WEBVTT - The AI Arms Race Part Two

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking, Hey darn, Welcome to Alward Thinking about podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>that listen the future and says Einstein can't be classed

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>as witless. He claimed Adams were the litt list. I'm

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick, and our other host,

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Vocal bamb is not with us today. She is

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in New York doing very exciting things. But today we're

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be initiating part two of a two part episode

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on the AI arms race, and the last episode. If

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you haven't heard that yet, you should go back and

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>listen to that one first, where we lay all the

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>groundwork for the stuff we're gonna be talking about today.

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Last time, what do we do? We talked about sort

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of some definitions of different concepts in artificial intelligence, how

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>likely we are we think to achieve them, what ways

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they might be achieved, some potential stumbling blocks to achieving them.

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But in the end we want to say, today, okay,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>let's assume that people create what's known as an artificial

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>general intelligence. Is that going to lead to a worldwide

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>arms race for intelligent machines? Boy, that's spoiled it. No,

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot to say about this, and this

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is if you listen to the last episode you heard.

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>At the end, I mentioned that we have some interesting

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 1>characters to talk about, people who have perspectives on this idea,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and the first person we're going to chat about falls

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>into that interesting character category quite handily. Yeah, so this

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 1>is just one example. There have been lots of people

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>actually who have written about the idea of a looming

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>AI arms race. But one example of a guy with

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this prediction is a guy named Sultan Istvan who is

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the presidential candidate in the United States for the Transhumanist

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Party ticket. He's a trans humanist journalist and I guess, now,

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>politician I suppose, yes, enthusiasts seems too modest a word.

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>He actually he had on his website a a suggestion

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of a trans humanist bill of rights, and it included

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>things like the right to extend one's life and stuff

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. But anyway, so, uh so, Istabon has a

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>thesis that he published in a Vice Motherboard article. Uh

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that was I guess a year or two ago, I think,

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and he he said, you know what artificial general intelligence

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is not going to arise in the lab of a

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>tech company like Google, or a university research program or

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>some genius kids garage. A g I is going to

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>arise through the work of state actors defending their interests

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>and as so, speaking of coming superhuman artificial intelligence, Zoltan

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>rights quote, politicians and military commanders around the world will

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>want this super intelligent machine mind for their countries and

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive forces, and they'll want it exclusively. Using AI's potential

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>power and might for national security strategy is more than obvious.

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It's essential to retain leadership in the future world. Inevitably,

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a worldwide AI arms race is set to begin. So

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so here's the thesis that we can explore for the

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of today's episode. Now, Ralph, the face of it,

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I think at least part of Sultan's argument is is wrong. Yeah,

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily think the AI arms race part is wrong,

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think necessarily that nations wouldn't want exclusive

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>use of some sort of super intelligent entity to work

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on their behalf. I think that's apparent right, Like it

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>would be crazy to suggest otherwise that if there was

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>any given nation were to have the opportunity to have

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a super intelligent entity on their side. It would be

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>insane to say, now we're good, go help someone else

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that then what's the part you disagree with? I disagree

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with his statement that says that AI is not going

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to show up in the lab of a tech company,

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but instead will become the will arise because of the

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the work of state actors. Yeah, okay, so, and I

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>know that's not the only thing we're going to disagree with,

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>but that's the first thing here. Yeah, that's the first

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>thing I disagree with, because I don't know if you've

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>ever worked for any government agency, Joe, have you? Have

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>you ever worked for I've worked for a university's state universe.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.119
<v Speaker 1>That's close. Yeah, Because all right, so you know about bureaucracy,

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>You know about the barriers that are there and for progress,

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>because well I know about bureaucracy and barriers to progress

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in private industry. Sure, sure, it's just in government, and

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it tends to be on a on a

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>level that's exacerbated prodigious, right, And I mean, let's be fair. Okay,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So bureaucracy exists for a reason. Bureaucracy exists so that

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>p did tasks have a streamlined process to go through, right,

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so that that way you have designed a system that

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.679
<v Speaker 1>is really good at handling very specific things. The problem

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is anything that's outside of that specificity doesn't fit the system,

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and then getting any progress on that is laborious at

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>best or possibly impossible, depending upon the degree. Now, I

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>would say that companies are far more nimble and have

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a greater incentive to invest in research and development of

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence on a scale that dwarfs anything that any

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>government is able to do, unless you're talking about a

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>massive government that just decides to turn its full attention

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>on this problem. So king yes, yeah, some sort of

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>very authoritarian approach saying all right, we're just turning all

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of our like if you're playing the game Civilization, you

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>switch all your cities so that they're just producing science

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Where uh, you know, here in

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States, for example, yes, we have organizations like

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>DARPA that's part of the Department of Defense. They are

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 1>very heavily into administering projects that guide research and development

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in AI and other areas of technology. They're not the

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>ones who do it themselves. Private companies or even publicly

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>traded companies or research organizations do the work. So I

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>think maybe state actors will play a part in the

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>sense that there might be some funding. But I would

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>argue that we're far more likely to see the emergence

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of something approaching general artificial intelligence from one of these companies,

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>not from like a specific state sponsored program, because the

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>companies are more nimble. They're able to respond and change

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>their course of action much more quickly than any government

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>agency can. There's a lot of inertia and momentum involved

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in government agencies, and trying to change course is very

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to do. You know. I would say, if you

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>are a government and you're interested in funding AI research

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to win this AI arms race, to beat all the

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>other countries and international competitors to beat, to establish this

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a g I that you can call upon to do

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>your bidding, I think that the best strategy to go

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>about that would probably be to set some kind of

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>huge prize for it. Uh and and governments have done

