WEBVTT - UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves Talks UK Pensions; US-UK Trade

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Chancellor. Since we last spoke,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has been re elected. Does that change your

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>secure andomics vision, given it was at least partly inspired

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>by Bidenomics.

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, the idea of secure nomics is that we build

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 2>a strong and secure economy on strong foundations. And that

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>does mean thinking about where things are made and who

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>makes them. It means being more resilient in the face

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 2>of shops, whether those be energy price shocks or pandemics.

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think those are important principles because the UK

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>has found itself very exposed, whether it is the energy

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>price shock after Russia's invasion of Ukraine or during the

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 2>pandemic and struggling to get the supplies of vital equipment

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 2>that there needed.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>But would you rule out regulatory tariffs?

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I think it'd be wrong to speculate what

0:00:55.600 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 2>an incoming US administration would do. But we benefit, and

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 2>so does the United States, from trade worth more than

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 2>three hundred billion pounds a year. That trade is growing

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and it's important for the prosperity of both the United

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Kingdom and the United States. And we'll continue to make

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 2>representations for free and open trade that benefits both of

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 2>our nations.

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's turn to your Mansion House speech. When it

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to harnessing pension money to boost growth. What are

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you going to offer in terms of reform that your

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>conservative predecessors didn't.

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've long believed that we need to reform how

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the UK pension system works, and I welcome what the

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>previous government and what Jeremy Hunt did when he was

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Chancellor to look at the consolidation and the investment choices

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>of pension funds. But I want to go further because

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 2>there's more that we can do to unlock that long

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 2>term patient capital to help British businesses like Quell where

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 2>we are today in White City in London and others,

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 2>and also to help secure investment into infrastructure. If you

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>look around the world, so countries like Canada where I

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 2>was in the summer, or Australia, they have mega pension

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 2>funds that achieve economies of scale, get better returns for

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 2>their savers and help unlock that long term growth that

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 2>we desperately need in Britain.

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Australia. Australia gives tax breaks to funds that

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>invest in domestic companies. Where you offer the same.

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 2>We already have very generous tax breaks for investing in pensions,

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and rightly so, we want to incentivize people to invest

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and save for the future. What we don't have in

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 2>the UK is mega pension funds. We don't have those

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.839
<v Speaker 2>economies of scale in our pension funds, which is why

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the interim report that we're publishing looks at having a

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 2>minimum size of twenty five or fifty billion pounds, similar

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 2>to what you have in Canada and the United States.

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Those sorts of mega funds will have the expertise to

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 2>make those investments, both in startup and scale up businesses

0:02:58.480 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 2>and in British infrastructure.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>At the size matters, but I'm wondering how you get

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that money into UK companies. Are you looking at mandatory minimums.

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 2>We're not looking at mandating pension funds. What we're looking

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>at in these reforms, building on the reforms of the

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 2>previous government, is to create a smaller number of big

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 2>pension funds with the expertise and the scale to make

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 2>those long term investments. Quell where we are today received

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 2>money from the British Business Bank, which leverages in private

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 2>sector investment, but most of the funding that this business

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 2>and so many other scale up businesses in Britain have

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 2>been able to access comes from the United States. I

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 2>don't want it just to be US investors benefiting from

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 2>investment in UK startups and scale ups. I want savers

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 2>here in Britain to be able to benefit from that

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>growth potential that we see at this business and so

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>many others.

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Terms of there's also the issue of how you get

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>more money into the pension parts. In the first place.

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Employers are already squeezed by the tax hikes in the budget.

0:03:58.200 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to address that.

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>By the end of this decade, we expect to have

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 2>one point three trillion pounds in pension funds, either in

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 2>DC or in the local government pension scheme. But I

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>don't think anyone believes that money is working well enough,

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 2>either for savers or indeed for our wider economy. And

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the reforms that we're bringing in is about ensuring that

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 2>the money that is invested the assets under management work

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 2>better for the UK economy and work better for savers.

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering what's different to what Jeremy Hunt did,

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>because he just finished this consultation into consolidating the local

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>government pension scheme. It made these exact points. Do you

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>really need another consultation.

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.239
<v Speaker 2>The difference between what we're doing and what the previous

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 2>government did is that we're going to legislate and the

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 2>previous government haven't had a pensions bill, didn't have a

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>pensions bill for around five years. We have a slot

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 2>in the king Speech for a pensions bill in this

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 2>session of Parliament. Will be introducing legislation in the Mark

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 2>in the spring, so that we don't just talk about

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 2>consolidation in the pension industry. Anyone can do that, but

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 2>we actually make sure that it happens. That's the difference

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>between this government and the previous government. We're getting on

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 2>and doing the job.

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, what about the regulators? How are you going

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>to make them prioritize competitiveness?

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'll be publishing the remit letters to the regulators

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow at the met Mansion House Speech. Obviously, regulation is

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>incredibly important both for protecting consumers but also for protecting

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 2>our wider economy. But we don't just need to regulate

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 2>for risk. We also need to regulate for growth. There's

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 2>huge growth potential in our financial services sector. The secondary

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 2>objective that we supported in opposition is really important, but

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 2>we now need to bring that to life and ensure

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 2>that our regulatory system helps businesses to grow, not just

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 2>manage risk.

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>But Chancellor, US investors tell us that all these recent

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>regulatory reviews make investing in UK financial services less attractive.

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Are you planning anything to give them more certainty?

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.559
<v Speaker 2>We had a very welcome response over the last few months,

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 2>whether that's to our changes in ring fencing rules, our

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 2>implementation of the Basel rules, or indeed the SAA's rules

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 2>around listing in London. Things that we've done in our

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 2>first four months of government to make Britain a more

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 2>attractive place for global investors in financial services. We've brought

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 2>in sixty three billion pounds worth of investment at the

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 2>International Investment Summit just a few weeks ago. So we

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 2>recognize the important role that regulators have in encouraging growth

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 2>in financial services, not just managing down risk.

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's the motor services they're pointing to, and.

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 2>There's a court case at the moment, so it's important

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to let that work through the system and be up

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 2>to the motor finance companies whether they appeal the court decision.

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 2>It is welcome that that sector continues to offer motor

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 2>finance through a number of workarounds. But it's now up

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 2>to those individual companies whether they want to appeal the

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>court decision.

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, Chancellor, good luck with you, mana and House

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>speech tomorrow. Thank you very much.

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you,