WEBVTT - Early Look at Week 8 NFL Lines (Ep. 120)

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, welcome back to the Betting Pros podcast. I

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>am your host, Dan Harris. You can find me on

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Dan Harris eighty. Is time to take an

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>early look at the Week eight NFL lines. To do

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that with me is our old friend Matt Parral, you

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>know most of the Daily Juice podcast. Find him on

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Sports Talk Matt. Matt, thanks for popping on

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>with me today. How is your Sunday for the NFL?

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Eh?

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 3>It was okay.

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>It ended with me losing a teaser on Monday night

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>by half a point.

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Sough, just kind of how things go.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 2>I bet the same game teaser a little about half

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>an hour earlier. I would have gotten forty two and

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>not forty one and a half, and the game fell

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 2>forty eight, so I had forty seven and a half,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>so that was kind of a bummer. I had the

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Cults post nine and a half, so not the way

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>that I wanted to end the week. Decent week on

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the Props, and you know, the Chiefs really were the

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 2>only game I completely whiffed on.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I'll take that one bet. Yeah, that's it.

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>That is that was something there. I still to mean

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>right side, wrong side doesn't really matter, but I still

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>think the under was very clearly the right side on

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that cold San Francisco game. I mean that the pass

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>interference calls were just like NonStop and driving them down

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the field and everything like that. But is what it is.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's rebound here, but let's take an early look and

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>again some news. As we say, we were recording this

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>on Monday afternoon, news just broke about Devonte Adams, which

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>will obviously impact probably the spread I assume, and how

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we feel about the Thursday night game. But before we do,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I remind you about two things. First, as you guys know,

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this podcast is brought to you by bet MGM. So

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>our latest offer you bet ten dollars for new customers.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>You win two hundred dollars if the team that you

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>bet on in an NFL game scores a touchdown, So

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that's ten dollars, win two hundred dollars in free bets

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>if the team that you bet on scores a touchdown

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>when you use the code Juice one hundred and we

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>have Parlet here of course, which is where that code

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>comes from from his podcast, The Jalli Jue. Second, we

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are giving away assigned Saquon Barkley, Jersey. Entry is very simple.

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Leave review for this show on Apple Podcasts or castbox.

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Go to Betting Pros dot com slash review. That is it.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're subscribed to our YouTube channel, a YouTube dot

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>com slash Betting Pros, you get three times the entries. Also,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of benefits. Matt videos the Daly

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Duthe podcast every single day like a true champion right there.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Matt and I do a live stream every Sunday morning

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>from eleven am to twelve pm Eastern, so it's a

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>great thing to do anyway, So subscribe there to YouTube

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Betting Pros, and also go ahead and

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>leave review for the show and enter to win assigned

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>saquon Barkley, Jersey. Matt, you ready to get into it,

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>let's go. Big news Thursday Night Game. Just found out

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Devanta Adams on the reserve COVID list. I haven't seen

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>him officially ruled out, but I assume he's out. That

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is right now. The Cardinals laying four and a half

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>points at home, and the total is it's fine. I

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>totally miss up and stuff on the toll Give me

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a second. It is fifty two and a half. What

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think right now? Does the atoms injury do

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>anything for you?

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, number opened up at three and a half, it's

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>already moved to four and a half. So telling you

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 2>what the Adams news is is worth the point, which

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>is pretty if you look at what wide receiver.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>You know that was before Adams less unless they knew

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that the line will move was before Adams, just so

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So, but it was open at three and a

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 2>half and the movement to four and a half. So

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the first move and the number open, the first move

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>was towards the Cardinals. So I guess with the Adams news,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 2>has anyone taken it off the board?

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Is it still on the board.

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll take a look right now, but last I checked

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it was still on.

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 2>But so yeah, I would say the money for the

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals is going to come pouring in here without Adams

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>because talking about the number one security blanket, number one

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver in the NFL, and really the guy who

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 2>moves the offense for the Green Bay Packers up against.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 2>The defense for the Cardinals has been surprisingly good this season,

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>and I mean the number one point differential offensive defense

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 2>right now for the Cardinals and the Cardinals have given

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 2>up forty points fewer than anybody else in their division

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>right now, So that defense has been very good and

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be a test anyway for the Packers

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>to score on the road. Although Aaron Rodgers's numbers in

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>primetime are quite impressive. He's ten and five straight up,

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>ten four and one against the number playing on Thursday

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Night football. But I think without his star wide receiver,

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I think right now, this four and a half point number,

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I would jump on it before it gets to be

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 2>any higher.

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I think at the right side to.

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Six six now and the total has dropped two fifty

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Geez, well there you go, And well I'll say this.

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 2>I would wait then, yes, and I would let this

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>thing climb and see how you can get over seven

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 2>and then take the Packers.

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Yep, that's exactly right. That is the play, exactly what

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, Matt. And it's going to continue to climb,

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, because this is just an immediate, just reaction.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Interesting that they didn't take it off the board even

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to think about it, that they just moved it right

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>here to four and a half, from four and a

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>half to six. So yeah, I think this is going

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to continue to climb here, and it's going to be

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to see what we're going to see. But

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think eventually that this probably gets to touchdown,

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is my guess, just because the money is gonna come

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>pouring in so much once it gets passed there. Yeah,

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I will take a bite here on the Packers for sure,

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>because it is still Aaron Rodgers, still a team of

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the decent defense, and the Cardinals at some point Matt

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>at some point are due for a letdown.

