Speaker 1: All right, Happy Friday, and we're glad you are with us.
Speaker 1: Right down our toll free telephone number. It's eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one, Sean. You want to be a
Speaker 1: part of this extravaganza. Wow, what a rally the president
Speaker 1: had last night in Dallas. I guess it's a phenomenon
Speaker 1: that I don't think the mob in the media likes,
Speaker 1: or the mob will ever care to understand. There is
Speaker 1: a contempt there, and it's been on display now for
Speaker 1: a long time. You know, we can we can break
Speaker 1: it down into smelly Walmart Trump supporters or irredeemable deplorables
Speaker 1: or bitter angry people that cling to God, I'm guilty God, Bibles,
Speaker 1: religion and they believe in the Second Amendment. Wow, I mean,
Speaker 1: there is this what condescension from a bunch of elitist
Speaker 1: right you think about that? It's so condescending and the
Speaker 1: president shows up. I mean, one of the funniest things
Speaker 1: I thought the President did last night is when he said,
Speaker 1: I you couldn't be presidential. The new Walks are on
Speaker 1: the stage and New York's all presidential the way people
Speaker 1: expect an establishment president to look like. I think one
Speaker 1: of the reasons we are where we are is Donald
Speaker 1: Trump has been a shock to the system. And many
Speaker 1: of you own a pool out there. You know, when
Speaker 1: the pool season starts after a long winter, you got
Speaker 1: to shock the pool, and by shocking, dump a bunch
Speaker 1: of chlorine in there, and you know, then it cleans
Speaker 1: up all the crap that grew in there over the
Speaker 1: winter and you go from ugly water to beautiful water.
Speaker 1: Not that you want to swim in right away. You
Speaker 1: might want the chlorine to dissipate a little bit before
Speaker 1: you finally dive in or jump in. And I think
Speaker 1: that's what Donald Trump represents. You know, people who had asked, well,
Speaker 1: they don't understand how did he win? How did Hillary lose?
Speaker 1: And you could take it back further because they're a
Speaker 1: Republicans still in that camp. Mitt Romney probably the worst
Speaker 1: of everyone now and he just cannot understand how it
Speaker 1: is that he lost in twenty twelve. That was a
Speaker 1: winnable election in my view, lovely man. But they I
Speaker 1: think he forgets that. They still called him racist and
Speaker 1: a misogynist because he had women's resumes and he beat
Speaker 1: up kids and cut their hair in high school or something. Ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Whatever it was, they wanted him, they destroyed him. There
Speaker 1: was a period of time the media was always in
Speaker 1: love with the great maverick John McCain. And he ran
Speaker 1: for president and he was excoriated as a racist and
Speaker 1: called every other predictable name that every other Republican candidate
Speaker 1: it's always going to be called. And then when he
Speaker 1: started opposing Trump, they liked him again. They liked him
Speaker 1: a lot. And it's there's something about the swamp. It's
Speaker 1: America new Donald Trump. Donald J. Trump was a disruptor.
Speaker 1: You can see this. We saw it last night. You
Speaker 1: saw the overflow crowd. You see and hear an enthusiasm.
Speaker 1: This is Dallas, Texas. Now Dallas is everything. It's a
Speaker 1: perfect mix of Americana. It's cosmopolitan. It's got a big city.
Speaker 1: It's got big industry, it's got big business. It's got
Speaker 1: also on the outskirts. You're gonna find your ranches, your cowboys,
Speaker 1: you know, hard working Texans, work the land, et cetera.
Speaker 1: You're gonna find it all. But that is Americana. And
Speaker 1: then you want a big night out, You want to
Speaker 1: get dressed up, go to a nice, beautiful, big city.
Speaker 1: You got Dallas, Texas. It's right there. That's where you live.
Speaker 1: It's a perfect blend. But it's not DC, and it's
Speaker 1: not New York, and it's not La and it's not
Speaker 1: San Francisco. And that is where the country's biggest divide
Speaker 1: is now. The country had heard about Access Hollywood just
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks before the election. They absorbed it.
Speaker 1: American people are smart. American people also are comparing and
Speaker 1: contrasting the economy under President Trump versus Biden Obama. I've
Speaker 1: made that comparison many times. It's dramatic. Instead of thirteen
Speaker 1: million more Americans on food stamps, we have seven million
Speaker 1: fewer Americans on food stamps, eight million more in poverty,
Speaker 1: millions now out of poverty. You see these record we're
Speaker 1: almost a full full employment in this country, record low unemployment,
Speaker 1: the best since nineteen sixty nine. And you see that,
Speaker 1: you have record low unemployment for you know, the forgotten
Speaker 1: men and women, African Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, women
Speaker 1: in the workplace, youth unemployment. Get a lot of lip
Speaker 1: service from liberal Democrats about how Republicans hate them and
Speaker 1: they're racist and they're sexist, and they're misogynists and their homophobic, xenophobic, islamophobic. Actually,
Speaker 1: most Republicans I know are pretty libertarian. They don't really
Speaker 1: give a flying rip about people's personal lives. They just don't.
Speaker 1: We're too busy gulping water in our own life to
Speaker 1: care about what other people are doing. And it's just
Speaker 1: the fact they're too busy paying our taxes, trying to
Speaker 1: pay for the kids' school, pay for the car payment,
Speaker 1: pay for whatever college, put away for retirement. That's what
Speaker 1: people are doing every day. And so you have a
Speaker 1: disruptor and he comes in. He's so shocked the system
Speaker 1: that they can't handle it. It's like they've been short
Speaker 1: circuited in a way to the point where they've lost
Speaker 1: there to be a Democrat or a member of the
Speaker 1: mob in the media that hates him so much, you
Speaker 1: have to suspend all connection to objective truth and reality.
Speaker 1: They're not connected to reality now. There is just fixation, focus,
Speaker 1: psychotic rage. And I'm telling you this is real, and
Speaker 1: I bet a lot of them don't even know they're
Speaker 1: doing it. They delive in this little bubble in DC
Speaker 1: media circles, etc. I've seen it. You can go online
Speaker 1: and watch it. If you watch social media, you watch Twitter.
Speaker 1: They all tweet each other and retweet each other and
Speaker 1: try and outdo each other, and they're all listening only
Speaker 1: to each other. And they actually, I guess in their
Speaker 1: own minds. I don't know. I think some of them
Speaker 1: have just corrupt ideologues and I just just rabbit socialists
Speaker 1: that want this country to you know, they believe in
Speaker 1: this climate change hysteria, and they believe in socialism, and
Speaker 1: they want they hate capitalism, and they believe in redistribution,
Speaker 1: and they believe that the government can handle every need
Speaker 1: and we don't need oil and gas and or a
Speaker 1: combustion engine. And you know, I mean they're out of
Speaker 1: their minds because that vision will fail on such a
Speaker 1: spectacular level. I don't know how we'd ever recover. I
Speaker 1: don't know if. I don't even know if it's possible.
Speaker 1: Because that's the alternative that will be the choice this
Speaker 1: election year. Radical extreme socialism, the New Green Deal, medicare
Speaker 1: for all, no private insurance, wealth taxes that will push
Speaker 1: every rich person out of the country. They'll leave. And
Speaker 1: if you doubt it, look what's happening to New York, California,
Speaker 1: New Jersey and Illinois. They're leaving next stop out of
Speaker 1: the country, and they'll take their money with them. Most
Speaker 1: people that I know that have made money on their own,
Speaker 1: not inherit money, but made their own money. Most of
Speaker 1: them made it by being pretty smart and working pretty
Speaker 1: darn hard. I don't know these people that grew up
Speaker 1: with the trust funds. I don't know who they are.
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you they're not going to take legalize,
Speaker 1: stealing or ninety seven point five percent of what Bernie
Speaker 1: wants to confiscate. They're not going to take it. And
Speaker 1: so we find ourselves that they now couldn't get over
Speaker 1: the election results. They couldn't get over four separate investigations
Speaker 1: that exonerated the president from this stupid conspiracy theory hoax
Speaker 1: of collusion in Russia, Russia, Russia, and so now they
Speaker 1: just they've now created their secret Soviet style, you know,
Speaker 1: impeachment who attempt How is it possible that Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: won't allow a vote as by the way, as has
Speaker 1: happened in every modern impeachment inquiry Nixon Clinton, they had
Speaker 1: a vote the entire House on the in whether they'll
Speaker 1: have an inquiry. If Nancy does that, well, That would
Speaker 1: mean a lot of things would change, and that would
Speaker 1: define They would have to define the full house, the scope,
Speaker 1: the rules, the procedures. Right now, everything's behind closed doors.
Speaker 1: And I'm telling you because I have a lot of sources,
Speaker 1: nothing is working out for them behind closed doors. Yesterday
Speaker 1: I heard was a disaster. What's his name, Sonderland went
Speaker 1: in there. You know. Then they'd have to equal grant
Speaker 1: coeequal subpoena power to the chair and the ranking member
Speaker 1: on the committee level. They don't want to do that,
Speaker 1: you know. If they did it the right way, they
Speaker 1: would be required that all subpoenas be subject to a
Speaker 1: vote of the full committee at the request of the
Speaker 1: chair of the ranking member. In other words, what Newt
Speaker 1: allowed to happen in Clinton's appeachment. And they would provide
Speaker 1: the president's counsel, Yeah, he has due process rights in
Speaker 1: this also that president's counsel would have the right to
Speaker 1: attend all hearings and depositions. The president's counsel would have
Speaker 1: the right to present evidence. The president's counsel would have
Speaker 1: the right to object to admitting certain evidence. The president's
Speaker 1: counsel would get the right to cross examine witnesses, the
Speaker 1: president's counsel would get the right to recommend a witness list, etc.
Speaker 1: Now by them not doing this, they're now acting in
Speaker 1: a all this illegitimate fashion. That's why I call it
Speaker 1: a secret Soviet Union style impeachment coup attempt, because this
Speaker 1: is the stuff of Yeah, like the former Soviet Union,
Speaker 1: this is the process I would expect to go on there,
Speaker 1: not here. Democrats have a secret Soviet style impeachment coup
Speaker 1: attempt against Donald Trump. It's only the latest. I played
Speaker 1: you the montages again and again. They started this impeachment
Speaker 1: garbage two days after he was elected. Yesterday was another
Speaker 1: closed door disaster. If the public was seeing this, the
Speaker 1: public would demand that it all stop. And they know that, Well,
Speaker 1: look at the poles show. I have talking points that
Speaker 1: the DCC puts out. Oh the pole show that this
Speaker 1: is a should know what the American people want. Every
Speaker 1: pole I've read so far is slanted towards Democrats, every
Speaker 1: one of them. And then you got the mob they're
Speaker 1: hyperventilating yesterday over Mick mlvan's probab little harsh On mc mulvaney.
Speaker 1: He served in the country. When I finally got to
Speaker 1: look at the whole thing. It was not what the
Speaker 1: medium mobs said, and they had isolated, you know, one
Speaker 1: phrase over and over again, and that was not what
Speaker 1: he was saying. And said that's even frustrating too, because anyone,
Speaker 1: you know, everyone who already thought this case against Trump's impeachment,
Speaker 1: the Soviet style impeachment, coup attempt, you know, go berserk.
Speaker 1: Yesterday mulvaney. You know, what he admitted is that the administration,
Speaker 1: what they were doing was pushing a foreign government to
Speaker 1: cooperate and getting to the bottom of foreign interference in
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen campaign. That's why I read again from
Speaker 1: the transcript yesterday crowdsource. He was asking about twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: election interference, not about Joe Biden, his future potential rival,
Speaker 1: and it's there in plain sight. We don't even need
Speaker 1: a non whistle blower, was not a whistleblower who got
Speaker 1: instructions apparently from Shifts people and his friends with Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: We don't need that person, No one that they don't.
