WEBVTT - Cutch Injury Fallout, Ryu Best SP Ever?? | Fantasy BFFs, Ep. 439

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Dun Yeah. Now,

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>welcome up Baby Happy, your host, Fiday from Mine, your

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 1>five guy, Rob, Sat, Francis, Frank stand ball ladies and gentlemen,

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>your ps. And with that we welcome you inside Studio

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty four. This is the BFFs alongside Frank Stample. I

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>am Greg sauceman, Franky, what's happening? But okay, what's up? Man?

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Happy hump day here on a Wednesday. More importantly, Gregg,

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a huge day. You know what today is.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I do know what today is. It is Happy birthday,

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Nelson. Happy Jimmy Nelson Day. It's his birthday, returns third.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Today he's making raising debut, first start since seventeen we

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>are absolutely pumped. Let's just hope that it doesn't end

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the same way it did for Chase Anderson last night,

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and you realized there was his birthday too, and he

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>makes his debut. I ken, he's thirty here ready. I

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>know it feels like he's just a prospect. I know, well,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>people forget he had so many years of being a

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>failed prospect. Last week saw him seen not a failed prospect.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>He went through Let's say the Lucas Geelito turn around

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen. Greg, Let's see if he if he can

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>pick up some of that night against the Morlins. I

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>know you're very excited about the prospects, and everybody out

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>there are also very excited about the prospects of big

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>time Jimmy Nelson returning finally for the burs and getting

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>into it the day show you the Best Bets Forever.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Coming up a little bit later on, we got a

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of news and notes to get to you, a

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of game stuff we want to uh talk about,

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>as well as giving you some betting and fantasy advice. Frankie,

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>let's begin with the latest out of Philadelphia, and that

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>means Andrew McCutcheon is out for the season with a

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>torn a c L. He got caught in a rundown,

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>made a turn, didn't go well, and he is now

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>out for the rest of the season with the torn

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a c L. He hopes to be back and ready

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.839
<v Speaker 1>for spring training. Brutal lost affilities, brutal loss for fantasy owners. Yeah.

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if people realize this, but Andrew McCutcheon,

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't having the best year. He was showing signs

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of coming around over the past two weeks. He was

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>betting three hundred with four home runs. But he had

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>forty five runs scored this season, which was among the

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>leaders in all baseball. I think he was like tied

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>for fifth or six in the league with Christian Yellot.

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So he's scoring a lot of runs. It's gonna be

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to replace that in your lineup. You know, to

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty five to sixty batting average gives you a little

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of pop. Had ten home runs as well. We

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>were about a third of the way through the season,

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>so Andrew McCutcheon was on pace four, you know, between

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty and thirty home runs, well over a hundred runs scored.

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't running as much. I think that's part of

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the philosophy of the Philadelphia Phillies. You know, Gabe Kapita

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like to send these guys all that much. But ultimately, Greg,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be the easiest thing to replace

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>those the decent pop and those runs scored for Andrew McCutcheon.

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.239
<v Speaker 1>But we'll try her best. I put out a poll.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Put out a poll, Greg, because I own Andrew McCutcheon

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in one of my twelve team leagues. We own him

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>together in a fifteen team league as well, where we

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>will have to figure this out. But I think a

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of the names that we've been getting questions about

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>how do I replace McCutcheon, Derek Cooper, j Bruce, Visa Garcia,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Scott Kingery, I think they're all pretty good options. I

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know that there's a wrong answer here, Greg, There's

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a wrong one there. There's definitely a wrong answer,

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>because only one of them is going to sustain to me,

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you know where Eileen Frank, I'm surprised you're you're even

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>questioning were what I'm thinking. I actually have no idea. Really,

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>My guests would be that you like Ei Garcia correct

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 1>to tell you might be. Of course, I like Garcia.

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>He's my guy. He gets on base, he has power

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>at to the top of the raised lineup. Well, you

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about sustainability, he has six stolen bases, Greg,

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to sustain that. More power than that, though,

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>as long as he's in the line of every day

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't really had good great pop though he's always

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>been known for his bat to baby batting average, does everything. Well,

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be baby Miggie. Well maybe last

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>night you want to be again, Yeah, right, of course

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>against Blake Snell of all. How you know with Garrett Cooper, Greggy,

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what he did last night and what he's doing recently

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>or for for a home run three runs scored last night,

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I was tweeting this out drink that

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Marlins are not the same team that you've

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>just been able to stream any starting pitcher against in

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>fantasy purposes because with Garrett Cooper and Harold mrs Have

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>brought to the table for the Miami Marlins, it has

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>turned their offense around. They don't strike out as much,

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they make a lot of contact, they make hard contact

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. You know, maybe they're not prominent home run hitters.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you wouldn't be able to know it based

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>on what Garrett Cooper is doing recently. But what Cooper

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and Harold Mrez have brought to the Miami Marlins, Greg,

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you could just stream every starting

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 1>pitcher against them anymore. So, honestly, I don't really know

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's a wrong answer. If I had to, I'll

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>tell you there's a wrong answer. I would rank Scott

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>can Ree last out of this punge. I agree with that.

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.239
<v Speaker 1>That's what I would do, sure, And I would rank

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>at the moment Ja Bruce third at this bunch. Would

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you really, dude, Jay Bruce is one good game? 're

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>freaking out? Yeah, but he's a good game also in

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>a much better line up now, Greg, shouldna be in

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a much better hitters ballpark, even if we don't expect

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>batting average from him. Right, if we get a Bruce

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't back two hundred, what Ja Bruce at time doesn't

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>back two hundred? He is streaky a f Yeah he is? Well,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that might make him better for rohdo then and head

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to head points. But you know, even if he's a

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>two forty two fifty hit, the rest of the way.

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>He showed you his upside again last night, three hits

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>to I didn't need brands him do it left. We know,

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we know what the upside is like. Did you need

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to see that to know? Well? I mean, people see

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the batting average and they automatically assume, well, all right,

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Jay Bruce at this point in his career, just pop,

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna hurt your batting average. And look, he's not

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna help your batting average by any means. But he's

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>only two years older than Jimmy Nelson. Is he a

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>two twelve hitter? Is he a two twenty hitter? He's

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>probably better than that. But his pop, I don't know

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>who that he is. You can't argue this, Greg, his

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>pop is the best of this group. There's no argument.

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess it comes down to what you need. There's

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>no argument that his pop is by far the best

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of this group. But if they think, when you're trying

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to replace an Agema Cutching, you want the person who's

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna do a little bit of everything, have a solid average,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>give you runs scored, have a little bit of pop,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>get some more eyes. Cooper does that too, he does.

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you want somebody's gonna be more well rounded

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>than Jay Bruce. That's what brings me exactly for the

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>biggest cutching with giving youth, and I think Cooper and

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Evis Garcia are probably the correct and that's exactly where

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>my head's at as well. A right, So if you

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>if you just want a close skill set to Andrew McCutchen,

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about some of my Patreon as well. I

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>also mentioned, you know, a short term fix. I think

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Derek Fisher offers something similar. Potentially Andrew McCutcheon can give

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit of power, a little bit of

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>speed leading off for the Astros, but that's more of

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a short term answer, whereas I think Garret Cooper and

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Evisio Garcia might be able to help you more long term.