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, but look, they just had it against Texans.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean the first half they were asleep, Sure they

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 2>had they had to wake up, and they were thankfully

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 2>playing Davis Mills, who couldn't do anything for that offense.

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise I think they would have lost that game yep

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday.

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I mean they are.

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 2>They're trending like a team that needs a loss to

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of wake them up and shake them up a

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit. So they're not running the table. They're not

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 2>going seventeen to o. No, they're gonna they're gonna have

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 2>four to five losses at the end of the year.

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 2>And it's very possible the Packers win the game outright and.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>They were a missed field goal away from losing to

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Viking, so let us not forget any of that

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. Earlier in the year, Dolphins are visiting the Bills.

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>The Bills are thirteen and a half point favorites with

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>a total of forty eight.

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, Look, this is a really interesting

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>week because of the This is the week that de

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Shaun Watson has to be traded by Tuesday. So Tua

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 2>made the said today he was asked about the trade rumors,

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>he said, I do hear it, but I tend to

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 2>try to ignore it. So he clearly understands his jobs

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 2>on the line. He played pathetically really bad over the weekend,

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think Tua is probably not going to be

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 2>a starting quarterback in the league next year.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 3>The Texans don't.

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Even want him back in a return trade, so it's

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 2>not like, oh, you go to the Texans, at least

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 2>you're a starter in the league. Still is only thirty

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 2>two jobs. He's not going to be a starter next year,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and I think he knows he's not going to be

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>a starter next year. I'd be real careful of this

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Dolphins defense because I think the Bills are going to

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>torch him. I wouldn't lay thirteen and a half points,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>but if I had to pick it, I would take

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo Oversuore.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>I think I might like the over. I don't know

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>about you, because I think Buffalo is going to put

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>up a ton of points here. And look, the thing

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>about Tua is, I'm we can talk about your proclamation

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that two is not going to be a starting quarterback

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL going forward, which may or may not

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>be true.

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 3>But they love the Dolphins.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>What do you have jump in?

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we talked about it on Sunday. You were on

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 2>You're on the Dolph on Sunday, and you like to

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 2>it now? And what is the deal with you and

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins.

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>First of all, we were correct on the teaser. You

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>know that plus eight and a half and I had

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>them at plus two and a half, which they covered,

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>which is fine. It's nothing. It's just the fact that,

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>as you know, I do fantasy projections, and Tua for

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>their offense is much better than admittedly Jacoby Brissett, which

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is fine. I'm not saying I'm dying to have two

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>as a quarterback, but perhaps when you grow up as

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a Jets fan and you live your entire life there,

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you are sort of what you allow more passes for

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a guy who is adequate. He made some terrible decisions

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in that game. But do I think that he couldn't

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>start for the Texans right now and he would be

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of, you know, a startable option. I mean, would

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you rather have case Keenum or two a tongue of

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>my low there, Matt like, but it's a backup quarterback? Yes,

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, but you have to have a backup quarterback

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that you're willing to start over.

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 2>So fun too. I just told you Ta next year

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a backup quarterback in the league,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>which you were agreeing with.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 3>You put them on the same category as case Keenum.

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>No, no, I was asking you if you would prefer

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Case you and I can.

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 2>We'll have Baker Mayfield. The Browns already have a starting quarterback.

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 2>They're not gonna go and have Tua over Baker.

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that. What I'm saying is you're putting

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>him in the class of like, how can he be

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a starting quarterback? And I'm saying, as of right now,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>name me a backup quarterback that you would prefer over

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to a tongue of I love in the league. I can't.

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 3>That's up the point though.

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>We're arguing whether there's a starting quarterback position that I

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 2>would want for Tua right now and.

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>When you start Davis Mills, or would you start.

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 2>To The Texans are already telling you that they're drafting

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback next year. They don't want Tua, so that

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>job's off the board. So then what other job are

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 2>we seeing Tua getting to be a starting quarterback in

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the league And there isn't one. No one's looking at

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 2>him and saying I want to it to be my starter.

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, as much as people would love to be

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>able to have us debate Tua for this entire podcast,

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we can save that for our other podcast, Dan and

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Matt fight over nonsense things. But for this one, I

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>like the over forty eight night because I think the

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Bills are going to be able to score at will.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And again, my point with Tua is just like the

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins are at least a more competent offense uh with

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Tua than there with Jacoby Brissett. So it's not as

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to be completely shut down by a

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Bills team that has a very good defense. But it's

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>not quite Matt. For me, this unit that is a

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>completely shut down. You can't move the ball against them,

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>just totally forget it. They're a good defense, I don't

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>think they're necessarily an elite defense. So I like the

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>forty eight. I would jump on that now. Actually, before

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I get anywhere else, let's go on to the Titans

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Colts. Matt, this really interesting one. It's a

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>divisional game Colts played well. Right now, I've got the

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Colts laying one on betting pros and the total of

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>forty nine. What do you think here?

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Over?

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 2>These two teams play games where they score a ton

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of points. In particular in Indianapolis. This is always one

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 2>of the games every year to look at. When the

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Titans play at the Colts, this game historically goes over.

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't play aside on this because I think I leaned.

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 2>I lean Indy, But Carson Wentz makes some really stupid

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 2>decisions a lot with football, and I'm really concerned about that.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Titans I think will run all over Indy. I think

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 2>they'll score. I think Indianapolis will throw all over the Titans.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I like the over a lot here in this game.

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that yesterday with the Chiefs had anything

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to do with the Titans sort of, you know, buckling

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit defensively or is that all on

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs just being completely out of sorts offensively.

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>It's the offensive line for Kansas City that cannot protect

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes and so the Titans secondary is still an

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 2>absolute train wreck.

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 3>It's a mess.

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>But they couldn't give any time to Mahomes to find

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 2>guys down the field because teams know that now after

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 2>watching what the Bucks did to Kansas City, they do

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 2>the same thing. They play zone and they rush and

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 2>they blitz and they try to pressure the quarterback and

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 2>they got home because an offensive line is absolutely awful

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 2>right now for Kansas City. So that's the recipe. I

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>don't think India's got the same problem. Indies offensive line,

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 2>it's very good, and I think they'll tick up any

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 2>type of blitz packages. They'll pick it up, and I

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 2>think they'll throw the ball deep. I think the receivers

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 2>are going to have a huge games for Indianapolis coming up.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 2>I think Wentz is a big game throwing the football

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 2>against Titans.

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I assume though with the spread, you don't

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>feel the need if you liked, which doesn't sound like

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you do right now, you don't feel the need to

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>bet this now, right because it's at plus one. It's

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to move past like three or anything either.

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Way, I don't think so.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Barring any injury news, I don't think so. I think

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>if you want to bet this game, you could wait

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and make sure everyone's okay with COVID protocols and injuries

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and whatnot. But I think this really is a coin

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>flip game between two teams that are are a little

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 2>bit more similar than what the records indicates. And I

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 2>think home field is significant here, but I do like

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the I think we're seeing a lot of points here

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 2>in this game. I don't like either defense to stop

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the offenses.

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. I think that Indianapolis with Carson Wentz

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>fully healthy right now as he looks, has you know,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>stupid decisions aside, really has started, you know, even without

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton in this last game between Taylor between Pittman,

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they're really getting going here, and of course we know

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>about what the Titans can do offensively. Rams get a

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>second straight ginormous spread here traveling to Houston, laying fourteen

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half and a total of forty eight. Are

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you willing to go to the well and back the

0:11:58.840 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Rams on the big spread again?

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Because they didn't play well.

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess the Lions and I think there's a lot

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>of anger there after what happened. I think the special

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 2>teams coach for the Rams probably had a really rough

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Monday morning. And when you walk in and two faked

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 2>punts and one on side kick, that's still three possessions

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 2>for the Lions.

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Not good from a Rams perspective.

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I do expect them to go to Texas and take

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the living daylights unless Tyrod Taylor plays practice right practicing.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>If he plays, I would be a little bit more

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 2>hesitant to come in and go heavy on this, But

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>fourteen and a half doesn't scare me.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Even when Tyrod Taylor, I would take the Rams.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the line will move if to

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Rod Tayler is named the starting quarterback here.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it's possible, but I don't know how.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean think the pros might move it down to

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 2>fourteen or thirteen and a half. You may get a

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>better number. I still think the Rams kill him even

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 2>when we're playing. I think the Rams gonna kill.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Him fair enough let's get to the Panthers visiting the Falcons.

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>How far we have fallen into the Panthers, as you know, mapped.

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I like the Panthers very much. Yesterday I had leaked

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>off on that game. The Falcons are now laying three

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>points total of forty six.

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 3>So many people screwed me on this.

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 2>You had it, I had it in both my circa teams.

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because you didn't like it.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 3>I hate it. Didn't like it, you absolutely hated it.

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Sam Donald going to New York, Everyone's like, well, Danny

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Dimes stinks, Joe Judge is having to explain why he's

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 2>losing his team, and then like that win. The Panthers

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 2>are awful without Christian McCaffrey, awful without him. He is

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>their entire team and Matt Rule. Look, unless Deshaun Watson

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 2>weighs his no trade clause, that team's in big trouble

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 2>because they're hitching their wagon to Sam Donald. And Donald stinks,

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>all right, he flat out stinks. People need to stop

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 2>telling me that Donald's good. That Donald there's some underlying

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>thing that I'm not watching that I need to learn

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>more about him, or his quarterback abilities or whatever. Donald

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>stunk in New York. He stinks for Carolina. He throws picks,

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 2>he keeps on turning the football over. I mean, look,

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm on the Falcons over for over seven and a

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 2>half wins. So I like the Falcons. They are laying

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 2>three points at home against this Panthers team. Until McCaffrey

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 2>comes back. The Panthers are a fade, hard fade.

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't take the Falcons. I tell you that,

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't take the Panthers. I tell you that, like,

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no way that you can take them. After watching

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>what we saw in that game, and again they were

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>getting apps, he was getting pressured. They were you know,

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Chewba Hubbard couldn't find any running room against the Giants, right,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>who get no pressure whatsoever. It was just insane. That

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>team looks in disarray. I'm very concerned about him. I

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know how I feel about it yet, so I'm

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>not making a move on it. It's not a game

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that I really want to go near, but it is something.

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Raress Man Kyle Pits back to back hundred yards receiving. Yeah,

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I saw a PFF tweet on Monday morning. Kyle Pitts

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 2>has not dropped a ball thrown to him since twenty

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>nineteen at Florida.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts is a unicorn at the time. What's so funny, dude,

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is that, like I, you know, if I'm switching around

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the I got a bunch of different TVs going at once,

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm looking at a bunch different games, Like I

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>don't realize it's Pits because he looks like a wide receiver,

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>like until I see the number. He looks like a

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, but he's built like a tight end. Like

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>those guys. It's just incredible to watch and they are.

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>What's great is again it thought maybe like whether or not,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just that they need a little time under Arthur Smith.

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is still when Calvin Ridley is not even

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>playing that well. Right He didn't look great yesterday even

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>though he got ten targets, he found the end zone.

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Didn't look great. But they're involving Cordero Patterson and he

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>looks great. Kyle Pits is incredible. Matt Ryan looks a

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>little more confident right now. Not a great team or

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. When you're going up against a team

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>like the Panthers right now, which you are correct, You know,

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I was rooting for Sam Darnold. You know, even as

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a Jets fan, I wanted him to be in the

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>situation where he could succeed. But man, this this looks

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>very familiar to me, Matt. As I look at so

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>not taking the Panthers, I'm not sure I'm willing to

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>go near the falcons, but it's close. This is an

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting one to me, Matt. The forty nine ers are

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Bears. The Bears are getting three and a

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>half pointints that total thirty nine and a half. What

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think?

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Look, the Niners have got a real big problem at quarterback,

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and Kyle Shanahan doesn't do his team any favors when

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 2>he's asked about Jimmy Garoppolo being a starting quarterback, and

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 2>he's like.

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess, so, I guess so.

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Like it's I like Kyle Shanahan, but in the leadership category,

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I think he's lacking and I think he really doesn't

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 2>understand how a team's going to respond to you, Like,

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 2>you need the team to buy into Jimmy G until

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Lance is healthy to go again, and it doesn't sound

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 2>like he's coming back for this game. So you have

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy g. He's your starter, your year is not over.

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>You're two and four, the team that's in first place

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 2>is seven and oh, you are four games behind the

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals already in the division, and you're just acting nonchalant

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 2>and flip it about. You know, you have to win

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>with Jimmy g right now. But the Bears, on the

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 2>other hand, are coached by Matt Naggi, who just got

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 2>COVID so he could be out for this game. Out

0:16:58.000 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 2>that I don't know how big of a subtraction that's

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be might be.

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Addition, by the way, right not even joking, Yeah.

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 2>It might be a plus to not have him out there,

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, justin Field scores three points yesterday on

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the road against Tampa Bay. Buccaneers offense looked completely pathetic.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Defense equally looked pathetic.

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what to.

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Make of this game, to be quite honest, I want

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>no part of this game. I don't know which team

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 2>is gonna show up and be it. I mean, right now,

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 2>I would say that the Niners should probably win, but

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that. I mean, I'm not I mean running,

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're running attack should be traveling to Chicago,

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know that's a tough game to call.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I am not scared off by the hook now.

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Oddly enough, there's one book that I'm seeing right now

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's at three, the consensive Line three and a half.

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>The book that's at three, my book DraftKings. I feel

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot better about that. And I realized, like, I

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>don't road favorites when they're kind of crappy teams like

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine Ers are right now, not really where

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>I want to go, But holy cow, I can't remember

0:17:55.160 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing a quarterback who is quite so overwhelmed right now,

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or at least the way it looks in the NFL,

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>like justin Fields, And I don't want to make any

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>proclamation about his career. And know what, you know, maybe

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this is just but the game. I was talking about

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it on our fantasy podcast yesterday. The game looks too

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>fast firmed right now, and the forty nine ers still

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have a solid defense they're going to get after the quarterback.

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And again last night, I know they look terrible offensively,

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>but it was a monsoon out there, and I think

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>there can show a little more coming in here in

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.719
<v Speaker 1>a game that they obviously have to win. So I

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>do like the forty nine ers right here. I don't

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>think you have to go after it right now, because

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not three and a half. It's I

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's going to climb much further than that certainly,

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think you need to go after it.

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>The total thirty nine and a half is just ridiculous,

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>but I want no part of it whatsoever. You know

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>how often I backed the Eagles, Matt, It's probably time

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 1>for me to stop doing that. The Eagles are visiting

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the Lions. Same thing here, Eagles as a road favorite

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>here laying three and a half total a little bit

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>higher forty seven and a half. What do you think?

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>So this is now you're finding out why my circa

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>team went in five this week because the both of them, Oh, Eagles, Panthers.

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 2>My partner was just adamant he I mean he was

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 2>in love with the Eagles. Huge bet on the Eagles.

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't believe they didn't even cover the teaser, man.

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 3>Like, just so that's what I did.

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 2>I tease them up to nine to nine, and I

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 2>thought that was gonna be safe.

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 3>And Jalen hurts again.

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the league is filled up with mediocre coaches,

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 2>with mediocre quarterbacks right now. It's amazing Nick Sirianni and

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Hurts. You got Matt Naggy and Justin Fields. You

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 2>just go down the list of these guys who are

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 2>not I mean, Joe Judge and Danny Dimes. I mean,

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 2>it is remarkable how consistent we are right now with

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 2>mediocre coaches and mediocre quarterbacks. And Jalen Hurts is much

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 2>like I've been talking about with Donald in Tua. Jalen

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Hurts is not a starting quarterback. He's just not a

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 2>starting quarterback in this league and he'll be a backup

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 2>next year. Eagles will replace him. Lions are zero and seven.

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>But the difference with this Lions team is that they're

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 2>fighting and if they play the way they played last

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 2>week against the Rams against the Eagles, they will beat

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles. And they have to do that onside kicks,

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 2>fake punts, trick plays, misdirections, throw the kitchen sink at

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles to get a win, because it's there for

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 2>you if you do what you're capable of doing. I

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 2>can't believe the Eagles allowed Derek Carr to go thirty

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 2>one of thirty four.

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 3>That is insanity. So maybe Jared Goff has a big game.

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I am taking the Lions, and I'm taking them now

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>because I I yeah, if you're gonna give me the

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>hook right now, And this is from the guy who

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>loves the Eagles, I just I think the bottom line

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is they play matty. We've known this about this, like

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>say what you want about Dan Campbell, and I thought

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what he did was phenomenal. I thought the way they

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>came out of that game and they just said, we

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>know what we're up against right now, We're gonna have

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>some fun with it and see what we can do,

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're probably gonna lose and fine, and it all

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>worked in the beginning. It was really cool. But they

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>fought till the very very they were in that game.

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And you're gonna say that they're home right now against

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>an Eagles team that looks terrible, that's probably not gonna

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>have Miles Sanders, even if that is not a huge deal,

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but that just looks in complete disarray, and you're gonna

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>give me the hook right now. There's a lot of

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>threes out there as well. I don't love it quite

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>as three, But if you're giving me the hook, I'm

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>doing it now because I don't want it to drop

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>to three, and I think it might. I think this

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is strikes me, Matt as something where sharp betters, maybe

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong, are going to come in on the lines

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>here and it's going to get down to three. So

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I would take it now when it's three and a half.

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the game that everybody wants to watch,

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals visiting the Jets. The Bengals are laying nine

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half here and the total. Hold on, I

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>just had it up and I lost it somehow it's coming.

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I will give you the total a second, but give

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>me the spread here nine and a half for the Bengals. Oh,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I got it, and the total is forty three and

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a half.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, what am I missing? Why is it this? Fourteen?

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Backup backup quarterback for the Jets? Okay, backup quarterback. You're

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 2>not gonna haveving Zach Wilson for two to four weeks

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 2>with the sprained MCL. You've got a a receiver in

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Jamar Chase who just broke the record for the most

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 2>receiving yards in his first seven weeks. Ever, yep, and

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 2>Burrow is ripping apart defenses like crazy and just carved

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 2>up the Ravens on the road. Now going to the Jets.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Why isn't this higher? I would DraftKings is at nine nine?

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Draft Kings as well?

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, give me the Bengals minus nine?

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>So what about nine and a half? At where it

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is at.

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Nine and a half? Anything? Whow double digits? Give me

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals.

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you worry though, man? I mean, you know the

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>industry as well as anybody else. Do you worry when, like,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm in complete agreement with you what I mean, Mike White,

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>are really I mean, when you look at what happened

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>this weekend and what we're looking at going forward, you

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>see a line like this that screams at you, how

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>do I not push all my chips in on the Bengals?

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Does that wear you at all? Just because of it?

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Well? Look, the Patriots were the same thing.

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Patriots were seven point favorites at home, and everyone was like,

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 2>here comes the trap, here comes to the hook. It

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 2>went to seven and a half, and the Pros hammered

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the Jets. Patriots scored fifty three points on this team.

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Pete mac Jones scored fifty three points on

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 2>this team.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 3>What is Burrow gonna do. What is Burrow gonna do?

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess if you want to say, if

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to build a case for it, you could say, well,

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously a quote unquote letdown spot for the Bengals

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and they could be looking ahead. Of course, they've got

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the Browns a week after that divisional game. But still, realistically,

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you under and do it now. I would,

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's gotta climb to ten. It's gotta climb to

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>ten without a question. So I'm gonna bet it now

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. And again DraftKings nine a little bit better

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>for me. Steelers visiting the Browns here, Matt. The Browns

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>are laying three and a half points and the total

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>is forty two and a half.

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is a stayaway game for me.

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these are the old black and blue divisional

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 2>type of games that could go any which way. In

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the injury to Baker and whether or not he's playing,

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think he's gonna be dealing with that

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 2>pain for a long for the entire year, and he

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 2>can't run now. He's got a broken because he's he's

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 2>popped it out of the socket so many times that

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 2>he broke his shoulder the actual humorous broke that bone

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 2>because it's popping out so many times, which is like

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 2>the number one concern when I started, when it happened

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 2>to me, when it came out three times. That the

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>reason why they went in and did surgery finally with

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 2>me was because they're like, if you keep doing this,

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna break You're it's gonna be a lot more

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 2>painful in a longer term surgery, longer term recovery because

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna break the bone because you just instantly. Yeah,

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>So like they're like, we have to go in and

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 2>fix this now, otherwise you could have some real big problems.

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>You're lucky that you haven't broken it yet. So it's like, okay,

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 2>so I got to go in and get it taken

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 2>care of. So I've had the same surgery, and you know,

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 2>it's it's extremely painful when that shoulder comes out.

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 3>It is unlike anything I've ever felt in.

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 2>My life because of the overall pulsing and throbbing and.

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Terrible. This is a terrible one minute of podcasting right now.

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 3>So it so hurts. It's it's awful.

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean, I get I can't believe Baker went

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 2>back into the game. I mean, it's unbelievable how much

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 2>he that kid is to go in there and with

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 2>that injury and get hit by three hundred and fifty

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 2>pounds men, I mean, nope, Noy'll thank you.

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 3>But on the other side, I mean, the Steelers.

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 2>Catching three and a half points is pretty attractive, but

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 2>I hate that Steeler offense.

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 3>So this is a no play for me.

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Eileen, Steelers, to be honest, and if you like

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>it for me, I would do it now just in

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>case it gets to three, because I do think that

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the Browns are going to be a little overvalued based

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>on what we saw with Denver, which I think was

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about Denver and Nick Chubb's gonna return here.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>But you got the Steelers off of Bye. You've got

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>them as underdogs, which I always much prefer them under Tomlin,

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>just as as a road underdog here, and they also

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>are starting to play a little bit better. Ben looks

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better, the offensive line looked a little

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>bit better, and I think the Browns here are a

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>little overvalued. So I personally would do the Steelers and

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I would take them now, But again it's not something

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.719
<v Speaker 1>where I'm gonna you know run in because these divisional games,

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, you really never know how it's going to be,

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the mayfield plays. Jaguars are visiting the Seahawks. Matt,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>we don't know anything that happens tonight. Of course. With

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks, we're recording this before they play here on

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Monday night against the Saints. But as of right now,

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>they are laying three and a half points to the

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars and the totals forty three and a half.

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 3>What do you think, I mean, what do you do

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 3>with this?

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>This?

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 2>To me, if Seattle plays poorly, this is a game

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the Jaguars can win. And I just need to watch

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.479
<v Speaker 2>and see the Seattle defense as to how they are

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>against the pass. I mean, the DJ Shark injury being

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 2>out for the year stinks for this offense. For the Jaguars,

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 2>They've already beaten the Dolphins, they had the bye last

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 2>week off of the trip to London, and so now

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 2>here they are preparing for a Seattle team that might

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>be two and five at home without Russ.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the three and a half points is what

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I probably would take. But it's a tough it's a

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 2>tough game to bet.

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if forced, I think three and a half. Like,

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're giving me your money map, that's probably where

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:50.239
<v Speaker 1>I would put it. But it's not something where I'm

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna risk my own I think no matter what the

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>spread is, I'm not gonna feel comfortable with it because again,

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to get me to back RB and Mara, kudos to

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you who backed them in London, crazy man that you were,

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and that turned turned out correctly. What do you want?

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>You had a lot of good reads there out with that.

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I just I probably can doo. But again,

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I want no part of Seattle with Gina Smith, so

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably staying away. Your team, Matt is going to

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles High. If a Giant win there. The Chargers

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>are laying five and a half coming off a bye,

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the totals forty eight and a half.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Man, I gotta do a lot of research on this, okay,

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>because the initial read for most people is going to

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 2>be one let down two justin Herbert three road trip

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 2>to California.

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing though, the Patriots against the Chargers and

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 2>against I gotta go back and watch that game last

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 2>year because they should have won this game last year

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 2>at Los Angeles against the Chargers. This is one of

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the games where there were mistakes made by Cam Newton

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 2>that cost the team. But they had a really good

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 2>game plan up against that Chargers defense and they were.

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Right there to win the game. So I need to

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 3>do more.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 2>My initial lean is Patriots catching five and a half,

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 2>but I need to go in do some real research

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 2>as to how this team's going to approach because they

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 2>did the dink and dunk last year with Cam, and

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 2>the red zone offense really bogged down. They couldn't get

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Cam in the in the end zone as much as

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 2>they would have liked. This is a game where Herbert

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 2>might get fluxed, you know, flustered a little bit in

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 2>The Patriots might be able to throw a defense at

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 2>him that confuses him. You know, he's not a rookie,

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 2>but his second year player who's played pretty well this year.

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 2>The thing that really concerns me are the injuries and

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the secondary for the Patriots. Right now, another dB went

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 2>down for the year today. That that's my one concern

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 2>up against this team. Austin Eckler might have a really

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 2>big game. It could be a big Austin Eckler game.

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like a prop we'll bet. Yeah, what about the

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>total forty eight and a half. I mean it strikes

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>me there's gonna be points in this game.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Matt, Yes, I agree, Okay, over, I would definitely say

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 2>the over in this game. I mean Mac Jones on

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 2>passes that are under ten yards is completing eighty percent

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>of his passes.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:56.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's just stupid.

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean he's the dank and dunk king, and you

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.719
<v Speaker 2>can do that against the Chargers. You can know they

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 2>don't want to have big plays and you can just

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 2>guy find guys and if jhald Smith, if that's gonna

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 2>be the general Smith that we see now for the

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 2>rest of the year. Okay, the Patriot offense finally has

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 2>a as a playmaker from that position.

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know if he I hope he's okay.

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I know he left late with the shoulder indury. I

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen any update on that yet in terms of

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the severity of it. But yeah, and again, if you

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>would wherever you are on the spread, I assume that

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>this strikes me as the five and a half, the

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know what we're doing is basically where

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we're ending up right, I don't I don't see this

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>climbing or dropping much either way.

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I think news.

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 2>I think the potential for it to climb is there.

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I think public money coming in on the Chargers, okay,

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think there's a lot of love, especially out

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 2>west here in Vegas. I think there's gonna be Charger

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 2>money that will come in. So I think it could

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 2>close at six or six and a half. I don't

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 2>think it gets to seven, h but I think that's

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:51.959
<v Speaker 2>why I'm not gonna bet it, because I'm gonna let

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna wait and see how high this number could

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 2>get to. If I get six and a half, it

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 2>would be awesome a bit. If you give me six

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 2>and a half, I'm on the Patriots.

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I love it. Washington is visiting Denver, the Broncos

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>are laying three points. The total is, as always pretty low,

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>forty three and a half. What do you think?

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so betham dims at three and a half. I

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 2>would take Washington plus three and a half right now

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 2>if you can get it. Yes, And I think the

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 2>hook matters here. Look that this Broncos offense is not good.

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Teddy Bridgewater is not going to be the quarterback long term.

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 2>They're another team that's going to be in the running

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.239
<v Speaker 2>for a quarterback coming up here very soon. And you know,

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 2>if it's not going to be Bridgewater and it's going

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 2>to go back to Drew Lock or whatever they're going

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to do. They just don't have any playmakers really right now.

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Too many injuries with their receivers and kJ Hamler kind

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 2>of being the last one when he went down. It

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 2>really took out a lot of the starts from this offense.

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 2>And look at Bronco defense. We thought it was going

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to be great. Hasn't been great. It's been black.

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and Heinike. I like Tyler Heinekey a lot.

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 2>It's been fun to watch Tyler Heinekey run up and

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 2>down the field, and he was mobile.

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Against the Packers.

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, they had two really bad fourth down stops

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 2>inside the ten yard line that decided that game.

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 3>I think Washington wins the game outright.

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeahbviously the Broncs are gonna get back. It sounds like

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy in this one, so that will certainly help them.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But they you know, Teddy Bridgewater is playing terribly and

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Washington still gets enough pressure. I think that, you know,

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that's been the big thing with Bridgewater right now? Is

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know, he seems to you know, be you know,

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>have happy feet there in the pocket. It's probably gaming

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>right There are a bunch of actually three and a

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>halfs out there. The majority of books are at three,

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>but there are three and a halfs out there right

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>now and at three and a half. Yeah, I love Washington.

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I get there at three. I think

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>i'd wait and hope that it gets theret three and

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a half. But we'll have to see. The Bucks right

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>now are visiting the Saints again. Haven't seen the Saints

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>play tonight. Who knows what happens, but as of right now,

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks are laying four and a half in New

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Orleans with a total of fifty one. What do you

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think over?

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the over is probably in play here. I

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 2>think both teams are gonna score. I think the Bucks

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 2>are definitely gonna score. I like the Saints defense. I'm

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 2>on the Saints over nine and a half wins, So

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 2>tonight's an important game. I needed to win four and

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 2>two because I think they're gonna lose this games with

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the Buccaneers, and they lost the division to the Saints

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 2>last year.

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 3>I think the this Bucks team has been really focused.

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 2>On winning the division this year because they didn't do

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 2>it last year, so there's some extra motivation there. And

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't like Jamis up against that buccaneer defense. That

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 2>scares me tremendously. So my initial read would be to

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 2>lay the four and a half, although there are some

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>fives that are popping up right now, so it looks

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 2>like the first move is to the Bucks.

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, BETMGM. You know, I know that's you know, our

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sponsor here. Of course they are at five. The overall

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is at four and a half. I don't love it,

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but I probably would go with the Bucks if I

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>had to go one way or another, and I'd probably

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>do it sooner rather than later. This one, I'm confused

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about a little bit, Matt, so hopefully you can walk

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>me through it. The Cowboys are visiting the Vikings on

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night Football, so naturally televised game. The Cowboys are

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between two at BETMGM, but consensus line of two

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half and the total is fifty four and

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a half. What do you think about this?

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I've got to be get pressed here because the Vikings

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 2>are on my no bet list and I this is

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 2>a standard alone game in primetime, so we always for

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the juice. We always like to have plays on it

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 2>because everyone's watching it, so we like to get involved.

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what to do with this game.

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be honest here because the initial my first

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 2>read would be too if you buy points to buy

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the two and a half to three and take the

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Vikings as a three.

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Point home dog.

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 2>But I am awful with Viking games, and I'm not

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 2>as high on the Cowboys as everybody else.

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't like I guess that's okay.

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 2>So I just I don't like their defense, and I

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 2>think everybody is just so in love with the Cowboys

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 2>because it's DAK and they're five and one. I don't

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 2>think they're very I think they're good. I just don't

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 2>think they think they're as good as everyone thinks that

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 2>they are. If I had to bet, I'll take the Vikings.

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. That's interesting because I when I saw it, I

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>would have expected this spread to be, especially given how

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>public the Cowboys usually are and how well they've been

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>playing and coming off now the bye, which I realized

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings are as well, that it would have been

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>three or you know, even three and a half, and

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, them wanting to get the public to take

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings because this is the line I think that says,

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>even though they're on the road to take the Cowboys.

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a little surprised by it. I agree the Vikings.

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like our team. And it's not just you,

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not just me. It's probably the vast majority of

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>betters have no idea what to do with because at times,

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>right they come up and you know, they make their

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>showing and then you think like it's going to be

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>something good, and then they just aren't. There no idea

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what to do with them. Kirk Cousins in primetime owas

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>a little nerve wracking. I still lean the Cowboys, Matt

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's under field goal, like I, you know, because

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I do have more faith. I agree their defense isn't

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>quite as good as people think it is. They are

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>just more opportunistic. They cause a lot of turnovers and

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. That's not going to go on forever.

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>And Kirk Cousins has played better, you know, excellent I

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>think for the most part this year. But still, man,

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's weird. I will lean the Cowboys,

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not going to make my final proclamation about

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it yet. Now a Monday night game here, the Giants

0:34:55.960 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>are visiting the Chiefs. The consensus spread here is and

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are laying ten. The total is fifty two.

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, Apparently it's going to be fine. Clear concussion protocol.

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>That's good. The Giants have forty thousand injuries that we

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>were waiting to see about. So what do you think

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you're at ten?

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Why the Chiefs in Clemson they're both laying double digits

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 2>this weekend, and I cannot figure out why. I don't

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.280
<v Speaker 2>care who the Chiefs are playing. Why are they laying

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 2>ten points? I know it's the Giants.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 3>The Giants they're a mess. The Chiefs are an absolute mess. Yeah,

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 3>And I.

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Mean, fine, maybe they go ahead and destroy the Giants,

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 2>but this screams teaser teaser teaser, like take this thing

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 2>down to four and take Kansas City because I don't

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 2>like this game at all.

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think. I don't trust them to cover ten.

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 3>I just don't.

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean it's rare you trust the Chiefs to

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>cover just generally speaking, But I don't know.

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Matt, it's a trap.

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Oh, I agree. Oh, I know, I know, I know.

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going near it. I'm not going near out

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of curiosity, where does this Let's assume obviously everybody in

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs we know Mahomes is healthy. Let's assume the

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>giants are probably not getting back Saquon Barkley. That's my guess. Well,

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>let's assume they're getting back, Sterling Shepherd. They're getting back

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple pieces or something here or there.

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think this line ends.

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Up ten and a half, eleven and a half?

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>You think it goes up? Oh?

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this line, this line's not going down. Okay, our

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 2>lines going like this line's going up. So then you wait,

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 2>you wait then for the giants. Yeah, and if you

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 2>want to tease it down, you do it now if

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 2>you want. I mean to me, it's it's more or less.

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Getting it below seven is gonna be the most important thing.

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 2>So this number is not going.

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 3>It's not gonna go to thirteen.

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 2>Okay, stunned if it's good, if it goes if it's

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 2>that much movement, we get three points, so it goes

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 2>to thirteen. I don't think so. So all right, I

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 2>think eleven and a half. I think the line will

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 2>close under twelve.

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt. The Giants offense thinks the Chiefs scored

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>three points against the Titans, the total of fifty two

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 1>or fifty two and a half. Any thoughts on it whatsoever.

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I would go under. But I'm not betting primetime unders.

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Forget it. I want no part.

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I want no part of prime time unders because of

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 2>what we talked about right at the top. Yeah, these

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 2>these referees are throwing flags on past interference. You breathe

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 2>on somebody in the flag's coming out in particular in

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:10.800
<v Speaker 2>the red zone.

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.320
<v Speaker 3>You know that's it. So just no.

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean the Colt's got three touchdowns on passing interference

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 2>calls last time.

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a bad beat, man, bad beat. It's all right,

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about it. Matt. Thank you so much for

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>joining me. I was glad I wanted to have you

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>on here at least for one of these early ones.

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>We don't get a chance to talk as much as

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we used to. Mind everybody, of course, Daily Juice, but

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>mind everybody where We find more.

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Of you at Sports Talk, Matt on Twitter, Daily Juice

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 2>on our Betting Pros YouTube channel for the video, and

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 2>then wherever you get your audio podcasts, just go and

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 2>search The Daily Juice and you'll find us like everywhere,

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 2>like even Audible. You find everywhere on every audio platform

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you will find The Daily Juice.

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>And again, the Daily Juice. I don't just say it

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>because it's under the Betting pros umbrella. It is one

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite podcasts for here. It's a great listen.

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Matt does a great job. He records it no matter

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>what he's been in the hospital, he's had no cell service,

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>He's done everything again and again. Don't forget guys, check

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>out are discord over there betting pro dot Com slash chat.

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt is in there all the time. I'm being pulled

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in there more and more and I can't get away.

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It's fine. It's fantastic. Tons of people in there, great

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:12.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about every possible betting angle in the meantime. During

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the week, everybody, We'll be back later

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this week with the College Football Betting Podcast, and then

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 1>again on Thursday giving our best bets for the NFL Sunday.

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I will talk to you then