WEBVTT - CDK Hack, Apple EU Warning

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 2>So here's a headline for you. Blacksuit cyber crime gang

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>is blamed for major CDK ransomware attacks.

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 3>So this is the deal.

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 2>Fifteen thousand car dealerships across the US in Canada have

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>gone days now without software systems that are crucial to

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 2>running their business, and this is after multiple cyber attacks

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 2>on CDK Global. Now that company's just a handful of

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>dealer management systems that provide auto retailer's ability to basically function,

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>schedule appointments, customer records, etc. And so apparently Blacksuit cyber

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 2>crime Gang is blamed in that attack.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 4>It's a real deal.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 5>Buddy Mine manages a dealership in Jersey and he said

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 5>it's definitely. It impacts everything they do. And the net

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 5>result is it just takes longer to serve your customer,

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 5>gives them.

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 4>More time to walk out the door, and.

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 5>So it's impacting, you know, a little bit of an

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 5>impact on units sold per day they're noticing, so they

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 5>need to get that fixed as quickly as possible.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>But also like when you go to a car dealership,

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>you already spend half your day there, so you extended

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and like forget it. Steve Mann is Bloomberg Intelligence Global

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Auto is an industrials research analyst, and he joins us. Now, Steve,

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 2>you've been following this and the hack.

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 3>What happened?

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 6>Oh, this is very significant. I mean, I mean, Paul

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 6>just said he spoke to some of the dealership in

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 6>New Jersey. If I've reached out to some of the

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 6>dealerships that I've that I've talked to, the impact is significant.

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 6>It's not just only sales, but it's also service and parts.

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 6>You know, the systems interrupted to a point where they

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 6>can't even get certain cars registered and delivered to their customers,

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 6>the ones that's already sold. So you know, Inventor is

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 6>gonna get a little pick up. It's gonna be you know,

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 6>I don't know when it's gonna get fixed. They probably

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 6>have to pay that fine, and I think they will

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 6>pay that fine. But at the end of the day,

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 6>I think if I look at from the automaker's perspective,

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 6>it's it's a temporary, temporary blip. Inventory is gonna rise,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 6>but I think sales will be delayed, and hopefully when

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 6>this gets resolved, customers will come back. More customers will

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 6>come back to the to the showroom.

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 5>And it seems I mean Bloomberg News reporting CDK plans

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 5>to make the ransomware payment.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, frustrating. It's just but I guess they kind

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 4>of have to.

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, all right, Steve talked to us about

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 5>China europe tariffs. We've got the European Union reporting you know,

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 5>we talked to you last week initiating some tariffs here.

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 5>Now Beijing's kind of responding here. What's the latest.

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's uh, it's it's a big deal for the Germans,

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 6>especially the luck through automakers like BMW, Mercedes and Audi

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 6>which Volkswagen owns Audi. Uh. You know, they have about

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 6>eighty percent of the market, the luxury car market in China,

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 6>so they sell a huge amount of cars in China.

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 6>About a third to forty percent of these companies' revenues

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 6>actually generate in China, so they yeah, so they want

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 6>to make good with the Chinese. As you know, Germany

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 6>has been against the tariffs. So if the Germans are

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 6>able to get something from China and help ease some

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 6>of the tariffs or China. You know, if China can

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 6>get the Germans to help them ease some of the

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 6>tariffs in the EU, I think it will benefit you know,

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 6>potentially companies like Stilentis as well, which is which also

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 6>has a new joint venture.

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 2>But here's the thing that I get confused, is it

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 2>China's making a pitch to individual countries versus the European

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Union trying to operate as one body in relation to tariffs,

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>and I wonder how that's gonna work itself out.

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it's it's that conquer, divine and conquer

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 6>strategy they're they're taking. So but you know, I think

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 6>the Germans probably has the most to lose out of

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 6>the global automakers here. You know, about sixteen percent of

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 6>their battery electric vehicles that are produced in China, it's

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 6>actually shipped out globally. So China plays an important part

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 6>for the BEEV market as a low cost producer. So

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, I don't think there's a lot of other

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 6>automakers that are you know that have that many bev's

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 6>produced in China and sold elsewhere around the world.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 5>And Steeve just a red headline crossing the Bloomberg terminal.

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 5>Now Canada now gets into the game. Canada announces planned

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 5>to curb imports of Chinese made evs.

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what's going on here?

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I mean, first of all, just give us

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 5>a sense of how good, how competitive are these Chinese evs,

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 5>because if you tell me they're good vehicles, let's bring

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 5>them into the market.

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, Yeah, I think some if you talk

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 6>to some of the al makers, they actually have the

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 6>same thinking. Let's let's let's compete, right. I think competition

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 6>will make the whole industry better. You saw that with

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 6>Tesla being the you know, fourth or third automaker in

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 6>the US and actually helped drive a lot of the

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 6>b EV costs down. But you know, it's not surprising

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 6>that Canada is is implementing tariffs. Uh. They are part

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 6>of the US Mexico Canada Free Trade Agreement, and I

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 6>think you know they have to close that that door,

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 6>that back door where the Chinese evs can come in.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 6>It is it is very competitive. I think you know,

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 6>Chinese evs are cheap enough that if you know, some

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 6>argue that even with the tariffs, even with some engineering

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 6>change to to so that they're they fit thet they

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 6>fit the regulatory safety and mission rules here, is still

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 6>be a very competitive price vehicle for North America.