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>things like this before. Do yeah, research prizes, So some

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>gigantic pool of money, you say, first person to produce

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a computer that can meet these five requirements gets all

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of this, yes and uh and so again, then you're

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>still talking on indirect kind of influence, right, like that

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you've you've created the incentive, but it's not the agency

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that actually creates the a g I that has been

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the Resulten has been argueing for. Also in another article

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at Sultan wrote there's a bit where uh he he says, well,

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this would be unlike the space industry, where we see

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>international cooperation like on the International Space Station, which to

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>me seems to be very convenient in the fact that

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>there he's ignoring the origin of the space race, like

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, AI would be different from the space race

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>because with the space race, or rather the space industry,

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>because the space industry, we see this relatively peaceful cooperation

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>between nations to advance our understanding of science and technology. Right,

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But the space race started as a branch of the

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Cold War. I mean it was, it was a product

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Cold War. If it weren't for this this

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>our space program, could could you argue that it's essentially

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>something that was like hastily cobbled together after sput Nick

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>because they were like, oh crap, well yeah, I mean,

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>and spot Nick did exactly what the Russians wanted it

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to do, which was to indicate to the United states, Hey,

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we can build a rocket that can reach you, right,

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that was really the Soviet Union's primary goal. Now, the

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>people who worked on the spot Nik project, they had

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>their other like their their own individual motivations and their

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>own individual goals for that project, but the state goal

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>was to say, we can launch a rocket that can

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>reach you. You America, And then America said, well, we

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>have to make sure that we have the same capability.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Um and they funded it in a way where it

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>was in the name of science, and there were legitimate

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>scientists doing legitimate science under this program. But it wouldn't

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have existed without the Cold War, right, without this this

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>competition between two massive world powers. And so really I

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>would argue that the reason why the space industry is

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the way it is is because this history that predates

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>it of of competition and kind of uh well again

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a branch of that Cold War, it was, it was

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>acts of passive aggression, I guess, uh so, I think

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>an AI arms race. I agree with this point that

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>an AI arms race would be uh something we would

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>expect should we reach that level of AI sophistication. And

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you could even argue that we're seeing an AI arms

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.359
<v Speaker 1>race right now. It's just we're seeing it in the

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>context of narrow AI as opposed to general AI. But

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>I a lot of the premises he sets up to

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>support that I disagree with. I think that that those

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>would need to be revisited. I do agree with his

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>end conclusion, but his argument is not I don't think

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it's supportable like the actual premises of his argument. That

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is okay, Well, what are some of the basic arguments

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>than about whether the world is about to be entering

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>an artificial intelligence arms race? Well, like Sultan says, he says,

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>an AI a really useful AI. So the furthest extension

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we would put to that is the super intelligent general

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. Although I argue that's not necessary for it

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to be an issue. Uh. He says, it would be

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>such a valuable tool that no one would be able

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to ignore that possibility, like to to to say, we're

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to go down that road. Well, I'd agree

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that AI is a tool too powerful to ignore. I mean,

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in general, intelligence is the most valuable thing we have.

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence is the thing that you know, not just that

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>empowers us, that makes human life worth living, I mean,

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and and increasing your share of intelligence capability is probably

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing you could do to ensure your

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>future success. Right, and now he makes the argument that

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>whichever nation out there created the creates the first super

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>intelligent a g I wins the game. Like, imagine that

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that geo political uh influences and forces are all reduced

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to a board game. Whoever hits that last square is

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the one who hit first, is the one who creates

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>super intelligent a g I, and they win the whole

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>thing automatically, hands down. Um. I don't necessarily believe that,

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>because I think that access to a super intelligent a

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>g I doesn't immediately solve other issues that a nation

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>must address, at least not not so quickly that other

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>nations can't also react to it. Yeah, I I think

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd agree with you there. I came up with a

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>little thought experiment to sort of service an analogy. So

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>imagine you've got two ships trying to win a race

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>across the Atlantic Ocean. One ship is a nineteenth century

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>style steamship, is capable of about eight knots, and the

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>captain is assisted by a team of the world's most

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>brilliant scientists with access to powerful supercomputers and all the

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>tools they could want. The other ship is a modern

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>ocean liner powered by geared steam turbines capable of thirty knots,

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>but it is captained by a rather dim guy named Todd,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>who has no scientists or supercomputers at his disposal at all. Todd, Now, unfortunately,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the fact is given what I've stated, Todd

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>is still going to win the race, right unless unless

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Todd is so dumb as to cause damage to his ship. Yes, then,

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>assuming that Todd is is at least of the level

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of intelligence necessary to follow a specific route, Yeah, it's so. Yeah,

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it's good to have very smart people at your disposal

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to help optimize your chances of winning. But if you're

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>stuck with a ship that's more than three times slower

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and and that's how you start the race, you're just

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna win. But I would say maybe if

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the captain of the first ship is able to consult

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>with the scientists and the supercomputers over a period of

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>several years leading up to the race, well then you

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you could maybe go in with a clear advantage and

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>win it. But then again, if if dim Todd knows this,

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>he may get some scientists and supercomputers of his own

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you've got a right, you've got an arms

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>race on your hands. But I would say that just

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>having this intelligence advantage does not automatically mean you immediately

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>become the runaway winner for all time, right though. It

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>though it is a very strong advantage. And ce Zoltan's

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>point is that, or the argument he makes is that

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>whichever nation develops at first will have a dominant hand

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>from that point forward, will become the dominant force on

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the face of the planet. Yeah, I know. He's also

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of the opinion that I think, if you have the power,

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>so if you have a g I on your side,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you have the power to shut down and prevent other

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>nations from achieving a g I. And I think unless

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you're willing to take incredibly extreme measures, that's not necessarily

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the case either. It also presupposes that that a g

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I is going to have those capabilities, and it may

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be that it can accomplish things that we cannot easily

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>do on our own, but doesn't necessarily mean it can

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>magically accomplish anything, right Like I there's I think he's

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>giving it so much credit. And to be fair, we

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know, right we we don't have anything that's super intelligent,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>because we've not been capable of creating such a thing.

