WEBVTT - U.S. Recovery Not Likely Until End of Q3: Bart Van Ark

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahmowitz. Each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your money, whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. Well, some of the economic data coming

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in is starting to reflect the impacts from the COVID nineteen.

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index decline sharply in March,

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>following an increase in February. Help us walk through the numbers.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Who welcome Bart van Arc. He's a chief econmist at

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the Conference Board. Bart, thanks so much for joining us.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:43.279
<v Speaker 1>What are the March data show? Well at them at

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>at a good level of the overall consumer Confidence Index.

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the index is showing a drop from und

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty two point six in February two twenty in March.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>That perhaps it is not as you to drop as

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you might expect, but it is important that when we

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the responses to this survey, most of these

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>responses were still coming in in the sort of early

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>half of March, and a majority even in the first

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>week of March. So this was before the COVID crisis

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>was announced to be a global pandemic, and the US

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really strongly affected. However, if we look belon beyond

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the or below the aggregant number, particularly on expectations, we

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>saw already a very significant weakening from hundred and eight

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to eight point two in March, so that's a big decline.

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>So even in early March, consumers were already getting very

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the outlook and obviously that we'll only have

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>strength and over the last few weeks, well, this has

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>been an unprecedented period on a lot of different levels,

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>one of which is just the speed of which this

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>has hit and changed the whole economic backdrop. So it's

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of it is difficult to cling to some of

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the previous leading indicators when you look at some of

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the indicators in real time. We saw the jobless claims

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>last week. We're expecting more data on that front. We've

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>gotten regional FED measures coming out showing one dire picture

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>after another. It's the most likely economic scenario that you

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>see going forward. Oh, I think, so, first of all,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the index wherret stands now, I

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>think we'll see significantly more declines happening over the next

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>few weeks and months. Uh, even compared to the financial crisis,

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not yet at that low point, you know. At

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that time, the expectations index dropped at some point of

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the thirty and we're still at a t a. So

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>there's still a very long way to go in terms

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of declining confidence going forward. The really couple of scenarios

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>now to your question, leads out on sort of where

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going. Really a couple of scenarios to think about now.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>One is indeed that we will see this very deep

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>contraction happening for at least a not a month, if

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>not perhaps six weeks or two months, but then see

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a fairly strong v bound kind of recovery. Most of

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the forecast are still sort of working on that scenario

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that we will be able to begin to open up

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the economy again over the summer. Still leaves the question

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what will happen after the summer in the case of

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>researchens of cases. But I have to say that I

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's actually more likely that, uh, you know, the

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>contraction may continue well into the third quarter. Um, it's

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>very likely that you know, you know, containment measures and

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>social distancing measures will continue even if the economy opens up.

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that will remain in place. Businesses have

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to be prepared for a lot of regular free pressure

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>from authorities about under what conditions that can open up

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in order to avoid the spread of the virus. So

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I think this is really a much longer period. Therefore,

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>even the third quarter may still be a fairly weak quarter,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and you may not really begin to see recovery in

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the economy of any significance until the final quarter of

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the year. So bart, give us a your assessment kind

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of the fiscal stimulus we've seen me at the two

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar bill, and now there's talk of another two

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar perhaps infrastructure bill. How how do you expect

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that to impact the economy. Well, it will of course

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>help to sort of, um, you know, put the bottom

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>into the decline here. Um. You know, some of this

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>money will go to small businesses who are sort of

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in immediate need of an end of support. If they

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>don't get that trenencial support, they will have to close down. Uh,

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and that would make it much more difficult for them

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to actually open up again. Wants to recovery start. So

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll see some effects there. It will not

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily excelerate growth now, but it will have these businesses

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to recover again once we get through

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this crisis. The other part is to support to unemployment

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and to income. Again, low income households will need the

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>money in order just to be able to pay their

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>basic expenses. UH. Sort of in the medium income level,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>it's very likely as long as people can pay their

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>basic expenses and their mortgages and everything else, that will

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>put you know, extra support into savings because they will

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>be prepared for more difficult times to come. And therefore

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>some of these effects on the consumption site may be

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>delayed and we will not begin to see anything of

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>that really picking in into the second half of the year.

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Bart when we talk about the consumer at accounts for

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about two thirds of the American economy, and there was

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a survey out from bank Rate that I was looking

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>at this morning showing that more than half of Americans

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>are reducing their consumptions even online uh in response to

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus crisis. Just to show up enough capital heading

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>into this period, how big of a recession. Do you

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>think the US is going to have this year? Oh well,

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever way with the finery recession, this is going to

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>be a recession, whether it is multiple months of contraction

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or uh, you know, a level of GDP by the

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, which can be you know, between

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>five and seven percent lower than what it was at

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year. So this is a This

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is a big recession, and it's bigger than what we've

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>seen in two oh eight and and and two oh nine.

