1
00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:07,159
Speaker 1: This is the Late with your host JJ Zacher. Jake Zachers.

2
00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:15,200
Speaker 1: What's up everyone, It's JJ Zacharyesen in this episode eleven

3
00:00:15,360 --> 00:00:19,080
Speaker 1: eleven of the Late Round Fantasy Football Podcast. Thanks for

4
00:00:19,079 --> 00:00:22,680
Speaker 1: tuning in. I'm back from vacation and just like that,

5
00:00:23,079 --> 00:00:26,119
Speaker 1: we're firmly in draft season. The Draft Guides Out it

6
00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:29,480
Speaker 1: had its first update. The Fantasy Football Expo is this weekend.

7
00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:32,240
Speaker 1: It's a great time of year, and it's a time

8
00:00:32,280 --> 00:00:34,200
Speaker 1: of year where I start flipping some of my content

9
00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:36,920
Speaker 1: on this podcast to be a little bit more player specific.

10
00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:40,160
Speaker 1: Over the next handful of weeks, you're gonna hear about

11
00:00:40,159 --> 00:00:44,040
Speaker 1: schedule analysis, players to target players, to avoid bold predictions,

12
00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:48,519
Speaker 1: all of those admittedly pretty generic fantasy football topics. In

13
00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:51,400
Speaker 1: today's topic, it's another player specific one, and it's one

14
00:00:51,400 --> 00:00:53,440
Speaker 1: of that I'm going to throw into this rotation every year.

15
00:00:53,920 --> 00:00:56,639
Speaker 1: Now that we've established Market Scorer as a new Late

16
00:00:56,760 --> 00:00:59,720
Speaker 1: Round Fantasy football metric for those of you who are

17
00:00:59,800 --> 00:01:02,800
Speaker 1: just winning and haven't been totally caught up. First off, welcome,

18
00:01:03,240 --> 00:01:05,839
Speaker 1: But second, Market Score is a metric that we developed

19
00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:08,760
Speaker 1: at Late Round Fantasy this offseason that assigns a score

20
00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:13,120
Speaker 1: to a player based on his ADP alongside previous season inputs.

21
00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:16,480
Speaker 1: In essence, it's like the ZAP model, except instead of

22
00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:20,480
Speaker 1: draft capital, we're looking at ADP. ADP, of course can

23
00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:22,960
Speaker 1: be predictive, but we want to create a metric that

24
00:01:23,120 --> 00:01:26,720
Speaker 1: utilize that market value alongside other metrics to be even

25
00:01:26,760 --> 00:01:31,000
Speaker 1: more predictive than ADP itself. And that's what market score is.

26
00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:34,640
Speaker 1: It's more predicted than ADP. If you were to simply

27
00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:37,039
Speaker 1: draft off of the market score sheet, you'd have a

28
00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:40,760
Speaker 1: better time than if you drafted via ADP. Now, the

29
00:01:40,840 --> 00:01:43,200
Speaker 1: Draft Guide has those values and we're working on getting

30
00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:45,959
Speaker 1: them on the Late Round dot Com website too. You

31
00:01:45,959 --> 00:01:48,600
Speaker 1: can learn more about market score and episode eleven oh five.

32
00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:51,840
Speaker 1: To be clear, I don't blindly agree with everything market

33
00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:55,040
Speaker 1: score says. To me. It's simply another tool to use

34
00:01:55,160 --> 00:01:59,160
Speaker 1: when you're evaluating players, similar to any other metric. I

35
00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:01,720
Speaker 1: take markets score in a consideration and it makes me

36
00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:05,080
Speaker 1: think twice about some players. It's not my sole evaluation

37
00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:09,560
Speaker 1: process that to me would be bad process, but it's

38
00:02:09,639 --> 00:02:12,280
Speaker 1: really helpful. And one way that it can be really

39
00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:15,440
Speaker 1: helpful aside from the raw score that it produces, is

40
00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:19,200
Speaker 1: through comps. We've talked about this before, but I can

41
00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:22,160
Speaker 1: find the closest historical comparables for players in the current

42
00:02:22,200 --> 00:02:25,720
Speaker 1: season via market score. I look at their market score,

43
00:02:25,840 --> 00:02:28,519
Speaker 1: their ADP, and their career year to get a list

44
00:02:28,560 --> 00:02:31,640
Speaker 1: of players all ranked by similarity, so the most similar

45
00:02:31,680 --> 00:02:34,639
Speaker 1: player gets ranked up top. I can then see how

46
00:02:34,680 --> 00:02:37,320
Speaker 1: that player performed in their season to give us an

47
00:02:37,360 --> 00:02:41,480
Speaker 1: idea of how the player we're analyzing might perform this year. So,

48
00:02:41,639 --> 00:02:44,239
Speaker 1: just for example, Zay Flowers this year, one of his

49
00:02:44,360 --> 00:02:47,600
Speaker 1: top comps is Jackson Smith and Jigba's twenty twenty five season.

50
00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:53,359
Speaker 1: Pretty awesome. That's a great comp obviously for day Flowers. Now.

51
00:02:53,400 --> 00:02:55,480
Speaker 1: I've shared some of this with you already, and there

52
00:02:55,520 --> 00:02:57,679
Speaker 1: are more insights from it in the Draft Guide, which

53
00:02:57,680 --> 00:03:00,200
Speaker 1: you can order right now on Late round dot com.

54
00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:03,320
Speaker 1: It's updated weekly for you. But I took all of

55
00:03:03,320 --> 00:03:06,359
Speaker 1: this one step further. I looked at all of the

56
00:03:06,440 --> 00:03:09,560
Speaker 1: running backs, wide receivers, tight ends, and quarterbacks who currently

57
00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:12,560
Speaker 1: have market scores. For running backs and wide outs, it

58
00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:15,000
Speaker 1: means that their top one hundred and twenty picks or

59
00:03:15,040 --> 00:03:17,760
Speaker 1: picked in the top ten rounds of a twelve team league.