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And maybe he's right, Maybe a super intelligent entity would

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to accomplish things that most of us would

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>think of as being, if not impossible, impractical because it

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>would be so difficult to do. But I agree with you.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that it would be something that would give

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a country a distinct advantage, but not guarantee what Zoltan

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to think of as victory. Uh. He he seems

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to to, at least in his arguments. I think that

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>what we're heading toward is a world that's united because

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>whichever country comes up with a super intelligent a g

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I will be able to subjugate all other countries do

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>its will. And he thinks, gosh, darn it, the good

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>old US of A should be the country to do that. Ah.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>There's some elements to Sultan's philosophy that I find particularly troubling.

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Might be might be too strong a word. Well, I

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>mean to defend I I don't think I agree with

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>his philosophy either, but to defend what he says, I mean,

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>he he does say at least what he has in

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>mind is a sort of benevolent hegemon e. It's not

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like we're going to subjugate you and oppress you and

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>do what we tell you. I think what he has

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in mind is that, you know, it's going to be

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the Federation from Star Trek. Everybody's happy, and you know,

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a utopian kind of I think that's what he

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>sees if the United States is the entity that creates this.

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think he also imagines a world that would

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>be in the realm of the dystopian future should some

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>other country do it, like, for example, China or Russia.

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Not that he specifically names these countries, but that would

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>be example, or North Korea. I think he had actually

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>does in North Korea. No, I will admit I can

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>imagine if North Korea were able to develop an artificial

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>general intelligence long before anyone else. I think that could

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>have disastrous consequences for the planet. Absolutely. But I think

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>again saying that in those scenarios, you don't get that

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Starfleet future, you also get some other science fiction future

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that's probably written by Burgess or something. I also don't

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>think that's very likely though. Yeah. Uh, Now we have

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>other people that have weighed in on this issue, who

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have some really interesting points to Yeah. One thing we

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>read is by Anya Cosperson, writing for the World Policy

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Journal blog about the idea of an AI arms race,

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and what does she say, Jonathan. She says that, first

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of all, AI is it's undeniably intrinsically valuable. And Yeah,

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that. I think there is no way to

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>dispute that. I think we both agree that AI is

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>definitely valuable. Um, even in even at the extent that

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we have it right now, the the narrow AI that

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is our reality, we see that it's valuable because it's

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>doing stuff for us. I mean that that kind of

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>defines value. Uh. So there's an incentive for countries to

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>pursue the development of AI. I think that's undeniable too. Now,

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>even if those countries agree that weaponized AI is unethical,

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not enough of a deterrent, she says, to make

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>sure that this does not, you know, blossom into a

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>weaponized AI future, because Yeah, there's always gonna be rogue

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>operators that may not be state sponsored. You may have

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>independent rogue operators that are willing to either develop or

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps more likely appropriate AI technology and then convert it

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>for weaponized purposes, which creates pressure on all nations to

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>consider developing weaponized AI as uh, just as a preventive measure.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So in other Mr President, we cannot allow an AI

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>gap exactly exactly. Uh. There are a lot of doctor

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Strange love moments I had while researching this this particular topic.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't fight here. This is the war room. So

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the examples that you could think of is

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>that the United Nations agrees that weaponized DAI is a

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>bad idea. This is this is a hYP hypothetical situation.

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually had more to say about this in a bit. Yeah,

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>well we'll we'll cover it in greater detail in a second.

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>So in this hypothetical situation, the U n says, all right, uh,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>we as an international community agree that weaponized DAI is

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea. It's gonna lead us down a destructive road.

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Once we head down there, there's no turning back, and

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the outcome is going to be negative. There's not a

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>way of envisioning this future where there's like a net

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>positive outcomes. So we're gonna agree no weaponized DAI. But

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>then you've got those rogue operators like a terrorist cell

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>or organized crime that see this as an opportunity to

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>use AI in a weaponized way, and they don't. They're

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>not beholden to this international agreement, they have no stake

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>in that, right, They're they're not getting they're not worried

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>about international sanctions from the u N. They're trying to

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>accomplish whatever goals their particular organization has and they're using

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever tools are at their disposal to do so. Yeah,

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're invoking here the concept that and this

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is true generally even peace loving people who are not

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>looking to start a fight don't tend to opt for

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>unilateral disarmament. Yeah, because because if you were to do

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that and there's that one person who hasn't agreed, then

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that one person just runs rampant over everybody else. Right,

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Like if you if you had a group of kids,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go Lord of the Flies. You have a group

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of kids, and each kid is given a whiffleball bat,

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's just to keep this from being like too

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>violent for for even for a hypothetical situation. Each kid

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>has a whiffleball bat, and you tell all the kids, like, well,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you can either have that whiffleball bat and wail on

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>your classmates, or you can put the whiffleball bat down

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have a fun activity. But you all need

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to put the whiffleball bat down in order for that

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to happen. And one by one they start dropping their

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>whiffleball bats until there's that one bully in the back.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>It's like, no, I know what my fun activity is,

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>hit all the kids who don't have whiffleball bats. That's

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of argument here and up. So you know,

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>I made a little funny note in here saying, next thing,

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've got gangster drones shaking down local businesses

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>for extortion money, Like you know, it's a you gotta

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you got a nice pizza joint here, and be a

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>shame as someone I don't know assimilated it into what's

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>growing technological layout, you know. So so you know, I

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's a legitimate argument, and I agree very much

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>with those those assertions that if in fact, you know

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a possibility to go down this, then someone, someone,

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>whether state sponsor or not, is going to do it.