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's a very kind of unique recession in terms

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of recent history because basically what happened here is the

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>economy has been shut down. Uh, that's where we are

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>right now at the moment. This is primarious supply shock

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>because you know, people just can't go anywhere. But gradually

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that supply shop will turn into a demand problem and

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that this at once. Once we can begin to open

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy, the real question is how quickly can that

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 1>consumer come back online? When? When? When? When are they

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>ready to start spending again? Are they allowed to be spending,

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to be able to go out to the shops and

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the restaurants and everything else, And how willing are they

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to spend because they're taking a big hit at the moment,

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and they are being told that if they're not careful,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>they have researchers of cases later in the year. So

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I think people will be cautious in order to uh

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to uh to to to start spending again, and I

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>think therefore again the recovery will be a difficult recovery

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>in a slow one. Bart van Ark, thank you so

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us, Bart van Ark, chief economists

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>at the conference board time to check in with Bloomberg.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Opinion were joined by opinion Calumust Julian Lee. It covers

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>off things oil for Bloomberg Opinion joining Julian, thanks so

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We've seen this incredible decline in

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>crewde We've got you know, w T I crede about

0:06:56.040 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>twe barrel right now. I know it's supplying, I know

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's demanded. Give us a sense of how much of

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>each is really driving oil down here. I think at

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the moment it's it's mostly demand. Um. You know, we've

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>had the Saudis and the Russians threatening to open the taps,

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're starting to see some of that oil perhaps

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>beginning to move, particularly out of Saudi Arabia. They seem

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to have boosted shipments to storage tanks that they lease

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Mediterranean. Um, we're seeing a little bit of

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>an increase in shipments going towards the United States, but

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>none of that oil has arrived yet. What we're really

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing at the moment at least, is a response to

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a collapse in demand. Um. You know, there are estimates

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that demand this week is down by about twenty six

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>percent globally. That's as if the entire United States, Canada, Mexico,

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>all of Central America, and all of the Caribbean stopped

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>using any oil at all. Well, it's kind of what

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it feels like. I mean, you look up and there

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are no airplanes in the sky, and you look out

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>on the street here and there are no cars going

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>by except for except for the horrible whale of ambulances

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>which we've been hearing as people are suffering throughout the city.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to understand how much pain has been

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>priced in, given the fact that we're running out of

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>storage and that Saudi Arabia seems to have no intention

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of stopping with the production. I think obviously a lot

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>has been priced in. I mean, as you said, we're

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing you know, w T I down around twenty bucks

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the barrel. But some of the inland crews that are

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>finding it difficult to access storage space are are even

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>now trading in single digits UM. So there are there

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>are a lot below the the international benchmarks UM. And

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're as you say, we're not seeing any

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>end to the pressure. We're not seeing any significant nuptick

0:08:56.120 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in in road traffic. UM. We're not seeing any of

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the airline starting to talk about getting some of their

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>fleet flying again. In fact, some of the you know,

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>the biggest low cost carriers in Europe have grounded their

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>entire fleets in the last couple of days. So we're

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>really not yet seeing any pickup in demand. And we

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>still have this this wave of additional oil that has

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>been promised or threatened making its way towards consumers who

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want it. So, Julian, we had President Trump speak

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>with Mr Putin yesterday. Any sense of what they talked

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>about or whether there can be any movement there on

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>a part of Russia, UM, I haven't got any detailed

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of what they talked about. I mean we were

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>hearing that they talked about energy and they talked about

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the virus and responding to it. UM. My own take

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.479
<v Speaker 1>on it is that nobody is going to act unilaterally.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Russia isn't going to do anything if it doesn't see

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>other people, um sort of playing their part. And I

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think those other people include the United States, m Saudi

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Arabia and Russia. Both see that their actions over the

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>last four or five years have helped to spur a

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>doubling of US oil production, and quite frankly, I think

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>their view is that this is too big um for

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>anybody to deal with on their own. We're all in

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>this together. Um. If we're going to come back, we're

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>all going to come back, and that has to include

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>American oil producers too. Julian, if we could take a

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>step back and talk about what happens when this period

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>of time is over, do you foresee the destruction and

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>demand being something with permanent ramifications, people going to other

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sources of energy or changing their habits, or do you

