WEBVTT - Is math a human invention or a human discovery?

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com. Robert Lamb and I'm Julie Douglas, and listeners,

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>do not run away. We are we are talking about

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>math in this episode, but we're not going to talk about, um,

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, a whole bunch of rat We're not gonna

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>rattle off a bunch of equations and talk about, um,

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the inner workings of Alderbar geometry or calculus,

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>because if you're like me, you probably never really got

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>into mathematics in school and you're not particularly good at it.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And uh, anytime a math question comes up, you try

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and force it on other people. And you absolutely cannot

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>go to a bowling alley that does not have automated

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>score keeper right right, Or you always say something like

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm an English major yeah to the response of what's

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>seven times three or something ridiculous like that, But I

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>will say yes, stick around absolutely, because nobody has more

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>anxiety about math and I do, and nobody's less of

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a mathlete than I am. And yet I find this

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>question that we're going to pose to you into ourselves

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fascinating. Yeah, we're getting into the philosophical area of

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>mathematics to a certain degree and just talking about what

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it is and uh and indeed the question is mathematics

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a human creation, a human invention, or is it a

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>human discovery? So think think about that. Mathematics this thing

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that powers everything pretty much everything that we do, uh

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that from the device that you're listening to this podcast

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>on right now to the the science that has enabled

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>civilization to reach the point that it has reached. But

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what is math? Right? Yeah, what is math? We should

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>back up. We're gonna back up. We're gonna we're gonna start.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're not gonna really go back into the

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>history books and talk about like who invented this in

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that because a lot of mathematics is pretty ancient to

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the point where we can't really place uh, you know,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>attributed to one particular individual or another. But we can

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>back up to birth to you, when you were a

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>baby and you were just you know, spit out on

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the world, uh gleaming with with goog um. Even then,

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>your brain had some mathematics and you didn't even know it. Yeah,

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a minor mathlete at least. Yeah, because you were you

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>were born with something that we call number since all right, Um,

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and a number. Just to to break it down, a

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>number is a word and a symbol representing a count. Okay, uh,

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the basic though you may call it too,

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you may attribute it with the numeral two, or you

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>may have some other system of referring to it um.

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>For instance, in China they have they have small they

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>have shorter words for their numbers, which is one of

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the reasons they're supposedly better at at mathematics because there's

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>s less just you know, it's kind of like cutting

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a penny off of every transaction. It adds up and

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that allows everything to to move. You don't have to

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>have a new word for two hundred um. You just

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>well anyway, we won't get into that math system. But

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty cool. But but this is necessary because it's

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>imagine yourself in the wild and you encounter a dog,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like a wild dog that's barking at you. And then

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>and then you were to encounter two wild dogs barking

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at you. Being able to differentiate between the two is essential.

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's all about navigating a world full of multiple

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>objects and moving objects. You know, there are a lot

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of like if you're just walking around the forest, there

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of trees, there are um wild dogs

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>moving around, There may be other humans. I mean, just

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>think all the things in your life that are in flux,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and you have to be able to navigate that world.

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And that is what mathematics helps us do well. And

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this is your brain in action, right, I mean, when

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you enter a room, of what you are seeing is

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>not coming in through your eyes, it's actually what your

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>brain is inferring. And so we're pointing to here is

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>our brain structures and this idea that we might be

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>hardwired to to spatially differentiate as much as possible. That's

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about. Right, When you come into a room,

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the height whether or not you know

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the height of the walls. You're you're

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of creating this pattern in your brain of pattern recognition, right,

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>And other animals do this too. But but those other animals,

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like the gooey infant that you once were, uh, they

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have wiped that off actually after a while. Yea, all

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the infants on encounter gooey, some of the adults are

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>gooi um. But such a child will have no grasp

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of the human number system. They are not going to

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>know what two is, or what three is, or what

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>three times eight is. Those are things are going to

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>come with in time via education, but they still have

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that number. Since then they can identify changes in quantity

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>and this basically equates to something called logarithmic counting. And

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>neuroimaging research is actually studied the brains of infants and uh,

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean scientists have studied the brains of infants through