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>This year, and I saw a lot of people throwing

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>out Adam Hazley, the prospect that was called for the Phillies.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>To me, he's he's an and it will only add

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, nothing more than that fifteen teamers. You know,

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I looked at the minor league numbers. Is the best

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>tool is his hit tool, and even that isn't great.

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>He's been you know, between two seventy and three batting

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>average in the minors, doesn't really have a lot of pop,

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have a lot of speed. Again, like it's

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>chief exposure to the Phillies. But I don't really have

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>high hopes from Greg so not even in like fifteen

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>team Mixed. I'm really desperate for an now Fieler. But

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, he's just really and only for now. We've

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>spoken about players getting hurt, like Andrew McCutcheon. Now le's

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about players coming back. Mike cleving He is going

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to start He's triple a rehab assignment here this weekend.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Great news for cleub owners. Let's say he you know,

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>has a few rehab starts, he's gonna be back, right,

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be back for the All Star raak just

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>fantastically so last before they All Star break. So great

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>news for my Clevinger owners. That's awesome, especially because Jeffrey

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez just hit the eye out for Cleveland, who had

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>just been battered around and beaten in that starting rotation.

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Fernando Tatis Jr. He starts his rehab assignment. Finally, what's

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>supposed to keep him out ten days, It's been more,

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>which is annoying, but Tatis looks healthier now and looks

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to be coming back. And zach Eflin, I know he's

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>not on the level of the Tatis and not on

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the level of the Clevinger, but zach Eflin was kind

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of out of nowhere put on the i L last week.

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>He's returning off the IL without a rehab start on Friday,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>making he's returning for the Phillies. Yeah, I think specifically,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I did want to touch on Fernando Tatis has a

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>hit in each one of his rehab games. He returned

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, and he already has a stolen base as well,

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's good to see considering that he was dealing

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>with a leg injury, so has hits in both of

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>his rehab starts, has a stolen base already as well,

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's been a long time coming for Tatis.

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually respect the Padres for what they're doing here,

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 1>taking their time with him. You know, top prospect, you

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want to rush him back and then risk can

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>re injuring himself. You know, we always say this when

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to prominent players who can make a major

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>impact for Fantasy. We just want the teams to take

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>their time do not rust these guys back because we'd

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>rather you take the time and have them come back healthy.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>We have them for the long term, especially when it

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to Tatis. You know, the last we saw him

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>was he was stealing a ton of bases and he's

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>got a little bit of pop as well. So we

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>need him back fully, and I'm very excited about that.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Another added element to the San Diego Padre's lineup. Hopefully

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>he can give them a little bit of a jolt

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of underperforming so far. Uh Manny Machado

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>hasn't lived up to it. Frand Milrays continuing to do

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>what he does hit home runs, but overall I think

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the San Diego Padre's lineup has been inconsistent, so hopefully

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>he can help out there great. By the way, I

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>also do what I men came Andrew becussion of his

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>tweeting back and forth Florida about this that one of

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the biggest benefactors here. It says that Hernandez, who now

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>goes from hitting seventh in this lineup every day, batting

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>leadoff potentially every day. Now things could change. Scott Kingary

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>could wind up there, Jean Segura could flip flop, a bit,

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but yesterday says that Hernande is back to the top

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of the lineup, which gives him a ton more opportunities

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to score some runs, maybe steal some bags. Really really

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>uh like, says, hernand is leading off, very very good

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>news for his fantasy owners. Yeah, and he just has

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.719
<v Speaker 1>a better skill set than what Scott Knary offers for

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a leadoff man, because you look at the walk rate

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's a Hernandez career at ten point four percent

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>walk rate that is down this year to six point

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. Last year he was up at thirteen percent.

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And I've actually said this on the show before. I think,

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>what's he's a Hernandez was doing this here was conscious,

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>It's something that he wanted to do because he was

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>batting more so in the middle to lower end of

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the lineup. I think he was taking a more aggressive approach,

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to drive more runs in. And I think now

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that we'll see him at the top of the lineup again,

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you'll see that more patient approach again and see him

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>start to draw more walks and score more runs. So

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the guy is absolutely awesome for O B P leagues.

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really hurt you anywhere in Rhodo, but not

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>really a standout anywhere either. Really really good for points

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>seeds because thirteen percent strikeout rate, gonna get on base,

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna score a lot of runs. How about this yesterday, Greg,

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was really interesting for the Phillies lineup.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Rice Harper was betting second, Jean's the girl was betting third.

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Did we just get capitlerd I think it's a verb

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that just made it. I mean, I get you kapler

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>As at his finest to be hold on. I don't

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind, don't blame, don't don't blame Capitaler for this. Well,

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>in the Yankees earlier in the year, remember that right,

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Remember they had they had Great Gardner batting third. I

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't like that either. So I mean, I'm not gonna defend,

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but there's a there's clearly I don't know the answer,

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>but there's clearly a method behind that. Matnet Well, I

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>think the reason why the Yankees did at the time,

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>what I thought was they were trying to break up

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>all their right ees. They didn't want to have too

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>many rights in row, and they didn't have a lot

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of lefties. I think it was just you know, Brett

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Gardner at the time, and I think they were trying

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to slot him into the middle of the order to

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>break up the right ees here for the Phillies. Um,

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question would be, if you don't bat

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Jean Sigura third, if you like Brett Bryce Harper batting second,

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>where do you move Jean Sigura too? Because not really

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a prototypical leadoff hitter. Yes he has speed, but he's

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>more of an aggressive swinger, doesn't walk as much as

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy like sees O Hernandez. So where would you

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>put Jean Sigura then? I mean, I guess the only

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>other spot I see would be six. You would probably

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>put a guy like maybe you put Bryce Harper second,

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Reese Hoskins third, Jay Bruce four, Rio Muto fifth, and

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>then Jean Sigura six. I don't I'm just talking this

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>side in my head right now. They're trying to find

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>ways to get it. Is Harper going? I understand it.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And we see this with a lot of batters in baseball,

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>even a lot of teams best hitters, right, if they're

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>really good, uh in terms of plate discipline and and

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and have a good eye, and they walk a lot,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll bat second. We've seen it with Aaron Judge with

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees, so I can't knock them for wanting to

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>do that with Bryce Harper. A little bit of a

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit of the moneyball effect here, Greg. They just

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>want to get guys on base and keep things. But

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I just thought it was really weird and interesting that

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Jane Sigara was batting third for the Phillies yesterday. So

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>see what happens today. We'll absolutely get the lineup as

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>soon as we get it at three forty, so we

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>might get if we make a show before the show ends.

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I look at it right now, make sure I don't

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have it yet. We don't have it yet, all right.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to make sure they're we'll have to

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about we do. It's a couple of lineups today,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>one of them being the Washington Nationals who lost Brian

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Doser do a hit by the pitch, which gives how

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>He Kendrick an opportunity to play every day at second base.