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 2>So then to that point, we're waiting for Mexico now, right,

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 2>because I think we talked about this before. So not

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 2>only is Canada gonna put tariffs on EV imports, they're

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>also going to curb imports.

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Of Chinese made evs.

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>The idea is that if Mexico doesn't have any of

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>those restrictions, that they can just import EV's from China

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>and then through Mexico go into the US. And that's

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 2>a different way of operating. When do we get that

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 2>from Mexico.

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 6>I think there are some negotiation that's happening now with

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 6>Mexico to kind of implement similar tariff. I've heard that

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 6>VOVO is already kind of lobbying. VOVO is actually part

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 6>of Chile, is actually lobbying the Mexican government to not implement,

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 6>to not put tariffs in place. So then negotiations are ongoing.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 6>I don't think we were gonna wait, have to wait

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 6>too long to hear any news from that.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 5>All right, So stepping back a little bit, give us

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 5>the latest thinking out of Detroit and other auto capitals

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 5>around the world about.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 4>EV's versus the hybrids.

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.679
<v Speaker 5>Is the hybrid going to be I guess the stepping

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 5>stone to a pure EV environment? Do you think is

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 5>that still the thinking?

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think that is still the thinking. I think

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 6>with BEEV sales slowing down or growth slowing down, the

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 6>automakers do need something else to meet the cafe, the

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 6>few economy regulations, the emissions regulations. So hybrid is a

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 6>stopgap measure. But if you talk to the all the

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 6>automakers just still spending a lot of money on BEV.

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 6>They think that is the future because at the end

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 6>of the day, hybrid vehicles do still spill spell out

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 6>pollution or greenhouse gases. So you know, as you know,

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 6>these emission standards, these few economy standards, they're only going

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 6>to get tighter and tighter.

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, Steve, we appreciate it, Thank you very much.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel like your sector is moving so fast right

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 2>now in terms of all the rules and regulations. Steve

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Man Bloomberg Intelligence, Global Autos and industrials research analyst.

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car.

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 7>Play and Android Auto.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>With the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station Just

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 5>One of the pieces of news crossing the tape here,

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 5>Alex just reaching is you know Apple, there's some concerns

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 5>there at the European Union regulators once again looking at

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 5>a big US tech company, in this case Apple, looking

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 5>at their app store and maybe some abuses. Their Temlin

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 5>Basent Joints is here. Temlin is a technologyannelst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 5>He was in the US, but now he's in London.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Get to London. I have no idea how that happened.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 4>I did not complane.

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean a ship would take a way too long.

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I did not approve that.

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 5>But anyway, Tamlin, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 6>Talent.

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 5>Tell us what's happening with Apple today as it relates

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 5>to the European Union and some of the regulators there.

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. Sure, So what happened today is the European Commission

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 8>announced preliminary findings in an investigation into Apple under the

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 8>Digital Markets Act. This is the sweeping new competition rules

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 8>that the European Union is sort of implemented in March

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 8>of this year. Now, the findings of this probe relate

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 8>to anti steering rules, so essentially to Apple's rules that

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 8>it has in place to sort of prevent app developers

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 8>from informing users of maybe cheaper subscription options outside of

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 8>the app store. Now this might sound familiar because just

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 8>in early March, before the DMA took effect, the Commission

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 8>did find Apple one point eight billion euros over sort

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 8>of the same anti steering. Now, what today their commission

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 8>said is that Apple is still not complying now with

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 8>the d m A in terms of really letting developers

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 8>freely engage with users and direct them to cheaper options. Specifically,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 8>this kind of they want developers to be able to

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 8>market within the app and show cheaper subscriptions within that.

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 8>So it's really this is kind of more pressure on

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 8>those sort of app store revenues that Apple.

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 2>So what does Apple say to that, Like, well, what's

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 2>their defense to that, because presumably they had months to

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of get it together.

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 8>They did, and they haven't responded. What do they said

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 8>is they think that they do comply with all of this.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 8>What's interesting about the DMA, though, is that this is

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 8>the DMA that European Commission did play a strong role

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 8>in drafting these rules, and it's also responsible for enforcing them,

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 8>and there are a lot of sort of subjective interpretations

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 8>in terms of first complying with it. So I think

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 8>what we are going to see is probably the European

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 8>Commission taking a very strict view of what's reasonable in

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 8>these circumstances and probably really try to get strict adherance here.

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 8>So it's going to be going to be up to

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 8>them to decide whether Apple is complied or not, and

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 8>then Apple can then sort of appeal to the courts.