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>near imaging research and they've they've registered these, uh the

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>mental activity going on as they identify integral increases in

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>physical quantity. So like a baby, for instance, wouldn't be

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>able to tell that much difference between five and six

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>heady bears, but five and ten they'll definitely see because

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>there there's a definite um logarithmic increase in quantity. Yeah,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and I thought this is really fascinating. Um uh To

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that point, there's an article from futurity dot org and

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>it's called babies can compt before they can communicate, And

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>what they say is our findings indicate that humans use

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>information about quantity to organize their experience of the world

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>from the first few months of life. Quantity appears to

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>be a powerful tool for making predictions about how objects

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>should behave And what I think is really important about

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>that is predictions because that is what math is about

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day. Right If I'm sitting

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>there adding one in one, then then I'm trying to

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>predict what the following number is going to be. And

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>that's at the most basic level. I mean, we know

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this is applied throughout physics, throughout every single field that

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>you can think of, in order for us to try

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to make sense and categorize our lives and predict future outcomes.

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Even chaos theory is an attempt to predict the unpredictable.

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the thing, though, and this is where math begins,

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>because we're not even really dealing with math yet. We're

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>dealing with numbers. We're dealing with with numbers. Since but

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>as we're navigating this environment around us, um, the the

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>higher the higher the math gets, the more the larger

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the numbers become, the harder it is for us to

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to to to process it like even um like humans

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are systematically slower to compute four plus five than they

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>are to compute two plus three. Like when I was

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>going over that in my notes, I could actually notice

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>it since I'm not good at math. I mean I

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>could actually feel the difference in in computing four place,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you could feel the brain power. Yeah. But but this actually,

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this is something that everyone experiences, everybody because we are

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>not evolved to do arithmetic, higher arithmetics, certainly not geometry

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>or anything. But I do think this is actually started

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>looking through some information about autism UM, in particular savants

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and ten percent of autistic population is savant, by

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, and estimated one percent of non autistic population

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is a savant. But when you think about that, and

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the reason I bring it up is because it's clear

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in those instances that the brain is working at a

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>much higher cognitive function level than than what we would

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>normally be used to, right. So that's why you've got

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>someone like Daniel Talmot. He's an autistic savant UM And

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>from the Guardian article Genius explains Talmont, they say that

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Talmot broke the European record for recalling pie the mathematical

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>constant to the furthest decimal point to twenty two thousand,

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and fourteen decimal places. He yes, I mean,

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm saying, and we most of us

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>can just say three point one, four and then yea

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>two decimal points right right. Um, So he says that

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>he found it easy because he didn't even have to think.

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>To him, pie is an abstract set of digits. It's

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a visual story. Um. It's almost like a film projected

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in front of his eyes. So in that case, we

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>know that he has a brain that is hardwired for

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thinking. Um, and this really complex level. Right.

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But even he, even someone is is gifted uh for numbers,

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>UM has has to turn to an outside system. They

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have to augment their their number since even if it's

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly phenomenal one And that's where mathematics begins to play. Well, actually,

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>even before mathematics really becomes into play, we have we

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was we've discussed in our five Fingered Evolutionary podcast. We

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>start using our fingers. That's why we are so much

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of our our number system is based on us on

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>units of five, tune or twenty, because that's what the

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>tools that we had. It's like, you know, you can

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>easily imagine this ancient and you know, prehistoric individual doing

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>mathemis like, well goodness, I'm having a hard time processing

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers beyond like three or four in my head, What

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>can I turn to to help me? Oh, look at

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>these things? And uh, and you know, starts using his fingers,

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>starts using his toes. From there starts using other things rocks, twigs.

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh and before long you have a an emerging mathematical system.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, and that's why we have these like ten

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>based twenty based mathematics decimal system or the other twenty

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is of vegesimal system twenty base right. Yeah, even our

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>even our numerals um, like the the Phoenician symbols that

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>are number numbers are are based on those were in

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>their original archaic forms, which are our current system is

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>derived from. If you look back at the the the

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>ancient versions of it, the number um, you could tell

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>what the number was by the number of angles in

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the symbol. I remember this from your article how math works. Yeah,

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of it doesn't stack up because like

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>our nine is a lot different from the the ancient

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Phoenician nine. Take the number zero. Zero zero has no

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>angles in it because it is nothing. The numeral one

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>has one angle in it, right because it is one.