60
00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:20,239
Speaker 1: For tight ends and quarterbacks, we're looking at the top

61
00:03:20,320 --> 00:03:23,359
Speaker 1: one to eighty. From there, I found the top ten

62
00:03:23,440 --> 00:03:26,680
Speaker 1: comps for each player, and from there I found the

63
00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:29,880
Speaker 1: average points per game from those ten players, how those

64
00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:33,160
Speaker 1: comps actually performed, and I weighed those point per game

65
00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:36,080
Speaker 1: outputs by how similar that player scored to the one

66
00:03:36,120 --> 00:03:39,360
Speaker 1: that we're analyzing. Now, since this entire episode is based

67
00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:41,840
Speaker 1: on this concept, let me run through an example. Let's

68
00:03:41,840 --> 00:03:45,440
Speaker 1: go back to Zay Flowers. You get JSN twenty twenty

69
00:03:45,480 --> 00:03:49,320
Speaker 1: five as a comp forum, where JSN scored twenty one

70
00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:52,760
Speaker 1: point six PPERO points per game, and that's in relevant games.

71
00:03:53,120 --> 00:03:55,000
Speaker 1: I took out the final week of the season, and

72
00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:57,920
Speaker 1: I'll be doing that for everyone on today's show. But

73
00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:00,880
Speaker 1: you also get a high similarity score for Cooper Cups

74
00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:03,880
Speaker 1: twenty twenty where Cup was at about fourteen PPR points

75
00:04:03,880 --> 00:04:07,360
Speaker 1: per game. When you look at flowers top ten comps,

76
00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:10,840
Speaker 1: you get a weighted average about fifteen point four PPR

77
00:04:10,880 --> 00:04:13,600
Speaker 1: points per game, which is really really good, and it's

78
00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:16,800
Speaker 1: one of the reasons that I like Zay Flowers this year. Now,

79
00:04:16,839 --> 00:04:18,880
Speaker 1: to be clear, this is not what market score is.

80
00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:22,080
Speaker 1: Market scores is one of the inputs to get those comps.

81
00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:25,720
Speaker 1: Market score grades a player from zero to one hundred.

82
00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:28,400
Speaker 1: But this is giving us a weighted point per game

83
00:04:28,440 --> 00:04:32,440
Speaker 1: average based on historical comps. It's like a next level

84
00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:35,479
Speaker 1: look at what market score can do and for what

85
00:04:35,520 --> 00:04:37,479
Speaker 1: it's worth. I look back the last two years of

86
00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:42,200
Speaker 1: comps and technically these projections they correlate stronger to actual

87
00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:46,400
Speaker 1: performance than eighty p's done, which is pretty cool. So,

88
00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:48,960
Speaker 1: like I said, I did this for every player this year,

89
00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:50,839
Speaker 1: and my goal today is to share with you, from

90
00:04:50,880 --> 00:04:54,400
Speaker 1: ten to one the ten most interesting market Score projections

91
00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:57,560
Speaker 1: based on these comps and give you a little insight

92
00:04:57,760 --> 00:05:00,360
Speaker 1: about where I'm at with those players. So with all

93
00:05:00,400 --> 00:05:04,960
Speaker 1: that out of the way, let's do it. I'm in

94
00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:07,600
Speaker 1: on the Eagles offense rebounding this year with Kevin Petulo

95
00:05:07,680 --> 00:05:09,640
Speaker 1: out of the picture, because I generally don't think it

96
00:05:09,640 --> 00:05:12,400
Speaker 1: could have been much worse schematically last year for that team.

97
00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:15,719
Speaker 1: Now that being said, market Scorer is looking at previous

98
00:05:15,720 --> 00:05:18,720
Speaker 1: season inputs, so it's not that big of a surprise

99
00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:22,559
Speaker 1: that it doesn't love Saquon Barkley this year. Market Score

100
00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:25,719
Speaker 1: focuses pretty heavily on receiving metrics at running back, and

101
00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:28,479
Speaker 1: Barkley hasn't had the most robust volume profile as a

102
00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:32,040
Speaker 1: receiver in Philly and last year. Since market score takes

103
00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:35,159
Speaker 1: previous season metrics, his low yards per out run was

104
00:05:35,160 --> 00:05:38,160
Speaker 1: a red flag entering this year. So in the end,

105
00:05:38,160 --> 00:05:41,479
Speaker 1: Barkley's market score leaves him that like RB ten, But

106
00:05:41,520 --> 00:05:45,120
Speaker 1: then his market score comp projections equate to RB thirteen,

107
00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:48,479
Speaker 1: so even worse. His number two comp is Marshawn Lynch

108
00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:51,360
Speaker 1: in year eight, where he scored nineteen point one PPERO

109
00:05:51,360 --> 00:05:54,200
Speaker 1: points per game. That's great, but his top comp is

110
00:05:54,240 --> 00:05:57,400
Speaker 1: to Marco Murray's twenty seventeen where Murray split a backfield

111
00:05:57,400 --> 00:05:59,880
Speaker 1: with Derrick Henry. Now, obviously we're not looking to sit

112
00:05:59,880 --> 00:06:02,479
Speaker 1: youuation quite like that, so I'm gonna get two worked

113
00:06:02,560 --> 00:06:05,560
Speaker 1: up about those specifics. That's not what these comps are

114
00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:09,440
Speaker 1: looking at. Remember it's ADP market score and career year.

115
00:06:10,560 --> 00:06:12,760
Speaker 1: But it is a little scary that Saquon has just

116
00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:16,200
Speaker 1: one comp in his top ten above eighteen PPR points

117
00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:18,400
Speaker 1: per game. That's a heck of a season, don't get

118
00:06:18,400 --> 00:06:20,920
Speaker 1: me wrong, but it's also the type of sealing outcome

119
00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:23,800
Speaker 1: that we want from a one to two turn pick. Now,

120
00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:26,120
Speaker 1: I'm not out or in on Saquon this year. Personally,

121
00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:28,480
Speaker 1: I think he's part of that giant cluster of running

122
00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:31,800
Speaker 1: backs in that late round one early round two range.

