WEBVTT - Winning Was the 'Easy Part' for Starmer: Now What?

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 2>You campaign for it, you've fought for it, you've voted

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 2>for it, and now it has arrived.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Change begins.

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 4>Now welcome to another special edition of the voter Nomics podcast,

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 4>where politics and markets collide. I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 4>Economics and Government at Bloomberg, and I'm in Whitehall in

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 4>the Old War Office, just a stone's throw from ten

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 4>Downing Street. If you're much better at throwing stones than

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 4>i am. The Conservatives just a review have been turfed

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 4>out in a seismic changing of the guard in Westminster

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 4>and across constituencies up and down the land, with Prime

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 4>Minister of Is She's Sunak presiding over a record loss

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 4>of around two hundred and fifty Conservative seats, Labor with

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 4>a majority just shy of Tony Blair's landslide victory of

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 4>nineteen ninety seven, and there will be a lot of

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 4>other new faces joining him in Parliament, including many more

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 4>Liberal Democrats, a clutch of reform and Green MPs will

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 4>be very interested in five years time to see what

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 4>the opposition, what kind of opposition the Labor Party is facing.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's fair to say, for the first

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 4>time in a long time, the world here in that

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 4>the financial markets and in London but also around the

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 4>world doesn't have to pay that much attention to the

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Conservative Party's travails, at least for a while, any more

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 4>than they ever care about a weak opposition party at

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 4>the start of a new government with a massive majority.

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 4>So instead we'll be focusing here on Labor and markets

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 4>haven't reacted this morning. You'll probably have seen, and I

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 4>think con mentioned there's been no big change in the

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 4>pound foot seats up slightly when it opened a few

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 4>minutes ago, and that's obviously because it wasn't a surprise

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 4>that the Labor Party had won. But I think you

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 4>know they've been so cagey and so careful in the

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 4>lead up to this, with their huge lead in the

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 4>polls that they didn't want to lose. Then I think

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 4>there will be plenty in the months to come that

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 4>will be a surprise for investors and for the business

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 4>community and for all of.

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Us here up on the stage.

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 4>I have to help me thinking about this, think about

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 4>this for the next few minutes. Bloomberg's editor in chief

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 4>John Mikolfwaite and Sir Nigel Wilson, who was the chief

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 4>executive of the insurer Legal in General for a decade

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 4>before standing down last year, and has recently been appointed

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 4>group chairman of Canary Wharf Group. So Nigel, let me

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 4>come to you, because along with your business career, you've

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 4>been quite public over the years about the factors holding

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 4>back the UK economy and the shortcomings in government policy

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 4>over this period. Do you seriously expect now that lay

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 4>But will change things and what kind of advice would

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 4>you give them.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm very excited because I think Kids done an amazing

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 6>job to transform the party and win the election, and

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 6>he's now got a wonderful opportunity because as I've always said,

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 6>we've got an amazing amount of capital in the UK.

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 6>We've got six trillion pounds of long term capital which

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 6>has been hopelessly misallocated for the last twenty or thirty years.

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 6>So they've got the capital already sitting in the UK

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 6>to do all the necessary changes. Because we're always bottom

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 6>of the G seven table in terms of the percentage

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 6>of investment as a proportion of GDP, we could now

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 6>move to near the top of it if we want

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 6>to do that, And they put the policy and regulation

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 6>in place, to drive growth in housing, to drive growth

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 6>in sort out the water industry, their massive transformation on energy,

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 6>and to build a world class venture capital and scale

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 6>up businesses in the UK. So I'm very excited about

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 6>the prospects because kids done a great job in Phase one,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 6>which I think is the easiest.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>One, is winning the election.

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 6>Verse two is actually coming forward with some not KG policies,

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 6>but some real credible policies about how we're really going

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 6>to grow the economy and use.

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>All the private capital and all the.

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 6>Private expertise to drive that growth, and then be very

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 6>supportive next year in actually making sure that capital gets

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 6>spent and the government acts in a very bald and

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 6>aggressive way that they haven't done for a very long

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 6>period of time to really drive change. Don't just talk

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 6>about change, You've got to make change happen. So I

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 6>think they are listening. I've had lots of indeed some

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 6>private sessions with kir on this, and I think they're

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 6>up for doing this. This could be nineteen forty five,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 6>a transformation of the economy going forward, a modernization of

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 6>the economy going forward, and really really delivering and making

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 6>people happy again about the terrible lack of growth that

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 6>we've seen since two thousand and seven. How far behind

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 6>we've fallen against the best amount of competitors.