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I would also argue we're already at a point where

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 1>this can happen. You don't need a g I for

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this to be a problem. Narrow AI is enough exactly,

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So you don't need a general intelligence that can you know,

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>be super intelligent and produce the next next generation of

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>technology and innovations and everything. You just need like a

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>really good weapon that's smart. Yeah. Or even if you're

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>going to go the semi autonomous route right like, you

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>could argue we're there with drones. Were there, we're using

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>technology that removes human operatives from conflict and replaces them

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>with robotic ones. We'll have a lot more to say

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>about about that concept a little bit further too, because

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that that ties into one of the other big concerns

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about weaponized AI in general. Sure, okay, so let's uh,

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>let's speculate little more. Sure, if there is an AI

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>arms race, what's it gonna look like. What are some

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>scenarios that could actually happen? Okay, So we have the

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>state sponsored approach where countries decide not to essue weabinized AI.

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Whether that ends up being a direct implementation of like

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a robotic soldier or AI that's assisting in some military

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>capacity for strategical or tactical planning, it doesn't really matter.

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>You could have topped down AI or bottom up AI exactly,

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>or both you know, you could have some integrated approach

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that's both. Uh. So one scenario is that you have

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>established nations like the United States, Russia, China developing weaponized

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>AI like webinized robots is a good example. So there's

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>still some they're already examples like drones that are kind

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of in this category, whether they are autonomous or semi

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>autonomous or remote controlled. Uh, there are various types. Obviously

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>remote controlled you wouldn't call it AI because it's under

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the operation of a of a human, but semi autonomous

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>or autonomous would fall into the AI category, even the

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>narrow AI band. So these future robots, uh that these

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical future robots that are weaponized AI, they take the

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>place of our soldiers, or they augment the presence of soldiers.

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you would normally be able to

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>field a couple of thousand soldiers. Well now you've got

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of thousand soldiers and ten thousand robots. Or

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you get to a point where you just have the

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>robotic soldiers and you don't put any humans in the

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>field at all. It starts to sound like I'm playing

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>war gaming here, but this is serious business. Uh. They

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>those robots then use narrow or general AI, depending upon

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the level sophistication we've reached in this hypothetical future to

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>identify targets and differentiate them from non targets. They can

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>enter hostile zones and make snap decisions without any emotional considerations.

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>So they're very cold and calculating in that sense. Because

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they are things and not people. They remove some of

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the checks that would be in place for a nation

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>before entering into conflict. This is one of those common

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>arguments about if we go down the road of weapon

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>iszed ai, it makes war so easy. Yeah, war becomes

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>such an easy decision because I mean yes, because you're

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you are not committing human life. You're committing resources, so

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it's still costs money and time and resources. But you're

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>not You're not saying, well, we're gonna you know, we're

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>not gonna enter into this because human lives will be lost,

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and we will lose citizens and families will be affected.

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>You're like, well, the robots, you're putting more layers of

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 1>abstraction between yourself and the actual carnage too. I mean,

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've read that old idea. I can't remember

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>who it was, who suggested it. But somebody who suggested,

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>you know what, Uh, you've got the person who follows

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 1>around the president with a briefcase for the you know,

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>nuclear launch materials that you would require in order to

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>initiate a nuclear strike. And the suggestion was, you know,

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the president really, uh shouldn't be able to just initiate

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the strike. The president he or she should have to

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>kill that person physically with their bare hands or with

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>a cleaver of some kind in order to get the

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>code out of some kind of implant in the person's

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>body in order to use it to launch the nukes,

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 1>because it show a level of commitment that that is

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>necessary considering the outcome of the choice. Yeah, it sounds insane,

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like that's that's insanity. Why would you ever institute a

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>policy like that, But you're talking about a policy of

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>launching a nuclear strike killing millions of people. Yeah, and

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it just shows you that like you're not you're not

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>really considering those deaths. You just you've got them sort

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>of like a step away from you. Those those are

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers and their numbers that exist far way away from

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>where you are. So the exactly that that abstraction is

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what makes that action easier to undertake. When you make

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it a real thing that you have to confront, it's harder.

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And again, like you're saying, you know, with the robotic soldiers,

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got that one concern that's taken away, the idea

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>that well, our soldiers won't be put in danger. But

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>then you you should start asking your question. Yeah, but

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the other side, that's that's people. These robots, we would

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>be killing human beings. They're not our human beings, but

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they're human beings. And that's where you know, depending upon

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the the UH motivations and the psychology psychology of the

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>nations involved and the military personnel involved, you get very

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>different outcomes. Um. So there is that argument that we

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>would become more warlike in this future because we would

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>have fewer impediments to entering into a war um which

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 1>also kind of sounds like the Terminator scenario. If you remember,

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Terminators were robotic soldiers that were meant to um be

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the service of humans, but because of the emergent

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>general intelligence, the super intelligence of Skynet, they turn on humans. Well,

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to possess general AI to be a threat.