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think that once things get back on track, the economy

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is globally start recovering, we're gonna see oil bounce back

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>up a barrel, maybe even sixty dollars a barrel. I

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly think we're we're going to see a recovery. Whether

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a complete recovery, I think is too early to

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>tell yet. But I think that if this is a

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>relatively short term disruption, and if if things are picking

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>back up off the off the floor by you know,

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>even the autumn or or the end of this year,

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's long enough for people to have

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally changed their habits. People are going to go back

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to driving, They're probably going to go back to flying

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that that restrictions allow them to do. So. Um,

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it takes a a long term disruption for

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>people to really change their habits. I I don't know

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of anyone at the moment who's saying, oh, I'll never

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>fly again, or I'll never travel overseas again. So I

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think things will come back. What the industry is going

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to look like when that happens, in the ability to

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>meet that rising demand, I think it's going to be

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>another question. Julian Lee, thank you so much for being

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>with us. Julian Lee Limbercampeian columnists covering all things oil related.

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>It was the worst month for US equities, frankly for

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>global equity since two thousand and eight, Europe fair to

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>even worse. Emerging market bonds had their worst month, worst

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>quarters since The superlatives continue and as an investor, there's

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a question do you buy the dip as so many

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>have been conditioned to do over the past decade, or

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is this time different as the entire economic landscape has

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>profoundly shifted. Scott Clemens, chief investment strategist at Brown Brothers Harriman,

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Pittsburgh. Scott, thank you so much for

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>being with us. I want to start there. How much

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>do you think it is time to buy the dip?

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And how much are we still reeling from an economic

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>shock that we cannot get our arms around and may

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>not be fully priced in? Good morning, Lisa. I think

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the economic shock has been so quick and the markets

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have certainly reflected that that just in the past week

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or so, investors are beginning to sort of gather their

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about this. I'm not sure if we formed the

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>bottom last week or not. You're never sure until well

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>after the fact. I would say for investors focused on

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the long term, this kind of market disruption does provide

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a good opportunity, may not be the best, doesn't mean

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the market won't move lower, but it does provide a

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 1>good opportunity to raise your allocation to equities. So Scott's

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense here we've seen the Federal Reserve

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Act really, I think pretty admirably here. Quickly they're out

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in front. One could argue, you know, using a lot

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of the tools in their toolbox. Give us a sense

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of what the FED has done from your perspective, Well, Paul,

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>they've thrown the entire to two thousand and a playbook

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>at the market. The differences. They've done it in about

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, whereas in two thousand and eight it took

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 1>them three or four months to do it. If you

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>look back at where FED policy was on the first

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>day of March of the year, thirty one days ago,

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it is astonishing how much that they have done and

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's working. I think we can give

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>them credit. The kind of volatility and spread widening that

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>we saw on fixed income markets, even in the highest quality,

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>shortest duration fixed income markets five or six days ago,

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>has begun to wash out. I think it's a good

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>sign that the Fed last week did when we use

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the word only a hundred and fifteen billion dollars of

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>repurchased operations. That's down from half a trillion in each

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of the two previous weeks. Doesn't mean we're out of

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the woods yet, but FED policy is working to help

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>financial markets function more effectively. All right, So let's talk

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about how people are investing. We have seen a rush

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of cash which has been basically preserved or hoarded, we

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>should say, over the past few weeks, cash flooding into

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the investment grade corporate bottom market. Is the FED backstops

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>those securities. I'm just wondering whether you're eating that and

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you're recommending people boost their allocations to that area slowly.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it's time to back up the

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>proverbial truck, because as as you've continually reported on, there's

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>probably more bad news to come, both on the economic

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>front and on the healthcare front as well. So we

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are guiding our clients at Bromer this's harement to take

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>advantage on a slow basis. If there is money that

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they're willing to put into the markets or rebalancing, that

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>should be done back to an asset allocation policy to

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>do so over time, and by overtime I mean several

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>months or maybe several quarters as well. Cres is a

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>crisis that's still in the very early days. We are

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>finding opportunities throughout equity markets. I would say in fixed income,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's probably more in non investment grade or distressed debt

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>where investors should tread carefully, but those were the real

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunities will begun to arise. You just reported on Carnival

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>spond offering them maybe an example of that kind of opportunity. Wait, wait, wait,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>hold on one second. I'm not going to let you

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>get away with other words you're saying by Carnival three

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>year bonds with a coupon of twelve and a half,

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you're all in. No, I'm not all saying that. I'm

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>saying about the example of a kind of opportunity. To

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>see a lot more of that come. Taking advantage of

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that for careful and cautious and patient investors is probably

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. Carnival is just the earliest example of

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that kind of trend. So, Scott, So a lot of

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>people are here trying to sense over the last several days,

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>has the market bottom did we see that last week?