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, just to follow up on that, I mean, I

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 4>think you know people would often people outside the world

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 4>are surprised that we have a world leading financial sector,

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 4>that it's so good at deploying capital, But historically, for

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 4>more than a century it has been bad deploying it

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 4>in its own country. We just haven't we haven't seen

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 4>it go into the kind of private investment. And as

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned, twenty four of the last thirty years we've

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 4>had the lowest rate of investment in the Group of Seven,

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 4>and we're about twenty eighth out of thirty one countries

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 4>in the OECD.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 5>So when you talk.

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 4>About Takirstama, the incoming prime minister knows what's at stake

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 4>and knows some of the key leavers to pull.

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 5>What are you.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 4>Focused on on planning restrictions on house building? Where would

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 4>you see it?

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 6>I think all of these things are integrated together, because

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 6>I think once you start delivering change and people seeing

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 6>things happen, then you create that immersing positive momentum. They've

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 6>done it in the election. I think they can do

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 6>it in the economy as well, because the numbers that

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 6>you caught are often the ones that I qued as well.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 6>We have this massive potential. There's six trillion pounds of

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 6>long term capital. There's three trillion in the pension fund industry,

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 6>there's one and a half trillion in the insurance industry,

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 6>seven and fifty billion sitting in various serving schemes, and

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 6>isis have seven and fifty billion as well. That's six

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 6>trillion hopelessly deployed. And we got some of the cleverest,

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 6>best bankers in the world, and as you said, they're

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 6>world leading. We now have to get them working with

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 6>industry and actually under the sponsorship and leadership of the

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 6>government to really make a difference and planning. Initially, they've

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 6>got to use the powers they already have, compulsory purchase orders,

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 6>call in rights, and then put in place legislation which

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 6>allows them to really drive growth in the energy industry

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.559
<v Speaker 6>and the housing industry, in the water industry, but also

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 6>in all these amazing scale up businesses that we have

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 6>across the UK. So they actually do scale up. They

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 6>do ip R here in the UK, and we look

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 6>in two or three years time and say, wow, all

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 6>these amazing things have happened here in the UK.

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I think is that we all know planning is one

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 2>huge area where things could change dramatically. The other gigantic

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>one is Europe, which you didn't mention that bit like

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Karma is not mentioned or he's tried not to mention it.

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>But if you were looking just from a straightforward economists

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 2>point of view about how to grow the British economy,

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 2>a new deal with Europe and one which went perhaps

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>quite close to a customs union, perhaps is that the

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 2>other the other lever he.

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.119
<v Speaker 3>Could pull in order to get these things happening.

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I think that's an excellent question, and I would

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 6>agree with everything you said that John, that it's something

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 6>we should be doing. There's a bit of chills in

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 6>Europe at the moment, and we've got these domestic priorities

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 6>where we can actually deliver on them without wasting too

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 6>much time literally next week they.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 2>In order to get the most growth out of Europe

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>to start.

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I would be in favor of a customs union,

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 6>but clearly that's not the position that here and the

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 6>rest of the team have right now. But actually the

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 6>get momentum in the domestic economy that will create confidence

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 6>and actually going forward and developing a much firmer and

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 6>better relationship with Europe, which I think we would all

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 6>cheer for.

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 4>I guess the pushback to some of this optimism, although

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 4>obviously it is exciting and it's great to hear the

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 4>kind of confidence and the optimism in your voice, Nigel.

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 4>The just two things that we've identified that could make

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 4>a difference. Are there just two things that have caused

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 4>the most problem for you successive UK governments? Pushing through

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 4>difficult investment projects or big infrastructure investment. Redeploying capital in

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 4>the in the savings industry. I mean, people have been

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 4>trying to do this for many years, many including Jeremy Hunt,

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 4>have talked about it, and equally Europe has has just

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 4>sucked so much time and political capital over the years

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 4>without necessarily you know, it's going to would take quite

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 4>a lot for this incoming government decide to deploy it there.

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 4>So isn't that the chat. The two things that we've

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 4>talked about are actually incredibly hard and they could look

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 4>very bogged down very quickly.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 6>I think that's not going to be the case, because

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 6>certainly I'm I'm very pleased by the way that Jeremy

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 6>kept his seat because he did a lot of work

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 6>on pension reform. He's a really good person and he

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 6>stood up when we really needed somebody to stand up.

