WEBVTT - NFTs And Royalties In A Down Market

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberghart podcast, and I'm

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for Bloomberg News.

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It's Wednesday, November nine. Evangelists of web three, a term

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>popularized by venture capitalist Chris Dixon, will often say that

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a big goal of the whole thing is giving more

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>power to create us, and especially monetary power. Web three,

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>these proponents say, will allow artists, musicians, and creators of

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>all stripes to cut out middlemen and into mediaries and

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>retain more of the financial benefits of their work. In

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>other words, y pa a platform or an agent or

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a dealer when you can keep all of your revenue

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for yourself. But this is where things get a little

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>bit complicated. If you're an artist or musician and you

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>sell your work as an n f T, you'll definitely

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>get paid the first time you make that sale. But

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>what happens if the person who bought it from you

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 1>then sells it to someone else. In the idealized version

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of n f T s, you get a royalty on

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that sale automatically. In reality, many of these transactions aren't

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>actually set up that way. For more in the current

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>states of n f T s and how platforms are

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about these royalties. We'll hear from Bloomberg Crypto Report

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to Olga Karif over nine percent of all of the

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>n f T sales or wash trading, and now most

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>n f T trackers actually have a button new press

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of all of the worst trading volume

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>meant to see what's actually happening in the market. And

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>from Dr Lauren van hoften Chick, who is an Andrew W.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Mel And Postdoctoral Fellow at the Center for the Humanities

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>at Wesleyan University. Platforms are the middle people, and by

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that I mean they kind of become equivalent to dealers

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in a way, and I you know, dealers have played

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a really important role in this history in their ability

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to work with artists. Olga, Lauren, Welcome to the show. Olga.

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It's always a pleasure to have you on. And you know,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that you have extensively reported on

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and that you've even talked about in previous episodes is

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>how the market for non fungible tokens is doing. We are,

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, months into crypto winter at this point,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and it feels like one of the bigger casualties of

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>shall we say, the decline in sentiment has been what's

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>happening with n f T s? Like, what are the

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.239
<v Speaker 1>numbers these days? Since the beginning of the year through

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter of sales volume is down. N f

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>T average selling prices are down by you know, a

0:02:55.080 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers of magnitude, and the number of buyers in the

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>market is also you know, active buyers and sellers also

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to be down a bit. Interest in n f

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>T s has fallen off a cliff. Trading volumes for

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>n f T s, which are basically just digital art

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and collectibles that are recorded on blockchains, has tumbled from

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a record high in January. So what's the past forward

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for n f T s? Will we find a good

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>use for the underlay this? The n f T market

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>has definitely been um impacted in part by following cryptocurrency prices,

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>but also by some factors that just relate to just

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this specific market. What are some of those factors? So

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>with with cryptocurrency, there are lots of use cases for

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it with enough tase, what we've seen so far is

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that most enough teas that have been popular, they essentially

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>don't do anything there, you know, say, pictures of you know,

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>acute animal or or an ugly cartoon character in it,

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, and it doesn't really do anything useful. Whereas

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, years ago people were dreaming of finn ft

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is being used as tickets and ft is being used

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>as you know, membership cards to U two events, and

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>some of them are used this way, but this is

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>a minority of uses. So Olga, you you talk about

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>this idea of utility tokens, right, and we've seen a

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>handful of examples of the idea of you know, your

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>n f T gives you a v I P all

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>access past to like backstage at a concert. We have

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>had folks talk about, well, you know, your n f

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>T s can unlock restaurant experiences or and we've even

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>profiled creators, especially musicians, who have been able to directly

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>monetize their music on the blockchain without having to go

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>through things like a Spotify or an Apple Music. And

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>then of course there is like the in game economy

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in places like actually Infinity, But to your point, the

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of the volume and the like truly sky

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>high prices were really in and around the art end

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of the market. Lauren, what I'd love to get your

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>perspective on as a person who studies this, you know,

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess for fun and for work. But but what

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to get your perspective on is what were

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the dynamics of the art market that these

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>types of n f t s were like explicitly rejecting,

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>as it were, like, what were they supposed to be

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>doing differently and better? N f t s have you know, really,

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I think appealed to a lot of artists because they

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>have offered a relatively seamless solution for collecting resell royalties,

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>so that the artists would get a percentage of the

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>sale price whenever their work resales, um thereby being able

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>to share in those profits. Now, historically, recent royalties have

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:04.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty famously been uh largely rejected by the traditional art market. Actually,

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:09.799
<v Speaker 1>in a very well known artist contract was written by

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>the dealer and curator Seth ste globe Um, which has

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>been taken up by a number of artists since. In

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a very very very famous clause within that contract gives

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>artists fift of the upside whenever their work resells. And

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>so the great thing about n f t s and

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>smart contracts. As many artists see it is that all

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of the work to and negotiate a contract that kind

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of convince UM a dealer to accept an artist's desire

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to use one UM or you know, to to convince

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a collector that the artist wants to share in the

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>resale value is now kind of taken care of through

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the basic automation of a smart contract. And really remarkably,

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>um reselle worlties became pretty standard across n f T

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>platforms from day one. Um So even the first blockchain

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>based platform for selling art, Monograph developed in actually replicated

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the resale royalty clause from this nine contract in an

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>attempt to kind of do what the traditional art market

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't able to an OLGA one. One thing about what

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Lauren is saying is after having all of this progress

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>over the past, you know, several years, in the past

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>several months, we've seen a kind of a reversal in

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that standard. Absolutely, so it's it's pretty amazing and uh,

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it really has had a huge impact on the entire

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>end of tea markets. So previously um the largest marketplace

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and of tea marketplace was open Sea. Back in March,

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it commanded eight pcent market share. And what they did

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>was they, as part of you know, signing up for

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a sale on this marketplace, you know, you would fill

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>out a royalty, check out a royalty box. Essentially you

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>would place a royalty of two and a half to

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>typically on on on an n f T resale. And

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of artists loved that because, like Laurence said,

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this finally opened an avenue for them to get paid

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>on on secondary sales. But the problem is that UM

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>n f T royalties are not enforced through a smart contract.

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>There in fact enforced by n f T marketplaces like

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>open sea that support them. And what happened in recent

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>months is that several new n f T marketplaces have

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>view did you know in the spring and in the

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in the summer, and what they said was will make

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>royalty is optional? And essentially when they make royalty is optional,

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:16.359
<v Speaker 1>of course nobody wants to pay them. And this marketplace

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>has gained a ton of market share. So what we've

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>seen is that open Seas market share dropped from in

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>March two at the end of September. Coming up more

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>on what's happening with the n f T markets and

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to artists, especially as it relates to resale royalties. Lauren,

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>having studied this in the quote unquote real world as

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>well as now in the digital world, what are artists

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to do? I think I want to push back a

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit in the sense that, let's keep in mind

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that n f T platforms have only existed in a

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>sizeable scale since okay maybe, and only really exploded less

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>than two years ago. So I think this is all

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>still very very new, and we can't forget that. Um.

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we still are in a place where norms

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and standards are kind of up in play, and there

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>are still plenty of platforms that are promoting Reselle royalties

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and even just the sort of principle of equity, and

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so I don't want to discount that. Actually, I think that,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's really important to recognize the fact again

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>that things still are very much information just as these

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>new developments of you know, platforms that don't give royalties

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>are quite new, well who knows what's around the corner,

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And already there are n f T makers who are

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>pushing back against new platforms that don't have royalties built in.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, resell royalties are are one thing to point

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to but I all so don't believe that we should

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>limit that. Are are our conversations around the kind of

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>financial possibilities of v n f T s to something

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like resell royalties. I'm also very interested in artists who

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>are looking to more broadly redistributive models and recognizing just

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the simple kind of administrative cost advantage of what you

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>can do when you can automatically pay a number of

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>people or site organizations, you know, et cetera. Um So,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Loody as an artist who shows a bit forms

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>gallery and um has developed a future n f T

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>agreement where thirty cent of the sale would go to

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>her gallery, but that would be divided among the staff.

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But so that's like one kind of model of how

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we can rethink what art sales are doing in the

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>first place. Could these models exist outside of a blockchain

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>enabled technology, right, Because to you know, Olga's earlier point,

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it was not actually and on chain mechanism that was

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>enforcing secondary royalties, It was sort of the will of platforms.

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think, Lauren, what you're pointing to is that

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the will of either individual creators or collectives of creators,

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and the you know, like the ecosystem in which they

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>operate is equally, if not more important in terms of

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>standard setting. And what I'm what I'm always fascinated by

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in crypto is this tension between the rhetoric of decentralization

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>being for the greater good and the reality that some

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>degree of centralization is where norms come from and can

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 1>be standardized and enforced. And so, Lauren, what I'd love

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>if you used to just kind of elaborate on is

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>what is it about the digital power of things like

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>royalties that seem to make people perhaps more interested, more

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>amenable to thinking about things differently, even if they don't

0:12:55.720 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>actually need the digital peace to enforce those mechanisms. Yeah,

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a very good question. Uh, there are

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a few factors here. One again, I think, is the

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of automation factor. You know, contracts are contracts with

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>something like a controversial term like recent royalties in them

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>are very difficult to negotiate one on one to present

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody with, especially for somebody like artists who have historically

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>been in the lower bargaining position. So I think that's

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing I think too. You know, the the rise

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of these platforms, you know, came not entirely from people

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>who were you know, already immersed in the traditional art

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>world and already kind of had those standards in mind.