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Or is it forming a bottom or is it typical

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of just a little bounce in what is a longer

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>term bear market. How do you think about that? Historically?

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I go back and look at our experience in two

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, and I know that there are a

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of differences. There always are differences in the particulars,

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but the common theme is human emotion in the battle

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>between fear and greed, and that's playing out again. Recalling

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, that a lot of the FED

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>policy and fiscal policy was in place by early October

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of that year. The market responded. There were in October

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>early November two separate rallies in the market, only for

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the market to bottom out at a lower level than

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a lower level, before ultimately finding a bottom in March

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and nine. So it is not uncommon

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>to have these kind of relief rallies within a longer

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>term bear market. So we're cautioning investors not to get

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>too carried away with the rally that we've had over

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of days. Scott, if you just take

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>a look at the balance of the calls and the

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>emotion that you get from investors that you deal with

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>from clients, is the balance more heavily waited to fear

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>or is it more heavily waited to greed, or at

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>least the sense of buying the dip always has worked.

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>We have a dip, let's get out there and buy,

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>you know. But it depends on what you mean by work.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>The longer term, your investment time horizon is the easier

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it is to say, yes, this is a time to

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>put money in the market. So we went back and

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>looked at the hypothetical unluckiest investor ever. What if you

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>had allocated capital to the market at the peak of

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble. What if you had bought into

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>equity markets the day before Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy Charlie

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Brown levels of unlucky investing timing, And yet with both

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of those time frames, ten or fifteen years down the road,

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>with a bad entry point, investors had still doubled or

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.479
<v Speaker 1>tripled their money. So the answer to whether or not

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this is the time to get into the markets or

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>not depends on the individual investor's temperament and time horizon

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>more than it does on calling a bottom in the

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>market itself. Scott Clemens, thank you so much for joining us.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate that. Scott Clements, UH Chief Investment strategies for

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Brown Brothers, Harriman giving us his thoughts on the market,

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.959
<v Speaker 1>and interesting headline just crossing it the Bloomberg Lisa. President

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump calls for two trilliant infrastructure package in the next

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>relief bill. Yeah, this sort of is interesting. It's called

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>it comes after Nancy Pelosi, how speaker always reportedly in

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>talks to get together a second round of a fiscal

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>bay out in the near future. President Trump, it seems

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like is weighing in trying to push that more into

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure realm. Both are not mutually exclusive, right, but

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>it does raise a question about whether we're going to

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>get some sort of you know, w p A or

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>c c C or you know, targeting back to the

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>nine thirties and some of the public works programs that

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>stemmed from that period of time. Are we going to

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>see a redux of this and it's going to give

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>fire to some of the infrastructure proposals that were out

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>there well before anything about COVID nineteen was on the scene. Poll. Yeah, absolutely,

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a prompt discussion of how much capital,

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>how much cash should be put in the hands of consumers,

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly those that have been that have lost their jobs,

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>versus how much aid should be given to companies versus

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>how much should be potentially put in for infrastructure. So

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that will likely again that debate. And also how much

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>does the economy need to be stimulated after the bailout?

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Key questions? Exactly right, exactly right. So looking at the

0:19:58.240 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>markets here, we have a little bit of green on

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the screen, a little bit of stability, Lisa and I

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>think we'll call it that right here. So but markets

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>are up just slightly here. We'll have more coming up.

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. If you listen really closely, you can

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>hear the helicopters hovering above you, ready to drop some cash.

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That is sort of the feeling out there is the

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>US government passes one stimulus effort or bailout effort, if

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you want to call it that, that will deliver checks

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>two Americans already in the works. He's get another one.

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>And the question that I have been having persistently is

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is this inflationary or deflationary? Ira Jersey has a very

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>strong view on this, chief US interestrate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and I want to continue the conversation because a lot

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of people are struggling here thinking that normally when you

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>print money that is inflationary, Why is the bond market

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>saying the exact opposite. Yeah, I think for two reasons.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I think one is that the quote unquote helicopter money

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that you just mentioned is really just replacing income and

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>revenues that are going to be lost by a lot

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of businesses globally, because the way that money gets into

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the economy is the Federal Reserve creates base money, right

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>or any central bank creates what's called base money, and

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>then banks go out and then lend money to other people,

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to their to their customers, and that's how money flows

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>into the system. In an environment like this, you're not

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>creating um a lot of new money and a lot

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of loans that are going to be used to expand businesses.