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Two has two angles in it in the arcade version,

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. So that that's that's fascinating. But that's another

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>example of of you know, the human brain can only

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>do so much and you have to build outward. It's

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 1>like that the trailer that one is building onto and

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>creating all these additional rooms. Um, we're the trailer and

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we've begin building the system and out from ourselves to

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>help us to better compute the world around us. Well.

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And again it's this idea of symbols and abstraction, which

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is pretty fascinating, right because math becomes something that's much

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>more than just you know, trigonometry or even one plus one.

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It is a system of symbols that we use to

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, extrapolate our existence in a sense. But I

0:10:58.240 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>did I didn't want to talk a little bit about

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>pattern recognition. I know we've already brought it up, but

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to say a little bit more about the

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>brain and the fact that we're pretty much pattern recognition machines. Um.

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you all have all these causal connections

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>between A and B. And this is from a Scientific

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>American article called Turn Me On, dead Man. We can

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about that TI if you want to. Um, But

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>they say that as when our ancestors. Uh so, the

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>causal connection between A and B are like when our

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>ancestors associated the seasons with the migration of game animals.

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>We are skilled enough at it to have survived and

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>passed on the genes for the capacity of association learning.

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So again, what we're doing is attributing some sort of

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>symbol to these associations, these patterns that we see to

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>document our world and try to navigate it in a

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>better way. Yeah, And I mean that's why pattern recognition

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is one of the pillars of artificial communication. Yeah, I mean,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I um, that's and that's why pattern

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>recognition is one of the pillars of artificial intelligence, like

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 1>being able to instill that in a machine, which incidentally

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is essentially made out of math. Yeah, right, And because

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a type of communicating right um. And

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and AI we know was sort of based on the

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>way that we think, right um. And even I was

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking even like morse code, something like the sort binary code.

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>These are again attempts to communicate ideas, um. And there's

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this idea that that math is fundamentally universal. Right, So

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what you end up with is basically a tower of mathematics,

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>which we're going to discuss, right after this quick break.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>This presentation is brought to you by Intel Sponsors of Tomorrow,

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're back a tower of mathematics. Now, hang with

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>me on this particular analogy, um, which I came up

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with for the out Stuff Works article how Math Works,

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a broad, um, you know, a broad look

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at what math is for generally, you know, for people

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>who are not super into math. It's you know, more

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>about the philosophy of and what it is and the

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff we're discussing here. Um. I was really

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>proud of this analogy until I realized that other people

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>had also developed it years before. Your intuition, your pattern recognition, right, yeah, exactly, So, yeah,

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you can think of math is this tower that we've built.

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Imagine a human standing on a plane, all right, a

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>big grassy plane. He can only see so far he

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>or she he, I don't know, she whatever, whatever the gender,

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>This human can only see so far. Given there there

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>their natural born height and the site. Now, if they're

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>going to see better, they're gonna want to climb on

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>top of something, right, climb a tree or something. There

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>no trees around, so they need to build something, and

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they build a tower, all right. So and in this analogy,

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the natural born height equates to one's natural born limited

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>mathematical abilities. And then the tower that we build is

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the system of mathematics. Each level of the mathematical tower

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>enables humans to see farther and achieve more UM. And

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>this this tower like just as a structured you know,

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>physical tower is built of materials and systems. You know,

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you would you would, you know, have the guys bring out,

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, some stone for it, some woold et cetera.

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And then you have you know, you probably need plumbers,

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>electricians and other various uh specialists. I'll come out to

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>build the systems that make up the tower. Well, our

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>tower of mathematics would be made of of integers, would

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>be made of rational numbers, irrational numbers, complex numbers, um,

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>real numbers, and these are explained in that article that

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I reference to how math works. You would also have

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>such systems as arithmetic, algebra, geometry, trigonometry, calculus. Uh. In

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>each of these you can think of as a different

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>level of complexity. Yeah, building block building on the last.

