down. It's had such

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 5>a multi year growth spurt coming out of the pandemic.

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 5>What's the state of the Florida I don't know the

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 5>apartment market any of that kind of stuff.

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean Florida I got hit by a climate

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 8>change too. I mean it was a really big hit

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 8>on insurance costs. It caused a lot of owners to

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 8>have second thoughts. The short term effect of a lot

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 8>of new supply in the market and insurance costs hit

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 8>Texas to Texas had a lot of challenges. So those

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 8>two markets have sort of the most growth and had

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 8>the most negatives. And in the short term, I think

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 8>Florida really, you know, doesn't doesn't look as good as

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 8>some of the other parts of the of the Sun Belt,

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 8>like you know, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia. But in

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 8>the more medium term, Florida and Texas just gets so

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 8>much more population growth in any other state. I mean,

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 8>some between the two of them that get over a

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 8>million people a year moving there, and over that like

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 8>three to five year period between migration and population growth.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 8>I think that Florida and Texas will be just fine,

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 8>But in the short term is not that pretty all right.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, we appreciate the update. Let's keep talking and see

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of how this all evolves. Ben Miller, co founder

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 2>and CEO at fund Rise, on the state of commercial illstate.

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.