123
00:06:32,320 --> 00:06:34,719
Speaker 1: But market score is slightly low on him and the

124
00:06:34,760 --> 00:06:40,120
Speaker 1: comp projections they show that too. At number nine. I'm

125
00:06:40,120 --> 00:06:42,320
Speaker 1: gonna go to the Jacksonville wide receiver room and I'm

126
00:06:42,320 --> 00:06:45,720
Speaker 1: looking at Brian Thomas and Parker Washington. Something they keep

127
00:06:45,760 --> 00:06:47,960
Speaker 1: in mind with market score is that it's largely a

128
00:06:48,120 --> 00:06:52,359
Speaker 1: median type projection. It's not giving you multiple outputs for

129
00:06:52,480 --> 00:06:55,800
Speaker 1: floor and ceiling. It's just giving you a general projected scorer,

130
00:06:55,839 --> 00:06:58,359
Speaker 1: which is not a lot different than a general projected

131
00:06:58,360 --> 00:07:01,800
Speaker 1: point per game output. So with Jacksonville in that wide

132
00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:03,880
Speaker 1: receiver room, and this is the same argument i'd make

133
00:07:03,920 --> 00:07:07,040
Speaker 1: for like Chicago too, I'm probably gonna be higher on

134
00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:09,960
Speaker 1: some of the players in those rooms than market score is,

135
00:07:10,360 --> 00:07:13,160
Speaker 1: because i want to embrace that ambiguity. Even if the

136
00:07:13,160 --> 00:07:16,720
Speaker 1: most likely outcome is that no one truly truly emerges.

137
00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:19,680
Speaker 1: It's just that someone has a chance to and it's

138
00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:22,040
Speaker 1: in a good offense, and if that happens, you're getting

139
00:07:22,040 --> 00:07:25,040
Speaker 1: a huge discount on that player. Now, I say all

140
00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:28,120
Speaker 1: that because market score is not super high on Jacksonville

141
00:07:28,120 --> 00:07:31,480
Speaker 1: wide receivers, market Score looks at market factors and there's

142
00:07:31,520 --> 00:07:34,960
Speaker 1: competition in Jacksonville. Based on where these guys are getting drafted.

143
00:07:35,880 --> 00:07:39,040
Speaker 1: It likes Brian Thomas more than Parker Washington, but that's

144
00:07:39,040 --> 00:07:42,040
Speaker 1: also driven by our ADP sources, which is Fantasy Data's ADP.

145
00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:46,600
Speaker 1: There's an eighteen pick gap between Thomas and Washington. You

146
00:07:46,640 --> 00:07:49,240
Speaker 1: won't see that in the best ball streets. But that's

147
00:07:49,240 --> 00:07:51,320
Speaker 1: also why I think Washington is a good target and

148
00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:54,160
Speaker 1: managed season long leaves this year because his ADP on

149
00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:58,200
Speaker 1: some platforms like Yahoo, it's really low. I'm willing to

150
00:07:58,200 --> 00:08:01,360
Speaker 1: see if his crazy good efficiency last year translates into

151
00:08:01,360 --> 00:08:04,160
Speaker 1: this season. You can read more about that in the

152
00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:07,480
Speaker 1: Draft guide. Regardless though, when you look at the market

153
00:08:07,480 --> 00:08:11,240
Speaker 1: Score comp projections, Brian Thomas's top ten comps bring him

154
00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:15,239
Speaker 1: to wide receiver twenty Parker Washington brings him to wide

155
00:08:15,240 --> 00:08:18,760
Speaker 1: receiver thirty nine. Thomas is being boosted by some higher

156
00:08:18,840 --> 00:08:21,400
Speaker 1: end outcomes. I don't think this is a shock to anyone,

157
00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:24,760
Speaker 1: given we know his profiles volatile, but he's got George

158
00:08:24,760 --> 00:08:27,800
Speaker 1: Pickens twenty twenty five, for example, as one of his highest.

159
00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:32,040
Speaker 1: Five of Thomas's top ten comps are above fifteen PPR

160
00:08:32,160 --> 00:08:34,880
Speaker 1: points per game, but then four of them are below

161
00:08:34,920 --> 00:08:38,960
Speaker 1: eleven PPR points per game. Parker Washington's are based on

162
00:08:39,000 --> 00:08:42,080
Speaker 1: a lower ADP, so actually, based on where these guys

163
00:08:42,120 --> 00:08:46,520
Speaker 1: are drafted. ADP wise, their projections don't look terrible. But

164
00:08:46,600 --> 00:08:49,800
Speaker 1: at Washington's current ADP, he only has five double digit

165
00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:52,760
Speaker 1: PPR point per game comps out of his ten, hence

166
00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:56,040
Speaker 1: the reason he's close to wide receiver forty. I think

167
00:08:56,080 --> 00:08:58,640
Speaker 1: these two should be back to back in rankings, but

168
00:08:58,760 --> 00:09:01,800
Speaker 1: given their prices in manage season long leagues, I like

169
00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:04,480
Speaker 1: Washington a lot more as a value. That doesn't mean

170
00:09:04,480 --> 00:09:07,000
Speaker 1: that I'm off of Thomas, and these comps are gonna

171
00:09:07,080 --> 00:09:09,560
Speaker 1: keep me more neutral and maybe even above market. With Thomas.

172
00:09:10,040 --> 00:09:15,080
Speaker 1: It's an offense that I do want pieces of. Tyler

173
00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:17,679
Speaker 1: Shuck came out as a QB nine with market score

174
00:09:17,720 --> 00:09:20,640
Speaker 1: comp projections. I'm pretty surprised, and I'm excited about it.

175
00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:23,840
Speaker 1: I've found that second year quarterbacks are generally really good

176
00:09:23,840 --> 00:09:28,080
Speaker 1: bets against ADP. They have substantial downside risk, but they

177
00:09:28,120 --> 00:09:31,080
Speaker 1: have more upside versus their cost than any other career

178
00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:34,680
Speaker 1: year among fantasy quarterbacks. And generally speaking, with quarterback we're

179
00:09:34,679 --> 00:09:38,120
Speaker 1: looking for that ceiling. Now, market Score does not have

180
00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:41,120
Speaker 1: Shuck at QB nine. It actually has him at QB fifteen,

181
00:09:41,400 --> 00:09:44,160
Speaker 1: which is still higher than most platforms are gonna have him.