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And the higher the tower gets, the more humans are

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>able to achieve to they you know, they reached the

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>point where they're able to use mathematics to better navigate

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the physical world. They're able to use it to better

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>navigate and understand the world beyond our planet, to build

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>artificial machines and artificial intelligences, and create the computer world

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that we have today. All of these things become possible

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>by building building this tower, working on the backs of

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>other geniuses, as we can sending on the shoulders of giants, right.

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's really interesting, even like you're talking

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>about using this system to to get outside of ourselves, right,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to get outside of our our particular planet, our universe. Um.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And we can see that proven out through math managed

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>throughout history, right. And I was thinking at the very

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>basic level, and we began to understand, uh, you know,

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>pattern recognition in nature. You know, something like the Fibonacci sequence,

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>which you have an excellent article on as well. Um.

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And if for those who are not familiar with it,

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Fibonacci sequences essentially like a number wherein each number is

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that some of the previous two? Yeah, and they in

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this number sequence is not It's not like the secret

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>code of everything, like it doesn't it doesn't correspond with everything,

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>but it corresponds with the alarming number of things from

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>like propagation numbers in various uh uh species. You know,

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the number of rabbits for instance of the classic example,

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>like if you can predict how many rabbits will be born, right,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and how the population will grow based on that growth

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>points and trees, pedal counts, sunflower seed arrangements. Uh. They're

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>just expressed in multiple ways in nature. And this is

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>called the golden ratio to write this number. Um. And

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>what I thought is when, of course, when us vain humans,

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>when we apply to ourselves, we can see it, right, Um.

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>We can see this um in the number of body

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>parts that we have, the way that our body parts

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>are arranged in spaced they all follow this golden ratio.

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's that aspect of math. You know that

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it it helps us understand the world. It helps us,

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>um predict things in nature that we haven't actually observed

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>yet or proven. Um. You know, certainly when it comes

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to things like dark matter. Well in dark matter is

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this problematic thing, right, um? And what I think is

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>interesting about math it's contribution to physics is that we

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>again we arrive at this understanding because we have this

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>universal language and many different uh, epochs of time, people,

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>cultures have all contributed to this. So we have this understanding.

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>But then you get to something like dark matter, and

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it is purely a result of math. And if I'm

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>understanding it correctly, our computational models of the universe weren't

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>really washing and it was cosmologists who finally figured, you know,

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>via math, that in order are for the mathematical models

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to make sense, there had to be some sort of

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>matter not seen, known or measured really to us that

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>was occupying the space of the universe. And this is

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>dark matter. It's like an accountant looking at the books

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for a business and saying, hey, we've got some money

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>missing here. Somebody's embezzling, you know, But in this case

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the embezzler it's the universe itself, which apparently has the

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>right to embezzle. And then it's just figuring out, well,

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>what does that what where does this money go? What

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>is it paying for? Well? And I love this idea

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of dark matter um as an example of what what

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>are the limits of our knowledge? You know? What's noble

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>because it's still very much a mystery, but now it's

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a known mystery, right, It's a known quantity of mystery

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and um. It furthers us to the edge of understanding,

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>just as the theory of relativity did and every other

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>mental constract that helped us to define something like say,

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics that now we are beginning to use in

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a very concrete way, right Like you've got the Hadron

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>large clider, and we're hoping to answer some really fundamental

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>questions about physics through that. Here's the other thing about math.

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Look back through the history books and show me one

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>war that was waged over disagreements about mathematics. You know.

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like, mathematics is the is like the one

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>thing that we have where everybody's like like, yeah, yeah,

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>we can agree. I mean, you can get into disagreements

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>about certain things with with mathematical theory or mathematical philosophy,

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you'll have scholarly debates and I'm sure

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>in some cases some bitter rivalries among math mathematicians. But

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, this is the thing that we

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we all understand and we can agree on. And while

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we may use it to uh, you know, to to

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>prove or or or dictate science, which can at times,

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>as we we know, can can become a little problematic

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and there'll be disagreements about things that are scientific,

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but the mathematics you cannot. You can all you can

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>argue with mathematics, but the reason behind it, the mathematics

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>itself is pure. It's an elegant system, right, and it's

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>not saddled with and I don't know, as far as

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, it is not saddled with um a

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the problems that we have culturally, right and

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in communicating, because it is universal. So in every single culture,

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this number system is going to represent the same thing

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>um and maybe just a little bit differently, but you know,

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly and where we are in history right now, it's

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>widely used. And so to your point, you know, it's

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>how can you sit there and argue about the following

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>equation when it is bearing out at least in theory.

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So we come to the inevitable, inevitable question about mathematics.

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about this, this thing that composes the tower

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>by which we achieved everything we've achieved. You know, our

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.719
<v Speaker 1>our culture, also our science, everything rests on it. Our

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>ability to command as much of the physical world as

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we seem to be able to command. It comes down

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to mathematics. So is this something that we created. Did

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>we create something that that that that that corresponds to

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the natural world so well that it allows us to

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 1>control it. Or is it something that we discovered. Did

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we discover, you know, in Galileo's words, the language of God,

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the language of the universe. Is this? Is it a

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>human creation or a human discovery? Now? Both both possibilities

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>are equally awesome and and humans wind up looking pretty

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 1>good both equations because because either we're just you know,

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>either we are just so awesome that we created something

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that that the universe corresponds to and and unlocks the

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>hidden mysteries of the universe, or we discovered like we

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like under uncovering the bones of God in your

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>backyard and saying, look what I found. It enables me

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand And it was always there, whether or not

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 1>you noticed, right, whether or not. That's the other way

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of looking at it. Does math exist independently of humans? Like,

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is a planet out there that we've never we we

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>don't even know about, we haven't heard, we haven't discovered,

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we haven't been there. Does math exist there? Okay, So

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that's where I see parallels with like the Copernican principle, right,

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 1>which basically says that humans are not privileged observers of

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe, Like the universe is going to sit out

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>there and exist regardless of whether or not our gaze

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is directed at the universe, which I think is pretty interesting.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you know, math is inherently on

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the one on that one side existing and it's for

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>us to discover. On the other hand, the human brain,

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously has obviously developed to a point where it

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>is hardwired to make these observations, right, Like we know

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>that the neo cortex is a new thing for at

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>least the mammalion brain. It was lumped on there on

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on top of the reptilian brain, and it deals with

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>these higher cognitive functions um like spatial reasoning, like logarithmics.

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of a chicken egg proposition to me, Yeah,

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and uh and and as will continue to discuss here,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:08.479
<v Speaker 1>you can you can sort of go with both sides. Now,

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>my power analogy definitely sort of lends itself more to

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we build something and it's a human creation.

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>But but on the other hand, is was pointed out

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to me by actually by a DJ by the name

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of the d J Eric, who actually is a has

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a PhD in mathematics. I've interviewed him recently on the blocks.

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>You can look that up. But he pointed out that

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>U two hydrogen atoms floating beside two other hydrogen atoms,

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>can still be called four hydrogen atoms, regardless of you know,

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I fear on Earth in another galaxy that there there

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is a there is a there's a number system at

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>work in the universe, just an inherent intrinsic number system. Yeah.

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>To to actually throw in, uh, you know, the words

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of to invoke the words of Plato, who and this

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>is actual Plato, not a DJ named Plato, um argue.

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>He argued that method is this is a discovery system,

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>discoverable system that underlines the structure of the universe, all right,

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, the universe has made a math,

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>and the more we understand this vast interplay of numbers,

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the more we can understand nature itself. So math exists

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to the observer. But then you know, then the of course,

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the other side again is that math is a man

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>made tool, um, and that and that it's an abstraction

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's free of time and space and merely corresponds with

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Uh, and that and and not. It doesn't

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>always correspond, you know, completely, like a consider elliptical planetary orbits. Uh.

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>An elliptical trajectory provides astronoers with a close approximation of

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a planet's movement, but it's not a perfect one. Okay.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>See what I love about that is again you get

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>into this sort of gray area that yes, you've got.

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Math is an elegant uh thing unto itself. It's very straightforward,

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it's universal, and yet there it doesn't provide all the answers.

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>The mystery still remains the logistic theory. There are a

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>number of theories about this, which I'm not going to

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>mention all of them. But the logistic theory holds that

0:24:57.720 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>math is an extension of human reason and a lot

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>so again, it's the the idea, that's the system. It's

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>an extension of our our problem solving abilities, and it's

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>just the extension of that that allows us to candle

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>even larger problems. It's just an extrapolation of our own

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>cogitating minds. Okay, yeah, and then then there's the instant

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the intuitional theory, which defines math is a system of

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>purely mental constructs that are internally consistent. So the reason

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>math works so well is because it's internally consistent. That

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the system itself works well. And then it but it

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>happens to correspond to nature, So you're intuiting pattern recognition. Right.

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>The the extrapolation of of the intuitional theory and one

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that is less accepted as one called fictionalist theory, which

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>says that math is essentially a fairy tale. Uh success

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that are just scientifically useful fictions, which is uh. And

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>again this is an extreme version, but it helps eliminate

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>this whole idea of math is a human creation. It's

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of the idea that you have outgo biblical

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>for a second. So you have Jesus setting around on

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a log, right, I don't know why it's on a log,

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but he he's telling parables. Right. There are no like

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>fancy seats, right, and the parables that he's telling in

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>this situation, they're not true stories. Uh, there're you know,

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>some some story about someone's kind of like subs fables, right.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>The subs fables are not real stories. They didn't actually happen,

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>but there's a truth to them that that resonates throughout

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>human culture, you know. So it's kind of that idea

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of math. It's like math is an internally consistent story

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that is not true, but it's real. Okay. And and

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>did we talk about formalist theory yet, because I want

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that one and then and then I

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>want to sort of see if we can locate if

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's possible dark matter in one of these Okay, I

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know, just as like a little quiz for us,

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>which um, just a fun game. But the formalist theory,

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is from your article, argues that mathematics boils

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>down to the manipulation of man made symbols. In other words,

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>these theories propose that math as a kind of analogy,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>um that draws a line between concepts and real events.

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And I thought it was interesting because I began to think,

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>what is the line between art and math? Then, because

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 1>you're communicating through a system of symbols some sort of experience, right,

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>So I find I find that really fascinating for for

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that aspect of it. But I began to think about

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the fictionalist theory, and I'm begin to think about dark matter,

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and and I don't want to call it a fairy tale.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want anybody to to misconstrue that. But I

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>did think that if even though we've got the mathematical

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>model that sets one plus one equals too it is,

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it may not necessarily be a true statement, right, because

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still an unknowable quantity. It's still a mystery to

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>a certain degree. I don't know. Yeah, I think that's valid.

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>The when when you take this even farther though, you

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>get into question of okay, regardless of whether math is

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>something we created or discovered, like how far does it go?

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>What are the limits of mathematics? Um, there's a cosmologist,

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>contemporary dude by the name of Max teg Mark. Yes,

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he has a website and everything, so you know he's yes,

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>string theory guy. So this is the idea of of

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>math is the ultimate, like like, yeah, math is the

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>universe and math is the understanding of the universe, and

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and hey, we can probably figure it out in time. Well,

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fascinating because, uh, in the neuroscience field,

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to figure out a theory of the brain,

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>which is very similar to the theory of everything right,

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to figure out how the brain works,

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the one cohesive theory of the brain. But we know

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>because we've we've researched this before that there's the Blue

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Brain project, in which they're trying to re engineer the

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>human brain, essentially map it's one trillion synapses and to

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>get some sort of understanding of how it works, much

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like the universe. Because if what they're saying to what

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>they're proposing is that the universe is the brain, it

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is a construct of the brain. So let's just imagine

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that these these you know, side by side, they are

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>going down the same rails, and then within ten years

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we'd be able to answer this question. I mean, what

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>would we just vaporize with, you know, because we've we've

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>reached some sort of final end of the meaning you know,

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like the semantic apocalypse. Like we've discussed before, the

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>idea that if you explain the way the magic trick,

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>then it's no longer a magic trick, and that and

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we are the magic tricks. So um. Then but then

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>there's also something we call Godal's first incompleteness theorem, and

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the work of Austrian mathematician Kurt Godel, and

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>he basically said in this theorem that any theory that's

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>based on self evident but unprovable proofs is incomplete or inconsistent.

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So the the implication here is that um and and

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this is something that this is something that also this

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is what keeps us from vaporizing. Yeah. Yeah, So so

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>basically the idea here is that mathematics is inexhaustible. All right,

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>no matter how many problems we solve, we're inevitably going

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to encounter more unsolvable problems within the existing rules. Um

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So this would seem to discount the idea of of

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a of a theory of everything, because math is is

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this system that whether we created it or or discovered it,

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it goes on forever. It's like the how many to

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.239
<v Speaker 1>what decimal point can we carry out pie? Uh? You know,

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you can carry it out to the billions, you can

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>carry it out to the trillions, But can you carry

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it out to the end. No, because it's infinite, because

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>there is no end. Well, but that's what's so interesting too.

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if the Blue Brain Project does have

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>some sort of breakthrough about our understanding of the hum

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>mbringing and if string theory begins to prove itself out

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in a more concrete way, then does it just spiral

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>other questions that we need to answer into the you know,

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>into the effor um or you know, which is probably

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the case, right. I don't think it just closes down

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>our understanding and we finally say we are complete, we

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>know it all. Yeah, it's like we get new you know.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like it's like life. You you solve one problem,

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be another one. You. You know, if

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you're you see that one item in the store, that

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>one game, that one book you you know you really need,

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and you finally get it, and it's just gonna be

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.239
<v Speaker 1>another one you you end up setting your heart on.

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, and at the end today, it's not going

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to actually make me become a scrabble champ. I don't think.

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe maybe we could take some theories

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of the brain and in some string theory and we

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>should do something of scrabble. Sometimes it's pretty yeah, word

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>freaking well, Hey, there you go. So that's math. Um.

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, from a very broad level, it's like like

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>math is a city and we're flying over it at

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a fairly high altitude and trying to make out as

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>much as we can of it through the clouds. That's right,

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we're we're just tourists of math cool. I have a

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of listener mail here for us and nonmath related,

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>because it would be impossible for someone to respond to

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that you just record. I don't know, multi

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.239
<v Speaker 1>versus maybe stream theory um. This first one comes from

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a listener by the name of Peyton, and Peyton says, hey,

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Julie, this is Peyton from Hendersville, North Carolina.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I lived just up the road apiece from you guys

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta. Actually it's more it's about three hours away.

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to say that I enjoyed the Nuclear

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Fallout podcast and it actually reminded me of a very

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>funny episode of The Office from a few years ago.

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>It was the one where Pam's old boyfriend Roy comes

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>into the office and attacks Jim. Fortunately, Dwight quickly Pepper

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>sprays him, and everyone in the office has immediately bent over,

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>coughing and rubbing their eyes. A similar thing would happen

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in the case of a nuclear strike. It's true that

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>only one concentrated area would receive the full destruction of

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the bomb, but its effects would be felt all over

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the world. Just that i'd share the analogy with you guys,

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>keep up the great podcast. So, yeah, this is the

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>example he's he's bringing up here is a small application

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of um of fluid dynamics. The way um these particles

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of pepper spray, uh, particles of pepper or whatever would

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>would distribute through a closed environment in moving air and

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>moving fluid and then nuclear fallout. As we discussed in

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the previous podcast, A lot of that depends on you know,

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>how is how is air, how is this fluid moving on,

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, around the globe, in a local area, in

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>an urban environment, et cetera. I just like the fact

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that in this analogy, Dwight, it's kind of like the

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>enriched uranium. I think that's appropriate. Yeah, we received another

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>one here. This is from Eric, and Eric writes in

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>about the dog podcast that's my dogs really loved me

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that we did and uh, actually he's responding to an

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>email with most of respond he's actually responding to a response.