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 6>And I think Rachel's going to be the same is

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 6>that she's going to try to make things happen and

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 6>at pace. And so we know what the past look like,

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 6>we don't want to repeat of that. Therefore, we've got

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 6>to really drive change through very very quickly. And there

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 6>are so many easy wins. You know, there's a stock

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 6>of housing projects just stuck in planning, and you can

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 6>accelerate that. It's a choice you can select whether do

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 6>we go faster U s law. We all want to

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 6>go faster on things like that. And once that starts happening,

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 6>doors lead to doors, and we'll see more good things

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 6>happening right now because there's there's a good will towards

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 6>the party.

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 4>Are you so confident these things are going to happen

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 4>because you're going to be in charge of doing them.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 5>You have been talked about as.

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 6>I'm certainly very close to lots of the mayors across

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 6>the Believer and Devolution, and indeed I'd already set up

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 6>some meetings post the election to talk to them about

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 6>what else we can do to accelerate the growth, be

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 6>that in Newcastle or Sunderland.

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 4>But if Takia calls up in a few hours, I said,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 4>you know what, I.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 6>Think he's got bigger issues to worry about than what

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to do for the next few months. But

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 6>he's going to He's got a good team around him,

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 6>and that team's talked up their capability. Now they have

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 6>to deliver on that capability. And they've got the money.

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 6>And as you're right you said, we've got a brilliant

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 6>financial services sector, almost the envy of the world. We're

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 6>brilliant in Pe, We're brilliant in VC. We've got tons

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 6>of savings, We've got masses of great banks here in

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 6>the City of London. We've got huge underinvestment. As you

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 6>pointed out, for the last thirty years, there's so many

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 6>easy wins make them happen.

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 2>If I was you imagine you did get that job,

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I would be rather worried by some of the seats.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 3>That labor is just one.

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, all these things like Uldershot, These are all

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the places where the Tories have faced endless problems over

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 2>planning because people object to it.

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 3>They don't like it.

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 2>There's that film studio in Theiamalow which even people like

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 2>Georgie Osporan say it's insane not to build it, the

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 2>three thousand jobs, two hundred acres, but because it's just

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 2>on the edge of the green belt, people don't want it.

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>You are now going to have in Labor a group

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 2>of MPs which never had before, who, after a few

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 2>hours of self congratulation, they're stunning and face to the prospect.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 2>They've got constituents who don't like new houses. There could

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 2>be another wing of the Labor Party which actually makes

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 2>life more difficult than easy for all the things you

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>want to do.

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a possibility.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 6>But you know, when I was at Legal in General,

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 6>we did the sky studios at Elstree, which is in

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 6>a not quite the green belt, but in an area

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 6>that was difficult to achieve planning on. But once people

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 6>see these things and they become up and running, and

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 6>you can take people across the country and say, look,

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 6>this is what happened here. This is the outcome. Don't

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 6>be fearful about it. This is the rights of our

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 6>children to have housing. You know, our generations stolen from

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 6>our children by not giving them their housing, by charging

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 6>for god to universities, by not giving them good pensions,

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 6>all the things that we took for granted. We have

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 6>to replace them by doing a better job for them

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 6>going forward in educations on that list as well, which

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 6>I know you feel very strong.

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 4>In a minute, I want to get onto sort of

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 4>pulling back of the lens in terms of where this victory,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 4>what it looks like in a global context, and what

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 4>that means for kirs Arma as a new prime minister.

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 4>But I guess you know, for the audience that is

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 4>the business community, for investors around the world, very important

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 4>to get stability, and I think that is why there

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 4>was confidence around this. There was a positive reaction to this,

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 4>just the prospect of a five years stable majority government,

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 4>the good things that they might do that we've talked

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 4>about to unlock investment and growth. But of course with

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 4>any labor government, you also have the question of what bad.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 5>Things are we hoping they don't do?

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 4>And you know, one query has been given that they're

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 4>not going to have very much money to play with.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 4>What often then happens is that you change laws instead

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 4>of spending money, because you can do sweeping things by changing,

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 4>for example, employment law, maybe eating away a bit at

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 4>the sort of flexible hire and fire structure of the

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 4>UK in ways that have unexpectedly quite negative effects for

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 4>growth and for business confidence. So how worried should people

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 4>be about that? Because that was where there was a

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 4>bit of detail in the manifesto.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I agree with that, and I think that's what's

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 6>happened over the last thirty years. We made all these

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 6>marginal decisions which look when you're making them as though

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 6>they're positive, but actually when you look at the second

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 6>order effects and the unintended consequences have been very negative

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 6>for the overall economy and people's thinking about what a

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 6>great place the UK is to invest.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>That's why they have to have some wins on the

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>positive growth story.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 6>So they're definitely changing the narrative, but not spending all

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 6>of their time causing things which are a problem for business.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Is there anything in that manifesto on that front that

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 4>you would worry about?

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 4>I think everyone, Yeah, I forget.

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 6>The worker's rights issues are going to are going to

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 6>be an issue that people are going to have to

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 6>be concerned concerned about, you know, and it's not going

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 6>to be plain sailing giving the composition of the of

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 6>the Labor Party, and that is a risk, that is

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 6>definitely a risk. So you're right to highlight that as

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 6>a as a risk. And I've been on the other

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 6>side of that where I've been overly optimistic about things

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 6>and then got just really let me down again.

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's happened so much in the so much in

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the past.

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 6>But I think the towns and the cities across the

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 6>UK have very capable people.

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>In them now as well.

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 6>The banks themselves have moved to Birmingham, to Leeds, to Manchester,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 6>to Newcastle, and that's having a difference because suddenly capital

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 6>is on tap, ambitions on tap. The mayors themselves are

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 6>very ambitious people and very capable people.

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 5>That is clearly going to be the ultimate test.

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 4>They've talked a lot about decentralizing, and I certainly with

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 4>someone who thinks, I agree with you that it's the

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 4>best way now given where we are to make things happen,

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 4>is to be devolving more power to regions and to

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 4>cities in particular. But whether you know, so many governments

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 4>say that and then they get power they don't want

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 4>to relinquish it, so we'll see what happens. John, I think,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, you're someone who is flitting around the world

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 4>quite a lot while we do all the work, she says,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 4>And I flicked It was not a surprise in the

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 4>UK context at all, and it comes after fourteen years

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 4>of conservative rule. But in a global context this is

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 4>completely out of step.

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a big deal globally. I think

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 2>that if you step back spect those of us who

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 2>deal with America a lot, we'll get a lot of calls.

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Later next week, You've got the summit where star War

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 2>will go there, and suddenly this man who is describing

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>was was you know, rather it seemed like a rather

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 2>marginal figure in world politics, will suddenly be one of

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 2>the most powerful people, notwithstanding the fact the kind of

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 2>basket case nature of Britain in many ways. He will

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 2>appear and he is the one person next week who

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 2>will be able to say, look, I'm here for the

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 2>next five years. You look around the rest of the world.

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 2>You've got Joe Biden, for whom the weekend maybe a

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 2>long time.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 3>You have.

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Macron, who is in severe trouble. I love Schultz has

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 2>also got issues. And from that perspective, you've got Keir Starmer,

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 2>a very good Greek prime minister, good Italian primi or

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Italian prime minis who's doing quite well. That Starmo is

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 2>going to be right at the very center of things

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 2>with a degree of longevity, and I think that is

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 2>actually really quite a big thing, and especially in the

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 2>context of what's happening in other countries, and that degree

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 2>of permanence is a very strange thing. And then secondly,

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 2>he will be able to say, look, I'm the person

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>who's managed to resist or at least in theory, I've

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 2>managed to resist these sort of nationalist currents which are

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 2>happening elsewhere. And yes, people will come back at him

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 2>and say we'll reform did well that that is not

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 2>the same as what's happening in Paris. It's not the

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 2>same as what's happening in Germany. And if you factor

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump, and it's not not the same as what's

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 2>happening in America. So there will be I think, amongst

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 2>what might have describe the center ground of politics, there

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 2>will also be a degree of Starmerism. So I completely

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 2>agree as I indicated, but that with the massive problems.

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Starmer's got here, but actually in a weird way, you know,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 2>he's on the international stage. I think he is the

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 2>first person since kind of Cameron or possibly Blair to

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 2>have that degree of clout when it comes to the

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the world politics.