Speaker 1: You want that person to come out of the woodwork,
Speaker 1: because now that person's going to be asked real questions
Speaker 1: about who told you to get a lawyer? Who told
Speaker 1: you to go to the IG. Who are you working
Speaker 1: with in this endeavor? Oops? That would be the cowardly,
Speaker 1: sneaky liar schiff. And what's your relationship with Joe Biden? Oh,
Speaker 1: you've been supporting him for president? Oh okay? Oh and
Speaker 1: you didn't have any direct evidence, this is hearsay evidence. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that would come up too. Every media outlet is out
Speaker 1: there hyperventilating every day, and the hope and the prayer
Speaker 1: like they've been for three years, that they take this
Speaker 1: man out. They apparently don't want to straight up election.
Speaker 1: It's only a year from now. You think they think
Speaker 1: they could beat him, They don't. They don't believe they
Speaker 1: can beat him. And I'm telling you what's now likely
Speaker 1: gonna happen. These idiots are going to impeach him. The
Speaker 1: Senate's not going to convict him, and he's gonna it
Speaker 1: will so piss off this country rightly, So this will
Speaker 1: be a righteous indignation. What you saw last night in
Speaker 1: Dallas is a preview of coming attractions, because that's gonna
Speaker 1: be every city and every small town in America saying
Speaker 1: we've had enough of your bs and we are going
Speaker 1: to reelect them and shove it right up your nose.
Speaker 1: What's going to happen? As my prediction, I usually have
Speaker 1: a pretty good track record with predictions. They are helping
Speaker 1: Donald Trump not gonna feel like it every day. It's
Speaker 1: gonna feel like the way of the world. Let him
Speaker 1: do it. Go take the vote, do it. I say
Speaker 1: that all the Democrats go vote. I want to stay
Speaker 1: a little more focused on this whole issue of well, okay,
Speaker 1: if you're a part of the mob, and you're a
Speaker 1: part of the Democratic Party, how you emotionally and intellectually
Speaker 1: now have to cut yourself off from any objective ruth,
Speaker 1: any reason, any common sense now, because if you did,
Speaker 1: if you were to apply standards equally, you would not
Speaker 1: be able to read the transcript of the President's call
Speaker 1: with the President of Ukraine and come to any other
Speaker 1: conclusion than oh, they're talking about twenty sixteen, which yeah,
Speaker 1: political wrote about on January eleven, twenty seventeen, about Ukraine's
Speaker 1: election interference in twenty sixteen. You have to forget that
Speaker 1: that happened. And then the next thing you're gonna have
Speaker 1: to forget is Joe Biden on that little tape, you know, saying, oh,
Speaker 1: I said, you know, you got six hours, you fireman
Speaker 1: six hours? No fireman six hours. You're not getting the money.
Speaker 1: Guess what son of a bee they fired him? And then,
Speaker 1: of course Hunter's big interview this week, I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: over this. Imagine that was Vice President Donald J. Trump
Speaker 1: that said what Biden said, confessed what Biden confessed. Imagine
Speaker 1: it was Don Junior this week. What experience did you
Speaker 1: ever have in Ukraine? None? Oil none, gas none, energy none, okay,
Speaker 1: China none, okay. Anything to do with financial industry portfolios? None?
Speaker 1: And you got paid millions of millions of millions of
Speaker 1: dollars why? I don't know. I was on the board
Speaker 1: at Amtrak once. Okay. Do you think your last name
Speaker 1: had something to do with it? Yeah? Probably? Yeah, So
Speaker 1: they paid you millions of dollars. Why? Because they wanted
Speaker 1: to buy favor, that's the answer. Imagine if it was Trump,
Speaker 1: how would the mob react? All right, twenty five now
Speaker 1: till the top of the hour, eight hundred nine for one, Shawn,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: Dahi Caller has a great piece out. It's about Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: Now I would tell you that, I promise you if
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's name was Don Junior, and he gave the
Speaker 1: interview that Hunter Biden game. Don Junior gave that interview,
Speaker 1: and Don Junior one asked, Okay, do you have any
Speaker 1: experience with Ukraine? No? Any experience with China? No? Any
Speaker 1: experience with an oil gas energy, no, private equity. No.
Speaker 1: I didn't get anything from China, though, do you why
Speaker 1: do you think that they? Do you think your last
Speaker 1: name was? You know? Okay, well, I sat on a
Speaker 1: board of am Trap. Once will qualify him to be
Speaker 1: on the board of Amtrak. Anything will qualified him for that.
Speaker 1: Do you think your father's yeah, probably, yeah, it's probably
Speaker 1: my dad's last name. So why does Ukraine and China
Speaker 1: want to give the son of the vice President of
Speaker 1: the United States money? Millions millions of dollars? Why? And
Speaker 1: this gets to where if you're a liberal or part
Speaker 1: of the mob, you have to then you have to
Speaker 1: detach yourself from objective truth. You have to detach your
Speaker 1: reality away from the utter hypocrisy of what you do
Speaker 1: every day, and that's you only go after Trump. You
Speaker 1: can read the transcript. The transcript is what it is.
Speaker 1: And I'm like mulvanny didn't say there was a quid
Speaker 1: pro que. I should apologize to Mick. I was too
Speaker 1: hard on him yesterday. You know what, He's working hard
Speaker 1: for the country. It's just this is what the mob does.
Speaker 1: You just can't go out there. The lessons don't talk
Speaker 1: to the mob because they don't they don't want to hear,
Speaker 1: you know. And then we went through this whole thing. Um.
Speaker 1: You know, his claim that he hasn't gotten a penny
Speaker 1: in the China deal. Our friends at the Daily Caller
Speaker 1: actually found something very different. The son of former Vice
Speaker 1: President Joe Biden did receive over seven hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 1: in payments from capital management company called Rosemont Seneca, which
Speaker 1: obtained a twenty percent equity share in BHR Partners, the
Speaker 1: Chinese investment firm Biden remember this was ten days the
Speaker 1: billion dollars deal, ten days after he went to China
Speaker 1: on Air Force two with his father. He served on
Speaker 1: the board of BHR Partners. That they're the ones with
Speaker 1: the close ties to the Bank of China. Rosemont Seneca's
Speaker 1: you know, Morgan's Stanley Bank records are publicly available because
Speaker 1: they were submitted in an unrelated criminal case. The Daily
Speaker 1: Caller dug all this up and this point out that
Speaker 1: the records show that in each month between June of
Speaker 1: twenty fourteen and October twenty fifteen, Rosemont Seneca wired between
Speaker 1: ten thousand and one hundred and fifty thousand dollars to
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden for undisclosed purposes and totally got seven hundred
Speaker 1: eight thousand, three hundred and two dollars from Rosemont Seneca.
Speaker 1: And then during the seventeen month time frame in June
Speaker 1: of twenty fifteen, Rosemont Seneca obtained a twenty percent equity
Speaker 1: stake and this the Harvest st Chinese private equity firm
Speaker 1: that Hunter Biden has been a board member of since
Speaker 1: its founding. Right after the trip with his father, and
Speaker 1: he announced Sunday that he would resign from that position,
Speaker 1: and at the end of October, Rosemont Seneca held onto
Speaker 1: its twenty percent equity and BHR Partners until October twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: when its steak was split between two companies. According to
Speaker 1: Chinese business records, one of the entities that took a
Speaker 1: position or a portion of Rosemond Seneca in BHR Partners
Speaker 1: was called It's called I can't even say it's a
Speaker 1: neat least s k A N E A T E
Speaker 1: L E s LC, where Hunter Biden is one of
Speaker 1: two co directors according to business records. They still hold
Speaker 1: the ten percent equity stake in BHR Partners. According to
Speaker 1: Chinese business records, the other director is a guy by
Speaker 1: the name of Well, a longtime business partner of Hunter.
Speaker 1: Eric Sherwin is apparently his name, and BHR Partners currently
Speaker 1: manages the equivalent of two point one billion in assets
Speaker 1: and they boast of having the support of the Bank
Speaker 1: of China according to their own website. So when the
Speaker 1: lawyer for Hunter Biden went out and said, oh no, no,
Speaker 1: he hasn't taken his equity share yet. Yeah, that's when
Speaker 1: they did the math other people in the media and
Speaker 1: their figure is twenty million dollars he has coming to him.
Speaker 1: Here's the thing, why if he had no experience in
Speaker 1: China private equity that we can find and by his
Speaker 1: own admission and none and energy, none in gas, none
Speaker 1: in China, none in Ukraine, why would they be paying
Speaker 1: him millions? Why is he going to end up with millions?
Speaker 1: Is he getting paid fifty thousand dollars a month in
Speaker 1: the Ukraine case? Why? Well, because he says his last
Speaker 1: name is Biden. He said, well, when I asked that,
Speaker 1: probably probably in the list that you gave him of
Speaker 1: the reasons why you're on that board did not list
Speaker 1: the fact that you were the son of the course. Yeah,
Speaker 1: what role do you think that played? I think that
Speaker 1: it is impossible for me to be on any of
Speaker 1: the boards that I just mentioned without saying that I'm
Speaker 1: the son of the vice president of the United States.
Speaker 1: You were paid fifty thousand dollars a month for your position. Look,
Speaker 1: I'm a private citizen. One thing that I don't have
Speaker 1: to do is sit here and open my command as
Speaker 1: it relates to how much money and make or maker
Speaker 1: dealer didn't But it's all been reported. If your last
Speaker 1: name wasn't Biden, do you think you would have been
Speaker 1: asked to be on the board of Barisma. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't I don't know. Probably. I don't think that
Speaker 1: there's a lot of things that would have happened in
Speaker 1: my life that if my last name wasn't Biden. So
Speaker 1: probably not so. Ukraine is paying the son of the
Speaker 1: vice president, the second most powerful guy in the country,
Speaker 1: millions of dollars but no expertise whatsoever. Same in the
Speaker 1: China deal. Okay, what do you think Ukraine and China?
Speaker 1: Why would they do that? What do you think you
Speaker 1: Crane and China we're thinking about? I think and maybe this,
Speaker 1: and this is where I think is a liberal you
Speaker 1: have to suspend any connection to truth reality. You have
Speaker 1: to get rid of all reason, all common sense. And
Speaker 1: it comes down to, oh, maybe they wanted to have
Speaker 1: favorable treatment in a favorable relationship with sleepy, creepy crazy
Speaker 1: uncle Joe Joe three ze three. That would be what
Speaker 1: how would we describe that? Well? I think you know,
Speaker 1: it sounds a little bit like pay to play, buying access, cronyism,
Speaker 1: that site type of thing. Because if none of you
Speaker 1: listening to this program's child would ever have a shot
Speaker 1: at that board. Maybe even if your kid went to
Speaker 1: Harvard or Harvard Business School, or Yale or Princeton or
Speaker 1: Brown or wherever the kids go these days, I don't
Speaker 1: even know so many good colleges, right, you think? And
Speaker 1: that means yeah, they wanted to say, Hey, I hope
Speaker 1: they were hoping to get something for that money. Weren't they?
Speaker 1: Wouldn't that make the most sense. Well, if you're a liberal,
Speaker 1: you don't even pay attention to it. But if it
Speaker 1: was Don Junior and Donald J. Trump vice president, what
Speaker 1: would the medium mob be doing today? Do you see
Speaker 1: how corrupt they are? This is how corrupt they are.