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>They could have narrow AI. They could even be semi

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>autonomous where there they're consistently being guided by human intervention

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for it to still be an issue, to still be

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a very real escalation AI arms race problem. Um, the

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>super intelligent general AI think makes it absolutely terrifying, but

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessary for it to be a problem, right, Like,

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's just the the degree of the scenario. Uh So,

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>if you do get to that general AI super intelligent,

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>then you start entering into other possible disasters, the classic

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>science fiction one being that the robots themselves decide that

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they have to unite against humans in general, not just

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>work for one group of humans against a different group

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of humans. For some reason, I've never found the robots

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>decide to exterminate humanity scenario all that plausible. I have

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>found very destructive scenarios plausible. Like I could see how

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence could cause catastrophic damage to human civilization, but

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the I don't see it coming in the form of

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>exterminate all humans. You have to you have to have

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>some form of you know, the robots would have to

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>have some motivation, right as opposed to just the directive,

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I can easily understand imagine scenarios where robots through

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a directive pursue it in a way that was not

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>anticipated by the people who there are disastrous side effects

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of their behavior. The classic example being you've got a

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>super intelligent computer and you say I want to bring

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>about world peace, and it decides to eliminate all humans

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>because by eliminating all humans, you've eliminated the potential for conflict. Right.

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the classic example of Oh gosh, I wish

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I had thought of that. Uh. It also falls very

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>much into a realm that I am I love very dearly,

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>which is dungeons and dragons. Whenever your character receives a wish,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you will see players spend hours trying to craft the

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>perfect wish to to create a a full proof scenario

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>where the dungeon master can't misinterpret the wish and create

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a terrible outcome for the players. I've never seen this,

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>so they're like genies or someone. Yes, So so you

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>might say like, like, uh, you know the Simpsons version

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>make me a sandwich and turns them into a sandwich

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's misinterpreted the wish on purpose. But same sort

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of thing with the general AI, Like there there are

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>disaster scenarios where it's not that the general AI was

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>setting out to cause harm. It's just that through the

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>process of trying to achieve whatever the goal was set,

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>there were unintended consequences that were harmful. Um. There are

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>other scenario as though. There's the one that I think

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>is the most likely, which is that companies, some sort

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of corporations, maybe multiple corporations, developed more competent AI that

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>ends up having a negative impact through unintended consequences. Kind

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of similar to what I was just saying. UH, governments

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>will end up relying on these companies, contracting with them

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>or even just buying off the shelf components to put

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>toward UH military use again either top down or bottom up,

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially saying like, well, I know that this this piece

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of software was intended to do this, but with a

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>little modification, we can have it do this other thing.

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>We see this all the time in all sorts of

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>technology industries. The VR industry is a great way of

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>pointing out how this happens in VR before we got

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to some of the consumer headsets and and controls that

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>are out on the market. Now you had researchers who

0:31:55.560 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>were they were they were appropriating video game technology working

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with it programming new interfaces for it, and using that

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>as tools to develop VR applications, And it was all

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it was taking something that was in a related field

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but changing it, transforming it to do something else. We

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>could see that, and I think that's the more likely

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>future that we see various types of AI developed specifically

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to do some non military function but then get adopted

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>into into into uses applications that it was not necessarily

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>intended for at the beginning. I think that's very likely

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>simply because companies have a lot of incentive to continuously

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>innovate in this space, and we're going to see a

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>lot more rapid development there than we would in some

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>state sponsored program where uh, you know you've got you've

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>got a top down pressure that work harder, do do

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>more innovation. Um. And also we could just see AI

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>cause massive amounts of harm just in its normal operation,

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>not even when it's being used for something else. So

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about this in the past too, Like the

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 1>stock trading AI, like the various simple algorithms that just

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the stock market and make very small but

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>very rapid transactions. Uh, once you get a bunch of

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>those acting at the same time, you don't know how

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>they affect one another, and there can become a cascading

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>effect where you create market and stability simply because of

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the collective activity of all these where if maybe it

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>was one AI or one simple algorithm that's acting on

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, no one would notice. It wouldn't really

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>make a big difference. But when you have thousands of

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>them all working to try and make a profit for

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>whichever company is employing them, there could be these unintended

0:33:56.120 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>consequences leading to like a market crash, which we've um

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>We've seen market crashes that last minutes and then in

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>return normal, but it could be catastrophic. Uh. Then we

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.879
<v Speaker 1>have the rogue actors scenario. This is the one where

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the countries, the various nations in the world have agreed, Okay,

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a hands off approach on weaponizing AI.

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to do that. The rogue actors one

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is that these other entities, whether they're terrorist cells, organized crime. Uh,

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe it's a a group within a nation

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that wants to break free of whatever the the government

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:43.839
<v Speaker 1>in power is, they might be willing to take those steps. Uh.

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>One of the examples kiss person actually brought up is

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to imagine a weaponized drone with facial recognition capabilities flying

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>over a crowd, and it analyzes the crowd and it

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 1>looks for a specific person, and if it identifies that person,

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>that person is a target. It's weaponized drone, so it

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>fires on the target and you essentially have assassination by robot.

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 1>This means that doesn't sound implausible to me at all.

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could you could rig something up like

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that today. It would not be terribly sophisticated, it would

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not be terribly reliable. But the other point that Casperson

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>makes is for rogue nations, they don't not even just

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>rogue nations, rogue actors, they don't necessarily have a high

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>threshold of reliability that they must meet in order for

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>them to be comfortable investing in this technology or utilizing

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>this technology. Right like if if there if their device

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>ends up killing someone mistakenly, well that's unfortunate, but it's

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't necessarily care, like, that's not they don't have

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>anyone else to answer to apart from their own organization.

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>And if their organization doesn't value that humans life, there's

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>from their perspective, there's no problem nations is different. Right,

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of people to answer to, and

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't just go killing people indiscriminately. There huge problems

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:17.280
<v Speaker 1>with that obviously, I mean you know everything everything well,

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like like not just the not just the obvious ethical issues.

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But then you've got things like the Geneva Convention to

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>contend with two. Right, So you've got this this possibility

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of UH agents that are outside of state control that

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>could potentially be using this technology, which therefore puts the

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>pressure on all the states to at least figure out

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a way to counteract that, if not keep pace with it. So,

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I also really love the word rogue

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:59.399
<v Speaker 1>and also uge, which some people well interchange because they

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>make a type of So I'm not talking about yeah,

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Mulan rogue are rouge actors. As an actor, I have

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>a warn rouge before. I'm not ashamed to admit it.

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it look good on you. Okay. So one

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 1>more thing I want to point out is that very

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>often the ideas that get tossed around when discussing the

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>concept of an AI arms race are specifically about weaponized AI,

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>so it has military connotations. You're talking about military robots

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>or drones or at the top level, a g I

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that's some kind of military commander or creating new weapons

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. I was thinking about how there

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>could very much be an AI arms race that's not

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily explicitly military in nature, or at least not at first, right,

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so developing an a g I. If you

0:37:55.200 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>have a superhuman general intelligence in a machine, that's not

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just useful for military advantage, it's useful for every possible competition,

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>right right, any any application of intelligence, it would by

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>definition be useful toward that. Right, So in market competition

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and trade wars and stuff like that between countries, and

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>a g I would be a supreme advantage. I mean

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in any in any place you're looking to solve a

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>problem or excel, the a g I is is an advantage.

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So it almost seems like an overly confined way of

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>envisioning the transformation of geopolitics by AI to just think

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>about AI robot soldiers and AI military commanders and stuff

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:44.919
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yeah. No, I agree entirely, which is why

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those scenarios I was talking about companies like

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>can you imagine the first company to provide a a

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:57.280
<v Speaker 1>computer or a smartphone or a tablet or some piece

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of personal electronics that incorporate a g I into it

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in some way, whether the device itself possesses it or

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it has uh an Internet link to a cloud based

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a g I solution that would be enormous, right, that

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.919
<v Speaker 1>would be that would be a game changer. That would

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>be a killer app a killer product. And so assuming

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's super intelligent, yeah, well even if it's not

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>super intelligent, just just imagine having a pretty intelligent person

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you could rely upon to do stuff on your behalf.

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Like think of all the narrow AI applications we have

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, but you have all of them wrapped up

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in a single format. Factor, So you would have something

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that could do everything from helping you keep track of

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 1>your activity throughout the day, to making sure that you

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>are on time for all your scheduled appointments, to following

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>up with you about concerns, all this kind of stuff

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>like like that that ideal personal assistant that really creates

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>your reality. Uh as far as how you interact with technology,

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:06.959
<v Speaker 1>that would be a huge product. And you can bet

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that any company that works in consumer technology is looking

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to incorporate more and more sophisticated AI into their products.

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's there already is an AI arms race in

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that sense. It doesn't necessarily mean an arms race that

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to lead toward violent confrontation. But there is

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:35.439
<v Speaker 1>this competition already in the market for companies to try

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and develop in that space, and maybe several generations down

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the line, that evolves into something that is more akin

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to a weapon's arms race, But it doesn't necessarily have

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to start out that way. That's one of the scary

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>things about this, right that we might not even intend

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>this to be used in any way that would be

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 1>remote related to military applications or acts of hostility. But

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>generations down the line, and by generations, I'm talking about

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>technology generations, which happened way faster than human generations. That

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>might end up being the case. All right, So what happens? What?

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>What are the what are the outcomes of the AI

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>arms race? Like, what are the various things we see this?

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>How how do we see this turning out? People stop

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>making terminator jokes on every article about AI. I mean

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they would certainly think twice about it before the AI

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the AI kneecappers come by. I saw that joke you

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>made real funny. You know what else is funny? This

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>battling clamps. Now they don't need bats, but you know,

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you just got to do stuff for style. Okay, no,

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're what are some things? So? What are some things?

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So one outcome is that we get this uh competitive approach.

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 1>This is what we're seeing right now. Everyone's competing to

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:11.399
<v Speaker 1>make more robust, useful AI. Eventually someone creates a super

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>intelligent AI that's harmful to humans, either intentionally or otherwise,

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and then we have to deal with that reality. Ultimately,

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>dealing with that might mean that we don't succeed, that

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we as a species are eliminated, because if you're talking

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>about super intelligent AI, by definition, it is smarter than

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>we are. It's more capable than we are at processing information,

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and thus, any strategy we might come up with to

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>try and take down that AI will be something it's

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>already considered and figured out a way to counteract um

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>at least that's that's the general way we we frame that, Like,

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>if it is truly super intelligent, nothing we think of

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>will be something it hasn't already considered by definition, because

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's more intelligent than we are capable of being unless

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we also become super intelligent. Yeah, well then there's a

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>totally different AI arms race, right. Uh So that's one

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 1>outcome that's kind of depressing. You know, everyone dies. I

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>don't really like that, big fan. I mean, I love Shakespeare,

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we don't have to have it be

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a tragedy. Were canna have a be a comedy. Maybe

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 1>everyone gets married, we get married to robots. How about

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that one. That's a good outcome. Uh So another outcome

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is super intelligent AI ends up being impossible or so

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>impractical to create that we never really implemented. And in

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this scenario, we would discover either that we lack the

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:40.720
<v Speaker 1>capability to achieve super intelligent machines or we could do it,

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but it requires so much energy and it's so resource

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>heavy that no one's willing to actually go to the

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>step of making it. Yeah. I think I stick by

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion we talked about it in the last episode

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 1>that it is pretty much demonstrated that super intelligence is

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in principle possible, but that doesn't mean that it is

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in practice feasible. Right, it might be possible in principle,

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but we just can't ever do it. Yeah, if it

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>if it turned out to be something where we just

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have the physical resources to design the system, or

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe we do, but it would be to to do

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:24.319
<v Speaker 1>so would create a hardship because we're diverting so many

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>resources from other things, or we're just too locked into

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 1>patterns of stupidity to ever figure out how to do it. Right. Yeah,

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>then we never have to worry about the super intelligent

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 1>part at all. But here's the problem with that. We

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>don't need it to be super intelligent for it to

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be a problem. Right. You don't need a driverless car

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to be super intelligent for it to be able to

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>deliver an explosive, for example, which is terrifying, but a

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>reality that we could see. Um. So then we would

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>enter an era of rapid development to both create and

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>prevent harmful uses of AI. UM These would be human guided, right,

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not necessary fairly AI guided, because if we aren't able

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to make superhuman intelligent or super intelligent rather AI, then

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 1>we would mostly be relying on human ingenuity in that case.

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Zoltan's outcome was that idea that we would become a

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>united species under one government, one flag, one nation, indivisible.

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>His goal would be to have America be the dominant

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:29.439
<v Speaker 1>force that would then bring the rest of the world together. Uh. So,

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>essentially the US would annex everybody else and then we

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>would just have to worry about the possibility of super

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:38.799
<v Speaker 1>intelligent AI that we had created turning against us, and

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.880
<v Speaker 1>not worry so much about each other. Um. So are

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you voting for Zultan President? No? I I don't think

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a realistic outcome. Um. Either. Well, first of all,

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's realistic that we would have unity

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>on any on any global level. We don't even have

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 1>unity on a national level, so unity on a global

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>level to me seems idealistic to a point of being implausible. Um.

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 1>But beyond that, I think again, as I've said many times,

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the the AI being an issue will happen long before

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we get to any super intelligent type of AI or

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>general intelligence. Um. Another outcome is that we create a

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:25.760
<v Speaker 1>series of guidelines to shape AI so that it works

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>for the benefit of humans, not to the detriment, and

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that involves creating a set of practices that allow us

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to guide AIS development a way that doesn't lead to

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the terminator scenario. This is where you have the people

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:39.760
<v Speaker 1>arguing we need to come up with ways to instill

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>human value into machines problem yeah, and the and of

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>course this leads to other problems too, right, like who

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>defines what human value is? Under whose definition do we

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:58.399
<v Speaker 1>create this AI? And like who writes the guidelines? And

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:01.839
<v Speaker 1>who wants to stop someone from developing AI that doesn't

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, abide by them? These are all tough questions

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't have answers to. Well, I guess the last

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 1>major question is is there any way to avoid an

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 1>AI arms race? Well? Can it? Can it be averted?

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We first, we first have to think about that you in, right, Yes,

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the international agreements the AI equivalent of the Nuclear Test

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Band treaties. So the international community, Uh, they've done stuff

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:36.760
<v Speaker 1>like this before, with varying degrees of success. They've attempted

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to halt or limit the proliferation of nuclear weapons and

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the acceleration of the twentieth century at least nuclear arms

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:48.800
<v Speaker 1>race by coming up with these International Nuclear Test Band Treaties.

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And these treaties banned various types of nuclear weapons testing

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>among ratified parties. For example, the Partial Test Band Treaty

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen sixty three was signed by nuclear powers like

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the US, the UK, and Soviet Union, which mutually agreed

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to prohibit all testing of thermonuclear weapons except for underground tests. Right.

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 1>The same thing is true with chemical weapons, like they

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>were essentially international agreement that that is a as a

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 1>no go. Right, So there's a question, I guess, could

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we do something similar with AI? People recognize the potential

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:30.280
<v Speaker 1>for danger and make AI development illegal everywhere in the world.

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I'd say this seems unenforceable even by

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 1>international treaty, Like, even assuming you could get every country

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 1>in the world to sign on as a party to

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that treaty, which I don't necessarily think you could. For example,

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Band Treaty of nineteen six that

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>attempted to extend the you know, the scope of the

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:55.759
<v Speaker 1>nuclear test band treaties that existed. They couldn't get that

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>signed or ratified by key countries. And by my estimation,

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's much easier to hide the development of

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:06.279
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence than it is to hide the testing of

0:49:06.360 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons. You can probably perform key AI research in

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:14.280
<v Speaker 1>ways that can be contained in a single nondescript warehouse.

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just not that hard. There's no radiological evidence to

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 1>sniff out with an atmospheric collection aircraft or anything like that.

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>There'd be no seismographic signature. All these things we can

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>use to check and see if people are performing nuclear

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 1>tests they're not supposed to be doing. You could have

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>decentralized development, Yes, how would you? How would you do

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>anything like that with AI? So in the end, I

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:40.720
<v Speaker 1>think even if you're able to get all the member

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 1>states of the u N to sign a comprehensive AI

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Test band treaty, there would be no way whatsoever to

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:50.440
<v Speaker 1>enforce it. It would just be paper. Right, And we

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.360
<v Speaker 1>have to keep in mind that, like we said before,

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of potential uses for a GI.

0:49:56.680 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 1>The scary, right, But do we even want this? Mean,

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:03.799
<v Speaker 1>let's not forget how useful AI could be if it's

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a G. I's promise this, this almost certainly yields major

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:11.720
<v Speaker 1>breakthroughs in medicine, energy, all kinds of fields that would,

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 1>if implemented properly, improve human life, increase wealth for the

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 1>whole world, and protect our environment. But I guess the question.

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You know that that key phrase, if implemented properly is

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a big if. Okay, So would there be any other

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 1>ways to prevent it? I would say nothing that I

0:50:29.680 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 1>can think of. I mean, my intuitive ruling is that

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>if a g I is technologically feasible, a different question

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 1>than whether it's possible in principle, which I agree that

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:43.759
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's just not possible to prevent the development

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of it. You can't put anything in place to stop

0:50:46.600 --> 0:50:49.800
<v Speaker 1>people from doing it, unless you're talking about some something

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:52.399
<v Speaker 1>extreme like just well, wipe out the whole human race

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>or destroy all computers or something right like like the

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:58.400
<v Speaker 1>human race as a as an entire species gets wiped

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:01.239
<v Speaker 1>out before we have they to create an a g I,

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 1>which which case that's like trying to prevent I mean,

0:51:06.320 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>or that some other thing caused it and it wasn't

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:11.759
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't even and the the a g I wasn't

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:15.759
<v Speaker 1>even remotely connected to the reason for for the extermination

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of the species. Assuming human progress continues as normal without

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>major catastrophe, if there's a way for us to do it,

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:25.920
<v Speaker 1>then we're going to do it. Someone will do it. Yeah,

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. I mean, if it's possible to create it,

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:35.120
<v Speaker 1>someone will create it, because that's what we are as

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:38.239
<v Speaker 1>a species. It's it's not necessarily that someone would create it.

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>In an effort to create to do malicious activity, but

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.840
<v Speaker 1>someone will do it. If it's possible, then we will

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:48.280
<v Speaker 1>get around to doing it sooner or later. The question

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is how hard is it? Right? Like if it's if

0:51:51.560 --> 0:51:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it's so hard that it's possible, but we're not going

0:51:54.000 --> 0:51:57.239
<v Speaker 1>to be there for another century, Well we can have

0:51:57.320 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, but it's not really really going to matter

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>until a century from now. That's it's still going to matter,

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:06.400
<v Speaker 1>but it will be a hundred years later. This whole

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:10.320
<v Speaker 1>discussion does seem to make that control problems seem of

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of imminent importance. Like even if the development of a

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:17.279
<v Speaker 1>g I is not imminent, which I don't think it is,

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't get the feeling that it's going to happen

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>anytime real soon. We still do need to be thinking

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 1>about these control problems, like what what do you do

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to UH to you know, to limit the unintended consequences

0:52:31.719 --> 0:52:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of a g I to UH to understand how we're

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:38.920
<v Speaker 1>going to use it and prevent people from using it

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:42.719
<v Speaker 1>in a destructive way. UH. They're they're really hard problems,

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>but we need to be working on them. I think

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:50.840
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna see is a new dawn of electromagnetic

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:55.719
<v Speaker 1>pulse technology to take out take out robo soldiers and computers.

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Is I mean that's I'm I'm kind of making a joke,

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm kind of not because as if you get

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to a point where you're thinking, well, I can't stop

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:10.279
<v Speaker 1>anyone from trying to pursue this line of development, UM,

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and even if it takes a long time, people are

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 1>going to go after it. What do I do in

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:20.959
<v Speaker 1>order to prepare for the eventuality that someone is incorporating

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this on some scale, whether it's a bunch of narrow

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 1>AI implementations, a general AI into implementation, or super intelligent

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:34.319
<v Speaker 1>a g I. You gotta have you gotta have a

0:53:34.360 --> 0:53:37.920
<v Speaker 1>plan in place. I'm I've kind of made a joke

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about e m p s, but I think that's gonna

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 1>be a big thing. I really do think that, uh,

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>those that technology would be an important element because if

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, you could shut stuff down, anything that's electronic,

0:53:51.880 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 1>You could shut it down long enough for you to

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>have a different plan to go in place too, UM

0:53:58.200 --> 0:54:01.719
<v Speaker 1>potentially take care of things. Obviously, if you get to

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a point where it's a distributed intelligence, that's a lot

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:07.880
<v Speaker 1>harder because there's no place to aim at. It's everywhere,

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and at that point we're having we're having a totally

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 1>different conversation. Maybe that's the point where humans and machines

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:17.840
<v Speaker 1>merge and we we truly do, become transhumanist and Zoltan

0:54:18.040 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 1>rules over us all well said, yeah, um, and I

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:24.880
<v Speaker 1>know we had a lot of fun with this, but

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it is one of those things where

0:54:27.040 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got to kind of stretch your mind to think

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 1>about because obviously we're talking about situations that aren't in

0:54:35.520 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the realm of possibility right now, but we can see

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of where we're headed, so it's easy to imagine it,

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 1>even if it's not something that is pressing right now. Uh.

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:47.319
<v Speaker 1>I kind of curious what you guys think. If you

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:50.359
<v Speaker 1>have any thoughts on the subject of the AI arms race,

0:54:50.400 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you should write in and let us know. Our email

0:54:52.640 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 1>addresses FW Thinking at how Stuff Works dot com, or

0:54:56.280 --> 0:54:58.400
<v Speaker 1>drop us a line on Facebook or Twitter. You can

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>go to Facebook search FW Thinking, our profile will pop up.

0:55:00.960 --> 0:55:03.000
<v Speaker 1>You can leave us a message or send us a

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:06.360
<v Speaker 1>tweet over on the Twitters. Our handle is f W

0:55:06.600 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Thinking and we will talk to you again. Really see

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for more on this topic in the future. Of technology.

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Visit forward thinking dot Com, brought to you by Toyota

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's Go Places,