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>He's been a fifth in the lineup at second and Frank,

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you've been on how He Kendrick for a while now,

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and you say he deserves his playing time. Can I

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>get the camera over here? Can I get like a

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll see these little red these little red dots if

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we can zoom in a little bit here this is

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>This is the Baseball Savants stat cast page for Howie Kendrick. Basically,

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the more red you see when it's going all that way,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that's really really good. Like, Howie Kendrick is up there

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>with some of the best hitters in baseball right now

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his exit velocity, hard hit percentage, expected WHOABA,

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>expected batting average, expected slogging percentage. I don't know what

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the guy is doing right now, Greg, but it is working.

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Howie Kendrick is seeing the ball well. The eggs of

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>velocity way up this year launch angle up has expected

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>batting average Greg three thirty two. He's in the nine

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. I don't know what Repents and Howie Kendrick

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>car doing, but it is working because we're seeing a renaissance.

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And if Brian Dojer misses you know, any extended time here,

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I know you know. I've been at the forefront of

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the Carter Key boom bandwagon. We need Carter Key boom back.

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brian Doser sucks, but Howie Kendrick is pretty damn good too.

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So if Brian Doser is gonna miss any time here,

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and Howie Kendrick gets consistent playing time. I don't understand

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>why he hasn't had consistent playing time already, Like David Martinez.

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the problem. We're trying to figure out why

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the Nationals suck. Why don't you just play the players

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>who are performing the best. Howie Kendrick is performing like

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one of your best hitters so far this season. So

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>play the guy, whether it's at first base or second base,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>or use him at one of the corner outfield positions.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>The guy has been a godsend for the team. He

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>has ten home runs, he's betting three thirty one, he's

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>got thirty five r b I s as a part

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>time player. Play Howie Kendrick, and if that happens, you're

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to add him in. All the twelve team

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>leagues are deep. Howie Kendrick somebody roll worth adding right now.

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>According to our own Frank stand will get in. He's

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>not just an old gross veteran. He's somebody very well

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>worth picking up. We have a lot to get to,

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Frank from last night, specifically pitching performances with Kendrick and

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Rye making his case for the site up his floor.

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>He was tweeting out, Pablo Lopez is just out of

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>nowhere in Milwaukee, which was studying aurage of the numbers

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>yesterday what he did? Who does away from Miami's and

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>this kind of came out of nowhere. Frankie Mantas Mickey

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Callowie making idiotic mistakes. Been a lot to talk about,

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of time to do it. Four minutes ago.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll break everything down from last night, going up next.

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Daily rodo dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you advice. We play every day,

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>rodo dot Com optimized heer in minutes, build an optimized

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>line up for cash games and tourneys. Learned from the

0:17:55.000 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>game's best DFS players joined Daily rodo dot Com. Rain

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is Make It Rain. Todd Gurley did an interview on

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>on Interrupted and he was asked about Drake's you know,

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hanging out in l A. Are you friends? Are you

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>closing up with Drake? Where you've got his phone number?

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And Gurley said, oh, hell now, man, I don't want

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>his phone number in my phone. The dude is nothing bad.

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I just want to send a shout out to Gurley

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>for recognizing everything that dude touches from an athletic standpoint.

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Turns the Crap weekdays six and nine am Eastern on

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy sports networking on your popular podcast providers can't

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>get enough fantasy football. Rhoto Experts has launched their NFL

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>three five Fantasy Football package, which includes the best math

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet.

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Davis Madig and the Roto Experts are providing dynasty season

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>long betting, best Ball and Edvil draft content every day

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of the year to give you an edge regardless of

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.239
<v Speaker 1>what type of fantasy football you play. Save temper sent

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>at Roto Experts dot com with the promo code Evan

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>t s Y. It's the NFL three Fantasy Football Package

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>only at Rhoto Experts dot com. Colleague. All drivers want

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a career that will take you places, then Coach USA

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and Mega Bus is the place for you. Couch USA

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and Megabus leaders in the local and Peter City bus

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>transportation industry are looking for career minded, conscientious drivers with

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a valid CDL Class A or B licensed with passenger endorsement.

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>They offered paid training, competitive salary and many benefits. Apply

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>now and start driving to a better future. Visit coach

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>USA dot jobs. That's Coach us A dot jobs. Back

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>with you on the b f f's Frankie standplled Greg

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Susman hanging out with you and Frankie. Let's get right

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>into this pitching performances because John jan ryou is the

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>best picture in baseball in en week after week, start

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>after start a picture ever, No, the dude just puts

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>up zeros and last night, once again, he was absolutely

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous for the Los Angeles Dodgers. Um as this lying

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you read it out loud. It's seven innings, three hits,

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>no runs, two k's, hundred pitches over seven innings of work. Yeah,

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>he's not one of these guys that you're expecting him

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to get a turn point three five r. Does he

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>need it though, Like does he need swinging strikes. It's

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>just he's a master of commanding the zone. Right now.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>If you look at his walks per nine, there's zero

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>point five six On the season. He has five walks

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in eighty innings pitch. That is why he hungine Ryu

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>is able to do what he's doing right now. And

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you can read me off the peripheral numbers on two

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>point five four five x five Sierra. That's all. That's

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>all good and fine. I mean, no one's expecting hingine

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Ryu to pitch to a one three five e r

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>A for the rest of the season. Started to rup

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Cork Rosenthal. The Chicago Cubs are pushing hard right now

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for Craig Kimberl. So should we address that now or

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>keep going with right? Do right? We'll get into that

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a second, because I know where you're going with that, alright,

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So uh yeah, with hing and Ryou. Look there there's

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a bunch alike so far this season. It's the first

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>pitch strike percentage up to sixty four percent, previous career

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>high sixty one point seven. So he's establishing the strike

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>zone early on in counts thirty six point three percent.

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh swing, that's chase rate. How often is he getting

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>opposing batters to chase pitches outside the strike zone thirty

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>six point three percent his previous career high thirty one

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>point six percent, So that is up five percent from

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>his previous career hi and just looking into his arsenal.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>What he's doing a little bit differently is he's throwing

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a sinker more this season. He throws three different iterations

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of a fastball. He has a four steamer, he has

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>a cutter, he has a sinker that he throws this

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>season twelve percent of the time, up from five point four.

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 1>And I think that makes sense in conjunction with everything

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that's going on, keeping the ball down in the zone,

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of groundballs already nine point eight percent

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>groundball rate. He's not gonna pitch to a sub one

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>point five ear A for the rest of the season.

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be starts where he gives up to three

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>runs and that that raises his e r A. But

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who has a two point nine

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>six ERA in his career. He's a really good picture.

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>There was never any doubt when it comes to that.

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of people are gonna raise the question

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>right away, Oh, well, we gotta we gotta sell engine, ride,

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>we gotta send sell engine right before he gets hurt.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>My question is, for what, seriously, rest of season, he's

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty starting pitcher, top fifteen starting pitcher. Yeah,

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, like the obvious names. You're not gonna get

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a Mixtures there for him. We know that you're not

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna get Justin Verland, or you're not gonna get a

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell for this guy. And he isn't even any

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of those pictures. But my question, Greg, is if everyone's saying, well,

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>you know he's he's performing out of his mind now,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna keep this up, or he's gonna get hurt,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I gotta sell him now. I think a lot of

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna have a similar mindset. They're gonna say, well,

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're trying to do. You're clearly trying

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>to sell hingin Rye for someone that you can trust

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>more for the rest of the season that's not gonna

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>get hurt. I know what you're trying to do. They're

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not gonna bite Greg, So I'm just me personally. Look,

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>if you can flip him for a top fifteen starting

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>pitcher you trust to stay healthy the rest of the way, Sure,

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>but I would imagine in most cases fantasy owners are

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>too savvy to fall for that. Would you trade Rye

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>for Clayton Kershaw? No, Because Clayton Kershaw is also an

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>injury risk, and right now Ryu is pitching better than Kershaw.