Speaker 1: The President took every opportunity to spread unsubstantiated claims and
Speaker 1: attack his political enemies. Trump is referring to unfounded allegations
Speaker 1: that his vice president Biden tried to protect his son
Speaker 1: by stopping an investigation into the Ukrainian company that his
Speaker 1: son worked for. Biden and his son have denied all
Speaker 1: wrongdoing and there is no evidence of any and there's
Speaker 1: no evidence either Biden did anything wrong. But there's been
Speaker 1: no evidence of any wrongdoing but uncovered, no evidence, no evidence,
Speaker 1: no evidence, no evidence of doing by Biden. Rudy Giuliani
Speaker 1: claims without proof, unsubstantiated, unsubstant unfounded accusations against Biden. Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden did not violate anything, and there's no evidence Biden
Speaker 1: did anything wrong. And the President say talked about Joe
Speaker 1: Biden corruption. Of course, there's no evidence on the record
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden acted in a corrupt way at all,
Speaker 1: no evidence at all. The presence out there repeating it,
Speaker 1: and so is his attorney or Giuliani. Wow, unbelievable. Now
Speaker 1: I have another story by the Daily Caller to the
Speaker 1: Daily Caller gets a lot of credit today. They've been
Speaker 1: doing a lot of work and I think we need
Speaker 1: to start paying attention to it. And by the way,
Speaker 1: there was a State Department official. This was the Washington
Speaker 1: Post via National Review. Well, anyway, they point out a
Speaker 1: US State Department official told impeachment investigators, by the way,
Speaker 1: the secret Soviet style impeachment coup hearings that denies Donald
Speaker 1: Trump hall due process. He raised concerns about Hunter Biden's
Speaker 1: involvement in the Ukrainian gas company in twenty fifteen, telling
Speaker 1: one of then Vice President Joe Biden's staffers that the
Speaker 1: arrangement may constitute a conflict of interest. Even The Washington
Speaker 1: Post reported that Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent
Speaker 1: testified he word Ukrainian officials would use Hunter Biden's position
Speaker 1: at the company Baris Maholdings is an opportunity to influence
Speaker 1: His father, Ken said he tried to convey his opinion
Speaker 1: at Joe Biden's office, but a stafford told him the
Speaker 1: Vice president didn't have the bandwidth to address the issue
Speaker 1: because his other son was battling cancer. That was their
Speaker 1: answer at the time. Here's another thing, you know, you
Speaker 1: have to you have to look remember Russia collusion. But
Speaker 1: they didn't care about the dirty dossier. All the IE
Speaker 1: believers aren't there complaining about the real serious allegations of
Speaker 1: rape and violence sexual assault against the what lieutenant governor
Speaker 1: or the Commonwealth of Virginia. No I believes if Donald
Speaker 1: Trump had a secret server with its top secret classified
Speaker 1: information on it, I bet they'd care. Donald Trump had
Speaker 1: a dirty Russian dossier he bought with funneled money through
Speaker 1: a law firm, hiring an op research firm, you know,
Speaker 1: then hiring a foreign national, and then that becomes the
Speaker 1: basis of lying to a FISA court with unverified Russian lies.
Speaker 1: We'd find out later and that was premeditated fraud on
Speaker 1: a FISA court because they didn't verify it. Because we
Speaker 1: now know it's unverifiable and they used it anyway. I
Speaker 1: think that Donald Trump would be in big trouble. I
Speaker 1: think his campaign would be in big trouble. Here's the
Speaker 1: headline in the Daily Caller today. Also, State Department concludes
Speaker 1: Clinton email review says it found nearly six hundred security violations.
Speaker 1: State Department investigators probing Hillary Clint's use of a private
Speaker 1: email server or sea State discovered nearly six hundred security
Speaker 1: incidents that violated agency policy, according to a report obtained
Speaker 1: by the Daily Caller News Foundation. Investigation conducted by the
Speaker 1: State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security found thirty eight individuals
Speaker 1: were culpable or ninety one security violations. Another four ninety
Speaker 1: seven violations found no individuals were found culpable, etc. Etc.
Speaker 1: What about those subpoenat emails. So this is where the
Speaker 1: mob now has to ignore. You have to ignore the
Speaker 1: dirty email server, Ignore the rigged primary with Bernie, Ignore
Speaker 1: the obstruction of justice as it relates to the email
Speaker 1: server and deleting subpoenat emails and cleaning the hard drive
Speaker 1: and busting up devices and removing sim cards. You have
Speaker 1: to ignore the real Russia Dasier. You have to ignore
Speaker 1: the premeditated fraud and a fies a court. You have
Speaker 1: to justify sourcing out or subcontracting out buying on Americans
Speaker 1: and a president Chola candidate and transition team and president
Speaker 1: to Western Allied countries, illegal spying to circumvent American law.
Speaker 1: You have to just ignore that Hunter Biden had no
Speaker 1: experience and they just picked him for no real reason.
Speaker 1: Suspend any connection to reality, and now you have a
Speaker 1: what I am calling a Soviet because this is really
Speaker 1: what it is. This is a secret Soviet style who
Speaker 1: attempt to impeach President Trump because everything's behind closed doors.
Speaker 1: Because now we know that if the cowardly shift, if
Speaker 1: we were to bring the phony whistleblower non whistle blower
Speaker 1: only at hearsay, well then the Republicans would get to
Speaker 1: ask who told you to get a lawyer? Who told
Speaker 1: you to go to the inspector general? My strong guests
Speaker 1: would be someone in Shifty's office. Okay, what's your connection?
Speaker 1: You like Joe Biden? Yeah? You knew Joe Biden? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Oh boy. And if they cared about an election interference,
Speaker 1: they probably have to look at the January eleventh, twenty
Speaker 1: seventeen political article. If they were attached to reality. You
Speaker 1: see this is the mob. You have the medium mob,
Speaker 1: the Democratic mob, and you got Hunter Biden paid millions
Speaker 1: for no experience. Why did China want to pay it?
Speaker 1: Why did Ukraine want to pay it? You must suspend
Speaker 1: all connection to reality. And objective truth and logic and
Speaker 1: reason and common sense to not see the corruption and
Speaker 1: double standard here. That's how sick this is getting. And
Speaker 1: if you're asking me if I'm worried from my country,
Speaker 1: the answers that yeah, overwhelming yes, because they're gonna impeach them.
Speaker 1: I don't think they'll find them guilty in the Senate.
Speaker 1: And I'm hoping I'm right that the American people will
Speaker 1: correct all of this themselves. Hopefully the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: will ultimately do their job. I keep here in delay, delay,
Speaker 1: delay on the FISA Inspector General's report. I'm getting sick
Speaker 1: of the delays, you know. But the Durham report, all right,
Speaker 1: that delayed delay. Nobody delays anything with Trump. No delays
Speaker 1: only for the Democrats. And I will tell you that
Speaker 1: if the American people don't send the message to those
Speaker 1: that are willing to suspend common sense, logic, reason, any
Speaker 1: intelligence they were born with those that do see reality
Speaker 1: for what it is, and a hypocrisy on the worst
Speaker 1: level ever, and corruption on the worst level ever. If
Speaker 1: you don't get out and vote, you're gonna get this
Speaker 1: mess on the other end of it, which which is
Speaker 1: a corrupt country that embraces economic suicide, socialism, the New
Speaker 1: Green Deal, and with that wealth taxes and confiscation of
Speaker 1: wealth and legalize stealing by your government, and redistribution and
Speaker 1: no oil, no gas, no planes, no cows. Everything's free,
Speaker 1: and it'll never come to fruition. That's the choice. Otherwise.
Speaker 1: I'm very upbeat today. This is so solemn. None of
Speaker 1: us came to Congress to impeach a president. That's not
Speaker 1: what we come here to do. And any such actions
Speaker 1: are to be taken very solemnly, seriously, am I view prayerfully.
Speaker 1: People love you, and you win. And when your son
Speaker 1: looks at you and says, Mama, look you won. Bullies
Speaker 1: don't win, and I say, baby, they talk. Because we're
Speaker 1: gonna go in there. We're gonna impeach the mother. None
Speaker 1: of us came to Congress to impeach a president. That's
Speaker 1: not what we come here to do. Since the day
Speaker 1: that I've gotten elected, I've said to people it is
Speaker 1: not if he will be impeached. But when none of
Speaker 1: us came to Congress to impeach a president, that's not
Speaker 1: what we come here to do. And peach boty fye,
Speaker 1: and peach body bye, and peach body by None of
Speaker 1: us came to Congress to impeach a president. That's not
Speaker 1: what we come here to do. Would you push for
Speaker 1: a Trump impeachment? Should you? Should you win? Well? I would,
Speaker 1: I would. I would support impeachment. I think that, Um,
Speaker 1: you know, we have the grounds to do it. None
Speaker 1: of us came to Congress to impeach a president. That's
Speaker 1: not what we come here to do. The president will
Speaker 1: have two options. One he can resign from office, or
Speaker 1: two he can face impeachment. None of us came to
Speaker 1: Congress to impeach a president. That's not what we come
Speaker 1: here to do. None of us came to Congress to
Speaker 1: impeach a president. That's not what we come here to do.
Speaker 1: We're introducing articles of impeachment and to remove President Trump
Speaker 1: from office. Shocking anyway, eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program
Speaker 1: hour two and as the impeachment saga, madness, insanity, you
Speaker 1: must suspend any connection to reality. You know, secret Soviet
Speaker 1: Union's style, impeachment, coup attempt. This is what Republicans are
Speaker 1: doing now. There's so many irregularities. Number One, they don't
Speaker 1: want to open up any system of fairness as it
Speaker 1: would relate to the president, because if they did, that
Speaker 1: would mean the whole variety of things would be triggered.
Speaker 1: So they're just going to do it quietly without being
Speaker 1: a real impeachment. And they don't want any due process
Speaker 1: for the president. You know, for example, what does the
Speaker 1: president's job okay to faithfully execute the laws of the land.
Speaker 1: We already have the transcript as it relates to what
Speaker 1: as it eates to the president talking to the president
Speaker 1: of Ukraine. What are they talking about election interference twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: And we know from the from Politico January eleven, twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: Ukraine admits they did involved themselves and interfere in our election.
Speaker 1: When are we going to have that investigation? When are
Speaker 1: we going to get tack When are we going to
Speaker 1: look into the cowardly shift? And now we know he
Speaker 1: lied when he said, oh, we'd like to speak with
Speaker 1: the whistle blower while his office had been in contact,
Speaker 1: and when before the whistle blower went forward and apparently
Speaker 1: giving advice on getting a lawyer and going to the
Speaker 1: IG and then the non whistleblower whistle blower, we find
Speaker 1: out is a supporter and friend of Joe Biden. Joe
Speaker 1: three zo three three zero. Okay, Well you think any
Speaker 1: Republican would get away with these unfair tactics. I don't
Speaker 1: think so anyway. Andy Biggs is the Freedom Caucus chairman.
Speaker 1: He's Congressman from Arizona. He's gotten I believe now over
Speaker 1: one hund written seventy signatures for censure and a censure
Speaker 1: vote as it relates to the cowardly liar Adam Schiff.
Speaker 1: I hope you get there. How are you, sir, great
Speaker 1: great Sean, how you doing. I'm good, good, Yeah, we
Speaker 1: are close. We're well over one hundred and seventy. We
Speaker 1: would like to get one hundred and ninety nine, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, that's what we'd want. We want everybody to
Speaker 1: be on there. But we got over one hundred and seventy.
Speaker 1: And this thing should have gone yesterday, But out of
Speaker 1: deference to the passing of Elijah Cummings, we're gonna we're
Speaker 1: doing this Monday evening. That's when we're gonna go forward
Speaker 1: with a censure resolution. I've already introduced it. It's a
Speaker 1: matter now of the Democrats are going to probably try
Speaker 1: to stop that floor vote through a procedural measure, but
Speaker 1: it will still have the same The same impact is
Speaker 1: who's voting for censure and who's voting against censure. What
Speaker 1: don't you have a privilege resolution opportunity with this, in
Speaker 1: other words, that you can get an up or down vote. Well, yes,
Speaker 1: technically we have a privilege, and that's how I filed it.
Speaker 1: It is as a privilege, which means that it takes
Speaker 1: precedence a priority. The problem that we have is the
Speaker 1: rules allow a different priority motion and it gets kind
Speaker 1: of technical. But they will come in and say, well,
Speaker 1: we want to table that motion. I've already read the
Speaker 1: censure on the floor. The clerk will read the censure
Speaker 1: on the floor, then they'll move to table it, and
Speaker 1: they've got the votes to prevent us from stopping tabling.
Speaker 1: But but even in that table motion, I'm just telling
Speaker 1: you it has the same impact. The Democrats are going
Speaker 1: to be voting yes the table, which means that no,
Speaker 1: they don't want censure, so that the table vote is
Speaker 1: just being substituted for the censure vote. Well, okay, I understand.
Speaker 1: Now here's the reason. Why do you think it is
Speaker 1: that Nancy Pelosi goes to a caucus and tries to
Speaker 1: get the vote on whether or not they're going to
Speaker 1: have an impeachment inquiry, which, by the way, has happened
Speaker 1: in every other past impeachment inquiry. You actually have a
Speaker 1: real up or down vote, because now, why do you think, first,
Speaker 1: I'll ask this that Nancy Pelosi didn't they decided not
Speaker 1: to take the vote. Do you think she doesn't have
Speaker 1: the votes? That may be part of it. But I
Speaker 1: think more than that, they don't want to have a
Speaker 1: fair process for President Trump. They if you don't do
Speaker 1: the formal vote, he doesn't get to have his attorney
Speaker 1: present for these interviews. He doesn't get to cross examined,
Speaker 1: he doesn't get to subpoena witnesses. Republicans don't get to
Speaker 1: subpoena witnesses. Republicans don't get to fully participate. We're kind
Speaker 1: of shut out, he gets. She operates by the oversight rules,
Speaker 1: which means that they get to basically close the procedure
Speaker 1: up so nobody can see it. They get to withhold
Speaker 1: the transcripts until they're good and ready to release them.
Speaker 1: And that's why I think they didn't take the vote.
Speaker 1: They don't want this to be a fair process. They
Speaker 1: want it to be a closed process. Well, if they
Speaker 1: took the vote, I mean, and this now has been
Speaker 1: brought up numerous times, if they had a full vote
Speaker 1: in the House to authorize the inquiry, Well, that would
Speaker 1: mean they that if we're going to follow past precedents,
Speaker 1: and that would mean exactly the very considerations New king
Speaker 1: Rich gave the minority in the impeachment of Bill Clinton.
Speaker 1: Are they going to involve the full House and every
Speaker 1: step of the inquiry and define the scope of it
Speaker 1: and have rules and procedures. They're going to grant coequal
Speaker 1: subpoena power to the chair and ranking members of the committees?
Speaker 1: Are they going to require all subpoenas be subject to
Speaker 1: a vote of the full committee at the request of
Speaker 1: either the chair or ranking member like Nood allowed, Well,
Speaker 1: they provide the president's counsel the right to attend all
Speaker 1: hearings and depositions. Are they're going to intend to provide
Speaker 1: the president's counsel of the right to present evidence, the
Speaker 1: right of the president's counsel to object to the admittance
Speaker 1: of certain evidence. Do you know they got to provide
Speaker 1: the president's counsel the right to cross examine witnesses and
Speaker 1: the right of the president's counsel the right to recommend
Speaker 1: a witness list. I mean, that's all basic fundamental due
Speaker 1: process fairness that happened in every other impeachment, did it not,
Speaker 1: your correct sir? That is the way it's done. That
Speaker 1: is actually the rules, because but they don't want to
Speaker 1: follow the rules. They don't want to be fair. This
Speaker 1: is not about impeachment as much as it is about
Speaker 1: a coup sean. They want to throw him out of office,
Speaker 1: They want to overturn the election. They hate the people
Speaker 1: who voted for him as much as they hate him.
Speaker 1: That is why they're not going to give a fair
Speaker 1: and open process. With all of the things you just read,
Speaker 1: which have been done in the Nixon and the Clinton impeachments,
Speaker 1: where the majority party allowed the president and the minority
Speaker 1: party to have full acts, full participation, and the American
Speaker 1: people got to participate by watching and communicating with their representatives.
Speaker 1: That is not happening because they don't. It's not just
Speaker 1: about impeachment, It is about overthrowing the government, and that
Speaker 1: includes destroying the rules, destroying the process. And you know
Speaker 1: what happens. That means that any president will be subject
Speaker 1: to this same kind of unfair process from this point forward.
Speaker 1: And that is just it's a smirch. It's it's a
Speaker 1: scar on the Constitution of the United States, and that's
Speaker 1: where they are. It's it's pretty pathetic, all right. So
Speaker 1: there's vote is on Monday. How many Republicans now do
Speaker 1: we have in the House of Representatives? Were one? Nine? Nine? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Where are the other twenty nine? I don't know, I
Speaker 1: don't know. I think it's time. No, I think that No,
Speaker 1: we're going to put up on my website the names
Speaker 1: of the twenty nine and we're going to put up
Speaker 1: the phone numbers of the offices of the twenty nine people,
Speaker 1: because every Republican should be united in this. Have they
Speaker 1: just said no? Have any said no outright? Or are
Speaker 1: they just avoiding you? I have not found anyone who
Speaker 1: has said no, So we either we just we haven't
Speaker 1: finished gathering them up and vacuuming them up, because everybody
Speaker 1: I talked to is indicated they have signed on to
Speaker 1: this this resolution. So I don't even know. All right, Well,
Speaker 1: we'll tell you what. As they sign on, we'll take
Speaker 1: the name off the list and we'll put it up
Speaker 1: from my audience so that they can go and identify
Speaker 1: whether they're congressman, Republican, congressman or woman has signed onto
Speaker 1: the censure resolution that you're putting forward for a vote
Speaker 1: on Monday. I think Republicans ought to be united. Any Democrats,
Speaker 1: are they willing to sign on anyone with an integrity
Speaker 1: in that party? Left or no? Oh no, nobody's going
Speaker 1: to sign on to this from the Democrats. Um and
Speaker 1: and that's why they're gonna They're gonna fight this on
Speaker 1: a procedure again, on a procedural process vote instead of
Speaker 1: straight up vote. That's what the that's what they're all about, now,
Speaker 1: what they're all about. It. It's pretty unbelievable. Can you
Speaker 1: answer a question for me? And I just can't get
Speaker 1: over this. You know, here we have the transcript. There's
Speaker 1: nothing in that conversation with President Zalinski and President Trump,
Speaker 1: not one thing that was inappropriate. The President said, yeah,
Speaker 1: I need you to do me a favor. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: need you to know all this stuff, CrowdStrike, election interfere
Speaker 1: and stuff. The whole country was outraged about election interference.
Speaker 1: The whole country were obsessed with it. Every Democrat, everyone
Speaker 1: in the media, mob, and then all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: the president says, which by the way, he has a
Speaker 1: sworn oath and a constitutional duty to faithfully execute the
Speaker 1: laws of the land. Clearly, election interference by a foreign entity,
Speaker 1: We've got problems if that happens in this country. Okay,
Speaker 1: it didn't happen with Trump and Russia. We did have
Speaker 1: a dirty Russian dacier Hillary paid for. But in this case,
Speaker 1: what do we have. We have the Ukrainians admitting that
Speaker 1: they helped, and they helped successfully implement a plan in
Speaker 1: support of Hillary Clinton to hurt Donald Trump, even having
Speaker 1: a DNC contractor meeting with Ukrainians to get dirt on
Speaker 1: Trump and his associates. So, you know, when are we
Speaker 1: going to get to that aspect, and when are we
Speaker 1: going to get to the Biden you know, shakedown with
Speaker 1: our money. You know, fire this guy in six hours
Speaker 1: or you're not getting the billion dollars. And then his
Speaker 1: son Hunter being paid millions and admitting he had no
Speaker 1: experience in either Ukraine or in China, or in financial
Speaker 1: dealings or portfolios, or in energy and gas, and yet
Speaker 1: why was he paid? Well, my dad as the vice president,
Speaker 1: wouldn't that be They're trying to buy influence. Seems to
Speaker 1: me that would be a slam dunk case. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: he even admitted Hunter Biden even admitted he would never
Speaker 1: have gotten that gig if not for his last name
Speaker 1: and in other words, being the son of the vice president.
Speaker 1: So so for President Trump. If President Trump does the
Speaker 1: same thing that the Democrats wanted, which was an investigation
Speaker 1: in the twenty sixteen election and an all foreign interference,
Speaker 1: I cannot tell you how many times I heard that, Well,
Speaker 1: that's what he was asking of President Zelinski of the Ukraine.
Speaker 1: That was perfectly rational at perfect time to do it.
Speaker 1: And you know what's disgusting about this is somebody that
Speaker 1: was listening into his conversation leaked this to somebody who
Speaker 1: leaked it to somebody else. And then you get this
Speaker 1: whistleblower who nobody knows who it is. For all we
Speaker 1: know it was Adam Schiff for Pete's sakes, We just
Speaker 1: don't know who the whistle blower is. The bottom line
Speaker 1: is President Trump was betrayed by somebody listening to the
Speaker 1: phone call who misinterpreted and went after him for that.
Speaker 1: And what he was doing was what the American people
Speaker 1: want him to do. And which is as you said,
Speaker 1: it's this constitutional obligation to do, and that is to
Speaker 1: protect the integrity of the election. Ask for help from
Speaker 1: a country that is actually doing their own parliamentary investigation
Speaker 1: of this. That's how serious this is. And he gets
Speaker 1: and he's asking for it, and now it's just getting
Speaker 1: flipped on him by these, uh, these unpatriotic folks who
Speaker 1: who just cannot stand Donald Trump and his biggest sin
Speaker 1: to them was to defeat Hillary Clinton. All right, I
Speaker 1: appreciate all you're doing. That will happen Monday, the censure
Speaker 1: of Adam Schiff, but brought to the floor by Congressman
Speaker 1: Andy Biggs. If you want to go to our website
Speaker 1: Hannity dot com, we have up the names of those
Speaker 1: Republican congressmen that have yet to sign on to the
Speaker 1: Centure Resolution. Hopefully by Monday they will do so. And
Speaker 1: if they're your congressman or a woman, you'll have a
Speaker 1: number and you might want to give him a call
Speaker 1: and ask them are they planning to sign this? This
Speaker 1: freedom of speech, yes, we all have to have freedom
Speaker 1: of speech, but at times there are ramifications for the
Speaker 1: negative that can't happen when you're not thinking about others.
Speaker 1: You know, you only think about yourself. So I don't
Speaker 1: believe I don't want to get into a word or
Speaker 1: sentenceditude with Darryl, but I believe he wasn't educated on
Speaker 1: the situation at hand, and so many people could have
Speaker 1: been harmed. All right, when we come back, we'll talk
Speaker 1: with US Senator Tim Scott, South Carolina. By the way,
Speaker 1: he's outraged on a lot of things, especially comments by
Speaker 1: Lebron James and Curry and others in the wake of
Speaker 1: the NBA China fallout. Um, and it's a simple battle.
Speaker 1: It's a controversy over the fight for freedom and standing
Speaker 1: with the freedom fighters in Hong Kong and of course
Speaker 1: the talitarians in China, Uh pretty much wanting to you know,
Speaker 1: put them under their rule. And that means everything that
Speaker 1: has made Hong Kong the great success that it is
Speaker 1: would go with it. That wouldn't be good for anybody. Also,
Speaker 1: get his take on Washington, the impeachment, madness, Hunter Biden,
Speaker 1: much much more as we continue. Eight hundred nine for
Speaker 1: one Shawn toll free telephone number been on air with
Speaker 1: CCTV in China for over thirty years and last season
Speaker 1: over six hundred million people in China watched a portion
Speaker 1: of an NBA game. So the regrettable notion was that
Speaker 1: we had upset our fans. I didn't think at that
Speaker 1: time while we were saying we regretted upsetting our fans,
Speaker 1: that also at the same time supporting Daryl Morey's right
Speaker 1: to express himself, right to tweet. Obviously, we made clear
Speaker 1: that we were being asked to fire him by the
Speaker 1: Chinese government, by the parties we dealt with, government and business.
Speaker 1: We said, there's no chance that's happening. There's no chance
Speaker 1: we'll even discipline him. So in that context, I was saying,
Speaker 1: on one hand, we were supporting free expression. But again
Speaker 1: maybe I was trying too hard to be a diplomat.
Speaker 1: We're in the middle again, a sort of at some point,
Speaker 1: look to the American government. We're in the middle of
Speaker 1: negotiating a trade agreement. Many multinational corporations obviously trade extensively
Speaker 1: with China, and if that's ultimately how our government feels
Speaker 1: we should be dealing with China. Again, we are a
Speaker 1: US company. We all talk about this freedmo of speech. Yes,
Speaker 1: we all do have freedom of speech, but at times
Speaker 1: there are ramifications for the negative that can happen. Um
Speaker 1: when you're not thinking about others, you know, you only
Speaker 1: think about yourself. So I don't believe I don't want
Speaker 1: to get into a word word or sentenced to with
Speaker 1: hero Um where d more. But I believe he wasn't
Speaker 1: educated on the situation at hand, and any spoke and
Speaker 1: so many people could have been harmed, not only financially
Speaker 1: but physically, emotionally, spiritually. So just be careful what we
Speaker 1: what we tweet, when we say what we do. Even
Speaker 1: though yes we do have freedom speech, canny, a lot
Speaker 1: of negative that comes. That's all right. So there you
Speaker 1: have Lebron James. This is never ending saga. It's actually
Speaker 1: sad it keeps going on here. And you know you
Speaker 1: have Stefan Curry, Lebron others in the wake of this
Speaker 1: NBA China fallout and the controversy. Clear couldn't be any
Speaker 1: more clear is you got to fight for freedom. One
Speaker 1: of the reasons Hong Kong is prospered so much is
Speaker 1: because of the lack of Chinese interference. And now at
Speaker 1: the crackdown coming, you know, it's more than an unfortunate
Speaker 1: that the MBA, I mean you have in one case,
Speaker 1: you've got the Houston Rockets general manager, you know, going
Speaker 1: out there standing up for the freedom fighters, and then
Speaker 1: Lebron is, you know, taking on the standoff. And anyway,
Speaker 1: he said that Daryl Morey, who is the Rockets GM,
Speaker 1: was misinformed or not really educated when he sent a
Speaker 1: tweet out in support of Hong Kong's pro democracy, pro
Speaker 1: freedom movement. In anyway, the Lakers won a preseason game
Speaker 1: Monday night. Comments from Lebron James before tipoff arguably arguably
Speaker 1: over shout out his win. He's considered obviously one of
Speaker 1: the most influential players in history. Is a four year,
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty two million dollar deal with the Lakers.
Speaker 1: But the reaction to his statements, he's not speaking for
Speaker 1: everyone in the league. Quote. I believe he wasn't educated
Speaker 1: on the situation at hand. That's what James said. So
Speaker 1: many people could have been harmed, not only financially, but emotionally, physically, spiritually.
Speaker 1: And yes, we do have freedom of speech, but there
Speaker 1: can be a lot of negative because of that too.
Speaker 1: I'm like, huh, where did this all come from? Now?
Speaker 1: We had a really interesting exchange with Jason Whitlock, who
Speaker 1: does his own show on Fox Sports is I've one
Speaker 1: an amazing, amazing host And he says it's all about
Speaker 1: the money. And he actually tried to tie in the
Speaker 1: bigger dollars, which are Nike and not the NBA. Like
Speaker 1: the NBA's I guess an eight billion dollar industry and
Speaker 1: Nike is forty. But I you know, it's out of
Speaker 1: my pay league here. But anyway, Senator Tim Scott is
Speaker 1: with us. I did not know until this week he
Speaker 1: was such a big basketball fan. I am not a
Speaker 1: huge basketball fan, but I am a fan of getting
Speaker 1: your freedom. Yeah, I'm a freedom fan, and I thank
Speaker 1: God for a Houston Rockets general manager. I appreciated his
Speaker 1: willingness to take a stand on behalf of freedom. So
Speaker 1: many times, our athletes in America have the freedom to
Speaker 1: talk about and challenge their government. And when you're playing
Speaker 1: ball in China, you're playing ball in front of fans
Speaker 1: who may not have even the opportunity to exercise freedom
Speaker 1: of speech in any way anyhow, anywhere in a country
Speaker 1: with one point three billion people, we who are influencers
Speaker 1: should stand up for their rights as much as we
Speaker 1: criticize this government. In the world's greatest democracy, I just
Speaker 1: you know, it's sad. And when Great Britain got out,
Speaker 1: we were assured, weren't we that this wasn't going to happen,
Speaker 1: This day wouldn't come. That is why we codified in
Speaker 1: the Constitution a mimic number one, the notion that freedom
Speaker 1: of speech is the DNA of the American experience, and
Speaker 1: we have the responsibility, I believe, to the purveyors of
Speaker 1: hope through free speech, even when you don't like it.
Speaker 1: Our founding fathers did the best they could to make
Speaker 1: sure that future generations of Americans would live at the
Speaker 1: highest level possible because they understood freedom of speech is
Speaker 1: like the wet versus of water. They're inseparable with the
Speaker 1: freedom of religion. And that's why we protected freedom of speech.
Speaker 1: And we see around China minority Muslims and other religious
Speaker 1: groups being persecuted and really an encampments, these concentration camps
Speaker 1: that still exists in China. We should be out front
Speaker 1: and center when we are influencers speaking against the atrocities
Speaker 1: of the Chinese government and the communist regime. Yeah, let
Speaker 1: me ask you. There's so much going on in Washington,
Speaker 1: and you see this impeachment insanity that's going on. I've
Speaker 1: read the transcript. You've read the transcript or the President's
Speaker 1: call with Presidents Lensky. Do you see anything inappropriate at all?
Speaker 1: Because I don't not at all. I'll tell you this, Sean.
Speaker 1: And you're such a brilliant man when you're talking on TV.
Speaker 1: I love watching your program and I like listening to
Speaker 1: you on the radio. Beatle guys, why don't we have
Speaker 1: why don't we have Senator Scott on once week? Why
Speaker 1: do we have Lindsay Graham on all the time? Forget
Speaker 1: Lindsay Graham. We need Senator Scott on all the time.
Speaker 1: I know I wondered that myself. But here's what you say,
Speaker 1: and you see it so well. You distill some of
Speaker 1: the most complicated facts to make it digestible for people
Speaker 1: like me. And what you keep telling me, and I
Speaker 1: read the transcripts five times to make sure you were right.
Speaker 1: The CrowdStrike server with a twenty sixteen issue, not a
Speaker 1: twenty twenty is the president in no way, shape or form, hinted.
Speaker 1: He didn't even hint at influencing the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: He was doing his job as a president of the
Speaker 1: United States and bringing corruption to light from the twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen election. And well, let me let me say this. Yeah,
Speaker 1: because let's listen. I'm gonna tell you, and I'm watching
Speaker 1: this all unfold, and I think it's rooted in a
Speaker 1: couple of things. I think there's a rage out there
Speaker 1: that is it is unhinged. And yes, okay, so my
Speaker 1: so where I'm coming from me? All right? They tried
Speaker 1: four separate investigations into Trump Russia. To get there, you
Speaker 1: had to ignore Hillary, you know, and her obstruction with
Speaker 1: the emails that were subpoenaed, and the whole violation of
Speaker 1: the Espionage Act and its subsections when she had a
Speaker 1: server with top secret and classified information on it. You
Speaker 1: have to ignore that her dirty Russian dossier was leaked
Speaker 1: to the media and then used as the bulk of
Speaker 1: information in the grass league Graham emo to get secure
Speaker 1: warrants on carter page and spy on a candidate and
Speaker 1: then a transition team and then a president and to
Speaker 1: get to all to get there, you have to ignore
Speaker 1: all of that. But the big thing they said was
Speaker 1: election interference. Now we have the Ukraine's admitting election interference,
Speaker 1: and when are we going to get to the bottom
Speaker 1: of that and then the other corruption which we have,
Speaker 1: which is Joe Biden and what he said on tape
Speaker 1: and what his son said this week. Sean, if you
Speaker 1: watched the interview with the Sun, you have to come
Speaker 1: to the conclusion that you would not want him on
Speaker 1: the Biden campaign trail. It was not very helpful, but
Speaker 1: it did illuminate really important topics. The other thing that
Speaker 1: happened was in twenty fifteen the State Department career professionals
Speaker 1: called into question Biden's hunter Biden's relationship, but that that,
Speaker 1: once again is a fact pattern that we continue to ignore.
Speaker 1: The national media continues to ignore the clear and present
Speaker 1: danger that we see in the fact patterns emerging on
Speaker 1: the surface of the Biden interactions in Ukraine and in China.
Speaker 1: And there's a reason why he resigned the board seat
Speaker 1: prematurely based on what he had did previously. I mean,
Speaker 1: I mean, I never thought that we'd be in this
Speaker 1: where we are, where you have so many people in
Speaker 1: the media Democratic Party. Here you have Biden saying that
Speaker 1: he leveraged a billion dollars to get a Ukrainian prosecutor
Speaker 1: fired successfully who was investigating his son. Then his son
Speaker 1: gives an interview. What experience do you have? None, No
Speaker 1: experience Ukraine, no experience and energy oil or gas, no
Speaker 1: experience in private equity, no experience in China, but they're
Speaker 1: paying in millions. Now, Senator, you're a smart guy. Why
Speaker 1: were Why was China in Ukraine willing to pay Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden with no experience millions of dollars has answered? I
Speaker 1: think Biden said it himself if his last name is Biden.
Speaker 1: And it appears that access to power was the goal,
Speaker 1: and there was an exchange, the exchange, which is clear
Speaker 1: to me, of allowing that access to the power to
Speaker 1: be at least a part of the process. And it's
Speaker 1: interesting that that all happened after Joe Biden received the
Speaker 1: portfolio of Ukraine and other countries to work on. HM. Well,
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, I mean, why do I think
Speaker 1: if the if it was Vice President Donald J. Trump
Speaker 1: and Don Junior, and Don Junior gave the interview that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden gave this week, admitting he had no background,
Speaker 1: no experience, and then the money question, Well you didn't
Speaker 1: mention your last name. Yeah, probably the reason I got
Speaker 1: millions is because of my dad's name. Now maybe I
Speaker 1: don't know, Maybe I'm just more fishes haven't grown up
Speaker 1: in New York, and I don't have the genteel South
Speaker 1: Carolina way about me. And no, and I mean that sincerely.
Speaker 1: I mean people in the South very different to their credit.
Speaker 1: I mean that. But I would look at that is
Speaker 1: that they want him. They want Biden in this case
Speaker 1: to get the money. So let me guess that they'd
Speaker 1: buy favor from his father. Otherwise why would they do it.
Speaker 1: There's no other alternative. To be honest with you, John,
Speaker 1: there's nothing, even as a Southern person who enjoys my
Speaker 1: Southern roots, there's no way, there's no denteel way to
Speaker 1: explain what you've just said any better than you've said it.
Speaker 1: Access to power was what they were trying to purchase.
Speaker 1: From my perspective. Number one. Number two, if it was
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump and Donald J. Trump Junr. Who would
Speaker 1: have a complete their heads would be on fire, their
Speaker 1: heads would explode in the media, we've already seen that happen,
Speaker 1: and you can look at back at seventeen one. The
Speaker 1: first headlines was looking for ways to impeach and nullify
Speaker 1: the decision of sixty three million Americans from coast to
Speaker 1: coast have voted for Donald Trump. They were looking for
Speaker 1: a way to nullify the election in January twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: and it appears to me, twelve months from another election,
Speaker 1: they're still trying to find a way to nullify twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen and we cannot let that happen. Period. Do you
Speaker 1: see this scenario. I'll tell you what. I'll get to
Speaker 1: it when I get back. More with Senator Tim Scott,
Speaker 1: the Great State of South Carolina, eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: four one. Sean, you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program. We'll have a quick break, our news round up,
Speaker 1: information overload hour at the top of the next hour.
Speaker 1: More on Hunter Biden and how nobody deals with it.
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable to me. As we continue, all right, as
Speaker 1: we continue with Senator Tim Scott of the Great State
Speaker 1: of South Carolina. All right, so now we know what
Speaker 1: went on here, how is it that the Democrats now
Speaker 1: want to impeach the president? Is what I think is
Speaker 1: going to play out. I believe the House is stupid
Speaker 1: enough to follow through on this because they jumped out
Speaker 1: of the airplane. By this point, they can't go back
Speaker 1: in the airplane, and they're even and so it's a
Speaker 1: secret Soviet style coup attempt by impeachment. All right, then
Speaker 1: it gets to the Senate, your body, and they will
Speaker 1: not convict. Then, I say, my prediction is the country's
Speaker 1: going to see this for what it is, a raw
Speaker 1: political play, a power play, and they're going to reelect
Speaker 1: the president, maybe in bigger numbers than when he won
Speaker 1: his first election. What do you think. I think you're
Speaker 1: right so far, Shan. Here's what I think that the
Speaker 1: House has done what is impossible to do in the
Speaker 1: greatest democracy ever crafted. They have decided to close the doors,
Speaker 1: lock the door so the way the key, hide the evidence,
Speaker 1: and then only indict, so to speak, but actually impeach
Speaker 1: the President of the United States for what. Certainly no
Speaker 1: one knows the answer to that question. But when you
Speaker 1: come to the Senate, this is a good news. All
Speaker 1: the things that were hidden we're hidden in the House.
Speaker 1: We will be able to bring that to light in
Speaker 1: the Senate. I don't think they're going to have a
Speaker 1: public trial. For the first time in the history of
Speaker 1: our country as it relates to the impeachment process in
Speaker 1: the House of Representatives, they're going to allow their closed
Speaker 1: door meetings to be corruptantiates it. It can't be done,
Speaker 1: and yet we're watching it be done in our time.
Speaker 1: I can't even believe it. But the good news is
Speaker 1: the Senate gets the ball next and we will have
Speaker 1: a process that the American people can be proud of
Speaker 1: that will bring to the surface all the information, the facts,
Speaker 1: so that the whole thing is illegitimate behind closed doors.
Speaker 1: It's disgusting and there's no reason anyway. Just read the transcript.
Speaker 1: It's pathetic. But all right, Senator, you know we love you.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine one sewn to free telephone number. Stay
Speaker 1: right here for our final news round up and information overload.
Speaker 1: In the final hour of the Sean Hannity Show, said
Speaker 1: I'm not going to We're not going to give you
Speaker 1: the billion dollars. I said, you have no authority, You're
Speaker 1: not the president. The president said, I said, call him.
Speaker 1: I said, I'm telling you're not getting a billion dollars.
Speaker 1: I said, you're not getting a billion. I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: leaving here. And I think it was about six hours.
Speaker 1: I look, I said, leaving six hours that the prosecutors
Speaker 1: not fired. You're not getting the money. A son of
Speaker 1: him got fired. I did actually get to hear about
Speaker 1: Ambassador Kent. This is the witch hunt. You know, the
Speaker 1: crooked chief is coming after the Republican Party. He's coming
Speaker 1: after the Republican Party as hard as he can, considering
Speaker 1: he's really he's been compromised, very sadly and badly because
Speaker 1: of the fact, as you know, I think as the presidels.
Speaker 1: He made a statement, and he made a virtual speech
Speaker 1: about what I said, and then it turned out that
Speaker 1: I didn't say any of it because he forgitally made
Speaker 1: this statement to Congress. I thought what he did was
Speaker 1: one of the worst things. I under that he has immunity,
Speaker 1: but he doesn't have immunity when he puts it on
Speaker 1: his Twitter, which he did, and he doesn't have immunity
Speaker 1: he speaks to press, which he did, and he certainly
Speaker 1: won't have immunity if we ever get him into Congress
Speaker 1: and can swear him under oath, because what he did
Speaker 1: was a very big thing. But what just happened his
Speaker 1: Ambassador Kent do I have never had the privilege. I
Speaker 1: don't believe of meeting. I don't know him, and they
Speaker 1: wrote him in as a witness against me, even though
Speaker 1: I don't know him, and he excoriated from what they
Speaker 1: reported on the news, and of course maybe in this
Speaker 1: case it won't be effectives. But he excoriated the Obama
Speaker 1: administration and Joe Biden and Joe Biden's son, saying that
Speaker 1: has tremendous problems, tremendous problems with Joe Biden's son and
Speaker 1: the Ukraine. So he's got tremendous problems with Biden's son
Speaker 1: and Ukraine. And it's inappropriate at all of the horrible things.
Speaker 1: I mean, you could get it, you could see it.
Speaker 1: It's been a big deal. And I heard Shift has
Speaker 1: going no, no, we don't want to talk about that.
Speaker 1: We don't want to talk about that. But he talked
Speaker 1: about it, and it's one of those things. So if
Speaker 1: this is a terrible which all right, news round up,
Speaker 1: Information Overload eight hundred and nine for one. Sean is
Speaker 1: a toll free telephone number. You know, I've been saying
Speaker 1: this and it just gets clearer and clearer in my
Speaker 1: mind every day, and that is that to be a
Speaker 1: Democrat or a member of the media mob, you cannot
Speaker 1: believe there's something known as objective truth. You cannot You
Speaker 1: must suspend any connection to reality and disconnect from all
Speaker 1: reason and common sense God gave you. You have the
Speaker 1: cowardly Shift on tape talking to a Russian getting dirt
Speaker 1: on Donald Trump. Nobody in the media, mob or Democratic
Speaker 1: Party cares. You have Shift now, oh, lying about any
Speaker 1: contact with his office and the whistle blower. Then we
Speaker 1: find out the non whistle blower whistle blower is also
Speaker 1: a friend of Biden's. You cannot make this fraud up.
Speaker 1: You have the former vice president on tape admitting that
Speaker 1: he withheld a billion dollars because and demanded the firing
Speaker 1: of a prosecutor. Why because he was corrupt? Okay, we're
Speaker 1: really going to believe that, because that prosecutor, according to
Speaker 1: the interview he gave to ABC and the Washington Post
Speaker 1: said yeah, he was investigating his son. And why was
Speaker 1: he investigating his son? Whether the interview of the week. Again,
Speaker 1: the mob won't talk about it. The mob is that
Speaker 1: abusively corrupt and biased themselves. No Democrat will talk about Hunter.
Speaker 1: Biden admitting with no experience in Ukraine or China, no
Speaker 1: experience and oil energy or gas none, admitting that he
Speaker 1: gets you know, these these millions and millions of dollars,
Speaker 1: Why haven't gotten a penny from China. No, but his
Speaker 1: own lawyer admits he's getting this equity payment, which is
Speaker 1: estimated at least twenty million dollars. Some are saying a
Speaker 1: lot more like Peter Swa. The President has repeatedly said
Speaker 1: that you received one point five billion dollars from trying
Speaker 1: to despite no experience and for no apparent reason. Obviously,
Speaker 1: fact checkers have said that that is not true. This
Speaker 1: is literally has no basis in fact in any way.
Speaker 1: Have you received any money from business dealing at all?
Speaker 1: Not one cent, not one cent, Definitely not one point
Speaker 1: five billion. It's crazy. They feel like they have the
Speaker 1: license to go out and say whatever they want. It
Speaker 1: feels to me like living in some kind of alice
Speaker 1: in wonderland where you're up on the real world and
Speaker 1: then you fall down the rabbit hole, and you know,
Speaker 1: the president's the cheshire cat asking you questions about crazy
Speaker 1: things that don't have any resemblance to the reality of
Speaker 1: anything that has to do with me. And so here's
Speaker 1: the answer. No one ever paid me one point five
Speaker 1: billion dollars, and if they had, I would not be
Speaker 1: doing this interview right now. The company he got one
Speaker 1: point five billion, the lawyer. I mean as he sits
Speaker 1: there as cocky is Bill Clinton, and the parsing of words,
Speaker 1: it should nauseate everybody. Because his own lawyer admitted that, Yeah,
Speaker 1: well they haven't paid out the yeah equity, I'm as
Speaker 1: estimate it would be twenty billion dollars according to fact
Speaker 1: check dot org, and it may be much more. But
Speaker 1: he got the millions from the Barissa holding the Barisma.
Speaker 1: Now the money question was, well, why do you think,
Speaker 1: if you had no experience, why would the higher hunter
Speaker 1: Biden in these countries? These countries his dad is the
Speaker 1: second most powerful guy. I'll give you the answer before
Speaker 1: you hear him. The answer is they're buying favor from
Speaker 1: Biden by taking care of his son. That's chronyism, that's corruption.
Speaker 1: They're not giving it to him for any logical reason.
Speaker 1: It's a political buy off, so that they're getting political
Speaker 1: favor down the road. Listen, in the that you gave
Speaker 1: me of the reasons why you're on that board, you
Speaker 1: did not list the fact that you were the son
Speaker 1: of the Bob. Of course, Yeah, what role do you
Speaker 1: think that played. I think that it is impossible for
Speaker 1: me to be on any of the boards that I
Speaker 1: just mentioned without saying that I'm the son of the
Speaker 1: Vice President of the United States. You were paid fifty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars a month for your position. Look, I'm a
Speaker 1: private citizen. One thing that I don't have to do
Speaker 1: is sit here and open my kimono as it relates
Speaker 1: to how much money I make or make or deer didn't.
Speaker 1: But it's all been reported. If your last name wasn't Biden,
Speaker 1: do you think he would have been asked to be
Speaker 1: on the board of Barisma? I don't know. I don't know,
Speaker 1: probably not. I don't think that there's a lot of
Speaker 1: things that would have happened in my life that if
Speaker 1: my last name wasn't Biden. Probably not. Jonathan Gillham Danielle McLoughlin.
Speaker 1: Danielle McLoughlin. Why would China and Ukraine ever pay millions
Speaker 1: of millions of dollars to a hunter Biden? He has
Speaker 1: no experience? And isn't that the definition of pay to
Speaker 1: play chrony ism? Use whatever term you want? Corrupt should
Speaker 1: isn't that by influence pedaling? Didn't they do it to
Speaker 1: curry favor with Joe? Yes or no? Well, it's a
Speaker 1: long question. Well it's a yes. Or no. Did they
Speaker 1: give did they give the inexperienced Hunter millions of dollars
Speaker 1: to curry favor hopefully down the road with his father?
Speaker 1: Yes or no? Well, it certainly looks that way with
Speaker 1: regards to Charisma. And he should never have taken that board,
Speaker 1: that board membership. I've never said anything different. He should
Speaker 1: never have done it. No child of any youth president
Speaker 1: or right now, answer the million dollars multimillion dollar question.
Speaker 1: Did they do it to buy favor? Why did they
Speaker 1: do it with the non experience son of the vice president. Well,
Speaker 1: he's the thing, right, So Joe Biden wanted a prosecutor
Speaker 1: out right, Shokin who was not investigating Charisma. He was
Speaker 1: not investigating because that's not true. The Washington Post and
Speaker 1: a BC had interviews with Chokin and he said just
Speaker 1: the opposite. So what you're saying is not true. And
Speaker 1: we know an investigation was stopped, don't we Yeah, in
Speaker 1: twenty fourteen before he joined the board. You know, no,
Speaker 1: the investigation, Well, I can only tell you what the guy.
Speaker 1: I mean, everybody seems to be corrupt in Ukraine to me,
Speaker 1: but I can only tell you what the guy said
Speaker 1: in the interview, And the guy said he was fired
Speaker 1: because Biden demanded it, and he was investigating the kid.
Speaker 1: I don't, you know, I don't know the guy. That's
Speaker 1: what he said. I mean, unless you don't believe him.
Speaker 1: But Jonathan, why did they pay Hunter Biden millions with
Speaker 1: no experience? Why? Well, I mean it's obvious there a
Speaker 1: reason why is because who his dad was. But I
Speaker 1: think it's also very interesting how the one movie that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden decided the reference, which was Alice in Wonderland,
Speaker 1: is a basically a movie about somebody who's on a
Speaker 1: terrible drug trip. I think that was very interesting. But
Speaker 1: I think you know, when we look at the reality
Speaker 1: of what's happening there, we can look at several people.
Speaker 1: You know, Chelsea Clinton, you know she got straight out
Speaker 1: of college and nine hundred thousand dollars job. I mean,
Speaker 1: these are things that a lot of the people on
Speaker 1: the left. I'm sure there's people on the right that
Speaker 1: have done it as well. But the fact that, to
Speaker 1: see again, Jenna Bush also got a huge TV contract, right,
Speaker 1: and it's wrong. It across the board, it's right. I agree. Wait,
Speaker 1: let me have well, I'm going to stand up for
Speaker 1: Jenna Bush and Megan McCain, I don't know what I think.
Speaker 1: I think they're both good on TV. Oh, I think
Speaker 1: they are both well hang on, and they both had
Speaker 1: experience with TV because of what their parents did. No way,
Speaker 1: I think they're both very good on TV. I disagree
Speaker 1: with you. I think there's no question that children are famous.
Speaker 1: Parents get all kinds of advantages as me. You cannot
Speaker 1: compare this to the inexperienced Hunter Biden while his father's
Speaker 1: vice president, getting millions of dollars having no experience. Let
Speaker 1: me tell you something, just being around television, you're gonna
Speaker 1: learn a lot in a week. Trust me. I know
Speaker 1: because I've had a million kids in turn for me
Speaker 1: over the years. But in all these other cases, you
Speaker 1: didn't have a vice president sit up on a podium
Speaker 1: and brag about the way that he's strong armed a
Speaker 1: prosecutor in another country. And it doesn't matter if that
Speaker 1: prosecutor was corrupt or not. The fact is he was
Speaker 1: a prosecutor in another country. And Joe Biden used his
Speaker 1: official position to strong arm somebody for the purpose of
Speaker 1: getting his son out of trouble, and he admitted that
Speaker 1: in and It or live on a stage. I mean
Speaker 1: These people don't need to be protected anymore the way
Speaker 1: that they've been protected for so long. There's no special
Speaker 1: type of protection clauses in the constitution to take care
Speaker 1: of these people when they do criminal activity, and it
Speaker 1: needs to stop, you know. I think influence happens all
Speaker 1: the time. I think about even President Trump saying that
Speaker 1: he thought that Boris mayor Boris now Prime Minister Boris
Speaker 1: would be the best person to leave the England out
Speaker 1: of the UK out of Brexit. I mean, this stuff
Speaker 1: happens all the time, and I just want us to
Speaker 1: remember that the problem with Ukraine was corruption, and going
Speaker 1: even back to Kent and what Kent aarticified today state
Speaker 1: Department employee that the problem was that they were worried
Speaker 1: that the Biden stuff was about a conflict of interest
Speaker 1: or the appearance of a conflict of interest. I've said
Speaker 1: every time on the show that you've asked mis Sean,
Speaker 1: I don't believe he should have been on that board.
Speaker 1: And I think we should have the same rules for
Speaker 1: every child of every politician. And I don't care what
Speaker 1: party you belong to. It is wrong, it looks wrong,
Speaker 1: and we need to be sure that our politicians are
Speaker 1: doing things. But you can't say that this is comparable
Speaker 1: to somebody that does a try out on TV that
Speaker 1: has background and experience being around TV and then they
Speaker 1: do a good job been they get hired. There's no
Speaker 1: comparison here. And let me tell you something. You might
Speaker 1: get the gig, but you know, the audience will determine
Speaker 1: very quick whether you stay in TV. And in the
Speaker 1: case of both Jenna Bush and Megan McCain, and I
Speaker 1: don't always agree with Megan, but so what, she's very
Speaker 1: good on television. She's done a lot of great work
Speaker 1: and to her credit, and that's not the same as
Speaker 1: no experience in Ukraine, China. Oh, let me pay you
Speaker 1: millions to do nothing. He has nothing to offer except
Speaker 1: hopefully they gained something. What are they looking to gain
Speaker 1: favor from the dat? That's the difference, the major difference.
Speaker 1: All right, guys, thank you. Eight hundred nine for one,
Speaker 1: Shawn is a number. All right, to our phones we go.
Speaker 1: David Michigan, Dave, Hi, how are you welcome to the program?
Speaker 1: Says you're a carpenter, Union carpenter. Good for you. Yeah, Hey, Sean,
Speaker 1: I got an issue. I've been ahead. You asked me away,
Speaker 1: go ahead. I've been in the trades for a long time.
Speaker 1: I'm fifty eight years old. You know. They were always
Speaker 1: pushing us to vote Democrat, Democrat, Democrat. But I couldn't
Speaker 1: have good conscience vote for Hillary the last time around,
Speaker 1: so I gave Trump a shot. And my biggest issue
Speaker 1: is why are these Republicans. Why do they just keep
Speaker 1: backing down and let all this craft go on until
Speaker 1: somebody goes and gets put in jail. This stuff's going
Speaker 1: to continue to go on. That's why there's ampathy about voting,
Speaker 1: because no, I don't know if there's gonna be ampathy
Speaker 1: this year and voting. I see Trump's look. Assuming that
Speaker 1: the Democrats follow through on their insane impeachment strategy, They're
Speaker 1: gonna impeach them. Okay, impeach them, do nothing, Democrats. This
Speaker 1: is what their fixation over nothing. We already know because
Speaker 1: we have the transcript. So they'll impeach them. Senate won't
Speaker 1: convict him, and then he's gonna win reelection because you
Speaker 1: know what every Americans gonna do. Those you know seven
Speaker 1: million Americans strong now that got jobs, seven million off
Speaker 1: of food stamps, and those out of poverty, record low
Speaker 1: unemployment for African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, women in
Speaker 1: the workplace, you unemployment. They're gonna vote and they're gonna
Speaker 1: see this for what it is, and that is their
Speaker 1: secret Soviet style coup impeachment attempt. And you know what
Speaker 1: they're gonna lose. That's where I think this ends. If
Speaker 1: you're asking me, we're nearly a year out. We'll start
Speaker 1: counting down one year on November third from election day.
Speaker 1: Where I am telling you, listen to me. The American
Speaker 1: people see the stench, the double standard. They know why
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was hired without any experience. You know the
Speaker 1: fact that I have to explain it is just really
Speaker 1: because no one else will in the corrupt mob in
Speaker 1: the media. I'm gonna tell you the other thing. People
Speaker 1: like you that you're a union carpenter. Now, just imagine
Speaker 1: you're in the trades in New York City and your
Speaker 1: mayor says, we're not going to build skyscrapers with glass
Speaker 1: or steel anymore. Okay, what happens to the carpenters, the plumbers,
Speaker 1: the electrician, the construction workers, the steel workers. They're screwed. Really,
Speaker 1: you want to vote Democrat, your unions telling you to
Speaker 1: vote Democrat. Well that's what your Democratic DOPEI Mayor just
Speaker 1: did so bad for everybody, just so unbelievable. They make
Speaker 1: it so cost prohibitive you can't even build a building,
Speaker 1: and if you do build one, they're gonna tell you
Speaker 1: how you can't rent it for any amount of money
Speaker 1: that would ever make a profit. You have to subsidize
Speaker 1: housing for strangers. We're talking about this as a team,
Speaker 1: and Linda actually came up with the idea, why don't
Speaker 1: we run with our Friday free for all fun music,
Speaker 1: get ready for the weekend music, some of the great
Speaker 1: sound that we don't even have time to get to
Speaker 1: all week because Jason Ethan everybody worked so hard putting
Speaker 1: it together. And so we're gonna kind of mix it
Speaker 1: in with our friends from Zach Brown and Big and
Speaker 1: Rich and Charlie Daniels, like you know Pelosi the President
Speaker 1: saying hates the US or she wouldn't allow impeachment and
Speaker 1: he's right, or the dumb stuff of Andrew McCabe or
Speaker 1: James o'keefson credible series this week, Let's hit it so
Speaker 1: Jack Zucker runs the show, Jeff Zucker runs so he
Speaker 1: may he will personally go into the control and if
Speaker 1: Jake Toppers didn't really killing and Conway. He one time
Speaker 1: that he went to control room bringing out interview and
Speaker 1: he was like he keep going to keep going, asking questions,
Speaker 1: flow pass of commercial lights, keep going. I mean it
Speaker 1: turned a seven minute we towards twenty five minute. Why
Speaker 1: because jaf Zucker person when he got on the phone
Speaker 1: and the Topper show what was happening or he got
Speaker 1: into his ear that he was interviewed calling hotway and
Speaker 1: then when she went shade, she was about argue going
Speaker 1: back and forth with Jack Tapper, and Zucker told him
Speaker 1: that keep going, keep going and keep going. Don't stop guys,
Speaker 1: because you were jamming her up. Yeah yeah, yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean kind of condos whatever. How I like the fact
Speaker 1: that you guys are jamming her up. I did see
Speaker 1: started to guess she deserves it. She's lying, is she
Speaker 1: or she's just is it? So? Zucker seems an opportune
Speaker 1: the vice president President Trump has falsely accused your son
Speaker 1: of doing something wrong while serving on a company board
Speaker 1: in Ukraine. I want to point out there's no evidence
Speaker 1: of wrongdoing by either one of you. No one in
Speaker 1: my family, we'll have an office in the White House,
Speaker 1: we'll sit at in meetings as if they're a cabinet member,
Speaker 1: will in fact have any business relationship with anyone that
Speaker 1: relates to a foreign corporation or a foreign country, period period,
Speaker 1: end of story. And what I'm not going to let
Speaker 1: you all do is take the focus off the problem.
Speaker 1: No one, No one has asserted my son did a
Speaker 1: single thing wrong. No one has asserted that I have
Speaker 1: done any wrong except the lying president. That's the only
Speaker 1: thing that's the focus. When he said, I hope you
Speaker 1: know what you're doing, what did he think you were
Speaker 1: doing well? He wrote? The press reports that I joined
Speaker 1: the board of Barisma, which was a Ukrainian natural gas company,
Speaker 1: And there's been a lot of misinformation about me, not
Speaker 1: about my dad. Nobody buys that, but it buys this
Speaker 1: idea that I was unqualified to be on the board.
Speaker 1: What were your qualifications to be on the board of
Speaker 1: ARESMA Well. I was vice chairman of the board of
Speaker 1: Amtrak for five years. I was the chairman of the
Speaker 1: board of the UN World Food Program. I was a
Speaker 1: lawyer for boyschill Or Flexner, one of the most prestigious
Speaker 1: law firms in the world. You didn't have any extensive
Speaker 1: knowledge about natural gas or Ukraine itself. So no, but
Speaker 1: I think that I had as much knowledge as anybody else.
Speaker 1: It was on the board, if not more. The President
Speaker 1: has repeatedly said that you received one point five billion
Speaker 1: dollars from trying to despite no experience and for no
Speaker 1: apparent reason. Obviously fact checkers have said that that is
Speaker 1: not true. But this is literally has no basis in
Speaker 1: fact in any way. Have you received any money from
Speaker 1: on business dealing. No at all, not one cent, not
Speaker 1: one cent, Definitely not one point five billion. It's crazy.
Speaker 1: They feel like they have the license to go out
Speaker 1: and say whatever they want. It feels to me like
Speaker 1: living in some kinds of Alice in Wonderland, where you're
Speaker 1: up on the real world and then you fall down
Speaker 1: the rabbit hole, and you know, the presidents of Cheshire
Speaker 1: Cat asking you questions about crazy things that don't have
Speaker 1: very any resemblance to the reality of anything that has
Speaker 1: to do with me. And so here's here's the answer.
Speaker 1: No one ever paid me one point five billion dollars,
Speaker 1: and if they had, um, I would not be doing
Speaker 1: this interview right now. There's both plausibility perhaps accuracy. Uh,
Speaker 1: and but that it's not It was not intended to
Speaker 1: be a definitive document. You're absolutely right. It is raw
Speaker 1: source reporting and the common thing you would do it.
Speaker 1: Steel presented it as such. It's the kind of thing
Speaker 1: we see often from sources. We knew that Steele was
Speaker 1: working a number of different sources, some of which had
Speaker 1: subsources and sub subsources, and he would represent that in
Speaker 1: the reporting as any good source should. So it didn't
Speaker 1: come with his like impromoter of this is all gospel.
Speaker 1: It was like, this is what I'm hearing, and that's
Speaker 1: how good sources report. UM. A lot of the information,
Speaker 1: some of the information was consistent with reporting we were
Speaker 1: getting from other sources. So that's always to his credit,
Speaker 1: Steele had a history of um of good reporting to us.
Speaker 1: He had provided information on other cases, cases about like
Speaker 1: Russian organized crime issues and other issues, information that was
Speaker 1: judged to be so accurate that it was used in
Speaker 1: things like a restaurants and indictments. So he had a
Speaker 1: very solid track record and provided this information with you know,
Speaker 1: accurately describing some of it he you know, he thought
Speaker 1: was pretty solid. Others he made clear like, Hey, I'm
Speaker 1: getting this from one person, and I can't vouch for
Speaker 1: the sourcing chain, and I'm just giving it to you
Speaker 1: for your As I've said to you before, the times
Speaker 1: have found us to do just that. So I'm very
Speaker 1: proud of the works that Adam Shipp is doing. And
Speaker 1: this isn't about politics or partisanship. Is about patriotism for
Speaker 1: our country and value the way he's conducting this with
Speaker 1: equal time on all sides. For the questioning that are there.
Speaker 1: You've heard from him, we were here together when he
Speaker 1: presented how he was proceeding. He also sent a letter
Speaker 1: two members yesterday which is in a public filmain. I
Speaker 1: call it to your attention in case you have some
Speaker 1: questions about the professionalism and the fairness which these hearings
Speaker 1: are being helped. Basically, the crazy stuff from all week long,
Speaker 1: and every one week is crazier than another. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get to some of our busy phones here on
Speaker 1: this Friday. I know it's come. Glad, it's Friday, aren't
Speaker 1: you all glad it's Friday? All right, let's say hi?
Speaker 1: Is it? Tanner is in Florida, the beautiful, warm state
Speaker 1: of Florida. It's kind of chilly up here in New York.
Speaker 1: What's going on? Well, we've got some sunshine and on here, Sean.
Speaker 1: I was listening to your show the other day with
Speaker 1: Micro and I gotta say I completely agree. I'm a
Speaker 1: project manager for a half a billion dollar project down
Speaker 1: here at Walt Disney World, and I got to agree
Speaker 1: there is a definitely a shortage of skilled labor. But
Speaker 1: I think also my comment is that it's coupled with
Speaker 1: a lot of employers who aren't willing to pay guys
Speaker 1: out of high school a decent wage. So I think
Speaker 1: it's kind of a twofold problem from what I'm seeing,
Speaker 1: you know, I gotta tell you, and yeah, there's a
Speaker 1: shortage of skilled labor and also a shortage of what
Speaker 1: we're saying pay or benefits, whatever, But that's changing. You know,
Speaker 1: when you have a what is virtually an unemployment situation
Speaker 1: where we have full employment, that puts the job seeker
Speaker 1: in the driver's seat. You know. I know we have
Speaker 1: our friends at expresspros dot com, but I mean, this
Speaker 1: is the time if you're looking for a better job
Speaker 1: with better benefits and better pay and a better career track,
Speaker 1: now would be the time to do it because if
Speaker 1: then you lock in and then you're with a good company,
Speaker 1: and now you made a decision that's going to benefit
Speaker 1: you for the rest of your life. I know for
Speaker 1: a lot of people, for whatever reason, change is hard
Speaker 1: to do. I'm not one of those people. I've never
Speaker 1: been afraid to jump and take chances. I've lived in
Speaker 1: five different states and I've followed my crazy career around
Speaker 1: like a lunatic. But you know, people have to get
Speaker 1: part of living is getting out of your comfort zone.
Speaker 1: Does that make sense? I completely agree, and I tell
Speaker 1: you I think in the last three years it's definitely
Speaker 1: headed in a better direction as far as you know,
Speaker 1: benefits and wage and scale. But I think we've still
Speaker 1: got a ways to go to get the type of
Speaker 1: people in the construction or the trades industry that we want.
Speaker 1: I think it's a great conversation I have. Not everybody
Speaker 1: has meant for college, I can tell you that, and
Speaker 1: college has gotten so expensive, and I know everybody in
Speaker 1: my mindset too. In my head, it's like, yeah, of
Speaker 1: course my kids have to go. You've got to get
Speaker 1: a college degree. That's why I've always thought, and you know,
Speaker 1: that's why, even on my own no money. I was
Speaker 1: working my way through college and paying it for all
Speaker 1: by myself and working the whole time. One of the
Speaker 1: things I think I missed out on because I have
Speaker 1: so many friends. I mean, when my friends talk about
Speaker 1: their alma matera whatever it happens to be, and their
Speaker 1: college experience, I know I'm a little envious of it.
Speaker 1: I'm not the type of person that's jealous of anything.
Speaker 1: I'm happy with what I have and I'm happy the
Speaker 1: way my life is unfolded, and it just wasn't meant
Speaker 1: to be. But you know, they meet friends and memories
Speaker 1: are made for life, and it's probably the best transition
Speaker 1: into adulthood and reality that you could ever want. You're
Speaker 1: kind of still clinging a little bit to being a kid,
Speaker 1: and you're also now looking at this other world that
Speaker 1: you have to enter and hopefully conquer. And it's a
Speaker 1: little scary in that other world when you start out.
Speaker 1: But for some people, I will tell you what, the
Speaker 1: best thing in my life was working with my hands,
Speaker 1: doing real work for two decades. It defines me, It's
Speaker 1: in my DNA. It helps me be normal, If that
Speaker 1: makes sense. I completely agree. And I did carpentry all
Speaker 1: through high school and ultimately loved carpentry. Would loved working
Speaker 1: with my hands. But what drove me to get a
Speaker 1: four year degree in construction science was the benefits and
Speaker 1: then the pay. When you look at what I could
Speaker 1: make with a four year degree in construction science versus
Speaker 1: what I could make as a carpenter, there's just really
Speaker 1: no comparison. Yeah. Look, I went for I guess a year, semester,
Speaker 1: a year. I don't remember, Rhode Island, Rhode Island, Rhodeland
Speaker 1: te Technical I forget what it was, Rhode Island Technical College.
Speaker 1: I forget. I'd have to go back and look, I
Speaker 1: mean you're saying you don't remember, Actually I don't know
Speaker 1: the real name of it. And what happened was I
Speaker 1: already had a contracting business. I already had a company,
Speaker 1: and I went there and all my professors were in
Speaker 1: the industry, and I ended up working and doing deals
Speaker 1: with them, and then you know, I'm like, guys, I
Speaker 1: can't go to school anymore because you've given me so
Speaker 1: much work. And they're like, oh, don't worry about it.
Speaker 1: I'm like, well, I'm wasting my time here. Um, because
Speaker 1: I wanted to advance my knowledge base but you know,
Speaker 1: when you when you got that much work and the
Speaker 1: kind of money we were kind of making at the time,
Speaker 1: you gotta take it. We didn't get it. It's actually
Speaker 1: a pretty funny situation. Now. Another another aspect of this
Speaker 1: is we have to talk about the border and the
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants coming across. And by the way, I remember
Speaker 1: now the New England Institute of Technology. That's where I
Speaker 1: went any it a matter of fact, LYNDA call them
Speaker 1: and say I want my transcript. I don't remember how
Speaker 1: long I went there. Okay, I mean that sounds stupid,
Speaker 1: but I mean I did go there, but I got
Speaker 1: all my professors once they realized what I was capable of,
Speaker 1: and I kind of specialized in, you know, doing rehab
Speaker 1: work in these older New England homes. I had horsehair,
Speaker 1: plaster and lats. They were like, oh my gosh, this
Speaker 1: guy's gold for us, and they kept me busy. I
Speaker 1: made a lot of money. Right go ahead, right, Well,
Speaker 1: what I was going to say is, I think we
Speaker 1: also have to have a conversation about our border and
Speaker 1: the illegal workforce that's coming across, and they're working jobs
Speaker 1: that American citizens should have, but they're taking those jobs
Speaker 1: at such a cut rate that you know, again, it
Speaker 1: just drives down the wages from where we want them
Speaker 1: to be and where people who are Yeah, you're right,
Speaker 1: and people are hurt because of cheap labor. You know, look,
Speaker 1: they don't. Republicans aren't, you know, free of the blame
Speaker 1: in this. Either. Got to be really clear about this.
Speaker 1: There are Republicans and business that one cheap labor, and
Speaker 1: I'm like, too bad. Look, I do hope and I
Speaker 1: mean this sincerely. I know this strike is going on
Speaker 1: the UAW and GM. I praying that they don't close
Speaker 1: this freaking factory done. You know, somehow, everybody's got to
Speaker 1: understand the company's got to make money and you want
Speaker 1: to take care of the those people that are working
Speaker 1: hard every day. I got it. But they've got they've
Speaker 1: got to understand that they're in this together. And I
Speaker 1: always get this feeling when you get the UAW. You know,
Speaker 1: if they push too hard, they're gonna drive these car
Speaker 1: companies away. Again, You've got to meet in the middle.
Speaker 1: The best way that I see that happening is profit sharing.
Speaker 1: Get a percentage of the upside. Everybody will let them
Speaker 1: work harder because they're incentivized on the upside, make the
Speaker 1: best car, then you sell enough of them everybody, everybody wins.
Speaker 1: That's how I would do it. All right, All right, man,
Speaker 1: appreciate it. You know, I will say this. At some
Speaker 1: point in everybody's life. I think it is. You gotta
Speaker 1: learn to do some work with your hand. You gotta
Speaker 1: get your hands dirty. You just got to if you
Speaker 1: you know, you can't go through life thinking that everything's easy.
Speaker 1: You know, do you ever sympathize with a truck driver? Now?
Speaker 1: I used to get mad. I remember when I was
Speaker 1: younger driving. You know, you get behind an eighteen wheeler
Speaker 1: and or you try and pass it and it's raining
Speaker 1: out and it's flooding your windshield with water and you
Speaker 1: can't see, and it's stressful and you're trying to drive
Speaker 1: past the stupid thing. Yeah, but you stop and you
Speaker 1: think about it. One of them important role truck drivers
Speaker 1: playing our lives. Why because all the food that you're
Speaker 1: buying in the grocery store, all the lumber you're getting
Speaker 1: at home depot, you know, all the everything you pretty
Speaker 1: much get comes from them. And they drive overnight. It's
Speaker 1: not an easy job. And then the government puts restrictions
Speaker 1: how many hours they gonna be on the road, and
Speaker 1: then they're getting ticketed up the yazoo if God forbid,
Speaker 1: they're on the road two hours longer than they should
Speaker 1: have been. It's unbelievable. But I just think every person
Speaker 1: at some point in your life needs to do real work.
Speaker 1: I've tried to institute this with my own kids to
Speaker 1: the extent possible that I could, and just make sure
Speaker 1: they have jobs being a good person. School sports was
Speaker 1: a big job for them because they, you know, played
Speaker 1: at a pretty high level and that was and then
Speaker 1: you got to do these other choice. Right. That's gonna
Speaker 1: wrap things up at today. We have a busy week.
Speaker 1: Next week we have an interview with the president set up,
Speaker 1: and we have shows from California not telling where. Oh
Speaker 1: look at this, I forgot to get to the psycho
Speaker 1: leftist Oh everso loving liberals that took out a billboard
Speaker 1: in Times Square, Yeah, showing your president hog tide and assaulted.
Speaker 1: Oh all peace and love and Times Square by liberal
Speaker 1: New Yorkers. Where's the mayor? Now? Have a great weekend.
Speaker 1: We will see you Monday from Washington, d C. Thanks
Speaker 1: for being with us.