182
00:09:44,520 --> 00:09:47,560
Speaker 1: My rankings are bullish on him too, because not only

183
00:09:47,640 --> 00:09:49,600
Speaker 1: is he a second year player, but he's coming off

184
00:09:49,600 --> 00:09:51,640
Speaker 1: a year where he finished strong with almost twenty points

185
00:09:51,679 --> 00:09:54,960
Speaker 1: per game over his final six and he proved that

186
00:09:55,000 --> 00:09:56,840
Speaker 1: he could bring a little bit extra with his legs.

187
00:09:57,440 --> 00:10:00,280
Speaker 1: Add In Kellen Moore's high volume offense Jordan Tyson being

188
00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:03,559
Speaker 1: added there, the offensive line looking pretty good, Shuck is

189
00:10:03,600 --> 00:10:06,079
Speaker 1: in a good spot to at least have the opportunity

190
00:10:06,080 --> 00:10:08,679
Speaker 1: to make that leap this year. The reason he ranked

191
00:10:08,679 --> 00:10:11,200
Speaker 1: so high in market score comp projections is because he

192
00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:13,520
Speaker 1: drew a year two comp of Carson Wentz back in

193
00:10:13,559 --> 00:10:16,520
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen he scored almost twenty two points per game,

194
00:10:17,280 --> 00:10:19,480
Speaker 1: and lower down the list at number nine, he got

195
00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:23,160
Speaker 1: Patrick Mahomes in say twenty eighteen season. Now, I don't

196
00:10:23,160 --> 00:10:25,520
Speaker 1: think the latter is going to happen for Shuck, but

197
00:10:25,559 --> 00:10:28,200
Speaker 1: there are enough upside comps here to make me not

198
00:10:28,320 --> 00:10:31,400
Speaker 1: in agreement with market Score. He's a great late round

199
00:10:31,400 --> 00:10:36,240
Speaker 1: option this season. Now on this countdown from ten to one.

200
00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:39,160
Speaker 1: My number seven most interesting takeaway from these market score

201
00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:43,040
Speaker 1: comp projections is Quinn Shawn Judkins being the RB thirty

202
00:10:43,080 --> 00:10:46,640
Speaker 1: two now in regular market score. The thing that we've tested,

203
00:10:46,880 --> 00:10:50,120
Speaker 1: we know correlates a lot better than ADP. Judkins comes

204
00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:54,680
Speaker 1: into RB twenty two significantly lower, significantly better. The biggest

205
00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:57,360
Speaker 1: thing for Judkins this year, and my opinion, is this situation.

206
00:10:57,840 --> 00:11:01,319
Speaker 1: The Browns offensive line was horrible last season. Judkins ranked

207
00:11:01,400 --> 00:11:04,640
Speaker 1: last among high volume running backs and yards before contact

208
00:11:04,679 --> 00:11:07,720
Speaker 1: per attempt. Now we have a huge question market quarterback.

209
00:11:07,880 --> 00:11:10,600
Speaker 1: Though I am more bullish than most on Todd Munkin

210
00:11:10,600 --> 00:11:13,319
Speaker 1: as head coach. I think he's a pretty good offensive coach.

211
00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:16,800
Speaker 1: Another issue for Judkins though, is the pass catching. He

212
00:11:16,920 --> 00:11:19,360
Speaker 1: wasn't a huge pass catcher in college, and he ran

213
00:11:19,400 --> 00:11:22,480
Speaker 1: a route on just thirty percent of Cleveland's dropbacks last season.

214
00:11:22,880 --> 00:11:25,280
Speaker 1: Todd Munkin has historically split that kind of work in

215
00:11:25,280 --> 00:11:28,280
Speaker 1: his backfield, So I'm expecting Dylan Samson to play more

216
00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:31,000
Speaker 1: of a pass catching role for Cleveland and that's what

217
00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:34,199
Speaker 1: Market Scores kind of seeing here. His ranking within market

218
00:11:34,200 --> 00:11:38,160
Speaker 1: scores fine, but the comps are legitimately scary. His top

219
00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:40,920
Speaker 1: one is Devin Singletary's second year, where his ADP was

220
00:11:40,960 --> 00:11:43,640
Speaker 1: about seven spots higher than where Judkins is currently at.

221
00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:46,280
Speaker 1: But he scored nine point four PPR points per game.

222
00:11:46,720 --> 00:11:49,680
Speaker 1: But among the top ten comps, we've got six with

223
00:11:49,800 --> 00:11:53,360
Speaker 1: fewer than ten PPR points per game, only one was

224
00:11:53,440 --> 00:11:56,440
Speaker 1: over fourteen. Now, I've been a little bit lower the

225
00:11:56,480 --> 00:11:59,280
Speaker 1: consensus with Judkins because I'm worried about the pass catching

226
00:11:59,320 --> 00:12:01,800
Speaker 1: and I'm worried about the situation. I didn't even mention

227
00:12:01,880 --> 00:12:04,679
Speaker 1: the injury either. But in the end, Judkins isn't far

228
00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:06,600
Speaker 1: enough off in my rankings to call him a player

229
00:12:06,640 --> 00:12:09,560
Speaker 1: to avoid, even if I'm lower than the market. I

230
00:12:09,559 --> 00:12:12,200
Speaker 1: think the talent profile is there too, which makes it

231
00:12:12,240 --> 00:12:14,720
Speaker 1: harder to fade a player like this. But there's no

232
00:12:14,840 --> 00:12:19,840
Speaker 1: doubt that these comps are scary. We go from one

233
00:12:19,920 --> 00:12:22,719
Speaker 1: year two back to another. Let's take a second and

234
00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:26,760
Speaker 1: talk about RJ. Harvey. His market score projections put him

235
00:12:26,800 --> 00:12:30,000
Speaker 1: at RB fifteen, which is exactly why he made it

236
00:12:30,040 --> 00:12:33,480
Speaker 1: on today's list, because that's very surprising for anyone who's

237
00:12:33,480 --> 00:12:35,920
Speaker 1: listening to the show this offseason. You know, I started

238
00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:38,840
Speaker 1: the off season back in January by calling Harvey a