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>He says, he says, Hey, you had an email from

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a dog owner who felt that maybe his dog had

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Stockholm syndrome, having adopted more than one rescue dog. I've

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>noticed many dogs who have been abused are very skittish

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>at first, but when they realized they will no longer

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:12.959
<v Speaker 1>be a hit, they showed quite a lot more love.

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>My current dog than Austie, named Ghost, was very skittish

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 1>at first. If you reached down to give him a rub,

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>he'd always he'd always flinch. Uh. He was also always

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>very skittish around new people. We started having all the

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>HouseGuests give him a treat when they arrived. Last week,

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>while walking him off leash, we came upon another couple

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>walking their dogs. Ghost walk right up to them for

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a rub. Personally, I think this this person's dog was

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>simply afraid of him at first, but soon realized his

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>new owner was okay. Uh. It's something whether there's an

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>account of dogs. I don't know if it's love, but

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you know it certainly it shows that dogs are able

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 1>to get over trauma a lot easier to humans. Yeah.

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 1>But do you think Ghost has something to do with

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>with maybe being a most skittish I mean the names Ghost.

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>He occured to send us a picture but did not.

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, you know, questioning the existence of the dog. Yeah,

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>or even that the name choice. I'm just wondering, don't

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>ever know what dogs really understand. I think i'd be

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a little skinnish if I was name ghost I did.

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a lot to put it on the

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 1>naming of the dog, I know, but still I have heard, um,

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I have heard the argument that the name you give

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the dog does have a huge play a role in

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>how that dog is, Like it's just about like how like, um,

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I forget which dog expert this was, but they pointed

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 1>out that if you have a big, scary pit bull

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and you name it Kujo, then you're already, as you know,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>ascribing a certain energy to that animal, you know, and

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:43.399
<v Speaker 1>uh and and you're like, I'm just a subconscious level,

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you're already making the dog the scary thing that you're

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be submissive to. And is is you know,

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe not your friend, that's the so psychologically on the

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 1>part of that the person who's perceiving the dog, right,

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's kind of I don't know if it actually

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 1>crosses up like human names as well, because you've heard

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like if you if you name a child like Eggberg

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>or something, it's not really a name like Cuban Hubert

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>or Hubert. That's kind of you're kind of setting them

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.280
<v Speaker 1>up to be, you know, a bookish nerd, I guess.

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And if you're kind of call them brutus or something,

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>then there they've kind of been. They're kind of destined

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to be on the football team, right, unless they're taking

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of like classical like antiquities interpretation from that,

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know. Yeah, it's certainly not the

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>only factor. But you know, you wonder to what extent

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're you're forecasting their their future. You're gonna

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have to check in with Apple in a couple of

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>years see how that's working for her. Gwyneth paultrows kid, right,

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Yeah, that's all I got. All Right, Well, hey,

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>if you guys have anything to share with us, you

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>want to check out what we're into. You can find

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>us online. We are blow the Mind on both Twitter

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook, and do check out how stuff Works dot com.

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>You can find that math article we talked about, um,

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>how math works. You can find the Fibonacci of Nassis

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>numbers article, and uh, there's also some really cool stuff

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>about fractals. Right, Yeah, we have an incredible Fractal Image Gallery, um,

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 1>which is I mean, if you would like to see

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>math is interpreted in in these um incredible figures, then

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you should check that out. It's on our homepage and

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely worth a look. Um. It's not something that

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we were able to get to today, but Mandel brought

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 1>set one of the fractals is just amazing. Yeah, and

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we and if you don't know what fractals are, guess what.

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>They have an article about how fractals work as well,

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's excellent. And yeah, if you want to drop

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>us line, please do so at blow the Mind that

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>has to Works dot com. For more on this and

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics, visit how stuff Works dot com.

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.760
<v Speaker 1>To learn more about the podcast, click on the podcast

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>icon in the upper right corner of our homepage. The

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works iPhone app has a ride. Download it

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>today on iTunes