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 8>But I do think it's it's pretty likely we're going

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 8>to see another fine in this and some behavioral remedies

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 8>coming down the line.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 5>You know, Alex, I love talking to Tamlin. Good guy,

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 5>smart guy, But you know what, it just doesn't matter.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 5>Apple stock up a tenths of one percent today, It's

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 5>a nine percent year to date. We've seen this time

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 5>and time again where the Europeans just start nitpicking at

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 5>these US technology companies, Tamila, what's the feeling within the

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 5>regulatory environment of Europe as to really what they're trying

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 5>to do here, because it just doesn't seem like it's

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 5>even relevant. I mean, it just at the end of

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.599
<v Speaker 5>the day, they just these whether it's Google or Facebook,

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 5>or they just write checks here to make could all

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 5>go away? I mean, is that kind of do European

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 5>regulators recognize that it just doesn't seem to be that

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 5>I material what they're doing.

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 8>Right, Yeah, So I think if you look at this

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 8>specific investigation, you know, this is one that sort of

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 8>came out of sort of Spotify, which of course is

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 8>headquartered in Europe, and the app developers are complaining that

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 8>the Apple is squeezing them too hard. So I think

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 8>in some of these instances, Europe is trying to protect

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 8>some local players by sort of ordering a sort of

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 8>loosening of these rules that sort of maybe benefit the

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 8>gatekeeper on the NBA, which DNA, which would be at Apple, Google,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 8>Microsoft brothers, and they are sort of trying to show

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 8>domestic industry that they are trying to pry open the markets.

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 8>But I do think you're right that I think at

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 8>this point investors are sort of kind of just shrugging

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 8>this off. This is just one thing after another. I

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 8>will point that may point out that a difference under

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 8>the DMA is that the timeline is really much quicker

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 8>than under sort of former case law, where it may

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 8>take three four years until you got a result after

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 8>an industiation. Here that this finding came just three months

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 8>after the inquiry opened, and we're going to have sort

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 8>of a final remedial measure by early next year. So

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 8>I do think the timeline is faster. Whether or not

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 8>this results and sort of the impact that the regulators

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 8>might be looking for, I think definitely remains to be seen,

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 8>and I think investors are definitely looking a little bit

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 8>of skew at it and thinking maybe this is sort

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 8>of just more of the same.

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 5>And Alex, I mean, you know, it's really almost, maybe

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 5>even more than thirty years ago that Microsoft started going

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 5>through the same whole thing with the European Union, and

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 5>again it investors became conditioned to it's no big deal.

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 5>They just write it check and it kind of goes away.

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 5>The tobacco industry, you know, investors kind of said, put

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 5>it in context, it's not that big a deal, and

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 5>you kind of wonder, you know, given that the US

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 5>regulators have taken a very light touch to technology and

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 5>then allowing these companies to get so big, like the

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Europeans are trying to do what they can to kind

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 5>of rein it in, but it seems almost too little,

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 5>too late, right.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 2>And also you can make the argument too that you know,

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Europe doesn't have a lot of technology companies. They have some,

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 2>of course, like ASML for example, Yes, but yeah, exactly SAP,

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>but I mean, can you name anymore? No, there's some,

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think that that's kind of the point. Maybe

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 2>take a look at you know, European stocks versus the

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 2>S and P and market cap like twenty years ago

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 2>versus now, Oh my gosh, forget that different. Hey Tamlin,

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 2>what's going on with Apple in general? Like it's it's

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 2>it seems to be making a little bit of a

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 2>comeback here. It's actually ups extensive one percent, despite you know,

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 2>in video for example, down over two percent.

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of that?

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean I think some of this comes some

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 8>sort of the recent announcement to sort of build AI

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 8>into the into the iPhone and maybe maybe sort of

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 8>accelerate the recycle in terms of getting people to buy

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 8>those phones. I do think it probably definitely. I don't

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 8>think the regulatory headwinds are really causing it much damage

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 8>right now. I will point out that although the US

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 8>is definitely like ASSAD taking a light touch approach, the

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 8>one area they are getting involved in is on sort

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 8>of these apps for rules, where where Apple's obviously been

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 8>in litigation with Epic for years and years and years.

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 8>So I think on both sides of the Atlantic, there

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 8>are some pressure on that on those services revenues that

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 8>we might see shaking out over the next you know,

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 8>nine to eighteen months to see how that plays out.

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 5>So Timmley, you've you've been based both in the US

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 5>and now in the UK. What's your view of kind

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 5>of the technology and landscape and the ability for new

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 5>technologies to kind of be developed and grow in in

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 5>the UK and Europe. What's what's your view given your

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 5>experience in the US.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, I think the US probably probably has more

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 8>of a fostering environment for that startups stage. I think

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 8>that's why you've seen some of your US companies really flourished.

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 8>I do think in Europe there's trying to create that

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 8>fostering environment, specifically for the artificial intelligence field. I think

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 8>you have seen some they are. There's an AI regulation

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 8>that's taken effect. I don't think it's nearly as strict

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 8>as it could have been. I think a large reason

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 8>for that are lawmakers, specifically in France and Germany, really

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 8>wanted to try to foster and incubate beat AI industries

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 8>that they had going on. So I think we'll have

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 8>to see whether that works out and whether we have

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 8>the European large scale AI players. I think historically definitely,

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 8>I think you've seen more of that sort of startup,

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 8>startup fostering taking place in the US than Europe.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, Tamlin, we really appreciate it. Thank you so much.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Do you like living in Europe? By the way, are

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 3>you enjoying the UK?

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 8>Quite nice?

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Excellent, right, I get you. It's not ninety two degrees there.

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, humidity. I'm just put that out there, all right, Tamlin.

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate you. Thank you.

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Tamlin based in joining US A Bloomberg Intelligence technology analyst

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 2>from the UK. Here's my question for you, Paul, what

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 2>do you think is going on with tech right now? Like?

0:16:58.360 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Is this like a rebalancing to the end of the

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 3>cour order. Is this like a pause? Is there something

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 3>more disastrous going on here? What do you think?

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 5>I don't think so. I mean again, we just heard.

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 5>I just got a note from Vince from out in

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 5>the audience. Bid in stocks's quarter end window dressing. That's

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 5>all he's hearing so far, Vince Cignarella kind of rating

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 5>in here. So no, I think tech is you know,

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 5>I just think it's a pause here.

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think they're gonna be.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 5>The question for a lot of folks, is you know

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 5>tech has been the leader in this stock market performance

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 5>for years now?

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Can it continue to be?

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 5>And I just think you look at the tech spending

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 5>and you see where it continues to be a significant

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 5>growth story, and just in terms of old total tech

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 5>spending throughout the entire tech stack.

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Led by AI.

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 5>So maybe the AI trade maybe got the sector a

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 5>littlehead of itself. Maybe time for a pause, but boy,

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 5>the longer term trend seems really solid.

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Focar playing Endroyd Auto

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 2>And the NASDA gets flat on the day. I mean,

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 2>go figure. I feel like we're definitely on our way back.

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Alleren Gilbert's CEO of Wealthfuised Financial, is joining us right

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.239
<v Speaker 2>now for her take. So, Alaren Paul and I were

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 2>talking just earlier about what is going on. Is it

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 2>a tech breather, is it rebalancing into the end of

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the quarter. Is last week kind of the start of

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 2>something more severe?

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 3>How do you view it?

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean I think let's not forget it's starting

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 9>to be summer. People are off to the Hamptons, off

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 9>to international trips, et cetera. So part of this would

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 9>be just seasonality. But another part is I think we're

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 9>going through a shift when it comes to AI from

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 9>development to deployment, and so I think with that, we're

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 9>going to see a broadening out of the market, not

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 9>just the companies like Nvidia that are the start of AI,

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 9>but moving into how companies can monetize it. And so

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 9>I think we're going to continue to see this broadening

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 9>out with other companies that are able to actually profit

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 9>from it.

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 5>What are some of those companies on what are some

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 5>of those sectors that can benefit from the actual deployment

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 5>of this technology.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, it goes across all sectors really, but you know,

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 9>when we think about even even just industrials and how

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 9>the technology here is going to be able to broaden out.

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 9>You know, even companies like Caterpillar and John Deere are

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 9>going to be able to use AI to improve efficiencies.

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 9>So really it's across all sectors, whether it's healthcare or industrials,

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 9>et cetera.

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 3>So that's the AI play.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 2>And then you do like, plus, let's look at valuation

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 2>and where we're at, what's a good bet?

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Like do you like industrials right now?

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 9>I do like industrials. We think that that is going

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 9>to be a backbone and when we look to add

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 9>infrastructure spending, that is going to continue to be a theme. So,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 9>you know, and I think we have to take in

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 9>mind where we are with the FED and that we're

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 9>definitely about to see ray cuts, you know, and the

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 9>question is just when do they start. But we know

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 9>that trend is going to be our friend, and so

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 9>I think you can't give up on technology. It's going

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 9>to continue to be the driver here moving forward, and

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 9>with interest rates that will go down. That's a risk

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 9>on move in the market, so we have to be mindful,

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 9>but it is all about what are you buying at

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 9>what price?

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 5>All right, Lauren, you're a graduate of the University of Texas,

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 5>so that means by default you must have an energy call.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 5>What do you think what do you think energy stocks

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 5>are going to be doing here? How do you think about,

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, investing in energy stocks.

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, we like energy a lot, and we like utilities.

0:20:55.000 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 9>Looking at the play just continued expansion in the need

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 9>for energy with regards to AI. If you look at

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 9>those numbers, they're astronomical and so there has to be

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 9>this continued build out and making energy more efficient. So

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 9>we definitely like the energy play.

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Where in the energy play because this is something that

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 2>I've been thinking about, Like oil companies aren't power companies,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 2>and power companies are the ones that are going to benefit,

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 2>But utilities are regulated. So does that kind of change

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 2>how you want to be investing in utility companies versus

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 2>power companies.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 3>We're on that spectrum. It makes the most sense.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So it's true that utility companies are regulated, but

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 9>what we're seeing is that there's going to be there's

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 9>just so much demand that the demand versus supply is

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.479
<v Speaker 9>going to be the story there. So definitely there I

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 9>agree with you, not so much just oil and gas companies,

0:21:53.359 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 9>but really everything that is behind the idea of what's

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 9>going to help with AI.

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 5>All right, so how do we think about that's at equities?

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 5>How about fixed income?

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 8>Here?

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 5>What are you telling your clients these days about bond market?

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 9>Well, we love the bond market. It couldn't be you know,

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 9>more excited about bonds, and who gets excited about bonds?

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 9>So right now is a very good time because when

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 9>you look at where we are once again with rates

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 9>going to be going down, the story is that all

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 9>that money that's sitting in money markets is going to

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 9>be moving. It's already started to move a little bit,

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 9>and while some of it may land in the equity markets,

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 9>a lot of it's going to end up in the

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 9>bond markets. And so with that, you know, now is

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 9>the time to be moving money because for people that

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 9>are going to be in money markets a year later,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 9>they're going to be very disappointed and moving into the

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 9>bond markets. Now you have the yield, but you also

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 9>have capital appreciation opportunities. We like preferred stock as well,

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 9>other good play that's fixed income to equity. So keeping

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 9>it though, I would say all high quality, not venturing

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 9>into as our economy has been softening, keeping it on

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 9>the high quality side.

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 2>This brings up my question that I have is that

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 2>why are we convinced that money market funds are going

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to go somewhere else? Because if we're in a rate

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>normalization cycle, doesn't mean we're going to go back to

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 2>one percent of the Fed funds rate, Like if we

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>stay at four, I don't know, three and a half, Like,

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 2>why would I maybe take on more resk when it

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 2>can sit there and still make money.

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 9>Well, because what you're doing is locking in to a

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 9>higher rate for longer by moving into the fixed income

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 9>markets versus seeing the rates continue to go down in

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 9>money markets. So right now, if you move into just say,

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, a six year duration on your fixed income,

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 9>you're looking at between you know, four to five percent

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 9>on the yield with some capital appreciation opportunity that you

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 9>can lock in for the next six years. That's what

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 9>history tells us, So I'd liken it too. You know,

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 9>if you could go back in time a couple of

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 9>years ago and lock into a home mortgage rate at

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 9>three percent, So if.

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 3>You could be alan statically, yes, so Paul's we can

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 3>go back in time and be me that's what you.

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 9>Would do, be a static about that. And so similarly,

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 9>right now we have the opportunity in fixed income to

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 9>lock in at the higher rate for a period of

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 9>time and instead of watching the rates go down.

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 5>Uh, Lauren, you mentioned preferred stock, and we don't talk

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 5>about prefers stock a lot.

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 4>How do you use perfertock in your port portfolio? Why

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 4>is it attractive right now?

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so we use it as part of our fixed

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 9>income allocation because you're getting a yield from it, but

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 9>you also have equity like exposure with you know, some

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 9>upside there. So it's this hybrid as it were, and

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 9>it gives off a very nice yield while you're waiting.

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 9>So it is kind of this more conservative way, more

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 9>conservative approach and looks very attractive right now.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 3>What do you think of corporate credit, Well, you.

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 9>Know, I think that we would prefer agency mortgage backed

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 9>securities corporate credit. You know, in a diversified fixed income portfolio,

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 9>you're going to have some corporate credit, but more so

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 9>than that agency even treasury, but a smaller allocation I

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 9>would say to corporate just with the softening of the economy.

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 5>I mean I was speaking with a large group of

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 5>registered investment advisers recently now surprised by how aggressive they

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 5>were in terms of allocating their client's portfolio to alternative investments.

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 5>While it's hedge funds, private equity, private credit, How do

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 5>you view alternatives in a client's portfolio.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think alternatives have their space, and we allocate

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 9>to alternatives as well, but it is a smaller piece

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 9>of the puzzle. So you know, we look at, you

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 9>know how much between equity and fixed income and in

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 9>all alternatives in general, we consider that part of the

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 9>equity exposure that gives us more diversification than just going

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 9>along on equity. But I think you have to be

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 9>careful because some alternatives can lock you in for a

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 9>very long time, so liquidity needs have to be considered.

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 9>And the other thing is as they can be a diversifier,

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 9>but that doesn't always mean that they're going to outperform

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 9>other areas of the market. So yes, we use it,

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 9>and we're always looking for what the opport tunities are.

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 9>I think there's been there's been quite a bit of

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 9>investment in private credit as an alternative investment. And I

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 9>don't know how much more legs that really have.

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Great stuff really appreciated some counterintuitive views.

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 3>They're so fun to get.

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Hullarene Gilbert, CEO of wealth Wise Financial, kind of you know,

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of tempering.

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Expectations when it comes to private credit. Maybe it's not

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 3>the bazillion dollar industry that we all think in.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we'll see how the asset class performs here with

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:33.239
<v Speaker 5>these higher for longer interest rates, because you've got to,

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 5>you know, now, some of the banks are kind of

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 5>getting you know, maybe getting a little bit more aggressive

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 5>in their leverage lending businesses here, trying to you know,

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 5>kind of compete a.

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Little bit better with this private credit.

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 5>But the private credit's done really well, particularly in the

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 5>mid middle markets where maybe some of the regional banks

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 5>have dialed back since a great financial crisis their risk

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 5>taking environment.

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 4>So keep an eye on that.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>weekdays ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android Auto

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also listen live

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Malex Steel alongside pauls. We need this Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 2>We bring you all the top news and analysis with

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 2>our analysts from Bloomberg Intelligence. They cover two thousand companies

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries worldwide. And Friday means

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the end of the second quarter, we will be halfway

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>through the year. So it's that time where we're getting

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 2>all the mid year outlooks, which are super helpful, particularly

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 2>from Bloomberg Intelligence and joining us in studio as Michael Halen,

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.479
<v Speaker 2>He's consumer Products senior Bloomberg Intelligence industry analyst.

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Michael in studio, We're very excited about this.

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm excited too.

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for joining. He finally came in.

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I was digging through my junk drawer, but I

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:51.959
<v Speaker 10>found it.

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 3>We found it. It was just important.

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, is New Jersey Transit even running? I

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 2>think is more of the question.

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 4>It's tough.

0:28:57.840 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Nice.

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So midyear outlook give us the broad sweeps, like

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 2>what are you expecting for the back half, and then

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 2>we can get to specific stocks.

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, sure, you know, broad sweeps. I'd say sales are

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 10>probably looking a little bit better just because than they

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 10>were in the first half. Because the year over year

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 10>comparisons are getting easier. Higher income consumers should have money

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 10>to spend, right, we see we see stock markets at

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 10>all time highs, bitcoins having a rough day, but not

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 10>far off the highs, and home prices have held in

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 10>despite the higher rates, so that those should kind of

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 10>buoy restaurants sales. But on the other end, the other

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 10>end of the k, the low income consumers continue to struggle.

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 10>You know, consumers under seventy five thousand were cited by

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 10>Darden the other day on their earnings call is struggling,

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 10>especially consumers you know that are earning less than fifty thousand.

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 10>So we have kind of a push and a pull there.

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 10>You know, Margins are okay, you know.

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 4>We would like to see better sales because that's really.

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 10>What drives most of the margin expansion in that business.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 10>Right There's a lot of operating leverage in the model,

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 10>so so maybe some modest margin expansion. And the stocks

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 10>generally haven't done so well this year, you know. You

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 10>know what we wrote is that we we think we're

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 10>going to see a larger spread between the stock market,

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 10>you know, the market share winners and losers this year,

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 10>you know, which we've largely seen in the first half.

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 4>You've seen stocks like Chipotle, you.

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 10>Know, actually absolutely knocked the cover off the ball again

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 10>and and really appreciate where where other chains like Darden

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 10>you know, actually, I'm sorry, Darden's done pretty well, like

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 10>blooming I should say, is kind of struggled in the

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 10>first half, and you've seen that stock, you know, sell

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 10>off pretty precipitously.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 5>Talk to us about California and their new minimum wage law.

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 5>What's the impact been on the fast food business?

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 2>We have like a famous Hollywood restaurant closed because of that,

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 2>like the famous like Hollywood Donalds or something.

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 10>Oh, San Fran, Yeah, San Fran closed, Yeah, yeah, So

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 10>it's not been.

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Good so far. April results were.

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 10>Kind of in line with the US in terms of

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 10>same star sales at quick service restaurants. But I think

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 10>everybody went in April and then they had got sticker

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 10>shock and they did not return in May.

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 5>So the McDonald's are the world the restaurants in general California.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 5>Are they raising prices to cover their.

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 10>Higher labor Yeah, high single digits is typical, which is

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 10>a lot, and and that's not even covering it because

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 10>the traffic loss that that that we've seen here in May,

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 10>it's it's not even gonna cover it. So they may

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 10>even have to raise prices again if they can.

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Quick Service.

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 10>Uh, California Same Star sales underperformed by almost four hundred

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 10>basis points in May versus the US. Yeah, so you know,

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 10>what we wrote is that we expect quick service to

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 10>continue to outperform casual dining just because it's a cheaper check.

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 10>Even though it's gotten all the bad press about the

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 10>eighteen dollars big Mac meal twenty two dollars smash Burger meal,

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 10>it's still you can eat there a lot cheaper on

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 10>the value menu and stuff like that. Also, you know,

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 10>chains are starting to discount more Burger King and McDonald's

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 10>five dollars meals, things of that nature. But California is

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 10>definitely gonna weigh on quick service growth throughout your end

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 10>for sure.

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 2>So as the k shape recovery grows even wider, it

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 2>feels like, so do the valuations of those companies that

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 2>service those two lines.

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Is that a fair statement?

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:39.959
<v Speaker 10>If you if you're a chain that can attract high end,

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 10>can high income consumers like Chipotle's done such a good

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 10>job of doing and McDonald's has done a good job

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 10>of it as well since since the start of the pandemic.

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Chipotle is their Wednesday day, Paul, It varies, but it's

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 2>seven one day week they get Chipotle.

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 4>But here's a funny Chipotle story.

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 5>They got slammed in social media for like underfilling their

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 5>time and things like that. Now they've gone overboard and

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 5>they overfilled them. So the net result for me, instead

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.719
<v Speaker 5>of getting three hard tacos with chicken and I'll give

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 5>you the whole order later, I only get two.

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh, there you go.

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 5>So it's got to be hurting their sales. So that

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 5>is an interesting tidbit.

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so we were thinking about doing some work into it,

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 10>but we haven't done anything yet all right here, but

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 10>there was definitely some heat and some shade thrown at

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 10>Chipotle for a little while there.

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna say a year and a half ago, somebody

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 5>came in here. This is kind of the beginning of

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 5>this whole AI thing, And somebody came in to this

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 5>studio and said, one of the biggest areas is going

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 5>to be like, for example, drive through going through a

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 5>drive through McDonald's, it's gonna be all AI blah blah

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 5>blah blah blah. So my question to you is, are

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 5>local I don't know McDonald's or Burger Kings, did they

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 5>have fewer employees because they're using technology or at all

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 5>like that?

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 10>Well, they have tried to cut labor hours in other ways,

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 10>that's a goal using AI, for sure.

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 7>Uh.

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 10>It's been harder though at the drive through then anticipated

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 10>a lot of things just like accents, you know, you know,

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 10>something like that. You know, actually is is has caused

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 10>some issues something else there. Uh, they're also using AI

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 10>with these cameras that are using AI to see if

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 10>orders are being played packaged correctly, you know, since takeout

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 10>and delivery has become such.

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 4>A big part of these businesses.

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 10>But uh, you know, one of the companies that was

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 10>doing that got caught using people in India watching like screens.

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Videos supposedly quote unquote AI.

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 10>So we're not quite there yet with the AI in that.

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting.

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 2>It's like the practical application, like how it really makes

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the difference. We may not quite be there yet. Here's

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 2>my question if you and Ken Shae Fromloomberg Intelligence, who

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 2>covers many things but in particular he covers all the

0:34:56.200 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 2>cannabis companies got together, like what is your interplay between

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 2>you guys?

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not actually trying to be that funny, but

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 3>like you know, with all the.

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Weed stores coming up and you can get kind of

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 2>cannabis anywhere in many places, Like, does that have a

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 2>direct impact on the companies that you cover? Like have

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 2>you noticed something along those lines?

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 10>They haven't necessarily necessarily attributed any you know, lower alcohol

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 10>sales to that, you.

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Know, or like more food sales or like runchy sales.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.760
<v Speaker 10>I mean, you know, we've had some of our companies

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 10>like Jack in the Box and other companies that do

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 10>a big late night business kind of lean into that

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 10>stuff on their advertising. You know, they've used snoop you know,

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 10>and some of their stuff. I think ice Cube now is.

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 5>But on the flip side of that, is the GLP

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 5>one situation true?

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Because is that real? Because your company has called it out.

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, but like the panic over it seems to have

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 10>uh subsided.

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Is it real? Yeah? But there's still a lot of

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 4>question marks.

0:35:59.440 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 10>Uh, there is definitely concern because like people are less

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 10>likely to go to fast food restaurants like there's a

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.760
<v Speaker 10>lot of people saying they feel sick eating fast food

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 10>on GLP ones.

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot lower alcohol.

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 10>Consumption on GLP one. So it's definitely something that's being monitored.

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 10>But right now it's still like such a small it's

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:24.959
<v Speaker 10>just had such small distributions so far. I think what's

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 10>going to be more of a concern is once it's

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 10>in a in a pill or something that's easier than

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 10>a shot.

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right, it's interesting.

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 5>So I'm looking at the S and P Restaurant Index

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 5>VAT member returns. The second worst performing stock for restaurants

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 5>is cracker Barrel Old Country. That kills me because I'm

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 5>a huge advocate for Cracker brow So I don't know

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 5>why this stock's not working.

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 4>All right, all right, I'm going to improve by breakfast.

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 5>All right, Michael Halen, Bloomberg Intelligence, Thank you very much.

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloombergen.

0:36:56.400 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast cat I have

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:03.399
<v Speaker 1>week days at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>station just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 5>Well for the month of June, Bloomberg Radio is committed

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 5>to bringing new segments and guests focus on the topic

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 5>of equality. Today, we're speaking with Mike Heider, President and

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 5>CEO of Executive Leadership Council. Mike, thanks so much for

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 5>joining us here. Tell us what the Executive Leadership Council is.

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 4>What are you guys doing over there?

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's good. Thank you for having me. It's nice

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 11>to be here. I appreciate it. The Executive leaders of Council,

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 11>otherwise known as the ELC, we're an organization of the

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 11>highest ranking black executives in global organizations worldwide with a

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 11>commitment to the leadership and development of talent in corporations.

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 7>Been around thirty eight years.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Right, good stuff.

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 5>What are you finding these days? Just in terms of

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:07.399
<v Speaker 5>overall that DEI concept which had been ascending for many

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 5>years and for some people feels.

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Like it may have peaked. How how do you view

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 4>that commitment?

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:20.359
<v Speaker 11>Well, the diversity, equity and inclusion is and continues to

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 11>be a very strong element and element for organizations that

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 11>are beneficial for them. Unfortunately, there's a lot of heated

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 11>rhetoric about the diversity, equity, inclusion I guess being perceived

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 11>as reverse discrimination, which we don't. We fundamentally disagree with

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 11>that assertion. It is failing to sort of readdress the

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 11>facts that diversity equity inclusion has actually been benefited the

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 11>United States economy over the years with its But it

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 11>just has to be folks as properly if in order

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 11>for that to happen.

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 2>How do we do that, How does that? How is

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 2>it focused properly? And one of the steps that need

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 2>to be taken.

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:11.919
<v Speaker 11>Now the steps should be the diversity equity inclusion should

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 11>be considered the impetus behind superior business performance, increase access

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 11>and opportunity for development for all people, and that the

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 11>focusing on increasing building corporate culture to increase and enhance

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:37.439
<v Speaker 11>the engagement of as many employees as possible is what

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 11>diversity equity inclusion means.

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't mean lowering standards.

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 11>So if it's applied as the significant contributed to the

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 11>business driver that it is, then it's it will be

0:39:55.760 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 11>strategically relevant in the organizations and less concerned as something

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 11>that is being merely tolerated.

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 5>So I mean, give us a sense how you think

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 5>that about this, Miket and how your counsel thinks about

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 5>this because again it seems like DEI is sharing a

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 5>similar type of situation or environment as e SG is

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 5>Environmental Social governance investing. As people are just kind of

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 5>pushing back on both of those types of initiatives, whether

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.319
<v Speaker 5>it's from a political perspective.

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 4>Or a business perspective.

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 11>How do you think about that, Well, it's unfortunate that that's.

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 7>Been the case.

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 11>We're focusing on we want organizations need to be and

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 11>shareholders and customers are expecting and employees are expecting companies

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 11>to be peak performers. And specifically the ELC, we are

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:02.720
<v Speaker 11>corporate officers that are our executives and major corporations around

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 11>the world.

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 7>So where we.

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 11>Look at the diversity equity inclusion as a piece of

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 11>increasing the effectiveness of an organization's ability to be more

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 11>profitable and be more successful as how we would suggest

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 11>organizations focus on it as opposed to it being something

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 11>that's perceived as a political issue.

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 2>What do you think would be helpful, Mike, because to

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 2>not politicize it just a few months before an election

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 2>that will definitely politicize this. How do you sort of

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 2>manage that?

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:44.720
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's an excellent question, and I guess the challenge

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 11>of the day. Our assessment on managing it is staying

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 11>focused on what is required to be functional on the

0:41:55.560 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 11>ground in organizations and to be less I guess, less

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 11>defined by other people's assessment about what it is or

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 11>it isn't. That's the only way we think is the best.

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 11>I guess the best avenue is to be consistent for

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:22.760
<v Speaker 11>addressing what I called this disparities in terms of numbers

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 11>based on representation of talent within organizations, and to have

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 11>talent strategies and development strategies that ensure that everybody is

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 11>reaching their full potential in organizations as our suggestions for

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 11>what organizations are to do, and to stay focused on

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 11>that independent of what it's called or indefinitive of what

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 11>the acronyms are that people are defining it.

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 5>By Mike, you mentioned that the EOC is a global

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 5>Council global entity. Giving your global view here, how does

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 5>the US doing on DEI initiatives maybe versus some other

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 5>parts of the world.

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 7>I think it is mixed relative to other parts of

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:12.720
<v Speaker 7>the world, but I do believe that the.

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 11>Focus on productivity and team benefits globally is much more

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 11>pronounced and less it's less it's less defined by race

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 11>and culture, and so it has less less baggage, I guess,

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 11>if you will, relative to how it's perceived globally than

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 11>it does here in the United States. I think team productivity,

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 11>maximizing the contributions of all types of folks independent of

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 11>their background or gender, sexual orientation, continues to be something

0:43:54.920 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 11>that all organizations are striving towards. You know, they're some

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 11>companies who are more effective at it globally than others.

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 11>But you know, I just think the whole issue around

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 11>the discussion that you all are referencing is primarily much

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 11>more I guess, aggressive in the United States, because I

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 11>think there is an over interpretation of this as a

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 11>byproduct of a racial issue as opposed to something that

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 11>is looked at as a full production of all types

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 11>of people independent of race.

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:29.800
<v Speaker 7>In the United States.

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that's such a great point that it gets

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 2>stuck on race versus all diversity, like you need full

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 2>diversity in order to sort of deliver that profitability, to

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 2>deliver synergies, et cetera. So, yeah, it's true, all right, Mike,

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 2>we appreciate it.

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 3>Thanks very much.

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Mike Hicher, President and CEO of Executive Leadership Committee ELC

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 2>joining us excuse me, Leadership Council joining us on all

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the efforts through DEI. And you know, I wonder what

0:44:57.120 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 2>this happens once we get past November, Paul, Like, what

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:01.399
<v Speaker 2>the result will wind up being?

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Does this conversation get easier, get harder?

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Can we refocus it into diversity is good for many reasons?

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Here are the numbers that show it versus making it

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 2>a race issue.

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 4>At the end of the day, yep, exactly.

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 5>If you can put in the context of profitability and returns,

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 5>let's probably get the board's attention.

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.