WEBVTT - Ruth Porat

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, tech stocks really have had a bit of

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a rough time lately. But some of them, you know,

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it, even after the recent folatility,

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>will you know, there's still up a lot some of them, Yeah, Denis.

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And take Google's parent Alphabet for example. It's come down

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>from its highs for the year, but people invested in

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet at the start of the year still aren't exactly

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>losing money. Yeah. And David Rubinstein had a chance to

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>talk with Ruth poor At on the David Rubinstein Show

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Peer to Peer Conversations about the company, and he starts

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>here by asking her how business has been during the pandemic.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's listen in So during this period of time, Google

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.639
<v Speaker 1>has done quite well, Alphabet has done quite well. Your

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>stock is up but more than this year, and I

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>should say from the time you became the CFO, the

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>stock is up about over and the market caps over

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>So done quite well under your leadership. But I'm curious

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>or more people looking at doing searches now during this

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen period of time than ever before, or the

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>people not spending as much time searching. I know people

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>are spending a lot of time searching. We have trillions

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of searches every year pre COVID post COVID. It's really

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the nature of searches the change. And so early in

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, people really migrated to shifting for information about

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the disease. What they needed to know is all information

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>about COVID. You then saw people shift to Okay, how

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.279
<v Speaker 1>am I going to live my life in a COVID world?

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And so more things that more how to search is

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? On? How do I cook? What

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>do I do? And meditation wellness. It was really moving there.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Now you're seeing people moving back into more um commercial

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>activities and I think one of the big surges that

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw was how can I how can I help

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in my community? How can I help others? And it's

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>always really quite inspiring to see through search how people

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>are feeling about the world. So most of your employees

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>are still working remotely? Is that correct? So we moved

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody to remote work from home, all d and twenty

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand of us. But as countries are opening up, we're

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>starting to move people back in. So, for example, in

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan we actually are about in places in Europe we've

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>been bringing some people back, but fundamentally we moved everybody

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to work from home. When you started working remotely, did

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you ever worry it would be a problem because you

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>have all these people, but you're technically very savvy. So

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>when we started the move to work from home, it

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>did seem daunting. I'm responsible for our crisis response and

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>put together a really strong governance around how do we

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>get people to move from home with a global team

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and then a regional team, and we were in sync daily.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>That worked really well. What we were most concerned about

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>was what would be the impact on productivity and wellness.

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Our chief medical officer, very early in the crisis said

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that more people would be affected by mental health issues

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>than actually the physical disease itself, So we focused on

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>those two and I think that was really important. The

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>other thing is Google is really about our people and

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the ability to to liver for users and communities because

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of our compute capacity. And one of the things we

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to worry about was our ability to to

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>really deal with the surgeon online activity. And that was

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>because of all of the investments over many years and

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>all of the testing for what could happen in a

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of crisis scenario. And I think it's an important

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>point because you can't solve the risk management issue in

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a crisis. You obviously need to solve

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it ahead of time, and that worked. So many companies

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>are saying, well, now that I've learned that my people

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 1>can work from home, maybe I don't need all these

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>people either in the office or I don't need all

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>these people. Is that your view? You don't need all

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the people you have, or you may not need them

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>all in the office. We believe that when people are

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>together that's a critical element for innovation. Collaboration helps support innovation.

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It's collaboration within teams, and it's collaboration across teams. It's

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>collaboration and its serendipity. So we do look forward to

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>having people back in the office. What we're looking at

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is the productivity lift you get if people have the

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ability to work from home some days be in the office,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in particular when the rest of their team or more broadly,

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>teams are in the office. And if you can save

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>people commute time, you have better access to talent. Because

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you're solving what people want in their personal life, it's

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>actually going to result in a better outcome. What that

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>means for real estate we're still figuring out. Early on,

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Google was well known for, among other things, Um, you've

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>got free food. Um, what about if you're working at

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>home you give them free food showing up by delivery

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>or somehow or how do they compensate for that? So

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing that. But you know, a lot of

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>people focus on food when really what we are trying

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to create have been trying to create is this fun, quirky,

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>magical campus. And so it's about more than just the

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>free food. It's the experience on campus. So what we

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>did when we moved everybody to home is we moved

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these sort of connecting the community um

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to a virtual delivery. And so for food, as an example,

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:51.679
<v Speaker 1>you can do a one on one session with a chef,

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you can do a cooking class. We took our fitness

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>classes and moved them to virtual fitness classes and even

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>some sort of goofy Google style ones like yoga with

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>your dog. What have you learned about yourself during this

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>period of time. One of the things that was actually gratifying,

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>if I can broaden that question, is what I saw

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>at Google and what I saw about my colleagues. And

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this has obviously been an extraordinary stressful time. UM. We

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>feel this responsibility because so many people are counting on

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>us for quality information, for the ability to stay connected.

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And what I saw was people really step up in

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful way, and that was inspiring. It's been an

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary time. UM. What I learned about myself is one

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of the positive elements of of this has been sheltering

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in place and having my kids who have graduated from college.

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>They're now back with us for at least a limited

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>period of time, and that's been remarkable in My husband

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and I have thoroughly enjoyed that. So some people say

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Google's of the world, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Amazon are too powerful. They have so much power in

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>our economy that it's not healthy. And you've been a

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>congressional hearings recently where your CEO testify. UM, what is

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>your response to the view that the technology companies are

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>becoming so dominant in our economy that it's not healthy.

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>We are very mindful of the fact that with the

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>scale of these company comes scrutiny, and that it's incumbent

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.799
<v Speaker 1>on us to engage with regulators and help them understand

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>what is it that we're doing that is of benefit.

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>How how are we providing better services at lower costs?

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Which is really indicative of the competitive nature of the

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>world in which we operate. We've got intense competition within

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the US, intense competitors outside of the US, and uh,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think this COVID experience, many companies and

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>individuals would not have been able to operate the way

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they did without the support and benefit from technology. But

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a fair question, and we're engaged constructively here

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and around the globe with regulators on it. You have

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred billion dollars of cash um on

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>your balance which a lot cash um. Why do you

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>need all that cash? Why not just div it ended out?

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Or are you going to use it for investments? So

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the second quarter we actually had

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a billion, but who's counting? So you're you're right. Um.

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>When I got to Google, there had been a longstanding

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>view that it was helpful to have cash because of

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the optionality it provided. And I think the question I

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>post was how much is too much and how much

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is too little? And can we actually try and um

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to mention that analytically and put together you know, the

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>data that led to a conversation about beginning a sherry

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>purchase program. And it started small, but we've now increased

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it five times in the last number of years. Um.

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.119
<v Speaker 1>The last one we just did in the second quarter.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>It's billion dollar authorization and I'm you know, so it's

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>been a journey and we've we've been increasing the return

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of capital. Um. You know, I've spent a big chunk

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of my career covering firms like Carlisle private equity firms,

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>so I do appreciate what an efficient capital structure looks like.

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is really trying to um get the balance.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about your background for a moment. How

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you came to be the CFO of Google Alphabet and

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>before that, Morgan Stanley. So where did you grow up? So?

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I was born in England, mostly grew up in Silicon Valley.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>My father was a Holocaust survivor Holocaust refugee. He escaped

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>from Vienna right after Crystal Knock when when he was

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a teenager, he was sixteen. He had no high school education,

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>he had no college education. Obviously. He escaped to Palestine

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and as soon as he could he enlisted in the

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>British Army fought under Montgomery. He was in the Two

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Battles of Alaman, and his view was that the only

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>way to find peace in a peaceful place was to

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>have a skill that people needed. So he decided to

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>teach himself physics while in the army. And he used

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to always tell us as kids that his fellow soldiers

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 1>would would tease him and say, you will die before

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you can ever use this physics. And his answer was

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>always if I die, I want to die. And educated

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>man and after the war he was one of the

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>lucky ones. Um. He was given a place at the

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 1>University of Manchester. He got a master's degree at PhD

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that's where I was born um, and then was given

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a position at Harvard. The only two places he ever

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>worked was Harvard and Stamford, and so we moved eventually

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to Silicon Valley, and that's where I grew up. So

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you went to Stamford undergrad I did, and did you

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>major in finance? I majored in economics and international relations,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and thought I would go off and be a lawyer,

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just like you. Okay, well you were smart not to

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>do that, but but you did go to Wharton NBA school, right,

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 1>and you've got an NBA from Wharton and you went

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to Wall Street. Well, when I actually went from Stamford

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to the London School of Economics to Wharton, I assumed

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I would be a consultant. When I started in business school,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I was convinced that what I wanted to do was

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>work with companies and helped them understand their problems. But

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>then I took a fascinating course and a great teacher,

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and he opened my eyes to this thing called Wall

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Street and mergers and acquisitions, and I got excited. So

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I went from completely convinced I was doing one thing

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to completely convinced the only thing I wanted to do

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>as mergers. When you went to Ultimate to Morgan Stanley,

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was it women? Far from it um? When I started

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley was seven, and so it was sort of

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Stone Age for um for any sort of sense

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 1>of what was the role of women in banking. In fact,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that general attitude was that those of us

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>who were there would get married, have kids and leave.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have the stamina. It was just a question

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of time. And I loved Morgan Stanley, I think more

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>instantly was the best of the best. But that was

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of the Ethos on Wall Street, and in fact,

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years into my career, I was working

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>on a deal and I was out with a partner

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and a client. I was pregnant with our first child,

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and the partner actually turned to the client said, Ruth

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>may come back after the first child, but there's no

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>way she'll come back after the second child. Unfortunately, the

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>client liked me a lot more than he liked this

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>partner and basically told him he was an idiot. But

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>that really made an impression on me, and the thing

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that was inspiring and helpful and critical in my career

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>as there were so many extraordinary men who really bet

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>on me help open doors. You know, I didn't know

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>at the time those were sponsors, but that's what they were.

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You became the CFO and at some point you're one

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of the most important people Morgan Stanley, and the US

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>government calls up and says, why don't you come and

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>work at the Treasure Department, a very senior position. Did

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you seriously consider doing that? Well? One of the most

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>meaningful parts of my career was in O eight when

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>two crisis, when UM Secretary Paulson asked me to lead

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a team to help him with um the housing the

0:11:55.160 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>booming housing crisis, and um UH spent the entire period

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>working on Fannie Mae and Freddie mac and then that

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>evolved into work on a I G. And I thought

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it was extraordinary to be able to use skills I

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>developed over decades that Morgan Stanley for something so important

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>for the country, So that to me remains one of

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the most meaning you're doing that as a employee of

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>as doing that. Okay, But Morgan Stanley also went through

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a crisis during that period of time. I'm sure you

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>remember it, where Morgan Stanley was close to maybe not

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>being able to survive, and then a Japanese investor said,

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll put in some money. It turned out that money

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>was at three times the stock price that you were

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>trading at, and people weren't sure whether the Japanese company

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Mitsubishi would show up. Were you ever in doubt that

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Mistsubishi would show up with that money. That was a

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>terrifying period of time. This series of events was there

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was the Lehman Brothers famous weekend, followed by a call

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I got from the Federal Reserve saying we had worked

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on we collectively had worked on the wrong thing. We

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>needed to focus on A I G. And asked me

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>to get back down to the Federal Reserve that Sunday evening.

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Um they said A I G would be out of

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 1>money by Wednesday. In fact, it was Tuesday when they

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>were out of money. And that's the point at which

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley was running into its own very severe liquidity crisis.

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley obviously prospered through the period of time. They survived,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and you did quite well. And then someday somebody called

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you up. I don't know who it was. Was it

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a headhunter? Was it somebody from Google saying we'd like

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you to be considered to be the CFO. UM. Were

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you surprised at that offer because you were a Wall

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Street person, you weren't a technology person. So actually it

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was a very different path to the question. I was

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Stanford board and had the opportunity to spend

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>some time with Bill Campbell, who was an iconic coach

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to so many people, to Larry to Sergeate, to Eric Schmidt,

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to Steve Jobs. And I left the board meeting and

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>went to his home and sat down with him to

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about life generally, and he started probing kind of

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 1>what next, what would I want to do? And um

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>my comment and was I didn't know. At some point

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I would want another chapter. But one thing I knew

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for certain is I would not leave Morgan Stanley at

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>CFO to be a CFO anywhere else. And for two

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>hours he kept kind of coming back to that strong assertion,

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of two hours he said, okay,

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>so you wouldn't leave to be a CFO anywhere else? Correct?

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm adamant correct, And he said that I have

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the perfect job. You should be the CFO of Google.

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And of course the two of us burst into laughter,

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and I said, well, that one I would do. And

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't believe it. I left his home and

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually believe it was real or that it would happen.

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And within a couple of hours he called and said,

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>go over to Larry Page's house and spend some time

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>with him, see if this works. Right. She went over

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to see Larry Page, and he said, guess what I

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>just heard about you? And I wanted you to be

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the CFO. So I had known him. I worked on

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the Google ipeo and had had different interactions through the

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Stanford board. We spent two hours. It was this broad

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>conversation fascinating, as Larry Page always is. I left again

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>not actually believing that it would happen, and quickly everything

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>came together. So you took the position. But now you're

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be breaking into another world where women are

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not that prominent. Was it harder break into the technology

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>world as a woman or as a harder break into

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the financial world as a woman? Well, when I broke

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>into the financial world, I was junior, and I think

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it's harder when you're junior then when you're coming in

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who's credentialed. But if the question were broadly's

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>which world is tougher, Wall Street or um Tech? You

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>both have evolved meaningfully since those days of the boys

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Club on Wall Street that UM we're so painful, and

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a much greater awareness that it's not

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>just the right thing to do to have diversity and

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>senior ranks throughout an organization, but it leads to better

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>outcomes UM and so I think that they're actually pretty similar.

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>The difference is there's it's a more collaborative environment um UM.

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>In tech, I would say a Well Street can be

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty rough, but the more testosterone filled place is

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street or Silicon Valley. Um, there's a lot of testosterone.

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>There's enough to go around. So when you get there,

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you're a fairly buttoned down CFO of Morganstown. That you're

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>very precise and so forth. Google is probably a less

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>precise place when you get there, right. That's they're making

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>so much money and not have to worry about every

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>little dollar. I guess, so, did you say we've got

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to change things, and that people say we don't want

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to change, we're doing well, or that people say, yes,

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we want to change. So throughout my career my view

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>has been if you actually anchor your points in data,

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it becomes very easy to engage people and what is

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the issue and what's the proper path forward. And one

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of the extraordinary things at Google is we have very

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>smart and very inquisitive people. So as I laid out

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever issue it is anchored in data, it engaged the conversation. UM.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I actually didn't find it to be discordant.

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I was really impressed with the view of yes,

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>throw in the new idea, well, let us understand what

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and why? Um, And it's you know, it's been a journey.

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So Alphabet, it is the parent company. You're the CFO

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of that. You're also the CFO of of Google. Google

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is the search engine, and that is still massively profitable

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>by anybody's standard. I assume, I don't know if you

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 1>like the word massive, but but it's profitable, right, it's

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>doing all right. What about cloud computing? Your number three

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in that business but catching up to I guess the

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>number one is Amazon, number two is Microsoft. But is

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that important growth engine as well? You think it's a

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>very important one. It's a sizeable market. We think, in

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>very very early innings, UM, the opportunity for businesses to

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>migrate to the cloud provides them with extraordinary added capabilities

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and they're looking to us, whether it's for security or

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>data analytics or a I that's what we're able to

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>do working with with customers. And you've really seen the

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>important migration to the cloud. So we're investing meaningfully in it.

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>We do see it as a sizeable opportunity. And one

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of your areas of focus at Google and Alphabet is

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>healthcare and health related UM, why is that such an

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>important focus, uh of the founders and you UH? In

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of healthcare? Why is that so important to you healthcare.

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We have the opportunity with technology to make a fundamental

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>difference in healthcare, in particular with AI, in a host

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of areas. For me personally, I'm a breast cancer survivor.

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I've had breast cancer twice. I've had gone through chemo twice, radiation,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>more surgery than than one could imagine. And I view

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>myself as one of the really lucky ones. I was

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>here in New York City when I was first diagnosed.

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I was treated at Memorial slum Cattering. I had the

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>best care, and here I am healthy, as healthy as

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I've ever been. Not everybody gets that, that break and

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that a year two ago. Um I remember when our

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>AI engineers had a breakthrough in early stage detection of

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>metastatic breast cancer with AI, which struck me as precisely

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that is transformative. And there is

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>so much debate in the world about whether AI is

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a positive or not, and I wanted to make sure

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I got an objective, non tech view of this. So

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I called my oncologists to ask whether I was reading

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this the right way, and it really had the impact

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I expected, And his answer was, you cannot democratize healthcare

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 1>without AI. So we look at this as this opportunity

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to democratize healthcare, to provide service, to identify diseases earlier,

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to do things like telehealth that enables everybody to get

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the kind of care that I was able to have.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm passionate about it. Now, somebody's watching this

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>man or a woman says, all right, she's a leader. Um,

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>she must have some qualities that I would like to

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>know about more. What are the qualities that you think

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are important to be a leader. So I think one

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of them is it's very important to be able to

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>make clear decisions anchored and data. It's the way you

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>can build support for the ideas. Is the way you

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>can know where to double down on great opportunities for

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the long term where you should be pulling back. So

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>it starts with data analytics. I think the other is

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>integrity and building a culture that makes it really clear

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that you expect the highest quality, performance and integrity at

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>all times from your people. UM. I would say that

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that the other is making it really clear that you

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>want diverse views, that you build a diverse team, and

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>that you're open to UM not only open, really expect

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>diverse views and debate. Uh you know. To me, I've

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>often been asked how do I think about rising stars?

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And my answer is I want someone who's in my face.

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I want somebody who challenges me. And I think creating

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>an environment where there's that open to discussion is really

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>um is really important. So some people say it's very

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult for women to have it all, but you seem

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to have it all. So what's the secret to having

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it all? And is it is harder than people would

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>think or is it easier than people would think. I

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>think it depends on how you define having it all.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I've often been asked about work life balance. I think

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>that is a horrible term and everybody should banish it

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>from their vocabulary because getting balance, just the physics of

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>it are hard. To me, the most important thing is

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to find a mix in life that works for you.

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>And so for me, it's been an incredible career. I

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of joy and energy out of what

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing, and then I have an amazing family. I've

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>been married to an extraordinary man for ever. We have

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>three wonderful kids. And for some people it may not

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>be kids, but it's got to be something other than work,

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's finding a mix. So sometimes you may be

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>more heavily focused on work, other times more heavily focused

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on family. In that mix changes throughout your life. To me,

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that's been the most important element of it. And I

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>would say I get very concerned when I hear women

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>have a plan, a plan on when you're gonna sequence

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>each step along the way. And I would say, in particular,

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>when I had cancer and didn't actually know what was

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>going to come, I was able to look back on

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>my life and say I have no regrets. And you've

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>been listening to Ruth poor atte cfo at Alphabet on

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the David Rubinstein Show Peer to Peer Conversations