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>These are just going to be used to keep businesses afloat.

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's not necessarily uh inflationary where you're going to

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>see hyper inflation, but it's designed in many ways to

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>reduce the worst case deflation scenarios, and and the market's

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of pricing for that because we're not pricing for

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>um for consumer prices to go down a lot for

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a long period of time. So it's basically we're expecting

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>UM prices to go down very quickly now, but then

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>rebound to you know, some level of like one and

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a half percent UM a couple of years from there.

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>So I talk to us a little bit about the

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>liquidity that we're seeing in the marketplace that was really

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a concern a couple of weeks ago. Uh, give us

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a sense of kind of where that is right now?

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Are the markets functioning UM? I guess you know, you know,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>well at this stage, well, I would say they they're

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>functioning better UM. And they were certainly last week and

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the week before, but they're still not to where they were,

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>say a month ago, um in in late February, when

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you were able basically to buy or sell a significant

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>amount of risk. One of the reasons for that UM

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is at this point is actually the opposite problem that

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we had two weeks ago, which is UM you know,

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago, basically bank balance sheets, banks were and

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>dealers were unwilling to take a lot of risk onto

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>their books one way or the other, whether they were

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>short rates or long rates. Now, with the Federal Reserve purchasing,

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, hundreds of billions of dollars of treasury securities

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>from the dealers every week. Um, dealers are not left

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of securities on their balance sheets. So

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>you've actually seen a couple of auctions that were under subscribed.

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So basically dealers didn't even offer enough bonds into these

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>auctions for the FED to buy all of them. So, um, yeah,

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you're in an environment now where um, there's actually it's

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>much easier to sell bonds, for sure, because the Feds

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>buying almost every bond that they can find. Um. But

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, it's, uh, it's not normal market function. Yeah,

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's not normal market function when you see the

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Fed's balance sheets spike upwards. It's now about five and

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a quarter trillion dollars. Uh. That de leveraging period, the

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>shrinking of the balance sheet happened for about two minutes there.

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, I wrote. We talked about this last time.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Given the renewed assumptions and the expectations around the fiscal

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>rescue efforts and beyond, how big is the central banks

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet couldn't get eventually in this year or in

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the near future. Yeah, So so the FED balance sheet,

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, our our expectation is for it to basically

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>double this year from where it was a couple of

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, and then um, you know, well more than

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>double um over the next couple of years. And a

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>big reason for that though, um, And we have to

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>revise that too now because the FED actually just came

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>out with a new program this morning where it's going

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to allow UM for in central banks to repo their

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>treasury bonds. So that's going to expand the balance sheet

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>even further. Um. So it's gonna get big, right, It's

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a ten trillion dollar number, easy, um, if

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>not more, that's technical, Paul, it's gonna carry on, carry on.

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>So so one of the you know, but but the

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>size of the Fed's balance sheet, even though it's gonna

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>be really large, it's gonna be very variable and and

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the programs that they're designing now are

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>naturally going to go away. So it's likely you know that, well,

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we might spike the Fed's balance sheet over the next

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>year or so to you know, ten, eleven, twelve trillion dollars,

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but then it might naturally come back down to seven

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>or eight billion dollars just because um, they're gonna own

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>all these treasuries and probably hold them for a long

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>period of time, probably forever, quite frankly. But some of

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>these other programs, like the REPO programs and the like,

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>those will naturally shrink as the economy improves, hopefully, you know,

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>come two. So what's next for the federal reserves that

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 1>they have any tools left in their toolbox, but they

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of little tools, certainly for funding, I think,

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically implementing the programs that have already been announced.

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.479
<v Speaker 1>I think is has to be the next thing. Remember,

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we haven't most of the programs that were announced last

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>week have not yet been implemented. So things like the

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>commercial paper funding program that's not going to be uh

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>probably started until next week or the week after. You

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>have the corporate bond buying program. And importantly, and I

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think this is the single biggest one for the overall

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>health of the economy, is that main street funding facility,

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>so the small and medium sized enterprise facility run between

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury, the Small Business Administration and funded by the Fed.

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>That program has to get going, and has to get

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>going quickly if we're gonna see a a V shaped

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of recovery over the next year. If not, then

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be much more of a you in

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. Alright, Jersey, thank you so much for joining us.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate your thoughts here our Jersey chief US interest

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence joining us on the phone.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg pen L podcast. You

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Woyds. I'm on

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa A. Bram Woyits one before the podcast.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio