WEBVTT - Update: Steven Donziger's Trial in New York

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Drilled. I'm Amy Westervelt, and it has

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>been quite a month for climate nudes. A week ago,

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the International Energy Agency issued a shocking report for them,

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>saying that we need to end new fossil fuel developments now,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>not twenty years from now, not ten years from now. Today.

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>This is Henry Kissinger's International Energy Agency, folks, not a

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 1>bunch of tree hugging hippies, and they're saying something that

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>even progressive politicians who think we should act on climate

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have been kind of afraid to say. That was a

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>huge deal. Then this week, a Dutch court ordered Shell

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to cut emissions from both its operations and its products

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>forty twenty thirty. That ruling sets a huge precedent for

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>climate cases around the globe, and shareholder meetings in the

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>US this week didn't go the industry's way either. Exonmobile

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>had to give up two board seats to climate activist

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>shareholders who have vowed to push the company away from

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas and toward climate action, and Chevron shareholders

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>voted in favor of a proposal to cut emissions generated

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>by the company's products. Chevron shareholders also voiced concern over

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the company's continued pursuit of human rights activist Stephen Donziger,

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>who was in court in New York earlier this month

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>facing criminal contempt charges related to his work on the

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>case against Chevron in Ecuador. I didn't say Attorney Stephen Donziger.

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>They because Chevron successfully got Donziger disbarred last year. If

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you haven't listened to our season on that case, it's

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a quick way to get caught up. It's litigation that's

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>been going on for thirty years. Today, I've got Paul

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Buzzyminho from Amazon Watch here with an update. He was

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in the courtroom last week and says the judge in

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that case against Donziger seems intent on sending him to jail.

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>That update coming up after this quick break.

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's maybe start with just like day one showing up,

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 2>what was the kind of the vibe in the courtroom?

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>It it was, you know, I've been working in some

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 3>way on this case for fourteen years. Right that rally

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 3>the opening day of Donzier's trial was one of the

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 3>highest energy, most engaged groups that I've seen in a

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 3>decade in the US, especially involved in this case. Like

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 3>we've had many protests that shareholder meetings. There are obviously

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>there's more issues with Chevron than just this case, but

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 3>this case is such an important one. But I was

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 3>so amazed at the level and the amount of support

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 3>and interest behind Donzinger, and I see that as the

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>failure of Chevron and give some done strategy. I mean,

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 3>this is the last thing that they wanted to make

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Donzinger into a hero. But by going after him to

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 3>the level that they have, they've done that. They've turned

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the narrative around to why would any judge do this?

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Why would the US judicial system allow this? Oh, hustle

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 3>fuel industry is behind this, And then you realize this

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 3>is one guy going up against an unbelievably powerful force

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 3>that is seeking to destroy him, just like he's been

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 3>saying for years. But now people can visualize what that.

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Looks like the private secutor in the fact that the

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 2>private prosecutor has links to Chevron, And then you know,

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I just saw a few days ago when Stephen posted

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the log where they had met with Chevron's lawyer several times,

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>and that means time to where I'm just like, this

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 2>just doesn't look good. No matter what you think of Stephen,

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 2>even if you think this Stephen Donziger. Guy is skeeduy,

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>this is unheard of. And the fact that he has

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 2>already been on house arrest for what more than six

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred days? Now, yeah, let's call it almost two years

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 2>for a crime in air quotes that comes with a

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 2>six month sentence and the crime.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>That's really what the point is about, right. They wanted

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 3>to be officially a crime because all he did was

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>resist a judge's order in a civil case. Okay, it's

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 3>a federal judge, and okay, you're supposed to do certain things,

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 3>but that's not a crime. They need criminalize him so

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 3>that when he picks up the one who tries to

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 3>talk to you know, the press or members of Congress

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 3>or other judges outside of the United States want to

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 3>be able to say, you're honor this man has been

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 3>convicted in the United States. Why are you listening to

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 3>him or don't feature him? He's been He's a convicted criminal.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>So what was Judge Presca like in the courtroom?

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 3>So I was I've been thinking about how to how

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 3>I would raise this. I'm not I was not at

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 3>all surprised, but I was continually shocked by her level

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>of disdain and dismissal for Donziger and the defense team.

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 3>She didn't even pretend to hide the fact that she

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 3>was going to keep arguing with the defense and that

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 3>she was so happy to be listening to the prosecution,

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 3>except for when she felt like reading the paper, which

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 3>she did several times and.

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 2>What like during the defense.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 3>During the trial, Yeah, during all parts, almost every day,

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 3>I saw a newspaper on her desk, and occasionally she

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 3>would flip the page. And you know, this is a

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 3>criminal trial, like someone's fate of going to jail hangs

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 3>in the balance. You shouldn't be reading a newspaper. And apparently,

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're allowed to have that on the desk.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 3>It's not like you can't file a judicial miscondent complaint

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 3>for that, but you should be able to, especially when

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 3>her demeanor towards like Marti Garbus, who's you know, a

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 3>renowned that claims lawyers work you know with with Nelson,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Mandela and so many other leadership, says our Chavez, and

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 3>here's this iconic defender of the rights of people who've

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 3>been attacked by governments and others, and she argued with him,

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 3>she raided him. She continually stopped him in mid sentence

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>whenever he was trying to speak, and he was bringing

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>some really important constitutional challenges now with the caveat right,

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a lawyer. I've just spent so many times

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 3>in court listening to all this stuff. His argument was

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 3>that Rita Glevin and Sorting Kissel had said on the

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 3>record in court that they were not being supervised in

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 3>any way by the Department of Justice. Now, this Rule

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>forty two thing, which is really bizarre, allowing a federal

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 3>judge to appoint a private prosecutor. It doesn't mean that

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 3>once they do that, they can therefore act however they

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 3>so choose. Right, they build over a million dollars already, Right,

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 3>a federal prosecutor would not do that. They can't do that.

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 3>They shouldn't never charge by the hour, because it's not

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 3>in their interest to enrich themselves to prosecute a crime.

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 3>But they should have some oversight by a government institution.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 3>So Garbus was trying to argue that we need to know,

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 3>the defense needs to know what the DOJ was or

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 3>wasn't doing, and Prescot would not allow him to seek

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 3>that kind of discovery, saying that it didn't pertain strictly

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 3>to these contempt charges, and she said on day one

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 3>that it wouldn't matter whether or not Captain's orders were

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 3>overturned on appeal by the Second Circuit. He received an

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 3>order from a federal judge, didn't comply with that order.

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 3>He was held in contempt. So she said pretty much

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 3>right at the outset, like I'm convicting you. I see

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 3>that you have committed contempt of court. And that's what

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 3>these charges are. And that's why Donzeinger realized, Okay, there's

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 3>no point in testifying. This isn't about us mounting a defense.

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 3>This is about getting things on the record so that

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 3>when we appeal, a fair minded judge will actually look

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 3>at what's the orchestration of this entire effort to lock

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 3>him up. And that's how the questions on cross examination

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 3>were phrased to show how many hours did Getson done

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 3>volunteer to work with the prosecutor. How did you expect

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 3>that Stephen Donzinger was going to pay back the eight

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand dollars that Gibson done, said it owes in

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 3>legal fees. Gibson done was trying to get his law

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 3>license taken away. Makes it kind of hard to make

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 3>a living as a lawyer if you can't to pay

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 3>the money back if you have no profession. There were

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 3>arguments that they spent way more money going after him

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 3>than they ever expected to collect, because of course the

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 3>objective was not about the money.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Did this stuff about, you know, Chevron's attorneys meeting with

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>the private prosecutors come out in the in the trial.

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Could you talk a little bit about that?

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 3>It was quite interesting because to the two principal witnesses

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 3>were Anne Champion and William Thompson from Gibson Done. And

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Champion started as an associate before the Rico charges were filed.

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 3>She was involved in the seventeen eighty two filings, so

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 3>prior to twenty ten, I think, and then she was

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>involved all the way through the reco case. And so

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 3>she has kind of when the prosecution asked her, she

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 3>had kind of an encyclic takes knowledge of the case.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 3>When the defense asked her questions, all of a sudden,

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 3>she kind of had a hard time remembering things. But

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 3>as they were going through questioning her, you know, Ron

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Koby for the defense would ask how many meetings did

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 3>you have with it with the rita Glevin and Sorting Kissel,

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 3>calling them the private prosecutor, not giving them the not

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 3>really respecting the idea that they're supposed to be acting

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 3>as federal prosecutors. They were called the private prosecutor. And

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 3>she talked about meetings that went on for several hours,

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 3>like seven hours long zoom call with her and other

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 3>partners that gets and done, all preparing for this testimony.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Now that you know they have it received subpoenas to testify,

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 3>but they haven't received subpoenas to meet with the prosecutor.

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 3>That's something that they did of their own free will.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 3>And as Ron Kobe would ask, he would say, so,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 3>how many hours did you volunteer? And both lawyers would say, well,

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't. I wouldn't put it that way. I wasn't volunteering. Okay, Well,

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 3>then were you compelled to do so by law?

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't. Well were you billing Chevron for the time

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 3>that you spent? Well, no, because this doesn't pertain to

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Chefron's litigation, So that means you volunteered, Like that's the

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 3>definition of volunteering your time. But they were so belligerent

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 3>that they refused to even respond with a yes or

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 3>no when asked yes or no questions. A great example

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 3>was a one point ron Kuby said, so did Caplin,

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 3>So Kaplyn rejected that order a request of Gibson done

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 3>and one of the back and forth right, and the

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>response was, well, I wouldn't say that he declined to

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 3>accept it. Fobes like your honor, can you please just

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 3>direct the witness to answer the question yes or no?

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 3>And it got to the level of the absurd when

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 3>they Ron put up an exhibit which was the filing

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 3>of the reco charges, the first document filing the reco

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 3>charges and Randy Master's signature is at the bottom of

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 3>the page and a line checking a box that says

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>damages to be assessed to be determined at the trial,

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 3>because originally they were seeking money damages, and then the

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 3>box was checked for a jury. Right of course, we

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 3>know famously they dropped the money damages. They didn't want

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 3>a jury and they never got it. And you know

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Kaplin refused to give Steven donzing Our a jury. But

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 3>it was Randy's signature at the bottom. Everybody could read that.

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 3>It was up on the screen, William Thompson's like I

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 3>can't quite tell what that is. So ron Koby's like, okay,

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 3>do we need to go through this That first letter,

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 3>would you say that that looks like an R? And

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 3>William Thompson's like, yeah, I could say that that could

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 3>be an odor. The next letter, does it look like

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 3>that could be an A?

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that might be an A.

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 3>And they went through every letter of Randy Master's name

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 3>before he would admit, Okay, yes it looks like Randy

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Master for what purpose? Like there, it's not a crime.

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 3>There's nothing nefarious about Randy mastero being the one who

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 3>signs it. It's just a thing you want to give

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 3>the defense. Even that she overturned every single objection of

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>the defense but one, and she sustained every objection to

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the prosecution butt one. So it was so clear from

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the beginning that this was Presca, you know, going through

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 3>the motions, getting in on the record so that she

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 3>can get to a conviction. And that's why I really

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 3>think Steven Donzrier made the right move and not testifying

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 3>because it wouldn't have helped him in any way.

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 2>So what happens next now the you know, everything has

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 2>rested right, So I imagine Presca will have a decision soon, so.

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 3>She gave two weeks. They have two weeks to file

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 3>their final papers, so there's no like closing arguments, but

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 3>each side files last documents after that, so two weeks

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 3>from yesterday and then she said she would rule very quickly,

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 3>but that doesn't mean Sole sentenced very quickly. So we

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 3>don't know how long it's going to take before she decides,

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 3>if there's any jail time, if it's partial, if it's

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 3>six months the maximum. We'll find out at some point,

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 3>probably in June, maybe the end of June, but it's

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 3>really hard to say. And you know, Stephen Downzier is

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 3>just wondering every day if and when he's going to jail. Meanwhile,

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 3>he's still stuck on home detention. He's still wearing an

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>ankle bracelet and still fighting these orders from Kaplan.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, two things. One would any part of the.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 5>Judgment like force him to comply with Kaplan's order? And Two,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 5>what's happening with the civil contempt charge? Because I know,

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 5>like the judgment and that was expected, and you know,

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 5>if that were to go, if that were to be dismissed,

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 5>it would sort of eliminate the whole basis of this charge, right,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 5>So what's happening with that.

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, as far as what this does, I don't think

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 3>actually it does. He's already surrendered his passport. I think

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 3>this would just be jail time. I believe it's the

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 3>other orders, because this is just about the contempt. It's

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 3>not about the orders. Did he or didn't he go

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 3>into contempt and he volunteered that he was willingly going

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 3>to civil content, not criminal.

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Contempt right the other you know, it's been all.

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 3>That Donzinger could do to defend himself against this. Meanwhile,

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 3>mounting an appeal of all these other things with the

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 3>second Circuit takes a lot of time and energy and

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 3>legal muscle, and most of this has done pro bono,

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 3>you know. So I'm not sure where all of those

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 3>appeals stand. But what's really significant to this case was

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 3>that the recent decision in Donzinger's favor was about clarifying

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Caplin's order about what he could or couldn't do with

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>the judgment and selling basically shares of the judgment in

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 3>order to finance enforcement efforts. So he was continuing to

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 3>work with people to do that, which is how Canada happened,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 3>and presumably more enforcement actually would happen, and Caplan's order

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 3>was too vague because Kaplin's order basically says, as you know,

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Steven can't monetize the Equatorian judgment in the United States,

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 3>he can't find it from it, But it doesn't say

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 3>that he can't take portions of other people's portion of

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 3>it and then bring it to investors and others to

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 3>support the case. And Chevron said, no, he can't do that.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Stephen said, yeah, the way I read it, we can't

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 3>do that. Caplain, can you please clarify this, which he

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 3>refused to do for a year, and then the Second

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Circuit came down, and trust me, there's nothing that they

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 3>hate more than overruling Caplin. They wanted to. If they

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 3>could have figured out how to dismiss all of his appeals,

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 3>they would have, but they couldn't because it was so

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 3>poorly written.

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 4>They agreed this was not clear. So that's the underlying

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 4>basis for all the subsequent stuff that Chevron was throwing it.

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 4>But PRESCA wouldn't allow that to be brought up in

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 4>any way as part of the defense. And that's the

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 4>real crux of why this wasn't a case about justice,

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 4>because if you don't get to explain what's happening and why.

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 4>If it's just a matter of you were told to

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 4>do X, you did, why therefore, Z you.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Could have a computer issue a burden. You don't need

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 3>a human being to make a decision. So in what

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 3>goes forward now, he still has to continue appealing some

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 3>of Kaplan's orders, and I don't honestly, I don't know

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 3>when or if they will come down and say, yeah,

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 3>we're rejecting everything and now you need to turn over

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 3>your computer and cell phone. That could still happen, and

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, as he has said, if that happens, he'll

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 3>do what he's supposed to do. He never said he

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 3>was going to defy every court. He was going to

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 3>appeal and then act on that decision. So I don't

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 3>know when that's going to come. But honestly, right now

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 3>he has to appeal the criminal contempt charges, so everything

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 3>gets pushed even further and this could be another year

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 3>before the decision is even made on those things. And

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 3>while you know, everybody loses sight of the fact that

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 3>every single day this contamination is still affecting people, and

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 3>that's every day that judge says come back tomorrow. We're

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 3>a journey like you can adjourn for lunch in New

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 3>York and have a nice little lunch in the cafeteria. Meanwhile,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 3>tens of thousands of people are still affected by the

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 3>water and equidard that knows the FEEDA.

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this time. Thanks for listening. If you

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>would like to support our work, you can join us

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>at Patreon. That is patreon dot com slash drilled. We

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>are bringing you several stories on the natural gas industry,

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it's history, its impacts, and some of its crazy tactics

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>coming up starting in June and running through the end.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Of the year.

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>We've also got some more projects coming up on disinformation

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>across industries and several international climate cases, So stay tuned

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for all of that and we'll see you soon.