239
00:12:38,920 --> 00:12:42,040
Speaker 1: clear cell, a very clear cell. He wasn't a good

240
00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:44,800
Speaker 1: rusher last year, and it seemed very clear that Denver

241
00:12:44,920 --> 00:12:47,600
Speaker 1: was going to do something to that backfield. That's something

242
00:12:47,880 --> 00:12:50,600
Speaker 1: ended up being re signing JK. Dobbinson then drafting a

243
00:12:50,640 --> 00:12:53,400
Speaker 1: solid running back in Joanah Coleman. But I'm now of

244
00:12:53,400 --> 00:12:56,040
Speaker 1: the belief, at least from a season long perspective, that

245
00:12:56,080 --> 00:12:59,520
Speaker 1: there's some market over correction here. I've seen people say

246
00:12:59,520 --> 00:13:02,240
Speaker 1: that Harvey a terrible draft pick this season, and it's

247
00:13:02,240 --> 00:13:04,520
Speaker 1: pretty much for the same reasons that I talked about

248
00:13:04,520 --> 00:13:08,760
Speaker 1: back in January. Bad rushing yards, overexpected per attempt, Dobbins

249
00:13:08,760 --> 00:13:11,840
Speaker 1: outperformed him on the ground, and there wasn't enough consistency.

250
00:13:12,679 --> 00:13:15,840
Speaker 1: But he's not priced in like round five anymore. Over

251
00:13:15,880 --> 00:13:19,720
Speaker 1: on ESPN, Harvey's going past pick one hundred after JK. Dobbins.

252
00:13:20,120 --> 00:13:22,880
Speaker 1: He's back to back with Dobbins on CBS. He's close

253
00:13:22,880 --> 00:13:26,240
Speaker 1: to one hundred over on Yahoo, and I get it.

254
00:13:26,559 --> 00:13:29,360
Speaker 1: The argument is that he's worse than Dobbins, but we're

255
00:13:29,400 --> 00:13:33,199
Speaker 1: also basing that off of rookie season production. And when

256
00:13:33,240 --> 00:13:35,400
Speaker 1: I get into round eight, round nine, and so on,

257
00:13:35,880 --> 00:13:39,120
Speaker 1: I'm looking purely at ceiling. If it doesn't work out,

258
00:13:39,320 --> 00:13:42,320
Speaker 1: it's not gonna kill my team. That's why Harvey's all

259
00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:45,120
Speaker 1: of a sudden become intriguing. He had a really good

260
00:13:45,200 --> 00:13:48,400
Speaker 1: weighted opportunity last season, and his top ten market score

261
00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:51,800
Speaker 1: comps bring him to RB fifteen. Like I said, though,

262
00:13:51,800 --> 00:13:54,640
Speaker 1: to be clear, after RB fourteen, there's a very big

263
00:13:54,679 --> 00:13:56,640
Speaker 1: gap to RJ. Harvey. I do want to be clear

264
00:13:56,679 --> 00:13:59,600
Speaker 1: about that. Harvey, though, gets a couple of really strong

265
00:13:59,640 --> 00:14:02,240
Speaker 1: six team plus pp your point per game comps, and

266
00:14:02,320 --> 00:14:06,800
Speaker 1: David Montgomery's year two and Todd Gurley's rookie season, only

267
00:14:06,840 --> 00:14:09,720
Speaker 1: two of his top ten comps are below ten pper

268
00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:12,920
Speaker 1: points per game. I've bought more into Harvey this season,

269
00:14:13,320 --> 00:14:16,000
Speaker 1: even if the consensus hasn't. I don't want to be

270
00:14:16,040 --> 00:14:18,680
Speaker 1: so concerned about the downside case when we're now so

271
00:14:18,840 --> 00:14:22,120
Speaker 1: late in drafts, especially when we know the offensive environment's

272
00:14:22,160 --> 00:14:25,360
Speaker 1: really good and we know that ambiguous backfields they have

273
00:14:25,400 --> 00:14:28,760
Speaker 1: a chance to bring out really great values. The fact

274
00:14:28,760 --> 00:14:31,200
Speaker 1: that his market score comp projections look the way they do,

275
00:14:31,280 --> 00:14:33,600
Speaker 1: and for the record, market Score as Harvey as a

276
00:14:33,720 --> 00:14:36,840
Speaker 1: very firm RB three this year too. The fact that

277
00:14:36,920 --> 00:14:40,200
Speaker 1: market Score in general likes Harvey has made me look

278
00:14:40,200 --> 00:14:43,160
Speaker 1: at the situation a whole lot differently, and hopefully you

279
00:14:43,280 --> 00:14:48,600
Speaker 1: will too. Market Score hates Mike Evans like way more

280
00:14:48,600 --> 00:14:51,440
Speaker 1: than I do. When you look at his top ten comps,

281
00:14:51,760 --> 00:14:56,080
Speaker 1: Mike Evans comes out as wide receiver forty one. Now

282
00:14:56,120 --> 00:14:58,200
Speaker 1: I do like the fit with San Francisco. I think

283
00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:01,720
Speaker 1: there's a lot of touchdown upside Shanahan system. He's not

284
00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:04,720
Speaker 1: a fade for me. But I've mentioned this before. One

285
00:15:04,760 --> 00:15:08,040
Speaker 1: of Evans' top comps is Alan Robinson's twenty twenty two

286
00:15:08,320 --> 00:15:11,880
Speaker 1: when he went to the Rams frightening. He also gets

287
00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:14,880
Speaker 1: Vincent Jackson Rest in Peace in twenty fifteen and eleventh

288
00:15:14,960 --> 00:15:17,560
Speaker 1: year player who had an eighty p seventieth overall who

289
00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:20,960
Speaker 1: scored ten point seven PPR points per game. There's year

290
00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:23,800
Speaker 1: ten Michael Crabtree under nine PPR points per game, Year

291
00:15:23,840 --> 00:15:27,080
Speaker 1: seven Christian Kirk, year eleven Wes Welker. They were both

292
00:15:27,120 --> 00:15:30,280
Speaker 1: under the nine mark. There's only one player in evans

293
00:15:30,400 --> 00:15:33,440
Speaker 1: komp list who scored more than thirteen PPO points per game.

294
00:15:33,440 --> 00:15:37,040
Speaker 1: That was Will Fuller in twenty twenty. He crushed that year,

295
00:15:37,040 --> 00:15:40,040
Speaker 1: but it's still a frightening situation overall for Evans. When

296
00:15:40,040 --> 00:15:42,920
Speaker 1: we're looking through this lens. Like I said, I don't

297
00:15:42,920 --> 00:15:45,600
Speaker 1: have Evans this low. But it's pretty interesting to see

298
00:15:45,600 --> 00:15:48,360
Speaker 1: how market scores treating Evans this year. And it's a

299
00:15:48,360 --> 00:15:52,040
Speaker 1: combination of a lot of things as to why teammate competition,

300
00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:55,080
Speaker 1: his age, and some of his numbers just weren't fantastic

301
00:15:55,160 --> 00:15:57,680
Speaker 1: last year, like his yards per route run. Now, I

302
00:15:57,680 --> 00:16:00,720
Speaker 1: still think that the circumstances surrounding Mike Evans last year

303
00:16:00,760 --> 00:16:03,760
Speaker 1: in Baker Mayfield in particular, that led to that lower

304
00:16:03,840 --> 00:16:06,560
Speaker 1: yards per out run rate, because Evans still did a

305
00:16:06,600 --> 00:16:09,720
Speaker 1: really good job at commanding targets. He actually had his

306
00:16:09,760 --> 00:16:12,640
Speaker 1: third best targets perut run rate of his career last year.

307
00:16:13,280 --> 00:16:15,480
Speaker 1: But I can see why a model would objectively view

308
00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:20,120
Speaker 1: Evans as being in a bad spot this year. It's

309
00:16:20,160 --> 00:16:22,480
Speaker 1: kind of crazy that Arondez Gatson's coming off a rookie

310
00:16:22,520 --> 00:16:24,920
Speaker 1: season where he had forty nine catches, six hundred and

311
00:16:24,960 --> 00:16:27,960
Speaker 1: sixty four yards and three touchdowns, and yet he's almost

312
00:16:28,000 --> 00:16:31,640
Speaker 1: an afterthought in fantasy football. He brings fifteenth in NFL

313
00:16:31,720 --> 00:16:35,200
Speaker 1: history in receiving yards by a rookie tight end. Now,

314
00:16:35,200 --> 00:16:38,080
Speaker 1: the obvious reason is that they changed offensive coordinators in LA.

315
00:16:38,400 --> 00:16:41,280
Speaker 1: They signed David and Joku, they signed Charlie Kohlar, They

316
00:16:41,280 --> 00:16:43,880
Speaker 1: have wide receivers, they have other players in that offense

317
00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:47,240
Speaker 1: who can catch passes. But to be fair, even with that,

318
00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:50,480
Speaker 1: market score in general views Gadston as the tight end

319
00:16:50,480 --> 00:16:54,080
Speaker 1: fourteen overall. And look, we know there's variants with tight end,

320
00:16:54,560 --> 00:16:57,480
Speaker 1: but this is still very shocking to me. Gaston's top

321
00:16:57,560 --> 00:17:01,080
Speaker 1: ten comps led to a tight end four and market

322
00:17:01,080 --> 00:17:04,719
Speaker 1: score comp projection, there's a very low outcome with one

323
00:17:04,760 --> 00:17:07,280
Speaker 1: of Gatston's top three comps, which is Ladarius Green in

324
00:17:07,320 --> 00:17:10,600
Speaker 1: twenty fourteen. Ironically that was for the same Chargers team,

325
00:17:10,600 --> 00:17:12,960
Speaker 1: but back then they were in San Diego. But his

326
00:17:13,040 --> 00:17:16,480
Speaker 1: top comp is twenty eighteen George Kittle, Kittle's second year

327
00:17:16,480 --> 00:17:19,840
Speaker 1: in the league. Kittle went nine spots later than Gadston,

328
00:17:20,200 --> 00:17:22,880
Speaker 1: but their market scores were pretty close, and Kittle scored

329
00:17:22,920 --> 00:17:25,800
Speaker 1: over fifteen p Pier points per game that year. This

330
00:17:25,920 --> 00:17:27,920
Speaker 1: isn't very easy to find a tight end, but six

331
00:17:27,960 --> 00:17:31,400
Speaker 1: of Gatston's top ten comps scored over ten Ppier points

332
00:17:31,400 --> 00:17:34,360
Speaker 1: per game. I guarantee you that we're going to read

333
00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:36,960
Speaker 1: beat reports this summer about the other tight ends for

334
00:17:37,080 --> 00:17:40,919
Speaker 1: the Chargers the other pass catchers. But I don't think

335
00:17:40,960 --> 00:17:43,840
Speaker 1: that we should lose sight of Gadston. His rookie season

336
00:17:43,880 --> 00:17:47,280
Speaker 1: was impressive, and if we're throwing darts, why not throw

337
00:17:47,320 --> 00:17:49,840
Speaker 1: one his way In a managed league. Maybe I should

338
00:17:49,880 --> 00:17:54,080
Speaker 1: be a little bit higher on him than I currently am.

339
00:17:54,520 --> 00:17:57,280
Speaker 1: Despite Ceedee Lamb having the higher ADP, so his comps

340
00:17:57,280 --> 00:17:59,560
Speaker 1: are naturally going to include some players who are really good.

341
00:18:00,119 --> 00:18:04,200
Speaker 1: Despite that fact, George Pickens ranks ahead of Ced Lamb

342
00:18:04,200 --> 00:18:07,360
Speaker 1: in market score comp Projection. Now the difference is only

343
00:18:07,400 --> 00:18:09,719
Speaker 1: by like point seven PPR points per game, but still

344
00:18:10,240 --> 00:18:12,760
Speaker 1: there's a decent sized gap between the two players and ADP.