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>That was the one name that Hent lights tim it here. Yeah,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can look at classic you know, sell

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>high by low scenarios. Carrasco, a Noah synder Guard. Is

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>that what you want to do right now? Greg, you

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>want to give up a guy with a one three

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>five e R A Carlos Carrasco or North Syndergard. No, No, Look,

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's gonna be some people that and make

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the argument for it. You know, Ry's probably you drafted

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>him as your SP four SP five, maybe even later

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>than that, so you know, if you could turn him

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>into one of these bylows like a synder Guard or

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Carrasco like, yeah, of course they're upside for the rest

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of the season, is probably better and we've seen them

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>do it before. But we'll get to this a little

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>bit later on too. Something is just not right with

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Syndergard this year, and and then with Carrasco. He's typically

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a really slow starter in the first half of seasons.

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>You look at it his for his career, he's got

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>an ear A over four in the first half, and

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>then he has a three three seven EARRA in the

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>second half. So for whatever reason, he's just always a

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>slow starter. He's gonna get better. The underlying numbers for

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Carrasco are awesome, but I would I would want to

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>hold on to Ryo you unless I can get a

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>legitimate top fifteen starting pitcher rest of the way that

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have injury concerns about. Okay, fair enough. I

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>want to move on now. Given news from Ken Rosenthal

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that he Cubbies are trying hard on Craig Kimberal. Last night,

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>patro stroke came back and gotta save here, Frank for

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Cubs, you're waiting to see what would happen

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in that bullpen. Well, they got up against the Colorado

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Rockies and it was Steve Schack pitching the eight padre

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Stroke pitching the ninth for his fifth save of the year.

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Ten strikeouts last night for Kyle hendricks Well, Jeff Hoppman

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>got bombed predictably. So uh in this one page of

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>strikes out there is they must add, Well, it's interesting

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>because we have this Kimberal news that we have to

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>deal with now, and it look, it doesn't surprise me. Greg.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a really good point that you

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>made yesterday that you know, Ben's obrist is dealing with

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.959
<v Speaker 1>this ugly divorce situation. He's been placed on like an

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>administrative leave where the Cubs don't have to pay him,

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>so they actually have more money to go around. And

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the Cubs always have money anyway, so it's not like

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we even needed that. But if we want to throw more,

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, fuel on the fire as to why they

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>might want Craig Kimberll, they have more money to go around,

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>so they have eleven blown saves as a team on

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the season, that's tied for the third most in all

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of baseball. I think it makes a lot of sense.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, if I played in a Roado

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>league or a head to head categories league, yes, I'll

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>be trying to add Pedro Strope right now because if

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't end up with Kimberall, if he ends up

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>going to a team like the Twins or the Rais

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or the Brave instead, then I do think stroke is

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the closer, or now they could be in the market

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>for and Alex Column a trade another reliever. In those formats,

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I would try and add Strope now. And I think

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty safe to say you can drops everywhere, third

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>or second in line. You could be third in line

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>by the time this show goes up on the podcast

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and you're listening to us there, it could all be over.

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's keep a eye out and ear is open

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Craig Kimber, Steve probably you now

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>can be dropped. Um let's see Mark Mark Curry just

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>reported I was talking had this Craig kimberal to the

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>cause of the ballpark last night. Obviously Kimber would improve

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>every team, every team, and I still don believe the

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>place he had the most impact on is with the Twins.

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like for kimberal it could be Twins

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>or the Cups. What about the Braves? What happened to

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the Braves? Are they falling out of this thing? Great?

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I haven't see think they're going harder after Kaiko haven't

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>seen it all? Right? Well, yeah, look, I think it

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>makes sense for the Twins to their bullpen has been

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>peace together so far using Blake Parker and Taylor Rogers

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and Trevor May and his setup role. But look, they

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>want a lockdown closer if they want to cement themselves

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>as a legitimate contender. This year. Then, yeah, I think

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of sense for the Twins to

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 1>go out and and be interested in Kimberal. It might

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>actually make more sense for them to be in on

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Kichael because I don't know how many starting pitchers they

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have in their rotation that you know they can actually

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>trust in a three or four man rotation when it

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to the postseason. But that's just me. I think

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Braves should be going really hard to let's see

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>what happen. Definitely now as we continue on around the

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>major leagues, the biggest score that stands out Sea last

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>night was in Miller Park, and it wasn't that it

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>was a sixty nothing victory. It was that it was

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a sixty nothing victory where the Brewers lost lost to

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Pablo Lopez. And what about the revenge game for Christian Yell.

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it didn't matter. Frank did. Chase Anderson

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>pitched poorly, but Corbyn Burns pitched worse, and Taylor Williams

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>pitched the worst in this game. Of the Brewers who

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>seemingly never had a shot. Even her now in Perez

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>pitched better than these guys. My man here not Perez

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>were not not a shock that they see him pitching well. Um,

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Pablo Lopez goes six shut out in the last just

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>three hits and a walk while striking out seven, finally

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>getting done on the road. Great start here from Pabolito. Yeah,

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited about this. I thought this was a

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 1>big moment for Pablo Lopez to go into Milwaukee. Had

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>terrible numbers on the road this season. Uh, and we've

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>been clamoring for Pablo Lopez. I think we all. I

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's a talented starting pitcher. He hasn't necessarily put

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it all together yet. I think he's kind of learning

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on the fly at the major league level. But you're

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>starting to see it now a little bit. Some glimpses

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>here from Pablo Lopez. Doesn't completely overpower you. Fastball ninety

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>three and a half miles per hour on average last night,

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>but works in a curveball that he threw seventeen times,

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a changeup that he threw five times. So he has

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>your classic three pitch makes. He has a fastball, curveball, changeup.

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, load of mid nineties fastball. He maxed out

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>at ninety five at times yesterday, ten swinging strikes on

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety two pitches. UM, really really good performance. I mean

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>seven strikeouts against this Milwaukee Brewers team they are prone

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to striking out at times. Really really like only one

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>walk for him. You know, we've we've all been on

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Pablo Lopez at some point this year, and I've held

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>onto in in fifteen teamers. In fact, in the main event,

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I benched him this week. That's how scared it was

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of this start in Miller Park. But I'm not mad

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>at myself because it's something hopefully that he can build

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>off moving forward and continue to be maybe that SP

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>five maybe SP four that we all thought that he

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>could be. So I thought this was a really really

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>encouraging performance to build off for Pablo Lopez. Great Pavo

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Lopez was absolutely fantastic. Hopefully this leads to even more

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>good things. But the story when he put up sixteen

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>runs is of course Garrett Cooper who he went four

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>for five with four runs, score, a couple r v

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>i's and a walk, as well as Harold Ermier is

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>going for two for six here. Uh, he's worth mentioning

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:33.239
<v Speaker 1>as well. He's mentioned before, UM, Garrett Cooper, how good

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>he's been held AMR is also worth talking about yeah.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>For Garrett Cooper right over the past two weeks, three

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven batting average, five home runs, thirteen RB. I

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Craig Mish. You can hear live on

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>fmcs Y Radio right now from twelve to two pm.