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'm thinking about super Rare, for example, the people

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>who started super Rare, we're coming from the music industry Spotify,

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and so their understanding of a royalty was actually thinking

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>about music royalties and thinking about, well, you know, creators

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there get to share in, you know, some kind of

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>profit or profit in some way each time you know,

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a song is played or whatever. Of course, music is

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a very different type of good than an artwork or

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>even you know, some kind of digital image. Um But nonetheless,

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's you know, interesting to think about the

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of factors at play and influences that play

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that have really made for a quite unique combination of

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>things now that we didn't quite see before. And the

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that um n f T buyers tend to not

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>participate in the traditional art market. It's not that you

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>had a bunch of buyers who were coming from you know,

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn Gallery Life who were used to one way of

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>doing things now coming into n f T s. You

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>had people who are coming to n f T s

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>as their way into the art market right exactly. And

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be very interesting to watch

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens more and more if, say, n f T

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>buyers who had become accustomed to buying works so the

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>resemb yalty attached, you know, make their way into the

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>trade sational art market, and then artists there ask for

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>recent royalties. Will those collectors say no? Although one thing

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure that we address and when

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>whenever we talk about volumes is just this idea of

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>wash trading, because for a while, one of the big

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>criticisms of folks who were, you know, saying like, oh

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>my god, look at these amazing prices and volumes on

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these platforms was in some cases these

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>were sales that were not exactly traditional in the sense

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of this is this is a buyer exchanging this with

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a with a seller. Can you just explain what wash

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>trades were and n f T s and how they

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>affected some of this data. What trading would be, you know,

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>person basically selling an n f T between his own accounts,

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>right back and forth, back and forth. And the reason

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this was happening was because some of the n f

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>T marketplaces offered their own tokens to uh two people

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>based on the amount of activity on the marketplace. And

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>so the more trading you did, the more of those

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>tokens you earned. And in some cases those tokens were

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>quite valuable and they could appreciate in price by some estimates.

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, over nine of all of the n f

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>T sales for wash trading. And now most n f

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>T trackers actually have a button new press to get

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>rid of all of the trading volume. Meant to see

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening in the market a lot harder to

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>do in physical arts, Lauren. I would imagine um, so Lauren,

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>as just as a kind of a closing thing. I'm

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really interested in what you said about, you know, the

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>differences in standards and principles going all the way back

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>decades in terms of physical galleries and you know, art

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>versus what you're seeing in n f T s. Are

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there any good things that you have observed in putt

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>on quote traditional art markets that you think food who

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>are trying to innovate and digital should adopt. Hm hmm.

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a fantastic question. I think it's a real danger,

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>um that there's so much rhetoric against you know, the

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>scare quotes middleman among n f T creators and platforms.

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, the platforms are the middle people, and by that,

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean they kind of become equivalent to dealers in

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a way. And I think, you know, dealers have played

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>a really important role in this history in their ability

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:36.239
<v Speaker 1>to work with artists to like realize for artists the

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>kinds of sales and artists want, you know, to help

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>artists be able to show the kind of work that

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they want. And you know, I really do believe that

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>dealers as well as curators can be serious advocates um

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and partners with artists. And I don't think that that

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>relationship has translated to this new world, so that I

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>would like to see the importance of relationship apps here

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>be taken much more seriously. Thank you Olga, and thank

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you Lauren. You can find more of Olga's reporting on

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal, on Bloomberg dot com and on Twitter.

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>She's at Olga Karf. That's O l G A k

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>H E R I F. On the next episode of

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Crypto, how do five hundred investors feel about the

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>prospects for digital assets? Well, we asked them, why do

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>so many of them perceive the Why do so many

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of them perceive the likelihood of regulation as bullish for

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>the asset class, we'll discuss the findings of a recent

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets Live Pulse survey. This is Bloomberg Crypto, a

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>daily podcast from Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For more

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>shows from I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app,

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Send us

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>your comments, questions, or suggestions for the show to Crypto

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net or find us on Twitter. We're

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at Crypto. The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky Verglina.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producers are Mohammed

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Faruk and Sharon Barriro. Our associate producers are Ty Butler

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and Moses on Them. Desta wonder At is our engineer.

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Original music by Leo Sidron. I'm Stacy Marie Schmal. We'll

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>be back tomorrow.