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I guess we don't know what's going to

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 4>happen in France, will find out on Sunday night. But

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 4>to the extent as you say, we have the German Chancellor,

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 4>French President Macron very much on the back foot, potentially

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 4>President Biden as well. I guess there is danger though

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 4>that they've invested all this time in roose relationships that

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 4>are not really going to be worth very much and

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 4>they're not going to be able to provide things that

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 4>labor or that the UK needs. So is that that

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 4>that's the downside?

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 3>I think there is.

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the problems which Nigel alluded to

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 2>is that the obvious thing. I think if all three

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 2>of us, to make a terrible presumption, were put into

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Downing Street, I think redoing the relationship with Europe would

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>be that is the simple, easiest way to get the

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 2>growth that Britain needs, and that nothing none of the

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 2>wonderful things that you may not be wonderful to everybody.

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 3>The things that labor wants to do are going to be.

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Really possible without growth because you have the guilts market

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 2>sitting there looking at government spending. But the problem is

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>you go to Europe and it's a mess, and so

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the idea that you know, Starma can immediately get some.

0:18:58.960 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Degree of deal there.

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, if I was Starmer, I would

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 2>still try and do that rapidly because I think it

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 2>has two amazing effects for Starmer.

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Number one is it increases British growth.

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Secondly, it really skewers the Tories because it probably pushes

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the Tories into a position where they oppose no matter

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 2>what happens, whatever deal he does come up with, And

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 2>I think when he does, if they do that, I

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 2>think I'll make a terrible presumption again about the nature

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 2>of the people in this room. But I think the

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 2>commercial classes in Britain, if the Tories again push themselves

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 2>into a thing where they really limit growth, I think

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 2>that would be a very serious thing for the future

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 2>of the Conservative Party.

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if you look sorry, and I.

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Think we can change investor perception.

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 6>That's the other thing One of the points that John's

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 6>just made is that because this will have financial and

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 6>political stability for the next five years, this is a.

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've got a conscious buiers.

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 6>I think London's the best city in the world in

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 6>the UK is an amazing class to invest and we've

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 6>just underinvested it in it for such a long time.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 6>Investor perception is going to change. The Conservatives did a

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 6>really poor job of country management across the across the world.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 6>We have an opportunity to put a lot of that

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 6>ride right now, and there's tons of money elsewhere looking

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 6>for homes the world to wash with cash and capital

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 6>at the moment, and we should be telling people this

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 6>is a great place to come and invest that money

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 6>because you're going to have the political stability and economic

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 6>growth agenda here very poor business and these are great

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:29.479
<v Speaker 6>cities and towns to live in.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 4>We're going to run out of time in a minute,

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 4>but I guess I had had two more words to

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 4>ask you what your feelings were. Industrial policy, you know,

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 4>we've had that's one of the ways in which the

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 4>world has actually moved left in recent years in terms

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 4>of economic policy, much more interventionism. Rachel Reeves has talked

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 4>about Bidenomics without the money, or I guess she's not

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 4>talked about it, but what she said has implied Bidenomics

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 4>without the money because we don't have the kind of

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 4>scale of trillions that the Biden administration has been able

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 4>to put into things like the Inflation Reduction Act and

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Infrastructure program. But we may have bidnomics without President Biden

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 4>as well. But that's a whole other issue. But do

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 4>you kind of have a natural kind of watch your

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 4>wallet response when you start hearing about industrial policy? Do

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 4>you worry about competition in that context?

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 5>How do you? How should one should one welcome that?

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 6>I think we should welcome it because that's I think

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 6>there's going to be an engagement around what the industrial

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 6>policy should be because they've been actively listening for us

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 6>for a very long time time and that's been very,

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 6>very positive.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 1>And there is just just this huge gap and we

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>have the capital.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 6>You know, as John mentioned, public finances are very constrained

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 6>and will find out just how constrained there is when

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 6>they do their due diligence starting next week.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Private sector capital is huge.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 6>The personal financial sector in the UK has a very strong,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 6>massive excess service, really good shape. The SME is in

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 6>Britain one hundred and ninety billion of borrowings two hundred

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 6>and fifty billion of deposits right now. So there's huge

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 6>headroom for growth in the UK, but you have to

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 6>have that confidence to invest, and I don't. We've had

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 6>either the planning, the regulation, the policy, the tax situation

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 6>which is really encouraged investment. I was talking to the

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 6>Tartar Group about their investment in their the battery factory

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 6>yesterday and Chandra is one of the most visionary leaders

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.239
<v Speaker 6>in the in the world and they're going to make

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 6>that happen and seeing is believing. The envision one up

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 6>in Sunderland is absolutely fantastic and if people get out

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 6>and see what's happening.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>And that, you know, the early green shoes.

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 5>Per job is extraordinarily high.

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 6>Though I think that's a short term view and I

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 6>think the doors lead to doors, and we filled when

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 6>we built the original nissunfactory. We haven't really done very

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 6>much since to build the supply chain. We have to

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 6>build supply chains in the in the UK in part

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 6>to trade bede.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Here we face this fundamental problem is that we decided

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not exit is not the main issue, but the

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 2>basic factor is just at the moment when the world

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.959
<v Speaker 2>stopped being global, when it went to regional trade blocks,

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 2>we are the people outside. And when you talk about

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 2>industrial policy that the comment about you know, Bidenomics without

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 2>without the money is you sit in anything and you

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 2>look at Biden spends a trillion on green industry, and

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 2>if we get twenty million, we think we're doing really well.

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 6>It's we could do over one hundred billion pounds of

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 6>investment per year for the next ten years just with

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 6>the private sector money and now absolute confidence that all

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 6>the projects are there, absolute confidence in the financial services

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 6>sector to actually deliver, deliver, deliver that capital, and the

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 6>economic growth that we'd get out of that would actually

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 6>in five years sort out the public finance problem.

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that interesting though, that your version of labor, which

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I think most people in this room would definitely support,

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 2>that could end up being a more free market version

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>of the left broadly than what's happening in America, what's

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>happening in other places.

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 4>We're going to end, but I want to just grasp

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 4>both of you just one sort of simple question that

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 4>comes out of the way. This majority was one and

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 4>actually it's a historically very small share of the vote

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 4>for an extraordinary majority. I think it's the lowest ever

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 4>share of the vote for the highest ever majority. So

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 4>there's been a very sort of softly softly approach leading

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 4>up to this, and even with this symphatic win, maybe

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 4>some nervousness about how solid some of these seats are.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 4>Do you think Kirs Starmer both of you, do you

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 4>think Kirs Starmer is brave enough to really move the

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 4>dar over the next few years and then the next

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 4>few months.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he is definitely brave enough to do it.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 6>He needs his other members of the cabinet to be

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 6>bald and brave and he actually use the powers that

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 6>they have to really start to build momentum around economic growth,

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 6>because whilst public finances appear, as John mentioned, the rest

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 6>of the economy is in pretty good share, and we.

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Have a lot of a lot of really good capable

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>people who are now in positions rather like you.

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 6>I think devolution is a great idea and we should

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 6>be doing more of it rather than let less of it,

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 6>and really really build up that our great cities outside

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 6>of London as well.

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I think intellectually Starmer is in the right place in

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 2>terms of the things you're talking. I think the emotional

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 2>side of it. The bit I worry about is that

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 2>his whole record is one of on the whole is gradualism.

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, he comes in, he changes things. Look at

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>what he's done to labor. It's an amazing feat. But

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 2>he didn't do it all on day one. And the

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 2>slight problem is when you when you go into government,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 2>that is, as you know, it's a different challenge. You

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 2>suddenly get thrown things. So you have to make big

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 2>decisions and you have to try to do them as

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 2>early as possible because political capital.

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Is a bit as George W. Bush what said, it

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 3>is like an iceberg in the desert. It it evaporates.

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 2>And I think the more stuff that Starma does early,

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, Blair tragic, lamb old enough to remember that

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Blair came in and he did a lot of things

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 2>straight away. And that's where we're getting very good indication

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 2>of how bold Starma really is.

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I think quite soon watch this space.

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, we have managed to talk all this time without

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 4>talking about really talking about the public finances or where

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 4>the money is going to come from. But we spent

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 4>so much time talking about that over the last few weeks,

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 4>and I know there'll be plenty more discussions around that,

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 4>so I'm very happy to have had this quite optimistic

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 4>and quite detailed micro look at the challenges ahead for

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 4>this government and whether they're.

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Up to them.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for being here for our recording of Voter

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Nomics from the Old War Office in Whitehall as part

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 4>of this bloomberg UK election of twenty twenty four.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 5>The debrief.

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Thank you to our guest John Miiklfwaite and Sir Nigel Wilson,

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 4>and all of you listening and sitting here. Please do

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 4>subscribe to voter Nomics wherever you listen to podcasts or

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 4>indeed listening to panels like this one.

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much