345
00:18:13,840 --> 00:18:15,960
Speaker 1: I do have Lamb ranked ahead of Pickens, don't get

346
00:18:15,960 --> 00:18:18,200
Speaker 1: me wrong, but I can kind of see where market

347
00:18:18,200 --> 00:18:21,400
Speaker 1: scores coming from here. In terms of their raw market scores,

348
00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:23,600
Speaker 1: we're looking at a seventy two for Lamb and a

349
00:18:23,720 --> 00:18:27,200
Speaker 1: sixty five for Pickens. It's not like that significant of

350
00:18:27,240 --> 00:18:30,760
Speaker 1: a difference. Lamb is the wide receiver six, Pickens is

351
00:18:30,800 --> 00:18:34,760
Speaker 1: the wide receiver thirteen, not that far from ADP. But

352
00:18:34,840 --> 00:18:37,680
Speaker 1: I think the small gap between these scores that's what's

353
00:18:37,720 --> 00:18:39,920
Speaker 1: more telling, and that's why we could see the type

354
00:18:39,920 --> 00:18:42,879
Speaker 1: of result that we're seeing with market score comp projections,

355
00:18:43,600 --> 00:18:45,760
Speaker 1: Lamb's being dragged down a little bit by year ten

356
00:18:45,840 --> 00:18:48,720
Speaker 1: Jordy Nelson, who scored just nine point two PPR points

357
00:18:48,720 --> 00:18:51,879
Speaker 1: per game. That's his third highest comp. That was a

358
00:18:51,960 --> 00:18:54,439
Speaker 1: year where Nelson was competing with both DeVante Adams and

359
00:18:54,600 --> 00:18:57,440
Speaker 1: Randall Cobb. At least Lamb only as Pickens to really

360
00:18:57,440 --> 00:19:01,639
Speaker 1: worry about. Lamb actually has an extremely close comp of

361
00:19:01,680 --> 00:19:04,080
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three Stephan Diggs, and then his second comp

362
00:19:04,200 --> 00:19:07,480
Speaker 1: is twenty twenty two Digs. Both of those were good

363
00:19:07,520 --> 00:19:11,560
Speaker 1: seasons sixteen point one and nineteen point six PPR points

364
00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:14,280
Speaker 1: per game. And then Lamb gets a year six Tyreek

365
00:19:14,359 --> 00:19:16,560
Speaker 1: Hill is his fourth comp, where he scored eighteen and

366
00:19:16,600 --> 00:19:19,600
Speaker 1: a half PPR points per game. There are some really,

367
00:19:19,640 --> 00:19:23,320
Speaker 1: really good ceiling outcomes for CD Lamb. It's just oddly

368
00:19:23,400 --> 00:19:27,160
Speaker 1: he has worse floor comps than George Pickens. Pickens' worst

369
00:19:27,240 --> 00:19:29,920
Speaker 1: floor comp is at des Bryant season, where does scored

370
00:19:29,960 --> 00:19:33,600
Speaker 1: twelve point one PPR points per game. Lamb had three

371
00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:37,240
Speaker 1: comps lower than that mark, And I think from a

372
00:19:37,320 --> 00:19:39,959
Speaker 1: value perspective in your draft, that's kind of how I'm

373
00:19:40,040 --> 00:19:43,119
Speaker 1: viewing these two players all because of opportunity costs. I

374
00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:47,600
Speaker 1: like Pickens more at his price. There's a scarier floor

375
00:19:48,119 --> 00:19:52,360
Speaker 1: given the cost for CD LAMB. But in that Dallas environment,

376
00:19:52,400 --> 00:19:57,040
Speaker 1: I'm not fading either player. You guys know, I'm na

377
00:19:57,080 --> 00:19:59,560
Speaker 1: Mecca Buca guy, and I'm higher on him versus some

378
00:19:59,600 --> 00:20:02,520
Speaker 1: of the non best ball platforms. ESPN has met wide

379
00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:06,439
Speaker 1: receiver nineteen. Yahoo hasn't met wide receiver twenty three. I

380
00:20:06,520 --> 00:20:10,000
Speaker 1: have met wide receiver sixteen market scorers. He's met wide

381
00:20:10,000 --> 00:20:15,160
Speaker 1: receiver fifteen. His market score player comp projection wide Receiver

382
00:20:15,359 --> 00:20:19,600
Speaker 1: five for real. Abukah's worst comp out of his top

383
00:20:19,680 --> 00:20:22,920
Speaker 1: ten is DJ Sharks year three, where he scored twelve

384
00:20:22,960 --> 00:20:26,600
Speaker 1: PPR points per game. He also gets AMRII. Cooper's twenty fifteen,

385
00:20:26,840 --> 00:20:30,600
Speaker 1: where he was at thirteen point nine. Every other player

386
00:20:30,600 --> 00:20:33,640
Speaker 1: in his comp list scored at least fifteen PPR points

387
00:20:33,640 --> 00:20:37,000
Speaker 1: per game. You get Juju Smith Schuster in twenty eighteen

388
00:20:37,280 --> 00:20:41,320
Speaker 1: eighteen point eight, DK metcalf in twenty twenty seventeen point eight,

389
00:20:41,560 --> 00:20:44,480
Speaker 1: AJ Brown in twenty twenty sixteen point two. He got

390
00:20:44,480 --> 00:20:47,520
Speaker 1: a Chris Godwin year three to one when Godwin dominated.

391
00:20:47,560 --> 00:20:51,160
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just one amazing comp after one amazing comp.

392
00:20:52,080 --> 00:20:55,080
Speaker 1: Abukah's twenty twenty five peripherals took a hit after a

393
00:20:55,119 --> 00:20:58,920
Speaker 1: really hot start, but there are reasons for it. His injury,

394
00:20:59,000 --> 00:21:03,280
Speaker 1: Baker's injury an awful catchuble targets rate. Now Mike Evans

395
00:21:03,320 --> 00:21:06,040
Speaker 1: is gone and he has a chance to be the alpha.

396
00:21:06,960 --> 00:21:10,240
Speaker 1: Market Score likes Abuka's chances of producing a big season.

397
00:21:12,920 --> 00:21:14,480
Speaker 1: This is the final part of today's show, and you

398
00:21:14,560 --> 00:21:17,240
Speaker 1: might be wondering, how is anything more interesting than a

399
00:21:17,359 --> 00:21:21,760
Speaker 1: mecha Buka at wide receiver five. Well, when Jackson Dart

400
00:21:21,760 --> 00:21:26,080
Speaker 1: comes out as the QB one, that's how market score

401
00:21:26,119 --> 00:21:29,119
Speaker 1: does not have Dart as the QB once you can breathe.

402
00:21:29,760 --> 00:21:32,600
Speaker 1: That's not what I'm saying here, though market Score does

403
00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:36,000
Speaker 1: love Jackson Dart. What I am saying here is that

404
00:21:36,080 --> 00:21:40,119
Speaker 1: his top ten comps are absolutely insane better than what

405
00:21:40,280 --> 00:21:43,200
Speaker 1: Josh Allen is seeing. Who's the QB two, i'llbe it barely.

406
00:21:43,720 --> 00:21:45,560
Speaker 1: One of the problems with Dart, though, is that he's

407
00:21:45,640 --> 00:21:48,399
Speaker 1: kind of a rarity. No player on his complice is

408
00:21:48,440 --> 00:21:51,320
Speaker 1: a similarity above eighty percent. So while as comps are

409
00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:55,480
Speaker 1: really good, they're also not unbelievably close matches. But I've

410
00:21:55,480 --> 00:21:57,840
Speaker 1: said this before. His top match has a seventy nine

411
00:21:57,840 --> 00:22:01,200
Speaker 1: point seven similarity. It's Lamar Jackson's twenty nineteen, his first

412
00:22:01,280 --> 00:22:05,320
Speaker 1: MVP season, where he literally broke fantasy football. You have that,

413
00:22:05,760 --> 00:22:09,160
Speaker 1: Josh Allen's year three, and Kyler Murray's year two, all

414
00:22:09,280 --> 00:22:12,000
Speaker 1: driving up his overall projection, which is a little over

415
00:22:12,040 --> 00:22:15,280
Speaker 1: twenty two points per game. There's really only one bad

416
00:22:15,320 --> 00:22:17,600
Speaker 1: outcome on this list, which is Nick foles third year

417
00:22:17,600 --> 00:22:19,919
Speaker 1: in the league, but that also came after a touchdown

418
00:22:20,000 --> 00:22:22,080
Speaker 1: rate of eight and a half percent during a time

419
00:22:22,119 --> 00:22:26,360
Speaker 1: when the fantasy football market didn't quite understand regression. Now

420
00:22:26,359 --> 00:22:28,800
Speaker 1: there are reasons to not be so bullish on Dart.

421
00:22:29,240 --> 00:22:33,359
Speaker 1: Change in coaching staff means ambiguity. Maybe we see less rushing,

422
00:22:33,920 --> 00:22:36,040
Speaker 1: and it's not like we saw a super clear picture

423
00:22:36,240 --> 00:22:39,159
Speaker 1: of the type of quarterback he's going to be long term.

424
00:22:39,480 --> 00:22:42,240
Speaker 1: Malik Neighbors is banged up two, though he did do

425
00:22:42,280 --> 00:22:45,320
Speaker 1: a lot of work last year without Neighbors. But look,

426
00:22:45,359 --> 00:22:47,560
Speaker 1: if you have an opportunity to get Dart as your QB,

427
00:22:47,640 --> 00:22:50,520
Speaker 1: won at a price where the opportunity costs is not significant.

428
00:22:50,640 --> 00:22:53,800
Speaker 1: Round eight, Round nine, Round ten, I do think that

429
00:22:53,840 --> 00:22:57,160
Speaker 1: we should be leaning into this upside, consider this, We've

430
00:22:57,200 --> 00:23:00,440
Speaker 1: had six rookie quarterbacks since twenty eleven, averagely the five

431
00:23:00,520 --> 00:23:03,040
Speaker 1: rushing points per game across at least eight games played.

432
00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:07,760
Speaker 1: Those six quarterbacks are Cam Newton, Josh Allen, Jayden Daniels,

433
00:23:08,040 --> 00:23:12,359
Speaker 1: Robert Griffin, the third Lamar Jackson, and Jackson Dart. And

434
00:23:12,440 --> 00:23:14,920
Speaker 1: for what it's worth, Dart was at seven point three

435
00:23:15,040 --> 00:23:17,600
Speaker 1: points per game via rushing last year. This isn't some

436
00:23:17,720 --> 00:23:21,879
Speaker 1: random parameter to make Dart look extra special. There's at

437
00:23:21,960 --> 00:23:23,720
Speaker 1: least some chance that Dart is just really good for

438
00:23:23,760 --> 00:23:27,000
Speaker 1: fantasy football purposes. Like the same way that Jalen Hurts is.

439
00:23:28,240 --> 00:23:31,119
Speaker 1: Market Score believes in the ceiling and at the right price.

440
00:23:31,440 --> 00:23:34,439
Speaker 1: I think the rest of us should too. That's it

441
00:23:34,440 --> 00:23:36,399
Speaker 1: for today's show, though, thanks to all of you for listening.

442
00:23:36,600 --> 00:23:39,240
Speaker 1: If you had subscribed to the Late Round Fantasy Football podcast,

443
00:23:39,359 --> 00:23:41,119
Speaker 1: make sure you are by shooting for it pretty much

444
00:23:41,119 --> 00:23:43,760
Speaker 1: anywhere podcast can be found, and to follow me on

445
00:23:43,800 --> 00:23:47,240
Speaker 1: Twitter and on Blue Sky at Late Round QB. Thanks

446
00:23:47,240 --> 00:23:49,960
Speaker 1: for listening. Everyone greatly appreciate it. I'll be back in

447
00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:52,119
Speaker 1: your ears on Wednesday on the YouTube channel for the

448
00:23:52,160 --> 00:23:54,879
Speaker 1: Late Round Fantasy Football Show and obviously this week you

449
00:23:54,880 --> 00:23:56,840
Speaker 1: have another becoming a best ball bro and at the

450
00:23:56,920 --> 00:23:59,600
Speaker 1: end of the week you get late round perspectives. I'll

451
00:23:59,600 --> 00:24:00,119
Speaker 1: talk to you that