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>He's been talking to Garret Cooper for a long time.

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>He's really really close to the Miami Marlins organization. Again

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>over those last two weeks and ops over a thousand,

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to see the launch angle pick up a

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but I think we're starting to see that again.

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Five home runs during that span makes a lot of contact,

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of hard contact. Um. I like Grek

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Cooper a lot. If I had to choose one between

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>him and Harold Ramirez, I do like Cooper more, and

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we spoke about it at the top of the show.

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking for an Andrew mc cutcheon replacement, there

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>might not be a better guy than Garrett Cooper right now.

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg A question I kept getting last night was, and

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it's something I'm actually struggling with myself, would you drop

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Gregory Polanco for Garrett Cooper? And the the answer I

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>kept giving people was I don't want to drop Gregory Polanco.

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Because it last year, hey, and then he took off.

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>We know what his upside can be. He's a guy

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that can be streaky at times and he can go

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on these big runs. Plus he's coming back from a

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>major shoulder injury. I cautioned everybody that he could get

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>off to a slow start when he comes back, and

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>he didn't necessarily do that. I think we're starting to

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>see some of that now. Infordo went through the same

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>thing last year and it had a monster second half.

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>That could be what we're looking at when it comes

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to Gregory Polanco. So I understand, you know you only

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>had limited roster spot. I would try my best suit

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep Gregory Planco on my bench. That's what I'm

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>doing right now. It's a twelve team, head to head

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>points league, it's a four outfielder league. I got him

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>super late and he's gonna have keeper value. So I'm

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>trying my best to hold onto Gregory Polanco. But I

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>understand the frustration. I would just keep him on the

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>bench right now. Greg I agree for someone who didn't

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>drop Gregory Polanco was got see what he got. Don't

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>give up on Gregory. Don't give up on Gregory. Uh

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>yet give him another opportunity, give him a chance to

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>come out of this funk. We've seen what he can

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>do now, cople of other pitching performances, I wanted to

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>get you, my man. Frankie Montas against the Angels pitched

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>really really well until the sixth inn He hadn't allowed

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>anything until that six anywhere. Hyotani got to him to

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>go deep and that was all that he allowed. Oakland

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>won this one for to two Lopez or Manta rather

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for it. Hits, two runs, a walk, and three strike

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>aspen four. Oakland was very, very good. On the other side,

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Griffin Kenny allowed runs on his six ins of work,

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>seven hits, eight strikeouts, a walk. Uh. The big last

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>for him Ramone Loreto with a two run shot in

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that sixth inning. Yeah, I'll start off with Frankie Mantas here,

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>really really nice bounce back performance against the same team

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that he just got rocked. So I love to see that. Right,

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>just got rocked against the Angels his last time out,

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>struggled with walks, had five walks in that game, four

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>earned runs. Comes back here six ending pitts, only two

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>earned runs, only one walk. I love to see that

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>from Frankie Mantas that ability to bounce back against the

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>team in the Los Angeles Angels that doesn't strike out

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot. He only had four swinging strikes, he only

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>had three strikeouts. I understand that. I don't think that's

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a detriment against Frankie Mantas. I think that just speaks

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>for how much contact the Los Angeles Angels make and

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>have made so far to this season. So really really

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>nice bounce back here for Frankie Mantas, I would say

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that he's firmly entrenched himself as a you know, top

0:33:56.520 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>forty starting pitcher moving forward. And for Griffin Canning, you

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily get the results. He ran into some trouble

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>at times here, but he was able to piece together

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a serviceable outing here or earned runs six and he's

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>only one walk eight strikeouts. He also had eighteen swinging

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>strikes here. So Griffin Canning has some nasty stuff. But

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we've seen with other young starting pitchers

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paddock, they're not always going to be great. You know,

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>They're they're gonna they're gonna run, they're gonna be some

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>ups and some downs. So overall, I still do really

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like Griffin Canning a lot moving forward, Griffin Canning somebody

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that expected bounce back next time out of course him

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>much like Mantas based the same team twice in a row.

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>We saw both these guys can in the opposite direction

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>last night. I'm so confident in Griffin Canning uh to

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, listen, a lot of two runs shot in

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the six otherwise he would have a quality start and

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 1>basically the same exact line of Franky Matas. So I'm

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>not worried about start out to your best bet for

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>every yesterday, Greggy, Hey, buddy, six runs combined that that

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>would be uh, if my math is correct, would be

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:58.919
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half total runs. Now, I'm not gonna

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ignore your best at forever, and we'll talk

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>about all the other ones that we talked about, except

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 1>for the Orioles. We'll ignore that as well. We'll talk

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>let's handle Chris Paddock versus JAREDI Cough from yesterday, because

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the one that we both liked over. We

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a sucker plays about the under here

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was going over was the move as Paddock

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>facing a tougher Phillies lineup, It's rocked four and a third,

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>eight hits, six runs, five of them were earned, struck

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>out four allowing to home runs. Jared I Cough in

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the equality start didn't walk anybody. That was the key there,

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>allowing three runs on four hits, striking out five. He

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed just a home run do Fran mill Rays who

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>he too on the night. Um. We talked about j

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Bruce before, who were twice, including the grand slam of

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Paddock in the fifth. Scott King Ray had a huge

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.919
<v Speaker 1>game too. A lot going on in this one, Frank, Yeah,

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this was There was a lot to happen in this

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>game between the Podres and the Phillies. But it's now

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 1>you know three of his last four starts for Chris

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Paddock where he's allowed four earned runs or more. And

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Matt Modika who was tweeting this out

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of hours ago. During that span last

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>four starts for Chris Paddock five point eight five e

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>r A four point three zero x fift three point

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>nine one. Sierra. As good as a pitching prospect as

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you are, You're going to run into some trouble at

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>some point at the major league level. Every starting pitcher

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>goes through this. I mean, Max Scherzer got off to

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a slow start this year, for God's sake, So let's

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>not just freak out about Chris Paddock right away. Oh

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 1>my god, I need to sell him. Oh my god,

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I need to sell him. His next start is going

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to come against San Francisco. So if there's ever a

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>time that you maybe you wanted to shop him, it

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>would be after that start, because I think that he

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>would bounce back. But I was reading a little bit

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>his quotes on you know, last night's performance, and he

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>has admitted himself he's hitting a wall right now. And

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it all starts with the command of his of his

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>change up. So he said he just didn't necessarily have it.

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>He normally he's able to pinpoint wherever he wants to

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>put that pitch within the zone. He wasn't able to

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>do that last night. He's going to run into these issues. Also,

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>velocity a little bit down last night, the home run

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that he gave up to King Reyer fastball he's normally

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>been nineties. So I mean to pay attention to here

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>or Chris Paddock. I'm not just completely freaking out and

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>saying cell right now, We'll take a break here we'll

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>hit on some more hitting performances last night. Give your

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>best bets forever around the show. Next, lose weight now,

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 1>got a fat dot com. Lose that unwanted belly fat

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>today and get free information at fat one dot com.

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Fit in the dress or pets or bathing suits you've

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>always wanted to. Got a fat dot com lose ten,

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty or more pounds immediately go to fat one dot

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>com for free information on how you can lose weight.

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Go to fat dot com, fat dot com. That's fat

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hi, I'm Keith of I believe every child

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is entitled to a complete and inspiring education. Music education

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>programs in our schools help kids learn, socialize, game confidence,

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and stay in school. But they need you will help

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to survive. Mr Hollens Others Foundation give school music programs

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the instruments they need to make this opportunity available to

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>every student who wants to play. If you will help,

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we can keep music alive in our schools and give

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>all kids education they deserve. Visit mhois dot org now

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to find out how you can help. Are you single?

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Everyone single is looking for the best day possible. Well,

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I found one website that can find you the best

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:41.919
<v Speaker 1>date and it's called the Best Date one dot com.

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Just go there and log in for your free trial

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>and see if you can find your new and maybe

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>last best date. Remember, you can find the best date

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of your life at the Best Date one hundred dot com.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the best Date one hundred dot com. One more time,

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the Best Date one dot com. Do you want to

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>risk free wagers up to one thousand dollars? If so,

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.839
<v Speaker 1>go to points bet dot com forward slash grid. Open

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>yourself up a points pet sports wagering account, enter the

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:13.399
<v Speaker 1>promo code grid and you'll get to risk free bets

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of up to one thousand dollars. In addition to traditional betting,

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>points beets also offers its own betting concept where customers

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they're rewarded by how much they win their beat, and

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that's points pet dot com forward slash Grid. Enter the

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.879
<v Speaker 1>promo code grid and get your two risk free bets

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 1>of up to one thousand dollars today. Put your money

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with your mouth this take a shot by opening a

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>sports wagering account with FanDuel. New Jersey's larger sports book

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>could have a dot com slash grid with yours free

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>bet up five bucks it's a free bet of up

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to five hundred bucks. You open a sports wagering account

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>at FanDuel dot com slash grid, points friends, game totals, props,

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.720
<v Speaker 1>polas and the game wagering on college and pro sports

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.280
<v Speaker 1>near in control. Got a vandel dot com slash grid,

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>open your new account and claim you're freewage. You're up

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>your five hundred bucks today vanduel dot com slash grid

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and actually hit it over there. Um after the show,

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 1>take some pictures, Greg, send me do you want do

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you want me to? That's why why I asked me to.

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just missing all right, fair enough, Frank, thanks thanks

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>for the update there now, so you could you could

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>actually put put some bets in tonight? I could if

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you're heading out there, slash probably whatever my best bet

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>forever is, I probably should put that in tonight. Yeah,

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the second I walk into Jersey. I could do that. Yes,

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you kid, something I've done myself. You have many times

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you skulkies. You have a beer. I'm sorry you got

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a hobook and have a beer. Place those bets in

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of at the time football bets. Yeah, should

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you have a baseball Why isn't this happening in New York.

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Kick Greg because they want you to save your money. Frank. Also,

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we've been very hot. We've been hot. Can not be yesterday.

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>You can make a living doing that. They certainly can,

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>as long as you bet enough to do it. M M,

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, what do we want to get into you?

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Still from last night here meeting to Mickey Callaway and

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.320
<v Speaker 1>no Ah Syndergard. So no, no, I was just like

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it was at at Mickey Callaway and so that's what

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that was. Because you want to do a time. They've

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>been quite frustrating, all right. So um so last night

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Synderguard stroll a bit early to get it going and

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>then retired ten of twelve batters, one of which reached

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>on an error and the other one just just reached.

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Micky Callaway comes takes him out because he's afraid of

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike Yastremski stealing a base on Noah synder Guard and

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 1>those Cynda guards just like, are you eving kidding me?

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>He pulls them. Next thing you know, Seth Lugo allowed

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>was massive Brandon Belt double game is ti Evan Lagoy

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>gets thrown out at home plate. They put up a

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:16.800
<v Speaker 1>billion runs in the tenth Mets lose, Frank, what do

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 1>you do with notice inderguard? It's still been a frustrating

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>year for Noah Syndergard. I mean, this is a spot

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:27.439
<v Speaker 1>that he you're expecting him to dominate in. I don't

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>care that Mike yes Stromsky is in the lineup, grandson

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of Carl Yastremski. But six point two winnings, five hits,

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>three on runs. I realized one of those runs came

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>after he left the game. Three walks, only four strikeouts.

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Now a four point eight three e r A for

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Noah's synder Guard. All the underlying numbers for him are

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 1>much better. Three points six zero five three point eight

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:55.879
<v Speaker 1>nine x fIF three point nine six ERA. Strand rate

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is got awful at sixty four and a half percent

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is bad as high, but as bad up has always

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>been high. It's being strike right down this year. Strikeouts

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>are down this year. I don't. I don't own him anywhere.

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm happy that I don't. He's he's throwing his

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>slider less this year. Last year twenty point nine percent

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 1>slider usage this year eleven point nine, So that's down

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. But the velocity on that slider is also

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>down four percent this year. So because hann Has hasn't

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>had the same level of effectiveness, I've seen people complaining

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>about this on Twitter, using his change up more as well.

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems like location within the zone is that like

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>just leaves a lot of pitches up and people are

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>squaring up. You know, the harder you throw, no, the

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the higher you know, the bat up against you. It's

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be if you live in the zone and you

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>throw hard. No ask Nathan of Aaldi all those years.

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.280
<v Speaker 1>You know you live in the zone, you don't walk anyone.

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 1>You throw hard, you're gonna get hit hard. So we've

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>continuously said this about Synderguard. Seems like he's more of

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a thrower than a picture. What I mean by that,

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just doesn't understand the sequencing or you know, pitching

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>up and down and moving in and out. He doesn't

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>understand how to be a picture. I don't know what

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take. Like if he hasn't figured it

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>out at this point, six hundred endings into his major

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 1>league career, I just don't know when it's going to happen.

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, what do you do with Syndergard? Greg? Honestly,

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that I would even try buying low

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>on him. I think most fantasy owners that own him

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are like, I know what you're trying to do. I'm

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>not gonna fall for this. And if you try and

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>trade him away, you're gonna get what fifty of what

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 1>his value was expected to be coming into the year. So, um,

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you're in what I like to call fantasy purgatory right now.

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You're stuck. You're stuck. If you own him, you can't

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 1>really trade him away. You're not going to drop him.

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm an owner in the league, and I

0:44:56.960 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 1>don't you know, if I if I'm just another in

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:02.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna try and trade for him. I try to trade

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for him, but there's no way I'm gonna give you

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 1>what you you believe because he was a you know,

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>third round, second pick, second round pick, third round pick,

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>greg and you know you're gonna try and throw Let

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>me try and uh sell high on a Frankie Mantas

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and then you know no one's gonna

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:23.320
<v Speaker 1>trick take Frankie Mantas for no one's Syndergarden, rightfully. So,

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:27.359
<v Speaker 1>so I think this is a sergard I mean I'd

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:30.439
<v Speaker 1>rather have gileto right now would you would you would

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>not trade overy? No underguard? No, I mean it's working

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:38.799
<v Speaker 1>for Lea. I understand that. I mean I don't see

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>any signs of him falling off. That's cool. I wouldn't

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. It was awesome. Would you trade oh, I

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 1>mean we spoke about earlier. Would you trade trade ry

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>you for lead us? No? I would not lead us.

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Phip is writeing loud with the ear is extually specifically higher.

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But he's famous right there, man, there's a home and

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a fly ball racers six. Yeah, and look the weather's

0:46:02.640 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna heat up. He's gonna give up a few home runs,

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>especially pitching in Chicago, but was doing phenomenal things this year.

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Swinging shrike rate is better than Noah Cydergards. I mean

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 1>even his underlying numbers, his three point six six x

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>fit and his three point six once a year. This

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is Lucas Gilto significantly better than Noah Syndergard would why

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 1>would I make that deal? Right now? I'm keeping Gileto, okay.

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get into the Nationals. From yesterday, the

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Washington Nationals UH defeated Lucas Gilto's team, rand Ronaldo Lopez

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 1>and the White Sox are Ducks got it wrong, um,

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's one nine to five. Straspeck wasn't good. You

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>almost gotta have pitched by Lopez, but he didn't, and

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>then the White Sox bullpen failed and ultimately Nationals one,

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 1>nine to five. But what I want to take away

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>from this game is what Victor Roblas did in this one.

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>He went too or four with the run score, a

0:46:57.680 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of r V eyes and he also had his

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 1>ninth home run of the year roblast betting two or

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>three o b P. He's got those nine home runs

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:09.919
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, to do alone with nine stolen bases. Frank,

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you are a Victor Roebliss owner. Are you satisfied? Victor Roblos,

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>for me is one of the hardest hitters to figure out.

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually wanted to have a little bit of a

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 1>back and forth here and and find out what you

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 1>think about him, Greg, because by all accounts, back and

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>forth sounds. Can we get a camera, Greggy, what is

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:30.400
<v Speaker 1>he doing right now? Well, I'm back and forth, camera, Gregy.

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 1>That's back and forth all right? Well, by all accounts

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and measurements that you can use to figure out whether

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:44.879
<v Speaker 1>a hitter is a good hitter or not, Greg, Yes,

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Victor Roblost is below average and all of those seems.

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>He has a nineties six weighted runs created plus one

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is average. He has a seven fifty four OPS. I

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's gonna get it done yet. He has

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>nine home runs and nine steals, so he's basically on

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pace for season. He's on pace four over five runs scored.

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>But he's a two forty hitter with a strikeout rate

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and a six percent walk rate. If I own him

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in Rodo, I think I'm I'm fine, Like, I don't

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>really care that you're batting average sucks. Yeah, it should

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 1>come up a little bit. That have been is a

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit low. But his hard hit rate, Greg is,

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty two in an arrow where I mean the

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 1>average hard hit rates serees like tht seven percent. He's

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a twenty two percent hard hit rates. So, like to me,

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Victor Roeblates is just one of the hardest guys to

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:47.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out. It still has an interesting power speed combination.

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So in Rhodo, I think I'm all right. But like

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:55.439
<v Speaker 1>a points league, So is he a good hitter? Greg?

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's the question. I don't know the I

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:00.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer to that. If he just really athletic,

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>is how what it comes down to. Yeah, he's fantasy wise,

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>he's fine from my rod perspective, as you said, because

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:11.399
<v Speaker 1>never's gonna be there like you're looking. You were looking

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:14.880
<v Speaker 1>trying guy out of Victor Roblez hopefully, and he's kind

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:17.959
<v Speaker 1>of talking about like starlely Marte. Right, but that's without

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the batting average. That's what we had, And I am

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>concerned a bit that that batting profile is terrible, but

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are gonna be there ultimately, so you're all

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 1>right with it, I guess. So, Yeah, we're gonna points league.

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a little bit harder because at least in

0:49:35.239 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the points leaus I play and you lose a half

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 1>point for a strikeout, so he strikes out a quarter

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of the time, doesn't walk all that much. Um, I

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:44.800
<v Speaker 1>think the batting average will be better. The fan Graphs

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 1>projections have him for a two fifty five batting average

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the way. Derrick Cardi actually the bat

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:52.360
<v Speaker 1>has him met for two seventy five, So some lofty

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:55.799
<v Speaker 1>expectations there. With twelve home runs in thirteen stolen bases,

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the way that would give him, that

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>would give him a any one home run when he

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:04.680
<v Speaker 1>two stolen base season, I'd be pretty good. I mean

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you you signed up for that. We came just wanted

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:11.319
<v Speaker 1>to get that batting average. I agree. Okay, what else

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>we want to get to? We have actually know what

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we gotta get to our best bets forever. And we

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:17.040
<v Speaker 1>got signed off YouTube because at the window is coming

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:18.919
<v Speaker 1>up next. We don't because I'm doing this thing first,

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really have to sign off YouTube. Don't wenna,

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:21.920
<v Speaker 1>stay on YouTube. We're gonna stay on you way to

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>stay on you. You go way to talk it out.

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I just realized if we didn't have to you, so

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll stay on YouTube, We'll get the best bets. We'll

0:50:27.640 --> 0:50:35.400
<v Speaker 1>continue on UM. Austin Riley Greater signed Vladdie d Vladieto Jr.

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Ied the Junior want to see Lado, So I'll try

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:44.439
<v Speaker 1>this again. Austin Riley Greater sign of Vladdie Jr. That's

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>fair question. Everyone's waiting for the wheels to fall off

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:49.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Austin Riley because he has a

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>thirty two point nine percent strike out rate and just

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a five percent walk great, but he also hits the

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:57.960
<v Speaker 1>ball hard fifty two percent at the time, puts the

0:50:57.960 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>ball in the air forty three for ten of the time,

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a thirty percent line drive rate. I think in the

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 1>future of Vladi mcgaro Junr. Will be a better well

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:11.880
<v Speaker 1>rounded hitter than Austin Riley. If you can pull that

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:15.080
<v Speaker 1>off in a dynasty or a keeper league, that's probably

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 1>something I would look into doing. Selling Austin Riley to

0:51:17.000 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>get lad Jr. This year in Redraft, I don't think

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it, Craig. I think I'm just gonna write

0:51:22.200 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it out. I mean, Austin Riley, the guy who's played

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen games. He has twenty five RBIs that is this massive,

0:51:29.640 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and he has nine home runs, so I understand the

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>plate discipline. You have some question marks when it comes

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to Austin Riley, but battball data supports a lot, if

0:51:39.040 --> 0:51:41.839
<v Speaker 1>not all, of what he's doing. So again, Redraft, I'm

0:51:41.840 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>probably just holding on to Austin Riley your thinging long term.

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Vladim mcgarero Jr. Long term will be the

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:48.760
<v Speaker 1>better player. Fair enough for right now, Austin Riley clearly

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>getting it done. No signs of slowing down for the

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:54.239
<v Speaker 1>big man from Atlanta who does not seem to be

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:56.799
<v Speaker 1>in the mix for Craig Kimbrell, as you would call him.

0:51:59.200 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I would never do that to you. I'm not that's

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:04.879
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, you know, you know, want to continue my mock.

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the Rockies before I forgot to mention Danny

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Murphy with a bomb. Well, you can't mock me. I

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:12.759
<v Speaker 1>got him on my teams. I'm excited, happy started. He's back.

0:52:12.920 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Murphy. He's back. And I mentioned this either last

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.440
<v Speaker 1>week or the week before. He's either learning how to

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 1>play through this, you know, finger fracture thing that he

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:25.320
<v Speaker 1>had going on earlier on the season, or he's just

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>getting healthier. So it's whichever one it is. I'm perfectly

0:52:29.719 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 1>fine with it. So Daniel Murphy is coming around, um,

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited about it. And he does that in

0:52:35.719 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the revenge game against the Cubs, very slight revenge game

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 1>only played about half a year last year with the Cubs.

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 1>That one doesn't even count, but it still counts. Greg

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 1>over the past. Let's see here, what measurement do you

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>want to go by? Because all of them are good.

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Last fifteen days, last thirty days. Let's go with last

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 1>two weeks for Daniel Murphy re sixty batting average to

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 1>home runs sixteen r b i s and ops over

0:52:56.040 --> 0:52:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a thousand. So Daniel Murphy's coming around. You had your

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:02.839
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to buy low, and now it's gone. Happy about

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Murphy. You wanted to drop the dude, well, because

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm losing in my leagues and I need the guy

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:11.719
<v Speaker 1>to play, and he wasn't playing. He was sitting out

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:13.760
<v Speaker 1>against lefties. It doesn't seem like that's the case anymore.

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:16.840
<v Speaker 1>It's actually better than here against lefties and his righties.

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:21.360
<v Speaker 1>But Black, let's get the best bets forever here on

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the bf S b F f's What are you going, Frank?

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking at? Kevin Gosman? Probably? Yeah, I

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 1>don't like Kevin Gosman. That is well documented, the gas

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:39.360
<v Speaker 1>man they call him. Um. There's nothing that really stands

0:53:39.360 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 1>out to me today Greg that I love. But if

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I had to choose one thing that I would throw

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a few shekels down on, it is the Pittsburgh Pirates

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 1>money line with Joe Musgrove. I realized Musgrove hasn't been

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>great either as well. The velocity down this year or

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Joe Musgrove, but I still think he's a better pitcher

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:57.719
<v Speaker 1>than Kevin Goalsman overall. And the Pirates lineup has been

0:53:57.719 --> 0:53:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit inconsistent, but I think they could get

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to Gasman. Here you're getting the Pittsburgh Pirates and Joe

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Musgrove at plus one twelve. They are underdogs at home

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:07.560
<v Speaker 1>tonight with the money line. So I am going with

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Big Joe, going start, Joe muscob start well, Joe must

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 1>betty on Joe Musgrove. It's not I haven't even loked

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>at the totals. Totals usually my jam, but I haven't

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:21.480
<v Speaker 1>looks at the totals tonight. There's one that stands out.

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:23.359
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna like with my pick tonight at all.

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you right now, you're not gonna like it.

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing it really stands out, like Carrasco Martine Perez

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. Rasco hasn't been good. Martine Perez

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:35.040
<v Speaker 1>has been bombed as past couple of starts. The Twins

0:54:35.080 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 1>can get home hit home runs and bunches. You know,

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually kind of talking to myself into the over

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and neck Indians and twins over eight and a half. Craig,

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:44.879
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? I don't love it. I don't

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 1>love it alright, I'm going to total because the total

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:50.120
<v Speaker 1>has been my jam. Like I said, you're not gonna

0:54:50.160 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>like this at all. I mentioned I mentioned one of

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>them downstairs. I have my head bun in here. You're

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:57.480
<v Speaker 1>not gonna You're not gonna like it. You'd be mad

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:01.080
<v Speaker 1>at me. I'm going over up. We're going over nine

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:07.239
<v Speaker 1>in Jimny Nelson's return, over nine in the Marlins and

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers and Bruers got shut out last night, sixteen nothing.

0:55:10.880 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 1>You know they're putting up runs, Jimmy Nelson. How deep

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is this dude going in the games? Everyone just thinks

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins are gonna get shut out or something because

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:21.600
<v Speaker 1>they put up sixteen runs last night. I don't think so.

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We're going over nine in the Word Crew in the Marlins.

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:30.440
<v Speaker 1>His birthday, Greg, same on you. Maybe he'll win. It's

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:32.800
<v Speaker 1>his birth some runs, Frank, I will say, there's some

0:55:32.920 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 1>value in the Marlins. Money like to like Jimmy. It

0:55:36.200 --> 0:55:41.479
<v Speaker 1>started seventeen. He's the minus two seventy favorite. Come on, guys,

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't even know what the guys gonna we don't

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:46.839
<v Speaker 1>know how many it's he's gonna throws two seventy. Really,

0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, Sandy all Katara has been because the total

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that I did want to mention Greg was the Cubs

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Rockies. It's total. There's seven. It's Darvish against

0:55:57.840 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>her Man Marquez. Marques has been a sudden I realized that.

0:56:01.040 --> 0:56:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But Cubs have a really good line. I know he

0:56:05.680 --> 0:56:08.759
<v Speaker 1>pitches better away from cors Field. You Darvish has been

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>better recently. What can still be prone to getting blown up?

0:56:13.360 --> 0:56:16.279
<v Speaker 1>That total at seven is really really low. It's low.

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It's low. I like that, Frank, I like where your

0:56:21.200 --> 0:56:23.799
<v Speaker 1>head's at. I think while we're just mentioning the Cubs

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>real quick, Greg, I did want to get to this

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>today on the show. Kyle Hendrix has been awesome recently.

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You know me, not Kyle Hendricks guy admittedly seven innings, pitched,

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 1>six hits, three earned runs, one walk, ten strikeouts last

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:39.480
<v Speaker 1>night over twenties swinging strikes against the Colorado Rockies. How

0:56:39.600 --> 0:56:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Hendricks greggy since the start of May seven starts two

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:45.080
<v Speaker 1>point zero nine e r A or seven strikeouts, the

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:48.720
<v Speaker 1>six walks in fifty one and two thirds and he's pitched.

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:52.919
<v Speaker 1>He's at one point zero five walks per nine. Would

0:56:52.920 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you sell high on Kyle Hendrix right now? Yes? Yes,

0:56:56.480 --> 0:56:59.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you, yes, yes, and we get Do you think

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you can get corre Asco, Flaherty or Zach Wheeler for

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Hendricks No, No, I think you might be able to.

0:57:06.239 --> 0:57:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I would throw if I own Kyle Hendry. I'm throwing

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:09.600
<v Speaker 1>an all for out for each one of those pictures

0:57:09.840 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Give us like five minutes at the window

0:57:12.000 --> 0:57:14.320
<v Speaker 1>with Shawn Watstavakia is coming your way next, Frank Stample

0:57:14.320 --> 0:57:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and Gregg Sousman. We'll do it all go tomorrow, we

0:57:16.960 --> 0:57:17.240
<v Speaker 1>hope